• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Diagnostic Study of Global Energy Cycle of the GRAPES Global Model in the Mixed Space-Time Domain

    2014-12-14 06:58:00ZHAOBin趙濱andZHANGBo張博
    Journal of Meteorological Research 2014年4期
    關(guān)鍵詞:張博

    ZHAO Bin(趙濱)and ZHANG Bo(張博)

    National Meteorological Center,Beijing 100081

    Diagnostic Study of Global Energy Cycle of the GRAPES Global Model in the Mixed Space-Time Domain

    ZHAO Bin(趙濱)and ZHANG Bo?(張博)

    National Meteorological Center,Beijing 100081

    Some important diagnostic characteristics for a model’s physical background are reflected in the model’s energy transport,conversion,and cycle.Diagnosing the atmospheric energy cycle is a suitable way towards understanding and improving numerical models.In this study,formulations of the“Mixed Space-Time Domain”energy cycle are calculated and the roles of stationary and transient waves within the atmospheric energy cycle of the Global-Regional Assimilation and Prediction System(GRAPES)model are diagnosed and compared with the NCEP analysis data for July 2011.Contributions of the zonal-mean components of the energy cycle are investigated to explain the performance of numerical models.

    Mixed Space-Time Domain energy cycle,energy reservoir,energy conversion,stationary wave, transient wave,GRAPES model

    1.Introduction

    Atmospheric systems such as cyclones and anticyclones are measured in terms of their kinetic energy (KE)(Storch et al.,2012),and those systems that are intensifying or weakening are often defined as gaining or losing KE(Luo,1994).Therefore,knowledge regarding the sources and sinks of KE in this context is very important(Li and Zhu,1995;Gao et al.,2006).

    The total energy of the whole atmosphere will remain constant under adiabatic motion and the only source and sink of KE should be the available potential energy(APE).The APE can be considered as the difference between the total potential energy and minimum potential energy,and we can state that APE should vanish when the system’s distribution becomes universally horizontal and stable.However,the general motion of the atmosphere is not adiabatic;the presence of friction should alter KE directly,and conversion between APE and KE should be considered as the generation and dissipation energy within the whole life cycle of the atmospheric motions.

    Supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(41305091)and China Meteorological Administration Special Fund for Numerical Prediction(GRAPES).

    ?Corresponding author:zhaob@cma.gov.cn.

    ?The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    Lorenz(1955)developed a life cycle for energy conversions and defined a series of formulations to represent such conversions from APE to KE.He subdivided APE and KE into mean and eddy forms.The eddy form is the deviation from the mean form and the mean form can convert into the eddy form by eddytransport of sensible heat from low to high latitudes. In his energy cycle process,the general circulation can be characterized as a conversion of zonal APE,which is generated by low-latitude heating and high-latitude cooling,to eddy APE,then to eddy kinetic energy and to zonal mean KE.The conversion between the two forms of energy involves horizontal and vertical transport of momentum and sensible heat.The dissipation and generation terms within the life cycle can barely be estimated directly,and they are only a few balance terms in the budget equations.

    This life cycle can be used to distinguish different contributions from different synoptic-scale and general circulation processes.It should give an intuitive judgment for evaluating the sources of different model performances.With regard to the Hadley cell,this largescale system involves a conversion from mean APE to mean KE(Dickinson,1969;Wu,1987),and for the barotropic atmosphere,the rate of transport between the eddy and mean KE is given by the product of the eddy transport if the momentum and gradient of mean angular rotation are both taken in the north-south direction.Concerning the baroclinic atmosphere(Stone, 1978),by the eddy transport of sensible heat from low to high latitudes,the mean APE converts into eddy APE and the eddy conversion from APE to KE is given by vertical motion and temperature within the latitudinal circle.Thus,it is a result of warm air rising and cold air sinking(Stein,1986;Huang and Vincent, 1998).In terms of the real atmosphere,the entire energy life cycle should display a complete conversion from APE to KE.

    Oort(1964,1983)used the classical Lorenz energy cycle concept to estimate the reservoirs of APE and KE,together with related sources and sinks for the Northern Hemisphere.Steinheimer et al.(2008) estimated the conversion of Lorenz theory both in gridscale processes and subgridscale processes obtained from parameterization schemes.Their results showed that the subgridscale processes contributed significantly to the Lorenz energy cycle and the total dissipation terms of the subgridscale were more intense than what all earlier gridscale estimates had indicated.

    Lorenz formulas can be introduced in the space domain,and we can further acquire the energy value in the mixed space and time domain,the so-called“Mixed Space-Time Domain”energy cycle.The eddy energy is subdivided into stationary and transient waves.The stationary form is the time mean and a result of diabatic and orographic forcing.The transient form is the departure from the time mean and a result of baroclinic instability of zonal mean flow(Simmons and Hoskins,1978,1980).

    Ulbrich and Speth(1991)expanded the Lorenz classical process to give a series of detailed formulations for the“Mixed Space-Time Domain”energy cycle(Arpe et al.,1986),and examined the role of stationary and transient waves within the atmospheric energy cycle with the ECMWF data for winter and summer.Their results showed that all terms of the energy cycle related to stationary waves reveal a predominance of the planetary scale while the transient waves are governed by synoptic-scale waves.

    In the present study,an approach based on the“Mixed Space-Time Domain”energy cycle is adopted.The formulations of the energy cycle are calculated,and the role of stationary and transient waves within the atmospheric energy cycle from the Global-Regional Assimilation and Prediction System (GRAPES)is firstly diagnosed and compared with NCEP Final Operational Global Analysis(FNL)data for July 2011.Three main kinds of considerable processes(planetary scale,barotropic conversion,and baroclinic conversion)are examined separately in order to investigate in detail the characteristics and features of energy cycle and its component contribution. The zonal-mean components of the energy cycle are investigated to diagnose the performance of numerical integrations.The forecast results at different lead times are used to explain the reason for deteriorating forecast performance.

    2.Method

    By following Ulbrich and Speth(1991)’s energy cycle framework(illustrated in Fig.1),all the energy reservoirs and conversions are calculated in this study with Ulbrich and Speth’s detailed formulations. Zonal available potential energy(AZ)and zonal kinetic energy(KZ)are zonal APE and KE.Stationary eddy available potential energy(ASE)and transient eddy available potential energy(ATE)are stationary and transient eddy APE,and the stationary and transient eddy KE is named KSE and KTE,respectively. Besides energy reservoirs,some terms of the energy cycle,such as CZ(conversion from AZ to KZ),CAS (conversion from AZ to ASE),CAT(conversion from AZ to ATE),CES(conversion from ASE to KSE), CET(conversion from ATE to KTE),CKS(conversion from KZ to KSE),CKT(conversion from KZ to KTE),and the nonlinear conversions between stationary and transient terms(CATE and CKTE)all play important roles in the global energy cycle process and can be regarded as an important benchmark to estimate the basic model performance.

    3.Data

    Fig.1.Diagram of the global atmospheric energy cycle in the Mixed Space-Time Domain.Arrows indicate orientation of conversions corresponding to the definitions of parameters(from Ulbrich and Speth,1991).Note:G denotes generation of potential energy;D denotes dissipation of kinetic energy.

    The GRAPES model daily forecast data for July 2011 with four different lead times of 24,72,120,and 168 h are used.The model resolution is selected as 0.5°and it is initialized with global 1200 UTC analyses of the NCEP FNL data.Archived GRAPES model data consist of geopotential height,temperature,specific humidity,zonal and meridional wind,and vertical wind for 29 pressure levels(1000,962.5,925,887.5, 850,800,750,700,650,600,550,500,450,400,350, 300,275,250,225,200,175,150,125,100,70,50, 30,20,and 10 hPa).NCEP FNL data are selected as the analysis data for comparison and are interpolated from 1.0°to 0.5°grid,and vertically from 26 to 29 pressure levels.NCEP global forecast(not analysis)data are also selected for the same time period and the same horizontal and vertical resolutions for comparison.

    4.Results

    4.1 The global energy cycle for July 2011

    As a preliminary work for the energy cycle analysis,it is necessary to evaluate the performance of the GRAPES model and provide an intuitive impression of the quality of the FNL data,which serve as the comparative observation.In the classical treatment of statistical verification for different model forecasts, root-mean-square-error(RMSE)is a predominant index used as a measure of model forecast performance. Temperature and wind velocity are the main variables involved in the calculation of energy cycle and conversion terms.Figure 2 depicts the global averaged RMSE for temperature and wind velocity against the FNL analysis data and NCEP BUFR(Binary Universal Form of the Representation of meteorological data) sounding data.The latter dataset is chosen as the observation,which is only distributed between 850 and 50 hPa.Figure 2a shows that the maxima of temperature RMSE are mostly concentrated within 200 hPa,and with increasing lead time,RMSE grows from 1.59 K(24 h)to 3.80 K(168 h).Meanwhile,in Fig. 2c,the maxima of wind velocity RMSE are located within 250 hPa,and with increasing lead time,RMSE rises from 6.14 m s-1(24 h)to 16.16 m s-1(168 h). The RMSEs of GRAPES model outputs relative to the FNL data in Fig.2b and 2d present a similar pattern to that in Figs.2a and 2c.Temperature RMSE at different lead times in Fig.2c is consistently smaller

    than that in Fig.2a(e.g.,at 200 hPa,1.09 K for 24 h and 3.53 K for 168 h).Moreover,wind velocity RMSE is smaller in Fig.2d than in Fig.2b at 120-h lead time and increases to 17.00 m s-1(168 h)at 250 hPa.This is possibly due to the GRAPES model being initiated with the FNL data.With respect to upper levels(above 50 hPa),where there are no comparative observations,large temperature and wind velocity RMSE maxima are observed to intensify with lead time.This will lead to strengthening potential energy and KE.

    Fig.2.Global averaged RMSE for GRAPES produced (a,b)temperature(K)against(a,c)NCEP BUFR observation and(b,d)FNL analysis in July with different lead times.

    Following Ulbrich and Speth’s work(1991),we have calculated the globally averaged energy cycle of the GRAPES model with different lead times and the results are shown in Fig.3.It is confirmed that the GRAPES model has the capability to reproduce the main features of the global energy cycle as compared with NCEP analysis data.AZ is converted into ASE and ATE;the stationary waves cannot be neglected compared with the transient ones,and ASE and ATE have about the same value.The nonlinear conversion between the two eddy available potential energy terms, i.e.,CATE,plays an important role in the global energy cycle and is directed from the stationary to the

    transient reservoir of APE.It can be deduced that the damping of stationary temperature by horizontal transient fluxes of sensible heat is an important process in the global general circulation.

    Fig.3.The global atmospheric energy cycle of GRAPES in July 2011.Various energy components(in boxes)are in J m-2,while conversions between the components are in W m-2.Numbers at the top indicate values based on NCEP FNL data,and 24,72,120,and 168 h are the different lead times from 1 to 7 days.The dotted frame refers to the planetary-scale(Hadley cell)process,the dashed frame refers to the barotropic process,and the dot-dashed frame refers to the baroclinic process.

    With increased forecast lead time,AZ becomes larger,which reflects the meridional temperature gradient between high and low latitudes becoming steeper. This enhances zonal baroclinic processes, which increases the meridional heat flux and enhances the conversion from AZ to eddy potential energy,especially the conversion of the transient term,CAT.The stationary conversion of APE,i.e.,CAS,is just 1/6 of the magnitude of the transient conversion of CAT.

    The zonal KE(i.e.,KZ)has a similar value to the sum of stationary and transient eddy KE(KSE and KTE),and the transient term is three times larger than the stationary term,while there is almost no global net conversion between the two eddy KE terms. Barotropic stationary and transient conversions(CKS and CKT)are directed from eddy KE to zonal KE. The zonal planetary-scale conversion CZ(from AZ to KZ)is about 1.5 times larger in GRAPES than in the NCEP analysis.

    4.2 Planetary-scale processes

    The globally averaged energy values are presented in Fig.3,which gives us an intuitive impression of how the global energy cycle works.It is also a useful diagnosis tool to analyze the source of the bias between different model forecasts.However,globally averaged values can barely depict the contributions and interrelations of special energy terms.More needs to be done to reveal detailed features.We further separate the framework of the energy cycle into three major processes:planetary-scale,barotropic,and baroclinic atmospheric processes.

    With regard to planetary-scale processes,largescale systems such as the Hadley cell provide a conversion from zonal APE(AZ)to zonal KE(KZ).The AZ and KZ increase with the increasing lead time.Figure 4 shows the zonal mean temperature distribution of NCEP FNL analysis and the bias of the GRAPES forecast relative to FNL data at different lead times.As expected,the maximum overestimation is located at low levels near the equator and at high levels near the poles,and the overestimation becomes stronger with increasing lead time.This indicates that the strong warm bias in the low latitudes increases the meridional temperature gradient,which leads to stronger AZ.Concerning the CZ term,which represents the conversion between AZ and KZ,this reflects the zonal features of the vertical wind and temperature.When warm air rises and cold air sinks,CZ>0 and shows Hadley cell features.In contrast,when CZ<0,it shows the features of the Ferrel cell.In Fig.3,it presents positive values of CZ,so it reflects a Hadley cell feature in planetary-scale processes.

    4.3 Barotropic conversion

    In this section,the barotropic conversion and KE are diagnosed.As discussed in Section 4.1,zonal KE (KZ)is the sum of the stationary and transient eddy KE,while KSE is about 1/3 of KTE and there is almost no net global conversion between the two eddy terms.The zonal distribution of KTE(Fig.5)shows that the maxima in the Southern Hemisphere are displaced northward at the location of the zonal mean jet (50°S)and the maxima in the Northern Hemisphere

    are displaced southward in the opposite latitudes. With increasing lead time,the strong western flow decreases in the upper troposphere(near 300 hPa)and stratosphere(near the top of the model),which leads to a decreasing of the global averaged energy value.

    Fig.4.(a)Zonal averaged temperature distribution of FNL and(b)-(e)biases of GRAPES relative to FNL with different lead times(1-7 days,i.e.,D+1 to D+7).

    Fig.5.Transient eddy kinetic energy(KTE)in July(J m-2Pa-1).(a)FNL data,and(b)24-,(c)72-,(d)120-, and(e)168-h GRAPES forecast.

    The stationary eddy KE(KSE)displays a very different pattern to the transient one(Fig.6).The comparatively weak maxima are presented at the locations of 30°S,15°N,and 45°N,separately,and are associated with the zonal mean jets in both hemispheres. Another maximum appears in high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere,which is related to the polar jet.With increasing leading time,the four weaker maxima decrease significantly.A band of high energy values presents in the Southern Hemisphere over 100 hPa due to the presence of a large zonal wind jet at the upper 30-hPa level,which causes a strengthening of KSE.

    As mentioned before,the nonlinear conversion be tween KSE and KTE is directed from KSE to KTE, and it is difficult to determine the symbol of the global averaged value because it is approximately zero.However,the zonal mean distribution of transient eddy momentum against or along the direction of the stationary eddy momentum gradient can be explained. The zonal mean distribution of the nonlinear conversion CKTE shows a pair of strong maxima in Fig.7. Comparing the location with respect to the zonal mean

    contribution of KSE and KTE,we find that the maximum of the nonlinear conversion is displaced near the location of the maximum KTE and minimum KSE. This means that the strong nonlinear conversion can be considered as a physical mechanism forcing the atmosphere to a more uniform state.Figure 7 shows that as the lead time increases,the maximum nonlinear conversion value becomes weaker,which indicates a weakening of the local contribution.

    Fig.6.As in Fig.5,but for the stationary eddy kinetic energy(KSE)in July(J m-2Pa-1).

    Fig.7.Distributions of the conversion term CKTE(from KTE to KSE;10-6W m-2Pa-1)in July.(a)FNL data, and(b)24-,(c)72-,(d)120-,and(e)168-h GRAPES forecast.

    CKTE is a very important nonlinear conversion term and its positive or negative value indicates the direction of transfer between transient waves and stationary waves.Moreover,the strength of KSE can be used as a basis to determine the jet intensity changes.When CKTE is positive,heat transport is transferred from transient waves to stationary waves, which strengths KSE.Conversely,if CKTE is negative,heat transport is directed into transient waves, resulting in a weakening of KSE.The result obtained by Ulbrich and Speth(1991)showed that a strengthening of KSE corresponded to local jet maxima while a weakening prevailed over the jet entrance regions.

    Figure 7 shows the conversion term CKTE from FNL analysis and GRAPES forecast,while the CKTE in the Southern Hemisphere is depicted in Fig.8. It is seen that in the FNL analysis,positive values are mainly found downstream of the jet maxima over Southwest Pacific,while negative values are distributed in the jet entrance regions over Southeast Atlantic where wind velocity is relatively weak.The distribution of positive and negative local values and jet regions verifies Ulbrich’s conclusion.Compared with the FNL analysis,the strength of the local jet in the GRAPES forecast becomes gradually weaker with increased lead time,while the corresponding CKTE decreases significantly,together leading to the dissipation of KSE.Until 7 days,the positive values over the local jet maxima show a clear decreasing trend,while the corresponding jet is significantly weaker than in the FNL analysis.It can be concluded that CKTE can be used to determine stationary wave changes,and act as an indicator of the jet intensity features.

    4.4 Baroclinic conversion

    For the baroclinic conversion process,the global averaged values reported in Fig.3 indicate how this process is working.With increased lead time,the conversion from zonal APE to stationary eddy APE remains constant.As a result of the meridional temperature gradient increasing,meridional transport of sensible heat enhances,which causes an increase in the conversion CAT,transferring energy from zonal to transient eddy APE.

    In order to compare details of the process associated with baroclinic conversion,the zonal contributions of ASE and ATE are plotted in Fig.9.Larger ASE values appear in both the Southern and Northern Hemispheres.In the Northern Hemisphere,the largest ASE is found below 850 hPa between 20°and 60°N,and the second largest ASE is seen between 400 and 200 hPa around 30°N.However,in the Southern Hemisphere,the largest ASE occurs between 850 and 700 hPa and further south of 60°S,with the maximum value greater than 30 J m-2Pa-1.In contrast to ASE,the zonal mean distribution of ATE has a similar structure to KTE(Fig.5).The maximum value of transient eddy potential energy ATE is only about half that of ASE.With increased lead time,the maximum value of ASE increases and ATE decreases slightly.

    In terms of the zonal mean distribution of ASE, Fig.10 shows that the maxima of ASE are associated with the linear conversion term CAS.The zonal contribution of stationary conversion is negative over 200-400 hPa at 30°N,corresponding to similar conversion rates of ASE maximizing at a similar location. The same coincidence can be seen in high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere.The zonal mean contribution to the conversion from zonal to transient eddy APE,i.e.,CAT,is determined by the meridional temperature gradient.Comparing CAT(Fig.10)with ATE(Fig.9)reveals that a coincidence in the maximum energy value with conversion terms is apparent.The conversion value increases over low levels in the Southern Hemisphere with increasing lead time. This is determined by the decreasing of vertical stability and,simultaneously,the decreasing of transient sensible heat transport.The coincidence in the distribution of CAS is found to be very similar to that observed for the transient term with respect to midtropospheric values.This indicates that the baroclinic

    process associated with the stationary wave is comparable to that associated with the transient wave.

    Fig.8.Wind velocity(m s-1)at 250 hPa in July 2011 in the Southern Hemisphere.Shaded areas depict the local contributions to CKTE greater than 50×10-6W m-2Pa-1(dark)and lower than-50×10-6W m-2Pa-1(light).(a) FNL data,and(b)24-,(c)72-,(d)120-,and(e)168-h GRAPES forecast.

    Fig.9.(a1-e1)Stationary eddy available potential energy(ASE)and(a2-e2)transient eddy available energy(ATE)(J m-2Pa-1)in July.(a1-a2)FNL data,and(b1-b2)24-,(c1-c2)72-,(d1-d2)120-,and(e1-e2)168-h forecast.

    Fig.10.As in Fig.9,but for the conversion terms CAS(a1-e1)and CAT(a2-e2)(10-6W m-2Pa-1)in July.

    The nonlinear conversion CATE is directed from ASE to ATE.Local zonal mean values of this nonlinear conversion are depicted in Fig.11.The maximum contribution to the global averaged energy is located at lower levels over Antarctica,where the maximum value of ASE presents.It is considered that this kind of energy conversion does not originate from the zonal reservoir of AZ,but from the stationary eddy APE’s nonlinear interactions.The maximum ASE above the troposphere at 30°N is not associated with the strong nonlinear conversions.The negative values of CATE is seen to intensify over Antarctica with increased

    lead time. The nonlinear conversion is thought as the horizontal heat transport by transient waves(Lau, 1982)and a negative value means that the heat transport is directly from warm to cold regions.

    Fig.11.As in Fig.7,but for CATE(ATE to ASE;10-6W m-2Pa-1)in July.

    As the maximum zonal mean CATE appears at 700 hPa in the Southern Hemisphere,we choose to analyze the nonlinear conversion CATE at 700-hPa in the Southern Hemisphere(Fig.12).With regard to the FNL analysis,some negative and positive values of CATE are located around Antarctica,coinciding with regions of relatively warm and cold air.We superimpose temperature on CATE,and see that the distribution coincides with the horizontal heat transport by the transient waves.When heat is transported against the local temperature gradient by transient waves,meaning that heat transport is directed into the warm region,the CATE value is positive.In contrast,a negative value indicates that the heat transport is directed into the cold region.Compared with FNL data,the GRAPES forecast data show a larger temperature gradient and increasing negative values.

    4.5 Comparison with NCEP-GFS

    According to the aforementioned analysis of the atmospheric energy cycle,the main characteristics of the energy cycle is now used to aid in traditional verification of model performance.Real forecast data with the same resolution as that of FNL data from the NCEP Global Forecast Systems(NCEP-GFS)are used to compare the features of the energy cycle with the GRAPES model.The same 31 days of analysis are carried out and monthly averages are considered.

    Firstly,the anomaly correlation coefficient(ACC) is calculated for geopotential height at 500 hPa. We use wavelet analysis and our verification procedure include a separation of the waves with different zonal wave numbers.The long waves of the planetary scale(zonal wavenumbers 0-3),synoptic scale waves(zonal wavenumbers 4-9),and small-scale waves (zonal wavenumbers 10-20)are distinguished separately.We assume that fast moving waves are synoptic or small scale,and slowly moving ones are predominantly planetary scale(Kung,1988).

    In Fig. 13,the separation into the different wavenumber groups is shown in order to compare the performance of NCEP forecast and GRAPES forecast. With respect to NCEP forecast results,the ACC of GRAPES falls behind with different lead times.The bias at 168 h is approximately 0.03 and all verification indices are significant at the 95%confidence level. The planetary-scale contribution is roughly similar to the aggregate performance. However,the synoptic scale and shorter scale represent some differences:for the synoptic scale(wavenumbers 4-9),the confidence interval becomes larger at 168 h,meaning that the standard deviation of ACC bias also becomes larger. Therefore,the bias can barely satisfy the 95%confidence level.For the shorter scale(wavenumbers 10-20),the bias of model performance becomes more statistically insignificant after 48 h.We conclude that significant bias is reflected on the large and meso scales, and is roughly equal on the smaller scale.

    Fig.12.Temperature(K)at 700 hPa in July 2011 in the Southern Hemisphere.Shaded areas depict local contributions to CATE greater than 50×10-6W m-2Pa-1(dark)and lower than-50×10-6W m-2Pa-1(light).(a)FNL data,and (b)24-,(c)72-,(d)120-,and(e)168-h forecast.

    Fig.13.Monthly mean of 500-hPa geopotential height ACC for GRAPES and NCEP-GFS with different lead times of 1-7 days.(a)Total statistical score,(b)planetary scale(wavenumbers 0-3),(c)synoptic scale(wavenumbers 4-9), and(d)short scale(wavenumbers 10-20).Note:“w.r.t.”means“with regard to.”

    Figure 14 shows the energy values for the global integrals of NCEP-GFS with different lead times.In contrast to the GRAPES model,it is generally accepted that most energy values calculated by baroclinic and barotropic processes are roughly similar in July.The primary difference lies in the conversion of zonal APE to zonal KE,which is a result of the planetary-scale processes.AZ of NCEP-GFS is larger than in GRAPES,which means that NCEP-GFS has a steeper meridional temperature gradient between the high and low latitudes.The conversion term CZ of NCEP-GFS is smaller than in GRAPES,which is mainly due to the simulated weak vertical wind.Due to the hydrostatic assumption,NCEP-GFS simulates weaker vertical air motion than GRAPES,leading to the nonlinear conversion CZ becoming smaller.All of these features will seriously affect the Hadley cell simulation.KZ of GRAPES is larger than that of NCEP-GFS,mainly because of the zonal mean wind amplitude being too large.It should be noted at this point that the difference in model performance between GRAPES and NCEP-GFS is mainly reflected in the large-scale process,and such a conclusion is consistent with the results obtained via traditional verification in Fig.13.Furthermore,detailed characteristics should be investigated and compared with a full analysis of unique energy cycle processes.

    Fig.14.The global atmospheric energy cycle in the Mixed Space-Time Domain for NCEP-GFS in July 2011.Various energy components(in boxes)are in J m-2,while conversions between the components are in W m-2.Numbers at the top indicate values based on NCEP FNL data,and 24,72,120,and 168 h are the different lead times from 1 to 7 days. The dashed box indicates the large difference of NCEP-GPS with the GRAPES model.

    5.Summary

    An investigation on the atmospheric energy cycle was carried out by using GRAPES forecast data,with a focus on the role of model performance at different lead times.Three main atmospheric-scale processes were diagnosed separately and the characteristics of stationary and transient eddy energy terms and their conversions were calculated and presented.The results show that:

    (1)The GRAPES model has the capability to reproduce the main characteristics of the global energy cycle as compared with NCEP FNL analysis data.

    (2)ASE and ATE have approximately the same values and the nonlinear conversion is directed from the stationary to the transient.

    (3)Barotropic conversions(CKS and CKT)are directed from eddy kinetic energy to zonal kinetic energy,and the kinetic energy of stationary eddy is about 1/3 of that of the transient eddy.

    (4)With increasing forecast lead time,AZ becomes larger and the zonal conversion CZ(from AZ to KZ)in GRAPES is around 1.5 times larger than in the NCEP analysis.

    (5)In contrast with traditional verification,the energy cycle diagnosis can help to derive statistical scores and identify the source of model differences.

    This study on the diagnosis of the energy cycle is at a preliminary stage in terms of operational application.There are some areas of work that need to be improved and some problems that should be noted. For example,only short-term integrations of forecast data were collected for analysis in order to acquire stable performances of energy values.Low-resolution and long-term integrations should be run for“seasonal forecasts.”Moreover,we have recognized that diagnosis of the energy cycle can be achieved with a similar conclusion to traditional verification methods,but how to combine traditional verification methods with this energy cycle diagnosis for model evaluation remains to be examined.These problems should be discussed in future investigations.

    Arpe,K.,C.Brancovic,E.Oriol,et al.,1986:Variability in time and space of energetics from a long series of atmospheric data produced by ECMWF.Beitr. Phys.Atmos.,59,321-355.

    Dickinson,R.E.,1969:Theory of planetary wave-zonal flow interaction.J.Atmos.Sci.,26,73-81.

    Gao Hui,Chen Longxun,He Jinhai,et al.,2006:Characteristics of zonal propagation of atmospheric kinetic energy at equatorial region in Asia.Acta Meteor. Sinica,20,86-94.

    Huang,H.-J.,and D.G.Vincent,1988:Daily spectral energy conversions of the global circulation during 10-27 January 1979.Tellus,40A,37M9.

    Kung,E.C.,1988:Spectral energetics of the general circulation and time spectra of transient waves during the FGGE year.J.Climate,1,5-19.

    Lau,N.C.,and A.H.Oort,1982:A comparative study of observed Northern Hemisphere circulation statistics based on GFDL and NMC analyses.Part II: Transient eddy statistics and the energy cycle.Mon. Wea.Rev.,110,889-906.

    Li Qingquan and Zhu Qiangen,1995:Analysis on the source and sink of kinetic energy of atmospheric 30-60-day period oscillation and the probable causes. Acta Meteor.Sinica,9,420-431.

    Lorenz,E.N.,1955:Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation.Tellus,7, 157-167.

    Luo Zhexian,1994:Effect of energy dispersion on the structure and motion of tropical cyclone.Acta Meteor.Sinica,8,51-59.

    Oort,A.H.,1964:On estimates of the atmospheric energy cycle.Mon.Wea.Rev.,92,483-493.

    —-,1983:Global Atmospheric Circulation Statistics 1958-1973,Volume 14,NOAA Professional Paper. U.S.Department of Commerce/NOAA,180.

    Simmons,A.J.,and B.J.Hoskins,1978:The life cycles of some nonlinear baroclinic waves.J.Atmos.Sci., 35,414-432.

    —-,and—-,1980:Barotropic influences on the growth and decay of nonlinear baroclinic waves.J.Atmos. Sci.,37,1679-1684.

    Stein, C., 1986: Das zeitliche Zusammenwirken baroklinerEnergieumwandlungen durch grogrfiumige Wellen in derAtmosph/ire. Diplomarbeit, Institut fiir Geophysik und Meteorologie der Universit/it zu K61n.

    Steinheimer,M.,M.Hantel,and P.Bechtold,2008:Convection in Lorenz’s global energy cycle with the ECMWF model.Tellus,60A,1001-1022.

    Stone,P.H.,1978:Baroclinic adjustment.J.Atmos. Sci.,35,561-571.

    Storch,J.S.,C.Eden,and I.Fast,2012:An estimate of the Lorenz energy cycle for the world ocean based on the STORM/NCEP simulation.J.Phys.Oceanogr., 42,2185-2205.

    Ulbrich,U.,and P.Speth,1991:The global energy cycle of stationary and transient atmospheric waves: Results from ECMWF analyses.Meteor.Atmos. Phys.,45,125-138.

    Wu Rongsheng,1987: Energy,energy flux and Lagrangian of Rossby wave. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 1,143-150.

    :Zhao Bin and Zhang Bo,2014:Diagnostic study of global energy cycle of the GRAPES global model in the mixed space-time domain.J.Meteor.Res.,28(4),592-606,

    10.1007/s13351-014-3072-0.

    (Received October 16,2013;in final form June 17,2014)

    The results show that the GRAPES model has the capability to reproduce the main features of the global energy cycle as compared with the NCEP analysis.Zonal available potential energy(AZ)is converted into stationary eddy available potential energy(ASE)and transient eddy available potential energy(ATE),and ASE and ATE have similar values.The nonlinear conversion between the two eddy energy terms is directed from the stationary to the transient.AZ becomes larger with increased forecast lead time,reflecting an enhancement of the meridional temperature gradient,which strengthens the zonal baroclinic processes and makes the conversion from AZ to eddy potential energy larger,especially for CAT(conversion from AZ to ATE).The zonal kinetic energy(KZ)has a similar value to the sum of the stationary and transient eddy kinetic energy.Barotropic conversions are directed from eddy to zonal kinetic energy.The zonal conversion from AZ to KZ in GRAPES is around 1.5 times larger than in the NCEP analysis.The contributions of zonal energy cycle components show that transient eddy kinetic energy(KTE)is associated with the Southern Hemisphere subtropical jet and the conversion from KZ to KTE reduces in the upper tropopause near 30°S.The nonlinear barotropic conversion between stationary and transient kinetic energy terms(CKTE) is reduced predominantly by the weaker KTE.

    猜你喜歡
    張博
    過(guò) 橋
    對(duì)善舉的尊重
    項(xiàng)目學(xué)習(xí)背景下高中信息技術(shù)課堂教學(xué)有效實(shí)施的探索
    師道·教研(2021年8期)2021-09-22 12:12:03
    集成創(chuàng)新發(fā)揮優(yōu)勢(shì) 自主研發(fā)服務(wù)造紙
    造紙信息(2019年7期)2019-09-10 11:33:18
    心里住著彼得·潘
    不孝之子
    一道高考試題的四次拓展
    張博:一個(gè)任性Girl的折騰史
    不孝之子
    基因組編輯技術(shù)研究前沿與挑戰(zhàn)
    遺傳(2015年10期)2015-01-03 06:31:58
    亚洲色图av天堂| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99热全是精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 在线免费十八禁| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 色视频www国产| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产精品,欧美在线| 六月丁香七月| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久久久大精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 99热这里只有是精品50| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 午夜视频国产福利| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 如何舔出高潮| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 永久网站在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一级av片app| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| www日本黄色视频网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产成人福利小说| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成年av动漫网址| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 色哟哟·www| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 色综合色国产| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产老妇女一区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 直男gayav资源| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 色吧在线观看| 99热全是精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品三级大全| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 1000部很黄的大片| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 床上黄色一级片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 在线观看66精品国产| 深夜精品福利| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 在现免费观看毛片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 天堂动漫精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 内地一区二区视频在线| 嫩草影视91久久| 日本a在线网址| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| ponron亚洲| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 中国国产av一级| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲最大成人av| 极品教师在线视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 少妇高潮的动态图| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 色av中文字幕| 嫩草影视91久久| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 观看美女的网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| ponron亚洲| 亚洲av熟女| 成人综合一区亚洲| 精品国产三级普通话版| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 小说图片视频综合网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 赤兔流量卡办理| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 少妇高潮的动态图| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 99热这里只有是精品50| www日本黄色视频网| 1024手机看黄色片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产三级在线视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一进一出抽搐动态| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 我要搜黄色片| 国产精品野战在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 免费大片18禁| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲四区av| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久精品91蜜桃| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产色婷婷99| 免费观看在线日韩| 日日撸夜夜添| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久草成人影院| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 天堂网av新在线| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 床上黄色一级片| 在线播放国产精品三级| eeuss影院久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美成人a在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久久久国内视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 嫩草影院精品99| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产精品一及| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 级片在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲性久久影院| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| www.色视频.com| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 色综合色国产| 不卡一级毛片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产高清三级在线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产高清三级在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 丰满的人妻完整版| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 午夜激情欧美在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 91精品国产九色| 国产三级在线视频| 简卡轻食公司| h日本视频在线播放| 全区人妻精品视频| 深夜精品福利| 久久草成人影院| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| av在线播放精品| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产三级在线视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 免费大片18禁| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| av在线蜜桃| 欧美色视频一区免费| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | av在线亚洲专区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 内射极品少妇av片p| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 中国美女看黄片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 免费看光身美女| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 99久国产av精品| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 日本 av在线| av黄色大香蕉| 国产精品三级大全| 内射极品少妇av片p| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 性色avwww在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成年免费大片在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 看片在线看免费视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 一级毛片电影观看 | 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 免费高清视频大片| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av黄色大香蕉| 色综合站精品国产| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美日本视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品永久免费网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 身体一侧抽搐| 国内精品宾馆在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 如何舔出高潮| 免费高清视频大片| 免费看光身美女| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 成年av动漫网址| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲无线在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产 一区精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产av不卡久久| 成人欧美大片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲18禁久久av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 直男gayav资源| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 色哟哟·www| 18+在线观看网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 免费观看在线日韩| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 简卡轻食公司| 99久久精品热视频| 国产在线男女| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产真实乱freesex| 精品国产三级普通话版| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久久国内视频| 国产三级在线视频| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 99热6这里只有精品| 美女黄网站色视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 男人舔奶头视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 看免费成人av毛片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲性久久影院| 老司机影院成人| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 一夜夜www| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 色综合色国产| 毛片女人毛片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 性欧美人与动物交配|