• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Production of renewable aromatics and olefins by catalytic co-cracking of fatty acid methyl esters and methanol

    2022-01-05 09:06:34LIUSenGUOYuqianSUNPeiyongZHANGShenghongYAOZhilong
    燃料化學(xué)學(xué)報(bào) 2021年12期

    LIU Sen , GUO Yu-qian , SUN Pei-yong , ZHANG Sheng-hong,* , YAO Zhi-long

    (1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Enze Biomass Fine Chemicals, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China;2.College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, China)

    Abstract: Catalytic cracking of triglycerides and their derivatives (e.g., fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs) by HZSM-5 zeolite offers a promising route to produce renewable aromatics and olefins, but it is primarily hindered by the rapid catalyst deactivation caused by coke.In this work, the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol over HZSM-5/Al2O3 composites was developed to regulate the product distribution and slower the catalyst deactivation.Co-feeding methanol with FAMEs enhanced the olefin selectivity at the expense of aromatics, and the total selectivities of aromatics and olefins added up to 70.9% with an optimized methanol content of 60%.The co-feeding of methanol not only promoted the olefin yield but also retarded the consecutive H-elimination of aromatics to polycyclic aromatics, thus reducing the coke formation and prolonging the catalyst lifespan.Under the conditions of 450 °C, 0.16 MPa and a space velocity of FAMEs at 4 h-1, increasing the methanol blending ratio in FAMEs from zero to 50% reduced coke from 17.8% to 10.1% after reaction for 12 h.Besides, the spent catalyst for the co-cracking reaction could be easily regenerated by coke combustion, yielding similar structure, acidity and activity to those of the fresh one.

    Key words: catalytic cracking;fatty acid methyl ester;methanol;aromatic;olefin

    Light aromatics and olefins are produced mainly via energy-intensive processes such as reforming and cracking of petroleum fractions[1].With the declining petroleum resource and increasing environmental concerns, biomass as an alternative and renewable energy source to produce fuels and chemicals,especially BTX (benzene, toluene, and xylenes) and C2-4olefins, has significantly been encouraged to reduce the environmental footprint of petroleum usage.Different from starch, sugar, and lignocellulose biomass, triglyceride-rich biomass has a similar skeleton structure and physical properties (density,boiling point, hydrogen/carbon ratio,etc.) to those of the petroleum-derived hydrocarbons[2].Triglycerides and their derivatives are, thus, considered as promising feedstock to complement the fossil-based counterparts in the production schemes of current refineries such as cracking and refining[3].Producing fuels and chemicals from edible vegetable oils, however, seems much less viable in China, as the gap between the domestic supply of vegetable oils and their market demand is expanding with its increasing population[4].By contrast,fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), which are derived from waste cooking oils via transesterification, provide an alternative feedstock to produce renewable aromatics and olefins.

    HZSM-5 zeolite has been widely applied in the catalytic cracking of triglycerides into hydrocarbons like aromatics and olefins, due to its adjustable acidity and unique intersecting pores preferring the formation of monoaromatics over polyaromatics[5-8].The formed aromatics, however, tend to condense and fuse into polyaromatics masking on the external surface of HZSM-5, causing the pore blockage and thereby a rapid deactivation[9].Strategies such as dealumination[10], introducing hierarchical structures[11],and doping with Zn and Ga[12]have been developed to attenuate coking.Despite the promoted catalyst stability, these measures always generate undesired effects on catalyst activity and/or selectivity.Dealumination of HZSM-5 reduces the strong acid sites responsible for cracking and cyclization reactions,thereby leading to inferior activity and aromatic selectivity in the cracking of triglycerides; While the introduction of hierarchical porosity into HZSM-5 increases significantly light olefins at the expense of aromatics.By comparison, doping Zn and Ga with dehydrogenation capacity promotes the transformation of olefins into aromatics.Nevertheless, Ga was found to facilitate the deep dehydrogenation of aromatics to graphitic coke, which contributed to a more pronounced decline in the lifetime of HZSM-5 zeolite[12].It is still a challenge to balance monoaromatic formation and further dehydrogenation to polyaromatic coke precursors by directly modifying HZSM-5 zeolite.

    In addition to the upgrading of HZSM-5 zeolite,advanced process technologies such as coupling reactions have been developed to attenuate catalyst coking in biomass cracking.The co-cracking of small alcohol molecules with bio-oils improved the stability of HZSM-5 and the aromatic yield due to the hydrogen transfer between methanol and bio-oils[13-15].Methanol has a hydrogen to carbon effective ratio ((H/C)eff) of 2[16], much higher than the (H/C)effvalue of bio-oils.The surplus hydrogen released from alcohol cracking compensates for the hydrogen required for the cracking of bio-oils with a low (H/C)eff, thus attenuating the catalyst deactivation.Improving the integral (H/C)effratio of feedstock by co-feeding reactants with high(H/C)effratios is, therefore, an alternative strategy to retard the deactivation of HZSM-5 zeolite in the catalytic cracking of biomass[17].

    Similarly, introducing methanol to triglyceride would prolong the catalyst lifespan, particularly when the triglyceride and methanol crackings require the same active sites and share similar reaction intermediates and products.The integration of triglyceride cracking and“methanol to hydrocarbon (MTH)” is expected to achieve less coke, as well as a promoted energy efficiency by thermally coupling endothermic cracking of triglycerides and exothermic MTH process.For this purpose, industrial HZSM-5 extrudates bound with boehmite have been prepared and evaluated for the FAMEs and methanol co-cracking in the present work.The effect of methanol blending contents on the cracking of FAMEs was investigated in terms of reaction product distribution and catalyst stability.Besides, a reaction pathway for the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol was further proposed to elucidate the integrated cracking process.This work aims to develop a practical technology that enables the sustainable production of aromatics and olefins from triglycerides and their derivatives.

    1 Experimental

    1.1 Materials

    FAMEs derived from waste cooking oils were supplied by Jiangxi Xufeng Chemical Co., Ltd.The raw materials consisted mainly of FAMEs with 16 or 18 carbon atoms, which accounted for more than 95%.HZSM-5 zeolite with a Si/Al ratio (n(SiO2)/n(Al2O3))of 25 was purchased from Nankai University Catalyst Co.Ltd., and boehmite was provided by Sinopec Catalyst Co.LTD.

    1.2 Catalyst preparation

    HZSM-5 zeolite and boehmite were mixed at a mass ratio of 3∶1 in a certain amount of 10% HNO3aqueous solution, followed by extrusion, drying at 120 °C overnight, and calcination at 550 °C in air for 4 h.The formed HZSM-5/Al2O3composites were then cut into extrudates of 2.0-3.0 mm in length and 1.5 mm in diameter before use.

    1.3 Catalyst characterization

    Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at -196 °C using an Autosorb-iQ analyzer(Quantachrome).The specific surface area was estimated from nitrogen adsorption data in the relative pressure (p/p0) range from 0.05 to 0.25 using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, and the total volume was calculated from the adsorbed amount of N2atp/p0=0.99.Thet-plot method was used to determine the micropore volume and the discrimination between the external and internal surface areas of catalysts.Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku D/max2500 diffractometer (CuKα,λ= 0.15418 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA) at a scan rate of 2(°)/min.The morphology of catalysts was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Shimadzu SSX-550) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.The29Si magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (29Si MAS NMR) measurement was performed on a 400 MHz solid-state NMR spectrometer (Bruker,Avance Ⅲ) at 79.5 MHz.Carbonaceous species deposited on the used catalyst were quantified by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on an SDT-650 simultaneous thermal analyzer (TA Instrument) from room temperature to 800 °C in air.

    Temperature-programmed desorption of NH3(NH3-TPD) was carried out on a DAS-7200 TPDanalyzer (Hunan Huasi).Generally, samples (100 mg)were first treated at 500 °C for 1 h and cooled down to 100 °C in He (40 mL/min), followed by exposure to NH3(30 mL/min) for 0.5 h at the same temperature.The NH3-saturated sample was then purged by He at 100 °C until a constant baseline was recorded by the thermal conductivity detector (TCD) connected to the reactor.Finally, the sample was heated to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, with the desorbed NH3continuously monitored by the TCD.

    The pyridine-infrared (Py-FTIR) spectra were measured on a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR)spectrometer (Nicolet 6700) in the range of 1300 to 1800 cm-1.Before the measurement, the tableting sample was treated at 350 °C under a vacuum for 2 h.After cooling down to 50 °C, pyridine vapor was injected into the sample cell under a nitrogen flow of 30 mL/min, and the adsorption continued for 0.5 h.The sample saturated with pyridine was then heated to 200 °C and evacuated at this temperature for 0.5 h under 10-5torr to remove the weakly adsorbed pyridine.Finally, the temperature was increased to 350 °C to detect the medium and strong acid sites.According to the absorbance measured at around 1540 and 1450 cm-1,the Br?nsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites were quantified using the molar extinction coefficients reported by Emeis[18].

    1.4 Cracking reactions

    Cracking reactions were carried out in a fixed-bed reactor (Φ20 mm × 600 mm), as illustrated in Figure 1.The reaction temperature was controlled by a thermometer inserted into the catalyst bed, and the pressure was kept at 0.16 MPa by a back pressure regulator.Calibrated pumps (Laballience Series II) and mass flow controllers (SevenStar D07-11C) were respectively used to feed liquid reactants (FAMEs,water, and methanol) and N2to the reactor.Typically,10 g catalysts were loaded in the center of the reactor and sandwiched by two glass bead (O.D.= 0.5 mm)zones.After treatment by steam (WHSV = 1 h-1, N2=100 mL/min) at 480 °C for 12 h under ambient pressure, the reactor was cooled to 450 °C before feeding FAMEs and methanol.The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of FAMEs was generally set at 1 h-1, with the mass ratio of methanol to FAMEs varied from 1∶4 to 2∶1 in case of co-cracking reactions.The gaseous reaction stream exiting from the reactor was quenched to 0 °C before passing through a gas-liquid separator, and the condensed liquid phase was collected every two hours for analysis.

    Figure 1 Simplified flow diagram of the setup for co-cracking FAMEs and methanol

    1.5 Product analysis

    The mixture from the reactor outlet was divided into gas, aqueous, and oil phases after separation.The gas products were composed mainly of light hydrocarbons with 1-6 carbon atoms and COx.Their composition was determined by a Shimadzu gas chromatography (GC) GC-2014 equipped with a capillary column (HP-Al2O3/KCl, 50 m × 0.53 mm ×15 μm) and a flame ionization detector (FID).While the aqueous phase comprising predominantly methanol and water was analyzed using an Agilent GC-7890A equipped with a capillary column (SupercowaxTM10,30 m × 0.53 mm × 1 μm) and an FID.The oil phase contained unreacted FAMEs and liquid hydrocarbon products such asparaffins, olefins, and aromatics.A Shimadzu GC-2010 equipped with a capillary column(HP-5, 30 m × 0.32 mm × 15 μm) was used to quantify the liquid hydrocarbons.The relative response factors used for quantification were obtained from the analysis of liquid hydrocarbon standards of known composition.Besides, PONA (paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics) analysis was also performed on an SP-3420A GC with an HP-PONA column (50 m × 0.20 mm ×0.50 μm) to quantify isomers of olefins and aromatics in the liquid hydrocarbons.

    The conversions of FAMEs (x(FAMEs)) and methanol (x(CH3OH)) were defined as the mass ratios of the converted reactant to the fed one, as listed in Eq.(1) and (2), respectively.The mass balance (MB),which was calculated from the mass ratio of the total products to the converted FAMEs and methanol (Eq.(3)), varied between 94% and 100% for the studied reactions.While the selectivity of each product(s(CxHy)) was determined with a normalization method due to the satisfactory reaction mass balance within(97 ± 3)%, as seen in Eq.(4).However, neither water nor COxwas considered when calculating selectivities,as they were out of focus in this work.

    Herein,m(FAMEs)convrepresents the mass of converted FAMEs, equal to the mass difference of FAMEs between flowing in (m(FAMEs)in) and flowing out (m(FAMEs)out).So arem(CH3OH)conv, (m(CH3OH)in),andm(CH3OH)out.

    2 Results and discussion

    2.1 Catalyst characterization

    The HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst after steam treatment was examined by SEM, XRD, and N2physical adsorption techniques, with results shown in Figure 2 and Table 1.HZSM-5 zeolite consisted of agglomerates of single crystals with uniform sizes ofca.250 nm, while alumina seemed much fluffy with many cavities.Unlike both, the HZSM-5/Al2O3composites were composed of HZSM-5 crystallites dispersed well on the porous alumina (Figure 2(c)).Nevertheless, the catalyst exhibited an identical XRD pattern to HZSM-5, giving a set of typical diffraction peaks in the 2θranges of 8°-10° and 22.5°-25°, which correspond to an MFI framework.This indicates that the MFI structure of HZSM-5 was well maintained after introducing the boehmite binder and the subsequent calcination and steam treatment.Also, the surface area (SBET) and pore volume (vt) of HZSM-5/Al2O3were not significantly affected by steam,decreasing from 345 m2/g and 0.434 mL/g to 305 m2/g and 0.411 mL/g, respectively, see Table 1.Interestingly, the decreases were comparable to the losses in the internal surface area and micropore volume, implying that steam reduced mainly the microporosity of HZSM-5 zeolite.

    Figure 2 SEM images of Al2O3 (a), HZSM-5 (b) and HZSM-5/Al2O3 (c); XRD patterns (d) and N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (e) of the steam-treated HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalyst

    Table 1 Physicochemical properties of HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts

    Besides the microporosity, the steam treatment reduced the acidity of HZSM-5, especially the strong acid sites, as reflected by the NH3-TPD profiles in Figure 3(a).Two NH3desorption peaks appearingaround 190 and 365 °C, which can be respectively assigned to the desorption of NH3adsorbed on the weak and strong acid sites[19], are observable for both bare and steam-treated HZSM-5 zeolites.However, the high-temperature peak is much smaller for the hydrothermally treated sample, suggesting a loss in its strong acid.The loss in the acidity of HZSM-5 was probably caused by the dealumination via steam treatment, as suggested by the29Si NMR spectra of HZSM-5 shown in Figure 3(b).For both calcined and steam-treated zeolites, the resonances at -113.8 and-116.9 could be assigned to the Si (4Si,0Al) sites, and the resonance near -110.8 could be attributed to Si(3Si,1Al) sites; Other resonances below -100 were not identified for either catalyst, indicating the absence of Si (2Si,2Al) sites[20].According to the deconvolution results of29Si NMR spectra and the established method to calculate the Si/Al ratio[21], the estimated (Si/Al)fratio of HZSM-5 zeolite increased from 23 to 31 after the steam treatment, see Table 1.The rising (Si/Al)fratio indicated that some tetrahedrally coordinated Al atoms were substantially removed by steam, in line with the reduced acidity of HZSM-5 measured by NH3-TPD.

    Figure 3 Effect of steam treatment on the NH3-TPD profiles (a), 29Si MAS NMR spectra (b) and Py-FTIR spectra(c), (d) of HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalyst recorded at 200 and 350 °C, respectively

    With pyridine as a probe molecule, the distribution of acid sites over HZSM-5/Al2O3catalysts was investigated in detail by Py-FTIR.The results are displayed in Figure 3(c)-(d) and Table 2.Both calcined and steam-treated catalysts exhibit three characteristic bands at 1545, 1454, and 1490 cm-1.The first two bands can be respectively assigned to the adsorption of pyridine on Br?nsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites,respectively, and the last one corresponds to the adsorption of pyridine on both B and L acid sites[18].The resulting concentrations of B and L acid sites,summarized in Table 2, show that the reduction of acidity after steam treatment was mainly caused by the loss of the dominant B acid sites.The concentration of B acid declined from 0.35 to 0.17 mmol/g, while the L acid increased slightly from 0.067 to 0.091 mmol/g.Similar trends are also observable for the medium &strong acid sites obtained from the Py-IR spectra after heating at 350 °C.Such an evolution of B and L acid sites suggests the transformation of the tetrahedral Al in the framework of HZSM-5, which is mainly responsible for the B acid sites[19], into extra-lattice alumina with steaming duration, fitting well with the increased (Si/Al)fratio after the steam treatment.

    Table 2 Amount of Br?nsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites determined by Py-FTIR on HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts

    2.2 Cracking reactions

    The product of FAMEs and methanol co-cracking over HZSM-5/Al2O3catalysts was divided into oil,aqueous, and gas phases after condensation.Under the conditions of 450 °C, 0.16 MPa and a space velocity of FAMEs at 1 h-1, the FAMEs conversion was 96.8% in the absence of methanol, and the selectivities of oil,aqueous, and gas phases were 60.3%, 7.5%, and 28.1%, respectively, as shown in Figure 4.Introducing 16% methanol improved the FAMEs conversion from 96.8% to 99.5%, suggesting the positive effect of methanol on the activity of HZSM-5/Al2O3towards FAMEs cracking.However, the conversion of FAMEs changed little with further increasing the methanol blending ratio, fluctuating around 99% as the methanol content was further increased to 100%.Meanwhile, oil and gas products decreased from 60.3% and 28.1% to 25.2% and 14.4%, respectively, with the rising methanol content.

    Figure 5 further illustrates in detail the dependence of product distribution on the methanol blending ratios.Cracking FAMEs over the HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst yielded aromatics as main products(54.7%), in which benzene, toluene, and xylene counted for 6.2%, 17.5%, and 19.2%, respectively.That is, the BTX selectivity added up to 42.9% for the cracking of FAMEs.Such a product distribution suggests that monocyclic aromatics were preferentially formed in the pores of HZSM-5 zeolite, despite the considerable amount of olefins (12.0%) and paraffins(33.3%).Different from the cracking of FAMEs,methanol cracking over HZSM-5/Al2O3catalysts yielded light paraffins as the main products.The selectivities of aromatics, olefins, and paraffins were 29.8%, 25.7%, and 44.5%, respectively.The lower aromatic selectivity and higher paraffin selectivity,compared with those for the cracking of FAMEs(54.7% and 33.3% in sequence), suggest a preferential transformation of olefins to paraffins over aromatics in the MTH.

    Figure 4 Effect of the methanol blending ratios on the cocracking of FAMEs and CH3OH over HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts(reaction conditions: 450 °C, 0.16 MPa,WHSV (FAMEs) = 1 h-1)

    Figure 5 Effect of the methanol blending ratios on the selectivities of (a) aromatics, (b) olefins, and (c) paraffins in the co-cracking of FAMEs and CH3OH over HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts (reaction conditions: 450 °C, 0.16 MPa, WHSV (FAMEs) = 1 h-1)

    The different product distribution between the cracking of FAMEs and methanol originated probably in the mechanism involved in each reaction.Triglycerides and their derivatives, such as FAMEs,first undergo decomposition with the cleavage of C-O bonds in ester groups to produce long-chain hydrocarbons by releasing COxand H2O simultaneously[22], as schemed in Figure 6.The resulting hydrocarbons are then protonated to form carbenium ions at Br?nsted acid sites of HZSM-5,followed by consecutive β-scissions and hydrogentransfer reactions to produce smaller hydrocarbon intermediates.Thereinto, the C6-9intermediates lead to either alkyl aromatics through cyclization and alkyl rearrangement or small molecules by the continuous cracking.The light C2-5olefins can oligomerize,cyclize, and aromatize to aromatics[5-7].Different from the cracking of FAMEs, the MTH proceeds via a dualcycle mechanism wherein the two cycles are dominated by olefins and aromatics, respectively[23-25].The olefinic cycle involves the methylation and cracking of olefins, and the aromatic cycle encompasses the methylation and dealkylation of aromatics.However,the two cycles are interrelated with each other through cyclization and hydrogen transfer reactions[26].That is,the cracking of both triglyceride and methanol can be subcategorized into elementary steps such as cracking and cyclization of olefins, hydrogen transfer,alkylation, and dealkylation of aromatics.It is,therefore, expected to regulate the product distribution by coupling FAMEs cracking and MTH processes since they require the same active sites and share similar reaction intermediates and products.

    Figure 6 Proposed reaction pathway for the co-cracking of FAMEs and CH3OH over the HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalyst[5 - 7, 22 - 26]

    The co-feeding of methanol changed, indeed, the product distribution of FAMEs cracking.The selectivity of aromatics decreased with increasing the methanol content from zero to 100%, but a reversed trend was observed for olefins.With an optimal methanol content of about 60%, the yields of desirable aromatics and olefins added up to 70.9%, much higher than cracking either reactant.Besides, the relative content of benzene in the aromatics dropped from 11.3% to 6.5% with the rising methanol content,suggesting the promoted methylation of benzene by the co-fed methanol.Different from aromatics and olefins,the selectivity of paraffins changed slightly with the blending ratios of methanol.The results indicated that the co-feeding of methanol degraded the formation of aromatics but promoted olefins in the cracking of FAMEs.According to Figure 6, aromatization processes provide hydrogen required for the cracking of FAMEs in the absence of methanol, which in turn produces aromatics as main products, as well as a considerable amount of coke[5-7].Co-feeding methanol with FAMEs, however, offers an efficient way to supply hydrogen and water.The surplus hydrogen released from the methanol cracking promotes the deep cracking of reaction intermediates and retards the aromatization of olefins, thereby resulting in the preferential formation of olefins in the co-cracking process.Moreover, the steam formed in methanol dehydration has also been reported to compete for the acid sites against hydrogen transfer reactions,attenuating the formation of aromatics and favoring the production of light olefins[27].

    2.3 Attenuation of the deactivation

    Besides the product distribution, the co-fed methanol also changed the deactivation behavior of the HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst in the cracking of FAMEs, as shown in Figure 7.Despite the high selectivity of aromatics, the HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst suffered a rapid deactivation in the cracking of FAMEs at a high space velocity of 4 h-1.The conversion of FAMEs increased initially from 93.8% to 96.4% in the first 4 h and declined finally to 39.8% after 12 h.By comparison,the methanol conversions in the cracking of methanol were almost constant during the first 12 h, remaining at around 97%.However, the initial conversions of FAMEs and methanol for the co-cracking reaction were 89.6% and 78.2%, respectively, much lower than cracking each reactant.The results suggest that the cracking of FAMEs and MTH may share and compete for the same active sites, namely, the Br?nsted acid sites of HZSM-5 zeolite.Nevertheless, the co-cracking slowed down the catalyst deactivation rate.The FAMEs conversion decreased from 89.6% to 49.3%after 12 h but still higher than that for the cracking of FAMEs (39.8%).

    Figure 7 Variation of FAMEs and CH3OH conversions with time-on-stream for the cracking of (a) FAMEs, (b) CH3OH, and (c) the mixture of FAMEs and CH3OH (conditions: 450 °C, 0.16 MPa, WHSV (FAMEs) = 4 h-1, WHSV (CH3OH) = 4 h-1)

    Deactivation of HZSM-5 zeolites in the cracking reactions is generally related to the coke formation caused by the undesired deep dehydrogenation of aromatics due to the diffusion constraints imposed by the relatively small pores of HZSM-5 zeolites.The TG curves displayed in Figure 8 quantified the carbonaceous deposition on the used HZSM-5/Al2O3catalysts after reaction for 12 h.In the cracking of FAMEs, the total amount of deposited coke was 17.8%referred to the used catalyst weight.The weight loss of the TG curve, which occurred atca.300 °C and 510 °C with the respective mass drop of 5.8% and 12.0%,provides additional information about the nature of carbon deposition.The former loss was caused by the burn out of heavy hydrocarbons condensed on the external catalyst surface, whereas the latter corresponded to the combustion of polyaromatic coke[12].Compared with the cracking of FAMEs, the cofeeding of methanol with FAMEs reduced the carbonaceous deposition from 17.8% to 10.1%.In particular, the TG weight loss occurring above 400 °C dropped from 12.0% to 6.4%, suggesting much less polyaromatic coke deposited on the used catalyst for the co-cracking reaction.As discussed above, the water and hydrogen provided by MTH processes could promote the deep cracking of hydrocarbon intermediates, suppress the aromatization of olefins,and the following deep dehydrogenation to polyaromatics as coke precursors[28-30].Nevertheless,the co-cracking reaction still produced more coke than the MTH process (3.9%) under identical conditions,which might explain the continuous decrease in both FAMEs and methanol conversions with TOS in the cocracking reaction (Figure 7(c)).

    2.4 Catalyst reactivation

    The TG plots in Figure 8 confirmed the deposition of carbonaceous species on the used HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst for the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol.As a consequence, the surface area and pore volume of the spent catalyst decreased from 305 m2/g and 0.411 mL/g to 162 m2/g and 0.240 mL/g, respectively.However, the deactivated catalyst exhibited an identical XRD pattern to that of the fresh one, as seen in Figure 9(a), suggesting little change in the framework of HZSM-5 zeolites during the reaction.The spent HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst was thus reactivated bycalcination at 600 °C, yielding comparable surface area and pore volume (332 m2/g and 0.423 mL/g) with the fresh one (345 m2/g and 0.434 mL/g), as shown in Figure 9(b) and listed in Table 1.The identical NH3-TPD spectra were also obtained between the fresh and reactivated catalysts (Figure 9(c)), indicating the restored acidity by coke combustion.Figure 9(d)presents the29Si NMR spectra of fresh, used, and reactivated HZSM-5/Al2O3composites.Compared with the fresh one, the used catalyst exhibited a broadened29Si NMR resonance peak, which was probably caused by the formation of coke in localized regions of zeolite and its distribution over the catalyst surface[31].Nevertheless, burning coke at 600 °C renewed the29Si NMR spectrum, suggesting the local environment of Si atoms was seldom affected by the coking-calcination cycle.Besides, the (Si/Al)fratios changed slightly from 31 to 32 (Table 1), implying a negligible dealumination of HZSM-5 zeolite in the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol.

    Figure 8 TG curves of the used HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts after reaction for 12 h with different feeds (reaction conditions:450 °C, 0.16 MPa, WHSV (FAMEs) = 4 h-1,WHSV (CH3OH) = 4 h-1)

    Figure 9 XRD patterns (a), N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (b), NH3-TPD profiles (c), and 29Si MAS NMR spectra(d) of the fresh, used, and reactivated HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalysts

    The reactivated HZSM-5/Al2O3catalyst exhibited a comparable performance with the fresh one in the cocracking of FAMEs and methanol, as shown in Figure 10.The FAMEs conversion declined inevitably with reaction time from 89.6% and 86.6% to 49.3%and 47.8%, respectively, for the fresh and reactivated catalysts.A similar trend was also observed for the conversions of methanol on both catalysts.The restoration of catalyst activity to its original state and the simple regeneration process contribute to a promising application potential for the sustainable production of aromatics and olefins via the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol over HZSM-5 zeolites.However, catalyst deactivation caused by coking remains still a challenge for the co-cracking reaction.Catalysts with long-term stability need to be further developed.

    Figure 10 Reusability of the HZSM-5/Al2O3 catalyst for the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol (conditions: 450 °C,0.16 MPa, WHSV (FAMEs) = 4 h-1, WHSV (CH3OH) = 4 h-1)

    3 Conclusions

    The effect of methanol on the cracking of FAMEs was probed over HZSM-5/Al2O3extrudates in terms of catalyst stability, selectivity, and reaction pathway.Catalytic cracking of FAMEs produced aromatics as main products, but the catalyst suffered a rapid deactivation due to coking.Co-feeding methanol with FAMEs enhanced the olefin selectivity greatly at the expense of aromatics, offering a practical method to regulate the product distribution by the co-cracking of FAMEs and methanol.Moreover, the co-fed methanol reduced coke markedly and attenuated the catalyst deactivation.The HZSM-5/Al2O3composite was still subject to deactivation in the co-cracking reaction, but the spent catalyst could be easily reactivated by calcination without noticeable degradation in catalytic performance.The findings may provide rationales for designing a feasible process to produce sustainable aromatics and olefins from triglycerides and their derivatives in the well-developed petroleum refineries.

    亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| 咕卡用的链子| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 免费不卡黄色视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 在线观看66精品国产| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 777米奇影视久久| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 超色免费av| 中文欧美无线码| 超色免费av| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产在线免费精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 又大又爽又粗| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品免费大片| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 成年动漫av网址| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品.久久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产成人欧美| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 美女主播在线视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 香蕉丝袜av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 99香蕉大伊视频| 91国产中文字幕| 在线av久久热| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 久久影院123| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲第一青青草原| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 99re在线观看精品视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 男女免费视频国产| 久久香蕉激情| 国产精品免费大片| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品 国内视频| 一区二区av电影网| 国产麻豆69| 脱女人内裤的视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 丁香欧美五月| 91成人精品电影| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲人成电影观看| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产av又大| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产在线视频一区二区| 青草久久国产| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 超色免费av| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 岛国在线观看网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 男女免费视频国产| 成人国产av品久久久| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产精品免费大片| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产单亲对白刺激| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 最黄视频免费看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 手机成人av网站| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 黄片播放在线免费| av在线播放免费不卡| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 满18在线观看网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | kizo精华| 午夜久久久在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 电影成人av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| av有码第一页| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品一二三| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 亚洲精品在线美女| 中国美女看黄片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成年动漫av网址| 一区二区三区精品91| 丁香六月欧美| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| avwww免费| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 自线自在国产av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久青草综合色| av线在线观看网站| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 制服人妻中文乱码| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产区一区二久久| 老熟女久久久| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品免费视频内射| 一夜夜www| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| av视频免费观看在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 男人操女人黄网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久中文看片网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 最黄视频免费看| 另类精品久久| 青草久久国产| 不卡一级毛片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 美女午夜性视频免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久香蕉激情| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久香蕉激情| 18禁观看日本| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 99久久国产精品久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 视频区图区小说| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文字幕色久视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 成人国语在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 色94色欧美一区二区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 极品教师在线免费播放| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 午夜两性在线视频| 制服诱惑二区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 777米奇影视久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产男女内射视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久热在线av| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 激情视频va一区二区三区| tocl精华| 99久久人妻综合| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 午夜久久久在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 一夜夜www| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 成年动漫av网址| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产在线观看jvid| 在线播放国产精品三级| 捣出白浆h1v1| 美国免费a级毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久av网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久久久久久国产电影| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产三级黄色录像| av不卡在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 天堂动漫精品| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 69av精品久久久久久 | 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 操出白浆在线播放| 丝袜喷水一区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲av美国av| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产单亲对白刺激| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 电影成人av| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 99国产精品免费福利视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲 国产 在线| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久av网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久免费观看电影| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 精品福利观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产av精品麻豆| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产成人av教育| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人手机av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 岛国在线观看网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 99久久人妻综合| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| svipshipincom国产片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美日韩黄片免| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产三级黄色录像| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 五月天丁香电影| 国产麻豆69| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 手机成人av网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具|