• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Can MODIS Detect Trends in Aerosol Optical Depth over Land?

    2018-01-09 05:35:21XuehuaFANXiangaoXIAandHongbinCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年2期

    Xuehua FAN,Xiang’ao XIA,and Hongbin CHEN

    1Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    2School of the Earth Science,Chinese Academy of Science University,Beijing 100049,China

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    ?Original Paper?

    Can MODIS Detect Trends in Aerosol Optical Depth over Land?

    Xuehua FAN?1,Xiang’ao XIA1,2,3,and Hongbin CHEN1,2,3

    1Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    2School of the Earth Science,Chinese Academy of Science University,Beijing 100049,China

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)sensor onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite has been collecting valuable data about the Earth system for more than 14 years,and one of the benefits of this is that it has made it possible to detect the long-term variation in aerosol loading across the globe.However,the long-term aerosol optical depth(AOD)trends derived from MODIS need careful validation and assessment,especially over land.Using AOD products with at least 70 months’worth of measurements collected during 2002–15 at 53 Aerosol Robotic Network(AERONET)sites over land,Mann–Kendall(MK)trends in AOD were derived and taken as the ground truth data for evaluating the corresponding results from MODIS onboard Aqua.The results showed that the AERONET AOD trends over all sites in Europe and North America,as well as most sites in Africa and Asia,can be reproduced by MODIS/Aqua.However,disagreement in AOD trends between MODIS and AERONET was found at a few sites in Australia and South America.The AOD trends calculated from AERONET instantaneous data at the MODIS overpass times were consistent with those from AERONET daily data,which suggests that the AOD trends derived from satellite measurements of 1–2 overpasses may be representative of those from daily measurements.

    MODIS,AERONET,Aerosol Optical Depth,Mann–Kendall trend test

    1.Introduction

    Aerosols remain one of the largest uncertainties in estimates and interpretation of the changes in Earth’s energy budget(Boucher et al.,2013).Aerosol optical depth(AOD),which is related to the column-integrated aerosol amount,is a basic optical parameter used to estimate the aerosol radiative forcing.There is compelling reason to study long-term trends in AOD to help us ascertain the effects of aerosols on climate change.The Aerosol Robotic Network(AERONET)is a network of automated ground-based sunphotometers,which has been providing globally distributed,quality-assured observations of AOD since the 1990s(Holben et al.,1998).Observations were made over more than 7 years at 77 stations that are distributed around the world,which make the analysis of long-term trends in AOD possible.Linear trends in AOD and ?ngstr¨om exponent values using AERONET level 2.0 aerosol products were reported by Xia(2011)and Yoon et al.(2012).Uncertainties in trends due to cloud disturbances were estimated using the weighted trends,depending on the monthlystandarddeviation(SD)andnumberofobservations.Decreasing trends in AOD were observed in Western Europe,with the maximum trend of ?0.12(10 yr)?1at Belsk and North America,and with trends ranging from?0.04(10 yr)?1at Egbert to ?0.07(10 yr)?1at MD_Science-Center(Xia,2011).Li et al.(2014)presented trends in 440 nm AOD from 90 AERONET stations using two statistical methods—the Mann–Kendall(MK)test with Sen’s slope estimator and linear least-squares fitting.Negative trends in AOD were also found at most sites in North America and Europe.In addition,there were downward trends of?0.08,?0.06 and?0.03(10 yr)?1at CUIABA-MIRANDA in South America and at Osaka and Shirahma in Japan.Signi ficant increasing trends were found at Kanpur[0.08(10 yr)?1]in India and at Solar-Village[0.13(10 yr)?1]on the Arabian Peninsula.The authors noted that the trends derived from AERONET AOD measurements are more robust compared with those from AERONET inversion products.

    AOD from satellite measurements can provide global AODtrends.A number of studies haveassessedtendencies in AOD from several satellite products,such as those from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer(Mishchenko et al.,2007;Zhao et al.,2008),the Sea-viewing Wide Fieldof-view Sensor(SeaWiFS;Yoon et al.,2011;Hsu et al.,2012),the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer(MISR;Kahn et al.,2007),the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS;Yu et al.,2009;Zhang and Reid,2010;Zhang et al.,2017),and the Along Track Scanning Radiometer(Thomas et al.,2010).The AOD retrieval algorithms,underlying assumptions and uncertainties involved in creating the products differ between the satellite sensors(Petrenko et al.,2012).These AOD products have substantial discrepancies(Kokhanovsky et al.,2007;Mishchenko et al.,2007;Thomas et al.,2010).The discrepancies remain so large that they can hardly be utilized to obtain a consistent and unified AOD trend(Li et al.,2009).Especially on regional scales,the differences can be much larger and more complex.Note that most of the studies mentioned above focused on the AOD trends from satellites over the ocean.Few studies have been carried out on AOD trends using satellite aerosol products over land(Yoon et al.,2011;Hsu et al.,2012),where the aerosol and surface characteristics are more complicated than those over the ocean.Yoon et al.(2011)and Hsu et al.(2012)evaluated the linear trends of SeaWiFS AOD using AERONET measurements over a limited number of land and coastal sites.Significant positive trends derived from SeaWiFS AOD were found over the Arabian Peninsula,India,southern China and eastern China,with linear slopes of 0.0092±0.0013,0.0063±0.0020,0.0049±0.0018 and 0.0032±0.0018 yr?1,respectively.However,Li et al.(2014)reported declines of?0.10 and?0.18(10 yr)?1in AERONET AOD at Beijing(2002–13)and Xianghe(2005–12)on the NorthChinaPlain.NegativeAODtrends overthe eastcoastal regionofChinasince2008werealsorevealedbyMODISand MISR satellite measurements(Zhang et al.,2017).

    Several recent studies have analyzed aerosol variations andtrendsusingdifferentmodelsanddatafrommultipleplatforms.Chin et al.(2014)investigated aerosol tendencies and variations over a period of 30 years(1980–2009)using the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport model and multiple satellite sensors and ground-based networks.They found that the model-calculated global annually averaged AOD values showed little trend—a result that highlights the necessity of studying regional-scale AOD trends.Pozzer et al.(2015)compared the AOD trends from MODIS,SeaW-iFS and MISR satellite measurements with simulated values from the ECHAM/Modular Earth Submodel System Atmospheric Chemistry(EMAC)general circulation model covering the decade(2001–10)on a global scale.The simulation results showed that the model could qualitatively reproduce the MODIS AOD trends over North America,Eastern Europe,North Africa and the Middle East,while some discrepancies were found for other regions.The application of a newly developed satellite AOD dataset,such as the MODIS collection 6,will be helpful to improve the reliability of these datasets and reduce artificial trends(Lyapustin et al.,2014;Pozzer et al.,2015).

    The MODIS sensor onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite has been collecting valuable data about the Earth system for more than 14 years,which has made it possible to detect the longterm variation in aerosol loading across the globe.However,the long-term AOD trends derived from MODIS need careful validation and assessment,especially over land.It is necessarytocomparetheAODtrendsfromtheMODISsensorwith those from ground-based observations,which was the primary objective of the present study.Furthermore,most satellite aerosol products are derived from polar-orbiting satellites that pass overhead at a fixed time of day;for example,Terra passes overhead at 1010–1130 LST and Aqua passes overhead at 1230–1400 LST.Therefore,only 1–2 overpasses with aerosol retrievals collected at a fixed time of the day are available from these polar-orbiting satellites.When we use these satellite aerosol products to study long-term trends,one question that arises is whether the long-term AOD trend derived from satellite measurements of 1–2 overpasses can be representative of that determined from daily measurements.This was the second objective of the present work,which is somewhat similar to the analysis performed by Kaufman et al.(2000),who investigated whether daily aerosol abundances and properties could be represented by the aerosol products from the Terra and Aqua polar orbiting satellites.They showed that the annual average AOD could be calculated from Terra and Aqua aerosol products within a 2%error level,and this conclusion was independent of the particle size or range of the AOD.

    2.Data and method

    2.1.Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System AOD

    The Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System(MAPSS)is a framework that provides statistics on spatial and temporal subsets of level 2.0 aerosol scientific datasets from spaceborne sensors as MODIS and MISR.The data system is described in detail in Petrenko et al.(2012).The AERONET sites were identified as focal points for spatial statistics.Theprocessofgeneratingthestatisticsforeachspatial spaceborne aerosol product involved extracting values of the pixels that fell within a diameter of approximately 50 km centered on the chosen AERONET site.Statistics for groundbased temporal observations collected at a particular station were derived from measurements taken within±30 min of each satellite overpass of this location.The MODIS dataset obtained from MAPSS used in this paper is a merged dataset comprising the dark target(DT)and deep blue(DB)AOD products filtered by quality assurance(QA)processes.Unless otherwise specified,all the analyses in this paper are based on AOD at 550 nm.The highest quality(QA=3)AODs retrieved by the DB algorithm have been shown to have an absolute uncertainty of approximately 0.03+0.20τMfor a typicalAtmosphereMassFactorof2.8(Sayeretal.,2013),where τMis MODIS retrieved AOD.The uncertainty of MODIS DT AOD has been estimated to be 0.05+0.15τAover land(Levy et al.,2010,2013),where τAis collocated AERONET AOD.Data at 53 AERONET stations were chosen for this analysis because their measurements are available for a relatively longer period compared with other stations.Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of these stations,with their data lengths represented by the colors.

    2.2.Data analysis

    We used quality-assured and cloud-screened level 2.0 AERONET AOD data,with a low uncertainty of 0.01–0.02(Holben et al.,1998).Three daily series were calculated from instantaneous AOD products as follows:AERONET daily mean AOD was calculated from all instantaneous AOD measurements each day;AERONET morning and afternoon mean AOD was calculated from instantaneous AOD measurements within±30 min of the Terra and Aqua overpass times;and monthly median AOD was calculated from the daily mean AERONET AOD if there were more than five daily measurements each month[AOD reference value(AODRE)],which was taken as a benchmark for comparison with other estimates.The monthly median AOD in the morning(AODAM)and in the afternoon(AODPM)were also calculated if at least five daily measurements were available each month.The monthly median was used in the trend test instead of the monthly mean because AOD does not follow a normal distribution.The AOD trends derived from AODRE,AODAMand AODPMwere compared to determine whether the trends derived from AERONET AOD measured at the Terra and Aqua overpass times were representative of those derived from daily mean AERONET AOD.The monthly medians of AODMODwere calculated from all collocated AOD from MODIS/Aqua provided by the MAPSS system if there were more than five daily measurements each month.The AOD trends from AODMODwere compared with those of AODREto determine whether AERONET AOD trends could be reproduced by MODIS.The trends from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua AOD at each site were calculated based on the measurements during the same measurement period.Although the comparison of the AODREand AODMODtrends mentioned above was based on measurements during the same study period,AOD measurements were not necessarily available simultaneously from AERONET and MODIS each day.Therefore,the monthly median AOD from AERONET and MODIS were probably calculated from different daily measurements.In other words,itwaspossible thatdaily AOD was available from AERONET,but MODIS/Aqua had no AOD product,or vice versa.This situation arose because of insufficient temporal coverage by MODIS or insufficient spatial coverage by AERONET.Since the difference in temporal sampling was not considered in calculating the monthly median AOD values,the trends in the MODIS and AERONET data may not have been consistent.The AOD measurements from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua were matched day-byday,and the monthly medians were then recalculated for all the sites to assess the potential effects of sampling issues on the comparison of AOD trends.

    2.3.Trend detection

    The MK test was used to detect monotonic trends.The MK test is a rank-based non-parametric test for assessing the significance of a trend,which requires that the data be independent.The null hypothesis(H0)is that a sample of data,{X1,X2...,Xn},is independent and identically distributed.The alternative hypothesis(H1)is that a monotonic trend exists in X .The slope b of the trend is computed using the method proposed by Sen(1968)as follows:

    where b is the slope of the trend,Xiand Xjare the ith and the jth observations respectively.The slope is robust for estimating the magnitude of a trend(Yue and Wang,2002)and much less sensitive to outliers compared with linear regression coefficient(Li et al.,2014).

    Thenon-parametrictestismoresuitablefornon-normally distributed,censored,and missing data(Yue and Wang,2002),such as the AERONET AOD data(Li et al.,2014).However,the AOD time series,which have distinct seasonal variability,frequently display statistically significant serial correlation.The existence of positive serial correlation in a time series increases the probability of the MK test detecting a significant trend(Hirsch and Slack,1984;Yue and Wang,2002).Therefore,a pre-whitening scheme proposed by Yue et al.(2002)was used to eliminate the inf l uence of serial correlation on the MK trend detections.First,the slope(b)of the trend in an AOD time series was estimated using Eq.(1).If b was almost equal to zero,then it was not necessary to continue performing the trend analysis.If it differed from zero,the AOD time series were detrended using

    where r1is the lag-1 autocorrelation coefficient,is the detrended series at time t?1.Third,the identified trend was addedbacktotheresidualaccordingtothefollowingequation:

    It was evident that the blended time series(Yt)preserved the true trend and was no longer inf l uenced by the effects of autocorrelation.The MK test and Sen’s slope estimator were applied to the blended series to estimate the trend in AOD time series.Hirschand Slack(1984)developed a seasonal MK test and estimated the annual trend as the median of the seasonal trends—an approach that is resistant to data seasonality and serialdependence.Thus,thepre-whiteningschemedescribed by Yue et al.(2002)was adopted first.Then,the seasonal MK test of Hirsch and Slack(1984)and Sen’s slope estimator were applied to the pre-whitened time series of AOD.

    3.Results and discussion

    Table 1 shows that relatively low monthly mean AOD(<0.15)was found in Australia,Europe,North America and South America,except at CUIABA-MIRANDA,where the aerosols were in fl uenced by biomass burning in the Amazon region.The sites located in the semi-arid Sahel region(suchasBanizoumbou,Dakar,andIER_Cinzana),andinEast Asia(Beijing and Chen-Kung_Univ),as well as northern India(Kanpur),showed higher monthly mean AOD(>0.35).

    Table 2 shows that the majority of sites exhibited negative trends of AODRE,including all stations in Europe,North America,South America and most sites in Africa(eight of nine)and Asia(seven of nine),although the trends were not statistically signi ficant at some sites.A signi ficant increasing trend in AODRE[0.12(10 yr)?1]was found only at Solar Village in Saudi Arabia.The strong positive trend there has also been noted in AOD measurements collected by Sea-WiFS(Hsu et al.,2012),MISR(de Meij et al.,2012a)and MODIS/Aqua(this study),as well as EMAC model simulations(de Meij et al.,2012b;Pozzer et al.,2015).AODREat Skukuza in South Africa,Kanpur in India,and Birdsville in Australia showed trends that were increasing but were not statistically significant.

    Comparisons of the trends between AODREand AODAM,between AODREand AODPM,and between AODREand AODMODare illustrated in Figs.2–4,respectively.The tendencies in AODREwere reproduced by AODAMand AODPMat nearly all stations.The trend magnitudes of AODAMand AODPMwere also close to those from AODREat most stations.The results suggest that AOD measured at Terra or Aqua overpass times could represent the trends derived from daily measurements.

    The trends in AODREand AODMODwere consistent over 44ofthesites.AllsitesinEuropeandNorthAmericashowed the same tendencies.Opposite MK trends between AODREand AODMODwere found at one of nine sites in Africa(Banizoumbou),four of nine sites in Asia(Beijing,Xianghe,Nes-Ziona and SEDE-BOKER),three of four sites in Oceania(Birdsville,Canberra and Jabiru),and three of four sites in South America(CEILAP-BA,La-Parguera,and Trelew).

    The tendencies of the strictly matched monthly medians of AODREand AODMOD(i.e.,monthly medians calculated from simultaneous measurements from both products)remainedunchangedexceptatBeijinginChina,whichsuggests that the temporal differences in sampling between AODREand AODMODhas little effect on the detection of AOD trends in most cases.If the temporal sampling difference was not accounted for,the AODREat Beijing showed a significant decreasing trend[?0.08(10 yr)?1]but the AODMODexhibited a weak increasing trend[0.01(10 yr)?1].The trend in AODMODchanged to ?0.03(10 yr)?1if the daily measurements from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua were strictly matched.Additionally,the seasonal MK tests of MODIS and AERONET AOD exhibited the same trend signs at Xianghe as those reported by Zhang et al.(2017).Increasing trends of 0.001 yr?1(MODIS)and 0.004 yr?1(AERONET)were found from 2002 to 2007,but there were downward trends of?0.006 yr?1(MODIS)and ?0.004 yr?1(AERONET)from 2008 to 2015.However,consistent declines in AERONET AOD and MODIS/Aqua AOD were found at Beijing during the two periods(2002–07 and 2008–15).

    AOD over Australia is typically low,with occasional high AOD events mostly resulting from locally derived or transported smoke from wildfires and mineral dust(Qin and Mitchell,2009).Another interesting feature seen in this region is that the surface ref l ectance is relatively high,because of the abundance of bare soil and desert.Both factors indicate that it is very hard to retrieve AOD with high quality.Validation has shown that the correlation between AERONET and MODIS AOD is lower over Australia than in other regions(Sayer et al.,2013).Figure 5a shows the time series of the monthly medians of AODREand AODMOD(shown as a dependent variable on the left-hand y-axis)and the AOD anomaly(shown as a dependent variable on the right-hand y-axis)defined as the difference between theAODMODand the monthly averaged AODREover all years at Birdsville,Australia.An interesting feature is that all the AOD anomalies were positive before September 2008,i.e.,MODIS/Aqua overestimated AOD,but AOD was underestimated by MODIS afterwards.The shift in the AOD anomalies resulted in the artificially negative trend in AODMODseen at Birdsville.This same scenario also occurred at Canberra.Trelew is in the middle of the Argentinean Patagonia,where the monthly median AOD is less than 0.10.A shift in AOD anomalies after March 2008(Fig.5b)resulted in an artificially positive tendency in AODMOD.The reason for these abrupt changes in MODIS performance compared with AERONET at these stations needs further study.

    Table 1.Site locations,study periods and 550-nm monthly mean AOD±SD from the four data records at the 53 selected stations.AODRE is monthly mean AOD calculated from the daily AERONET AOD if there were more than five daily measurements each month.AODAM and AODPMis monthly mean AOD calculated from AERONET instantaneous AOD measurements within±30 min of the Terra and Aqua overpass times.AODMODwere calculated from all collocated AOD from MODIS/Aqua provided by the MAPSS system if there were more than five daily measurements each month.

    Table 2.Site locations,study periods and decadal trends in 550-nm AOD from the four data records at the 53 selected stations.Bold font indicates trends that are statistically significant at the 95%confidence level.

    Fig.2.Comparison of decadal trends between AODREand AODAMin different regions.The trends estimated from AODREand AODAMare shown on the x-axes and the y-axes,respectively,in the scatterplots.Blue solid diamonds indicate that the trends from both AODREand AODAMwere statistically significant.Red solid squares indicate that the AODREtrend was statistically significant but the AODAMtrend was statistically non-significant.Green asterisks indicate that the AODREtrend was statistically non-significant but the AODAMtrend was statistically significant.Cyan crosses indicate that the trends from AODREand AODAMwere statistically non-significant.The black dots in the map represented the locations of sites,and the numbers of sites in the different regions are given in parentheses in the scatter-plots.

    Banizoumbou,in the semi-arid Sahel region and inf l uenced by dust emissions and/or biomass burning(Levy et al.,2010),showed high AOD.Studies have shown that,from the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s in the Sahara and Sahel regions,near-surface wind speed decreased,precipitation increased,and therefore dust emissions decreased(Chin et al.,2014).This finding of a reduction in AOD is also supported by insitu aerosol measurements(Li et al.,2014)and model simulations(Chin et al.,2014).The AODREand AODMODat other stations in the Sahel showed a declining trend.Therefore,the increasing trend at Banizoumbou(although non-signi ficant)seen in the MODIS data seems likely to be spurious.

    The sites of SEDE_BOKER and Nes-Ziona are in Israel,where aerosols are in fl uenced both by mineral dust transported from the Saharan and Arabian deserts and fine-mode pollution emitted by the petroleum industry in this region(Yoon et al.,2012).The AOD at these two sites showed a decreasing tendency based on AERONET measurements,which is consistent with the results reported by Yoon et al.(2012)and Li et al.(2014).Yoon et al.(2012)noted that the decreased AERONET AOD at SEDE-BOKER was due to a decrease in coarse-mode particles[approximately?0.29(10 yr)?1for coarse-mode AOD].MODIS/Aqua AOD generally produced overestimates at SEDE_BOKER,where 98%ofthemonthlymediananomalies werepositive(Fig.5c).The retrieval uncertainty of MODIS AOD under conditions with heavy aerosol loading is mainly related to the aerosol mode assumptions.The MODIS retrieval algorithm assumes a constant single-scattering albedo value;however,the AERONET single-scattering albedo at SEDE_BOKER shows an increasing trend[0.004(10 yr)?1](Li et al.,2014).Therefore,the temporal change in single-scattering albedo may produce a spurious tendency in the AOD retrieved by MODIS(Mishchenko et al.,2007,2012;Li et al.,2014).

    Fig.3.As Fig.2,except that the trend comparisons are between AODREand AODPM.

    Fig.4.As Fig.2,except that the trend comparisons are between AODREand AODMOD.

    Fig.5.Comparison of AERONET AOD(AODRE)and MODIS/Aqua AOD(AODMOD)at(a)Birdsville in Australia,(b)Trelew in Argentina,and(c)SEDE_BOKER in Israel.The AOD anomalies are shown as blue solid lines,which are matched to the right-hand ordinate axis,and the blue dashed lines indicate that the anomaly is 0.

    In addition,we found a few high-altitude sites(>1.2 km)in North America(BSRN-BAO_Boulder,Railroad_Valley,Sevilleta,TABLE_MOUNTAIN-CA)and Asia(Dalanzadgad)where AERONET AOD was not suitable for representing the regional AOD trend due to a lack of spatial representation.The retrieval accuracy of MODIS AOD at such sites is impacted by the weak aerosol signal due to the very low aerosol loading(Levy et al.,2010;Sayer et al.,2013).Thus,high-altitude sites(>1.2 km)were excluded in the AOD trend analyses.

    4.Conclusions

    AOD trends derived from MODIS/Aqua and AERONET at 53 stations in land areas in various locations across the globe were compared and analyzed.The major findings can be summarized as follows:

    AOD trends calculated from daily measurements can be accuratelyreproducedbyAODmeasurementscollectedatthe overpass time of MODIS,which indicates that MODIS has the potential to capture AOD trends.

    Consistent AOD tendencies calculated from the monthly medians of the AERONET and MODIS/Aqua AOD products were derived at 44 of 53 sites.However,this was not true for sites in Australia,where the retrieval accuracy of MODIS/Aqua AOD data was found to be poor due to the very low aerosol loading(monthly median AOD<0.15)and the relatively higher surface ref l ectance of bare soil and/or desert.Disagreement in the AOD trends between MODIS and AERONET was also found at a few sites in South America.This was due to the low retrieval quality in MODIS/Aqua AOD and likely resulted from improper surface ref l ectance parameterization and uncertainties in the aerosol model used in the algorithm(Levy et al.,2010).Furthermore,sampling issues should be evaluated carefully when deriving long-term trends in AOD in regions where AOD shows substantial dayto-day variation.

    Merged data based on the MODIS AOD products derived from both the DT and DB algorithms are used in many studies to investigate the long-term AOD trends over land areas in various locations throughout the world.In some regions,the typical AOD and its variability are low,close to the magnitude of the retrieval uncertainty,which affects the estimation of the AOD trends.However,the current MODIS AOD products do provide a continuous aerosol data record for monitoring long-term climate change.

    Acknowledgements.This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41475027,41475138 and 41675033).We are grateful to the AERONET team and MAPSS team,especially the PIs of the selected AERONET sites,for providing the data used in this study.We are also thankful for the suggestions and comments from the two anonymous reviewers and the editor,which helped to improve the manuscript.

    Boucher,O.,and Coauthors,2013:Clouds and Aerosols.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al.,Eds.,Cambridge University Press.

    Chin,M.,and Coauthor,2014:Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009:A perspective from observations and a global model.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,14,3657–3690,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3657-2014.

    de Meij,A.,A.Pozzer,and J.Lelieveld,2012a:Trend analysis in aerosol optical depths and pollutant emission estimates between 2000 and 2009.Atmos.Environ.,51,75–85,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.059.

    de Meij,A.,A.Pozzer,A.,K.Pringle,H.Tost,and J.Lelieveld,2012b:EMAC model evaluation and analysis of atmospheric aerosol properties and distribution with a focus on the Mediterranean region.Atmos.Res.,114–115,38–69,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.014.

    Hirsch,R.M.,and J.R.Slack,1984:A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence.Water Res.Res.,20,727–732,https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727.

    Holben,B.N.,and Coauthors,1998:AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization.Remote Sens.Environ.,66,1–16,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5.

    Hsu,N.C.,R.Gautam,A.M.Sayer,C.Bettenhausen,C.Li,M.J.Jeong,S.-C.Tsay,and B.N.Holben,2012:Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,12,8037–8053,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012.

    Kahn,R.A.,M.J.Garay,D.L.Nelson,K.K.Yau,M.A.Bull,B.J.Gaitley,J.V.Martonchik,and R.C.Levy,2007:Satellitederived aerosol optical depth over dark water from MISR and MODIS:Comparisons with AERONET and implications for climatological studies.J.Geophys.Res.,112,D18205,https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008175.

    Kaufman,Y.J.,B.N.Holben,D.Tanr′e,I.Slutsker,A.Smirnov,and T.F.Eck,2000:Will aerosol measurements from Terra and Aqua Polar Orbiting satellites represent the daily aerosol abundance and properties?Geophys.Res.Lett.,27(23),3861–3864.

    Kokhanovsky,A.A.,and Coauthors,2007:Aerosol remote sensing over land:A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments.Atmos.Res.,85,372–394,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.02.008.

    Levy,R.C.,L.A.Remer,R.G.Kleidman,S.Mattoo,C.Ichoku,R.Kahn,and T.F.Eck,2010:Global evaluation of the collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,10 399–10 420,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010.

    Levy,R.C.,S.Mattoo,L.A.Munchak,L.A.Remer,A.M.Sayer,F.Patadia,and N.C.Hsu,2013:The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,6,2989–3034,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013.

    Li,Z.,and Coauthors,2009:Uncertainties in satellite remote sensing of aerosols and impact on monitoring its long-term trend:A review and perspective.Ann.Geophys.,27,2755–2770,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-2755-2009.

    Li,J.,B.E.Carlson,O.Dubovik,and A.A.Lacis,2014:Recent trends in aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,14,12 271–12 289,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1599-2015.

    Lyapustin,A.,and Coauthors,2014:Scientific impact of MODIS C5 calibration degradation and C6+improvements.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,7,4353–4365,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4353-2014.

    Mishchenko,M.I.,I.V.Geogdzhayev,W.B.Rossow,B.Cairns,B.E.Carlson,A.A.Lacis,L.Liu,and L.D.Travis,2007:Long-term satellite record reveals likely recent aerosol trend.Science,315,1543,https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709.

    Mishchenko,M.I.,L.Liu,I.V.Geogdzhayev,J.Li,B.E.Carlson,A.A.Lacis,B.Cairns,and L.D.Travis,2012:Aerosol retrievals from channel-1 and-2 AVHRR radiances:Long-term trends updated and revisited.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer,113,1974–1980,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.05.006.

    Petrenko,M.,C.Ichoku,and G.Leptoukh,2012:Multisensor Aerosol Products Sampling System(MAPSS).Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,5,913–926,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-913-2012.

    Pozzer,A.,A.de Meij,J.Yoon,H.Tost,A.K.Georgoulias,and M.Astitha,2015:AOD trends during 2001–2010 from observations and model simulations.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,15,5521–5535,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5521-2015.

    Qin,Y.,and R.M.Mitchell,2009: Characterisation of episodic aerosol types over the Australian continent.AtmosphericChemistry and Physics,9,1943–1956,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1943-2009.

    Sayer,A.M.,N.C.Hsu,C.Bettenhausen,and M.-J.Jeong,2013:Validation and uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6“Deep Blue”aerosol data.J.Geophys.Res.,118,7864–7872,https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50600.

    Sen,P.K.,1968:Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau.Journal of the American Statistical Association,63,1379–1389,https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934.

    Thomas,G.E.,and Coauthors,2010:Validation of the GRAPE single view aerosol retrieval for ATSR-2 and insights into the long term global AOD trend over the ocean.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,4849–4866,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4849-2010.

    Xia,X.G.,2011:Variability of aerosol optical depth and ?ngstr¨om wavelength exponent derived from AERONET observations in recent decades.Environ.Res.Lett.,6,044011,https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044011.

    Yue,S.,and C.Y.Wang,2002:Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the inf l uence of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test.Water Resour.Res.,38(6),1068,https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000861.

    Yue,S.,P.Pilon,B.Phinney,and G.Cavadias,2002:The inf l uence ofautocorrelationontheabilitytodetecttrendinhydrological series.Hydrological Processes,16,1807–1829.

    Yoon,J.,W.vonHoyningen-Huene,M.Vountas,andJ.P.Burrows,2011:Analysis of linear long-term trend of aerosol optical thickness derived from SeaWiFS using BAER over Europe and South China.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,11,12 149–12 167,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12149-2011.

    Yoon,J.,W.vonHoyningen-Huene,A.A.Kokhanovsky,M.Vountas,and J.P.Burrows,2012:Trend analysis of aerosol optical thickness and ?ngstr¨om exponent derived from the global AERONET spectral observations.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,5,1271–1299,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1271-2012.

    Yu,H.,M.Chin,L.A.Remer,R.G.Kleidman,N.Bellouin,H.Bian,and T.Diehl,2009:Variability of marine aerosol fine mode fraction and estimates of anthropogenic aerosol component over cloud-free oceans from the Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS).J.Geophys.Res.,114,D10206,https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010648.

    Zhang,J.,andJ.S.Reid,2010:Adecadalregionalandglobaltrend analysis of the aerosol optical depth using a data-assimilation grade over-water MODIS and Level 2 MISR aerosol products.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,10 949–10 963,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10949-2010.

    Zhang,J.L.,J.S.Reid,R.Alfaro-Contreras,and P.Xian,2017:Has China been exporting less particulate air pollution over the past decade?Geophys.Res.Lett.,44,2941–2948,https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072617.

    Zhao,X.-P.,I.Laszlo,W.Guo,A.Heidinger,C.Cao,A.Jelenak,D.Tarpley,and J.Sullivan,2008:Study of long-term trend in aerosol optical thickness observed from operational AVHRR satellite instrument.J.Geophys.Res.,113,D07201,https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009061.

    17 February 2017;revised 6 July 2017;accepted 11 July 2017)

    :Fan,X.H.,X.A.Xia,and H.B.Chen,2018:Can MODIS detect trends in aerosol optical depth over land?Adv.Atmos.Sci.,35(2),135–145,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7017-2.

    ?Corresponding author:Xuehua FAN

    Email:fxh@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ?Institute of Atmospheric Physics/Chinese Academy of Sciences,and Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,part of Springer Nature 2018

    在现免费观看毛片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 直男gayav资源| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 三级国产精品片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产成人a区在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久热精品热| 国产男女内射视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久久久网色| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美日本视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一区二区三区精品91| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久久色成人| 人妻 亚洲 视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 视频区图区小说| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 在线看a的网站| 国产高潮美女av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久久久久人妻| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 欧美zozozo另类| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产成人精品婷婷| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品一及| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产高潮美女av| 国产成人91sexporn| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 99久久人妻综合| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成人免费观看视频高清| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产精品成人在线| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 99热6这里只有精品| kizo精华| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 亚洲av.av天堂| 婷婷色综合www| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 在线看a的网站| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| www.色视频.com| 国产亚洲最大av| 色视频www国产| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 在线播放无遮挡| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产在线视频一区二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 简卡轻食公司| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲av福利一区| 人妻系列 视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 熟女电影av网| 欧美另类一区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 男女国产视频网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人影院久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播| h日本视频在线播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久精品人妻少妇| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 尾随美女入室| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 久久久久网色| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 男女免费视频国产| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av在线播放精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚州av有码| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 多毛熟女@视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美人与善性xxx| 黑人高潮一二区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久久色成人| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 成人影院久久| 日韩电影二区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美97在线视频| av免费观看日本| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| kizo精华| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩中字成人| 一级黄片播放器| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 少妇的逼好多水| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 精品午夜福利在线看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美97在线视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 日韩av免费高清视频| 老司机影院成人| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 久久6这里有精品| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久久视频综合| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 如何舔出高潮| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 美女内射精品一级片tv| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品三级大全| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 中国三级夫妇交换| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产精品无大码| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| h视频一区二区三区| av免费在线看不卡| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 免费大片18禁| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 777米奇影视久久| videos熟女内射| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 免费观看在线日韩| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 最黄视频免费看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 老司机影院毛片| 美女福利国产在线 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 春色校园在线视频观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 成人无遮挡网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品一及| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 91狼人影院| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 日韩一区二区三区影片| freevideosex欧美| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 九草在线视频观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 少妇高潮的动态图| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 成人特级av手机在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 国产精品免费大片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩av免费高清视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲av福利一区| 精品久久久噜噜| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲内射少妇av| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 午夜视频国产福利| 免费大片18禁| 精品酒店卫生间| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 九草在线视频观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 五月天丁香电影| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产一级毛片在线| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 免费看不卡的av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久大av| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 免费大片18禁| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 只有这里有精品99| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 91狼人影院| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 欧美性感艳星| 三级经典国产精品| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚州av有码| 午夜视频国产福利| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| a 毛片基地| 只有这里有精品99| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日韩成人伦理影院| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 黄片wwwwww| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 少妇人妻 视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产综合精华液| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 夫妻午夜视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲综合色惰| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产高清三级在线| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久久久国产电影| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久久人妻| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| av线在线观看网站| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 性色avwww在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 日韩一区二区三区影片| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产美女午夜福利| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| av.在线天堂| 免费看av在线观看网站| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产美女午夜福利| 日日撸夜夜添| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 色5月婷婷丁香| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美日本视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产视频内射|