• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Mature stand developmental stage has ceased to constitute the most suitable habitat for the capercaillie in the Augustów Forest,Poland

    2021-02-28 09:13:20StanisawDrozdowskiDorotaZawadzkaGrzegorzZawadzkiMarcinStudnickiandBogdanBrzeziecki
    Forest Ecosystems 2021年4期
    關(guān)鍵詞:綜上生產(chǎn)性稅負(fù)

    Stanis?aw Drozdowski,Dorota Zawadzka,Grzegorz Zawadzki* ,Marcin Studnicki and Bogdan Brzeziecki

    Abstract

    Keywords:Habitat suitability,Lek occupancy,Logistic regression,Lowland forest,Stand structure,Tetrao urogallus

    Background

    Forest management has a profound impact on forest habitat conditions (Angelstam 1996; Battles et al. 2001).It leads to forest fragmentation, the disappearance of a forest’s natural structure, the shortening of the stand developmental cycle, and a reduction of the area of oldgrowth stage (e.g. Angelstam et al. 2004; L?hmus et al.2005; Zawadzka et al. 2016). Other effects include a reduction of the volume of dead wood as well as an elimination of natural disturbance patterns and structures(Linder and ?stlund 1998; Lindenmayer and McCarthy 2002; Bujoczek et al. 2018). Birds are an important group of organisms affected by forest practices in many different ways (Scheringer and Schumacher 2004; Basile et al. 2019). The birds which are most sensitive to habitat changes are highly-specialised species, especially those connected with mature forests (Rosenvald and L?hmus 2003; Roberge and Angelstam 2006; Czeszczewik et al. 2014; Zawadzka et al. 2018). The maintenance and conservation of forest biodiversity, including rare bird species, is one of the significant challenges of modern forestry(Basile et al. 2016).

    In Europe,one of the most endangered forest bird species is the capercaillie Tetrao urogallus, which is considered an iconic species serving an “umbrella” role(Pakkala et al. 2003; L?hmus et al. 2017). The capercaillie is a rare sedentary forest grouse species that lives in the old, natural forest complexes of a larger size, occurring in certain boreal and mountainous regions of Europe (Storch 2001, 2007; Jahren et al. 2016). It has proved to be among the birds which are most sensitive to the anthropogenic changes of forest habitat, not least due to a large amount of living space required by both individuals and the whole populations of this species(Rolstad and Wegge 1987; Angelstam 2004; Angelstam et al. 2004; Wegge and Rolstad 2011). The global climate warming can also have a negative impact on the grouse population (Moss et al. 2001; Storch 2007; Poirazidis et al. 2019). As a result of the anthropogenic pressure related to habitat loss, forest management, and hunting, the last two centuries witnessed the species’ retreat from large parts of both Western and Central Europe (Tomia?oj? 2000).

    Population declines among capercaillies have, in fact,been observed in almost all European countries for some time now.However,the process has been most rapid in the central and southern parts of the species’fragmented European range (Zawadzka and Zawadzki 2003; Storch 2007).The capercaillie is listed in Annex 1 of the EU’s Birds Directive, and is also Red-Listed as an endangered species– and under strict protection – in 21 European countries,including Poland(G?owaciński 2001;Storch 2007).

    Capercaillie extinctions and population declines are both associated with habitat loss and fragmentation, as well as intensified land-use by people (e.g. in sport, tourism and recreation, and forest management) (Storch 2007, 2013; Thiel et al. 2011; Moss et al. 2014; Coppes et al. 2017, 2018). The major reasons for changes in the habitat of the species are considered to relate to the development of commercial forestry, where large areas are clear-felled (Saniga, 2003; Wegge and Rolstad, 2011;Mikolá? et al., 2015; K?mmerlea et al. 2020). The remaining areas of old-growth forests are too small and isolated, and extensive areas of young and middle-aged stands are characterised by unsuitably high densities of trees(Sirki? et al.2011).In general,the negative influences of forestry manifest mostly in the destruction of lekking sites along with the surrounding territories occupied by males, as well as, partly, in overall habitat loss and forest fragmentation (Rolstad and Wegge 1987; Miettinen et al.2010; Wegge and Rolstad 2011; Mikolá? et al. 2015).Changes in the structure of forest landscape, induced by forest management, affect the distribution of leks and the area occupied by the capercaillie (Angelstam 2004; Zizas et al. 2017). Besides the direct influences (such as clearcutting in lek areas), modern forestry has affected populations of the capercaillie also in an indirect manner,namely through its tendency to cause change in forest structure,age, and stand composition (Broome et al. 2014;Braunisch et al. 2019). In forests which are managed,natural disturbances – characteristic of unmanaged old-growth forests that do favour the formation of a forest structure suitable for the capercaillie – play only a minor role (Mikolá? et al. 2017). The widespread fencing of forest plantations results in grouse collisions. Locally, it can represent an important cause of mortality, as is the case in Scotland (Baines and Summers 1997). Collisions with fences as a cause of mortality of the capercaillie have also been documented in Poland (Zawadzka 2014).

    In the Carpathian Mountains, selective logging at low intensity was reported as affecting the population of the local capercaillies in a positive way. In contrast, the proportion of forest clear-cuts in an area as well as the intensity of tourism are both seen to exert a significant negative influence on the numbers of males present at leks (Mikolá? et al., 2015).

    In recent decades, several studies have made it clear that lekking is not at all confined to areas of a mature forest (Rolstad et al. 2007). The occurrence of the capercaillie is seen to be conditioned not only by the specific stand structure in the area of the lek, but also by the quality of forest habitat analysed on the landscape scale(Storch 2002; Sirki? et al. 2011; Brzeziecki et al. 2012;Zizas et al. 2017).

    The identification of habitat requirements of the capercaillie is a precondition for its effective conservation.The same can be said about the co-existing species,whose needs are less demanding but which benefit from the conservation measures adopted with regard to the capercaillie, which makes it a recognised umbrella species (Suter et al. 2002; Pakkala et al. 2003). Recently,studies on forest grouse, mainly the capercaillie, has focused on the ecological requirements, particularly habitat preferences (Moss et al. 2010). Inadequate attention to the capercaillie’s habitat requirements is among the reasons for failures to achieve an effective reintroduction of the species (Merta et al. 2015).

    Studies of habitat preferences have been conducted in order to determine the probability of the occurrence of the capercaillie. Work has also been done on areas occupied by still-relatively-large populations (Storch 2002;Braunisch and Suchant 2007; Teuscher et al. 2011), as well as by ones heading for extinction (Graf et al. 2005,2007; Bollmann et al. 2011; Mikolá? et al., 2015). There are two emerging approaches to the assessment of habitat for capercaillies. In mountainous areas of Central Europe, the main kind of work uses mathematical modelling to identify habitat features associated with the highest probabilities of the species being present (e.g.Storch 2002; Bollmann et al. 2005, 2011; Braunisch and Suchant 2007; Graf et al. 2005, 2006, 2007; Teuscher et al. 2011). In Fennoscandia and the Baltic countries,there have been analyses of the long-term influence of structural change induced by forest management on the distribution of leks and changes in numbers of the birds(Gregersen and Gregersen 2008; Miettinen et al. 2010;Sirki? et al. 2010,2011; Wegge and Rolstad 2011;Leivitis 2014; L?hmus et al. 2017; Zizas et al. 2017).

    In the work presented here, the emphasis has been put on a detailed investigation of the habitat requirements of the species, which has been assessed in relation to the small and isolated natural population (of ca. 50–80 individuals) still living in the lowlands of North-Eastern Poland, in the managed part of the Augustów Forest.Based on the long-term monitoring of the capercaillie on the leks (Zawadzki and Zawadzka 2008, 2012), a total of 18 leks (9 active and 9 abandoned) were selected for field measurements. We investigated hierarchy and importance among 13 variables characterising the forest habitat within a 1-km radius of each of those 18 leks. At the latter stage, we considered the absolute and relative significances of each of the above variables,using a logistic regression with regard to the current status of leks within the managed forest as either abandoned or still occupied.

    We hypothesised that changes in habitat structure at the stand scale were the key reason for the disappearance of the capercaillie from some locations in the Augustów Forest. Our expectation was that the identification of the importance of particular habitat features might prove to be useful in formulating recommendations concerning the active protection of habitat suitable for the capercaillie in the context of modern forestry.Moreover,the recognition of the most important variables characterising stand structure would help to determine the probability of the occurrence of species in any particular part of the forest. Our study would,therefore,offer indirect help with the assessment of the impact of forest management and other factors on the capercaillie’s habitat conditions, at the same time providing a basis for recommendations concerning habitat management.

    Materials and methods

    Materials

    The study area and data collection

    The Augustów Forest is the home of one of the country’s four isolated populations of the capercaillie. The Polish part of the Augustów Forest is located in the north-eastern part of the country (at 23°15′ E, 53°54′ N,Fig. 1) and extends over 1140 km2. The area is fairly flat,with a range of elevations between 135 and 190 m a.s.l.The climate is relatively cold, with a mean annual temperature of 6.5°C, a 135-day growing season, and snow cover typically present for around 100 days a year.Forest cover here is of around 93%, while lakes account for a further 6% of the area. Tree stands are dominated by Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) (78%), Norway spruce(Picea abies) (8%), black alder (Alnus glutinosa) (9%), silver birch (Betula verrucosa) (5%), and pedunculate oak(Quercus robur) (1%). The understorey is formed mainly by spruce, while the bush layer consists mainly of young spruces and common junipers (Juniperus communis),with the cover of these varying from one stand to another. The mean age of tree stands here is 65 years, with stands older than 100 years accounting for about 15% of the overall area of forest. The mesic pine forest site type,distinguished by a big share of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), accounts for almost 40% of the area, while 27% is occupied by mesic mixed coniferous forest site type with bilberry and bush-grass (Calamagrostis epigeios). Some 7% of the forest area is classified as a wet alder forest.The Augustów Forest is included in Europe’s Natura 2000 network as the Special Protection Area for Birds PLB200002 “Puszcza Augustowska”. Most of the area comprises managed stands supervised by six Forest Districts of Poland’s State Forests National Forest Holding.Over the past several hundred years, this forest has been intensively managed with the use of a clear-cutting system. Clear-cuts were regenerated by either natural seeding (by leaving seed trees) or by direct seeding and/or planting.The study area has not been impacted by major natural disturbances, with these affecting small areas at most (Reindl 1965; Soko?owski 2010).

    Fig.1 Study areas in the Augustów Forest(North-Eastern Poland).Black points –active Key Areas around leks,open points–abandoned KeyAreas around leks. The area of the whole square is ca.4 km2. The measurements were conducted on circular plots(r=15 m radius,located across a 200 m×200 m grid)

    Data on the locations of lekking sites within the Augustów Forest, history of each lek and number of cocks attending, as well as on their present status (occupied or abandoned) was taken from Zawadzki and Zawadzka (2008, 2012). The spatial distribution of leks and the number of displaying cocks were determined during the 15-years-long monitoring. Every spring all known leks were visited three times in order to determine the number of capercaillie males (Zawadzki and Zawadzka 2008, 2012). The main fieldwork was carried out in the area of 9 active leks as well as 9 abandoned by the capercaillie over the last 25 years (6 less than 10 years ago). The study plots covered key areas located within a 1-km radius from the studied leks (Fig. 1). This size of the key area was recognised as a territory of the utmost importance for the proper functioning of the capercaillie population (Wegge and Larsen 1987; Wegge et al. 2013).

    The assessment of the habitat was performed within the Key Areas, on circular plots positioned across a 200 m×200 m grid (Fig. 1). Each plot had a radius of 15 m and thus covered 706 m2. We established between 53 and 133 study plots in each Key Area (depending on the local conditions, e.g. clear-cuts area, dense young plantations, roads), with the average amounting to 98; the area was spread over 4 km2. We excluded areas of open water and bogs. The nine Key Areas including active leks were represented by a total of 1032 circular plots, while there were 747 plots in the 9 Key Areas associated with abandoned leks.

    Stand and site variables

    Measurements or estimations made on all plots included 13 habitat features (variables) (Table 1). The description of the tree stand involved a determination of its age(ATS), tree stand structure (vertical layering) (TSS),stand density (TN), and the percentage share of Scots pine (PSP). Other recorded features included the canopy(crown) closure of the upper stand layer (CCUL) and the closure of the second stand layer (CCSL) as a measure of the amount of light penetrating through to the forest floor. The canopy closure was determined by the visual estimation from the ground – summing up the crown areas for all trees on a fixed plot area and dividing them by the ground area. We used a 5-rank scale: Open (1; 0–30% of ground covered by crowns), Loose (2; 31%–50%),Discontinuous (3; 51%–70%), Moderate (4; 71%–90%),Full (5; >91%). Other measured or assessed variables included the classes of soil-moisture (SM) and soil fertility(SF), the shrub cover (PCS), the bilberry cover (PCB),the height of ground-vegetation (GVH), the distance from roads used to transport timber (DFR), and the presence of specific habitat elements (PHE). In the latter case, we considered the occurrence of:1) large trees with horizontal branches (good for perching); 2) dead fallen trees; and 3) anthills. Values for the analysed features on scales – as detailed in Table 1 – were estimated and noted in the field, with the information contained in the BDL forest data bank (available at https://www.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/portal/mapy-en) also being used.

    The values of some explanatory variables (the share of Scots pine, tree stand structure, canopy closure, the cover of shrub layer, the cover of bilberry, ground vegetation height, and distance from roads) obtained ranks that increased with greater magnitudes of the given feature (e.g., the greater the percentage of the cover of bilberry, the higher the designated rank – Table 1). In this way, the importance of a higher level of a given parameter for the suitability of the habitat for the capercaillie was reflected. In the case of stand age, soil moisture,and soil fertility, values were given to labels based on the measured features of the stand that had been inventoried in the sample plots. These were chosen in such a way as to point to the characteristic habitat conditions associated with the phase of forest development (sapling, pole,early mature, mature forest, late mature), as well as trophic (oligo-, meso-, eutrophic) and moisture (dry,fresh,wet, bog) conditions of the soil. Thus, for example,stand aged between 1 and 10 years corresponded with the developmental phases of a young plantation, while an age over 100 represented a mature forest. There was,therefore, a correspondence with the structure characteristic of a given age-related developmental stage (Table 1).It was assumed that these variables would be nominal in nature. The assignment of different values to labels describing habitat features (variables) was based oninformation in the literature as well as on expert knowledge relating to the habitat requirements of the capercaillie.

    Table 1 Variables used to describe the capercaillie’s habitat in the Augustów Forest

    Methods

    First, the distribution of sample plots in classes corresponding with the occupied and abandoned Key Areas was compared using the χ2test. Subsequently, the occupied and abandoned Key Areas were compared by means of logistic regression, with a binary dependent variable taking on values 0 (area abandoned) or 1 (area occupied). This method was used because of the fact that logistic regression does not set out assumptions regarding the nature of explanatory variables (which can be either ordinal or nominal). Moreover, the distributions of independent variables (assessed features of the forest) do not have to conform to a normal distribution(Kleinbaum et al. 1982; Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989).Binary logistic regression is a common statistical method used in conservation biology to estimate probabilities of occurrence in relation to different predictors (Kleyer et al. 1999; Cowley et al. 2000).

    The general logistic regression model was:

    where Y is the dependent variable, Xi(i=1–k) are the independent variables, α is the intercept, and βiare the coefficients.

    In order to avoid a strong multicollinearity between predictor variables, we studied the correlation matrix for 10 out of 13 predictors (after excluding the three nominal variables: stand age, soil moisture, and soil fertility)(Table 2). If there was a strong correlation between two variables (Spearman rank correlation, |rs|>0.70), only that parameter which is seemingly more important for the species (in line with the literature and expert knowledge) was selected for further modelling (see Hosmer Jr and Lemeshow, 1989). The first analysis used all the non-co-linear explanatory variables.It was followed by the identification of a subset of explanatory variables characterised by the greatest predictive power, i.e., those assessed features of forest which were differentiating between occupied and abandoned KAs in the most adequate manner. We applied the Akaike Information Criterion to the selection of variables(Akaike 1974;Burnham and Anderson 2002), while general model performance was assessed by calculating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), as well as model sensitivity and specificity(Hanley and McNeil 1982).We carried out all statistical modelling with the R 3.6.1 packages stat and lme4, using a generalised linear model (GLM) for binary response variable(R Core Team 2019).

    Results

    Habitat differences between active and abandoned leks

    The distribution of sample plots for age classes shows that in both categories of Key Areas stands over 30 years old occurred most frequently (Fig. 2a). In the Key Areas still occupied by the species, stands aged 30–60 years were prevailing. In contrast, the abandoned Key Areas were dominated by forest stands older than 60 years(χ2=23.95; p=0.002). In the studied Key Areas, singlelayered stands dominated, while two-layered stands were limited (Fig. 2b). Stands in active and abandoned Key Areas differed in terms of structure (χ2=27.05; p <0.001), with the occupied ones dominated by singlelayered stands.

    Occupied Key Areas showed bigger shares of stands with more than 90% Scots pine (χ2=21.99; p=0.002)(Fig. 2c). Canopy closure of the upper stand layer resembled a normal distribution (Fig. 2d). Abandoned stands have a higher canopy closure than occupied stands (χ2=28.57; p=0.001). Stands within active Key Areas havemainly a single-layered structure (χ2=28.57; p=0.001),while the share of stands with a well-developed second layer was bigger in the abandoned Key Areas (χ2=34.58;p <0.001) (Figs. 2e, 3a, 3b).

    綜上,我們可以得知,對(duì)于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)一般納稅人而言,其“營(yíng)改增”前后稅負(fù)變化主要取決于其購(gòu)進(jìn)項(xiàng)目的多少,且購(gòu)進(jìn)固定資產(chǎn)比購(gòu)進(jìn)服務(wù)對(duì)稅負(fù)下降的影響更大;稅率為6%的一般納稅人“營(yíng)改增”對(duì)其稅負(fù)的影響程度遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)小于稅率為11%的一般納稅人,“營(yíng)改增”后稅負(fù)下降可能性大大高于稅率為11%的一般納稅人。在此不再贅述。

    Table 2 Spearman Rank correlation matrix for variables describing the capercaillie’s habitat (Relationships statistically significant at α=0.05 are indicated by the use of italics strong correlation(Spearman rank correlation,|rs|>0.70)between two variables is indicated by the use of bold)

    Fig.2 Percentage shares of sample plots in still-occupied or abandoned refuges for variables(Table 1)describing Key Areas for the capercaillie

    Fig.3 The comparison of stand structure in Key Areas that are active(a)or abandoned(b)

    The occurrence of shrub and ground-vegetation layers was skewed to the left (Fig. 2f), meaning that undergrowth was, most typically, only poorly-developed in the Key Areas. Areas with only a poorly-developed shrub layer occurred much more often in the still occupied Key Areas (χ2=34.58; p <0.001). On most of the plots,ground vegetation did not exceed 40 cm in height. However, the height interval 30–40 cm was mostly present in the abandoned Key Areas (χ2=94.72; p <0.001), while the still-occupied ones were dominated by shrubs, whose height was below 30 cm (Fig. 2g). The occupied Key Areas featured the prevalence of bilberry cover shares between 1% and 30%, while the abandoned Key Areas featured the share of bilberry cover that often exceeded 30% (χ2=65.2098; p <0.001) (Fig. 2h). Mesic forest site types occurred most often in both occupied and abandoned Key Areas (χ2=4.16; p=0.245), while the link between the age-class structure and soil humidity proved very similar in both variants (Fig. 2i). A somewhat greater share of nutrient-poor site types characterised the stilloccupied Key Areas,as opposed to the ones abandoned by the capercaillie(χ2=21.96;p <0.001)(Fig.2j).

    We have found that distance from frequently used forest roads points to the prevalence of plots at a distance (>150 m)among the still-occupied Key Areas,as opposed to the abandoned ones(χ2=20.34;p=0.001)(Fig.2k).

    The numbers of special habitat elements proved to be similar in areas representing both categories (χ2=3.03;p=0.387) (Fig. 2l). Nevertheless, it was noteworthy that 33.2% of sample plots featured all these three structural elements identified as important to the capercaillie.

    The numbers of trees with DBH ≥7 cm per hectare were in the range from 0 (i.e., no such trees on plots located in newly-established plantations) to around 16,000 per hectare among the abandoned Key Areas, and to some 14,300 in the occupied ones. Nonetheless, respective mean values were of just 844 and 876 trees·ha-1. All that can be said about this feature is that it proved to be more variable in plots representing the Key Areas abandoned by the capercaillie, as opposed to the stilloccupied ones (V=118% and 101%, respectively).

    The logistic regression model

    Our inspection of the habitat correlation matrix revealed a very high correlation between stand structure and canopy closure of the second stand layer (r=0.97). This ensured a limitation of further analysis to canopy closure of the second stand layer (Table 2).

    The first parametrisation involved the full model containing all non-collinear variables, with the aim being to determine the influence of each explanatory variable on the modelled phenomenon. It emerged that higher values for canopy closure of the upper and the second layer, the cover of shrubs, the cover of bilberry, and stand density were associated with a reduced probability that a Key Area would still be found to be occupied by capercaillies, whilst higher values for proportion of Scot pine, the height of ground vegetation, distance from roads, and the presence of habitat elements were all associated with a higher probability of the Key Area being occupied (Table 3). In the case of the variable describing a forest’s developmental stage, and with the mature stage chosen as a point of reference, capercaillies were categorised as less likely to be present in newly-planted areas and in young plantations and stands in the polewood stage, whereas they were more likely to occur in stands aged 30–60 or 60–100 years. A particularly high value for OR was obtained for stands that were 30–60 years old, with capercaillies being 1.6 times as likely to be present there as in the mature stage.

    The reference variants for soil moisture and soil fertility were taken to be the wettest (boggy) soil and the soil of the highest fertility, respectively. Lower moisture and/or fertility were associated with a higher probability of the presence of capercaillies. The chance (OR) of the species being present in the forest on dry soil was 2.4 times as high as in the reference conditions, while the corresponding figure was even 7.3 times as high where soil was poorer in nutrients, as opposed to the most fertile one (Table 3).

    In fact, the model has six explanatory variables that achieve statistical significance, i.e., the stand age, the share of Scots pine, upper canopy closure, the cover ofshrubs, and the cover of bilberry. The variables best distinguishing between the occupied and the abandoned Key Areas for the capercaillie proved to be shrub layer(OR=0.111) as well as the extent of the closure of the second canopy layer (OR=0.441). Only a slightly less considerable influence was found to be exerted by the stand age. The full model is characterised by high values for the ROC area beneath the curve (AUC=0.72), with a high degree of specificity (73.3%), although with low sensitivity (18.9%) (Table 4).

    Table 3 Results of a logistic regression analysis –full model including all explanatory variables but stand structure

    In order to determine the optimal model – containing the variables that are best able to distinguish between Key Areas still occupied or else abandoned by capercaillies – all the combinations of subsets of explanatory variables were analysed. The model characterized by the lowest value for the AIC criterion was made up of following variables: the stand age, upper canopy closure,the cover of shrubs, and the cover of bilberry (Table 5).It further emerged that the variables of the greatest discrimination power involved the presence of the two layers of undergrowth (shrubs and ground vegetation)?)(OR=0.325), the closure of the second canopy layer(OR=0.369), the closure of the upper layer (OR=0.565), and stand age as a manifestation of a developmental stage (Table 5). A greater cover by the lower stand layer and a higher density of trees in either the first or the second layer had a negative effect on the suitability of the habitat. Hence the chance of capercaillies being present in stands aged 30–60 years was 1.8 times as high as in the case of the mature forest, whereas it was lower in stands aged 60–100 or 10–30 years, and the lowest at all in newly-established plantations (Table 5). The cover of bilberry was also the subject of a significant relationship (PCB, OR=0.687). The share of an occupied area accounted for by bilberry was often lower than on plots already abandoned. All the explanatory variables forming part of the optimal model achieved statistical significance. The optimal model was characterised by the presence of the AUC – an area under the ROC curve of 0.709, with a very high level of specificity(91.9%), but very limited sensitivity (5.3%) (Table 6).This, in turn, ensures that the model offers a very clear indication of places with features of the biotope suitable for the capercaillie.

    Discussion

    The capercaillie has been commonly recognised as a bird species which needs different successional forest stages,but which prefers old, mature stands (Rolstad and Wegge 1987;Klaus et al.1989;Storch 2001).Stands suitable for the capercaillie are characterised by a loose or moderately-dense canopy cover, a well-developed layer of bilberry bushes covering the ground, the presence of patches of trees regenerating naturally, as well as the occurrence of small open areas (Storch 2001, 2002).

    Field-based observations of the active and the abandoned Key Areas – supported by the results obtained by the means of the logistic model as well as other studies from the Augustów Forest (Brzeziecki et al. 2012;Zawadzka et al. 2018) – suggest that capercaillies present there occupy mainly single-layered, poor coniferous stands, with an intermediate canopy cover, strongly dominated by Scots pine, and a very limited admixture of spruce. In the active Key Areas, the cover of shrublayer rarely exceeded 10%, while in the abandoned Key Areas this level was, on average, much higher. Another finding, and a rather surprising one, concerned the preference for fresh coniferous forest site types. Over the last 20 years, the capercaillies living in the Augustów Forest have, indeed, abandoned the Key Areas located in moist or swamp coniferous forest site types, while all the leks remaining active at the time of our study were located in mesic pine forest sites. The only exception involves an old and extensive swamp pine forest, which has been in use by capercaillies for more than 90 years now (Domaniewski 1933;Zawadzki et al. 1999).

    Table 4 Confusion matrix for the full model (OR=3.35, Log OR=1.21), 1 –Key Areas still occupied by the capercaillie (active), 0 –Key Areas abandoned by the species

    Table 5 Results of a logistic regression analysis –model parametrised by the method of searching all the possible combinations using the AIC criterion

    Both the full and the optimal logistic regression models were characterised by rather high levels of explanatory or predictive power, to the extent that they might be used to indicate areas more or less suitable for the species – e.g., with regard to the proposed efforts to resettle or reintroduce capercaillies – as well as management-related considerations as to where forests continue to fit in in terms of their economic usefulness.Specificity values proved to be particularly high (at 92%),indicating a great extent of suitability of the model when it comes to an appropriate habitat being identified. In contrast, the model sensitivity was much lower, which is to say that it is far less efficient at rejecting sites or, to be more precise, at pointing to those places that are not suitable for the capercaillie.

    We explored the capercaillie’s habitat preferences within a 1-km radius. According to Storch (2002), such an approach, lacking characterisation at the landscape level, does not offers full opportunities for the quality of the capercaillie’s habitat to be assessed. Nevertheless,our results confirmed the hypothesis that changes in the habitat observed at the patch scale can represent important reasons for capercaillies to abandon some leks in the Augustów Forest. It results that by far the most important factors (differentiating most clearly between occupied and abandoned Key Areas) are linked to a forest’s vertical structure. Particularly, the presence of dense undergrowth has significantly reduced the probability of the occurrence of the capercaillie. The developed logistic regression model indicated that the filling of space in the forest with trees and shrubs – and hence an increase in overall stand volume – is inferred to do a lot to reduce the probability that capercaillies will be present.Such features are, of course, closely connected with forestry management in temperate forests, in which a high stocking rate is regarded as essential to both productivity and even the technical quality of trees producing timber(Oliver and Larson 1996). With this in mind, it is either the case that underplanting takes place in forests, or efforts are made to nurture the naturally-occurring undergrowth (Silvicultural Guidelines, 2012). In addition,installed or naturally-developing layers of undergrowth in nutrient-poor (oligotrophic) sites – such as the poor pine forest sites present in the Augustów Forest – are being stimulated anyway both by the global climate warming and by the ongoing habitat eutrophication. In the case of the Augustów Forest, the annual deposition of nitrogen is at the level of 10–12 kg·ha-1per year(Kasperowicz and Wac?aw 2016), and this alone suffices to ensure that forests here are different from those from several decades ago. This is particularly true for the older phases of stand development, which historical data reveal as once less resource-rich, with spruce and broadleaved trees absent from lower stand layers, and with ground cover formerly typical of coniferous forest, consisting of a fairly loose cover of bilberry (Ossendowski 1936; Andrzejczyk and Brzeziecki 1995; Szczygielski 2007; Solon and Matuszkiewicz 2008; Paluch and Gabrysiak 2019). This has been documented in Fig.3.

    Today, the ongoing effects of eutrophication in the Augustów Forest include the presence of spruce in what had previously been nutrient-poor site types, with a closed understorey or the second stand layer of thisspecies. Succession involving spruce – and even broadleaved trees such as birch and the hazel Corylus avellana– is changing forest structure (including the oldest developmental stages of pine forest) in a manner unfavourable to capercaillies, even where the site had previously been nutrient-poor. This would seem to explain why today’s capercaillies in the Augustów Forest most often occupy forest stands that are 30–60 or 60–100 years old,and why the phase of development proved to have such a great and significant influence in the context of the overall model.Along the forest age gradient,competition eases and the closure of the stand is more open, which makes it possible for the undergrowth to develop in stands that are 30–60 years old.

    Table 6 Confusion matrix for the model parametrised by the method of searching all the possible combinations using the AIC criterion AIC(OR=3.42,Log OR=1.23), 1 –active Key Areas, 0 –abandoned Key Areas

    The process referred to here also applies to sites in which lekking of capercaillies takes place. Many descriptions of leks indicate that a great share of old forest is a typical requirement for the species (Gjerde and Wegge 1989; Storch 1993; Swenson and Angelstam 1993; Saniga 1996, 2003). And yet, several studies from more recent decades document the presence of leks in middle-aged stand classes (Picozzi et al. 1992; Miettinen et al. 2010;Sirki? et al. 2010; Wegge and Rolstad 2011). Our work suggests that the Augustów Forest’s active leks are predominantly located in stands which are 30 to 100 years old, not in the oldest parts of stands.

    The process of leks in mature (>100 year-old) forest being abandoned by capercaillies has been observable in the Augustów Forest over the last few decades, while new places for the leks have been observed in younger stands (50–60 years old) (Zawadzki et al. 1999; Brzeziecki et al. 2012; Zawadzki and Zawadzka 2012;Zawadzka et al. 2018). Similar trend is visible in commercial forests in South-Eastern Norway, where the formation and establishment of new displaying grounds in stands which are less than 50 years old has been described (Rolstad et al. 2007; Wegge and Rolstad 2011).Positive relationships between the proportion of a forest of younger age classes and the densities of capercaillie populations have been also documented in Finland,where studies suggest that a managed, thinned, middleaged forest (30–40 years and more) is suitable and even has a positive effect on population density at the large scale (Miettinen et al. 2008, 2010). According to Sirki? et al. (2010), a change of preference regarding stand age can be also indirectly connected with the extent of the fragmentation of the habitat and the spatial distribution of particular patches of a mature forest. Small fragments of old stands occurring as ‘islands’ surrounded by forest in the youngest age classes do not represent favourable conditions for the species. The importance of connectivity between habitat patches suitable for the capercaillie is also emphasised by Bollmann et al. (2011) as well as Sirki? et al. (2012). The preferences of the species for the mature forest as once described seem to be most directly associated with the structure rather than age, as evidenced also by more recent publications (Storch 2001,2007; Watson and Moss 2008; Miettinen et al. 2010).

    Researchers had previously confirmed the major importance of bilberry to capercaillies, both as a food plant for adult birds and as places in which the Lepidotera larvae representing food for chicks may develop (Storch 1993; Selas 2000; Gregersen and Gregersen 2008). In the Augustów Forest, the cover of this dwarf shrub was high across the study area, with the effect that this factor was not considered to influence any differentiation between areas still occupied or already abandoned by the birds under study. Indeed, within the analysed areas, the share of the ground covered by bilberry was actually greater in the abandoned Key Areas, perhaps due to the basic fact that the presence of bilberry bushes attracts potentiallydisturbing bilberry-pickers and also ensures a greater intensity of use of certain roads (a variable not taken into account in the optimal model on the basis of the AIC criteria). However, in line with the expectations, Key Areas which were further from roads were those still supporting capercaillies, while the negative influence of human disturbance on the species has been demonstrated with regard to other areas across the range(Summers et al. 2007; Storch 2013; Moss et al. 2014). It is not only forest works that are damaging to the capercaillie; human recreation also has a negative effect(Coppes et al. 2017,2018).

    Conclusions

    Altogether, changes in forest structure at the local(patch) scale are important, though they are probably not the only reasons for the decline in the numbers of the capercaillie. The grouse representing the subject of our study are shown to occupy the dry and poor,middle-aged, pine-dominated, single-layered forest with a much less-diversified habitat mosaic than in other parts of their lowland range.Our research further reveals that over the last few decades the species has abandoned the oldest stands in the Augustów Forest, with leks having been transferred to younger stands. Our analysis based on the logistic regression model points to the cover shares of the two layers of undergrowth as the most important features discriminating those Key Areas for capercaillies that remain active as lekking grounds or else have already been abandoned. Any development of a greater inclusion of trees and shrubs – stimulated by climate changes or the eutrophication of habitats, or in connection with forest management – will do much to reduce the probability of the occurrence of the capercaillie. The lack of natural disturbances also favours the development of a dense layer of undergrowth. The birds’transfer of leks to younger stands is probably associated not so much with an age preference as with a specific kind of not-too-dense stand structure. In places where under-layers of vegetation are artificially introduced or appear spontaneously under the canopy of older stands,this process changes the forest structure in a manner unfavourable to the capercaillie. Thus, habitat improvement for the species in question requires that the natural development of the understorey (mainly spruce under the conditions in the Augustów Forest) should be held back, or not introduced at all where this would be an element of managerial measures. Also recommended is the maintenance of a more open stand closure than hitherto, one not exceeding 70%. The logistic regression model based on stand variables is well able to point to habitat that is suitable for capercaillies, even if it is less precise in indicating which habitat features are inappropriate for the species. However, it is strongly recommended that the habitats which the study revealed to be suitable should not be transformed with practical measures.

    Authors’contributions

    SD conducted the conception,design of the work, data collection, statistical analysis, data interpretation, draft of the work. DZ conducted the conception,data collection, draft of the work, significant revision, review of the literature.GZ conducted the data collection and analysis, design of graphics, review of the literature.MS conducted the statistical analysis. BB conducted the conception, design of the work, data collection, review of the literature,significant revision. The authors' read and approved the final manuscript.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences,Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland.2Department of Forest Sciences, University of ?ód?, Branch in Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Konstytucji 3 Maja 65/67, 97-200 Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Poland.3Institute of Agriculture,Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa,Poland.

    Received: 11 January 2021 Accepted: 6 June 2021

    猜你喜歡
    綜上生產(chǎn)性稅負(fù)
    構(gòu)造法破解比較大小問(wèn)題
    具有非齊次泊松到達(dá)的隊(duì)列 模型的穩(wěn)態(tài)分布
    集合測(cè)試題B卷參考答案
    Value of Texture Analysis on Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR for Detecting Liver Fibrosis in a Rat Model
    少數(shù)民族傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)藥知識(shí)生產(chǎn)性保護(hù)研究
    煤礦工人生產(chǎn)性粉塵對(duì)身體健康影響的研究
    基于生態(tài)的京津冀生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展探討
    新媒體時(shí)代的生產(chǎn)性受眾淺析
    新聞傳播(2016年2期)2016-07-12 10:52:16
    交通運(yùn)輸類(lèi)快遞業(yè)營(yíng)改增稅負(fù)比較及對(duì)策
    中國(guó)適度稅負(fù)水平的估計(jì)
    中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲在线观看片| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品无大码| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 色5月婷婷丁香| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 777米奇影视久久| 国产在视频线精品| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 成人免费观看视频高清| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产成人精品福利久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久久欧美国产精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产老妇女一区| 午夜福利在线在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久热精品热| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久6这里有精品| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美日本视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品无大码| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费看a级黄色片| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 免费看日本二区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 黄片wwwwww| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品酒店卫生间| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品久久久精品久久久| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产乱人视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 美女高潮的动态| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| www.色视频.com| 日本一二三区视频观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 精品酒店卫生间| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 精品一区二区免费观看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 成年av动漫网址| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日日撸夜夜添| 简卡轻食公司| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 超碰97精品在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 综合色av麻豆| av黄色大香蕉| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 六月丁香七月| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久久色成人| 少妇高潮的动态图| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费观看av网站的网址| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| av播播在线观看一区| 嫩草影院入口| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲四区av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 只有这里有精品99| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| av国产免费在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| av在线蜜桃| 久久久久久久精品精品| 成人欧美大片| 七月丁香在线播放| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲精品视频女| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| av专区在线播放| 精品国产三级普通话版| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| av在线app专区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 尾随美女入室| 免费av毛片视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 大码成人一级视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产精品成人在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 一级黄片播放器| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产高清三级在线| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 嫩草影院精品99| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲国产色片| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线观看国产h片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产精品无大码| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 永久网站在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 在线看a的网站| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日本午夜av视频| 三级国产精品片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久6这里有精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| av免费在线看不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久久久精品性色| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲最大成人av| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 成人欧美大片| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 搞女人的毛片| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 黑人高潮一二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 老女人水多毛片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 91精品国产九色| 深夜a级毛片| 美女高潮的动态| av在线观看视频网站免费| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| av国产免费在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 色视频www国产| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| a级毛色黄片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日日啪夜夜撸| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩中字成人| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 免费少妇av软件| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| videossex国产| 在线天堂最新版资源| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 色视频www国产| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 七月丁香在线播放| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 一级毛片电影观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产色婷婷99| 舔av片在线| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产老妇女一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 51国产日韩欧美| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 亚洲在久久综合| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产永久视频网站| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 秋霞伦理黄片| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 99热6这里只有精品| 1000部很黄的大片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 老司机影院毛片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲国产av新网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 大香蕉久久网| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产成人福利小说| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产乱人视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲四区av| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99热全是精品| 美女国产视频在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产成人一区二区在线| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 精品久久久久久电影网| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 一级黄片播放器| 免费av毛片视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 成人无遮挡网站| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| .国产精品久久| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 各种免费的搞黄视频| 搞女人的毛片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 色吧在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 五月天丁香电影| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 嫩草影院入口| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产成人a区在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美另类一区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| av播播在线观看一区| 精品一区二区三卡| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 香蕉精品网在线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲国产色片| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 韩国av在线不卡| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人|