• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Seafloor Surficial Sediment

    2021-06-25 11:17:06ZOUDapengZENGZiwenKANGuangmingLIUWeiandXIAOTibing
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年3期

    ZOU Dapeng, ZENG Ziwen, KAN Guangming, LIU Wei, and XIAO Tibing

    Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Seafloor Surficial Sediment

    ZOU Dapeng1), *, ZENG Ziwen1), KAN Guangming2), *, LIU Wei1), and XIAO Tibing1)

    1),,510006,2),,,266061,

    In this work, we investigated the influences of salinity, temperature, and hydrostatic pressure on the acoustics of seafloor surficial sediment by theoretically and experimentally analyzing the sound velocity ratio of the seafloor sediment to the bottom seawater in typical environmental conditions. Temperature- and pressure-controlled experiments were conducted to examine the characteristics of the sound velocity ratio, the results of which agree with the theoretical analysis using the effective density fluid model. Of the three environmental factors considered, the sound velocity ratio was found to be sensitive to temperature and pressure but not to salinity, with the sound velocity ratio decreasing with temperature and hydrostatic pressure. With respect to surficial sediments, pore water plays a key role in the sound velocity ratio of sediment influenced by different environmental factors. The sound velocities of different types of sediments (sandy, silty, and clayey) change similarly with temperature, but change slightly differently with hydrostatic pressure. The influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio of seafloor sediment is independent of the detection frequency. The results show that the sound velocity ratio can change up to 0.0008 per ℃ when the temperature ranges from 2℃ to 25℃ and up to 0.00064MPa?1when the seawater depth pressure ranges from 0MPa to 40MPa.

    sound velocity ratio; environmental factors; seafloor; sediment; geoacoustics

    1 Introduction

    Three main acoustic techniques are currently used to measure, invert, and forecast the acoustic properties of seafloor sediments under different environmental conditions. Geoacoustic inversion measurementmethods (Li and Li, 2010;De and Chakraborty, 2011; Buckingham., 2012; Williams., 2015; Chapman, 2016) detect underwater and geoacoustic properties by the sound gradients of the seawater and sediment, which are affected by the spatial distributions of temperature and pressure in the propagation path.acoustic measurementmethods(Richardson and Briggs, 1996; Buckinghamand Richardson, 2002; Tao., 2009; Kan., 2013; Ballard.,2016) directly measure theacoustic properties of sediment inenvironmental conditions. In contrast, samplingacoustic measurementmethods (Hamilton, 1971; Hoffman and Tobin, 2002; Richardson and Briggs, 2004; Lu., 2007; Meng., 2015; Wang., 2016) are applied to sediment core samples under laboratorial pressure and temperature conditions, which are quite different from those in theenvironment. Thus, environmental factor have the primary impact on the acoustical, physical, and mechanical properties of seawater and sediment by geo- acoustic inversion measurement at different water surficial levels,acoustic measurements at different seafloor depths,and sampling acoustic measurements in different laboratory environments. The empirical equations of Hamilton (Hamilton, 1970,1971; Hamiltonand Bach- man, 1982) are widely used and referenced by researchers in different marine regions using different measurement methods (Gorgas., 2002; Buckingham, 2005; Lu., 2006; Jackson and Richardson, 2007; Endler., 2015; Wang., 2016; Kan., 2019). Less consi- deration is given to the environmental influences on acoustic characteristics.

    A solution to the abovementioned problems, which was proposed by Hamilton (1971), was to assume that the sound velocity ratio between the seafloor sediment and bottom seawater was constant. With the sound velocity ratio held constant, the sound speeds of sediments measured using different methods have been calculated and applied to correct or eliminate the influence of different temperatures and pressures (Hamilton and Bachman, 1982; Bachman, 1989; Wang., 2016). However, recent experimental results (Kim., 2018; Kan., 2019; Zou., 2019) have reported the influence of temperature and hydraulic pressure on both the sound speed of seafloor sediment and the sound velocity ratio, and that the sound velocity ratio can vary in different environmental conditions. However, the above research mostly focused on experimental analysis. Factors such as salinity, acoustic detection frequency, and sediment type must also be considered together. With the help of generally accepted theoretical models, further analysis and interpretation of experimental results is needed, along with exploration of the influence mechanisms of environmental factors.

    In this study, we examine the influence of environmentalconditions, including temperature, pressure, and salinity, on the sound velocity ratio of different types of seafloor sur- ficial sediments (., less than 3m beneath the surface of the ocean bottom), analyze the relationship between the sound velocity ratio and the influence of environmental conditions using the effective density fluid model (EDFM), and describe the measurement results obtained in temperature- and pressure-controlled laboratory acoustic experiments to verify conclusions obtained by theoretical analysis.

    2 Theoretical Analysis of the Environmen- tal Influence on the Sound Velocity Ratio in Surficial Sediment

    2.1 EDFM Considering the Influence of Environmental Factors

    Widely employed theories,such as fluid, elastic, and poroelastic theories, focus on analysis of the influences of physical parameters of the seafloor sediment and acoustic frequency on the acoustic properties of sediment (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). These theories can also be used to analyze the influences of environmental factors. The EDFM(Williams, 2001)simplifies the parameters of the Biot– Stoll model for two-phase media at low frequencies and uses the effective bulk moduluseffand effective densityeffto model a general expression for the properties of sound speed in sediment. The EDFM can explain the relationship between the compressional wave velocity and the detection frequency. With consideration ofthe effectsof temperature, pressure, and salinity on the physical parameters, the sound speedcin the EDFM can be expressed as follows:

    where,, andare the temperature, pressure, and salinity, respectively. Kand Kare the bulk modulus of solid grains and the bulk modulus of pore water, respectively, andis the porosity of the sediment.,,are the bulk densities of the pore water, solid grains, and sediment, respectively.is the viscosity of the pore water andis its permeability.is a dynamic viscosity correction factor,is the detected angular frequency, andis the tortuosity. Generally speaking, the above parameters all vary with changes in temperature and pressure, albeit with different scales.

    With consideration of the environmental influence on the bottom seawater (equal to the pore water in the sediment), the sound velocity ratioof the surficial sediment to the bottom seawater can be written as:

    where theK(,,) and(,,) can be calculated us- ing the seawater state equation (Jackson and Richardson, 2007).

    Eqs. (1) and (5) can be used to study both the sound speedcin sediment and the sound velocity ratioof the surficial sediment to the bottom seawater in different environmental conditions. These applications may lead to the discovery of the mechanism underlying the influence of temperature and pressure on the acoustic properties of se- diment.

    According to Eq. (1), even if the texture and grain com-position of sediment do not change, the sound speed in the sediment will change due to the influence of different salinities, temperatures, and pressures on the sediment’s physical parameters. This mechanism can be described as the influence of salinity, temperature, and pressure on the effective elastic modulus and effective density of the se- diment. For surficial sediment, analysis based on a general model of the sound velocity ratio indicates that the series texture is dominant in two-phase structures of unconsolidated sediments (Zou, 2018). In other words, most solid particles are suspended in pore water or separated by a liquid film, with the solid and liquid phases subject to equal stress. Therefore, filling with seawater weakens the effect of the shear modulus of the solid grains. Thus, to study compressional waves with the EDFM, we use the Wood equation, as shown in Eq. (2), to express the effective bulk modulus. Changes in the environmental factors will result in variations in both the seawater and sediment, and thus the sound velocity ratio according to Eq. (5).

    The equivalent bulk modulus and equivalent density of solid grains are expected to be influenced much less by environmental factors compared to their effect on those of pore water. Therefore, variations in the acoustic properties of surficial sediment can mainly be attributed to changes in the acoustic properties of pore water. This assumption has been verified and elucidated by experimental and theoretical analyses of the influence of temperature on sediment(Shumway, 1958; Rajan and Frisk, 1992; Eastwood, 1993; Zou., 2015).That is, changes in the bulk modulus and density of pore water with changing environmental factors determine the variations in the effectivebulk modulus and effective density of the sediment. This determination, in turn, affects the trend and extent of the acoustic variation.

    2.2 Analysis of the Environmental Influence on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Surficial Sediment Based on EDFM

    Typical sandy sediment was selected for this study, the representative physical parameters of which are listed in Table 1. The changes in the bulk modulus, bulk density, and viscosity of seawater can be calculated using the sea- water state equationwith temperature, pressure, and salinity (Jackson and Richardson, 2007).

    Table 1 Representative physical parameters of sandy seafloor sediment (Williams, 2001)

    Notes: Values with the ‘*’ symbol change with variations in temperature and pressure, and are calculated using the seawater state equation.

    Changes in the sound velocity ratio were calculated by the EDFM using Eqs. (1) to (5) at 200Hz, 40kHz, and 1MHz in different environmental conditions. These three typical frequencies were chosen for comparison to represent different acoustic measurement methods. The calculations were performed using Matlab software and the results are shown in Fig.1 and Table 2. Although different detection frequencies show a notable influence on the sound velocity ratio, the changes in the sound velocity ratio were found to be similar to the changes in the environmental factors. Table 2 presents the mean value of each factor’s influence on the sound velocity ratio. The difference between the maximum and minimum values (Vdmax?min) and its division by the mean value (Vd/mean), which is referred to as the relative rate, are used to observe the change in the sound velocity ratio and the change rate. An absolute change rate (abs) is obtained to represent the change in the sound velocity ratio with respect to the range of a given factor. This parameter provides a reference value for changes in the sound velocity ratio for different environmental factors. In Fig.1 and Table 2, it is evident that the influence of salinity is obviously less than that of the other two factors. Considering the fact that the variation range in the salinity of seawater is small and the absolute and relative change rates are also small, the influence of salinity is ignored in the following analysis.

    Fig.1 Theoretical relationship between the sound velocity ratio of sandy sediment and environmental influence factors: (a) different temperature at a pressure of 1atm and salinity of 34.5, (b) different seafloor depths at a temperature of 23℃ and salinity of 34.5, and (c) different salinities at a pressure of 1atm and a temperature of 23℃.

    Fig.2 shows a three-dimensional profile of the changes in the sound velocity ratio with temperature and hydrostatic pressure, which indicates the acoustic attributes of seafloor surficial sediment for mostand laboratorial environmental conditions. The theoretical calculations show that the sound velocity ratio decreases with increases in both temperature and hydrostatic pressure. With variations in the temperature and hydrostatic pressure, the sound velocity ratio does not remain constant. As salinity has only a slight impact on the velocity ratio, its effect is omitted. The theoretical analysis indicates that the sound velocity ratio of surficial sandy sediment changes by up to 0.0006 per ℃when the temperature ranges from 1℃ to 30℃, and by up to 0.00054MPa?1when the hydrostatic pressure ranges from 0 to 40MPa, which is equal to that of the sea bottom at 4km depth, in bothand laboratory distributions.

    Table 2 Variations in the sound velocity ratio due to the influence of environmental factors as determined by EDFM analysis

    3 Experimental Relationships Betweenthe Sound Velocity Ratio and the Temperature and Hydrostatic Pressure

    Due to the minor effect of salinity, as determined by theoretical analysis, experiments were conducted to deter- mine only the influences of temperature and hydrostatic pressure. Changes in the sound velocity ratio of the seafloor sediment were systematically investigated in experi- ments with respect to the actual sediment distribution in any possible environmental state.

    Table 3 and Fig.3 show the representative relationships between the physical properties and the depth of seawater in the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea, respectively. Theseawater temperatureand sound-speed profile were measured using SBE-9CTD probes.The Yellow Sea is shallow, with an average depth of about 40m, which means its temperature changes significantly and has a strong influence on the sound speed of the seawater. As a result, the sound speed of the seafloor sedimentis apt to be affected by seasonal variations in temperature. The South China Sea is much deeper, with an average depth of about 1200m, and its temperature decreases with increasing water depth as the hydrostatic pressure increases. Initially, the seawater temperature decreases rapidly and then slows,whereas the pressure continues to increase linearly. There-fore, the sound speed of seawater first decreases with decreasing temperature,and then increases at depths exceeding approximately 1000m due to the effect of the con- tinuous increase in hydrostatic pressure (Fig.3).

    Table 3 Seawater properties in the Yellow Sea in June

    Fig.3 Typical temperature and sound-speed profiles of the northern South China Sea in September (provided by 2011 South China Sea Open Cruise by R/V Shiyan 3, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, CAS).

    3.1 Sample Attributes and Experimental Processes

    The sediments were sampled using the gravity sampling method at different sites and times from the Yellow Sea (YS) and South China Sea (SCS). These samples were stored in a PVC tube to protect their structures and maintain their seawater contents. Most of the samples utilized in these experiments were surficial sections approximately 300mm in length. Table 4 lists the properties of the representative samples.

    Table 4 Properties of the representative samples measured in the experiments

    Using laboratory equipment, experiments were conducted to examine the change in the sound speed while controlling for temperature and pressure, respectively. In the experiments, the environmental conditions were recreated to reflect the most likely state of the seafloor surficial sediment. The experimental system mainly consisted of a measurement bench, a digital sonic meter (WSD-3 or DB4), and a pair of planar transducers. The experimental principles and equipment are described in greater detail in Kan. (2019). In the temperature-controlled experiments, the equipment was filled with air at 1atm, and the temperature of the sediment sample was controlled at in- crements of 1℃. In the pressure-controlled experiments, the pressure chamber was filled with seawater, and the hydrostatic pressure of the sediment sample was controlled at increments of 2MPa. The temperature during the pressure measurement process was 25.6℃±0.5℃. At each controlled temperature or pressure, the sound speed of the sediment was measured using an acoustic pulse detection technique and the time-of-flight method. To compare theand laboratory acoustic detection approaches used in different methods and by different researchers, several representative detection frequencies, as shown in Table 4, were chosen in the ultrasonic range. The degree of uncertainty of the sample length measurement was approximately 0.5mm. The total uncertainty of the sound velocity measurements was approximately±1.8ms?1.

    3.2 Experimental Results of the Temperature-Dependent Sound Velocity Ratio

    For comparison, a sandy sample measured at 1MHz was provided (Carbó and Molero, 2000), which consisted of fine sand with a porosity of 42% and a density of 1.97gcm?3. Its sound velocity ratio was found to decrease with increases in temperature. The sound velocity ratios of samples TS1, TS2, STX1204, and STX1205 in Fig.4 show a similar decreasing trend even with different sediment types, different acoustic detection frequencies, and sediments from different sea areas. The uneven variation in the sound velocity ratio indicates the anisotropy and non-unifor- mity of the sediment. Table 5 lists the relative and absolute change rates of the sound velocity ratio with tempe- rature.

    The theoretical EDFM calculation can explain the decreasing trend of the sound velocity ratio (Fig.4), verifying that the temperature mainly affects the acoustic properties of the seafloor sedimentchanges in the elastic modulus, density, and viscosity of the pore water. The de- creasing trend and fluctuation of the sound velocity ratio in this experiment imply that the sound velocity ratio should not be regarded as a constant when the temperature changes.

    3.3 Experimental Results of the Hydrostatic-Pre- ssure-Dependent Sound Velocity Ratio

    As shown in Fig.5, the sound velocity ratios of sandy samples SPE1404 and SPE1901 decreased with the hydrostatic pressure, and those of samples SPE1402, SPE- 1403, and SPE1405 also showed a decreasing trend. Table 5 lists the relative and absolute change rates of the sound velocity ratio with hydrostatic pressure. The decreasing trend and fluctuation in the sound velocity ratio with hydrostatic pressure in this experiment imply that the sound velocity ratio must not be regarded as a constant.

    Fig.4 Dependence of the sound velocity ratio in different sediments on temperature: STX1204 (), STX1205 (), TS1 (), TS4 (), and Carbó’s sand sample () (Carbó and Molero, 2000) denote the experimental results, and the solid lines represent the calculated EDFM results.

    The theoretical EDFM calculation can explain the decreasing trend of the sound velocity ratio. The hydrostatic pressure was found to mainly affect the acoustic properties of the seafloor sedimentchanges in the elastic modu- lus, density, and viscosity of the pore seawater. This well explains the influence of hydrostatic pressure on the sound velocity of sandy sediment, with slight deviations for silty and clayed sediments, as shown in Fig.5.

    Table 5 Variations in the sound velocity ratio with temperature and hydrostatic pressure, as determined by analysis of the experimental results

    Fig.5 Dependence of the sound velocity ratio on hydrosta- tic pressure in different sediments: SPE1402 (○), SPE14- 03 (×), SPE1404 (□), SPE1405 (◇), and SPE1901 (☆) denote the experimental results, and the solid lines represent the calculated EDFM results.

    4 Discussion

    Sandy sediments have good porous connections, with the inside pore water being well-connected and easily ba- lancing changes in temperature and pressure. The physical state of pore water rapidly changes and evenly affects the solid grains of the sediment due to the good porous connections. Because of the relatively minor changes in the solid grains within the experimental temperature and pressure ranges, changes in the physical properties of the pore water was determined to dominate changes in the acoustic properties of the sediments. This finding was ve- rified in both the temperature experiment (Carbó’s sand sample, STX1204, and TS1 in Fig.4) and pressure expe- riment(SPE1404 and SPE1901 in Fig.5), and shows good agreement with the theoretical analysis. However, the porous connections are complex. In sediments with more clay and silt, the pores are smaller and the pore channels are narrower, although the pore water retained its dominant role in the experiments. However, reconstruction of tortuous pore channels by changes in the environmental conditions becomes increasingly complex, due to the enhanced capillary action and blockage effect of more finely grained particles. Fluctuations occur with changes in the physical properties of the sediment, followed by changes in the sound speed of the sediment. Due to heat conduction, the silty sample STX1205 and the clayey sample TS4 in the temperature experiment showed the same change phenomenon as the sandy samples. However, in the hydrostatic pressure experiment, effects such as capillary action and the blockage effect lead to more complex influences on the sediment. These effects may increase the non-uni- formity and weaken the effect of the pore water, which was found in the clayey sample SPE1202 and the silty sam- ples SPE1203 and SPE1205 at high pressure. The sound velocity ratios of the silty and clayey samples seemed to first rapidlyand then slowly decrease, whereas the sound velocity of the sandy sample decreased almost immediately. This phenomenon merits further study.

    In Table 5, the uneven variation in the sound velocity ratio indicates anisotropy and non-uniformity in the sedi- ment. The inhomogeneous distribution of the sediment-grain composition and the loosely packed pore structure can lead to a micro-reconstruction of the texture under the action of thermal or hydrostatic stress, which then causes a slight fluctuation in the sound speed of the sediment (Zou., 2015, 2019).

    The sound-speed dispersion in samples SPE1402 and SPE1403 slightly increased in by approximately 10ms?1, whereas the acoustic frequency increased from 25kHz to 250kHz (Kan., 2018).This dispersion is smaller than the result obtained by Buckingham and Richardson (2002) of approximately 17ms?1, with the acoustic frequency increasing from 25kHz to 100kHz. The difference may be due to the different types of seafloor sedimentin the two studies. It indicates that the dispersion of seafloor sediments hadno significant effect on the detection frequency in this experiment (in Table 4). Although the acoustic detection frequencies were different and dispersion was evident in the datasets, the experimental results showed that the influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio resulted in almost the same change trend at different detection frequencies. As shown in Fig.4, the sound velocity ratios changed similarly with increases in temperature at 1MHz, 23.8kHz, and 35kHz, which agrees with the EDFM analysis shown in Fig.1a. As depicted in Fig.5, the sound velocity ratios changed similarly with increases in the hydrostatic pressure at 33kHz and 100kHz, which substantially agrees with the EDFM analysis shown in Fig.1b.

    The experimental results showed that the sound velo- city ratio decreased with increases in both temperature and hydrostatic pressure. Compared with the theoretical calculations, the experimental results showed fluctuations in the decreasing trend due to the complex texture and composition of the actual samples. The experimental ana- lysis showed that the sound velocity ratio changed up to 0.0008per℃ when the temperature ranged from 2℃ to 25℃ and up to 0.0064MPa?1when the hydrostatic pressure ranged from 0 to 40MPa. The experimental results were slightly larger than those obtained by theoretical analysis. The change rate of the sound velocity due to changes in hydrostatic pressure was slightly higher than that due to changes in temperature for the examined environmental conditions.

    Therefore, use of the sound velocity ratio method(Ha- milton, 1971), wherein the sound velocity ratio is consi- dered to be constant, can incur errors when it is applied to correct the variation in sound speed caused by variations in temperature and hydrostatic pressure under different environmental conditions (.,, laboratory, and different depths below the seafloor). The expected errors can be estimated, as shown in Table 5.

    5 Conclusions

    Various compositions and textures are major factors that determine the acoustic properties of seafloor sediments. However, temperature and hydrostatic pressure are also key factors that impact the acoustic properties of seafloor surficial sediments in different sedimentary environmental conditions. By comparing the results obtained by experimental measurements and theoretical calculations, the re- lationship between the sound velocity ratio and environmental factors was investigated with consideration of boththe sediment types and different detection frequencies. These analyses yielded some meaningful results, from which the following conclusions can be drawn:

    1) Among the three environmental factors considered, the sound velocity ratio is sensitive to temperature and pressure but not to salinity.

    2) In surficial sediments, pore water plays a key role in the sound velocity ratio of sediment influenced by environmental factors.

    3) The sound velocities of different types of sediments (sandy, silty, and clayey sediments) change in similar ways with temperature, but change slightly differently with hy- drostatic pressure.

    4) The influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio of seafloor sediments is independent of different detection frequencies.

    5) The sound velocity ratio decreases with both temperature and hydrostatic pressure.

    6) The results obtained by experimental measurements regarding the influence of temperature and hydrostatic pressure on the sound velocity ratio agree with those obtained by the EDFM.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41676055 and 41776043), the Natural Science Foundation of GuangdongProvince (No. 2019A1515011055), and the Foundation of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Te- chnology (No. MGQNLM-KF201805). The authors wish to thank the staff at Guangdong University of Technology, the First Institute of Oceanography of Ministry of Natural Resources, and the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology of Chinese Academy of Sciences for performing mea-surements, conducting experiments, analyzing the datasets, and discussing the findings for this research. The authors also wish to thank the reviewers and Pro. Guoliang Ye for providing so much valuable advice regarding this paper.

    Bachman, R. T., 1989. Estimating velocity ratio in marine sediment., 86 (5): 2029-2032, DOI: 10.1121/1.398585.

    Ballard, M. S., Lee, K. M., McNeese, A. R., Wilson, P. S., and Goff, J. A., 2016. Development of a system formea- surements of geoacoustic properties during sediment coring.of, 139: 2125.

    Buckingham, M. J., 2005. Compressional and shear wave pro- perties of marine sediments: Comparisons between theory and data., 117 (1): 137-152, DOI: 10.1121/1.1810231.

    Buckingham, M. J., and Richardson, M. D., 2002. On tone-burst measurements of sound speed and attenuation in sandy marine sediments., 27 (3): 429-453, DOI: 10.1109/joe.2002.1040929.

    Buckingham, M. J., Giddens, E. M., Simonet, F., and Hahn, T. R., 2012. Propeller noise from a light aircraft for low-frequency measurements of the, speed of sound in a marine se- diment., 10 (4): 445-464, DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x02001760.

    Carbó, R., and Molero, A. C., 2000. The effect of temperature on sound wave absorption in a sediment layer., 108 (4): 1545-1547, DOI: 10.1121/1.1289360.

    Chapman, N. R., 2016. A critical review of geoacoustic inversion: What does it really tell us about the ocean bottom?, 140 (4): 3023, DOI: 10.1121/1.4969376.

    De, C., and Chakraborty, B., 2011. Model-based acoustic remote sensing of seafloor characteristics., 49 (10): 3868-3877, DOI: 10.1109/ tgrs.2011.2139218.

    Eastwood, J., 1993. Temperature-dependent propagation of P- and S-waves of Cold Lake oil sands: Comparison of theory and experiment., 58 (6): 863-871, DOI: 10.1190/1. 1443470.

    Endler, M., Endler, R., Bobertz, B., Leipe, T., and Arz, H. W., 2015. Linkage between acoustic parameters and seabed sediment properties in the south-western Baltic Sea., 35 (2): 145-160, DOI: 10.1007/s00367-015-0397-3.

    Gorgas, T. J., Wilkens, R. H., Fu, S. S., Neil Frazer, L., Richardson, M. D., Briggs, K. B., and Lee, H., 2002.acoustic and laboratory ultrasonic sound speed and attenuation mea- sured in heterogeneous soft seabed sediments: Eel River shelf, California., 182 (1): 103-119, DOI: 10.1016/ S0025-3227(01)00230-4.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1970. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments, North Pacific., 75 (23): 4423-4446, DOI: 10.1029/JB075i023p04423.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1971. Prediction ofacoustic and elastic properties of marine sediments., 36 (2): 366-377, DOI: 10.1190/1.1440168.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1985. Sound velocity as a function of depth in marine sediments., 78 (4): 1348-1355, DOI: 10.1121/1.392905.

    Hamilton, E. L., and Bachman, R. T., 1982. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments., 72 (6): 1891-1904, DOI: 10.11 21/1.388539.

    Hoffman, N. W., and Tobin, H. J., 2002. An empirical relationship between velocity and porosity for underthrust sediments of the Nankai Trough accretionary prism., 190/196: 1-23, DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.190196.355.2004.

    Jackson, D. R., and Richardson, M. D., 2007.. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1-605.

    Kan, G., Liu, B., Wang, J., Meng, X., Li, G., Hua, Q., and Sun, L., 2018. Sound speed dispersion characteristics of three typesof shallow sediments in the southern Yellow Sea.y, 36 (7): 853-860, DOI: 10.1080/ 1064119X.2017.1392659.

    Kan, G., Su, Y., Li, G., Liu, B., and Meng, X., 2013. The correlations betweensound speeds and physical parameters of seafloor sediments in the middle area of the southern Huang- hai Sea., 35 (3): 166-171, DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2013.03.019.

    Kan, G., Zou, D., Liu, B., Wang, J., Meng, X., Li, G., and Pei, Y., 2019. Correction for effects of temperature and pressure on sound speed in shallow seafloor sediments., 37 (10): 1217-1226, DOI: 10.1080/ 1064119X.2018.1545812.

    Kim, S., Lee, G. S., Kim, D., Hahn, J., and Ryang, W., 2018. Variation of temperature-dependent sound velocity in unconsolidated marine sediments: Laboratory measurements., 36 (3): 280-287, DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2016.1277442.

    Li, Z., and Li, F., 2010. Geoacoustic inversion for sediments in the South China Sea based on a hybrid inversion scheme., 28 (5): 990- 995, DOI: 10.1007/s00343-010-9117-z.

    Lu, B., Li, G., Huang, S., and Li, C., 2006. Physical properties of sediments on the northern continental shelf of the South China Sea., 24 (1): 47- 60, DOI: 10.1080/10641190600559523.

    Lu, B., Li, G., Liu, Q., Huang, S., and Zhang, F., 2007. A study on seafloor sediment and its acouso-physical properties in the southeast offshore sea area of Hainan Island in China., 29 (4): 34-42, DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:02 53-4193.2007.04.004.

    Meng, X., Li, G., Han, G., and Kan, G., 2015. Sound velocity and related properties of seafloor sediments in the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea., 34 (5): 75-80, DOI: 10.1007/s13131-015-0669-9.

    Rajan, S. D., and Frisk, G. V., 1992. Seasonal variations of the sediment compressional wave-speed profile in the Gulf of Me- xico., 91 (1): 127-135, DOI: 10.1121/1.402760.

    Richardson, M. D., and Briggs, K. B., 1996.and laboratory geoacoustic measurements in soft mud and hard-packed sand sediments: Implications for high-frequency acoustic pro- pagation and scattering., 16 (3): 196-203, DOI: 10.1007/BF01204509.

    Richardson, M. D., and Briggs, K. B., 2004. Empirical predictions of seafloor properties based on remotely measured se- diment impedance.. La Jolla, CA, 12-21, DOI: 10.1063/1.1842992.

    Shumway, G., 1958. Sound velocity. temperature in water- saturated sediments., 23 (3): 494-505, DOI: 10.11 21/1.1930017.

    Tao, C. H., Deng, X. M., Li, H. X., Zhou, J. P., Jin, X. B., Fu, S. S., Wilkens, R. H., Gu, C. H., and He, Y. H., 2009. Development ofmarine sediment geo-acoustic measurement system with real-time and multi frequencies (the second ge- neration)., 23 (4): 769-778, DOI: 10. 1016/j.oceaneng.2008.10.004.

    Wang, J., Guo, C., Liu, B., Hou, Z., and Han, G., 2016. Distribution of geoacoustic properties and related influencing factors of surface sediments in the southern South China Sea., 37 (4): 1-12, DOI: 10.1007/s11001-0 16-9294-z.

    Williams, K. L., 2001. An effective density fluid model for acoustic propagation in sediments derived from Biot theory., 110 (5): 2276- 2281, DOI: 10.1121/1.4776930.

    Williams, K., Ewart, T., Jackson, D., Thorsos, E., Dahl, P., and Tang, D., 2015. Six decades of evolution in underwater acoustics at the Applied Physics Laboratory-University of Washington (APL-UW).,23: 1-15, DOI: 10.1121/1.4920514.

    Zou, D., 2018. Relationship between the sound velocity ratio of the compressional wave and the physical characteristics of seafloor sediments., 43 (1): 41-51, DOI: 10.159 49/j.cnki.0371-0025.2018.01.005 (in Chinese with English abs- tract).

    Zou, D., Kan, G., Long, J., and Xiao, T., 2019. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on the sound speed of surficial seafloor se- diments., 37 (3): 277- 281, DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2017.1409300.

    Zou, D., Williams, K. L., and Thorsos, E. I., 2015. Influence of temperature on the acoustic sound speed and attenuation of sand sediment., 40 (4): 969-980, DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2014.2365072.

    June 11, 2020;

    October 9, 2020;

    December 8, 2020

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    E-mail: anthonyzou@gdut.edu.cn E-mail: kgming135@fio.org.cn

    (Edited by Chen Wenwen)

    国产在视频线在精品| 一夜夜www| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 日本wwww免费看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 少妇丰满av| 欧美bdsm另类| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 免费av毛片视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 中文字幕制服av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| av线在线观看网站| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 极品教师在线视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| www.色视频.com| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 午夜福利在线在线| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 九九热线精品视视频播放| 日本午夜av视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 在线播放无遮挡| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 精品酒店卫生间| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产av不卡久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 人妻系列 视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| kizo精华| 黄色日韩在线| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 69人妻影院| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产乱来视频区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 免费观看人在逋| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日本一二三区视频观看| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产成年人精品一区二区| av视频在线观看入口| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| eeuss影院久久| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 丝袜喷水一区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 成年av动漫网址| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产精华一区二区三区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 在现免费观看毛片| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 中文欧美无线码| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 22中文网久久字幕| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 免费观看精品视频网站| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 毛片女人毛片| 久久久久网色| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | av线在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产在视频线精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 少妇熟女欧美另类| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 97在线视频观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久久久久久大精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成人三级黄色视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 乱人视频在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 在线播放无遮挡| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 在线免费十八禁| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 高清毛片免费看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本与韩国留学比较| 18+在线观看网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日本免费在线观看一区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 成人三级黄色视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 美女黄网站色视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产视频内射| 日本三级黄在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美97在线视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 三级经典国产精品| 色网站视频免费| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| eeuss影院久久| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 六月丁香七月| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| av国产免费在线观看| 国产精品一及| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产成人精品一,二区| 免费看光身美女| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 97超视频在线观看视频| videossex国产| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 男女那种视频在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 深夜a级毛片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 老司机影院成人| 观看免费一级毛片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 欧美三级亚洲精品| av国产免费在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| kizo精华| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产综合懂色| 99久久精品热视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜免费激情av| or卡值多少钱| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美性感艳星| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 只有这里有精品99| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 六月丁香七月| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 18+在线观看网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久6这里有精品| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 99久久精品热视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久热久热在线精品观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产高潮美女av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产视频内射| 久久久久久久久中文| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲av男天堂| 91精品国产九色| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 乱人视频在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚州av有码| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 精品一区二区免费观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲在线观看片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久性生活片| av免费观看日本| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品,欧美在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 搞女人的毛片| 日韩高清综合在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 日本免费a在线| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 永久网站在线| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产高清三级在线| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美潮喷喷水| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 我要搜黄色片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 舔av片在线| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲图色成人| 深夜a级毛片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 中国国产av一级| 三级经典国产精品| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | av在线老鸭窝| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 天堂网av新在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 在线观看66精品国产| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 我要搜黄色片| av.在线天堂| 三级国产精品片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 黄片wwwwww| 国产高清三级在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 久久6这里有精品| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 美女黄网站色视频| 91狼人影院| 97热精品久久久久久| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 高清毛片免费看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 嫩草影院精品99| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 成人av在线播放网站| av免费观看日本| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜视频国产福利| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产高清三级在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 有码 亚洲区| 老司机影院毛片| 色视频www国产| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲色图av天堂| 三级毛片av免费| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产免费男女视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美潮喷喷水| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 中文欧美无线码| 男女那种视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 日日啪夜夜撸| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 99热精品在线国产| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽|