鄭孝云
[摘要] 目的 分析快速康復(fù)護(hù)理在經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療腰椎間盤突出癥中的應(yīng)用效果。方法 該院2016年1月—2017年9月收治的腰椎間盤突出癥患者中,方便選取采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療的80例進(jìn)行研究分析,將80例患者分為實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組,對(duì)照組患者采取常規(guī)護(hù)理,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者采取快速康復(fù)護(hù)理,對(duì)比兩組患者的住院時(shí)間和生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分等。結(jié)果 實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(5.24±1.21)d,對(duì)照組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(7.54±1.35)d,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間明顯低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=3.365 2,P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的生活質(zhì)量各項(xiàng)評(píng)分明顯高于對(duì)照組,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的軀體功能評(píng)分為(95.26±5.36)分、精神狀態(tài)評(píng)分為(94.16±4.58)分、行為能力評(píng)分為(94.82±4.58)分、認(rèn)知能力評(píng)分為(96.62±3.25)分,對(duì)照組患者的軀體功能評(píng)分為(80.51±3.62)、精神狀態(tài)評(píng)分為(81.41±4.16)分、行為能力評(píng)分為(81.69±4.53)分、認(rèn)知能力評(píng)分為(80.69±6.51),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)后第2天和第3天的SAS評(píng)分分別為(3.74±0.62)分,(2.21±0.42)分,對(duì)照組手術(shù)后第2天和第3天的SAS評(píng)分分別為(4.58±0.62)分(4.16±0.65)分,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的SAS評(píng)分明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=6.632 5、4.0325,P<0.05)。 結(jié)論 為采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療腰椎間盤突出癥患者采取快速發(fā)康復(fù)護(hù)理,要秉承以人為本的護(hù)理原則,護(hù)理人員要拉近與患者的距離,提高患者對(duì)臨床護(hù)理的依從性,縮短患者的住院時(shí)間,提高臨床護(hù)理效果。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 快速康復(fù)護(hù)理;經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡;腰椎間盤突出癥;護(hù)理效果
[中圖分類號(hào)] R473.6 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A [文章編號(hào)] 1674-0742(2018)11(b)-0161-03
Application Effect of Rapid Rehabilitation Nursing in the Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopy in Treatment of Prolapse of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
ZHENG Xiao-yun
Department of Orthopedics for Spinal Trauma, Kaiyuan Peoples Hospital, Kaiyuan, Yunnan Province, 661600 China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the application effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing in the percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy in treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods 80 cases of patients treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2016 to September 2017 were convenient selected, the control group used the routine nursing, while the experimental group used the rapid rehabilitation nursing, and the length of stay and quality of life score were compared between the two groups. Results The average length of stay in the experimental group was obviously lower than that in the control group(5.24±1.21) d vs (7.54±1.35)d, and the difference was statistically significant(t=3.365 2,P<0.05), and various scores of quality of life in the experimental group were obviously higher than those in the control group, and the somatic function score, mental state score, and behavior ability score, cognitive ability score in the experimental group and in the control group were respectively (95.26±5.36)points,(94.16±4.58)points,(94.82±4.58)points,(96.62±3.25)points and (80.51±3.62)points,(81.41±4.16)points,(81.69±4.53)points,(80.69±6.51)points, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05), and the SAS scores in 2d and 3d after surgery in the experimental group and in the control group were respectively (3.74±0.62)points, (2.21±0.42)points and (4.58±0.62)points, (4.16±0.65)points, and the SAS score in the experimental group was obviously better than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(t=6.632 5,4.032 5,P<0.05). Conclusion The percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy in treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc should adhere to the people-oriented principle, and the nursing staff should make contact with the patients, improve the compliance to the clinical nursing, shorten the length of stay and improve the clinical nursing effect.
[Key words] Rapid rehabilitation nursing; Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy; Prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc; Nursing effect
腰椎間盤突出癥是骨科常見疾病,疾病的病程較長(zhǎng),需要定期的進(jìn)行檢查治療,腰椎間盤突出癥是在腰椎間盤退行性病變后,在外力的額影響下,纖維環(huán)部分或全部撕裂,導(dǎo)致單獨(dú)或者聯(lián)合髓核、軟骨終板突出,由于壓迫竇椎神經(jīng)和神經(jīng)根會(huì)引發(fā)患者出現(xiàn)腰腿疼的情況[1]。根據(jù)該院2016年1月—2017年9月收治的腰椎間盤突出癥采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療的80例進(jìn)行研究,分析快速康復(fù)護(hù)理在經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療腰椎間盤突出癥中的應(yīng)用效果。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
該院收治的腰椎間盤突出癥患者中,方便選取采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療的80例進(jìn)行研究分析,將80例患者分為實(shí)驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者40例,其中有男性22例,女性18例,平均年齡為(46.5±11.3)歲,對(duì)照組患者40例,其中有男性24例,女性16例,平均年齡為(45.8±12.4)歲。兩組患者的性別,年齡等無(wú)差異,具有可比性。兩組患者均自愿參與該次實(shí)驗(yàn)研究,通過(guò)倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)。
1.2 方法
1.2.1 對(duì)照組 為對(duì)照組患者采取常規(guī)護(hù)理。護(hù)理人員要向患者介紹醫(yī)院的環(huán)境,了解患者的既往史和過(guò)敏史,幫助患者完善各種檢查。在手術(shù)前向患者講解手術(shù)的注意事項(xiàng),處理患者病情的變化及時(shí)的匯報(bào)給醫(yī)生[2]。
1.2.2 實(shí)驗(yàn)組 為實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者采取快速康復(fù)護(hù)理。首先建立快速康復(fù)護(hù)理小組,小組成員包括科室主任、護(hù)士長(zhǎng)、責(zé)任護(hù)士等。
①手術(shù)前宣教手術(shù)前,患者長(zhǎng)期受到腰腿疼的困擾,影響患者的心理狀態(tài)和生活質(zhì)量,采取手術(shù)治療會(huì)增加患者的心理負(fù)擔(dān),為了消除患者的不良心理狀態(tài),護(hù)理小組要承擔(dān)很大的責(zé)任,護(hù)理人員要向患者講解經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療方法,預(yù)防手術(shù)后并發(fā)癥的發(fā)病情況,幫助患者樹立治療的信心[3]。
②手術(shù)中配合快速康復(fù)護(hù)理小組要對(duì)患者的基本情況進(jìn)行全面的評(píng)估,幫助患者完善手術(shù)前的各項(xiàng)檢查,患者的手術(shù)在2 h左右,患者取側(cè)臥位,手術(shù)前患者要采取循序漸進(jìn)的訓(xùn)練模式,護(hù)理小組要幫助患者進(jìn)行訓(xùn)練[4]。
③手術(shù)后指導(dǎo) 手術(shù)后,護(hù)理小組成員要嚴(yán)密監(jiān)測(cè)患者的生命體征變化,保證手術(shù)切口的敷料干燥,出現(xiàn)滲血情況要及時(shí)的更換敷料。手術(shù)后2 h,護(hù)理小組要幫助患者進(jìn)行支腿抬高訓(xùn)練,手術(shù)第2天采取腰背肌的訓(xùn)練,逐步過(guò)渡到飛燕式鍛煉。在患者可耐受的情況下進(jìn)行循序漸進(jìn)的訓(xùn)練[5]。
④出院指導(dǎo) 護(hù)理小組要告知患者出院后要絕對(duì)的臥床休息,加強(qiáng)對(duì)腰背肌的鍛煉,外出活動(dòng)要注意保暖,避免重體力的勞動(dòng),避免對(duì)腰椎增加負(fù)擔(dān)。
1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)方法
應(yīng)用SPSS 21.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,計(jì)量資料用(x±s)表示,采用t檢驗(yàn); P<0.05為差異統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)有意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 兩組患者的住院時(shí)間分析
實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(5.24±1.21)d,對(duì)照組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(7.54±1.35)d,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間明顯低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表1。
2.2 兩組患者的生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分
實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的生活質(zhì)量各項(xiàng)評(píng)分明顯高于對(duì)照組,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的軀體功能評(píng)分為(95.26±5.36)分、精神狀態(tài)評(píng)分為(94.16±4.58)分、行為能力評(píng)分為(94.82±4.58)分、認(rèn)知能力評(píng)分為(96.62±3.25)分,對(duì)照組患者的軀體功能評(píng)分為(80.51±3.62)分、精神狀態(tài)評(píng)分為(81.41±4.16)分、行為能力評(píng)分為(81.69±4.53)分、認(rèn)知能力評(píng)分為(80.69±6.51),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表2。
2.3 兩組患者心理狀態(tài)評(píng)分
實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)后第2天和第3天的SAS評(píng)分分別為(3.74±0.62)分,(2.21±0.42)分,對(duì)照組手術(shù)后第2天和第3天的SAS評(píng)分分別為(4.58±0.62)分(4.16±0.65)分,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的SAS評(píng)分明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表3。
3 討論
臨床治療腰椎間盤突出癥的主要手段包括后路椎板開窗髓核摘除手術(shù)、后路全椎板切除椎間融合內(nèi)固定手術(shù)等,經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療在臨床中的廣泛應(yīng)用,其優(yōu)點(diǎn)為患者的恢復(fù)速度快,具有較高的手術(shù)安全性和治療效果[6-7]。在采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療的同時(shí),采取快速康復(fù)護(hù)理,能夠有效減輕患者的痛苦,縮短患者的住院時(shí)間[8]。
研究發(fā)現(xiàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(5.24±1.21)d,對(duì)照組患者的平均住院時(shí)間為(7.54±1.35)d,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的平均住院時(shí)間明顯低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的生活質(zhì)量各項(xiàng)評(píng)分明顯高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者術(shù)后2 d的SAS評(píng)分和術(shù)后3 dSAS評(píng)分明顯低于對(duì)照組患者,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。根據(jù)翻閱文獻(xiàn)可知,采取快速康復(fù)護(hù)理的平均住院時(shí)間為(5.39±1.22)d,生活質(zhì)量平均分為(92.26±3.65)分,而患者術(shù)后SAS評(píng)分為(3.26±1.05)分,因此該文實(shí)驗(yàn)組研究數(shù)據(jù)準(zhǔn)確。
綜上所述,為采取經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療腰椎間盤突出癥患者采取快速發(fā)康復(fù)護(hù)理,要秉承以人為本的護(hù)理原則,護(hù)理人員要拉近與患者的距離,提高患者對(duì)臨床護(hù)理的依從性,縮短患者的住院時(shí)間,提高臨床護(hù)理效果。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1] 張穎,陳旻.快速康復(fù)護(hù)理對(duì)經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡下腰椎間盤切除術(shù)后疼痛與療效的影響[J].護(hù)理實(shí)踐與研究,2018(6):59-61.
[2] 周健美,徐娟.快速康復(fù)外科理念在經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡腰椎髓核摘除術(shù)患者護(hù)理中的應(yīng)用[J].護(hù)理實(shí)踐與研究,2017,14(23):153-155.
[3] 袁年紅.經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡治療腰椎間盤突出癥的護(hù)理[J].中國(guó)實(shí)用醫(yī)藥,2016,11(3):189-190.
[4] 楊敏.快速康復(fù)外科理念在腰椎間盤突出癥患者圍術(shù)期護(hù)理中的應(yīng)用[J].實(shí)用臨床醫(yī)藥雜志,2017,21(8):208-210.
[5] 吳曉晴.快速康復(fù)外科理念在腰椎間盤突出癥微創(chuàng)手術(shù)護(hù)理中應(yīng)用效果分析[J].臨床醫(yī)藥文獻(xiàn)電子雜志,2017(99):19493-19494.
[6] 葉彩霞,楊淑萍.腰椎間盤突出癥行椎間孔鏡髓核摘除術(shù)后快速康復(fù)理念護(hù)理的應(yīng)用[J].中外醫(yī)學(xué)研究,2017(28):79-80.
[7] 蘇長(zhǎng)英,葉愛琴,安原,等.快速康復(fù)外科護(hù)理在腰椎間盤突出癥脊椎微創(chuàng)手術(shù)中的對(duì)照研究[J].當(dāng)代護(hù)士,2017(1下旬刊):6-8.
[8] 常玉萍,蒙碧艷,劉春花.快速康復(fù)外科護(hù)理在脊椎微創(chuàng)下治療腰椎間盤突出癥術(shù)后康復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[J].特別健康,2017(15):205.
(收稿日期:2018-08-13)