• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Can MODIS Detect Trends in Aerosol Optical Depth over Land?

    2018-01-09 05:35:21XuehuaFANXiangaoXIAandHongbinCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年2期

    Xuehua FAN,Xiang’ao XIA,and Hongbin CHEN

    1Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    2School of the Earth Science,Chinese Academy of Science University,Beijing 100049,China

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    ?Original Paper?

    Can MODIS Detect Trends in Aerosol Optical Depth over Land?

    Xuehua FAN?1,Xiang’ao XIA1,2,3,and Hongbin CHEN1,2,3

    1Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    2School of the Earth Science,Chinese Academy of Science University,Beijing 100049,China

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)sensor onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite has been collecting valuable data about the Earth system for more than 14 years,and one of the benefits of this is that it has made it possible to detect the long-term variation in aerosol loading across the globe.However,the long-term aerosol optical depth(AOD)trends derived from MODIS need careful validation and assessment,especially over land.Using AOD products with at least 70 months’worth of measurements collected during 2002–15 at 53 Aerosol Robotic Network(AERONET)sites over land,Mann–Kendall(MK)trends in AOD were derived and taken as the ground truth data for evaluating the corresponding results from MODIS onboard Aqua.The results showed that the AERONET AOD trends over all sites in Europe and North America,as well as most sites in Africa and Asia,can be reproduced by MODIS/Aqua.However,disagreement in AOD trends between MODIS and AERONET was found at a few sites in Australia and South America.The AOD trends calculated from AERONET instantaneous data at the MODIS overpass times were consistent with those from AERONET daily data,which suggests that the AOD trends derived from satellite measurements of 1–2 overpasses may be representative of those from daily measurements.

    MODIS,AERONET,Aerosol Optical Depth,Mann–Kendall trend test

    1.Introduction

    Aerosols remain one of the largest uncertainties in estimates and interpretation of the changes in Earth’s energy budget(Boucher et al.,2013).Aerosol optical depth(AOD),which is related to the column-integrated aerosol amount,is a basic optical parameter used to estimate the aerosol radiative forcing.There is compelling reason to study long-term trends in AOD to help us ascertain the effects of aerosols on climate change.The Aerosol Robotic Network(AERONET)is a network of automated ground-based sunphotometers,which has been providing globally distributed,quality-assured observations of AOD since the 1990s(Holben et al.,1998).Observations were made over more than 7 years at 77 stations that are distributed around the world,which make the analysis of long-term trends in AOD possible.Linear trends in AOD and ?ngstr¨om exponent values using AERONET level 2.0 aerosol products were reported by Xia(2011)and Yoon et al.(2012).Uncertainties in trends due to cloud disturbances were estimated using the weighted trends,depending on the monthlystandarddeviation(SD)andnumberofobservations.Decreasing trends in AOD were observed in Western Europe,with the maximum trend of ?0.12(10 yr)?1at Belsk and North America,and with trends ranging from?0.04(10 yr)?1at Egbert to ?0.07(10 yr)?1at MD_Science-Center(Xia,2011).Li et al.(2014)presented trends in 440 nm AOD from 90 AERONET stations using two statistical methods—the Mann–Kendall(MK)test with Sen’s slope estimator and linear least-squares fitting.Negative trends in AOD were also found at most sites in North America and Europe.In addition,there were downward trends of?0.08,?0.06 and?0.03(10 yr)?1at CUIABA-MIRANDA in South America and at Osaka and Shirahma in Japan.Signi ficant increasing trends were found at Kanpur[0.08(10 yr)?1]in India and at Solar-Village[0.13(10 yr)?1]on the Arabian Peninsula.The authors noted that the trends derived from AERONET AOD measurements are more robust compared with those from AERONET inversion products.

    AOD from satellite measurements can provide global AODtrends.A number of studies haveassessedtendencies in AOD from several satellite products,such as those from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer(Mishchenko et al.,2007;Zhao et al.,2008),the Sea-viewing Wide Fieldof-view Sensor(SeaWiFS;Yoon et al.,2011;Hsu et al.,2012),the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer(MISR;Kahn et al.,2007),the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS;Yu et al.,2009;Zhang and Reid,2010;Zhang et al.,2017),and the Along Track Scanning Radiometer(Thomas et al.,2010).The AOD retrieval algorithms,underlying assumptions and uncertainties involved in creating the products differ between the satellite sensors(Petrenko et al.,2012).These AOD products have substantial discrepancies(Kokhanovsky et al.,2007;Mishchenko et al.,2007;Thomas et al.,2010).The discrepancies remain so large that they can hardly be utilized to obtain a consistent and unified AOD trend(Li et al.,2009).Especially on regional scales,the differences can be much larger and more complex.Note that most of the studies mentioned above focused on the AOD trends from satellites over the ocean.Few studies have been carried out on AOD trends using satellite aerosol products over land(Yoon et al.,2011;Hsu et al.,2012),where the aerosol and surface characteristics are more complicated than those over the ocean.Yoon et al.(2011)and Hsu et al.(2012)evaluated the linear trends of SeaWiFS AOD using AERONET measurements over a limited number of land and coastal sites.Significant positive trends derived from SeaWiFS AOD were found over the Arabian Peninsula,India,southern China and eastern China,with linear slopes of 0.0092±0.0013,0.0063±0.0020,0.0049±0.0018 and 0.0032±0.0018 yr?1,respectively.However,Li et al.(2014)reported declines of?0.10 and?0.18(10 yr)?1in AERONET AOD at Beijing(2002–13)and Xianghe(2005–12)on the NorthChinaPlain.NegativeAODtrends overthe eastcoastal regionofChinasince2008werealsorevealedbyMODISand MISR satellite measurements(Zhang et al.,2017).

    Several recent studies have analyzed aerosol variations andtrendsusingdifferentmodelsanddatafrommultipleplatforms.Chin et al.(2014)investigated aerosol tendencies and variations over a period of 30 years(1980–2009)using the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport model and multiple satellite sensors and ground-based networks.They found that the model-calculated global annually averaged AOD values showed little trend—a result that highlights the necessity of studying regional-scale AOD trends.Pozzer et al.(2015)compared the AOD trends from MODIS,SeaW-iFS and MISR satellite measurements with simulated values from the ECHAM/Modular Earth Submodel System Atmospheric Chemistry(EMAC)general circulation model covering the decade(2001–10)on a global scale.The simulation results showed that the model could qualitatively reproduce the MODIS AOD trends over North America,Eastern Europe,North Africa and the Middle East,while some discrepancies were found for other regions.The application of a newly developed satellite AOD dataset,such as the MODIS collection 6,will be helpful to improve the reliability of these datasets and reduce artificial trends(Lyapustin et al.,2014;Pozzer et al.,2015).

    The MODIS sensor onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite has been collecting valuable data about the Earth system for more than 14 years,which has made it possible to detect the longterm variation in aerosol loading across the globe.However,the long-term AOD trends derived from MODIS need careful validation and assessment,especially over land.It is necessarytocomparetheAODtrendsfromtheMODISsensorwith those from ground-based observations,which was the primary objective of the present study.Furthermore,most satellite aerosol products are derived from polar-orbiting satellites that pass overhead at a fixed time of day;for example,Terra passes overhead at 1010–1130 LST and Aqua passes overhead at 1230–1400 LST.Therefore,only 1–2 overpasses with aerosol retrievals collected at a fixed time of the day are available from these polar-orbiting satellites.When we use these satellite aerosol products to study long-term trends,one question that arises is whether the long-term AOD trend derived from satellite measurements of 1–2 overpasses can be representative of that determined from daily measurements.This was the second objective of the present work,which is somewhat similar to the analysis performed by Kaufman et al.(2000),who investigated whether daily aerosol abundances and properties could be represented by the aerosol products from the Terra and Aqua polar orbiting satellites.They showed that the annual average AOD could be calculated from Terra and Aqua aerosol products within a 2%error level,and this conclusion was independent of the particle size or range of the AOD.

    2.Data and method

    2.1.Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System AOD

    The Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System(MAPSS)is a framework that provides statistics on spatial and temporal subsets of level 2.0 aerosol scientific datasets from spaceborne sensors as MODIS and MISR.The data system is described in detail in Petrenko et al.(2012).The AERONET sites were identified as focal points for spatial statistics.Theprocessofgeneratingthestatisticsforeachspatial spaceborne aerosol product involved extracting values of the pixels that fell within a diameter of approximately 50 km centered on the chosen AERONET site.Statistics for groundbased temporal observations collected at a particular station were derived from measurements taken within±30 min of each satellite overpass of this location.The MODIS dataset obtained from MAPSS used in this paper is a merged dataset comprising the dark target(DT)and deep blue(DB)AOD products filtered by quality assurance(QA)processes.Unless otherwise specified,all the analyses in this paper are based on AOD at 550 nm.The highest quality(QA=3)AODs retrieved by the DB algorithm have been shown to have an absolute uncertainty of approximately 0.03+0.20τMfor a typicalAtmosphereMassFactorof2.8(Sayeretal.,2013),where τMis MODIS retrieved AOD.The uncertainty of MODIS DT AOD has been estimated to be 0.05+0.15τAover land(Levy et al.,2010,2013),where τAis collocated AERONET AOD.Data at 53 AERONET stations were chosen for this analysis because their measurements are available for a relatively longer period compared with other stations.Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of these stations,with their data lengths represented by the colors.

    2.2.Data analysis

    We used quality-assured and cloud-screened level 2.0 AERONET AOD data,with a low uncertainty of 0.01–0.02(Holben et al.,1998).Three daily series were calculated from instantaneous AOD products as follows:AERONET daily mean AOD was calculated from all instantaneous AOD measurements each day;AERONET morning and afternoon mean AOD was calculated from instantaneous AOD measurements within±30 min of the Terra and Aqua overpass times;and monthly median AOD was calculated from the daily mean AERONET AOD if there were more than five daily measurements each month[AOD reference value(AODRE)],which was taken as a benchmark for comparison with other estimates.The monthly median AOD in the morning(AODAM)and in the afternoon(AODPM)were also calculated if at least five daily measurements were available each month.The monthly median was used in the trend test instead of the monthly mean because AOD does not follow a normal distribution.The AOD trends derived from AODRE,AODAMand AODPMwere compared to determine whether the trends derived from AERONET AOD measured at the Terra and Aqua overpass times were representative of those derived from daily mean AERONET AOD.The monthly medians of AODMODwere calculated from all collocated AOD from MODIS/Aqua provided by the MAPSS system if there were more than five daily measurements each month.The AOD trends from AODMODwere compared with those of AODREto determine whether AERONET AOD trends could be reproduced by MODIS.The trends from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua AOD at each site were calculated based on the measurements during the same measurement period.Although the comparison of the AODREand AODMODtrends mentioned above was based on measurements during the same study period,AOD measurements were not necessarily available simultaneously from AERONET and MODIS each day.Therefore,the monthly median AOD from AERONET and MODIS were probably calculated from different daily measurements.In other words,itwaspossible thatdaily AOD was available from AERONET,but MODIS/Aqua had no AOD product,or vice versa.This situation arose because of insufficient temporal coverage by MODIS or insufficient spatial coverage by AERONET.Since the difference in temporal sampling was not considered in calculating the monthly median AOD values,the trends in the MODIS and AERONET data may not have been consistent.The AOD measurements from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua were matched day-byday,and the monthly medians were then recalculated for all the sites to assess the potential effects of sampling issues on the comparison of AOD trends.

    2.3.Trend detection

    The MK test was used to detect monotonic trends.The MK test is a rank-based non-parametric test for assessing the significance of a trend,which requires that the data be independent.The null hypothesis(H0)is that a sample of data,{X1,X2...,Xn},is independent and identically distributed.The alternative hypothesis(H1)is that a monotonic trend exists in X .The slope b of the trend is computed using the method proposed by Sen(1968)as follows:

    where b is the slope of the trend,Xiand Xjare the ith and the jth observations respectively.The slope is robust for estimating the magnitude of a trend(Yue and Wang,2002)and much less sensitive to outliers compared with linear regression coefficient(Li et al.,2014).

    Thenon-parametrictestismoresuitablefornon-normally distributed,censored,and missing data(Yue and Wang,2002),such as the AERONET AOD data(Li et al.,2014).However,the AOD time series,which have distinct seasonal variability,frequently display statistically significant serial correlation.The existence of positive serial correlation in a time series increases the probability of the MK test detecting a significant trend(Hirsch and Slack,1984;Yue and Wang,2002).Therefore,a pre-whitening scheme proposed by Yue et al.(2002)was used to eliminate the inf l uence of serial correlation on the MK trend detections.First,the slope(b)of the trend in an AOD time series was estimated using Eq.(1).If b was almost equal to zero,then it was not necessary to continue performing the trend analysis.If it differed from zero,the AOD time series were detrended using

    where r1is the lag-1 autocorrelation coefficient,is the detrended series at time t?1.Third,the identified trend was addedbacktotheresidualaccordingtothefollowingequation:

    It was evident that the blended time series(Yt)preserved the true trend and was no longer inf l uenced by the effects of autocorrelation.The MK test and Sen’s slope estimator were applied to the blended series to estimate the trend in AOD time series.Hirschand Slack(1984)developed a seasonal MK test and estimated the annual trend as the median of the seasonal trends—an approach that is resistant to data seasonality and serialdependence.Thus,thepre-whiteningschemedescribed by Yue et al.(2002)was adopted first.Then,the seasonal MK test of Hirsch and Slack(1984)and Sen’s slope estimator were applied to the pre-whitened time series of AOD.

    3.Results and discussion

    Table 1 shows that relatively low monthly mean AOD(<0.15)was found in Australia,Europe,North America and South America,except at CUIABA-MIRANDA,where the aerosols were in fl uenced by biomass burning in the Amazon region.The sites located in the semi-arid Sahel region(suchasBanizoumbou,Dakar,andIER_Cinzana),andinEast Asia(Beijing and Chen-Kung_Univ),as well as northern India(Kanpur),showed higher monthly mean AOD(>0.35).

    Table 2 shows that the majority of sites exhibited negative trends of AODRE,including all stations in Europe,North America,South America and most sites in Africa(eight of nine)and Asia(seven of nine),although the trends were not statistically signi ficant at some sites.A signi ficant increasing trend in AODRE[0.12(10 yr)?1]was found only at Solar Village in Saudi Arabia.The strong positive trend there has also been noted in AOD measurements collected by Sea-WiFS(Hsu et al.,2012),MISR(de Meij et al.,2012a)and MODIS/Aqua(this study),as well as EMAC model simulations(de Meij et al.,2012b;Pozzer et al.,2015).AODREat Skukuza in South Africa,Kanpur in India,and Birdsville in Australia showed trends that were increasing but were not statistically significant.

    Comparisons of the trends between AODREand AODAM,between AODREand AODPM,and between AODREand AODMODare illustrated in Figs.2–4,respectively.The tendencies in AODREwere reproduced by AODAMand AODPMat nearly all stations.The trend magnitudes of AODAMand AODPMwere also close to those from AODREat most stations.The results suggest that AOD measured at Terra or Aqua overpass times could represent the trends derived from daily measurements.

    The trends in AODREand AODMODwere consistent over 44ofthesites.AllsitesinEuropeandNorthAmericashowed the same tendencies.Opposite MK trends between AODREand AODMODwere found at one of nine sites in Africa(Banizoumbou),four of nine sites in Asia(Beijing,Xianghe,Nes-Ziona and SEDE-BOKER),three of four sites in Oceania(Birdsville,Canberra and Jabiru),and three of four sites in South America(CEILAP-BA,La-Parguera,and Trelew).

    The tendencies of the strictly matched monthly medians of AODREand AODMOD(i.e.,monthly medians calculated from simultaneous measurements from both products)remainedunchangedexceptatBeijinginChina,whichsuggests that the temporal differences in sampling between AODREand AODMODhas little effect on the detection of AOD trends in most cases.If the temporal sampling difference was not accounted for,the AODREat Beijing showed a significant decreasing trend[?0.08(10 yr)?1]but the AODMODexhibited a weak increasing trend[0.01(10 yr)?1].The trend in AODMODchanged to ?0.03(10 yr)?1if the daily measurements from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua were strictly matched.Additionally,the seasonal MK tests of MODIS and AERONET AOD exhibited the same trend signs at Xianghe as those reported by Zhang et al.(2017).Increasing trends of 0.001 yr?1(MODIS)and 0.004 yr?1(AERONET)were found from 2002 to 2007,but there were downward trends of?0.006 yr?1(MODIS)and ?0.004 yr?1(AERONET)from 2008 to 2015.However,consistent declines in AERONET AOD and MODIS/Aqua AOD were found at Beijing during the two periods(2002–07 and 2008–15).

    AOD over Australia is typically low,with occasional high AOD events mostly resulting from locally derived or transported smoke from wildfires and mineral dust(Qin and Mitchell,2009).Another interesting feature seen in this region is that the surface ref l ectance is relatively high,because of the abundance of bare soil and desert.Both factors indicate that it is very hard to retrieve AOD with high quality.Validation has shown that the correlation between AERONET and MODIS AOD is lower over Australia than in other regions(Sayer et al.,2013).Figure 5a shows the time series of the monthly medians of AODREand AODMOD(shown as a dependent variable on the left-hand y-axis)and the AOD anomaly(shown as a dependent variable on the right-hand y-axis)defined as the difference between theAODMODand the monthly averaged AODREover all years at Birdsville,Australia.An interesting feature is that all the AOD anomalies were positive before September 2008,i.e.,MODIS/Aqua overestimated AOD,but AOD was underestimated by MODIS afterwards.The shift in the AOD anomalies resulted in the artificially negative trend in AODMODseen at Birdsville.This same scenario also occurred at Canberra.Trelew is in the middle of the Argentinean Patagonia,where the monthly median AOD is less than 0.10.A shift in AOD anomalies after March 2008(Fig.5b)resulted in an artificially positive tendency in AODMOD.The reason for these abrupt changes in MODIS performance compared with AERONET at these stations needs further study.

    Table 1.Site locations,study periods and 550-nm monthly mean AOD±SD from the four data records at the 53 selected stations.AODRE is monthly mean AOD calculated from the daily AERONET AOD if there were more than five daily measurements each month.AODAM and AODPMis monthly mean AOD calculated from AERONET instantaneous AOD measurements within±30 min of the Terra and Aqua overpass times.AODMODwere calculated from all collocated AOD from MODIS/Aqua provided by the MAPSS system if there were more than five daily measurements each month.

    Table 2.Site locations,study periods and decadal trends in 550-nm AOD from the four data records at the 53 selected stations.Bold font indicates trends that are statistically significant at the 95%confidence level.

    Fig.2.Comparison of decadal trends between AODREand AODAMin different regions.The trends estimated from AODREand AODAMare shown on the x-axes and the y-axes,respectively,in the scatterplots.Blue solid diamonds indicate that the trends from both AODREand AODAMwere statistically significant.Red solid squares indicate that the AODREtrend was statistically significant but the AODAMtrend was statistically non-significant.Green asterisks indicate that the AODREtrend was statistically non-significant but the AODAMtrend was statistically significant.Cyan crosses indicate that the trends from AODREand AODAMwere statistically non-significant.The black dots in the map represented the locations of sites,and the numbers of sites in the different regions are given in parentheses in the scatter-plots.

    Banizoumbou,in the semi-arid Sahel region and inf l uenced by dust emissions and/or biomass burning(Levy et al.,2010),showed high AOD.Studies have shown that,from the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s in the Sahara and Sahel regions,near-surface wind speed decreased,precipitation increased,and therefore dust emissions decreased(Chin et al.,2014).This finding of a reduction in AOD is also supported by insitu aerosol measurements(Li et al.,2014)and model simulations(Chin et al.,2014).The AODREand AODMODat other stations in the Sahel showed a declining trend.Therefore,the increasing trend at Banizoumbou(although non-signi ficant)seen in the MODIS data seems likely to be spurious.

    The sites of SEDE_BOKER and Nes-Ziona are in Israel,where aerosols are in fl uenced both by mineral dust transported from the Saharan and Arabian deserts and fine-mode pollution emitted by the petroleum industry in this region(Yoon et al.,2012).The AOD at these two sites showed a decreasing tendency based on AERONET measurements,which is consistent with the results reported by Yoon et al.(2012)and Li et al.(2014).Yoon et al.(2012)noted that the decreased AERONET AOD at SEDE-BOKER was due to a decrease in coarse-mode particles[approximately?0.29(10 yr)?1for coarse-mode AOD].MODIS/Aqua AOD generally produced overestimates at SEDE_BOKER,where 98%ofthemonthlymediananomalies werepositive(Fig.5c).The retrieval uncertainty of MODIS AOD under conditions with heavy aerosol loading is mainly related to the aerosol mode assumptions.The MODIS retrieval algorithm assumes a constant single-scattering albedo value;however,the AERONET single-scattering albedo at SEDE_BOKER shows an increasing trend[0.004(10 yr)?1](Li et al.,2014).Therefore,the temporal change in single-scattering albedo may produce a spurious tendency in the AOD retrieved by MODIS(Mishchenko et al.,2007,2012;Li et al.,2014).

    Fig.3.As Fig.2,except that the trend comparisons are between AODREand AODPM.

    Fig.4.As Fig.2,except that the trend comparisons are between AODREand AODMOD.

    Fig.5.Comparison of AERONET AOD(AODRE)and MODIS/Aqua AOD(AODMOD)at(a)Birdsville in Australia,(b)Trelew in Argentina,and(c)SEDE_BOKER in Israel.The AOD anomalies are shown as blue solid lines,which are matched to the right-hand ordinate axis,and the blue dashed lines indicate that the anomaly is 0.

    In addition,we found a few high-altitude sites(>1.2 km)in North America(BSRN-BAO_Boulder,Railroad_Valley,Sevilleta,TABLE_MOUNTAIN-CA)and Asia(Dalanzadgad)where AERONET AOD was not suitable for representing the regional AOD trend due to a lack of spatial representation.The retrieval accuracy of MODIS AOD at such sites is impacted by the weak aerosol signal due to the very low aerosol loading(Levy et al.,2010;Sayer et al.,2013).Thus,high-altitude sites(>1.2 km)were excluded in the AOD trend analyses.

    4.Conclusions

    AOD trends derived from MODIS/Aqua and AERONET at 53 stations in land areas in various locations across the globe were compared and analyzed.The major findings can be summarized as follows:

    AOD trends calculated from daily measurements can be accuratelyreproducedbyAODmeasurementscollectedatthe overpass time of MODIS,which indicates that MODIS has the potential to capture AOD trends.

    Consistent AOD tendencies calculated from the monthly medians of the AERONET and MODIS/Aqua AOD products were derived at 44 of 53 sites.However,this was not true for sites in Australia,where the retrieval accuracy of MODIS/Aqua AOD data was found to be poor due to the very low aerosol loading(monthly median AOD<0.15)and the relatively higher surface ref l ectance of bare soil and/or desert.Disagreement in the AOD trends between MODIS and AERONET was also found at a few sites in South America.This was due to the low retrieval quality in MODIS/Aqua AOD and likely resulted from improper surface ref l ectance parameterization and uncertainties in the aerosol model used in the algorithm(Levy et al.,2010).Furthermore,sampling issues should be evaluated carefully when deriving long-term trends in AOD in regions where AOD shows substantial dayto-day variation.

    Merged data based on the MODIS AOD products derived from both the DT and DB algorithms are used in many studies to investigate the long-term AOD trends over land areas in various locations throughout the world.In some regions,the typical AOD and its variability are low,close to the magnitude of the retrieval uncertainty,which affects the estimation of the AOD trends.However,the current MODIS AOD products do provide a continuous aerosol data record for monitoring long-term climate change.

    Acknowledgements.This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41475027,41475138 and 41675033).We are grateful to the AERONET team and MAPSS team,especially the PIs of the selected AERONET sites,for providing the data used in this study.We are also thankful for the suggestions and comments from the two anonymous reviewers and the editor,which helped to improve the manuscript.

    Boucher,O.,and Coauthors,2013:Clouds and Aerosols.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al.,Eds.,Cambridge University Press.

    Chin,M.,and Coauthor,2014:Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009:A perspective from observations and a global model.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,14,3657–3690,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3657-2014.

    de Meij,A.,A.Pozzer,and J.Lelieveld,2012a:Trend analysis in aerosol optical depths and pollutant emission estimates between 2000 and 2009.Atmos.Environ.,51,75–85,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.059.

    de Meij,A.,A.Pozzer,A.,K.Pringle,H.Tost,and J.Lelieveld,2012b:EMAC model evaluation and analysis of atmospheric aerosol properties and distribution with a focus on the Mediterranean region.Atmos.Res.,114–115,38–69,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.014.

    Hirsch,R.M.,and J.R.Slack,1984:A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence.Water Res.Res.,20,727–732,https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727.

    Holben,B.N.,and Coauthors,1998:AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization.Remote Sens.Environ.,66,1–16,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5.

    Hsu,N.C.,R.Gautam,A.M.Sayer,C.Bettenhausen,C.Li,M.J.Jeong,S.-C.Tsay,and B.N.Holben,2012:Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,12,8037–8053,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012.

    Kahn,R.A.,M.J.Garay,D.L.Nelson,K.K.Yau,M.A.Bull,B.J.Gaitley,J.V.Martonchik,and R.C.Levy,2007:Satellitederived aerosol optical depth over dark water from MISR and MODIS:Comparisons with AERONET and implications for climatological studies.J.Geophys.Res.,112,D18205,https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008175.

    Kaufman,Y.J.,B.N.Holben,D.Tanr′e,I.Slutsker,A.Smirnov,and T.F.Eck,2000:Will aerosol measurements from Terra and Aqua Polar Orbiting satellites represent the daily aerosol abundance and properties?Geophys.Res.Lett.,27(23),3861–3864.

    Kokhanovsky,A.A.,and Coauthors,2007:Aerosol remote sensing over land:A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments.Atmos.Res.,85,372–394,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.02.008.

    Levy,R.C.,L.A.Remer,R.G.Kleidman,S.Mattoo,C.Ichoku,R.Kahn,and T.F.Eck,2010:Global evaluation of the collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,10 399–10 420,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010.

    Levy,R.C.,S.Mattoo,L.A.Munchak,L.A.Remer,A.M.Sayer,F.Patadia,and N.C.Hsu,2013:The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,6,2989–3034,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013.

    Li,Z.,and Coauthors,2009:Uncertainties in satellite remote sensing of aerosols and impact on monitoring its long-term trend:A review and perspective.Ann.Geophys.,27,2755–2770,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-2755-2009.

    Li,J.,B.E.Carlson,O.Dubovik,and A.A.Lacis,2014:Recent trends in aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,14,12 271–12 289,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1599-2015.

    Lyapustin,A.,and Coauthors,2014:Scientific impact of MODIS C5 calibration degradation and C6+improvements.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,7,4353–4365,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4353-2014.

    Mishchenko,M.I.,I.V.Geogdzhayev,W.B.Rossow,B.Cairns,B.E.Carlson,A.A.Lacis,L.Liu,and L.D.Travis,2007:Long-term satellite record reveals likely recent aerosol trend.Science,315,1543,https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709.

    Mishchenko,M.I.,L.Liu,I.V.Geogdzhayev,J.Li,B.E.Carlson,A.A.Lacis,B.Cairns,and L.D.Travis,2012:Aerosol retrievals from channel-1 and-2 AVHRR radiances:Long-term trends updated and revisited.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer,113,1974–1980,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.05.006.

    Petrenko,M.,C.Ichoku,and G.Leptoukh,2012:Multisensor Aerosol Products Sampling System(MAPSS).Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,5,913–926,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-913-2012.

    Pozzer,A.,A.de Meij,J.Yoon,H.Tost,A.K.Georgoulias,and M.Astitha,2015:AOD trends during 2001–2010 from observations and model simulations.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,15,5521–5535,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5521-2015.

    Qin,Y.,and R.M.Mitchell,2009: Characterisation of episodic aerosol types over the Australian continent.AtmosphericChemistry and Physics,9,1943–1956,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1943-2009.

    Sayer,A.M.,N.C.Hsu,C.Bettenhausen,and M.-J.Jeong,2013:Validation and uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6“Deep Blue”aerosol data.J.Geophys.Res.,118,7864–7872,https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50600.

    Sen,P.K.,1968:Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau.Journal of the American Statistical Association,63,1379–1389,https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934.

    Thomas,G.E.,and Coauthors,2010:Validation of the GRAPE single view aerosol retrieval for ATSR-2 and insights into the long term global AOD trend over the ocean.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,4849–4866,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4849-2010.

    Xia,X.G.,2011:Variability of aerosol optical depth and ?ngstr¨om wavelength exponent derived from AERONET observations in recent decades.Environ.Res.Lett.,6,044011,https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044011.

    Yue,S.,and C.Y.Wang,2002:Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the inf l uence of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test.Water Resour.Res.,38(6),1068,https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000861.

    Yue,S.,P.Pilon,B.Phinney,and G.Cavadias,2002:The inf l uence ofautocorrelationontheabilitytodetecttrendinhydrological series.Hydrological Processes,16,1807–1829.

    Yoon,J.,W.vonHoyningen-Huene,M.Vountas,andJ.P.Burrows,2011:Analysis of linear long-term trend of aerosol optical thickness derived from SeaWiFS using BAER over Europe and South China.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,11,12 149–12 167,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12149-2011.

    Yoon,J.,W.vonHoyningen-Huene,A.A.Kokhanovsky,M.Vountas,and J.P.Burrows,2012:Trend analysis of aerosol optical thickness and ?ngstr¨om exponent derived from the global AERONET spectral observations.Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,5,1271–1299,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1271-2012.

    Yu,H.,M.Chin,L.A.Remer,R.G.Kleidman,N.Bellouin,H.Bian,and T.Diehl,2009:Variability of marine aerosol fine mode fraction and estimates of anthropogenic aerosol component over cloud-free oceans from the Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS).J.Geophys.Res.,114,D10206,https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010648.

    Zhang,J.,andJ.S.Reid,2010:Adecadalregionalandglobaltrend analysis of the aerosol optical depth using a data-assimilation grade over-water MODIS and Level 2 MISR aerosol products.Atmos.Chem.Phys.,10,10 949–10 963,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10949-2010.

    Zhang,J.L.,J.S.Reid,R.Alfaro-Contreras,and P.Xian,2017:Has China been exporting less particulate air pollution over the past decade?Geophys.Res.Lett.,44,2941–2948,https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072617.

    Zhao,X.-P.,I.Laszlo,W.Guo,A.Heidinger,C.Cao,A.Jelenak,D.Tarpley,and J.Sullivan,2008:Study of long-term trend in aerosol optical thickness observed from operational AVHRR satellite instrument.J.Geophys.Res.,113,D07201,https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009061.

    17 February 2017;revised 6 July 2017;accepted 11 July 2017)

    :Fan,X.H.,X.A.Xia,and H.B.Chen,2018:Can MODIS detect trends in aerosol optical depth over land?Adv.Atmos.Sci.,35(2),135–145,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7017-2.

    ?Corresponding author:Xuehua FAN

    Email:fxh@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ?Institute of Atmospheric Physics/Chinese Academy of Sciences,and Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,part of Springer Nature 2018

    久久精品久久久久久久性| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 内地一区二区视频在线| av在线老鸭窝| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产精品.久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| av在线亚洲专区| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲精品一二三| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 久久影院123| 亚洲国产色片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 成年av动漫网址| 赤兔流量卡办理| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲av男天堂| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 中国三级夫妇交换| 在线 av 中文字幕| 伦精品一区二区三区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| freevideosex欧美| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品50| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产成人精品福利久久| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 永久网站在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 极品教师在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产成人一区二区在线| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av免费观看日本| 在线观看国产h片| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 五月天丁香电影| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美人与善性xxx| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产亚洲最大av| av在线天堂中文字幕| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产在视频线精品| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲四区av| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 黄色日韩在线| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 色综合色国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久6这里有精品| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 97超视频在线观看视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 一级爰片在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 在线观看一区二区三区| videossex国产| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 两个人的视频大全免费| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产av国产精品国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 禁无遮挡网站| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 美女内射精品一级片tv| 日韩电影二区| 777米奇影视久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 美女高潮的动态| 日韩成人伦理影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产精品成人在线| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲无线观看免费| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜福利视频精品| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 搞女人的毛片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 性色avwww在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 三级经典国产精品| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久久色成人| av在线app专区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| av卡一久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产综合懂色| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| av在线天堂中文字幕| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲av二区三区四区| eeuss影院久久| h日本视频在线播放| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产永久视频网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 中文天堂在线官网| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 色网站视频免费| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久精品人妻少妇| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 三级经典国产精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 综合色丁香网| 中文字幕久久专区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 老司机影院毛片| 在线观看国产h片| tube8黄色片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 午夜激情福利司机影院| www.av在线官网国产| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久热精品热| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| tube8黄色片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久精品94久久精品| 51国产日韩欧美| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 丝袜喷水一区| 深夜a级毛片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成年av动漫网址| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 嫩草影院新地址| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 综合色丁香网| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 免费av观看视频| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 久热久热在线精品观看| 黄片wwwwww| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 九草在线视频观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 嫩草影院入口| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产亚洲最大av| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 大码成人一级视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| www.色视频.com| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美另类一区| av在线app专区| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品.久久久| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚州av有码| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 中国国产av一级| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | av播播在线观看一区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久久色成人| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲四区av| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产乱人视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人aa在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 少妇 在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 成年免费大片在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久久久精品性色| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产乱来视频区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 性色av一级| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品久久久精品久久久| 只有这里有精品99| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产视频内射| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 99久久人妻综合| 成人特级av手机在线观看| h日本视频在线播放| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品国产三级普通话版| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 男女国产视频网站| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 高清毛片免费看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| av天堂中文字幕网| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 色吧在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 在现免费观看毛片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 在线观看国产h片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 一级毛片我不卡| 中文欧美无线码| 日韩视频在线欧美| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 日本一二三区视频观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一级毛片我不卡| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久人人爽人人片av| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲最大成人av| 日本黄大片高清| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 午夜视频国产福利| 高清欧美精品videossex| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看|