• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Blast disruption using 3D grids/perforated plates for vehicle protection

    2023-07-31 13:30:24ThseSchunckDominiqueEckenfelsLaurentSinniger
    Defence Technology 2023年7期

    Thérèse Schunck,Dominique Eckenfels,Laurent Sinniger

    French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis, ISL, 5 Rue Du G′en′eral Cassagnou, 68300, Saint-Louis, France

    Keywords:Blast Mitigation Perforated plates 3D grids Vehicle protection

    ABSTRACT In this work,blast disruption and mitigation using 3D grids/perforated plates were tested for underbelly and side protection of vehicles.Two vehicle simulants were used: a small-scale one for side vehicle protection assessment and a true-to-scale simulant for underbelly protection testing.The deformation of target plates was assessed.These were either unprotected or protected by three different types of disruptors.The first disruptor was made of a sandwich structure of two perforated plates filled with a thin aluminum structure allowing the air to pass through.The two other disruptors were made of pieces of cast metallic foam.Two different kinds of foams were used:one with large cells and the second one with small cells.Beforehand,the mitigation efficiency of the disruptors was evaluated using an explosivedriven shock tube (EDST).The experiments showed that blast disruption/mitigation by 3D grid/perforated plate structures was not suitable for vehicle side protection.However,3D grids/perforated structures proved to be relatively effective for underbelly protection compared to an equivalent mass of steel.? 2022 China Ordnance Society.Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications

    1.Introduction

    The present study deals with blast disruption and mitigation using 3D grids/perforated plates within the context of vehicle protection.The main objective is to assess the operational capability of this type of disruptors for underbelly and side protection of vehicles.

    One of the most important requirements for combat vehicles is the protection against mines (anti-personnel or anti-tank mines)and improvised explosive devices(IEDs).IEDs are complex because there are many variations.Whereas some IEDs are made of military explosives,others can contain home-made explosives.In addition,they can be hidden in various places,e.g.the device may be buried in the soil or placed in a vehicle for roadside attacks.Blast vehicle protection follows guidelines such as blast protection (blast deflection and mitigation) as well as roll prevention.

    The general principle of blast protection is to place a “system”(material,structure,etc.) between the explosive charge and the target.This system serves either to mitigate the detonation of the explosive,to disturb the blast wave propagation,or to ensure passive protection of the target.Methods commonly considered to mitigate explosion are the use of bulk water [1] or mist [2-4] and aqueous foam [5].Multi-layered materials rely on the impedance mismatch between each layer to scatter the blast waves across the system[6].Specific geometries,such as V-shape plates or arrays of cylindrical pipes,are generally used to deflect/disturb the incoming blast wave [7,8].The use of sacrificial claddings is a passive protective solution which allows to dissipate the blast wave energy and improves the target’s resistance against blast load [9].A sacrificial cladding is made of three components: a crushable core,sandwiched between a front plate(attack side) and a rear plate.When submitted to a blast wave,the front plate is set in motion and crushes the core.Elastic,plastic and brittle deformation of the core leads to energy dissipation and to the transmission of a lower,quasi-constant loading over a longer timespan.

    The present study focuses on blast deflection and mitigation and especially on the use of 3D grids/perforated plates for underbelly and side protection of vehicles.Grids and perforated plates were used to disrupt blast waves.The description of the interaction of a shock wave with grid-like obstacles started in the 1950s[10].It has been shown that grids or perforated plates modify the flow field by introducing new shock waves,regions of vortices and considerable turbulences in which the energy of the incident shock wave can be dissipated[8,11].It has been demonstrated that when a shock wave collides with a perforated plate,a part of the incident shock wave is reflected by the plate and the other part is transmitted through it,generating a non-steady flow behind the plate.The flow located immediately behind the grid is highly unsteady and non-uniform.It becomes steady and uniform further downstream.The transmitted wave is mostly attenuated in the region where the flow is highly turbulent.The pressure development on a wall placed behind rigid porous samples was also investigated using a shock tube [12].The porous samples were made of ceramic foams having three different porosities(10 PPI,20 PPI and 30 PPI,PPI stands for pores per inch).The results indicated that lower porosity reduces the time required for the pressure to build-up on the end-wall.This phenomenon was due to the higher flow resistance through porous samples of low porosity (larger PPI).Configurations of several perforated plates were also investigated.It has been reported that shock wave trapping between several plates enhanced the shock wave attenuation downstream from the plates[13-15].The initial shock wave reflected several times and was strongly disturbed.It has been shown that the grid porosity and the shape of the open spaces are the major factors to reduce the overpressure,whereas the geometry had practically no influence.The shape of holes could potentially have an impact in case the plate is thick and the holes beveled thus enhancing the reflection of the shock wave.For this reason we tested in the present work the capability of perforated 3D structures with regard to blast disruption and mitigation.This type of structures offers both effects:a reflection of the blast wave as well as strong perturbations of blast wave on its path.To the best of our knowledge,perforated 3D structures have not yet been tested for vehicle blast protection.As far as ballistic protection is concerned,it has been shown that they could destabilize a threat and reduce its penetration capability before it reaches the main armor [16].Impact tests have proven that perforated plates offer a high protection level against the impact of 7.62 × 51 0.308 WIN P80 hardcore armor piercing projectiles.A rigid slatted metal grid (Slat armor)fitted around key sections of the vehicle has also been used to disrupt shaped charges of a warhead by either crushing it,preventing optimal detonation from occurring,or by damaging the fusing mechanism,preventing detonation outright [17].Consequently,perforated plates could have a dual use as add-on armors.In the present work,three types of blast disruptors were tested.The first disruptor was made of a sandwich of two perforated plates filled with a thin aluminum structure allowing the air to pass through.A disruptor designed in this way will reflect the shock wave two times and the perforated structure will strongly disturb the wave between the two plates.The two other disruptors were made of pieces of cast metallic foam.Two different kinds of foams were used:one with large cells and the second one with small cells.The cast metallic foam is an interesting 3D structure:since the cells are open,they allow the shock wave to pass through but the air flow inside will be strongly perturbed.Moreover,the round shape of open cells will increase the shock wave reflection.Two sizes of cells were tested in order to assess the cell size on blast mitigation efficiency.

    The French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis(ISL)owns two vehicle simulants which were both used in the course of this work:a small-scale vehicle simulant developed to investigate side vehicle protection and a true-to-scale vehicle simulant that has been extensively used to investigate side and underbelly protection.First,experiments with the small-scale vehicle simulant were carried out in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the principle for side vehicle protection.Then,experiments with the true-to-scale vehicle simulant were carried out in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the principle for underbelly protection.The deformation of target plates was assessed.These were either unprotected(reference) or protected by the three different types of disruptors.Beforehand,the mitigation efficiency of the disruptors was evaluated using an explosive-driven shock tube (EDST).

    2.Experiment

    2.1.Explosive-driven shock tube (EDST)

    The design of our EDST was based on previously published works [18,19].The shock tube has a 100 mm square external and 80 mm square internal section,with a total length of 1750 mm(Fig.1).A pressure sensor(Kulite HKS 375)was used to measure the reflected overpressure on a wall behind the disruptor.Spherical charges of composition C-4 were used (m=15 g) to produce a planar blast wave.All the charges were hand-packed and detonated in a distance of 50 mm from the shock tube inlet without any container(Fig.1).The distance between the outlet of the EDST and the wall was 180 mm.The blast disruptor was positioned 50 mm in front of the wall.

    Fig.1.Schematic view of the explosive-driven shock tube and positioning of the blast disruptor.

    2.2.Small-scale vehicle simulant

    The small-scale vehicle simulant is composed of a 1 m3cubic metallic structure equipped with a removable sample plate (the free surface of the sample is a square of 800 mm edge) (Fig.2(a)).The maximum dynamic deformation of the sample was measured by squeezing a hexagonal 150 mm long aluminum tube (Fig.2(b))located at the rear face of the plate.

    Fig.2.(a)Experimental setup:the charge was positioned in front of the small-scale vehicle simulant at a distance of 1.5 m.The side-on pressure gauge was located near the vehicle simulant at the same distance;(b) Hexagonal aluminum tube for maximum deformation measurement.

    One pressure sensor(PCB137A23)was used to measure the blast generated by the explosive charge in order to control the reproducibility of blast loading across experiments.It was placed 30 cm above the ground and located 1.5 m from the charge,the same distance as from the charge to the test plate,and at a right angle to the charge-vehicle simulant line (Fig.2(a)).Hand-packed spherical charges of C-4 with a mass of 400 g were used.The explosive charges were positioned 7 cm above the ground.

    2.3.True-to-scale vehicle simulant

    The true-to-scale vehicle simulant has overall dimensions(Length×Width×Height)of 2.8×2.6×3.6 m3(Fig.3).A 1×1 m2sample plate is attached to the floor through a circular flange with an inner diameter of 0.8 m and an outer diameter of 1 m.The screws are regularly disposed along a circle with a diameter of 0.92 m.Consequently,the free surface of the sample is a disc with a diameter of 0.8 m(Fig.3).The sample plate was placed at 1 m above the ground.Thick discs of C-4 were used,hand-packed inside a mold.After removing the discs out of the mold,the charge has the following dimensions: height of 66 mm and diameter of 100 mm.The explosive mass,positioned 20 cm above the ground surface,was 730 g.Consequently,the charge was centered at 80 cm from the sample plate.The maximum dynamic deformation of the plate was measured by squeezing a hexagonal 150 mm long aluminum tube located at the rear face of the plate(Fig.4).The deformationtime history was also assessed by digital image correlation (DIC)[20].DIC uses two high-speed video cameras(VEO 710L,Phantom)to track the movement of the sample.It allows to compute 3D coordinates from the image series recorded by the two cameras.Measurement results for displacements were derived.The two cameras were attached via a ball heads to an aluminum profile.The profile was attached to the vehicle simulant structure using silent blocks(Fig.3).To perform the DIC measurements,the surface of the sample was prepared with an adequate black and white pattern.To this purpose,paint spray cans were used.Before performing a test,the DIC system was set up to the desired field of view and calibrated.The relative angle between the cameras was computed additionally by the software (GOM).Before starting the test,socalled reference images were captured by the left-side and the right-side stereo cameras.These images served as displacement reference for all further evaluations.During the test,image acquisition was carried out depending on the test requirements.Image acquisition parameters were the following:a frame rate of 9500 fps with a resolution of 1024 × 768 pixels.The exposure time ranged from 20 to 30 μs.A matrix of facets (subsets) with an applicationdependent size and distance was overlaid on the initial reference image of the left-hand camera.This matrix consisted of thousands of facets.The facets were used to compute 3D coordinates by evaluating the grey value distribution in each facet and reidentifying it in the reference image of the right-side camera.From the centers of the facets in the left-side camera images and in the right-side camera images,3D coordinates were triangulated with the help of the calibration data from the DIC sensor.The identification of corresponding facets in the left-side and the rightside camera images and through all images over time was done in the sub-pixel range,thus,leading to a much higher accuracy compared to pixel scaling alone.The initial results from DIC were 3D coordinates from the plate’s surface over time.Subtracting the 3D coordinates from all recorded stages over time from the 3D coordinates of the reference stage led to 3D displacement values.In addition,using the time derivatives of the displacement values,3D velocities and 3D accelerations could be calculated.

    Fig.3.(a) True-to-scale vehicle simulant;(b) Sample plate and circular flange bolted onto the floor;(c) Hexagonal aluminum tube for maximum deformation measurement.

    Fig.4.High-speed camera positioning in the vehicle simulant for DIC measurements.

    2.4.Samples

    2.4.1.Blast disruptors

    2.4.1.1.Home-made sandwich.The first disruptor was made of two steel (S235-steel) perforated plates with “small” round holes(Fig.5(a)).The plate has the following characteristics:a porosity of 48%,a hole size of 10 mm,a distance of 14 mm between the holes and a thickness of 1.5 mm.The plates were distanced 50 mm apart from each other and the space between was filled with pieces of drilled aluminum honeycomb (Fig.5(b) and Fig.5(c)).The orientation of the honeycomb cells in the sandwich was parallel to the perforated plates.

    Fig.5.(a)Steel perforated plate with“small”round holes,a porosity of 48%,a hole size of 10 mm and a distance of 14 mm between the holes,and a thickness of 1.5 mm;(b)piece of drilled aluminum honeycomb,foil thickness of 70 μm,diameter of 19 mm,two holes of 7 mm on each side;(c) structure of the home-made sandwich.

    2.4.1.2.Cast metallic foam sandwich.The two other disruptors were made of pieces of aluminum cast metallic foam(F.T.B,France).Two types of foam were used,one with“l(fā)arge”cells and the second one with “small” cells (Fig.6).Their characteristics were as follows: a cell diameter of 30 mm and 15 mm,a strand thickness of 4.2 mm and 2.1 mm and a porosity of 93%,respectively.

    Fig.6.(a) Aluminum cast metallic foam with “l(fā)arge” cells: cell diameter of 30 mm,strand thickness of 4.2 mm,and a porosity of 93%;(b) Aluminum cast metallic foam with “small”cells: cell diameter of 15 mm,strand thickness of 2.1 mm,and a porosity of 93%.

    From a technical point of view,FTB was not able to provide 1 × 1 m2cast metallic foam slices but only pieces of 250×250 mm2.Consequently,several pieces were aggregated and held together with a strap.In order to keep the flatness of the assembly,it was inserted between two thin expanded aluminum plates with the following characteristics:a hole size of 10×5 mm2,a thickness of 0.8 mm,an apparent thickness of 2.1 mm,and a strand of 1 mm.

    2.4.1.3.Metallic test plates.The reference test plates for the tests on the small-scale vehicle simulant were 2,4 and 5 mm thick aluminum alloy plates (EN AW-2017A).Each blast disruptor was placed in front of a 2 mm thick aluminum alloy plate.

    The reference test plates for the experiments on the true-toscale vehicle simulant were 5,6 and 8 mm thick steel plates(S235).Each blast disruptor was placed in front of a 5 mm thick steel plate.

    3.Experimental results and analysis

    3.1.Explosive driven shock tube

    Six reference tests were conducted without any disruptor,and three experiments were conducted each with one of the three different blast disruptors positioned at the outlet of the EDST.The time-history of reflected overpressure was captured by the sensor inserted into the wall,50 mm behind the disruptor.The impulse,which is the overpressure signal integrated over time,was also computed as a function of time.Fig.7 (a) shows the reflected overpressure as a function of time.The results of a reference test conducted without disruptor were compared to the results of those tests conducted with disruptors.Fig.7 (b) presents the impulse versus time for the same experiments,respectively.The maximum reflected overpressures and the maximum reflected impulses for all the tests are illustrated in Table 1.The attenuation of the maximum reflected overpressure or the maximum reflected impulse,compared to the mean value obtained in the reference tests,is also given.

    Table 1 Initial reflected overpressure and maximum impulse obtained with the sensor inserted in the wall located 50 mm downstream from the disruptors.The attenuation is calculated with respect to the mean value from reference tests(no disruptor).

    Fig.7.(a) Reflected overpressure and (b) impulse measured on the wall positioned 50 mm behind the disruptor for all types of disruptors.The figure also shows the results of a reference test performed without disruptor (CMF: cast metallic foam).

    The maximum reflected overpressure on the wall decreased in a range between 48%and 67%with the cast metallic foams.There was no obvious difference between the two types of cast metallic foam.The attenuation was higher with the home-made sandwich,ranging from 73% to 79%.The maximum reflected impulse decreased in a range between 69% and 86% with the cast metallic foams,and in a range between 77%and 88% with the home-made sandwich.

    3.2.Small-scale vehicle simulant

    The explosion test matrix is provided in Table 2.Thanks to these tests,the deformation of a 2 mm thick plate protected by a disruptor was compared to the deformation of a 2 mm unprotected plate as well as to the deformation of thicker aluminum plates.

    Table 2 Explosion test matrix.

    The residual deformation of the metallic plates was difficult to assess as the plates were warped and bent forward after the detonation tests.As expected,the maximum dynamic deformation of the reference plates decreased when the thickness increased.The measurement of the maximum dynamic deformation revealed that the 2 mm thick aluminum plates were less deformed when protected by disruptors(Table 2).

    Fig.8 presents the side-on initial overpressure and maximum impulse obtained with the pressure gauge located at a standoff distance of 3 m to the charge for each experiment.The initial overpressure and the maximum impulse were relatively similar across the tests.Thus,the dynamic loading on the vehicle simulant was relatively equivalent.The home-made sandwich has been more efficient to protect the 2 mm thick aluminum plate than both types of cast metallic foam sandwiches.The deformation of the 4 and 5 mm thick aluminum plates has been assessed.They were less deformed than the 2 mm thick target plates protected by the disruptors.An aluminum plate with a smaller mass outperformed the home-made sandwich combined with a 2 mm thick aluminum plate.The two cell sizes of cast metallic foam led approximately to the same results.An aluminum plate having an equivalent mass outperformed both types of cast metallic foam sandwiches combined with a 2 mm thick aluminum plate.

    Fig.8.Side-on initial overpressure and maximum impulse measured by the pressure gauge located at a distance of 3 m of the charge for each experiment.

    After the test,the home-made sandwich was relatively undamaged,the perforated plates were intact but the honeycomb was compressed (Fig.9(a)).The pieces of cast metallic foam were intact after the test (Fig.9(b)).

    Fig.9.(a) Home-made sandwich after the test;(b) Large cells of cast metallic foam after the test.

    3.3.True-to-scale vehicle simulant

    The explosion test matrix is provided in Table 3.With these explosion tests,the deformation parameters of a 5 mm thick steel plate protected by a disruptor could be compared with the unprotected target plate as well as with the deformation parameters of steel plates with a higher or almost equivalent mass.

    Table 3 Explosion test matrix,maximum dynamic and residual deformations.

    Table 3 indicates,for each experiment,the residual and the maximum dynamic deformations of the metallic plate obtained either by using aluminum tube squeezing or DIC.As expected,the residual and the maximum dynamic deformations of the reference plates decreased when the thickness increased.Both deformations,dynamic as well as residual,showed that the 5 mm thick steel plates were less deformed when they were protected by the disruptors (Table 3).Differences in the protective effect of the three disruptors were not obvious.It could be noted that the two cell sizes of cast metallic foam led approximately to the same results.

    Fig.10 plots the decrease of the maximum dynamic deformation compared to the 5 mm thick steel plate as a function of the additional mass of the protective solution for all the tests.The homemade sandwich proved to be relatively efficient.Compared to the 5 mm thick steel plate,it induced an increase of 30% in the floor mass but a decrease of 25%-32% in the maximum dynamic deformation.While a 6 mm thick steel plate increased the floor mass by 20%,when compared to a 5 mm thick steel plate,the maximum dynamic deformation decrease was only 11%-14%.In comparison with an 8 mm thick steel plate,the home-made sandwich was much lighter and caused almost the same maximum dynamic deformation.

    Fig.10.Decrease of maximum dynamic deformation compared to the 5 mm thick steel plate as a function of the additional mass of the protection solution.AT: Aluminum tube.DIC: Digital image correlation.

    When compared to a 5 mm thick steel plate,the cast metallic foam sandwiches increase the floor mass by 15% but decrease the maximum dynamic deformation by 13%-32%.These disruptors were more effective than a 6 mm thick steel plate.The maximum dynamic deformation decrease was equivalent or higher than that obtained with a 6 mm thick steel plate but these protective solutions had a lower mass.

    Fig.11 shows the deformation of the metallic plate at the position of maximum deformation as well as that of the vehicle simulant floor as a function of time for all the tests.The curves were obtained by DIC measurements.The time evolution of the metallic plate deformation was similar for all the tests.In fact the deformation was not delayed in time when the metallic plate was protected by a disruptor.The maximum deformation of the metallic plate occurred between 0.0025 and 0.0030 s while that of the vehicle simulant floor occurred at about 0.01 s.The deformation of the vehicle simulant floor occurred much later and was similar across all the experiments.Obviously the level of deformation was different according to the targets.The metallic plate deformations with respect to the vehicle simulant floor deformations are given in Table 3.It could be noted that the results obtained using the aluminum tube were in good agreement with the DIC measurements.

    Fig.11.Deformation of the metallic plate and of the vehicle simulant floor as a function of time for all the tests (DIC measurement).

    After the test,the home-made sandwich was damaged,the two perforated plates were bent and the honeycomb was compressed or destroyed (Fig.12).The pieces of cast metallic foam were relatively intact,even if slightly distorted.The deployed aluminum plates were torn(Fig.13).

    Fig.12.(a) Home-made sandwich after the test;(b) Details.

    Fig.13.(a)Cast metallic foam sandwich after the test;(b) Pieces of cast metallic foam after the test.

    4.Discussion

    The experiments conducted with the EDST have shown that the three types of disruptors were effective in reducing the blast wave impacting a wall located at the back of the disruptor.The homemade sandwich was more effective than the cast metallic foams.The reflected overpressure and impulse on a wall were strongly reduced.This is due to the fact that the disruptors had relatively a low porosity consequently a large part of the incident shock wave was reflected.Moreover,these 3D barriers led to strong disturbances on path of the transmitted shock wave.The air flow was heavily thwarted when passing through the disruptors in which the shock wave energy was dissipated.Following these interesting results,these disruptors were tested for vehicle side and underbelly protection.

    The explosion tests performed with the small-scale vehicle simulant have shown that the 2 mm thick aluminum alloy plates were less deformed when protected by the disruptors.The homemade sandwich was more efficient than both types of cast metallic foam sandwiches to protect the 2 mm thick aluminum plate.This is consistent with the results obtained with the EDST.The home-made sandwich was somewhat more efficient than the cast metallic foams.This result is also coherent since the additional mass related to the home-made sandwich was higher.The disruptors had the expected effects: the maximum dynamic deformation of the target plate behind was well decreased.Therefore the incident shock wave was effectively reflected and we can assume that the part of the shock wave passing through has been stronglydisturbed.However,a lighter aluminum plate outperformed the home-made sandwich combined with a 2 mm thick aluminum plate.The two cell sizes of cast metallic foam led approximately to the same results.As both foams had the same density,it could be assumed that the difference of cell size had no effect on blast disruption and mitigation.An aluminum plate with an equivalent mass also outperformed both types of cast metallic foam sandwiches combined with a 2 mm thick aluminum plate.Consequently,the blast disruptors tested in front of an aluminum plate were efficient,but the protection level was not higher than that of an aluminum plate with an equivalent mass.A crucial issue for vehicle protection is the vehicle mass.It is acceptable to increase the protection level while maintaining the mass and even to maintain the protection level while decreasing the mass.To obtain protection solution with equivalent mass,it will be much simpler to increase the metallic plate thickness than to integrate such blast disruptors on vehicles.Accordingly,such disruptors cannot be considered as a valuable option for vehicle side protection.

    With regard to the experiments featuring the true-to-scale vehicle simulant,it was observed that both deformations,residual as well as dynamic,of the 5 mm thick steel plate decreased when it was protected by the disruptors.The protective effect of the home-made sandwich seems greater than those of the cast metallic foams,but the mass increase is higher.The three disruptors were relatively effective for underbelly protection compared with an equivalent mass of steel.An effect on the residual deformation was observed.The maximum dynamic deformation was also influenced,and reducing the maximum dynamic deformation is paramount in the area of vehicle protection.With such disruptors,it would be possible to increase the protection level while maintaining the mass or to maintain the protection level while decreasing the mass.

    In summary,the blast disruption/mitigation by 3D perforated structures for vehicle side protection cannot be considered as an effective approach.Very good results were obtained with the EDST experiments,however this efficiency could not be achieved for vehicle protection as it is necessary to take into account the total mass of the protection solution.The blast disruptors were not more efficient than metallic plate with an equivalent mass.However,for underbelly protection,the blast mitigation was better.This is probably due to the numerous blast reflections under the vehicle.The blast reduction obtained by the interaction of the blast wave with the disruptor was amplified by the numerous blast reflections.Concerning underbelly protection,it would be possible to increase the protection level while maintaining the mass or to maintain the protection level while decreasing the mass.All things considered,this method seems to be of interest for vehicle underbelly protection purposes but some further work and improvement are still required.More experiments should be conducted and the concept should be tested with higher blast loading.Sturdy and lightweight 3D structures may be interesting solutions for such protection solution.

    5.Conclusions

    (1) The blast mitigation by 3D grids/perforated structures is due to the fact that:(a)these disruptors has a low porosity and so a large part of the incident shock wave is reflected;(b)these 3D barriers lead to strong disturbances on the path of the transmitted shock wave in which the energy of the shock wave can be dissipated.

    (2) The blast disruption by 3D grids/perforated structures for vehicle side protection is not a good protection solution.

    (3) 3D grids/perforated structures are relatively effective for underbelly protection compared with an equivalent mass of steel.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to acknowledge the French Ministry of Defense for its financial support,in the frame of an official subsidy agreement (convention de subvention).

    We thank our colleagues Yannick Stehlin and Thierry Ottié who assisted us in our research by providing technical support.

    久久久久久人妻| 少妇高潮的动态图| 中国三级夫妇交换| 精品酒店卫生间| 91精品国产九色| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 如何舔出高潮| 综合色丁香网| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| .国产精品久久| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 自线自在国产av| 精品少妇内射三级| 午夜av观看不卡| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| av有码第一页| 人人妻人人看人人澡| a 毛片基地| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| kizo精华| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 如何舔出高潮| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 在线看a的网站| av专区在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| videos熟女内射| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 丝袜喷水一区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 天堂8中文在线网| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 熟女电影av网| 日韩电影二区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久97久久精品| 日日撸夜夜添| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av.在线天堂| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产高清三级在线| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 婷婷色综合www| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 简卡轻食公司| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美人与善性xxx| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 美女国产视频在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 午夜视频国产福利| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 一级av片app| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 欧美+日韩+精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| www.av在线官网国产| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 高清av免费在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 老熟女久久久| a级毛色黄片| 春色校园在线视频观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲性久久影院| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日韩电影二区| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 大码成人一级视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 97在线视频观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产在视频线精品| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲综合色惰| 精品国产一区二区久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 老女人水多毛片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 97在线人人人人妻| 丝袜喷水一区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产在线男女| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 三级经典国产精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 国产男女内射视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 日本wwww免费看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 大香蕉97超碰在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 韩国av在线不卡| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 黑人高潮一二区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 中文字幕制服av| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产永久视频网站| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| av天堂久久9| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 在现免费观看毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 老司机影院成人| 如何舔出高潮| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| av.在线天堂| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久影院123| 亚洲综合精品二区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产在线男女| 老司机影院毛片| freevideosex欧美| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 99热全是精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 成人二区视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 9色porny在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜免费观看性视频| 熟女电影av网| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 欧美另类一区| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲av男天堂| 97在线视频观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 91精品国产九色| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产 一区精品| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产成人91sexporn| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线 av 中文字幕| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | av免费在线看不卡| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费看日本二区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 久久久久精品性色| 美女中出高潮动态图| 永久网站在线| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 男女免费视频国产| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久久久国产电影| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 午夜91福利影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 97超碰精品成人国产| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 看十八女毛片水多多多| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 国产精品无大码| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 51国产日韩欧美| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 简卡轻食公司| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 22中文网久久字幕| 伦理电影免费视频| 色视频www国产| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产 一区精品| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲无线观看免费| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 黄色一级大片看看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产色婷婷99| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 777米奇影视久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 六月丁香七月| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一级av片app| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产av国产精品国产| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| 尾随美女入室| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久婷婷青草| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av免费在线看不卡| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 久久久久国产网址| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 全区人妻精品视频| 中国国产av一级| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 久久久久久人妻| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久久久精品精品| 一个人免费看片子| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 成人二区视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 99热6这里只有精品| 老司机影院毛片| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 尾随美女入室| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 黄色日韩在线| 日本av免费视频播放| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久免费观看电影| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| xxx大片免费视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| h视频一区二区三区| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产高清三级在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 伦理电影大哥的女人| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 观看av在线不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美bdsm另类| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 尾随美女入室| 一级a做视频免费观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 99热这里只有精品一区|