• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comprehensive Study on the Inf l uence of Evapotranspiration and Albedo on Surface Temperature Related to Changes in the Leaf Area Index

    2015-05-22 07:57:39ZHUJiawenandZENGXiaodong
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年7期

    ZHU Jiawenand ZENG Xiaodong?

    1International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences,Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

    Comprehensive Study on the Inf l uence of Evapotranspiration and Albedo on Surface Temperature Related to Changes in the Leaf Area Index

    ZHU Jiawen1,2and ZENG Xiaodong?1,3

    1International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences,Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049

    3Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

    Many studies have investigated the inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo and emphasize their separate effects but ignore their interactive inf l uences by changing vegetation status inlarge amplitudes.This paper focuses on the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature by changing the leaf area index(LAI)between 30°–90°N. Two LAI datasets with seasonally different amplitudes of vegetation change between 30°–90°N were used in the simulations. Seasonal differences between the results of the simulations are compared,and the major f i ndings are as follows.(1)The interactive effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature were different over different regions during three seasons[March–April–May(MAM),June–July–August(JJA),and September–October–November(SON)],i.e.,they were always the same over the southeastern United States during these three seasons but were opposite over most regions between 30°–90°N during JJA.(2)Either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant over different areas and during different seasons.For example,evapotranspiration dominated almost all regions between 30°–90°N during JJA,whereas albedo played a dominant role over northwestern Eurasia during MAM and over central Eurasia during SON.(3)The response of evapotranspiration and albedo to an increase in LAI with different ranges showed different paces and signals.With relatively small amplitudes of increased LAI,the rate of the relative increase in evapotranspiration was quick,and positive changes happened in albedo.But both relative changes in evapotranspiration and albedo tended to be gentle,and the ratio of negative changes of albedo increased with relatively large increased amplitudes of LAI.

    surface temperature,evapotranspiration,albedo,leaf area index,comprehensive inf l uence

    1.Introduction

    As the interface between the land surface and the atmosphere,vegetation plays a signif i cant role in regulating the land–atmosphere interaction,thereby affecting regional and global climates.Its variations inf l uence the exchangeof heat, mass,and momentumbetween the land surface and the lower atmosphere(Dickinson et al.,1992;Bonan,1994;Guillevic et al.,2002;Kang et al.,2007;Li and Xue,2010).Pielke et al.(1998)suggested that vegetation dynamics might be as important for climate as other forcings,such as atmospheric dynamics and composition,ocean circulation,ice sheet extent,and orbit perturbations.

    In recent decades,many studies have been conducted to detect the effects of vegetation on albedo(Charney et al., 1975;Sud and Fennessy,1982;Bonan et al.,1992;Claussen et al.,2001),evapotranspiration(ET;Shukla and Mintz, 1982;Chen and Zeng,2012;Zhu and Zeng,2014),and surface roughness length(Sud et al.,1988).Generally speaking,increased vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere is expected to reduce surface albedo because of an increase in the amount of solar radiation absorbed by vegetation,which may result in further regional or even global climate warming.For example,Levis et al.(2000)showed that this process could increase global warming during the 21st century when considering the northward expansion of the boreal forests as a result of climatic warming.Bonf i ls et al.(2012)also determined that an invasion of the tundra by tall shrubs tended to systematically warm the soil.However,increased vegetation also accompanies intensif i ed evapotranspiration,which is favorable for cloud development and causes surface cool-ing(Bounoua et al.,2000;Buermann et al.,2001).These opposing biophysical effects of vegetation—warming through increased energyabsorption(relativelylow albedo)and cooling through increased evaporation—tend to dominate at different latitudes,depending on the regional climate characteristics and geographical features(Meir et al.,2006;Xue et al.,2010).Many studies emphasize one aspect of the effects of increased vegetation,but ignore its interactive inf l uences. Therefore,the goal of this paper is to discuss the comprehensive impacts of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.Throughout this entire paper,we will always maintain the concept that the importance of evapotranspiration and albedo for surface temperature is on the same level.

    Many previous studies used relatively large amplitude changes to investigate the inf l uence of vegetation on temperature.For instance,Dickinson and Henderson-Sellers(1988) and Shukla et al.(1990)replaced tropical forests with grass, which led to warmer and drier conditions.Over the mid–high latitudes,simulations with borealforest result in warmerconditions than those with bare ground or tundra(Bonan et al., 1992).More recently,both Bounoua et al.(2000)and Buermann et al.(2001)applied maximum and minimum leaf area index(LAI)values from yearly satellite records to investigate the impact of extreme variability in the amount of vegetation on temperature.These experiments provide valuable references for understanding the inf l uence of vegetation on climate but also may bracket these inf l uences with relatively large changes in the amount of vegetation.However,in this paper,the results are discussed with different ranges of LAI changes.Furthermore,changes in climate are expected to be larger over the mid–high latitudes relative to the tropics.The entire poleward shift of the boreal ecosystem that arises from regionalwarmingandincreasingCO2levels may havesignificant impacts on climate,including changes in precipitation patterns,carbon levels,and the energy balance(Lucht et al., 2006;Schaphoff et al.,2006;Alo and Wang,2008;O’Ishi and Abe-Ouchi,2009).Thus,the region over 30°–90°N was selected as the research focus.

    In the next section,the model and LAI datasets that were applied in this study,as well as the experimental design, are described.Section 3 presents the results and discussion, emphasizing the comprehensiveeffects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.Finally,concluding remarks are given in section 4.

    2.Model,data,and experimental design

    2.1.Model description

    In this study,we employed the coupled model of the Community Earth System Model(CESM),including the atmosphere and land components of the Community Atmosphere Model version 4(CAM4;Neale et al.,2013)and the Community Land Model version 4(CLM4;Oleson et al.,2010;Lawrence et al.,2011),respectively.CLM4 represents the fundamental physical,chemical,and biological processes of the terrestrial ecosystem and describes the water,energy,and carbon–nitrogen processes by coupling with the carbon–nitrogen model(CN)and the dynamic vegetation model(CNDV,Castillo et al.,2012).When the CN or CNDV model is inactive,the prescribed LAI data is used as the boundary condition.

    2.2.Leaf area index

    Two sets of LAI data were applied in this study.One was the LAI used in CLM4(the default LAI),which is the climatological mean with monthly variability at a 0.9°lat×1.25°lon horizontal resolution.Figure 1 shows its spatial differences between March–April–May(MAM)and December–January–February(DJF),June–July–August(JJA)and DJF, as well as September–October–November(SON)and DJF over 30°–90°N.It is in line with expectations that the average LAI in MAM,JJA and SON should be larger than that in DJF.By and large,the amplitudes of the differences between JJA and DJF are largest,followed by those between SON and DJF,and then MAM and DJF.Therefore,for the purposes of investigating the inf l uence of a change in the LAI in different and reasonable ranges,we constructedanother dataset, the idealized LAI data,from the default LAI dataset.For the idealized LAI,each monthly value over 30°–90°N was the averaged value of DJF of the default LAI,whereas over other regions,it was the same as the default LAI.Consequently, by analyzing the seasonal results of the simulations using the two LAI datasets,the inf l uence of a change in the seasonal amplitudes of the LAI could be investigated.

    2.3.Experimental design

    Two simulations,CTL and IDL,utilizing the default LAI and the idealized LAI,respectively,were performed.Beyond this,the two simulations were totally identical.For example,the atmosphere and land components were active in both simulations,and they were both driven by historical sea surface temperatures for 1979–2003(Hurrell et al.,2008).Both simulations were run at a 0.9°lat×1.25°lon horizontal resolution with the carbon and nitrogen cycles turned off.

    3.Results and discussion

    In this section we discuss the seasonal changes to evapotranspiration and albedo,which were directly inf l uenced by the changes to the LAI,and emphasize their comprehensive inf l uences in determining surface temperature.When referring to differences in the following sections,we mean CTL minus IDL averaged over the last 23 years of the simulations (1981–2003).

    3.1.MAM

    Generally,the CTL’s surface temperature increased over high latitudes and decreased over mid latitudes when compared to IDL(Fig.2).The main statistically signif i cant regions,indicated by the three boxes in the f i gure,were selected as the objective areas.Over the southeastern United States(area 1),the increased LAI led to an increase in bothevapotranspiration(6.37 mm month?1,or 8.7%)and albedo (0.025,or 2.1%),which together contributed to the decrease in surface temperature(Table 1).Over southern Europe(area 2),the surface temperature in CTL also decreased compared to IDL,which mainly resulted from the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration(4.76 mm month?1,or 8.7%)that dominatedthe warmingimpacts of the slightly decreased albedo(?0.02,?1.4%).Over northwestern Eurasia(area 3), however,the albedo in CTL decreased by 0.043,or by about 12.2%,compared to the change in IDL,which dominated the inf l uenceofincreasedevapotranspiration(2.51mmmonth?1, or 15.0%)on surface temperature.Consequently,the CTL’s surface temperature increased 1.58 K on average.In general, over the three regions,the changes to the surface temperature resulted from the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo.In this process,their roles were different, with evapotranspiration being dominant over area 1 and area 2 but albedo being dominant over area 3.

    Table 1.Area averaged differences(CTL?IDL)in LAI(units:m2m?2),evapotranspiration(ET,mm month?1),albedo(%),and surface temperature(T,units:K)over selected regions during MAM,JJA,and SON.Only these grids,over which the differences of surface temperature,evapotranspiration,and albedo are all statistically signif i cant(P<0.05)were selected for calculation.The number in parentheses is the relative differences compared to IDL.

    3.2.JJA

    Compared to IDL,CTL’s evapotranspiration increased signif i cantly,whereas its albedo decreased over most regions in 30°–90°N(Fig.3).Correspondingly,surface temperature of CTL signif i cantly decreased in comparison to that of IDL. Therefore,it is implied that the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration dominated the warming inf l uences of decreased albedo over most regions in the range 30°–90°N. However,albedo still played a role in regulating surface temperature,as illustrated by the spatial heterogeneity of the differences in surface temperature,exceeding 2 K over eastern United States and eastern Russia and below 2 K over other regions,such as central North America and central Eurasia. The changes in albedo also showed a large spatial heterogeneity,but they were large over central North America and central Eurasia and exceeded 2.5%.Relatively,the differences of evapotranspiration over these regions were less heterogeneous than those of albedo,and all exceeded 15 mm month?1.Therefore,the decreased albedo of CTL reduced, to some extent,the decreasein amplitudesof the surfacetemperature induced by the increase in evapotranspiration.

    To further compare the effects of evapotranspiration and albedo,three more areas—central North America(area 4), central Eurasia(area 5),and eastern Russia(area 6)in Fig. 3—were selected in addition to the three areas chosen during MAM.Overarea4andarea5,thechangestoalbedowererelativelylarge,while overarea 6,changestoevapotranspiration were relatively large.Over area 1,the negligibly increased albedo(0.3%)together with the increased evapotranspiration (14.92 mm month?1,or 14.4%)resulted in a decrease in surface temperature(1.89 K).This was consistent with what happened during MAM,although the increased amplitudes of albedo were smaller than those of MAM.Over area 2 and area 3,the averaged effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature were opposite.Finally,cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration(25.3%,27.7%)offset, tosomeextent,thewarmingimpactsofthedecreaseinalbedo (6.2%,3.8%)and led to a decrease in the surface temperature.Over area 2 and area 3,the albedo did not change much,and thus the average surface temperature decreased up to 1.91 and 1.84,respectively.Over area 4 and area 5, however,the albedo in CTL compared to IDL decreased by 16.7%and 16.3%,respectively,which weakened the cooling effects of the increase in evapotranspiration to a large extent. As a result,the average decrease in the surface temperature was 1.36 K and 1.62 K,respectively,which were reduced by 28.8%and 15.2%,respectively,compared to that of area 2.Over area 6,although the decrease in the albedo also exceeded 10%,the absolute and relative increase in the evapotranspiration was too large,and consequently the average decrease in the surface temperature reached up to 2.74 K.In short,when changes in the LAI happened in relatively large amplitudes during JJA,the cooling effects of increased evapotranspiration dominated over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N.However,the corresponding albedo changes still played a signif i cant role in regulatingthe surface temperature,which contributed to the heterogeneity of the changes in surface temperature.

    3.3.SON

    In general,compared to IDL,surface temperaturein CTL signif i cantly decreased over eastern North America,western Europe,and eastern China,while it increased over central Eurasia(Fig.4).Therefore,the southeastern United States (area 1),southern Europe(area 2),and central Eurasia(area 5),discussed in section 3.2,were also selected for comparison to the above results during MAM and JJA.

    Over area 1,the results of SON were also in line with observations from during MAM and JJA,i.e.the increased evapotranspiration(4.69 mm month?1,or 9.8%)and the increased albedo(6.0%)were both responsible for the average decrease in the surface temperature(1.58 K).Over area 2,the increasedLAI ledtoan increasein theevapotranspirationand albedo,whichbothcontributedtothedecreaseinsurfacetemperature.This was different from the changes during MAM andJJA,whentheeffectsofchangesintheevapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature were opposite.Over area 5 during SON,CTL’s surface temperature increased by an average of 0.98 K in comparison to that of IDL.This was mainly because of a signif i cant decrease in albedo(11.3%). Meanwhile,the slight decrease in the evapotranspirationalso made a certain contribution.Overall,during SON,the effects of changes in the evapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature of area 1 were consistent with the changes during MAM and JJA,whereas over area 2 and area 5,their roles were different from those observed during MAM and JJA.

    3.4.Discussion

    The scatterplots of the relative changes to CTL’s evapotranspiration and albedo compared to those of IDL over six selectedareasduringJJA(Fig.5)showconsistentresultswith Fig.3b,inwhichoveralmostall ofthegridsCTL’s evapotranspiration increased when compared to IDL.This was mainly because the presence of vegetationwas favorable for increasing the evapotranspirationof the area by extractingadditional water from the soil via roots(Meir et al.,2006).Furthermore, our results also show that,along with changes to the LAI,the relative changes in the evapotranspiration did not increase at the same pace.Over the six selected areas(Fig.5),when the relative amplitudes of changes to the LAI were below a value of about 200%for area 1 to area 5 and a value of 600% for area 6,the relative increase in the amount of evapotranspiration was quick,but it tended to be gentle when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI exceeded those values.Guillevic et al.(2002)suggested that the impact of LAI variability on canopy evapotranspiration is determined by both external environmental factors and internal vegetation factors.They emphasized the effects of saturation over dense vegetation and water stress.Therefore,Fig.5 further reveals that the changes in the evapotranspiration were limited by LAI when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were smaller;whereas when they became larger, the changes to the evapotranspirationwere limited mainly by other external environmentalfactors,i.e.,precipitationor soilmoisture.On the other hand,the albedo also showed different results that corresponded to different relative amplitudes of changes to the LAI.Positive changes happened to the albedo when the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were smaller;and when the amplitudes of the changes became larger,the ratio of grids over which negative changes happened to the albedo increased.Similar to the results observed in changes to the evapotranspiration,the changes to the albedo also tended to be gentle,as the relative amplitudes of the changes to the LAI were suf fi ciently large.

    Therefore,the different effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature in different regions and seasons can be explained by the combination of above changed responds and external environmental factors.First,when the amplitudes of the increases to the LAI are relative small, the quick increase in the evapotranspiration and the positive changesto the albedotogethercontributeto a decrease in surface temperature.For example,over area 1 during MAM and SON and area 2 during SON,the amplitudes of the relative changes to the LAI were around 100%,and consequently both evapotranspiration and albedo increased and then togetherresultedina decreasetothe surfacetemperature(Table 1).However,the external environment also plays important roles.For example,over area 3 during MAM,although the averageamplitudeoftherelativechangetotheLAI was small (19%),the change to the albedo was still negative.In this region boreal trees and shrubs stand above snow cover,the large contrast between leaf and snow albedo may have strong impact on land surface energy balance,further increase the albedo difference between the CTL and IDL experiments. Second,when the amplitudes of the increase to the LAI were relatively large,the warming effects of the decrease in albedo were reversed with the cooling in fl uences from the increase in evapotranspiration.Either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant depending on the climate’s characteristics and relative changes of themselves.For instance, over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N during JJA, evapotranspiration played a dominant role in regulating the surface temperature in comparison to albedo,which is also because of the relative suf fi cient precipitation.In contrast, duringSON,the signi fi cant decrease in the albedodominated area 5 when compared to the slight changes in the evapotranspiration due to not suf fi cient precipitation.

    Of course,the characteristics of LAI change are strong correlated to the feature of local vegetation composition,in particular the dominant plant functional type(PFT).For example,evergreen and deciduous plants have different phenology,and woody plants(trees and shrubs)behave different with grasses duringsnow cover.Our current work focuses on the regional effects of changed LAI,further study may investigate the different impacts of PFTs within a gridcell,as well as the regional impacts based on the distribution of different plant functional types.

    This paper emphasizes the impacts of local land–atmosphere interactions on surface temperature.However, local climate(e.g.,temperature,precipitation,etc)is also infl uenced by the change in large scale atmospheric circulation,which may represent the regional and even global LAI changes between the two experiments.Further experiments are needed to quantitate the contributions from different regions.

    4.Conclusion

    The CESM was used to investigate the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature under seasonal situations with different ranges of changes to the LAI.

    The interactive effects of evapotranspiration and albedo on the surface temperature were different for six selected areas during the three chosen seasons(MAM,JJA,and SON). For the southeastern United States(area 1)during all three seasons,as well as for southern Europe(area 2)during SON, increases to both evapotranspiration and albedo contributed to cooling effects and resulted in decreases to the surface temperature.However,for the other f i ve regions during JJA, the average albedo decreased,resulting in warming effects, which were reversed with the cooling inf l uences of the increases to the evapotranspiration.In addition,either evapotranspiration or albedo tended to be dominant over different areas and different seasons.During JJA,the cooling effects of increases in the evapotranspiration dominated the warming inf l uences of decreases in albedo over almost all regions in the range of 30°–90°N.However,over northwestern Eurasia(area 3)during MAM and central Eurasia(area 5)during SON,the changes to the albedo played a dominant role in determining the surface temperature in comparison to changes in the evapotranspiration.

    The response of the evapotranspirationand albedo to different increases in the LAI showed distinct paces and signals. When the amplitudes of the increase to the LAI were relatively small,the rate of the relative increase in evapotranspiration was quick;whereas,it tended to be gentle when the amplitudes of increase in the LAI became relatively large. Meanwhile,positive changes happened to the albedo when the amplitudes of increase in the LAI were relatively small. When the amplitudes of the changes became larger,the ratio of grids over which the negative changes happened to the albedo increased,and ultimately the decreases in the amplitudes also tended to be gentle.Therefore,these effects explain the changing interactive and dominant inf l uences of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature.

    This paper has highlighted the comprehensive inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature and discussed their changes in relation to a range of changes to the LAI.The results were based on six selected areas during three seasons.More studies are necessary to investigate the effects over other regions.Furthermore,the characteristics of the response of evapotranspiration and albedo to changes in the LAI using different ranges need to be further investigated so as to identifythe possible relationshipsbetween the results and climatic characteristics or vegetation types.

    Acknowledgements.This work was supported by the Chi-nese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program (Grant No.XDA05110103)and the National High Technology ResearchandDevelopment Programof China(863Program,Grant No. 2009AA122100).

    REFERENCES

    Alo,C.A.,and G.L.Wang,2008:Potential future changes of theterrestrialecosystem based on climateprojections byeight general circulation models.J.Geophys.Res.-Biogeosci.,113, doi:10.1029/2007JG000528.

    Bonan,G.B.,1994:Comparison of two land-surface process models using prescribed forcings.J.Geophys.Res.-(Atmos),99, 25 803–25 818.

    Bonan,G.B.,D.Pollard,and S.L.Thompson,1992:Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate.Nature,359,716–718.

    Bonf i ls,C.J.W.,T.J.Phillips,D.M.Lawrence,P.Cameron-Smith,W.J.Riley,and Z.M.Subin,2012:Onthe inf l uenceof shrub height and expansion on northern high latitude climate. Environ.Res.Lett.,7,doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015503.

    Bounoua,L.,G.J.Collatz,S.O.Los,P.J.Sellers,D.A.Dazlich, C.J.Tucker,and D.A.Randall,2000:Sensitivity of climate to changes in NDVI.J.Climate,13,2277–2292.

    Buermann,W.,J.R.Dong,X.B.Zeng,R.B.Myneni,and R.E. Dickinson,2001:Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations.J.Climate,14,3536–3550.

    Castillo,C.K.G.,S.Levis,and P.Thornton,2012:Evaluation of the new CNDV option of the community land model:Effectsof dynamic vegetationand interactivenitrogenonCLM4 means and variability.J.Climate,25,3702–3714.

    Charney,J.,P.H.Stone,and W.J.Quirk,1975:Drought in the sahara:A biogeophysical feedback mechnism.Science,187, 434–435.

    Chen,H.,and X.D.Zeng,2012:The impacts of the interannual variability of vegetation on the interannual variability of global evapotranspiration:A modeling study.Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,5,225–230.

    Claussen,M.,V.Brovkin,and A.Ganopolski,2001:Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks oflarge-scaleland cover change.Geophys.Res.Lett.,28,1011–1014.

    Dickinson,R.E.,and A.Henderson-Sellers,1988:Modelling tropical deforestation—A study of GCM land surface parameterization.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,114,439–462.

    Dickinson,R.E.,A.Henderson-Sellers,C.Rosenzweig,and P.J. Sellers,1992:Evapotranspiration models with canopy resistance for use in climate models.Agric.Forest Meteor.,54, 373–388.

    Guillevic,P.,R.D.Koster,M.J.Suarez,L.Bounoua,G.J.Collatz,S.O.Los,and S.P.P.Mahanama,2002:Inf l uence of the interannual variability of vegetation on the surface energy balance—A global sensitivity study.J.Hydrometeorol., 3,617–629.

    Hurrell,J.W.,J.J.Hack,D.Shea,J.M.Caron,and J.Rosinski, 2008:A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model.J.Climate, 21,5145–5153.

    Kang,H.S.,Y.K.Xue,and G.J.Collatz,2007:Impact assessment of satellite-derivedleaf areaindex datasets using ageneral circulation model.J.Climate,20,993–1015.

    Lawrence,D.M.,and Coauthors,2011:Parameterizationimprovements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model.Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems,3,doi:10.1029/2011MS00045.

    Levis,S.,J.A.Foley,and D.Pollard,2000:Large-scale vegetation feedbacks on a doubled CO2climate.J.Climate,13,1313–1325.

    Li,Q.,and Y.K.Xue,2010:Simulated impacts of land cover change on summer climate in the Tibetan Plateau.Environ. Res.Lett.,5,doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/015102.

    Lucht,W.,S.Schaphoff,T.Erbrecht,U.Heyder,and W.Cramer, 2006:Terrestrial vegetation redistribution and carbon balance under climate change.Carbon Balance and Management,1, doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-6.

    Meir,P.,P.Cox,and J.Grace,2006:The inf l uence of terrestrial ecosystems on climate.Trends inEcologyEvolution,21,254–260.

    Neale,R.B.,J.Richter,S.Park,P.H.Lauritzen,S.J.Vavrus,P.J. Rasch,and M.Zhang,2013:The mean climate of the community atmosphere model(CAM4)in forced SST and fully coupled experiments.J.Climate,26,5150–5168.

    O’Ishi,R.,and A.Abe-Ouchi,2009:Inf l uence of dynamic vegetation on climate change arising from increasing CO2.Climate Dyn.,33,645–663.

    Oleson,K.W.,and Coauthors,2010:Technical description of version 4.0 of the community land model(CLM).NCAR Technical Note,NCAR/TN478+STR,National Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder,Colorado,257 pp.

    Pielke,R.A.,R.Avissar,M.Raupach,A.J.Dolman,X.B.Zeng, and A.S.Denning,1998:Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems:Inf l uence on weather and climate.Global Change Biology,4,461–475.

    Schaphoff,S.,W.Lucht,D.Gerten,S.Sitch,W.Cramer,and I. C.Prentice,2006:Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections.Climate Change,74,97–122.

    Shukla,J.,and Y.Mintz,1982:Inf l uence of land-surfaceevapotranspiration on the earth’s climate.Science,215,1498–1501. Sud,Y.C.,J.Shukla,and Y.Mintz,1988:Inf l uence of Land Surface-Roughness on Atmospheric Circulation and Precipitation—A Sensitivity Study With A General-Circulation Model.J.Appl.Meteorol.,27,1036–1054.

    Shukla,J.,C.Nobre,and P.Sellers,1990:Amazon deforestation and climate change.Science,247,1322–1325.

    Sud,Y.C.,and M.Fennessy,1982:A study of the inf l uence of surface albedo on July circulation in semi-arid regions using the GLAS GCM.J.Climatol.,2,105–125.

    Xue,Y.K.,F.De Sales,R.Vasic,C.R.Mechoso,A.Arakawa,and S.Prince,2010:Global and seasonal assessment of interactions between climate and vegetation biophysical processes: A GCM study with different land-vegetation representations. J.Climate,23,1411–1433.

    Zhu,J.W.,and X.D.Zeng,2014:Comparison of the inf l uence of interannual vegetation variability between off l ine and online simulations.Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,7,453–457,doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.14.0031.

    :Zhu,J.W.,and X.D.Zeng,2015:Comprehensive study on the inf l uence of evapotranspiration and albedo on surface temperature related to changes in the leaf area index.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,32(7),935–942,

    10.1007/s00376-014-4045-z.

    (Received 10 March 2014;revised 5 November 2014;accepted 2 December 2014)

    ?Corresponding author:ZENG Xiaodong Email:xdzeng@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ?Institute of Atmospheric Physics/Chinese Academy of Sciences,and Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 最黄视频免费看| 久久中文看片网| 精品一区二区三卡| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 一本久久精品| 午夜久久久在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 丝袜美足系列| 成人国产av品久久久| videosex国产| 精品一区二区三卡| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 午夜视频精品福利| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 青草久久国产| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 黄色成人免费大全| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 一本综合久久免费| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 在线观看www视频免费| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黄色视频不卡| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品第一国产精品| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产成人系列免费观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产片内射在线| 性少妇av在线| 国产成人影院久久av| videosex国产| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 夫妻午夜视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 看免费av毛片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 777米奇影视久久| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 手机成人av网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久精品吃奶| av有码第一页| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲中文av在线| 91精品三级在线观看| videosex国产| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产成人系列免费观看| avwww免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 咕卡用的链子| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 热re99久久国产66热| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 99国产精品99久久久久| 成人精品一区二区免费| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | a级毛片黄视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 咕卡用的链子| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| 三级毛片av免费| av片东京热男人的天堂| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一区二区三区激情视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久狼人影院| 国产在线观看jvid| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 人妻一区二区av| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 深夜精品福利| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 日韩欧美免费精品| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产区一区二久久| 高清在线国产一区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 另类精品久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 黄片小视频在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品影院久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 大香蕉久久网| 久久久久国内视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| av国产精品久久久久影院| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| svipshipincom国产片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品少妇内射三级| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 一夜夜www| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 91成年电影在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品影院久久| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产区一区二久久| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| av天堂久久9| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久九九热精品免费| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 脱女人内裤的视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产淫语在线视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品福利观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 色在线成人网| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 美女福利国产在线| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精品国产亚洲在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| bbb黄色大片| 美国免费a级毛片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美日韩精品网址| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜91福利影院| 色在线成人网| 大型av网站在线播放| 欧美大码av| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 在线av久久热| av免费在线观看网站| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产成人影院久久av| 一级毛片精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 老司机福利观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 久久精品成人免费网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 悠悠久久av| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产激情久久老熟女| av免费在线观看网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产成人影院久久av| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 天天添夜夜摸| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 午夜免费鲁丝| 悠悠久久av| 男女免费视频国产| av天堂久久9| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 不卡一级毛片| videosex国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 午夜视频精品福利| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲伊人色综图| 又大又爽又粗| 美女福利国产在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 99九九在线精品视频| kizo精华| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 久久亚洲精品不卡| 一区在线观看完整版| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| av天堂在线播放| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产成人欧美| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 一本综合久久免费| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久中文字幕一级| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩免费av在线播放| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 自线自在国产av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 宅男免费午夜| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 91字幕亚洲| 久久亚洲真实| av电影中文网址| 国产在线免费精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| av网站在线播放免费| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 一本久久精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 色在线成人网| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 精品国产亚洲在线| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 老司机靠b影院| 又大又爽又粗| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲第一av免费看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 午夜两性在线视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久青草综合色| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| www.999成人在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 天天添夜夜摸| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 久久久精品区二区三区| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久99一区二区三区|