• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanisms*

    2015-12-01 02:12:15YANGYang楊陽CAOShuyou曹叔尤YANGKejun楊克君LIWenping李文萍StateKeyLaboratoryofHydraulicsandMountainRiverEngineeringCollegeofWaterResourceandHydropowerSichuanUniversityChengdu60065China2KeyLaboratoryofEngineeringSedimentofMinis
    關(guān)鍵詞:楊陽

    YANG Yang (楊陽), CAO Shu-you (曹叔尤), YANG Ke-jun (楊克君), LI Wen-ping (李文萍). State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 60065, China2. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300456, China, E-mail: yangyangscu@63.com

    Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanisms*

    YANG Yang (楊陽)1,2, CAO Shu-you (曹叔尤)1, YANG Ke-jun (楊克君)1, LI Wen-ping (李文萍)1
    1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300456, China, E-mail: yangyangscu@163.com

    (Received June 30, 2014, Revised November 6, 2014)

    The present paper studies the physics of the breach erosion process, particularly, the breach initiation process in overtopped landslide dams. Due to great complexities involved, only homogeneous landslide dams are considered. The flume experiments of dam overtopping are conducted to study the breach growth process. And in order to reveal the effects of the seepage during the breach development, the permeability characteristics of the dam materials are also taken into consideration. With the experimental observation, the details of the breach growth are examined, and the whole breach process could be distinguished into five stages, i.e.,Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II, the formation of the initial breach, Stage III, the erosion toward the head, Stage IV, the expansion and incision of the breach, and Stage V, the re-equilibration of the river channel through the breach. It is shown that once triggered the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the significant impact of the early stages on the later deformation of the dam. Evidence shows that the initial breach of the dam is most likely to take place in the downstream slope of the dam, near the upper edge of the seepage face. The experimental results show a “headcut” mechanism of the breach initiation.

    experimental study, landslide dams, breach process, overtopping, breach initiation, seepage, headward erosion

    Introduction0F

    Massive landslide dams induced by the recent two earthquakes in west China (i.e., the Wenchuan Earthquake, 2008 and the Ya'an Earthquake, 2013)have once again attracted worldwide attentions with regard to the potential dam failure risks[1,2]. From the experience of historical events, a dam failure would generate destructive flash flood and debris flow, leading to catastrophic losses. It is recognized that accurate knowledge of the dam breach process is essential to help build an early warning system for the evacuation of people and property. And a better understanding of the dam breach development is required for an emergency preparedness for taking adequate engineering measures to prevent further damages.

    Physically, the problems of dam breach are very complicated. In the first place, a landslide dam could fail in a variety of ways (e.g., the overtopping, the piping, the slope failures, etc.) due to its random formation and different inflow conditions. Even if the dam breaches in a specific mode, the key concerns of the breach process such as the breach initiation, the breach growth rate and the induced maximum flood discharge would be affected by two aspects of factors,the material aspect, including the dam grain size distribution, the dam structure and geometries, and the water aspect, including the inflow magnitude and the reservoir volume. Generally speaking, the dam breach process is the outcome of the water-sediment interaction involving these two factors.

    A landslide dam usually consists of non-cohesive clast materials ranging a wide grain size distribution(e.g., from millimeters to meters and with the mean grain size in the order of 0.1 m)[3,4]. Such dominant non-cohesive property of the material grains would give rise to different eroding behaviors comparing with the man-made clay dams[5,6]. In addition, since the dam is made of non-cohesive materials, the seepage in the slopes is inevitable, and sometimes itcould even be the decisive cause for the dam failure,for instance, the piping[7]. However, according to Costa and Schuster[8], of all 55 natural dam failure cases they have reviewed, in over 50 cases, the dam was breached in the way of overtopping and in very rare cases the dam was breached by seepage (either by the piping or the slope failure), which indicates that the erosion from overflow during the flood events should be the principal cause of the dam failures. The following-up researches on the dam breach process mostly chose the overtopping mode as their background setting.

    Fig.1 Flow regimes of the overtopped dam described by Powledge et al.[9]

    Fig.2 Breach growth process described by Visser[10]

    Fig.3 Breach growth development described by Yang et al.[12]

    Powledge et al.[9]experimentally studied the mechanism of the flow regimes when an embankment dam was overtopped. Over the dam crest, they identified three regimes of the water flow and three corresponding erosion zones (see Fig.1). They demonstrated that the place near the downstream edge of the crest is the transition zone where the flow will transit from subcritical to supercritical regimes, and due to the high tractive stress, erosion is expected to initiate there or in the slope below. Visser[10]experimentally studied the breach growth by overtopping in sandy sea dikes. Based on some hypotheses and his experimental observation, he established a conceptual model of the process of the breach erosion in five stages (see Fig.2). In his observations, as the flow accelerates on the downstream slope, the breach will initiate when the sand grains at rest begin to be entrained as a suspended load by the high speed flow (at x=ln) and then erosion will progress and retreat in parallel until the whole dam is washed out. Coleman et al.[11]studied the overtopping breaching of non-cohesive homogeneous embankments in laboratory flumes. For an accurate estimation of a breach outflow hydrograph,their study focused on the deformation of the breach and the outflow discharge. It is shown that, in the varying process, the breach cross-sectional profile will maintain a parabolic shape. From their experimental data, they finally developed a set of dimensionless expressions for the prediction of the breach geometry and the discharge. More recently, Yang et al.[12]studied the overtopping breach growth processes in sand dams of quake lakes in laboratory experiments. Similar to Visser's[10]description, they presented a fourstage picture of the breach growth processes (see Fig.3). However, they demonstrated that the dam will not erode to the end, because, due to the finite reservoir volume, the water level will drop as the breach vertically incises until the flow is less erosive to carry away the bed materials, and finally the dam erosion ceases. Moreover their findings also emphasized the important role of the angle of repose of the sediment particles in the retreat erosion stage.

    Apart from experimental researches, physicallybased mathematical models were also established for practical uses. The most popular physically-based mathematical models for embankment dam breaching problems are the BREACH model and the BEED model[13]. Since many aspects of the breaching mechanism remain unclear, these models empirically preset the breach initiation and subsequent deformation behaviors. For example, they assume that the breach initiates in a regular profile (e.g., rectangular, triangular,or trapezoid) and its shape remains nearly unchanged during the enlargement. And they also assume that the breach erodes down and retreats at a steady rate. With the combination of the weir formula and the bed-load type erosion formulas, this kind of models are applied to calculate the breach process and the outflow hydrograph. The accuracy of these models highly relies on the parameters such as the soil erodibility and the flow resistance. More recently, Chang and Zhang[14]developed a similar model to simulate the overtopping erosion process of landslide dams especially with consideration of the layered dam structure of varying erodibility along the depth direction. And they reproducedthe breaching process of the famous Tangjiashan landslide dam.

    Fig.4 Experimental layout

    From the above review, one may see the state of the art of the study of the dam breach process. Some of the results may be applied to the breach process of a landslide dam, but others may not. It should be noted that none of these researches have considered the effects of the seepage on the dam breach process. As stated earlier, because of the non-cohesive property of the dam materials, the seepage in dam slopes is unavoidable. Without consideration of the seepage,some of the erosion mechanisms would not be revealed when a dam is overtopped. And another point is that it is essential to determine how the breach initiates to help reliably determine how long it takes for a breach to develop to a critical point, which in turn can help emergency planners in establishing the flood risk and the potential warning time for areas downstream. However, from the literature review, it is seen that,except for Visser[10], who explicitly pointed out the formation and the location of the initial breach, the quantitative knowledge of the initiation processes for overtopping is very rare. And moreover, in view of the research background, even Visser's[10]theory is questionable to be applied to decide the initial breach point of a landslide dam. In his experiments, the water level was preset as a constant the same as the sea level and it would not drop with the breach growing, which is hardly the case in landslide dams. Thus the suspended mechanism of the initial breach may no longer be valid.

    For the rare and inadequate knowledge of the breach process in landslide dams, further study is of importance. The objective of the present study is to investigate the physics of the breach erosion process,particularly, the breach initiation process in overtopped landslide dams. Due to the great complexities involved, only homogeneous landslide dams are considered. The flume experiments of dam overtopping are conducted to study the breach growth process. In order to reveal the effects of the seepage during the breach development, the permeability characteristics of the dam materials are also considered. Finally based on the experimental results, the mechanism of the breach initiation is discussed in details.

    Fig.5 Cross-section profiles of the dam

    1. Experimental study of the breach growth process

    1.1 Experimental layout and setup

    Experiments are performed in a flume with two glass sidewalls and a steel bed, about 16 m long, 0.3 m wide and with an average slope of S=0.003. As shown in Fig.4, the dam is located about 8 m downstream the triangle weirW . The weir is used to verify the inlet discharge Q0. E1-E5 are automatic electric water-level probes, and they are deployed to measure the stage hydrographs along the flume. C1-C4 are digital video cameras which are to capture the dam breach process from three different perspectives(i.e., C1 from the top, C2 from the downstream, and C3 and C4 from the sides). Along the dam site,0.05 m×0.05 m grids are painted on the glass side wall in order to help observation and measuring.

    Table 1 Experimental parameters in the present study

    Figure 5 shows the geometric dimensions of the dam. Except for the length of the dam crestL and the upstream slope Su, which vary in different Runs, all other (longitudinal and cross-sectional) dimensions remain the same. The dam heightH is 0.3 m, the dam widthB is 0.3 m, the downstream slope Sdis 1:2.5(see Table 1).

    Fig.6 Grain size distribution in the present study

    The sediment materials used for the dams are artificially graded (see Fig.6, whereP is the percentage finer by weight). During construction, each dam is compacted with the same compact force (i.e., by keeping the same dry density of the material ρd≈ 1610 kg/m3). After a dam is built, a trapezoidal pilot channel of fixed geometry is dug in the crest, bordering upon one side of the flume walls (see Fig.5(b)). The depth of the channeld is 0.05 m, the top width btis 0.1 m, and the bottom width bbis 0.05 m. It should be noted that the pilot channel is not a preset initial breach, instead, it is dug to lead the water to flow to the side wall. Such an arrangement not only maximizes the possible lateral erosion within the limited flume width but also enables a better condition for observation.

    Values of other relevant experimental parameters are also listed in Table 1, where Q0is the inlet discharge,D50is the mean diameter of the dam materials, σgis the geometric standard deviation of the particle size,ρsis the solid density,φis the friction angle and Pois the porosity of the dry sediment samples.

    In order to simulate the practical overtopping process of landslide dams, we start each experiment from the beginning of the reservoir impoundment. The valve Vis turned on and the inlet discharge is preset to a given value Q0. As the water in the reservoir rises to a certain level, a distinguished saturation line is formed (as seen from the side wall), then the video cameras and the water-level probes are switched on to capture, respectively, the pictures and the real-time variation of the water level. Through a frame-by-frame analysis, the video acquired could provide a series of profiles of the dam erosion process.

    It is known that the water balance equation for a reservoir is dV/dt=Qin-Qout, whereVis the volume of the reservoir,Qinis the inflow discharge, and Qoutis the outflow discharge (herein ignoring the impact of the rainfall, the evaporation and other factors). Thus in the present experiment, the outflow discharge Q (including the seepage discharge Qseepageand the overflow discharge through the breach Qbreach) could be calculated as follows:

    where Q0is the inlet discharge,dV/dtis the variation rate of the reservoir volume in the flume.

    1.2 Dam breach process and experimental results

    Generally speaking, as shown in Fig.7, the breach growth in sand dams could be described in five stages, namely, Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II,the formation of the initial breach, Stage III the erosion toward the head, Stage IV the expansion and the incision of the breach, and Stage V the re-equilibrium of the river channel through the breach.

    Fig.7 General erosive stages observed in the experiments (images (a)-(d) are from the experiment Run 6, while (e) is from Run 5, and(f) from Run 2)

    As Stage I starts, the water level in the reservoir begins to rise at a low rate. Since the water level has not reached the elevation of the pilot channel, there is no overflow except for the seepage going through the dam. After the seepage in the dam is well developed,the water begins to release from the downstream slope. The higher the water level is, the larger the magnitude of the seepage becomes. It is seen that along with the released water, “seepage-induced transport”[15]works:small amount of sand grains in the seepage face begin to move downwards partly by individual grain motions but mostly by the intermittent shallow mass wasting (see Fig.7(b)). However it should be pointed out that the seepage-induced transport is so weak and so slow that the erosion in the downstream slope remains almost negligible and poses no threat to the stability of the slope. Then Stage I ends when, the water level reaches the invert point of the pilot channel.

    Stage II starts when the rising water enters the pilot channel and forms an overflow. However the amount of the overflow is quite small and it is almost in a way of creeping downstream. The time for the overflow to take going through the entire pilot channel depends on the length of the channel, which is in proportion to the length of the dam crest. At the moment that the overflow exits the pilot channel (see Fig.7(c)),the velocity of the water begins to accelerate. Despite the fact that the velocity of the flow is relatively high,the overflow is not erosive enough to cause an extensive damage to the downstream slope due to the limited quantity. Only a discernable gully is formed soon after the flow exits the pilot channel. In the meanwhile,the seepage as described in Stage I still works at the lower region of the downstream slope. As soon as the overflow reaches the upper edge of the seepage face,considerable breach occurs and Stage II ends.

    The spot where the overflow meets with the upper edge of the seepage face when Stage III begins is taken as the initial breach point, about which the process quickly develops in the downstream slope face. It could be seen that above the point, the gully gets deepened sharply and widened slightly, while beneath it since the sediment is flushed downstream, the breach outlet in the downstream face spreads fast laterally from near the observation side wall to the opposite side, forming an alluvial fan. In this Stage, the erosion of the dam mainly happens within the developing gully. The gully bed retreats and flattens gradually. At the same time the water level in the reservoir is still rising, thus such erosion toward the head would continue and become a little more severely as the overflow discharge increases. In the end of Stage III,when the erosion toward the head reaches the entrance of the pilot channel, the water level in the reservoir reaches its maximum and an entire breach channel is formed (see Fig.7(d)). In addition, comparing with the distinct erosion toward the head upstream the initial breaking point, the elevation of the initial breaking point drops little during the whole stage (see Fig.9).

    Stage IV, i.e., the breach expansion and incision stage, is the main stage of the breach growth, and it starts when the entrance of the breach channel begins to be eroded down. From this moment on, the water level begins to drop with the decrease of the elevation of the breach channel entrance, and thus the outflow of the flood water continues increasing and surpasses the inlet discharge Q0. However, the quickly enlarged flow discharge makes the whole bed of the breach channel more erodible. Focusing on the entrance of the breach channel, the highly erosive flow washes away the remained sediment there and enables the breach entrance to expand and incise. Simultaneously in turn, the magnified breach entrance allows much more flood water to release from the reservoir and again causes further erosion. Down below the breachentrance, similar erosional process (i.e., in both lateral and vertical directions) takes place in the whole breach channel. Due to the high gradient of the channel bed, the sediment-laden flow is quite torrential. It could be easily understood that the sediment phase is mostly transported as the contact load, supported by frictional and collisional grain-grain interactions, and without the stream-wise sorting during the transport. Apart from the previously described erosional process,one significant distinguished phenomenon happens in the breach channel is that the lateral collapse: the sediment bulks slip apart from the dam body and fall into the breach channel (see Fig.7(e)). And the larger the discharge grows the more frequently the lateral collapse becomes. Since the reservoir is of a finite volume,when the breach of the dam grows to a certain degree,the outflow discharge reaches its maximum. Afterwards, the outflow discharge begins to decrease and the erosional process in the breach channel turns weak. At the moment when the eroding down process stops at the breach entrance, Stage IV ends.

    The last stage of the breach process is the reequilibrium. When it begins, the breach through the dam has almost reached its final dimensions (Fig.7(f)). The stream power becomes too small to cause considerable lateral erosion and thus the collapse is halted. As the flow discharge reduces, the stream width reduces as well. It could be seen that a part of the side bank of the breach channel which used to be under the water has now been exposed to air and in addition, the slope of it is much more flattened comparing with the adjacent steep side wall above. Slowly, the flow discharge becomes equal to Q0, and when an armored layer forms in the channel bed, the whole breach process ends.

    Fig.8 Hydrographs of the outflow in different experimental runs

    Figure 8 shows the outflow hydrographs from the breach.Q?represents the dimensionless outflow discharge:Q?=Q/ Q, whereQis the outflow discha-0rge and Q0is the inlet discharge. The time origin herein is set at the moment when the water depth reaches 0.24 m in each experimental run. In order to clarify the similarity, the time intervals of different breach stages are separated by vertical dashed lines, and TI-II,TII-III,TIII-IVand TIV-Vare notated as the transitional moments for every two adjacent stages, respectively (in fact the separation shown in Fig.8 is just simplified and is a schematic diagram, for instance, in each experiment, the transitional point from Stage III to Stage IV should be the intersection of the hydrograph curve with the horizontal line Q?=1).

    However, it could be seen that each hydrograph goes from a very low flow at early stages (i.e., in Stages I and II,Q?≈0.14-0.39) to the outburst after the dam is overtopped (i.e., in Stage IV,Q?≈4-9.58 at the peak) and in the end it returns to the magnitude of Q?=1. The differences of the hydrograph shapes during the flood period are mainly caused by the differences of the inlet discharges and the dam dimensions. Apparently it is shown that for the same inlet discharge, a shorter length of the dam crest would lead to a quicker and higher flood peak (i.e., Run 1- Run 4) and the style of the peak tends to vary from a multimodal to a unimodal one. Reversely for the same crest length of the dam, a larger inlet discharge would also result in a quicker flood peak (i.e., Run 4 vs. Run 6 and Run 5 vs. Run7).

    Fig.9 Breach growth process in the dams (the breach profiles are recorded every 10 s)

    The flash flood induced by a gradual breaching is controlled by the deformation of the breach, thus highly depends on the interactions between the dam materials and the flows. Figure 9 shows the eroding process of the dam in the longitudinal profile for the experiment Run 1 and Run 7.Tmax,Tmax1and Tmax2arethe flood peak moments and TII-III,TIII-IVand TIV-Vare as previously defined.

    Figure 9 indicates that the channel bed may retreat in parallel after the erosion toward the head reaches the entrance of the breach (i.e., after the moment TIII-IV), and such a finding is similar to that reported by Visser[10]and Yang et al.[12]. However in the present study it is shown that the retreat slope would not maintain at the angle of repose (as shown by Visser[10]and Yang et al.[12]), but at a much smaller angle.

    3. Mechanisms of breach initiation by overtopping

    It is clear that once triggered, the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the prominent impact of the initial developing erosive manner (caused by the small flow discharge in Stages I, II and III) on the later breach evolution and flash flood. The outflow consists of two parts in the early stages: the seepage flow and the overflow (seepage exists in Stage I only), and they are at the same order of magnitude and then neither could be ignored.

    Fig.10 Experimental apparatus for the measurement of the coefficient of permeability

    3.1 Seepage flow in the dams

    Generally speaking, for a porous medium, a basic physical equation could be written as[16]

    whereJ is the seepage gradient,Vis the average seepage velocity,K is the universal coefficient of permeability with the dimension of speed, andm is a parameter that identifies the flow condition and varies from 1 to 2. For instance, if m=1, the seepage flow is laminar, and the famous linear Darcy's law holds, and if m=2, the flow condition will be turbulent, and if m=1-2, it means that the flow condition is transitional. Taking the logarithm on both sides of Eq.(2), we have

    Fig.11 Plot oflgV versuslgJ

    In order to investigate the seepage characteristics of the dam material, an additional experiment is carried out similar to Darcy's, measuring the coefficient of permeability. The test apparatus is shown in Fig.10. To maximize the similar state of stress, the sediment sample is kept of the same dry density as that used for the dam construction. Different hydraulic gradientsJ are produced by shifting the tank to different elevations, and the average seepage velocitiesV are measured by the volumetric method. It is observed that when Jis small, clear seepage water from the sediment sample comes out evenly, no significant sediment movement is observed in the container. AsJ grows larger, a couple of small sands begin to get washed out from inside the sample and at J=0.35, a considerable spring hole is caused by piping. The measurement does not terminate until more spring holes are formed and the static sand face of the sample becomes rolling and totally unstable. The datalgV versuslgJare plotted in Fig.11.

    Figure 11 shows that whenJ is less than 0.35, the data measured are well along a straight line of the slope very close to unity, which indicates that the flow condition in the sample is laminar and is a Darcy flow. And thus the coefficient of permeability Kcould be calculated as 0.0209 m/s.

    Table 2 lists the main seepage parameters recorded at TI-IIin the dam breach experiments, where huis the water depth before the dam,heis the height measured from the bottom to the upper edge of the seepage face,J is the average seepage gradient,Q?is the dimensionless seepage discharge, and qm(= Q*Q/ B)is the measured seepage discharge per unit width. It could be seen that the average seepage gradient in each experimental run is far less than 0.35,and that is to say, during Stages I through II the seepage in the dam is the Darcy flow. Herein the famous and simple Dupuit's Equation[16]is applied to calculate the seepage discharge per unit width at the TI-II. Asalso listed in Table 2, the comparison of the calculated values of the seepage discharge per unit width (i.e., qc) with the measured ones (i.e.,qmreconfirms that that the seepage flow in the dam follows the Darcy's law.

    Table 2 Major seepage parameters at the moment TI-II

    3.2 Stress state of the sediment in the seepage face

    Now, consider a 2-D element near to the seepage face in the downstream slope of the dam in Stage I as shown in Fig.12.

    Fig.12 Stress state of the sediment element in the seepage face

    Besides the gravitational force (per unit width) Fg, the emergent seepage will impose a force per unit width Fson the element. Their resultant force could be thus divided into two components, respectively, the tangential forceT and the normal forceN. Using the Coulomb failure theory, the factor of safety against failure could be written as

    with T=Fgsinθ+Fscosβand N=Fgcosθ-Fssinβ, whereθis the slope angle,βis the angle between the seepage force and the slope, andφis the angle of internal friction, which for non-cohesive materials is generally considered as equal to the angle of repose φ0.

    Since it is the Darcy flow in the dam, and the element is thoroughly infiltrated, the seepage force[16]and the gravitational force could be written as

    whereJ is the average seepage gradient,γwis the unit weight of water, andγ′is the effective unit weight of the sediment element. Now Eq.(5) could be expressed as

    Typically, at the upper edge of the seepage face(i.e., the element is settled at Point A in Fig.12), the angleβis thought to be zero and with the element moving downward[16],βturns larger. The value ofβ is in the range of [0,90)in the seepage face. If the slope is stable under the seepage, it is at least required that the safety factor is no less than unity, thus we have

    Rearranging Eq.(6), we obtain

    where γsatis the saturated weight of the sediment element. It could be seen that on the right side of Expression (9), except for the angleβ, other variables are all constants. Thus it could be inferred that the larger βis, the smallertanθwill be. Under the critical condition F =1,tanθreaches its maximum at β= 0 (i.e., at the upper edge of the seepage face, see Point A in Fig.12), and then it will decrease all the way to zero at the end of the dam slope due to the variation of β. As for the experimental setup in the present study,[tanθ]max=(γ′/γsat)tanφ0≈0.37,[θ]=arctan0.37≈20.3o, that is to say, the maximaxmum slope angle, which could hold at A. Now an interesting phenomenon would appear: if the preset of the downstream slope of the dam is steeper than[θ]max, a gap of discontinuity is surely to take shape at A, otherwise if the present slope is equal to or smaller than [θ]max, then no discontinuity would form but the slope will gradually turn milder from the upper edge of the seepage face to the bottom end (see Fig.13).

    Fig.13 Slope deformation under seepage

    Fig.14 Stress state of the sediment under both overflow and seepage flow conditions

    In the present study, the downstream slope is preset as arctan0.4, which is a little greater than[θ]max=arctan0.37, then the slope in the seepage face needs to adjust, that explains the reason for the previously observed “intermittent described shallow mass wasting” (see Fig.7(b) and Fig.11(a)) It should be noted that the deformed slope becomes generally stable, and such a change in the profile of the slope would provide a more erodible condition for the subsequent breach process.

    3.3 Threshold of the sediment under both overflow and seepage flow

    Figure 14 shows the stress state of the sediment on the slope under both overflow and seepage flow conditions around the moment TII-III, where FDis the drag force induced by the overflow,F(xiàn)sand Fgare, respectively, the seepage force and the gravitational force as previously defined,θis the slope angle,α? is the angle between the seepage force and the horizontal line,δis the angle between the perpendicular line (to the drag force) and the segment (connecting the sediment centroid with the rotating point).

    Since the non-uniform sediment condition is considered in the present study, for simplicity, we apply the definition of equivalent sediment diameter D[17].eqThus the equation of the incipient motion of the sediment could be written as

    The critical drag force FDcould be interpreted as

    where CDis the drag force coefficient, and τcis the critical shear stress. From Eq.(6) and Eq.(7), the seepage force and the gravitational force could be expressed as

    where Csand Cgare the coefficients related to the grain shape and the exposure,J is the average seepage gradient,γwis the unit weight of water, and γsis the unit weight of the sediment material. Substituting Eq.(12)-Eq.(14) into Eq.(11), and after rearranging, we obtain,

    Table 3 Dimensionless critical shear stress on a slope with/without the consideration of seepage

    Equation (15) is the expression of the dimensionless critical shear stresstaking the effects of both the slope and the seepage into consideration. It could be seen that on right hand side of Eq.(15), the first item represents the slope factor, and the second item represents the seepage factor. Given the condition that no seepage exists, Eq.(15) reduces as

    Due to the random location of the sediment as shown in Fig.14, the relative position of the concerned sediment grain with the adjacent ones is uncertain, and the value of angleδwill also change accordingly. Yang[18]derived the formula for the mathematical expectation ofδby applying Han and He's relative exposure function[19]and it is E(tanδ)=1.11. If we assume that Cs=Cg, and similar to Eq.(10), taking the critical condition for F =1, we have

    It is shown that from the upper edge of the seepage face downward, if taking no consideration of the effect of the seepage in the sediment threshold, the lower the place is, the smallerθwould be and the larger the critical shear stress (i.e.,) would become, which means that the sediment herein is harder to incipient.

    On the contrary, however, if considering the effect of the seepage, the critical shear stress (i.e.,) would decrease with the reduction ofθ, which means that in the lower part of the slope the sediment is easier to incipient. The ratio ofandindicates that the existence of seepage has largely promoted the sediment incipient motion on the slope, and moreover,the lower it is, the greater contribution of the seepage to the sediment incipient would be.

    3.4 Formation of the initial breaching point

    In fact, Eq.(16) could also be applied to describe the critical shear stress that is required for the sediments upstream the upper edge of the seepage face. It could be seen that taking the upper edge of the seepage face as a distinguishing point (i.e., the point A in Fig.12 and Fig.13), only 0.7 to 0.395 times of the threshold stress is needed for the lower part as compared with the upper part (see Table 4). In the end of Stage II, when the overflow coming along the slope from the gully reaches the distinguishing point, a significanterosion with different manners would appear (see Fig.15): in the upstream, the little discontinuity (see Fig.13(a), i.e., as shown in the present experiment)will rapidly develop into a headcut[20-23]while in the downstream, an intense flush of the sediment will take place.

    Fig.15 A sketch of the breach initiation

    Additionally, even given the situation as shown in Fig.13(b), due to the different stress states for the sediments on both sides of the distinguishing point,the overflow would definitely give rise to a quick formation of a discontinuity and then a headcut as well for the same mechanism as previously discussed. Therefore, we define this distinguishing point at the moment TII-IIIas the initial breaching point. And from that time on, the dam will experience mega deformation and breaching.

    4. Conclusions

    In this paper, experimental and theoretical studies are carried out for the breach process of homogeneous non-cohesive dams by overtopping. Based upon the experimental results, a five-stage conceptual model is established to interpret the whole breach process, i.e.,Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II, the formation of the initial breach, Stage III the erosion toward the head, Stage IV the expansion and incision of the breach, and Stage V the re-equilibration of the river channel through the breach. It is shown that once triggered, the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the significant impact of the early stages on the later deformation of the dam.

    The investigation reveals that the seepage flow through the dam in early stages is the Darcy flow, and it plays an important role in the breach initiation. Analysis shows that the initial breach of the dam is most likely to take place in the downstream slope of the dam, and more specifically, it would be near the upper edge of the seepage face. It is the first time that the exact initial breach location is identified with a strong evidence from both experimental observations and theoretical considerations. However, one has to accept that the Darcy flow condition of the seepage flow derived in the present study mainly based on the choice of the dam material. Although it could be consistent with the situation in many dams in nature, there are exceptions. Thus, further study of non-Darcy flow conditions is desirable.

    In addition, it is shown in the present study that the erosion toward the head is the main pattern that the breach develops. In Stage IV, it is once again shown that the parallel retreat phenomenon might be an essential and decisive manner in the dam erosion. However due to the limitation of the experimental apparatus, the hydraulics in the developing breach channel is not fully revealed. In the follow-up research we will focus on this part of job.

    [1] YIN Y., WANG F. and SUN P. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan,China[J]. Landslides, 2009, 8(2): 139-152.

    [2] XU Q., FAN X. and HUAHG R. et al. Landslide dams triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake, Sichuan Province, south west China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and The Environment, 2009, 68(3): 373-386.

    [3] LIU Nin, ZHANG Jian-xin and LIN Wei et al. Draining Tangjiashan Barrier Lake after Wenchuan Earthquake and the flood propagation after the dam-break[J]. Science in China Series E:Technological Sciences, 2009,52(4): 801-809.

    [4] CUI P., ZHU Y. and HAN Y. et al. The 12 May Wenchuan Earthquake-induced landslide lakes: Distribution and preliminary risk evaluation[J]. Landslides,2009, 6(3): 209-223.

    [5] ZHANG Jian-yun, LI Yun and XUAN Guo-xiang et al. Overtopping breaching of cohesive homogeneous earth dam with different cohesive strength[J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(10):3024-3029.

    [6] ZHU Y.ong-hui, VISSER P. J., VRIJLING J. K. et al. Experimental investigation on breaching of embankments[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011,54(1): 148-155.

    [7] SINGH V. P. Dam breach modeling technology[M]. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, 34-45.

    [8] COSTA J. E., SCHUSTER R. L. The formation and failure of natural dams[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988, 100(7): 1054-1068.

    [9] POWLEDGE G., RALSTON D. and MILLER P. et al. Mechanics of overflow erosion on embankments Part II:Hydraulic and design considerations[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1989, 115(8): 1056-1075.

    [10] VISSER P. J. Breach growth in sand-dikes[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 1998.

    [11] COLEMAN S. E., ANDREWS D. P. and WEBBY G. Overtopping breaching of noncohesive homogeneous embankments[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,ASCE, 2002, 123(9): 829-838.

    [12] YANG F., ZHOU X. and LIU X. et al. Experimental study of breach growth processes in sand dams of quake lakes[J]. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2011,5(5): 445-459.

    [13] DANG C., CHU N. and DING Y. Predictive uncertainty of peak outflow relations for landslides dam breach[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(11): 4265-4271.

    [14] CHANG D. S., ZHANG L. M. Simulation of the erosion process of landslide dams due to overtopping considering variations in soil erodibility along depth[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2010,10(4): 933-946.

    [15] FOX G. A., WILSON G. V. and SIMON A. et al. Measuring streambank erosion due to ground water seepage:Correlation to bank pore water pressure, precipitation and stream stage[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(10): 1558-1573.

    [16] HARR M. E. Groundwater and seepage[M]. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc., 2011, 34-95.

    [17] LIU Xing-nian. Gravel bed-load transport and its modelling[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Chengdu, China:Sichuan University, 2004(in Chinese).

    [18] YANG Feng-guang. Study on the stochastic theory of sediment transport[D]. Dotoral Thesis, Chengdu,China: Sichuan University, 2009(in Chinese).

    [19] HAN Q., HE M. Stochastic theory of sediment motion[C]. The proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Stochastic Dydraulics. Beijing, China,2000.

    [20] HANSON G. J., COOK K. R. and HUNT S. L. Physical modeling of overtopping erosion and breach formation of cohesive embankments[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2005, 48(5): 1783-1794.

    [21] FRENETTE R., PESTOV I. Flow and erosive stresses at the base of a headcut[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131(2): 139-141.

    [22] CHEN L. K., CHEN S. C. Retrogressive erosion and longitudinal profile evolution in noncohesive material[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research,2006, 21(2): 113-122.

    [23] ZHAO G., VISSER P. J. and PEETERS P. et al. Headcut migration prediction of the cohesive embankment breach[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 164(18): 18-25.

    * Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51479128, 51279117).

    Biography: YANG Yang (1986- ), Male, Ph. D.

    LI Wen-ping,

    E-mail: liwpzy@126.com

    猜你喜歡
    楊陽
    Analytical formula describing the non-saturating linear magnetoresistance in inhomogeneous conductors
    我愛洋甘菊
    職場高手請“兼職”,請出大驚喜
    EXISTENCE OF SOULUTIONS FOR THE FRACTIONAL (p,q)-LAOLACIAN PROBLEMS INVOLVING A CRITICL SOBLEV EXPNN*
    Accuracy improvement of quantitative analysis of calorific value of coal by combining support vector machine and partial least square methods in laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy
    A potential germ cell-speci fic marker in Japanese flounder,Paralichthys olivaceus: identi fication and characterization of lymphocyte antigen 75 (Ly75/CD205)*
    數(shù)學(xué)的簡潔美
    東方教育(2017年17期)2017-10-31 19:10:58
    A Historical View on Translation Theory and Practice in China
    我是你的王子
    有朋自遠方來
    三月三(2015年5期)2015-05-05 16:34:22
    欧美一级毛片孕妇| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 搡老乐熟女国产| 欧美日韩精品网址| av欧美777| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 老司机靠b影院| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久久久国内视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美午夜高清在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 制服人妻中文乱码| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| av欧美777| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 在线观看66精品国产| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费不卡黄色视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| avwww免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 操美女的视频在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产成人系列免费观看| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 很黄的视频免费| av天堂久久9| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 国产成人精品在线电影| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久久国产成人免费| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲中文av在线| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久性视频一级片| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 在线天堂中文资源库| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 青草久久国产| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲 国产 在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 色播在线永久视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 多毛熟女@视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 女警被强在线播放| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 极品教师在线免费播放| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 9191精品国产免费久久| 飞空精品影院首页| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 大型av网站在线播放| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成年人黄色毛片网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产片内射在线| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| tube8黄色片| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 成人18禁在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 免费少妇av软件| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 天天影视国产精品| 香蕉国产在线看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲成人手机| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 手机成人av网站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 中文字幕色久视频| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 黄色成人免费大全| 日韩欧美免费精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美在线黄色| 日韩有码中文字幕| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩黄片免| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品第一国产精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美日韩黄片免| 在线看a的网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日本五十路高清| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 手机成人av网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲伊人色综图| 一区二区三区精品91| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 色在线成人网| 性少妇av在线| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 午夜久久久在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 91成年电影在线观看| xxx96com| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一区二区三区精品91| 9热在线视频观看99| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 成人18禁在线播放| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产av又大| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 天天添夜夜摸| netflix在线观看网站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 99久久人妻综合| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 捣出白浆h1v1| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 青草久久国产| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 十八禁网站免费在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久久久视频综合| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产男女内射视频| 久久狼人影院| 在线播放国产精品三级| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| tocl精华| 亚洲 国产 在线| bbb黄色大片| 日韩免费av在线播放| 在线观看日韩欧美| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 18禁观看日本| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品影院久久| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产高清videossex| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 黄片播放在线免费| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 一级片免费观看大全| 精品福利观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 大香蕉久久网| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 午夜两性在线视频| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲全国av大片| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 多毛熟女@视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲成人手机| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 不卡一级毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 捣出白浆h1v1| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 免费看十八禁软件| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 成年动漫av网址| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品人妻1区二区| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产成人精品在线电影| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产成人av教育| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 校园春色视频在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| www日本在线高清视频| 91国产中文字幕| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 黄片播放在线免费| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| av天堂在线播放| 在线播放国产精品三级| 老司机影院毛片| 久久国产精品影院| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久中文看片网| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| av片东京热男人的天堂| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲国产欧美网| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲av美国av| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 高清av免费在线| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美日韩精品网址| 麻豆av在线久日| 悠悠久久av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 午夜免费观看网址| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 精品人妻在线不人妻| xxx96com| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美午夜高清在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人手机av|