• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Lateral abdominal wall reconstruction

    2021-05-07 06:31:32MichaelSmithSahilKapurAlexanderMericliDonaldBaumannCharlesButler
    Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2021年7期

    J. Michael Smith, Sahil K. Kapur, Alexander F. Mericli, Donald P. Baumann, Charles E. Butler

    1Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

    2Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

    Abstract

    Keywords: Abdominal wall hernia, flank hernia, biologic mesh, acellular dermal matrix, synthetic mesh,polypropylene surgical mesh, outcomes

    INTRODUCTION

    Lateral abdominal wall (LAW) defects are relatively complex musculofascial pathologies that often require the expertise of a reconstructive surgeon. A thorough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of available surgical options is important to increase the probability of reconstructive success for the specific clinical scenario encountered.

    Incidence

    LAW defects are defined as hernias, bulges, or surgical wounds that occur within the anatomic region bounded by the linea semilunaris, paraspinous muscles, costal margin, and iliac crest [Figure 1]. Although these defects may arise from congenital causes, most LAW defects occur as a consequence of traumatic injury or surgical intervention. Structural weakening of the LAW may result from direct injury to the myofascial structures, indirect attenuation caused by disruption of the segmental motor innervation of this region, or combinations thereof[1]. Procedures involving retroperitoneal access, chevron/Kocher incisions,and direct oncologic resection of the abdominal wall are associated with postoperative flank weakness and/or hernia at a reported rate ranging from 8% to 57%[2-4]. In a meta-analysis of 26 studies, Zhou and Carlson[5]identified a flank hernia incidence of 14% following nephrectomy and 20% following retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

    Risk factors

    Patient-specific risk factors that have been reported to be associated with the postoperative development of a flank hernia or bulge include elevated body mass index, history of tobacco use, chronic constipation,abdominal distension, end-stage renal disease, carcinoma, coronary artery disease, and chronic immunosuppression[2,5-7]. Surgical risk factors include retroperitoneal incision length greater than 15 cm,single-layer wound closure, failure to identify and/or preserve the neurovascular bundles, and postoperative surgical site infection[6,7].

    Classification

    LAW defects can be classified according to their specific anatomic subregion, underlying cause, and morphology. In 2007, the European Hernia Society created a classification system to describe both ventral abdominal wall and LAW incisional hernias[8]. In this classification scheme, the traditional borders of the LAW noted above are divided into four anatomic subregions: subcostal (between the costal margin and a horizontal line 3 cm above the umbilicus), flank (lateral to the rectus sheath extending from 3 cm above to 3 cm below the umbilicus), iliac (between a horizontal line 3 cm below the umbilicus and the inguinal region), and lumbar (laterodorsal of the anterior axillary line; Figure 2). With this system, defects can be further differentiated by size, length, and width. Although this provides a well-established framework for comparative analysis between studies, it can be complicated by instances where the defect extends beyond the aforementioned boundaries. In these cases, further categorization is based on the borders crossed.Examples include “subcostal” defects that extend beyond the costal margin into the chest wall and diaphragm, “paramedian” defects that extend medially beyond the linea semilunaris, “paraspinous” defects that involve the spinal musculature, and “hemipelvectomy” defects that result from resection of the iliac crest[1].

    Figure 1. Boundaries of the lateral abdominal wall.

    Figure 2. European Hernia Society lateral abdominal wall hernia anatomic subregions.

    Figure 3. Planes of mesh placement in the lateral and ventral abdominal wall.

    In addition to anatomic location, LAW defects can be classified as excisional defects, true hernias, or bulges.Excisional defects occur following resection of abdominal wall muscle, fascia, or skin. In contrast, hernias and bulges are a result of myofascial weakening arising from congenital, traumatic, or iatrogenic causes.Hernias and bulges can be differentiated by whether there is a true musculofascial opening (hernia) or not(bulge)[2].

    Diagnosis

    LAW defects are often diagnosed using a combination of patient history, physical examination, and confirmatory imaging. Affected patients often note an asymmetric protrusion on the affected side. Other patient concerns may include pain of the adjacent oblique or paraspinous musculature, gastrointestinal complaints, psychological distress, and difficulty with ambulation or other activities of daily living[5,9].Although emergent symptoms such as strangulation and incarceration are possible with flank hernias, these findings are less common when compared with ventral abdominal wall defects. Upon physical examination,one can often identify unilateral flank asymmetry by visual inspection alone. It is important to differentiate LAW hernias from bulges. Hernias involve a true myofascial defect, whereas bulges result from progressive attenuation of the myofascial tissues, most commonly after denervation injury. Myofascial defects, if present, may be difficult to discern in patients with an elevated body mass index. Computed tomography imaging is helpful to differentiate between hernias and bulges, and provides additional detail regarding the size of the defect, affected myofascial structures, and proximity of intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal structures.

    SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

    Although elective surgical correction is generally recommended in medically fit individuals with symptomatic LAW hernias, surgical intervention is less frequently undertaken in patients with a flank bulge in the absence of a true fascial defect. Whether elective reconstruction is undertaken depends on patient motivation, a thorough assessment of clinical risks and benefits, and the probability of success of the procedure.

    Surgical techniques

    Several surgical techniques have been proposed that vary regarding incision placement, type of mesh used,location of mesh placement, extent of mesh reinforcement, and surgical approach. Further consideration must be given to defects that cross into adjacent anatomic regions or require additional soft tissue reconstruction.

    Incision placement

    Given that many LAW defects occur as a result of prior surgical intervention, many techniques involve reentering the abdomen through the initial incision made during the primary procedure. This approach allows excellent visualization of the defect as well as direct excision of scar tissue, foreign bodies, and previously placed mesh[3]. One must be careful to preserve the cutaneous perforators because failure to do so will likely result in skin necrosis and wound breakdown when large flaps are raised. Zierenet al.[10]championed a midline approach through a median laparotomy incision. Proposed benefits include complete access to the defect through an uncompromised anatomic plane and the potential ability to offset asymmetric abdominal forces via mesh fixation to the contralateral rectus sheath. However, this approach is limited by the significant morbidity of the laparotomy incision and risk of infection and herniation at this site. Access to the LAW through a suprapubic abdominoplasty incision was proposed by Hoffmanet al.[9]in 2004. This approach offers visualization and access to both the ipsilateral and contralateral abdominal walls.Removal of excess skin and adipose tissue may offer additional cosmetic and functional benefits for patients.The major drawback is the need to elevate large soft tissue flaps. Furthermore, the utility of this approach may be limited in patients without significant abdominal lipodystrophy.

    Type of mesh

    Both synthetic and biologic meshes have been successfully used in the reconstruction of LAW defects.Important variables that may influence mesh selection include patient comorbidities, wound contamination, prior radiation, defect size, surgical technique, availability of omentum, and the quality of overlying soft tissue[1]. Synthetic mesh is often believed to have greater prolonged durability than biologic mesh. However, the prolonged foreign-body response associated with synthetic mesh can promote bowel adhesions, obstruction, and erosion through adjacent skin and viscera[1]. The regenerative properties of biologic mesh confer greater resistance to infection and adhesions, and thus these meshes are often favored for use in contaminated wounds. In cases where infection or exposure of the mesh does occur, biologic mesh can often be managed conservatively with dressing changes or local debridement, whereas synthetic mesh is more likely to require surgical explantation[3]. Revisionary procedures following biologic mesh implantation are often less complex owing to fewer and less tenacious adhesions and because these meshes can be incised and closed like native fascia[1]. Although biologic mesh is typically associated with higher perunit cost compared with synthetic alternatives, no studies so far have provided a long-term cost analysis for LAW reconstruction.

    Location of mesh placement

    The main anatomic locations of mesh placement used in LAW reconstruction are the onlay (overlay),intramural (also known as intraparietal), transversus abdominus muscle release (TAR), and underlay planes[Figure 3]. The overlay plane is located superficial to the anterior rectus sheath medially and the external oblique muscle laterally. The utility of onlay mesh is limited by an increased risk of recurrence and surgical site infection. Nevertheless, the use of this plane may be indicated in the reconstruction of select retroperitoneal defects where vital structures impede the use of other options and in techniques that use multiple layers of mesh reinforcement[1].

    Figure 4. (A) Direct mesh repair. (B) Pillar-anchored repair.

    The intramural plane lies between the internal and external oblique muscles. A significant benefit of this approach is the lack of important neurovascular structures in this plane[11]. Reconstruction in the intramural plane often requires imbrication of internal oblique myofascial advancement flaps prior to mesh placement and careful re-approximation of the external oblique muscle over the mesh[3,12,13].

    The transversus abdominus muscle release (TAR) plane exists between the transversus abdominus muscle and transversalis fascia and can be extended medially to enter the retrorectus plane. It allows placement of a large piece of mesh superficial to the posterior rectus sheath medially and transversalis fascia laterally[10,14,15].

    The underlay plane refers to both the preperitoneal and intraperitoneal planes. The preperitoneal plane exists between the transversalis fascia and the peritoneum. This can be a potentially challenging dissection owing to frequent obliteration of the tissue planes. The intraperitoneal plane lies deep to the peritoneal lining and is a common anatomic plane for minimally invasive approaches. The major limitation of the intraperitoneal plane is potential complications resulting from contact between the mesh and intraperitoneal viscera.

    Extent of mesh reinforcement

    The extent of mesh reinforcement is another important variable that can significantly influence the ultimate stability of the LAW reconstruction. There are two main categories of mesh reinforcement that vary with respect to the amount of mesh used and the underlying biophysical principles: direct mesh repair and pillaranchored repair.

    Direct mesh repair refers to the use of an underlay mesh that extends 3-5 cm beyond the immediate boundaries of the defect and is secured locally to healthy musculature [Figure 4A][12]. This technique is considered “l(fā)oad-sharing” because any applied force is transmitted to both the mesh and the muscular abdominal wall. Proponents of this technique suggest that anchoring the mesh to a dynamic structure optimizes abdominal wall compliance and decreases distraction forces at the mesh-tissue interface, which may ultimately translate to improved outcomes. They also cite a potential decrease in the risk of postoperative infection, adhesions, and patient discomfort because a relatively small piece of mesh is used[12]. In contrast, other techniques use a larger piece of mesh that is secured to more distant fixed structural supports.

    The pillar-anchored repair involves anchoring an underlay mesh to stable points of fixation along the borders of the LAW: the linea semilunaris, costal margin, inguinal ligament/iliac crest, and posterior paraspinal fascia [Figure 4B][2]. This technique is considered “l(fā)oad-bearing” because most of the applied force is transmitted to the mesh and static supporting structures instead of to the abdominal wall musculature. A recent study by Kapuret al.[2]compared outcomes of LAW reconstruction using direct mesh repair with those of LAW reconstruction using pillar-anchored repair. That study included 106 consecutive patients with a median follow-up of 28 months. Patients who underwent LAW reconstruction with pillaranchored repair had a 3.5-fold lower risk of hernia recurrence than those who underwent LAW reconstruction with direct mesh repair. Other outcomes such as surgical site occurrences and re-operation for complications did not differ between the two groups.

    Minimally invasive surgical techniques

    Laparoscopic and robotic techniques have been applied to LAW reconstruction to repair these defects in a minimally invasive fashion. Benefits associated with minimally invasive approaches include reduced infections, less postoperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay, quicker return to normal activities, and the potential for improved cosmesis[16,17]. Minimally invasive repairs often use intraperitoneal onlay mesh or transabdominal pre-peritoneal tissue planes for mesh placement. Although more technically challenging,transabdominal pre-peritoneal repairs offer the added benefit of shielding the mesh from the abdominal viscera[17]. Although less common, successful laparoscopic repair of interparietal flank hernias has also been described[18]. Drawbacks of minimally invasive approaches include the potential for visceral injury during bowel mobilization to improve visualization, difficulty addressing bulge-type defects, the challenge of maneuvering and securing large pieces of mesh, and a potentially steeper learning curve[19,20].

    Hybrid techniques

    Newer hybrid modalities that combine open and laparoscopic approaches have been proposed with the aim of capitalizing on the relative merits of each approach. Dissatisfied with residual bulges following traditional minimally invasive repair of flank hernias, Amaralet al.[21]in 2019 published a report of their experience with a novel hybrid “sandwich” technique. The procedure begins with laparoscopic adhesiolysis and colonic mobilization to visualize the defect and reduce the intra-abdominal components of the hernia. Following this, an open approach is used to excise the hernia sac, perform fascial closure, and place a reinforcing onlay mesh. Finally, the procedure returns to a laparoscopic approach for an intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. In their series of 16 patients, the authors reported 1 recurrence (6%) at 12 months after the surgery. The authors acknowledged that their recurrence rate is not superior to that reported in other published series of pure laparoscopic repairs by Moreno-Egeaet al.[16](3%) and Novitsky (0%), but the authors noted that excision of the hernia sac via an open approach may offer potential benefits in terms of reducing postoperative wound complications[14,21]. However, further research is needed to validate this claim and justify the likely increase in operative time and postoperative pain associated with this procedure.

    Special boundary considerations

    Defects that extend beyond the anatomic boundaries of the LAW and into adjacent territories such as the ventral abdomen, chest wall, retroperitoneum, and pelvis can pose a reconstructive challenge that merits special consideration. This often occurs in the context of oncologic extirpation.

    Defects that extend medially beyond the linea semilunaris require reinforcement of both the ventral abdominal wall and the LAW. Because the linea semilunaris has been compromised, it is no longer a stable fixation point for repair. In these instances, a modified pillar-anchored repair can be performed by securing a wide underlay mesh spanning the remaining boundaries of the LAW and the nearest pillar of strength,which is often the linea alba or contralateral linea semilunaris[1,2].

    Large chest wall resections can result in destabilization of the superior border of the LAW, loss of separation between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, and compromised respiratory mechanics. Lateral subcostal full-thickness excisions often include components of the ribs, diaphragm, and corresponding connective tissues. Although small peripheral defects may be corrected by suturing the diaphragm to the cut edge of the rib cage, larger resections require a more sophisticated reconstruction to restore the complex threedimensional anatomy of this region[1]. The remnant LAW and diaphragm are advanced and anchored to the unresected cephalad rib, and an underlay mesh is used to reinforce the repair [Figure 5].

    Figure 5. Management of extensive subcostal lateral abdominal wall defects. (A) Anatomic relationship of the diaphragm and the lateral abdominal wall. (B) Subcostal defect. (C) Underlay mesh placement to reinforce and re-establish separation between the thoracic and abdominal cavities. The mesh-diaphragm-abdominal wall complex is affixed to the intact rib.

    Resection of the iliac crest during an internal hemipelvectomy compromises the caudal support of the LAW.Reconstruction of these defects can be accomplished by securing an underlay mesh to the cephalad LAW and the superior aspect of the remaining iliac crest. The mesh is suture-anchored to the iliac crest by drilling holes into the osseous margin or by using bone anchors.

    Reconstruction of the posterior boundary of the LAW is complicated by the proximity of numerous important retroperitoneal structures. In cases where an underlay mesh cannot be used owing to the risk of neurovascular injury, the mesh may be placed in an onlay fashion. Mesh can also be placed in the transversus abdominus muscle release plane to reinforce this region. The mesh may be further reinforced by a soft tissue flap if significant retroperitoneal dead space is present[1].

    Soft tissue reconstruction

    Depending on the cause of the LAW defect, additional soft tissue reconstruction may be required to obliterate dead space and attain a tension-free closure. Important variables that influence operative planning include defect size, anatomic location, bacterial contamination, radiation exposure, and prior surgical history[22]. Given that the LAW is perfused by multiple overlapping angiosomes, many defects can be closed by local fasciocutaneous tissue advancement[1]. In certain cases, preoperative tissue expansion can be used to provide additional tissue for advancement. When local options are compromised by excessive skin resection, prior surgery, and radiation-induced fibrosis, pedicled or free flaps are required for wound closure[1,22]. Pedicled flap options for LAW reconstruction include vertical rectus abdominus, latissimus dorsi, anterolateral thigh vastus lateralis, and subtotal thigh flaps. If a pedicled flap would have limited reach or insufficient volume, a free tissue transfer is indicated. Thigh-based fasciocutaneous or musculocutaneous flaps offer large skin paddles and generous volume[1]. Regional recipient vessels include the superior/inferior epigastric, internal mammary, intercostal, and lumbar systems. Arteriovenous loops to the internal mammary and femoral vessels offer an alternative option if the aforementioned recipient vessels are unavailable.

    OUTCOMES

    Comparative analysis of LAW reconstruction outcomes is complicated by the relative rarity of these defects,variety of available surgical options, and overall heterogeneity of patient-specific factors that influence the reconstructive approach chosen. Much of the published literature on this topic consists of the presentation of novel surgical techniques in a small number of patients. Larger series have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of multiple approaches. In 2013, Moreno-Egeaet al.[16]published a comparative analysis of 35 laparoscopic and 20 open lumbar hernia repairs. The recurrence rates for laparoscopic (2.9%) and open(15%) hernia repairs were not statistically different (P= 0.13). In 2016, Patelet al.[4]reported their experience with open mesh repair of LAW hernias in 61 patients. The authors reported an overall recurrence rate of 11.5% at a mean follow-up of 15.4 months. In the largest series of LAW reconstructions to date,Kapuret al.[2]compared 47 patients who underwent direct repair (defined as an underlay mesh inset with a 5 cm overlap of healthy surrounding tissue) with 59 patients who underwent pillar-anchored repair. The authors noted that patients undergoing pillar-anchored repair experienced a 3.5-times lower risk of hernia recurrence than patients undergoing direct repair, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 months. In the only available comparative study regarding LAW defects, Zhou and Carlson[5]performed a qualitative analysis of 11 flank hernia repair studies. Although the included studies were a heterogeneous collection of uncontrolled series and case reports, the authors found an overall mean recurrence rate of 7%. Further expansion of the existing case series is needed to facilitate higher levels of comparative analysis.

    CONCLUSION

    Reconstruction of the LAW is a complex undertaking with several different available surgical options.Although recent studies have demonstrated the superiority of a pillar-anchored, load-bearing mesh repair,stronger clinical evidence generated by randomized controlled trials is needed to further inform the most optimal approach for this complex surgical problem. Surgeons should be aware of all available surgical options and choose an approach that maximizes the likelihood of long-term success for the specific patient being treated.

    DECLARATIONS

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Erica Goodoff, Senior Scientific Editor in the Research Medical Library at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, for editing this article.

    Authors’ contributions

    Participated in the accumulation of data, literature review, writing, and editing of this manuscript: Smith JM, Kapur SK, Mericli AF, Baumann DP, Butler CE

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2021.

    国产毛片在线视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一级爰片在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 午夜免费观看性视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 操美女的视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 成人国语在线视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 青草久久国产| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产 一区精品| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 99热网站在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品在线美女| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 精品久久久久久电影网| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 18禁观看日本| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 老司机靠b影院| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 黄色视频不卡| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 老熟女久久久| 午夜影院在线不卡| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产精品.久久久| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 午夜激情av网站| 免费少妇av软件| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产三级在线视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| av天堂在线播放| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久狼人影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 制服诱惑二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| www.精华液| 91在线观看av| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 女警被强在线播放| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 色综合站精品国产| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 级片在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成人免费观看视频高清| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 搡老岳熟女国产| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| svipshipincom国产片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 久久久久国内视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| bbb黄色大片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 看免费av毛片| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 免费高清视频大片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲av美国av| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 久99久视频精品免费| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产99白浆流出| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一区在线观看完整版| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 多毛熟女@视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| 看黄色毛片网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲九九香蕉| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| av天堂在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲全国av大片| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 超碰成人久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一区二区三区精品91| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 69av精品久久久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 美女大奶头视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 丁香欧美五月| 中国美女看黄片| 9191精品国产免费久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 日本 欧美在线| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲激情在线av| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 9色porny在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| www.999成人在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲第一av免费看| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 手机成人av网站| 国产av精品麻豆| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久伊人香网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 超碰成人久久| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 9色porny在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 色在线成人网| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产成人影院久久av| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久九九热精品免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费看十八禁软件| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 91成年电影在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 伦理电影免费视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| av欧美777| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日本 av在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲国产看品久久| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 一a级毛片在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 在线观看一区二区三区| 校园春色视频在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| svipshipincom国产片| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 在线观看一区二区三区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲av熟女| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 一本久久中文字幕| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| av天堂在线播放| 成人国语在线视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久亚洲真实| 精品国产亚洲在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 九色国产91popny在线| www.999成人在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 9色porny在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精华一区二区三区| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 九色国产91popny在线| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | svipshipincom国产片| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 满18在线观看网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 免费观看精品视频网站| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 人人澡人人妻人| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 成人手机av| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲av美国av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 天天添夜夜摸| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产成人精品无人区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久久久久久久中文| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 欧美午夜高清在线| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 国产区一区二久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久香蕉激情| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 老司机福利观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲av成人av| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 久久久国产成人免费| 91成人精品电影| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| netflix在线观看网站| av视频在线观看入口| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一夜夜www| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲色图av天堂| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 久久久久久久午夜电影|