• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison for ecological economic performance of Chinese sea perch(Lateolabrax Maculatus) under different aquaculture systems

    2022-03-01 03:32:28ZhiyiZhangXiuFangLongqiSun
    Aquaculture and Fisheries 2022年6期

    Zhiyi Zhang , Xiu Fang , Longqi Sun

    a College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China

    b Fujian Minwell Industrial Co., LTD, Fuding, 355200, China

    c Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, China

    Keywords:

    Chinese sea perch (Lateolabrax maculatus)

    Ecological economic performance

    Pond farming

    Cage culture

    Data envelopment analysis

    A B S T R A C T

    Chinese sea perch (Lateolabrax Maculatus) is one of the main marine fish culture species in China, its green development has received increasing attention and its ecological economic study is rare.Based on field survey,this paper takes water pollution tax of China as conversion indicator for aquaculture eutrophication to simulate aquaculture waste fee for further analyzing the ecological impact of Chinese sea perch’s aquaculture.For data analysis, data envelopment analysis model has been used.The comparison for Chinese sea perch’s economic performance and ecological economic performance under its main aquaculture systems has been done.The results show that: 1.The simulated waste fee has no significant impact for the comparison.2.Ranking for ecological economic performance’s ecological economic, technical and scale efficiency is as follow: pond farming, offshore cage culture and cage culture.3.Offshore cage culture is the only system presenting positive increase for ecological economic performance, which makes its aquaculture activity more sustainable than other systems.4.The key point of green development is to maximize the ecological economic efficiency of main aquaculture systems.Thus, offshore cage culture is the most sustainable aquaculture system among China’s current marine fish culture systems, and other systems need innovation for achieving the green development of China’s aquaculture.

    1.Introduction

    The “Opinions of the Ten National Committees on Accelerating the Sustainable Development of Aquaculture” (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2019; translated from Chinese) “accelerating the sustainable development of aquaculture construction using the spatial pattern, industrial structure, and production system, and promoting the transformation of China from a large aquaculture country to a strong aquaculture country” is a primary goal.As the second highest production volume species of Chinese marine fishes in 2018 (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China et al.,2015-2019),providing a sustainable supply of Chinese sea perch (Lateolabrax maculatus) is significant for both the marine fish supply and high protein food supply for citizens in China, which makes its sustainable development more important than ever before.During the past 40 years, the aquaculture industry related to Chinese sea perch has developed rapidly in Zhuhai, Guangdong and in Fuding, Fujian, where provide the most appropriate natural aquaculture resource for this species.At present,Chinese sea perch is mainly cultured by pond farming as well as inshore and offshore cage culture, where pond farming contributes (71.71%)1more volume than the two other systems (28.28%).1However, because the Chinese sea perch aquaculture industry has rapidly agglomerated in Zhuhai and Fuding, related environmental issues have developed in the agglomerated areas.(Pan et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2018).Facing the aggravation of aquaculture pollutants, a renovation of sustainable development that can promote the sustainability of aquaculture activity must be performed.The benefits of this type of aquaculture for farmers have to be taken into account while discovering methods designed to provide for sustainable development of the industry and for solving environmental issues.Thus, the sustainable development not only involves environmental sustainability, but also concerns economic efficiency.Therefore, to deal with the current policies of Chinese government, it is crucial to explore the ecological economic(eco-economic) side of Chinese sea perch aquaculture industry.

    Current research related to the Chinese sea perch industry mainly focused on growth performance (Hou et al., 2019), gene sequencing (Qu et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017), toxicology (Zhou et al., 2011), and other biological fields of study.The limited research that has been conducted in the field of economics for this species has been mainly addressed brand building (Liao, 2019), value chain development (Gao et al., 2015),and economic performance (Liao et al., 2018).Most researchers were trying to come up with preliminary research results related to the biological characteristics of Chinese sea perch to promote various aquaculture techniques, while some of researchers sensed the importance of studying the economic side of the industry as well as ecological aspects needed to achieve sustainable development of the industry.Although,economic research and ecological research of Chinese sea perch is still limited and cross-field studies are rare, in the meantime, quantitative analysis is sparse in the existing research studies.into the eco-economic aspect of Chinese sea perch culture and production is still lacking; the need to measure the eco-economic performance of the main aquaculture systems for this species is pressing.The aim for this study is to evaluate the actual production data and eco-economic performance for farmers of Chinese sea perch, which cover the three main existing Chinese sea perch aquaculture systems, and to explore and reveal the optimal Chinese sea perch aquaculture system from an eco-economic aspect.Owing to its sustainability and product quality, offshore cage aquaculture has been regarded as the most advanced system in the field of marine fish culture (Jin & Zhou, 2006; Guo, 2006).With the goal of producing an eco-economic performance analysis, a field survey was questionnaire was used and the related data were collected in the selected areas.This study is organized into four parts (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People Republic of China, 2019): the current aquaculture status of Chinese sea perch (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China,2015), methodology and data description (Pan et al., 2019), results and discussion, and (Liao et al., 2018) conclusions and research prospects.

    2.Materials and method

    2.1.Method

    The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, which originated in 1957, was invented for analyzing production efficiency with unsure production function cases.In 1978, A.Charnes, W.W.Cooper, and E.Rhodes established the Constant Return to Scale (CRS) model, which is based on the constant return to scale hypothesis.Banker, Charnes, and Cooper established the Variable Return to Scale (VRS) model in 1984 that is based on the variable return to scale hypothesis and can be used in cases when the output increase rate is not equal to its input increase rate.The Stochastic Frontier Approach, as another popular efficiency test method, is often used for production efficiency analysis, which needs a production function for analyzing.For this study, the aim is to evaluate and compare main aquaculture system’s production efficiency of Chinese sea perch from both economic side and eco-economic side, and each system has different production inputs that make each system’s production function differ from others.Thus, for this study, DEA is more proper for the eco-economic efficiency analysis of three different marine fish culture systems.

    The DEA method has been used in many different research areas for efficiency and performance evaluation.Because the need for broad scale evaluation has increased, this method has recently been applied to the following research areas.(a) integrated DEA and life-cycle assessment were used to evaluate the technological and environmental performance of sludge-to-energy systems, which documented the overall and pure technical efficiency systems in 16 samples (Lam et al., 2020).(b)DEA-WEI was used as a base to further develop a corporate social performance index, which was able to identify the impact of company activities on its stakeholders (Lahouel et al., 2020).(c) DEA with a double bootstrapping technique was used to measure the efficiency of shrimp farming’s efficiency, which helped to determine the actual efficiency for the cost and technical side of current farming techniques; the results were more precise than a traditional DEA for aquaculture (Long et al.,2020).Thus, to provide a more accurate eco-economic performance evaluation, the traditional DEA method is inadequate.Therefore, data analysis has been designed based on using the eutrophic ingredients of aquaculture waste water as the environmental impact indicator to stimulate the environmental cost of aquaculture activities, which can be seen as an ecological cost in this study.

    The mathematical programming of DEA is as follows: suppose there are n decision making units (DMUs), and each DMU has m types of“input” and s types of “output".xijis the input amount of the jth DMU to the ith input,xij>0;yrjis the output amount of the jth DMU to the rth output,yrj>0;viis the weight of the ith input;uiis the weight of the rth output, where i =1,2, …,m; r =1,2, …,s; j =1,2, …,n; for convenience,see:

    Thus, CRS’s mathematical programming of DEA is:

    Based on our knowledge of the marine fish culture and the results of field surveys, the Chinese sea perch market is not a perfectly competitive market, and the assumption that all inputs are in line with the constant return to scale cannot be fully confirmed.Based on the above and previous studies (Cang et al., 2018), this paper mainly used the VRS of the DEA method for data analysis, while DEAP2.1 software was employed for measurement.The following dual programming of VRS model will be used:

    Wherein,yjis the output variable;xjis the input variable and θ is the result of efficiency value.With this model, multiple inputs with single output can be measured to get efficiency level.Moreover, strong DEA efficiency will be achieved when θ =1 and s- =s+=0, in which scale and technical efficiency of DMU are both reached, and DMU’s optimal combination and output are achieved.On the other hand, when θ =1 and s-∕=0 or s+∕=0, weak DEA efficiency will be achieved, in which only scale efficiency or technical efficiency is achieved.For θ ≤ 1, the DMU’s efficiency value is non-DEA efficiency, in which both scale efficiency and technical efficiency are not achieved.

    Based on the VRS model and the actual conditions of Chinese sea perch aquaculture,field surveys were conducted with a designed questionnaire for each system.Starting with total cost theory, a questionnaire was designed based on a solid foundation of preliminary research studies that were done during the past 10 years related to marine flat fish culture (Cang et al., 2018).To resolve the economic and eco-economic performance of Chinese sea perch aquaculture, the questions were all designed to solve the input and output by culture cycle.Construction is the first step in developing aquaculture activity.Land rent and pond excavation involve the major construction costs of developing a pond farming system, while cage frame building takes almost all cost of construction fees in inshore and offshore culture.Considering different characteristics of each system, the following factors were inserted(Table 1): building cost of cage frames and living area, solar power generation equipment fees, fresh and formulated diet input including unit price and feeding coefficient, fuel input, labour input, investment in boats, utilities, equipment maintenance cost, sea area use fee, and employee salaries.For pond farming, the cost of land rent, pond excavation, formulated diet input,fish pharmaceutical fees, interest expenses, transportation fees, aerators, electric generators, and fuel input,water pumps, and employee salary were inserted.For output factors,average sales price and sales volume were inserted in the questionnaire.To acquire more information, other related questions were addressed that discussed issues currently faced by farmers that were designed after finishing the initial questionnaire.With face-to-face individual in-depth interviews, the field surveys were expected to be able to provide related data.

    Table 1Inputs of each Chinese sea perch aquaculture system.

    2.2.Data source and indicator selection

    2.2.1.Current aquaculture status of Chinese sea perch

    According to China Fishery Statistics Yearbook (CFSY) (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China et al.,2015-2019), the total marine culture area for fishes was 75.12 ×105ha in 2018.For understanding current aquaculture status of Chinese sea perch, data have been collected in China Agriculture System Marine Fish Centre (CARSMFC) Database.This database has 19 comprehensive test stations covering more than 84 counties of ten coastal provinces in China (the main marine fish production area) (Fig.1).Data show that in 2018, 4.46 ×105ha of aquaculture area existed for Chinese sea perch in the main marine fish production area, including 4.29 ×105ha of pond farming (accounting for 96.18% of all), 0.17 ×105ha of inshore and offshore cage culture aquaculture area (accounting for 3.57% of all) and 1.2 ha of recyclingwater aquaculture systems.Pond farming systems are mainly used in Liaoning (56.82%) and Guangdong (37.86%), while inshore cage culture systems are mainly applied in Fujian (96.34%) and offshore cage culture systems have only been adopted in Fujian (71.55%) and Shandong (Table 2).

    Fig.1.Comprehensive test stations of China Agriculture System Marine Fish Centre.

    Table 2Chinese sea perch’s aquaculture area of each aquaculture system in the main marine fish production area in 2018.

    The production volume of Chinese sea perch has been steadily increasing in the recent years with Guangdong and Fujian as the main contributors in the main marine fish production area.According to CFSY(Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China and China Society of Fisheries,2015-2019), from 2014 to 2018, total output of Chinese sea perch was 113.8 × 104tons, 122.54 × 105tons, 139.46 × 105tons, 156.6 × 104tons and 166.58 ×105tons, respectively.The ring growth rates were 7.68%, 13.81%, 12.28%, and 6.38%, respectively, and the average annual growth rate was 10%.As the main production areas, Guangdong and Fujian contributed 52.43% and 20.25%, respectively, to the total Chinese sea perch production in 2018.

    The data for the stock of the Chinese sea perch production areas in 2018 show that the stock at the end of seasons experienced large changes.The stock at the end of the first quarter was 36.02 ×105tons,which increased by 64.87% in the second quarter, then increased again by 67.74% in the third quarter, and finally decreased by 23.63% at the end of the fourth quarter.Compared with 2017, the stock at the end of one year increased by 1.57% in 2018 (76.07 ×105tons).

    In the main marine fish production area, the production area of Chinese sea perch fry was 1.76 ha in 2018, in which a running water aquaculture system is adopted.As for the contributors, Fujian contributed 42.61%, Liaoning and Shandong also contributed 37.5% and 19.89%, respectively, to the production.The fry production area of Fujian was steady in each quarter of 2018, which was 0.75 ha.Liaoning became the highest production area (0.66 ha) in the first quarter of 2018 but production decreased in the following quarters, while the production area of Shandong remained steady from the first to the third quarters (0.1 ha) and peaked in the final quarter (0.35 ha).

    In 2018, the fry of Chinese sea perch were mainly sold to Fujian,Guangdong, Guangxi, Liaoning, Shandong and Zhejiang.Therefore, for the present study fry prices were collected in those areas.Despite of the large amount of production area, Liaoning only sold 2 million tails of fry and there were all sold in the second quarter.Shandong sold 1.37 million tails mainly in the first quarter.The total sales volume was 52.37 million tails and Fujian marketed 49 million tails mainly in the first quarter.The price of Chinese sea perch fry is normally set based on two different sizes divided by fry length (shorter or longer than 5 cm).The sale price of fry not longer than 5 cm ranged from 0.23 to 1.8 Yuan/tail with the lowest price reported for Guangdong.The sale price of fry longer than 5 cm was higher than smaller fry with a price ranging from 0.6 to 7 Yuan/tail.

    The pond farming industry for Chinese sea perch has been developing for over 30 years, and a unique aquaculture industry has been created.To produce this species, the pond farming system uses aerators provide an abundant supply of oxygen in the ponds with a low construction cost; however, the cost of electricity and the yield are both relatively higher than those of the other two systems.The cycle of pond farming culture is normally around 10-12 months, and 600-750 g fish per tail can be produced.Furthermore, with the high accumulated temperature in Guangdong, its culture cycle can last 18 months so that over 1000 g of fish per tail can be produced.With the use of a formulated diet during the entire culture cycle, the pond farming industry often involves a high rate of debt for farmers who buy formulated fish food from the food manufacturers.The debt relationship creates a purchasing advantage for some large formulated diet manufacturers, which will be a way of compensating for the debt with fish products sold at a lower price than the general market.Because Chinese sea perch is often sold in a chilled form, the advantages for the large formulated diet manufacturers gives them the ability to manipulate the fish’s sales price by holding a large amount of chilled fish at times.Thus, even with the high yield and newly developed farming methods, the industry still faces an urgent need for reform.

    Unlike pond farming, inshore and offshore cage culture techniques use a natural marine environment.However, taking advantage of nature is expensive and sometimes involves a higher level of risk related to the occurrence of fish disease and dissemination as well as the risk of extreme weather when compared with pond farming.Compared with inshore cage culture, running an offshore cage culture farm requires not only a large investment for construction, but also requires high operating expenses mainly for shipping fish meal.The production cycle for inshore and offshore cage culture systems is normally 18-24 months, in which fish with the weight of 750 g-1000 g per tail can be produced.Compared with pond farming, fresh fish meal is more commonly used in both cage culture systems; fresh fish meal is normally used for 8 months per year because of the summer moratorium prohibiting marine fishing in summer in China.For the two cage culture systems, fresh fish meal is the main bait source and suppliers require immediate payment at the time of purchase, which requires a large amount of cash and limits the operating scale of many farmers.The formulated diet for the two cage culture systems is also considered to be an alternative fish bait that has recently become popular among a relatively small scope of farmers.Thus, even if the chilled product still includes a high proportion in all products, formulated diet manufacturers do not currently have the advantage of purchasing in those two systems.

    In 2018, Chinese sea perch ranked second in terms of production volume among all Chinese marine fish culture species.Chinese sea perch is mainly sold through four distribution channels and a variety of products from different aquaculture systems have various sales prices.The main distribution channels for this species are domestic commodity,high-end, e-commerce, and export markets.Chinese sea perch is normally sold by different sizes such as 600 g/tail, 750 g/tail, 1000 g/tail and over 1100 g per tail, and over 1100 g per tail the last of which accounts for the lowest overall percentage.The 600 and 750 g/tail sizes are the most common in Chinese commodity market, because they are more convenient for household use and in some restaurants.The 750 and 1000 g/tail products are often used for high-end public service meals, business dining, and all kinds of banquets.The>1100 g/tail fish are popular during festivals in Shandong based on local customs, and it is also used for export, normally to Korea.The sale price of Chinese sea perch has continued a slow but steady increasing trend.The marine environment of offshore cage culture can provide better farming conditions than pond or inshore culture providing enhanced protein content and reduced fat content.The aquaculture environment and flavour of products of the same size produced in pond farms are sold at a much lower price than the products from inshore and offshore cage culture.Offshore cage culture can create farming conditions similar to the natural habitat of Chinese sea perch and its products can normally be sold at a higher price than products of the same size under an inshore cage culture system.Moreover, products with a weight of>1100 g/tail can usually be sold at a higher price than the products of other sizes.

    The data collection of this study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System in 2017.Based on data collected from CARSMFC Database for pond farming systems, even if the production area of the Doumen District in Zhuhai was less than 50% of the entire main production area, Chinese sea perch production in Doumen accounted for>99% of the total production under this system in the main production area in 2018.The production area for inshore and offshore cage culture in Fuding accounted for around 40% of the entire main production area and its yield exceeded 50% of the total production in 2018 (Table 3).Thus, to understand the main culture systems used in Chinese sea perch aquaculture, this study selected two locations for the collection of field survey data.The data were collected by face-to-face individual in-depth interviews from 2017 to 2019 due to limitations of field surveys as well as the need for data accuracy.A total of 74 farmers were involved who gave comprehensive information according to the provided questionnaire, of whom five used more than one system for Chinese sea perch aquaculture.Due to the uncertain input details of each aquaculture system for those five samples, they were eliminated from the analysis; this study employed the other 69 samples that applied only to farmers using a single aquaculture system for the analysis of ecoeconomic performance.

    Table 3Percentage of Chinese sea perch’s different system aquaculture area by province in the main marine fish production area in 2018.

    Field survey areas have long history of being used to address issues related to the Chinese sea perch aquaculture; their use in the aquaculture industry has developed comparatively well.Located near the south of Zhejiang Province, the county level city of Fuding in Fujian Province has excellent marine resources that can provide suitable aquaculture conditions for inshore and offshore cage culture for Chinese sea perch and other marine fishes (especiallyLarimichthys crocea).Fuding is developing its marine cage culture industry, which serves as one of the main marine cage culture areas in China.During the field surveys, 19 and 13 farmers were interviewed in 2017 and 2019, respectively.The interviews in Fuding included interviews and surveys of 13 offshore cage culture farmers, 14 inshore cage culture farmers and five interviews of farmers using both systems.Zhuhai is located at the southwestern end of the Pearl River Delta and has estuaries of two of Pearl River’s tributaries-Beijiang and Xijiang-in its area.The development of pond farming for Chinese sea perch in Zhuhai mainly depends on areas with a suitable and effective accumulated temperature as well as abundant water resources provided by the Pearl River system; those unique and powerful strengths result in fruitful yields.Because Weiguo Village of Doumen District is the production area with the longest history of Chinese sea perch pond farming, field survey data for this system were collected from seven villages, including Weiguo Village of Doumen, in 2018 and 2019.A total of 42 pond farming interviews were conducted(Table 4).

    Table 4Collected Chinese sea perch’s field survey data from Fujian province and Guangdong province (2017-2019).

    The collected questionnaire data were classified into five variables for data processing: fish meal, fry, fixed costs, operating fees, and income (Table 5).For measuring the eco-economic factor, this study took a pollution loads of Chinese sea perch aquaculture for each system from“The First National Pollution Source General Investigation of Aquaculture Pollution Source Pollution loads Manual” (The Group of Pollution Discharging Loads in the National Aquaculture Pollution Census, 2009)as the index to measure environmental effects of aquaculture.This was done by converting the production volume of each DMU to the amount of aquaculture eutrophication it caused to obtain the related simulated aquaculture waste fee.The Environmental Protection Law of People’s Republic of China (EPLC) and the implementation of the EPLC’s taxation standards for water pollutant discharges in Fujian and Guangdong were used to measure the environmental effects based on the simulated tax for aquaculture waste, which is an eco-economic deduction variable for farmer’s income.To compare the differences between economic performance and eco-economic performance of each system, the income and income without an eco-economic deduction were both employed as output variables for DEA (Tables 6 and 7).

    Table 5DEA analysis’s indicator description.

    Table 6Fujian and Guangdong’s implementation of taxation standards for water pollutant discharges of the Environmental Protection Law of People’s Republic of China (Per pollution equivalent).

    Table 7Pollution loads and charge standards of each aquaculture system for Chinese sea perch.

    It should be noted that (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People Republic of China, 2019): offshore cage culture areas are normally in offshore areas, which experience stronger waves and faster seawater exchange speed.These factors shorten the pollution decay cycle; currently, the offshore cage culture system has a limited distribution of offshore cage culture areas.Previous research (Jin & Zhou,2006; Guo, 2006) has shown that the offshore cage culture system produces a negligible amount of pollution in the surrounding environment.Thus, the waste discharge from and cost of the offshore cage culture system were considered negligible in this study (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China, 2015).The field survey and questionnaire data were obtained in Doumen, Zhuhai, in 2018 and 2019, and in Fuding, Fujian, in 2017 and 2019.This article adopted the China Fishery Product Production Price Index (104.95 and 102.6) to convert the cost of fish meal, fixed assets, and fees of the related sample data; the output variables were converted by the China Consumer Price Index for Aquatic Products (104.4 and 103.8) accordingly (Pan et al., 2019).The pollution loads of inshore cage culture for Zhejiang is the only accessible pollution rate found that addresses Chinese sea perch inshore cage culture; this system for this species normally uses the same fish meal method.Thus,the pollution loads of Zhejiang could be used as a reference for the inshore cage culture system in Fuding.Therefore, the pollution rates were used for analysis.

    3.Results

    The analysis results found using DEAP2.1 software show the average economic efficiency and eco-economic efficiency of each system did not have major differences (Table 8).Under the simulated waste fee based on the implementation of taxation of EPLC in Guangdong and Fujian, the eco-economic factor is presented based on the waste fee as a deduction from income for the comparison output variable.The results show that the simulated waste fee cannot change the frontier points of economic efficiency.However, some samples’ efficiency was changed and this kind of change can also be found in the average efficiency level.

    Table 8Efficiency of each aquaculture system.

    When the ecological factor is not considered, the economic performance analysis shows the following results (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People Republic of China, 2019): The average values of economic, technical, and scale efficiency of each system had the same ranking.Among all systems, pond farming was the most effective, while offshore cage was more efficient than inshore cage culture (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China, 2015).For the average value of economic efficiency, the gap between offshore cage culture and pond farming(0.0114) was smaller than that between offshore cage culture and inshore cage culture (0.0532) (Pan et al., 2019).As for technical efficiency, the difference of pond farming and offshore cage culture was 0.0333, whereas it was only 0.0036 for offshore and inshore cage culture systems (Liao et al., 2018).For scale efficiency, the difference between pond farming and offshore cage culture was 0.0035, whereas it was 0.0573 for offshore cage culture and inshore cage culture (Hou et al.,2019).By comparing the average efficiency of the three types of aquaculture, scale efficiency was the highest and economic efficiency was the lowest.

    The eco-economic performance analysis results show the same ranking existed for average values of three types of efficiency for the simulated waste fee when compared with economic performance(Table 8).However, slight changes can be found in some efficiency results of some samples that are scattered in all systems.By comparing economic performance analysis results, the eco-economic performance analysis results show (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People Republic of China, 2019): the eco-economic, technical, and scale efficiency of pond farming all declined slightly by 0.0002, 0.0001, and 0.0002, respectively (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural of the People Republic of China, 2015).The findings for inshore cage culture were similar with those of pond farming in that all types of efficiency declined to some extent.Eco-economic efficiency decreased the most (0.0025), while scale efficiency (0.0021) and technical efficiency (0.0018) experienced smaller changes (Pan et al., 2019).The eco-economic and technical efficiencies of offshore cage culture both increased by 0.0001, whereas scale efficiency remained unchanged.

    Furthermore, major eco-economic efficiency disparities existed for collected samples.The eco-economic efficiency frontier was created by four samples that were strongly effective in DEA.Those samples were spread across each system with two of the frontier samples using the offshore cage culture system.The frontier sample ratios of pond farming,inshore cage culture, and offshore cage culture were 2.38%, 7.14%, and 15.38%, respectively.For weakly effective points in DEA, six samples reached technical efficiency and the ratios for each system were 7.14%,7.14%, and 15.38%, respectively.However, the 10 samples with the lowest eco-economic efficiencies were scattered in inshore and offshore cage culture systems, while the sample ratios were 42.86% and 30.77%,respectively.The lowest eco-economic efficiency sample applied to the offshore cage culture system and its technical efficiency was the main reason for the shortage.The lowest technical efficiency also belonged to the offshore cage culture system; but with much higher scale efficiency,the eco-economic efficiency of this sample was not the lowest of all.For scale efficiency, its lowest value was in an inshore cage culture sample that had the highest technical efficiency.As for scale status, three samples showed a decreasing trend among all 69 samples.Among them,two used the pond farming system and the other one used the inshore cage culture system.

    Considering the simulated waste fee based on current legislation, the results of DEA for field surveys show a high contact ratio exists between economic and eco-economic efficiencies for Chinese sea perch aquaculture; their efficiency rankings are the same with the following order:pond farming>offshore cage culture>inshore cage culture.Although the offset of the simulated waste fee does not show a significant effect, it resolved a slight increase in the positive eco-economic performance of offshore cage culture system.Only one sample showed a positive change in both eco-economic efficiency and technical efficiency, and it also shows the effect was still weak.In contrast, eco-economic performance analysis results of samples for pond farming and inshore cage culture all show a decreasing trend, compared with the economic performance analysis for all three types of efficiency.In addition, the results show that samples of pond farming had a smaller change in efficiency than the samples of inshore cage culture in all types of efficiency.

    Chinese sea perch aquaculture serves as an important part of the Chinese marine fish culture industry and the spatial extent of its aquaculture area is also a region with a high level of natural resources in southern China.Thus, its sustainable development has a significant effect on the supply of Chinese marine fish products.The following problems were found based on the field surveys and DEA: the current aquaculture systems still have disadvantages, such as a low degree of intensification, polarized development, and environmental pollution caused by the use of fish meal.Those are the main obstacles to sustainable development of Chinese sea perch aquaculture.

    4.Discussion

    With the longest history of Chinese sea perch aquaculture in China,inshore cage culture had the lowest economic and eco-economic efficiencies.When compared with previous studies, salmon cage culture’s eutrophication cost was directly compared with human settle (Folke et al., 1994), which proved its pollution represent a net addition to the environment and the relative impact depend on the amount of fish farmed.Moreover, compare with the human nutrient production, the release of fish farm for 1994’s Nordic countries salmon total production exceed the human nutrient production of Stockholm, Sweden.Due to the areas of inshore cage culture systems analyzed in this study have low currents, Chinese sea perch inshore cage culture showed show environmental impacts as salmon culture in Nordic countries Chile and other places (e.g.Folke et al., 1994; Buschmann et al., 1996).Moreover,because of different input methods, the technical efficiency of inshore cage culture for each sample had huge disparities.Inshore cage culture farmers have different feeding methods and different expectations for the size of the products, which results from their own experiences.Fresh fish served as the original fish meal for the inshore cage culture system,and the high percentage of waste caused by using fresh fish meal creates main environmental pollution problem for this system.To protect the environment and maintain biodiversity, the literature indicate that it is essential to increase the efficiency for fresh fish meal’s conversion,switching to formulated feeds, reduction of the incorporation of fish meal and oil in fish diets (Naylor et al., 2000) and adopting bioremediation techniques like Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture allowing to recycle and extract nutrient loads form aquatic and marine systems(Chopin et al., 2001).However, a high percentage of farmers believe a formulated diet cannot achieve the same effect as frozen or fresh fish meal.Thus, only six samples out of 14 showed the use of a formulated diet, including four samples with seasonal use of a formulated diet; the main reason is for this was to reduce the risk of fish disease occurrence.In contrast, inshore cage culture uses wooden frame cages with foam float at a depth that is normally<10 m.The cost of wooden frames and the related operating fees are normally less expensive than those of offshore cage culture.The lower cost of building wooden frame cages means the aquaculture not only uses less space, but also employs a high cage density in ideal coastal areas.To improve the yield, the smaller space is used with the highest density limitation for Chinese sea perch,which as former study proved will slows the growth rate of the fish(Hwang et al., 2014).Thus, more resources are needed for aquaculture such as fish meal and fuel, which will create heavier burdens on the environment.Both of high density application of inshore cage culture systems in inshore aquaculture area and high density cage culture can reduce the speed of seawater flow, which will eventually accelerate the accumulation of inshore cage culture area’s organic sediments under the cage as former study shown (He, 2015).Sediment will make it extremely difficult to clean the area creating environmental pollution (Pereira et al., 2004; Aguado-Giménez et al., 2011).In addition, the occurrence of fish disease is riskier than for the offshore cage culture system (He,2015).All of these make the current inshore cage culture system an unsustainable aquaculture system.

    For a pond farming system, although the Doumen District of Zhuhai has a brand certificate titled “Products of Geographical Indication of People Republic of China” and a technical advantage, farmers in this area have only achieved a medium level of consistent development in scale efficiency.Extensive production, poor market access, and a shortage of scientifically sound production planning have led to a polarization of eco-economic efficiency (Cui & Chui, 2017), which will not change naturally.In addition, as ponds age over time with ongoing aquaculture activity, sediments tend to accumulate so that the normal cleaning depth does not remove them, thus increasing environmental risks as well as the occurrence of fish diseases (Steeby et al., 2004; Riera et al., 2017).Actually, water resources are abundant, its high yield offsets some of the negative eco-economic effects such as eutrophication and land occupation (Herbeck et al., 2013; Aubin et al., 2015).Moreover, the flourishing vegetation of the river body is also able to absorb pollutants from waste discharge and limit eutrophication, which also offsets some negative eco-economic effects of the pond farming system(Gennaro et al., 2006).

    As the most updated system, offshore cage culture has its pros and cons.Offshore cage culture areas experience stronger waves and faster seawater exchange, shortening the pollution decay cycle.Moreover, the expense involved in establishing this type of aquaculture and the ongoing cost of using the technique in offshore areas still creates an obstacle most farmers have difficulty overcoming, so that offshore areas have a smaller area of distribution for offshore cage areas than inshore cage culture in coastal areas.Thus, offshore cage culture is more environmentally friendly (Molina Dom??nguez et al., 2001; Jin & Zhou, 2006;Guo, 2006; Varol, 2019).Nevertheless, it should be noted that the costs of building an offshore cage system and fish meal transportation are high.Actually, the high yield of the offshore cage culture means the unit cost for this system does not differ markedly from that of an inshore cage culture system (Di Trapani et al., 2014).For small scale farmers, offshore cage culture is still too difficult to implement due to the major operating costs even with government subsidies used for cage building; subsidies canfinance about 60% of the cage cost.However, because the offshore cage culture method provides a better environment for rearing fish than other systems (Du et al., 2019), the fish can grow without fish disease and live in what is essentially a wild environment.This results in fish that are in better physical shape, are of a higher quality (Table 9), and grow at a faster rate than fish raised in other systems (Hwang et al.,2014), allowing the fish products to be sold at a higher price on domestic market or even exported to other countries.Nevertheless, former research studies have proved that offshore cage culture can provide a similar fish aggregation device, thus increasing biodiversity (Riera et al.,2017).Therefore, despite the major investment required, offshore cage culture has a positive effect from an eco-economic perspective.

    Table 9Chinese sea perch’s nutrition of pond farming and offshore cage culture system.

    As for the current status of Chinese aquaculture, the most important need related to the development of green aquaculture is to maximize the eco-economic efficiency of the current production systems.The main problem with pond farming is the need to treat wastes to minimize the emission of nitrogen and phosphorus while minimizing the chemical oxygen demand.In addition, for farmers with low scale and technical efficiencies, feeding more efficiently is also the main way to reduce their environmental impact (Jackson et al., 2003).The main problems for the sustainable development of inshore cage culture are the use of fresh fish meal and the high cage density in inshore areas that cause water eutrophication and a high risk of fish disease occurrence.Thus,improvement in the fish meal feeding system is needed as soon as possible.Meanwhile, scientifically sound and detailed feeding methods should be provided to farmers so that they can further improve the utilization rate of fish meal (Ballester-Moltó et al., 2017).Spatial planning and fish disease prevention should also be prioritized by stakeholders (Ferreira et al., 2014).In addition, the current inshore cage culture system mostly uses foam floats that always cause serious particle contamination because the foam breaks down over time, is difficult to control, and is harmful to the health of local residents.Note that the treatment for particle contamination is costly and difficult to achieve.Although offshore cage culture has greater eco-economic efficiency, the construction and operation costs are too high for small and medium scale farmers.Thus, the operation and generalization of this system will be another major issue in support of the sustainable development of the aquaculture industry.

    At present, the provinces and cities in the study region have carried out related experiments in support of the sustainable development of Chinese sea perch aquaculture.Fuding in Fujian has renovated the production of wooden cage frames since 2019.This move aims to support the majority of farmers to replace wooden cage frames and to relocate aquaculture cages into specific planning areas so that inshore cage culture in Fuding can be more environment friendly.The goal of this relocation is to offer government subsidies that will cover about 60% of the cost of building new plastic cage frames.With the new cages,based on solid research related to the spatial planning of aquaculture,specific aquaculture areas have been identified.This type of frame is normally cube-shaped; its border is about 20-24 m long on the four sides with an 8-15 m deep net.The new type of cage will be set up in the planning area.The new material is more environmentally friendly,which can reduce particle contamination from inshore cage culture.With the above renovation, the eco-economic efficiency of inshore cage culture is expected to increase remarkably.With a view of further increasing the market price of the product and enhancing the brand advantage for sales, Doumen of Zhuhai has started to prepare for the establishment of a Chinese sea perch aquaculture association.Relevant policies for waste discharge are already in preparation in support of the sustainable development of aquaculture, with the goal of reducing water pollution caused by aquaculture to some extent.In addition, some farmers invest 30-40 tails into four major Chinese carp individuals per mu during Chinese sea perch farming to help regulate the water quality.The fish can not only be sold for a good price (100 yuan/mu), but also reduce the discharge of water pollutants.

    5.Conclusions and research prospections

    5.1.Conclusions

    As the second highest production volume species of China marine fishes in 2018, Chinese sea perch has been steadily increasing in the recent years in terms of the yield and the main contributors for the main marine fish production area are Guangdong and Fujian.The main systems for Chinese sea perch aquaculture are pond farming, inshore and offshore cage culture.In the main marine fish production area, the most representative area of pond farming system is Doumen.For inshore and offshore cage culture, the most representative area is Fuding.

    The analysis has been done to evaluate eco-economic performance of main aquaculture systems for Chinese sea perch and further explore the optimal eco-economic aquaculture system based on the existing main culture systems.It turns out that the deduction of simulated waste fee doesn’t have significant effect on eco-economic performance of major aquaculture system for Chinese sea perch, and its economic efficiency and eco-economic efficiency are highly consistent.Meanwhile, the ranking of all three types of efficiency is the same, i.e.pond farming,offshore cage culture and inshore cage culture.Although all three types of efficiency of eco-economic performance drop slightly compared to economic performance, pond farming system still maintains the highest eco-economic efficiency.The reasons for this high efficiency lie not only in its abundant water resources, great vegetation conditions and strong environmental self-purification ability, but also in the high yield and relatively small environmental pollution of formulated diet.However, it is worth noting that the polarization of technical and scale efficiencies also shows that there is a great gap between some samples and the strongly effective point in DEA for pond farming system.With stricter access conditions for inshore and offshore cage culture, it can be seen that pond farming still has lower access, less investment and lower technical requirements than the other two systems.These characteristics can be a double-edged sword for sustainable development of pond farming.

    Inshore cage culture, similar with pond farming, also show a huge disparity with all three types of efficiency.But compared with pond farming, inshore cage culture cannot provide a higher level of remuneration and the main reason is the unscientific feeding method for some farmers.And compared with offshore cage culture, under the similar feeding method, inshore cage culture has higher risks of fish disease occurrence and lower product quality.Furthermore, with a slower water flow speed, the nitrogen, phosphorus and COD produced by aquaculture metabolism have aggravated eutrophication of the bay and accelerated sediment deposition.Those negative impacts can be seen from the data analysis results that eventually lower its eco-economic efficiency.

    Offshore cage culture is the only system that can achieve a positive change from economic performance to eco-economic performance, but its efficiency is affected by the high cost of frame building and operation.The eco-economic efficiency of offshore cage culture is lower than that of pond farming and higher than that of inshore cage culture.The positive effect is mainly due to the assumed eutrophication discharge, the faster growth rate and higher quality of its products.However, the huge investment in cage frame building and high transportation cost for fish meal and equipment maintenance are the obstacles for small and even medium farmers to join in.Innovation for business practice is needed to accelerate the generalization for this system.But with the better living conditions, the higher quality products can be sold at a higher price,which can ultimately increase the eco-economic efficiency.

    5.2.Research prospections

    This study mainly focuses on the current major systems in use for Chinese sea perch aquaculture in the agglomeration areas; however, the sample size is still small.Thus, further data collection and fixed-point tracking will be conducted as a part of future research.For the conversion of the waste discharge related to Chinese sea perch aquaculture,“The First National Pollution Source General Investigation of Aquaculture Pollution Source Pollution loads Manual” was used to simulate the waste fee; individual differences among the three aquaculture systems and other reasons caused some deviation in the simulation.Furthermore, sediments generated by aquaculture metabolism and the particulate pollution of inshore cage culture were not included in the analysis indicators, which need to be investigated in further research.

    The treatment for aquaculture waste is the key to the sustainable development of the pond farming system.As for inshore cage culture,the replacement of fish meal and renovation of the cage frame are the most essential issues for the industry’s future development.Offshore cage culture also needs technical innovation with the better use of fuel during the transportation of fish meal and improvement in formulated diet.This system needs a new business practice if it is going to be generally used among small- and medium-scale farmers.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Zhiyi Zhang: Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration,Software, Writing - review & editing.Xiu Fang: Investigation.Longqi Sun: Investigation.

    Acknowledgments

    During the field survey, the Industrial Economic team, Zhuhai Comprehensive Test Station and Zhangzhou Comprehensive Test Station of China Agriculture System Marine Fish Centre have contributed very considerate input, which is sincerely appreciated.The authors take sole responsibility for this paper.

    Appendix A.Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2021.02.004.

    Funding

    This research was funded by China Agriculture Research System(CARS-47).

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 黑人高潮一二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 男女免费视频国产| 国产成人freesex在线| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久影院123| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 国产成人91sexporn| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | 高清毛片免费看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合色惰| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| av专区在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 观看av在线不卡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| .国产精品久久| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久av网站| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久久国产一区二区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费av中文字幕在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一个人免费看片子| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 丁香六月天网| 日本黄大片高清| 少妇的逼好多水| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 高清毛片免费看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久影院123| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 永久网站在线| 精品久久久久久久久av| 91精品国产九色| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 91成人精品电影| 人妻一区二区av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 欧美性感艳星| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 免费看光身美女| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 成人综合一区亚洲| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 中国国产av一级| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产美女午夜福利| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品三级大全| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 777米奇影视久久| av有码第一页| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 乱人伦中国视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 成人综合一区亚洲| 18+在线观看网站| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产黄片美女视频| 国产精品无大码| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| videos熟女内射| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久久欧美国产精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 久久热精品热| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产成人精品婷婷| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 人妻系列 视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 内地一区二区视频在线| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品一二三| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 日本黄大片高清| 18+在线观看网站| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 色哟哟·www| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产成人精品一,二区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | tube8黄色片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| kizo精华| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 人妻一区二区av| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美+日韩+精品| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久婷婷青草| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 午夜福利,免费看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| www.av在线官网国产| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| av在线播放精品| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产淫语在线视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 午夜久久久在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品三级大全| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲国产色片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| av专区在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 婷婷色综合www| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一本一本综合久久| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲av二区三区四区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久久久视频综合| 一级爰片在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 嫩草影院入口| 免费看不卡的av| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | av.在线天堂| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 在线观看国产h片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲国产色片| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产 一区精品| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产色婷婷99| 日日啪夜夜撸| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品国产一区二区久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 大码成人一级视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 午夜日本视频在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 最黄视频免费看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 观看av在线不卡| 如何舔出高潮| 最黄视频免费看| 国产视频内射| 中文天堂在线官网| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久av网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 精品久久久噜噜| 女人久久www免费人成看片| av免费在线看不卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲成色77777| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 丰满少妇做爰视频| www.av在线官网国产| 日韩强制内射视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 免费大片18禁| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久午夜福利片| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品成人在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产视频内射| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 高清不卡的av网站| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美区成人在线视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 另类精品久久| 日本wwww免费看| 老女人水多毛片| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99热全是精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| av卡一久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久精品性色| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 三级国产精品片| av福利片在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品第二区| 在线看a的网站| 一本久久精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| av线在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 综合色丁香网| 色5月婷婷丁香| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| av专区在线播放| av免费观看日本| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 日本黄色片子视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品999| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 丁香六月天网| 午夜av观看不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| av在线app专区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人精品无人区| 在线 av 中文字幕| .国产精品久久| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| av专区在线播放| 97超视频在线观看视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 九草在线视频观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| tube8黄色片| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 日韩欧美 国产精品| xxx大片免费视频| 另类精品久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 丰满少妇做爰视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| av有码第一页| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 在线观看国产h片| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 22中文网久久字幕| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 美女主播在线视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| av天堂久久9| 国产成人freesex在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久影院123| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产毛片在线视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 少妇的逼水好多| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日本午夜av视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产永久视频网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| videos熟女内射| 久久97久久精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 老女人水多毛片| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 一个人免费看片子| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品|