邱思+++岑俏丹+++關(guān)彩云+++李奕婷
[摘要]目的 探討個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移瘤術(shù)后生活質(zhì)量的影響。方法 選擇2014年5月~ 2016年1月我院收治的擇期行腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移性骨腫瘤手術(shù)的患者79例作為研究對(duì)象。依照時(shí)間順序分為對(duì)照組42例與觀察組37例。對(duì)照組實(shí)施常規(guī)護(hù)理,觀察組在常規(guī)護(hù)理的基礎(chǔ)上采用積極的個(gè)性化護(hù)理。觀察比較兩組患者術(shù)前后的睡眠質(zhì)量和心理狀態(tài)評(píng)分。結(jié)果 兩組患者術(shù)前睡眠質(zhì)量比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。觀察組術(shù)后各因子評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。兩組患者術(shù)前SAS、SDS評(píng)分比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。觀察組術(shù)后SAS、SDS評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。結(jié)論 個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù)以個(gè)體為中心,以數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù)制訂一對(duì)一的護(hù)理方案,有助于及時(shí)調(diào)整術(shù)后康復(fù)方案,改善疾病的預(yù)后,值得在臨床護(hù)理工作中推廣。
[關(guān)鍵詞]個(gè)性化護(hù)理;轉(zhuǎn)移瘤;生存質(zhì)量;睡眠質(zhì)量
[中圖分類號(hào)] R473 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A [文章編號(hào)] 1674-4721(2017)02(c)-0182-03
Effect of personalized nursing intervention on quality of life after surgery of lumbosacral metastatic tumor
QIU Si CEN Qiao-dan GUAN Cai-yun LI Yi-ting
Department of Orthopedics,People′s Hospital of Yangjiang City in Guangdong Province,Yangjiang 529500,China
[Abstract]Objective To explore the effect of personalized nursing intervention on postoperative quality of life of lumbosacral metastases.Methods A total of 79 patients undergone surgeries of lumbosacral metastatic bone tumor at appropriate time from May 2014 to January 2016 in our hospital were selected as observational subjects.According to the sequence of visiting time,they were divided into control group (n=42) and observation group (n=37).In the control group,routine care was used,while in the observation group,active personalized nursing was added on the basis of the routine care.The sleep quality and mental state scores were compared between the two groups before and after operation.Results Before operation,there was no statistical difference between sleep quality in two groups (P>0.05).After operation,the scores of each factor in the observation group were lower than that in the control group,with statistical differences (P<0.05).The scores of SAS and SDS before operation were not displayed significant differences in two groups (P>0.05).However,after operation,the scores of SAS,SDS in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,with statistical difference (P<0.05).Conclusion Individualized nursing intervention refers to a nursing program centered by individuals and evidenced by data in one-to-one,which is beneficial to timely adjust postoperative rehabilitation regimen and improve the disease prognosis,and is worthy of promotion in clinical nursing.
[Key words]Personalized nursing;Metastatic tumor;Quality of life;Sleep quality腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移瘤發(fā)病率約為2.6%[1],屬于中晚期腫瘤。重建脊柱穩(wěn)定性、緩解神經(jīng)脊髓壓迫所致的疼痛是外科手術(shù)治療的目的?;颊哂捎谔弁础㈤L(zhǎng)期臥床,生活無(wú)法自理,同時(shí)又擔(dān)心手術(shù)效果,術(shù)后往往會(huì)出現(xiàn)心理及生理的系列改變,這些變化會(huì)使患者對(duì)術(shù)后康復(fù)治療的依從性下降,影響手術(shù)效果[2],因此,本研究對(duì)37例擇期行腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移性骨腫瘤手術(shù)治療患者制定個(gè)性化護(hù)理方案,反饋較好,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選擇2014年5月~2016年1月我院收治的擇期行腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移性骨腫瘤手術(shù)治療的患者79例作為研究對(duì)象。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[5]:病理與影像學(xué)資料確診為轉(zhuǎn)移性腫瘤;意識(shí)清晰并對(duì)本次研究?jī)?nèi)容知情同意;既往無(wú)脊柱手術(shù)史、精神疾病史。按入院時(shí)間順序?yàn)橛^察組37與對(duì)照組42例。觀察組中男20例,女17例;年齡38~83歲,平均(59.8±7.1)歲;肺癌轉(zhuǎn)移11例,直腸癌轉(zhuǎn)移9例,乳腺癌轉(zhuǎn)移7例,前列腺癌轉(zhuǎn)移6例,不明原因轉(zhuǎn)移性腫瘤4例。對(duì)照組中男23例,女19例;年齡36~81歲,平均(57.4±8.3)歲;肺癌轉(zhuǎn)移12例,直腸癌轉(zhuǎn)移10例,乳腺癌轉(zhuǎn)移9例,前列腺癌轉(zhuǎn)移6例,不明原因轉(zhuǎn)移性腫瘤5例。本研究經(jīng)我院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)實(shí)施。兩組年齡、病情等臨床資料比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
對(duì)照組實(shí)施常規(guī)護(hù)理。觀察記錄切口滲出和腫脹情況并第一時(shí)間處理異常。指導(dǎo)患者科學(xué)制定飲食計(jì)劃,手術(shù)后48 h內(nèi)禁食,之后可補(bǔ)充清淡的流食,食物以富含膳食纖維的蔬菜、水果為主,不適用易產(chǎn)氣的食物。為減少患者術(shù)后感染機(jī)會(huì),護(hù)士要每日清晨用消毒水擦拭病床及床頭柜,并更換床單及被罩,按要求規(guī)范更換敷料,觀察記錄切口情況,有異常及時(shí)處理[6-7]。
觀察組在常規(guī)護(hù)理的基礎(chǔ)上采用積極的個(gè)性化護(hù)理,具體如下。①交互性護(hù)理:患者個(gè)人及家庭的基本情況與病情特點(diǎn)是個(gè)性化護(hù)理的基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)一般交互式交談熟悉患者社會(huì)支持情況,緩解入院的心理顧慮,與患者建立起良好的醫(yī)患關(guān)系。②圍術(shù)期健康教育:以疾病與手術(shù)相關(guān)知識(shí)為主,耐心詳細(xì)地向患者及家屬介紹手術(shù)的方式及目的,術(shù)前注意事項(xiàng),術(shù)后可能的并發(fā)癥,讓患者較好地理解手術(shù)治療的利與弊,并在理解的基礎(chǔ)上指導(dǎo)患者做好術(shù)前相關(guān)準(zhǔn)備。③心理護(hù)理:腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移性骨腫瘤患者經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)期的放、化療,且手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷大,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥多,生活難以自理,造成患者存在不同程度的恐懼、焦慮、悲觀等負(fù)性情緒。部分患者還由于經(jīng)濟(jì)條件承擔(dān)了額外的思想壓力。通過(guò)仔細(xì)了解每一名患者的實(shí)際情況,制定一對(duì)一的個(gè)性化護(hù)理方案。包括3次/d床旁交談,動(dòng)態(tài)了解患者的心理狀態(tài)變化,敏銳地找出患者的心理障礙,正面地解釋病情,給予患者積極的心理暗示;介紹病房成功治療的病例,幫助患者建立戰(zhàn)勝病魔的信心;針對(duì)部分家屬要求對(duì)患者保密病情的情況,要多與家屬溝通,使家屬正確認(rèn)識(shí)疾病與治療的關(guān)系。④放松訓(xùn)練:可以精心選錄一些舒緩、優(yōu)美的鋼琴曲、小夜曲、古典樂(lè)曲給患者聽(tīng),并以此作為背景音樂(lè)展開(kāi)放松練習(xí),包括閉目養(yǎng)神的同時(shí)均勻腹式呼吸,家屬幫助按摩四肢及后背肌肉等。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
評(píng)估兩組患者術(shù)前睡眠質(zhì)量和心理狀態(tài),術(shù)后急性期過(guò)后即第4~15天為干預(yù)期,干預(yù)后2 d內(nèi)再次評(píng)估患者睡眠質(zhì)量和心理狀態(tài)。睡眠質(zhì)量的評(píng)估采用匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)。焦慮狀態(tài)的評(píng)估采用焦慮自評(píng)量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS),由20項(xiàng)組成,采用1~4級(jí)評(píng)分,國(guó)內(nèi)焦慮常模分值是(37.28±12.58)分,SAS標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分界值為50分,其中50~59分為輕度焦慮,60~69分為中度焦慮,≥70分為重度焦慮[8]。抑郁狀態(tài)的評(píng)估采用抑郁自評(píng)量表(SDS):由20項(xiàng)組成,每項(xiàng)癥狀按1~4級(jí)評(píng)分,國(guó)內(nèi)抑郁常模分值是(41.88±10.57)分,53分為臨界值。53~62分為輕度抑郁,63~72分為中度抑郁,≥73分為重度抑郁[9]。
1.4統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS 20.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,計(jì)量資料以(x±s)表示,采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料以率(%)表示,采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 兩組患者手術(shù)前后睡眠質(zhì)量的比較
兩組患者術(shù)前PSQI各因子比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);觀察組手術(shù)后各因子評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)(表1)。
2.2 兩組患者手術(shù)前后負(fù)性情緒的比較
兩組患者手術(shù)前SAS、SDS評(píng)分比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);觀察組手術(shù)后SAS、SDS評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)(表2)。
3 討論
脊柱腰骶部轉(zhuǎn)移瘤手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷大,疼痛感較強(qiáng)烈,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥多,無(wú)法根治等諸多因素使患者長(zhǎng)期處于一種焦慮、抑郁狀態(tài),無(wú)法保證良好的睡眠質(zhì)量。已有大量研究證實(shí)[10-11],癌癥術(shù)后患者的睡眠質(zhì)量遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)低于普通人群 ,而且癌癥術(shù)后患者的主觀睡眠較差,存在負(fù)性情緒,睡眠質(zhì)量與負(fù)性情緒密切相關(guān),睡眠障礙會(huì)進(jìn)一步加劇患者的負(fù)性情緒,使患者產(chǎn)生放棄治療的想法,降低患者的依從性,影響患者的術(shù)后康復(fù)治療[12-13]。
個(gè)體化護(hù)理干預(yù)目前已經(jīng)成為國(guó)外護(hù)理工作中的主流方式,其是指根據(jù)患者自身的病情種類、程度、心理承受能力、個(gè)人喜好、生活方式、文化水平的不同因素來(lái)合理制定符合患者個(gè)體需要的特殊護(hù)理方式[14]。本研究中,個(gè)體化護(hù)理干預(yù)為患者提供個(gè)體化專業(yè)支持和幫助,先期利用專業(yè)量化評(píng)分工具對(duì)患者睡眠質(zhì)量及情緒進(jìn)行量化評(píng)估,通過(guò)健康教育、心理護(hù)理、家庭社會(huì)支持等多途徑指導(dǎo)家屬加強(qiáng)環(huán)境控制,降低患者與過(guò)敏事件接觸的機(jī)會(huì);密切觀察患者的生活習(xí)慣和情緒變化,指導(dǎo)患者按計(jì)劃組織康復(fù)訓(xùn)練,進(jìn)一步提高外科治療效果。本研究中,觀察組患者術(shù)后各因子評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05),睡眼質(zhì)量得到明顯改善,觀察組術(shù)后SAS、SDS評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組,心理狀態(tài)明顯好轉(zhuǎn)。與Briggs等[15]研究結(jié)果一致,避免護(hù)理人員根據(jù)個(gè)人既往工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)公式化、非人性化的制定護(hù)理方案,密切了護(hù)患關(guān)系,緩解患者的不良情緒,能夠?qū)ψ陨硎中g(shù)情況有正確認(rèn)識(shí)并積極配合。
綜上所述,個(gè)性化護(hù)理干預(yù)以個(gè)體為中心,通過(guò)干預(yù)前后患者睡眠質(zhì)量與心理狀態(tài)進(jìn)行模擬量化評(píng)分,以數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù)制定一對(duì)一的護(hù)理方案,避免常規(guī)護(hù)理中責(zé)任護(hù)士憑借經(jīng)驗(yàn)和直覺(jué)進(jìn)行護(hù)理的盲從性,有助于及時(shí)調(diào)整術(shù)后康復(fù)方案,改善疾病的預(yù)后,提高患者生活質(zhì)量,值得在臨床護(hù)理工作中推廣。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]雷莉萍,曾谷清.術(shù)前訪視中實(shí)施綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)腎移植患者焦慮抑郁的影響[J].中南醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)雜志,2015,43(2):234-236.
[2]劉佳,嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),葉放發(fā),等.健康教育路徑在腎移植患者中的實(shí)施及效果評(píng)價(jià)[J].中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版),2014,39(1):78-83.
[3]鄭洪敏.腎移植40例術(shù)后護(hù)理與健康指導(dǎo)[J].齊魯護(hù)理雜志,2015,21(20):79-80.
[4]Okoro T,Ramavath A,Howarth J,et al.What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail?Results of a mixed methods study[J].BMC Musculoskeiet Disord,2013,12(14):91.
[5]Varga PP ,Bors I ,Lazary A.Sacral tumors and management[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2014,40(1):105-123.
[6]袁學(xué)枝,袁平,龔敏,等.人性化護(hù)理對(duì)手術(shù)室護(hù)理的影響研究[J].國(guó)際護(hù)理學(xué)雜志,2015,34(14):1890-1892.
[7]Murata A,Brown CJ,Raval M,et al.Impact of short-course radiotherapy and low anterior resection on quality of life and bowel function in primary rectal cancer[J].Am J Surg,2013, 195(5):611-615.
[8]何之學(xué),陳建慶,溫來(lái)友.患者術(shù)前焦慮情緒與應(yīng)對(duì)方式的相關(guān)性研究[J].中國(guó)現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2014,19(15):2389-2391.
[9]Wintner LM,Giesinger JM,Zabernigg A,et al.Quality of life during chemotherapy in lung cancer patients:results across different treatment lines[J].Br J Cancer,2013,109(9):2301-2308.
[10]Arrieta O,Angulo LP,Nunez-Valencia C,et al.Association of depression and anxiety on quality of life,treatment adherence,and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2013,20(6):1941-1948.
[11]Campbell CL,Campbell LC.A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer[J].Patient Educ Couns,2012,89(1):15-24.
[12]陳汝桂,黃桂連,李小梅,等.規(guī)范化癌痛護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)癌痛患者心理與生活質(zhì)量的影響[J].腫瘤藥學(xué),2014,(6):473-477.
[13]Janzen JA,Hadijistavropoulos HD.Examination of negtive affective response to waiting for surgery[J].Can J Nurs Res,2008,40(4):72-91.
[14]Sajjadi M,Rassouli M,Abbaszadeh A,et al.Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Mishel′s Uncertainty in Illness Scale in patients with cancer[J].Eur J Oncol Nurs,2014,18(1):52-57.
[15]Briggs AM,Slater H,Smith AJ,et al.Low back pain-related beliefs and likely practice behaviours among final-year cross-discipline health students[J].Eur J Pain,2013,17(5):766-775.
(收稿日期:2016-12-30 本文編輯:顧雪菲)