耿 力 唐 丹
昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)第一附屬醫(yī)院產(chǎn)科(650032)
·臨床研究·
胎兒頸部透明層厚度預(yù)測早期雙胎輸血綜合征的效果分析
耿 力 唐 丹
昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)第一附屬醫(yī)院產(chǎn)科(650032)
目的:探討雙胎頸部皮膚透明層厚度(NT)差值預(yù)測雙胎輸血綜合征(TTTS)的臨床價值。方法:對接受產(chǎn)前超聲檢查且被追蹤到妊娠結(jié)局的單絨毛膜雙羊膜囊(MCDA)雙胎孕婦136例的臨床資料進行回顧性分析,其中TTTS 20例為TTTS組,非TTTS 116例為非TTTS組。比較兩組雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)者的比率,并計算以雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)預(yù)測TTTS的敏感度、特異度、陽性預(yù)測值、陰性預(yù)測值。結(jié)果:TTTS組和非TTTS組雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)的發(fā)生率分別為35.0%(7/20)及12.9%(15/116),差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05);雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)發(fā)生TTTS的相對危險度(OR)為 3.626(95%CI :1.247~10.538);預(yù)測TTTS的敏感度、特異度、陽性預(yù)測值及陰性預(yù)測值分別為35.0%、87.1%、31.8% 及88.6%。結(jié)論:在MCDA雙胎中,雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)是TTTS發(fā)生的危險因素,對早期預(yù)測TTTS有一定的臨床參考價值。
頸部透明層;單絨毛膜雙羊膜囊雙胎;雙胎輸血綜合征
雙胎輸血綜合征(TTTS)是單絨毛膜雙羊膜囊(MCDA)雙胎特有的并發(fā)癥。雙胎妊娠中有20%為單絨毛膜雙羊膜囊雙胎,其中TTTS的發(fā)生率為10%~15%[1]。迄今,TTTS發(fā)病機制尚不完全清楚,胎盤間血管交通支的存在是TTTS的解剖學(xué)基礎(chǔ)。雖然早期干預(yù)對改善妊娠結(jié)局的程度并未得到評估,但早期診斷和治療確實可以改善妊娠結(jié)局。本研究旨在探討妊娠11~13+6周,MCDA雙胎頸部透明層厚度(NT)差值>0.6mm對預(yù)測TTTS的價值,以期在妊娠期盡早評估發(fā)生 TTTS的危險程度。
1.1 一般資料
回顧性分析2011年1月~20l5年1月在本院產(chǎn)檢并接受超聲檢查,且被追蹤到妊娠結(jié)局的MCDA雙胎孕婦136例臨床資料。根據(jù)產(chǎn)前超聲檢查結(jié)果和產(chǎn)后臨床資料,將孕婦分為TTTS組(20)例和非TTTS組(116例)。
1.2 儀器
使用Philips iU22、GE E8彩色頻譜多普勒超聲診斷儀,經(jīng)腹探頭頻率為3.5~8.0MHz,采用預(yù)置的胎兒檢查程序。
1.3 產(chǎn)前超聲檢查
于11~13+6孕周B超確定MCDA雙胎(雙胎間的羊膜分隔與胎盤呈“T”征,且存在兩個羊膜囊),同時檢測雙胎NT。
1.4 TTTS超聲診斷
單絨毛膜性雙胎孕期超聲檢查中出現(xiàn)一胎兒(受血兒)羊水過多(<20孕周最大羊水深度>8cm),另一胎兒(供血兒)出現(xiàn)羊水過少(最大羊水深度<2cm)。
1.5 統(tǒng)計學(xué)分析
采用SPSS 19.0統(tǒng)計軟件,正態(tài)分布的計量資料比較采用t檢驗。計數(shù)資料比較采用χ2檢驗、 檢驗的校正公式或者Fisher's確切概率法檢驗(Fisher's Exact Test)。計算雙胎NT差值>0.6mm預(yù)測TTTS的敏感性(真陽性/患病總數(shù))、特異性(真陰性/健康總?cè)藬?shù))、陽性預(yù)測值(真陽性/陽性總數(shù))和陰性預(yù)測值(真陰性/陰性總數(shù))。Binary logistic回歸模型計算相對危險度(OR)。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義。
2.1 一般情況比較
TTTS組與非TTTS組孕婦孕次、產(chǎn)次差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05),年齡、分娩孕周比較有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表1。
表1 兩組孕婦一般情況比較
2.2 NT差值對TTTS的預(yù)測分析
本研究選取雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)為截斷值,TTTS組雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)比率為35.0%(7/20),高于非TTTS組的12.9%(15/116),差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(χ2=6.127,P<0.05);NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)者發(fā)生TTTS的OR值為3.626( 95%CI: 1.247~10.538)。兩胎NT差值>0.6mm(或≥20%)預(yù)測TTTS的敏感度為35.0%(7/20)、特異度為87.1%(101/116)、陽性預(yù)測值為31.8%(7/22)、陰性預(yù)測值為 88.6%(101/114)。
臨床上B超診斷的TTTS多為中、晚期病例,TTTS胎兒圍生期死亡率高達(dá)80%~100%,并且存活兒中出現(xiàn)神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)后遺癥的風(fēng)險極大,探討TTTS早期預(yù)測指標(biāo)具有重要的意義。目前研究認(rèn)為:孕18周后胎盤A-A吻合、孕11~13+6周NT、孕15~17周雙胎間胎膜皺褶及臍帶帆狀附著均可能成為TTTS的早期預(yù)測指標(biāo)[3-7],但相關(guān)研究較少而且結(jié)論不一致 。
在MCDA雙胎妊娠中,受血胎兒NT值增加,提示可能循環(huán)超負(fù)荷早期引起受血胎兒心臟功能失調(diào),此時受血胎兒心臟功能失常與隨后TTTS的發(fā)展有關(guān),雙胎NT的差異較早反映了供血兒和受血兒之間血流的不平衡狀態(tài)。MCDA雙胎妊娠中,若胎兒NT值增加,則發(fā)生TTTS的可能性較高[3]。TTTS者中有28%檢測到至少一胎的NT值超過正常值的95%,而非TTTS組僅為10%,其敏感度為30%,陽性預(yù)測值為28%[3]。最近的兩項對MCDA的研究顯示,如果雙胎NT差值≥20%或≥0.6mm,預(yù)測TTTS的敏感度為50%~52%,特異度為80%~ 92%。以雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm聯(lián)合靜脈導(dǎo)管異常、心房收縮波α波反向可以很好的篩出TTTS的高危群體,敏感性75.0%,特異性92.0%[4-5]。
本文結(jié)果顯示TTTS組雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)的比率高于非TTTS組;雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)發(fā)生TTTS的OR為3.626,提示雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)是TTTS發(fā)生的危險因素,與文獻(xiàn)[4-5]研究結(jié)論吻合。本文結(jié)果顯示NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)預(yù)測TTTS的敏感度、特異度、陽性預(yù)測值及陰性預(yù)測值分別為35.0%、87.1%、31.8%及88.6%,預(yù)測TTTS的特異度及陰性預(yù)測值較高。
綜上,MCDA雙胎妊娠中,雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)是發(fā)生TTTS的危險因素,對早期診斷TTTS有一定的參考價值。如果雙胎NT差值≥0.6mm(或≥20%)提示需要嚴(yán)密監(jiān)測,每周1次B超檢查,以盡早診斷TTTS,達(dá)到早期干預(yù)的目的。由于本研究樣本量較少,尚待進一步驗證。
[1] Wee LY, Muslim I. Perinatal complications of monochorionic placentation[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 19(6):554-560.
[2] Sueters M, Oepkes D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin anaemia-polycythaemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2014, 28(2):215-226.
[3] Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, et al. Early prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome[J]. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(9): 2008-2010.
[4] Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Sepul veda, et al. Discordance in nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2007,29(5) : 527-532.
[5] Matias A, Montenegro N, Loureiro T, et al. Screening for twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy: the key role of ductus venosus blood flow assessment[J] . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2010, 35(2): 142-148.
[6] Tan TY, Taylor MJ, Wee LY, et al. Doppler for artery-artery anastomosis and stage independent survival in twin-twin transfusion[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,103(6): 1174- 1180 .
[7] 王學(xué)舉,魏媛,趙揚玉,等. 雙胎輸血綜合征胎盤特點分析[J]. 中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志, 2015, 95(17):1323-1327.
[責(zé)任編輯:張 璐]
Clinical study of early predictive value of fetal nuchal translucency for twin to twin transfusion syndrome
GENG Li,TAN Dan
Department of Obstetrics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, 650032
Objective: To explore the predictive value of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) on twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, which included 136 pregnant women with monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) from department of obstetrics,the first affiliated hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2011 to January 2015. 20 pregnant women with TTTS were in the TTTS group, and 120 pregnant women with non TTTS were in the non TTTS group. The rate of fetal NT difference value (D-value) ≥0.6mm (≥20%) was compared between the two groups. And sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) of NT D-value≥ 0.6mm (≥20%) for predictive TTTS were analyzed. Results: The rate of fetal NT difference value (D-value) ≥0.6mm (≥20%) was 35.0% (7/20) in the TTTS group and 12.9% (15/116) in the non TTTS group, respectively, which had significant different(P<0.05). The pregnant women with NT D value ≥ 0.6mm (≥20%) had higher risk of TTTS compared with those with NT D value<0.6mm (OR 3.626, 95%CI 1.247-10.538). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of NT D value ≥ 0.6mm (≥20%) for predicting TTTS was 35.0%, 87.1%, 31.8% and 88.6%, respectively. Conclusion: NT D value ≥ 0.6mm (≥20%) may be a risk factor for TTTS, and it has some value in early predicting TTTS.
Nuchal translucency; Monochorionic diamniotic; Twin to twin transfusion syndrome
云南省衛(wèi)生廳研究基金項目(2011WS0040)
2016-01-04
2016-03-10
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189. 2016.05