• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Enhanced recovery and medical management after head and neck microvascular reconstruction

    2021-05-07 06:31:30SunderGidumalDouglasWorrallNoelPhanAnthonyTanellaSamuelDeMariaBrettMiles
    Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2021年7期

    Sunder Gidumal, Douglas Worrall, Noel Phan, Anthony Tanella, Samuel DeMaria, Brett Miles

    1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.

    2Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.

    Abstract

    Keywords: Enhanced recovery, fast track surgery, major head and neck surgery, preoperative carbohydrate loading,evidence-based medicine, surgical outcomes, length of stay, cost

    INTRODUCTION

    Protocols to expedite patient recovery after surgery were first pioneered in the late 1990s by colorectal and cardiothoracic surgeons looking to reduce length of hospital stay and postoperative complications.Conventional postsurgical care for these populations frequently involved a hospital stay of five to ten days and significant postoperative complications, such as prolonged ileus, loss of physical mobility, and poor wound healing[1-4]. Surprisingly, innovations in surgical technique, such as the advent of laparoscopy over open abdominal surgery, had a limited impact on patient recovery; thoughtful standardization of pre-,intra-, and post-operative care, however, was shown to improve outcomes and enhance recovery after surgery significantly. A paper by Kehletet al.[5], “Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome”, is often credited as the first systematic review to compile and evaluate many of these perioperative interventions. From this paper and others, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) was developed and gave way to the significant developments in this field over the last decade.

    The foundational concept of ERAS is that major surgery incites a significant biologic stress response in the patient. Length of stay and severity of postoperative complications correlate with the magnitude of this stress and how it is managed. Interventions aimed at reducing the magnitude of this stress response are paramount and are performed in the following ways[6-8]:

    · A multidisciplinary team working together to reduce the impact of surgery;

    · A multimodal approach to resolving issues that delay recovery and cause complications;

    · A standardized, evidence-based approach to all phases of perioperative care;

    · Changes in management using interactive and continuous audits.

    Some reviews in multiple surgical fields have been performed on this subject in efforts to compile the most compelling interventions for readers to learn from and implement in their own institutions. Our research team has published previously on this topic, specifically highlighting interventions applicable to head and neck surgery and its patient population[8]. This review builds upon and emphasizes that work while also focusing on compelling perioperative interventions that have not yet reached universal acceptance despite convincing evidence and thus have not been discussed much elsewhere. While certain well-established interventions, such as perioperative antibiotics and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, often have the strongest data to support their use, we have included these established practices only for completeness in the final section on “accepted practices”. We hope to focus the attention of our readership on the interventions that may not currently be in practice at their respective institutions in the hopes of future widespread investigation and implementation [Figure 1].

    Figure 1. Overview of perioperative ERAS interventions. The interventions highlighted in this review have been chosen because they have demonstrated compelling evidence to merit their inclusion in an ERAS program, but they still lack universal acceptance among those providing care for patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery.

    ERAS for major head and neck surgery

    ERAS protocols have become increasingly popular in the field of head and neck surgery over the last decade[9-11]. The ERAS Society, a nonprofit medical society, was formed in 2010 to promote and develop ERAS programs and build on foundational work in enhanced recovery in colorectal and thoracic surgery from the beginning of the century. The official ERAS society recommendations for head and neck surgery were published in 2017, setting off a slew of research both to report outcomes of the implementation of these protocols as well as to trial new interventions that build off the tenets of ERAS[12].

    While the composition of interventions comprising an ERAS protocol has differed amongst the many head and neck institutions reporting results of their ERAS implementation, the results of these implementations are often similar. In particular, implementation studies have demonstrated that, compared to control groups treated with conventional perioperative care, ERAS patient cohorts experience reduced ICU and hospital stays, reduced delay between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, diminished narcotic use in the first 24-72 h after surgery, and fewer overall complications[13-16].

    Rather than focusing on the clinical outcomes of implementing a comprehensive ERAS pathway as many groups have already done successfully, we instead direct our attention to individual interventions themselves and the physiology that explains their success. These enhanced recovery interventions are chronologically organized into three categories: (1) preoperative, which includes both pre-and postadmission interventions; (2) intraoperative; and (3) postoperative, which includes both pre-and postdischarge interventions. We seek to shed light on select interventions within each category that have demonstrated clinical success and have sound physiologic explanations but have not yet been established in widespread use; we make a case for their implementation in future ERAS protocols.

    Preoperative interventions

    Patient education and anxiolytics

    Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery often present stress and anxiety on the day of surgery.Fear of surgical and anesthetic complications, anxiety about a prolonged hospital stay, and the uncertainty surrounding a cancer treatment course are all factors that can contribute to increasing a patient’s psychological stress levels. Furthermore, previously published bio-behavioral models of stress have demonstrated that psychological stress worsens wound healing and increases the risk of tumor recurrence through the same mechanisms as physiological stress. These mechanisms include increased insulin and cortisol secretion, increased production of arachidonic acid, and increased catabolism[8,17,18].

    A patient’s understanding of their planned treatment is often limited to that discussed in a preoperative clinic visit, which may parallel diagnostic discovery related to their disease process. Enhanced preoperative communication between surgeon and patient may alleviate patient anxiety and mitigate increased stress levels before surgery. It may be done by building a shared understanding of the surgical plan and setting expectations regarding the pre-and post-operative course[17-19]. Additionally, an independent discussion with the anesthesiologist in the preoperative setting has been shown to reduce stress levels[18,19]. While the value of these discussions is obvious, the time required to adequately counsel patients undergoing complex head and neck surgery is often a barrier in the real-world setting, given the pressures of clinical practice. While these discussions’ most effective timing and exact content have not been well described, managing patient expectations and improving their understanding of treatment course are recommended as an early part of enhanced recovery protocol and represents a target for improvement[8,20,21].

    Assessment of preoperative nutritional status

    Up to 57% of head and neck cancer patients suffer from malnutrition caused by catabolic tumor cytokines,mechanical obstruction within the aerodigestive tract, and anorexia from alterations in neurotransmitters and immunoregulatory hormones[8,22]. Malnutrition leads to an immunocompromised state and predisposes patients to postoperative complications such as poor wound healing, infection, poor survival outcomes, and increased risk of locoregional recurrence[8,23].

    Originally developed in 1984 to screen surgical candidates for malnutrition prior to gastrointestinal surgery,Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has gained significant traction as a preferred nutritional screen prior to head and neck surgery[24]. PNI uses a simple formula [Figure 2] to calculate a nutritional score with just two variables: serum albumin and total lymphocyte count. A PNI ≤ 40 is associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo grade II and IIIa as well as prolonged hospital stay[25]. Furthermore, a PNI score under 40 has been shown as a stronger and more consistent prognostic indicator for postoperative complications due to malnutrition than body mass index[25]. In addition to the surgical setting use, PNI has also been used successfully to predict worse outcomes after chemotherapy, demonstrating the wide-ranging applicability of the metric as an indicator of malnutrition[26]. While other validated nutritional screens have also been employed to screen for nutritional status in head and neck populations, no single metric of malnutrition has yet been established as the standard of care[26]. Interestingly, despite the supporting evidence, many institutions do not utilize PNI routinely in clinical practice. It is believed that all patients presenting as candidates for head and neck surgery should be screened using PNI, and patients should be referred to a dietician for further evaluation and management.

    Figure 2. Formula for Onodera’s Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI).

    Preoperative immunonutrition

    When possible, patients who suffer from malnutrition may benefit from a brief delay prior to surgery to undergo nutritional prehabilitation, a practice that has been shown to improve postoperative outcomes. The administration of immunonutrition, nutritional formulas containing essential nutrients to promote adequate immune response after medical treatment or surgery, has demonstrated improved outcomes[27]. In addition to supplementing caloric intake to combat malnutrition, immunonutritional formulas are often comprised of a variety of immunoactive additives, including L-arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA nucleotides. L-arginine, in particular, has garnered the most attention for its beneficial impact on wound healing and infection prevention prior to surgery.

    L-arginine (now “arginine”), an amino acid, is an essential component of both the urea cycle and the nitric oxide cycle[28]. Although arginine is synthesized in the kidney from citrulline, additional dietary arginine is needed for growth, wound repair, and infection prevention[29]. Arginine improves wound healing through two mechanisms: the generation of nitric oxide as well as the upregulation of growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor. Firstly, nitric oxide (NO), the chemical that forms the basis for many vasodilatory medications such as nitroglycerin, is generated from arginine in the nitric acid cycle. The biological effects of NO on vascular tone have been shown to improve blood flow to free flaps in both healthy and diseased individuals, with effects lasting for weeks after administration[30,31]. Secondly, dietary arginine administration has been shown to elevate serum levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). These hormones are key components of the anabolic response required for wound healing and are associated with increased collagen production[31,32]. The improved wound healing afforded by arginine administration has been shown to reduce fistula formation after surgery for oral and laryngeal cancer, with greater effect associated with higher doses up to 20 g/day[33-35].

    Arginine also improves infection prevention. Firstly, the increased blood flow due to NO generation improves microbial defenses by increasing white blood cell delivery to tissue. Secondly, through mechanisms that are not completely understood, arginine increases the response of peripheral lymphocytes to mitogenic stimulus and restores the activity of macrophages often depressed by physiologic stress[31,36].However, it is notable that adverse clinical outcomes have been reported with the administration of arginine after the establishment of a severe infection rather than as infection prophylaxis, a finding that has been attributed to the maladaptive reduction in blood pressure that can come from NO generation in the setting of septic hypotension[37].

    Very recent outcomes research has further substantiated claims that arginine improves both wound healing and infection prevention. A Cochrane meta-analysis from 2018 of 19 randomized controlled trials evaluating immunonutrition administration prior to head and neck surgery demonstrated a significant reduction in the rate of fistula formation among patients who received the intervention[38]. Furthermore, two extensive studies published after this meta-analysis also demonstrated significant reductions in hospital length of stay and wound infection complications[27,39]. While the most effective dosing and timing of preoperative supplementation are not yet established, it is our view that all patients, particularly those with malnutrition, should receive immunonutritional supplementation prior to scheduled head and neck surgery to reduce the risk of wound complications and prolonged hospital stay.

    Reduced fasting

    For decades, patients have been instructed not to eat or drink after midnight the day before surgery in order to mitigate the risks of aspiration during anesthetic induction and intubation. Nothing by mouth, or “nil per os (NPO)”, after midnight is thought to cause dehydration, increase anxiety and physiologic stress, and induce a catabolic state that increases insulin resistance and perioperative hyperglycemia[40]. Perioperative hyperglycemia is associated with numerous perioperative complications such as the increased risk of infection, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, and interventions that reduce hyperglycemia have successfully reduced postoperative complications[41,42]. Furthermore, the instructions of nothing by mouth after midnight might be misconstrued as instructions not to take certain daily medications, such as antihypertensives, the abstinence from which can increase cardiac lability in the perioperative period[41-43].

    The American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) most recently published new preoperative fasting guidelines in 2017, which are liberal than the conventional teaching of NPO after midnight and consider the risks of complications imparted by more stringent fasting criteria[44]. These updated guidelines allow for the consumption of heavy foods up to 8 h before surgery, light foods up to 6 h before surgery, and clear liquids up to 2 h before surgery. They assume normal gastrointestinal anatomy and function and apply to elective procedures requiring general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, or sedation. Because many patients undergoing major head and neck surgery have disease processes or comorbidities that may increase the risk of aspiration (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease, altered anatomy along the upper aerodigestive tract),many institutions use the cutoff of 8 h of fasting for any solid foods, light or heavy.

    Perioperative nutrient loading (glucose, protein)

    The physiologic stress of surgery induces a metabolic response that results in insulin resistance and subsequent hyperglycemia[40,45]. As previously mentioned, hyperglycemia in the intraoperative and postoperative settings is associated with significant morbidities, such as poor wound healing, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary complications, and heart failure[41,42]. Preoperative oral carbohydrate loading,through consumption of a carbohydrate-rich clear liquid up to 2 h before surgery, has been shown to increase insulin sensitization in the intraoperative setting[46]. This practice minimizes preoperative gluconeogenesis and glycogen depletion and reduces insulin resistance by 50%, lowering the risk of perioperative hyperglycemia and its associated comorbidities[46,47]. Evidence indicates that many patients are likely to benefit from the practice of oral carbohydrate loading with carbohydrate-rich clear liquids up to 2 h before surgery.

    While solid data on the benefits of preoperative carbohydrate loading has been recognized, newer evidence suggests that patients who add protein to their preoperative carbohydrate bolus demonstrate even fewer postoperative complications than those who take carbohydrates alone[48]. While the mechanism of action is not yet clear, it is thought that in addition to further reducing insulin resistance, the addition of protein or amino acids to the preoperative oral carbohydrate load reduces the acute-phase inflammatory response to surgery. It has been demonstrated through measurements of c-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation,which appears to be lower in patients taking protein with their preoperative carbohydrate than those taking carbohydrates alone and those taking just water before surgery[48-50]. Prior studies have demonstrated that elevated levels of inflammatory markers in the first 24 h after surgery are associated with higher rates of postoperative complications; thus, through this mechanism, protein supplementation prior to surgery is thought to reduce postoperative complications[51]. Although a further study will be required to elucidate the precise mechanism of action of this intervention, we recommend considering preoperative oral loading with 25 g of carbohydrates and 7 g of protein or amino acids to reduce insulin resistance and inflammation perioperatively.

    Intraoperative interventions

    Anesthetic agents

    Short-acting anesthetic agents, such as propofol and remifentanil, are preferred for maintaining anesthesia during head and neck surgery. Long-acting agents are associated with an increased risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events, leading to worse patient outcomes[52,53].Furthermore, recent data suggest an association between volatile anesthetics, such as desflurane,sevoflurane, isoflurane, and increased rates of cancer metastasis. The completion of an ongoing randomized controlled trial, General Anesthetics in Cancer Resection Surgery (GA-CARES Trial - NCT03034096), may shed more light on whether the choice of general anesthetic impacts long-term cancer morbidity and mortality. While those data are completed, we currently favor the use of short-acting total intravenous anesthesia in place of traditional inhaled anesthetic agents.

    Vitamin C administration

    Recent data support the administration of intravenous vitamin C in the perioperative setting as a mechanism to reduce postoperative pain and narcotic usage[54,55]. Vitamin C, a water-soluble vitamin found widely in fruits and vegetables, plays a prominent role in wound healing and hemostasis. It is best exemplified by the pathologic state that develops in vitamin C deficiency, scurvy, which is characterized by spontaneous bleeding, anemia, and gingival ulceration. Vitamin C is also known that have antinociceptive properties that exert an ameliorative effect on chronic pain syndromes[56-58]. Vitamin C, administered intravenously shortly before surgery or shortly after anesthetic induction, appears to significantly reduce pain scores and opioid use starting 1 h after surgery and lasting up to 48 h[54]. Given the remarkably low acute toxicity of vitamin C and the absence of any reported adverse effects of this practice, practitioners may wish to consider intravenous administration of 3 g of vitamin C 30 min after anesthetic induction.

    Avoiding routine tracheostomy

    Routine tracheostomy is often used to secure the airway following reconstructive head and neck surgery within the oral cavity. This practice reduces airway resistance, improves patient comfort, and reduces the need to manipulate the newly reconstructed field in cases in which postoperative ventilatory support is required[59]. The practice of routine tracheostomy in head and neck surgery may also be rooted in anecdotal surgical experience or anesthesiologist’s comfort levels. However, tracheostomy is associated with a high complication rate of 8%-45%[60]. These complications include tracheomalacia, tracheal stenosis, obstruction of the tracheostomy cannula, tracheo-innominate and tracheoesophageal fistulas, pneumonia, and bleeding to adjacent structures[61]. Furthermore, the presence of a tracheostomy tube increases rates of dysphagia and aspiration because the laryngeal elevation is restricted during swallowing[59].

    As an alternative to routine tracheostomy, recent evidence supports overnight orotracheal or nasotracheal intubation as a means to secure the airway against the risk of postoperative airway edema. In some cases,extubation in the operating room with close observation is the most appropriate management. Compared with patients who underwent tracheostomy, patients who were managed with overnight intubation were found to have reduced overall length of hospital stay, the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, time to first oral intake, and rates of lower respiratory infections[59,62,63]. The downsides of overnight intubation include prolonged sedation, reliance on an intensive care setting to provide management for intubated patients requiring a ventilator, and the lack of a secure airway once extubation is performed. Interestingly, the outcomes classically associated with prolonged sedation such as atelectasis and increased length of stay,however, have been shown to occur more frequently in patients with tracheostomies[62]. Furthermore, the increased cost associated with an ICU stay is more than offset by the reduction in cost associated with an earlier time to discharge[64,65]. However, certain procedures may preclude the possibility of avoiding a tracheostomy due to a less stable airway or aerodigestive reconstruction. While we recognized the challenges of airway management and certainly favor a case-by-case approach, we recommend that routine tracheostomy practices should be avoided.

    Postoperative interventions

    Early diet initiation

    Early initiation of oral diet is an essential tenet amongst ERAS programs in all surgical fields[66-68]. It has been established that early postoperative enteral, rather than parenteral, feeding reduces the risk of infection,improves insulin resistance, improves nutritional uptake, and ultimately reduces the length of hospital stay in surgical patients[60,69]. The increase in gastrointestinal (GI) hormone secretion associated with enteral feeding has been shown to improve both macrophagic activity and absorptive function in the GI tract and is the mechanism by which the clinical benefits of enteral feeding are attributed[70].

    Head and neck patients represent a unique population due to violation of oral cavity and pharyngeal structures and have traditionally been kept nothing-by-mouth after major head and neck surgery for six to twelve days to avoid salivary fistula[71]. Postoperative enteral nutrition, either through a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube, is now common, with parenteral nutrition reserved only for patients with an absence of intestinal function or with contraindications to enteral access[12]. In the last decade, however, new evidence in the general surgery field has shown benefits of early oral feeding compared to enteral therapy. These benefits include a decreased length of stay and improved quality of life[72,73]. Furthermore, weak evidence supports early oral intake as a mechanism to preserve muscle memory associated with swallowing[74].Historically, however, head and neck services have hesitated to start an oral diet on the first postoperative day (POD-1) out of concern that overuse of the tongue and pharynx could increase the risk of wound dehiscence and fistula formation in the aerodigestive tract. Until recently, head and neck surgery data on the benefits of early oral regimens had been sparse and inconclusive[60,71]. It has led to the continued avoidance of standardized oral diet initiation for head and neck patients[8].

    However, recent work in the field of head and neck surgery has demonstrated convincing evidence that initiation of oral diet on POD-1 reduces the length of stay without an increase in perioperative complications[75]. More compelling evidence now supports older studies that had occasionally shown that rates of fistula formation were not increased by early oral feeding[76-79]. Together with the aforementioned promising data seen in the general surgery populations, these findings suggest that oral feeding as early as postoperative day one is likely to improve dysphagia outcomes, quality of life, and length of stay in patients after head and neck oncologic surgery. We are currently exploring clinical trials in order to compare outcomes of early oral feedingvs.traditional approaches.

    Tracheostomy management

    For patients who require tracheostomy, early tracheostomy tube cuff deflation, 24 h capping trials to judge readiness for decannulation, and subsequent early decannulation are all practices that have improved outcomes in tracheostomized patients[8,12]. Additionally, recent data have supported the implementation of two new strategies for managing tracheostomies in the postoperative setting: immediate use of an uncuffed tracheostomy tube and the use of high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT).

    Immediate placement of an uncuffed tracheostomy tube, rather than placement of a cuffed tube with subsequent deflation, has recently been shown to reduce time to decannulation as well as the length of stay[80]. Uncuffed tracheostomy tubes both reduce resistance to airflow around the tube, allowing for earlier assessment of readiness for decannulation, and reducing pressure on the esophagus, diminishing the risk of dysphagia in the postoperative setting. While it has been proposed that the lack of a cuff to prevent tracheal secretions from entering the lower airway may lead to increased rates of lower respiratory infection,equivalent rates of respiratory complications have been found in cuffed and uncuffed populations[80].

    High flow oxygen therapy through a tracheostomy tube has reduced rates of postoperative pulmonary complications in preliminary work[81]. Oxygen provided at a rate of 60 L/min from the cessation of mechanical ventilation to decannulation reduces anatomical dead space and improves airway humidification, thus decreasing the risk of mucous plugging and retention of respiratory secretions[82,83].Patients undergoing HFOT did not suffer from adverse events often associated with positive-pressure oxygenation such as pneumothorax. Furthermore, these patients benefited from reduced time to mobilization, reduced physiotherapy needs and decreased overall length of stay[81]. Further work in larger study populations will be required to establish HFOT as common practice in patients after tracheotomy.

    Wound care

    While postoperative wound care after head and neck surgery must be individualized, the use of specific dressing types for skin grafts and specific drainage mechanisms after neck dissection facilitate faster recovery, reduced pain, and lower infection rates. The management of the donor sites for split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) has garnered attention because patients often report more pain from the skin graft donor site than from the reconstructive sites where the majority of surgery is performed[84]. STSG donor sites heal more quickly, with fewer infections, and with less pain with hydrocolloid dressings [e.g., DuoDERM hydrocolloid (ConvaTec, Princeton, NJ)] compared with non-moist dressings (e.g., sterile gauze). While other moist dressings [e.g., Tegaderm transparent film (3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN)] lead to slower healing than hydrocolloid, they also demonstrate superiority over non-moist dressings with respect to healing and infection rates[85,86].

    The use of prophylactic mechanical drains following neck dissection helps prevent the accumulation of serosanguinous fluid under skin flaps before hematomas or seromas can develop. Active drains, such as the Jackson-Pratt (JP), provide low or high levels of negative pressure to remove fluid actively from a cavity.Compared to passive drains, such as Penrose, active drains facilitate more rapid healing and better adherence to skin flaps. The often-cited concern that the negative pressure of an active drain compromises a microvascular anastomosis has not consistently been demonstrated[87].

    Finally, the use of wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is a safe, established practice in head and neck surgery that is used to aid in the healing of complex wounds. When administered over skin graft recipient sites, wound VAC therapy has been shown to increase graft acceptance rates and decrease healing time compared to conventional wound care[88]. More recently, the immediate use of perioperative wound VAC therapy in the neck has been shown to be safe after neck dissection and microvascular anastomosis.This practice demonstrated lower rates of infection when compared to conventional therapy and was not associated with any events of vascular compromise[89]. Additional work is required to determine whether wound VAC therapy to the neck also demonstrates superiority over more conventional active draining mechanisms when applied immediately after neck dissection and microsurgery.

    Pain management

    The use of multimodal analgesia in the postoperative setting has been shown to reduce overall opioid use and expedite recovery[12,90-92]. Pain regimens consisting of multiple opioid-sparing analgesics, such as gabapentin, acetaminophen, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), have demonstrated synergistic effects and enable the reservation of opioids for breakthrough pain alone[13]. Gabapentin, in particular, appears to provide a significant ameliorative effect on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption when administered preoperatively and continued in the postoperative setting[93,94]. Regional anesthesia through nerve blocks performed pre- and intra-operatively has demonstrated success in reducing postoperative pain scores without a significant increase in morbidity[95,96]. Notably, however, intraoperative infusion of long-acting local anesthetics into donor sites after harvest for free flap reconstruction does not appear to reduce postoperative pain scores[97]. Additionally, the use of longer-acting opioids or those with reduced habit-forming potentials, such as methadone or tramadol, decreases overall opioid usage, reduces postoperative pain, and increases patients’ quality of life[95,98,99].

    Despite widespread beliefs to the contrary, NSAIDs, such as ketorolac, celecoxib, and diclofenac, have been shown not to increase the risk of postoperative bleeding in surgical patients[100-103]. However, a synergistic effect between ketorolac and heparin used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis appears to increase the risk of bleeding in head and neck patients when used together, despite neither agent increasing the risk when used alone[104-106]. These findings have been interpreted to caution the concomitant use of NSAIDs and heparin derivatives and to encourage individualization of the use of NSAIDs based on the analgesic needs and bleeding risk of the patient[8].

    Accepted postoperative practices

    Several perioperative interventions that have established as part of routine care in the setting of head and neck surgery; we mention them here for completeness. Preoperatively, the benefits of cessation of alcohol intake and smoking are widely documented; patients should be counseled to undergo these lifestyle modifications prior to surgery and encouraged to maintain these changes even after the perioperative period. Antibiotic prophylaxis against surgical site infections during clean-contaminated surgical cases is well-established, with the administration of antibiotics typically 1 h prior to surgery and continued for 24 h[107-110]. Intraoperatively, the benefits of regional nerve blocks, normothermia, prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting, and goal-directed hemodynamic therapy are published widely.Postoperatively, prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis is a widely accepted practice to reduce the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism[111]. Although no randomized clinical trial has been conducted to lend evidence to the utility of perioperative free flap monitoring, the practice of intensive monitoring every 1-4 h for up to 72 h after surgery has become routine[12,112-114]. Lastly, the need for and benefit of early mobilization and pulmonary physical therapy after the surgery is commonly accepted to reduce the incidence of postoperative vascular, musculoskeletal, and pulmonary complications[4,12,60,66-68,115-118].

    CONCLUSION

    The application of ERAS protocols to head and neck surgical populations has become more widespread in the last decade. Continued evaluation of newly developed interventions presents an ongoing opportunity to reduce the length of hospital stay, treatment costs, and complication rates and improve patient quality of life. These interventions also provide an opportunity for future investigations to improve outcomes in head and neck microvascular surgery.

    DECLARATIONS

    Authors’ contributions

    Made substantial contributions to the conception of the study, performed literature analysis, and interpretation, and contributed to the manuscript writing process: Gidumal S, Worrall D, Tanella A, Phan N

    Made substantial contributions to the conception of the study, contributed to the manuscript writing process, and provided administrative, technical, and material support: DeMaria S, Miles B

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    All figures are original. The authors give consent for publication.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2021.

    国产淫片久久久久久久久| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久6这里有精品| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 视频区图区小说| 一级a做视频免费观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 色综合色国产| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产成人aa在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 免费看av在线观看网站| kizo精华| 亚洲自拍偷在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 简卡轻食公司| 日本一本二区三区精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 老司机影院成人| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产精品一及| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 99热全是精品| 毛片女人毛片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久97久久精品| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲av福利一区| xxx大片免费视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| av一本久久久久| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 五月开心婷婷网| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99热网站在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 插逼视频在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 乱系列少妇在线播放| av黄色大香蕉| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲四区av| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久热精品热| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产成人a区在线观看| 色综合色国产| 成人国产麻豆网| av在线天堂中文字幕| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 69人妻影院| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 久久久久久久久久成人| 岛国毛片在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲色图av天堂| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 如何舔出高潮| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 色吧在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 一级毛片我不卡| 91精品国产九色| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日韩电影二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产成人福利小说| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 99热这里只有精品一区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲成色77777| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 美女高潮的动态| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 午夜视频国产福利| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日本与韩国留学比较| 五月开心婷婷网| av线在线观看网站| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品999| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 搞女人的毛片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| videossex国产| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 嫩草影院入口| 黑人高潮一二区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| av黄色大香蕉| 精品久久久精品久久久| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 免费观看在线日韩| 一区二区三区精品91| 黄片wwwwww| 97在线视频观看| 久久6这里有精品| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产高清三级在线| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产综合精华液| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 99久久精品热视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 中文欧美无线码| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 精品酒店卫生间| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 深夜a级毛片| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 美女高潮的动态| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 黄片wwwwww| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产成人freesex在线| 一级毛片 在线播放| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 永久网站在线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 在线观看人妻少妇| av免费观看日本| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久精品夜色国产| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| videos熟女内射| 国产乱人视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| av专区在线播放| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| av网站免费在线观看视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产精品一及| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 内射极品少妇av片p| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品无大码| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| www.色视频.com| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| av在线老鸭窝| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美日本视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 老司机影院毛片| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲av男天堂| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 六月丁香七月| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲av.av天堂| 极品教师在线视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲性久久影院| 草草在线视频免费看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 成人二区视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品.久久久| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 免费看光身美女| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品成人在线| 极品教师在线视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产成人freesex在线| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲四区av| av在线亚洲专区| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久精品性色| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 精品午夜福利在线看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 91精品国产九色| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 丝袜喷水一区| 中文欧美无线码| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 免费看日本二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久97久久精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 黄色配什么色好看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 三级经典国产精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产成人精品福利久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| av播播在线观看一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲av男天堂| 观看美女的网站| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 欧美日本视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 性色av一级| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品三级大全| 日日啪夜夜爽| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产精品一及| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 99久久人妻综合| 97超视频在线观看视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日韩电影二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 一本一本综合久久| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费看不卡的av| 在线观看国产h片| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久影院123| 亚洲最大成人中文| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产淫语在线视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲精品一二三| 色播亚洲综合网| 搞女人的毛片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久热久热在线精品观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 毛片女人毛片| freevideosex欧美| 男女国产视频网站| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日本免费在线观看一区| 一级黄片播放器|