• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Environmental variables affecting the gillnet catches and condition of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii in northern Malaysia

    2022-03-01 03:32:28MustafizurRahmanAhmadFathiMattBroadhurst
    Aquaculture and Fisheries 2022年6期

    Mustafizur M.Rahman, Ahmad Fathi, Matt K.Broadhurst

    aDepartment of Marine Science, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia

    bInstitute of Oceanography and Maritime Studies, IIUM, Kg.Cherok Paloh, Kuantan, Pahang, 26160, Malaysia

    cDepartment of Biotechnology, IIUM, Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia

    dNSW Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Conservation Technology Unit, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, 2 Bay Drive, Coffs Harbour, 2450, Australia

    eMarine and Estuarine Ecology Unit, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia

    Keywords:

    Redundancy analysis

    PERMANOVA

    Growth co-efficient

    Water turbidity

    Phytoplankton abundance

    Benthos

    Lake Kenyir

    A B S T R A C T

    The influences of technical factors on the catching efficiencies of gillnets are well understood, but less is known about the importance of environmental factors and how these might concurrently affect target-species condition.Here we address this deficit for two economically important southeast Asian cyprinids (Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii) during a one-year study at a key fishing location in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia.Three gillnets(each 200 m long, 2 m deep and comprising either 38-, 51-, or 76-mm mesh) were deployed each month concurrent with sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates and various environmental parameters.Various multivariate analyses (detrended correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance) were used to explore potential relationships between the extrinsic variables (mesh size,sampling season, water quality and, based on known prey items, benthic macroinvertebrates) and gillnet catches and the biological condition (growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index) of the target species.Catches of L.festivus (the most abundant species) were positively influenced by water turbidity without seasonal effects, while their biological condition was positively influenced by benthic macroinvertebrates (mostly Trichoptera) and the concentrations of DO and phosphate, and negatively influenced by water temperature.By comparison, seasonal influences on the catches and biology of O.hasseltii were somewhat size specific with positive and negative effects of the monsoon on small and large fish, respectively.The abundance of phytoplankton also positively affected the catches of O.hasseltii, while their biological condition was positively influenced by water temperature, but negatively influenced by water turbidity.Such species-specific differences were attributed to life histories, and although the more abundant L.festivus might be best sought during any period of turbidity, effort should be focused during the monsoon when individuals have optimal condition (and therefore better flesh quality).In contrast, larger O.hasseltii might be best sought during non-monsoon months concurrent with greater catches and optimal condition.Collecting similar data for other freshwater species both nationally and internationally might facilitate future efforts at fine-tuning gillnet fishing effort.

    1.Introduction

    Gillnets are widely used throughout the world, and are favoured in artisanal fisheries because they are relatively inexpensive, easily constructed and deployed and quite effective for various species, especially schooling teleosts (Hamley, 1975; Brandt, 2005; Yalei et al., 2018;Grimaldoa et al., 2019).However, like all fishing gears, gillnets are not 100% selective for the target species (Broadhurst, Kennelly, & Gray,2007).Rather, they typically have wide selectivities among similar sizes/shapes of animals, which means at times they also catch unwanted species.To promote sustainable harvesting, ideally gillnets would be configured and fished across appropriate spatio-temporal scales that maximize catches of the permitted species and their sizes.

    Various extrinsic and intrinsic factors are known to affect gillnet selectivities and/or efficiencies (reviewed by Hamely, 1975).Key technical parameters can include, but are not limited to: soak time (Minns &Hurley, 1988; Losanes, Matuda, & Fujimori, 1992); and net length(Rudstam, Magnuson, & Tonn, 1984), hanging ratio (defined as the length of stretched meshes divided by the length of rope to which they are attached; Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995), twine size, material (Jensen,1995; Hovgard, 1996a), headline height (Gray, Broadhurst, Johnson, &Young, 2005), panel configuration (Gilman, Gearhart, Price, Eckert,Milliken, Wang, Swimmer, Shiode & Abe, 2010), and perhaps most importantly, mesh size (Hamley, 1975).

    In addition, many environmental and biological parameters can affect species catchability in gillnets.Specifically, beyond short-term diel effects, seasonal influences are often quite important and can directly and indirectly influence the biology or behaviour of many fishes and their subsequent vulnerability to capture (Bobori & Salvarina, 2010;Gray, Johnson, Broadhurst, & Young, 2005).Such broad temporal effects are often linked with the interacting effects of important abiotic(water temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and the concentration of various nutrients) and especially biotic factors such as food availability (Hansson & Rudstam, 1995).Some of these factors probably manifest as quite variable species-specific impacts, although according to Stoner (2004), ambient prey density has the greatest influence on catchability.

    Despite recognition of the many environmental and biological factors affecting gillnet catches, most previous studies investigating the importance of key technical factors such as mesh sizes or other gear configurations on relative efficiencies/selectivities have been done over quite short temporal scales (Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995; Gray, Johnson,et al., 2005; Hovgard, 1996b).Such studies often incorporate random effects in analyses, including different fishing days and locations, which implicitly encompass some variables likely to affect gillnet fishing performances (usually across multiple mesh sizes).But, by default these approaches preclude deciphering the range of potentially important environmental and biological factors listed above, which means data are lacking for many species.

    This study sought to contribute towards addressing the above stated shortfall in information by investigating the influence of key extrinsic variables on the gillnet vulnerability (catches) and condition (growth coefficient and hepatosomatic index; HSI) of two economically important Malaysian cyprinid fish (Labiobarbus festivusandOsteochilus hasseltii)across a full annual fishing season.Both species are targeted using gillnets (~51-mm stretched mesh opening {SMO} monofilament)appropriately configured for the desired sizes (~16-18 cm total length-TL) throughout their southeast Asian distributions and mostly for regional consumption, especially in Malaysia.These two species have variable distributions, but previous ecological research suggestsL.festivustypically consumes macroinvertebrates, such as insect larvae along with detritus, whileO.hasseltiiis mostly planktivorous, although larger individuals also consume invertebrates (Nurulnajwa, 2004; Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).Variations in the relative availability of these preferred prey items should affect relative abundances and therefore vulnerability to gillnets, but no data are available.

    Considering the above, our first aim here was to test the null hypothesis of no effects of a suite of environmental variables on the gillnet catches and biological parameters ofL.festivusandO.hasseltiiin a key Malaysian fishery (at Lake Kenyir which, with a surface area of 38,000 ha, is the largest man-made waterway in Malaysia).Using this information, our second aim was to then identify any conditions (or otherwise) that might be amenable for future regional harvesting, and ultimately to facilitate the broader, effective exploitation of these species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site and fishing gear

    The study was done in Lake Kenyir (5°3′′N; 102°44′′E), northeastern Malaysia between January and December 2016 (Fig.1).At this location,the monsoon and non-monsoon periods are from October to March and April to September, respectively.Three gillnets were constructed for the study: (1) a traditional configuration (51.0 mm SMO) and those with (2)larger (76.2 mm SMO) and (3) smaller (38.1 mm SMO) mesh sizes (to ensure adequate sampling of fish populations).All three gillnets were made from clear polyamide monofilament mesh (0.2-mm diameter-? twine) throughout, attached to 200-m floatlines (4.0-mm ? twisted polypropylene) and suitably weighted footropes (3.0-mm ? twisted polypropylene) at a hanging ratio of ~50% (Fig.2).Each gillnet orientated to a fishing depth of ~2 m (Fig.2).

    Fig.1.Map of Lake Kenyir, Malaysia and the designated fished area between January and December 2016.

    Fig.2.Configurations of three gillnets (comprising 38.1, 51.0 and 76.2 mm stretched mesh opening) monthly deployed in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.?, diameter.

    The gillnets were always fished across the same defined location(depths of 3.1-4.3 m) in the Lake and in an area where conventional fishing effort was known and considered constant (Fig.1).The chosen location was monthly sampled over 12 months (to incorporate a full seasonal cycle).Three replicate-gillnet deployments were completed each month.

    2.2.Fish and benthos sampling and associated water quality

    During each fishing night, the gillnets were deployed at the surface at 17:00 h and retrieved at 01:00 h.After retrieval, all fish were immediately untangled and counted.Specimens ofL.festivusandO.hasselttiiwere separated, stored in ice and transported to the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) where their total length (TL) (to the nearest 1 mm) and weight (TW to the nearest 0.01 g) were immediately recorded before they were dissected and their livers removed for weighing(LW as above).The growth co-efficient (parameterbin the regressionW=aLb) and the hepatosomatic index (HSI =LW/TW ×100) for each specimen were subsequently calculated following conventional procedures (Pauly, 1993).

    Concurrent with gillnet deployments, and within 100 m of each deployment, replicate substrate samples were collected using a Ponar grab (15.2 × 15.2 cm).Samples were washed through a 250-μm mesh sieve and all non-filtered benthos were immediately preserved in plastic vials containing a 10% buffered formalin solution and transferred to IIUM for quantification.Organisms were identified to at least their Class following keys developed by Brinkhurst (1971) and Pinder and Reiss(1983).

    Replicates of water temperature (oC), dissolved oxygen (mg l-1),water turbidity (NTU) and pH (-logaH+) were also recorded at the~mid-fishing depths of the gillnets using Hydrolab? monitors(Hydrolab Minisonde water-quality multiprobes).Additionally, water samples (~1 l) were collected at the surface, mid and bottom depths using a Van Dorn? water sampler and cumulatively assessed for nitrogenous and phosphorous nutrients, silica (mg l-1) and chlorophylla (μg l-1), with the latter selected because it is indicative of phytoplankton biomass (Jenkerson & Hickman, 2007).

    Chlorophyll-a was determined spectrophotometrically after acetone extraction according to Boyd (1979).Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN)and phosphorus (PO4-P) were analysed spectrophotometrically following Stirling (1985).Nitrate (NO3-N; derived via the cadmium reduction method) and nitrite (NO2-N) were determined according to APHA (1998) and along with TAN, were used to calculate total dissolved inorganic nitrogen (TIN).

    2.3.Statistical analyses

    Data describing the extrinsic variables (e.g.seasons separated into monsoon and non-monsoon periods, water quality measures, pH, TIN,phosphate, chlorophyll-a, silica, and abundant benthic macroinvertebrates) and the intrinsic biology (growth co-efficient and HSI)and gillnet vulnerability (catches) of each species for each mesh size were first explored using the canonical correlation index.The waterquality variables were subsequently designated as explanatory (independent) variables while the biology and gillnet vulnerability of fish were considered responses (dependent) for analyses in multivariate ordinations using CANOCO 4 (ter Braak & Smilauer, 1998).

    Initially, a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was performed to elucidate prevailing patterns of the response variables relative to the explanatory variable gradient.The subsequent ordination axes were smaller than two standard deviations, implying a linear response, and so redundancy analyses (RDA) was deemed appropriate following ter Braak & Smilauer (1998).The RDAs were run separately for the two species with variables centered and standardized by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation.The significance of the first-ordination axis and of the first four canonical axes together were evaluated via Monte Carlo-permutation tests with 1000 permutations.

    Following the results of the RDA, permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on Euclidian distance was performed to investigate the main categorical effects of season (monsoon vs non-monsoon) and ‘mesh size’ of the gillnets and their interaction on various intrinsic variables for both species.We also used PERMANOVA with the DistLM model to investigate the influence of environmental factors on species biology and gillnet vulnerability.The PERMANOVA analyses were performed using PRIMER v7 (Anderson, 2008), while both DCA and RDA were completed using CANOCO v4 (ter Braak &Smilauer, 1998).

    3.Results

    In total, 4430 fishes comprising at least 18 species were caught, withL.festivusandO.hasselttiiaccounting for 48 and 13%, respectively of the total catches (Table 1).These catches were mostly taken in the 38.1-mm(total of 1519; and 78% and 22%L.festivusandO.hasselttii) and 51.0-mm gillnets (1162; 79% and 21%), with only 25 fish recorded in the 76.2-mm gillnet.The later gillnet was excluded from any further analyses.The remaining fish species mostly comprised cypriniformes.

    Table 1Summary of means ±SD and ranges of catches and biology of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii during the 12-month study fishing gillnets made from three mesh sizes (stretched mesh opening) in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    The sampled benthic organisms (total benthic macroinvertebrates;TBM) belonged to 10 classes, including polychaete, oligochaete, insecta,hirudiena, bivalvia, arachnida, isopoda, copepoda, mysida and gastropoda.However, 62% of organisms were Trichoptera larvae.The collected environmental parameters were all annually variable across the entire fished area, but especially chlorophyll-a and turbidity(Table 2).

    Table 2Summary of means ±SD and ranges of various extrinsic variables across the fishing location of gillnets deployed monthly in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    3.1.Labiobarbus festivus

    For the RDAs describing relationships between environmental variables and the catches and biology ofL.festivus, the first canonical axis and the first four canonical axes combined were statistically significant(P <0.05; Table 3).The first two canonical axes explained 82.5% of the variance in catches and 93.3% of the catches/environmental relationship (Table 3).Monsoon season scored high on the second RDA axis(Fig.3).For both the 38.1-mm and 51.0-mm mesh gillnets, the second RDA was positively correlated with several environmental variables(excluding turbidity) and fish biology variables, and was negatively correlated with non-monsoon, water temperature, pH, TIN and chlorophyll-a (Fig.3).

    Fig.3.Redundancy analyses plots of environmental variables explaining the gillnet (38.1- and 51.0-mm mesh) catches and biology of Labiobarbus festivus in Lake Kenyir during 12-months’ sampling between January and December 2016.Lf, Labiobarbus festivus; TIN, total dissolved nitrogen; HSI, heptosomatic index;DO, dissolved oxygen; TBM, total benthic macroinvertebrates.

    The PERMANOVA assessing the categorical effects of season and mesh size failed to return a significant pseudo-F for either main effect or their interaction on the number ofL.festivuscaught, or their growth coefficient (Table 4).However, there were significant effects of season on HSI (means ± SDs of 7.44 ± 4.94 and 2.61 ± 2.51 for monsoon and nonmonsoon seasons, respectively), and mesh size on the TLs and weights of fish, which manifested as incrementally greater sizes and weights with increasing mesh size (P <0.05; Table 1 and 4).

    Irrespective of mesh size, PERMANOVA (with DistLM) revealed that water turbidity strongly positively influenced the number ofL.festivuscaught (P <0.05; Fig.3, Table 5).And the HSI of fish was significantly and positively influenced by benthic macroinvertebrates, DO and phosphate and negatively influenced by water temperature (P <0.05;Fig.3, Table 5).Only phosphate and TIN significantly influenced the growth coefficient ofL.festivus, and with positive and negative effects,respectively (P <0.05; Fig.3, Table 5).

    3.2.Osteochilus hasseltii

    The first canonical axis and the first four canonical axes combined were also statistically significant forO.hasseltii(P <0.05; Table 3).The first two canonical axes explained 70.1% of the variation in catches and 92.9% of the catches/environmental relationship (Table 3).It was clear that fishing with the 38.1-mm gillnet during the monsoon season, and both gillnets during the non-monsoon scored high on the first RDA axis(Table 3; Fig.4).This axis was strongly positively correlated with the number of fish caught and chlorophyll-a, and negatively correlated withthe phosphate concentration in the water (Fig.4).

    Table 3Redundancy analyses (RDA) of environmental variables explaining the biology and catches of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii in gillnets deployed monthly in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia between January and December 2016.

    The observed influence of the smaller mesh on catches ofO.hasseltiiduring the monsoon season manifested as a significant interaction between mesh and season in the PERMANOVA (P <0.05; Table 4).However, irrespective of season and like forL.festivus, mean TL and weight were greater in the larger mesh size (P <0.05; Table 1 and 4).Neither the growth co-efficient nor HSI ofO.hasseltiiwere affected by mesh size or season (P >0.05; Table 1 and 4).

    Table 4PERMANOVA pseudo-Fs and significance for influence of season (monsoon vs non-monsoon), mesh size (31 vs 51 mm mesh; see Table 1 for means) and their interaction on the number, total length (cm), weight (g), growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index (HSI) of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii.

    PERMANOVA (with DistLM) revealed the number ofO.hasseltiicaught was significantly and positively influenced by the abundance of phytoplankton (chlorophyll-a concentration) (P <0.01), but was not significantly influenced by the phosphate concentration in the water (P>0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).The growth coefficient and HSI were positively influenced by water temperature and negatively influenced by water turbidity (P <0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).While other environmental variables (phytoplankton, Trichoptera and TBM densities, TIN and phosphate concentration and pH) slightly influenced the growth coeffi cient and HSI ofO.hasseltii, their influences were not statistically significant (P >0.05; Fig.4, Table 5).

    Fig.4.Redundancy analyses plots of environmental variables explaining the gillnet (38.1- and 51.0-mm mesh) catches and biology of Osteochilus hasseltii in Lake Kenyir during 12-months’ sampling between January and December 2016.Oh, Osteochilus hasseltii; TIN, total dissolved nitrogen; HSI, heptosomatic index;DO, dissolved oxygen; TBM, total benthic macroinvertebrates.

    Table 5PERMANOVA (with DistLM) pseudo-Fs and significance for the influence of various extrinsic factors on the catches, growth co-efficient and hepatosomatic index (HSI)of Labiobarbus festivus and Osteochilus hasseltii (irrespective of mesh size and season).

    4.Discussion

    This study provides a unique contribution towards understating important factors affecting gillnet efficiency/selectivity (e.g.Hamley,1975; Rudstam et al., 1984; Minns & Hurley, 1988; Losanes et al., 1992;Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1995; Jensen, 1995; Hansson & Rudstam, 1995;Hovgard, 1996a,b; Poulsen, Nielsen, Holst, & Sather, 2000; Gray,Johnson, et al., 2005; Gilman et al., 2010).Specifically, by sampling across a full 12-month cycle using three different-meshed gillnets in one fishery and collecting a plethora of environmental data, we have delineated species-specific variability among the relative importance of key variables such as food availability, water turbidity, temperature, DO and nutrients affecting the catches ofL.festivusandO.hasseltiiand also their biology.

    We acknowledge that these variables are probably not the limit of causality among observed catches-which could extend to the other factors affecting gillnet vulnerability (e.g.abundances of other fish species or effort by fishers) and should be assessed in future research.Nevertheless, the observed influences provide important information,which can be discussed according to possible life-history requirements for the studied species, and used to not only regulate regional effort, but also contribute towards fisheries management more broadly.

    The environmental dataset adequately explained variations among catches and the biology of each species quite well for each of the two mesh sizes with sufficient data, but clearly with divergent speciesspecific importance.Like for several other species, the gillnet catches ofL.festivuswere strongly affected by water turbidity (Balik & Cubuk,2000; Simasiku, Mafwila, & Sitengu, 2017).Such a result might reflect their reliance on visual stimuli considering this species generally resides in clear water and might not be proficient at detecting gillnets as turbidity increases (Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).Other factors, such as seasonal variation, did not affect the growth co-efficient and vulnerability ofL.festivusto capture, but did affect their HSI, which was strongly positively influenced during the monsoon, and negatively influenced during the non-monsoon season for both gillnets.Specific variables influencing HSI within these broad seasonal effects included water temperature, DO and phosphate concentrations and the abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates (dominated by Trichopterans).Considering the latter, one hypothesis to explain the positive effect on the HSI ofL.festivusmight be their dietary preferences (Amira et al., 2016; Rahman et al., 2009; Rahman & Balcombe, 2018), which although not studied here are known to be strongly directed towards insect larvae and detritus (Kottelat & Widjanarti, 2005).

    The remaining environmental factors (chlorophyll-a, as a measure of phytoplankton density, pH and turbidity) only slightly affected the biology ofL.festivus, and were not significant.This outcome may reflect Liebig’s law of the minimum whereby fish energetics are influenced by the combination of numerous factors, but for many species, are mostly controlled by the scarcest resources such as DO or food availability(Gibson, 1994; Hiddink & Kaiser, 2005).The observed negative relationship between water temperature and the biology ofL.festivusimplies the monsoon season is optimal for the growth of this species.Similar relationships have been recorded for various other teleosts in lakes and reservoirs (e.g.Kocovsky & Carline, 2001; Quist, Guy, Bernot, & Stephen, 2002).

    Unlike forL.festivus, the catches ofO.hasseltiiwere greatly influenced by the abundance of phytoplankton in lake water.Catches ofO.hasseltiiwere mostly greater during the non-monsoon season and probably due to changes in habitat selection and increased activity during the former seasons.A similar relationship between gillnet catch rates and the non-monsoon season has been observed for other species,includingPerca fluviatilisin Lake Doirani in Greece (Bobori & Salvarina,2010).

    Notwithstanding some effect of the non-monsoon season, there was a clear size-specific influence of the monsoon onO.hasseltii(evidenced via the PERMANOVA interaction between mesh size and season) which manifested as a negative influence on the catch and biology of largerO.hasseltii(as sampled by the 51.0-mm gillnet).While speculative, such a result may have reflected food and habitat preferences.According to Nurulnajwa (2004), smallO.hasseltiiare mostly planktivorous, while larger individuals feed on phytoplankton, zooplankton, aquatic invertebrates and detritus.At the onset of the monsoon, largerO.hasseltiiare known to migrate into inundated areas for feeding (mainly aquatic invertebrates) and spawning (Motomura, Tsukawaki, & Kamiya, 2002).Such size-specific shifting habitat and food preferences could explain the negative influence of monsoon on catches ofO.hasseltiiin the larger-meshed gillnet.

    We also observed that water temperature and turbidity positively and negatively influenced the growth coefficient and HSI, respectively ofO.hasseltiiwithout any clear seasonal influence.UnlikeL.festivus,water turbidity may not greatly affect the visionO.hasseltii, but could affect their biology (Table 5).Negative effects of turbidity on capture and biology are commonly observed in many freshwater fishes (Pekcan-Hekim.2007; Pekcan-Hekim & Lappalainen, 2006; Rahman &Verdegem, 2007).Considering the improved condition ofO.hasseltiiduring the non-monsoon period (and with significantly warmer temperatures than during the monsoon period), one hypothesis might be that this correlates better with the preferred temperature range,although further research is required to validate this hypothesis.

    5.Conclusions

    The data collected here have implications for optimal fine-scale harvesting of both species.In terms of absolute abundances, forL.festivusthe lack of any seasonal effect means the species could be sought during any period of turbid waters throughout the year.But,becauseL.festivusdemonstrated optimum biological condition (which by default might imply better flesh quality and therefore economic return) during the monsoon season, directed effort during this period would be advantageous in terms of maximizing profits for local fishers.In contrast, largeO.hasseltiiwould best be targeted during the nonmonsoon using the conventional gillnet, simply because the species demonstrated optimum biological condition during this period.For other areas of the species’ distributions, the observed relationships between extrinsic environmental factors and gillnet vulnerability could be used to refine targeting, although additional data would be required.

    The existing data also have implications for fishery-independent sampling and potential confounding effects.In particular, sporadic episodes of increased turbidity could confound time-series data forL.festivus, but notO.hasseltii.Such factors require consideration for effective stock assessments and to decipher trends during anomalous annual climatic events.Similar characteristics could affect the vulnerability of other freshwater species to gillnets elsewhere and warrant ongoing assessments.In this regard, our data support broader, more holistic evaluations of extrinsic factors affecting the gillnet vulnerability of targeted fish.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Mustafizur M.Rahman: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Software, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - review & editing.Ahmad Fathi: Data curation.Matt K.Broadhurst: Review and editing.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No author has any conflict of interest with the contents of the manuscript.

    Acknowledgments

    We are thankful to the International Islamic University Malaysia,Malaysia for providing financial support through P-RIGS18-032-0032 project.We also thank the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) for logistical support during the study, and the NSW Department of Primary Industries for the involvement of Matt Broadhurst.

    欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久99一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 88av欧美| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久青草综合色| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久久国产成人免费| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 91在线观看av| 无限看片的www在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| netflix在线观看网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 一级片免费观看大全| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 中文欧美无线码| av片东京热男人的天堂| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜91福利影院| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| av在线播放免费不卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| cao死你这个sao货| 制服诱惑二区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美乱妇无乱码| aaaaa片日本免费| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 99久久人妻综合| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久影院123| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 老司机靠b影院| 自线自在国产av| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 免费高清视频大片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久久国产成人免费| 大码成人一级视频| 成人三级做爰电影| av国产精品久久久久影院| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 99久久人妻综合| 88av欧美| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 自线自在国产av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 高清在线国产一区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| www日本在线高清视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 久久青草综合色| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 露出奶头的视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| xxx96com| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| a在线观看视频网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| www.自偷自拍.com| 丰满的人妻完整版| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 丝袜美足系列| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 91精品三级在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 久久精品成人免费网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产区一区二久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| av欧美777| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产麻豆69| 99国产精品99久久久久| av免费在线观看网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久中文看片网| 91av网站免费观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品第一国产精品| 精品福利观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲激情在线av| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费看十八禁软件| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久视频播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 丁香欧美五月| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 怎么达到女性高潮| 黄色 视频免费看| 91精品三级在线观看| 青草久久国产| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 丰满的人妻完整版| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲久久久国产精品| tocl精华| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久九九热精品免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产亚洲欧美98| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | avwww免费| 满18在线观看网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久国产精品影院| 搡老岳熟女国产| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品电影一区二区在线| 免费高清视频大片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产三级黄色录像| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 9色porny在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品国产国语对白av| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久伊人香网站| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | a在线观看视频网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| netflix在线观看网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 99国产精品99久久久久| av天堂在线播放| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| av有码第一页| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 免费少妇av软件| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产片内射在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲中文av在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 97碰自拍视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 少妇 在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 免费av中文字幕在线| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美日韩黄片免| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| av免费在线观看网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久香蕉激情| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久影院123| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日本免费a在线| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 丰满的人妻完整版| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 高清av免费在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 精品高清国产在线一区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲中文av在线| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 色在线成人网| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| a级毛片黄视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕色久视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 成人手机av| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 超碰成人久久| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久国产精品影院| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美色视频一区免费| 欧美日韩精品网址| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 一a级毛片在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 青草久久国产| 精品福利观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 久久草成人影院| 午夜影院日韩av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 乱人伦中国视频| 午夜老司机福利片| 精品电影一区二区在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产av在哪里看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 99国产综合亚洲精品| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 人人澡人人妻人| www.999成人在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 99香蕉大伊视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 美女午夜性视频免费| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 99热只有精品国产| 91老司机精品| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 级片在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成人免费观看视频高清| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 精品福利观看| 91国产中文字幕| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜免费鲁丝| 五月开心婷婷网| 咕卡用的链子| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 黄色 视频免费看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| avwww免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 99国产综合亚洲精品| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 999精品在线视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲激情在线av| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区|