• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Seafloor Surficial Sediment

    2021-06-25 11:17:06ZOUDapengZENGZiwenKANGuangmingLIUWeiandXIAOTibing
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年3期

    ZOU Dapeng, ZENG Ziwen, KAN Guangming, LIU Wei, and XIAO Tibing

    Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Seafloor Surficial Sediment

    ZOU Dapeng1), *, ZENG Ziwen1), KAN Guangming2), *, LIU Wei1), and XIAO Tibing1)

    1),,510006,2),,,266061,

    In this work, we investigated the influences of salinity, temperature, and hydrostatic pressure on the acoustics of seafloor surficial sediment by theoretically and experimentally analyzing the sound velocity ratio of the seafloor sediment to the bottom seawater in typical environmental conditions. Temperature- and pressure-controlled experiments were conducted to examine the characteristics of the sound velocity ratio, the results of which agree with the theoretical analysis using the effective density fluid model. Of the three environmental factors considered, the sound velocity ratio was found to be sensitive to temperature and pressure but not to salinity, with the sound velocity ratio decreasing with temperature and hydrostatic pressure. With respect to surficial sediments, pore water plays a key role in the sound velocity ratio of sediment influenced by different environmental factors. The sound velocities of different types of sediments (sandy, silty, and clayey) change similarly with temperature, but change slightly differently with hydrostatic pressure. The influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio of seafloor sediment is independent of the detection frequency. The results show that the sound velocity ratio can change up to 0.0008 per ℃ when the temperature ranges from 2℃ to 25℃ and up to 0.00064MPa?1when the seawater depth pressure ranges from 0MPa to 40MPa.

    sound velocity ratio; environmental factors; seafloor; sediment; geoacoustics

    1 Introduction

    Three main acoustic techniques are currently used to measure, invert, and forecast the acoustic properties of seafloor sediments under different environmental conditions. Geoacoustic inversion measurementmethods (Li and Li, 2010;De and Chakraborty, 2011; Buckingham., 2012; Williams., 2015; Chapman, 2016) detect underwater and geoacoustic properties by the sound gradients of the seawater and sediment, which are affected by the spatial distributions of temperature and pressure in the propagation path.acoustic measurementmethods(Richardson and Briggs, 1996; Buckinghamand Richardson, 2002; Tao., 2009; Kan., 2013; Ballard.,2016) directly measure theacoustic properties of sediment inenvironmental conditions. In contrast, samplingacoustic measurementmethods (Hamilton, 1971; Hoffman and Tobin, 2002; Richardson and Briggs, 2004; Lu., 2007; Meng., 2015; Wang., 2016) are applied to sediment core samples under laboratorial pressure and temperature conditions, which are quite different from those in theenvironment. Thus, environmental factor have the primary impact on the acoustical, physical, and mechanical properties of seawater and sediment by geo- acoustic inversion measurement at different water surficial levels,acoustic measurements at different seafloor depths,and sampling acoustic measurements in different laboratory environments. The empirical equations of Hamilton (Hamilton, 1970,1971; Hamiltonand Bach- man, 1982) are widely used and referenced by researchers in different marine regions using different measurement methods (Gorgas., 2002; Buckingham, 2005; Lu., 2006; Jackson and Richardson, 2007; Endler., 2015; Wang., 2016; Kan., 2019). Less consi- deration is given to the environmental influences on acoustic characteristics.

    A solution to the abovementioned problems, which was proposed by Hamilton (1971), was to assume that the sound velocity ratio between the seafloor sediment and bottom seawater was constant. With the sound velocity ratio held constant, the sound speeds of sediments measured using different methods have been calculated and applied to correct or eliminate the influence of different temperatures and pressures (Hamilton and Bachman, 1982; Bachman, 1989; Wang., 2016). However, recent experimental results (Kim., 2018; Kan., 2019; Zou., 2019) have reported the influence of temperature and hydraulic pressure on both the sound speed of seafloor sediment and the sound velocity ratio, and that the sound velocity ratio can vary in different environmental conditions. However, the above research mostly focused on experimental analysis. Factors such as salinity, acoustic detection frequency, and sediment type must also be considered together. With the help of generally accepted theoretical models, further analysis and interpretation of experimental results is needed, along with exploration of the influence mechanisms of environmental factors.

    In this study, we examine the influence of environmentalconditions, including temperature, pressure, and salinity, on the sound velocity ratio of different types of seafloor sur- ficial sediments (., less than 3m beneath the surface of the ocean bottom), analyze the relationship between the sound velocity ratio and the influence of environmental conditions using the effective density fluid model (EDFM), and describe the measurement results obtained in temperature- and pressure-controlled laboratory acoustic experiments to verify conclusions obtained by theoretical analysis.

    2 Theoretical Analysis of the Environmen- tal Influence on the Sound Velocity Ratio in Surficial Sediment

    2.1 EDFM Considering the Influence of Environmental Factors

    Widely employed theories,such as fluid, elastic, and poroelastic theories, focus on analysis of the influences of physical parameters of the seafloor sediment and acoustic frequency on the acoustic properties of sediment (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). These theories can also be used to analyze the influences of environmental factors. The EDFM(Williams, 2001)simplifies the parameters of the Biot– Stoll model for two-phase media at low frequencies and uses the effective bulk moduluseffand effective densityeffto model a general expression for the properties of sound speed in sediment. The EDFM can explain the relationship between the compressional wave velocity and the detection frequency. With consideration ofthe effectsof temperature, pressure, and salinity on the physical parameters, the sound speedcin the EDFM can be expressed as follows:

    where,, andare the temperature, pressure, and salinity, respectively. Kand Kare the bulk modulus of solid grains and the bulk modulus of pore water, respectively, andis the porosity of the sediment.,,are the bulk densities of the pore water, solid grains, and sediment, respectively.is the viscosity of the pore water andis its permeability.is a dynamic viscosity correction factor,is the detected angular frequency, andis the tortuosity. Generally speaking, the above parameters all vary with changes in temperature and pressure, albeit with different scales.

    With consideration of the environmental influence on the bottom seawater (equal to the pore water in the sediment), the sound velocity ratioof the surficial sediment to the bottom seawater can be written as:

    where theK(,,) and(,,) can be calculated us- ing the seawater state equation (Jackson and Richardson, 2007).

    Eqs. (1) and (5) can be used to study both the sound speedcin sediment and the sound velocity ratioof the surficial sediment to the bottom seawater in different environmental conditions. These applications may lead to the discovery of the mechanism underlying the influence of temperature and pressure on the acoustic properties of se- diment.

    According to Eq. (1), even if the texture and grain com-position of sediment do not change, the sound speed in the sediment will change due to the influence of different salinities, temperatures, and pressures on the sediment’s physical parameters. This mechanism can be described as the influence of salinity, temperature, and pressure on the effective elastic modulus and effective density of the se- diment. For surficial sediment, analysis based on a general model of the sound velocity ratio indicates that the series texture is dominant in two-phase structures of unconsolidated sediments (Zou, 2018). In other words, most solid particles are suspended in pore water or separated by a liquid film, with the solid and liquid phases subject to equal stress. Therefore, filling with seawater weakens the effect of the shear modulus of the solid grains. Thus, to study compressional waves with the EDFM, we use the Wood equation, as shown in Eq. (2), to express the effective bulk modulus. Changes in the environmental factors will result in variations in both the seawater and sediment, and thus the sound velocity ratio according to Eq. (5).

    The equivalent bulk modulus and equivalent density of solid grains are expected to be influenced much less by environmental factors compared to their effect on those of pore water. Therefore, variations in the acoustic properties of surficial sediment can mainly be attributed to changes in the acoustic properties of pore water. This assumption has been verified and elucidated by experimental and theoretical analyses of the influence of temperature on sediment(Shumway, 1958; Rajan and Frisk, 1992; Eastwood, 1993; Zou., 2015).That is, changes in the bulk modulus and density of pore water with changing environmental factors determine the variations in the effectivebulk modulus and effective density of the sediment. This determination, in turn, affects the trend and extent of the acoustic variation.

    2.2 Analysis of the Environmental Influence on the Sound Velocity Ratio of Surficial Sediment Based on EDFM

    Typical sandy sediment was selected for this study, the representative physical parameters of which are listed in Table 1. The changes in the bulk modulus, bulk density, and viscosity of seawater can be calculated using the sea- water state equationwith temperature, pressure, and salinity (Jackson and Richardson, 2007).

    Table 1 Representative physical parameters of sandy seafloor sediment (Williams, 2001)

    Notes: Values with the ‘*’ symbol change with variations in temperature and pressure, and are calculated using the seawater state equation.

    Changes in the sound velocity ratio were calculated by the EDFM using Eqs. (1) to (5) at 200Hz, 40kHz, and 1MHz in different environmental conditions. These three typical frequencies were chosen for comparison to represent different acoustic measurement methods. The calculations were performed using Matlab software and the results are shown in Fig.1 and Table 2. Although different detection frequencies show a notable influence on the sound velocity ratio, the changes in the sound velocity ratio were found to be similar to the changes in the environmental factors. Table 2 presents the mean value of each factor’s influence on the sound velocity ratio. The difference between the maximum and minimum values (Vdmax?min) and its division by the mean value (Vd/mean), which is referred to as the relative rate, are used to observe the change in the sound velocity ratio and the change rate. An absolute change rate (abs) is obtained to represent the change in the sound velocity ratio with respect to the range of a given factor. This parameter provides a reference value for changes in the sound velocity ratio for different environmental factors. In Fig.1 and Table 2, it is evident that the influence of salinity is obviously less than that of the other two factors. Considering the fact that the variation range in the salinity of seawater is small and the absolute and relative change rates are also small, the influence of salinity is ignored in the following analysis.

    Fig.1 Theoretical relationship between the sound velocity ratio of sandy sediment and environmental influence factors: (a) different temperature at a pressure of 1atm and salinity of 34.5, (b) different seafloor depths at a temperature of 23℃ and salinity of 34.5, and (c) different salinities at a pressure of 1atm and a temperature of 23℃.

    Fig.2 shows a three-dimensional profile of the changes in the sound velocity ratio with temperature and hydrostatic pressure, which indicates the acoustic attributes of seafloor surficial sediment for mostand laboratorial environmental conditions. The theoretical calculations show that the sound velocity ratio decreases with increases in both temperature and hydrostatic pressure. With variations in the temperature and hydrostatic pressure, the sound velocity ratio does not remain constant. As salinity has only a slight impact on the velocity ratio, its effect is omitted. The theoretical analysis indicates that the sound velocity ratio of surficial sandy sediment changes by up to 0.0006 per ℃when the temperature ranges from 1℃ to 30℃, and by up to 0.00054MPa?1when the hydrostatic pressure ranges from 0 to 40MPa, which is equal to that of the sea bottom at 4km depth, in bothand laboratory distributions.

    Table 2 Variations in the sound velocity ratio due to the influence of environmental factors as determined by EDFM analysis

    3 Experimental Relationships Betweenthe Sound Velocity Ratio and the Temperature and Hydrostatic Pressure

    Due to the minor effect of salinity, as determined by theoretical analysis, experiments were conducted to deter- mine only the influences of temperature and hydrostatic pressure. Changes in the sound velocity ratio of the seafloor sediment were systematically investigated in experi- ments with respect to the actual sediment distribution in any possible environmental state.

    Table 3 and Fig.3 show the representative relationships between the physical properties and the depth of seawater in the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea, respectively. Theseawater temperatureand sound-speed profile were measured using SBE-9CTD probes.The Yellow Sea is shallow, with an average depth of about 40m, which means its temperature changes significantly and has a strong influence on the sound speed of the seawater. As a result, the sound speed of the seafloor sedimentis apt to be affected by seasonal variations in temperature. The South China Sea is much deeper, with an average depth of about 1200m, and its temperature decreases with increasing water depth as the hydrostatic pressure increases. Initially, the seawater temperature decreases rapidly and then slows,whereas the pressure continues to increase linearly. There-fore, the sound speed of seawater first decreases with decreasing temperature,and then increases at depths exceeding approximately 1000m due to the effect of the con- tinuous increase in hydrostatic pressure (Fig.3).

    Table 3 Seawater properties in the Yellow Sea in June

    Fig.3 Typical temperature and sound-speed profiles of the northern South China Sea in September (provided by 2011 South China Sea Open Cruise by R/V Shiyan 3, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, CAS).

    3.1 Sample Attributes and Experimental Processes

    The sediments were sampled using the gravity sampling method at different sites and times from the Yellow Sea (YS) and South China Sea (SCS). These samples were stored in a PVC tube to protect their structures and maintain their seawater contents. Most of the samples utilized in these experiments were surficial sections approximately 300mm in length. Table 4 lists the properties of the representative samples.

    Table 4 Properties of the representative samples measured in the experiments

    Using laboratory equipment, experiments were conducted to examine the change in the sound speed while controlling for temperature and pressure, respectively. In the experiments, the environmental conditions were recreated to reflect the most likely state of the seafloor surficial sediment. The experimental system mainly consisted of a measurement bench, a digital sonic meter (WSD-3 or DB4), and a pair of planar transducers. The experimental principles and equipment are described in greater detail in Kan. (2019). In the temperature-controlled experiments, the equipment was filled with air at 1atm, and the temperature of the sediment sample was controlled at in- crements of 1℃. In the pressure-controlled experiments, the pressure chamber was filled with seawater, and the hydrostatic pressure of the sediment sample was controlled at increments of 2MPa. The temperature during the pressure measurement process was 25.6℃±0.5℃. At each controlled temperature or pressure, the sound speed of the sediment was measured using an acoustic pulse detection technique and the time-of-flight method. To compare theand laboratory acoustic detection approaches used in different methods and by different researchers, several representative detection frequencies, as shown in Table 4, were chosen in the ultrasonic range. The degree of uncertainty of the sample length measurement was approximately 0.5mm. The total uncertainty of the sound velocity measurements was approximately±1.8ms?1.

    3.2 Experimental Results of the Temperature-Dependent Sound Velocity Ratio

    For comparison, a sandy sample measured at 1MHz was provided (Carbó and Molero, 2000), which consisted of fine sand with a porosity of 42% and a density of 1.97gcm?3. Its sound velocity ratio was found to decrease with increases in temperature. The sound velocity ratios of samples TS1, TS2, STX1204, and STX1205 in Fig.4 show a similar decreasing trend even with different sediment types, different acoustic detection frequencies, and sediments from different sea areas. The uneven variation in the sound velocity ratio indicates the anisotropy and non-unifor- mity of the sediment. Table 5 lists the relative and absolute change rates of the sound velocity ratio with tempe- rature.

    The theoretical EDFM calculation can explain the decreasing trend of the sound velocity ratio (Fig.4), verifying that the temperature mainly affects the acoustic properties of the seafloor sedimentchanges in the elastic modulus, density, and viscosity of the pore water. The de- creasing trend and fluctuation of the sound velocity ratio in this experiment imply that the sound velocity ratio should not be regarded as a constant when the temperature changes.

    3.3 Experimental Results of the Hydrostatic-Pre- ssure-Dependent Sound Velocity Ratio

    As shown in Fig.5, the sound velocity ratios of sandy samples SPE1404 and SPE1901 decreased with the hydrostatic pressure, and those of samples SPE1402, SPE- 1403, and SPE1405 also showed a decreasing trend. Table 5 lists the relative and absolute change rates of the sound velocity ratio with hydrostatic pressure. The decreasing trend and fluctuation in the sound velocity ratio with hydrostatic pressure in this experiment imply that the sound velocity ratio must not be regarded as a constant.

    Fig.4 Dependence of the sound velocity ratio in different sediments on temperature: STX1204 (), STX1205 (), TS1 (), TS4 (), and Carbó’s sand sample () (Carbó and Molero, 2000) denote the experimental results, and the solid lines represent the calculated EDFM results.

    The theoretical EDFM calculation can explain the decreasing trend of the sound velocity ratio. The hydrostatic pressure was found to mainly affect the acoustic properties of the seafloor sedimentchanges in the elastic modu- lus, density, and viscosity of the pore seawater. This well explains the influence of hydrostatic pressure on the sound velocity of sandy sediment, with slight deviations for silty and clayed sediments, as shown in Fig.5.

    Table 5 Variations in the sound velocity ratio with temperature and hydrostatic pressure, as determined by analysis of the experimental results

    Fig.5 Dependence of the sound velocity ratio on hydrosta- tic pressure in different sediments: SPE1402 (○), SPE14- 03 (×), SPE1404 (□), SPE1405 (◇), and SPE1901 (☆) denote the experimental results, and the solid lines represent the calculated EDFM results.

    4 Discussion

    Sandy sediments have good porous connections, with the inside pore water being well-connected and easily ba- lancing changes in temperature and pressure. The physical state of pore water rapidly changes and evenly affects the solid grains of the sediment due to the good porous connections. Because of the relatively minor changes in the solid grains within the experimental temperature and pressure ranges, changes in the physical properties of the pore water was determined to dominate changes in the acoustic properties of the sediments. This finding was ve- rified in both the temperature experiment (Carbó’s sand sample, STX1204, and TS1 in Fig.4) and pressure expe- riment(SPE1404 and SPE1901 in Fig.5), and shows good agreement with the theoretical analysis. However, the porous connections are complex. In sediments with more clay and silt, the pores are smaller and the pore channels are narrower, although the pore water retained its dominant role in the experiments. However, reconstruction of tortuous pore channels by changes in the environmental conditions becomes increasingly complex, due to the enhanced capillary action and blockage effect of more finely grained particles. Fluctuations occur with changes in the physical properties of the sediment, followed by changes in the sound speed of the sediment. Due to heat conduction, the silty sample STX1205 and the clayey sample TS4 in the temperature experiment showed the same change phenomenon as the sandy samples. However, in the hydrostatic pressure experiment, effects such as capillary action and the blockage effect lead to more complex influences on the sediment. These effects may increase the non-uni- formity and weaken the effect of the pore water, which was found in the clayey sample SPE1202 and the silty sam- ples SPE1203 and SPE1205 at high pressure. The sound velocity ratios of the silty and clayey samples seemed to first rapidlyand then slowly decrease, whereas the sound velocity of the sandy sample decreased almost immediately. This phenomenon merits further study.

    In Table 5, the uneven variation in the sound velocity ratio indicates anisotropy and non-uniformity in the sedi- ment. The inhomogeneous distribution of the sediment-grain composition and the loosely packed pore structure can lead to a micro-reconstruction of the texture under the action of thermal or hydrostatic stress, which then causes a slight fluctuation in the sound speed of the sediment (Zou., 2015, 2019).

    The sound-speed dispersion in samples SPE1402 and SPE1403 slightly increased in by approximately 10ms?1, whereas the acoustic frequency increased from 25kHz to 250kHz (Kan., 2018).This dispersion is smaller than the result obtained by Buckingham and Richardson (2002) of approximately 17ms?1, with the acoustic frequency increasing from 25kHz to 100kHz. The difference may be due to the different types of seafloor sedimentin the two studies. It indicates that the dispersion of seafloor sediments hadno significant effect on the detection frequency in this experiment (in Table 4). Although the acoustic detection frequencies were different and dispersion was evident in the datasets, the experimental results showed that the influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio resulted in almost the same change trend at different detection frequencies. As shown in Fig.4, the sound velocity ratios changed similarly with increases in temperature at 1MHz, 23.8kHz, and 35kHz, which agrees with the EDFM analysis shown in Fig.1a. As depicted in Fig.5, the sound velocity ratios changed similarly with increases in the hydrostatic pressure at 33kHz and 100kHz, which substantially agrees with the EDFM analysis shown in Fig.1b.

    The experimental results showed that the sound velo- city ratio decreased with increases in both temperature and hydrostatic pressure. Compared with the theoretical calculations, the experimental results showed fluctuations in the decreasing trend due to the complex texture and composition of the actual samples. The experimental ana- lysis showed that the sound velocity ratio changed up to 0.0008per℃ when the temperature ranged from 2℃ to 25℃ and up to 0.0064MPa?1when the hydrostatic pressure ranged from 0 to 40MPa. The experimental results were slightly larger than those obtained by theoretical analysis. The change rate of the sound velocity due to changes in hydrostatic pressure was slightly higher than that due to changes in temperature for the examined environmental conditions.

    Therefore, use of the sound velocity ratio method(Ha- milton, 1971), wherein the sound velocity ratio is consi- dered to be constant, can incur errors when it is applied to correct the variation in sound speed caused by variations in temperature and hydrostatic pressure under different environmental conditions (.,, laboratory, and different depths below the seafloor). The expected errors can be estimated, as shown in Table 5.

    5 Conclusions

    Various compositions and textures are major factors that determine the acoustic properties of seafloor sediments. However, temperature and hydrostatic pressure are also key factors that impact the acoustic properties of seafloor surficial sediments in different sedimentary environmental conditions. By comparing the results obtained by experimental measurements and theoretical calculations, the re- lationship between the sound velocity ratio and environmental factors was investigated with consideration of boththe sediment types and different detection frequencies. These analyses yielded some meaningful results, from which the following conclusions can be drawn:

    1) Among the three environmental factors considered, the sound velocity ratio is sensitive to temperature and pressure but not to salinity.

    2) In surficial sediments, pore water plays a key role in the sound velocity ratio of sediment influenced by environmental factors.

    3) The sound velocities of different types of sediments (sandy, silty, and clayey sediments) change in similar ways with temperature, but change slightly differently with hy- drostatic pressure.

    4) The influence of environmental factors on the sound velocity ratio of seafloor sediments is independent of different detection frequencies.

    5) The sound velocity ratio decreases with both temperature and hydrostatic pressure.

    6) The results obtained by experimental measurements regarding the influence of temperature and hydrostatic pressure on the sound velocity ratio agree with those obtained by the EDFM.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41676055 and 41776043), the Natural Science Foundation of GuangdongProvince (No. 2019A1515011055), and the Foundation of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Te- chnology (No. MGQNLM-KF201805). The authors wish to thank the staff at Guangdong University of Technology, the First Institute of Oceanography of Ministry of Natural Resources, and the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology of Chinese Academy of Sciences for performing mea-surements, conducting experiments, analyzing the datasets, and discussing the findings for this research. The authors also wish to thank the reviewers and Pro. Guoliang Ye for providing so much valuable advice regarding this paper.

    Bachman, R. T., 1989. Estimating velocity ratio in marine sediment., 86 (5): 2029-2032, DOI: 10.1121/1.398585.

    Ballard, M. S., Lee, K. M., McNeese, A. R., Wilson, P. S., and Goff, J. A., 2016. Development of a system formea- surements of geoacoustic properties during sediment coring.of, 139: 2125.

    Buckingham, M. J., 2005. Compressional and shear wave pro- perties of marine sediments: Comparisons between theory and data., 117 (1): 137-152, DOI: 10.1121/1.1810231.

    Buckingham, M. J., and Richardson, M. D., 2002. On tone-burst measurements of sound speed and attenuation in sandy marine sediments., 27 (3): 429-453, DOI: 10.1109/joe.2002.1040929.

    Buckingham, M. J., Giddens, E. M., Simonet, F., and Hahn, T. R., 2012. Propeller noise from a light aircraft for low-frequency measurements of the, speed of sound in a marine se- diment., 10 (4): 445-464, DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x02001760.

    Carbó, R., and Molero, A. C., 2000. The effect of temperature on sound wave absorption in a sediment layer., 108 (4): 1545-1547, DOI: 10.1121/1.1289360.

    Chapman, N. R., 2016. A critical review of geoacoustic inversion: What does it really tell us about the ocean bottom?, 140 (4): 3023, DOI: 10.1121/1.4969376.

    De, C., and Chakraborty, B., 2011. Model-based acoustic remote sensing of seafloor characteristics., 49 (10): 3868-3877, DOI: 10.1109/ tgrs.2011.2139218.

    Eastwood, J., 1993. Temperature-dependent propagation of P- and S-waves of Cold Lake oil sands: Comparison of theory and experiment., 58 (6): 863-871, DOI: 10.1190/1. 1443470.

    Endler, M., Endler, R., Bobertz, B., Leipe, T., and Arz, H. W., 2015. Linkage between acoustic parameters and seabed sediment properties in the south-western Baltic Sea., 35 (2): 145-160, DOI: 10.1007/s00367-015-0397-3.

    Gorgas, T. J., Wilkens, R. H., Fu, S. S., Neil Frazer, L., Richardson, M. D., Briggs, K. B., and Lee, H., 2002.acoustic and laboratory ultrasonic sound speed and attenuation mea- sured in heterogeneous soft seabed sediments: Eel River shelf, California., 182 (1): 103-119, DOI: 10.1016/ S0025-3227(01)00230-4.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1970. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments, North Pacific., 75 (23): 4423-4446, DOI: 10.1029/JB075i023p04423.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1971. Prediction ofacoustic and elastic properties of marine sediments., 36 (2): 366-377, DOI: 10.1190/1.1440168.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1985. Sound velocity as a function of depth in marine sediments., 78 (4): 1348-1355, DOI: 10.1121/1.392905.

    Hamilton, E. L., and Bachman, R. T., 1982. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments., 72 (6): 1891-1904, DOI: 10.11 21/1.388539.

    Hoffman, N. W., and Tobin, H. J., 2002. An empirical relationship between velocity and porosity for underthrust sediments of the Nankai Trough accretionary prism., 190/196: 1-23, DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.190196.355.2004.

    Jackson, D. R., and Richardson, M. D., 2007.. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1-605.

    Kan, G., Liu, B., Wang, J., Meng, X., Li, G., Hua, Q., and Sun, L., 2018. Sound speed dispersion characteristics of three typesof shallow sediments in the southern Yellow Sea.y, 36 (7): 853-860, DOI: 10.1080/ 1064119X.2017.1392659.

    Kan, G., Su, Y., Li, G., Liu, B., and Meng, X., 2013. The correlations betweensound speeds and physical parameters of seafloor sediments in the middle area of the southern Huang- hai Sea., 35 (3): 166-171, DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2013.03.019.

    Kan, G., Zou, D., Liu, B., Wang, J., Meng, X., Li, G., and Pei, Y., 2019. Correction for effects of temperature and pressure on sound speed in shallow seafloor sediments., 37 (10): 1217-1226, DOI: 10.1080/ 1064119X.2018.1545812.

    Kim, S., Lee, G. S., Kim, D., Hahn, J., and Ryang, W., 2018. Variation of temperature-dependent sound velocity in unconsolidated marine sediments: Laboratory measurements., 36 (3): 280-287, DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2016.1277442.

    Li, Z., and Li, F., 2010. Geoacoustic inversion for sediments in the South China Sea based on a hybrid inversion scheme., 28 (5): 990- 995, DOI: 10.1007/s00343-010-9117-z.

    Lu, B., Li, G., Huang, S., and Li, C., 2006. Physical properties of sediments on the northern continental shelf of the South China Sea., 24 (1): 47- 60, DOI: 10.1080/10641190600559523.

    Lu, B., Li, G., Liu, Q., Huang, S., and Zhang, F., 2007. A study on seafloor sediment and its acouso-physical properties in the southeast offshore sea area of Hainan Island in China., 29 (4): 34-42, DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:02 53-4193.2007.04.004.

    Meng, X., Li, G., Han, G., and Kan, G., 2015. Sound velocity and related properties of seafloor sediments in the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea., 34 (5): 75-80, DOI: 10.1007/s13131-015-0669-9.

    Rajan, S. D., and Frisk, G. V., 1992. Seasonal variations of the sediment compressional wave-speed profile in the Gulf of Me- xico., 91 (1): 127-135, DOI: 10.1121/1.402760.

    Richardson, M. D., and Briggs, K. B., 1996.and laboratory geoacoustic measurements in soft mud and hard-packed sand sediments: Implications for high-frequency acoustic pro- pagation and scattering., 16 (3): 196-203, DOI: 10.1007/BF01204509.

    Richardson, M. D., and Briggs, K. B., 2004. Empirical predictions of seafloor properties based on remotely measured se- diment impedance.. La Jolla, CA, 12-21, DOI: 10.1063/1.1842992.

    Shumway, G., 1958. Sound velocity. temperature in water- saturated sediments., 23 (3): 494-505, DOI: 10.11 21/1.1930017.

    Tao, C. H., Deng, X. M., Li, H. X., Zhou, J. P., Jin, X. B., Fu, S. S., Wilkens, R. H., Gu, C. H., and He, Y. H., 2009. Development ofmarine sediment geo-acoustic measurement system with real-time and multi frequencies (the second ge- neration)., 23 (4): 769-778, DOI: 10. 1016/j.oceaneng.2008.10.004.

    Wang, J., Guo, C., Liu, B., Hou, Z., and Han, G., 2016. Distribution of geoacoustic properties and related influencing factors of surface sediments in the southern South China Sea., 37 (4): 1-12, DOI: 10.1007/s11001-0 16-9294-z.

    Williams, K. L., 2001. An effective density fluid model for acoustic propagation in sediments derived from Biot theory., 110 (5): 2276- 2281, DOI: 10.1121/1.4776930.

    Williams, K., Ewart, T., Jackson, D., Thorsos, E., Dahl, P., and Tang, D., 2015. Six decades of evolution in underwater acoustics at the Applied Physics Laboratory-University of Washington (APL-UW).,23: 1-15, DOI: 10.1121/1.4920514.

    Zou, D., 2018. Relationship between the sound velocity ratio of the compressional wave and the physical characteristics of seafloor sediments., 43 (1): 41-51, DOI: 10.159 49/j.cnki.0371-0025.2018.01.005 (in Chinese with English abs- tract).

    Zou, D., Kan, G., Long, J., and Xiao, T., 2019. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on the sound speed of surficial seafloor se- diments., 37 (3): 277- 281, DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2017.1409300.

    Zou, D., Williams, K. L., and Thorsos, E. I., 2015. Influence of temperature on the acoustic sound speed and attenuation of sand sediment., 40 (4): 969-980, DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2014.2365072.

    June 11, 2020;

    October 9, 2020;

    December 8, 2020

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    E-mail: anthonyzou@gdut.edu.cn E-mail: kgming135@fio.org.cn

    (Edited by Chen Wenwen)

    亚洲图色成人| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本免费在线观看一区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国产 一区精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 午夜免费观看性视频| 一个人免费看片子| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 如何舔出高潮| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 香蕉国产在线看| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 成人国语在线视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| www.av在线官网国产| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 婷婷色综合www| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久青草综合色| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品第一国产精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美bdsm另类| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成人国语在线视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 成人无遮挡网站| 有码 亚洲区| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产精品.久久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品一二三| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久久国产一区二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 老女人水多毛片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 999精品在线视频| 久久av网站| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久免费观看电影| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 五月开心婷婷网| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 春色校园在线视频观看| kizo精华| 观看av在线不卡| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 91国产中文字幕| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产成人精品久久久久久| xxx大片免费视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 熟女av电影| 日本午夜av视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 赤兔流量卡办理| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产av一区二区精品久久| av播播在线观看一区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人二区视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品免费大片| 香蕉精品网在线| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产 一区精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 人妻系列 视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 51国产日韩欧美| 尾随美女入室| 精品午夜福利在线看| 韩国av在线不卡| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 人人澡人人妻人| videos熟女内射| freevideosex欧美| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲成色77777| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 国产在视频线精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲国产av新网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产成人精品在线电影| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 成人影院久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 中文欧美无线码| av电影中文网址| 亚洲精品一二三| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久热在线av| h视频一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| a 毛片基地| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美另类一区| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| www.色视频.com| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 伦理电影免费视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美+日韩+精品| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| a 毛片基地| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 看免费av毛片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日韩伦理黄色片| 少妇 在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久久视频综合| 一个人免费看片子| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产精品一国产av| 99热全是精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费av不卡在线播放| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久av网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| av电影中文网址| av有码第一页| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲av福利一区| videos熟女内射| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 日本午夜av视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 免费av不卡在线播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 高清av免费在线| tube8黄色片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 一区二区三区精品91| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| av一本久久久久| 三级国产精品片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产高清三级在线| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲综合精品二区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久97久久精品| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 男人操女人黄网站| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜视频国产福利| 日韩中字成人| 久久久久网色| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 成年动漫av网址| 一区二区三区精品91| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产在视频线精品| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人手机av| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 在线看a的网站| av在线播放精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美3d第一页| 日本黄大片高清| 高清不卡的av网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产又爽黄色视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 大香蕉久久网| av电影中文网址| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久av网站| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 九草在线视频观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 两个人看的免费小视频| 一级爰片在线观看| av福利片在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 伦理电影大哥的女人| videossex国产| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| www.色视频.com| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| videos熟女内射| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 看免费av毛片| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 色吧在线观看| 成人二区视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲国产色片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av在线老鸭窝| 精品久久久久久电影网| 黄色 视频免费看| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产成人aa在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 免费看光身美女| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 考比视频在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 乱人伦中国视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| videossex国产| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产色婷婷99| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久人人爽人人片av| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲性久久影院| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 内地一区二区视频在线| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| a级毛片黄视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久影院123| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 美女福利国产在线| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久99精品国语久久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日日啪夜夜爽| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品.久久久| 咕卡用的链子| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 两个人免费观看高清视频| av天堂久久9| 久久av网站| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产精品成人在线| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费看光身美女| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 一级毛片电影观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区|