• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method*

    2017-03-09 09:09:54KaidiSmaouiSergent

    S. Kaidi, H. Smaoui, P. Sergent

    1.CEREMA-DtecEMF, 60280 Margny-lès-Compiègne, France

    2.Sorbonne universités, Université de technologie de Compiègne, laboratoire Roberval, 60203 Compiègne cedex, France, E-mail: sami.kaidi@cerema.fr

    (Received November 9, 2015, Revised May 11, 2016)

    Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method*

    S. Kaidi1,2, H. Smaoui1,2, P. Sergent1

    1.CEREMA-DtecEMF, 60280 Margny-lès-Compiègne, France

    2.Sorbonne universités, Université de technologie de Compiègne, laboratoire Roberval, 60203 Compiègne cedex, France, E-mail: sami.kaidi@cerema.fr

    (Received November 9, 2015, Revised May 11, 2016)

    This paper presents a numerical investigation of ship manoeuvring under the combined effect of bank and propeller. The incompressible turbulent flow with free surface around the self-propelled hull form is simulated using a commercial CFD software (ANSYS-FLUENT). In order to estimate the influence of the bank-propeller effect on the hydrodynamic forces acting on the ship, volume forces representing the propeller are added to Navier-Stokes equations. The numerical simulations are carried out using the equivalent of experiment conditions. The validation of the CFD model is performed by comparing the numerical results to the available experimental data. For this investigation, the impact of Ship-Bank distance and ship speed on the bank effect are tested with and without propeller. An additional parameter concerning the advance ratio of the propeller is also tested.

    Viscous fluid flow simulation (CFD), bank effect, bank-propeller-hull interaction, hydrodynamic forces estimations, advance ratio

    Introduction

    The transport by inland waterways is considered as an alternative to rail and road transport. Over these years this mode of transport has seen a significant increase due to the encouragement of governments to the exploitation of waterways. This is, on the one hand, to relieve the other modes of transport and, on the other hand, for its ecological quality.

    Navigation in inland waterways faces a major risk which concerns mainly accidents due to ship controllability. In contrast to the maritime navigation, the waterways navigation environment plays an important role in the ship manoeuvrability (channel geometry, water depth, bank distance,…), therefore, it is important to study the manoeuvrability in confined water in order to offer proposals concerning a development and security.

    In the present work, we focus on the study of bankeffect. Norrbin[1], was the first to work on Ship-bank interaction. The conclusion of shis experiment has shown a significant impact of the banks on the trajectory of ships. His study was improved later by Ch'ng et al.[2]by taking into account new parameters, such as bank slope, hull form, water depth, bank height and ship speed.

    Recently, Duffy[3,4]and Vantorre et al.[5]conducted a series of experimental tests and carried out a study in the influence of some parameters such as water depth, distance to the bank, bank slope, bank height and the forward speed on hydrodynamic force and moment by using a Captive Model Test model. The results of their works showed that the sway force and yaw moment are linearly influenced by the distance to the bank. Few years after, an empirical mathematical formula was proposed by Lataire et al.[6]to calculate the bank-ship interaction forces as a function of the bank geometry, ship speed and propulsion system.

    With the fast development of the computer technology and the commercial CFD software, the CFD method has interested the inland community. This method is used mostly and it has proved its ability to predict the ship manoeuvring hydrodynamic forces inmedium deep waters.

    Miao et al.[7]used a potential flow method for calculating the lateral force and yaw moment for a ship sailing in a rectangular channel. Lo et al.[8]performed a series of simulations to estimate the bank effect of a container ship taking into consideration the viscous action, by using the commercial CFD software based on Navier-Stokes equations. The temporal variation of yaw angle and sway force by varying the ship speed and the distance to the bank were also discussed. Recently, Wang et al.[9]studied the bank effect for a series of hull for several water depth-ship draught ratios and ship-bank distance, using a CFD method to estimate the viscous force better. Ma and Zhou[10]studied the hydrodynamic interaction among hull, rudder and bank. The verification and validation of this method was carried out by Zou et al.[11]. This method was used later to simulate different channel geometries by Zou and Larsson[12].

    In this investigation, a preliminary study is presented to predict the combined effect of bank-propeller on the ship manoeuvrability. The theme of this work is the use of viscous CFD model to estimate the different hydrodynamic forces acting on the hull with and without propeller, taking into consideration the influence of ship position on bank, ship speed and the advance ratio of the propeller. The viscous CFD model is updated by adding additional volume forces to represent the propeller action.

    1. Problem formulation

    1.1Governing equations

    The governing equations for mass and momentum conservation are the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for incompressible flow, by using the Einstein notation these equations are given as bellow:

    The Reynolds stresses introduce new variables, which makes the equation system Eqs.(1)-(2) not closed. To close and solve this system, several complementary mathematical models with additional equations are proposed, these models are called turbulence models. In the present work, among the various turbulence model proposed by Fluent, the implicit Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST)k-ωmodel[13]was chosen for its robustness and stability. The (SST)k-ωequations are shown as follows:

    GkandGωdenote the generation of turbulent kinetic energy due to mean velocity gradients andω,YkandYωrepresent the turbulence dissipation ofkandω,Dωis the cross-diffusion term,SkandSωare user-defined source terms.GkandGωexpress the active diffusivity ofkandω.

    1.2CFD Solver

    In this work, the incompressible free surface flow around the ship hull is studied using the commercial RANS code “Ansys-Fluent? based on the finite volume method. The pseudo transient pressure-based coupled algorithm is adopted to compute the pressurevelocity coupling, the (PRESTO) interpolation method is selected to compute the cell-face pressure.

    To capture the free surface in air-water interface, the implicit volume of fluid (VOF) method based on a second order scheme is employed. The VOF is an Eulerian method particularly used for flows with deformed interfaces. Using this approach the air-water interface can be tracked in a fixed grid by solving the continuity equation of the volume fraction (Eq.(7)).

    Table 1 Geometric parameters of ship hull

    Fig.1 Lines plan of the self-propelled ship

    Fig.2 (Color online) Illustration of the test tank

    Fig.3 Channel geometries

    αpdenotes the volume fraction of thept hfluid, and

    Table 2 Validation test conditions

    1.3Ship hull

    In this investigation, the hull form of the self-propelled container ship (135 m of length and 1 140 m of width) is selected for both test cases, experimental and CFD. No rudder and no propeller are included for the validation tests. The propeller will be included only in the last section of this work. The ship hull geometry for tested model is presented on the scale of 1/25. Table 1 and Fig.1 show the main characteristics and the body lines of the hull form.

    2. Presentation of the experimental tests

    The tests conducted for this work are realized in the towing tank at the Liege University (Length is 100 m, width is 6 m and depth is 3.5 m, see Fig.2). Figure 3 and Table 2 present the geometrical characteristics for all the tested configurations (three channel widths, three under keel clearance and two ship-bank distances).

    The test device consists of a towing carriage that tows the ship model with a speed which can reach 5 m/s and a balance to measure the forces and moments acting on the ship model.

    To test the effect of the bank, independent panels inclined 27owere placed one beside the other (Fig.4).

    Fig.4 Middle section of the tank with mobile bank

    3. Validation of numerical model

    To validate the CFD model, the numerical results of the ship resistance were compared with those measured in towing tank. Seven geometrical configurations are simulated. Five configurations (three water depths and three bottom widths) with a ship positioned at the centre of the channel (see Fig.3(a)) and one geometrical configuration with two ship-bank distances (see Fig.3(b)). For each configuration, different ship speeds varying between 0.222 m/s and 0.575 m/s (between 4 km/h and 10 km/h in real scale) are tested. Due to the symmetry of the domain studied for the centred ship cases, only half of the domain is considered and meshed. However, for the coming other cases, the whole domain is meshed.

    Fig.5 (Color online) Boundary conditions applied

    In this investigation, only three most influential forces and moments were examinedX,YandN. The non-dimensional form of these forces and moment are,and, defined as:

    Table 3 Boundary conditions

    The non-dimensional ship-bank distance is expressed by the ratio

    whereymax=0.8 mrepresents the largest scaled distance tested between the ship and the bank.

    3.1Boundary conditions

    The following figures show the standard computational domain with all boundary conditions applied for centred ship (only half model is considered, see Fig.5(a)) and offset ship position (whole model is considered, see Fig.5(b)). The boundary conditions shown in the following figures are detailed in Table 3.

    Fig.6 Grids tested

    3.2Grid settings

    For the validation cases, the domain studied is meshed with a mixed mesh. The region around the ship hull is meshed using non-structured tetrahedral elements, and the rest of the region studied is meshed with structured hexahedral elements.

    For an accurate resolution of the viscous flow, the mesh is appropriately refined at the air-water interface to better represent the free surface variation and made near the ship to estimate the hydrodynamic forces (pressure and viscous forces) acting on the hull form more exactly (Fig.6). The mesh quality used for the investigation tests is chosen after a mesh sensitivity analysis. This analysis is based on the test of different mesh qualities varying from 0.76×106to 2.24×106of elements. To perform this sensitivity test, the identical simulation conditions are used for all grid tests. Where, the channel width and the water depth are 1.44 m and 0.18 m respectively (see Fig.5(b)) and the ship speed is 0.45 m/s.

    Table 4 shows the evolution of the error between the measured and the computed ship resistance as function of grid quality. The simulations illustrate that the error is stabilized and the numerical results start converging from the Grid 3. The relative errorE= [(Rm?RC)/Rm]is estimated to be 3.1%. All following simulations use the quality of the Grid 3.

    Table 4 Test of the grid convergence

    3.3Centered ship results

    Figure 7 shows the comparison between the computed and measured ship resistance. By analyzing these graphs, a similar tendency of the both results is noted.

    Fig.7 Comparison of the CFD results with measurements

    We observe that for all tests, the relative error depends on two parameters, the ship speed and the confinement of the navigation environment. Where the error increases with increase of the ship speed and the blockage factor of the ship “BF? and reduce of the ratio between the water depth and the deep draft (h/T).

    Table 5 gives the evolution of the relative error for all cases aforementioned as function of confinement coefficients (BF andh/T). From this table it is clearly seen the influence of the ship speed on the error evolution. For all cases the maximum relative error is reached for the higher value of the ship speed.

    Table 5 Error evolution

    Fig.8 Ship resistance comparison

    The influence of the blockage factor on the relative error is clear by comparing Cases a, b and c. For the sameh/Tratio and the highest common ship speed(≈0.511m/s-0.575 m/s)it is observed that the error increases with increas of the blockage factor. The maximum value of this error is 13% noted in theCase a. The comparison of Cases b, d and e can illustrate the influence ofh/Tratio on the error variation. The relative error decreases with increase of the ratioh/T. Except for Case d, where the relative error at high ship speed is very large (18.1%) due to an over-estimation of the measured ship resistance.

    The relative error between the computed and measured ship resistance especially at high ship speed, can be explained by the use of some simplifying assumptions. Among the assumptions that can influence the numerical results is the neglect of the ship squat. At a high speed in a restricted channel, the ship sinks significantly in water and usually causes an additional resistance. Hence, ignoring the modelling of this phenomenon, it generates a pronounced difference between the two results.

    Table 6 Test conditions to study the influence ofsbdand ship speed

    3.4Offset ship position results

    In this section, additional validation tests are performed to examine the bank effect. This is rendered possible by experimental facilities that use a removable bank. Two offset positions of the ship to the bank (sbd)0.21 and 0.4 (see Fig.2 and Table 2) are tested for four different speeds. Figure 8 presents the comparison between the computed and experimental ship resistance.

    From this figure, it is shown that the allure of the computed and measured results is identical. It may also be noted that the ship resistance is well estimated by the CFD model for both ship positions when the ship speed is less than 0.45 m/s. Where relative error achieved maximum at this speed is 5.1% for the first ship position(sbd1=0.40)and 5.6% for the second ship position(sbd2=0.21). For the highest ship speed (0.575 m/s), the relative error is still reasonable for the first case(sbd1=0.40). However, when the ship is closer to the bank(sbd2=0.21)we note a significant error (21%). In this case the measured ship resistance is underestimated and this important gap is due particularly to a technical problem encountered during measurement sessions. When the ship is sailing close to the bank, the pressure forces of the wave crests between the ship and the bank increase and move slightly the independent panels representing the bank, which explain this energy dissipation.

    4. Test results

    The validated numerical model is used in order to perform a comparative study in the combined effect of the bank and the propeller on the ship maneuverability. This section is divided into two parts: the first part concerns the influence of the ship-bank distance (sbd) and the ship speed, while the second part treats the influence of the propeller system as function of shipbank distance, the ship speed and the propeller advance ratio. For the next simulations, to estimate the forces associated with the bank, we consider only one bank and assume the other bank is far apart thus the numerical model can be simplified by adding a symmetry plane condition.

    4.1Tests without propeller

    In this first part of results, we study the influence of the ship-bank distance and the ship speed on the effect of the bank. This investigation was carried out by varying the ship speed and the ship-bank distance.

    Four positions of the non-dimensional ship-bank distance (sbd)varying between 0.25 and 1 were tested and for each position the ship speed was varied between 0.2225 and 0.55 m/s. Table 6 summarizes the test conditions to simulate the sbd and ship speed influence.

    Figure 9 presents the impact of thesbdand the ship speed parameters on the non-dimensional forces acting on the ship (ship resistance, sway force and yaw moment). The results show that hydrodynamic forces are affected by thesbd. These forces increase when the ship is close to the bank and become lower for a largesbd. It’s observedthat the tendency of the hydrodynamic forces as function ofsbdis almost linear, which is in agreement with the experimental results reported by Vantorre et al.[5].

    The figures represent also the ship speed impact. For a givensbddistance, the curves show that all hydrodynamic forces acting on the hull increase with increasge of the ship speed, the variation of the ship resistance is proportional to the square of the ship speed. While the sway force and yaw moment are not considered proportional to square of the ship speed.

    Comparing the effect of the both parameters (thesbdand the ship speed), the results confirm that the influence of the ship speed on the bank effect dependsstrongly on thesbddistance. Whensbddistance is larger, the influence of ship speed is insignificant, however, when the ship is close to the bank, the ship speed influence increases rapidly and the hydrodynamic forces achieve high values. This is in agreement with the experimental investigation performed by Sian et al.[14]. The 3-D plots (Fig.9) illustrate better the combined influence of thesbdand the ship speed.

    Fig.9 (Color online) Non-dimensional values versussbdfor different ship speed

    Fig.10 Propagation of ship generated waves

    According to the experimental investigation conducted by Duffy[4]the hydrodynamic forces around the ship can be attractive or repulsive. The nature of this interaction depends on a number of factors such as blockage coefficient, Froude depth number and the bank geometry. When the flow velocity between the ship and the bank is faster than that on the other side, the pressure is lower. Hence the lateral force acting on the ship is attractive. The lateral force is considered repulsive, when the blockage and the Froude depth number are higher (h/T>1.5)[15]. In such situation, the wave crests inon the bank side are becoming very important, thus the reflected wake waves on the bank, pushing the ship on the open side[15,16], and can modify the yaw moment direction (see Fig.10). The ship length (LPP)can also affect the bank effect.

    More details about the generated waves in a restricted water are presented in the work of Ji et al.[17]. Figure 11 illustrates a descriptive sketch of the wave propagation. In the present work, the results revealed that the lateral force for all the simulated configurations is repulsive in nature.

    Fig.11 Representative illustration of the fluid flow around a propelled ship in a confined environ- ment[18]

    4.2Tests with propeller

    In this part, the numerical model is modified by including the propeller. The first results present comparative study of the bank effect on hydrodynamic forces applied on the hull with and without propeller, by considering two parameters: the ship-bank distance and the ship speed. The second results concern the influence of the advance ratio of the propeller on the hydrodynamic forces applied on the propelled hull.

    Here, the propeller effect is modeled by adding additional body forces and based on the total thrust and torque of the prop in Eq.(2). The formulation of this force was proposed by Stern et al.[19]and validated by Zhang[20]and Ji et al.[21]. The total force representing the propeller, can be expressed by three components: the axial force FPX, the tangential force FPT and the radial force FPR. In the present work, the radial force is considered zero. The other forces are normalized to the simulations scale. These forces are written as follows:

    TPandQPare the normalized total thrust and torque of propulsion system.KTandKQare the thrust and the torque coefficients,VHandnPare the hull speed and the number of rotations per second (rps) respectively.Δ=0.03mis the actuator disc thickness. Figure 12 shows a deformation of the free surface due to the propeller and the streamlines behind the propeller.

    Fig.12(a) (Color online) Velocity distribution on deformed free surface due to prop rotation

    Fig.12(b) (Color online) Streamlines colored by velocity magnitude behind the propeller

    4.2.1 Influence of ship-bank distance

    In this first part, we test the influence of the shipbank distance on the ship behavior in the presence of a propeller. To carry out this study we varied the non-dimensional ship-bank distance between 0.25 and 1.0 and we set the ship speed and rotation speed of the propeller to 0.45 m/s and 123 rpm respectively. The advance ratio is assumed to be 0.75, that corresponds to the high efficiency of the propeller (η0=0.81)and to the following thrust and torque coefficients:KT= 0.15 andKQ=0.028.

    The computed results show clearly the additional effect brought about by the propeller on the hydrodynamic forces applied on the hull. A comparison of the results, with and without propeller was performed to show qualitatively the influence of the propeller (see Fig.13).

    Fig.13 Non-dimensional values versussbddistance

    By analyzing the graphs representing the nondimensional forces and moments acting on the hull (ship resistance, sway force and yaw moment), we observe that all curvesshow an identical general tendency, the hydrodynamic forces increase when the ship is sailing close to the bank. However, in the presence of propeller, the following observations were also noted:

    (1) An increase of the ship resistance: This phenomenon is due principally to the accelerated flow by the propeller in front of and behind the hull. This acceleration generates an high rate of shear in the hull boundary layer and a low pressure at the rear of the hull. It can be seen from Fig.13 that the curves of the resistance for towed and propelled ship are parallel. This is confirmed by the relationship between the resistance of towed shipRtand self-propelled shipRspgiven by the next formula:Rt=Rsp(1?t),tis a positive number called the thrust deduction. The typical value oftis about 0.2. In Fig.13, the computed thrust deduction number is almost identical over all ship positions and its value is about 0.22.

    (2) An important increase in the magnitude of the sway force and the yaw moment. This augmentation can be interpreted by two factors: the first factor is the propeller jet direction (direction of rotation), and the second factor is the absence of the rudder. Without the rudder, the water jet caused by the prop revolution is more dispersed and it is directed at the bank to join the diverging stern waves, which slows the flow on that side. Hence, the pressure increases especially at the stern of the hull (see Fig.14) and the ship heading is directed to bank. However, the lateral distribution of the pressure along the hull dominates and pushes the ship to the channel center. This is represented in curves by the positive sign of the sway force and the negative sign of the yaw moment.

    4.2.2 Influence of ship speed

    To estimate the influence of ship speed on the hydrodynamic forces around the hull, we fixed the ship-bank distance by choosing a medium non-dimensional distance of 0.6 (corresponding to 0.48 m in scaled model and 5 m in real scale). We then proceeded to vary the speed of the ship and the equivalent rotation speed of the prop using an advance ratio of 0.75, which is considered the best performing ratio.

    In the shown tests presented bellow, the speed of the hull is varied between 0.2225 m/s (4 km/h) and 0.55 m/s (10 km/h). The corresponding prop rotation speed is varied between 55.625 rpm and 137.5 rpm.

    Figure 15 presents the variation of the computed non-dimensional hydrodynamic forces acting on the propelled hull as function of the ship speed. We note a similar trend for both results, with and without propeller. Although the hull speed variation is the same for each case, we observe that all forces are amplified by adding the propulsive forces, especially when the ship speed is high. This is due, on one side, to the pressure decrease in hull stern generating a supplementary resistance to the ship and on the other side, to the acceleration of the flow around the hull which amplifies the viscous force and modifies the pressure distribution along the hull as well as the lateral force.

    Fig.14 (Color online) Pressure contours around ship for severalsbd

    4.2.3 Influence of advance ratio

    The last section of this paper treats the impact of the other propeller parameter on the bank effect. This parameter concerns the Advance ratio (J). The advance ratio of apropelleris the distance advanced by the propeller through the fluid in one revolution made dimensionless with the propeller diameter.

    This ratio is given by the following formula:J=VF/nPD. WhereVFis the flow velocity at the inlet of the propeller, andDandnPare the diameter and the rotation frequency of the propeller. The advance ratio takes a high value when the propeller rotation speed is low and the ship is moving at high speed compared with that of the fluid. Otherwise, the advance ratio takes a lower value when the propeller operating at high rotation speed and the ship is moving at lower speed. In this case the thrust and torque coefficients (KTandKQ, see Eqs.(10) and (11)) are very large and the propeller loses its efficiency (η0)because of the high sliding between the prop and the water. In that situation, a high depression is generated at hull stern and can causes a cavitation phenomenon. Hence, the study of the influence of this parameter is very important. Typical values of these coefficients are presented in Fig.16.

    Note that the average velocity of the flow at the propeller inlet is usually less than the hull speed, this is due to the viscous flow effect that causes retardation of the flow near the ship boundary layer. The Figs.17(a)-17(b) show the pressure contours at propeller plane and the cross flow vectors colored by velocity magnitude. From these figures we can see clearly the flow acceleration through the propeller plan and the resulting dynamic pressure distribution. Compared with realistic propeller, the use of the simplified body forces method can reproduce an identical radial distribution of thrust, however, the radial distribution of torque remains not identical. This is because the detailed resolution of the blade flow is not taken into account and it is simply represented by an average body forces over rotating cell volume. Hence, the influence of the form and the finite number of blades is not directly considered.

    For the following simulations, the propeller characteristics are listed in Table 7. To test the influence of Advance ratio, the non- dimensional ship-bank distance and the ship speed were fixed at 0.46 m/s and 0.4505 m/s respectively. The initial flow velocity around the hull is assumed not variable and the propeller rotation speed varies with the advance ratio. Four values of the advance ratio were tested: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1, corresponding to rotation speeds 135 rpm, 180 rpm, 270 rpm and 540 rpm.

    The influence of theJcoefficient on the hydrodynamic forces acting on the ship is plotted in the Fig.18. The results revealed that the sway force and the yaw moment applied on the hull rise with increaseof the advance ratio. While the ship resistance rise with decrease of the advance ratio.

    Fig.15 Non-dimensional values versus ship speed

    Fig.16 Typical thrust, torque and open water efficiency coefficients versus advance ratioJ[22]

    Fig.17(a) (Color online) Pressure contours of propeller plane

    Fig.17(b) (Color online) Cross flow vectors downstream of propeller plan

    Fig.18 Non-dimensional values versus advance ratio (J)

    This is due principally to sliding between the prop and the water. When the Advance ratio is less than 1, the real pitch is lower than the theoretical pitch, hence, the turn more times faster than the inlet water velocity. This makes it possible to decrease the pressure in stern of the hull generating an additional resistance. and the sliding between the water and the propeller blades decrease also the flow acceleration around the hull espe-cially on bank side, which leads to a reduction in the sway force and yaw moment. These results are in agreement with the experimental investigations conducted by Vantorre et al.[5].

    Table 7 Propulsion characteristics

    In ideal case (=1)J, the ship resistance considerably decreases and tends to the towed hull resistance. At this value ofJ, a slight difference between both results (with and without propeller) can be seen. This is due to the fact that the incoming velocity seen by the propeller is less than the hull speed because of the wake effect.

    5. Conclusions

    In this paper a numerical investigation was conducted in order to estimate the impact of the banks on the ship manoeuvrability with and without propeller. A 3-D CFD model based on steady Navier-Stokes equations and the (SST)k-ωturbulence model is used to simulate the flow around the ship. The validation tests of the CFD model revealed that the predicted ship resistance were closer to the measured data.

    A preliminary study of the grid convergence was performed for each part of this investigation to choose the optimal mesh. To represent the propeller forces a body-force approach is selected in this work.

    The first results concern the study of the influence of ship-bank distance and ship speed on the hydrodynamic forces acting on the ship without propeller. The results show that the hydrodynamic forces due to the bank increase with reduce of the ship-bank distance. And for a given distance between the ship and the bank, the bank effect is proportional to the ship speed and more affected by this parameter.

    The second part of this work illustrates the impact of the propeller on the bank effect as function of the ship-bank distance, ship speed and the advance ratio of the propeller. The conclusions yielded show clearly the supplementary effect generated by the addition of the propeller on the hydrodynamic forces acting on the hull. The effect of the two first parameters is represented by an increase in the different hydrodynamic forces in comparison with ship without propeller. The effect of the last parameter is more important, and show that the reduction of the advance ratio, on one side amplifies the sway force and yaw moment acting on the hull, and on the other side decrease the ship resistance.

    [1] Norbin N. Bank effects on a ship moving through a short dredged channel [C].10th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974.

    [2] Ch'ng P. W., Doctors L. J., Renilson M. R. A method of calculating the ship-bank interaction forces and moments in restricted water [J].International Shipbuilding Progress, 1993, 40(421): 7-23.

    [3] Duffy J. T. The effect of the channel geometry on ship operatio in a port [C].30th PIANC-AIPCN Congress. Sydney, Australia, 2002.

    [4] Duffy J. T. Prediction of bank induced sway force and yaw moment for ship-handling simulation [C].International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water: Bank Effects. Antwerp, Belgium, 2009.

    [5] Vantorre M., Delefortrie G., Eloot K. et al. Experimental investigation of Ship-Bank interaction forces [C].Conference MARSIM’03. Kanazawa, Japan, 2003.

    [6] Lataire E., Vantorre M., Laforce E. et al. Navigation in confined water: Influence of bank characteristics on shipbank interaction [C].The 2nd International Conference on Marine Research and Transportation. Ischia, Naples, Italy, 2007.

    [7] Miao Q. M., Xia J. Z., Chwang A. T. et al. Numerical study of bank effects on a ship travelling in a channel [C].Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Busan, Korea, 2003.

    [8] Lo D. C., Su D. T., Chen J. M. Application of computational fluid dynamics simulations to the analysis of bank effects in restricted waters [J].Journal of Navigation, 2009, 62(3): 477-491.

    [9] Wang H. M., Zou Z. J., Xie Y. H. et al. Numerical study of viscous hydrodynamics forces on a ship navigating ner bank in shallow water [C].Proceedings of the Twentieth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Beijing, China, 2010.

    [10] Ma S. J., Zhou M. G. Hydrodynamic interaction among hull, rudder and bank for a ship sailing along a bank in restricted waters [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(6): 809-817.

    [11] Zou L., Larsson L., Orych M. Verification and validation of CFD predictions for a manoeuvring tanker [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(5Suppl.): 438-445.

    [12] Zou L., Larsson L. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) prediction of bank effects including verification and validation [J].Journal of Maritime Science and Technology, 2013, 18(3): 310-323.

    [13] Menter F. R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J].AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.

    [14] Sian A.Y., Maimun A., Priyanto A. et al. Assessment ofShip-bank interactions on LNG tanker in shallow water [J].Jurnal Teknologi, 2014, 66(2): 141-144.

    [15] Tuck E. O., Taylor P. J. Shallow water problems in ship hydrodynamics [C].Proceedings of 8th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Pasadena, USA, 1970, 627-659.

    [16] Chen X., Sharama S. Nonlinear theory of asymmetric motion of a slender ship in a shallow channel [C].Twentieth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 1994, 386-407.

    [17] Ji S., Ouahsine A., Smaoui H. et al. 3D Numerical simulation of convoy-generated waves in a restricted waterway [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(3): 420-429.

    [18] BAW Code of Practice. Principles for the design of bank and bottom protection for Inland Waterways (GBB) [R]. 2010.

    [19] Stern F., Kim H. T., Patel V. C. et al. A viscous flow approach to the computation of the propeller hull interaction [J].Journal of Ship Research, 1988, 32(4): 246-262.

    [20] Zhang Z. R. Verification and validation for RANS simulation of KCS container ship without/with propeller [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(5Suppl.): 932-939.

    [21] Ji S., Ouahsine A., Smaoui H. et al. 3D Numerical modeling of Sediment resuspension induced by the compounding effects of ship-generated waves and the ship propeller [J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(6): 682-694.

    [22] Triantafyllou M. S., Hover F. R. Maneuvering and control of marine vehicles [R]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.

    * Biography:S. Kaidi (1984-), Male, Ph. D., Confirmed Researcher

    久久久久国内视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 咕卡用的链子| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲av成人av| 免费av毛片视频| 国产av在哪里看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 欧美日韩av久久| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产精品永久免费网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 免费少妇av软件| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| av免费在线观看网站| 少妇 在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| ponron亚洲| 国产成人欧美| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美中文综合在线视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久影院123| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 一级黄色大片毛片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 91成人精品电影| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 成人免费观看视频高清| 香蕉丝袜av| cao死你这个sao货| 久久精品成人免费网站| 制服诱惑二区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 看片在线看免费视频| av电影中文网址| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 精品国产国语对白av| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产精品九九99| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 又大又爽又粗| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产熟女xx| 手机成人av网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产三级在线视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 成年版毛片免费区| ponron亚洲| 一区福利在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 男人操女人黄网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 两个人免费观看高清视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 青草久久国产| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 一本综合久久免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 色综合站精品国产| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产单亲对白刺激| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| www国产在线视频色| 丁香六月欧美| 精品福利观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 午夜免费观看网址| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品日产1卡2卡| av国产精品久久久久影院| 曰老女人黄片| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| www国产在线视频色| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 一区在线观看完整版| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 看免费av毛片| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| bbb黄色大片| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲中文av在线| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 色播在线永久视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 9色porny在线观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 伦理电影免费视频| 手机成人av网站| 丁香欧美五月| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 人人妻人人澡人人看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久亚洲精品不卡| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品久久久精品久久久| 午夜视频精品福利| 在线天堂中文资源库| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产三级在线视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 91国产中文字幕| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 日本三级黄在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 日本 av在线| 一级片免费观看大全| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| a在线观看视频网站| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 9热在线视频观看99| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 香蕉国产在线看| 我的亚洲天堂| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 精品第一国产精品| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 在线天堂中文资源库| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 91在线观看av| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 极品教师在线免费播放| www国产在线视频色| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 成人精品一区二区免费| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 色综合站精品国产| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产成人欧美| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 99久久国产精品久久久| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 高清在线国产一区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久热在线av| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产又爽黄色视频| 色在线成人网| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 91字幕亚洲| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 99久久人妻综合| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久国产精品影院| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| av电影中文网址| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲片人在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久中文看片网| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线看a的网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久久精品成人免费网站| 91大片在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 91字幕亚洲| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 日本五十路高清| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 欧美大码av| www.自偷自拍.com| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| videosex国产| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久伊人香网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲av熟女| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 老司机靠b影院| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 三级毛片av免费| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产色视频综合| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 99久久国产精品久久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 很黄的视频免费| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产免费男女视频| 天堂动漫精品| 91在线观看av| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产成人欧美| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产精品成人在线| 老司机靠b影院| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 精品久久久久久成人av| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久九九热精品免费| 91字幕亚洲| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 99国产精品99久久久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| av电影中文网址| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片|