• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Budd-Chiari syndrome in children: Challenges and outcome

    2023-12-05 07:17:00ArghyaSamantaMoinakSenSarmaRajanikantYadav
    World Journal of Hepatology 2023年11期

    Arghya Samanta,Moinak Sen Sarma,Rajanikant Yadav

    Abstract Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon disease of the liver,characterised by obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow tract.The etiological spectrum of BCS as well as venous obstruction pattern show wide geographical and demographic variations across the globe.Compared to adults with BCS,children have primary BCS as the predominant etiology,earlier clinical presentation,and hence better treatment outcome.Underlying prothrombotic conditions play a key role in the etiopathogenesis of BCS,though work-up for the same is often unyielding in children.Use of next-generation sequencing in addition to conventional tests for thrombophilia leads to better diagnostic yield.In recent years,advances in radiological endovascular intervention techniques have revolutionized the treatment and outcome of BCS.Various non-invasive markers of fibrosis like liver and splenic stiffness measurement are being increasingly used to assess treatment response.Elastography techniques provide a novel non-invasive tool for measuring liver and splenic stiffness.This article reviews the diagnostic and therapeutic advances and challenges in children with BCS.

    Key Words: Budd-Chiari syndrome;Radiological endovascular intervention;Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt;Direct intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt;Liver stiffness;Splenic stiffness;Shear-wave elastography

    INTRODUCTION

    Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare vascular disease of the liver with a promising outcome if treated optimally on time.It occurs due to obstruction in the hepatic venous outflow anywhere from the hepatic vein (HV) to the entry of the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the heart[1].Involvement of at least two HV leads to an increase in hepatic sinusoidal pressure and congestion resulting in symptoms of BCS[2].Global epidemiological data on BCS is scarce[3].The incidence of BCS reported in the published literature ranges from 0.2 to 4.1 cases per million population per year,with an estimated prevalence of 2.4-7.7 per million population in Asian countries[4,5] and of 1.4-4.0 per million population in Western countries[6-9].Population-based study on the epidemiology of BCS in children is lacking.Large case series on pediatric BCS are available[10-15].Chronic BCS constitutes 3%-7% of cases of portal hypertension (PHTN) in the pediatric population[10,11].So far,interventional and long-term outcome studies in children are limited[12-15].Over the years there has been remarkable progress in understanding the evolution of this disease.This review aims to discuss the various aspects of BCS,including recent updates on diagnostic and treatment modalities for BCS in children as well as the challenges in them.The review will particularly focus on chronic BCS which accounts for the majority of cases in children.

    VARIATIONS IN THE ETIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF BCS

    Primary BCS is an obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow tract that occurs due to an endoluminal venous lesion(thrombosis or web) resulting from an unidentifiable cause or an inherent prothrombotic condition.Secondary BCS results from obstruction from an invasive lesion (malignant tumor or a parasitic mass) or extrinsic compression by spaceoccupying lesions (abscesses,cysts,and benign or malignant solid tumors)[1].The above inflammatory or neoplastic conditions can also result in a secondary prothrombotic state which further adds to thrombosis in the HV.Secondary causes of BCS are common in adults as compared to children[16].Global variations in the type of BCS may reflect different predisposing factors in different countries.Studies from Western countries have shown HV to be the most common site of obstruction in BCS[17,18].There seems to be a shift in the pattern of obstruction in studies from Asian countries.Earlier,isolated IVC obstruction was the most type of BCS in Asian patients.Recent studies from China[19,20]as well as India[16,21,22] have noted that a combined IVC and HV obstruction (40%-75%) is the most common type of BCS.A similar pattern has also been documented in Indian children with BCS[12-15].Over the years,the changes in the spectrum have been better documented due to the advancements in radiology such as high-resolution Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and non-invasive venography by computed tomography (CT),and magnetic resonance imaging.

    BCS AND THROMBOPHILIA

    Primary BCS is often regarded as a result of a unique constellation of prothrombotic conditions.The inherited prothrombotic conditions associated with BCS are protein C deficiency,protein S deficiency,antithrombin III deficiency,factor V Leiden mutation,prothrombin gene mutation,and hyper-homocysteinemia with methyltetrahydrofolate reductase mutation[23].Acquired prothrombotic conditions like antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS),paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH),sickle cell disease,and myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) also predispose to BCS[24,25].Systemic disorders like inflammatory bowel disease,Behcet’s disease,and other inflammatory intraabdominal lesions can cause BCS in adults but rarely in children[26].Recent studies reported an identifiable etiology in 80-84% of cases in adults[27-30].Underlying myeloproliferative disorders (45%-51%) and exposure to oral contraceptives (50%) are the commonest etiologies[27,28].In over 25% of cases,more than one thrombophilic state may be present[29,30].From the available pediatric literature,we understand that the prothrombotic workup in children is often unyielding,inconclusive,or ambiguous.Table 1 summarizes the findings of prothrombotic workup of prior pediatric studies on BCS[11-14,31-35].As shown,most of the pediatric publications are from India including authors’ own experience.One of the majordrawbacks is the lack of in-depth testing for prothrombotic conditions.Shuklaet al[32] found thrombophilia in 42% of children and 37% of adolescents.The commonest etiologies were Factor V Leiden in children and JAK 2V617F mutation in adolescents.Although thrombophilia may be present in 68%-75% of children,the cause-and-effect relationship is not established[12,32].Relative and multiple deficiencies of proteins C and S,antithrombin III deficiency,and hyperhomocysteinemia (9%-15%) may be a result of an advanced liver disease resulting in poor synthetic function of the liver rather than a true thrombophilia state[29].In a systematic review of adults with BCS,MPD was found to be more associated with HV block (16%-62%) than IVC block (4%-5%)[36].

    Table 1 Summary of various pediatric studies (national) of thrombophilia profile in children with Budd-Chiari syndrome

    Oral anticoagulants may alter proteins C and S,activated protein C levels,and lupus anticoagulant levels.Hence these tests are best performed before starting thromboprophylaxis.Further,the presence of hypersplenism and hemodilution in cirrhosis with portal hypertension masks the peripheral blood findings of a concomitant MPD[29].Genetic testing is the gold standard for documentation of thrombophilia.In a study of 80 adults with non-cirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis,next-generation sequencing was able to identify JAK2 mutations,previously undetected by conventional techniques in one-third of cases[37].

    It is also suggested that the prevalence of various thrombophilic disorders is different between younger children and adolescents.In a study from India,the JAK2V617F was found to be common in adolescents but not in children[32].Recently it has been shown that adolescent venous thromboembolism is multifactorial in the majority with more than two risk factors at diagnosis[38].Warfarin is the most commonly used oral anticoagulant in BCS patients,especially after radiological intervention.As it has a narrow therapeutic window,the dose needs to be titrated with regular monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR) (target: 2-3).Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit C1 (VKORC1) and cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) are the two major genes involved in the metabolism of warfarin and they determine the dose requirement of warfarin[39].CYP2C9 metabolizes the more potent S-enantiomer of warfarin while VKORC1 is the target protein for warfarin.Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms have been described in these genes,of which the most important ones are CYP2C9*2,CYP2C9*3,and VKORC1 heterozygous haplotype GA and homozygous AA[40].Thus,the patient’s genotype is a major determinant of not only the dose requirement but also the risk of anticoagulationrelated complications.In a study from India in adults with BCS,patients with the presence of mutations in VKORC1 or CYP2C9 were associated with an increased risk of bleeding[41].More intensive monitoring while on warfarin is recommended for these patients.Some guidelines have now started recommending incorporating the results of genetic testing for clinical use while on warfarin therapy[42].

    Identification of thrombophilia in a child has implications in terms of the need for lifelong oral anticoagulation,increased risk of other venous thromboembolic events,lifestyle modifications like avoiding oral contraceptive pills,risk of complications like leukemia in myeloproliferative disorders,and implications for other family members.In addition,there is a need to educate asymptomatic family members regarding the risk factors and lifestyle modifications.

    CLINICAL FEATURES

    Clinical manifestations can be diverse,ranging from acute liver failure to completely asymptomatic patients,making BCS a possible differential diagnosis in many acute and chronic liver diseases.Most patients with BCS have a chronic presentation,whereas only a small number of patients present with a fulminant type of BCS[12-14].The clinical and radiological features of children with BCS in various pediatric studies are summarized in Table 2.The usual age at presentation in children is 10 (range 1.5-17) years but BCS has been reported in children as young as 4.5 mo[11,12,32].The commonest symptom is rapidly reaccumulating ascites (83%-90%) with dilated tortuous abdominal and back veins (60%-70%)[11-14,31].Up to 15%-20% of patients can be completely asymptomatic,hence a high index of suspicion should be kept,especially when there is no clear detectable etiology for chronic liver disease and/or a prothrombotic condition exists[43].In such scenarios,proper imaging by an experienced radiologist is warranted[44].The presentation of BCS depends on the extent and rapidity of hepatic venous outflow obstruction and the development of decompressing venous collaterals.With this concept,BCS can be classified as fulminant,acute,subacute,or chronic[45,46].However,a pathological examination of the liver illustrates a dissociation between the rapidity of the clinical presentation and the acuteness of the histological damage.Up to 50% of patients clinically classified as acute have histological features of chronicity (e.g.,fibrosis or cirrhosis)[46].The prognostic value of this clinical classification in predicting mortality has not been prospectively evaluated[47].Over time,several prognostic indices have been designed to predict mortality and response to therapeutic interventions[15,18,46,47].These scoring systems incorporate clinical and laboratory features to stratify patients,although their use for the management of an individual patient is debatable[48].

    Table 2 Clinical presentation,site of block,radiological intervention,and outcomes of major studies in children with Budd-Chiari syndrome

    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADULTS AND CHILDREN WITH BCS

    BCS can occur at any age group but it most commonly affects young adults.In adults,secondary causes of BCS are much more frequently seen than children in whom primary causes are predominant.Regarding the underlying etiology,thrombophilic conditions are reported in more than 80% of adults with BCS.In Asian children,the etiology is largely idiopathic.Thrombophilia work-up is often under-reported and the results are variable.Acquired prothrombotic conditions like MPD,APLS,PNH,sickle cell disease,and oral contraceptive pill use are predominantly seen in adults.On the contrary,inherited thrombophilias like protein C deficiency and protein S deficiency are more commonly found in children.The clinical presentation is also different for adults and children.Shuklaet al[32] compared 43 children and 129 adult patients with BCS.They found hepatomegaly without ascites as the most common presentation in children as compared to ascites being the most common presentation in adults.The authors hypothesized that children have better angiogenesis and collateral formation,and shorter disease duration,leading to milder clinical presentation and better treatment outcome.

    DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGES

    The diagnosis of BCS depends on the demonstration of HV and/or IVC obstruction.Invasive venography remains the gold standard;however,it is performed during the time of endovascular intervention procedure.DUS has therefore emerged as the primary imaging modality with a diagnostic accuracy of > 90%[12,13,15].DUS evaluates hepatic,portal,and IVC patency,site,and length of block and liver parenchymal changes (including caudate lobe hypertrophy and intrahepatic comma-shaped collaterals).HVs may be engorged,irregular,or filled with thrombus.The “health” and residual stump of the HV are the most critical to plan an endovascular intervention.Triphasic flow may be dampened or reversed.The IVC may be narrowed or displaced by caudate hypertrophy or contain an intraluminal thrombus.Intrahepatic comma-shaped collaterals and caudate lobe hypertrophy are almost universally seen in patients with BCS.The presence of dense intrahepatic collaterals suggests chronicity.Subcapsular collaterals may bleed during a percutaneous intervention and need to be carefully documented.Non-invasive venography (CT or MRI) is required when there is a diagnostic ambiguity.Hypoenhancement of the peripheral hepatic parenchyma and relatively normal enhancement of the caudate lobe result in a mottled appearance on CT.These changes are more obvious on MRI[49].However,if they are unyielding,invasive venography and liver biopsy should be considered.

    Another challenging diagnostic dilemma in the context of BCS is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Long-standing congestion and fibrosis of hepatic parenchyma in patients with chronic BCS are known to give rise to hepatic nodules.The etiology of hepatic nodules detected on radio imaging in BCS patients can be benign regenerative nodules and HCC.It is important to distinguish between these two conditions as treatment differs significantly.HCC lesions are usually larger in size (> 2 cm) and hypervascular on DUS and CT/MR[50].Also,for HCC,contrast enhancement in T1-weighted MR imaging can show different enhancement patterns between HCC with and without BCS[51].Yanget al[51],in a comparative study between 10 adult HCC patients with associated primary BCS and 32 other HCC patients without BCS,found that significantly more lesions with BCS were hyperintense during the arterial phase and slightly hyperintense or isointense during the venous phase than lesions without BCS (P< 0.05 for both).Therefore,histological confirmation is required in the workup of HCC in patients with BCS.

    TREATMENT OPTIONS

    Therapeutic options for BCS include medical management with anticoagulation therapy,radiological interventions such as angioplasty and stenting,surgical shunting and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS),and lastly,liver transplantation (LT).

    Medical therapy

    Anticoagulation alone with oral anticoagulants is sufficient in only 10% of adult patients,especially those with mild disease,and the vast majority of them progress,requiring intervention strategies in follow-up[52-54].Pediatric experience is limited.Sharmaet al[14] reported a 33% response in a small cohort of Indian BCS children who were treated with warfarin alone.Data on the comparative efficacy of directly acting anticoagulantsvsvitamin K antagonists in BCS patients is scarce[55].A recent Austrian multicentre study on the efficacy and safety of DOAC in 22 adult BCS patients(DOAC first-line anticoagulation in 6,switched over from warfarin and LMWH in 16) showed that DOAC showed clinical response in 63% of cases while bleeding occurred in 11 (4 major bleeding,7 minor bleeding)[55].Confirmation of efficacy and safety by larger prospective studies is needed.

    Radiological endovascular intervention

    The progressive improvement in radiological endovascular intervention (REI) techniques in the past two decades has provided better procedural and clinical success for BCS treatment compared to other treatment modalities in both adults and children[14,15,56,57].

    Angioplasty vs stenting

    The rationale of angioplasty is to decompress the liver while restoring hepatic blood flow.Angioplasty can be done with or without stenting in BCS patients with short-segment stenosis (< 5 cm).Wanget al[58],in a landmark study,compared the treatment efficacy and long-term patency of angioplasty with and without stenting in 88 adult Chinese patients with BCS.They had shown that the superiority of angioplasty with stenting over angioplasty alone in the rate of re-stenosis(2%vs40% over a median follow-up period of 27 mo,P< 0.0001)[58].Balloon angioplasty without stenting of the obstructed veins is preferred in infants and younger children as appropriate sizes of stents are not available,thus making stenting technically difficult in this population.Also due to the relatively shorter duration of disease,the veins are likely to be much more pliant.Hence angioplasty alone may reduce and normalize the venous pressure significantly after the procedure.In older children,angioplasty alone has a technical success rate and clinical response rate of 90% but is fraught with a high risk of blockage[11-15].Restenosis is almost always inevitable.Nagralet al[12],Kathuriaet al[13],and Sharmaet al[14] have reported higher re-occlusion rates with angioplasty alone (75%,33%,and 57%,respectively) compared to angioplasty+stenting (0%,13%,and 33%,respectively) and TIPSS (20%,33%,and 28%,respectively).This highlights that angioplasty with stenting rather than angioplasty alone,should be the preferred modality of radiological intervention(RI) in children.The smaller size of the liver and caliber of the veins in children pose a challenge when choosing an appropriate size and length of the stent.An uncovered self-expandable metallic stent is preferred over fully covered stents because of the lower risk of post-procedural thrombosis.Longer stents (20-30 mm) are required for long-segment IVC blocks than HV blocks.Overall,the technical success and clinical response rate of stenting in children is excellent (>90%) with a much less re-stenosis rate than angioplasty[11-15].In the authors’ experience,the length of the stent may appear longer as the liver decongests after the intervention.However,with the growth of the child,the liver also grows in size and the final stent size is usually appropriate for the child.Customized stents are available.It is also important to realize that once the liver is recovering and the physiology is restored,there is an expected sudden growth spurt in children with chronic liver disease,especially during puberty.With growth,the blood flow and turbulence through the recovering liver increase.Hence anticoagulation is most important in this phase till the stent undergoes complete endothelialization.Oral contraceptives in adolescence are to be prescribed with caution.

    TIPSS

    TIPSS is a shunt created between the portal and the systemic circulation,leading to a reduction in hepatic congestion and symptom resolution.Currently,TIPSS is performed in failed angioplasty-stenting with an available HV stump and as a bridge to LT[27].TIPSS is technically more demanding than cirrhotic patients due to the blocked HVs.Nonetheless,various studies have established TIPSS as a safe and effective treatment for BCS in adults[22,48,59,60].Amarapurkaret al[22] and Shalimaret al[59] have shown good technical success rates (87.5%-100%) and clinical success rates (80%-93%).Post-procedure encephalopathy occurs less frequently (3% to 5% cases) than in other cirrhotic patients,reflecting the relatively preserved hepatic function in most patients with BCS[59,60].The main concern about TIPSS is the higher occurrence of stent dysfunction.Compared to other cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPSS,BCS patients show higher stent dysfunction (70%vs50% within 1 year),probably due to underlying prothrombotic conditions in BCS[61].The advent of polytetrafluoroethylene covered stents has dramatically reduced the incidence of stent dysfunction (30%-70% in bare stentsvs10-20% in covered stents)[61,62].The available TIPSS stents are usually expensive and are inappropriate in terms of sizes for children,thus limiting their use in the pediatric population,although reports of successful treatment of children with BCS with TIPSS are available[12,13].TIPSS in children with BCS risks placement of the bare end of the stent beyond the portal vein and into the superior mesenteric vein if the size is too long.Hence,a “stent within a stent” is a minor modification of this technique that allows customization for the size of the liver.In this technique,a fully covered graft stent (10 mm × 3-7 cm) is placed inside the bare uncovered stent (10 mm × 8-10 cm).

    Modified TIPSS/DIPS (direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt)

    Long-segment (> 5 cm) HV block is usually not amenable to angioplasty,stenting,or TIPSS.A modified TIPSS or DIPS is a procedure where a shunt is made between IVC and the right branch of the portal vein.Though technically challenging,DIPS has been shown to effectively decompress hepatic congestion and clinical resolution in patients with BCS.In a large pediatric study from the authors’ center,children with chronic BCS undergoing DIPS had a procedural success and clinical response rate of 80% and 90%,respectively[15].

    Surgical shunts

    The principle of a surgical portosystemic shunt is to relieve the obstruction causing PHTN using a venous conduit,thereby decompressing the hepatic sinusoids.Surgical portosystemic shunts have now been almost completely abandoned because of high perioperative mortality (25%) and poor shunt patency (70%)[63-65].Surgical portosystemic shunting can also be technically difficult when there is caudate lobe hypertrophy[66].Most studies on surgical portosystemic shunts in adult patients with BCS failed to show any survival benefit[65,67].In a case series of 25 Indian children with BCS,only one out of the four patients who underwent surgical shunts survived[68].

    LT

    LT is considered a salvage therapy in the setting of fulminant presentation,progression to end-stage liver disease,or development of HCC[27,53].BCS accounts for approximately 1% of all pediatric LT cases[69].Involvement of retrohepatic IVC,the proximity of thrombus near the right atrium,and an underlying prothrombotic condition causing vascular complications make LT challenging.The challenge is even greater when considering living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) since the graft does not contain the retrohepatic IVC,as in deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT).Therefore,HV reconstruction is more complex,especially if the IVC is also obliterated[69].The smaller size of vessels in children complicates the situation further.Several large retrospective analyses have evaluated the benefit of DDLT in adult BCS patients with 5-year survival rates varying between 71% and 89.4%,similar to those undergoing LT for other diseases[70,71].Due to the scarcity of deceased-donor liver grafts,LDLT has been the mainstay for BCS patients undergoing LT in most Asian countries with 5-year survival rates ranging from 75% to 81%[72-75].Data on LT in pediatric BCS is only in the form of case reports and small case series and long-term prognosis has been reported to be good so far[76,77].

    STEPWISE APPROACH OR UPFRONT REI IN CHILDREN WITH BCS: THE WAY FORWARD?

    The rarity of BCS in general makes it difficult to perform randomized controlled trials in patients with BCS.Hence,most recommendations regarding treatment are based on case reports,retrospective studies,and expert opinions.Concerning the timing of the interventions,the European Association for the Study of the Liver[78] and the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)[27] recommended a stepwise therapeutic algorithm for BCS in adults.The algorithm depends on treatment response,medical therapy with anticoagulant drugs,angioplasty,stent placement,TIPS,and LT.In contrast to the strict step-up principle,an AASLD practical guideline suggested checking for a venous obstruction amenable for angioplasty in all symptomatic patients right at the beginning and treating accordingly[79].The step-up algorithm has also been criticized because it pays little attention to hemodynamics and its possible improvement or even relief by interventional treatment.The step-up algorithm also does not restore physiology at the onset and possibly delays the definitive procedure,leading to advanced liver disease.Guidelines are silent regarding what should be the optimal treatment approach in children with BCS.Longitudinal studies on pediatric BCS have shown that children with chronic BCS tend to decompensate early with ascites and variceal bleeding[13,14].In those receiving medical therapy alone,it has been seen that 26% of adults die over 2 years[53,55].Response to medical therapy has been variable in children (33-43%)and two-thirds of these children ultimately require an intervention in the long run[14].There is also concern about the safety profile of long-term use of oral anticoagulants in children[80].Hence,we suggest that all children with BCS(whether symptomatic or not) should undergo angioplasty and stenting as a primary treatment modality.

    It is debatable whether asymptomatic or incidentally detected BCS should be subjected to REI or not,especially in children.On one hand,decompensation may rapidly set in as children do not tolerate portal hypertension for longer periods as compared to adults.On the other hand,there are no sound ethical justifications as to whether these children should be subjected to invasive procedures and maintained on lifelong anticoagulation.In a personal opinion,the authors would prefer the former in asymptomatic children given their longer life expectancy,milder liver disease,and possibly better health and compliance with the HV.Hence there is a small window of opportunity to restore normal physiology in optimal conditions.

    POST-INTERVENTION COMPLICATIONS AND NEED FOR MONITORING AFTER REI

    Immediate complications of REI include subcapsular hematoma,hemoperitoneum,congestive heart failure,transient hepatic encephalopathy,and pulmonary thromboembolism and are encountered in 1%-3% of procedures in experienced centers[12-16,27].Long-term complications of bleeding secondary to anticoagulation have also been reported[12,13,22].However,the most commonly encountered post-procedure complication is re-stenosis after REI.Singhet al[15],in a large cohort of Indian children with BCS,reported follow-up vascular patency rates of 87%,82%,and 62% at 1,5,and 10 years after intervention,respectively.In the above study,29% of the cohort with REI (27% HV/IVC stenting;60% modified TIPSS) had restenosis[15].Adult studies report 17% to 41% restenosis after REI[21,22,24].To prevent re-stenosis,heparin infusion should be started during the intervention and continued thereafter.Warfarin must be initiated within 24 h of completing the procedure.The physician should consider stopping heparin and continuation of long-term warfarin if the target INR of 2-3 is achieved.Periodic clinical examination,liver function test,and shunt patency by DUS (post-stenting:24 h,1 wk,1 mo,3 mo,and subsequently every 6 mo;post TIPS/DIPS: at 7-14 d,3 mo,6 mo,9 mo,and 12 mo) is performed.Post-intervention surveillance aims to re-intervene before critical stenosis or occlusions recur.

    Assessment of response to therapy

    Response to therapy implies restoration of blood flow across previously blocked HV/IVC and consequent improvement in organomegaly and liver function test (LFT),no recurrence of ascites without need of diuretics,and resolution of signs of PHTN.Kathuriaet al[13],in a study among 20 children with BCS undergoing REI,demonstrated clinical and biochemical resolution in all;however,the median follow-up duration was 6.5 mo only.Sharmaet al[14],in another study of 20 Indian children with BCS who underwent REI,showed that HV stenting or TIPS is efficacious in improving clinical features,LFT,PHTN features,and growth parameters in 66% and 72% of cases,respectively,over a median follow-up duration of 44 (range 5-132) mo.Further long-term studies need to holistically address the natural history and timelines of resolution of organomegaly,liver stiffness,varices,liver functions,growth,pubertal maturity,and quality of life in children with BCS.

    LIVER AND SPLENIC STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT IN MONITORING

    Recently,liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) have been extensively studied as potential non-invasive markers of hepatic and splenic fibrosis and congestion and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with chronic liver disease[81-84].LSM and SSM can be measured by various imaging techniques [transient elastography (TE),shear-wave elastography (SWE),and MR elastography].Fraquelliet al[82],in a study of 132 patients with chronic hepatitis B and C,showed that LSM and SSM measured by TE,were reliable in predicting significant fibrosis[odds ratio (OR)=5.2 and 4.6,respectively] and cirrhosis (OR=7.8 and 9.1,respectively).SSM of < 48 kPa by TE was useful in ruling out esophageal varices.In another study by the same authors in 186 chronic liver disease patients,LSM and SSM measured by SWE were equally effective and reliable in predicting significant liver fibrosis as compared to TE,with SWE having the advantage of applicability in patients with obesity or ascites[83].The latest Baveno VII guidelines recommended that all cases of clinically advanced chronic liver disease should undergo LSM testing[85].

    However,these tests are yet not standardized in children.Pediatric literature regarding LSM and SSM by elastography techniques is emerging.Chongsrisawaet al[86] reported significantly higher LSM in biliary atresia patients with esophageal varices than those without (37.72 ± 21.55vs10.97 ± 8.71 kPa,P< 0.001).Yoonet al[87] showed that an LSM value of > 18.4 kPa predicted clinically significant PH (CSPH) in children with CLD with a high sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (84.0%).LSM has been used to monitor and assess treatment response in adult patients with BCS[88].In a study to assess short-and long-term outcomes in 32 Chinese adults with BCS undergoing REI,Wanget al[88] measured LSM using SWE at 2 d,3 mo,and 6 mo post-procedure.Mean LSM value before the procedure was 35.17 ± 10.60 kPa,which decreased to 15.36 ± 4.34 kPa and 15.68 ± 5.58 kPa at 3 mo and 6 mo post-procedure,respectively (P< 0.001).Published literature on the role of LSM in monitoring children with BCS is scarce[89].Dohareet al[89] evaluated the role of LSM in 32 children undergoing REI and showed that LSM values decreased significantly after REI.A maximal decrease is seen 24 h after REI (43.7 kPa at baselinevs22.5 kPa 24 h post-procedure,P=0.001)[75].Among the nine children developing re-stenosis after REI,re-stenosis was typically associated with an increase in LSM compared with the patient's prior measurement (median absolute increase 11.0 kPa;interquartile range [IQR] 6.1-24.4).

    SSM reflects congestion as well as structural changes in the spleen as a direct consequence of the increased PHT[90,91].SSM is considered a direct and more suitable surrogate marker of PHTN and performs better for the prediction of CSPH[91,92] and esophageal varices[93,94].Suttonet al[94] evaluated SSM in 67 children with chronic liver disease and showed that SSM is a reliable predictor of CSPH at a value > 38.0 kPa [area under receiver operating curve (AUROC)=0.92,sensitivity=89%,specificity=82%,P< 0.01].Sintuseket al[95] studied 51 BA children and showed a higher SSM of 46.85(IQR 25.95-54.55) kPa in patients with varices as compared to the no-varices group [median SSM-16.54 (IQR 11.75-21.75)kPa;P< 0.001].SSM has been performed in adults with BCS (n=7) who underwent TIPSS[96].In this case series,SSM in combination with LSM may reflect the severity of the disease at presentation and the need for invasive treatment.SSM values also showed a significant decline after TIPSS over a median follow-up period of 1 year.Further studies are required to elucidate the role of LSM and SSM in monitoring BCS patients after REI.

    PROGNOSTIC INDICES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

    To date,many prognostic scores have been developed in patients with BCS to quantify the disease severity and prognosis(Table 3).The authors evaluated the prognostic accuracy of these indices in BCS children and found that pre-intervention PELD score with a cut-off of 4 (AUROC=0.809,86% sensitivity,and 75% specificity) significantly determined poor outcomes following REI.Zeitoun score independently predicted poor outcome [OR=15.4,95% confidence interval (CI):1.17-203.56,P=0.04] with a cut-off of 4.3 (AUROC=0.923,83% sensitivity,and 77% specificity) in the unintervened chronic BCS[15].Hence BCS children with a Zeitoun index > 4.3 should undergo REI without any delay.

    LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS OF BCS

    Hepatopulmonary syndrome

    Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) occurs in a substantial portion (28%) of adult patients with BCS and balloon angioplasty can reverse HPS in patients with BCS[97].The mechanism is unknown but may be related to portal decompression.This may also explain the favorable outcomes of TIPSS creation for HPS in patients with cirrhosis and idiopathic PHTN[98].Sharmaet al[14] in a previous pediatric study reported the detection of HPS among five children in long-term follow-up,one in an un-intervened child and four after RI with patent stent (3 TIPSS,1 HV angioplasty).It is not clear as to which patients will have resolution or progress to HPS as contradicting outcomes have been noted.The possible reason for developing HPS even after reduction of portal hypertension post-RI could be increased exposure of pulmonary vasculature to vasodilator mediators like increased levels of nitric oxide,endothelin-1,tumor necrosis factor-α,and endotoxemia[98].

    HCC is an uncommon but dreaded long-term complication of BCS[99,100].In a recent systematic review of adults,the prevalence of HCC in BCS is geographically varied[99].It is documented as 2.0%-46.2% in 12 Asian studies,40.0%-51.6%in two African studies,11.3% in one European study,and 11.1% in one American study[99].Irrespective of hepatitis as the underlying risk factor of HCC,the pooled prevalence of HCC was 17.6% in BCS patients (95%CI: 10.1%-26.7%),26.5%in IVC obstruction (95%CI: 14.4%-40.7%),and 4.2% in HV obstruction (95%CI: 1.6%-7.8%).When patients with HCC and concomitant hepatitis were excluded,the pooled prevalence of HCC was 15.4% (95%CI: 6.8%-26.7%).Only 3 out of the 16 included studies evaluated the risk factors for the development of HCC in BCS patients.However,there was significant heterogeneity among these studies and the results were contradicting[99].Further long-term prospective studies are necessary to evaluate risk factors for HCC in BCS patients.Data regarding the prevalence of HCC in children with BCS is limited.So far,only three cases of HCC in children with BCS have been reported[14,32,101].All of them had HCC in the 2nddecade of life,liver nodules > 3 cm,and elevated alpha-fetoprotein.One patient was on anticoagulation only[101]while the other two had blocked stents[14,32].In the authors’ own unpublished experience from the authors' center,an 18-year-old boy developed HCC 6 years after blockage of DIPS.Routine surveillance for HCC is thus warranted in BCS patients,even after undergoing REI.

    FUTURE DIRECTIONS

    Future studies need to elucidate the underlying thrombophilic conditions and their role in the etiopathogenesis of BCS.The use of next-generation sequencing in addition to the conventional thrombophilia work-up is warranted for better understanding and higher diagnostic yield.Further studies are needed to determine the precise role of MRA in differentiating benign liver nodules with HCC in BCS patients.Liver and splenic stiffness measurement by elastography techniques (transient elastography,shear-wave elastography,and MR elastography) may serve as a useful non-invasive marker for assessing treatment response.Despite its rarity,pediatric BCS provides a unique opportunity to study the natural history,long-term complications,and treatment outcome.

    CONCLUSION

    BCS is a rare but potentially treatable cause of portal hypertension with an excellent prognosis after definitive treatment.Due to recent advances in interventional radiology,radiological endovascular intervention is currently the preferred primary treatment modality.Better patient and procedure selection,choice of appropriate size and type of stent,and mandatory follow-up assessment are of utmost importance for better long-term outcomes.In future,prospective and larger studies should be undertaken to study the epidemiology and establish standardized diagnostic and therapeutic management protocols for pediatric BCS.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Samanta A contributed to literature review,analysis,data collection and interpretation,and drafting of the initial manuscript;Sen Sarma M contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript,interpretation of the data,and critical revision of the initial manuscript;Yadav R contributed to interpretation of the data and the critical revision of the initial manuscript;all the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:India

    ORCID number:Arghya Samanta 0000-0002-1768-0263;Moinak Sen Sarma 0000-0003-2015-4069;Rajanikant Yadav 0000-0002-6955-850X.

    S-Editor:Liu JH

    L-Editor:Wang TQ

    P-Editor:Cai YX

    久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 中文欧美无线码| 黄频高清免费视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 1024视频免费在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| av天堂久久9| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| www日本在线高清视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 看免费av毛片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 免费观看精品视频网站| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| www国产在线视频色| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 天堂动漫精品| 午夜免费观看网址| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 97碰自拍视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久中文看片网| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 中国美女看黄片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 91老司机精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 午夜视频精品福利| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 在线播放国产精品三级| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 在线观看一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 五月开心婷婷网| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 日韩av在线大香蕉| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲伊人色综图| 99热只有精品国产| 久久中文字幕一级| 香蕉国产在线看| 成人影院久久| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲av成人av| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品永久免费网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲av美国av| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 99热只有精品国产| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产精品九九99| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产99白浆流出| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产av又大| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久性视频一级片| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久香蕉激情| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 满18在线观看网站| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| ponron亚洲| 亚洲av成人av| 成人手机av| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美成人午夜精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 成人三级做爰电影| 岛国在线观看网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久久国产成人免费| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| www日本在线高清视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 午夜免费激情av| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 精品人妻1区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 午夜激情av网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产亚洲欧美98| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产av精品麻豆| 热99re8久久精品国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 午夜福利,免费看| 香蕉国产在线看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 97碰自拍视频| 色综合站精品国产| 高清av免费在线| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 大码成人一级视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 大香蕉久久成人网| av免费在线观看网站| 香蕉丝袜av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久精品影院6| 久久伊人香网站| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产在线观看jvid| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 成人国语在线视频| 91在线观看av| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久久久九九精品影院| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 午夜福利,免费看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲九九香蕉| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 天堂动漫精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 午夜老司机福利片| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 脱女人内裤的视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲片人在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 午夜久久久在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 性欧美人与动物交配| 免费看a级黄色片| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品在线美女| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 在线视频色国产色| 日韩高清综合在线| 一级毛片精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久久久九九精品影院| a级毛片黄视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| bbb黄色大片| 国产精品免费视频内射| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品人妻在线不人妻| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 久久狼人影院| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 精品电影一区二区在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 曰老女人黄片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产av在哪里看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 欧美日韩av久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产激情久久老熟女| 不卡一级毛片| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| a级毛片黄视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 日本五十路高清| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 岛国在线观看网站| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久影院123| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久性视频一级片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精品久久久久久成人av| 嫩草影视91久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产区一区二久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久热在线av| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 男人操女人黄网站| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 在线观看66精品国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久人妻av系列| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 美女大奶头视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 黄片播放在线免费| 天堂√8在线中文| 性少妇av在线| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 一区在线观看完整版| 身体一侧抽搐| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 看黄色毛片网站| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产精品永久免费网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 午夜免费激情av| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品 国内视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲精品在线美女| 成人手机av| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| av欧美777| 亚洲avbb在线观看| avwww免费| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 丁香欧美五月| 女警被强在线播放| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久久久久大精品| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 91在线观看av| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 中文字幕色久视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品一区二区三卡| 夫妻午夜视频| 日本 av在线| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 91成人精品电影| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 在线视频色国产色| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产三级黄色录像| 脱女人内裤的视频| 露出奶头的视频| av电影中文网址| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 露出奶头的视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 露出奶头的视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 嫩草影院精品99| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| www.精华液| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 99久久国产精品久久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产成人欧美| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品九九99| 脱女人内裤的视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 一进一出抽搐动态| 美女大奶头视频| 级片在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 老司机靠b影院| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 老司机靠b影院| 性少妇av在线| av欧美777| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| www.www免费av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 午夜免费观看网址| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃|