• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Associations between serum uric acid and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer: A cohort study

    2021-01-13 07:43:32ChongFeiHuangJunJunHuangNingNingMiYanYanLinQiangShengHeYaWenLuPingYueBingBaiJinDuoZhangChaoZhangTengCaiWenKangFuLongGaoXunLiJinQiuYuanWenBoMeng
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年44期
    關(guān)鍵詞:手腳管子脖子

    Chong-Fei Huang, Jun-Jun Huang, Ning-Ning Mi, Yan-Yan Lin, Qiang-Sheng He, Ya-Wen Lu, Ping Yue, Bing Bai, Jin-Duo Zhang, Chao Zhang, Teng Cai, Wen-Kang Fu, Long Gao, Xun Li, Jin-Qiu Yuan, Wen-Bo Meng

    Abstract

    Key Words: Uric acid; Liver neoplasms; Pancreatic neoplasms; Gallbladder neoplasms; Biliary tract neoplasms; Cohort studies

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) cancer includes liver cancer, biliary tract cancer, gallbladder cancer and pancreatic cancer[1-3]. The number of new cases of HBP cancer worldwide in 2018 was approximately 1.85 million, accounting for 10% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases and resulting in a great financial burden[4,5]. Due to the large number of HBP cancer cases, from the perspective of prevention[6,7], identifying highrisk populations has become an urgent public health issue[8-10].

    Serum uric acid (SUA) is the final product of purine nucleotides that are ingested or endogenously synthesized and mainly metabolized by the liver[11]. Because of its function of inhibiting reactive oxygen species formation, SUA was considered a protective factor against cancer[12], and studies have indicated that elevated SUA was associated with low cancer mortality[13,14]. However, subsequent experiments revealed that SUA was associated with inflammatory mediators, which act as cancer-promoting factors[15,16]. A meta-analysis conducted in 2019 that included eight cohort studies investigating cancer incidence, and SUA suggested that high SUA levels increased the risk of all cancers[17].

    However, few previously published studies have focused on the SUA levels and the incidence of cancer at specific sites, and none of these studies highlighted HBP cancer. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the associations between SUA and the HBP cancer risk based on the UK Biobank cohort.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study design and population

    The UK Biobank is a national and international health resource with over 500000 participants aged 40-69 years recruited from all over the United Kingdom from 2006-2010. More details of the UK Biobank are available elsewhere[18]. The UK Biobank has received ethical approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee, the England and Wales Patient Information Advisory Group and the Scottish Community Health Index Advisory Group. All participants provided written informed consent. In this analysis, we excluded 26868 participants with any cancer prior to recruitment (except for non-melanoma skin cancer 10threvision of the International Classification of Diseases C44) and 31197 participants with missing SUA data (Figure 1). Eventually, 444462 participants were included in the final analysis and were grouped by quartiles of SUA (Q1-Q4).

    Data collection

    The baseline characteristics were collected by self-completed touch-screen questionnaires, computer-assisted interviews and physical measurements. The data retrieved for the analysis included age, gender, education, ethnic group, family history of cancer, annual household income and lifestyle habits such as fruit and vegetable intake (more than five portions or not), alcohol consumption, smoking status, physical activity (categorized according to the standard International Physical Activity Questionnaire guidelines[19]as high, moderate or low) and body mass index [body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight divided by height squared, kg/m2). Approximately 45 mL of blood and 9 mL of urine were collected to measure specific biomarkers by using the latest analytical methods in a dedicated facility in Stockport. The samples were stored separately for the subsequent detection and stored at -80 °C and -180 °C[20]. SUA was measured by a Beckman Coulter AU5800 (BC, United States) using enzymatic determination (Uricase PAP).

    Diagnosis of cancer cases

    Information regarding the cancer diagnoses in the UK Biobank is provided by the National Health Service (NHS) Digital and Public Health England for participants residing in England and Wales and the NHS Central Register for participants residing in Scotland. The general classification of the cancer cases was based on the 10threvision of the International Classification of Diseases codes. The primary outcomes in this study were liver cancer (C22), gallbladder cancer (C23), biliary tract cancer (C24) and pancreatic cancer (C25).

    Statistical analysis

    The baseline characteristics are presented as numbers (percentages) for the categorical variables and means (standard deviations) for the continuous variables. Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between SUA and HBP cancer. The potential confounders were adjusted gradually in three models. In model 1, we adjusted for the general demographic characteristics (gender, age, education, ethnic group and family history of cancer). Then, we further adjusted for lifestyle factors (alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake) in model 2. Because obesity is closely related to the SUA levels and cancer risk, in model 3, we adjusted for BMI separately in addition to the variables included in model 2. The potential nonlinear associations between the SUA levels and the HBP cancer risk were investigated by fitting restricted cubic splines in a fully adjusted Cox regression model. In addition, considering the large gender difference in the distribution of SUA, we also conducted a gender-stratified analysis.

    A sensitivity analysis was performed to verify the stability of our results by excluding participants with less than 2 yrs of follow-up from the fully adjusted Cox regression models. All statistical analyses were conducted by using R software (version 3.5.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

    RESULTS

    This study included 444462 participants (Tables 1 and 2). There were fewer males in the quartiles with higher SUA levels and fewer females in the quartiles with lower SUA levels. As the SUA level quartiles increased, the participants tended to be older, have a higher BMI, consume more alcohol, consume less fruit and vegetables and have fewer college or university degrees.

    我像瘋了一樣跑到醫(yī)院,媽的手腳已經(jīng)被綁在床上了,身上插滿了管子,脖子上還挖了一個(gè)洞。大夫說(shuō)怕媽亂抓管子,就把她綁起來(lái)了。

    In total, 920 participants developed HBP cancer during a median of 6.6 yrs of follow-up. The risk of pancreatic cancer tended to increase with the SUA levels (adjusted HR per 1 mg/dL increase in SUA = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.04-1.21). In model 1, the HR of the pancreatic cancer risk was 1.91 (95%CI: 1.42-2.58) in the highest quartile (Q4) of SUA compared with the lowest quartile (Q1). After adjusting for potential confounders, the HR was gradually attenuated, but the association still existed in model 3. The risk of pancreatic cancer in the highest quartile of SUA increased by 77% compared with that in the lowest quartile (HR 1.77, 95%CI: 1.29-2.42, Table 3).

    The stratified analysis results showed that SUA had different effects on HBP cancer between the males and females. In the male population, after fully adjusting for potential confounders, the risk of liver cancer decreased in the second quartile (HR 0.87, 95%CI: 0.57-1.34) and the third quartile (HR 0.61, 95%CI: 0.38-0.98) compared with that in the lowest quartile. However, in the highest quartile (HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.63-1.46), the HR of liver cancer was increased compared with that in the third quartile (Figure 2A). In contrast to liver cancer, the risk of gallbladder cancer in the second quartile (HR 2.45, 95%CI: 0.90-6.70), the third quartile (HR 2.71, 95%CI: 1.05-6.98) and the highest quartile (HR 3.09, 95%CI: 1.28-7.46) were all higher than that in the lowest quartile (Figure 2D). The risk of biliary tract cancer and pancreatic cancer did not differ between the lowest and other quartiles (Figure 2B).

    In the female population, no difference was found between the lowest quartile and the other quartiles of the SUA levels in gallbladder cancer and liver cancer. Regarding the biliary tract cancer risk, the HR of the highest quartile of SUA was 2.33 (95%CI:1.14-4.76) compared with the lowest quartile in model 2 (Table 4). However, after additionally adjusting for BMI in model 3, the risk was attenuated (HR 1.65, 95%CI: 0.81-3.36). Regarding the pancreatic cancer risk, the risk increased by 1.33 times per 1 mg/dL SUA level in model 3 (HR 1.33, 95%CI: 1.21-1.47, Table 4). After an additional adjustment for potential confounders, the highest quartile still showed an increased risk compared with the lowest quartile (HR 2.04, 95%CI: 1.35-3.08, Figure 2C).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristic

    Figure 3 shows the evaluation of the potential nonlinear relationship with HBP cancer. A strong linear dose-response relationship was observed between the SUA levels and the risk of pancreatic cancer (P-nonlinear > 0.05,P-overall < 0.0001, Figure 3). After the stratification by genders, the SUA levels exhibited a linear doseresponse relationship with the risk of pancreatic cancer in both the male and female populations, but the effect was much stronger in the females than in the males (Pinteraction < 0.0001, Figure 4). The liver cancer risk showed a U-shaped relationship with the SUA levels (P-nonlinear < 0.05,P-overall < 0.0001, Figure 3); however, a nonlinear relationship with the risk of liver cancer was observed only in the males (P-nonlinear < 0.05, Figure 5). Additionally, regarding the SUA levels and the risk of gallbladder cancer and biliary tract cancer, a linear dose-response relationship was observed.

    Table 2 Baseline characteristic stratified by gender

    These results suggest that high SUA levels are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in females and gallbladder cancer in the males. Moreover, the risk of liver cancer showed a U-shaped association in the males as both too high and too low levels of SUA were associated with an increased risk. We did not observe sufficient evidence of an association between the SUA levels and biliary tract cancer.

    In the sensitivity analysis, by excluding cases that were documented in the first 2 yrs, we did not observe major changes in the primary results (Tables 5 and 6).

    DISCUSSION

    As a very common metabolite, SUA has multiple effects on the human body, and high SUA levels have been considered harmful. Previous studies have found that elevated SUA levels are associated with gout, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia,obesity[21-25]and cancer[26-28]. Kolonelet al[29]conducted a prospective cohort study including 7889 males and indicated that high SUA levels were associated with a high prostate cancer risk. Denget al[30]included 8274 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Shanghai Diabetes Registry and found that in female diabetic patients, SUA was positively associated with the cancer risk. Another Mendelian randomization study analyzed 86210 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and indicated that high SUA levels were associated with an increased cancer risk[31]. In our research, we also found a relationship between high SUA levels and an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in females and gallbladder cancer in males.

    Table 3 Effect of serum uric acid on hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer

    SUA has been found to be associated with inflammatory stress, which is closely related to the occurrence of cancer. Components of the inflammatory microenvironment, such as adiponectin, C-reactive protein, leptin and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), which are closely related to SUA, were found to be associated with cancer development[15,32]. In addition, in our study, the SUA levels were positively correlated with pancreatic cancer and gallbladder cancer, and COX-2 was widely expressed in tumor tissues[33,34]. Xieet al[35]conducted anin vitroexperiment examining the effect of COX-2 on the angiogenesis of pancreatic cancer cells and indicated that COX-2 was positively associated with the microvascular density, promoting pancreatic cancer cell growth. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, was found to enhance the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs on pancreatic cancer and inhibit the proliferation of gallbladder cancer cells[36,37]. Ohtsuboet al[38]confirmed that SUA regulates the expression of COX-2 through XOR inin vivoandin vitroexperiments, which may explain the association between SUA and cancer. Based on the evidence from previousepidemiological and experimental studies along with our findings, high SUA levels are likely to lead to an increased risk of cancer in various sites, suggesting that we should pay attention to reducing the SUA levels to reduce the risk of cancer.

    Table 4 Effect of uric acid on hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer stratified by gender

    Estimated HR (per 1 mg/dL)1.02 (0.93-1.12)1.02 (0.93-1.12)1.33 (1.21-1.47)Model 1 adjusted for age, education, ethnic group and family history of cancer. Model 2 adjusted for age, education, ethnic group, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity. Model 3 additionally adjusted for body mass index based on model 2.1Per 100000 person years. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Table 5 Sensitivity analysis

    Although many studies have shown that high SUA levels are a risk factor for cancer, some evidence suggests that the SUA levels should not be too low. Ameset al[12]. first proposed the hypothesis that SUA might act as a protective factor against cancer due to its antioxidant function and its function as a scavenger of singlet oxygen and free radicals. Some epidemiological studies also supported this hypothesis. Tilmanet al[39]conducted a population-based study of endogenous antioxidants, including albumin, bilirubin and SUA, and indicated that a high SUA level was associated with a low risk of breast cancer and low mortality of all cancers. Patients with oral cancer and lung cancer also had lower SUA levels[40,41]. The results of a cohort study confirmed that low SUA levels were associated with lung cancer[42]. In our study, we found that as the SUA levels increased, the risk of liver cancer first exhibited a downward trend. Male participants in the third quartile had a 39% decreased risk of liver cancer (HR 0.61, 95%CI: 0.38-0.98) compared with those in the lowest quartile, possibly due to the protective function of SUA. However, as the SUA levels further increased, the risk of liver cancer also increased. In the highest quartile, the risk of liver cancer was notably higher than the risk in the third quartile, revealing a U-shaped relationship. Strasaket al[43]conducted a population-based study involving Austrian men and suggested a Jshaped effect of SUA on the risk of overall cancer incidence, which is similar to our results in liver cancer, indicating that SUA within a proper range is better in thecontext of liver cancer, and too low or too high levels of SUA represent a risk factor for liver cancer. Similarly, COX-2 is overexpressed during the development of liver cancer and tumor tissues, while normal liver tissues scarcely express COX-2[44,45]. Chenet al[46]showed that COX-2 was a leading factor related to liver cancer in a spontaneous liver cancer mouse model that overexpressed COX-2 specifically in the liver. As the SUA levels increase, the cancer-promoting effect of COX-2 overexpression may be stronger, leading to the U-shaped association between SUA and liver cancer.

    Table 6 Sensitivity analysis stratified by gender

    Figure 2 Associations between uric acid and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer stratified by gender. Adjusted for age, education, ethnic, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity and body mass index. A: Liver; B: Biliary tract; C: Pancreas; D: Gallbladder. CI: Confidence interval.

    In the gender stratified analysis, we found that only gallbladder cancer and liver cancer were associated with SUA in males, and that pancreatic cancer was related to SUA in females. This finding might be related to the reduced number of cases after the stratification as the statistical power was insufficient. In addition, we found that the risk associated with SUA in biliary tract, gallbladder and liver cancer in the female participants was generally higher than that in the male participants. Similar results were found in previous studies. A Chinese cohort study found that high SUA levels were associated with cancer risk in diabetic female patients[30]. Yanet al[47]conducted a systematic review and suggested that high SUA levels were associated with a high cancer risk, especially among females. Further analysis suggested that SUA and gender had an interactive effect on pancreatic cancer because sex hormones may lead to different sensitivity to SUA. More research is still required to reveal such gender differences.

    To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to focus on the association between SUA and HBP cancer. The main strength of our research is the large sample size. We included over 0.44 million participants in this analysis, allowing us to discover the relationship between the SUA levels and HBP cancer at multiple levels. Additionally, the UK Biobank comprehensively collected data related to established HBP cancer risk factors, allowing us to sufficiently control for potential confounders. We also investigated the potential nonlinear relationship, which provided insight into the carcinogenicity of SUA and contributes to individualized cancer prevention.

    This study has limitations. First, as an observational study, we cannot confirm the causal-relationship between SUA and HBP cancer. Second, due to the limited number of cases, we were unable to conduct further stratified analyses of some variables. Third, in the UK Biobank, most included people were white Europeans, and the role of SUA in other races is unclear. More research is needed to compensate for the above limitations.

    Figure 3 Dose response of uric acid and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer risk. Adjusted for genders, age, education, ethnic, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity and body mass index. The reference uric acid level for these plots (with hazard ratio fixed as 1.0) was 4.0 mg/dL. CI: Confidence interval.

    Figure 4 Association between uric acid level and pancreatic cancer with effect modification by gender. Adjusted for age, education, ethnic, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity and body mass index. The reference uric acid level for these plots (with hazard ratio fixed as 1.0) was 4.0 mg/dL.

    CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, SUA is likely to have gender-specific effects on HBP cancer. High SUA levels represent a risk factor for gallbladder cancer in males and have a strong effect on pancreatic cancer in females. SUA levels that are too high or too low are associated with an increased risk of liver cancer in males. In clinical and public health practice, the management of either too high or too low SUA levels may contribute to the prevention of HBP cancer. Future research is required to confirm our conclusion and investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations.

    Figure 5 The effect of uric acid on hepatobiliary cancer stratified by gender. Adjusted for age, education, ethnic, family history of cancer, alcohol intake, smoking status, annual household income, fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity and body mass index. The reference uric acid level for these plots (with hazard ratio fixed as 1.0) was 4.0 mg/dL.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    猜你喜歡
    手腳管子脖子
    比脖子
    六連音手腳配合練習(xí)
    樂(lè)器(2022年12期)2022-12-27 06:08:06
    手腳心發(fā)燙未必都是陰虛火旺
    放開干事創(chuàng)業(yè)的“手腳”
    脖子真重要
    撩人手腳大“摩”咒趕走春日干渴肌
    Coco薇(2015年3期)2015-12-24 03:09:20
    還要再讓你的脖子“裸奔”嗎?
    Coco薇(2015年1期)2015-08-13 02:15:33
    滾球游戲
    比脖子
    搞不定的水管子
    欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 床上黄色一级片| 深夜精品福利| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美午夜高清在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产高清videossex| www.精华液| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 色综合婷婷激情| 91在线观看av| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 香蕉久久夜色| 搞女人的毛片| 在线观看66精品国产| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 小说图片视频综合网站| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 一区福利在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲18禁久久av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 露出奶头的视频| 一夜夜www| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产区一区二久久| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| www.精华液| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 在线观看66精品国产| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| www.自偷自拍.com| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| www.精华液| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| 精品福利观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | av福利片在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美在线黄色| 天堂√8在线中文| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产精品免费视频内射| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 美女午夜性视频免费| videosex国产| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产单亲对白刺激| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻 | 精品久久久久久,| 免费高清视频大片| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 三级毛片av免费| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 老司机靠b影院| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久这里只有精品19| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 丁香欧美五月| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 久久香蕉激情| xxx96com| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 999久久久国产精品视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 一本精品99久久精品77| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中国美女看黄片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 中文资源天堂在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| xxx96com| 欧美成人午夜精品| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 深夜精品福利| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 无限看片的www在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久性视频一级片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 91字幕亚洲| 亚洲中文av在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久久久久久久久黄片| tocl精华| 中文字幕久久专区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产成人影院久久av| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 我要搜黄色片| 色av中文字幕| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲激情在线av| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日本 av在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产免费男女视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 一本综合久久免费| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 无人区码免费观看不卡| www.999成人在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 色在线成人网| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 极品教师在线免费播放| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 在线观看日韩欧美| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 超碰成人久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 午夜精品在线福利| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| a在线观看视频网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 看免费av毛片| 国产精品影院久久| 久久亚洲真实| 久久 成人 亚洲| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 精品第一国产精品| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产高清videossex| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 一夜夜www| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 天堂动漫精品| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线播放国产精品三级| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 怎么达到女性高潮| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| tocl精华| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲九九香蕉| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 天天添夜夜摸| 九色国产91popny在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 99国产精品一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 一级片免费观看大全| 看黄色毛片网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久伊人香网站| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| avwww免费| 免费看日本二区| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 91国产中文字幕| av免费在线观看网站| 91av网站免费观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 男人舔奶头视频| av福利片在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲国产欧美网| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲 国产 在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 精品福利观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 1024香蕉在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久香蕉国产精品| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜福利18| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品影院久久| 操出白浆在线播放| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲av熟女| 手机成人av网站| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 黄色成人免费大全| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 岛国在线观看网站| av视频在线观看入口| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 在线视频色国产色| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 在线视频色国产色| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 午夜两性在线视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 毛片女人毛片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产片内射在线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 小说图片视频综合网站| www.www免费av| 精品国产亚洲在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 一本久久中文字幕| 黄色 视频免费看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 午夜影院日韩av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日韩欧美免费精品| 手机成人av网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| www日本黄色视频网| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 露出奶头的视频|