• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Empirical Equations of P-Wave Velocity in the Shallow and Semi-Deep Sea Sediments from the South China Sea

    2021-06-25 11:13:08LIGuanbaoHOUZhengyuWANGJingqiangKANGuangmingandLIUBaohua
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年3期

    LI Guanbao, HOU Zhengyu, WANG Jingqiang, KAN Guangming, and LIU Baohua, 7)

    Empirical Equations of P-Wave Velocity in the Shallow and Semi-Deep Sea Sediments from the South China Sea

    LI Guanbao1), 6), HOU Zhengyu2), 3), 4), 5), *, WANG Jingqiang1), 6), KAN Guangming1), 6), and LIU Baohua1), 6), 7)

    1),,,266061,2),,,,510301,3),,511458,4),,100190,5),511458,6),,266237,7),,266237,

    Three-hundred and thirty-one sediment cores, including six sediment types (clayey- and sandy-silt, silty- and sandy-clay, clayey- and silty-sand) were collected from the shallow and semi-deep seas of the South China Sea, and the P-wave velocities and physical properties of core sediments were measured under standard laboratory conditions. To eliminate the influence of environmental factors, the empirical sound speed ratio equations were established. Compared with several equations from literature, the porosity and wet bulk density empirical equations established in this paper agree well with Richardson and Briggs (2004)’sequations, which implies that our empirical equations can be used in the similar region of world’s oceans under certain conditions and will be useful in areas lacking first-hand P-wave speed data. However, the mean grain size equations established in this study, similar to the previous studies, have low accuracy, which may be due to the different particle arrangements and degrees of compaction in sediments. The results also show that for different sediment types, the equation based on all sediment data is in good agreement with the measured data in the study area, as there are both siliciclastic and carbonate sediments on the studied seabed. It is suggested that appropriate empirical equations should be selected according to sediment types and sedimentary environment in future works, and the empirical equation of porosity or the two-parameter equation of porosity and grain size should be preferred.

    seafloor sediment; geo-acoustic property; sound speed; empirical equation; South China Sea

    1 Introduction

    In the waveguide of the shallow and semi-deep sea (SSD),the seabed is a dominant factor controlling underwater acoustic propagation by bottom reflection and scattering losses (Zhou and Zhang, 2010). Sediment geo-acoustic pa- rameters, such as P-wave speeds, and their relationships with physical properties are important in many marine- geophysical applications (Liu., 2019), such as seismic exploration, seismic inversion and marine engineering. The geo-acoustic properties of SSD sediments are affected by many factors, such as sediment source, ocean current, water column and benthic organisms. Successful estimation of geo-acoustic properties in seabed sediments, such as the P-wave speed (hereafter called sound speed or SS), has been the goal of many studies involving inverse techniques (Zou and Kan, 2011; Suzuki., 2015; Mi- chalopoulou and Gerstoft, 2019). Core sediments are the primary samples for obtaining geo-acoustic parameters, which provide valuable insight into physical properties of the seabed (Konno., 2015; Ballard., 2019).

    Both empirical and physical models have been used to predict the relationships between seafloor geo-acoustic parameters and physical properties; however, the former has significant advantages since some of parameters required by physical models are either very difficult or nearlyimpossible to be obtained (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). To acquire the accurate sound speed data, many researchers have established several empirical equations based on the sediment cores from different regions. In the last century, Hamilton and co-workers (Hamilton, 1970; Hamilton and Bachman, 1982; Bachman, 1989) studied the acoustic characteristics of marine sediment worldwide and established empirical relationships between sound speed and physical properties for various topographical regions (con- tinental terrace, abyssal hill, and abyssal plain). Consi- derable efforts have been made to develop empirical equations (Richardson., 2002; Goff., 2004; Endler., 2016) that can be used to predict the acoustic behavior of marine sediments. Few studies concerning the geo-acoustic and physical properties of sediments in the South China Sea (SCS) have been published. Basic characteristics and general distribution of sediments in the southeast offshore sea area off the Hainan Island were analyzed by Lu. (2008), and the regional empirical equations for sediments were established based on the data. Wang. (2018) used thesystem to measure seafloor sediment acoustic properties in SCS, and com- pared the results with several empirical equations, and found that the measured data were closed to the results calculated by the equation of Richardson and Briggs (2004). Hou. (2015, 2018a, 2018b) investigated the vertical and planar distribution of acoustic parameters of sediments in the southern and central areas of SCS and studied the effects of ocean currents and sediment source on the sound speed of sediments. Geo-acoustic parameters are influenced by multiple factors, and different seabed environments have different sediment acoustic properties. Due to the limited number of sediment samples and no standard measurement methods, the empirical equations for SCS given in many of these studies, which are based on variety of techniques (different measurement methods or frequencies), are limited in practical application. In this study, the same measurement method and frequency were used to measure the geo-acoustic parameters for more than 300 different types of core sediment samples collected in the SSD of the SCS at the same batch. Empirical equations between sediment geo-acoustic and physical parameters were established and compared with several equations from the literature.

    2 Materials and Methods

    Sediment cores were collected by a gravity corer in the SSD area in the north and west of SCS (water depth less than 1500m), among which the shortest sediment core was only 25cm long, and the longest core was 3m long. There was a plexiglass hard tube in the gravity corer and the two ends of sediment cores were sealed, which was conducive to the preservation of moisture and transport of cores. The sediment acoustic parameters were measured by the coaxial differential distance method under the standard laboratory conditions (23℃, salinity 35, and atmosphe- ric pressure). Details about the measurement method are described in Hou. (2018a, 2018b). The transmitting waveform was produced from a signal generator, and the waveform was received by the receiving transducer and recorded by a digital recorder at a sample rate of 10MHz. The long cores are cut into sections every 25cm and each section is acoustically measured. The transducer frequency was 100kHz, and the compressional sound speed was cal- culated by using the sediment length and the propagation time of the acoustic signals. The speed in pore-water was reported under the standard laboratory conditions favored by Hamilton (23℃, salinity 35, and atmospheric pressure). These conditions correspond to a water sound speed of 1529.4ms?1and a water density of 1024kgm?3, as calculated by the Del Grosso equation (1974). The sound speed ratio (SSR) is defined as the ratio of the measured sediment sound speed to the pore-water sound speed at same temperature, salinity, and pressure.

    All sections were sub-sampled at their tops and ends, and additional samples were taken at depths with special interests. The porosity and water content were determined from the weight loss of sediments. Grain density was determined using a pycnometer. Sediment bulk density is calculated from the porosity and densities of pore water and sediment particles (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). The sediment particle size parameters were analyzed by the British Mastersizer 2000 laser diffraction particle size analyzer, and according to the percentage of each fraction in the sediment, the sediment type can be determined.

    3 Results

    The sediments collected in this study consisted of clay- ey-silt, sandy-silt, silty-clay, sandy-clay, clayey-sand and silty-sand (based on Shepard ternary diagrams, 1954). The geo-acoustic and physical parameters measured in this study included sound speed (SS), wet bulk density (ρ), meangrain size (Mz), and porosity (n). Three-hundred and thirty- one samples were examined in the study area, with 135 silty-clay, 131 clayey-silt, 37 silty-sand, 15 clayey-sand, 8 sandy-silt, and 5 sandy-clay. The statistical acoustic and physical parameters for different sediment types are listed in Table 1. The results show that the SS of sandy sediments (clayey-sand and silty-sand) was the highest, with the average larger than 1600ms?1, and the sandy sediments had higher wet bulk densities, particle sizes, and lower porosity. The lowest SS occurred in the clayey sediments (silty-clay and sandy-clay), with the average of about 1500ms?1, and the clayey sediments had lower wet bulk density, particle size, and higher porosity. The SS of silty sediment (sandy-silt and clayey-silt) was between clayey and sandy sediments. The results also show that the SS was closely related with physical properties, and the SS was proportional to the wet bulk density and particle size but was inversely proportional to porosity, which is consistent with previous studies (Hamilton, 1972; Hamilton and Bachman, 1982). Sound speed in sediments varies with seabed environment (temperature, pressure, and pore water salinity), and the laboratory environment is usually different from theenvironment. In order to eliminate the influence of the environment on the speed of sediments, Hamilton proposed the term ‘sound speed ratio (SSR)’, which was defined as the ratio of SS of sediments to the SS of water at the same temperature, salinity, and pressure (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). We used a least squares method to perform regression analysis on all data and established empirical equations for the SSR and some physical parameters (,and). The empirical equations are listed in Table 2.

    Table 1 The acoustic and physical parameters of six types of sediments

    4 Discussion

    As previous studied, SS exhibits strong inverse relation- ship with(Fig.1). Also shown in Fig.2, SSR decreased with the increase of. Whenwas approximately 75%, an inflection was encountered, and SSR began to increase with. The differences between this paper and other stu- dies (Bachman, 1989; Richardson and Briggs, 2004; Jack- son and Richardson, 2007) are plotted in Fig.2, and the equations used in this paper are listed in Table 2. The curve of this study fit well with the datameasured by using ISSAMS (Jackson and Richardson, 2007). The curve of Bachman (1989) is much higher than our curve, especially for high SS sediments. The curves of Richardson and Briggs (2004) are slightly higher than ours, while the one determined by all sediment equation was closer to the measured data. These results agree well with the work done by Wang. (2018) in the same sea area. The results obtained from the carbonate equation were only a bit less than those of all sediment equations when porosity wassmaller than 75%. However, when the porosity was greater than 75%, the prediction accuracy of carbonate equation was less than all sediment equations, which demonstrates that sediment type is an important factor influencing the SS.

    Table 2 Regression equations used in this paper

    Fig.3 illustrates the relationship between SSR andfor sediments from the SSD of SCS. It can be seen that the SSR has a positive relationship with. Whenwas larger than 1.40gcm?3, SSR began to increase with. As in the case of Fig.3, the curve of Bachman equation is higher than other studies, while the curve of this study is basically consistent with theone. After comparing Fig.2 with Fig.3, we can see that the trends ofandwere basically inverse becauseandhad a negative linear relationship (Fig.1). Just as the relationship ofand, thealso had a linear relationship with, which was more dispersed (Fig.1). The relationship between SSR andis display- ed in Fig.4. Generally, SSR increased with increasing. Kim. (2012) suggested that grain size affects sound speed through its influence on porosity, density, and other factors. The relationship between SSR andis sometimes important when grain size analyses can be made on dried sediments, on which density, porosity and sound speed measurements cannot be made (Hamilton and Bachman, 1982). In Fig.4, the curve of this study was not close to the curve of the Bachman equation or the curve of themeasurement (ISSAMS). Whenwas between 3 and 5.5f, the measured SS were relatively scattered. In this case, the Bachman equation had the highest predicted SS, and the equation established in this paper and ISSAMS equations give the results in the middle of the scattered points. When thewas between 5.5 and 9f, the measured SS was relatively concentrated. Our equation was con- sistent with the measured data; however, the predicted SS of other equations were higher than the measured data, and the siliciclastic equation has the highest predicted SS. Due to the uncertain relationship between the SSR and, the equation of the SSR based onof the sediment often has a low prediction accuracy for the data in SCS, especially whenis small. This may be due to the different particle arrangement and compaction degree in se- diments. The mean grain size (Mz) alone cannot express the characteristics of the particles (Wang., 2019). The different measuring methods of mean grain size used in these studies, which bring different errors, may be one of the reasons for not being able to use thealone.

    Fig.1 Scatter plots of acoustic and physical parameters of different type sediments.

    Fig.2 Sound speed ratio vs. porosity for sediments from the SSD of SCS. The empirical equation in this paper is: VSSR=1.587?1.591n+1.042n2, with n ranging from 0.43 to 0.82. The root mean square error (RMSE) for this equation is 0.0135, the sum of squared estimate of errors (SSE) is 0.05982 and R-square is 0.8232.

    Fig.3 Sound speed ratio vs. wet bulk density for sediments from the SSD of SCS. The empirical equation of this paper is: VSSR=1.692?1.011ρ+0.3591ρ2, in which ρ ranges 1.30 to 1.97gcm?3. The RMSE for this equation is 0.0144, the SSE is 0.06798 and R-square is 0.7991.

    Fig.4 Sound speed ratio vs. mean grain size for sediments from the SW of SCS. The empirical equation of this paper is: VSSR=1.307?0.07763Mz+0.004578Mz2, in which Mzranges 3.04 to 8.60f. The RMSE for this equation is 0.01377, the SSE is 0.06215 and R-square is 0.8163.

    Richardson and Briggs (2004) collected nearly 800 cores from 67 shallow-water sites worldwide (12 carbonate and 55 siliciclastic sediment sites), and they obtained nearly 4500 data points resulting from measurements or calculations (3922 siliciclastic and 621 carbonate) to yield the SSR regression equations (Table 2). From Fig.2, we can see that the SSR curve calculated by the equation for sili- ciclastic sediments was nearly parallel to the curve of this paper, and the maximum difference was about 0.0216. In Fig.3, the equations for siliciclastic and all sediments almost coincided, and both had a maximum difference of about 0.0212. We found in Fig.4 that the equations for siliciclastic and all sediments had a large difference in our study area with the maximum up to 0.0405. However, the discrepancy between the equations for all sediments and those in this paper is smaller, and for the low SS sediments, their curves almost coincided. The results calculated by the regression equations between SSR and physical properties are similar for carbonate and siliciclastic sediments, and Richardson and Briggs (2004) suggest a universal applicability of the SSR regression equations for all sediments. The sediments in the shallow and semi-deep areasof the SCS are mostly siliciclastic sediments and often con- tain more than 30% CaCO3(Li., 2004). Therefore, all sediment equations fit better with the data for the SSD in SCS than the siliciclastic equation, especially for porosity. All sediment equations were based on data for both siliciclastic and carbonate sediments. They have a wide range of applications and are suitable for all sediment types.

    Another probable reason for the differences among equations may be the differences in instrumentation and computation. Data from Bachman (1989) were measured at a frequency of 200kHz, whereas data from Richardson and Briggs (2004) were measured at a single high frequency (400kHz) and may not be compared with our lower frequency data (100kHz). According to dispersion characteristics, the sound speed decreases with decreasing fre- quency. It is reasonable that the values we measured could have been smaller than their measurement values. The data for theequations was measured by ISSAMS at frequency of 38 or 58kHz, and therefore have higher accuracy. Until now, no systematic analysis has been con- ducted to yield standardized sediment sound speed data. This process is out of the scope of this study, but a standard measurement procedure or anmeasuring me- thod should be developed for geo-acoustic databases.

    Hamilton and Bachman (1982) believed that marine sediments consist of only a few common mineral species, and there are few variations in the physical properties of bottom water. So, for a given sediment type (in a given environment), the bulk elastic properties should be almost the same worldwide. The common geo-acoustic relationship could be used to estimate the sound speed for unknown regions with similar porosity. We also confirmed that for given the same sediment types, the porosity-SSR equation can be used to estimate SSR for different regions. However, when the SSR of sediments was relatively low (SSR<1), there was an apparent envelope for sediments within the range from 1.30 to 1.76gcm?3,of 0.57 to 0.82, andof 5.78 to 8.60f(Phi), indicating that the SSR was relatively insensitive to changes of sediment phy- sical parameters. When the SSR of sediments was relatively high (SSR>1), there is an apparent envelope for se- diments within the range from 1.68 to 1.97gcm?3,of 0.43 to 0.58, andof 3.04 to 5.93f, which indicates that the SSR was relatively sensitive to changes of sediment physical parameters. The sound speed can be affected by multiple physical parameters although porosity is the primary one, given that the porosity may not produce an accurate speed. With the same porosity, the sediments may still have different grain sizes, resulting in different sound speeds. For example, in Fig.5, when the porosity was about 0.55 to 0.58, the different mean grain sizes (or different sediment types) account for the different sound speeds of sediments.

    Fig.5 Sound speed ratio vs. mean grain size and porosity. The red cross is for samples with Mz ranging from 3 to 5f, the yellow diamond is for Mz ranging from 5 to 7f, and the blue hollow circle is for Mz ranging from 7 to 9f.

    In order to yield a creditable equation that takes into account both porosity and sediment types, we recommend adding a parameter, mean grain size, in the above formula because the grain size can not only represent the sediment type, but also is invariant for measurements both in the seabed and in the laboratory. The two-parameter equation (SSR--equation) in our study was that:

    in whichranged from 0.43 to 0.82, andranged from 3.04 to 8.60f. The RMSE for this equation was 0.01024, the SSE was 0.03529 and-square was 0.8957. This equa- tion has a higher-square and a smaller RMSE than the single parameter equations (SSR-, SSR-equation). How- ever, it can generate an accurate estimate of speed for dif- ferent regions and sediment types when porosity and mean grain size data are available.

    5 Conclusions

    Seafloor sediments from the SSD of SCS were collected to study the relationship between geo-acoustic parameters and physical properties. The results show that the empirical equations established in this paper accord well with theequations. This study confirms the sound speed is more correlated with wet density and porosity than with mean grain size. The discrepancy among different equations may be caused by the different carbo- nate contents, the various measured frequency for sound speeds, and different measurement methods for physical properties.

    Due to the limitations of samples, the empirical equations given in this study are more suitable for the fine sediments in shallow and semi-deep sea. This study suggests that moredata should be measured, and it is necessary to strengthen the comparative study between sampling measurements andmeasurements since the sound speed of sediments is affected by many factors, such as sediment source, ocean current, and sediment types. In the next stage, we will compare and study the geo- acoustic properties of seafloor sediments in other sea areas of China, such as the South China, Yellow, and East China Seas. The applicability of empirical equations established in different areas, and the influence mechanism of sedimentary environment on geo-acoustic properties will be investigated.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was funded by the State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. SKLA202 007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41706045, 42076082, 41706062), the Director Fund of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (No. QNLM201713), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. 2017A030313237), the Taishan Scholar Project Funding (No. tspd20161007), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA13010102), and the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (No. GML2019ZD0104).

    Bachman, R. T., 1989. Estimating velocity ratio in marine sediment.,89: 2029-2032.

    Ballard, M. S., Lee, K. M., McNeese, A. R., Wilson, P. S., Chay- tor, J. D., Goff, J. A., and Reed, A. H., 2019.measurements of compressional wave speed during gravity coring operations in the New England mud patch., 45 (1): 26-38.

    Del Grosso, V. A., 1974. New equation for the speed of sound in natural waters (with comparisons to other equations)., 56 (4): 1084-1091.

    Endler, M., Endler, R., Wunderlich, J., Bobertz, B., Leipe, T., Moros, M., Jensen, J., and Arz, H., 2016. Geo-acoustic mo- delling of late and postglacial sedimentary units in the Baltic Sea and their acoustic visibility., 376: 86- 101.

    Goff, J. A., Kraft, B. J., Mayer, L. A., Schock, S. G., Sommerfield, C. K., Olson, H. C., and Nordfjord, S., 2004. Seabed cha- racterization on the New Jersey middle and outer shelf: Correlatability and spatial variability of seafloor sediment pro- perties., 209 (1-4): 147-172.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1970. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments, North Pacific., 75 (23): 4423-4446.

    Hamilton, E. L., 1972. Compressional-wave attenuation in marine sediments., 37 (4): 620.

    Hamilton, E. L., and Bachman, R. T., 1982. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments., 72 (6): 1891-1904.

    Hou, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Zheng, X., Yan, W., Tian, Y., and Luo, Y., 2018a. Acoustic characteristics of seafloor sediments in the abyssal areas of the South China Sea., 156: 93-100.

    Hou, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Zheng, X., Yan, W., Tian, Y., and Luo, Y., 2018b. Acoustic impedance properties of seafloor se- diments off the coast of southeastern Hainan, South China Sea., 154: 1-7.

    Hou, Z., Guo, C., Wang, J., Chen, W., Fu, Y., and Li, T., 2015. Seafloor sediment study from South China Sea: Acoustic & physical property relationship., 7 (9): 11570- 11585.

    Jackson, D. R., and Richardson, M. D., 2007.. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 1-605.

    Kim, D. C., Kim, G. Y., Yi, H. I., Seo, Y. K., Lee, G. S., Jung, J. H., and Kim, J. C., 2012. Geoacoustic provinces of the South Sea shelf off Korea., 263: 139-147.

    Konno, Y., Jin, Y., Yoneda, J., Kida, M., Egawa, K., Ito, T., and Nagao, J., 2015. Effect of methane hydrate morphology on compressional wave velocity of sandy sediments: Analysis of pressure cores obtained in the eastern Nankai Trough., 66: 425-433.

    Li, X., Chen, F., Liu, J., and Huang, X., 2004. Distribution and its dissolution of carbonate in seafloor surface sediment in the western South China Sea., 33 (3): 35-41 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Liu, J., He, Z. L., Liu, X. W., Huo, Z. Z., and Guo, P., 2019. Usingfrequency-dependent AVO inversion to predict the ‘sweet spots’ of shale gas reservoirs., 102: 283-291.

    Lu, B., Li, G., Liu, Q., Huang, S., and Zhang, F., 2008. Sea floor sediment and its acouso-physical properties in the southeast open sea area of Hainan Island in China., 26 (3): 129-144.

    Michalopoulou, Z. H., and Gerstoft, P., 2019. Multipath broadband localization, bathymetry, and sediment inversion., 45 (2): 92-102.

    Richardson, M. D., and Briggs, K. B., 2004. Empirical predictions of seafloor properties based on remotely measured se- diment impedance. In:. Porter, M. B., and Siderius, M., eds., AIP, Melville, NY, 12-21.

    Richardson, M. D., Briggs, K. B., Bentley, S. J., Walter, D. J., and Orsi, T. H., 2002. The effects of biological and hydrodynamic processes on physical and acoustic properties of sediments off the Eel River, California., 182 (1): 121-139.

    Shepard, F. P., 1954. Nomenclature based on sand-silt-clay ratios., 24: 151-158.

    Suzuki, K., Schultheiss, P., Nakatsuka, Y., Ito, T., Egawa, K., and Holland, M., 2015. Physical properties and sedimento- logical features of hydrate-bearing samples recovered from the first gas hydrate production test site on Daini-Atsumi Knoll around eastern Nankai Trough., 66: 346-357.

    Wang, J., Hou, Z., Li, G., Kan, G., and Liu, B., 2019. A new compressional wave speed inversion method based on granularity parameters., 7: 185849-185856

    Wang, J., Li, G., Liu, B., Kan, G., Sun, Z., Meng, X., and Hua, Q., 2018. Experimental study of the ballastsediment acoustic measurement system in South China Sea., 36 (5): 515-521.

    Zhou, J. X., and Zhang, X. Z., 2010. Physical parameters for four seabed geoacoustic models from low-frequency measure- ments., 1272 (1): 163-172.

    Zou, D., and Kan, G., 2011. Application study onacoustic measurement system of seafloor sediments., 9 (4): 1507-1510.

    February 7, 2020;

    May 6, 2020;

    July 24, 2020

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    . E-mail: zyhou@scsio.ac.cn

    (Edited by Chen Wenwen)

    婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品福利永久在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产av国产精品国产| 三级国产精品片| 国产又爽黄色视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 美女国产视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 777米奇影视久久| 99九九在线精品视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产成人精品福利久久| 欧美bdsm另类| av国产精品久久久久影院| 一区二区三区激情视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 在线看a的网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 18禁观看日本| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 春色校园在线视频观看| 欧美在线黄色| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 精品久久久久久电影网| 色播在线永久视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产 精品1| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久97久久精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久青草综合色| 成人二区视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 丁香六月天网| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 婷婷色av中文字幕| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲成人手机| 日韩电影二区| 中文欧美无线码| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲国产色片| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 成人影院久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 一级片'在线观看视频| www日本在线高清视频| 日韩电影二区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| h视频一区二区三区| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 高清av免费在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久久视频综合| 99热全是精品| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲综合色网址| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 高清av免费在线| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 赤兔流量卡办理| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 美国免费a级毛片| 一区福利在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久婷婷青草| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产极品天堂在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| www日本在线高清视频| 宅男免费午夜| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久久精品区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲国产色片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 少妇人妻 视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲av.av天堂| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 91精品三级在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 九草在线视频观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产精品.久久久| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 色哟哟·www| 999精品在线视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 成人国产麻豆网| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲成人手机| 国产淫语在线视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| av.在线天堂| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久精品94久久精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 午夜福利视频精品| 午夜影院在线不卡| av在线观看视频网站免费| 成人影院久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产精品.久久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日本免费在线观看一区| videossex国产| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日本91视频免费播放| av福利片在线| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲人成电影观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| h视频一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲精品视频女| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产片内射在线| 精品一区二区三卡| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 美女中出高潮动态图| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 99久久人妻综合| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产男女内射视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| av有码第一页| 99久久综合免费| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 尾随美女入室| 9色porny在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 观看美女的网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 尾随美女入室| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美另类一区| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 91精品三级在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产免费福利视频在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 五月天丁香电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 超色免费av| 性色av一级| 青草久久国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 久久影院123| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 看免费av毛片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品成人在线| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 在现免费观看毛片| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 91成人精品电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产在视频线精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 一级毛片电影观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 精品国产国语对白av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产综合精华液| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产综合精华液| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 自线自在国产av| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 香蕉丝袜av| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 老熟女久久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 久久免费观看电影| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 色吧在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产在视频线精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产成人精品一,二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产成人精品在线电影| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 美女午夜性视频免费| 我的亚洲天堂| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲精品一二三| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲成色77777| 久久久久精品性色| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 成人国产av品久久久| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 18禁观看日本| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 岛国毛片在线播放| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 热re99久久国产66热| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| www.自偷自拍.com| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 在线天堂最新版资源| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 欧美97在线视频| av在线播放精品| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 9热在线视频观看99| 日韩伦理黄色片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 老女人水多毛片| 午夜免费鲁丝| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 夫妻午夜视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 一本久久精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 满18在线观看网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品一国产av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 精品国产国语对白av| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频|