• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Collaborative Research between South Africa and China:An Overview of Literacy Development in Grade R Classes in South Africa

    2016-11-06 01:42:24NormaMargaretNel
    浙江外國語學院學報 2016年6期
    關鍵詞:研究員博士生中非

    Norma Margaret Nel

    (College of Education,University of South Africa,Pretoria 0003,South Africa)

    中非教育交流研究

    Collaborative Research between South Africa and China:An Overview of Literacy Development in Grade R Classes in South Africa

    Norma Margaret Nel

    (College of Education,University of South Africa,Pretoria 0003,South Africa)

    The main aim is to give a synopsis of the articles which were the outcomes of the first of three phases of an international collaborative research project between a university in South Africa and a university in China.The overall theme of the project was:Literacy development in pri?mary schools.Firstly,an introduction,including the benefits and challenges of the international re?search project collaboration based on reports in literature,is discussed.Secondly,the background of the South Africa?China project and its three phases is described.Thirdly,the literacy development in primary schools in South Africa is discussed.Lastly,a synopsis of the South African team’s em?pirical findings providing overviews of literacy development within the early childhood sector in ur?ban and rural education in South Africa is presented.These overviews(together with two remaining overviews not included in this article) serve as a point of departure for the second phase in the re?search project.

    international collaborative research project;South Africa;literacy;early childhood development;rural

    1.Introduction

    Assessment of research by national systems is emphasising international collaborations as it enables re?searchers from different countries to use their strengths to make contributions which would otherwise be diffi?cult to do locally.In addition,it also enables researchers who are in one location to tackle problems together instead of on their own,because of an inability to understand the context or to access the knowledge from lo?cals[1]95,103.Since collaborative research “offers higher productivity and has a greater impact than non?inter?national collaboration”,it requires researchers to make strategic decisions regarding their collaboration modes within their environments and to consider the costs and benefits involved.To encourage international collabo?rations,“ substantial financial and attentional resources, academic excellence, individual motivation, and active informal communication play significant roles”[2]520,529.Parties involved are located in different con?texts,having their own structures and constraints as well as different assumptions about the world,as they connect and work with one another on mutual matters[1]94which in this study is literacy development in pri?mary schools in South Africa and China.Most importantly,Parding,Hertting,Alerby,et al.mention learning“from and with each other...become communities of practices,with excellent results.”[3]291The common de?nominator in the literature regarding international research projects,is leadership,management and the com?plexity of administration[3]286.The author of this article also focussed on the backdrop of our specific contex?tual experiences which were reported in the resultant articles thus enabling us to glean the different themes from it and arrive at significant conclusions and implications for international collaborative research projects.

    Hoadley reports that research on teaching and learning in South African primary schools results in con?sistency regarding what is happening in classrooms[4]187,198?199.Furthermore, specific features of classroom practice which affects learner learning are being identified based on classroom observations instead of inter?views and other methods.Hoadley postulates that although much is learnt from small scale studies,there is a need for large scale longitudinal studies of classrooms in South Africa[4]199.She emphasises that “ new avenues of research into pedagogy and its relation to subject?specific knowledge signal a deeper engagement in making sense of classrooms.” In the light of Hoadley’s assertions,it justifies the present international col?laborative research project which offers greater benefits as new and differentiated ideas come to the fore,de?rived from different cultural contexts.Kivrak,Arslan,Tuncan,et al.reveal from their research that national culture plays a major role in sharing knowledge with people from different cultures[5]642.Aspects such as dif?ficulties in language and communication, trust, motivation and personal relationships are barriers that influence multicultural project teams’ successful knowledge?sharing.Brewet al.a(chǎn)ssert that where there are major cultural and language differences,it often requires renegotiation of understandings[1]94.

    In this study,the ability to speak the common language namely English,played an important role in knowledge?sharing.On the other hand,Gains and Graham realise that the design for parallel research need not be replicated in each of the settings,but rather that the researchers consider their own situations pertain?ing to their country and decide on a suitable design which is the case in this study[6]92.In this way the re?searchers could share the development of their designs,learn from one another and reflect on their own re?sponses and each other’s analysis.Jeonget al.explain that international collaboration not only helps to in?crease the productivity and the impact of the research but also encourages further international collaboration and academic excellence,which is the case in this project[2]530.

    We first discuss the background of the collaborative research project between South Africa and China,followed by literacy development in primary education in South Africa,the South African methodology used during phase I and finally a synopsis of two resultant literacy overview articles.

    2.South Africa?China collaborative research project

    During the latter part of 2013,a collaborative research project titled:South Africa?China Collaborative Research on Teachers’Literacy Perceptions and Classroom Practices in Primary Schools,involving the Univer?sity of South Africa and the Zhejiang International Studies University,was initiated via email correspondence.Subsequently,in November 2013,four academics from the University of South Africa visited the Zhejiang In?ternational Studies University,Hangzhou to further discussions pertaining to the project.After three days of intensive discussions,the following phases were decided on.

    This collaborative comparative research project comprises of three phases:

    Phase I:Gaining an overview of current teacher attitudes and practices in primary school classrooms re?garding literacy development(2014—2015) in each respective country.Anticipated outcomes are:the publi?cation of three to four co?authored articles from each university,in the South African journal,Per Linguam.The South African articles are based on empirical findings and the Chinese articles are based on narratives.

    Phase II:Training teachers to teach reading for meaning:a framework for in?service teacher training(2016—2017).An alternative theme may be introduced as the need arises.This phase involves empirical research in both countries and will ultimately be recorded in articles for publication.

    Phase III:Dissemination of information and institutional interaction will take place at conferences in South Africa and/or China (2016/2017).

    The main purpose of Phase I of the project is to produce an updated knowledge base that sheds light on how reading is currently being taught and developed in primary schools in South Africa and China.A special edition of the accredited journalPer Linguam(South Arica) in 2016 has been published,in which the three South African and three Chinese articles were published online in May 2016.

    The exploratory comparative focus of Phase I will enable us to identify patterns and develop an under?standing of variations of global phenomenon like reading and the ways in which it is viewed,valued and ex?plicitly taught within the unique multilingual,multicultural,socio?economic and historical contexts in which literacy development takes place.Central themes that fall within this exploratory phase include Early Child?hood Development(ECD),Inclusive Education,normative cultural frameworks within which policy documents are formulated,poverty and literacy development (including urban/rural socioeconomic factors),teacher training,and capacity building.Literacy development during the Early Childhood Development stage,in urban and rural areas is reported and discussed here.

    Producing an updated and reflective knowledge base of this nature will enable the researchers from both countries to discover what can contribute to improving literacy policy and practices.A better understanding of teacher attitudes and practices relating to reading will provide an informed platform for Phase II of the colla?borative research project.This study provides “pragmatic strategies at an action level”[2]521to facilitate inter?national collaboration as communities of practice.A memorandum of understanding(MOU) was drawn up,approved and signed by both parties in 2014.

    3.Literacy development in primary education in South Africa

    The present study is a parallel research project which was rooted in collaboration and aimed at cross?culturally (South Africa?China) examining children’s literacy development in primary schools.In both coun?tries teachers’ differences and similarities were identified.This collaboration led to a shared realisation that in both South Africa and China,literacy development during preschool years and primary years experience varied problems which are challenging and need to be addressed.

    Educational reform has many advantages.However,concomitantly there are also many challenges.Nsa?menang explains that“the emancipatory potential of Anglo?American approaches visualized in the first Edu?cation For All(EFA) goals,though attractive,instead suppress goal?achievement by non?Westerners.Blind optimism in them stunts non?Western children.To empower most of the world’s children and enrich the field,we simply need to accept and respect differentness.”[7]

    Despite great gains made in access for children in institutions of formal early education in South Africa,the issue is about providing acceptable quality schooling experiences which lays the“basis for future learning and enhanced life chances.” To date the learner performance in the early grades is very low and the majority of learners are unable to read,write,count and calculate on their grade level,which means the Grade R “has very little measureable impact on learners’ subsequent school performance.” The key sources of this under?performance are inter alia:children living in poverty;impoverished pedagogy;classes are too large;poor child?rearing practices and childrens’ inadequate social and physical readiness for school[8]72?74.Where centre and periphery schooling in the previous dispensation was based on race,it is capital which is now the barrier as learners from poor communities and the rural areas are marginalised,which means that black children conti?nue to receive poor schooling seeing that poverty is “overdetermined by race.”[9]9

    Janks and Makalela postulate that in order to gain success in school,the language question needs to be linked to questions about literacy.“A bilingual or trilingual language?in?education policy should include bili?teracy be it mother?tongue or English based.Skills such as decoding,comprehension and meaning?making skills need to be developed and an approach should be designed to develop these skills.”[10]225?226Similarly,Luo,Zhang,Liu,et al.explain that “China has made impressive strides in education over the past several decades(and even more so in recent years).” However,early childhood education (ECE) in the rural areas still has many problems such as limited quality ECE services,poorly trained teachers and facilities which do not meet minimum standards[11]60.Hence the rural children have fallen behind their peers in terms of physi?cal,cognitive and social development and consequently are not ready for the next stage in their education.Similar challenges are experienced in South Africa and this article will concentrate on the South African researchers’ outcomes of their empirical research.

    Hoadley offers a knowledge base gleaned from research conducted regarding the reasons why South Afri?can schools are still failing the majority of our learners[4]187,198?199.She offers descriptive features of South Af?rican schools with regards to discourse:domination of oral discourse and opportunities to read and write are limited;chorusing as a classroom interaction pattern;there is limited feedback on learners’ responses;instead of learning being individualised it is communalised.Regarding knowledge,cognitive demand is low;limited use of textbooks and other reading material;emphasis on concrete meanings instead of abstract meanings;little or no focus on the written text, reading and writing; focussing on decoding of texts and neglecting reading of extended texts.Furthermore,the pace is slow and instructional time is eroded.Factors which will influence student gains are appropriate assessment and feedback to learners;a focus on reading and writing;teachers need to be proficient in the language of instruction;teachers need to adjust their pace to learners’ a?bility;more of the curriculum needs to be covered;more content needs to be exposed by cognitive de?mand[4]187,198?199.

    During Phase I,the South African researchers examine the perceptions of teachers who teach learners literacy within inclusive classes during the early childhood education phase (reception year,age 5 years) and primary school in South African township and rural schools.

    4.The South African methodology used in Phase I

    In the South African component of Phase I,both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to col?lect,compare and analyse data related to various aspects of early literacy development and reading compre?hension instruction.A survey was undertaken by two colleagues from the Department of Linguistics and Mo?dern Languages at University of South Africa,to tap into primary school teachers’ attitudes to reading,their perceptions of themselves as readers,their reading habits and their reported classroom practices relating to reading comprehension.Besides the general focus on reading comprehension in the primary school phase,there are also specialist perspectives on reading comprehension in relation to ECD (Grade R)and Inclusive Education,and the urban/rural divide in literacy development,undertaken by colleagues in the College of Education.

    The target population was primary school teachers of schools which include Grade R teachers.Four to 8 schools in each of the selected 3 provinces were purposively selected to participate in the research project.Research instruments and the data collection process included a questionnaire that probes teachers’attitudes and classroom practices with regard to comprehension instruction and was distributed to selected primary school teachers in schools across 4 provinces,viz.Western Cape,Eastern Cape,Mpumalanga and Gauteng.The questionnaire comprised both closed and open type questions.

    Regarding ethical issues,permission to conduct the research was sought from the Department of Educa?tion in the provinces as well as from the school principals.Teachers who agreed to participate in the research project completed the questionnaires in their own time,and their anonymity and confidentiality were not com?promised.Any person who wished to withdraw could do so at any time.There was no payment for participa?tion and no risk was anticipated with the completion of the questionnaire.

    At this stage of the research project,Phase I is completed amidst several challenges which we had to o?vercome,such as the management of co?authored articles.

    5.Synopsis of two resultant literacy overview articles①

    (1) Article 1:Research partnership between South Africa and China:Emergent literacy teaching and learning in early childhood education in South Africa(available online May 2016:Per Linguam32(1)②)

    The first article offers an overview of emergent literacy teaching and learning in early childhood educa?tion in South Africa.The main aim of the research was to report on the quantitative data analysis (of the mixed method design employed) of teachers perceptions of literacy and classroom practices in Grade R,ob?tained from the questionnaires.By means of purposeful and convenient sampling strategies,10 schools with Grade R classes were selected in two cities in Gauteng province and 4 schools in a city in Mpumalanga prov?ince and 28 questionnaires (consisting of open and closed questions) were administered to teachers.Statisti?cal analysis was done using the SAS/STATS module of the SAS version 9.4 statistical package.

    As an introduction to the article,the authors discuss the dire situation in both South Africa and China in terms of early literacy education.Common problems are shared by both countries as well as unique contextual problems of each country and thus there is a need for research in this area.With regard to the literacy levels in South Africa,they are on the lower end of the international systemic measure of performance in literacy(PIRLS③,2006 & 2011).Many factors can be provided to explain cross?cultural differences for example“cultural background for preschool education,the nature and role of preschool curriculum and the view and basic philosophy preschool teachers have for preschool education.”[12]217

    The literature study furthers discussions.Regarding Second Language Acquisition,the authors acknowl?edge and discuss Krashan’s cognitivist Input?Interacting?Output approach, Atkinson’s socio?cognitive stance[13]13,143and Janks’ future?orientated socio?cultural literacy pedagogies[9]8,11.As an extension of these discussions,the authors expand on the problems that occur with teachers’ classroom practices.Gleaned from the literature,it was concluded that teachers must not only depend on practice but also have adequate content and pedagogic knowledge,conduct action research and thus be reflective and engage in a quest to become ex?perts in the field of literacy pedagogy and early childhood education[6]85[14]97[15]82.In doing so the South Afri?can Department of Basic Education has adopted an integrated approach where the Language programme has been integrated into all subject areas[16]10.However,the authors point out the gaps which exist in the Curriculum,Assessment,Policy Statement(CAPS) for Grade R (reception year) and non?articulation of policy ideals at teaching level.This is exacerbated by difficulties such as limited funds,lack of well trained teachers and in?adequate focus on emergent literacy teaching and literacy in ECD.More importantly,Grade R is formally,not yet part of primary education even though it is included in the CAPS document,which also provides guide?lines such as teaching instruction time,in this case for language as well as the skills such as listening,speak?ing,reading and writing that need to be mastered.Language and literacy teaching in Grade R focus on play?based learning and formal and informal teaching.

    Summary of the findings:

    An astounding 76.06%of participating teachers’ highest qualification was a Grade 10 certificate.The findings also indicate limited teaching experiences and resources and the lack of print?rich environments.Teachers’ rigid teaching methods,which include chorus teaching,repetition,completing of worksheets are still very much in use.

    Only a small portion of the participating teachers were speakers of the home languages of their learners(Sepedi,isiZulu and siSwati).On average there are 29 learners per Grade R class;9 languages were used by learners;consequently not all learners were taught in their home language.In the Gauteng sample,all South African languages were used and mixed and some learners even spoke foreign languages such as French.The majority of the parents,however,chose to have their children educated in English.

    As much as 76.47%of teachers perceived themselves as reading literate,which is questionable,keeping in mind the social desirability aspect,which means that there is an absence of a reading culture in their schools where they teach.Teachers indicated that their learners reading readiness ranged from average to good and that a strong reading culture exists,yet low literacy levels exist,which indicates that teachers have misconceptions regarding these issues.Teachers’ reading practices are also in question as teachers lack sen?sitivity towards the developmental levels of the learners thus only teaching on one level and whole class read?ing is the order of the day.Asking literal questions about a text was most common.It was also found that ac?tivities to develop laterality were absent and that tracing and drawing pictures activities dominated.

    In view of these findings,the researchers’ plea to the South African education authorities is to pay heed essentially,to the importance of quality literacy teaching in Grade R;to invest in the upgrading of teacher qualifications;the inclusion of theories such as child development,learning,language and ESL;providing op?portunities for teachers to conduct evidence based research;teachers to gain a sound knowledge and use of English (Language of Learning and Teaching,LoLT) and how learners acquire reading;and lastly,to gain a thorough understanding of ECD pedagogy.

    (2)Article 2:Contextual challenges in early literacy teaching and learning in Grade R rural schools in South Africa(available online May 2016:Per Linguam32(1)④)

    The second article offers an overview of the contextual challenges experienced during early literacy teaching and learning in Grade R rural schools in South Africa.The main aim of this research was to report on the qualitative data obtained from semi?structured interviews,questionnaires and classroom observations,challenges which hamper teachers in teaching literacy adequately and prevent learners from acquiring quality literacy in Grade R rural schools.

    With the use of purposive sampling,3 rural schools(with 3 Grade R classes each) were selected in Jo?hannesburg,Gauteng Province.9 Grade R teachers and 3 Heads of Departments were selected.

    Table 1 Contexts of the participating schools

    Due to the context of the research,namely rural schools,the researchers deemed it necessary to give a detailed description of the participating schools.

    In the introduction of the article,the authors emphasised the slow advancement of literacy skills in rural schools despite various policies and support programmes provided by the Department of Education.The South African government has acknowledged the need for increased access to quality ECD programmes and services;however,problems at the ECD level persist.There is thus an urgent need for research in the area of rural ECD in South Africa in an effort to improve the delivery of quality education in this area.

    As part of the literature review,the authors discuss the education in the rural South African context.Ru?ral is defined differently based on people’s socioeconomic,geographical and personal perspectives.The chal?lenges faced in rural contexts are inter alia access to public transport,diverse leaner backgrounds,poor or no school attendance,poor infrastructure (water,electricity) and their impact on ECD education.This calls for curriculum delivery to be tailored for the rural contexts and unfortunately the teachers are not prepared for these diverse contexts.Early childhood education (birth to 6 years) where Grade R resides,serves as a guide for the implementation of universal access to Grade R and includes aspects such as ECD services,curriculum,and ECD practitioners,as discussed according to the Department of Education’s White Paper 5(2001)[17].The Diagnostic Review of ECD draft report(2012) in which the priority areas such as a teacher development strategy for ECD and Grade R for improvement, are discussed[18].Further discussions are around staffing and finances.

    Considering the theme of the article,it necessitated a discussion on the Curriculum Assessment and Policy Statement(CAPS) for Grade R,published by the Department of Education (2011).References such as the Catholic Institute of Education and SACE raise concerns regarding CAPS such as proper qualified teachers and the curriculum being too detailed and overwhelming[19].

    Summary of findings:

    By means of manual thematic content analysis of the transcribed interview responses,the following themes were identified:infrastructure and provisioning,pedagogical challenges,and management and support.

    The participating schools 2 and 3 and to a lesser degree school 1,are faced with many infrastructure and provisioning challenges,ranging from water and electricity shortages,lack of classroom space,inadequate re?sources(and where there were resources they were underutilised),lack of upkeep of buildings and school terrain;barriers learners face such as poverty,language difficulties,parental and home challenges which in?clude unemployment and lack of food and finances for school funds.

    On pedagogical level,and in this case literacy teaching and learning for Grade R,teachers in the partici?pating schools displayed limited knowledge regarding the development of uniform lesson preparation and ex?perienced difficulty in adhering to set timetables and daily programmes.Ultimately,teachers experience CAPS implementation as demanding because it requires the attendance of frequent meetings for discussions on planning,preparation and assessment,receiving little or no support from the Department of Education offi?cials.As a result of inadequately qualified teachers,teachers do not prepare lessons properly and use rigid teaching methods and are unable to understand the teaching of literacy,reading and writing,consequently their classroom management also leaves much to be desired.Furthermore,teachers as well as learners use at least two languages(their home language and LoLT) during the teaching of English literacy which results in the con?tamination of the LoLT,for example the incorrect pronunciation of English words.Whilst some teachers were eager to receive further training to improve their qualifications,others were not motivated to do so.

    The management and support in the development of literacy in Grade R classrooms also presents with many challenges.The Heads of Departments(HOD) indicated that they had many additional tasks over and above their HOD tasks such as dealing with problems with underqualified teachers,limited resources,lack of parental involvement and poverty.

    It can thus be concluded that although South Africa has policies in place it is the implementation that is problematic,such as universal access to Grade R which has as yet not materialised.In addition,teachers are not adequately trained and qualified to teach the CAPS Grade R curriculum particularly in rural areas where one needs to involve the community and the good leadership and support of the HOD’s and the principal.Support and training for teachers and parents from District Offices is also imperative.Provision of resources,improving the infrastructure of rural schools,financial assistance and a strategic plan by the Department of Education,is desperately needed in order to offer a quality ECD education to young South African children.

    6.Conclusion

    This collaborative research project between South Africa and China has proved to benefit both universi?ties in terms of the MOU.The expected outcomes of Phase I have been reached namely,four South African articles,of which 3 have been published in the special edition ofPer Linguamjournal in 2016,and one in a later edition ofPer Linguamjournal and three Chinese articles in the special edition ofPer Linguamjournal in 2016.Subsequently,the Chinese university has also established a journal in which their articles will be published in China.This article gives a South African perspective of one of the identified themes namely Ear?ly Childhood Education (ECD),under the umbrella theme:Literacy.

    From the findings reported in the two articles,the researchers were able to gain an understanding of ECD literacy teaching and learning in the South African education context,even though the research was only conducted in two provinces.Article 1 provided an overview of emergent literacy teaching and learning in early childhood education in South Africa motivated by the recognition of common literacy challenges experi?enced in both South Africa and China as well as their unique contextual challenges.The main challenges which repeatedly emerged throughout the research were the issue of underqualified teachers,rigid teaching practices,the difficulties experienced with the curriculum,CAPS,and the difficulties surrounding Language of Learning and Teaching (LoLT).In addition to these challenges,article 2 expounded on the contextual chal?lenges in early literacy teaching and learning in Grade R rural schools in South Africa.Although rural schools have their own unique challenges such as poor infrastructure namely no electricity and water,dilapidated buildings,no transport,little or no parental involvement,poor socio?economic conditions and access to ECD education and services,some of these are also prevalent in the schools in article 1.Despite initiatives taken by the Department of Education to address these challenges,not enough has been undertaken to alleviate the problems experienced in rural areas,and the low literacy levels in South African schools.Both articles conclude with a plea to the Department of Education to increase their efforts in alleviating these challenges and to acceler?ate access to quality ECD education and services and to improve literacy levels in South African schools.

    In terms of the research project itself,the participating South African researchers were able to make stra?tegic decisions and consider costs and benefits involved[2].Good leadership,communication and collaboration skills were evident and team members were committed to the project and were fully co?operative.Regular meetings were held in a participatory fashion and excellent administration skills[3]particularly for the publi?cations of the articles were employed.Much has been gained by collaborating with the Chinese counterparts regarding the education in China,which brings us to the realization that both countries have common challen?ges yet unique strengths and together,through research,we are able to address the challenges and share the strengths for the benefit of all learners.Geoghegan,O’Neill and Petersen explain that there is a great deal of research being conducted regarding pedagogical change in order to improve the outcomes of literacy teaching as well as schoolwide approaches toward teaching and learning with the goal to improve schools[20]119.By means of preliminary investigations into possible research partners and mutual research topics will enable re?searchers to match potential partners and thus lead them to mutual exploration by means of collaborative re?search opportunities[2]530.In order to improve the current project performance,continued collaborations in Phase II and III are envisaged.

    Notes:

    ①Three co?authored articles from the Chinese counterparts of the project were also published in the special edition (2016)Per Linguam32(1) journal on the following topics:teacher training;literacy education;reading instruction.

    ②Cf.Nel N,Krog S,Mohangi K,et al.Research partnership between South Africa and China:Emergent literacy teaching and learning in early childhood education in South Africa[J].Per Linguam (Special edition),2016,32(1):102?122.

    ③PIRLS(The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study) is run by International Association for the Evaluation of Edu?cational Achievement(IEA).

    ④Cf.Mohangi K,Krog S,Stephens O,et al.Contextual challenges in early literacy teaching and learning in grade R rural schools in South Africa[J].Per Linguam (Special edition),2016,32(1):71?87.

    [1]Brew A,Boud D,Lucas L,et al.Reflexive deliberation in international research collaboration:Minimising risk and maximis?ing opportunity[J].High Education,2013,66(1):93?104.

    [2]Jeong S,Choi J Y,Kim Y.On the drivers of international collaboration:The impact of informal communication,motivation,and research resources[J].Science and Public Policy,2014,41(4):520?531.

    [3]Parding K,Hertting K,Alerby E,et al.Bridges and barriers:Learning experiences from an international research project[J].The International Journal of Learning,2012,18(8):285?293.

    [4]Hoadley U.What do we know about teaching and learning in South African primary schools? [J].Education as Change,2012,16(2):187?202.

    [5]Kivrak S,Arslan G,Tuncan M,et al.Impact of national culture on knowledge sharing in international construction projects[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2014,41(7):642?649.

    [6]Gains P,Graham B.Making space for expressive and creative writing in African primary schools:A two?site action research study in Kenya and South Africa[J].Reading and Writing,2011,2(1):77?94.

    [7]Nsamenang A B.Cultures in early childhood care and education:Background paper prepared for Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007?Strong Foundations:Early Childhood Care and Education[EB/OL].[2015-05-15].http://unes?doc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147442e.pdf.

    [8]Hoadley U.Building strong foundations:Improving the quality of early education[J].South African Child Guage,2013:72?77.

    [9]Janks H.Globalisation,diversity and education:A South African perspective[J].The Educational Forum,2014,78:8?25.

    [10]Janks H,Makalela L.Engaging a visionary:Horizons of the (im)possible[J].Education as Change,2013,17(2):219?228.

    [11]Luo R,Zhang L,Liu C,et al.Behind before they begin:The challenge of early childhood education in rural China[J].Australasian Journal of Early Childhood,2012,37(1):55?64.

    [12]Ojala M,Talts L.Preschool achievement in Finland and Estonia:Cross?cultural comparison between the cities of Helsinki and Tallinn[J].Scandanavian Journal of Educational Research,2007,51(2):205?221.

    [13]Atkinson D.A sociocognitve approach to second language acquisition[C]//Atkinson D.Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition.London:Routledge,2011:i?190.

    [14]Happo I,M??tt? K.Expertise of early childhood educators[J].International Education Studies,2011,4(3):91?99.

    [15]Prinsloo M,Stein P.What’s inside the box? Children’s early encounters with literacy in South Africanclassrooms[J].Per?spectives in education,2004,22(2):67?82.

    [16]Department of Basic Education.Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement(CAPS)?Foundation Phase Home Language Grades R?3[M].Pretoria:Government Press,2011.

    [17]Department of Education (DoE).White Paper 5?Early Childhood Development[M].Pretoria:DOE,2001.

    [18]Richter L,Biersteker L,Burns J,et al.Diagnostic Review of Early Childhood Development[M].Pretoria:Human Sciences Research Council,2012.

    [19]Catholic Institute of Education.Submission on the national curriculum and assessment policy statement for all subjects lis?ted in the national curriculum statement Grades R?12 (No.784 of 2010)[EB/OL].Catholic Institute of Education.[2015-05-15].http://cie.org.za.

    [20]Geoghegan D,O’Neill S,Petersen S.Metalangauge:The “teacher talk” of explicit literacy teaching in practice[J].Impro?ving Schools,2013,16(2):119?129.

    G526.9

    A

    2095-2074(2016)06-0085-10

    2016-06-27

    Norma Margaret Nel,女,南非大學榮休教授、研究員,南非國家科研基金(NRF)在冊研究員,博士生導師,博士。

    猜你喜歡
    研究員博士生中非
    中南大學教授、博士生導師
    安全(2021年4期)2021-05-19 07:56:52
    賈康研究員
    蔣保江研究員簡介
    SelTrac?CBTC系統(tǒng)中非通信障礙物的設計和處理
    郭占恒研究員
    觀察與思考(2019年7期)2019-08-01 06:24:58
    首都師范大學博士生導師
    ——王永平教授
    唐都學刊(2017年6期)2017-11-27 06:08:05
    福建師范大學博士生導師
    ——陳桂蓉教授
    唐都學刊(2017年6期)2017-11-27 06:08:05
    夏啟斌研究員
    陜西師范大學博士生導師
    ——拜根興教授
    唐都學刊(2017年3期)2017-05-25 00:37:34
    深化中非交通運輸基礎設施建設合作
    中國公路(2017年13期)2017-02-06 03:16:22
    在线观看日韩欧美| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 电影成人av| 香蕉丝袜av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 99热只有精品国产| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 人妻一区二区av| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 搡老岳熟女国产| 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 色94色欧美一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | av网站在线播放免费| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | bbb黄色大片| 女警被强在线播放| 操出白浆在线播放| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 成人手机av| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 大码成人一级视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 怎么达到女性高潮| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产区一区二久久| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产色视频综合| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 亚洲第一青青草原| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| av一本久久久久| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 99re在线观看精品视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲国产欧美网| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 99热只有精品国产| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| tocl精华| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| svipshipincom国产片| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 久久99一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 无限看片的www在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 成人影院久久| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产av又大| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 一区在线观看完整版| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| av网站免费在线观看视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 成在线人永久免费视频| a在线观看视频网站| 大码成人一级视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲av美国av| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产在视频线精品| 999精品在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 黄频高清免费视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 精品人妻1区二区| av有码第一页| 国产精品成人在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产成人av教育| 久久影院123| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| a在线观看视频网站| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 午夜福利,免费看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 老熟女久久久| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 午夜老司机福利片| 久久人妻av系列| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| avwww免费| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | avwww免费| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 天天添夜夜摸| 777米奇影视久久| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 久久中文看片网| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| www日本在线高清视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 香蕉久久夜色| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 超碰97精品在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| tube8黄色片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲色图av天堂| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 91国产中文字幕| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 露出奶头的视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产片内射在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| av免费在线观看网站| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产麻豆69| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 我的亚洲天堂| 老熟女久久久| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 美女午夜性视频免费| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 窝窝影院91人妻| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 看片在线看免费视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久性视频一级片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产成人av教育| 在线观看66精品国产| 极品教师在线免费播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 99久久人妻综合| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 黄色女人牲交| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久人妻av系列| 乱人伦中国视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品久久视频播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 久久草成人影院| ponron亚洲| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 黄色女人牲交| 91麻豆av在线| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 免费在线观看完整版高清| av网站在线播放免费| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 超色免费av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产不卡一卡二| av片东京热男人的天堂| 成人18禁在线播放| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产免费男女视频| videosex国产| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产av精品麻豆| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| ponron亚洲| 成人手机av| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲第一av免费看| 在线av久久热| av线在线观看网站| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| tube8黄色片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 不卡一级毛片| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲av成人av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产成人欧美| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久影院123| 人妻一区二区av| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 国产野战对白在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成人国语在线视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 在线视频色国产色| 精品久久蜜臀av无| av在线播放免费不卡| 高清av免费在线| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲片人在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久青草综合色| 五月开心婷婷网| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 不卡av一区二区三区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| a在线观看视频网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 另类亚洲欧美激情| xxx96com| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 超碰97精品在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产精品免费大片| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久久国产成人免费| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 91大片在线观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产野战对白在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 不卡av一区二区三区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 一本大道久久a久久精品|