• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Lateral abdominal wall reconstruction

    2021-05-07 06:31:32MichaelSmithSahilKapurAlexanderMericliDonaldBaumannCharlesButler
    Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2021年7期

    J. Michael Smith, Sahil K. Kapur, Alexander F. Mericli, Donald P. Baumann, Charles E. Butler

    1Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

    2Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

    Abstract

    Keywords: Abdominal wall hernia, flank hernia, biologic mesh, acellular dermal matrix, synthetic mesh,polypropylene surgical mesh, outcomes

    INTRODUCTION

    Lateral abdominal wall (LAW) defects are relatively complex musculofascial pathologies that often require the expertise of a reconstructive surgeon. A thorough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of available surgical options is important to increase the probability of reconstructive success for the specific clinical scenario encountered.

    Incidence

    LAW defects are defined as hernias, bulges, or surgical wounds that occur within the anatomic region bounded by the linea semilunaris, paraspinous muscles, costal margin, and iliac crest [Figure 1]. Although these defects may arise from congenital causes, most LAW defects occur as a consequence of traumatic injury or surgical intervention. Structural weakening of the LAW may result from direct injury to the myofascial structures, indirect attenuation caused by disruption of the segmental motor innervation of this region, or combinations thereof[1]. Procedures involving retroperitoneal access, chevron/Kocher incisions,and direct oncologic resection of the abdominal wall are associated with postoperative flank weakness and/or hernia at a reported rate ranging from 8% to 57%[2-4]. In a meta-analysis of 26 studies, Zhou and Carlson[5]identified a flank hernia incidence of 14% following nephrectomy and 20% following retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

    Risk factors

    Patient-specific risk factors that have been reported to be associated with the postoperative development of a flank hernia or bulge include elevated body mass index, history of tobacco use, chronic constipation,abdominal distension, end-stage renal disease, carcinoma, coronary artery disease, and chronic immunosuppression[2,5-7]. Surgical risk factors include retroperitoneal incision length greater than 15 cm,single-layer wound closure, failure to identify and/or preserve the neurovascular bundles, and postoperative surgical site infection[6,7].

    Classification

    LAW defects can be classified according to their specific anatomic subregion, underlying cause, and morphology. In 2007, the European Hernia Society created a classification system to describe both ventral abdominal wall and LAW incisional hernias[8]. In this classification scheme, the traditional borders of the LAW noted above are divided into four anatomic subregions: subcostal (between the costal margin and a horizontal line 3 cm above the umbilicus), flank (lateral to the rectus sheath extending from 3 cm above to 3 cm below the umbilicus), iliac (between a horizontal line 3 cm below the umbilicus and the inguinal region), and lumbar (laterodorsal of the anterior axillary line; Figure 2). With this system, defects can be further differentiated by size, length, and width. Although this provides a well-established framework for comparative analysis between studies, it can be complicated by instances where the defect extends beyond the aforementioned boundaries. In these cases, further categorization is based on the borders crossed.Examples include “subcostal” defects that extend beyond the costal margin into the chest wall and diaphragm, “paramedian” defects that extend medially beyond the linea semilunaris, “paraspinous” defects that involve the spinal musculature, and “hemipelvectomy” defects that result from resection of the iliac crest[1].

    Figure 1. Boundaries of the lateral abdominal wall.

    Figure 2. European Hernia Society lateral abdominal wall hernia anatomic subregions.

    Figure 3. Planes of mesh placement in the lateral and ventral abdominal wall.

    In addition to anatomic location, LAW defects can be classified as excisional defects, true hernias, or bulges.Excisional defects occur following resection of abdominal wall muscle, fascia, or skin. In contrast, hernias and bulges are a result of myofascial weakening arising from congenital, traumatic, or iatrogenic causes.Hernias and bulges can be differentiated by whether there is a true musculofascial opening (hernia) or not(bulge)[2].

    Diagnosis

    LAW defects are often diagnosed using a combination of patient history, physical examination, and confirmatory imaging. Affected patients often note an asymmetric protrusion on the affected side. Other patient concerns may include pain of the adjacent oblique or paraspinous musculature, gastrointestinal complaints, psychological distress, and difficulty with ambulation or other activities of daily living[5,9].Although emergent symptoms such as strangulation and incarceration are possible with flank hernias, these findings are less common when compared with ventral abdominal wall defects. Upon physical examination,one can often identify unilateral flank asymmetry by visual inspection alone. It is important to differentiate LAW hernias from bulges. Hernias involve a true myofascial defect, whereas bulges result from progressive attenuation of the myofascial tissues, most commonly after denervation injury. Myofascial defects, if present, may be difficult to discern in patients with an elevated body mass index. Computed tomography imaging is helpful to differentiate between hernias and bulges, and provides additional detail regarding the size of the defect, affected myofascial structures, and proximity of intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal structures.

    SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

    Although elective surgical correction is generally recommended in medically fit individuals with symptomatic LAW hernias, surgical intervention is less frequently undertaken in patients with a flank bulge in the absence of a true fascial defect. Whether elective reconstruction is undertaken depends on patient motivation, a thorough assessment of clinical risks and benefits, and the probability of success of the procedure.

    Surgical techniques

    Several surgical techniques have been proposed that vary regarding incision placement, type of mesh used,location of mesh placement, extent of mesh reinforcement, and surgical approach. Further consideration must be given to defects that cross into adjacent anatomic regions or require additional soft tissue reconstruction.

    Incision placement

    Given that many LAW defects occur as a result of prior surgical intervention, many techniques involve reentering the abdomen through the initial incision made during the primary procedure. This approach allows excellent visualization of the defect as well as direct excision of scar tissue, foreign bodies, and previously placed mesh[3]. One must be careful to preserve the cutaneous perforators because failure to do so will likely result in skin necrosis and wound breakdown when large flaps are raised. Zierenet al.[10]championed a midline approach through a median laparotomy incision. Proposed benefits include complete access to the defect through an uncompromised anatomic plane and the potential ability to offset asymmetric abdominal forces via mesh fixation to the contralateral rectus sheath. However, this approach is limited by the significant morbidity of the laparotomy incision and risk of infection and herniation at this site. Access to the LAW through a suprapubic abdominoplasty incision was proposed by Hoffmanet al.[9]in 2004. This approach offers visualization and access to both the ipsilateral and contralateral abdominal walls.Removal of excess skin and adipose tissue may offer additional cosmetic and functional benefits for patients.The major drawback is the need to elevate large soft tissue flaps. Furthermore, the utility of this approach may be limited in patients without significant abdominal lipodystrophy.

    Type of mesh

    Both synthetic and biologic meshes have been successfully used in the reconstruction of LAW defects.Important variables that may influence mesh selection include patient comorbidities, wound contamination, prior radiation, defect size, surgical technique, availability of omentum, and the quality of overlying soft tissue[1]. Synthetic mesh is often believed to have greater prolonged durability than biologic mesh. However, the prolonged foreign-body response associated with synthetic mesh can promote bowel adhesions, obstruction, and erosion through adjacent skin and viscera[1]. The regenerative properties of biologic mesh confer greater resistance to infection and adhesions, and thus these meshes are often favored for use in contaminated wounds. In cases where infection or exposure of the mesh does occur, biologic mesh can often be managed conservatively with dressing changes or local debridement, whereas synthetic mesh is more likely to require surgical explantation[3]. Revisionary procedures following biologic mesh implantation are often less complex owing to fewer and less tenacious adhesions and because these meshes can be incised and closed like native fascia[1]. Although biologic mesh is typically associated with higher perunit cost compared with synthetic alternatives, no studies so far have provided a long-term cost analysis for LAW reconstruction.

    Location of mesh placement

    The main anatomic locations of mesh placement used in LAW reconstruction are the onlay (overlay),intramural (also known as intraparietal), transversus abdominus muscle release (TAR), and underlay planes[Figure 3]. The overlay plane is located superficial to the anterior rectus sheath medially and the external oblique muscle laterally. The utility of onlay mesh is limited by an increased risk of recurrence and surgical site infection. Nevertheless, the use of this plane may be indicated in the reconstruction of select retroperitoneal defects where vital structures impede the use of other options and in techniques that use multiple layers of mesh reinforcement[1].

    Figure 4. (A) Direct mesh repair. (B) Pillar-anchored repair.

    The intramural plane lies between the internal and external oblique muscles. A significant benefit of this approach is the lack of important neurovascular structures in this plane[11]. Reconstruction in the intramural plane often requires imbrication of internal oblique myofascial advancement flaps prior to mesh placement and careful re-approximation of the external oblique muscle over the mesh[3,12,13].

    The transversus abdominus muscle release (TAR) plane exists between the transversus abdominus muscle and transversalis fascia and can be extended medially to enter the retrorectus plane. It allows placement of a large piece of mesh superficial to the posterior rectus sheath medially and transversalis fascia laterally[10,14,15].

    The underlay plane refers to both the preperitoneal and intraperitoneal planes. The preperitoneal plane exists between the transversalis fascia and the peritoneum. This can be a potentially challenging dissection owing to frequent obliteration of the tissue planes. The intraperitoneal plane lies deep to the peritoneal lining and is a common anatomic plane for minimally invasive approaches. The major limitation of the intraperitoneal plane is potential complications resulting from contact between the mesh and intraperitoneal viscera.

    Extent of mesh reinforcement

    The extent of mesh reinforcement is another important variable that can significantly influence the ultimate stability of the LAW reconstruction. There are two main categories of mesh reinforcement that vary with respect to the amount of mesh used and the underlying biophysical principles: direct mesh repair and pillaranchored repair.

    Direct mesh repair refers to the use of an underlay mesh that extends 3-5 cm beyond the immediate boundaries of the defect and is secured locally to healthy musculature [Figure 4A][12]. This technique is considered “l(fā)oad-sharing” because any applied force is transmitted to both the mesh and the muscular abdominal wall. Proponents of this technique suggest that anchoring the mesh to a dynamic structure optimizes abdominal wall compliance and decreases distraction forces at the mesh-tissue interface, which may ultimately translate to improved outcomes. They also cite a potential decrease in the risk of postoperative infection, adhesions, and patient discomfort because a relatively small piece of mesh is used[12]. In contrast, other techniques use a larger piece of mesh that is secured to more distant fixed structural supports.

    The pillar-anchored repair involves anchoring an underlay mesh to stable points of fixation along the borders of the LAW: the linea semilunaris, costal margin, inguinal ligament/iliac crest, and posterior paraspinal fascia [Figure 4B][2]. This technique is considered “l(fā)oad-bearing” because most of the applied force is transmitted to the mesh and static supporting structures instead of to the abdominal wall musculature. A recent study by Kapuret al.[2]compared outcomes of LAW reconstruction using direct mesh repair with those of LAW reconstruction using pillar-anchored repair. That study included 106 consecutive patients with a median follow-up of 28 months. Patients who underwent LAW reconstruction with pillaranchored repair had a 3.5-fold lower risk of hernia recurrence than those who underwent LAW reconstruction with direct mesh repair. Other outcomes such as surgical site occurrences and re-operation for complications did not differ between the two groups.

    Minimally invasive surgical techniques

    Laparoscopic and robotic techniques have been applied to LAW reconstruction to repair these defects in a minimally invasive fashion. Benefits associated with minimally invasive approaches include reduced infections, less postoperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay, quicker return to normal activities, and the potential for improved cosmesis[16,17]. Minimally invasive repairs often use intraperitoneal onlay mesh or transabdominal pre-peritoneal tissue planes for mesh placement. Although more technically challenging,transabdominal pre-peritoneal repairs offer the added benefit of shielding the mesh from the abdominal viscera[17]. Although less common, successful laparoscopic repair of interparietal flank hernias has also been described[18]. Drawbacks of minimally invasive approaches include the potential for visceral injury during bowel mobilization to improve visualization, difficulty addressing bulge-type defects, the challenge of maneuvering and securing large pieces of mesh, and a potentially steeper learning curve[19,20].

    Hybrid techniques

    Newer hybrid modalities that combine open and laparoscopic approaches have been proposed with the aim of capitalizing on the relative merits of each approach. Dissatisfied with residual bulges following traditional minimally invasive repair of flank hernias, Amaralet al.[21]in 2019 published a report of their experience with a novel hybrid “sandwich” technique. The procedure begins with laparoscopic adhesiolysis and colonic mobilization to visualize the defect and reduce the intra-abdominal components of the hernia. Following this, an open approach is used to excise the hernia sac, perform fascial closure, and place a reinforcing onlay mesh. Finally, the procedure returns to a laparoscopic approach for an intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. In their series of 16 patients, the authors reported 1 recurrence (6%) at 12 months after the surgery. The authors acknowledged that their recurrence rate is not superior to that reported in other published series of pure laparoscopic repairs by Moreno-Egeaet al.[16](3%) and Novitsky (0%), but the authors noted that excision of the hernia sac via an open approach may offer potential benefits in terms of reducing postoperative wound complications[14,21]. However, further research is needed to validate this claim and justify the likely increase in operative time and postoperative pain associated with this procedure.

    Special boundary considerations

    Defects that extend beyond the anatomic boundaries of the LAW and into adjacent territories such as the ventral abdomen, chest wall, retroperitoneum, and pelvis can pose a reconstructive challenge that merits special consideration. This often occurs in the context of oncologic extirpation.

    Defects that extend medially beyond the linea semilunaris require reinforcement of both the ventral abdominal wall and the LAW. Because the linea semilunaris has been compromised, it is no longer a stable fixation point for repair. In these instances, a modified pillar-anchored repair can be performed by securing a wide underlay mesh spanning the remaining boundaries of the LAW and the nearest pillar of strength,which is often the linea alba or contralateral linea semilunaris[1,2].

    Large chest wall resections can result in destabilization of the superior border of the LAW, loss of separation between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, and compromised respiratory mechanics. Lateral subcostal full-thickness excisions often include components of the ribs, diaphragm, and corresponding connective tissues. Although small peripheral defects may be corrected by suturing the diaphragm to the cut edge of the rib cage, larger resections require a more sophisticated reconstruction to restore the complex threedimensional anatomy of this region[1]. The remnant LAW and diaphragm are advanced and anchored to the unresected cephalad rib, and an underlay mesh is used to reinforce the repair [Figure 5].

    Figure 5. Management of extensive subcostal lateral abdominal wall defects. (A) Anatomic relationship of the diaphragm and the lateral abdominal wall. (B) Subcostal defect. (C) Underlay mesh placement to reinforce and re-establish separation between the thoracic and abdominal cavities. The mesh-diaphragm-abdominal wall complex is affixed to the intact rib.

    Resection of the iliac crest during an internal hemipelvectomy compromises the caudal support of the LAW.Reconstruction of these defects can be accomplished by securing an underlay mesh to the cephalad LAW and the superior aspect of the remaining iliac crest. The mesh is suture-anchored to the iliac crest by drilling holes into the osseous margin or by using bone anchors.

    Reconstruction of the posterior boundary of the LAW is complicated by the proximity of numerous important retroperitoneal structures. In cases where an underlay mesh cannot be used owing to the risk of neurovascular injury, the mesh may be placed in an onlay fashion. Mesh can also be placed in the transversus abdominus muscle release plane to reinforce this region. The mesh may be further reinforced by a soft tissue flap if significant retroperitoneal dead space is present[1].

    Soft tissue reconstruction

    Depending on the cause of the LAW defect, additional soft tissue reconstruction may be required to obliterate dead space and attain a tension-free closure. Important variables that influence operative planning include defect size, anatomic location, bacterial contamination, radiation exposure, and prior surgical history[22]. Given that the LAW is perfused by multiple overlapping angiosomes, many defects can be closed by local fasciocutaneous tissue advancement[1]. In certain cases, preoperative tissue expansion can be used to provide additional tissue for advancement. When local options are compromised by excessive skin resection, prior surgery, and radiation-induced fibrosis, pedicled or free flaps are required for wound closure[1,22]. Pedicled flap options for LAW reconstruction include vertical rectus abdominus, latissimus dorsi, anterolateral thigh vastus lateralis, and subtotal thigh flaps. If a pedicled flap would have limited reach or insufficient volume, a free tissue transfer is indicated. Thigh-based fasciocutaneous or musculocutaneous flaps offer large skin paddles and generous volume[1]. Regional recipient vessels include the superior/inferior epigastric, internal mammary, intercostal, and lumbar systems. Arteriovenous loops to the internal mammary and femoral vessels offer an alternative option if the aforementioned recipient vessels are unavailable.

    OUTCOMES

    Comparative analysis of LAW reconstruction outcomes is complicated by the relative rarity of these defects,variety of available surgical options, and overall heterogeneity of patient-specific factors that influence the reconstructive approach chosen. Much of the published literature on this topic consists of the presentation of novel surgical techniques in a small number of patients. Larger series have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of multiple approaches. In 2013, Moreno-Egeaet al.[16]published a comparative analysis of 35 laparoscopic and 20 open lumbar hernia repairs. The recurrence rates for laparoscopic (2.9%) and open(15%) hernia repairs were not statistically different (P= 0.13). In 2016, Patelet al.[4]reported their experience with open mesh repair of LAW hernias in 61 patients. The authors reported an overall recurrence rate of 11.5% at a mean follow-up of 15.4 months. In the largest series of LAW reconstructions to date,Kapuret al.[2]compared 47 patients who underwent direct repair (defined as an underlay mesh inset with a 5 cm overlap of healthy surrounding tissue) with 59 patients who underwent pillar-anchored repair. The authors noted that patients undergoing pillar-anchored repair experienced a 3.5-times lower risk of hernia recurrence than patients undergoing direct repair, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 months. In the only available comparative study regarding LAW defects, Zhou and Carlson[5]performed a qualitative analysis of 11 flank hernia repair studies. Although the included studies were a heterogeneous collection of uncontrolled series and case reports, the authors found an overall mean recurrence rate of 7%. Further expansion of the existing case series is needed to facilitate higher levels of comparative analysis.

    CONCLUSION

    Reconstruction of the LAW is a complex undertaking with several different available surgical options.Although recent studies have demonstrated the superiority of a pillar-anchored, load-bearing mesh repair,stronger clinical evidence generated by randomized controlled trials is needed to further inform the most optimal approach for this complex surgical problem. Surgeons should be aware of all available surgical options and choose an approach that maximizes the likelihood of long-term success for the specific patient being treated.

    DECLARATIONS

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Erica Goodoff, Senior Scientific Editor in the Research Medical Library at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, for editing this article.

    Authors’ contributions

    Participated in the accumulation of data, literature review, writing, and editing of this manuscript: Smith JM, Kapur SK, Mericli AF, Baumann DP, Butler CE

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2021.

    老汉色∧v一级毛片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 超色免费av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 男女国产视频网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 成人手机av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 永久网站在线| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产精品成人在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 在线观看国产h片| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一级片'在线观看视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久青草综合色| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人国语在线视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 日韩中字成人| 最黄视频免费看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久99精品国语久久久| 男女边摸边吃奶| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 午夜福利视频精品| 高清不卡的av网站| 99九九在线精品视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 中国国产av一级| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 男女国产视频网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产在线免费精品| 日本免费在线观看一区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 美女中出高潮动态图| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 熟女av电影| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一区二区av电影网| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲精品一二三| a级毛片在线看网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产在线免费精品| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 伦理电影免费视频| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 美女国产视频在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 一区福利在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 乱人伦中国视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲精品第二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 99久久综合免费| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 色哟哟·www| 国产乱来视频区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久国产一区二区| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 免费看不卡的av| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲内射少妇av| videossex国产| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 中文字幕制服av| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 超色免费av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久免费观看电影| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 精品少妇内射三级| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 韩国av在线不卡| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 18禁观看日本| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 97在线人人人人妻| 五月开心婷婷网| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产片内射在线| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| freevideosex欧美| 成人影院久久| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产 一区精品| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产在线免费精品| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美97在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久久久视频综合| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一区二区av电影网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| av网站在线播放免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 两性夫妻黄色片| www日本在线高清视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 免费观看性生交大片5| 考比视频在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 在线观看人妻少妇| 久久这里只有精品19| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一本久久精品| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久av网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 桃花免费在线播放| 日日啪夜夜爽| 观看av在线不卡| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| av天堂久久9| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产精品.久久久| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 成人影院久久| 久久久久网色| 国产色婷婷99| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合色惰| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 黄频高清免费视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 婷婷色综合www| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 中国国产av一级| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 一个人免费看片子| av免费在线看不卡| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 香蕉精品网在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 天堂8中文在线网| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久影院123| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 中国国产av一级| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 成人国产av品久久久| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 中国国产av一级| 欧美在线黄色| 一区在线观看完整版| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 777米奇影视久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品.久久久| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 观看美女的网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久久久网色| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久影院123| 日韩电影二区| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 性色av一级| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久热在线av| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 搡老乐熟女国产| 超碰成人久久| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日本色播在线视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| av在线播放精品| 1024香蕉在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 视频区图区小说| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 人妻 亚洲 视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| av有码第一页| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品免费大片| 在线天堂中文资源库| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 中文天堂在线官网| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 五月开心婷婷网| av在线播放精品| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| av在线app专区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 三级国产精品片| 男女边摸边吃奶| a 毛片基地| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品亚洲成国产av| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久久久久精品精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 有码 亚洲区| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产极品天堂在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一个人免费看片子| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 满18在线观看网站| 性色av一级| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 在线 av 中文字幕| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲精品第二区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 成人国语在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 中文字幕制服av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 一区在线观看完整版| 18禁观看日本| 久久这里只有精品19| av在线老鸭窝| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产野战对白在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 日韩电影二区| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久97久久精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av|