• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

    2020-07-21 09:37:56GrantYoneokaKlimentBozhilovLindaWong
    Hepatoma Research 2020年10期
    關(guān)鍵詞:驢皮繞指柔老黃

    Grant Yoneoka, Kliment Bozhilov,2, Linda L. Wong,2

    1Transplant Center, The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

    2Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

    Abstract

    Keywords: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, transarterial radioembolization,hepatocellular carcinoma

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide[1]. In the United States, the overall prognosis for HCC is poor,with a 5-year survival rate of 10%[2]. Generally accepted curative therapies include liver resection or transplantation. Unfortunately, patients with advanced disease are usually not amenable to surgical intervention. For patients with unresectable tumors, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) can be considered to treat or downstage disease to qualify for curative surgery. Although TACE has been the mainstay of treatment for intermediatestage tumors, TARE has a distinct advantage in that it can be used in portal venous thrombosis and has a better adverse effect profile with similar efficacy to TACE[3-5].

    老板娘剔著她的指甲柔聲道:“老黃你小點(diǎn)聲,別嚇著大伙兒,你來搶錢,戴我給你們做的驢皮面具不好嗎?個(gè)個(gè)弄得兇神惡煞,像跳大神,好歹他們都是我的客人??!”她聲音不高,老黃卻聽得進(jìn)去,與她熟識(shí)既久,憋出來的惡氣稍泄,火焰山一變?yōu)槔@指柔。

    Response to TARE is measured by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST)using either contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)[6].Depending on individual center protocols, initial images are performed 1 to 3 months post-treatment.Unfortunately, tumors that are non-responsive to TARE may progress while waiting for subsequent imaging. Therefore, prognostic biomarkers are needed to help predict which patients will benefit from TARE.

    The serum marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), widely used as a screening tool for HCC, has been shown to have prognostic value in treatment[7,8]. However, AFP is also elevated in non-tumor environments and is not particularly sensitive for small tumors[9]. Liquid biopsy, which detects circulating tumor cells or nucleic acids, is a promising alternative to AFP but is not yet widely available[10]. Recently, inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have gained popularity as prognostic indicators in cancer[11-14]. While the mechanism behind these markers is not precisely understood, a proinflammatory environment along with thrombocytosis has been associated with tumor growth and survival[15-17].

    Previous studies have highlighted the clinical utility of NLR and PLR as prognostic markers for HCC after liver resection, transplantation, and TACE[12,14,18-20]. However, the use of NLR in combination with PLR for TARE has not been well established. This study aimed to understand the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in patients who received TARE as a first-line therapy for HCC.

    METHODS

    Patients

    This was a retrospective review from a prospectively collected database of 1,442 patients diagnosed with HCC from 1993 to 2019. All patients were referred to a group of hepatobiliary surgeons affiliated with a tertiary medical center in Hawaii that has the only liver center and liver transplant program in the state.This surgical group evaluates approximately 60%-70% of all the cases of HCC in Hawaii and includes referrals from the American territories of the Pacific Basin. We selected patients who received TARE as a primary treatment for HCC. Patients were excluded if they had a previous liver resection, liver transplant,any systemic therapy or locoregional therapy prior to TARE. Patients were also excluded if they received adjuvant therapy following TARE but prior to follow-up imaging. Patients who had initial follow-up later than 12 months were additionally excluded. We included patients who had two separate TARE treatments for bilateral or extensive disease. These Y90 treatments were typically done about 1 month apart, and imaging tests were done 3 months after treatment. This retrospective chart and imaging review study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Queen’s Medical Center and was determined to be exempt from needing informed consent.

    The diagnosis of HCC was made with histologic confirmation of HCC with biopsy or with contrastenhanced imaging (CT or MRI) which demonstrated liver mass or masses with LI-RADS 5 criteria,an arterial phase hyperenhancement and one or more of the following, “washout” on venous phase, an enhancing capsule or threshold growth. These criteria were also consistent with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation class 5 criteria.

    Pre-treatment imaging was performed using either CT or MRI. Pre-treatment tumor size was defined as the sum of the diameters of all enhancing lesions. All images were taken within 6 months prior to TARE.All patients were evaluated by an interventional radiologist, hepatologist and surgeon and cases were discussed at a multidisciplinary hepatobiliary conference. Patients were not candidates for TARE if they had a total bilirubin above 2.0 mg/dL or evidence of extrahepatic spread of disease. A Y90 arterial mapping procedure was performed to identify the tumor(s), vascular branches supplying the tumor and degree of lung shunting with99mTc-macroaggregated albumin. Patients with greater than 10% lung shunting were not candidates for TARE.

    Radioembolization was performed with Y90 delivered via glass microspheres (TheraSphere, Boston Scientific, USA) or resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres, Sirtex Medical, Australia). All procedures were performed by one of seven interventional radiologists who comprise the only group that performs complex hepatobiliary interventions in Hawaii.

    Post-treatment imaging was performed at approximately 3-month and 6-month intervals. Response to TARE was determined using mRECIST. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)according to mRECIST were further classified into a response group, while patients with stable disease (SD)or progressive disease (PD) were classified into a non-response group. For patients who received both a 3-month and 6-month scan, the 6-month scan was used to determine overall response to treatment.

    Data collected

    Collected demographic information included patient age, sex and race. Medical history included height,weight, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C, significant alcohol use (> 2 alcoholic beverages daily for 10 years), smoking history, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, ascites, encephalopathy, cirrhosis, AFP and normal AFP (< 20 ng/mL).

    Laboratory studies included prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin, albumin, white blood cell count, neutrophil count,lymphocyte count and platelet count. Laboratory values were obtained prior to TARE and approximately 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-treatment. NLR was defined as the ratio between the absolute neutrophil count and the absolute lymphocyte count. PLR was defined as the ratio between the absolute platelet count and the absolute lymphocyte count. Date of laboratory draws were used to determine temporal trends in NLR and PLR following treatment. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and Child-Pugh class were calculated from baseline laboratory values.

    After identifying patients and collecting baseline data from the prospectively collected database, individual charts were queried to obtain detailed imaging reports. Imaging was reviewed and measured retrospectively by a single physician. Collected imaging data included pre-treatment tumor size, post-treatment tumor size, mRECIST, and dates of imaging and treatment.

    Table 1. Cohort characteristics

    Statistical analysis

    Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal NLR and PLR cutoffs.Cutoff points were selected by maximizing Youden’s index. Mean comparisons were analyzed using Welch’st-test. Categorical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Independent predictors of response to treatment were determined using univariate logistic regression. Variables that were significant in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Time to progression(TTP) was defined as the date of treatment until the date of PD based on mRECIST. Patients who did not reach the endpoint were censored based on their last imaging date. TTP was analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All tests were two-tailed, andP< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM, USA), Jamovi version 1.0.8 and GraphPad Prism8 (GraphPad Software, USA).

    RESULTS

    Cohort characteristics

    In this cohort of 1,442 patients with HCC, a total of 276 TARE procedures were performed. Of those patients, 77 received TARE as primary treatment for HCC, and 42 patients met criteria for this study. Seven patients received a second TARE procedure within a month of the first: six were for bilateral disease, and one patient had extensive disease that was completed in 2 separate sessions to treat the entire lobe. The characteristics of this cohort are described in Table 1. The mean age of the cohort was 66.8 years [standard deviation (s.d.) 11.3 years]. There were 30 males and 12 females. Asian represented the largest ethnicity(61.9%), followed by Caucasian (19.0%), Pacific Islander (14.3%) and Hispanic (4.8%). There were 19 ALBI grade 1 patients, 20 ALBI grade 2 patients and 3 ALBI grade 3 patients. There were 33 Child-Pugh class A patients and 9 Child-Pugh class B patients. There were no Child-Pugh class C patients. The mean pretreatment AFP was 2,023 ng/mL (s.d. 7605 ng/mL). Twenty-three patients had normal AFP prior to TARE.The mean total tumor size was 7.0 cm (s.d. 4.0 cm), and the mean number of tumors was 1.71 (s.d. 1.07).

    Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curves for pre-treatment NLR (A) and PLR (B) in predicting non-response to TARE. The cutoff points for pre-treatment NLR and PLR were 2.83 and 83, respectively. Arrows depict selected cutoff points. NLR: neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; AUC: area under the curve; CI: confidence interval; TARE: transarterial radioembolization

    Determination of cutoff points and comparison between groups

    ROC analysis identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of 2.83 [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.746, 95%confidence interval (CI): 0.588-0.904, sensitivity: 65.2% and specificity: 89.5%] [Figure 1A] and a pretreatment PLR cutoff of 83 (AUC = 0.661, 95%CI: 0.491-0.832, sensitivity: 78.3% and specificity: 63.2%) for predicting non-response to TARE [Figure 1B].

    The mean age was higher in the pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 group than the pre-treatment NLR < 2.83 group(72.2vs.63.1,P= 0.008) [Table 2]. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was associated with ALBI grade ≥ 2 (P= 0.029).The pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 group had a higher mean neutrophil count (3.97 × 109/Lvs.2.51 × 109/L,P= 0.001) but lower mean lymphocyte count (0.98 × 109/Lvs.1.71 × 109/L,P= 0.001) compared to the pretreatment NLR < 2.83 group.

    The mean age was higher in the pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 group than the pre-treatment PLR < 83 group (72.1vs.59.0,P= 0.001) [Table 3]. Pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 was associated with hyperlipidemia (P= 0.004) and Child-Pugh class B (P= 0.006). The pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 group had a higher mean platelet count (186.2× 109/Lvs.97.5 × 109/L,P= 0.001) but lower mean lymphocyte count (1.24 × 109/Lvs.1.67 × 109/L,P= 0.048)compared to the pre-treatment PLR < 83 group.

    Response to treatment

    The change in response to TARE over time is shown in Figure 2. There were 15 responders to treatment(4 CR, 11 PR) and 25 non-responders to treatment (18 SD, 7 PD) at 3-month follow-up. At 6-month followup, there were 14 responders to treatment (6 CR, 8 PR) and 4 non-responders to treatment (4 SD). In total,using the latest available scan to determine overall response, there were 19 responders to treatment (7 CR,12 PR) and 23 non-responders to treatment (16 SD, 7 PD). Of the causes of progression in the 7 patients with PD, 1 had new intrahepatic lesions, 4 had an increase in size of existing intrahepatic lesion(s) and 2 had both an increase in size of an existing intrahepatic lesion and a new intrahepatic lesion.

    Table 2. Comparison of pre-treatment NLR < 2.83 and NLR ≥ 2.83 groups

    Table 3. Comparison of pre-treatment PLR < 83 and PLR ≥ 83 groups

    NLR and PLR for non-responders and responders

    The mean values of NLR and PLR at pre-treatment, 2 weeks post-treatment, 3 months post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment are shown in Figure 3. The mean pre-treatment NLR for non-responders was significantly higher than that for responders (3.5vs.2.1,P= 0.045). There were no statistically significant differences in PLR or NLR for other time points.

    Figure 2. Changes in response to transarterial radioembolization over time. Response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Non-response was defined as stable disease (SD)or progressive disease (PD). Arrows depict changes in response between 3-month and 6-month imaging. The total box represents the overall count of responders and non-responders to treatment. Two patients (one responder and one non-responder) did not receive 3-month imaging, and initial response was evaluated at 6-month follow-up instead (asterisk)

    Figure 3. Mean NLR and PLR for non-responders and responders to TARE. The mean pre-treatment NLR was higher for non-responders than for responders (3.5 vs. 2.1, P = 0.045) (asterisk). Error bars represent the standard deviation. NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio;PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; TARE: transarterial radioembolization

    Predictors of response to TARE

    Predictors of response to treatment are shown in Table 4. Univariate predictors of non-response to TARE included age ≥ 65 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.06, 95%CI: 1.12-14.80,P= 0.034], ALBI grade ≥ 2 (OR = 6.14,95%CI: 1.60-23.50,P= 0.008), pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 (OR = 15.94, 95%CI: 2.92-87.06,P= 0.001) and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 (OR = 6.17, 95%CI: 1.58-24.05,P= 0.009). On multivariate analysis, pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was a significant variable associated with non-response to TARE (OR = 7.83, 95%CI: 1.14-53.61,P= 0.036), while pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 was not a significant variable associated with non-response to TARE (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 0.49-18.34,P= 0.232).

    Time to progression

    TTP for pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR is shown in Figure 4. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression than pre-treatment NLR < 2.83 at 6 months post-TARE (43.6%vs.10.0%,P= 0.014, log-rank). Pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 was also associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression than pre-treatment PLR > 83 at 6 months post-TARE (38.6%vs.0%,P=0.010, log-rank). Median TTP was not reached in any group.

    Table 4. Predictors of non-response to TARE

    Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curves for time to progression grouped according to pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR cutoff values.Censored events are represented by vertical lines. NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    DISCUSSION

    Traditional ways of monitoring response to TARE have relied on imaging techniques such as CT or MRI.While imaging has been the best modality to demonstrate changes in tumor size, it may require months to see a visible response. Patients who did not respond to therapy during this time may have had disease progression. Therefore, it would be advantageous to find prognostic markers that can predict tumor response or progression prior to subsequent imaging. Inflammation-based markers, such as NLR and PLR,may provide an ideal solution as they are relatively easy to obtain from routine laboratory results and have established prognostic value in previous studies on HCC[11-14].

    This study sought to determine the ability of NLR and PLR to predict response to TARE as primary treatment for HCC. We demonstrated that a pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was associated with non-response to TARE in both univariate and multivariate analysis. These findings were in agreement with Taussiget al.[21],who previously used a similar grouping system based on mRECIST to demonstrate that an elevated NLR is associated with tumor progression after intra-arterial therapy. Although other studies have shown that an elevated NLR was associated with poor overall survival following TARE, none of these studies reported specifically on tumor progression based on imaging[22,23]. These results taken together suggest that NLR may be a valuable prognostic marker in TARE.

    Notably, we found that an elevated pre-treatment PLR predicted non-response to TARE in univariate analysis but was not a significant variable in our multivariate model. This suggests that the pre-treatment NLR may be superior to pre-treatment PLR in predicting non-response to TARE. Nonetheless, this result may be limited by our small sample size. To our knowledge, this was the first study to examine the prognostic capabilities of PLR in TARE based specifically on tumor response to therapy. D’emicet al.[24]previously suggested in their study of 116 patients who received selective internal radiation therapy that pre-treatment PLR > 78 was the most predictive serum marker associated with improved overall survival.However, it is difficult to make definitive conclusions about NLR and PLR in HCC as their study also included other cancer types and only 37 patients had HCC. Future studies are therefore needed to compare the prognostic capabilities of PLR compared to NLR in TARE.

    On TTP analysis, we found that pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 were both associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-TARE. The median TTP was not yet reached in all groups. This is consistent with previous results published by Salemet al.[3], who found that the median TTP for radioembolization was greater than 26 months. On the basis of these results,both the pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR may have utility in predicting tumor progression at 6 months following TARE. Nonetheless, the prognostic value of NLR could have a distinct advantage over PLR because pre-treatment NLR < 2.83 was also associated with response to treatment in our multivariate logistic regression analysis. NLR may therefore have greater clinical utility than PLR as pre-treatment NLR was predictive of both tumor progression and potential response to therapy in our cohort. In comparison,pre-treatment PLR was only predictive of tumor progression in our TTP analysis.

    The ALBI grade was a newer model proposed by Johnsonet al.[25]that offered better discriminatory capabilities compared to the Child-Pugh class. While other studies reported that the ALBI grade was predictive of survival following TARE, our multivariate model did not find the ALBI grade helpful in predicting response to TARE[26,27]. Since the ALBI grade likely reflects underlying liver function, it may be more suitable for determining longer-term overall survival following TARE, rather than predicting specific tumor response to treatment.

    The underlying mechanism behind NLR and PLR is not well understood. However, it is generally recognized that inflammation plays a key role in the development of cancer[15,17]. Neutrophils can favor a pro-mutagenic state with the abundant release of reactive oxygen species and proteases[28]. In addition,platelets may support a pro-tumor microenvironment with the release of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblastic growth factor[29]. These observations, coupled with the fact that lymphopenia has been associated with advanced disease in various tumors, may be reflected in systemic inflammation-based markers such as NLR and PLR[30]. Nonetheless, more research is needed to better understand the basis of these two markers.

    This study was limited in that this was a single center study with a small sample size. This study was also retrospective, and the exact timings of imaging and laboratory studies were not collected consistently as part of a study protocol. Missing data in some patients may have also contributed to our small sample size.In addition, several patients may have had laboratory data collected for other medical issues unrelated to TARE, which may have influenced NLR and PLR.

    Despite these limitations, the results of this study suggest that the pre-treatment NLR may predict response to TARE as primary treatment for HCC. Furthermore, the pre-treatment NLR may also have better prognostic value than the pre-treatment PLR or ALBI grade in predicting tumor response to therapy.These findings may help clinicians identify patients who are expected to respond poorly to TARE prior to treatment and enable them to consider additional or alternative therapies. However, future studies that examine NLR and PLR in a larger cohort prospectively will be necessary to draw definitive conclusions about the prognostic capabilities of these two inflammation-based markers.

    DECLARATIONS

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank the interventional radiology group, Pacific Endovascular, for its services.Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Anthony Herrera and Dr. Chuong Nguyen for their guidance and assistance with the concept design and instruction on review of images.

    Authors’ contributions

    Drafting of manuscript: Yoneoka G

    Data collection: Yoneoka G, Bozhilov K, Wong LL Data analysis: Yoneoka G, Wong LL

    Critical review of manuscript: Bozhilov K, Wong LL Conception: Wong LL

    Availability of data and materials

    Data inquiries may be forwarded to the corresponding author.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    This study was partially supported by National Institutes of Health (1U01CA230690-01).

    Conflicts of interest

    Mr. Grant Yoneoka and Dr. Kliment Bozhilov declared that there are no conflicts of interest. Dr. Linda Wong is on the Speakers Bureau for Eisai.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Queen’s Medical Center and was determined to be exempt from needing informed consent.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2020.

    猜你喜歡
    驢皮繞指柔老黃
    “老黃”和“小蕭”
    百煉鋼 繞指柔
    太鋼集團(tuán):情注“繞指柔”創(chuàng)新“中國(guó)造”
    黨建(2022年7期)2022-05-30 10:48:04
    嘴碎的“老黃”
    百煉鋼化作繞指柔 逆風(fēng)者致敬逆風(fēng)人 歌曲《逆風(fēng)而行》創(chuàng)作心路歷程
    黃河之聲(2020年5期)2020-05-21 08:25:46
    俠世界月報(bào)
    完美的驢皮
    “親戚”老黃
    關(guān)鍵人物
    參花(上)(2014年6期)2014-12-11 15:22:13
    完美的驢皮
    北方人(2012年5期)2012-04-29 00:44:03
    他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| ponron亚洲| 国产99白浆流出| 国产老妇女一区| 国产老妇女一区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 免费看a级黄色片| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 搞女人的毛片| 91在线观看av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久久九九精品影院| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 宅男免费午夜| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 特级一级黄色大片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 宅男免费午夜| 色吧在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产成人a区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| a级毛片a级免费在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久6这里有精品| 88av欧美| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 手机成人av网站| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 女警被强在线播放| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 91在线观看av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 亚洲av免费在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 操出白浆在线播放| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 97超视频在线观看视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久久精品大字幕| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| av天堂在线播放| 成人国产综合亚洲| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| www日本在线高清视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 全区人妻精品视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 亚洲,欧美精品.| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 91av网一区二区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 一级黄片播放器| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 我要搜黄色片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产熟女xx| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 一夜夜www| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久性生活片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美日本视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 色综合婷婷激情| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产熟女xx| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| 窝窝影院91人妻| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 51国产日韩欧美| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产亚洲欧美98| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产色婷婷99| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久久国产成人免费| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 成人18禁在线播放| 在线视频色国产色| 国产成人av教育| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 天堂网av新在线| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| xxxwww97欧美| 看免费av毛片| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 中文资源天堂在线| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美激情在线99| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 一级黄片播放器| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 看免费av毛片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲av成人av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 色吧在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 波多野结衣高清无吗| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产精品永久免费网站| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产精品影院久久| a级毛片a级免费在线| 99热6这里只有精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 色综合婷婷激情| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 成年版毛片免费区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 在线视频色国产色| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产熟女xx| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美zozozo另类| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产高潮美女av| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 级片在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 在线播放无遮挡| 午夜免费观看网址| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 一夜夜www| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 香蕉丝袜av| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 少妇的逼水好多| 床上黄色一级片| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| www.色视频.com| 久久伊人香网站| 精品国产三级普通话版| av黄色大香蕉| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 色综合站精品国产| 在线播放无遮挡| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 精品福利观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人av教育| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| avwww免费| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产高清激情床上av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产精品三级大全| 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 成人无遮挡网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久性视频一级片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 夜夜爽天天搞| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 在线视频色国产色| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产老妇女一区| 一夜夜www| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | av女优亚洲男人天堂| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人18禁在线播放| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美区成人在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产综合懂色| 欧美在线黄色| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 午夜影院日韩av| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人国产综合亚洲| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 天堂动漫精品| 国产综合懂色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久国产精品影院| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 级片在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产成人av教育| av天堂中文字幕网| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 悠悠久久av| tocl精华| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日本 欧美在线| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 色综合站精品国产| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美大码av| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 草草在线视频免费看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 长腿黑丝高跟| 日本熟妇午夜| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日本熟妇午夜| 一本一本综合久久| 免费看a级黄色片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久久大精品| 黄色成人免费大全| 热99re8久久精品国产| 一区福利在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 国产99白浆流出| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品,欧美在线| 免费av观看视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 有码 亚洲区| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| www.www免费av| 国产av在哪里看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一本综合久久免费| 香蕉丝袜av| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 丁香欧美五月| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 久久亚洲真实| 久久精品91蜜桃| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 色视频www国产| 色在线成人网| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲真实| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 成年版毛片免费区| 一本久久中文字幕| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久|