• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Seleucid, Demotic and Mediterranean Mathematics versus Chapters VIII and IX of theNineChapters: Accidental or Significant Similarities?*

    2016-02-13 10:11:48Jensyrup
    自然科學(xué)史研究 2016年4期
    關(guān)鍵詞:九章算術(shù)算術(shù)難題

    Jens H?yrup

    (RoskildeUniversity)

    Seleucid, Demotic and Mediterranean Mathematics versus Chapters VIII and IX of theNineChapters: Accidental or Significant Similarities?*

    Jens H?yrup

    (RoskildeUniversity)

    Similarities of geometrical diagrams and arithmetical structures of problems have often been taken as evidence of transmission of mathematical knowledge or techniques between China and “the West”. Confronting on one hand some problems from Chapter VIII of theNineChapterswith comparable problems known from Ancient Greek sources, on the other a Seleucid collection of problems about rectangles with a subset of the triangle problems from Chapter IX, it is concluded,(1)that transmission of some arithmetical riddles without method-not “from Greece” but from a transnational community of traders-is almost certain, and that these inspired the Chinese creation of thefangchengmethod, for which Chapter VIII is a coherent presentation;(2)that transmission of the geometrical problems is to the contrary unlikely, with one possible exception, and that the coherent presentation in Chapter IX is based on local geometrical practice.

    NineChaptersonArithmetic,Fangchengmethod, transmission, mathematical riddles, Babylonian geometry

    Yvonne Dold-Samplonius

    inmemoriam

    Received:2016- 08- 04Biography:Jens H?yrup, Roskilde University, Section for Philosophy and Science Studies. Email: jensh@ruc.dk. Homepage: http://ruc.dk/~jensh.As a historian of science, H?yrup has mainly worked on premodern Near Eastern, Mediterranean and European mathematics, but also in the border area between philosophy of science, sociology and history.

    * This paper is a contribution to the workshop Mathematical Texts in East Asia Mathematical History, Tsinghua Sanya International Mathematics Forum, March 11-15, 2016.

    Two pictures and a winged transmission

    First of all, as introduction, two pictures.

    Fig.1

    To the left, the decoration of the “Mathematics and Systems Science” tower in the campus of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, borrowed from Zhao Shuang’s third-century CE commentary to theGnomonoftheZhou-cf. (Cullen 1996: 206; Chemla & Guo 2004: 695-701); to the right, my own diagram reconstructed from the description of the procedure of the Old Babylonian problem Db2- 146 (c. 1775 BCE), in which the sides of a rectangle are to be determined from its area and the diagonal (H?yrup 2002a: 257-259). When I first made it, it should be added, I did not know about the Chinese diagram.

    A first reaction may be that the two must be connected; indeed, when Joseph Needham (1959: 96 n.a, 147) finds the same diagram in Bhaskara II (he gives no reference) and believes it to be found nowhere else, he deems it “extremely probable that Bhaskara’s treatment derives from” Zhao Shuang’s commentary.

    A connection between a Mesopotamian and a Chinese diagram is certainly not to be excludedapriori. There can be no doubt that the shared problem of the “hundred fowls” is really shared, and thus that some kind of mathematicsdidtravel.*For the moment I shall pretend that the notion of “shared problem” (or shared mathematical knowledge) is unambiguous; this corresponds to such classical discussions of inter-cultural mathematical connections as (Hermelink 1978) and (Vogel 1983). In the context of these discussions it was perhaps unproblematic to leave that semantic point to the understanding of the reader. We shall see below that it is not so for the present topic-but clarification is better postponed until we have our hands on material where it can be done concretely.The earliest known occurrence of this problem type is in the fifth-centuryZhangQiujianSuanjing(van Hée 1913), but soon it turns up not only with the same mathematical structure but also with shared parameters and dress (100 units of different prices and a total price of 100-only the choice of species and their individual prices vary) in Carolingian Western Europe, in India and in the Islamic World-see, e.g. (Libbrecht 1974); this cannot be imagined to be an accident.

    We may add an observation, elementary but to my knowledge not made before. The early Islamic, Indian and Chinese occurrences speak of fowls, the CarolingianPropositionesadacuendosiuvenes(Folkerts 1978) has various dresses but none with fowls. This supports Jean Christianidis’ suggestion (1994: 240f) that the problem has developed from an early form represented in a Greek papyrus from the second century CE, where the units are already 100 but the price 2500.*Text in (Winter 1936: 39).Once the more striking version 100/100 was invented, that was the one that spread east and west-but the fowls only eastward, for which reason this latter invention can be presumed to be a secondary accretion.

    Other possible interactions

    The hundred fowls is an arithmetical riddle. Another arithmetical riddle thatmayhave travelled far is the one known in the cultures connected to the Mediterranean as the “purchase of a horse”. Like the “hundred fowls” it circulated with varied numerical parameters, but a typical example states that three men go to the market in order to buy a horse. The first says that he has enough to pay the price if he can have half of the possession of the other two; the second only needs one third, the last only one fourth of what the other two have. The possession of each and the price of the horse is asked for. Sometimes the price of the horse is given.

    The problem seems to be hinted at in book I of Plato’sRepublic(333BC).*Trans. (Shorey 1930: I, 332f) Socrates asks when one needs an expert; and as usually he answers himself: for example when you go to the market to buy or sell a horse in common. Since horses did not serve in agriculture but only for military purposes, they would never be bought in common in real life. (I owe the discovery of the Platonic passage to the late Benno Artmann).In any case there can be no reasonable doubt that it turns up, undressed as pure-number problems, in Diophantos’ArithmeticaI:24-25(Tannery 1893: I, 56-69); the preceding propositions 22-23, moreover, ask a question which, if dealing with a purchase, would make each participant ask for the fractions 1/3,1/4 and 1/5 respectively 1/3,1/4,1/5 and 1/6 of the possession not of all the others but of the one that precedes in a circle.

    The latter type has an interesting parallel in Chapter VIII, problem 13 of theNineChapters*My English from the French of (Chemla&Guo 2004: 643).:

    Let us assume that with five families sharing a well, that what is missing for the two ropes ofJia(in order to reach the bottom of the well), that is as one rope ofYi, that what is missing for the three ropes ofYi, that is as one rope ofBing, that what is missing for the four ropes ofBing, that is as one rope ofWu, that what is missing for the six ropes ofWu, that is as one rope ofJia; and that, if each gets the rope that is missing for him, all will reach the bottom of the well. One asks for the depth of the well and for the length of the ropes.

    The mathematical structure of the problem is the nearly the same, including the characteristic attractive sequence of fractions. However, one ofnropes is spoken of instead of the fraction 1/nof the totality of the ropes of each (which avoids the need to cut the ropes); moreover, the request is made to the following participant, not to the predecessor in the circle.

    Problems 3 and 12 (ibid. p. 625, 641) are determinate but otherwise similar in structure. No. 3 speaks of 2 bundles of millet of high quality, 3 of medium quality and 4 of low quality, and in similar combinations they are to produce 1dou; no. 12 deals with the hauling capacity of horses of different strength. Problems 14 and 15 (ibid. pp. 645, 647) are sophisticated variants-we shall return to them.

    The coincidences may seem striking-but are they evidenceofconnectionorofparallelexperiencesof fascination?Ifthe far from obvious dress had also been shared, as in the case of the hundred fowls, then connection would seem next to certain. Since it is not, we cannot decide on the basis of these problems alone.

    However, problem 10 (ibid. p. 639) supports the connection hypothesis. It presents us with something like a two-participant version of the problems we have just examined. Two persons own money; ifJiagets half of whatYipossesses, he will have 50 coins; and ifYigets 2/3 of whatJiapossesses, he will have as much.

    With only two participants, there is no difference between Diophantos’s two types. We notice, firstly, that here fractions and not “one out ofn” are spoken about; secondly, that the dress is the familiar “give-and-take” type.

    This dress is used for a slightly different mathematical structure in problems from late Mediterranean Antiquity (and later). In Book XIV of theGreekAnthology(Paton 1916: V, 105), no. 145 runs

    A. Give me ten minas, and I become three times as much as you.B. And if I get the same from you I am four times as much as you.

    No. 146 uses different numerical parameters (two minas, twice, four times) but is otherwise identical. Prop. XV of Diophantos’sArithmeticaI (Tannery 1893: I, 36f) is an undressed version of the same problem type.

    On the other hand, Fibonacci’s first example of a “purchase of a horse” (Boncompagni 1857: 228)has the same mathematical structure as the Chinese give-and-take problem, apart from being indeterminate. In Fibonacci’s problem, the first man asks for 1/3 of the possession of the second, while the second asks for 1/4 of what the first has. In both cases, each will have enough to buy the horse (whence the same amount).

    Again, this coincidence in isolation suggests but does not prove a connection. However, the alternative explanation here cannot be fascination with interesting numbers but only accident. If we take together all the problems we have looked at, independent invention in the two areas becomes unlikely-not least because the case of the “hundred fowls” provides us with firm evidence that transmission could and sometimes did take place.

    But what exactly can have been transmitted? All these problems from theNineChapterscome from Chapter VIII, and all are used to train thefangchengmethod. Diophantos’s methods are quite different-and no closer are variants of the “Bloom of Thymarides” (Heath 1921: I. 94-96), which may have been used already around or before Plato’s times to solve similar problems.

    In connection with the “hundred fowls”, Ulrich Libbrecht(1974:313) points out that

    This implies that several mathematical problems were transmitted only as questions, without any method, as we can clearly state in Alcuin’s work (thePropositionesadacuendosiuvenes/JH); in different places methods were developed-wrong or right-to solve these problems. Perhaps they were considered more as games than as serious problems, as we can prove from several Chinese and European works.The same is clearly the case here. In terms I have used in (H?yrup 1990) (not knowing by then about Libbrecht’s observation), the problems have circulated as “subscientific” mathematics, more precisely as professional riddles belonging to an environment of mathematical practitioners; once taken up by groups which in some way can be characterized as scholarly mathematicians,*That is, people who are engaged in or linked to a school-based (as opposed to an apprenticeship-based) educational system, and who in that connection shape and transmit mathematical knowledge.these developed their own ways to deal with them, and in some cases they expanded the range of questions these methods could be applied to. Since the riddles functioned precisely asriddlesin the community of practitioners (in anthropological parlance asneckriddles-who is not able to solve them is “not one of us”) it is not even certain that the practitioners always had amathematicalmethod for solving them-a riddle asks for an answer, not for a calculation or a logical derivation, and a guess followed by a verification may have been enough.*This is precisely what Abū Kmil reproaches those who took pleasure in the “hundred fowls” in his times and surroundings-it was “a particular type of calculation, circulating among high-ranking and lowly people, among scholars and among the uneducated, at which they rejoice, and which they find new and beautiful; one asks the other, and he is then given an approximate and only assumed answer, they know neither principle nor rule in the matter”-my translation from (Suter 1910: 100).

    That is where problems no. 14 and 15 of Chapter VIII of theNineChapterscome in. No. 14 deals with groups of unit fields of millet with different yields-say 2A, 3B, 4Cand 5D. But this time 2A+B+C=3B+C+D=4C+D+A=5D+A+B=1dou. This is too complex to present a nice recreational riddle-to keep track of it without material support would be difficult. No. 15 deals with three groups of bundles of millet of different weights but speaks of differences instead of sums-in symbols, 2A-B=3B-C=4D-A=1dan.

    Such extensions of the range of “recreational” riddles by variation and systematization at the hands of scholarly mathematicians are a common occurrence in history, from Old Babylonian times to Pedro Nuez and beyond. Diophantos, inArithmeticaI, replaces variation by generalization-but his choice of numerical examples betrays the recreational starting point.

    At times, however, “scholarly mathematicians” have made a further step, and used the recreational material as the starting point or inspiration for the creation of a whole mathematical discipline. That is the way Old Babylonian second-and third-degree “algebra” was generated.*See, for instance, (H?yrup 2001).In the whole corpus, there is not a single second or third-degree problem derived from a genuine practical question that might present itself to a Babylonian scribal calculator. We should not be misled by the fact that theentitiesoccurring as “unknowns” in the problems would be familiar to him-dimensions of fields and excavations, prices, manpower, etc. In genuine surveying, one would (for instance) never have to determine the sides of a rectangular field from its area and the sum of the sides; but exactly such recreational riddles served as basis for the new discipline.

    If we now consider Chapter VIII of theNineChaptersin its integrity, the parallel becomes obvious. Although theNineChapterson the whole teach administrators’ mathematics, Chapter VIII does not present us with a single instance of this. True,theentitiesthat occur would again (mostly) be of the kind dealt with by calculating bureaucrats (the combined ropes hardly); buttheproblemswould never turn up in their offices. Moreover, the book as a whole is a theoretical unity. Since the topic is absent from theSunshùshū(Cullen 2004: 6;id. 2007: 29; Dauben 2008: 97, 131), Chapter VIII can be assumed to be the outcome of recent systematic establishment of a well-defined mathematical field-inspired in all likelihood by select recreational problems as received within the existing mathematical culture, with its techniques, approaches and metamathematical ideals; administrative mathematicspersewould not lend itself adequately to that role.

    All in all, Chapter VIII and its Mediterranean kin thus appears to present us with all the facets involved in questions about transmission:

    1.Transmission ofproblemsas riddles from an unidentifiedsomewhereto both the classical Mediterranean area and Han China (and other locations).*Somewheremust be emphasized. In questions of this kind it is misleading to take for granted that the ultimate source must be one of the literate, “nationally” defined high cultures we know about-“the Chinese”, “the Greeks”, “the Indians”, etc. “Proletarians have no fatherland”, it was claimed-until the experience of the First World War proved the opposite in France and Germany. Often, merchants and technicians (even highly qualified techniciansla Wernher von Braun) still have none.

    2.Local creation of adequatemethods.

    3.A creation of a mathematicaldisciplineon this foundation in China, in a process that is parallel to what can be seen in Old Babylonian mathematics. This parallel was based on shared sociological conditions and certainly did not involve any kind of transmission of metamathematical ideals.*Those of the Old Babylonian school had died with the school itself around 1600 BCE, more or less at the time of the earliest oracle bones. Even if that had not been the case, however, transmission could be safely excluded-institutional ideals can only be exportedwithunderstanding(whence with efficiency) if the institution itself is exported.

    Problems about “combined works” present themselves easily in all cultures of scribal mathematical administration, and there are basically only two reasonable ways to solve them;*IfAcan complete the task in 3 days andBin four, then each dayAcompletes 1/3 andB1/4, etc. Alternatively, in 3×4 days,Awill complete it 4 times, andB3 times, the two together thus 7 times, etc. If the numbers had not been mutually prime, the latter method can be found in the variant that the smallest common multiple is chosen, but apart from that sources I have looked at know no other ways. Obviously they are algebraically equivalent.neither the occurrence of such problems in different places nor a shared way to proceed can thus be taken as evidence of transmission. An unlikely dress can, however (as in the case of the “hundred fowls”).

    Such a case is present in Chapter VI, problem 6 of theNineChapters(Chemla & Guo 2004: 541). Here, a pool is filled from five streams. As it is, filling is a preferred dress for such problems in theGreekAnthologyXIV-thus no. 7, 130-133, 135(Paton 1916: V, 31, 97, 99). Shared transmission from somewhere is thus likely-but since this is nofavouritedress of the problem type in theNineChapters(other instances-no. 22, 23 and 25-really concern working rates), an isolated borrowed recreational problem may simply have been inserted in an adequate place of theNineChapters, the writer having recognized an already familiar type.*No. 21 and 22 are in the dress of travel times, which also shows up elsewhere in later times. No. 27 and 28, of structure “box problems”, are in the dress of repeated taxation, also familiar from India and elsewhere in the later first and early second millennium. Chapter VI thus serves, it seems, as a receptacle for several widely circulating recreational problems for which it presents the earliest written evidence (much as Diophantos’sArithmeticaI).

    All of these cases of credible transmission, from the “hundred fowls” onward, are number problems; they are of the kind that would allow an accountant or a travelling merchant to show his mathematical proficiency. Since accountants are likely to stay more or less in their place, travelling merchants constitute the plausible carrying community for these riddles; at an earlier occasion (H?yrup 1990: 74)I have spoken of them as the “Silk Route group”.

    Seleucid and Demotic Geometry

    We started with a suggestive geometric diagram, and then shifted focus to the possible transmission of arithmetical riddles. Let us return to geometry.

    Our initial diagram is too isolated to be worth pursuing. More intriguing is the geometry of Chapter IX of theNineChaptersin relation to certain geometric problems from Seleucid Mesopotamia (third to second century BCE) and Hellenistic-Demotic Egypt.

    The Seleucid problems in question (mainly) deal with rectangles with a diagonal. They have a family relationship with the Old Babylonian so-called “algebra”-apparently not by direct descent but via shared borrowing from the riddles of practical surveyors.*The evidence for this is in part linguistic, in part it has to do with strong reduction (followed by expansion) at the level of mathematical substance. See (H?yrup 2002a: 389-399).The kinship does not imply that the Seleucid problems represent an “algebra”. Whether the Old Babylonian technique does so is a matter of how we define algebra, but no reasonable definition will cover the Seleucid rectangle problems-they do not serve any kind of representation, and the method is purely synthetic.

    Most of the problems in question are known from the tablet BM 34568,*(Neugebauer 1935: III, 14-19), partial edition, “conformal” translation and commentary in (H?yrup 2002a: 392-399).undated but probably from the later third or earlier second century BCE. Its problems can be described as follows:*lstands for the length,wfor the width,dfor the diagonal andAfor the area of a rectangle. The sexagesimal place value numbers are transcribed into Arabic numerals. Entities that are found but not named in the text are identified in 〈 〉. With minor changes, I draw the list from (H?yrup 2002b: 13f).

    (4) d+w=8, l=4;solutioncorrespondingto(3).

    (6) l=60, w=32; Aisfoundasl·w.

    (8) l=60, w=25; Aisfoundasl·w.

    (16) A cup weighing 1 mina is composed of gold and copper in ratio 1:9.*Obviously an intruder, which however shows that at least some problems from the “Silk Road group” were already known in Mesopotamia at the time. In the present context there is no reason to discuss this connection in depth.Similar connectionsmaybe in play in the seemingly aberrant problem 1, extensively discussed, but with a different aim, in (Gon?alves 2008).

    (17)l+w+d=12,A=12; solved as (14),d=5.

    (18)l+w+d=60,A=300; not followed by a solution but by a rule formulated in general terms and cor-responding to (14) and (17).

    (19)l+d=45,w+d=40; again, a general rule is given which follows (13).

    Fig.2 The reed leaned against the wall.

    No. 2 is obviously an application of what I prefer to call the “Pythagorean rule”, no theorem being involved; it corresponds to knowledge that was amply around in Old Babylonian times. No. 10 is not identical with the Old Babylonian problem which I referred to initially (Db2-146); but it is closely related and solvable by means of the same diagram.

    All the others (disregarding here and in what follows the intruders no. 1 and no. 16) represent innovations within the surveyor’s riddle tradition-when not in question then in method (no. 6 and 8 obviously present old knowledge, which however had been taught at an elementary level). No. 12 deserves particular discussion. It deals with a reed of lengthdfirst standing vertically against a wall, next in a slanted position, in which the top descends to heightl(descending thusd-l); at the same time, the foot moves a distancewaway from the wall.

    In the Old Babylonian text BM 85196 we find a similar dress, but theredandware given. To findlthus requires nothing but direct application of the Pythagorean rule (similarly to no. 2 here). In the present case, instead, as stated, the descentd-lis given together withw.

    It is possible to find plausible geometric explanations of the procedures used to solve all the “new” problems-see (H?yrup 2002b: 13- 18); that, however, is of no interest in the present connection (in particular, of course, because we have no certainty that these explanations were those which the ancient calculators thought of).

    BM 34568 is not our only source for this kind of rectangle problems. Firstly, the Seleucid text AO 6484*Ed. (Neugebauer 1935: I, 96-99); early second century BCE.contains a rectangle problem of the same type as nos. 14, 17 and 18 of BM 34568. Secondly, the Demotic papyrus P. Cairo J.E. 89127-30, 89137-43 from the third century BCE*(Parker 1972: 13-53), with summaryibid. pp. 3f.contains eight problems about the reed leaned against the wall-three of the easy Old Babylonian type wheredandware given, three of the equally simple type wheredandd-l(and therefore easilyl) are given; and two, finally, whered-landware given, as in BM 34568 no. 12. Though with different numerical parameters, moreover, two of its problems coincide with that of the Old Babylonian text Db2- 146; they are thus closely related to BM 34568 no. 10.

    There can be no doubt that the ultimate source for this whole cluster of geometric problems is Mesopotamia or at least West Asia-Pharaonic mathematics contains nothing similar. It is also easy to pinpoint a professional community that could transmit it: For half a millennium, Assyrian, Persian and Macedonian military surveyors and tax collectors (even those of the Macedonians no doubt trained in the Near Eastern tradition) had walked up and down Egypt.*Macedonians excepted, this explains why Greek authors, from Herodotos onward, could believe the Egyptians to have invented geometric techniques which we now recognize as Mesopotamian.

    Travelling geometry-travelling how far?

    It is less easy to identify the channels through which these problems came to be adopted into Jaina mathematics, as they certainly were (H?yrup 2004). Our evidence is constituted by Mahvīra’sGanita-sāra-sangrahafrom the ninth century CE, but it is obvious from Mahvīra’s words that by then these problems were considered old, native and venerable by the Jainas. It is also highly plausible that what reached them had already been digested and somewhat transformed by a broader Mediterranean community.

    Given that they reached India, could they also have inspired China’s mathematical bureaucrats, or at least the author of Chapter IX of theNineChapters(which has no more to do with real administrative tasks than Chapter VIII)?

    At a first glance, problems 6 to 12 and 24 might suggest so. In that case, however, the inspiration has certainly been digested-the basic topic of Chapter IX is the righttriangle, and the Seleucid-Demotic problems deal with rectangles.*Problem 11 in theNineChaptersthenappliesthe triangle techniques to a problem about a rectangular door, while the Seleucid text applies its rectangle techniques to the slanted pole, a triangle problem. Both writers obviously understood the connection, but their choice of different basic models is still to be taken note of.Moreover, the Chinese variant of the reed against the wall (no. 8-the only one where the dress is suggestive) compares the slanted and thehorizontalposition of a pole.

    If we express the Chinese problems in the same symbolic form as used for BM 34568, we get the following:*Once more I borrow (this time more freely) from (H?yrup 2002b).

    (8)d-l=1,w=10. Same mathematical structure and same procedure as no. 7-but the dress is now a pole first leaning against a wall and then sliding down to horizontal position.

    Fig.3 The possible geometric basis for problem IX.24 of the Nine Chapters.

    (9) Another variation of no. 7.

    (10) Yet another variation of no. 7.

    All in all, the similarities boil down to the mathematical structures underlyingthequestions. The dresses are generally quite different, and the procedures used to obtain the solutions are also others, often as different in character as the subject allows. In summary, no decisive internal evidence speaks in favour of transmission-only problem 7couldbe an accidental intruder that has been inserted in the adequate place, as the filling problem 6 in Chapter VI.

    External evidence also seems unfavourable to the transmission thesis: arithmetical riddles might be carried along the Silk Road network by travelling merchants and exchanged as camp fire fun or challenges. But where can we find likely carriers of geometrical questions?

    There is a fundamental difference, however. In this case the formula has travelled together with the problem to which it is linked. If diffusion should be involved in the problems of Chapter IX, all that was transmitted was the mathematical structure of the problems, neither the actual questions to which they correspond nor the formulas used to solve them. This could only be carried by people who would recognize as essential an abstract mathematical structure behind the problems-that is, by people who must be characterized asmathematicians. They were hardly at hand for the task.

    All in all, Chapter IX of theNineChapters(of which problems 6-13+24 only form a subset) is therefore likely to be just as much an original Han creation as Chapter VIII-but with the difference that the underlying inspiration must be sought in local geometric practice, and not in the practice or riddles of any transnational professional community. TheGnomonoftheZhou, on which Zhao Shuang was certainly not the first to work, would suggests the practice of astral science. Since Chinese astral science is a field about which I am quite ignorant, I shall not pursue this suggestion, which is anyhow outside my topic.

    Boncompagni, Baldassare (ed.), 1857.Scrittidi Leonardo Pisano matematico del secolo decimoterzo. I. IlLiberabbacidi Leonardo Pisano. Roma: Tipografia delle Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche.

    Chemla, Karine, & Guo Shuchun (eds., trans.), 2004.Lesneufchapitres.LeClassiquemathématiquedelaChineancienneetsescommentaires. Paris: Dunod.

    Christianidis, Jean, 1994. “On the History of Indeterminate Problems of the First Degree in Greek mathematics”, pp. 237-247inKostas Gavroglu, Jean Christianidis & Efthymios Nicolaidis (eds.),TrendsintheHistoriographyofScience. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Cullen, Christopher, 1996.AstronomyandMathematicsinAncientChina:TheZhou bi suanjing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Cullen, Christopher, 2004. TheSunshùshū, “Writings on Reckoning”: A Translation of a Chinese Mathematical Collection of the Second Century BC, with Explanatory Commentary. (Needham Research Institute Working Papers, 1). Cambridge: Needham Research Institute. Web Edition http://www.nri.org.uk/suanshushu.html.

    Cullen, Christopher, 2007. “TheSunshùshū, ‘Writings on Reckoning’: Rewriting the History of Early Chinese Mathematics in the Light of an Excavated manuscript”.HistoriaMathematica, 34, 10-44.

    Dauben, Joseph W., 2008. “SuanShuShu.ABookonNumbersandComputations.English Translation with Commentary”.ArchiveforHistoryofExactSciences, 62, 91-178, erratum p. 347.

    Folkerts, Menso(ed.), 1978. “Die ?lteste mathematische Aufgabensammlung in lateinischer Sprache: Die Alkuin zugeschriebenenPropositionesadacuendosiuvenes”. ?sterreichischeAkademiederWissenschaften,Mathematisch-NaturwissenschaftlicheKlasse.Denkschriften, 116. Band, 6. Abhandlung.

    Hermelink, Heinrich, 1978. “Arabic Recreational Mathematics as a Mirror of Age-Old Cultural Relations Between Eastern and Western Civilizations”, pp. 44-52inAhmad Y. Hassan, Ghada Karmi & NizarNamnum (eds),ProceedingsoftheFirstInternationalSymposiumfortheHistoryofArabicScience,April5-12, 1976. Vol. II,PapersinEuropeanLanguages. Aleppo: Institute for the History of Arabic Science, Aleppo University.

    H?yrup, Jens, 1990. “Sub-Scientific Mathematics.Observations on a Pre-Modern Phenomenon”.HistoryofScience,28, 63-86.

    H?yrup, Jens, 2001. “On a Collection of Geometrical Riddles and Their Role in the Shaping of Four to Six‘Algebras’”.ScienceinContext,14, 85-131.

    H?yrup, Jens, 2002a.Lengths,Widths,Surfaces:APortraitofOldBabylonianAlgebraandItsKin. New York: Springer.

    H?yrup, Jens, 2002b. “Seleucid Innovations in the Babylonian ‘Algebraic’ Tradition and Their Kin Abroad”, pp. 9-29inYvonne Dold-Samplonius et al (eds),FromChinatoParis: 2000YearsTransmissionofMathematicalIdeas. (Boethius, 46). Stuttgart: Steiner.

    Libbrecht, Ulrich, 1974. “Indeterminate Analysis: Historical Relations between China, India, Islam and Europe”, pp. 311-314inXIVthInternationalCongressoftheHistoryofScience,ProceedingsNo. 3. Tokyo & Kyoto: Science Council of Japan.

    Needham, Joseph, 1959.ScienceandCivilisationinChina. III.MathematicsandtheSciencesoftheHeavenandtheEarth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Neugebauer, Otto (ed.,trans.), 1935.MathematischeKeilschrift-Texte. I-III. (Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik. Abteilung A: Quellen. 3. Band, erster-dritter Teil). Berlin: Julius Springer, 1935, 1935, 1937.

    Parker, Richard A. (ed.,trans.), 1972.DemoticMathematicalPapyri. Providence & London: Brown University Press.Paton, W. R. (ed., trans.), 1916.TheGreekAnthology.5 vols. New York: G. P. Putnam / London: Heinemann, 1916-1918.

    Sch?ne, Hermann (ed., trans.), 1903. Herons von AlexandriaVermessungslehreundDioptra. Griechisch und deutsch. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Shorey, Paul (ed., trans.), 1930. Plato,TheRepublic. 2 vols. London: Heinemann / New York: Putnam, 1930, 1935.

    Suter, Heinrich, 1910. “Das Buch der Seltenheiten der Rechenkunst von Abū Kmilrī”.BibliothecaMathematica, 3.Folge 11, 100-120.

    Tannery, Paul (ed., trans.), 1893.Diophanti AlexandriniOperaomniacum graecis commentariis. 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner, 1893-1895.

    van Hée, Louis, 1913. “Les cent volailles ou l’analyse indéterminée en Chine”.T’oungPao, 14, 203-210, 435-450.

    Vogel, Kurt, 1983. “Ein Vermessungsproblem reist von China nach Paris”.HistoriaMathematica, 10, 360-367.

    Winter, John Garrett (ed.), 1936.MichiganPapyri. Vol. III.MiscellaneousPapyri. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    塞琉西、古埃及、地中海數(shù)學(xué)與《九章算術(shù)》之“方程”和“勾股”:偶然亦或顯著相似?

    簡斯·休儒

    (羅斯基爾德大學(xué))

    幾何圖示與算術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)的相似性,往往被作為中國與“西方”之間開展數(shù)學(xué)知識與方法交流的證據(jù)。比對《九章算術(shù)》第八章“方程”中某些問題與源自古希臘的相似問題,第九章即關(guān)于直角三角形的“勾股”部分與塞琉西的一部關(guān)于矩形的問題集,得出如下兩點結(jié)論:(1)關(guān)于一些算術(shù)難題(但不含解法)的交流很可能存在——并非“來自希臘”,而是來自商賈們的跨國團體,這些算題激發(fā)了中國“方程”解法的創(chuàng)生,《九章算術(shù)》第八章就是其系統(tǒng)闡述;(2)相反,關(guān)于幾何問題的交流則不太可能(除了一個可能的例外),《九章算術(shù)》第九章“勾股”的系統(tǒng)闡述乃是基于本土的幾何學(xué)實踐之上。

    《九章算術(shù)》 方程 交流 數(shù)學(xué)難題 巴比倫幾何學(xué)

    N091∶O11

    A Article ID 1000- 0224(2016)04- 0463- 14

    猜你喜歡
    九章算術(shù)算術(shù)難題
    《九章算術(shù)注》中的數(shù)學(xué)思想和方法
    借調(diào)難題
    廉政瞭望(2022年8期)2022-05-23 01:18:08
    《九章算術(shù)》
    從《九章算術(shù)》看秦漢女性在經(jīng)濟生產(chǎn)中的作用
    科學(xué)(2020年4期)2020-11-26 08:27:12
    《九章算術(shù)》在初中教材及中考中的呈現(xiàn)研究
    算算術(shù)
    難題大作戰(zhàn)
    學(xué)算術(shù)
    小狗算算術(shù)
    巧解難題
    日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 91国产中文字幕| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 考比视频在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久热在线av| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 精品久久久久久电影网| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 男人操女人黄网站| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 精品酒店卫生间| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久免费观看电影| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产男女内射视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 免费少妇av软件| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲第一青青草原| 欧美成人午夜精品| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 精品亚洲成国产av| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 丝袜美足系列| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 色播在线永久视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 日本午夜av视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 超碰成人久久| 成人影院久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成人国语在线视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 嫩草影院入口| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久99一区二区三区| 欧美在线黄色| 99久久人妻综合| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲四区av| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 自线自在国产av| 老司机靠b影院| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲精品一二三| 嫩草影院入口| av天堂久久9| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久97久久精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 美女主播在线视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 日本欧美视频一区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 成人手机av| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 熟女av电影| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 99九九在线精品视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 最黄视频免费看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 综合色丁香网| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 尾随美女入室| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美在线黄色| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 又大又爽又粗| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 午夜激情av网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品亚洲成国产av| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久久国产一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品一国产av| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| www.av在线官网国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 搡老乐熟女国产| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 嫩草影院入口| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 中文字幕制服av| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久久久视频综合| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 高清欧美精品videossex| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| kizo精华| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 午夜激情久久久久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产极品天堂在线| 中文欧美无线码| 国产激情久久老熟女| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产片内射在线| 高清不卡的av网站| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 性色av一级| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 午夜影院在线不卡| 美女午夜性视频免费| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 香蕉丝袜av| 午夜日本视频在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 多毛熟女@视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 在线 av 中文字幕| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| kizo精华| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产成人91sexporn| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 老熟女久久久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 我的亚洲天堂| 99九九在线精品视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产精品三级大全| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 一区二区三区激情视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 天天添夜夜摸| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 91老司机精品| 乱人伦中国视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一区二区av电影网| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 熟女av电影| 制服诱惑二区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲精品第二区| av.在线天堂| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 永久免费av网站大全| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 深夜精品福利| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日本欧美视频一区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久久精品区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日本wwww免费看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 精品一区二区三卡| 18在线观看网站| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 91国产中文字幕| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久久久久人妻| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 一级毛片我不卡| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 两性夫妻黄色片| 高清不卡的av网站| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 性色av一级| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲综合色网址| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 老司机影院毛片| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久热在线av| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 在线看a的网站| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 黄频高清免费视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 一区二区三区激情视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 丝袜美足系列| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 黄频高清免费视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| xxx大片免费视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产av国产精品国产| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 午夜91福利影院| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲国产av新网站| a 毛片基地| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产亚洲最大av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 综合色丁香网| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久av网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲成色77777| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 9色porny在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日日撸夜夜添| 性色av一级| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲四区av| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| av片东京热男人的天堂| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜福利,免费看| av网站在线播放免费| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产一级毛片在线| 青草久久国产| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 亚洲精品一二三| 国产男女内射视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 青草久久国产| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久久久久久精品精品| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| www.精华液| 国产色婷婷99| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av不卡在线播放| 黄频高清免费视频| 一本久久精品| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| videosex国产| av卡一久久| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 香蕉丝袜av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国精品久久久久久国模美|