• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Sodium Abundances in Very Metal-poor Stars

    2023-09-03 15:24:52YuFuShenAlexeevaGangZhaoShuaiLiuZemingZhouHongliangYanHainingLiTianyiChenXiaodongXuHuilingChenHuaweiZhangandJianrongShi

    Yu-Fu Shen,S.A.Alexeeva,Gang Zhao,ShuaiLiu,Zeming Zhou,Hongliang Yan,Haining Li,Tianyi Chen,Xiaodong Xu,Huiling Chen,Huawei Zhang,and Jianrong Shi

    1 CAS Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy,National Astronomical Observatories,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;gzhao@nao.cas.cn,hlyan@nao.cas.cn,sjr@bao.ac.cn

    2 School of Astronomy and Space Science,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

    3 Department of Astronomy,School of Physics,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China

    4 Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China

    Abstract Chemical composition of very metal-poor(VMP)stars can provide observational constraints on current models of nucleosynthesis and the chemical evolution of the Galaxy.It has been found that the scatter of[Na/Fe]versus[Fe/H]in VMP stars is very large in contrast with most other elements.Moreover,a negative slope in[Na/Fe]versus[Fe/H]was found for giants,which is very unlikely according to the theory of nucleosynthesis.For the sample of 93 VMP stars in the metallicity range-4.25 <[Fe/H]<-1.64 we obtained NLTE sodium abundances using the line profile fitting method by employing accurate atmospheric parameters determined when taking into account NLTE line formation for both Fe I and Fe II.Originally selected from the LAMOST low-resolution spectral database,the spectra of stars were obtained with the High Dispersion Spectrograph of the Subaru Telescope.For 57 turn-off stars in metallicity domain -3.04 <[Fe/H]<-1.64,we obtained mean [Na/Fe]=-0.29±0.14 and positive slope 0.09±0.06.For 21 giants distributed over metallicity -3.59 <[Fe/H]<-2.19,we found mean[Na/Fe]=-0.35±0.1 and positive slope 0.07±0.07.Our[Na/Fe]trend is lower by~0.2 dex,compared to the modern GCE model.We believe the GCE model should be adjusted,by considering the associated scatter.Twelve stars in our sample are found to be outliers,with too low or too high Na abundances.

    Key words: techniques: spectroscopic–stars: abundances–stars: atmospheres

    1.Introduction

    The very metal-poor (VMP) stars are considered to be among the oldest stars in the universe,as they are believed to have formed from the remnants of the first generation of stars that died in supernova explosions.These early stars were composed mostly of hydrogen and helium,with minimal amounts of heavy elements.The supernova explosions of these stars enriched the interstellar medium with heavy elements,which later generations of stars incorporated into their atmospheres.Therefore,studying VMP stars can provide important clues about the early universe and the processes of stellar and Galactic evolution (Beers &Christlieb 2005;Frebel &Norris 2015;Nissen &Gustafsson 2018;Helmi 2020).Specifically,VMP stars are defined as having a metallicity less than about one-hundredth that of the Sun([Fe/H]<-2.0).

    Sodium (z=11,Na) is an odd-Z element,mainly produced by Type II supernovae (Kobayashi et al.2020) and its production increases with increasing metallicity.Determining the sodium (Na) abundance in VMP stars is an important step in understanding the early universe and the processes by which galaxies and stars have evolved over time.The relative abundance of sodium to iron can provide insights into the conditions under which the first stars formed,as well as the mechanisms by which heavy elements were synthesized and distributed throughout the Galaxy.Understanding the abundance and distribution of sodium in VMP stars can help shed light on the processes by which galaxies and their constituent stars evolve over time.

    Precision spectroscopy provides accurate and detailed information on VMP stars.Many spectroscopic campaigns have been conducted to study the chemical composition of VMP stars.The studies mainly focus on the abundance trends of [X/Fe] versus [Fe/H] for particular chemical element X,because these trends provide observational constraints on current models of nucleosynthesis and the chemical evolution of the Galaxy(e.g.,Spite&Spite 1978;McWilliam et al.1995;Cayrel et al.2004;Kobayashi et al.2006;Bensby et al.2014;Zhao et al.2016).Despite the large number of studies that have been conducted on the chemical abundances of stars,the problem of star-to-star scatter and systematic abundance shifts remains an active area of research in this field (Griffith et al.2023).

    Sodium is one of the elements with the biggest star-to-star scatter about the mean trend in VMP stars.As an example,in a recent study by Lombardo et al.(2022),a significant scatter of 0.17 dex was reported for sodium in a sample of 52 giant stars spanning a metallicity range of -3.59 <[Fe/H]<-1.79.Li et al.(2022) studied a sample of VMP stars spanning a metallicity range of -4.3 <[Fe/H]<-1.7 and reported a scatter of approximately 0.2 dex for [Na/Fe] when measuring the dispersion around a linear fit.Andrievsky et al.(2007)investigated 53 stars in the -4.2 <[Fe/H]<-1.6 metallicity range and found in the turn-off stars and “unmixed” giants:[Na/Fe]=-0.21±0.13.However,when excluding mixed giants,whose atmospheres may have been polluted by sodium during their evolution,the scatter for the entire sample of stars(36 stars)was found to be larger with[Na/Fe]=-0.17±0.19.

    The dispersion observed in average trends can arise from different enrichment events,such as those from core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe),Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia),or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars.Measuring the intrinsic scatter can give an idea of the number and variety of enrichment events,the degree of mixing in the interstellar medium and the mixing of stellar populations with different enrichment histories (Vincenzo et al.2021).

    Another reason for this scatter is that measuring the chemical abundances of stars is a complex and challenging task,and different methods and assumptions can lead to different results.For example,different studies may use different techniques for measuring abundances,leading to discrepancies in the derived abundances.The discrepancies can be due to spectral normalization,stellar parameters,and atomic data like oscillator strengths.

    It appears that another issue is prevalent among the studies,namely,negative slope of[Na/Fe]along the-2.8 ≤[Fe/H]≤-1.5.For example,a negative slope of [Na/Fe](-0.02±0.08) is reported by Reggiani et al.(2017) in a sample of 23 metal-poor stars.It is highly unlikely to observe a negative slope in the evolution of[Na/Fe]since the production of sodium heavily depends on the initial metallicity of the progenitor stars.The authors suggested that the problem may be related to issues with non-local thermodynamic equilibrium(NLTE) treatment of the data.Similar negative slopes of [Na/Fe] were reported in other studies (e.g.,Li et al.2022:-0.11±0.07 for giants).

    NLTE effects are known to have a substantial influence on the spectral lines,particularly on the Na I resonance lines at 5890 and 5896 ?,which are commonly used for measuring the Na abundances in VMP stars.NLTE effects can lead to an overestimation of the Na abundance when using local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE)-based analyses,especially in metal-poor giants where NLTE effects are more pronounced(e.g.,Li et al.2022;Lombardo et al.2022).The NLTE approach can help to reduce systematic errors in the derived Na abundances.

    In this study,we present the Na abundances in a sample of 93 VMP stars by employing their high-resolution spectra and following an accurate analysis technique.The sample is selected starting from Aoki et al.(2022),Li et al.(2022).The sample is comprised of a range of 67 turnoff stars and 26 giants,uniformly distributed across the-4.3 ≤[Fe/H]≤-1.5 metallicity range,which is appropriate for research into Galactic chemical evolution (GCE).

    A consistent set of effective temperatures (Teff),surface gravities (logg),metallicities,and microturbulence velocities(ξmic) was obtained using lines from two ionization stages of iron,Fe I and Fe II.Our study benefits from taking into consideration the NLTE line formation for both Fe I and Fe II.NLTE line profile fitting is employed to determine the abundance of each individual Na I line,with departure coefficients calculated for the specific physical parameters of the star using classical one-dimensional (1D) model atmospheres.The model atom for Na I used in this work was treated and tested by Alexeeva et al.(2014).

    Our goal is to minimize observational scatter and measure the intrinsic scatter as accurately as possible.We analyze outliers,such as Na-rich and Na-poor stars,to determine the possible reasons for their “anomalous” abundance.

    The paper is organized as follows.Section 2 describes the observation of the spectra,target selection,and the stellar parameters we used.Section 3 addresses the determination of Na abundance.Section 4 discusses the GCE.The conclusions are given in Section 5.

    2.Observations,Parameters,and Stellar Sample

    2.1.Observations

    Our sample of VMP stars was selected from the Large sky Area Multi-Object fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST,Zhao et al.2006;Cui et al.2012;Zhao et al.2012;Liu et al.2015;Yan et al.2022)low-resolution(R~2000)spectroscopic database as metal-poor candidates(Li et al.2018)and followed up with high-resolution spectroscopy(Aoki et al.2022;Li et al.2022)utilizing the High Dispersion Spectrograph(HDS)of the Subaru Telescope (Noguchi et al.2002;Sato et al.2002)through the JSPS-CAS Joint Research Program.High-resolution(R=36,000)spectra have wavelength range 4030–6800 ? with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) more than 60.

    We determine the locations of our sample stars based on the parallaxes given by Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3,Gaia Collaboration et al.2016,2022).We first convert the coordinates to Cartesian coordinates with the Sun as the center,and then make the Galactic center the coordinate center through translation.The Sun is placed atx=-8 andy=z=0.The Galactic locations of our sample are depicted in Figure 1.The positions of the stars in thex–yand thez–rGCplanes are also displayed in Figure 2.The star J1313-0552 (#51) is not included in Figure 2 due to extremely outlying coordinates.Coordinates and information about observations can be found in Table A1.

    Figure 1.The locations for our sample of stars in the Galactic coordinates.

    Figure 2.The positions of the VMP stars in the x–y plane(upper panel)and the z–rGC plane (bottompanel),wherex,yand z are the directions of the Cartesian system ofGalacticcoordinates,and The Sun is located atthe intersection of the dashed lines (x=-8, y=0, z=0).Some special stars are marked by the numbers.The number of the star follows its number from Table A1.

    2.2.Stellar and Kinematic Parameters

    Stellar parametersTeff,logg,and ξmicwere determined in this study applying different methods,including the spectroscopic one based on the NLTE analysis of lines of Fe I and Fe II.The stellar and kinematic parameters are listed in Table B1.The details of the determination of stellar parameters will be reported in Shi et al.(2023,in preparation).

    The kinematic parameters:parallax,proper motion,and radial velocity are taken from Gaia DR3.A few radial velocities of stars are not provided by Gaia,so we use the radial velocities determined by spectra instead.We focus on space velocity components(U,V,W),whose calculation is based on Johnson&Soderblom (1987).According to Figure 3,16 stars within the circle with radius 180 km s-1can be referred to as belonging to the thick disk,while the remaining 77 stars belong to the Galactic halo (Venn et al.2004).The star J1313-0552(#51) is not included in Figure 3 due to its extremely high velocity components (U=-1695 km s-1,V=-84 km s-1,W=85 km s-1).

    Figure 3. UVW velocity diagram for our sample of stars,except for #51.The dashed line is part of a circle whose radius is 180 km s-1.The markers are the same as Figure 2.

    2.3.Stellar Sample

    We have 93 metal-poor stars with metallicity range-4.25 <[Fe/H]<-1.64.Most of our sample stars (88) are in the metallicity range -3.14 <[Fe/H]<-1.64.

    Among 93 stars,26 of them are giants and another 67 are turn-off stars.TheTeff–loggdiagram is shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 4. Teff versuslogg of 93 stars.The solid line islogg=2.4,which is the most important basis for distinguishing between giants (blue) and turn-off stars (black).The other markers are the same as in Figure 2.

    3.NLTE Sodium Abundance

    3.1.Method of Calculation

    The 1D model atmospheres for givenTeff,logg,and [Fe/H]were calculated using the code MARCS(Gustafsson et al.2008).The opacity-sampling (OS) code is based on the opacity distribution function (ODF) version of Gehren (1979).

    The model atom of Na I and the adopted atomic data are described in Alexeeva et al.(2014).To solve the radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium equations,we used the code DETAIL (Butler &Giddings 1985) based on the accelerated Λiteration method (Rybicki &Hummer 1991).Theoretical NLTE spectra were calculated with the code SYNTHV_NLTE(Tsymbal et al.2019)using the obtained departure coefficientsbi=nNLTE/nLTE.Here,nNLTEandnLTEare the statistical equilibrium and thermal (Saha–Boltzmann) number densities,respectively.

    To examine theoretical stellar spectra and compare them to observations we employed widget program BINMAG5http://www.astro.uu.se/~oleg/binmag.html(Kochukhov 2018).BINMAG interfaces with mounted code SYNTHV_NLTE which allows obtaining the best LTE and NLTE fits to the observed line profiles automatically to determine chemical abundances with high precision.

    3.2.NLTE Sodium Abundance

    In spectra of VMP stars,only the resonance doublet of Na I lines at 5889.95 and 5895.92 ? can be used to measure Na abundance.The adopted atomic data for these lines are given in Table 1.Both LTE and NLTE abundances were derived using line profile fitting.Figure 5 illustrates the quality of the fits for 5889 ? and 5895 ? lines in three representative stars:J0119+2425(Teff/logg/[Fe/H]=6412/4.27/-2.56),J0232+0545 (6091/4.08/-2.16),and J0626+6032 (5926/3.77/-2.18).It is worth noting that in some cases only one Na I line is available,because the second line is affected by interstellar medium Na I lines.The lines with visual asymmetry were discarded.The deduced abundances of 93 VMP stars are listed in Table C1.An error=0.0 means that the error is less than 0.01.The trend of[Na/Fe]along[Fe/H]is displayed in Figure 6.

    Table 1The Line List Used in this Work

    Figure 5.Best NLTE fits(solid curves)of the observed spectra of three representative stars(filled circles).The LTE profiles were computed with the corresponding NLTE abundances and are shown by dashed curves.

    Figure 6.[Na/Fe] versus [Fe/H] determined in this work.The gray dashed line is the GCE model from Kobayashi et al.(2020).The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    The NLTE [Na/Fe] abundances are lower than the LTE abundances,on average,by 0.46 dex.Average value of[Na/Fe]NLTE=-0.28±0.23,while [Na/Fe]LTE=+0.18±0.32.Applying the NLTE approach leads to a decrease in the error of the average value for [Na/Fe].

    3.3.Abundance Uncertainties

    We calculate the abundance uncertainties by changing parameters by +80 K inTeff,+0.07 dex inlogg,and +0.1 km s-1in ξmicin atmospheres of two stars J1432+3755 (4585/1.34/-3.12) and J0244+0828 (6472/4.39/-2.26) (Table 2).These two stars are from our sample with the highest and lowest temperature we chose as an example.The total error was calculated by assuming all of the individual errors to be independent.In the atmosphere of a cool giant,the errors in[Na/Fe I]due to the uncertainties inTeffandloggare small compared to those of a hotter dwarf.

    Table 2Sensitivity of the [Na/Fe] Abundance to the Atmospheric Parameters,Δ log ∈ Na,For Two Representative Stars,J1432+3755(4585/1.34/-3.15)and J0244+0828 (6472/4.39/-2.26)

    3.4.Test on Determination of Sodium Abundances

    We test the robustness of our sodium abundance determination to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our determination of sodium abundances in stars.Figure 7 displays differences in the Na abundances obtained from the two Na I lines used in this study.The abundances obtained from two lines show good agreement,with differences typically below 0.06 dex.However,there may be a very weak dependence of the [Na/Fe] onTeffand ξmic(Figure 8).

    Figure 7.“5889–5895” means A(Na I 5889.95 ?)–A(Na I 5895.92 ?).The dashed line shows the average.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    Figure 8.[Na/Fe] as a function of Teff (upper panel) and ξmic (bottom panel).The solid lines represent linear fits.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    3.5.Differences Between LTE and NLTE

    For our sample of stars,the NLTE abundance effects(defined asfor both lines,5889.95 and 5895.92 ?,are from -0.03 to -0.79 dex,depending on the stellar parameters.NLTE abundance effects mainly depend on metallicity (Figure 9).They are small if[Fe/H]<-3.5 and become larger in absolute value with increasing [Fe/H] from -3.5 to -2.0 dex.On one hand,in metal-poor stars,the density of particles is low so particles collide insufficiently,and the NLTE effect should be stronger.The difference between LTE and NLTE of metal-poor stars is much stronger than relatively metal-rich stars,which could be found in previous works(e.g.,Gehren et al.2006).On the other hand,with low metallicity,the line formation region for investigated lines is moving toward deeper layers,where LTE prevails.Below,we present an explanation of why in the atmospheres with [Fe/H]<-3.5 NLTE effects become weaker.

    Figure 9.ΔNLTE versus [Fe/H].The line is the linear fit.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    Figure 10 presents the departure coefficients for the three Na I levels in the atmospheres of two stars,J1231+5243(5755/3.67/-1.98)and J1253+0753(5750/3.73/-3.96).The stars have closeTeffandlogg,and the difference in [Fe/H] is almost 2.0 dex.It allows us to focus on the metallicity effect.

    Figure 10.Departure coefficients b and bu/bl(upper level/lower level)for Na I versus optical depth.The parameters of the models are given on the top of the panels,in Teff (K)/logg/[Fe/H] format.Two vertical lines indicate the line formation regions for the cores of Na I 5889.95 and 5895.92 ? lines.

    We know that flux depends on two functions: the source functionSνand the optical depth τν.For lines in the visual and ultraviolet (UV) region,we have

    whereBνis the Planck function,andbuandblare departure coefficients for the upper (u) and lower (l) energy levels for transition l->u respectively.

    In addition,τνdepends on opacity χν,and we have

    so,whenbl>1 and (or)bu/bl<1,an NLTE strengthening of the line occurs.

    As shown in the left panels of Figure 10,in model atmosphere 5755/3.67/-1.98,the Na I line at 5889 ? forms in layers around logτ5000=-2.75,wherebl=3.4,andbu/bl=0.32 <1.Both factors lead to a strengthening line in NLTE,and ΔNLTE=-0.56 for the line at 5889 ?.

    In the model atmosphere 5750/3.73/-3.96,the Na I line at 5889 ? forms in deeper layers around logτ5000=-2.4,wherebl=1.25,andbu/bl=0.82 <1,and both factors also lead to a strengthening line in NLTE,and ΔNLTE=-0.04.The absolute value of ΔNLTEbecomes less with decreasing metallicity from-2.0 to -3.0 dex,because (1) the line formation of Na I lines moves toward deeper layers,where NLTE effects are weaker;(2)the departure coefficients of the lower level drop to smaller values.

    4.The Galactic Chemical Evolution

    The abundance trend of [Na/Fe] versus [Fe/H] determined in this work is shown in Figure 6.We compare our result with the GCE model (gray dashed line) from Kobayashi et al.(2020).GCE models consider that [Na/Fe] and [Fe/H] are positively correlated in metal-poor stars.We examine the slopes and mean [Na/Fe] values in the sample of stars,which was segregated into turn-off and giant stars (Figure 11).Some outliers are considered when examining the slopes and mean values.Stars with [Na/Fe]≥+0.1 are named “Na-rich” and stars with [Na/Fe]≤-0.67 are named “Na-poor.” For turn-off stars within the metallicity range of -3.04 to -1.64,we determine a slope of 0.17±0.06 when excluding only Na-rich stars,and a slope of 0.09±0.06 when excluding all outliers.The mean value of[Na/Fe]does not depend much on whether we take into account Na-poor stars or not and consists of-0.32±0.18 and -0.29±0.14,respectively.A similar result is obtained for giants.In the sample of 23 giants(Na-rich stars are excluded) in metallicity range -3.64 <[Fe/H]<-2.19,the slope is 0.12±0.08 with mean value -0.38±0.14.The scatter decreases after excluding two Na-poor stars resulting in the slope 0.07±0.07 and mean [Na/Fe] is -0.35±0.1.All obtained slopes are positive and results for turn-off stars and giants are consistent within the error bars.

    Figure 11.[Na/Fe]versus[Fe/H]in our sample stars,segregated into turn-off(left panels)and giant(right panels)stars.Two stars with[Fe/H]<-3.7 are excluded.The linear fits (gray solid lines) and averages (black dashed lines) of them are given.

    Figure 12.[Na/Fe] versus [Fe/H] for our sample stars is marked by red squares (TW means this work).For comparison,we present data from literature: M17:Mashonkina et al.(2017);Z16: Zhao et al.(2016);R20: Reggiani et al.(2017,2020);and K20 is the GCE model given by Kobayashi et al.(2020).

    Figure 13.Comparison of our trend of[Na/Fe]versus[Fe/H]with data from literature.TW means this work,A07 is Andrievsky et al.(2007),and L22 is Lombardo et al.(2022).The averages are indicated by the dashed lines.One outlier ([Na/Fe] >1.5) of Andrievsky et al.(2007) is excluded.

    Figure 14.RGC versus[Na/Fe](upper panel)and[Na/H](lower panel)for our sample of stars.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    The star-to-star standard deviation of[Na/Fe]in this work is 0.233 dex in case all 93 stars are taken into account.If we exclude the six Na-rich stars and the six Na-poor stars mentioned in Section 4.2,the scatter is reduced to 0.14 dex.However,even if the scatter is~0.14 dex,it is still larger than the scatter for stars with [Fe/H] >-1.5.

    Figure 15.|z| versus [Na/Fe] (upper panel) and [Na/H] (lower panel) for our sample of stars.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    Figure 12 displays our sample as well as samples from previous works,along with the prediction provided by the GCE model (Kobayashi et al.2020).It appears that the GCE model overestimates the [Na/Fe] ratio in stars with [Fe/H] between-3.0 and -2.0.In fact,this problem has already appeared in some of the previous samples;two previous works find a higher average (Andrievsky et al.2007;Lombardo et al.2022),and we will discuss this in detail in the next subsection.

    4.1.Test on HD 122563

    The comparison between our NLTE sodium abundances in 93 VMP stars and those from literature,specifically 33 VMP stars from Andrievsky et al.(2007) and 52 VMP stars from Lombardo et al.(2022)are displayed in Figure 13.Our sample of 93 stars has a mean value of -0.28±0.23,which is 0.19 dex lower than the mean values reported in those two studies.

    In order to gain a better understanding of the systematic shift observed in our [Na/Fe] abundances compared to Andrievsky et al.(2007),we conducted test calculations based on VMP star HD 122563 with well-determined stellar parameters (4600/1.40/-2.55/1.6).HD 122563 is widely recognized as a benchmark star,especially in the context of Gaia mission calibration and testing of spectroscopic and asteroseismic analysis techniques.This star is also presented in Andrievsky et al.(2007),where different physical parameters were used,such asTeff=4600 K,logg=1.1,[Fe/H]=-2.82,and microturbulence=2.0 km s-1.Applying our method with the same physical parameters as Andrievsky et al.(2007),we found a value of [Na/Fe]=-0.20 dex,very close to that of Andrievsky et al.(2007),who found [Na/Fe]=-0.23 dex.It means that our NLTE treatment of Na I lines is similar to that used in the study by Andrievsky et al.(2007).

    Using our adopted physical parameters of HD 122563(4600/1.40/-2.55/1.6),we obtained an [Na/Fe] value of-0.31 dex,which is 0.11 dex lower compared to the value reported by Andrievsky et al.(2007).If we compare the parameters between Andrievsky et al.(2007)and our study,we can see that the main difference is in the metallicity.In Andrievsky et al.(2007),the metallicity was 0.27 dex lower than in our study and an LTE abundance was used for iron.Underestimation of iron leads to an underestimation of[Fe/H]and an overestimation of[Na/Fe].In addition,Lombardo et al.(2022)also determine NLTE Na abundances of 26 species,and reach an average that is consistent with Andrievsky et al.(2007),as affirmed in Figure 13.The parameters used in Andrievsky et al.(2007),Lombardo et al.(2022)are both LTE parameters.

    The results of this test indicate that the systematic shift observed in the [Na/Fe] trend is primarily caused by differences in the sets of stellar parameters considered,particularly the metallicity derived from NLTE and LTE-based methods.

    4.2.Special Stars

    We distinguish some outliers (Table 3).Seven stars with[Na/Fe]≥+0.1 appear to be “Na-rich” and six stars with [Na/Fe]≤-0.67 are identified as “Na-poor.”

    Table 3The List of Some Special Stars

    Star #61 and 89 are two giants and suspected to have suffered a mixing between the atmosphere and the H-burning shell bringing the products of the Ne-Na cycle to the surface.Five out of six “Na-rich” stars are turn-off stars: #11,25,31,47,and 60 (Figure 4).It is difficult to explain their sodium overabundance by an evolutionary effect.We analyzed their kinematics and positions.Figures 14,15,and 16 respectively representRGC,|z|,and total angular momentum(L=whereLx=y*W-z*V,Ly=z*Ux*W,Lz=x*V-y*U) versus [Na/Fe] and [Na/H] for our sample of stars.Four stars #11,25,31,and 47 are relatively close to each other on theUVWdiagram (Figure 3);they have similarRGC,|z|,andL.We believe that they have merged from neighboring galaxies and their chemical enrichment history is different.

    The whole sky looked like gold, while violet and rose-colored clouds, which she could not describe, floated over her; and, still more rapidly than the clouds, flew a large flock of wild swans12 towards the setting sun, looking like a long white veil across the sea

    Another possible explanation of their sodium overabundance is that the stars have undergone a process of metallicity enrichment,where they have accreted material from a companion star that has already gone through nuclear fusion and produced sodium.This would result in an overabundance of sodium in the star’s atmosphere compared to other stars of similar age and mass.We have tried to find evidence that these stars are binaries.However,we have not yet found evidence that these stars are binaries.All seven Na-rich stars were excluded when calculating the average [Na/Fe] and slope of our sample.

    Stars #7,30,57,72,81,and 90 are Na-poor stars.Four of them belong to the thick disk.They have lower velocity components than the other stars in our sample(Figure 3).They also have closeL~1000 km s-1kpc(Figure 16).From above,we think those Na-poor stars may be old thick disk stars.

    Figure 16.Total angular momentum (L) versus [Na/Fe] (upper panel) and[Na/H] (lower panel) for our sample of stars.The markers are the same as in Figure 4.

    Star#51 was also included in the list of outliers.It is a giant with very highz=70.73 kpc,and extremely high velocity components.However,its [Na/Fe] is -0.09,which is very close to the vast majority of our sample.Star#51 is not shown in the diagrams involving coordinates or kinematic parameters.

    5.Conclusion

    Using accurate stellar parameters and high-resolution(R=36,000) stellar spectra obtained with the HDS of the Subaru Telescope,we calculated the NLTE sodium abundances in a sample of 93 stars with the -4.25 <[Fe/H]<-1.64 metallicity range.The sample of stars used in this study allows us to trace the properties of the Galactic halo and thick disk stars.Based on kinematics,most of the stars(77)belong to the halo.This is the first study devoted to sodium in VMP stars homogeneously distributed in metallicity range from -4.2 to-1.6 dex appropriate for Galactic chemical evolution research.

    The synthesis method was utilized to determine the NLTE sodium abundances for each individual Na I resonance line.Departure coefficients,which were calculated for the specific physical parameters of each star using classical 1D model atmospheres,were taken into account during the abundance determination process.It has been demonstrated that the abundance differences between NLTE and LTE are diminishing as metallicity decreases from -2 to -4,which is in line with previous NLTE studies,e.g.,Baumueller et al.(1998).

    The abundance trend of [Na/Fe] versus [Fe/H] obtained in this study has positive slope in the [Fe/H] range of -3.04 to-1.64 that is in accordance with prediction of the GCE model.For two groups of stars,turn-off and giants,we found slopes,0.09±0.06 and 0.07±0.07,respectively.However,mean[Na/Fe] is lower than expected by the GCE model in the[Fe/H] range of -3.04 to -1.64.

    We believe there is an intrinsic scatter of Na abundances,so the GCE model needs to be adjusted,not only the average,but also considering the scatter.We have measured the intrinsic scatter as 0.14 dex for 57 turn-off stars in our sample and 0.12 dex for 21 giants.

    Among 93 stars,we find 13 outliers:seven Na-rich stars and six Na-poor stars.Five Na-rich turn-off stars may have extragalactic origins,however,it is difficult to make a solid conclusion.We also find a VMP giant with extremely high velocity components and very high-z.However,its sodium abundance is closer to the mean[Na/Fe]value obtained for the whole sample.

    Acknowledgments

    This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC,Grant Nos.11988101 and 11890694),and the National Key R&D Program of China No.2019YFA0405502.This work was based on observations carried out with the High Dispersion Spectrograph (HDS) of the Subaru Telescope through the JSPS-CAS Joint Research Program.We made use of the SIMBAD and VALD databases.

    Software:DETAIL (Butler &Giddings 1985);SYNTHV_NLTE(Tsymbal et al.2019);BINMAG (Kochukhov 2018).

    Appendix A Sample Stars

    Table A1Locations and Magnitudes of our Sample

    Appendix B

    Table B1Stellar Parameters and Kinematic Parameters of our Sample

    Appendix C Sodium Abundance of the Stars

    Table C1Sodium Abundances of our Sample

    ORCID iDs

    亚洲 国产 在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 超碰成人久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲av美国av| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久狼人影院| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 中文欧美无线码| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久中文看片网| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 91大片在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久狼人影院| 一区二区三区精品91| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| av免费在线观看网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 露出奶头的视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 91老司机精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品久久久久成人av| tube8黄色片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 丁香六月欧美| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久久久视频综合| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 91成人精品电影| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产高清videossex| 久久香蕉精品热| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 热99re8久久精品国产| netflix在线观看网站| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 国产精品.久久久| 很黄的视频免费| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 夫妻午夜视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产精品成人在线| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产区一区二久久| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲国产欧美网| 色在线成人网| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 无限看片的www在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产高清激情床上av| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 99香蕉大伊视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 一区福利在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产色视频综合| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜免费观看网址| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产av又大| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久国产精品影院| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲av熟女| xxx96com| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品成人在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 黄色 视频免费看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 深夜精品福利| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | av有码第一页| 成人影院久久| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| av福利片在线| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 大型av网站在线播放| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久影院123| 咕卡用的链子| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产精品成人在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 在线看a的网站| 我的亚洲天堂| av视频免费观看在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 丰满的人妻完整版| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 高清在线国产一区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 99热只有精品国产| 高清在线国产一区| avwww免费| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 午夜两性在线视频| 中国美女看黄片| 超碰成人久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 在线视频色国产色| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日韩欧美免费精品| 咕卡用的链子| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产男女内射视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产成人av教育| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 色播在线永久视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 手机成人av网站| 91av网站免费观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 国产片内射在线| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 成人手机av| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线观看午夜福利视频| av免费在线观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产成人av教育| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| www.999成人在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 深夜精品福利| 看免费av毛片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久青草综合色| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 99热只有精品国产| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久性视频一级片| 飞空精品影院首页| 午夜老司机福利片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久九九热精品免费| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久九九热精品免费| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 在线观看日韩欧美| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 伦理电影免费视频| 天堂动漫精品| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 日本a在线网址| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久久久国内视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| av网站在线播放免费| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美在线黄色| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费观看人在逋| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 天堂√8在线中文| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 很黄的视频免费| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 老司机福利观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品一区二区三卡| 91老司机精品| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产av又大| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 午夜久久久在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| av电影中文网址| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲综合色网址| 宅男免费午夜| 日日夜夜操网爽| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日本a在线网址| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 人妻 亚洲 视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 在线观看66精品国产| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 91大片在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜91福利影院| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久中文字幕一级| 精品国产亚洲在线| 成人国语在线视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| av不卡在线播放| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 91国产中文字幕| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久久精品区二区三区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日本欧美视频一区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产99白浆流出| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产成人精品在线电影| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 免费高清在线观看日韩| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美黑人精品巨大| netflix在线观看网站| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲国产看品久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 免费看十八禁软件| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 香蕉久久夜色| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲综合色网址| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久久久久人人人人人| www.精华液| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看|