• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comprehensive Study on the Inf l uence of Evapotranspiration and Albedo on Surface Temperature Related to Changes in the Leaf Area Index

    2015-05-22 07:57:39ZHUJiawenandZENGXiaodong
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年7期

    ZHU Jiawenand ZENG Xiaodong?

    1International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences,Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

    Comprehensive Study on the Inf l uence of Evapotranspiration and Albedo on Surface Temperature Related to Changes in the Leaf Area Index

    ZHU Jiawen1,2and ZENG Xiaodong?1,3

    1International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences,Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

    Many studies have investigated the inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo and emphasize their separate effects but ignore their interactive inf l uences by changing vegetation status inlarge amplitudes.This paper focuses on the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature by changing the leaf area index(LAI)between 30°–90°N. Two LAI datasets with seasonally different amplitudes of vegetation change between 30°–90°N were used in the simulations. Seasonal differences between the results of the simulations are compared,and the major f i ndings are as follows.(1)The interactive effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature were different over different regions during three seasons[March–April–May(MAM),June–July–August(JJA),and September–October–November(SON)],i.e.,they were always the same over the southeastern United States during these three seasons but were opposite over most regions between 30°–90°N during JJA.(2)Either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant over different areas and during different seasons.For example,evapotranspiration dominated almost all regions between 30°–90°N during JJA,whereas albedo played a dominant role over northwestern Eurasia during MAM and over central Eurasia during SON.(3)The response of evapotranspiration and albedo to an increase in LAI with different ranges showed different paces and signals.With relatively small amplitudes of increased LAI,the rate of the relative increase in evapotranspiration was quick,and positive changes happened in albedo.But both relative changes in evapotranspiration and albedo tended to be gentle,and the ratio of negative changes of albedo increased with relatively large increased amplitudes of LAI.

    surface temperature,evapotranspiration,albedo,leaf area index,comprehensive inf l uence

    1.Introduction

    As the interface between the land surface and the atmosphere,vegetation plays a signif i cant role in regulating the land–atmosphere interaction,thereby affecting regional and global climates.Its variations inf l uence the exchangeof heat, mass,and momentumbetween the land surface and the lower atmosphere(Dickinson et al.,1992;Bonan,1994;Guillevic et al.,2002;Kang et al.,2007;Li and Xue,2010).Pielke et al.(1998)suggested that vegetation dynamics might be as important for climate as other forcings,such as atmospheric dynamics and composition,ocean circulation,ice sheet extent,and orbit perturbations.

    In recent decades,many studies have been conducted to detect the effects of vegetation on albedo(Charney et al., 1975;Sud and Fennessy,1982;Bonan et al.,1992;Claussen et al.,2001),evapotranspiration(ET;Shukla and Mintz, 1982;Chen and Zeng,2012;Zhu and Zeng,2014),and surface roughness length(Sud et al.,1988).Generally speaking,increased vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere is expected to reduce surface albedo because of an increase in the amount of solar radiation absorbed by vegetation,which may result in further regional or even global climate warming.For example,Levis et al.(2000)showed that this process could increase global warming during the 21st century when considering the northward expansion of the boreal forests as a result of climatic warming.Bonf i ls et al.(2012)also determined that an invasion of the tundra by tall shrubs tended to systematically warm the soil.However,increased vegetation also accompanies intensif i ed evapotranspiration,which is favorable for cloud development and causes surface cool-ing(Bounoua et al.,2000;Buermann et al.,2001).These opposing biophysical effects of vegetation—warming through increased energyabsorption(relativelylow albedo)and cooling through increased evaporation—tend to dominate at different latitudes,depending on the regional climate characteristics and geographical features(Meir et al.,2006;Xue et al.,2010).Many studies emphasize one aspect of the effects of increased vegetation,but ignore its interactive inf l uences. Therefore,the goal of this paper is to discuss the comprehensive impacts of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.Throughout this entire paper,we will always maintain the concept that the importance of evapotranspiration and albedo for surface temperature is on the same level.

    Many previous studies used relatively large amplitude changes to investigate the inf l uence of vegetation on temperature.For instance,Dickinson and Henderson-Sellers(1988) and Shukla et al.(1990)replaced tropical forests with grass, which led to warmer and drier conditions.Over the mid–high latitudes,simulations with borealforest result in warmerconditions than those with bare ground or tundra(Bonan et al., 1992).More recently,both Bounoua et al.(2000)and Buermann et al.(2001)applied maximum and minimum leaf area index(LAI)values from yearly satellite records to investigate the impact of extreme variability in the amount of vegetation on temperature.These experiments provide valuable references for understanding the inf l uence of vegetation on climate but also may bracket these inf l uences with relatively large changes in the amount of vegetation.However,in this paper,the results are discussed with different ranges of LAI changes.Furthermore,changes in climate are expected to be larger over the mid–high latitudes relative to the tropics.The entire poleward shift of the boreal ecosystem that arises from regionalwarmingandincreasingCO2levels may havesignificant impacts on climate,including changes in precipitation patterns,carbon levels,and the energy balance(Lucht et al., 2006;Schaphoff et al.,2006;Alo and Wang,2008;O’Ishi and Abe-Ouchi,2009).Thus,the region over 30°–90°N was selected as the research focus.

    In the next section,the model and LAI datasets that were applied in this study,as well as the experimental design, are described.Section 3 presents the results and discussion, emphasizing the comprehensiveeffects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.Finally,concluding remarks are given in section 4.

    2.Model,data,and experimental design

    2.1.Model description

    In this study,we employed the coupled model of the Community Earth System Model(CESM),including the atmosphere and land components of the Community Atmosphere Model version 4(CAM4;Neale et al.,2013)and the Community Land Model version 4(CLM4;Oleson et al.,2010;Lawrence et al.,2011),respectively.CLM4 represents the fundamental physical,chemical,and biological processes of the terrestrial ecosystem and describes the water,energy,and carbon–nitrogen processes by coupling with the carbon–nitrogen model(CN)and the dynamic vegetation model(CNDV,Castillo et al.,2012).When the CN or CNDV model is inactive,the prescribed LAI data is used as the boundary condition.

    2.2.Leaf area index

    Two sets of LAI data were applied in this study.One was the LAI used in CLM4(the default LAI),which is the climatological mean with monthly variability at a 0.9°lat×1.25°lon horizontal resolution.Figure 1 shows its spatial differences between March–April–May(MAM)and December–January–February(DJF),June–July–August(JJA)and DJF, as well as September–October–November(SON)and DJF over 30°–90°N.It is in line with expectations that the average LAI in MAM,JJA and SON should be larger than that in DJF.By and large,the amplitudes of the differences between JJA and DJF are largest,followed by those between SON and DJF,and then MAM and DJF.Therefore,for the purposes of investigating the inf l uence of a change in the LAI in different and reasonable ranges,we constructedanother dataset, the idealized LAI data,from the default LAI dataset.For the idealized LAI,each monthly value over 30°–90°N was the averaged value of DJF of the default LAI,whereas over other regions,it was the same as the default LAI.Consequently, by analyzing the seasonal results of the simulations using the two LAI datasets,the inf l uence of a change in the seasonal amplitudes of the LAI could be investigated.

    2.3.Experimental design

    Two simulations,CTL and IDL,utilizing the default LAI and the idealized LAI,respectively,were performed.Beyond this,the two simulations were totally identical.For example,the atmosphere and land components were active in both simulations,and they were both driven by historical sea surface temperatures for 1979–2003(Hurrell et al.,2008).Both simulations were run at a 0.9°lat×1.25°lon horizontal resolution with the carbon and nitrogen cycles turned off.

    3.Results and discussion

    In this section we discuss the seasonal changes to evapotranspiration and albedo,which were directly inf l uenced by the changes to the LAI,and emphasize their comprehensive inf l uences in determining surface temperature.When referring to differences in the following sections,we mean CTL minus IDL averaged over the last 23 years of the simulations (1981–2003).

    3.1.MAM

    Generally,the CTL’s surface temperature increased over high latitudes and decreased over mid latitudes when compared to IDL(Fig.2).The main statistically signif i cant regions,indicated by the three boxes in the f i gure,were selected as the objective areas.Over the southeastern United States(area 1),the increased LAI led to an increase in bothevapotranspiration(6.37 mm month?1,or 8.7%)and albedo (0.025,or 2.1%),which together contributed to the decrease in surface temperature(Table 1).Over southern Europe(area 2),the surface temperature in CTL also decreased compared to IDL,which mainly resulted from the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration(4.76 mm month?1,or 8.7%)that dominatedthe warmingimpacts of the slightly decreased albedo(?0.02,?1.4%).Over northwestern Eurasia(area 3), however,the albedo in CTL decreased by 0.043,or by about 12.2%,compared to the change in IDL,which dominated the inf l uenceofincreasedevapotranspiration(2.51mmmonth?1, or 15.0%)on surface temperature.Consequently,the CTL’s surface temperature increased 1.58 K on average.In general, over the three regions,the changes to the surface temperature resulted from the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo.In this process,their roles were different, with evapotranspiration being dominant over area 1 and area 2 but albedo being dominant over area 3.

    Table 1.Area averaged differences(CTL?IDL)in LAI(units:m2m?2),evapotranspiration(ET,mm month?1),albedo(%),and surface temperature(T,units:K)over selected regions during MAM,JJA,and SON.Only these grids,over which the differences of surface temperature,evapotranspiration,and albedo are all statistically signif i cant(P<0.05)were selected for calculation.The number in parentheses is the relative differences compared to IDL.

    3.2.JJA

    Compared to IDL,CTL’s evapotranspiration increased signif i cantly,whereas its albedo decreased over most regions in 30°–90°N(Fig.3).Correspondingly,surface temperature of CTL signif i cantly decreased in comparison to that of IDL. Therefore,it is implied that the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration dominated the warming inf l uences of decreased albedo over most regions in the range 30°–90°N. However,albedo still played a role in regulating surface temperature,as illustrated by the spatial heterogeneity of the differences in surface temperature,exceeding 2 K over eastern United States and eastern Russia and below 2 K over other regions,such as central North America and central Eurasia. The changes in albedo also showed a large spatial heterogeneity,but they were large over central North America and central Eurasia and exceeded 2.5%.Relatively,the differences of evapotranspiration over these regions were less heterogeneous than those of albedo,and all exceeded 15 mm month?1.Therefore,the decreased albedo of CTL reduced, to some extent,the decreasein amplitudesof the surfacetemperature induced by the increase in evapotranspiration.

    To further compare the effects of evapotranspiration and albedo,three more areas—central North America(area 4), central Eurasia(area 5),and eastern Russia(area 6)in Fig. 3—were selected in addition to the three areas chosen during MAM.Overarea4andarea5,thechangestoalbedowererelativelylarge,while overarea 6,changestoevapotranspiration were relatively large.Over area 1,the negligibly increased albedo(0.3%)together with the increased evapotranspiration (14.92 mm month?1,or 14.4%)resulted in a decrease in surface temperature(1.89 K).This was consistent with what happened during MAM,although the increased amplitudes of albedo were smaller than those of MAM.Over area 2 and area 3,the averaged effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature were opposite.Finally,cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration(25.3%,27.7%)offset, tosomeextent,thewarmingimpactsofthedecreaseinalbedo (6.2%,3.8%)and led to a decrease in the surface temperature.Over area 2 and area 3,the albedo did not change much,and thus the average surface temperature decreased up to 1.91 and 1.84,respectively.Over area 4 and area 5, however,the albedo in CTL compared to IDL decreased by 16.7%and 16.3%,respectively,which weakened the cooling effects of the increase in evapotranspiration to a large extent. As a result,the average decrease in the surface temperature was 1.36 K and 1.62 K,respectively,which were reduced by 28.8%and 15.2%,respectively,compared to that of area 2.Over area 6,although the decrease in the albedo also exceeded 10%,the absolute and relative increase in the evapotranspiration was too large,and consequently the average decrease in the surface temperature reached up to 2.74 K.In short,when changes in the LAI happened in relatively large amplitudes during JJA,the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration dominated over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N.However,the corresponding albedo changes still played a signif i cant role in regulatingthe surface temperature,which contributed to the heterogeneity of the changes in surface temperature.

    3.3.SON

    In general,compared to IDL,surface temperaturein CTL signif i cantly decreased over eastern North America,western Europe,and eastern China,while it increased over central Eurasia(Fig.4).Therefore,the southeastern United States (area 1),southern Europe(area 2),and central Eurasia(area 5),discussed in section 3.2,were also selected for comparison to the above results during MAM and JJA.

    Over area 1,the results of SON were also in line with observations from during MAM and JJA,i.e.the increased evapotranspiration(4.69 mm month?1,or 9.8%)and the increased albedo(6.0%)were both responsible for the average decrease in the surface temperature(1.58 K).Over area 2,the increasedLAI ledtoan increasein theevapotranspirationand albedo,whichbothcontributedtothedecreaseinsurfacetemperature.This was different from the changes during MAM andJJA,whentheeffectsofchangesintheevapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature were opposite.Over area 5 during SON,CTL’s surface temperature increased by an average of 0.98 K in comparison to that of IDL.This was mainly because of a signif i cant decrease in albedo(11.3%). Meanwhile,the slight decrease in the evapotranspirationalso made a certain contribution.Overall,during SON,the effects of changes in the evapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature of area 1 were consistent with the changes during MAM and JJA,whereas over area 2 and area 5,their roles were different from those observed during MAM and JJA.

    3.4.Discussion

    The scatterplots of the relative changes to CTL’s evapotranspiration and albedo compared to those of IDL over six selectedareasduringJJA(Fig.5)showconsistentresultswith Fig.3b,inwhichoveralmostall ofthegridsCTL’s evapotranspiration increased when compared to IDL.This was mainly because the presence of vegetationwas favorable for increasing the evapotranspirationof the area by extractingadditional water from the soil via roots(Meir et al.,2006).Furthermore, our results also show that,along with changes to the LAI,the relative changes in the evapotranspiration did not increase at the same pace.Over the six selected areas(Fig.5),when the relative amplitudes of changes to the LAI were below a value of about 200%for area 1 to area 5 and a value of 600% for area 6,the relative increase in the amount of evapotranspiration was quick,but it tended to be gentle when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI exceeded those values.Guillevic et al.(2002)suggested that the impact of LAI variability on canopy evapotranspiration is determined by both external environmental factors and internal vegetation factors.They emphasized the effects of saturation over dense vegetation and water stress.Therefore,Fig.5 further reveals that the changes in the evapotranspiration were limited by LAI when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were smaller;whereas when they became larger, the changes to the evapotranspirationwere limited mainly by other external environmentalfactors,i.e.,precipitationor soilmoisture.On the other hand,the albedo also showed different results that corresponded to different relative amplitudes of changes to the LAI.Positive changes happened to the albedo when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were smaller;and when the amplitudes of the changes became larger,the ratio of grids over which negative changes happened to the albedo increased.Similar to the results observed in changes to the evapotranspiration,the changes to the albedo also tended to be gentle,as the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were suf fi ciently large.

    Therefore,the different effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature in different regions and seasons can be explained by the combination of above changed responds and external environmental factors.First,when the amplitudes of the increases to the LAI are relative small, the quick increase in the evapotranspiration and the positive changesto the albedotogethercontributeto a decrease in surface temperature.For example,over area 1 during MAM and SON and area 2 during SON,the amplitudes of the relative changes to the LAI were around 100%,and consequently both evapotranspiration and albedo increased and then togetherresultedina decreasetothe surfacetemperature(Table 1).However,the external environment also plays important roles.For example,over area 3 during MAM,although the averageamplitudeoftherelativechangetotheLAI was small (19%),the change to the albedo was still negative.In this region boreal trees and shrubs stand above snow cover,the large contrast between leaf and snow albedo may have strong impact on land surface energy balance,further increase the albedo difference between the CTL and IDL experiments. Second,when the amplitudes of the increase to the LAI were relatively large,the warming effects of the decrease in albedo were reversed with the cooling in fl uences from the increase in evapotranspiration.Either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant depending on the climate’s characteristics and relative changes of themselves.For instance, over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N during JJA, evapotranspiration played a dominant role in regulating the surface temperature in comparison to albedo,which is also because of the relative suf fi cient precipitation.In contrast, duringSON,the signi fi cant decrease in the albedodominated area 5 when compared to the slight changes in the evapotranspiration due to not suf fi cient precipitation.

    Of course,the characteristics of LAI change are strong correlated to the feature of local vegetation composition,in particular the dominant plant functional type(PFT).For example,evergreen and deciduous plants have different phenology,and woody plants(trees and shrubs)behave different with grasses duringsnow cover.Our current work focuses on the regional effects of changed LAI,further study may investigate the different impacts of PFTs within a gridcell,as well as the regional impacts based on the distribution of different plant functional types.

    This paper emphasizes the impacts of local land–atmosphere interactions on surface temperature.However, local climate(e.g.,temperature,precipitation,etc)is also infl uenced by the change in large scale atmospheric circulation,which may represent the regional and even global LAI changes between the two experiments.Further experiments are needed to quantitate the contributions from different regions.

    4.Conclusion

    The CESM was used to investigate the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature under seasonal situations with different ranges of changes to the LAI.

    The interactive effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature were different for six selected areas during the three chosen seasons(MAM,JJA,and SON). For the southeastern United States(area 1)during all three seasons,as well as for southern Europe(area 2)during SON, increases to both evapotranspiration and albedo contributed to cooling effects and resulted in decreases to the surface temperature.However,for the other f i ve regions during JJA, the average albedo decreased,resulting in warming effects, which were reversed with the cooling inf l uences of the increases to the evapotranspiration.In addition,either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant over different areas and different seasons.During JJA,the cooling effects of increases in the evapotranspiration dominated the warming inf l uences of decreases in albedo over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N.However,over northwestern Eurasia(area 3)during MAM and central Eurasia(area 5)during SON,the changes to the albedo played a dominant role in determining the surface temperature in comparison to changes in the evapotranspiration.

    The response of the evapotranspirationand albedo to different increases in the LAI showed distinct paces and signals. When the amplitudes of the increase to the LAI were relatively small,the rate of the relative increase in evapotranspiration was quick;whereas,it tended to be gentle when the amplitudes of increase in the LAI became relatively large. Meanwhile,positive changes happened to the albedo when the amplitudes of increase in the LAI were relatively small. When the amplitudes of the changes became larger,the ratio of grids over which the negative changes happened to the albedo increased,and ultimately the decreases in the amplitudes also tended to be gentle.Therefore,these effects explain the changing interactive and dominant inf l uences of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.

    This paper has highlighted the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature and discussed their changes in relation to a range of changes to the LAI.The results were based on six selected areas during three seasons.More studies are necessary to investigate the effects over other regions.Furthermore,the characteristics of the response of evapotranspiration and albedo to changes in the LAI using different ranges need to be further investigated so as to identifythe possible relationshipsbetween the results and climatic characteristics or vegetation types.

    Acknowledgements.This work was supported by the Chi-nese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program (Grant No.XDA05110103)and the National High Technology ResearchandDevelopment Programof China(863Program,Grant No. 2009AA122100).

    REFERENCES

    Alo,C.A.,and G.L.Wang,2008:Potential future changes of theterrestrialecosystem based on climateprojections byeight general circulation models.J.Geophys.Res.-Biogeosci.,113, doi:10.1029/2007JG000528.

    Bonan,G.B.,1994:Comparison of two land-surface process models using prescribed forcings.J.Geophys.Res.-(Atmos),99, 25 803–25 818.

    Bonan,G.B.,D.Pollard,and S.L.Thompson,1992:Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate.Nature,359,716–718.

    Bonf i ls,C.J.W.,T.J.Phillips,D.M.Lawrence,P.Cameron-Smith,W.J.Riley,and Z.M.Subin,2012:Onthe inf l uenceof shrub height and expansion on northern high latitude climate. Environ.Res.Lett.,7,doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015503.

    Bounoua,L.,G.J.Collatz,S.O.Los,P.J.Sellers,D.A.Dazlich, C.J.Tucker,and D.A.Randall,2000:Sensitivity of climate to changes in NDVI.J.Climate,13,2277–2292.

    Buermann,W.,J.R.Dong,X.B.Zeng,R.B.Myneni,and R.E. Dickinson,2001:Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations.J.Climate,14,3536–3550.

    Castillo,C.K.G.,S.Levis,and P.Thornton,2012:Evaluation of the new CNDV option of the community land model:Effectsof dynamic vegetationand interactivenitrogenonCLM4 means and variability.J.Climate,25,3702–3714.

    Charney,J.,P.H.Stone,and W.J.Quirk,1975:Drought in the sahara:A biogeophysical feedback mechnism.Science,187, 434–435.

    Chen,H.,and X.D.Zeng,2012:The impacts of the interannual variability of vegetation on the interannual variability of global evapotranspiration:A modeling study.Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,5,225–230.

    Claussen,M.,V.Brovkin,and A.Ganopolski,2001:Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks oflarge-scaleland cover change.Geophys.Res.Lett.,28,1011–1014.

    Dickinson,R.E.,and A.Henderson-Sellers,1988:Modelling tropical deforestation—A study of GCM land surface parameterization.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,114,439–462.

    Dickinson,R.E.,A.Henderson-Sellers,C.Rosenzweig,and P.J. Sellers,1992:Evapotranspiration models with canopy resistance for use in climate models.Agric.Forest Meteor.,54, 373–388.

    Guillevic,P.,R.D.Koster,M.J.Suarez,L.Bounoua,G.J.Collatz,S.O.Los,and S.P.P.Mahanama,2002:Inf l uence of the interannual variability of vegetation on the surface energy balance—A global sensitivity study.J.Hydrometeorol., 3,617–629.

    Hurrell,J.W.,J.J.Hack,D.Shea,J.M.Caron,and J.Rosinski, 2008:A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model.J.Climate, 21,5145–5153.

    Kang,H.S.,Y.K.Xue,and G.J.Collatz,2007:Impact assessment of satellite-derivedleaf areaindex datasets using ageneral circulation model.J.Climate,20,993–1015.

    Lawrence,D.M.,and Coauthors,2011:Parameterizationimprovements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model.Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems,3,doi:10.1029/2011MS00045.

    Levis,S.,J.A.Foley,and D.Pollard,2000:Large-scale vegetation feedbacks on a doubled CO2climate.J.Climate,13,1313–1325.

    Li,Q.,and Y.K.Xue,2010:Simulated impacts of land cover change on summer climate in the Tibetan Plateau.Environ. Res.Lett.,5,doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/015102.

    Lucht,W.,S.Schaphoff,T.Erbrecht,U.Heyder,and W.Cramer, 2006:Terrestrial vegetation redistribution and carbon balance under climate change.Carbon Balance and Management,1, doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-6.

    Meir,P.,P.Cox,and J.Grace,2006:The inf l uence of terrestrial ecosystems on climate.Trends inEcologyEvolution,21,254–260.

    Neale,R.B.,J.Richter,S.Park,P.H.Lauritzen,S.J.Vavrus,P.J. Rasch,and M.Zhang,2013:The mean climate of the community atmosphere model(CAM4)in forced SST and fully coupled experiments.J.Climate,26,5150–5168.

    O’Ishi,R.,and A.Abe-Ouchi,2009:Inf l uence of dynamic vegetation on climate change arising from increasing CO2.Climate Dyn.,33,645–663.

    Oleson,K.W.,and Coauthors,2010:Technical description of version 4.0 of the community land model(CLM).NCAR Technical Note,NCAR/TN478+STR,National Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder,Colorado,257 pp.

    Pielke,R.A.,R.Avissar,M.Raupach,A.J.Dolman,X.B.Zeng, and A.S.Denning,1998:Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems:Inf l uence on weather and climate.Global Change Biology,4,461–475.

    Schaphoff,S.,W.Lucht,D.Gerten,S.Sitch,W.Cramer,and I. C.Prentice,2006:Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections.Climate Change,74,97–122.

    Shukla,J.,and Y.Mintz,1982:Inf l uence of land-surfaceevapotranspiration on the earth’s climate.Science,215,1498–1501. Sud,Y.C.,J.Shukla,and Y.Mintz,1988:Inf l uence of Land Surface-Roughness on Atmospheric Circulation and Precipitation—A Sensitivity Study With A General-Circulation Model.J.Appl.Meteorol.,27,1036–1054.

    Shukla,J.,C.Nobre,and P.Sellers,1990:Amazon deforestation and climate change.Science,247,1322–1325.

    Sud,Y.C.,and M.Fennessy,1982:A study of the inf l uence of surface albedo on July circulation in semi-arid regions using the GLAS GCM.J.Climatol.,2,105–125.

    Xue,Y.K.,F.De Sales,R.Vasic,C.R.Mechoso,A.Arakawa,and S.Prince,2010:Global and seasonal assessment of interactions between climate and vegetation biophysical processes: A GCM study with different land-vegetation representations. J.Climate,23,1411–1433.

    Zhu,J.W.,and X.D.Zeng,2014:Comparison of the inf l uence of interannual vegetation variability between off l ine and online simulations.Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,7,453–457,doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.14.0031.

    :Zhu,J.W.,and X.D.Zeng,2015:Comprehensive study on the inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature related to changes in the leaf area index.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,32(7),935–942,

    10.1007/s00376-014-4045-z.

    (Received 10 March 2014;revised 5 November 2014;accepted 2 December 2014)

    ?Corresponding author:ZENG Xiaodong Email:xdzeng@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ?Institute of Atmospheric Physics/Chinese Academy of Sciences,and Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    如何舔出高潮| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产成人精品婷婷| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 免费观看在线日韩| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av免费在线看不卡| 观看美女的网站| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚州av有码| av一本久久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| av福利片在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 五月天丁香电影| 国产91av在线免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产视频内射| 97超碰精品成人国产| av.在线天堂| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美另类一区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| av免费观看日本| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 精品久久久噜噜| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 99热全是精品| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲国产av新网站| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 97在线视频观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 少妇 在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 高清毛片免费看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| eeuss影院久久| 精品久久久久久久末码| av在线老鸭窝| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产成人精品婷婷| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产一级毛片在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美成人a在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产成人福利小说| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 在线免费十八禁| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲精品自拍成人| videossex国产| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 免费看不卡的av| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品成人在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 少妇丰满av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久久久网色| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久久九九精品影院| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 舔av片在线| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 尾随美女入室| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 婷婷色综合www| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲色图av天堂| av国产免费在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美97在线视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 国产在线男女| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 一级爰片在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日韩伦理黄色片| 成人国产麻豆网| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人手机av| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 青草久久国产| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 在线天堂中文资源库| 青草久久国产| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日本wwww免费看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲综合色网址| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产又爽黄色视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品三级大全| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲第一av免费看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久婷婷青草| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久欧美国产精品| 日本wwww免费看| 美国免费a级毛片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 高清av免费在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 中文天堂在线官网| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产 精品1| 人妻一区二区av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 曰老女人黄片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 观看av在线不卡| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 日本wwww免费看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | av在线播放精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品.久久久| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 久久av网站| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 一区福利在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品免费大片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品 国内视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 只有这里有精品99| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 无限看片的www在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 在线观看人妻少妇| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 97在线人人人人妻| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 一级片'在线观看视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久久久视频综合| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 老司机靠b影院| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 大香蕉久久网| 久久 成人 亚洲| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无人区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 看免费av毛片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 99久久综合免费| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 制服人妻中文乱码| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 熟女av电影| 久久青草综合色| kizo精华| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 99久久人妻综合| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 另类精品久久| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 曰老女人黄片| 91精品三级在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| av国产精品久久久久影院| 深夜精品福利| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 乱人伦中国视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| av有码第一页| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产色婷婷99| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 嫩草影院入口| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 777米奇影视久久| 日日啪夜夜爽| 一区二区三区精品91| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产乱来视频区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品无大码| 9热在线视频观看99| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 18禁观看日本| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美在线黄色| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 亚洲四区av| 中文欧美无线码| videos熟女内射| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产av精品麻豆| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 赤兔流量卡办理| 伦理电影免费视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲av福利一区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 91老司机精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久久网色| 电影成人av| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲伊人色综图| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| kizo精华| 一本久久精品| 男女免费视频国产| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 赤兔流量卡办理| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲av福利一区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 丁香六月天网| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一级片'在线观看视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久99精品国语久久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品三级大全| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 国产又爽黄色视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 9191精品国产免费久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 久久97久久精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 我的亚洲天堂| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品一二三| 五月天丁香电影| 成人国产麻豆网| h视频一区二区三区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 高清不卡的av网站| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久性视频一级片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 丝袜美足系列| 中文天堂在线官网| videos熟女内射| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| av.在线天堂| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人|