• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A Novel Stackelberg-Game-Based Energy Storage Sharing Scheme Under Demand Charge

    2023-03-09 01:03:40BingyunLiQinminYangandInnocentKamwa
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2023年2期

    Bingyun Li,,Qinmin Yang,,and Innocent Kamwa,

    Abstract—Demand response (DR) using shared energy storage systems (ESSs) is an appealing method to save electricity bills for users under demand charge and time-of-use (TOU) price.A novel Stackelberg-game-based ESS sharing scheme is proposed and analyzed in this study.In this scheme,the interactions between selfish users and an operator are characterized as a Stackelberg game.Operator holds a large-scale ESS that is shared among users in the form of energy transactions.It sells energy to users and sets the selling price first.It maximizes its profit through optimal pricing and ESS dispatching.Users purchase some energy from operator for the reduction of their demand charges after operator’s selling price is announced.This game-theoretic ESS sharing scheme is characterized and analyzed by formulating and solving a bi-level optimization model.The upper-level optimization maximizes operator’s profit and the lower-level optimization minimizes users’ costs.The bi-level model is transformed and linearized into a mixed-integer linear programming(MILP) model using the mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) method and model linearizing techniques.Case studies with actual data are carried out to explore the economic performances of the proposed ESS sharing scheme.

    NOMENCLATURE

    I.INTRODUCTION

    DEMAND charge is an electricity rate scheme that is being widely applied to all kinds of electricity consumers [1].Monthly demand charge fee that is calculated based on the“billing demand”,i.e.,the maximumgrid-side power demand(kW) across all hours of the month,is added to a consumer’s electricity bill.Hence,electricity consumers tend to shave their peak power demands and save their bills by reshaping their load profiles,namely demand response (DR) [2]–[4].Effective and flexible DR operations are enabled by employing energy storage systems (ESSs),however,the high price and inefficiency of ESSs can deteriorate the benefits of ESSbased DR [5],[6].

    ESS sharing is an effective solution to this issue.Alargescale ESS shared among a group of users can effectively promote their cost savings by taking advantage of the complementarity of the users’ load profiles as well as the economy of scale.The complementarity states that peak demands of different users may occur at different times of a day.Therefore,the shared ESS does not need to serve all users with complementary load profiles at the same hour.Thus,the requirement for ESS capacity is reduced.The economy of scale means that the unit price of ESS is lower when the purchased ESS is larger,i.e.,“the more,the cheaper”.

    Lots of researchers have been studying on operating modes and performances of large-scale shared ESSs.Paridariet al.[7],Oh and Son [8],Liuet al.[5],[9]–[11],Yanget al.[12],and Li [13] proposed multiple ESS sharing schemes aiming at minimizing total cost of users,i.e.,maximizing social welfare.It is verified that ESS sharing can significantly reduce users’costs,compared to scenarios where no ESSs are deployed or users’ own ESSs are not shared.In addition to cost minimization,lots of researchers,such as Rahbaret al.[14],Ta?c?karao?lu [15],Patnamand Pindoriya [16],and Taoet al.[17] involved various objectives such as photo voltaic accommodation,overload prevention,and multi-energy system objectives in their ESS sharing schemes.Thus,the benefits and operational flexibility of ESSs are promoted.However,these studies assume that all participants collaborate to maximize social welfare,regardless of their selfishness,which may make them impractical.Chenet al.[18] solved a multi-objective capacity dividing and scheduling problem of an ESS shared among users and a distribution company (DisCo).Balance between benefits of users and DisCo is achieved by properly setting weights of their objectives.Zaidiet al.[19] proposed an auction-based ESS sharing scheme.Users are assumed to compete with each other,instead of collaborating.Each user submits its bids for ESS capacity to the auctioneer.Fleischhackeret al.[20] assumed that the shared ESS is owned by an operator,and operator’s profit has priority over users’ cost savings.Benefits of both operator and users are verified via case studies.These schemes are more practical since participants’ selfishness is considered.

    However,to the best of the authors’ know ledge,the demand charge scheme is always not incorporated in existing studies considering a large-scale shared ESS.Although some other literatures that targeted distributed and peer-to-peer energy sharing considered demand charge [21],[22],the majority of them either assumed cooperative participants or used faulty setup of demand charge.The demand charge scheme brings coupling effects to participants’ decisions across a month.Thus,it cannot be easily integrated into those existing ESS sharing schemes where only day-ahead decision-making is considered.How to integrate demand charge into an ESS sharing scheme considering participants’ selfishness remains an interesting problem.

    The contributions of this paper are as follows:

    1) A novel Stackelberg-game-based ESS sharing scheme is proposed for multiple electricity consumers under demand charge and time-of-use (TOU) price with participants’ selfishness considered.In this scheme,a large-scale ESS is owned and dispatched by a “l(fā)eader”operator who sells electricity to“followers”users and sets its selling price.Users can purchase some electricity from operator instead of grid company to reduce their demand charges,in a practical scenario.All users and operator are selfish and apply their selfish operations.

    Note that this scheme is different from hierarchical power sales in existing studies.Firstly,the considered market structures are different.Hierarchical power sales usually consists of a wholesale market and a retail market.Multiple competing retailers purchase energy from the wholesale market and sell it to end users.In the proposed scheme,the wholesale market is excluded;a new participant– the storage operator is involved.It purchases energy from the retail market and acts as a supplementary energy provider that helps users reduce their bills instead of a competing retailer.Secondly,our objective differs from those of the studies focusing on hierarchical power sales.Generally,the primary objectives of hierarchical power sales consist of maximizing each retailer’s profit[23]–[26] and emission reduction [27],[28],which take priority over user-side benefits such as in [25].In our study,the proposed energy storage sharing scheme is user-oriented.The guarantee of users’ benefits is primary.The storage operator’s profit can only be achieved after users’ further cost savings are guaranteed.Thirdly,in our study,the demand charge tariff is considered,which is rarely involved in existing studies focusing on hierarchical power sales.

    2) Appropriate mathematical analyzing methods are applied to analyze the feasibility and economic performances of the proposed scheme.A bi-level operator profit maximization model is formulated and solved to characterize and analyze the economic performances of this Stackelberg-game-based ESS sharing scheme.The bi-level model is transformed into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model using mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) method and model linearization techniques.

    The MILP model is solved using CPLEX.The economic performances,i.e.,users’ cost savings and operator’s profit,are demonstrated via case studies.Actual load data from the Pecan Street dataset [29] and TOU price from the Austin Energy company [30] are used in these case studies.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows.The ESS sharing scheme is introduced in detail in Section II.The bi-level optimization model for analyzing is founded in Section III.The model transformation and linearization procedures are given in Section IV.Multiple case studies are carried out in Section V.The potential for providing services to the grid using the shared ESS is discussed in Section VI.The paper is concluded in Section VII.The proofs of the existence and the nonuniqueness of the optimal solution are given in the Appendix.

    II.MODEL OF THE ESS SHARING SCHEME

    The setup of the proposed ESS sharing scheme is firstly given in Fig.1.Operator holds a large-scale ESS that is shared among users in the form of electricity transactions.User group contains residential users,small commercial users,and small industrial users.All users and operator are located in the same neighborhood and are connected to the same distribution transformer.It should be noted that operator is also charged by grid company according to the same electricity tariff that is applied to users,i.e.,TOU price and demand charge.

    Fig.1.Architecture of the proposed ESS sharing scheme.

    A.Interactions in the ESS Sharing Scheme

    Advanced infrastructure enables bidirectional information exchanges among users,operator,and grid company,thus supporting their flexible interactions.The interactions among themare shown in Fig.2.

    Fig.2.Interactions within the proposed ESS sharing scheme.

    1) Users:Users are followers in the Stackelberg game.A user can choose to purchase any amount of electricity at any time from grid company or operator or both,as long as its own demand is fulfilled.Power flow #1 in Fig.2 is energy purchased by users from grid company.Cash flow #1 is users’corresponding electricity bills paid to grid company,which are calculated based on power flow #1 according to TOU price and demand charge.Power flow #2 is energy purchased by users from operator.Cash flow #2 is users’ corresponding electricity bills paid to operator,which are calculated based on power flow #2 according to the selling price set by operator.Power flows #1 and #2 fulfill users’ electricity demands.Cash flows #1 and #2 constitute users’ total costs.

    2) Operator:Operator is the leader in the Stackelberg game.It sets the selling price of its electricity sold to users at the beginning of each month,and holds and operates a large-scale ESS to provide the energy sold to users.Power flow #2 and cash flow #2 in Fig.2 are users’ purchased energy and corresponding payments,respectively.Cash flow #2 is exactly operator’s income.After receiving a purchasing requirement and the corresponding payment from a user,operator has to deliver this user with its required amount of energy.It should be noted that the delivered electricity does not necessarily come from the discharging of the ESS (shown as power flow#5 →#2 in Fig.2).It is also allowed that operator purchases energy from grid company and directly delivers it to users(shown as power flow #3 →# 4 →#2 in Fig.2).Hence,charging and discharging operations of the ESS can be flexibly scheduled by operator.Besides,operator also purchases energy from grid company to charge its ESS,shown as power flow #3 →#6 in Fig.2.The electricity bill of operator is depicted as cash flow #3 in Fig.2,and is calculated based on its purchased power from grid company (shown as power flow#3 in Fig.2).This calculation is according to TOU price and demand charge schemes that are the same as those applied to users by grid company.

    Essentially,both operator and users are regarded as electricity consumers by grid company since the same electricity tariff including TOU price and demand charge is enforced.From the perspective of an electricity consumer,operator’s load profile is exactly users’ summed purchasing demands that can be affected by operator’s selling price.The dispatching operations of the ESS are also operator’s DR actions.How to determine the selling price of operator’s electricity and manage the ESS to make this scheme profitable for both operator and users remains a challenge for further investigation.

    B.Objectives of Users and Operator

    1) Users:Each user aims to minimize its monthly electricity bill,i.e.,sum of fees paid to grid company and operator,by optimally deciding the amount of energy purchased from both sides at every hour across a month.

    2) Operator:Operator intends to maximize its monthly profit,i.e.,revenue minus expense,by optimally setting its energy selling price and dispatching its ESS.Its revenue is exactly the income from selling energy to users.Its expense consists of its own electricity bill paid to grid company,and investments on its ESS.

    Detailed model for analyzing the economic benefits of the proposed Stackelberg-game-based ESS sharing scheme will be given in Section III.

    III.PROBLEM FORMULATION

    The optimization model for characterizing the proposed ESS sharing scheme and analyzing its economic performances will be proposed in this Section.

    A.Problem Overview

    A bi-level optimization model is formulated to characterize the Stackelberg game between selfish operator and users,and to testify the economic performances,i.e.,operator’s profit and users’ savings,of the proposed scheme.

    The upper-level problem in the bi-level model is the profit maximization problem of “l(fā)eader”operator,since it sets its energy selling price and announces it to users before users send their purchasing operations.The lower-level problem is the cost-saving problem of every “follower”user.The interactions between the two levels are shown in Fig.3.The lower level problem will be introduced first since it is involved as a constraint in the upper-level problem.

    Fig.3.Interactions between the two levels.

    B.Lower-Level Model: User Cost Minimization

    The lower-level problem is the cost minimization problem of each user.The objective function of useriis given as its monthly expense:

    The constraints are given as (2)?(4) below:

    A user is not allowed to purchase electricity more than its demand from operator:

    A user is not allowed to sell energy back to operator:

    The billing demand of useriis calculated as follows:

    Therefore,for each useri,the lower-level problem can be modelled as the following linear programming (LP) model:

    It can be seen that,for each hourt=1,2,...,T,there exist three constraints (2)?(4).Therefore,there are 3Tconstraints in total in (5).Such a large number of constraints will cast a shadow on the solving time of the bi-level problem,since a large number of integer decision variables will be involved by model linearization.This will be further explained in Remark 1 in Section IV.Therefore,the number of constraints in the lower-level model must be reduced.

    A new model with far fewer constraints will be given in the rest of this subsection.First,the following assumption is given:

    Assumption 1:The optimal energy selling price of operator is higher than the TOU price at any hour across a month,i.e.,ro>rg(t) holds for allt=1,2,...,T.

    This assumption is reasonable since that if there exists a specifictwherero≤rg(t),users will purchase electricity as much as possible from operator.This will exhaust the operator’s ESS and result in a burdensome demand charge bill of operator.

    Then,the following observation about the optimal solution of the lower-level model (5) is given:

    C.Upper-Level Model: Operator’s Profit Maximization

    The upper-level problem is the profit maximization problem(modelled as a cost minimization problem) of operator.The objective function to minimize is the net cost of operator:

    The first two terms in (10) are investment costs of the ESS,including costs of inverter and battery,respectively.The third and fourth terms are operator’s energy fee and demand charge,respectively.The fifth termis the sum of fees paid by users for their purchased energy.

    The constraints are modelled as (11)?(26) below:

    Formulae (11)?(19) are constraints of the ESS.The energy conservation lawis:

    The charging power and the discharging power cannot exceed inverter power capacity,respectively:

    The charging power and the discharging power cannot exceed battery power limits,which are usually proportional to battery energy capacity,respectively:

    The battery cannot be charged and discharged at the same time.Moreover,the battery is not allowed to be discharged when none of users send purchasing requests:

    Battery state of charge (SOC) limits are enforced to prevent overcharging and overdischarging:

    At the start and end of a month,the amounts of stored energy must be the same:

    The following constraint calculates the billing demand of operator:

    Formulae (21)?(23) are interaction constraints.Operator is not allowed to sell energy back to grid company:

    It is observed that (17) is redundantly covered in (21).

    The peak load at distribution transformer must not increase after adopting ESS sharing:

    A constraint that guarantees users’ “further cost savings”should be involved to make this ESS sharing scheme attractive to them.This constraint states that each user’s total cost must be less than or equal to its total cost when it deploys an individual ESS without sharing:

    However,guaranteeing all users’ “further cost savings”may severely hurt operator’s profit.Consider a user who consumes 10 kWh of electrical energy at 4:00 pm–5:00 pmevery day in July,and does not use any electricity at other hours.Such a user can achieve significant cost savings by optimally deploying and scheduling its own ESS.However,guaranteeing the“further cost savings”of this user will result in an unbearable low energy selling price of operator,since this user has to purchase at least 31xkWh of energy from operator to reduce its billing demand byxkW.

    Hence,to avoid the harmful effects of such extreme user behaviors,it is allowed that a small part of users’ “further cost savings”are not guaranteed:

    These users whose “further cost savings”cannot be guaranteed are denoted as “dropped”users.are binary variables indicating whether a user is “dropped”or not.kdropis the“drop rate”that is set as 0.1 in simulations.The value ofkdropis not a concern of this paper.

    The lower-level problem is also a constraint here:

    Here,the upper-level problem is formulated as:

    It should be noted that (27) is also the bi-level optimization problem for characterizing the proposed ESS sharing scheme and analyzing its economic performances.

    IV.TRANSFORMATION INTO MILP

    In this section,the bi-level model (27) will be transformed into an MILP model.The problem is NP-hard and thus difficult to search for the global optimal solution.After the transformation,the solving time for the resulted MILP model can be effectively shortened using mature solving software where advanced pruning strategies are integrated.

    The transformation process consists of two steps.In Step 1,the bi-level model (27) is transformed into an equivalent single-level optimization model using MPEC method [18],[31]–[33].In Step 2,since general MPECs are uneasy to solve,the single-level model is linearized into an MILP model which can be solved by mature algorithms.

    A.Step 1: Transformation into MPEC Model

    In this step,the bi-level model (27) will be transformed into a single-level MPEC model,by replacing the lower-level problem(26) with its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions.

    The KKT conditions consist of primal constraints,dual constraints and complementary slackness conditions:

    1) Primal Constraints:(7)?(9).

    2) Dual Constraints:

    where the Lagrange functionLis omitted for brevity.

    3) Complementary Slackness Conditions:

    By replacing (26) with its KKT conditions,the single-level MPEC model is given as:

    B.Step 2: Linearization into MILP Model

    In this step,the single-level MPEC model (48) will be linearized into an MILP model using multiple linearization techniques.

    It is observed that the nonlinearities in (48) come from two sources: 1) the nonlinear constraints (16) and (31)?(33);2) the nonlinear termthat lies in the objective function(10) and the constraint (24).Two linearization techniques will be used to deal with these nonlinearities accordingly.

    1) Linearizing (16) and (31)?(33):The big M method [34]is used here to linearize these constraints.DenoteMas a sufficiently large positive number andas new binary decision variables,the derived linear constraints are shown as follows:

    Remark 2:It should be noted that using the big M method will involve one binary variable for every single constraint dealt with.Therefore,if the original model of the lower-level problem(5) is used instead of the simplified model (6)–(9),the number of binary variables will be extremely large,which can lead to an impractical solving time.

    2) LinearizingThis nonlinear term can be eliminated by using the strong duality condition of the lower-level problem.The strong duality condition states that the optimal values of primal and dual objective functions are equal:

    where the primal objective functionoiis given by (6) and the dual objective function is given as follows:

    By substituting (6) and (44) into (43) and rearranging the terms,the following equation is derived:

    It can be observed that the left-hand side of (45) is the considered nonlinear term,and the right-hand side of (45) is linear with respect to all the decision variables.By denoting Ξias the right-hand side of (45),the objective function (10) and the constraint (24) can be rewritten into the followings,respectively:

    whereY mdenotes the decision variables,i.e.,Ysand the binary variables involved by the big M method.This MILP model can be solved using mature softwares.

    V.CASE STUDIES

    In this section,case studies will be carried out to demonstrate the economic performances,i.e.,users’ cost savings and operator’s profit,of the proposed ESS sharing scheme.

    A.Real Data as Input

    Actual data of users’ load profiles and electricity tariffs are used in the simulations.The load profiles of electricity consumers in Austin,TX,USA in July 2019 from the Pecan Street dataset [29] are used as users’ load data.Consequently,the electricity tariff of the Austin Energy Corporation [30] that serves electricity consumers in Austin is used.The TOU price is $0.08994/kWh at 4 p.m.–6 p.m.and $0.05261/kWh at other hours.The demand charge rate is $7.99/kW.Other parame-ters are shown in Table I.Note that the unit prices of the ESSCP,cap,CE,capare average monthly costs set the same as those in [11].

    TABLE I PARAMETERS USED IN SIMULATIONS

    fiare obtained by assuming users optimally decide the sizes and dispatching operations of their own individual ESSs.

    B.Simulation Results

    In this part,the MILP model (48) will be solved to demonstrate the economic performances of the proposed ESS sharing scheme.For comparison,a baseline case where no ESSs are used and a case where users deploy their own non-sharing ESSs are also simulated.It should be noted thatfiare exactly users’ optimal costs in the latter case.

    Operator’s profit is calculated as $97.04.The sum of operator’s monthly average ESS investment costs and electricity bill is $67.13,and the revenue by selling electricity is$164.17.These results indicate that operator’s benefit is achieved.The optimal electricity selling price of operator is calculated as $1.5843/kWh,which is far higher than the TOU price of the grid company.Thus,Assumption 1 holds.

    Fig.4 shows operator’s load profiles with and without ESS scheduling.Note that the original load curve is exactly the sum of users’ energy purchasing demands.It can be seen that,through optimal ESS scheduling,operator’s peak demand is effectively reduced,which achieves a far less demand charge fee and consequently a satisfactory profit.As discussed in Appendix-B,the solution of the shifted load curve is not unique.The ESS can be charged at any time as long as the operator’s peak load power is not increased.Moreover,it can be seen that the ESS is idle at lots of time slots.This indicates that the operator has the potential to welcome more users or provide some ancillary services to the grid.Both of these aspects of its potential will be discussed in the rest of this paper.

    Fig.4.Operator’s original and shifted load profiles.

    Fig.5 shows users’ cost savings compared to the baseline.It can be seen that all users can save some expenses using the shared ESS.Users 1–6,8,and 10 achieve “further cost savings”compared to the case where they deploy their non-sharing individual ESSs.Especially,the cost saving of User 2 triples after participating in the ESS sharing scheme.The cost saving of User 9 is equal to the value when it deploys its own non-sharing ESS.User 7 is the “dropped”user whose saving slightly decreases.Note that although User 7 is “dropped”in the studied month,it is not likely to be “dropped”in another month,since users’ load profiles vary across months,and the operator chooses the “dropped”user by optimization with all users’ load profiles considered.Even if there is indeed an unlucky user who is frequently “dropped”,its losses can still be compensated by subsidies.

    All users choose to purchase electricity from operator in 5 hours across the month.Part of the original and shifted load profiles of User 2 and User 10 are shown in Figs.6 and 7,respectively.It can be seen that the peak demand of User 2 is quite protruding.By purchasing just a little electricity from the operator,this peak can be effectively shaved,and thus the demand charge fee of User 2 will be significantly lowered.Therefore,a cost saving of over 10% is observed in Fig.5.If User 2 decides to deploy its own ESS instead of participating in this sharing scheme,an inverter with a large power capacity will be required,which will raise the ESS cost and thus reduce the cost saving.On the contrary,lots of peaks with similar values exist in the load profile of User 10.If this user chooses to shave a lot of peaks,its purchased energy from the operator will be too much to achieve any savings in its total cost.On the contrary,if it chooses to shave only a few of those peaks,the reduction in its demand charge fee will be small.Thus,User 10 can save only about 1% of total cost due to the high price of electricity from operator.

    Fig.5.Cost savings of users compared to baseline.

    Fig.6.Part of original and shifted load profiles of User 2.

    Fig.7.Original and shifted load profiles of User 10.Differences between two curves are marked by circles.

    The solver is chosen as CPLEX 12.8 in MATLAB/Yalmip environment.The solving time is about 8 seconds by settingas 10.For comparison,the solving process is not terminated in half an hour whenis simply chosen as the set of all hours of the month.This indicates that a well-chosencan significantly reduce the solving time.

    C.Analysis of Battery Ageing

    In reality,the batteries of ESSs are affected by ageing effects.The actual capacity of a battery can decay to only 80%of the nominal value at the end of its lifespan.Therefore,a simulation withS OCmax=75% is carried out to explore the effects of battery ageing.The profit of operator is calculated as $90.14,which shows a slight decrease compared to the previous result of $97.04.The electricity selling price remains the same,indicating that users’ cost savings keep the same.The billing demand of operator is calculated as 2.45 kW,which is higher than the result of 1.57 kW in Fig.4.This is because that given a fixedkd,the maximum allowed discharging power of the battery falls with the decay of battery capacity.

    D.Analysis of ESS Energy and Power Capacities

    The energy capacity of the ESS batteryEcapand the power capacity of the ESS inverterPcaphighly impact the profit of operator.Simulations are carried out to clearly demonstrate the impacts.It should be noted that in these simulationsPcapis always set as 0.5Ecapfor simplicity,since the discharging rate of the battery is 0.5C.Fig.8 shows the results of operator’s profits under different values ofEcap.10 simulations with different load data are completed for eachEcap,and the average,maximum,and minimum values of operator’s profits are given.It can be seen that the operator can get profit in all the simulations.Ecap=20 kWh is the best choice in terms of the average or the maximum profit,whileEcap=25 kWh is the best considering the minimum profit.Operator’s profit decreases whenEcapis too small or too large.A smallEcapindicates that the ESS cannot store enough energy to fulfill users’ demands,and thus the operator has to purchase more energy from the grid,resulting in a higher demand charge fee.A largeEcapresults in expensive ESS investment costs.

    Fig.8.Average,maximum,and minimum values of operator’s profit under different ESS capacities.

    E.Analysis of Number of Users

    According to previous discussions,a single user usually uses ESS sharing service for only about 10 hours per month.Therefore,it is expected that more users will lead to more discharging requirements which will make the ESS operate more frequently,and consequently more profitable for the operator.In this part,this guess will be verified via simulation studies by choosing 10 to 50 users.For each number of users,10 simulations with different users are carried out to get the averaged results.

    Table II shows the operator’s average profit per user.It can be seen that with the grow th of the number of users,operator can indeed get more profit from each user.Moreover,the profit shows a large increment when the number of users grows from 10 to 20,and increases slow ly afterwards.This is because that users’ peak demand may overlap.If a new user’s discharging commands highly overlap with existing ones,theoperator will possibly have to deploy a larger ESS to fulfill them,leading to slower grow th of profit.

    TABLE II OPERATOR’S PROFIT PER USER VS.NUMBER OF USERS

    These results can demonstrate that the proposed ESS sharing scheme can benefit both users and operator.

    VI.DISCUSSIONS ON PROVIDING GRID-SIDE SERVICES

    In this section,the potential for providing services to the grid using the shared ESS facility will be explored.

    As discussed before in Section IV-C,the charging profile of the ESS operator is flexible.Moreover,the discharging profile can also be flexible when providing services to the grid,as long as users’ energy purchasing demands are always fulfilled without increasing the operator’s peak load power.Therefore,by modifying the charging/discharging profile,some ancillary services can be provided to the power grid.Since reshaping the charging/discharging profile will directly result in changes in the aggregated load curve (i.e.,the summed load curve of all users and operator),the service of smoothing the aggregated load curve will be considered in this section.

    A.The Optimization Problem

    To smooth the aggregated load curve,the objective function is chosen as the sum of squared differences of aggregated grid-side load between two neighboring time slots:

    The constraints include the following formulae:

    Constraints related to the ESS: (11)?(15),(18),(19).

    The demand charge fee of the operator must not increase after this grid-side service is provided.This means that the discharging power should not be less than the optimal value of problem(48),and the maximum charging power must not increase:

    The battery cannot be charged and discharged at the same time:

    Therefore,the optimization model is described as follows:

    By linearizing (52) using the big M method,the model can be written as a convex mixed-integer quadratic programming(M IQP) model,which can be directly solved by CPLEX.

    B.A Case Study

    A case study based on the settings and results of Sections VA and V-B is carried out to demonstrate the load-smoothing performance of the shared ESS.

    Fig.9 compares the optimized aggregated grid-side load profile of Days 21?24 and the original one derived from Section V-B.It can be seen that after this optimization,load peaks are obviously shaved,valleys are slightly filled,and frequent sharp rises and falls are smoothed.The optimized value of the objective function is about 67% of the original value,which can be interpreted as that the aggregated load curve is smoothed by about 33%.Fig.10 compares the charging and discharging power curves of the shared ESS.Firstly,charging and discharging operations are much more frequent after optimization,which shows the effort in smoothing load curve.Secondly,the maximum charging power is small due to the peak power limit (51),while the maximum discharging power is relatively large.This explains the observation that the load valleys are only slightly filled but the peaks are obviously shaved.

    Fig.9.Comparison between optimized and original aggregated grid-side load profiles.

    Fig.10.Comparison between optimized and original ESS power curves(positive means charging).

    VII.CONCLUSION

    In this paper,a novel operator-enabled Stackelberg-gamebased ESS sharing scheme is proposed for electricity consumers under TOU price and demand charge.Selfishness of both users and operator is considered in this scheme.Economic performances of the proposed scheme are analyzed by formulating and solving a bi-level operator-profit-maximizing optimization problem.Numerical results that are acquired by solving the model using real price and load data support the point that the proposed scheme can promote users’ cost savings and achieve operator’s profit.Moreover,this scheme also has the ability to provide some services for the grid.

    The design of online day-ahead decision-making mechanisms of operator and users is a compelling extension of this study.How to incorporate load prediction uncertainties,especially the prediction uncertainty of future peak demands,remains a challenge.Recently,renewable energy such as wind energy [35]–[37] and photovoltaics [38] has become a research focus.How to cope with the uncertainties brought by users’ distributed renewable systems is also a concern.These will be studied in our next paper in the future.

    In recent years,demand-side management in multi-energy systems is also an interesting research topic [39],[40].The involvement of heterogeneous energy carriers provides energy users a new degree of freedom for demand response,that is,conversion among different energy types.Therefore,energy sharing frameworks under multi-energy systems will be different and more flexible and thus are also listed in our future work plan.

    APPENDIX

    A.Proof of the Existence of the Optimal Solution

    For continuous linear programming problems,a sufficient condition for the existence of the optimal solution is: The feasible set of the problem is a non-empty compact set,and the objective function is continuous on the feasible set.For mixed-integer linear programming with finite possibilities of integer values,it is trivial that a similar sufficient condition can be described as the combination of the following statements: 1) The feasible set is non-empty;2) Assume that the values of all the integer variables are fixed,then the resulted“continuous”subset of the feasible set is always compact;3)The objective function is continuous on all the non-empty subsets defined in 2).For the considered problem,we will prove that 1) and 2) hold;3) is trivial.

    Proof of 2):We will show that when the values of integer decision variables are fixed,by adding some slack constraints that are always inactive,the resulted subset of the feasible set is always compact.It is trivial that the feasible set is closed since all the constraints are linear and all the inequality constraints are non-strict.Therefore,if a box set that covers the feasible set can be found,the feasible set is proved to be compact.

    Firstly,we denoteCas a sufficiently large positive number and add some slack constraints:

    Then,we will prove that these added constraints are always inactive.

    Then,the required box set can be described as:

    Therefore,the subsets are proved to be compact.

    B.Proof of the Nonuniqueness of the Optimal Solution

    However,it should be noted that,in all the optimal solutions,the values of the objective function are minimized and kept the same.Moreover,the interactions between the operator and users,i.e.,andro,are kept the same.The only difference lies in the operator’s charging/discharging profile,i.e.,Pc(t) andPd(t).

    舔av片在线| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 搞女人的毛片| 日韩中字成人| 69av精品久久久久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产在视频线在精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产成人aa在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 99热只有精品国产| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产老妇女一区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 看免费成人av毛片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 色综合色国产| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧美激情在线99| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 日本免费a在线| 欧美3d第一页| 免费看光身美女| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美+日韩+精品| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产亚洲欧美98| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久久国产网址| 1024手机看黄色片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 如何舔出高潮| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩欧美三级三区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| a级毛片a级免费在线| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 夜夜爽天天搞| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产不卡一卡二| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 一夜夜www| 午夜免费激情av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品永久免费网站| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 在线观看66精品国产| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 一本一本综合久久| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲最大成人av| videossex国产| 美女高潮的动态| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 露出奶头的视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 99久国产av精品| 天堂网av新在线| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日本a在线网址| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成年av动漫网址| 观看免费一级毛片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 色5月婷婷丁香| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久久久国产网址| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 九色成人免费人妻av| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美激情在线99| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 色综合色国产| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 性色avwww在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日日撸夜夜添| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久久久国产网址| .国产精品久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| www.色视频.com| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 91精品国产九色| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 亚洲av美国av| 如何舔出高潮| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲av熟女| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产 一区精品| 一本一本综合久久| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产老妇女一区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 直男gayav资源| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 直男gayav资源| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 乱人视频在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 看片在线看免费视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 毛片女人毛片| 成人欧美大片| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本免费a在线| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 夜夜爽天天搞| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲av.av天堂| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲在线观看片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲av一区综合| 日本三级黄在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品无大码| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 直男gayav资源| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 悠悠久久av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 欧美色视频一区免费| 一夜夜www| a级毛色黄片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | av在线老鸭窝| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 欧美成人a在线观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 成人av在线播放网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久这里只有精品中国| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 我要搜黄色片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 成人av在线播放网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 一级黄片播放器| 国产av在哪里看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 色综合站精品国产| av在线亚洲专区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲综合色惰| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 18+在线观看网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美人与善性xxx| 69人妻影院| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 免费看日本二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 久久中文看片网| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲无线在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品无大码| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 免费看光身美女| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日本成人三级电影网站| 在线免费十八禁| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本免费a在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久久久久久久大av| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美性感艳星| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久午夜福利片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 黄片wwwwww| 老女人水多毛片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲av熟女| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日韩中字成人| 国产成人a区在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 91在线观看av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久热精品热| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 91久久精品电影网| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 天堂动漫精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产三级中文精品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日本黄色片子视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日本五十路高清| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久久久性生活片| 香蕉av资源在线| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| h日本视频在线播放| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 嫩草影院入口| 免费看av在线观看网站| 91久久精品电影网| 毛片女人毛片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 在线a可以看的网站| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品国产三级普通话版| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 级片在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久久久性生活片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 舔av片在线| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 精品日产1卡2卡| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 三级经典国产精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| av卡一久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | .国产精品久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 色av中文字幕| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲av一区综合| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久人妻av系列|