Case analysis of Methodology of Western Translation Studies: Since the 1970s

馮笛

Translation Strategies

Peter Newmark deems that text could be categorized into three different types: expressive text, informative text and vocative text.

Expressive text can be found in most literature, authoritative text, personal letters and the like. As Newmark puts it: “The core of the expressive function is the mind of the speaker, the writer, the originator of the utterance.” (Newmark, 2001).

Vocative text provokes the readership to act, to think, or to feel the author's intention other than conveying information. (Newmark, 1988) Language as a human instinct has an embedded tendency to evoke sympathy that is a crucial psychological function linking human psychology and behavior.

Informative text is often written in a standard format with a serious tone. It includes most of non-literal texts, such as journalism,scientific reports, etc. The author's primary intention is to convey their designated information to readers instead of presenting their writing styles and language manners. (Newmark, 1988)

Based on the text types described above, two translation strategies were put up by Newmark, namely, semantic translation and communicative translation.

In semantic translation, the translator attempts to replicate the meaning of the source text in semantic and syntactic structure of the target language. Contrast to semantic translation strategy, communicative translation aims to eliminate obscurities and confusions caused in the translation process to target language readers.In other words, while semantic translation strategy is faithful to the author, communicative translation strategy is faithful to the content.

Case Analysis

Restructure Method

"The 'Restructure' method is restructuring the sentence structure completely on the basis of full comprehension of original meaning so as to fit into Chinese expressive habits. It basically deviates from the level and structure of the original sentence." (Liu Zhaoqing, 1985)

SL: For Cuellar, translation equivalence in his DTM could have immediate impact on the work of the professional translator by helping him/her solve translation problems, on teaching translation as an inter-subjective activity where clear parameters can be established as to what may count as a translation, and on the field of translation criticism as it would allow to avoid simplistic, biased critics of translations.

TL：對(duì)于奎利亞爾（Cuellar）來(lái)說(shuō)，他的DTM（Descriptive Translation Method）中的翻譯對(duì)等可以在以下方面產(chǎn)生直接影響：幫助譯者解決翻譯問(wèn)題；在跨學(xué)科的翻譯教學(xué)中，對(duì)什么是翻譯這一問(wèn)題確立明確標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；以及在影響翻譯批評(píng)領(lǐng)域，避免簡(jiǎn)單、帶偏見(jiàn)的翻譯批評(píng)。

Analysis：This is one of those long sentences that is structured in a sophisticated way. The phrase “immediate impact on” is followed by three objectives, the second of which “teaching translation as an inter-subjective activity” is again comprised by an attributive clause and a subjective clause which made the sentence all the more complicated. By dividing the long sentence into three parts and add colon and semicolons in its Chinese translation, discarding the syntax constraint forced by English language, we can single out the side information from two clauses led by “where” and “what”. Then its possible to combine and transform them into minor sentence in Chinese as “對(duì)什么是翻譯這一問(wèn)題確立明確標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”. In this way, the logic rigor and coherence maintain intact through translation process.

Cultural Translation

In the early 1990s, Susan Bassett and Lefever proposed the cultural shift of translation. Since then the relationship between translation and culture is increasingly linked. “Cultural translation” has become a buzz word in both translation studies and cultural studies.

SL: In 1530, Luther wrote the self-promoting and nationalistic Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen （Circular Letter on Translation）, in which he criticized Latin, Hebrew and other languages for being full of “stones and stumps”, in contrast to his smooth German writing.

TL：1530年，路德撰寫(xiě)了帶有自我宣傳和民族主義性質(zhì)的文章Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen（翻譯通函），在該文中他批評(píng)到，拉丁語(yǔ)、希伯來(lái)語(yǔ)和其他語(yǔ)言版本的圣經(jīng)充滿(mǎn)了佶屈聱牙的段落，與他流暢的德語(yǔ)版本圣經(jīng)形成了鮮明對(duì)比。

Analysis: This example contains a cultural loaded word that is “stones and stumps”. This phrase is actually a German phrase translated and fitted well in to expressive habits of English language. There is a lot of cultural loaded phrase used the structure “A and B” and are structured in a phonetically similar way such as “ins and outs” “toss and turn” “name and shame” “odds and sods” “ups and downs” etc. In this context, Luthers use of “stone and stumps” refers to those sentences or paragraphs that are in the Latin or Hebrew version of Bible. Luther once compared his German version of Bible and that of the Latin and Hebrew version and made a metaphor: his German version of Bible is like a smooth road extended all the way to God, and the Latin and Hebrew version of Bible are like unbeaten tracks or bumpy roads that are full of ups and downs.

Bibliography

[1] Newmark, Peter. A Textbook of Translation [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2001:21-34.

[2] Newmark, Peter. A Textbook of Translation [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1988:15-19.

[3 廖七一. 當(dāng)代西方翻譯理論探索[M]. 南京:譯林出版社，2002：124-130.

[4]王宗炎. 紐馬克論翻譯理論和翻譯技巧[J]. 中國(guó)翻譯，1982（01）：11-17.