葉彩霞 蘇曉 肖紅玉
摘要目的:探究情志護(hù)理對(duì)老年骨折手術(shù)患者應(yīng)激反應(yīng)與睡眠質(zhì)量的影響。方法:選取2019年5至9月廈門大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院的老年骨折手術(shù)患者94例作為研究對(duì)象,隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和觀察組,每組47例。對(duì)照組進(jìn)行常規(guī)護(hù)理,觀察組進(jìn)行情志護(hù)理。比較2組的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)(血液去甲腎上腺素、腎上腺素和腎素水平)及睡眠質(zhì)量[匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)(PSQI)]評(píng)分。結(jié)果:觀察組患者的去甲腎上腺素、腎上腺素和腎素水平均顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<005);護(hù)理前2組的PSQI評(píng)分比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>005),護(hù)理后觀察組的PSQI評(píng)分顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<005)。結(jié)論:情志護(hù)理干預(yù)可顯著改善老年骨折手術(shù)患者的應(yīng)激反應(yīng),提高睡眠質(zhì)量。
關(guān)鍵詞老年骨折患者;手術(shù)治療;情志護(hù)理;應(yīng)激反應(yīng);睡眠質(zhì)量
Study on the Improvement Effect of Emotional Nursing for Postoperative Stress Response and Sleep Quality of Elderly Patients with Fracture
YE Caixia,SU Xiao,XIAO Hongyu
(First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Xiamen 361000,China)
AbstractObjective:To explore the influence of emotional nursing for stress response and sleep quality of elderly patients with fracture surgeryMethods:A total of 94 elderly patients with fracture surgery in First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from May 2019 to September 2019 were divided into control group and observation group by cluster randomizationThe control group were with routine nursing,while the observation group were with emotional nursingThen the stress response(norepinephrine,adrenaline and renin)and sleep quality[Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)] score of two groups were comparedResults:The norepinephrine,adrenaline and renin of observation group were lower than those of control group,there were statistically significant differences(P<005);the sleep scores of two groups before nursing were compared,there was statistically significant difference(P>005),the sleep scores of observation group after nursing was significantly lower than that of control group,there was statistically significant difference(P<005)Conclusion:The emotional nursing intervention can effectively improve the stress response and sleep quality of elderly patients with fracture surgery.
KeywordsElderly patients with fracture;Surgical treatment;Emotional nursing;Stress response;Sleep quality
中圖分類號(hào):R4736文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:Adoi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-7130.2020.06.021
隨著社會(huì)人口老齡化的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),大部分老年人的機(jī)體應(yīng)變能力和器官功能都隨著年齡的增加而逐漸衰退,從而也一定程度增加了骨折情況的發(fā)生[1]。手術(shù)療法是目前臨床治療此疾病的常用手段,雖然手術(shù)方法的應(yīng)用取得一定療效,但因患者對(duì)手術(shù)治療認(rèn)知較低及手術(shù)治療具有創(chuàng)傷性,容易出現(xiàn)術(shù)后應(yīng)激反應(yīng),影響睡眠質(zhì)量。對(duì)此加強(qiáng)護(hù)理干預(yù)配合非常重要。情志護(hù)理是一種新型的護(hù)理模式,近幾年在臨床逐漸開始應(yīng)用,備受臨床關(guān)注[2]。故本研究采用情志護(hù)理對(duì)老年骨折手術(shù)患者進(jìn)行干預(yù),現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1資料與方法
11一般資料選取2019年5月至9月廈門大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院收治的老年骨折手術(shù)患者94例作為研究對(duì)象,隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和觀察組,每組47例。對(duì)照組中男26例,女21例,年齡62~85歲,平均年齡(7354±237)歲;股骨骨折40例,盆骨骨折4例,踝骨骨折3例。觀察組中男28例,女19例;年齡63~86歲,平均年齡(7465±253)歲;股骨骨折41例,盆骨骨折4例,踝骨骨折2例。一般資料經(jīng)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>005),具有可比性。
12納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)1)年齡60歲以上者;2)均行骨折手術(shù)者;3)對(duì)本研究知曉同意者。
13排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)1)嚴(yán)重精神功能異常者;2)伴認(rèn)知功能障礙、言語能力低下者;3)合并有其他嚴(yán)重疾病者。
14護(hù)理方法
141對(duì)照組對(duì)照組進(jìn)行常規(guī)護(hù)理,向患者簡(jiǎn)單介紹手術(shù)治療相關(guān)知識(shí),注意事項(xiàng)和可能發(fā)生的并發(fā)癥等。通過和患者對(duì)話溝通評(píng)估其心態(tài)想法;為患者營(yíng)造安靜舒適的治療環(huán)境,從而有助于負(fù)性心態(tài)的改善。對(duì)患者營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)指標(biāo)、心理狀況和生命體征情況密切觀察,對(duì)護(hù)理工作開展積極配;結(jié)合患者機(jī)體恢復(fù)情況,指導(dǎo)其運(yùn)動(dòng)鍛煉。
142觀察組觀察組進(jìn)行情志護(hù)理。1)患者評(píng)估:對(duì)患者進(jìn)行全面的評(píng)估,分析患者心理變化發(fā)生誘因,制定最適合患者的情志護(hù)理。2)情志護(hù)理的實(shí)施:分析患者的情志變化,并通過與患者深入溝通,了解患者需求及精神狀態(tài),本著“以人為本”的原則予以全面情志護(hù)理,盡可能為患者提供優(yōu)質(zhì)的護(hù)理服務(wù),樹立老年患者對(duì)骨折術(shù)后恢復(fù)的信心。3)心理疏導(dǎo):通過前期評(píng)估的資料,根據(jù)不同患者的差異制定不同的心理護(hù)理方案,護(hù)理人員可實(shí)施“以悲克怒”“以喜克悲”“以思克恐”方法,時(shí)常鼓勵(lì)安撫患者,和患者聊一些能激發(fā)患者興趣的話題,轉(zhuǎn)移患者的注意力,從而改善負(fù)性心態(tài)。干預(yù)頻率20~30 min/次,2次/周。4)松弛訓(xùn)練:首先先協(xié)助老年骨折患者收縮和放松練習(xí),收縮深吸氣10 s,然后吐氣時(shí)將檢測(cè)肢體和頸肩部、雙拳和胸腹部緩慢放松,練習(xí)3~5次/d。5)呼吸調(diào)節(jié):指導(dǎo)患者練習(xí)三字訣,即“嘆”“噓”和“唏”,其中,“嘆”注重養(yǎng)脾;“噓”注重護(hù)肝;“唏”注重養(yǎng)心。練習(xí)3次/d,練習(xí)時(shí)間為3~5 min/次。
15觀察指標(biāo)1)睡眠質(zhì)量:采用匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)(PSQI)評(píng)分[3]對(duì)患者術(shù)后的睡眠質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評(píng)定,本量表包括7個(gè)評(píng)估項(xiàng)目,每項(xiàng)評(píng)分范圍為0~3分,總分為21分,評(píng)分越高則表示睡眠質(zhì)量越差。2)應(yīng)激反應(yīng):檢測(cè)患者血液去甲腎上腺素、腎上腺素和腎素水平。采患者外周血經(jīng)離心處理后取血清進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)。
16統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法采用SPSS 230統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件對(duì)研究數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,計(jì)量資料用均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(±s)表示,采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料用百分比(%)表示,采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以P<005為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2結(jié)果
212組患者應(yīng)激反應(yīng)指標(biāo)比較觀察組的去甲腎上腺素、腎上腺素和腎素均顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<005)。見表1。
222組患者PSQI評(píng)分比較護(hù)理前2組患者PSQI評(píng)分比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>005),護(hù)理后2組患者PSQI評(píng)分均低于護(hù)理前,且觀察組的PSQI評(píng)分顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<005)。見表2。
3討論
手術(shù)療法是目前臨床治療骨折疾病的常用手段,然而手術(shù)方法的應(yīng)用雖然能取得一定療效,但也存在局限性。因手術(shù)治療存在創(chuàng)傷性,所以嚴(yán)重影響患者預(yù)后。尤其是對(duì)老年患者而言,隨著年齡的增加,患者機(jī)體功能逐漸衰退,代謝能力不斷下降,會(huì)延長(zhǎng)患者的恢復(fù)時(shí)間。此外因老年患者因認(rèn)知水平低下,對(duì)手術(shù)治療缺乏了解,加之受病情影響,易出現(xiàn)緊張、焦慮等情緒,從而會(huì)影響治療效果,延長(zhǎng)患者機(jī)體恢復(fù)時(shí)間。因此為避免上述情況發(fā)生,及早開展有效合理的護(hù)理干預(yù)配合非常重要[4]。
中醫(yī)中的“七情六欲”理論認(rèn)為,七情貫通五臟,情緒波動(dòng)過大則容易對(duì)五臟帶來傷害,情志變動(dòng)則會(huì)對(duì)氣機(jī)產(chǎn)生影響[5]。中醫(yī)學(xué)認(rèn)為,骨折本身產(chǎn)生的疼痛、手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷和預(yù)后均容易導(dǎo)致不良心態(tài),造成氣血不流通,經(jīng)絡(luò)受阻,進(jìn)而易出現(xiàn)失眠、氣血失調(diào)等情況。情志護(hù)理是一種新型護(hù)理方法,其是遵照“辨證施護(hù)”的原則開展實(shí)施,目的是將患者負(fù)性心態(tài)改善,實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)絡(luò)和臟腑陰陽平衡,穩(wěn)定情緒的作用。
綜上所述,情志護(hù)理干預(yù)可顯著改善老年骨折手術(shù)患者的應(yīng)激反應(yīng),提高睡眠質(zhì)量,值得臨床推廣應(yīng)用。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]胡甜,曾帥.中醫(yī)情志護(hù)理對(duì)骨折患者創(chuàng)傷后應(yīng)激障礙的影響[J].光明中醫(yī),2019,34(4):633635.
[2]張金姬,李照鑫,陳勝娥.情志護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)老年骨折手術(shù)患者應(yīng)激反應(yīng)及睡眠質(zhì)量的影響[J].世界睡眠醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2018,5(12):15041506.
[3]黃莉,朱小兵,吳論.情志護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)老年骨折手術(shù)患者應(yīng)激反應(yīng)及睡眠質(zhì)量的影響[J].齊魯護(hù)理雜志,2018,24(4):5658.
[4]潘芳.四肢骨折患者術(shù)后睡眠質(zhì)量及其影響因素分析[J].護(hù)理實(shí)踐與研究,2015,12(6):6162.
[5]馬雯雯.情志護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)老年骨折手術(shù)患者應(yīng)激反應(yīng)及睡眠質(zhì)量的效果評(píng)價(jià)[J].中國(guó)保健營(yíng)養(yǎng),2019,29(14):246.