• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Environmental variables affecting the gillnet catches and condition of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii in northern Malaysia

    2022-03-01 03:32:28MustafizurRahmanAhmadFathiMattBroadhurst
    Aquaculture and Fisheries 2022年6期

    Mustafizur M.Rahman, Ahmad Fathi, Matt K.Broadhurst

    aDepartment of Marine Science, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia

    bInstitute of Oceanography and Maritime Studies, IIUM, Kg.Cherok Paloh, Kuantan, Pahang, 26160, Malaysia

    cDepartment of Biotechnology, IIUM, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia

    dNSW Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Conservation Technology Unit, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, 2 Bay Drive, Coffs Harbour, 2450, Australia

    eMarine and Estuarine Ecology Unit, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia

    Keywords:

    Redundancy analysis

    PERMANOVA

    Growth co-efficient

    Water turbidity

    Phytoplankton abundance

    Benthos

    Lake Kenyir

    A B S T R A C T

    The influences of technical factors on the catching efficiencies of gillnets are well understood, but less is known about the importance of environmental factors and how these might concurrently affect target-species condition.Here we address this deficit for two economically important southeast Asian cyprinids (Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii) during a one-year study at a key fishing location in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia.Three gillnets(each 200 m long, 2 m deep and comprising either 38-, 51-, or 76-mm mesh) were deployed each month concurrent with sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates and various environmental parameters.Various multivariate analyses (detrended correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance) were used to explore potential relationships between the extrinsic variables (mesh size,sampling season, water quality and, based on known prey items, benthic macroinvertebrates) and gillnet catches and the biological condition (growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index) of the target species.Catches of L.festivus (the most abundant species) were positively influenced by water turbidity without seasonal effects, while their biological condition was positively influenced by benthic macroinvertebrates (mostly Trichoptera) and the concentrations of DO and phosphate, and negatively influenced by water temperature.By comparison, seasonal influences on the catches and biology of O.hasseltii were somewhat size specific with positive and negative effects of the monsoon on small and large fish, respectively.The abundance of phytoplankton also positively affected the catches of O.hasseltii, while their biological condition was positively influenced by water temperature, but negatively influenced by water turbidity.Such species-specific differences were attributed to life histories, and although the more abundant L.festivus might be best sought during any period of turbidity, effort should be focused during the monsoon when individuals have optimal condition (and therefore better flesh quality).In contrast, larger O.hasseltii might be best sought during non-monsoon months concurrent with greater catches and optimal condition.Collecting similar data for other freshwater species both nationally and internationally might facilitate future efforts at fine-tuning gillnet fishing effort.

    1.Introduction

    Gillnets are widely used throughout the world, and are favoured in artisanal fisheries because they are relatively inexpensive, easily constructed and deployed and quite effective for various species, especially schooling teleosts (Hamley, 1975; Brandt, 2005; Yalei et al., 2018;Grimaldoa et al., 2019).However, like all fishing gears, gillnets are not 100% selective for the target species (Broadhurst, Kennelly, & Gray,2007).Rather, they typically have wide selectivities among similar sizes/shapes of animals, which means at times they also catch unwanted species.To promote sustainable harvesting, ideally gillnets would be configured and fished across appropriate spatio-temporal scales that maximize catches of the permitted species and their sizes.

    Various extrinsic and intrinsic factors are known to affect gillnet selectivities and/or efficiencies (reviewed by Hamely, 1975).Key technical parameters can include, but are not limited to: soak time (Minns &Hurley, 1988; Losanes, Matuda, & Fujimori, 1992); and net length(Rudstam, Magnuson, & Tonn, 1984), hanging ratio (defined as the length of stretched meshes divided by the length of rope to which they are attached; Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995), twine size, material (Jensen,1995; Hovgard, 1996a), headline height (Gray, Broadhurst, Johnson, &Young, 2005), panel configuration (Gilman, Gearhart, Price, Eckert,Milliken, Wang, Swimmer, Shiode & Abe, 2010), and perhaps most importantly, mesh size (Hamley, 1975).

    In addition, many environmental and biological parameters can affect species catchability in gillnets.Specifically, beyond short-term diel effects, seasonal influences are often quite important and can directly and indirectly influence the biology or behaviour of many fishes and their subsequent vulnerability to capture (Bobori & Salvarina, 2010;Gray, Johnson, Broadhurst, & Young, 2005).Such broad temporal effects are often linked with the interacting effects of important abiotic(water temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and the concentration of various nutrients) and especially biotic factors such as food availability (Hansson & Rudstam, 1995).Some of these factors probably manifest as quite variable species-specific impacts, although according to Stoner (2004), ambient prey density has the greatest influence on catchability.

    Despite recognition of the many environmental and biological factors affecting gillnet catches, most previous studies investigating the importance of key technical factors such as mesh sizes or other gear configurations on relative efficiencies/selectivities have been done over quite short temporal scales (Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995; Gray, Johnson,et al., 2005; Hovgard, 1996b).Such studies often incorporate random effects in analyses, including different fishing days and locations, which implicitly encompass some variables likely to affect gillnet fishing performances (usually across multiple mesh sizes).But, by default these approaches preclude deciphering the range of potentially important environmental and biological factors listed above, which means data are lacking for many species.

    This study sought to contribute towards addressing the above stated shortfall in information by investigating the influence of key extrinsic variables on the gillnet vulnerability (catches) and condition (growth coefficient and hepatosomatic index; HSI) of two economically important Malaysian cyprinid fish (Labiobarbus festivusandOsteochilus hasseltii)across a full annual fishing season.Both species are targeted using gillnets (~51-mm stretched mesh opening {SMO} monofilament)appropriately configured for the desired sizes (~16-18 cm total length-TL) throughout their southeast Asian distributions and mostly for regional consumption, especially in Malaysia.These two species have variable distributions, but previous ecological research suggestsL.festivustypically consumes macroinvertebrates, such as insect larvae along with detritus, whileO.hasseltiiis mostly planktivorous, although larger individuals also consume invertebrates (Nurulnajwa, 2004; Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).Variations in the relative availability of these preferred prey items should affect relative abundances and therefore vulnerability to gillnets, but no data are available.

    Considering the above, our first aim here was to test the null hypothesis of no effects of a suite of environmental variables on the gillnet catches and biological parameters ofL.festivusandO.hasseltiiin a key Malaysian fishery (at Lake Kenyir which, with a surface area of 38,000 ha, is the largest man-made waterway in Malaysia).Using this information, our second aim was to then identify any conditions (or otherwise) that might be amenable for future regional harvesting, and ultimately to facilitate the broader, effective exploitation of these species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site and fishing gear

    The study was done in Lake Kenyir (5°3′′N; 102°44′′E), northeastern Malaysia between January and December 2016 (Fig.1).At this location,the monsoon and non-monsoon periods are from October to March and April to September, respectively.Three gillnets were constructed for the study: (1) a traditional configuration (51.0 mm SMO) and those with (2)larger (76.2 mm SMO) and (3) smaller (38.1 mm SMO) mesh sizes (to ensure adequate sampling of fish populations).All three gillnets were made from clear polyamide monofilament mesh (0.2-mm diameter-? twine) throughout, attached to 200-m floatlines (4.0-mm ? twisted polypropylene) and suitably weighted footropes (3.0-mm ? twisted polypropylene) at a hanging ratio of ~50% (Fig.2).Each gillnet orientated to a fishing depth of ~2 m (Fig.2).

    Fig.1.Map of Lake Kenyir, Malaysia and the designated fished area between January and December 2016.

    Fig.2.Configurations of three gillnets (comprising 38.1, 51.0 and 76.2 mm stretched mesh opening) monthly deployed in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.?, diameter.

    The gillnets were always fished across the same defined location(depths of 3.1-4.3 m) in the Lake and in an area where conventional fishing effort was known and considered constant (Fig.1).The chosen location was monthly sampled over 12 months (to incorporate a full seasonal cycle).Three replicate-gillnet deployments were completed each month.

    2.2.Fish and benthos sampling and associated water quality

    During each fishing night, the gillnets were deployed at the surface at 17:00 h and retrieved at 01:00 h.After retrieval, all fish were immediately untangled and counted.Specimens ofL.festivusandO.hasselttiiwere separated, stored in ice and transported to the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) where their total length (TL) (to the nearest 1 mm) and weight (TW to the nearest 0.01 g) were immediately recorded before they were dissected and their livers removed for weighing(LW as above).The growth co-efficient (parameterbin the regressionW=aLb) and the hepatosomatic index (HSI =LW/TW ×100) for each specimen were subsequently calculated following conventional procedures (Pauly, 1993).

    Concurrent with gillnet deployments, and within 100 m of each deployment, replicate substrate samples were collected using a Ponar grab (15.2 × 15.2 cm).Samples were washed through a 250-μm mesh sieve and all non-filtered benthos were immediately preserved in plastic vials containing a 10% buffered formalin solution and transferred to IIUM for quantification.Organisms were identified to at least their Class following keys developed by Brinkhurst (1971) and Pinder and Reiss(1983).

    Replicates of water temperature (oC), dissolved oxygen (mg l-1),water turbidity (NTU) and pH (-logaH+) were also recorded at the~mid-fishing depths of the gillnets using Hydrolab? monitors(Hydrolab Minisonde water-quality multiprobes).Additionally, water samples (~1 l) were collected at the surface, mid and bottom depths using a Van Dorn? water sampler and cumulatively assessed for nitrogenous and phosphorous nutrients, silica (mg l-1) and chlorophylla (μg l-1), with the latter selected because it is indicative of phytoplankton biomass (Jenkerson & Hickman, 2007).

    Chlorophyll-a was determined spectrophotometrically after acetone extraction according to Boyd (1979).Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN)and phosphorus (PO4-P) were analysed spectrophotometrically following Stirling (1985).Nitrate (NO3-N; derived via the cadmium reduction method) and nitrite (NO2-N) were determined according to APHA (1998) and along with TAN, were used to calculate total dissolved inorganic nitrogen (TIN).

    2.3.Statistical analyses

    Data describing the extrinsic variables (e.g.seasons separated into monsoon and non-monsoon periods, water quality measures, pH, TIN,phosphate, chlorophyll-a, silica, and abundant benthic macroinvertebrates) and the intrinsic biology (growth co-efficient and HSI)and gillnet vulnerability (catches) of each species for each mesh size were first explored using the canonical correlation index.The waterquality variables were subsequently designated as explanatory (independent) variables while the biology and gillnet vulnerability of fish were considered responses (dependent) for analyses in multivariate ordinations using CANOCO 4 (ter Braak & Smilauer, 1998).

    Initially, a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was performed to elucidate prevailing patterns of the response variables relative to the explanatory variable gradient.The subsequent ordination axes were smaller than two standard deviations, implying a linear response, and so redundancy analyses (RDA) was deemed appropriate following ter Braak & Smilauer (1998).The RDAs were run separately for the two species with variables centered and standardized by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation.The significance of the first-ordination axis and of the first four canonical axes together were evaluated via Monte Carlo-permutation tests with 1000 permutations.

    Following the results of the RDA, permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on Euclidian distance was performed to investigate the main categorical effects of season (monsoon vs non-monsoon) and ‘mesh size’ of the gillnets and their interaction on various intrinsic variables for both species.We also used PERMANOVA with the DistLM model to investigate the influence of environmental factors on species biology and gillnet vulnerability.The PERMANOVA analyses were performed using PRIMER v7 (Anderson, 2008), while both DCA and RDA were completed using CANOCO v4 (ter Braak &Smilauer, 1998).

    3.Results

    In total, 4430 fishes comprising at least 18 species were caught, withL.festivusandO.hasselttiiaccounting for 48 and 13%, respectively of the total catches (Table 1).These catches were mostly taken in the 38.1-mm(total of 1519; and 78% and 22%L.festivusandO.hasselttii) and 51.0-mm gillnets (1162; 79% and 21%), with only 25 fish recorded in the 76.2-mm gillnet.The later gillnet was excluded from any further analyses.The remaining fish species mostly comprised cypriniformes.

    Table 1Summary of means ±SD and ranges of catches and biology of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii during the 12-month study fishing gillnets made from three mesh sizes (stretched mesh opening) in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    The sampled benthic organisms (total benthic macroinvertebrates;TBM) belonged to 10 classes, including polychaete, oligochaete, insecta,hirudiena, bivalvia, arachnida, isopoda, copepoda, mysida and gastropoda.However, 62% of organisms were Trichoptera larvae.The collected environmental parameters were all annually variable across the entire fished area, but especially chlorophyll-a and turbidity(Table 2).

    Table 2Summary of means ±SD and ranges of various extrinsic variables across the fishing location of gillnets deployed monthly in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    3.1.Labiobarbus festivus

    For the RDAs describing relationships between environmental variables and the catches and biology ofL.festivus, the first canonical axis and the first four canonical axes combined were statistically significant(P <0.05; Table 3).The first two canonical axes explained 82.5% of the variance in catches and 93.3% of the catches/environmental relationship (Table 3).Monsoon season scored high on the second RDA axis(Fig.3).For both the 38.1-mm and 51.0-mm mesh gillnets, the second RDA was positively correlated with several environmental variables(excluding turbidity) and fish biology variables, and was negatively correlated with non-monsoon, water temperature, pH, TIN and chlorophyll-a (Fig.3).

    Fig.3.Redundancy analyses plots of environmental variables explaining the gillnet (38.1- and 51.0-mm mesh) catches and biology of Labiobarbus festivus in Lake Kenyir during 12-months’ sampling between January and December 2016.Lf, Labiobarbus festivus; TIN, total dissolved nitrogen; HSI, heptosomatic index;DO, dissolved oxygen; TBM, total benthic macroinvertebrates.

    The PERMANOVA assessing the categorical effects of season and mesh size failed to return a significant pseudo-F for either main effect or their interaction on the number ofL.festivuscaught, or their growth coefficient (Table 4).However, there were significant effects of season on HSI (means ± SDs of 7.44 ± 4.94 and 2.61 ± 2.51 for monsoon and nonmonsoon seasons, respectively), and mesh size on the TLs and weights of fish, which manifested as incrementally greater sizes and weights with increasing mesh size (P <0.05; Table 1 and 4).

    Irrespective of mesh size, PERMANOVA (with DistLM) revealed that water turbidity strongly positively influenced the number ofL.festivuscaught (P <0.05; Fig.3, Table 5).And the HSI of fish was significantly and positively influenced by benthic macroinvertebrates, DO and phosphate and negatively influenced by water temperature (P <0.05;Fig.3, Table 5).Only phosphate and TIN significantly influenced the growth coefficient ofL.festivus, and with positive and negative effects,respectively (P <0.05; Fig.3, Table 5).

    3.2.Osteochilus hasseltii

    The first canonical axis and the first four canonical axes combined were also statistically significant forO.hasseltii(P <0.05; Table 3).The first two canonical axes explained 70.1% of the variation in catches and 92.9% of the catches/environmental relationship (Table 3).It was clear that fishing with the 38.1-mm gillnet during the monsoon season, and both gillnets during the non-monsoon scored high on the first RDA axis(Table 3; Fig.4).This axis was strongly positively correlated with the number of fish caught and chlorophyll-a, and negatively correlated withthe phosphate concentration in the water (Fig.4).

    Table 3Redundancy analyses (RDA) of environmental variables explaining the biology and catches of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii in gillnets deployed monthly in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    The observed influence of the smaller mesh on catches ofO.hasseltiiduring the monsoon season manifested as a significant interaction between mesh and season in the PERMANOVA (P <0.05; Table 4).However, irrespective of season and like forL.festivus, mean TL and weight were greater in the larger mesh size (P <0.05; Table 1 and 4).Neither the growth co-efficient nor HSI ofO.hasseltiiwere affected by mesh size or season (P >0.05; Table 1 and 4).

    Table 4PERMANOVA pseudo-Fs and significance for influence of season (monsoon vs non-monsoon), mesh size (31 vs 51 mm mesh; see Table 1 for means) and their interaction on the number, total length (cm), weight (g), growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index (HSI) of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii.

    PERMANOVA (with DistLM) revealed the number ofO.hasseltiicaught was significantly and positively influenced by the abundance of phytoplankton (chlorophyll-a concentration) (P <0.01), but was not significantly influenced by the phosphate concentration in the water (P>0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).The growth coefficient and HSI were positively influenced by water temperature and negatively influenced by water turbidity (P <0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).While other environmental variables (phytoplankton, Trichoptera and TBM densities, TIN and phosphate concentration and pH) slightly influenced the growth coeffi cient and HSI ofO.hasseltii, their influences were not statistically significant (P >0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).

    Fig.4.Redundancy analyses plots of environmental variables explaining the gillnet (38.1- and 51.0-mm mesh) catches and biology of Osteochilus hasseltii in Lake Kenyir during 12-months’ sampling between January and December 2016.Oh, Osteochilus hasseltii; TIN, total dissolved nitrogen; HSI, heptosomatic index;DO, dissolved oxygen; TBM, total benthic macroinvertebrates.

    Table 5PERMANOVA (with DistLM) pseudo-Fs and significance for the influence of various extrinsic factors on the catches, growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index (HSI)of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii (irrespective of mesh size and season).

    4.Discussion

    This study provides a unique contribution towards understating important factors affecting gillnet efficiency/selectivity (e.g.Hamley,1975; Rudstam et al., 1984; Minns & Hurley, 1988; Losanes et al., 1992;Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995; Jensen, 1995; Hansson & Rudstam, 1995;Hovgard, 1996a,b; Poulsen, Nielsen, Holst, & Sather, 2000; Gray,Johnson, et al., 2005; Gilman et al., 2010).Specifically, by sampling across a full 12-month cycle using three different-meshed gillnets in one fishery and collecting a plethora of environmental data, we have delineated species-specific variability among the relative importance of key variables such as food availability, water turbidity, temperature, DO and nutrients affecting the catches ofL.festivusandO.hasseltiiand also their biology.

    We acknowledge that these variables are probably not the limit of causality among observed catches-which could extend to the other factors affecting gillnet vulnerability (e.g.abundances of other fish species or effort by fishers) and should be assessed in future research.Nevertheless, the observed influences provide important information,which can be discussed according to possible life-history requirements for the studied species, and used to not only regulate regional effort, but also contribute towards fisheries management more broadly.

    The environmental dataset adequately explained variations among catches and the biology of each species quite well for each of the two mesh sizes with sufficient data, but clearly with divergent speciesspecific importance.Like for several other species, the gillnet catches ofL.festivuswere strongly affected by water turbidity (Balik & Cubuk,2000; Simasiku, Mafwila, & Sitengu, 2017).Such a result might reflect their reliance on visual stimuli considering this species generally resides in clear water and might not be proficient at detecting gillnets as turbidity increases (Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).Other factors, such as seasonal variation, did not affect the growth co-efficient and vulnerability ofL.festivusto capture, but did affect their HSI, which was strongly positively influenced during the monsoon, and negatively influenced during the non-monsoon season for both gillnets.Specific variables influencing HSI within these broad seasonal effects included water temperature, DO and phosphate concentrations and the abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates (dominated by Trichopterans).Considering the latter, one hypothesis to explain the positive effect on the HSI ofL.festivusmight be their dietary preferences (Amira et al., 2016; Rahman et al., 2009; Rahman & Balcombe, 2018), which although not studied here are known to be strongly directed towards insect larvae and detritus (Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).

    The remaining environmental factors (chlorophyll-a, as a measure of phytoplankton density, pH and turbidity) only slightly affected the biology ofL.festivus, and were not significant.This outcome may reflect Liebig’s law of the minimum whereby fish energetics are influenced by the combination of numerous factors, but for many species, are mostly controlled by the scarcest resources such as DO or food availability(Gibson, 1994; Hiddink & Kaiser, 2005).The observed negative relationship between water temperature and the biology ofL.festivusimplies the monsoon season is optimal for the growth of this species.Similar relationships have been recorded for various other teleosts in lakes and reservoirs (e.g.Kocovsky & Carline, 2001; Quist, Guy, Bernot, & Stephen, 2002).

    Unlike forL.festivus, the catches ofO.hasseltiiwere greatly influenced by the abundance of phytoplankton in lake water.Catches ofO.hasseltiiwere mostly greater during the non-monsoon season and probably due to changes in habitat selection and increased activity during the former seasons.A similar relationship between gillnet catch rates and the non-monsoon season has been observed for other species,includingPerca fluviatilisin Lake Doirani in Greece (Bobori & Salvarina,2010).

    Notwithstanding some effect of the non-monsoon season, there was a clear size-specific influence of the monsoon onO.hasseltii(evidenced via the PERMANOVA interaction between mesh size and season) which manifested as a negative influence on the catch and biology of largerO.hasseltii(as sampled by the 51.0-mm gillnet).While speculative, such a result may have reflected food and habitat preferences.According to Nurulnajwa (2004), smallO.hasseltiiare mostly planktivorous, while larger individuals feed on phytoplankton, zooplankton, aquatic invertebrates and detritus.At the onset of the monsoon, largerO.hasseltiiare known to migrate into inundated areas for feeding (mainly aquatic invertebrates) and spawning (Motomura, Tsukawaki, & Kamiya, 2002).Such size-specific shifting habitat and food preferences could explain the negative influence of monsoon on catches ofO.hasseltiiin the larger-meshed gillnet.

    We also observed that water temperature and turbidity positively and negatively influenced the growth coefficient and HSI, respectively ofO.hasseltiiwithout any clear seasonal influence.UnlikeL.festivus,water turbidity may not greatly affect the visionO.hasseltii, but could affect their biology (Table 5).Negative effects of turbidity on capture and biology are commonly observed in many freshwater fishes (Pekcan-Hekim.2007; Pekcan-Hekim & Lappalainen, 2006; Rahman &Verdegem, 2007).Considering the improved condition ofO.hasseltiiduring the non-monsoon period (and with significantly warmer temperatures than during the monsoon period), one hypothesis might be that this correlates better with the preferred temperature range,although further research is required to validate this hypothesis.

    5.Conclusions

    The data collected here have implications for optimal fine-scale harvesting of both species.In terms of absolute abundances, forL.festivusthe lack of any seasonal effect means the species could be sought during any period of turbid waters throughout the year.But,becauseL.festivusdemonstrated optimum biological condition (which by default might imply better flesh quality and therefore economic return) during the monsoon season, directed effort during this period would be advantageous in terms of maximizing profits for local fishers.In contrast, largeO.hasseltiiwould best be targeted during the nonmonsoon using the conventional gillnet, simply because the species demonstrated optimum biological condition during this period.For other areas of the species’ distributions, the observed relationships between extrinsic environmental factors and gillnet vulnerability could be used to refine targeting, although additional data would be required.

    The existing data also have implications for fishery-independent sampling and potential confounding effects.In particular, sporadic episodes of increased turbidity could confound time-series data forL.festivus, but notO.hasseltii.Such factors require consideration for effective stock assessments and to decipher trends during anomalous annual climatic events.Similar characteristics could affect the vulnerability of other freshwater species to gillnets elsewhere and warrant ongoing assessments.In this regard, our data support broader, more holistic evaluations of extrinsic factors affecting the gillnet vulnerability of targeted fish.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Mustafizur M.Rahman: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Software, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - review & editing.Ahmad Fathi: Data curation.Matt K.Broadhurst: Review and editing.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No author has any conflict of interest with the contents of the manuscript.

    Acknowledgments

    We are thankful to the International Islamic University Malaysia,Malaysia for providing financial support through P-RIGS18-032-0032 project.We also thank the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) for logistical support during the study, and the NSW Department of Primary Industries for the involvement of Matt Broadhurst.

    一本久久中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人无遮挡网站| 成人二区视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 九色成人免费人妻av| 俺也久久电影网| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 中国美女看黄片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 色5月婷婷丁香| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久九九热精品免费| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产成人freesex在线 | 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 久久久久久伊人网av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 黄片wwwwww| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 久久久久国产网址| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产精品无大码| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 日本免费a在线| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 99热全是精品| 精品福利观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 在线看三级毛片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 午夜精品在线福利| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产乱人视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 免费高清视频大片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 在线播放无遮挡| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 精品久久久噜噜| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 色5月婷婷丁香| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 午夜影院日韩av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 色综合色国产| 亚洲内射少妇av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产日本99.免费观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 看黄色毛片网站| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费观看在线日韩| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| or卡值多少钱| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产成人a区在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| www日本黄色视频网| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 波多野结衣高清作品| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美+日韩+精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 悠悠久久av| 一夜夜www| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 1024手机看黄色片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 在线播放无遮挡| av免费在线看不卡| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲性久久影院| 天堂动漫精品| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 中国美女看黄片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 综合色av麻豆| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 91av网一区二区| 在线免费十八禁| av天堂中文字幕网| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 91狼人影院| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产免费男女视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产色婷婷99| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产乱人视频| 在线免费十八禁| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| av中文乱码字幕在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| av福利片在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产高清激情床上av| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产成人福利小说| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av美国av| 丝袜喷水一区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 床上黄色一级片| 99热这里只有是精品50| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 精品人妻视频免费看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美成人a在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 黄色一级大片看看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人无遮挡网站| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 18+在线观看网站| 色哟哟·www| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 波多野结衣高清作品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美3d第一页| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美潮喷喷水| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 观看美女的网站| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| av.在线天堂| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲成人久久性| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 禁无遮挡网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久人妻av系列| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 尾随美女入室| 久久6这里有精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 午夜影院日韩av| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 观看免费一级毛片| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 免费大片18禁| 小说图片视频综合网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 91av网一区二区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久精品影院6| 中文资源天堂在线| 六月丁香七月| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美98| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美3d第一页| av免费在线看不卡| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩中字成人| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲最大成人av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美成人a在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产在线男女| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 成人欧美大片| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 69人妻影院| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久久久九九精品影院| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 一级毛片电影观看 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 老司机影院成人| 身体一侧抽搐| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 97碰自拍视频| 久久久久性生活片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 深夜a级毛片| 99久国产av精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 精品国产三级普通话版| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲图色成人| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产高清三级在线| 99热只有精品国产| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| aaaaa片日本免费| 深夜a级毛片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 男女那种视频在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 毛片女人毛片| 国产 一区精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 久久热精品热| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 午夜a级毛片| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日本色播在线视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产 一区精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人三级黄色视频| 成人欧美大片| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 |