• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Insurance Liability for Ships Sailing Beyond Their Designated Navigation Zones During Construction Activities on Islands in the South China Sea

    2016-08-17 08:47:00LIRongcunLILan
    中華海洋法學(xué)評論 2016年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:毓秀西南政法大學(xué)厚德

    LI RongcunLI Lan

    ?

    Insurance Liability for Ships Sailing Beyond Their Designated Navigation Zones During Construction Activities on Islands in the South China Sea

    LI Rongcun*LI Lan**

    This paper attempts to clarify the definition of ships sailing beyond their designated navigation zones in respect to insurance claims disputes (especially the disputes concerning navigating in the waters adjacent to islands under the jurisdiction of Sansha City) over the past two years. Considered as an illegal act under administrative law, sailing beyond navigation zones will give rise to a corresponding administrative liability; meanwhile, such sailing would likely risk the insurer repudiating any claims made by the insured ship and its owners. In China’s maritime judicial practices, ships sailing beyond navigation zones are often identified as unseaworthy. If the insurer intends to refuse claims on these grounds,it should provide evidence to prove that the ship has sailed beyond its navigation zone and should causally link such sailing and the accident under investigation.

    Ships sailing beyond navigation zones; South China Sea Islands;Insurance liability

    I. Introduction

    Over the past two years, a series of disputes have occurred concerning insurance claims caused by ships which were sailing beyond their designated navigation zones. After the establishment of Sansha City, such insurance contract disputes have become more common since these ships are navigating or operating nearthe maritime features within the city’s jurisdiction, however they are only registered for operation in coastal or offshore navigation zones. These disputes often riddled with controversy between the insurer and the insured concerning issues such as whether the ship has sailed beyond the navigation zone, whether the sailing beyond the navigation zone constitutes a condition unsuitable for navigation, and whether sailing beyond the navigation zone can be causally linked to the incident in question. This paper discusses these issues based on the practical and research experience of the authors.

    II. Definition of a Ship Which Has Sailed Beyond Its Navigation Zone

    China’s maritime management primarily revolves around two categories of navigation zones: navigation zones for ships and navigation zones for seafarers.

    1. Navigation Zones for Ships

    Navigation zone for ships refers to the area where a ship may sail upon the approval of a ship inspection department and classification society, as indicated on the certificate of the ship, such as a seaworthiness/tow-worthiness certificate or ship classification certificate. It is primarily defined according to the structure,equipment and tonnage of the ship. Generally speaking, a ship’s navigation zone is determined during its design and construction since different navigation zones require varied levels of navigational performance, strength, structure, equipment configuration, and staffing of ships.1Chen Wengang and Tian Zhihong, A Brief Analysis of the Reasons for Ships’ Sailing within Navigation Zones in Coastal Areas, China Water Transport, No. 7, 2010, pp. 51~52. (in Chinese)According to the Regulations on Statutory Inspection of Vessels and Marine Installations - Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation, the navigation zones for seagoing vessels can be classified into four categories: far sea, offshore, coastal and sheltered areas.

    2. Navigation Zones for Seafarers

    Navigation zone for seafarers refers to the area applicable to the navigation of ships identified in the certificate of competency for seafarers. In accordance with the 2004 Rules for Examination, Assessment and Issuance of a Certificate of Competency for Seafarers of the People’s Republic of China, the navigation zonesfor seafarers fall into four categories, whose designations and meanings are not the same with those for seagoing vessels, including: unlimited, offshore, coastal and near-shore areas.

    The discussion above shows there are essential differences between navigation zones for seafarers and those for ships,2Jin Yuebo, Discussion on the Meaning and Designation of Navigation Zones for Ships,China Water Transport, No. 7, 2006, pp. 14~16. (in Chinese)however these two categories are also connected. For example, while a ship sails beyond its navigation zone, its seafarers may also navigate beyond the area applicable to their eligibility. This question will not be elaborated here, since the paper only focuses on issues concerning insurance responsibility with respect to ships’ sailing beyond their designated navigation zones. And a ship’s sailing beyond its navigation zone hereinafter refers to the ship’s sailing or operation beyond the area indicated on the certificate of the vessel upon the approval of the ship inspection department and the classification society.

    III. Sailing Beyond Its Navigation Zone:An Illegal Act Under Administrative Law

    Article 10 of the Maritime Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China states that, “while navigating, berthing or carrying out operations, vessels and installations must abide by the relevant laws, administrative statutes and rules and regulations of the People’s Republic of China.” Article 37(2) of the Provisions of the People’s Republic of China on Marine and Maritime Administrative Punishment, hereinafter referred to as “Provisions on Punishment”, lists the circumstances when “a vessel or installation fails to observe the relevant laws, administrative regulations, and rules, and affects the safety of other vessels and installations in navigation, berthing, and operation,” and the 11th circumstance refers to “navigating beyond its ratified navigation zone.” Therefore, if a ship is navigating beyond its ratified navigation zone then such an act would be considered illegal under administrative law. Furthermore, Article 37(1) of the Provisions on Punishment stipulates, corresponding fines shall be imposed on the owner, operator or captain of the vessel or any other persons who are directly liable, depending on whether navigating beyond the ratified navigation zone was conducted for the purpose of business or non-business activities and whether or not there are any illegal proceeds.

    Sailing beyond the ratified navigation zone is defined in the Provisions on Punishment as an illegal act that affects the safety of other vessels and installations in navigation, berthing, and operation. In practice, quite a few ships have ignored the hidden dangers and navigated beyond their designated navigation areas to seek economic benefits or shorter sailing routes. Since these ships have sailed beyond their designated navigational areas, the insurer would refuse insurance claims if the ships were to be involved in an accident.

    IV. Can Insurers Refuse Claims if a Ship Has Sailed Beyond Its Designated Navigation Zone?

    In China’s judicial practices concerning maritime affairs there is controversy between the insurer and the insured concerning insurance liability for ships which have sailed beyond their designated navigation zones, such as whether or not the insured ship has navigated beyond such zones, whether this constitutes its unseaworthiness, and whether there is any causality between the ship’s navigating beyond its designated zone and its insurance claims. Particularly, when the insurance coverage agreed upon in the policy (including operation routes) is far beyond the designated navigation zone, is the insurer required to shoulder the insurance responsibility for accidents caused by the ship while in these areas? In practice, insurers often claim exemption from the compensation responsibility on the ground that navigation beyond the designated area constitutes unseaworthiness. Such an exemption depends on the following four issues.: 1) whether the ship has sailed beyond its designated navigation zone, 2) whether this navigation constitutes unseaworthiness, 3) whether this navigation and any incident can be causally linked, and 4) whether the ship’s insurance coverage is applicable when the ship is beyond its navigable zone.

    A. Has the Insured Ship Navigated Beyond Its Designated Zone?

    In essence, whether or not the ship has sailed beyond its navigable zone is a factual question. As such, this issue is non-controversial especially when the insurance policy clearly defines the scope of navigation with longitudes andlatitudes. However, since the establishment of Sansha City,3With the approval of China’s State Council, Sansha City was officially inaugurated on July 24, 2012 as one of the prefecture-level cities of Hainan Province. Its government is situated in Yongxing Island of the Xisha Islands and it has jurisdiction over the maritime features of and the waters surrounding the Xisha Islands, Nansha Islands and Zhongsha Islands. Please refer to the maps for more details.multiple accidents have occurred near the maritime features under the city’s jurisdiction involving vessels which are designated to navigate within coastal and offshore zones. Because of unclear definitions on the navigation areas for vessels in China’s laws, regulations and normative documents pertinent to maritime affairs, there is much controversy between the insurer and the insured over whether the ship that has an accident has navigated beyond the designated navigation zone.

    Fig.1 Jurisdiction Map of Sansha City4

    Fig.2 Maritime Features under the Jurisdiction of Sansha City in the South China Sea5At http://www.360doc.com/content/12/0726/12/3008216_226552860.shtml, 15 June 2016. (in Chinese)

    According to the 2011 Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation of the Maritime Safety Administration of the P.R.C., General Rules, Article 13 (Demarcation of navigation zones and limitations on operation and navigation), “offshore navigation zone” refers to “the waters in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea less than 200 nautical miles from the coasts; Taiwan Strait; the waters in the South China Sea less than 120 nautical miles from the coasts (less than 50 nautical miles from the east coast of Taiwan Island, east and south coasts of Hainan Island)”; “coastal navigation zone” refers to “the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the east coast of Taiwan Island, east and west coasts of Taiwan Strait, east and south coasts of Hainan Island, as well as the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the coasts other than those mentioned above; the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the coastal islands capable ofproviding shelter from the weather as well as rescue and relief. But as to the islands over 20 nautical miles from the coasts, the Administration will narrow the scope of their surrounding waters from the coasts.”

    According to the Policies and Regulations Department of Maritime Safety Administration of the P.R.C., the distance from the coasts in principle refers to the distance from the coastline, including mainland and island coastlines (such as Taiwan Island and Hainan Island). In view that the navigation zones should be capable of providing shelter from weather as well as rescue and relief in accordance with the 2011 Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation, most maritime features under the jurisdiction of Sansha City do not enjoy such conditions; therefore the distance from the coastlines of these features is not included.

    Among the South China Sea islands under the jurisdiction of Sansha City, the Xisha Islands, which is the nearest to Hainan Island, is approximately 180 nautical miles from the east and south Coasts of Hainan Island. It is clear that the areas within the jurisdiction of Sansha City do not fall within the scope of offshore or coastal navigation zones as defined above. As such, whether a ship has navigated beyond the designated navigation zone needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

    B. Does the Ship's Navigation Beyond Its Designated Navigation Zone Constitute Unseaworthiness?

    Article 244 of the Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China provides that, “[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;…” As such, the insurer often refuses such claims on the ground that the ship’s navigation beyond its designated navigation area constitutes unseaworthiness. Since Chapter XII “Contract of Marine Insurance” of the Maritime Code contains no clear definition of “seaworthiness”, controversy between the insurer and the insured arises, especially when the standards for a ship’s seaworthiness are not fixed in the policy or insurance clauses.

    1. Insurance Clauses Make It Clear That a Ship Sailing Beyond Its Designated Navigation Area Should Be Deemed Unseaworthy

    Typical examples in this case include Article 6(1) of the Clauses of Insurance for Coastal Ships of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009) and Article 6(1) of the Clauses of Insurance for Inland Vessels of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009), which provide that “[w]here the insured ship is unseaworthy or untowworthy, including improper manning of the ship, the inconsistency of the ship’s technical conditions, navigation zone and purpose with provisions relating to navigation (towing), and inappropriate loading of goods.”

    2. The Interpretations of Insurance Clauses for Coastal and Inland Ships Issued by the People's Bank of China (Y.F. [1996] No. 459)

    The Interpretations of Insurance Clauses for Coastal and Inland Ships (Y.F. [1996] No.459) issued by the People’s Bank of China on December 27, 1996,provides a detailed interpretation on the seaworthiness of insured ships, holding that navigation beyond the designated navigation zone constitutes unseaworthiness and is categorized as excluded liability in insurance. It states that:

    I. Seaworthiness refers to all kinds of risks that the ships can withstand during its navigation through the navigation zone and is relevant to the suitability of guarantee and etc. There are clear-cut requirements on seaworthiness in relevant laws, international trade law and insurance articles. As for China,its Maritime Traffic Safety Law and Maritime Code have explicitly provided that ships should be seaworthy, and also extended the scope of seaworthiness under ship insurance and made it an important obligation for the insured and its representative. Therefore, among the insurance clauses, the one concerning the ship's seaworthiness is considered as an implied warranty by the insured,including leasing operator.

    II. Seaworthiness in insurance contracts involves three aspects: 1) a vessel's design, structure and equipment should comply with the construction and inspection criteria, and it should obtain the corresponding certificate of conformity upon inspection; 2) seafarers' eligibility, fueling and supplies should conform to relevant laws and meet the requirements relating to the navigation zone; 3) stowage should fulfill relevant requirements.

    III. Any of the following circumstances constitutes seaworthiness and the insured ship shall not be indemnified under this insurance, if:

    (I) The vessel does not hold a statutory certificate of technical qualifications, the certificate is falsified or altered, or the vessel's actual conditions are inconsistent with those specified in the certificate.

    (II) The vessel does not sail in the navigation zone defined according to its performance and arbitrarily navigates beyond its navigation zone, or changes its scheduled purpose without the approval from the inspection department…

    It is worth noting that, although the Interpretations was abolished on September 29, 2010,6The Interpretations was, on September 29, 2010, abolished upon passing the No. 12 Notice (2010) of the People’s Bank of China and China Insurance Regulatory Commission on Annulling Thirty-eight Pieces of Normative Documents with Respect to Recovering Domestic Insurance Businesses and Improving Insurance Agencies.it still has some legal impacts on the determination of seaworthiness of insured vessels in China’s maritime judicial practices.

    3. China's Stance in Maritime Judicial Practices

    Case 1:

    In Sunshine Insurance (Liuzhou City) Company et al. vs. Liuzhou City Yuanlong Shipping Co., Ltd.7(2014) Gui Min Si Zhong Zi No. 48, (2013) Hai Shang Chu Zi No. 68.concerning an insurance contract for waters connecting to the sea, the Court held that,

    Whether a vessel is seaworthy should be decided based on factors such as its technical conditions, manning and loading. Unseaworthiness mainly refers to:

    1. Improper manning. The vessel is not well-equipped with eligible seafarers and other crew members in the prescribed quantity.

    2. Invalidity of seaworthiness certificate. The certificates of nationality,registration or inspection, or fishing license have expired.

    3. Sailing beyond navigation zone or when the wind is higher than the prescribed anti-wind grade. The vessel sails beyond the navigation zone as indicated in seaworthiness certificate or sails when the wind is higher than the prescribed anti-wind grade.

    4. Improper equipment. The vessel's technical performance does not comply with the standardized requirements corresponding to its class and it has inadequate equipment, fuel, supplies, fresh water and provisions needed for the navigation.

    5. Improper stowage. The goods are not stowed in accordance with the requirements for that type of vessel or not stowed properly.

    Case 2:

    In ZHU vs. Sinosafe Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch8(2014) Hu Gao Min Si (Hai) Zhong Zi No. 117, (2013) Hu Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 1591.concerning a maritime insurance contract dispute, the cause for the dispute was analyzed in the investigation report by Maritime Safety Administration of Tangshan City. It was found that,

    The accident has been directly caused by the typhoon. When the “Ming [Xuan]” vessel encountered heavy waves, a large amount of water got into its cargo hold, after which the vessel sank as it approached the waters surrounding Jingtang Port. The accident had three indirect causes. First,the “Ming [Xuan]” vessel, which navigated beyond its navigation zone, was considered unseaworthy. The vessel was made for inland waters, and its structure, strength, stability and equipment were unable to satisfy the needs for safe navigation at sea, nor guard against the waves at sea. Second, the crew members onboard were considered ineligible since they did not hold seafarer certificates. Nor did they receive relevant training, which is against the laws and regulations concerning maritime traffic and transport. Third, the vessel was improperly managed and those aboard were unaware of the security situation.

    The courts of first and second instances also ruled that the vessel was unsuitable for navigation.

    In conclusion, even if a vessel has a seaworthiness/tow-worthiness certificate,it would still be deemed unseaworthy in China’s judicial practices, when it sails beyond its designated zone.

    C. Is There a Causal Link Between Navigation Beyond the Navigation Zone and the Insurance Accident?

    According to Article 244 of the Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China, “[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;...” Thus, if the insurer intends to claim exemption from insurance liability where a ship sailing beyond its designated navigation zone constitutes unseaworthiness,it still must prove that there is a causal link between such navigation and the insurance accident. This has been widely identified in China’s maritime judicial practices, particularly in the following three cases.

    Case 1: LIU Hefeng vs. CPIC Putuo Branch Company

    In the case of appeal concerning a maritime insurance contract dispute between LIU Hefeng and CPIC Putuo Branch Company (Zhoushan City),9(2012) Zhe Hai Zhong Zi No. 29, (2011) Yong Hai Fa Zhou Shang Chu Zi No. 72.the Higher People’s Court of Zhejiang Province held that,

    Since the “Guoliang 108” Vessel was not properly manned, it could be deemed unseaworthy. However, it has not been clearly agreed that the insurer would be exempted from liability for loss attributable to unseaworthiness. Even if it can be identified as an intentional act or gross negligence of the insured and its representative, CPIC Putuo Branch should still provide proof on the causal link between the losses caused by the accident and this act.

    Case 2: Jiangnan Shipping Co., Ltd vs. CPIC

    In Jiangnan Shipping Co., Ltd (Leqing City) vs. CPIC concerning an insurance contract for the sea and the waters connecting the sea,10(2008) Hu Gao Min Si (Hai) Zhong Zi No.1, (2006) Hu Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 612.the Higher People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality held that,

    In insurance contract cases arising from the sinking of ships, the insured only needs to provide preliminary proof on the causal link between the loss and the insured perils; when the insured has already preliminarily proved that the loss is caused by the insured peril, the insurer should present evidence that the loss is brought about by the ship's unseaworthiness, instead of merely proving the existence of such possibility, if it intends to refuse compensation on the ground of the ship's unseaworthiness.

    西南政法大學(xué)毓秀菁英學(xué)生骨干培養(yǎng)理念是以校、院兩級學(xué)生骨干為主體,秉承“博學(xué)、篤行、厚德、重法”的西政校訓(xùn),構(gòu)筑“一個中心”、落實“兩個支點”、貫徹“三個融合”的毓秀菁英學(xué)生骨干培養(yǎng)模式,培養(yǎng)中國特色社會主義合格建設(shè)者和可靠接班人,探索全員、全方位育人思想政治教育新格局。

    Case 3: Panama Yongyue Shipping Co., Ltd vs. PICC Qingdao Branch Company

    In the case concerning an appeal over compensation under the insurancecontract between Panama Yongyue Shipping Co., Ltd and the PICC Qingdao Branch Company,11(2007) Lu Min Si Zhong Zi No. 65, (2004) Qing Hai Fa Hai Shang Chu Zi No. 32.the Higher People’s Court of Shandong Province held that,

    As indicated in the policy issued by PICC Qingdao Branch Company to Yongyue Company, all the risks have been covered according to PICC Hull Insurance Clauses (January 1, 1986). The scope of liability is defined in the Clauses as the losses of the insured ship caused by negligent acts of the captain, crew, pilot, ship repairer and charterer. It also provides exclusions,stating that the losses, liabilities, or expenses arising from the following causes are not covered in the insurance: unseaworthiness, including improper manning, equipment or stowing, to the extent the insured knows or should know the unseaworthiness when the ship sails; negligent or intentional acts by the insured and its representatives; normal wear, corrosion, decay, poor maintenance, or material defects (including change or repair of parts in bad condition), which should be discovered by the insured with due diligence. In this case, the PICC claimed exemption from insurance compensation liability on the grounds that the loss in the accident was caused by Yongyue Shipping Company breaching its responsibilities. As such, it should submit evidence to prove the unseaworthiness of the ship or to prove that the Yongyue Shipping Company had acted negligently or that it had breached its responsibilities, and further to prove that the ship's unseaworthiness or Yongyue's negligent acts had led to the accident. As indicated by the technical assessment report on the ship, the accident was caused by the negligent acts of the seafarers which was within the coverage of all risks insurance according to the PICC Hull Insurance Clauses (January 1, 1986). As a result, the PICC Qingdao Branch Company should compensate for the loss. The evidence provided by the PICC Qingdao Branch Company was insufficient to prove that the lubricant oil purifier on the “Haifengdaban” vessel malfunctioned after the vessel's repair in the Ligang Shipyard, as claimed in the Inspection Report by Shuangcheng Consultant Company, and that the vessel also had other problems, as claimed in the Analysis Report by Yuezhi Loss Assessment Company. The evidence is also inadequate to prove that there is any causality between the five problems claimed in the Inspection Report and the problems claimed in the Analysis Report and the accident, or that the accident was due to unseaworthiness ofthe ship or caused by negligent acts/breach of responsibilities by the Yongyue Company. The claims for exemption from compensation responsibility by PICC Qingdao Branch Company are not well-grounded in fact and law. Therefore,the Court ruled against its claims.

    The burden of proof, however, shouldered by the insurer to establish the cause-and-effect relationship between the unseaworthiness of a ship and an insurance incident in some ship insurance clauses, vanished due to the design of these clauses. Perfect examples in this case include the design of certain exemption clauses in the Clauses of Insurance for Coastal Ships of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009) and the Clauses of Insurance for Inland Vessels of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009). Article 6 of both Clauses indicates that:

    Under any of the following circumstances within the period of insurance, the insurer shall not be liable to any responsibility, damage or costs caused by any reasons in circumstances:

    (1) Where the insured ship is unseaworthy or untowworthy, including improper manning of the ship, the inconsistency of the ship's technical conditions, navigation zone and purpose with provisions relating to navigation (towing), and inappropriate loading of goods.

    In accordance with the insurance clause above, a ship will become unseaworthy if it navigates beyond the zone prescribed in the relevant document. When a ship becomes unseaworthy, the insurer would be absolved from liability for any damages or associated costs. Nevertheless, given that such clauses are standard terms which obviously reduce the insurer’s obligation or absolve the insurer of its liability, such clauses shall have no effect if the insurer fails to explicitly state such clauses to the insurer when signing the insurance contract. For example, in the Marine Insurance Contract Dispute Case (Cui Jihao vs. Bengbu Center Branch of Minan Property and Casualty Insurance Company Limited),12(2013) Zhe Hai Zhong Zi No. 77, (2012) Yong Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 450.the court held that since Minan Company, the insurer, failed to present evidence which proved it had fulfilled its obligation to clearly inform the insured, the exemption clause of the insurance contract had no effect. Thus, the court decided that the insurer should paythe relevant compensation.

    D. Does a Ship's Insurance Coverage Apply Beyond Its Approved Navigation Zone?

    In practice, a ship’s navigation zone as stated in its insurance policy is normally consistent with the navigation zone indicated on its certificate. In order to reduce risks, however, in some cases the insurer reaches agreement with the insured concerning the navigation zone of the insured ship. For example, a ship’s navigation zone is limited to specific, agreed upon routes, or is clearly defined by a series of coordinates which often lie within the scope of the navigation zone approved on the ship’s certificate. Yet there are also exceptions. For instance, if the approved navigation zone of an insured ship is comprised of the coastal or offshore navigation areas then the coverage under the insurance policy, such as the operating routes, often far exceeds the approved zone. In this case, if a ship navigates beyond its approved zone but within the coverage agreed upon in the ship’s insurance policy, may the insurer refuse to pay the relevant compensation on the ground that the ship has navigated beyond its approved zone and has become unseaworthy?

    Article 244 of Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China provides that,“[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;…”This provision indicates that the Maritime Code grants the parties to a marine insurance contract with much freedom of contract. As such, the parties are fully entitled to agree on the insurer’s liability for any responsibility, damage or costs caused by the ship’s unseaworthiness or navigation beyond its approved navigation zone.

    V. Conclusion

    In conclusion, China’s current laws and maritime judicial practice indicate the following facts: A ship’s navigation beyond its approved zone constitutes a breach of administrative laws. In this case, courts tend to assert that the ship becomes unseaworthy. In spite of this, the insurer still bears the burden of proof if it intends to refuse compensation for the insured on the grounds that the insuredship has navigated beyond its approved navigation zone. Such proof must be provided primarily in two instances: First, in cases where the insurance policy or clauses explicitly state that the insurer shall be exempt from liability when the insured ship becomes unseaworthy due to navigation beyond its approved zone. In such instances the insurer shall prove that it has properly fulfilled its obligation to explain such standard terms or inform the insured of the same. Second, in the absence of specific provisions, the insurer must establish the cause-and-effect relationship between the unseaworthiness of a ship and an insurance incident.

    Additionally, as described above, if the coverage specified in the insurance contract exceeds the approved navigation zone of the insured ship, the insurer should bear the liability arising out of all risks covered by the insurance. Therefore,if a ship navigates beyond its approved zone, but within the coverage as agreed in the ship’s insurance policy, the insurer may lose the right to raise an exemption defense against the insured.

    Translators: XIE Hongyue and YE Lin Editor (English): David Devlaeminck

    ? THE AUTHORS AND CHINA OCEANS LAW REVIEW

    * LI Rongcun, Director and Partner of Wang Jing & Co. (Xiamen). Email: lirongcun@wjnco. com.

    ** LI Lan, Lawyer of Wang Jing & Co. (Xiamen). Email: lilan@wjnco.com.

    猜你喜歡
    毓秀西南政法大學(xué)厚德
    食品安全治理的法治基礎(chǔ)與法律完善
    ——評《食品法律法規(guī)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》
    中國釀造(2021年5期)2021-06-04 14:03:38
    弟子規(guī)
    弟子規(guī)
    厚德品質(zhì) 尊天下
    遵義(2017年8期)2017-07-24 18:11:29
    厚德品質(zhì) 尊天下
    遵義(2017年10期)2017-07-07 15:16:45
    弟子規(guī)
    厚德載物
    弟子規(guī)
    論留置權(quán)善意取得之否定
    西南政法大學(xué):育時代英才的“法學(xué)黃埔”
    日韩欧美精品免费久久| 高清不卡的av网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久青草综合色| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久免费观看电影| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 中国国产av一级| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久青草综合色| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久国产网址| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 一区二区三区免费毛片| av在线app专区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 成年av动漫网址| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产高清三级在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲精品视频女| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| av天堂久久9| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲无线观看免费| 一区在线观看完整版| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产精品伦人一区二区| h日本视频在线播放| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 老女人水多毛片| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久久久久精品精品| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 最黄视频免费看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久久久网色| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 一级爰片在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 久久午夜福利片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 嫩草影院新地址| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 人妻一区二区av| 免费观看在线日韩| 深夜a级毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 蜜桃在线观看..| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲四区av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日本午夜av视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美另类一区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 嫩草影院入口| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| av在线老鸭窝| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 尾随美女入室| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚州av有码| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 99热这里只有是精品50| 一区二区三区精品91| 人人澡人人妻人| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 丁香六月天网| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 色哟哟·www| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产综合精华液| 高清毛片免费看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 另类精品久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久免费观看电影| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品国产一区二区久久| 天堂8中文在线网| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 三级经典国产精品| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 综合色丁香网| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最黄视频免费看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 午夜影院在线不卡| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲成人手机| 91成人精品电影| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品.久久久| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久影院123| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| av在线播放精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 中文欧美无线码| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| av在线老鸭窝| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人二区视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲精品视频女| 日韩伦理黄色片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| av在线老鸭窝| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产色片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久av| a 毛片基地| tube8黄色片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩强制内射视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | av在线app专区| 91久久精品电影网| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 一级av片app| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产视频内射| av有码第一页| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 老女人水多毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 一级黄片播放器| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 少妇丰满av| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 男女国产视频网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 99热全是精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 色网站视频免费| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| .国产精品久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 51国产日韩欧美| 老司机影院毛片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日日撸夜夜添| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 曰老女人黄片| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| av黄色大香蕉| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日韩电影二区| 国产成人91sexporn| 超碰97精品在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 春色校园在线视频观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日本免费在线观看一区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 日本与韩国留学比较| 春色校园在线视频观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 美女福利国产在线| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 三级经典国产精品| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品久久久噜噜| 成人影院久久| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产在线视频一区二区| videossex国产| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品久久久久久久久av| 免费看光身美女| 久久午夜福利片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲国产av新网站| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一本久久精品| 三级经典国产精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 老熟女久久久| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文字幕制服av| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 嫩草影院入口| av福利片在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 高清毛片免费看| xxx大片免费视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日本黄大片高清| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 99热这里只有是精品50| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品无大码| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一级a做视频免费观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久久精品94久久精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久6这里有精品| 91久久精品电影网| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 色哟哟·www| av有码第一页| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | 久久久久久久久大av| 在线播放无遮挡| 99九九在线精品视频 | 乱人伦中国视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 黄色日韩在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产av一区二区精品久久| videossex国产| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产色婷婷99| 嫩草影院新地址| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成人二区视频| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| av不卡在线播放| 99热国产这里只有精品6| av视频免费观看在线观看| videossex国产| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 男人舔奶头视频| av在线app专区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 老熟女久久久| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| a级毛片在线看网站| videos熟女内射| 久久6这里有精品|