Spatial—Temporal Metaphor of“qian/hou”in Chinese and English

【Abstract】Spatial-temporal metaphor is adopted to understand the abstract temporal concept which is the basic domain of human cognition. Lakoff has contributed to the distinction of temporal metaphor， that is， Ego-moving Metaphor and Time-moving Metaphor. Thus， with the data from the Chinese and English languages， this paper puts forward some models concerning temporal metaphors， like Moving Ego Metaphor-Front-Back Model， Ego-centered Moving Time Metaphor-Front-Back Model and Sequence-centered Moving time Metaphor. By comparing the space-time concepts of orientation words front， back in Chinese and English， the similarities and differences of Spatial-temporal metaphors are been found that both of the two languages view time within Ego-moving metaphor and Time-moving metaphor. While， Chinese prefer to view time as a stabled object which sequentially arranged， English prefer to view time as a moving object.

【Key words】space； time； space-time concept

【摘要】時空隱喻是理解時間概念這一人們認(rèn)知的基本范疇的一種主要方式，Lakoff將其分為自我移動隱喻和時間流動隱喻兩個子類。本文在此基礎(chǔ)之上并結(jié)合英、漢兩種語料，根據(jù)時間空間化的橫向和縱向模式，提出了自我移動隱喻的“前/后”模式、以觀察者為中心的時間流動隱喻的“前/后”模式、以事件先后順序為中心的時間序列性隱喻等模式。由此進(jìn)一步探討英漢時空隱喻異同，認(rèn)為英漢語中都存在自我移動隱喻及時間流動隱喻，但漢語時間認(rèn)知偏向時間的序列性特征而英語側(cè)重時間流動性。

【關(guān)鍵詞】空間 時間 時空概念

1. Introduction

People are aware of time， but unable to make it a clear complete definition. And lots of linguists and philosophers have studied time based on various theories. Lakoff and Johnsen in their book Metaphors We Live By claim that we comprehend the world around us metaphorically base on our experiences and point out that we conceptualize and describe time through the domain of space. Metaphor has been recognized as a useful cognitive approach in explaining one thing through another. Time orientation metaphor is a basic and efficient approach to conceptualize and describe time. Therefore， spatial-temporal metaphors research becomes extremely popular and lots of achievements have been made. Now there are two different cognitive approaches of time in the metaphorical system of space and time. One is Time-moving Metaphor， under which the observers position is fixed， outside of time and the time is regarded as an independent moving object that moving from future to past. The other is Ego-moving Metaphor， under which the observer is treated as a traveler traveling from past to future in the long endless river of time.

2. Literature Review

In addition to the often-discussed MOVING TIME and MOVING EGO metaphors， Lakoff and Johnson （1999：140） discuss another “most basic metaphor for time”， the TIME ORIENTATION metaphor. Alverson（1994） claims to have discovered two important differences between English and Chinese. The English ego takes the front-to-the-future orientation while it is the back-to-the-future for the Chinese and that the Chinese ego remains stationary all the time facing toward the past.

In contrast， Yu （1998） concludes that the Chinese data largely fall into the patterns outlined by Lakoff （1993） for English. Yu （2012） reinforced that the metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese is realized by the pair of conceptual metaphors FUTURE IS IN FRONT OF EGO and PAST IS BEHIND EGO， which happens to be the parametric setting held by most of the languages studied. He argued that it is important to make two crucial distinctions with regard to Reference Point （RP） and Referent （R） in temporal reference frames for data analysis. Zhang （2003） divided the time cognition model in Chinese into right-sight approach and left-sight approach. Ye （2012）， opposite to the theory of Zhangs， argues that in Chinese， time is cognized only under the right-sight approach. The illusion of the existence of left-sight approach is due to the confusion of reference point of ‘前 and ‘后 in Chinese.

3. “Front （前）” in Chinese and English

In Chinese， ‘前 can express three kinds of spatial concepts： the orientation that human or other things facing， position that closing to the top of a sequence line and the moving direction. In English， different words are used to express the three concepts of ‘前 in Chinese. While in the domain of time， there exist great differences. In Chinese， ‘前 can stand for time in the future， in the past and a relatively earlier time.

1） 前途 （future）

2） 以前 （ past）

3） 前天 （a relatively earlier time）

In English， orientation words like before， forward， ahead and forth also used to represent both space and time. When mapping into time domain， they can be used to refer to two types of time. First， they can refer to the future and a relatively earlier time.

4） from this time forward， look forward to

5） the day before yesterday

4. “Back （后）” in Chinese and English

For the time metaphors of word “Back （后）” in English and Chinese， great differences can be found. In Chinese， “后” can be used to refer time in the future， such as 我以后再告訴你； a relatively later time， such as 飯后吃藥.While in English， words back， after， and behind can be used to refer time in the past or a relatively later time：

6） My school days are far behind me.

7） The train is ten minutes behind time.

5. Ego-RP vs. Time-RP and Time-R and Human-R

5.1 Ego-RP and Time-RP

Lakoff and Johnson （1980：41） note that there is an apparent contradiction in English in the metaphorical conceptualization of time， as illustrated below：

a. In the weeks ahead of us…（future）

b. Thats all behind us now. （past）

c. In the following weeks… （future）

d. In the preceding weeks…（past）

Thus， in （a） and （b）， the future is in front and the past is behind us， but （c） and （d） appear to suggest that the future is behind and the past in front of us. Lakoff and Johnson （1980）， however， point out there is an actually metaphorical coherence here considering that in （c） and （d） times conceptualized as moving objects receive a front-back orientation， with the front being in the direction of motion. In other words， ‘preceding weeks takes place earlier in the past， whereas ‘following weeks takes place later in the future， both of which are independent of the ego. Thus， the reference point of （a） and （b） is the ego， but that of （a） and （b） is ‘this week， which happens to be ‘collocated with the ego. Indeed， the distinction between Time-RP and Ego-RP can account for the seemingly contradictory data， such as in （a） and （b）.

5.2 Time-R and Human-R

Yu （1998 & 2012） proposed the necessary of distinguishing Time-R from Human-R and claimed that a clear distinction between them can avoid misinterpretation of a set of data. It has not received its due attention till now. Humans live in and through time， which is conceptualized metaphorically in terms of space， as objects， locations and motion in space. All humans can be ‘located along the imaginary time-line because humans and events alike ‘take place in time. In our conceptual systems， therefore， we place people of various generations or ages in various positions to form a ‘spatial sequence， with earlier ones in front of later ones， on a parallel with the sequence of events， along the time-line. This conceptualization is called the ‘human sequence， in contrast with the ‘event sequence， both of which are parallel to the ‘time sequence. It follows that in all three cases， namely， time， event， and human， the front-back spatial relationship is mapped onto the earlier-later temporal relationship Yu （2012）. With the distinction between Time- and Human-R， and between Time-， Human- and Ego-RP， we can distinguish the following four frames of reference： （a） the sequential time frame， （b） the deictic time frame， （c） the sequential human frame， and （d） the deictic human frame.

6. Conclusion

In Chinese， word ‘前 can refer to time in the future， past and a relatively earlier time. While in English words of the same space concepts as ‘前 lack the ability to refer time in the past. As for the word ‘后 in Chinese， it refer to time in the future. But word ‘back in English refers to time in the past. The existence of those great differences lies in the adaptation of different reference point in the process of conceptualization of time. In Chinese， people are preferred to take the Time-RP， regard time as a sequentially arranged thing. While in English， people tend to take Ego-RP， treat time as a moving object and themselves running in an opposite direction of time. With a clear distinction between Time- and Human-R， and between Time-， Human- and Ego-RP， the contradiction within either one language and between the two languages can be clearly understand and lots of misinterpretation can be avoided.

Reference：

[1]潘震.論“空間-時間”隱喻的多重性[J].甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報，2008.

[2]吳國盛.時間的觀念[M].北京：中國社會科學(xué)出版社，1996.

[3]張建理.漢語時間系統(tǒng)中的“前”、“后”認(rèn)知和表達(dá)[J].浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報，2003.

[4]葉龍娣.漢語時間系統(tǒng)及“前”、“后”的認(rèn)知研究[J].哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報，2010.

[5]Lakoff，George，Johnson，Mark，1980.Metaphors We Live By.University of Chicago Press，Chicago.

[6]Alverson，Hoyt.Semantics and Experience：Universal Metaphor of Time in English，Mandarin，Hindi，and Sesotho.Johns Hopkins University Press，Baltimore.1994.

[7]Yu，Ning.The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor：A Perspective from Chinese.John Benjamins，Amsterdam.1998.

[8]Yu，Ning.The Metaphorical Orientation of Time in Chinese[J].Journal of Pragmatics.2012.

作者簡介：肖麗紅（1991-），女，漢族，湖南邵陽人，碩士研究生，海南大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè)，研究方向：英語語言學(xué)。