• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Horizontal gas mixing in rectangular fluidized bed:A novel method for gas dispersion coefficients in various conditions and distributor designs

    2017-05-29 01:39:44AsheeshNautiyalChienSongChyangPinWeiLiHsinYungHou

    Asheesh Nautiyal,Chien-Song Chyang*,Pin-Wei Li,Hsin-Yung Hou

    Department of Chemical Engineering,Chung Yuan Christian University,Taoyuan 320,Taiwan,China

    1.Introduction

    A gas- fluidized bed is a system ofrandomly spread macroscopic particles that are suspended by an upward flow of air.In a fluidized bed,widespread gas and solid mixing provide a large active surface area to enhance chemical reactions and heat transfer[1].Fluidized beds are used in industry,particularly for the combustion of various fuels,the bulk drying of materials,and some food processing techniques[2,3].Various studies discussed gas-solid mixing,dispersion in a fluidized bed and fluidized bed design to promote high levels of contact between gases and solids[4-6].

    Numerous studies have been made to estimate only the dispersion coefficient(Dr)for a circularand rectangular fluidized bed,and itis generally constant at all levels in the bed(excluding the level near the bottom).Werther and Molerus[7]reported a detailed experimental study on the bubble behavior of fluidized beds with different diameters,sizes and densities.They suggested that near the distributor,a zone of maximum bubble growth exists in an annulus near the wall.With increasing bed height,this zone approaches the center of the bed.They stated that the presence of the wall prevents attraction to the inner bubbles from the outside;thus,the bubbles tend to coalesce,and the maximum bubble flow position approaches the central axis.If the wall is circular,the effectis circumferentially even,and the peak is atnearly the same radial location at a given height.However,Whitehead and Dent[8]suggested that if the wall is square,then the wall effect is not circumferentially even,and the peak position does not form a circular position but forms several spots arranged in a rectangle.

    Some previous studies observed and discussed the dispersion behavior and dispersion coefficients of the tracer in the lateral and horizontal planes in rectangular and circular fluidized beds.Kunii and Levenspiel[9]reported lateral dispersion of fluidized solids,postulating thatsolid particles are displaced by the rising bubbles,and then the particles are drawn into the wake of the bubbles where they are mixed.Shi and Fan[10]measured the lateral dispersion coefficients of particles(Dsr)in a rectangular gas-solid fluidized bed.They developed an empirical,dimensionless correlation to estimate the lateral dispersion coefficient.Klinkenberget al.[11]presented a study of the concentration distributions caused by diffusion in a fluid moving in a cylindrical tube at uniform velocity.They obtained a solution for a general equation of nonisotropic diffusion using two-sided Laplace integrals with boundary conditions.Brenner[12]provided a method forthe solution ofthe diffusion model of homogeneous fluid displacement in beds of finite length.The results presented in Brenner's paper are given in dimensionless form for the instantaneous concentration of solute leaving the bed and the average solute concentration in the bed at any instant.

    Using the study by Klinkenberget al.[11],Rowe and Evans[13]predicted the tracer dispersion at points within the bed using a singlephase model,primarily depending on the radial dispersion coefficient(Dr).In their study,the radial dispersion coefficient increases rapidly from a value near molecular diffusion with an increase in the excess gas flow(U-Umf.).Atimtay and Cakaloz[14]obtained the two-dimensional diffusion model.They measuredDrof a gas in a 10-cm-diameter fluidized bed charged with resin beads using a new strip staining technique with bromine as the tracer.Lin and Chyang[15]discussed the gas mixing in the radial direction within a cold model circular fluidized bed,which was studied using response surface methodology(RSM).Their results showed that the standard deviation of the time-averaged radial tracer concentration is well correlated with the operational and geometric parameters.?tefanica and Hrdli?ka[16]described the experimental apparatus for measurement ofDr,and the effects of gas velocity at various fluidization values and bed heights were investigated.The maximum value ofDron each level was found either in the center of the bed or at the wall.

    Fuel mixing has a large impact on the overallperformance of a fluidized bed combustor(FBC).As the fuel's horizontal mixing improves,there is a more uniform local stoichiometric ratio in the reactor's cross section,and this lowers the occurrence of sites with unreacted fuel or oxygen.The effects of various operating parameters on the dispersion coefficient have been studied in previous works.Such studies primarily focus on the effects of the operating parameters,such as super ficial gas velocity and particle size,on dispersion behavior[17-19].

    Most studies related to dispersion in the horizontal plane use smallscale circular and rectangular beds.Van Deemter[20]investigated mixing in small and large fluidized beds and demonstrated the importance of the size effect.The author concluded that the differences and similarities between a small and large bed could be attributed to the flow regime.Zhanget al.[21]suggested that the particle concentration is evenly distributed across the bed core but rapidly increases at the boundary layer towards the wall surfaces in circulating fluidized bed boilers.They mentioned that the cross-sectional average solid volume fraction was low,even as low as 0.003.The high particle concentration at the wall in such a dilute phase might be attributed to the membrane-tube wall con figuration and to the small bed aspect ratio,which is an order of magnitude of 10.The effects of various operating parameters on the dispersion coefficient are considered a wellunderstood phenomenon;yet,the effect of the side walls on the dispersion coefficient has not been discussed considerably.Therefore,it is necessary to investigate the effect of the chamber walls on dispersion behavior.

    Using the radial dispersion coefficient(Dr)for a circular fluidized bed is acceptable,but switching to a rectangular bed,Drneeds to be decomposed into Cartesian form,DxandDy,in the horizontal plane.This study uses a new analytic solution to estimateDxandDy.

    Rectangular fluidized-bed combustors have been widely adopted for commercial application.For most of the commercial fluidized beds,tuyere nozzles or bubbling caps are used as the distributor instead of perforated plates.Fora perforated plate,the gas jetfrom the distributoris in the vertical direction.Rather,for a fluidized bed equipped with tuyeretype distributor,the gas jetfromthe nozzle is in the horizontalplane.So,it becomes necessary to develop a method for estimating dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,in a rectangular fluidized bed.Additionally,in a rectangular fluidized bed,with a relatively low length-to-width ratio,back-mixing of solids does not substantially occur.

    In this study,a novel analytical solution,in terms ofDxandDy,was established for a governing equation of the tracer dispersion in the steady state.However,the solutions are valid for specialized situations,such as tracer injection from a point source with the physically relevant boundary conditions[15].Further,a novelsurface fitting ofthe obtained analytical solution to the experimental data is presented in this study.The tracer concentration data points along theXandYaxes at a certain height(Z-axis)were collected using controllable probes with CO2detection tips.In the fluidized bed,the dispersion coefficients are discussed within a Cartesian coordinate system of a three-dimensional dispersion model.In addition,the obtained results were compared with the conventional model[13],which shows that the values ofDxandDyremain in the same range.

    2.Experimental

    All ofthe experiments are conducted in a lab-scale rectangular fluidized bed,fabricated with a transparentacrylic column.The cross section ofthe bed is 0.2 m×0.4 m,and itis 1.5 min height.Aschematic diagram of the apparatus is shown in Fig.1.The experimental setup is similar to thatofour previously published papers[15,17].The fluidizing air is supplied by a 15 hp.Roots blower,and the super ficial gas velocities are set to be multiples of minimum fluidization velocity(Umf),that is,3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf.Glass beads with a mean density of 2500 kg·m-3and a mean size of 385 μm are used as the bed material.The minimum fluidizing velocity is 0.115 m·s-1.The static bed height(Hs)is 0.2 m.At the bottom,an acrylic perforated plate with 343 holes of 1.85 mm ID is employed as the gas distributor.In this experiment,carbon dioxide is used as the tracer gas.The glass bead used in this study is smooth and the absorption of CO2by glass beads can be neglected.The injection rate of the tracer gas is 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas was continuously injected from the center while maintaining the same distributor levelviaa 6.4 mm ID stainless-steel tube into the bed.After reaching a steady state of the tracer gas in the bed,using a stainless-steel probe of 6.35 mm I.D,the downstream tracer gas is sampled at 5 and 10 cm(sampling height(Z)is the distance between tracer gas injector and sampling point)above the distributor in a horizontal plane at fixed distances in 2D coordinate geometry,as shown in Fig.2.To observe the effect of the side walls,the tracer position shifted from the center to near the wall of the chamber along the long side,i.e.,theX-axis.To examine the effect of the bed height,two static bed heights of 15 cm and 20 cm were prepared.

    To study the effect of distributor design on the dispersion coefficients,the perforated plate was replaced with a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.The super ficial gas velocities are 3.5Umfand 5Umf.The bed materials are the same and the static bed height is 25 cm.The height of tracer injection is 10 cm and the sampling height(Z)is 10 cm above the distributor for the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.

    The concentrations of the tracer gas in the bed are analyzed using a nondispersive infrared gas analyzer(ETG IMA 3000B).The dimensionless ratio,C/Co,represents the concentration of the tracer gas in the study,whereCis the concentration of the tracer gas in the bed where the gas is mixed with the bed particles,andCois the concentration of the tracer gas within the freeboard.The tracer gas and fluidizing air are assumed to be well mixed.In this study,Cois 2350×10-6.Fig.3 shows the con figuration of the 3D lab-scale rectangular fluidized bed with the tracer gas injection and the data sampling locations in the horizontal(X-Y)plane and in the vertical(Z)direction.Our lab scale fluidized bed setup is a small-scale replica of commercially used fluidized bed technology,so the results from this study can be applied more accurately to a large size fluidized bed.

    2.1.Modeling

    In this study,a governing equation for tracer dispersion in a rectangular fluidized bed is formulated.An analytical solution is obtained for the governing equation of tracer dispersion with the physically relevant boundary conditions.

    The governing equation for tracer dispersion in the rectangular bed is as follows:

    whereCis the tracer concentration(kg·cm-3);Vx,Vy,andVzare the super ficial gas velocity vectors(cm·s-1)in the respective directions;andDx,Dy,andDzare the dispersion coefficients(cm2·s-1)in the respective directions.In a fluidized bed, flow through the bed is commonly represented by dispersed plug flow,where the mechanismofmixing involves the effective dispersion coefficients,DyandDr,known as axial and radial dispersion,respectively.Axial dispersion(Dy)can be offset by radial dispersion(Dr),which means that radial dispersion in fluences the plug flow behavior.For a steady state,plug flow,and negligible vertical dispersion(compared with the convective transport)from a point source in the rectangular bed,Eq.(1)can be simplified,as follows:

    The tracer progresses as a thin slab(dZ)in a rectangular bed where a massM(kg)oftracer is released atX=Y=Z=0.Rearranging Eq.(2)in the moving frame of reference with the direction of flow,thenZ/U= τ and ?C/?(Z/U)=?C/?τ and Eq.(2)transforms into the following equation:

    Fig.3.Continuous release of the tracer at mid-width W(X=0),(Y=0)and(Z=0).(a)The lab-scale fluidized bed.(b)Tracer point at mid-width.

    The solution is found by collecting thefandηterms on separate sides of the equation,as follows:

    As assumed in the beginning,τ=Z/U,we return to the stationary frame.Further,the solution transforms into the following equation:

    Dividing Eq.(6)by dZ(the tracer moving as a thin slab of heightdZ),the following equation is obtained:

    whereMis?m·(dZ/U)in which?mis the mass flow rate(kg·s-1,i.e.,Co·U·A),Cois the tracer gas concentration(kg·cm-3)atZ= ∞,andAis the cross-sectional area of theXYplane.Eq.(7)can be written as follows:

    The obtained experimental data are analyzed in OriginPro 8,which includes conversion of the worksheet data into the matrix for the 3D surface plot in theX-Y-Zdimensions.Origin's 3D surface fitting is performed by the nonlinear least squares fitter(NLFit)tool using a “user de fined built-in function”based on the compiled language(Origin C)of Eq.(8)[24,25].The solution,i.e.,Eq.(8),is written in the“Z-Script function form”,whereZis the dependent variable,andXandYare independentvariables.The other parameters in the“Z-Scriptfunction form”for surface fitting of Eq.(8)are de fined as follows:Z0,U1,D1,andD2 are named for the parametersA,U,DxandDy,respectively.Next,the“Z-Script function form”is compiled,and the parameter initialization is performed with constant and initial guess values.The nonlinear fitting always starts with an initial guess of the parameter to ensure greater convergence.Finally,auto-iterations are performed to achieve the best fit of Eq.(8)to the experimental data.

    Previously,Rowe and Evans[13]have discussed the solution and estimation ofDrusing a single-phase modelwith remote boundary conditions,as shown in Eq.(9).The results from Eq.(9)are used for comparison with the proposed model,i.e.,Eq.(8).

    3.Results and Discussion

    3.1.Effect of super ficial gas velocities(U)on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Fig.4.The experimental 3D surface plot of tracer gas concentrations with various super ficial gas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=5 cm).(a)U=3.5U mf;(b)U=5U mf;(c)U=6.5U mf.

    Fig.4(a)-(c)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at the sampling height of 5 cm with super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf,respectively.TheXaxis andYaxis represent the length and width,respectively,of the lab-scale fluidized bed as shown in Fig.3.The unit is in centimeter.From Fig.4(a)-(c),it can be observed that as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,the tracer gas concentration spreads farther.

    Subsequently,Fig.5(a)-(c)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting,based on the analytical solution,on the 3D surface plot ofthe experimental data to estimateDxandDy.The values of Adj.R-square in all surface fittings are greater than 97%,which indicates the quality of the best fit.Table 1 shows the estimated dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,from the nonlinear surface fitting of the experimentaldata under different working conditions.

    Fig.6(a)and(b)show the 2D form of the concentration profiles of the tracer gas along theXandYaxes with various super ficial gas velocities.The concentration profiles flatten as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,which indicates that the mixing extent at a higher super ficial gas velocity is improved.Fig.6(a)and(b)also show that the tracer gas concentration reaches a steady value,which is equivalent to the CO2concentration in the air(approximately 400×10-6).Because ofthe low sampling height(Z=5 cm),the jet effect is vigorous.Therefore,the maximum vertical tracer gas concentration could be overvalued.The maximum points are distantfrom the peak line.From Table 1,Dxis generally greater thanDy,which may be due to the effect of the side walls.The ratio ofDxtoDyaverages approximately 1.4-1.5,exceptundersome conditions,such aslowersampling height(Z=5 cm)and highersuperficial gas velocity(>3.5Umf)where the jet effect is dominant.

    Table 1Summary of the experimental conditions and results with tracer at center

    Fig.6.Experimental 2D concentration profiles of tracer gas with various super ficial gas velocities(H s=20 cm;Z=5 cm).(a)C/C o vs.Location on X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.Location on Y-axis.

    3.2.Effect of data sampling heights(Z)on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Fig.7(a)-(c)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at the sampling height of 10 cm with different super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf,respectively.It can be observed that as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,the tracer gas concentration spreads farther,and the trends are similar to Fig.4(a)-(c).However,the effectof the side walls on the tracer gas concentration profile in Fig.7(b)and(c)is noticeable.The walleffectatZ=5 cm(Fig.5)is not highly significant.

    Fig.7.The experimental 3D surface plotof concentrations of the tracer gas with various super ficialgas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm).(a)U=3.5U mf;(b)U=5U mf;(c)U=6.5U mf.

    Fig.8(a)-(c)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting,based on the analytical solution,on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data to estimateDxandDy.The values of Adj.R-square in all surface fittings are greater than 99%,which indicates the quality of the best fit.The estimated dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,are also listed in Table 1.As the sampling height(Z=10 cm)is increased,the jet effect is no longer significant.The side walls along the length of the chamber act as an immediate barrier at a higher super ficial gas velocity;thus,the tracer concentration near the wall is detected as markedly higher.This may affect the estimation of the dispersion coefficients,DxandDy;thus,Dxis not equal toDy.If the bed is sufficiently large throughout its width,then the tracer gas can disperse farther without being blocked by the side walls.In this ideal case,Dxwill be equal toDy.

    Fig.9.Experimental 2D concentration profiles of tracer gas with various super ficial gas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm).(a)C/C o vs.Location on X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.Location on Y-axis.

    Fig.9(a)and(b)show the 2D form of the concentration profiles of the tracer gas along theXandYaxes with various super ficial gas velocities.The concentration profiles flatten as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,and the trends are similar to those in Fig.6(a)and(b).However,the jet effect in Fig.9(a)and(b)is not significant compared with that in Fig.6(a)and(b),demonstrating the significance of the sampling height in estimating the dispersion coefficients.

    Fig.10(a)and(b)show the dispersion behavior in theX-Yplane with various fluidization values at sampling heights of 5 cm and 10 cm,respectively.As can be observed in Fig.10(a)and(b),the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare increased with the super ficial gas velocity.With no jet effect atZ=10 cm,the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyshow a linear trend.Because of the jet effect atZ=5 cm,when the super ficial gas velocity is greater than 3.5Umf,the dispersion coefficientDxis larger than the value obtained atZ=10 cm.

    3.3.Effect ofwalls on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)atdifferent tracer positions

    Fig.11(a)shows the 3Dsurface plotofthe concentrations ofthe tracer gas when the tracer's injection position is in the center ofthe bed.The operating conditions areU=5Umf,Hs=20 cm,andZ=10 cm.Subsequently,Fig.11(b)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data in Fig.11(a)from whichDxandDyare estimated.The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 2.

    Compared with Fig.11(a),which has similar operating conditions(U=5Umf;Hs=20 cm;Z=10 cm),Fig.12(a)-(c)shows the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations when the location of the tracer gas injection point is near the wall.Subsequently,Fig.13(a)-(c)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.12(a)-(c).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 1.

    Under ideal conditions,at the same horizontal plane with similar working conditions and operating parameters,the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyshould notdiffer.Theoretically,by modeling the analytic solution and assuming thatDx=Dy=46.0 cm2·s-1,which is given in Fig.11(b),the simulation of the tracer's concentration profile is presented in Fig.14.By comparing Figs.11(a)and 14,we can see that the tracer gas concentration profiles differ experimentally and theoretically.

    Fig.10.Gas dispersion coefficient with various fluidization numbers at different sampling heights(H s=20 cm).(a)Dx vs.U/U mf;(b)Dy vs.U/U mf.

    Table 2Summary of the experimental conditions and results with different location of the tracer

    However,in Fig.13(a)-(c),as the tracergas injection pointshifted to near the wall from the center,the dispersion coefficients differed.From Table 2,we can see that given similar operating conditions,the value ofDxdecreased,whereasDyremained almostunchanged.The ratio ofDxtoDywas 1.4 in the case when the tracer injection point was at the center.As the tracer injection pointshifted to near the wall,the ratio ofDxtoDywas 1.1.This change could be attributed to the fact that the concentration of the tracer gas(Ca/Co=28.9)was greater near the walls of the chamber.Therefore,the effect of the side walls on both dispersion coefficients in theXandYdirections is similar.Conversely,the tracer that was released at the center can diffuse much farther in theXdirection(Dx=46 cm2·s-1)because the walls are distant compared with theYdirection(Dx=32 cm2·s-1).In other words,if the length to width ratio of the rectangular bed is not appropriate,the mixing in the center area of the bed will not be excellent.

    Painet al.[26]discussed that the particles may slip at the wall or bounce off the wall,which creates complicated boundary conditions.These authors found that the time-averaged distribution of particles demonstrated that bubbles move in the central region of the bed and particles fall down along the bed wall.Liet al.[27]discussed that the solid-phase wall boundary condition needs to be specified with great care when gas mixing is modeled,because free-slip,partial-slip and no-slip wall boundary conditions result in substantial differences in the extent to which gas is transported downwards at the wall.Liet al.[28],in another study,found that both 2D and 3D simulations capture the general flow behavior in bubbling fluidized beds,but the wall effect in an experimental“two-dimensional”column was importantand must be considered when quantitatively comparing numerical simulations and experimental data.

    3.4.The effectof the gas injection rates on the dispersion coef ficients Dx and Dy in a horizontal plane

    To observe the effect of the side walls in the case of different gas injection rates,we changed the tracer gas injection rate from 0.20%to 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate.Fig.15(a)shows the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations when positioned at the center of the bed.The operating conditions were similar tofig.11(a),asU=5Umf,Hs=20 cm,andZ=10 cm,but the gas injection rate was 0.10%.Subsequently,Fig.15(b)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.15(a).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 2.Evidently,we can see thatDychanged slightly from 32 to 29.8 cm2·s-1,butDxchanged from 46 to 26.5 cm2·s-1.At a tracer gas injection rate of 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate,the value ofDxwas approximately equal toDy.

    This result may be because the difference between the ambient and referenced carbon dioxide concentration was 1950×10-6(i.e.,2350×10-6-400×10-6)when the gas injection rate was 0.20%of the fluidizing air;the difference was 950×10-6(i.e.,1350×10-6-400×10-6)when the gas injection rate was 0.10%of the fluidizing air.This difference between the ambient and the referenced carbon dioxide concentration in the bed may be significant.The reduction in the ambient carbon dioxide from the background in the case when the gas injection rate was 0.20%ofthe fluidizing air improves the detection sensitivity.Therefore,the value ofDxcan be detected more accurately and is greater thanDy.In contrast,when the gas injection rate was 0.10%ofthe fluidizing air,Dxwas approximately equal toDydue to the lower detection sensitivity.

    3.5.Effect of the static bed heights on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Figs.16(a)and 11(a)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration with a super ficial gas velocity of 5Umfat static bed heights of 15 cm and 20 cm,respectively.Subsequently,the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data in Figs.16(a)and 11(a)are shown in Figs.16(b)and 11(b).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyfor both bed heights(Hs=15 cm and 20 cm)are listed in Table 2.Fig.17(a)and(b)show the 2D representation of the tracer concentration for different bed heights(Hs=15 cm and 20 cm)in theXandYdirections,respectively.Clearly,the effect of static bed height onDxappears to be insignificant.This result is in agreement with our previous study where the effect of different bed heights onDrwas insignificant[29,30].However,the value ofDyincreased from 32 cm2·s-1to 37.3 cm2·s-1as the bed heightdecreased from 20 cm to 15 cm.Overall,the estimation ofthe optimal length to width ratio,bed height,and gas injection rate for good mixing in a rectangular bed is helpful for designing and controlling the fluidized bed reactor.

    3.6.Effect of the super ficial gas velocities on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)with the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor

    Fig.18(a)and(b)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umfand 5Umfand static bed heights of 25 cm,respectively.It can be seen clearly that in the case of a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor,the maximum concentration of tracer gas is not at the center of the bed as was observed in the case of perforated plate distributor.The maximum concentration is shifted to the direction of nozzle orientation rather than stable at the center.We would like to validate our dispersion model in the case of a multihorizontal nozzle distributor.For this purpose,we rearranged the scale in theXdirection while inYdirection,the scale remains same.Fig.19(a)and(b)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.18(a)and(b)and the results are listed in Table 2.It can be seen thatDxis considerably larger thanDyfor the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor compared to the perforated plate distributor in Table 2.The ratio ofDxandDyis 1.8.This shows that dispersion in theXdirection is higher for the multi-horizontal distributor than for the perforated plate distributor.

    Fig.12.The experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas injection was near the wall(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(a)Corner view;(b)side view;(c)front view.

    Fig.13.Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas injection was near the wall(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(a)Corner view;(b)side view;(c)front view.

    4.Comparison With the Conventional Method

    Fig.14.The simulated 3D surface plot of the tracer concentrations based on Dx=Dy=46.0 cm2·s-1 where H s=20 cm,Z=10 cm,and U=5U mf.

    Fig.15.(a).The experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.16.(a).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracergas concentration at0.20%ofthe fluidizing air flow rate(H s=15 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=15 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.17.Experimental 2D concentration profile of the tracer gas obtained using various static bed heights at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate(Z=10 cm U=5U mf).(a)C/C o vs.location along the X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.location along the Y-axis.

    Fig.18.(a).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracergas concentration at0.20%ofthe fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=3.5U mf).(b).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracer gas concentration at0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.19.(a).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multihorizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=3.5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    This approach is compared with the well-known conventional method[13]for estimating dispersion coefficients.In Table 1,by comparingDrwithDxandDy,the values and their order of magnitude generally remain in the same domain.These results show good support for this model.Previously,due to the assumption of uniform tracer concentration in theXandYdirections and the limitation of the solution,i.e.,Eq.(9),itwas only possible to calculateDrby neglecting the effectofthe side walls.With this new solution and using the 3Dsurface fitting method,which further decomposesDrintoDxandDy,it is possible to analyze the nature ofthe dispersion in both directionsas wellas the effect ofthe side walls in the rectangular chamber.It can be considered that there is always disparity between the theoretical and experimental dispersion behaviors due to the design of the chamber.

    5.Conclusions

    In this study,a mathematicalmodel for tracer dispersion in a rectangular fluidized bed is formulated.An analyticalsolution using the Pitheorem of dimensional analysis was obtained for 3D surface fitting of the experimental data.The dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,are estimated and analyzed.The experimental results obtained in this study indicate that the effect of super ficial gas velocity on the extent of gas dispersion is significant.The surface fitting shows that the estimatedDxandDyincrease with the super ficial gas velocity.The results also discussed the domination of the jet effect at a lower sampling height with higher super ficial gas velocity.The jet effect becomes insignificant as the sampling height increases.The estimatedDxandDyare not equal due to the effect of the side walls.The experimental results obtained in this study indicate that the effectof the side walls is significant.With similar working conditions,as the tracer gas injection point shifts near the wall from the center,DxandDychanged.The width to length ratio in a small rectangular fluidized bed affects the mixing in the centerofthe bed.Ata lowertracergas ratio ofthe injected gas to the totalgas flow rate,DxandDyare approximately equal.The results also show that the effect of bed height onDxis insignificant,whereas bed height may have an effect onDy.This model is also able to estimate the dispersion coefficients in the case of a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.The results from this model are compared with the conventional method,which shows reasonably good agreement.

    Acknowledgements

    The financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant MOST 105-3113-E-033-001 is greatly acknowledged.

    [1]K.Daizo,O.Levenspiel,Fluidization Engineering,Butterworth-Heinemann,USA,1991.

    [2]E.J.Anthony,Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels;status,successes and problems of the technology,Prog.Energy Combust.Sci.21(1995)239-268.

    [3]V.Orsat,V.Raghavan,Radio-frequency processing,in:D.W.Sun(Ed.),Emerging Technologies for Food Processing,Elsevier,USA 2005,pp.445-468.

    [4]D.Bing,L.S.Fan,F.Wei,W.Warsito,Gas and solids mixing in a turbulent fluidized bed,AICHE J.48(2002)1896-1909.

    [5]D.Y.Liu,X.P.Chen,Quantifying lateral solids mixing in a fluidized bed by modeling the thermal tracing method,AICHE J.58(2012)745-755.

    [6]J.J.Derksen,Simulations of scalar dispersion in fluidized solid-liquid suspensions,AICHE J.60(2014)1880-1890.

    [7]J.Werther,O.Molerus,The local structure of gas fluidized beds-II.The spatial distribution of bubbles,Int.J.Multiphase Flow1(1973)123-138.

    [8]A.B.Whitehead,D.C.Dent,Behavior of multiple tuyere assemblies in large fluidized beds,in:A.A.H.Drinkenburg(Ed.),Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fluidization,Netherlands University Press,Amsterdam 1967,pp.802-820.

    [9]D.Kunii,O.Levenspiel,Lateraldispersion ofsolid in fluidized beds,J.Chem.Eng.Jpn2(1969)122-124.

    [10]Y.F.Shi,L.T.Fan,Lateral mixing of solids in batch gas-solids fluidized beds,Ind.Eng.Chem.Process.Des.Dev.23(1984)337-341.

    [11]A.Klinkenberg,H.J.Krajenbrink,H.A.Lauwerier,Diffusion in a fluid moving at uniform velocity in a tube,Ind.Eng.Chem.45(1953)1202-1208.

    [12]H.Brenner,The diffusion model of longitudinal mixing in beds of finite length.Numerical values,Chem.Eng.Sci.17(1962)229-243.

    [13]P.N.Rowe,T.J.Evans,Dispersion of tracer gas supplied at the distributor of freely bubbling fluidised beds,Chem.Eng.Sci.2235-2246(1974).

    [14]A.Atimtay,T.Cakaloz,An investigation on gas mixing in a fluidized bed,Powder Technol.20(1978)1-7.

    [15]Y.C.Lin,C.S.Chyang,Radial gas mixing in a fludized bed using response surface methodology,Powder Technol.131(2003)48-55.

    [16]J.?tefanica,J.Hrdli?ka,Experimental investigation of radial gas dispersion coefficients in a fluidized bed,Acta Polytech.52(2012)97-100.

    [17]C.S.Chyang,Y.L.Han,C.H.Chien,Gas dispersion in a rectangular bubbling fluidized bed,J.Taiwan Inst.Chem.Eng.41(2010)195-202.

    [18]J.Sternéus,F.Johnsson,B.Leckner,Characteristics of gas mixing in a circulating fluidised bed,Powder Technol.126(2002)28-41.

    [19]R.S.Deng,F.Wei,T.F.Liu,Y.Jin,Radial behavior in riser and downer during the FCC process,Chem.Eng.Process.41(2002)259-266.

    [20]J.J.Van Deemter,Mixing patterns in large-scale fluidized beds,in:J.R.Grace,J.M.Matsen(Eds.),Fluidization,Plenum,New York 1991,pp.69-89.

    [21]W.Zhang,F.Johnsson,B.Leckner,Characteristics of the lateral particle distribution in circulating fluidized bed boilers,in:A.A.Avidan(Ed.),Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds,AIChE,USA 1993,pp.314-319.

    [22]W.D.Curtis,J.D.Logan,W.A.Parker,Dimensional analysis and the pi theorem,Linear Algebra Appl.7(1982)117-126.

    [23]L.Brand,The Pi theorem of dimensional analysis,Arch.Ration.Mech.Anal.1(1957)35-45.

    [24]M.L.Oyen,C.C.Ko,Examination of local variations in viscous,elastic,and plastic indentation responses in healing bone,J.Mater.Sci.Mater.Med.18(2007)623-628.

    [25]C.Xu,R.Shamey,Nonlinear modeling of equilibrium sorption of selected anionic adsorbates from aqueous solutions on cellulosic substrates.Part 1:model development,Cellulose19(2012)615-625.

    [26]C.C.Pain,S.Mansoorzadeh,C.R.E.De Oliveira,A study of bubbling and slugging fluidised beds using the two- fluid granular temperature model,Int.J.Multiphase Flow27(2001)527-551.

    [27]T.Li,Y.Zhang,J.R.Grace,X.Bi,Numerical investigation of gas mixing in gas-solid fluidized beds,AICHE J.56(2010)2280-2296.

    [28]T.Li,J.R.Grace,X.Bi,Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized bed,Powder Technol.203(2010)447-457.

    [29]C.S.Chyang,K.Lieu,S.S.Hong,The effect of distributor design on gas dispersion in a bubbling fluidized bed,J.Chin.Inst.Chem.Eng.39(2008)685-692.

    [30]G.H.Sedahmed,Mass transfer at packed-bed,gas-evolving electrodes,J.Appl.Electrochem.17(1987)746-752.

    久久97久久精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | a级毛色黄片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 22中文网久久字幕| 一级a做视频免费观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 午夜福利在线在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 欧美另类一区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日本av免费视频播放| 美女高潮的动态| av国产精品久久久久影院| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久久性生活片| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 中国国产av一级| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| videos熟女内射| 少妇高潮的动态图| 男人舔奶头视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲国产精品999| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品成人在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲综合色惰| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 高清不卡的av网站| av在线老鸭窝| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 极品教师在线视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 精品久久国产蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 综合色丁香网| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 大码成人一级视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 美女高潮的动态| 国产在线男女| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 只有这里有精品99| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一级片'在线观看视频| 简卡轻食公司| 黄色一级大片看看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 极品教师在线视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 三级国产精品片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲国产色片| 九草在线视频观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 美女国产视频在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲国产色片| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 夫妻午夜视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 99热网站在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 男女国产视频网站| 直男gayav资源| 男女免费视频国产| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产av新网站| 美女高潮的动态| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 午夜福利高清视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av男天堂| 久热久热在线精品观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一级毛片 在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 永久免费av网站大全| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 22中文网久久字幕| 性色avwww在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 中国国产av一级| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 日日啪夜夜撸| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 美女主播在线视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 97在线视频观看| 久久久久久人妻| 久久热精品热| 国内精品宾馆在线| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 男女国产视频网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 少妇高潮的动态图| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 人妻系列 视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美3d第一页| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 在线免费十八禁| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 色视频www国产| 国产永久视频网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 久久久久网色| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲四区av| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 身体一侧抽搐| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 99久久人妻综合| 久久精品人妻少妇| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 午夜免费观看性视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 简卡轻食公司| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩电影二区| 最黄视频免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 99久久精品热视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| av在线app专区| av播播在线观看一区| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲av二区三区四区| av卡一久久| 黄色日韩在线| 一本久久精品| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 午夜视频国产福利| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲国产精品999| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲成色77777| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久久综合免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一本一本综合久久| 久久热精品热| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| www.色视频.com| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 一级a做视频免费观看| 18+在线观看网站| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产毛片在线视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 三级经典国产精品| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日日撸夜夜添| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一本一本综合久久| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 熟女电影av网| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 在线观看国产h片| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 大香蕉久久网| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一级毛片电影观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 内地一区二区视频在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲内射少妇av| 99热这里只有是精品50| www.色视频.com| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日韩中字成人| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| av一本久久久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 尾随美女入室| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 色哟哟·www| 黄色一级大片看看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 黄片wwwwww| 国产淫语在线视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 两个人的视频大全免费| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品免费大片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 少妇人妻 视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美成人a在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 少妇人妻 视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 免费少妇av软件| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| av专区在线播放| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久热精品热| 色视频www国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日日啪夜夜爽| xxx大片免费视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产在线免费精品| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| kizo精华| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产在线男女| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 精品人妻视频免费看| 日韩电影二区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产色婷婷99| av卡一久久| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三卡| av卡一久久| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲精品视频女| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产成人freesex在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 黑人高潮一二区| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 欧美3d第一页|