• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation on Outdoor-and Indoor-Cultured Prorocentrum lima, a Toxic Benthic Dinoflagellate

    2021-06-25 10:47:50CHENHengHUANGKaixuanLIUShashaandLUSonghui
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年3期

    CHEN Heng, HUANG Kaixuan, LIU Shasha, and LU Songhui

    Effects of Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation on Outdoor-and Indoor-Cultured, a Toxic Benthic Dinoflagellate

    CHEN Heng#, HUANG Kaixuan#, LIU Shasha, and LU Songhui*

    ,,,510362,

    The effects of different types of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UVR, wavelength=280–400nm) and light intensities on cell growth, pigment composition, UV-absorbing compounds (UVACs), and chlorophyll(Chl) fluorescence were studied in dinoflagellatecultured outdoors for 16 days and indoors for 18 days. In the outdoor experiment, UVA radiation (320–400nm) increased the growth rate of this dinoflagellate when solar light intensities were<12%; decreased growth rates were observed when intensities were>12%. Exposure to UVB radiation (280–320nm) alleviated the negative effects of UVA. In the indoor experiment, UVA and low doses of UVB enhanced growth rates. Addition of low doses of UVB to UVA exposure resulted in higher contents of Chland photoprotective pigments compared with UVA exposure only. The results of both experiments showed that UVB is the primary signal of UVAC synthesis. High-dose UVB exposure accelerated growth rates when UVAC contents were maintained at high levels, suggesting that the latter plays a key role in UVR damage protection. Furthermore, the repair rate was enhanced by UVB exposure after 16 days of culture. This study confirms the positive effects of UVA and UVB on the growth of, with the latter enhancing the photoprotective and recovery pathways of the species.

    ultraviolet radiation; benthic dinoflagellates; positive effect;; UV-absorbing compounds

    1 Introduction

    Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a component of the solar radiation spectrum and can be divided into two bands at the Earth’s surface, including UVA (wavelength, 320–400nm) and UVB (wavelength, 280–320nm). Excess UVR is considered a harmful environmental factor for living organisms (Rastogi and Sinha, 2009). It can damage many biological systems because it induces the formation of cy-clobutane pyrimidine dimers in DNA, damages the photosynthetic apparatus, and decreases photosynthetic and growth rates (Villafa?e., 2004). Moreover, as a consequence of ozone layer depletion, increased UVB levels can decrease primary productivity and alter phytoplankton population structures (Gao., 2007, H?der., 2015).

    Marine benthic dinoflagellate assemblages are essential participants in marine ecosystems (Faust, 1991). Research on harmful benthic dinoflagellates, which produce toxins that can threaten the health of marine organisms and humansthe food chain (Mangialajo., 2008; Luo., 2017), has steadily increased over the last decade. As epi-phytic or benthic species, these organisms are normallyfound on bottom substrates, such as rocks, macroalgae, co-rals, and seagrass, to which they attach and proliferate (Shears., 2009). The results of numerous field investigations indicate that benthic dinoflagellates are widely distributed in intertidal and subtidal zones where solar ir-radiance can vary from low levels to over 1000μmolpho-tonsm?2s?1(Cohu and Lemée, 2012). Similar to other epiphytes, benthic dinoflagellates inevitably experience high light irradiance due to variations in solar irradiation, which can be attributed to column mixing, tidal changes, and diurnal variation. Toxin-producing benthic dinoflagel-lates are mainly distributed in temperate and tropical regions, where they undergo complex solar radiation exposure patterns (Gómez., 2005; Ferrier-Pagès., 2007).

    Marine autotrophic organisms have evolved photoprotective mechanisms to resist photodamage from excess light and UVR. The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) process is an effective photoprotective strategy that allows such organisms to dissipate excess light energy and protect their photosynthetic apparatus. NPQ dissipation is related to the activity of the xanthophyll cycle and achi-evedde-epoxidation of photoprotective xanthophyll pig-ments, which, in dinoflagellates, are mainly diadinoxanthin and diatoxanthin (Briantais, 1994; Venn., 2006). Another photoprotective method commonly employed is the synthesis of ultraviolet-absorbing compounds (UVACs), which are mainly composed of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) in marine algae (Sinha., 1998). These compounds have a high UVR extinction coefficient and a characteristic UV absorption peak of 310–360nm (Banaszak., 2006). MAAs are involved in the resistance of autotrophic organisms to UVR damage and can be induced by high light or UVR levels (Taira and Taguchi, 2017). The inherent and induced contents of MAAs are species-specific. An investigation of over 110 marine algal species indicated that dinoflagellates and haptophytes exhibit higher MAA synthesis rates than other algal groups (Jeffrey., 1999).

    Some researchers speculate that benthic dinoflagellates can synthesize high concentrations of UVACs to resist UV damage. Thus, in the present study,, a globally distributed and toxic benthic dinoflagellate species (Nagahama., 2011; Luo., 2017), was selected to study the effects of different light and UVR intensities. The objective of this work is to understand the photoprotective mechanisms of harmful benthic dinoflagellates in response to excess light and UVR intensities.

    2 Materials and Methods

    (SD4) was isolated from Hainan Island, Hainan Province, China (Zhang., 2015), and cultured at the Research Center for Harmful Algae and Marine Biology, Jinan University. The strain was maintained at 25℃ in f/2 medium (Guillard and Ryther, 1962) under irradiation by a white light-emitting diode (LED) at 100μmol photonsm?2s?1with a 12h:12h light:dark period.

    2.1 Outdoor Experiments

    Algal cells in the exponential growth phase were diluted to 500cellsmL?1 in f/2 culture medium and placed into quartz tubes (diameter, 2cm; height, 20cm). Two ir-radiation treatments were then applied. In the first set of treatments, different light intensities (3%, 6%, 12%, 25%, 50%, and 100% solar radiation) were achieved by using different layers of neutral filters to cover the tubes (one layer reduces the light intensity in the treatment by approximately 50%). In the second set of treatments, diffe-rent UVR intensities comprising three kinds of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), PA (PAR+UVA), and PAB (PAR+UVA+UVB), were achieved using different cutoff filters. The tubes containing the algae were transferred to a control bath (Eyela, Japan) with circulating water at 25℃±1℃ and cultured for 16 days (Fig.1A).

    Fig.1 (A) In the outdoor culture, quartz tubes (diameter, 2cm; height, 20cm) containing P. lima were wrapped in different UV cutoff filters and neutral filters and immersed in a black water tank. The tank was connected to a control bath with circulating waterfor temperature control. The inlet and outlet water pipes are indicated by red arrows. Three such water tanks were used for the outdoor experiment. (B) In the indoor culture, P. lima was placed in quartz tubes (diameter, 4cm; height, 20cm) wrapped in different UV cutoff filters and cultured under artificial light. Two UVB lamps were wrapped by different layers of neutral filter to provide two levels of UVB irradiance. (C) Light spectra detected in the indoor cultures. UVA, UVB=ultraviolet A, ultraviolet B; PAR=photosynthetically active radiation; PA=PAR+UVA; PALB=PAR+UVA + UVB (0.05Wm?2); PAHB=PAR+UVA+UVB (0.3Wm?2).

    2.2 Indoor Experiments

    The algae were cultured at 25℃ indoors for 18d with exposure to PAR (100μmolphotonsm?2s?1), PA (PAR+UVA, UAV=4.2Wm?2or 21μmol photonsm?2s?1), PALB (PA+low UVB, UVB=0.05Wm?2or 0.25μmol photonsm?2s?1), or PAHB (PA+high UVB, UVB=0.3Wm?2or 1.5μmol photonsm?2s?1) to clarify the effects of UVB on(Fig.1B). The PAR, UVA, and UVB light sources were LED (Opple, China), TL-D (Philips, Germany), and G15TBE (Sankyo Denki, Japan), respectively. The spectrum of each treatment was measured by a spectrometer (Hopoocolor, China; Fig.1C).

    2.3 Solar Irradiance and UVR Treatments

    The outdoor cultures received solar radiation and were monitored by QSI2100 (Biospherical Instruments Inc., USA) and PMA2100 (Solar Light, USA) devices, which record-ed solar PAR, UVA, and UVB levels every 1 or 5min. Dif-ferent cutoff filters were used for the UVR treatments: 1) PAR–the quartz tubes were covered with 395nm cutoff filters (Ultraphan, Digefra, Munich, Germany) transmitting wavelengths>395nm; 2) PA–the quartz tubes were covered with 320nm cutoff filters (Montagefolie, Folex,Dreieich, Germany) transmitting wavelengths>320nm; and 3) PAB–the quartz tubes were covered with 295nm cutoff filters (Ultraphan, Digefra) transmitting wavelengths>295nm.

    2.4 Measurement of Specific Growth Rates

    The samples were fixed with Lugo’s solution, and the cell numbers were counted under an optical microscope (CX31, Olympus, Japan). The growth rate () was calculated as follows:

    whereCand0represent the final and initial cell concentrations (cellsmL?1), respectively. Theof each treat-ment was measured in sextuplicate.

    2.5 Measurement of UVAC and Pigment Concentrations

    Exactly 15mL of cell culture medium was obtained be-fore and after the treatments and filtered through What-man GF/F filters. The filtrates were extracted by methanol (3mL) overnight at 4℃ and then centrifuged for 10min at 1500×(Eppendorf, Germany). Absorbance measure-ments of the supernatant were obtained within the wavelength range of 280–700nm using a scanning spectropho-tometer (U-3900, Hitachi, Japan). UVAC concentrations were expressed as the peak optical density at 310–370nm (Dunlap and Yamamoto, 1995). Chlorophyll(Chl) con-centrations were calculated following the method of Porra (2002). Pigment samples from the indoor experiments wereextracted by acetone and measured by a high-performance liquid chromatographic system (Agilent 1100, USA) with a C18 column (4.6mm, 180mm; Waters, USA). Pigment separation was performed following the method of Barlow. (1993). Chlorophyll and carotenoids were detected by absorbance at 440nm. Pigment peaks were iden-tified by comparing their retention times with those of the standards.

    2.6 Measurement of Damage and Recovery Rates

    After outdoor acclimation, the algal cultures were trans-ferred to small quartz tubes (10mL) at a density of less than 20μg Chlper mL and dark-adapted for 15min. The tubes were then covered with filters to conduct P, PA, and PAB treatments. A 1200W xenon lamp (HMI, Osram, Ger-many) was used as the UVR source. The lamp was adjusted to provide specific intensities of PAR (2000μmolphotonsm?2s?1), UVA (36Wm?2or 180μmolphotonsm?2s?1), and UVB (5.2Wm?2or 26μmolphotonsm?2s?1), whichare similar to the corresponding intensities observed at noon on a sunny day. After 30min of exposure to an artificial solar irradiance lamp, photochemical efficiency (Y’) and NPQ were measured by a Phyto-PAM device (Walz, Germany) every 3 or 15min, and the exposure–response curves (ERCs) were created. The ratio ofwas calculated by dividing the-value of different light intensities of solar irradiance (3%–50%) with the-value of 100% solar irradiance (Guan and Li, 2017). The rate of UVR-in-duced damage to the photosynthetic apparatus (, min?1) and corresponding repair rate (, min?1) were estimated ac-cording to previous studies (Lesser., 1994) as follows:

    Y’/Y0Y’,

    whereY’and0are the-values at timetand0, respectively.

    2.7 Data Analysis

    All experiments were performed in triplicate. Differences among the treatments were tested by one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s test) with SPSS 16.0. A confidence le-vel of 95% was used in all analyses.

    3 Results

    3.1 Long-Term Effects of Different UVR and Solar Light Intensities

    During the 16d of acclimation under solar irradiance, the average intensities of PAR, UVA, and UVB radiation were 475μmolphotonsm?2s?1, 2.52Wm?2(12.6μmolphotonsm?2s?1), and 0.3Wm?2(1.5μmolphotonsm?2s?1), respec-tively. Two phases were defined according to the weather conditions during the experiment. Phase 1, which includ-ed the first 20d, represented rainy or cloudy conditions and featured a relatively low level of solar irradiance, as shown in Fig.2A.The relative cell densities observed among the different treatments were similar in this phase (shown in Fig.1B).The doses of solar irradiance in Phase 2, which includeddays 11–16 of the experiment, were approxi-mately 2–4 times higher than the average values in Phase 1 (Fig.2A). Rapid growth and variations in cell densities among the different treatments were observed in Phase 2 (Fig.2B).

    The relationships betweenand percentage of solar irradiance under the conditions of P, PA, and PAB were cal-culated with formula=+×exp(×). In all cases, the formula fit the relationship (2>0.95, Fig.2C). The initial slopes of the curves under PA (0.0070±0.0007) and PAB (0.0065±0.0005) were higher than that under P (0.0029±0.0002;<0.05, Fig.2C).

    Under 3%–12% solar irradiance, which is lower than thelight saturation point, UVA negatively inhibited algal growth,indicating that UVA radiation enhances growth under light-limited conditions (Fig.2D). With light intensities >12% so-lar irradiance, UVA positively whereas UVB negatively af-fected the algal growth (Fig.2D). This finding suggests that UVA inhibits algal growth whereas UVB may moderate this inhibition under high solar irradiance.

    As shown in Fig.3, photosynthetic pigments wavelengths of 640–700nm with a peak at 665nm. The highest optical densities at 665nm in the P, PA, and PAB treatments occurred at solar irradiances of 25%, 12%, and 50%, respec-tively. Absorption by UVACs occurred at wavelengths of 280–400nm with peaks at 334 and 365nm. The optical densities of UVACs under the P, PA, and PAB treatments consistently increased according to the percentage of solar irradiance.

    Fig.4A illustrates the relationship between Chland UVACs and the percentage of solar irradiance under different UVR treatments. When the light intensities were >12% solar irradiance, the cellular contents of Chlunder the PA treatment were all lower than those under the P and PAB treatments (<0.05) and no significant difference between P and PAB was found (<0.05). Associations between the contents of UVACs and percentage of solar irradiance under different UVR treatments were fittedusing linear equations (2>0.95, Fig.4B). The slope of thePAB model (0.034±0.002) was approximately three timesgreater than those of the PA (0.013±0.002) and PAR (0.012±0.001) models, which indicates that UVB may be the main radiation band inducing the synthesis of UVACs.

    Fig.2 (A) Doses of solar radiation of PAR (400–700nm), UVA (320–400nm) and UVB (280–320nm) during the 16-d ex-periment. (B) Cell density throughout the experiments under different light intensities (3%–100% solar light) and diffe-rent UVR exposures (PAR, PA, PAB). (C) Specific growth rate (μ) of PAR, PA and PAB on day 16 as a function of acclimated light intensity (3%–100% solar irradiance). (D) Inhibition of different UV wavebands (UVA, UVB, and UVA+UVB) on μ under different acclimated light intensities. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations (n=6). PAR means photosynthetically active radiation;PA means PAR with UVA, PAB means PAR with UVA and UVB, UV means ultraviolet.

    Fig.3 Spectral absorption characteristics after 16 days of acclimation to various light intensities under the (A) PAR, (B) PA, and (C) PAB treatments. PAR=photosynthetically active radiation, PA means PAR with UVA, PAB means PAR with UVA and UVB, UV=ultraviolet.

    Fig.4 Effect of different UVR and solar light intensities on the contents of (A) Chl a and (B) UVACs. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations (n=3). Different lowercase letters between two bars indicate a statistical difference within treatments. Chl a means chlorophyll a; UVACs means ultraviolet-absorbing compounds; PAR means photosynthetically active radiation; PA means PAR with UVA, PAB means PAR with UVA and UVB, UV means ultraviolet.

    3.2 Short-Term Effects of Different UVR and Solar Irradiance Intensities

    As shown in Fig.5, the-value ratio and solar irradi-ance percentage were positively correlated, suggesting that photoacclimation occurs within the 16-day treatment period.samples grown at 100% solar irradiance under different UVR treatments (P, PA, or PAB) showed low-er decreases in effective photochemical efficiency than those grown at other solar irradiance percentages (3%–50%). In addition, the ratio of-values at other light intensities to that at 100% solar irradiance was less than 1 at most points of time.

    The relationship between NPQ and light intensity was fitted by an exponential equation (2>0.95, Fig.6A). NPQ values remained steady at solar irradiances greater than 25%. The NPQ values of the P and PAB treatments were significantly higher than that of PA when solar irradiance intensities were >25% (<0.05).

    Theand correspondingof each treatment were estimated according to the ERCs (Figs.6B, C). The results showed that different levels of solar irradiance do not af-fectunder different UVR treatments (>0.05, Fig.6C). By contrast, thevalues observed at solar irradiances of 50% and 100% under the PA treatment were significantly lower than those under the P and PAB treatments (<0.05, Fig.6B). Thus, the ratio ofto(/) with 100% irradi-ance under the PA treatment was significantly lower than those under the P and PAB treatments (<0.05, Fig.6D).

    Fig.5 Plots of the effective photochemical efficiency (Y’) ratio of X to Y’ under 100% solar irradiance. X indicates the ratio of Y’ at solar irradiances of 50%, 25%, 12%, 6%, and 3%. Y’ratios for the (A) PAR, (B) PA, and (C) PAB treatments. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations (n=6). PAR means photosynthetically active radiation;PA means PAR with UVA, PAB means PAR with UVA and UVB, UV means ultraviolet.

    Fig.6 Plots of (A) NPQ, (B) repair rate (r, min?1), (C) damage rate (k, min?1), and (D) r/k ratio under the PAR, PA, and PAB treatments with artificial light exposure as a function of the acclimated light intensity. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations (n=6). NPQ means non-photochemical quenching; PAR means photosynthetically active radiation; PA means PARwith UVA, PAB means PAR with UVA and UVB, UV means ultraviolet.

    3.3 Evidence of the Effect of UVR on Indoor Acclimation

    During indoor acclimation, the cell densities in the PA treatment were significantly higher than those in PAR on days 12 and 15 (<0.05, Fig.7A), confirming that UVA addition can enhance the growth of. The highest cell density and growth rate were observed under low UVB addition (PALB; Figs.7A, B). The growth rate under PAHB was not significantly different compared with that under PAR (Fig.7B). No difference in cell density for PAHB was noted between days 3 and 6. Then, following day 6, the cell density increased (>0.05, Fig.7A). Similar growth patterns were also observed with 100% PAB treatment during outdoor acclimation (Fig.2B). In this experiment,samples showed growth stagnation from day 10 to day 12. After day 12, they showed growth acceleration with increasing solar dosage.

    The concentration of UVACs in the PAHB treatment increased from 0.09 (day 0) to 1.63μgμg?1Chl(day 6; Fig.7C), which might result in the stagnation of growth of PAHB. The highest concentration of UVACs (2.76μgμg?1Chl) among different UVR treatments was observed in PAHB on day 18. The concentration of UVACs under PALB (0.94μgμg?1Chl) was significantly higher than those under PA (0.46μgμg?1Chl) and PAR (0.35μgμg?1Chl;<0.05).exposed to PALB revealed the highest contents of Chland photoprotective pigments, particularly diadinoxanthin (Fig.7F), diatoxanthin (Fig.7G), and β-carotene (Fig.7I). The enhanced UVB (PAHB) treat-ment showed the lowest contents of pigments (<0.05, Figs.7D–I).

    Fig.7 (A) Cell densities, (B) growth rates, (C) UVAC contents, and (D–I) pigments accumulated in indoor conditions under PAR, PA, PALB, and PAHB treatments. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations (n=3). Different lowercase letters between bars indicate a statistical difference within treatments. Diadino means diadinoxanthin; diato means diatoxanthin; UVACs meansultraviolet-absorbing compounds; PAR means photosynthetically active radiation; PA means PAR with UVA, PALB means PAR with UVA and low UVB (0.05Wm?2), PAHB means PAR with UVA and high UVB (0.3Wm?2), UV means ultraviolet.

    4 Discussion

    The present study investigated the combined effects of light and UVR intensities onin the long-and short-term scales. The simulated conditions represented different vertical distributions of algae exposed to solar light,., those occurring during low tide and at noon in intertidal flats. The results indicate thatnot only endures high solar irradiance and UVR, but also has a complex strategy for responding to or even benefiting from UVR.

    UVA significantly enhanced the growth when solar light levels were <12%,and significantly decreased the growth when solar light levels were >12% (Fig.2B). The positive effect of UVA on algal growth has been widely reported in several species, including(Xu and Gao, 2010),(Guan., 2016), andand(Ehling-Schulz, 1997). Xu and Gao (2016) investigated macroalgae from different families and found that the majority of the species can utilize UVA for photosynthesis. However, in some situations UVA restrictions can accelerate the growth.It has been reported that the enhancements in UVA are common in limited-light conditions, such as cloudy days, and carbon fixation is mainly driven by longer UVA wave-lengths (340–400nm)(Mengelt and Prézelin, 2005). In the present study, because the UVA waveband used in the in-door experiments was 340–400nm, growth under PA in-creased, even when the UVA irradiance was >4Wm?2(Fig.1C).

    Surprisingly, UVB addition significantly increased growth compared with that under PA with >12% solar irradiance (Fig.2B). UVB radiation is considered a negative factor in the growth and photosynthesis of photoautotrophic orga-nisms. However, several assays have reported a beneficial effect of UVB radiation on the performance of photosynthesis. The marine brown alga, for ex-ample, exhibits low photosynthesis recovery rates under UVB depletion and high recovery rates under UVB after sunlight-induced photoinhibition (Flores-Moya., 1997).Another study suggested that UVB may be involved in the simultaneous impairment and recovery of photosynthesis (Flores-Moya., 1999). Enhancements in recovery induced by UVB have also been observed in several other macroalgae species, including seaweeds(Rhodophyta)(Xu and Gao, 2010) and(Chlorophyta)(Figueroa.,2009), freshwater macroalgae (Bautista-Saraiva., 2018), and other aquatic plants (Hanelt., 2006). Many studies have revealed that the most positive effects of UVB are on tropical and subtropical species that experience in-tense solar radiation exposure, indicating that the UVB strategy may be used to adapt to high solar irradiance. Thestrain in the present study was isolated from Hainan Province, which is located in a tropical region (Zhang., 2015).

    UVB exposure promotedand the corresponding. Thus, the/ratio ofunder PAB is higher than that under PA in high-light exposure conditions. The/ratio represents the turnover rate of the D1 protein, which is the main UVR damage target protein and influences the activity of PSII and degree of photoinhibition in cells. Hanelt. (2006) reported that reductions inunder PA treatment cause the highest inhibition ofduring high light exposure, which may be alleviated in cells acclimated by UVB addition. Greenberg. (1989) found that the turnover rate of the D1 protein under UVB exposure is higher than that measured under PAR illumination alone.

    UVB may also play a role in stimulating and maintaining photoprotective compounds (Figueroa., 2009).Chland photoprotective pigments were readily degraded in the presence of UVA in both indoor and outdoor experiments (Figs.4A and 7C). UVA had no significant effect on the ratio of UVACs to Chl, suggesting thatdoes not efficiently protect Chl, the most important photosynthetic pigment, under UVA radiation. However, the contents of UVACs were significantly enhanced by UVB, indicating that UVB is the main UVAC induction band in. Moreover, the contents of dia-dinoxanthin and diatoxanthin, the main xanthophyll cycle pigments in dinoflagellates, were enhanced by low UVB in the indoor experiments. Xanthophyll pigments not only contribute to NPQ but may also help stabilize thylakoid chloroplasts and ROS quenching (Havaux and Niyoji, 1999; Brini, 2017). Acclimation under low doses of UVB pro-mote the synthesis of β-carotene, which is known as an efficient antioxidant compound (Rakhimberdieva., 2004). Research indicates that the accumulation of β-ca-rotene can prevent photosynthetic damage from UVA or blue light (White and Jahnke, 2002). The pigment results obtained in the present study support the hypothesis that low doses of UVB may stimulate the cellular photoprotective pathway to ameliorate the damage caused by UVR exposure.

    The mechanism by which UVB facilitates the growth and photosynthesis of algae remains unknown. One possible mechanism might be related to the production of UVACs (mainly MAAs) under UVB enhancement. Growth rates are accelerated by high contents of UVACs, which implies that MAAs play a pivotal role in the growth ofunder UVR irradiance. High concentrations of MAAs in cells provide efficient photoprotection against UVR-in-duced damage. Approximately 30% of the photons striking the photosynthetic apparatus are reportedly restrained by MAAs in cyanobacteria (Garcia-Pichel., 1993). Taira and Taguchi (2017) applied several PAR radiation intensities and found different concentrations of MAAs in the cells of the dinoflagellate. Ex-tensive UVR-induced damage was observed under the con-dition of low MAA content induced by low PAR; by contrast, high UVR tolerance was observed in the presence of high MAA contents. On the other hand, MAAs may function as antenna compounds that capture UVR energy into the photosynthetic pathway. In the haptophyte, some MAA species, such as shinorine, Gly, and mycosporine-Gly/Val, are able to transmit absorbed UVR energy to Chlthe photosynthetic pathway (Moi-san and Mitchell, 2001). Whether marine algae use short UV wavelengths (., UVB) for photosynthesis is yet un-clear (Neori., 1986; Holm-Hansen., 1993).

    5 Conclusions

    This study confirmed that UVA and UVB have positive effects onand help the species accommodate different light conditions. When light is limited,can utilize UVA and UVB to supply extra energy for growth. Under intense light,may use UVB as a signal to induce greater photoprotection by increasing the contents of UVACs and photoprotective pigments,as well as enhancing the recovery rate required to reduce UVR damage.

    Acknowledgements

    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41706126, 41876173 and 41606176).

    List of Abbreviations

    UV, Ultraviolet; UVA, ultraviolet A; UVB ultraviolet B; UVR, Ultraviolet radiation; PAR, photosynthetically active radiation; PA, PAR photosynthetically active radiation with ultraviolet A; PAB, photosynthetically active radiation with ultraviolet A and B; PALB, photosynthetically active radiation with ultraviolet A and low B; PAHB, pho-tosynthetically active radiation with ultraviolet A and high B; Chl, chlorophyll; Chl2, chlorophyll2; UVAC, ultraviolet-absorping compound; NPQ, non-photochemi-cal quenching; MAAs, mycosporine-like amino acids(MAAs); Y’, photochemical efficiency; ERCs, exposure-response curves;, damage rate;, repair rate; Diato, diatoxanthin; Diadino, Diadinoxanthin.

    Banaszak, A. T., Santos, M. G. B., LaJeunesse, T. C., and Lesser, M. P., 2006. The distribution of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) and the phylogenetic identity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in cnidarian hosts from the Mexican Caribbean., 337 (2): 131-146.

    Barlow, R. G., Mantoura, R. F. C., Gough, M. A., and Fileman, T. W., 1993. Pigment signatures of the phytoplankton composition in the northeastern Atlantic during the 1990 spring bloom., 40 (1-2): 459-477.

    Briantais, J. M., 1994. Light-harvesting chlorophyll-complex requirement for regulation of Photosystem II photochemistry by non-photochemical quenching., 40(3): 287-294.

    Brini, F., 2017. Photosynthesis under stressful environmental con-ditions: Existing challenges.In:. Singh., eds., Studium Press, In-dia, 68-91.

    Cohu, S., and Lemée, R., 2012. Vertical distribution of the toxic epibenthic dinoflagellatescf.,andin the NW Mediterranean Sea., 53 (3): 373.

    Dunlap, W. C., and Yamamoto, Y., 1995. Small-molecule antioxidants in marine organisms: Antioxidant activity of mycosporine-glycine., 112 (1): 105-114.

    Ehling-Schulz, M., Bilger, W., and Scherer, S., 1997. UV-B-in-duced synthesis of photoprotective pigments and extracellular polysaccharides in the terrestrial cyanobacterium., 179 (6): 1940-1945.

    Faust, M. A., 1991. Morphology of ciguatera-causing(Pyrrophyta) from widely differing sites., 27 (5): 642-648.

    Ferrier-Pagès, C., Richard, C., Forcioli, D., Allemand, D., and Shick, M. P. M., 2007. Effects of temperature and UV radiation increases on the photosynthetic efficiency in four scleractinian coral species., 213 (1): 76-87.

    Figueroa, F. L., Korbee, N., Carrillo, P., Medina-Sánchez, J. M., Mata, M., and Bonomi, J., 2009. The effects of UV radiation on photosynthesis estimated as chlorophyll fluorescence in(Chlorophyta) growing in a high moun-tain lake (Sierra Nevada, Southern Spain)., 68 (2): 206-216.

    Flores-Moya, A., Hanelt, D., Figueroa, F. L., Altamirano, M., Vi-?egla, B., and Salles, S., 1999. Involvement of solar UV-B ra-diation in recovery of inhibited photosynthesis in the brown alga(Hudson) Lamouroux., 49 (2-3): 129-135.

    Gao, K., Li, G., Helbling, E. W., and Villafane, V. E., 2007. Va-riability of UVR effects on photosynthesis of summer phytoplankton assemblages from a tropical coastal area of the South China Sea.,83 (4): 802-809.

    Garcia-Pichel, F., and Castenholz, R. W., 1993. Occurrence of UV-absorbing, mycosporine-like compounds among cyanobacterial isolates and an estimate of their screening capacity., 59 (1): 163-169.

    Gómez, I., Figueroa, F. L., Huovinen, P., Ulloa, N., and Morales, V., 2005. Photosynthesis of the red algaunder natural solar radiation in an estuary in southern Chile., 244 (1-4): 369-382.

    Greenberg, B. M., Gaba, V., Canaani, O., Malkin, S., Mattoo, A. K., and Edelman, M., 1989. Separate photosensitizers mediate degradation of the 32-kDa photosystem II reaction center protein in the visible and UV spectral regions., 86 (17): 6617-6620.

    Guan, W. C., and Li, P., 2017. Dependency of UVR-induced pho-toinhibition on atomic ratio of N to P in the dinoflagellate., 164 (2): 31.

    Guan, W. C., Chen, H., Wang, T. G., Chen, S., and Xu, J. T., 2016. Effect of the solar ultraviolet radiation on the growth and fluo-rescence parameters of., 40 (1): 83-91 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Guillard, R. R. L., and Ryther, J. H., 1962. Study of marine plank-tonic diatoms: I.Hustedt, and(Cleve) Gran., 8 (2): 229-239.

    H?der, D. P., Williamson, C. E., W?ngberg, S. ?., Rautio, M., Rose, K. C., and Gao, K. S., 2015. Effects of UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with other environmental factors., 14 (1): 108-126.

    Hanelt, D., Hawes, I., and Rae, R., 2006. Reduction of UV-B ra-diation causes an enhancement of photoinhibition in high light stressed aquatic plants from New Zealand lakes., 84 (2): 89-102.

    Havaux, M., and Niyogi, K. K., 1999. The violaxanthin cycle protects plants from photooxidative damage by more than one mechanism., 96 (15): 8762-8767.

    Holm-Hansen, O., Helbling, E. W., and Lubin, D., 1993. Ultravio-let radiation in Antarctica: Inhibition of primary production.,58 (4): 567-570.

    Jeffrey, S. W., MacTavish, H. S., Dunlap, W. C., Vesk, M., and Groenewoud, K., 1999. Occurrence of UVA-and UVB-absor-bing compounds in 152 species (206 strains) of marine microalgae., 189: 35-51.

    Lesser, M. P., Cullen, J. J., and Neale, P. J., 1994. Carbon uptake in a marine diatom during acute exposure to ultraviolet B radiation: Relative importance of damage and repair., 30 (2): 183-192.

    Luo, Z., Zhang, H., Krock, B., Lu, S., Yang, W., and Gu, H., 2017.Morphology, molecular phylogeny and okadaic acid production of epibenthic(Dinophyceae) species from the northern South China Sea., 22: 14-30.

    Mangialajo, L., Bertolotto, R., Cattaneo-Vietti, R., Chiantore, M., Grillo, C., and Lemee, R., 2008. The toxic benthic dinoflagel-late: Quantification of proliferation along the coastline of Genoa, Italy., 56 (6): 1209-1214.

    Mengelt, C., and Prézelin, B. B., 2005. UVA enhancement of carbon fixation and resilience to UV inhibition in the genusmay provide a competitive advantage in high UV surface waters., 301: 81-93.

    Moisan, T. A., and Mitchell, B. G., 2001. UV absorption by my-cosporine-like amino acids inKarsten induced by photosynthetically available radiation., 138 (1): 217-227.

    Nagahama, Y., Murray, S., Tomaru, A., and Fukuyo, Y., 2011. Spe-cies Boundaries in the toxic dinoflagellate(Dinophyceae, Prorocentrales), based on morphological and phylogenetic characters., 47 (1): 178-189.

    Neori, A., Vernet, M., Holm-Hansen, O., and Haxo, F. T., 1986. Relationship between action spectra for chlorophyllfluorescence and photosynthetic O2evolution in algae., 8 (3): 537-548.

    Porra, R. J., 2002. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophyllsand., 73 (1-3): 149-156.

    Rakhimberdieva, M. G., Stadnichuk, I. N., Elanskaya, I. V., and Karapetyan, N. V., 2004. Carotenoid-induced quenching of the phycobilisome fluorescence in photosystem II-deficient mutant ofsp., 574 (1-3): 85-88.

    Rastogi, R. P., and Sinha, R. P., 2009. Biotechnological and in-dustrial significance of cyanobacterial secondary metabolites., 27 (4): 521-539.

    Shears, N. T., and Ross, P. M., 2009. Blooms of benthic dino-flagellates of the genus; An increasing and ecolo-gically important phenomenon on temperate reefs in New Zea-land and worldwide., 8(6): 916-925.

    Sinha, R. P., Klisch, M., Gr?niger, A., and H?der, D. P., 1998. Ul-traviolet-absorbing/screening substances in cyanobacteria, phy-toplankton and macroalgae., 47 (2-3): 83-94.

    Taira, H., and Taguchi, S., 2017. Cellular mycosporine-like ami-no acids protect photosystem II of the Dinoflagellatefrom ultraviolet radiation damage., 174: 27-34.

    Venn, A. A., Wilson, M. A., Trapidd-rosenthal, H. G., Keely, B. J., and Douglas, A. E., 2006. The impact of coral bleaching on the pigment profile of the symbiotic alga,., 29 (12): 2133-2142.

    Villafa?e, V. E., Buma, A. G., Boelen, P., and Helbling, E. W., 2004. Solar UVR-induced DNA damage and inhibition of pho-tosynthesis in phytoplankton from Andean lakes of Argentina., 161 (2): 245-266.

    White, A. L, and Jahnke, L. S., 2002. Contrasting effects of UV-A and UV-B on photosynthesis and photoprotection of beta-carotene in twospp., 43 (8): 877-884.

    Xu, J. T., and Gao, K. S., 2010. Use of UV-A energy for photo-synthesis in the red macroalga., 86 (3): 580-585.

    Xu, J. T., and Gao, K. S., 2016. Photosynthetic contribution of UV-A to carbon fixation by macroalgae., 55 (3): 318-322.

    Zhang, H., Li, Y., Cen, J. Y., Wang, H. L., Cui, L., Dong, Y. L., and Lu, S. H., 2015. Morphotypes of(Di-nophyceae) from Hainan Island, South China Sea: Morpholo-gical and molecular characterization., 54 (5): 503-516.

    April 13, 2020;

    May 27, 2020;

    November 10, 2020

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    #The two authors contributed equally to this work.

    . E-mail: lusonghui1963@163.com

    (Edited by Qiu Yantao)

    国产一级毛片在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| www.色视频.com| 舔av片在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 黑人高潮一二区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品无大码| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 丝袜喷水一区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲av熟女| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产日本99.免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 在线观看66精品国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美3d第一页| 成年版毛片免费区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 色视频www国产| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| av免费观看日本| 舔av片在线| 色视频www国产| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久色成人| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 久久中文看片网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 韩国av在线不卡| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲av成人av| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产高潮美女av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 国产成人精品一,二区 | 老女人水多毛片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| av天堂中文字幕网| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 免费看日本二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 性色avwww在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 中文欧美无线码| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲性久久影院| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| av天堂在线播放| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 18+在线观看网站| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 成年版毛片免费区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 如何舔出高潮| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 性色avwww在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚州av有码| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 色综合站精品国产| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 九九在线视频观看精品| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| av专区在线播放| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久久色成人| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美zozozo另类| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 久久人人爽人人片av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 精品久久久噜噜| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品一二三区在线看| av.在线天堂| 观看美女的网站| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产精品.久久久| a级毛片a级免费在线| av黄色大香蕉| avwww免费| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 色综合站精品国产| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 午夜a级毛片| 99热全是精品| 日本黄大片高清| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产视频内射| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产成人freesex在线| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 深夜a级毛片| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 日本在线视频免费播放| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 少妇高潮的动态图| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| av国产免费在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 日韩成人伦理影院| a级毛片a级免费在线| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 中文欧美无线码| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 嫩草影院入口| .国产精品久久| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 青春草国产在线视频 | 97热精品久久久久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产视频首页在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 美女黄网站色视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产成人freesex在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产在线男女| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产午夜精品论理片| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产av不卡久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 久久久色成人| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 色综合站精品国产| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产三级中文精品| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 热99在线观看视频| 国产视频内射| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 少妇的逼水好多| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 免费看光身美女| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品无大码| 久久草成人影院| 国产 一区精品| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日韩成人伦理影院| av视频在线观看入口| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 日本在线视频免费播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产老妇女一区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 观看免费一级毛片| 久久精品影院6| 国产在线男女| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 黄色一级大片看看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 99热全是精品| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产色婷婷99| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产精品.久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 91精品国产九色| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精华一区二区三区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 免费人成在线观看视频色| or卡值多少钱| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 免费观看人在逋| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 丝袜喷水一区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久午夜福利片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲色图av天堂| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久这里只有精品中国| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品一及| 在线播放无遮挡| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 永久网站在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费观看精品视频网站| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频 | 久久精品人妻少妇| 美女高潮的动态| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| www.av在线官网国产| 综合色丁香网| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产高潮美女av| a级毛色黄片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久久色成人| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 毛片女人毛片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| videossex国产| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 99热全是精品| 深夜a级毛片| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 中文字幕制服av| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品一及| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产成人福利小说| 国产在线男女| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩国内少妇激情av| av视频在线观看入口| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看 | 我要搜黄色片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 1000部很黄的大片| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 男女那种视频在线观看| 舔av片在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看 | 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放|