• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Insurance Liability for Ships Sailing Beyond Their Designated Navigation Zones During Construction Activities on Islands in the South China Sea

    2016-08-17 08:47:00LIRongcunLILan
    中華海洋法學(xué)評論 2016年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:毓秀西南政法大學(xué)厚德

    LI RongcunLI Lan

    ?

    Insurance Liability for Ships Sailing Beyond Their Designated Navigation Zones During Construction Activities on Islands in the South China Sea

    LI Rongcun*LI Lan**

    This paper attempts to clarify the definition of ships sailing beyond their designated navigation zones in respect to insurance claims disputes (especially the disputes concerning navigating in the waters adjacent to islands under the jurisdiction of Sansha City) over the past two years. Considered as an illegal act under administrative law, sailing beyond navigation zones will give rise to a corresponding administrative liability; meanwhile, such sailing would likely risk the insurer repudiating any claims made by the insured ship and its owners. In China’s maritime judicial practices, ships sailing beyond navigation zones are often identified as unseaworthy. If the insurer intends to refuse claims on these grounds,it should provide evidence to prove that the ship has sailed beyond its navigation zone and should causally link such sailing and the accident under investigation.

    Ships sailing beyond navigation zones; South China Sea Islands;Insurance liability

    I. Introduction

    Over the past two years, a series of disputes have occurred concerning insurance claims caused by ships which were sailing beyond their designated navigation zones. After the establishment of Sansha City, such insurance contract disputes have become more common since these ships are navigating or operating nearthe maritime features within the city’s jurisdiction, however they are only registered for operation in coastal or offshore navigation zones. These disputes often riddled with controversy between the insurer and the insured concerning issues such as whether the ship has sailed beyond the navigation zone, whether the sailing beyond the navigation zone constitutes a condition unsuitable for navigation, and whether sailing beyond the navigation zone can be causally linked to the incident in question. This paper discusses these issues based on the practical and research experience of the authors.

    II. Definition of a Ship Which Has Sailed Beyond Its Navigation Zone

    China’s maritime management primarily revolves around two categories of navigation zones: navigation zones for ships and navigation zones for seafarers.

    1. Navigation Zones for Ships

    Navigation zone for ships refers to the area where a ship may sail upon the approval of a ship inspection department and classification society, as indicated on the certificate of the ship, such as a seaworthiness/tow-worthiness certificate or ship classification certificate. It is primarily defined according to the structure,equipment and tonnage of the ship. Generally speaking, a ship’s navigation zone is determined during its design and construction since different navigation zones require varied levels of navigational performance, strength, structure, equipment configuration, and staffing of ships.1Chen Wengang and Tian Zhihong, A Brief Analysis of the Reasons for Ships’ Sailing within Navigation Zones in Coastal Areas, China Water Transport, No. 7, 2010, pp. 51~52. (in Chinese)According to the Regulations on Statutory Inspection of Vessels and Marine Installations - Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation, the navigation zones for seagoing vessels can be classified into four categories: far sea, offshore, coastal and sheltered areas.

    2. Navigation Zones for Seafarers

    Navigation zone for seafarers refers to the area applicable to the navigation of ships identified in the certificate of competency for seafarers. In accordance with the 2004 Rules for Examination, Assessment and Issuance of a Certificate of Competency for Seafarers of the People’s Republic of China, the navigation zonesfor seafarers fall into four categories, whose designations and meanings are not the same with those for seagoing vessels, including: unlimited, offshore, coastal and near-shore areas.

    The discussion above shows there are essential differences between navigation zones for seafarers and those for ships,2Jin Yuebo, Discussion on the Meaning and Designation of Navigation Zones for Ships,China Water Transport, No. 7, 2006, pp. 14~16. (in Chinese)however these two categories are also connected. For example, while a ship sails beyond its navigation zone, its seafarers may also navigate beyond the area applicable to their eligibility. This question will not be elaborated here, since the paper only focuses on issues concerning insurance responsibility with respect to ships’ sailing beyond their designated navigation zones. And a ship’s sailing beyond its navigation zone hereinafter refers to the ship’s sailing or operation beyond the area indicated on the certificate of the vessel upon the approval of the ship inspection department and the classification society.

    III. Sailing Beyond Its Navigation Zone:An Illegal Act Under Administrative Law

    Article 10 of the Maritime Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China states that, “while navigating, berthing or carrying out operations, vessels and installations must abide by the relevant laws, administrative statutes and rules and regulations of the People’s Republic of China.” Article 37(2) of the Provisions of the People’s Republic of China on Marine and Maritime Administrative Punishment, hereinafter referred to as “Provisions on Punishment”, lists the circumstances when “a vessel or installation fails to observe the relevant laws, administrative regulations, and rules, and affects the safety of other vessels and installations in navigation, berthing, and operation,” and the 11th circumstance refers to “navigating beyond its ratified navigation zone.” Therefore, if a ship is navigating beyond its ratified navigation zone then such an act would be considered illegal under administrative law. Furthermore, Article 37(1) of the Provisions on Punishment stipulates, corresponding fines shall be imposed on the owner, operator or captain of the vessel or any other persons who are directly liable, depending on whether navigating beyond the ratified navigation zone was conducted for the purpose of business or non-business activities and whether or not there are any illegal proceeds.

    Sailing beyond the ratified navigation zone is defined in the Provisions on Punishment as an illegal act that affects the safety of other vessels and installations in navigation, berthing, and operation. In practice, quite a few ships have ignored the hidden dangers and navigated beyond their designated navigation areas to seek economic benefits or shorter sailing routes. Since these ships have sailed beyond their designated navigational areas, the insurer would refuse insurance claims if the ships were to be involved in an accident.

    IV. Can Insurers Refuse Claims if a Ship Has Sailed Beyond Its Designated Navigation Zone?

    In China’s judicial practices concerning maritime affairs there is controversy between the insurer and the insured concerning insurance liability for ships which have sailed beyond their designated navigation zones, such as whether or not the insured ship has navigated beyond such zones, whether this constitutes its unseaworthiness, and whether there is any causality between the ship’s navigating beyond its designated zone and its insurance claims. Particularly, when the insurance coverage agreed upon in the policy (including operation routes) is far beyond the designated navigation zone, is the insurer required to shoulder the insurance responsibility for accidents caused by the ship while in these areas? In practice, insurers often claim exemption from the compensation responsibility on the ground that navigation beyond the designated area constitutes unseaworthiness. Such an exemption depends on the following four issues.: 1) whether the ship has sailed beyond its designated navigation zone, 2) whether this navigation constitutes unseaworthiness, 3) whether this navigation and any incident can be causally linked, and 4) whether the ship’s insurance coverage is applicable when the ship is beyond its navigable zone.

    A. Has the Insured Ship Navigated Beyond Its Designated Zone?

    In essence, whether or not the ship has sailed beyond its navigable zone is a factual question. As such, this issue is non-controversial especially when the insurance policy clearly defines the scope of navigation with longitudes andlatitudes. However, since the establishment of Sansha City,3With the approval of China’s State Council, Sansha City was officially inaugurated on July 24, 2012 as one of the prefecture-level cities of Hainan Province. Its government is situated in Yongxing Island of the Xisha Islands and it has jurisdiction over the maritime features of and the waters surrounding the Xisha Islands, Nansha Islands and Zhongsha Islands. Please refer to the maps for more details.multiple accidents have occurred near the maritime features under the city’s jurisdiction involving vessels which are designated to navigate within coastal and offshore zones. Because of unclear definitions on the navigation areas for vessels in China’s laws, regulations and normative documents pertinent to maritime affairs, there is much controversy between the insurer and the insured over whether the ship that has an accident has navigated beyond the designated navigation zone.

    Fig.1 Jurisdiction Map of Sansha City4

    Fig.2 Maritime Features under the Jurisdiction of Sansha City in the South China Sea5At http://www.360doc.com/content/12/0726/12/3008216_226552860.shtml, 15 June 2016. (in Chinese)

    According to the 2011 Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation of the Maritime Safety Administration of the P.R.C., General Rules, Article 13 (Demarcation of navigation zones and limitations on operation and navigation), “offshore navigation zone” refers to “the waters in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea and East China Sea less than 200 nautical miles from the coasts; Taiwan Strait; the waters in the South China Sea less than 120 nautical miles from the coasts (less than 50 nautical miles from the east coast of Taiwan Island, east and south coasts of Hainan Island)”; “coastal navigation zone” refers to “the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the east coast of Taiwan Island, east and west coasts of Taiwan Strait, east and south coasts of Hainan Island, as well as the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the coasts other than those mentioned above; the waters less than 20 nautical miles from the coastal islands capable ofproviding shelter from the weather as well as rescue and relief. But as to the islands over 20 nautical miles from the coasts, the Administration will narrow the scope of their surrounding waters from the coasts.”

    According to the Policies and Regulations Department of Maritime Safety Administration of the P.R.C., the distance from the coasts in principle refers to the distance from the coastline, including mainland and island coastlines (such as Taiwan Island and Hainan Island). In view that the navigation zones should be capable of providing shelter from weather as well as rescue and relief in accordance with the 2011 Technical Rules on Statutory Inspection of Seagoing Vessels in Domestic Navigation, most maritime features under the jurisdiction of Sansha City do not enjoy such conditions; therefore the distance from the coastlines of these features is not included.

    Among the South China Sea islands under the jurisdiction of Sansha City, the Xisha Islands, which is the nearest to Hainan Island, is approximately 180 nautical miles from the east and south Coasts of Hainan Island. It is clear that the areas within the jurisdiction of Sansha City do not fall within the scope of offshore or coastal navigation zones as defined above. As such, whether a ship has navigated beyond the designated navigation zone needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

    B. Does the Ship's Navigation Beyond Its Designated Navigation Zone Constitute Unseaworthiness?

    Article 244 of the Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China provides that, “[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;…” As such, the insurer often refuses such claims on the ground that the ship’s navigation beyond its designated navigation area constitutes unseaworthiness. Since Chapter XII “Contract of Marine Insurance” of the Maritime Code contains no clear definition of “seaworthiness”, controversy between the insurer and the insured arises, especially when the standards for a ship’s seaworthiness are not fixed in the policy or insurance clauses.

    1. Insurance Clauses Make It Clear That a Ship Sailing Beyond Its Designated Navigation Area Should Be Deemed Unseaworthy

    Typical examples in this case include Article 6(1) of the Clauses of Insurance for Coastal Ships of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009) and Article 6(1) of the Clauses of Insurance for Inland Vessels of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009), which provide that “[w]here the insured ship is unseaworthy or untowworthy, including improper manning of the ship, the inconsistency of the ship’s technical conditions, navigation zone and purpose with provisions relating to navigation (towing), and inappropriate loading of goods.”

    2. The Interpretations of Insurance Clauses for Coastal and Inland Ships Issued by the People's Bank of China (Y.F. [1996] No. 459)

    The Interpretations of Insurance Clauses for Coastal and Inland Ships (Y.F. [1996] No.459) issued by the People’s Bank of China on December 27, 1996,provides a detailed interpretation on the seaworthiness of insured ships, holding that navigation beyond the designated navigation zone constitutes unseaworthiness and is categorized as excluded liability in insurance. It states that:

    I. Seaworthiness refers to all kinds of risks that the ships can withstand during its navigation through the navigation zone and is relevant to the suitability of guarantee and etc. There are clear-cut requirements on seaworthiness in relevant laws, international trade law and insurance articles. As for China,its Maritime Traffic Safety Law and Maritime Code have explicitly provided that ships should be seaworthy, and also extended the scope of seaworthiness under ship insurance and made it an important obligation for the insured and its representative. Therefore, among the insurance clauses, the one concerning the ship's seaworthiness is considered as an implied warranty by the insured,including leasing operator.

    II. Seaworthiness in insurance contracts involves three aspects: 1) a vessel's design, structure and equipment should comply with the construction and inspection criteria, and it should obtain the corresponding certificate of conformity upon inspection; 2) seafarers' eligibility, fueling and supplies should conform to relevant laws and meet the requirements relating to the navigation zone; 3) stowage should fulfill relevant requirements.

    III. Any of the following circumstances constitutes seaworthiness and the insured ship shall not be indemnified under this insurance, if:

    (I) The vessel does not hold a statutory certificate of technical qualifications, the certificate is falsified or altered, or the vessel's actual conditions are inconsistent with those specified in the certificate.

    (II) The vessel does not sail in the navigation zone defined according to its performance and arbitrarily navigates beyond its navigation zone, or changes its scheduled purpose without the approval from the inspection department…

    It is worth noting that, although the Interpretations was abolished on September 29, 2010,6The Interpretations was, on September 29, 2010, abolished upon passing the No. 12 Notice (2010) of the People’s Bank of China and China Insurance Regulatory Commission on Annulling Thirty-eight Pieces of Normative Documents with Respect to Recovering Domestic Insurance Businesses and Improving Insurance Agencies.it still has some legal impacts on the determination of seaworthiness of insured vessels in China’s maritime judicial practices.

    3. China's Stance in Maritime Judicial Practices

    Case 1:

    In Sunshine Insurance (Liuzhou City) Company et al. vs. Liuzhou City Yuanlong Shipping Co., Ltd.7(2014) Gui Min Si Zhong Zi No. 48, (2013) Hai Shang Chu Zi No. 68.concerning an insurance contract for waters connecting to the sea, the Court held that,

    Whether a vessel is seaworthy should be decided based on factors such as its technical conditions, manning and loading. Unseaworthiness mainly refers to:

    1. Improper manning. The vessel is not well-equipped with eligible seafarers and other crew members in the prescribed quantity.

    2. Invalidity of seaworthiness certificate. The certificates of nationality,registration or inspection, or fishing license have expired.

    3. Sailing beyond navigation zone or when the wind is higher than the prescribed anti-wind grade. The vessel sails beyond the navigation zone as indicated in seaworthiness certificate or sails when the wind is higher than the prescribed anti-wind grade.

    4. Improper equipment. The vessel's technical performance does not comply with the standardized requirements corresponding to its class and it has inadequate equipment, fuel, supplies, fresh water and provisions needed for the navigation.

    5. Improper stowage. The goods are not stowed in accordance with the requirements for that type of vessel or not stowed properly.

    Case 2:

    In ZHU vs. Sinosafe Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch8(2014) Hu Gao Min Si (Hai) Zhong Zi No. 117, (2013) Hu Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 1591.concerning a maritime insurance contract dispute, the cause for the dispute was analyzed in the investigation report by Maritime Safety Administration of Tangshan City. It was found that,

    The accident has been directly caused by the typhoon. When the “Ming [Xuan]” vessel encountered heavy waves, a large amount of water got into its cargo hold, after which the vessel sank as it approached the waters surrounding Jingtang Port. The accident had three indirect causes. First,the “Ming [Xuan]” vessel, which navigated beyond its navigation zone, was considered unseaworthy. The vessel was made for inland waters, and its structure, strength, stability and equipment were unable to satisfy the needs for safe navigation at sea, nor guard against the waves at sea. Second, the crew members onboard were considered ineligible since they did not hold seafarer certificates. Nor did they receive relevant training, which is against the laws and regulations concerning maritime traffic and transport. Third, the vessel was improperly managed and those aboard were unaware of the security situation.

    The courts of first and second instances also ruled that the vessel was unsuitable for navigation.

    In conclusion, even if a vessel has a seaworthiness/tow-worthiness certificate,it would still be deemed unseaworthy in China’s judicial practices, when it sails beyond its designated zone.

    C. Is There a Causal Link Between Navigation Beyond the Navigation Zone and the Insurance Accident?

    According to Article 244 of the Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China, “[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;...” Thus, if the insurer intends to claim exemption from insurance liability where a ship sailing beyond its designated navigation zone constitutes unseaworthiness,it still must prove that there is a causal link between such navigation and the insurance accident. This has been widely identified in China’s maritime judicial practices, particularly in the following three cases.

    Case 1: LIU Hefeng vs. CPIC Putuo Branch Company

    In the case of appeal concerning a maritime insurance contract dispute between LIU Hefeng and CPIC Putuo Branch Company (Zhoushan City),9(2012) Zhe Hai Zhong Zi No. 29, (2011) Yong Hai Fa Zhou Shang Chu Zi No. 72.the Higher People’s Court of Zhejiang Province held that,

    Since the “Guoliang 108” Vessel was not properly manned, it could be deemed unseaworthy. However, it has not been clearly agreed that the insurer would be exempted from liability for loss attributable to unseaworthiness. Even if it can be identified as an intentional act or gross negligence of the insured and its representative, CPIC Putuo Branch should still provide proof on the causal link between the losses caused by the accident and this act.

    Case 2: Jiangnan Shipping Co., Ltd vs. CPIC

    In Jiangnan Shipping Co., Ltd (Leqing City) vs. CPIC concerning an insurance contract for the sea and the waters connecting the sea,10(2008) Hu Gao Min Si (Hai) Zhong Zi No.1, (2006) Hu Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 612.the Higher People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality held that,

    In insurance contract cases arising from the sinking of ships, the insured only needs to provide preliminary proof on the causal link between the loss and the insured perils; when the insured has already preliminarily proved that the loss is caused by the insured peril, the insurer should present evidence that the loss is brought about by the ship's unseaworthiness, instead of merely proving the existence of such possibility, if it intends to refuse compensation on the ground of the ship's unseaworthiness.

    西南政法大學(xué)毓秀菁英學(xué)生骨干培養(yǎng)理念是以校、院兩級學(xué)生骨干為主體,秉承“博學(xué)、篤行、厚德、重法”的西政校訓(xùn),構(gòu)筑“一個中心”、落實“兩個支點”、貫徹“三個融合”的毓秀菁英學(xué)生骨干培養(yǎng)模式,培養(yǎng)中國特色社會主義合格建設(shè)者和可靠接班人,探索全員、全方位育人思想政治教育新格局。

    Case 3: Panama Yongyue Shipping Co., Ltd vs. PICC Qingdao Branch Company

    In the case concerning an appeal over compensation under the insurancecontract between Panama Yongyue Shipping Co., Ltd and the PICC Qingdao Branch Company,11(2007) Lu Min Si Zhong Zi No. 65, (2004) Qing Hai Fa Hai Shang Chu Zi No. 32.the Higher People’s Court of Shandong Province held that,

    As indicated in the policy issued by PICC Qingdao Branch Company to Yongyue Company, all the risks have been covered according to PICC Hull Insurance Clauses (January 1, 1986). The scope of liability is defined in the Clauses as the losses of the insured ship caused by negligent acts of the captain, crew, pilot, ship repairer and charterer. It also provides exclusions,stating that the losses, liabilities, or expenses arising from the following causes are not covered in the insurance: unseaworthiness, including improper manning, equipment or stowing, to the extent the insured knows or should know the unseaworthiness when the ship sails; negligent or intentional acts by the insured and its representatives; normal wear, corrosion, decay, poor maintenance, or material defects (including change or repair of parts in bad condition), which should be discovered by the insured with due diligence. In this case, the PICC claimed exemption from insurance compensation liability on the grounds that the loss in the accident was caused by Yongyue Shipping Company breaching its responsibilities. As such, it should submit evidence to prove the unseaworthiness of the ship or to prove that the Yongyue Shipping Company had acted negligently or that it had breached its responsibilities, and further to prove that the ship's unseaworthiness or Yongyue's negligent acts had led to the accident. As indicated by the technical assessment report on the ship, the accident was caused by the negligent acts of the seafarers which was within the coverage of all risks insurance according to the PICC Hull Insurance Clauses (January 1, 1986). As a result, the PICC Qingdao Branch Company should compensate for the loss. The evidence provided by the PICC Qingdao Branch Company was insufficient to prove that the lubricant oil purifier on the “Haifengdaban” vessel malfunctioned after the vessel's repair in the Ligang Shipyard, as claimed in the Inspection Report by Shuangcheng Consultant Company, and that the vessel also had other problems, as claimed in the Analysis Report by Yuezhi Loss Assessment Company. The evidence is also inadequate to prove that there is any causality between the five problems claimed in the Inspection Report and the problems claimed in the Analysis Report and the accident, or that the accident was due to unseaworthiness ofthe ship or caused by negligent acts/breach of responsibilities by the Yongyue Company. The claims for exemption from compensation responsibility by PICC Qingdao Branch Company are not well-grounded in fact and law. Therefore,the Court ruled against its claims.

    The burden of proof, however, shouldered by the insurer to establish the cause-and-effect relationship between the unseaworthiness of a ship and an insurance incident in some ship insurance clauses, vanished due to the design of these clauses. Perfect examples in this case include the design of certain exemption clauses in the Clauses of Insurance for Coastal Ships of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009) and the Clauses of Insurance for Inland Vessels of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (2009). Article 6 of both Clauses indicates that:

    Under any of the following circumstances within the period of insurance, the insurer shall not be liable to any responsibility, damage or costs caused by any reasons in circumstances:

    (1) Where the insured ship is unseaworthy or untowworthy, including improper manning of the ship, the inconsistency of the ship's technical conditions, navigation zone and purpose with provisions relating to navigation (towing), and inappropriate loading of goods.

    In accordance with the insurance clause above, a ship will become unseaworthy if it navigates beyond the zone prescribed in the relevant document. When a ship becomes unseaworthy, the insurer would be absolved from liability for any damages or associated costs. Nevertheless, given that such clauses are standard terms which obviously reduce the insurer’s obligation or absolve the insurer of its liability, such clauses shall have no effect if the insurer fails to explicitly state such clauses to the insurer when signing the insurance contract. For example, in the Marine Insurance Contract Dispute Case (Cui Jihao vs. Bengbu Center Branch of Minan Property and Casualty Insurance Company Limited),12(2013) Zhe Hai Zhong Zi No. 77, (2012) Yong Hai Fa Shang Chu Zi No. 450.the court held that since Minan Company, the insurer, failed to present evidence which proved it had fulfilled its obligation to clearly inform the insured, the exemption clause of the insurance contract had no effect. Thus, the court decided that the insurer should paythe relevant compensation.

    D. Does a Ship's Insurance Coverage Apply Beyond Its Approved Navigation Zone?

    In practice, a ship’s navigation zone as stated in its insurance policy is normally consistent with the navigation zone indicated on its certificate. In order to reduce risks, however, in some cases the insurer reaches agreement with the insured concerning the navigation zone of the insured ship. For example, a ship’s navigation zone is limited to specific, agreed upon routes, or is clearly defined by a series of coordinates which often lie within the scope of the navigation zone approved on the ship’s certificate. Yet there are also exceptions. For instance, if the approved navigation zone of an insured ship is comprised of the coastal or offshore navigation areas then the coverage under the insurance policy, such as the operating routes, often far exceeds the approved zone. In this case, if a ship navigates beyond its approved zone but within the coverage agreed upon in the ship’s insurance policy, may the insurer refuse to pay the relevant compensation on the ground that the ship has navigated beyond its approved zone and has become unseaworthy?

    Article 244 of Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China provides that,“[u]nless otherwise agreed in the insurance contract, the insurer shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the insured ship arising from any of the following causes: (1) unseaworthiness of the ship at the time of the commencement of the voyage, unless where under a time policy the insured has no knowledge thereof;…”This provision indicates that the Maritime Code grants the parties to a marine insurance contract with much freedom of contract. As such, the parties are fully entitled to agree on the insurer’s liability for any responsibility, damage or costs caused by the ship’s unseaworthiness or navigation beyond its approved navigation zone.

    V. Conclusion

    In conclusion, China’s current laws and maritime judicial practice indicate the following facts: A ship’s navigation beyond its approved zone constitutes a breach of administrative laws. In this case, courts tend to assert that the ship becomes unseaworthy. In spite of this, the insurer still bears the burden of proof if it intends to refuse compensation for the insured on the grounds that the insuredship has navigated beyond its approved navigation zone. Such proof must be provided primarily in two instances: First, in cases where the insurance policy or clauses explicitly state that the insurer shall be exempt from liability when the insured ship becomes unseaworthy due to navigation beyond its approved zone. In such instances the insurer shall prove that it has properly fulfilled its obligation to explain such standard terms or inform the insured of the same. Second, in the absence of specific provisions, the insurer must establish the cause-and-effect relationship between the unseaworthiness of a ship and an insurance incident.

    Additionally, as described above, if the coverage specified in the insurance contract exceeds the approved navigation zone of the insured ship, the insurer should bear the liability arising out of all risks covered by the insurance. Therefore,if a ship navigates beyond its approved zone, but within the coverage as agreed in the ship’s insurance policy, the insurer may lose the right to raise an exemption defense against the insured.

    Translators: XIE Hongyue and YE Lin Editor (English): David Devlaeminck

    ? THE AUTHORS AND CHINA OCEANS LAW REVIEW

    * LI Rongcun, Director and Partner of Wang Jing & Co. (Xiamen). Email: lirongcun@wjnco. com.

    ** LI Lan, Lawyer of Wang Jing & Co. (Xiamen). Email: lilan@wjnco.com.

    猜你喜歡
    毓秀西南政法大學(xué)厚德
    食品安全治理的法治基礎(chǔ)與法律完善
    ——評《食品法律法規(guī)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》
    中國釀造(2021年5期)2021-06-04 14:03:38
    弟子規(guī)
    弟子規(guī)
    厚德品質(zhì) 尊天下
    遵義(2017年8期)2017-07-24 18:11:29
    厚德品質(zhì) 尊天下
    遵義(2017年10期)2017-07-07 15:16:45
    弟子規(guī)
    厚德載物
    弟子規(guī)
    論留置權(quán)善意取得之否定
    西南政法大學(xué):育時代英才的“法學(xué)黃埔”
    久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产日本99.免费观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产成人91sexporn| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 色吧在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美人与善性xxx| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产高清激情床上av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 性欧美人与动物交配| 午夜激情欧美在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 嫩草影院新地址| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 热99re8久久精品国产| 嫩草影院新地址| a级毛片a级免费在线| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲图色成人| 美女高潮的动态| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日本色播在线视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 91久久精品电影网| 99热全是精品| 国产精品无大码| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 永久网站在线| 成年av动漫网址| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 看黄色毛片网站| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 搡老岳熟女国产| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 91精品国产九色| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美区成人在线视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚州av有码| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 夜夜爽天天搞| av在线亚洲专区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产成人福利小说| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 嫩草影院入口| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99热精品在线国产| 色视频www国产| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产高清三级在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲综合色惰| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在现免费观看毛片| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| www日本黄色视频网| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲18禁久久av| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产免费男女视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 高清毛片免费看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 在线看三级毛片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产老妇女一区| 国产乱人视频| 国产精品无大码| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲在线观看片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 成人二区视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成人欧美大片| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久性生活片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 色哟哟·www| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲av一区综合| av在线播放精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 色视频www国产| 国产综合懂色| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美日本视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 变态另类丝袜制服| 床上黄色一级片| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲av熟女| 国产单亲对白刺激| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 禁无遮挡网站| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中国国产av一级| 久久草成人影院| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产免费男女视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 三级毛片av免费| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚州av有码| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 黄片wwwwww| 久久久久国内视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | av视频在线观看入口| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 久久精品夜色国产| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 美女大奶头视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 一本一本综合久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本黄大片高清| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 极品教师在线视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| av在线天堂中文字幕| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日本在线视频免费播放| 男人舔奶头视频| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 亚洲在线观看片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av熟女| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 免费看日本二区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 丰满的人妻完整版| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 天堂动漫精品| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av国产免费在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 老司机影院成人| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久人妻av系列| ponron亚洲| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 秋霞在线观看毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 如何舔出高潮| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产成人aa在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久久精品热视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产免费男女视频| 色在线成人网| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 身体一侧抽搐| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 大香蕉久久网| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日本五十路高清| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产91av在线免费观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 乱人视频在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产精品无大码| 久久久色成人| 免费av不卡在线播放| 舔av片在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 美女免费视频网站| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 97超碰精品成人国产| www日本黄色视频网| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲五月天丁香| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产乱人视频| 综合色丁香网| 国产色婷婷99| 精品人妻视频免费看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久久色成人| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 精品午夜福利在线看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| ponron亚洲| 一本一本综合久久| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| av在线播放精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 我要搜黄色片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 91精品国产九色| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 精品午夜福利在线看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 精品久久久久久成人av| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲国产色片| 91久久精品电影网| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | av专区在线播放| 美女黄网站色视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 色av中文字幕| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 美女高潮的动态| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 免费观看在线日韩| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线|