• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Fatty liver is an independent risk factor for gallbladder polyps

    2021-01-13 07:45:36DongWonAhnJiBongJeongJinwooKangSuHwanKimJiWonKimByeongGwanKimKookLaeLeeSohee0hSoonHoYoonSangJoonParkDooHeeLee
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年44期

    Dong-Won Ahn, Ji Bong Jeong, Jinwoo Kang, Su Hwan Kim, Ji Won Kim, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee,Sohee 0h, Soon Ho Yoon, Sang Joon Park, Doo Hee Lee

    Abstract

    Key Words: Gallbladder polyp; Fatty liver; Sarcopenia; Visceral obesity; Risk factors; Body fat distribution

    INTRODUCTION

    Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are one of the most common biliary diseases and a major public health problem in many countries. The prevalence of GBP varies according to race and region[1]and diagnosis of GBP has been increasing in recent years due to the widespread use of ultrasonography (US) in routine health checkups[2]. Although benign cholesterol polyps are the most common type of GBP, accounting for 46% to 70% of all GBPs[3], some GBPs have malignant potential and the possibility of malignancy is markedly increased when the polyps are 10 mm or larger in size[2,4]. Considering the poor prognosis of advanced gallbladder cancer, it is important to detect GBPs before they reach an advanced stage.

    Determination of risk factors that contribute to GBP formation would help to design clinical strategies for screening and treatment in clinical practice. According to previous studies, old age, male gender, obesity, and metabolic syndrome are known to be associated with GBP[5-9]. Some studies have investigated the relationship between GBP and abnormal body fat distribution, such as fatty liver and visceral fat[1,4,10]. However, the results of these studies have been conflicting. Furthermore, there have been no studies evaluating the relationship between GBP and sarcopenia, which is a syndrome consisting of a progressive and generalized loss of skeletal mass and strength associated with a risk of physical disability, poor quality of life, and death[11]. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the development of GBP is associated with body composition and abnormal fat distribution, such as fatty liver, visceral obesity, or sarcopenia.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study population

    Subjects who underwent abdominal US and body composition measurement with a noninvasive body composition analyzer on the same day during a comprehensive health evaluation at Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center between January 2015 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study. After excluding subjects with a history of previous cholecystectomy, we enrolled subjects with GBP detected with abdominal US as the GBP group. Then, we enrolled age- and sex-matched subjects who were randomly selected among subjects without GBP in a ratio of 1:2 (GBP:control) as the control group. Age and sex matching was performed because both age and sex were considered important confounders in previous studies[12].

    The study was conducted in accord with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 30-2020-054).

    Clinical and laboratory evaluations

    All subjects underwent basic anthropometric examination and serum chemistry testing on the same day as both abdominal US and body composition measurement with a noninvasive body composition analyzer. Serum chemistry testing was performed after an overnight (12 h) fast, and structured questionnaires were reviewed to evaluate current illness (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome) and current medications.

    Body mass index (BMI) was calculated with division of weight (kg) by height squared (m2). Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the inferior margin of the last rib and the superior iliac crest in the horizontal plane. Hypertension was defined as a blood pressure of ≥ 130/85 mmHg. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting glucose level of ≥ 126 mg/dL. Subjects taking antihypertensive or antidiabetic drugs were considered to have hypertension or diabetes. Metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of at least three of the following five criteria from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III: (1) Waist circumference ≥ 102 cm in men and ≥ 88 cm in women; (2) Triglyceride (TG) level ≥ 150 mg/dL, or with drug treatment for elevated TG level; (3) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level < 40 mg/dL in men and < 50 mg/dL in women, or with drug treatment for reduced HDL-C level; (4) Blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg, or with drug treatment for hypertension; and (5) Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL, or with drug treatment for elevated glucose[13].

    Ultrasonographic examination

    To diagnose fatty liver and GBPs, abdominal US with a 3.5 MHz convex probe (Philips iU22; Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was performed by experienced radiologists after an overnight (10 h) fast. The radiologists performing the US were blinded to the subjects’ clinical and laboratory information.

    The diagnosis of GBPs was made when immobile features appearing to arise from the mucosa were seen without an acoustic shadow in US[14]. The diagnosis of fatty liver was made when characteristic features of “bright liver” with evident contrast between the hepatic and renal parenchyma were seen in US using previously described standardized criteria[15].

    The severity and degree of fatty liver was graded according to the criteria described in previous study[16]. Mild fatty liver was diagnosed when US showed slightly diffuse increase in bright homogenous echoes in the liver parenchyma, with normal visualization of the diaphragm and portal and hepatic vein borders. Moderate fatty liver was diagnosed when US showed diffuse increase in bright echoes in the liver parenchyma, with slightly impaired visualization of the peripheral portal and hepatic vein borders. Finally, severe fatty liver was diagnosed when US showed marked increase in bright echoes at a shallow depth, with impaired visualization of the diaphragm and marked vascular blurring. Moderate and severe fatty liver were combined into a single “moderate to severe” category because of the small number of cases of severe fatty liver.

    Body composition measurement

    Body composition measurements, including skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat area (VFA), were performed using an InBody 720 [direct segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method; Biospace, Seoul, Korea][17], a noninvasive body composition analyzer. The subjects fasted for at least 3 h and voided immediately before the BIA. In this system, body weight, BMI, skeletal muscle mass, and VFA are automatically calculated. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was calculated as the sum of the lean muscle mass in the bilateral upper and lower limbs. Then, the ASM was divided by body weight (kg) and expressed as a percentage (ASM/weight, ASM%). Sarcopenia was defined as an ASM% beyond two standard deviations (SDs) below the gender-specific mean for healthy young adults according to nationwide health examinations in the Korean population (ASM% < 29.0 in men or < 22.9 in women was considered to indicate sarcopenia)[18-20]. The VFA measured by the InBody 720 was used to assess visceral obesity.

    Comparison of InBody 720 and computed tomography data

    To validate the data on skeletal muscle mass and VFA measured by the InBody 720, we investigated the correlation between the measurements taken by the InBody 720 and the measurements obtained by computed tomography (CT) in subjects who underwent both InBody 720 and CT scans on the same day. Using a CT scan, we measured the total abdominal muscle area (TAMA) and VFA at the L3 vertebral level, which showed the highest correlation with whole-body skeletal muscle and visceral fat volume in previous studies[21,22].

    All abdominal CT scans were performed using a 64-slice multidetector CT scanner (Brilliance 64 scanners; Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). To measure TAMA and VFA, precontrast CT images were uploaded to commercially available segmentation software (MEDIP Deep Catch v1.0.0.0, MEDICALIP Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). The software contained a 3 dimensions (3D) U-Net that automatically segments whole-body CT images into a volumetric mask of seven body compartments: Skin, bone, muscle, visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, internal organs with vessels, and spinal cord. The 3D U-net was developed using approximately 40000 labeled wholebody CT images and provides an average segmentation accuracy for muscle, visceral, and subcutaneous fat of 96.8%-99.2%, 95.1%-98.9%, and 97.1%-99.7%, respectively, in internal and external validation datasets of whole-body CT scans. After automatic segmentation, the reader selected the level of the inferior endplate of L3 vertebra and extracted TAMA and VFA at the corresponding level (Figure 1). A clinically trained image analyst (DHL) reviewed and adjusted the results and finally a radiologist (SHY) confirmed the results.

    Statistical analysis

    Differences in categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Continuous variables, expressed as means ± standard deviations, were compared using Student’st-test. Some of the continuous variables were categorized according to reference values in a previous study and ATP-III NCEP, as follows[4,23]: BMI (< 23 kg/m2as normal weight, ≥ 23 kg/m2but < 25 kg/m2as overweight, ≥ 25 kg/m2as obesity), waist circumference (> 90 cmvs≤ 90 cm for males and > 80 cmvs≤ 80 cm for females), total cholesterol (< 200, 200-240, and ≥ 240 mg/dL), TG (< 150 and ≥ 150 mg/dL), and HDL cholesterol (> 40 mg/dLvs≤ 40 mg/dL for males and > 50 mg/dLvs≤ 50 mg/dL for females). Age was categorized into decades (< 30, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years). Because a normal range of VFA has not been defined with an absolute cutoff value to date, the variable was categorized into quartiles and the lowest quartiles of VFA were used as references.

    Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with GBP. First, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed, then, variables withPvalues < 0.10 in the univariable analysis were entered into backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis to predict the best risk factors. The results of univariable and multivariable analyses are expressed as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). An OR was considered to be statistically significant if the 95%CI did not include 1.0. To investigate the correlation between the InBody 720 and CT data, we conducted Pearson correlation analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). Statistical significance was defined asPvalues < 0.05.

    RESULTS

    Prevalence of GBPs in healthy patients

    Figure 1 Body morphometric evaluations of abdominal fat and muscle areas. At the level of the inferior endplate of the L3 vertebra, a segmented axial computed tomography image showed the visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat area, and total abdominal muscle area (cm2), including all muscles on selected axial images, i.e., psoas, paraspinals, transversus abdominis, rectus abdominis, quadratus lumborum, and internal and external obliques.

    From January 2015 to December 2019, a total of 13702 subjects underwent health evaluation including abdominal US and body measurement performed on the same day. After excluding 204 subjects with a history of previous cholecystectomy, 13498 subjects were enrolled in this study (Figure 2). GBPs were found in 1405 subjects (10.4%); 897 out of 7335 male subjects (12.2%) and 508 out of 6163 female subjects (8.2%) had GBPs. The age distribution of the subjects with GBPs is shown in Table 1. The prevalence of GBP tended to be higher in male subjects, and the prevalence by age peaked in the 3rddecade (Table 1).

    Baseline characteristics of the study subjects

    The 1405 subjects with GBPs (GBP group) were compared with 2810 age- and sexmatched control subjects without GBPs (control group). The baseline characteristics of the study subjects (GBP group and control group) are listed in Table 2. The mean age of the subjects was 46.8 ± 11.7 years, and 63.8% were male. The rates of fatty liver and sarcopenia among the study subjects were 43.1% and 7.2%, respectively, and the mean VFA of the study subjects was 93.8 ± 36.6 cm2.

    The GBP group had a higher prevalence of fatty liver (45.8%vs41.7%,P= 0.013) and lower levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (26.02 ± 17.18vs27.80 ± 15.39,P= 0.001) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (26.50 ± 22.88vs29.02 ± 22.00,P= 0.001). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in the prevalence of sarcopenia, hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. There was also no significant difference in BMI, waist circumference, or VFA between the two groups.

    Risk factors for GBPs

    We attempted to identify the risk factors for GBP. The candidate variables associated with GBP according to univariable analysis are shown in Table 3. The presence of fatty liver and sarcopenia, and the levels of AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) tended to differ between the two groups (Table 3). However, BMI, waist circumference, and visceral obesity (VFA) were not significantly associated with GBP. Multivariable analysis indicated that the presence of fatty liver (OR, 1.413; 95%CI, 1.218-1.638;P< 0.001) and low ALT levels (OR, 0.993; 95%CI, 0.989-0.996;P< 0.001) were independent risk factors for GBP (Table 4).

    We next investigated whether the degree of fatty liver was associated with GBP according to polyp size (≥ 5 mm and < 5 mm). Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender, and candidate variables in univariable analysis revealed that fatty liver showed both independent (OR, 1.413; 95%CI, 1.218-1.638;P< 0.001) and dosedependent relationship (moderate to severe fatty liver; OR 1.631; 95%CI, 1.317-2.020;P< 0.001) with GBP (Table 5). Furthermore, this independent and dose-dependent relationship was strengthened in the larger GBP group (moderate to severe fatty liver; OR 2.137; 95%CI, 1.662-2.749;P< 0.001, Table 5). In contrast, only a marginal association between the degree of fatty liver and GBP was observed in the smaller GBP group (P= 0.038, Table 5).

    Correlation between computed tomography and InBody 720 data

    Among a total of 13498 enrolled subjects, 361 underwent CT scans on the same day asInBody 720 measurements. So, correlation analysis was performed in these 361 subjects. ASM measured by the InBody 720 was positively correlated with TAMA measured by CT (R= 0.870,P< 0.001, Figure 3). VFA measured by the InBody 720 was also positively correlated with VFA measured by CT (R= 0.708,P< 0.001, Figure 4).

    Table 1 Age distribution of the whole study population and subjects with gallbladder polyps

    DISCUSSION

    GBP has become one of the most common biliary tract diseases seen in clinical practice due to the widespread use of US for routine health checkups. Because some GBPs have malignant potential, it is important to detect GBPs before they reach advanced stages, and determination of risk factors for GBP has clinical significance. Many studies have investigated the risk factors of GBP and demonstrated that metabolic diseases such as dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and metabolic syndrome are associated with GPB[5-8]. Considering the close association between these metabolic diseases and changes in body fat distribution[1], some studies have investigated whether abnormal body fat distribution, such as visceral fat or fatty liver, is related to GBP[1,4,10]. However, those studies have produced conflicting results. Furthermore, there have been no studies evaluating the relationship between GBP and sarcopenia, which is one of the most important indicators of body composition. Thus, we conducted this crosssectional study to validate the results of previous studies and to clarify these issues by using data from routine health checkups in large number of subjects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to comprehensively evaluate the potential associations between GBP and various indicators of body composition and fat distribution, such as fatty liver, visceral obesity, and sarcopenia. The results of this study show that fatty liver is an independent risk factor for GBP, whereas visceral obesity and sarcopenia are not associated with GBP.

    Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome consisting of a progressive and generalized loss of skeletal mass and strength associated with a risk of physical disability, poor quality of life, and death[11]. Skeletal muscle is known to play a key role in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis, and a reduction in skeletal muscle mass can cause insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction, resulting in metabolic diseases[24,25]. One previous study reported that skeletal muscle mass in the lower limbs negatively contributes to VFA in healthy men[26]. One retrospective cross-sectional study reported that visceral obesity measured by VFA is an independent risk factor for GBP[4]. Given the results of these previous studies, we hypothesized that sarcopenia and visceral obesity, together with fatty liver, would be related to GBP. However, the results of the current study with an age- and sex-matched population show that only fatty liver is an independent risk factor; we observed no association between GBP and either visceral obesity or sarcopenia. There is a discrepancy between our results and those of the above-mentioned study demonstrating a significant association between GBP and visceral obesity[4]. There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy. First, it may be partially attributable to the difference in variables used in the analyses. Fatty liver was not investigated as a possible risk factor in the previous study. Second, there was a large difference in the number of study subjects. The GBP group contained 1405 subjects in the current study, whereas there were fewer than 100 subjects in the previous study.

    In the current study, the positive association between GBP and fatty liver persistedafter adjustment of other variables in the multivariable analysis, whereas neither diabetes, BMI, and metabolic syndrome, which are known to be related to metabolic diseases, were associated with GBP. These results suggest that a direct association between GBP and fatty liver may exist. One previous retrospective cross-sectional study using data from routine health checkups in a large number of subjects reported similar results[1]. In that study, GBP was significantly associated with the presence and degree of fatty liver, whereas no association was observed with metabolic syndrome or visceral obesity. Given these results, the authors suggested that hepatic fat, which is anatomically close to GB fossa, might play a more important role than visceral fat[1]. More studies regarding the mechanism and pathogenesis of these direct relationships are needed.

    Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the subjects with and without gallbladder polyps

    A recent meta-analysis showed that GBP formation was not correlated with fatty liver[10]. However, among a total of 3 studies investigating the relationship between GBP and fatty liver and included in the meta-analysis, two were not age- and sexmatched; also, the definition of fatty liver was not clear in either of those two studies[27,28].

    In the current study, fatty liver was found to be associated with GBP in a dosedependent manner. Furthermore, this independent and dose-dependent relationship was strengthened in the larger GBP group. These results are in agreement with those of the abovementioned previous study[1]. It is known that possibility of adenoma ishigher in large GBPs than in smaller GBPs. So, according to the results of both the current and previous studies, fatty liver may be a risk factor not only of cholesterol GBP but also of adenomatous GBP, and careful verification using abdominal US to detect adenomatous GBP, which is a premalignant lesion, may be warranted, especially in patients with severe fatty liver. However, a further prospective study with a larger number of subjects is needed to further validate and clarify these issues.

    Table 3 Univariable analysis of the risk factors for gallbladder polyps

    Yes 0.797 0.616-1.031 0.084 Visceral fat area (cm2)Quartile I (male < 81.8, female < 55.2)1.000 Quartile II (male 81.8-100.8, female 55.2-71.6)1.069 0.890-1.283 0.477 Quartile III (male 100.8-121.8, female 71.6-92.5)0.951 0.793-1.140 0.585 Quartile IV (male > 121.8, female > 92.5)0.853 0.721-1.010 0.066 Fatty liver No 1.000 Yes 1.178 1.035-1.340 0.013 OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence level; BMI: Body mass index; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; hs-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HBsAg: Hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HCV Ab: Hepatitis C virus antibody; HDL: High-density lipoprotein.

    Table 4 Multivariable analysis of the risk factors for gallbladder polyps

    Currently, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and CT are the most accurate tools for evaluating skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat[25]. In the abovementioned previous studies on the risk factors of GBP, CT was used to measure visceral fat[1,4]. However, routine use of these tools is limited in clinical practice due to associated radiation exposure. So, in the current study, the InBody 720 was used to evaluate skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat. This tool has several strengths for application in clinical practice. First, it is non-invasive and easy to use[25,29,30]. Second, previous studies have demonstrated excellent correlations between InBody 720 data and that of DEXA and CT for evaluating skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat[31-33]. Furthermore, recent studies have used the InBody 720 to assess skeletal muscle mass and to diagnose sarcopenia[25,34]. Finally, the current study showed that skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat measured with the InBody 720 were positively correlated with those measured by CT scan. According to the results of the current and previous studies, we believe that this BIA system is a valid option for assessing sarcopenia and visceral obesity in clinical practice.

    The strengths and advantages of the current study are as follows. First, age and sex matching was conducted when selecting control subjects. It is well-established that the prevalence of GBP tends to increase with age and in men. Second, this study is the first to comprehensively evaluate the potential association between GBP and various indicators of abnormal body composition and fat distribution, such as fatty liver, visceral obesity, and sarcopenia. Through this comprehensive investigation, we showed an independent and dose-dependent relationship between GBP and fatty liver, especially in subjects with large GBPs. The results of this study validate those of the abovementioned previous study[1], and suggest that careful assessment of GBP using abdominal US be considered in patients with severe fatty liver.

    Despite its advantages, the current study has several limitations. First, because ofthe cross-sectional design, it was difficult to assess the causal or temporal relationship between fatty liver and GBP. Second, the final histology of GBP could not be confirmed in the enrolled subjects with the data from routine health checkups. Third, abdominal US was used to assess the presence and severity of fatty liver. Intra- and inter-observer variability can be a problem in assessments with abdominal US; liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessment of the presence and severity of fatty liver. However, liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and routine application of this procedure is difficult in clinical practice, especially in the setting of routine health checkups. US has several advantages, including safety, low cost, sensitivity, and specificity[1,16], and has been used as a first-line imaging in both clinical practice and epidemiological studies[35]. Finally, a selection bias might be present due to the singlecenter design of the current study.

    Table 5 Multivariable analysis of the association between gallbladder polyps and fatty liver grades according to gallbladder polyp size

    Figure 2 Diagram of showing enrollment of the study population. GBP: Gallbladder polyp.

    Figure 3 Correlation between the appendicular skeletal muscle mass measured by InBody 720 and the total abdominal muscle area measured by computed tomography scan. ASM: Appendicular skeletal muscle mass; TAMA: Total abdominal muscle area; CT: Computed tomography.

    Figure 4 Correlation between the visceral fat area area measured by InBody 720 and computed tomography scan. VFA: Visceral fat area; CT: Computed tomography.

    CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, the current study shows that fatty liver is associated with an increased risk of GBP in a dose-dependent manner. However, we found no significant relationship between GBP and sarcopenia or visceral obesity. Further prospective and multi-center studies are needed to validate these results and to explain the pathogenesis of the relationship seen in the current study.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research motivation

    Considering the importance of early detection of GBP, determination of risk factors for GBP might have clinical significance. Although some studies have investigated the relationship between GBP and abnormal body fat distribution, those studies are not sufficient and have produced conflicting results.

    Research objectives

    In this study, we aimed to determine whether the development of GBP is associated with body fat distribution such as fatty liver, visceral obesity, or sarcopenia.

    Research methods

    This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from routine health checkups in a single tertiary center. Based on review of the medical records of subjects who underwent various laboratory tests, body composition measurement, and abdominal ultrasonography, 1405 subjects with GBPs were compared with 2810 age- and sex-matched controls.

    Research results

    Among the body fat distributions, only the presence of fatty liver was an independent risk factor for GBP [odds ratio (OR) 1.413; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.218-1.638;P< 0.001). Furthermore, fatty liver showed both independent (OR 1.629; 95%CI, 1.335-1.988;P< 0.001) and dose-dependent (moderate to severe fatty liver; OR 2.137; 95%CI, 1.662-2.749;P< 0.001) relationship with large GBPs (≥ 5 mm). However, visceral obesity and sarcopenia were not significantly associated with GBP.

    Research conclusions

    Fatty liver was associated with an increased risk of GBP in a dose-dependent manner especially in larger GBPs.

    Research perspectives

    The results of our study suggest the need of careful assessment of GBP using abdominal ultrasonography in patients with severe fatty liver. Further studies are warranted to validate the results and to explain the pathogenesis of this relationship seen in our study.

    成年人午夜在线观看视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 一个人免费看片子| 免费观看av网站的网址| 色吧在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 性色av一级| 成年动漫av网址| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 桃花免费在线播放| av免费在线看不卡| 成人国产麻豆网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 美女主播在线视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 大香蕉久久成人网| 美女主播在线视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产毛片在线视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 色哟哟·www| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产色婷婷99| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| av不卡在线播放| 少妇 在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日韩视频在线欧美| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 成年av动漫网址| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产视频首页在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产乱来视频区| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲图色成人| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产成人精品在线电影| 成人国语在线视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产成人欧美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品免费大片| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| av网站在线播放免费| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| av在线app专区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日韩中字成人| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久精品夜色国产| a 毛片基地| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| av视频免费观看在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产毛片在线视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 777米奇影视久久| 久久精品夜色国产| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品二区激情视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 777米奇影视久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 七月丁香在线播放| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| av福利片在线| 午夜激情av网站| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一级片免费观看大全| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 一区二区三区精品91| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 老司机影院成人| 曰老女人黄片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产又爽黄色视频| kizo精华| 国产在线免费精品| 91国产中文字幕| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产1区2区3区精品| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 综合色丁香网| 考比视频在线观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 韩国av在线不卡| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久狼人影院| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日日撸夜夜添| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久99一区二区三区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜91福利影院| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| av卡一久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| www日本在线高清视频| 熟女av电影| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 观看av在线不卡| 曰老女人黄片| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲av.av天堂| kizo精华| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 美女福利国产在线| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲图色成人| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99热全是精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| tube8黄色片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 天堂8中文在线网| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 岛国毛片在线播放| 午夜免费鲁丝| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产1区2区3区精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 欧美在线黄色| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲国产av新网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 老熟女久久久| 岛国毛片在线播放| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久免费观看电影| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 中国三级夫妇交换| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 蜜桃在线观看..| 最黄视频免费看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美bdsm另类| www日本在线高清视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产97色在线日韩免费| 老司机影院成人| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产成人欧美| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 人妻系列 视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产成人欧美| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 尾随美女入室| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 精品国产国语对白av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 一本久久精品| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久久久精品性色| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一级黄片播放器| 日本av免费视频播放| 中文字幕制服av| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 99久久综合免费| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久免费观看电影| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产麻豆69| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91国产中文字幕| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 欧美+日韩+精品| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一级毛片 在线播放| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | tube8黄色片| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品第一国产精品| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 尾随美女入室| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 高清av免费在线| 97在线人人人人妻| 日日撸夜夜添| 丝袜喷水一区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | tube8黄色片| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 一级爰片在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 高清av免费在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜91福利影院| 国产毛片在线视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 在线观看www视频免费| a级毛片在线看网站| 夫妻午夜视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲av男天堂| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 性色avwww在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| videos熟女内射| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲精品视频女| 咕卡用的链子| 国产精品一国产av| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日日撸夜夜添| tube8黄色片| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 考比视频在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 18禁观看日本| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 丝袜喷水一区| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放|