Cloning and Expression Analysis on PmPGK1 and PmGPIC Genes in Pinus massoniana

XIA Lin-chao, WU Fan, JI Kong-shu

Cloning and Expression Analysis onandGenes in

XIA Lin-chao*, WU Fan*, JI Kong-shu**

(Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

To understand the functions of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) and cytosolic glucose phosphate isomerase (CPIC) of, the cDNA ofandwere cloned by RACE, and the bioinformatic and subcellular localization of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC were analyzed, and then their expression patterns were performed by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the full-length cDNA ofandwere 2 106 and 1 848 bp, encoding 507 and 566 amino acids, respectively. PmPGK1 and PmGPIC proteins were located in chloroplast and cytosol, respectively. The expression ofwas in order of new leaf>old leaf> new stem>root>flower, while that ofwas old leaf>flower>new leaf>new stem>root. Under low temperature stress for 24 hours, the expression ofanddecreased at first and then increased, and the expression ofdecreased to a low level after 2 hours. Under high CO2stress for 24 hours, the expression ofwas significantly down-regulated, showing a trend of decrease-increase-decrease, while the down-regulation ofwas not obvious. Therefore, it was suggested that PmPGK1 mainly participated in the Calvin cycle and chloroplast/plast glycolysis, and PmGPIC was mainly involved in cytosolic glycolysis. The activities of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC were inhibited under low temperature stress, and PmPGK1 activity was significantly inhibited under high CO2stress, while PmGPIC activity was less affected.

;;; Gene clone; Subcellular localization

Phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) is an important, soluble, rate-limited kinase used for basic metabolism in all organisms[1]. In plants, PGK participates in the Calvin cycle and glycolysis by catalyzing the release and transfer of high-energy phosphate groups between 3-phosphoglycerate (PGA) and 1,3-diphosphoglycerate (DPGA) and then catalyzing the reversible conversion of PGA and DPGA[2]. Glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI) is a multifunctional dimer protein in organisms that plays an important role in the carbohydrate meta- bolism cycle[3]. It catalyzes and breaks the molecular ring structure of fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) or glucose- 6-phosphate (G6P) and transfers the intramolecular protonits enzymatic acid-base catalytic mechanism and finally the two hexoses undergo reversible isome- rization[2,4].

PGK exists in only one form in prokaryotes, while in most eukaryotes, there are 2-3 isozymes with different subcellular localizations[1,5]. PGK in plants is divided into two localization subtypes: cytosolic and chloroplast/plastidial PGK. Cytosol PGK mainly parti- cipates in cytoplasmic matrix glycolysis, while chloro- plastic/plastidial PGK is mainly involved in the dual metabolic pathway of the Calvin cycle and chloro- plastic/plastidial glycolysis[6]. GPI exists as a single form of cytosolic GPI in most animals and microorga- nisms, while there is also a plastidial GPI in plant cells[7]. Cytosolic GPI mainly participates in sucrose synthesis and glycolysis, and plastidial GPI is mainly involved in the metabolism of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (OPPP) and starch synthesis[8–9].

At present, research on PGK and GPI mainly focuses on clinical diagnosis[10–12]. There are relatively few studies on the protein subcellular localization, biological function and gene expression analysis of isoenzymes encoding different subtypes of PGK and GPI in plants, and the researches of the two enzymes in plants are mainly concentrated on annual plants, such asor[13–16]. In this research, we cloned theandgenes of masson pine, which encode phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) and cytosolic glucose phosphate isomerase (CPIC), respectively. To explore the function ofPGK1 andGPIC, bioinformatic analysis, sub- cellular localization analysis and quantitative real- time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis based on tissue-specific expression, low temperature and high CO2stress were performed. The results of this research could advance our understanding of PGK and GPI in Masson pine and other plants.

1 Materials and methods

1.1 Test materials

The plant material used for rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) analysis was derived from germi- nated seeds of masson pine (). The protoplast material used for subcellular localization was obtained from wild-type(Columbia ecotype) at3-4-week-old and not flowered. A laboratory-preserved pJIT166 transient expression vector was used for subcellular localization. Materials for tissue-specific expression were collected from 15- year-old masson pine in the arboreal garden of Nan- jing Forestry University. The annual masson pine seedlings were used for expression analysis under low-temperature and elevated-CO2stress, which were provided by Fujian Baisha Forest Farm and then planted in soil (nutrient soil∶vermiculite∶perlite= 1∶1∶1) in laboratory in September, 2018. The seedlings were grown in a naturally chamber with a cycle of 10 h light/14 h dark, day/night temperature of 30℃/26℃, and a relative humidity of 60%, with a slow seedling stage for about 15 days. Then the seedlings with the same growth state were selected for the following experiment.

1.2 Total RNA extraction and full-length gene clone

Total RNA was extracted from masson pine seedlings followed the RNAprep Pure RNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing). The concentration and quality of the RNA were detected by a NanoDrop fluorometer (ThermoFisher, MA, USA) and electrophoresis, respec- tively. First-strand cDNA was synthesized by using TransScript?One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing).

Theandsequences were screened out after homology comparison between theandgene sequences ofobtained from the NCBI database (https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the masson pine transcriptome database (NCBI access No.: PRJNA561037). The cloningand amplification of intermediate fragments were carried out using the amplification primers (Table 1). Then, according to the intermediate sequence, the 5?/3? RACE- specific primer was used to amplify the 5?/3? end sequence according to the instructions of the SMA- RTer RACE 5?/3? Kit (TaKaRa, Beijing). The full- length ofandcDNA was obtained after sequence alignment and splicing predicttion, and conserved domains from the NCBI database were used for PmPGK1 and PmGPIC conserved domain analysis.

Table 1 Sequences of primers used in this study

*: Lowercase letters are the carrier sequence.

1.3 Bioinformatic analysis

Blastn and Blastp from the NCBI were used to compare the homologous sequences ofandcDNA and the amino acid sequences of their encoded proteins. Then, MEGA 7.0 was used to con- struct PmPGK1 and PmGPIC phylogenetic trees by the neighbor-joining method. WoLF PSORT (https:// wolfpsort.hgc.jp/) was used to analyze the subcellular localization of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC proteins.

1.4 Subcellular localization

pJIT166 plasmid was double digested (restriction enzyme cutting sites:dIII andI). The recom- binant expression vector was constructed according to the ClonExpress II One-Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing). The recombinant plasmid was extracted according to the instructions of the Plasmid Maxi Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) after transformation intoand culture expansion. According to the manufacturer’s instructions (Real-time Biotech, Beijing), approximately 10 large and plump wild-type(Columbia ecotype) leaves were selected and cut into thin strips with a width of 0.5-1.0 mm to prepare protoplasts, and then, the pJIT166 recom- binant plasmid (>1g/L) was transformed into the prepared protoplast (10L). Finally, the abovesolu- tion was put it in a 22℃-25℃ dark environment for 14-16 h of incubation, and the fluorescence reaction was recorded at 488 and 543 nm by fluorescence microscopy.Protoplasts with empty vector accom- panied by green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used as the control group (CK group).

1.5 Expression patterns

For tissue-specific expression analysis, total RNA from 5 tissues, including new leaves (NL), old leaves (OL), new stems (NS), flowers (F) and roots (R), was extracted with three biological replicates for each treatment using a Plant RNA Isolation Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing). Then, first-strand cDNA was syn- thesized with FastKing gDNA Dispelling RT Super- Mix (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cold stress, annual seedlings were placed in a refrigerator at 4℃ and the seedling leaves were collected at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h, respectively. For elevated-CO2stress, the seedlings were moved into a growth chamber with 10 h light/14 h dark at 25℃. Air containing approximately 400- 450 mg/m3CO2(approximately two times the ambient CO2concentration) was injected into the growth chamber constantly for at least 24 h. Then, the seedling leaves were sampled after 0, 6, 12 and 24 h of treatment. For qRT-PCR, the mixtures consisted of 10L of 2×ChamQTMUniversal SYBR?qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing), 0.4L of forward primer and reverse primer, 2L of cDNA, and 7.2L of ddH2O. The qRT-PCR program consisted of three stages: 95℃ for 30 s (preincubation), 95℃ for 10 s, 60℃ for 30 s, and 72℃ for 30 s, cycling 40 times (amplification), and 95℃ for 15 s, 60℃ for 1 min and 95℃ for 15 s (melting curves). QRT-PCR quality was estimated based on the melting curves.(NCBI Accession No.: KM496525.1) was used as the internal control[17]. The gene-specific primers employed are shown in Table 1. Three independent technical replicates were performed for each treatment. Quan- tification was achieved using comparative cycle threshold (Ct) values, and gene expression levels were calculated using the 2–??CTmethod[17].

2 Results

2.1 Full-length clone of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC

The intermediate fragments ofandwere 1 564 and 1 305 bp, respectively. The 5?/3? RACE sequences ofwere 297 and 1 225 bp, respectively, and those ofwere 1 056 and 1 117 bp, respectively. After sequence alignment and splicing, it was found that the full-length ofandwere 1 848 bp (NCBI Acce- ssion No.: MT586614) and 2 106 bp (NCBI Accession No.: MT591683), respectively (Table 2). According to ORF Finder analysis, the 5?/3? cDNA ends ofhad 93 and 324 bp untranslated regions (UTRs), respectively. The open reading frame (ORF) ofcovered 1 524 bp, encoding 507 amino acids. In contrast, the 5?/3? cDNA ends ofhad 146 and 259 bp UTRs, respecttively. The ORF ofcovered 1 701 bp, encoding 566 amino acids. Conserved domain analysis showed thatandwere members of the phosphoglycerate kinase super- family and PLN06249 superfamily, respectively (Fig. 1).

2.2 Sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree

The Blastn comparison results showed that the similarity ofbetweenand(the only species reportedsequence from gymnosperms) was 98.53%, and that betweenand angiosperms was 73%-80%. The similarity ofwithinreached 93.66%, and with those in,, andwas 85.60%, 84.23% and 83.64%, respectively.

The similarity of PGK1 betweenandwas 99.01%. In terms of known angiosperm plants, the similarity with the chloro- plastic PGK of,andwas 87.65%, 85.22% and 84.28%,respectively, and that with the cytosolic PGK of,andwere 87.92%, 87.89% and 83.56%, respecttively. For GPIC, among the known angiosperms, the simila- rities between Masson pine and,andwere higher than those with others, reaching 81.16%, 80.86% and 80.43%, respectively.

Table 2 Sequence of full-length cDNA of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC

According to PGK phylogenetic analysis,clustered withfirstly, showing the closest relationship, and then clustered with angio- sperms (Fig. 2: A). For GPIC, masson pine,,andwere clustered initially, with a confidence of 100%, and then sequentially clustered with monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants (Fig. 2: B). These results were consistent with the homology comparison results.

2.3 Subcellular localization

The localization results showed that the empty vector GFP fluorescence signal was expressed in the cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 3: a-d). WoLF PSORT predicted that PmPGK1 was located in the cytosol, which was different from the subcellularlocalization result that it was located in the chloroplast (Fig. 3: e-h). The fluorescence signal of PmGPIC filled the cytoplasmic matrix (Fig. 3: i-l), which was consistent with the prediction of WoLF PSORT.

Fig. 1 Conserved domain of amino acids of PmPGK1(A) andPmGPIC(B)

2.4 Gene expression pattern

Tissue-specific expression analysis revealed that the expression ofin new leaf (NL) was the highest, followed by new stem (NS) and old leaf (OL). The expression difference among three tissues was relatively small. The lowest expression was observed in flower (F), which had significant difference from that in other tissues (<0.05) (Fig. 4: A). For, the expression was the highest in old leaf and nearly zero in the roots (R). There were significant differences among all tissues except new leaf and flower (Fig. 4: A).

Under low-temperature stress within 12 h, the expression ofanddecreased with the time, and the decrease inwas more obvious than that in. The expression level ofdecreased to the lowest level after 12 h stress, showing a significant difference from that in other groups (Fig. 4: B). On the other hand, along the time, there was no significant difference in expression ofamong the experimental groups (Fig. 4: B). Under elevated-CO2stress,showed signi- ficant differences among different time and showing a trend of decreasing-increasing-decreasing (Fig. 4: C). The expression ofdid not change signify- cantly under high-CO2stress and within 24 h (Fig. 4: C).

3 Conclusion and discussion

Both of PGK and GPI have two localization sub- types in plant cells, i.e. cytoplasmic and plastidial. Isoenzymes of different localization types perform different functions in cell metabolism[1,7]. According to the subcellular localization, it was found that PmPGK1 was located in the chloroplast, belonging to chloroplastic/plastidial subtype, mainly involved in Calvin cycle and chloroplast/plastid glycolytic meta- bolism and catalyzes the reversible reaction between PGA and DPGA[6,13–14]. This result is the same as AtPGK1 inby Rosa-Téllez et al.[13], but contrary to that of Huang et al.[18], who proved that PGK1 was localized in the cytosol. PmGPIC was located in the cytosol, which proved that it was mainly involved in sucrose synthesis and glycolytic metabolism in the cell matrix and catalyzed the reversible isomerization between F6P and G6P. Currently, there are no reports on the subcellular localization of plant GPI isoenzymes.

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic treeof PGK1 (A) and GPIC (B).Pra: Prunus avium; Prp: P. persica; Ql: Quercus lobata; Qs: Q. suber; Ad: Arachis duranensis; Ai: A. ipaensis; Hb: Hevea brasiliensis; Rc: Ricinus communis; Poa: Populus alba; Pot: P. trichocarpa; Ns: Nicotiana sylvestris; Nt: N. tabacum; Cma: Cucurbita maxima; Cmo: C. moschata; Cs: C. sativus; Cm: C. melo; Gh: Gossypium hirsutum; Gr: G. raimondii; Ao: Asparagus officinalis; Pp: Pinus pinaster; Pm: P. massoniana; In: Ipomoea nil; It: I. triloba; Nn: Nelumbo nucifera; Ac: Ananas comosus; Eg: Elaeis guineensis; Pd: Phoenix dactylifera; At: Amborella trichopoda; As: Apostasia shenzhenica; Cj: Cryptomeria japonica; Cl: Cedrus libani.

The expression ofin leaf was higher than that in other tissues, which was consistent with the results in[13]and[19]. On the other hand,was also expressed in root, new stem and flower, suggesting that it is involved in glycolytic metabolism in these organs. Compared with,in[13,18]and[19]showed the highest expression in flower. This discre- pancy may be caused by some metabolic differences between perennial trees and annual herbs.was mainly expressed in leaves and flowers, and the expression level was highest in old leaves. Therefore, it is speculated that the transformation reaction between F6P and G6P catalyzed byGPIC in old leaves was stronger than that in new leaves and flowers. This result was consistent with that of Troncoso-Ponce et al.[16].

Fig. 3 Subcellular localization of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC proteins in protoplast of Arabidopsis thaliana.A: pJIT166-GFP; B: pJIT166-PmPGK1-GFP; C: pJIT166-PmGPIC-GFP; a, e, f: Chloroplast autofluorescence field; b, f, j: GFP field; c, g, k: Bright field; d, h, l: Merged pictures.

Fig. 4 Expression of PmPGK1 and PmGPIC in different tissues (A), under low-temperature stress (B) and high-CO2 stress (C). NL: New leaf; OL: Old leaf; NS: New stem; F: Flower; R: Root. Different letters upon column indicate significant differences at 0.05 level by Duncan test.

Previous studies have proven that low tempera- ture could reduce the stability of chlorophyll, the solubility of CO2in cells and the affinity of Rubisco to CO2, directly affecting the integrity and activity of the photosynthetic system[20–21]. As important regulating enzymes in the Calvin cycle, RuBP carboxylase (Ru- BPCase), phosphoribulose kinase (PRK) and 1,6- fructose bisphosphatase (FBP) all showed a decreasing trend of expression under low temperature stress[22–25]. The reaction product of RuBPCase and PRK was the reaction substrate of PmPGK1; therefore, the influence of low temperature on both led to a decrease in the activity of PmPGK1 and gene expression. Mean- while, the respiration metabolism of plants under low temperature stress was dominated by the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), at which time the glycolysis pathwaywas inhibited[26]. In addition, FBP activity was reduced under low temperature, resulting in a decrease in the catalytic substrate of PmGPIC[23,25]. Based on the above factors, the expression ofwas more downregulated after low temperature treatment than that of, showing a sharp decline.

Previous studies[27]have shown that the expre- ssion of all genes in the Calvin cycle, except GAPDH, decrease under a high CO2concentration in masson pine; therefore, it was speculated that the photo- synthetic acclimation of masson pine could be com- pleted within 6 h. In addition, it was found that an increased CO2concentration leads to a significant increase in hexokinase (HK) activity[27], while HK strongly inhibits the activity of Rubisco and Rubisco small subunit (RbcS)[28–29], in turn decreasing the content of PGA (the direct catalytic substrate for the transformation of RuBP to PGK, resulting in a signi- ficant decrease in the expression of). According to the changes in the expression levels of the two genes, PmGPIC was less affected by CO2stress than PmPGK1. The transcriptome sequencing results in a previous study[27]showed that the expression levels ofwere higher after treatment than those at 0 h, which was different from the finding in this experi- ment, but the overall trends of change were consistent. Invertase (INV) phosphorylates glucose and fructose to form the catalytic substrate of GPIC[2]. Under elevated CO2conditions, the expression levels of INV and HK in Masson pine were significantly increased[27], so the expression level ofwas slightly increased after 6 h. The decrease inafter 12 h might have been caused by gradual decreases in the accumulation of photosynthetic products and the glucose metabolic rate. In addition, since photosyn- thetic adaptation is more obvious in annual needles than in that mature needles under elevated-CO2stress[30], more detection could be used before photosynthetic adaptation, and the response mechanism ofandcould be further explored by comparison with the responses in perennial Masson pine samples.

In this study, full-lengthandwere cloned, and encoding proteins were belong to the plastidial and cytoplasmic subtypes, respectively.was mainly expressed in leaves, andwas mainly expressed in leaves and flowers. The expression ofandwas inhibited under low-temperature stress, and the inhibitory effect onwas stronger. Elevated-CO2stress signi- fycantly inhibited the expression ofbut had little effect on the expression of. The results of this study provide some references for subsequent studies on PGK and GPI in plants.

[1] WU D, WU Z D, YU X B. Advance in the research of phospho- glycerate kinase [J]. China Trop Med, 2005, 5(2): 385–387. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9727.2005.02.100.

[2] WANG J Y, ZHU S G, XU C F. Biochemistry [M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002: 66–79.

[3] KUGLER W, LAKOMEK M. Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase deficiency [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2000, 13(1): 89–101. doi: 10.1053/ beha.1999.0059.

[4] KUNZ H H, ZAMANI-NOUR S, H?USLER R E, et al. Loss of cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase affects carbohydrate metabolism in leaves and is essential for fertility of[J]. Plant Physiol, 2014, 166(2): 753–765. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.241091.

[5] SHAH N, BRADBEER J W. The development of the activity of the chloroplastic and cytosolic isoenzymes of phosphoglycerate kinase during barley leaf ontogenesis [J]. Planta, 1991, 185(3): 401–406. doi: 10.1007/BF00201064.

[6] ANDERSON L E, BRYANT J A, CAROL A A. Both chloroplastic and cytosolic phosphoglycerate kinase isozymes are present in the pea leaf nucleus [J]. Protoplasma, 2004, 223(2/3/4): 103–110. doi: 10.1007/ s00709-004-0041-y.

[7] NOWITZKI U, FLECHNER A, KELLERMANN J, et al. Eubacterial origin of nuclear genes for chloroplast and cytosolic glucose-6-phosphate isomerase from spinach: Sampling eubacterial gene diversity in eukaryotic chromosomes through symbiosis [J]. Gene, 1998, 214 (1/2): 205–213. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00229-7.

[8] MARTIN W, HERRMANN R G. Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: How much, what happens, and Why? [J]. Plant Physiol, 1998, 118(1): 9–17. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.1.9.

[9] YU T S, LUE W L, WANG S M, et al. Mutation of Arabidopsis plastid phosphoglucose isomerase affects leaf starch synthesis and floral initiation [J]. Plant Physiol, 2000, 123(1): 319–326. doi: 10.1104/pp. 123.1.319.

[10] ZHANG Y Y, FANG Z Q. Effect of PGK1 silencing on the proli- feration of SMMC 7721 hepatoma cells [J]. Chin J Integr Trad West Med Liver Dis, 2017, 27(4): 231–233. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1005-0264.2017.03.013.

[11] ZHAO Y, ZHENG Y B, YAN X F, et al. Screening crucial genes for glucose metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. J Shandong Univ (Health Sci), 2016, 54(3): 30–35,40. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6040/j.issn. 1671-7554.0.2015.842.

[12] WU D, SUN L, LI C H, et al. Significance of antibodies to the citrullinated glucose-6-phosphate isomerase peptides in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. J Peking Univ (Health Sci), 2016, 48(6): 937–941. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.003.

[13] ROSA-TéLLEZ S, ANOMAN A D, FLORES-TORNERO M, et al. Phosphoglycerate kinases are co-regulated to adjust metabolism and to optimize growth [J]. Plant Physiol, 2018, 176(2): 1182–1198. doi: 10. 1104/pp.17.01227.

[14] HUANG S X, SIRIKHACHORNKIT A, FARIS J D, et al. Phylo- genetic analysis of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase loci in wheat and other grasses [J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48 (5/6): 805–820. doi: 10.1023/a:1014868320552.

[15] TRONCOSO-PONCE M A, RIVOAL J, CEJUDO F J, et al. Cloning, biochemical characterisation, tissue localisation and possible posttrans- lational regulatory mechanism of the cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase from developing sunflower seeds [J]. Planta, 2010, 232(4): 845–859. doi: 10.2307/23391986.

[16] TRONCOSO-PONCE M A, KRUGER N J, RATCLIFFE G, et al. Characterization of glycolytic initial metabolites and enzyme activities in developing sunflower (L.) seeds [J]. Phytoche- mistry, 2009, 70(9): 1117–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.012.

[17] ZHU P H, MA Y Y, ZHU L Z, et al. Selection of suitable reference genes inLamb. under different abiotic stresses for qPCR normalization [J]. Forests, 2019, 10(8): 632. doi: 10.3390/f1 0080632.

[18] HUANG X Z, ZHAO Y C. Functional analysis ofgene family in[J]. J Mount Agric Biol, 2017, 36(1): 12–17,35. (in Chinese) doi: 10.15958/j.cnki.sdnyswxb.2017.01.002.

[19] GUO N, ZHAO J H, GAO T S, et al. Cloning and expression analysis ofgene in[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2014, 34(11): 2188–2193. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014. 11.2188.

[20] XU Y, CHEN J H, ZHU A G, et al. Research progress on response mechanism of plant under low temperature stress [J]. Plant Fiber Sci China, 2015, 37(1): 40–49. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611. 2016.33.006.

[21] WANG F, WANG Q, ZHAO X Y. Research progress of phenotype and physiological response mechanism of plants under low temperature stress [J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2019, 17(15): 5144–5153. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.005144.

[22] JIANG Z S, SUN X Q, AI X Z, et al. Responses of Rubisco and Rubisco activase in cucumber seedlings to low temperature and weak light [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21(8): 2045–2050. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0300.

[23] ZENG Y, YU J, CANG J, et al. Detection of sugar accumulation and expression levels of correlative key enzymes in winter wheat () at low temperatures [J]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2011, 75(4): 681–687. doi: 10.1271/bbb.100813.

[24] CHEN H. Genetic relationships analysis of longan germplasm resources and studies on low temperature resistance of ‘Shixia’ Longan seedlings [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2012: 90–92. (in Chinese)

[25] VAN HEERDEN P D R, KRüGER G H J, LOVELAND J E, et al. Dark chilling imposes metabolic restrictions on photosynthesis in soybean [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2003, 26(2): 323–337. doi: 10.1046/ j.1365-3040.2003.00966.x.

[26] SUN Y M, LIU L J, FENG M F, et al. Research progress of sugar metabolism of plants under cold stress [J]. J NE Agric Univ, 2015, 46(7): 95–102,108. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2015.07.015.

[27] WU F, SUN X B, ZOU B Z, et al. Transcriptional analysis of Masson pine () under high CO2stress [J]. Genes (Basel), 2019, 10(10): 804. doi: 10.3390/genes10100804.

[28] DRAKE B G, GONZàLEZ-MELER M A, LONG S P. More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2[J]. Annu Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol, 1997, 48(1): 609–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev. arplant.48.1.609.

[29] MOORE B D, CHENG S H, SIMS D, et al. The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 1999, 22(6): 567–582. doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-3040.1999.00432.x.

[30] TURNBULL M H, TISSUE D T, GRIFFIN K L, et al. Photosynthetic acclimation to long-term exposure to elevated CO2concentration inD. Don. is related to age of needles [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 1998, 21(10): 1019–1028. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00374.x.

馬尾松和基因的克隆和表達分析

夏林超*, 吳帆*, 季孔庶**

(南京林業(yè)大學(xué)林木遺傳與生物技術(shù)教育部重點實驗室，南方現(xiàn)代林業(yè)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心，南京 210037)

為了解馬尾松()磷酸甘油酸激酶1 (PGK1)與胞質(zhì)溶膠葡萄糖磷酸異構(gòu)酶(GPIC)的功能，采用RACE技術(shù)克隆了和基因，并進行了生物信息學(xué)分析與亞細胞定位，采用實時熒光定量PCR技術(shù)分析和的表達特性。結(jié)果表明，和全長為2 106和1 848 bp，分別編碼507和566個氨基酸。PmPGK1和PmGPIC分別定位于葉綠體和胞質(zhì)溶膠。表達量為新葉>老葉>新莖>根>花；而為老葉>花>新葉>新莖>根。低溫脅迫24 h，和的表達量均隨時間延長先降低后升高，且的表達量在處理2 h后即降至較低水平；高濃度CO2脅迫24 h，的表達量隨時間延長呈降低-升高-再降低的變化趨勢，的表達下調(diào)但變化較不顯著。因此，推測PmPGK1主要參與卡爾文循環(huán)及葉綠體/質(zhì)體糖酵解，PmGPIC主要參與細胞質(zhì)基質(zhì)糖酵解；PmPGK1、PmGPIC活性在低溫脅迫下均受抑制；PmPGK1活性在CO2脅迫下受到顯著抑制，而PmGPIC活性的影響不大。

馬尾松；；；基因克??；亞細胞定位

10.11926/jtsb.4315

2020–09–29

2020–11–16

This work was supported by the “Thirteenth-five” National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFD0600304), and the Program for Priority Academy Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

XIA Lin-chao (Born in 1998), Male, Undergraduate. E-mail: x18963629259@126.com

*Co-first author

. E-mail: ksji@njfu.edu.cn