趙慧 張富紅 馬圓圓
【摘要】
目的:研究個(gè)性化護(hù)理在重癥肺炎高熱驚厥小兒護(hù)理中的臨床應(yīng)用效果。方法:收集我院2018年2月-2019年12月時(shí)間內(nèi)收治的68例重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒作為研究對(duì)象,隨機(jī)分組n=34,對(duì)照組給予常規(guī)護(hù)理,觀察組給予個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù),對(duì)比兩組臨床護(hù)理效果。結(jié)果:對(duì)比兩組發(fā)熱消退時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間,觀察組均短于對(duì)照組,組間比較有顯著差異(P<0.05);對(duì)比兩組治療有效率,觀察組高于對(duì)照組,組間比較有顯著差異(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒接受個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù),可以縮短發(fā)熱時(shí)間,縮短住院時(shí)間,提高臨床療效,值得推廣應(yīng)用。
【關(guān)鍵詞】個(gè)性化護(hù)理;重癥肺炎;高熱驚厥;護(hù)理措施;應(yīng)用效果
[Abstract]
Objective:To study the clinical application of personalized nursing in the nursing of severe pneumonia and febrile convulsions in children. Methods:Sixty-eight children with severe pneumonia and febrile convulsions treated in our hospital from February 2018 to December 2019 were collected as the research object, and randomly divided into n = 34. The control group was given routine care, and the observation group was given personalized nursing intervention. The clinical nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the fever extinction time and hospitalization time in the two groups, the observation group was shorter than the control group, and there was a significant difference between the groups (P <0.05). Compared with the treatment efficiency of the two groups, the observation group was higher than the control group. Significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: Children with severe pneumonia and febrile seizures receiving personalized nursing intervention can shorten the fever time, shorten the hospital stay, and improve the clinical efficacy. It is worth popularizing and applying.
[Key words] personalized nursing; severe pneumonia; febrile seizures; nursing measures; application effect
【中圖分類號(hào)】 R8
【文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼】A
【文章編號(hào)】2095-6851(2020)06-250-01
重癥肺炎是多發(fā)呼吸系統(tǒng)疾病,多發(fā)嬰幼兒,表現(xiàn)出高熱、咳嗽及咳嗽等癥,不及時(shí)治療還會(huì)引發(fā)顱內(nèi)壓升高、驚厥等并發(fā)癥,影響患兒的身心健康[1]。臨床實(shí)施有效治療方案同時(shí),還要實(shí)施有效的護(hù)理干預(yù),才能對(duì)患兒預(yù)后起到有效的改善作用[2]。本文將患兒分組實(shí)施不同護(hù)理措施,對(duì)比如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
收集我院2018年2月-2019年12月時(shí)間內(nèi)收治的68例重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒作為研究對(duì)象,按雙盲法隨機(jī)分組,對(duì)照組34例,男女比例16:18;平均年齡(3.15±1.06)歲;入院時(shí)體溫平均(39.5±0.5)℃;觀察組34例,男女比例15:19;平均年齡(3.22±1.14)歲;入院時(shí)體溫平均(39.4±0.7)℃;兩組資料比較,無明顯組間差異(P>0.05),具可比性。
1.2 方法
對(duì)照組給予常規(guī)護(hù)理,根據(jù)醫(yī)囑糾正患兒的水電解質(zhì)平衡,監(jiān)測(cè)生命體征變化。觀察組給予個(gè)性化護(hù)理,具體如下:
(1)心理護(hù)理?;純阂蛏眢w的不適感,對(duì)陌生環(huán)境的恐懼情緒,臨床護(hù)理時(shí)患兒會(huì)產(chǎn)生煩躁、哭鬧等情緒,使護(hù)理工作開展受到很大的影響。護(hù)理前,護(hù)理人員以手撫觸患兒,與語言與患兒交流,調(diào)節(jié)患兒的心理狀態(tài),改善患兒的負(fù)面情緒,使患兒可以配合完成各項(xiàng)護(hù)理操作。
(2)降溫護(hù)理。每隔2h為患兒測(cè)量1次體溫,高于38.5℃要指導(dǎo)家長以酒精為患兒物理降溫,高熱不退要口服退燒藥,靜脈注射靜脈藥,調(diào)節(jié)病房內(nèi)溫度,避免著涼,及時(shí)為患兒擦汗,更新衣物,皮膚要保持干燥和潔凈。
(3)驚厥護(hù)理。監(jiān)測(cè)患兒的生命體征變化,發(fā)現(xiàn)驚厥、抽搐癥狀時(shí),調(diào)節(jié)室內(nèi)光線,將患兒頭偏于一側(cè),清理口腔中的分泌物,避免出現(xiàn)吸入性肺炎、窒息,以壓舌板置于患兒臼齒間,避免咬傷,同時(shí)保護(hù)患兒四肢,避免碰傷。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
①記錄兩組患兒發(fā)熱時(shí)間和住院時(shí)間[3]。②根據(jù)診療標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)兩組治療效果評(píng)價(jià),分成顯效、有效、無效三個(gè)等級(jí),顯效:肺陰影縮小,癥狀消失;有效:肺陰影有所縮小,癥狀改善;無效:肺陰影、癥狀均無改善,治療總有效率=顯效率+有效率[4]。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
使用SPSS17.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,計(jì)數(shù)資料用(n/%)表示,χ2檢驗(yàn),計(jì)量資料以(均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差)表示,t檢驗(yàn),P<0.05表示差異顯著,具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 對(duì)比兩組發(fā)熱時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間
觀察組發(fā)熱時(shí)間(4.62±0.80)d短于對(duì)照組(9.38±1.16)d,t=8.7062,P=0.0031;觀察組住院時(shí)間(7.50±0.92)d短于對(duì)照組(11.60±1.48)d, t=4.3107,P=0.0378;組間比較有顯著差異(P<0.05)。
2.2 對(duì)比兩組臨床治療效果
觀察組臨床治療效果91.2%高于對(duì)照組64.7%,組間比較有顯著差異(P<0.05),見表1。
3 討論
重癥肺炎是呼吸系統(tǒng)嚴(yán)重的疾病,細(xì)菌型肺炎致毒血癥,使患兒的微循環(huán)發(fā)生障礙,最常見的并發(fā)癥是高熱驚厥,使患兒生命安全受到嚴(yán)重的威脅。臨床對(duì)患兒實(shí)施個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù),可以有效改善患者的預(yù)后[5]。個(gè)性化護(hù)理要針對(duì)患兒心理、生理等特點(diǎn)實(shí)施個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù),與常規(guī)護(hù)理相比,具有明顯的針對(duì)性與持續(xù)性,對(duì)患兒身心均能起到較好的護(hù)理效果。個(gè)性化護(hù)理還能促進(jìn)患兒疾病轉(zhuǎn)歸,緩解患兒的煩躁情緒,提高對(duì)護(hù)理工作配合度,通過降溫、驚厥及心理護(hù)理等干預(yù),促進(jìn)患兒癥狀消退,縮短發(fā)熱消退時(shí)間,從而縮短住院時(shí)間,利于患兒疾病康復(fù)。本次研究結(jié)果也證實(shí)了這一點(diǎn)。可見,個(gè)性化護(hù)理可以針對(duì)患兒具體情況提供針對(duì)性護(hù)理,識(shí)別護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn),實(shí)施有效的護(hù)理干預(yù),降低并發(fā)癥發(fā)生,保障患兒的住院安全[6]。
綜上所述,重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒接受個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù),可以縮短發(fā)熱時(shí)間,縮短住院時(shí)間,提高臨床療效,值得推廣應(yīng)用。
參考文獻(xiàn):
[1] 于麗丹.個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù)小兒重癥肺炎高熱驚厥的應(yīng)用效果[J].中國醫(yī)藥指南,2019,17(14):287-288.
[2] 王小苗.個(gè)性化護(hù)理對(duì)重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒治療效果及康復(fù)的影響[J].臨床醫(yī)學(xué)研究與實(shí)踐,2017,2(31):167-168.
[3] 王若宇.個(gè)性化護(hù)理對(duì)小兒重癥肺炎高熱驚厥患兒康復(fù)的影響[J].臨床研究,2019,27(12):194-195.
[4] 徐曉玲.對(duì)重癥肺炎合并高熱驚厥患兒進(jìn)行個(gè)性化護(hù)理的效果研究[J].當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥論叢,2020,18(1):241-242.
[5] 高冉.小兒重癥肺炎高熱驚厥護(hù)理中個(gè)性化護(hù)理的應(yīng)用探究[J].臨床醫(yī)藥文獻(xiàn)雜志,2019,6(15):11-12.
[6] 胡瑋.個(gè)性化護(hù)理在重癥肺炎高熱驚厥小兒護(hù)理中的應(yīng)用[J].中西醫(yī)結(jié)合心血管病電子雜志,2018,6(20):93.