• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Study on the Comparisons of the Establishment of Two Mathematical Modeling Methods for Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Spectral Reflectance

    2016-06-15 16:39:51ZHANGPeiLIYi
    光譜學與光譜分析 2016年3期
    關鍵詞:黑河適用性反射率

    ZHANG Pei, LI Yi,2*

    1. College of Water Resources and Architecture Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

    2. Water Saving Agriculture Academy in China Arid Zone, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

    Study on the Comparisons of the Establishment of Two Mathematical Modeling Methods for Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Spectral Reflectance

    ZHANG Pei1, LI Yi1,2*

    1. College of Water Resources and Architecture Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

    2. Water Saving Agriculture Academy in China Arid Zone, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

    Existing prediction models of soil organic matter content (SOC) are restricted by some factors, such as sampling scale, soil type and spectral parameters of samples. Therefore, it is necessary to make a comparative analysis on larger scales to build a quantitative model with better feasibility and greater accuracy. A total of 225 soil samples were collected in an extensive region of the upper reaches of Heihe river basin. SOC and spectral reflectance were being measured. All the samples were divided into 2 subsets-a modeling subset (180 samples) and a validation subset (45 samples). Six indices were obtained through transformation of soil spectral reflectance (R), continuum-removal (CR), reciprocal (REC), logarithm of reciprocal (LR), first-order differential (FDR) and Kubelka-Munck transformation coefficient (K-M). To build the mathematical model of SOC with 12 spectral indices, two methods, i.e., stepwise linear regression and partial least-square regression were used based on the modeling subset, respectively; the validation subset is used for model evaluation. The results indicated that: (1) Regardless of different modeling methods, model between SOC and LR index was always the best among the 6 reflectance-related indices. LR was the best index for predicting SOC; (2) For the model based on the LR index, the accuracy of model using partial least-square regression method was better than that using stepwise linear regression method; (3)225 samples were compared to verify the former available published SOC model. Both the predicted and measured values passed the mean value t-test, and the Pearson correlation coefficient reached 0.826. It shows that local prediction model can be applied to the research of predicting SOC in the larger scale.

    Upper reaches of Heihe; Soil organic matter; Stepwise linear regression; Partial least square regression; Mathematic model; Spectral reflectance

    Introduction

    Soil nutrients play a significant role in the high efficient utilization of water and fertilizer. In which, soil organic matter content (SOC) reflects the fertility characters and the health degree of soil[1]. High accuracy can be achieved for determining SOC in laboratory test using the traditional methods, including complete wet-combustion method and potassium chromate volumetric method[2], etc. However, these methods are complex, in the meantime, the environment are easily to be polluted to some extent, and therefore they cannot be extended on large scales. With the development of quantitative remote sensing technology, many researches have been performed to obtain SOC values easily and rapidly in a large area. The utilization of the models for SOC based on spectral reflectance characteristics can reduce the workload of experimental analysis. And the application of this method to SOC estimation in a large area can provide references for agricultural production planning.

    Several international achievements have been made in predicting SOC based on spectral reflectance. For instance, Palacios-Orueta et al. studied the influences of SOC, iron content and texture on spectral reflectance through multivariate analysis, principal component analysis, discriminant analysis and waveband depth analysis[3]and then provided reference spectral wavebands for the prediction model of SOC. According to the reference spectral wavebands mentioned above, Liu et al. established a spectral prediction model for SOC in the saline land in Beiwucha Town, Manasi County, Xinjiang, China using the stepwise linear regression method (SLR). Their results indicated that, SOC models which established by different indices would have different prediction accuracy[4]. Bilgili et al. constructed a spectral prediction model for SOC in the semi-arid area of northern Turkey using the multivariate adaptive regression splines and partial least-square regression (PLSR) method. Their results revealed that higher prediction accuracy of the model could be achieved by improving the modelling method[5]. Based on the measured SOC values, Zhang et al. established a prediction model by calculating the pixel brightness value of the remote sensing image of the Landsat/TM waveband image for Fuxin, Liaoning, China. They found that the model showed different adaptability influenced by research scale and soil type[6]. Shi et al. also constructed a prediction model for SOC based on the spectral data of 1581 soil samples from 14 provinces in China. Their results suggested that the accurate prediction of SOC was influenced by soil factors, and therefore, accurate trans-regional modelling couldn’t be realized[7]. Using the SLR method, Liu Jiao et al. proposed a spectral prediction model for SOC in typical farmlands and high mountain areas on the upper reaches of Heihe, Gansu, China[8]with high prediction accuracy, but the established model could not be applied large scale due to the limitation of sampling scale. A better modelling method can be proposed to further improve the model accuracy and provide a reliable way to predict SOC on large scales.

    The prediction accuracy of a model, to a great extent, decides whether or not the model is reliable and practical. However, different modelling methods have different degrees of adaptability for different areas and scales, which brings difficulties for SOC modelling. Based on the measured SOC values and spectral reflectance, this research constructed spectral prediction models of SOC on the upper reaches of Heihe using the PLSR and the SLR methods. Through a comparison of the stability and prediction accuracy of the models obtained using the two methods, the best model for predicting SOC based on spectral reflectance was determined. Besides, by comparing the results in this research with previous achievements[7], in the case of expanding the sampling scale, the applicability of the previous model was validated. The result in this research is expected to provide more references for prediction of large-scale SOC based on spectral data.

    1 Materials and methods

    1.1 Soil sampling

    The upper reaches of Heihe are geographically in the range of 37.7°—42.7°N and 97.1°—102.0°E. In this area, the annual average precipitation is 300~700 mm, and the elevation varies from 1,700 to 5,066 m, with significant vertical zones, including the landscapes of glacier, grassland, forest, river shoal and waste land[9]. Owing to the Heihe section of Qilian Mountains runs through the upper reaches of Heihe in northwest-southeast direction, rich variation information concerning soil properties is found along the way. Therefore, the samples were collected along the ridge line of Qilian Mountains from Yugur Autonomous County of Sunan to Shandan County, Gansu, China direction. The distance between adjacent sampling points was about 3 km. Additionally, sampling points were distributed more extensively in different landscape zones, including the Heihe valley of Qilian mountains, Biandukou in Minle County, the military horse-breeding farm in Shandan County, Dayekou in Zhangye City and Kangle grassland. Totally 225 samples were collected at 0~10 cm depth range. These samples were all dried in laboratory, ground and screened by a 2 mm-diameter siever.

    1.2 Analysis of soil properties and classification of sample sets

    The particle size distribution of soil was obtained using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000)[10]. According to the international classification standards for soil texture, among the 225 soil samples, there were 77 clay loam samples, 78 loam samples, 21 sandy loam samples, and 49 samples of sand, light clay, silt clay, silt clay loam and silt loam. The SOC of these samples was measured using potassium chromate volumetric method[2]. Afterwards, the SOC data of the 225 samples were ranked in an increasing order. Beginning with the third sample, 45 samples occupying 20% of the total were selected with an interval of 4 samples to make up the validation subset, and the rest 180 ones were taken as modelling subset, accounting for 80% of the total. The statistical properties of the total samples, the modelling and the validation subsets are listed in Table 1.

    Table 1 Descriptive statistics of soil organic matter (Unit: g·kg-1)

    Table 1 reveals that the statistical parameters of the modelling and validation sets are close to that of the total samples and can reliably reflect the SOC distribution properties of the total samples. Therefore, the classification of subsets is suitable for further modelling and validation analysis.

    1.3 Acquisition and preprocessing of the spectral data of soil samples

    The spectral experiment was conducted in the Key Lab of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A & F University, China. The tests were conducted during 10:30—14:30 in sunny days with sufficient sunshine and clear sight. The soil spectrum was measured using a portable hyper-spectrometer ASD FieldSpec (Analytical Spectral Devices). The waveband ranges from 350~1 830 nm, among which, two wavebands of 350~999 nm and 1 000~1 830 nm were sampled at intervals of 1.4 nm and 2 nm, respectively. Before measurement, the apparatus was preheated for half an hour to reduce the error. When the measurement started, considering the factors including variation of light intensity et al., dark current was removed and whiteboard was calibrated every 10 min. The soil samples were placed in the aluminium boxes with 5 cm in diameter and 4 cm in height. The spectrometer was equipped with a sensor probe with 30° of field angle and was vertically fixed at 5 cm above the center of the soil sample. The coverage area of the sensor probe was within the boundaries of the aluminium boxes. Each sample was measured for 10 times and then the arithmetic mean was calculated. Given the non-uniform preheating of the apparatus, the step was observed at some spectral curves at 1000 nm wavelength. Therefore, the short infrared wavebands of the curves were corrected using ViewSpec Pro Version 6.0 (ASD Inc.). Besides, because water absorption waveband, iron oxide, and OH-in kaolinite clay mineral exerted influences on the soil spectral reflectance at 1 400 nm around, the spectral reflectance curve fluctuated violently[11], such wavebands were excluded.

    After transform processing of the observed original spectral reflectance (R), the following parameters were obtained: the reciprocal ofR(REC), the logarithm of REC (LR), the first-order differential ofR(FDR), the transform coefficient of Kubelka-Munck (KM)[12]and continuum removal (CR). Among which, REC, LR and FDR were determined with ViewSpec Pro Version 6.0; CR was obtained using the spectral analysis module of ENVI 4.7 (Exelis VIS Inc.); KM was calculated by the following

    (1)WhereRis reflectance value corresponding to spectral wavelength.

    1.4 Modelling and validation

    A model for spectral reflectance of SOC was established using SLR and PLSR methods respectively. By evaluating the modelling effects of the two methods, the optimal model was obtained.

    1.4.1 To establish models using the SLR and the PLSR methods

    (2)Where the unit of SOC is g·kg-1;c0is a constant;cirefers to coefficient andi=1, 2, 3…,n;Xjdenotes the corresponding spectral parameter value of the sensitive wavelength of the model;jis wavelength;Nis number of the selected wavelengths.

    (3)Wherenis sampling number; SOCOBSis measured SOC value(g·kg-1); SOCPREdenotes predicted SOC value (g·kg-1).

    In model establishment process using SLR and PLSR methods, spectral waveband information for establishing models were both selected through a statistically strict regression process. Both the selected sensitive wavelengths and principal components were significantly correlated to the observed SOC values. The obtained models met the statistical requirement of reliability. And there are some statistical bases for the selection of sensitive wavelengths. Stepwise linear regression analysis process was realized using IBM SPSS 22.0 (IBM Inc.) while PLSR was achieved with the Unscrambler X 10.3 (CAMO Inc.).

    1.4.2 Model evaluation

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    WhereSdis the standard deviation of the difference between the measured and predicted values;ndenotes sample size.

    2 Results and analysis

    2.1 The models and their validations using the SLR method

    Based on the R data of the 180 soil samples from the modelling subset, the SLR models of SOC for different indices includingR, CR, REC, LR, FDR and KM were constructed. The model etstablishment results of SOC~Rwas taken as an example. The corresponding equations for the models and validated statistical parameters are listed in Table 2.

    Likewise, by comparing the SOC models using the indices of CR, REC, LR, FDR and KM, the optimal models are determined, as shown in Table 3.

    Table 2 Establishment and validation of SOC-R model using the SLR method

    Table 3 The established SOC models using different spectral indices and the validation parameters using the SLR method

    To compare the model establishment accuracy of the models with different indices using the SLR method, the predicted SOC values were compared with the measured values. The results are illustrated in Figure 1.

    Fig.1 Chart of predictive effects of various models using the SLR method

    Figure 1 shows that, the scatter diagram of the SOC~LR model is closest to the 1∶1 line, with the maximal slope (0.937 7) and greaterR2(0.583 9). There is little error between the measured and estimated values. The SOC~LR model exhibits the best prediction effect, which is consistent with the results in Table 3.

    2.2 The models and their validations using the PLSR method

    Similarly, the PLSR models of SOC for multiple spectral indices, consisting ofR, CR, REC, LR, FDR and KM were established. To simplify the models, the maximum number of extracted principal component is 10. Taking the model for SOC~Ras an example, the corresponding modelling and validation parameters are presented in Table 4.

    Table 4 Establishment and validation of SOC-R

    Table 4 indicates that, with the increase in the number of the principal components, the explanation effects in SOC~Rmodel are better. In the case of 10 principal components, both theRC(0.877) and the accumulative contribution rate (76.89%) are largest and the RMSECV (16.68) is the smallest. Although the increase of principal components improves the stability of the models, the over-fitting might appear to reduce their prediction accuracy[15]. Therefore, to determine the best SOC model, the validation effects of these models need to be compared further. When 7 principal components are selected, minimal values ofrp(0.864) and RMSEP (17.78) are achieved; besides, the model passes theTtest of mean values for the measured and fitted values at the significant level of 0.05. Thus, the 7-principal-component model was selected as the best SOC~Rmodel.

    Likewise, the best models using other 6 spectral indices were selected, shown in Table 5.

    In Table 5, the SOC model using the index LR shows the largestRC(0.881), the largest accumulative contribution rate (77.6%), and the smallest RMSECV(16.63), the explanation effects of fitting the data from modelling subset is the best. The validation results indicate that the SOC~LR model had the largestrp(0.869) and the smallest RMSEP (17.23). The model passes thettest of mean values for the measured and fitted values at the significant level of 0.05. Therefore, the model of SOC~LR is the best when using the PLSR method.

    Table 5 The established SOC models using different spectral indices and the validation parameters using the PLSR method

    SpectralindexModelestablishmentValidationPC?NumberRCCumulative/%RMSECVrpRMSEP|t|R70.85873.6217.820.86417.780.267CR60.84471.2818.590.85618.380.372REC60.87476.3016.890.84418.630.156LR70.88177.6016.630.86917.230.117FDR20.85072.2718.270.79021.520.546K?M60.87376.1716.940.84018.870.13

    To contrast the prediction effects SOC models with various indices using the PLSR method, the predicted SOC were compared with the measured values. The results are shown in Figure 2.

    Figure 2 demonstrates that, the scatter plot of the SOC~FDR model is the closest to the 1∶1 line among all plots, with a slope of 0.927 6, but had the smallestR2(0.435 3) and larger prediction error, thus the model was not good. All of the other 5 scatter diagrams are close to the 1∶1 line, of which, theR2(0.658 6) of the SOC~LR model is the largest, and its prediction effect is the most effective. Hence, the model for SOC~LR is the best when using the PLSR method.

    For both the SLR and PLSR method, LR is the best predictor. By comparing Figures 1 d and 2 d which illustrate the models for SOC~LR using the two methods, the slope (0.937 7) of the model for SOC~LR based on the SLR method is close to 1, which is larger than slope (0.91) of the model for SOC~LR based on the PLSR method; thus, the model based on the SLR method is better in prediction effects. However, theR2(0.658 6) of the PLSR-based model for SOC~LR is larger. Therefore, the validation effects of the two models are similar. The validation parameters in Tables 3 and 5 suggest that the RMSEP (17.23) andrp(0.869) in the model using the PLSR method are obviously superior to the corresponding parameters in the model using the SLR method. Thus, the SOC~LR model based on the PLSR method is more accurate than the SOC~LR model based on the SLR method.

    2.3 Discussions

    Liu Jiao et al. established different models for predicting SOC at the small sampling scale on the upper reaches of Heihe based on measured R and the derived variables, among which

    Fig.2 Chart of predictive effects of various models using the PLSR method

    the best model is the SOC~Rmodel[8], and expressed as

    SOC=-189.3R1 632-740.3R836+615.9R1 326+314.3R474

    (7)

    By using their model, the SOC values of the 225 soil samples in this study were validated. By comparing with the observed values, thervalue of the measured and predicted SOC values is 0.826, the RMSEP is 20.24, and the model passes T test of mean value. It implies that the SOC model which had been established in local area can be applied to larger scaled to predict SOC. However, the extended scale of SOC model obtained at a small scale and its prediction accuracy for upscaling needs to be further explored because there is the influence of spatial variability in soil properties.

    Sun Yongmeng pointed out that, when the studied scale is large, and there is strong spatial variability, RMSEP increased accordingly, so the models established at different scales should not be compared directly[16]. Although the value of RMSEP of the empirical model proposed by Liu Jiao et al. is relatively large, the model shows strong prediction within certain accuracy range. Thus, their model can be employed for predicting SOC on the upper reaches of Heihe.

    With the diversity of the methods, it is necessary to explore more effective modelling methods so as to achieve more accurate prediction and more comprehensive information concerning the distribution of SOC. This research established the best model for predicting SOC using the SLR and PLSR methods at a larger sampling scale. The obtained models in this research are more effective than the existing models[8]both in stability or prediction accuracy. Particularly, the SOC model based on PLSR method shows superior parameters, i.e., larger RMSEP (17.23) andrp(0.869) than those of existing empirical models and is more suitable for predicting SOC on the upper reaches of Heihe.

    3 Conclusion

    According to six spectral-related indices, the SOC models on the upper reaches of Heihe using the two methods of SLR and PLSR were established. By comparing the related parameters during model establishment and validation processes, among the established SOC models using the six spectral-related indices, The two models using the index LR for both the PLSR and SLR methods were very effective for predicting SOC on the upper reaches of Heihe. Furthermore, the SOC~LR model obtained by the PLSR method was more accurate than the model obtained by the SLR method. Therefore, SOC~LR model obtained with the PLSR method is selected as the best model among several established models and it is suitable for predicting SOC on the upper reaches of Heihe.

    [1] Wang H J, Shi X Z, Yu D S, et al. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19: 197.

    [2] Bao S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. 27.

    [3] Palacios-Orueta A, Ustin S L. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988, 65(2): 170.

    [4] Liu S B, Li Y, He C S. Soil Science, 2013, 178(3): 138.

    [5] Zhang F S, Qu W, Yin G H, et al. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(4): 883.

    [6] Zhou S, Wang Q L, Peng J, et al. Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(7):1671.

    [7] Bilgili A V, van Es H M, Akbas F, et al. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74: 229.

    [8] Liu J, Li Y, Liu S B. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal., 2012, 33(12): 3354.

    [9] Qin J, Ding Y J, Wu J K, et al. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(3): 366.

    [10] Peng H T. Horton R, Lei T W, et al. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15: 937.

    [11] Ge Y F, Morgan C L S, Grunwald S, et al. Geoderma, 2011, 161: 202.

    [12] Feng Y Z, Sun D W. Talanta, 2013, 105: 244.

    [13] Li Y, Liu S B, Liao Z H, et al. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 92(6): 845.

    [14] Mark J, Michael A. The Appraisal Journal, 2001. 89.

    [15] Li L N, Li Q B, Yan H L, et al. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal., 2010, 30(11): 3041.

    [16] Sun Yongmeng, Ding Jianli, Qu Juan, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(20): 180.

    *通訊聯(lián)系人

    S123

    A

    基于光譜反射率的兩種土壤有機質數(shù)學建模方法對比

    張 沛1, 李 毅1,2*

    1. 西北農林科技大學水利與建筑工程學院, 陜西 楊凌 712100

    2. 西北農林科技大學中國旱區(qū)節(jié)水農業(yè)研究院, 陜西 楊凌 712100

    已有土壤有機質的光譜預測模型其適用性受建模樣本的采樣尺度、 土壤類型及光譜參數(shù)限制, 需要在大尺度及范圍上進一步檢驗適用性, 并比較分析不同建模方法的建模效果以尋求適用性更好、 精度更高的定量模型。 在黑河上游大尺度范圍采得225個土壤樣品, 進行了土壤有機質(SOC)及光譜反射率測定后將樣本劃分為建模集(180個土樣)與驗證集(45個土樣)。 將土壤光譜反射率(R)變換處理后得到連續(xù)統(tǒng)去除(CR)、 倒數(shù)(REC)、 倒數(shù)之對數(shù)(LR)、 一階微分(FDR)及Kubelka-Munck變換系數(shù)共6種指標, 針對建模集分別采用逐步線性回歸與偏最小二乘回歸方法建立12種光譜指標與SOC的數(shù)學模型, 并采用驗證集進行模型預測效果評價。 結果表明: (1)采用逐步線性回歸或偏最小二乘回歸方法建模, LR指標對SOC變化的解釋效果都是最好, 是SOC的最優(yōu)預測因子。 (2)基于LR指標建立的SOC模型中, 采用偏最小二乘回歸模型比逐步線性回歸模型的預測精度更好, 相較于黑河上游已有的經驗模型, 偏最小二乘回歸法建立的模型的預測效果也更好。 (3)采用本實驗的225個土壤樣品對比驗證了黑河上游僅有的SOC模型。 該模型的SOC預測值與實測值通過了均值T檢驗且Pearson相關系數(shù)達0.826, 表明在局部典型區(qū)域建立的SOC預測模型, 可以應用到更大尺度上的土壤有機質預測研究。

    黑河上游; 逐步線性回歸; 偏最小二乘回歸; 有機質預測模型; 光譜

    2014-12-13,

    2015-04-18)

    2014-12-13; accepted: 2015-04-18

    National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51579213), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. SS2013AA100904), the China 111 Project (No. B12007), and China Scholarship Council for Studying Abroad (201506305014)

    10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)03-0903-08

    Biography: ZHANG Pei,(1990-),Master Degree in College Water Resources and Architecture Engineering, Northwest A&F University e-mail: zpr0803@163.com *Corresponding author e-mail: liyikitty@126.com

    猜你喜歡
    黑河適用性反射率
    影響Mini LED板油墨層反射率的因素
    近岸水體異源遙感反射率產品的融合方法研究
    海洋通報(2022年4期)2022-10-10 07:40:26
    具有顏色恒常性的光譜反射率重建
    強調簡潔和適用性 MICHI by Rotel X5/X3合并功放
    黑河的“護衛(wèi)隊”
    當代陜西(2019年22期)2019-12-18 05:32:08
    環(huán)保技術在土木工程領域的適用性探討
    到張掖看黑河
    文學港(2019年5期)2019-05-24 14:19:42
    小議階級分析理論的適用性
    化學腐蝕硅表面結構反射率影響因素的研究*
    電子器件(2017年2期)2017-04-25 08:58:37
    張掖黑河濕地國家級自然保護區(qū)
    国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 日本欧美视频一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 少妇 在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美另类一区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 观看av在线不卡| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 黄片小视频在线播放| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 自线自在国产av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 99久久综合免费| 久久97久久精品| av天堂久久9| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 色吧在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 18在线观看网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 超碰成人久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久 成人 亚洲| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成人国语在线视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 美女主播在线视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 观看av在线不卡| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 丝袜喷水一区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 美女中出高潮动态图| 熟女av电影| av有码第一页| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产精品无大码| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产成人91sexporn| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 一个人免费看片子| 免费看不卡的av| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | av线在线观看网站| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 老司机影院毛片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 最黄视频免费看| 成人三级做爰电影| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日日啪夜夜爽| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | a 毛片基地| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 91精品三级在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 电影成人av| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 美女福利国产在线| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 香蕉丝袜av| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产在线视频一区二区| av.在线天堂| 国产极品天堂在线| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产毛片在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| a级毛片在线看网站| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 一级毛片电影观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产在线免费精品| 中文天堂在线官网| 视频区图区小说| 视频区图区小说| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久婷婷青草| 色94色欧美一区二区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产野战对白在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 多毛熟女@视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 一级黄片播放器| 免费少妇av软件| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 最黄视频免费看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久精品区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| www.av在线官网国产| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 热re99久久国产66热| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成人影院久久| 在线 av 中文字幕| tube8黄色片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 永久免费av网站大全| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 在线看a的网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 曰老女人黄片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 九草在线视频观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 永久免费av网站大全| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 美女福利国产在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 成人国产av品久久久| 多毛熟女@视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 一区福利在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费看不卡的av| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| www.精华液| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| avwww免费| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 悠悠久久av| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 超色免费av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久这里只有精品19| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲四区av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 七月丁香在线播放| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 青草久久国产| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲图色成人| 在线天堂最新版资源| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| avwww免费| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 91成人精品电影| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 少妇人妻 视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲图色成人| 满18在线观看网站| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久久国产一区二区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品999| 香蕉国产在线看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 乱人伦中国视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| av视频免费观看在线观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 中文欧美无线码| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 色吧在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久久久网色| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| a 毛片基地| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲综合精品二区| kizo精华| 免费不卡黄色视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 精品酒店卫生间| 777米奇影视久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 在线 av 中文字幕| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 大码成人一级视频| 国产乱来视频区| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜福利视频精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 香蕉丝袜av| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品无大码| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 咕卡用的链子| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 久久热在线av| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产 精品1| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| avwww免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 99九九在线精品视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一级爰片在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 男女国产视频网站| 午夜激情av网站| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品成人在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 中国三级夫妇交换| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久 成人 亚洲| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 观看av在线不卡| 国产精品免费视频内射| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲精品一二三| 免费少妇av软件| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 9色porny在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av网站在线播放免费| av在线app专区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 另类精品久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 久久久久视频综合| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 电影成人av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 99久久人妻综合| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| av有码第一页| 国产1区2区3区精品| kizo精华| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 两性夫妻黄色片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 老司机影院毛片| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产激情久久老熟女| avwww免费| 精品一区在线观看国产| 尾随美女入室| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲成人手机| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产乱来视频区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产精品三级大全| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 成年动漫av网址| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 青草久久国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 观看美女的网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产在视频线精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久青草综合色| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜激情av网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产成人一区二区在线|