• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater

    2014-03-15 07:47:01JohnLejuCelestinoLADUXiwu
    Water Science and Engineering 2014年2期

    John Leju Celestino LADU*, Xi-wu Lü

    1. School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China

    2. College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Juba 82, South Sudan

    Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater

    John Leju Celestino LADU*1,2, Xi-wu Lü1

    1. School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China

    2. College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Juba 82, South Sudan

    With rural population expansion and improvement of the socio-economic standard of living, treatment of rural domestic wastewater has rapidly become a major aspect of environmental concern. Selection of a suitable method for treatment of rural domestic wastewater depends on its efficiency, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigated the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), temperature, and effluent recycling on the treatment efficiency of an anaerobic filter (AF) reactor. The first round of experimental operations was run for three months with HRTs of one, two, and three days, temperatures of 18℃, 21℃, and 24℃, and no effluent recycling. The second round of experimental operations was conducted for another three months with HRTs of three and four days; temperatures of 30.67℃, 30.57℃, and 26.91℃; and three effluent recycling ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1. The first round of operations showed removal rates of 32% to 44% for COD, 30% to 35% for TN, 32% to 36% for, 19% to 23% for, and 12% to 22% for TP. In the second round of operations, the removal rates varied from 75% to 81% for COD, 35% to 41% for TN, 31% to 39% for, 30% to 34% for, and 41% to 48% for TP. The average gas production rates were 6.72 L/d and 7.26 L/d for the first and second rounds of operations, respectively. The gas production rate increased in the second round of operations as a result of applied effluent recycling. The best removal efficiency was obtained for an optimum HRT of three days, a temperature of 30℃, and an effluent recycling ratio of 2:1. The results show that the removal efficiency of the AF reactor was affected by HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling.

    anaerobic filter (AF); rural domestic wastewater; hydraulic retention time (HRT); effluent recycling; experimental operation

    1 Introduction

    Due to urbanization, changing attitudes, education, and improved socio-economic standards of living all over China, in particular in the eastern part of China, domestic wastewater is becoming a matter of concern. In the past, people lived in relatively small population units, often in the countryside, and the disposal of domestic wastewater was not devastating. However, with the expansion of rural populations, disposal and accumulation ofdomestic sewage products rapidly became one of the major aspects of environmental concern, due to the pollution of water sources, soil, and air, and, consequently, adverse impacts on the total environment. Hence, to cope with these alarming threats, an efficient, simple, cost-effective, and feasible means of anaerobic domestic wastewater treatment is highly recommended.

    Many advanced anaerobic treatment reactors have been invented to tackle the challenges faced in efficient treatment of domestic wastewater. Among the reactors are the anaerobic filter (AF) reactor (Ladu et al. 2012; Chernicharo and Machado 1998; Bodik et al. 2000, 2003), the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor (Heertjes and Van Der Meer 1978; Lettinga and Vinken 1980; Lettinga et al. 1983), the hybrid reactor (Elmitwalli et al. 2002a, 2002b; Chernicharo and Nascimento 2001), the anaerobic baffled reactor (Langenhoff and Stuckey 2000; Bodik et al. 2003), the anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (Angenent and Sung 2001), and the expanded granular sludge bed reactor (Van der Last and Lettinga 1992; Seghezzo 1997).

    Anaerobic processes have been used in the treatment of wastewater and sludge for more than 100 years (Martina 2008). Despite the application of these processes since the 19th century, anaerobic wastewater treatment has been considered to be inefficient and unstable. However, as a result of escalating energy prices during the 1970s and improvement in environmental education, the anaerobic treatment process has gained momentum, and more stable and efficient high-rate anaerobic systems have been developed, including AF, UASB, and the fluidized bed reactor (Gijzen 2002). The anaerobic method is now considered to be the best method for the treatment of rural domestic wastewater. Treatment of wastewater by the anaerobic process is considered sustainable (Lettinga 1996; Hammes et al. 2000) and appropriate for on-site wastewater treatment (Zeeman and Lettinga 1999) because of its simplicity and cost effectiveness, and the fact that it requires only a small space for operation.

    Among the anaerobic processes, the AF process has gained popularity and has been applied in various rural domestic wastewater treatment schemes since it was first developed by Young and McCarty (1969). An AF reactor is chiefly a column or tower packed with support filter material for the growth of biomass. Its process is simple, it has a low running cost, and it does not require complex professional management. Furthermore, the process has the advantage of producing methane gas, a high-calorie fuel gas (Chernicharo 2007).

    Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of AF reactors, including the influence of operating characteristics and packing media (Manariotis and Grigoropoulos 2006), in treating domestic or low-strength wastewater. The effect of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on pollutant removal performance of the AF reactor has been examined by several researchers (Elmitwalli et al. 2002b; Bodik et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2002). Important parameters affecting the performance of the AF reactor are the operating HRT (Chuan 2007) and temperature. When the temperature is high, the conversion rates of organic matter in the anaerobic process are also high (Luostarinen et al. 2007), and at the sametime, low temperature leads to low gas production in upflow reactors and insufficient mixing. Generally, the efficiency of the anaerobic treatment process is temperature-dependent (Bogte et al. 1993; Van Haandel and Lettinga 1994). When the temperature is low, more organic matter usually remains un-degraded as a result of slow hydrolysis of volatile solids at a given HRT (Seghezzo 2004). Other studies show that, at low temperatures, longer HRTs are needed because of the lower rate of hydrolysis in AF reactors (Van der Last and Lettinga 1992). Effluent recycling has been widely used in anaerobic treatment (Sam-Soon et al. 1991). However, the effects of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiencies of anaerobic filters in treating rural domestic wastewater have been contentious. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of these factors (HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling) on the overall performance of the AF reactor in treating rural domestic wastewater at the Taihu Lake Environmental Engineering Research Center of Southeast University, Wuxi, China.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Experimental setup

    The experimental system was comprised of a regulating tank (influent tank), two submersible pumps, and an AF bioreactor system. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The AF reactor system was composed of four columns made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), with a total capacity of 300 L. The first three columns were typically operated as an anaerobic zone and the fourth column contained an anoxic zone. The first two columns aimed mainly at the removal of physical solids in order to provide good processing conditions for the functioning of the third column. Usually, the second and third columns were optimized for volatile fatty acid (VFA) removal (Wang 1994). The AF reactors were connected in a series. The anaerobic columns had an internal diameter of 0.2 m and a height of 3 m, and the anoxic column had a diameter of 0.2 m and a height of 2 m. The columns was filled with non-woven fabric filter material with a length of 2.5 m, width of 50 mm, surface area of 150 m2/m3, and porosity of 97%. The AF reactors had an effective volume of 90 L for each anaerobic column and 60 L for the anoxic column. The influents werepumped from the same feed tank to the bottom of the columns with the help of a pump (BT100-2J). Sampling ports were located at different heights to help in extraction of samples for experimental tests and analysis.

    Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of experiment

    The flow rates were 300 L/d, 150 L/d, 100 L/d, and 75 L/d corresponding to HRTs of one day, two days, three days, and four days, respectively. The concentrations of suspended solids (SS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), and grey matter were 3 156 mg/L, 1 799 mg/L, and 1 357 mg/L, respectively, and the concentration ratio of VSS to SS was 0.5. The first three months of the experimental operation were conducted with HRTs of one, two, and three days, resulting in organic loading rates (OLRs) for COD of 0.19, 0.11, and 0.07 kg/(m3·d), respectively, without effluent recycling. After assessing the response of the reactor performance to those experimental factors and conditions in the first round of operations, the reactor was then operated with HRTs of three and four days, resulting in OLRs for COD of 0.08 and 0.06 kg/(m3·d) respectively, and operated with effluent recycling in the second round of operations. In this second round of experimental operations, effluent from the anoxic column was collected in the oxic column, some of it was pumped using a pump to the influent port of the reactor column, and some of it was pumped as effluent. The recycling ratio r can be defined as the ratio of the returned flow rate Qrto that of the main influent flow rate Q0, as shown in Eq. (1):

    Three effluent recycling ratios, 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, were used for the reactor. The total duration for these experimental operations was six months.

    2.2 Estimation of parameters

    2.2.1 Volumetric hydraulic load

    The am ount of wastewater applied daily to the reactor, per unit of volume, is termed the volumetric hydraulic load (L, m3/(m3·d)) (Martina 2008):

    where Q is the flow rate (m3/d), and V is the total volume of the reactor (m3). The hydraulic retention time (τ), given in days, is expressed as

    which gives

    2.2.2 Volumetric organic load

    The volumetric organic load (VOL) is the amount of organic matter applied daily to the reactor, per unit of volume (Martina 2008):

    where LOis the volumetric organic load for COD (kg/(m3·d)), and Siis the influent substrate concentration (kg/m3).

    For domestic wastewater characterized by low organic matter concentrations, the VOL value to be applied usually ranges from 2.5 to 3.5 kg/(m3·d) (Chernicharo 2007).

    2.2.3 Removal efficiency of reactor

    The removal of COD in the AF system refers to the difference between the influent concentration (Cinf) of COD and the effluent concentration (Ceff) of COD. Thus, the removal rate (Rr) of COD is expressed by the following equation:

    This equation can also be used to calculate the efficiency of the reactors in regards to other nutrients.

    2.2.4 Kinetics parameters of anaerobic reactor for anaerobic digestion process

    The substrate concentration surrounding the microorganisms is crucial to evaluating kinetics parameters based on Monod-type kinetic models (Govindaradjane and Sundararajan 2013). Different researchers have stressed the salience of the total OLR in assessing process performance as well as effluent substrate concentration. In view of the fact that anaerobic microorganisms, especially methanogens, are sensitive to their environment, it is more important to consider the amount of substrate per microorganism per unit period than the effluent concentration. The total OLR (Lx) takes into account both the flow rate and the concentration of the waste, and is then defined as

    where Xais the active biomass concentration in the reactor.

    The relationship between the substrate utilization rate (R) and Lxbecomes

    where k is the maximum specific substrate utilization rate, KLis the organic loading rate at R=k 2, and q is the specific substrate utilization rate.

    A mass balance on the substrate can be written around the entire system as follows:

    At steady state, Eq. (9) can be combined with Eq. (8) as follows:

    Similarly, a mass balance for the biomass gives the following expression:

    At steady state, Eqs. (7) and (8) are substituted for the substrate removal rate in Eq. (11) to solve for Xa:

    Eqs. (10) and (12) can be used to obtain the kinetic parameters k, KL, Kd, and Y.

    2.3 Wastewater used for experiment

    The type of wastewater used for this study was characterized by low strength. The influent was collected from a sewage manhole at the Taihu Lake Environmental Engineering Research Center of Southeast University, Wuxi, China, and then pumped into a storage tank as influent to the AF system. The AF reactors were inoculated with sludge obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant in Wuxi. The reactors were operated continuously for 20 days as the start-up period until the performance was stable (acclimatized). The effluent samples of every reactor were collected at the sampling ports of the reactors in separate bottles every two days and stored in a refrigerator at 5 ℃ before experimental tests in the laboratory. The pH value, temperature, and gas production rate were recorded daily. The composition of the raw domestic wastewater used in this study is shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Composition of study raw domestic wastewater

    2.4 Analytical procedures

    The experimental test was carried for a period of six months (April, May, June, July, August, and September, 2012). All the analyses were carried out in accordance with the Chinese standard methods in Determination of Municipal Sludge in Wastewater Treatment Plant (CJ/T 221―2005). The samples were filtered througha 0.45-μm membrane filter before experimental analysis. The influent and effluent COD, TN, NH+4-N, NO3?-N, and TPconcentrations were measured according to the standard methods recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Clescerl et al. 1998). Temperature and pH values were measured with a dissolved oxygen meter and pH meter, respectively. The gas production rate was measured with a wet gas meter. The flow rate was controlled by a valve and incessantly regulated with the help of a pump.

    3 Results and discussion

    3.1 COD removal

    The average concentrations of COD in the influent and effluent of the AF system were, in the first round of experimental operations, 203.07 mg/L and 123.53 mg/L, respectively, and, in the second round of experimental operations, 234.03 mg/L and 50.33 mg/L, respectively. The results provided in Tables 2 and 3 show the effects of the HRT, OLR, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal of COD.

    Table 2 Influent and effluent COD concentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 3 Influent and effluent COD concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    The COD removal efficiency throughout the treatment process in the first round of experimental operations was between 32% to 44% under the conditions of HRTs of three days, two days, and one day; OLRs for COD of 0.07 to 0.19 kg/(m3·d); temperatures ranging from 18 to 24℃; and without effluent recycling.

    The experimental results show that HRT, temperature, OLR, and effluent recycling have a significant influence on COD removal. In the first round of experimental operations, reducing HRTs from three to two days, and then to one day increases OLR and thus affects the efficiency, resulting in COD removal rates of 44%, 40%, and 32%, respectively. That is, when the HRT decreases, the COD removal rates also decrease, and this was found to be independent of the influent concentrations.

    In the second round of experimental operations, an increase in HRT and temperature andthe use of recycling led to improved efficiency of the reactor, in the range from 75% to 81% (Table 3). The maximum COD removal rate was 81%, which corresponds to an influent COD of 208.16 mg/L at a HRT of four days. The removal efficiency obtained coincided with the study conducted by Barbosa and Sant’Anna (1989), which achieved a COD removal efficiency of 74% when treating municipal wastewater at temperatures between 18℃ and 28℃, and also coincided with a study by Yu and Fang (2002), which obtained a COD removal efficiency of 89.2% without recycling and a COD removal efficiency of 92.5% with recycling. A study by Foresti (2001) showed that, at an average temperature of 25℃ and an HRT value lower than six hours, there was no significant difference in the anaerobic system performance at other temperatures and HRTs.

    Comparison of the two rounds of operations shows that the COD removal efficiency of the anaerobic reactor increased with an increase in HRT and effluent recycling, and decreased with an increase in OLR, and an increase in temperature always resulted in improved removal efficiency. This agreed with the findings of Lettinga et al. (1981), who reported a COD removal rate of 65% at high temperatures in a UASB reactor, which decreased to a removal rate of 55% when the temperature was reduced to between 13℃ and 17℃.

    3.2 TN removal

    The results in Tables 4 and 5 illustrate the effects of the HRT, nitrogen volumetric loading rate (VLR), temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiency of total nitrogen (TN) in the AF reactor. The average TN concentrations in the influent and effluent in the first round of experimental operations were 31.11 and 20.85 mg/L, respectively, and the average TN concentrations in the influent and effluent in the second round of experimental operations were 30.49 mg/L and 18.97 mg/L, respectively. These results indicate insignificant TN removal with regard to the operating conditions. This may be attributed to the low sludge production in the AF reactor, as reported by Barbosa and Sant’Anna (1989).

    Table 4 Influent and effluent TN concentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 5 Influent and effluent TN concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    It seems that an increase in HRT enhances the nitrification. However, there was no significant difference in the removal efficiency of the AF reactor at different nitrogen VLRs and temperatures, except for the operational conditions with or without effluent recycling. It can be seen that, the higher the amount of nitrogen compounds in the influent is, the higher the removal efficiency is. Some studies have shown that the TN removal efficiency depends on the ratio of COD to TN concentrations (COD/TN ratio) and the shape of the reactor. About 80% of the TN removal efficiency was observed at a COD/TN ratio greater than 3.9 in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) (Chul and Jay 2008). A study by Han (1996) reported a TN removal efficiency of 69.3% to 78.5% at a COD/TN ratio range of 4.5 to 5.8. In this study, a 37% to 41% of the total TN removal rate was obtained within a COD/TN ratio range of 7.2 to 7.5. The operation conditions without effluent recycling showed an average TN removal efficiency of 33%, while the operation conditions with effluent recycling revealed an average TN removal efficiency of 37.67%. Slight effects of temperature were observed.

    3.3 NH4+-N removal

    The results in Table 6 and Table 7 show the effect of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiency of. The average influent and effluent concentrations ofin the first round of experimental operations were 28.21 mg/L and 18.39 mg/L (Table 6). In the second round of experimental operations they were 29.33 mg/L and 18.73 mg/L, respectively (Table 7). The average removal efficiency forwith HRTs of one, two, and three days and without effluent recycling was 34.7%, while the average removal efficiency of the AF reactor with HRTs of four and three days and with effluent recycling forwas 36%. The results revealed insignificantremoval under these operating conditions. This can be attributed to inadequate sludge production in the reactor.

    Table 6 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 6 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) April 18.06 3 27.41 18.52 NR 32 May 21.49 2 28.20 18.13 NR 36 June 24.15 1 29.01 18.52 NR 36

    Table 7 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 7 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) July 30.67 4 29.59 18.29 1:1 38 August 30.57 3 29.30 17.91 1:2 39 September 26.91 3 29.10 19.98 2:1 31

    3.4 NO3--N removal

    Table 8 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 8 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) April 18.06 3 0.69 0.53 NR 23 May 21.49 2 0.58 0.47 NR 19 June 24.15 1 0.39 0.31 NR 21

    Table 9 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 9 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) July 30.67 4 5.20 3.43 August 30.57 3 3.27 2.30 September 26.91 3 3.59 2.48 Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) 1:1 34 1:2 30 2:1 31

    3.5 TP removal

    The average influent and effluent total phosphorus (TP) c and 3.07 mg/L, respectively, in the first round of experimen 5.05 mg/L and 2.86 mg/L, respectively, in the second round of exp oncentrations were, 3.72 mg/L tal operations (Table 10), and erimental operations (Table 11).

    Table 10 Influent and effluent TP concentrations and removal efficienc operations and experimental condition ies in first round of experimental s

    Table 11 Influent and effluent TP concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    In regards to TP, the HRT, temperature, and operation condition with or without effluent recycling had an influence on the reactor’s removal efficiency. The efficiency improved with increasing HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling. In the first round of experimental operations, the temperature was low and there was no effluent recycling, and a 17% average TP removal rate was obtained, whereas in the second round of experimental operations, the temperature was high and effluent recycling was used, and a 44% average TP removal rate was obtained. This shows that temperature and effluent recycling significantly affects the reactor’s performance in TP removal but HRT has only a slight effect. The results also showed that TP removal rates increased with an increase in COD concentration, and this result coincided with a study by Mohammed and Abbas (2007). Giuseppe (2009) found that the higher the recycling ratio for the anaerobic treatment process was (within a limit based on kinetic considerations), the higher the removal efficiency of nutrients could be. This result coincided with a study by Elmitwalli and Ralf (2007), in which an experimental test was conducted with a UASB reactor treating grey water at HRTs between 6 and 16 hours and a temperature of 30℃, and removal efficiencies of 22% to 30% for TN and 15% to 21% for TP were obtained.

    3.6 Variation of pH values

    The pH value fluctuations in the influent and effluent of the AF reactor were monitored over time and the average pH values in the influent and effluent were 7.70 and 7.94, respectively, during the first round of experimental operations, and 7.70 and 7.84, respectively, during the second round of experimental operations (Tables 12 and 13).

    Table 12 Influent and effluent pH values in first round of experimental operations

    Table 13 Influent and effluent pH values in second round of experimental operations

    Monitoring of pH value in the anaerobic reactor is crucial and can be helpful in detecting abnormalities of a system. In this study, the pH value of the treated domestic wastewater (effluent) was in the range of 7.68 to 8.04, indicating satisfactory conditions of the reactor. According to the literature (Stronach et al. 1986), pH values less than 6.8 or greater than 8.3 will cause souring of the reactor in the process of anaerobic digestion. The average pH value of the influent wastewater for the two experimental operations was 7.71, which is typical forwastewater with a mean pH value of 7.8, slightly higher than what reported by Chuan (2007). Several researchers have studied the effect of pH on the anaerobic treatment process (Yu and Fang 2002; Paulo et al. 2003; Hu et al. 2005) but there does not exist ample information about the influence of pH on AF’s efficiency in treating rural domestic waste. Generally, the pH throughout the AF effluent remained stable despite an increase in HRTs.

    3.7 Gas production rate

    The average gas production rate varying with time is shown in Tables 14 and 15. As the system stabilized, the average gas production rate varied between 5.82 and 8.39 L/d in the first round of experimental operations (Table 14) and in the range of 6.01 to 8.36 L/d in the second round of experimental operations (Table 15).

    Table 14 Gas production rate in first round of experimental operations

    Table 15 Gas production rate in second round of experimental operations

    The gas production rate during the experimental operations was in the range of 5.82 to 8.39 L/d. In the first round of experimental operations, the average gas production rate was 6.72 L/d, and in the second round of experimental operations, the average gas production rate was 7.26 L/d. For the first round of operations, the highest gas production rate was 8.39 L/d in April, and the lowest was 5.82 L/d in May. The highest amount recorded was due to an increased HRT and the fact that there was no effluent recycling, and also due to the fact that April was the start-up season with active sludge and organic-rich compounds. Moreover, in May, the average gas production rate dropped significantly to 5.82 L/d. This may have been a result of a decreased HRT, where biomass has a higher propensity to be washed out from the AF system. This finding corresponds with the results of Chuan (2007). Lew et al. (2004) experienced a decline in the gas production rate when the temperature was low. A study by Agrawal et al. (1997) revealed a 78% decrease in the gas production rate when the temperature was reduced from 30℃ to 10℃. Generally, the average gas production rate increased in the second round of experimental operations as a result of applied effluent recycling, which coincides with the findings of Yu and Fang (2002).

    4 Conclusions

    Rural domestic sewage and its composition vary with seasons and the natural cyclical pattern of human activity. In this study, an experiment was carried out to treat rural domestic sewage using AF reactors, and the effects of HRT, temperature, and effluents recycling on the treatment efficiency of the AF reactor were investigated. The best and optimum removal efficiency was obtained at an HRT of three days, an effluent recycling ratio of 2:1, and an average temperature of 30℃. The concentrations of TN,, and TP were slightly influenced by HRT, but significantly affected by temperature and the operating conditions with or without effluent recycling. For all the experimental operations with effluent recycling, the results obtained were better than for the experimental operations without effluent recycling.

    Thus, the application of the AF reactor in rural domestic wastewater can play a crucial part in the development of effective and feasible concepts for wastewater management, especially for people in rural low-income areas.

    Agrawal, L. K., Ohashi, Y., Mochida, E., Okui, H., Ueki, Y., Harada, H., and Ohashi, A. 1997. Treatment of raw sewage in a temperate climate using a UASB reactor and the hanging sponge cubes process. Water Science and Technology, 36(6-7), 433-440. [doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00552-0]

    Angenent, L. T., and Sung, S. 2001. Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system. Water Research, 35(7), 1739-1747. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00447-4].

    Barbosa, R. A., and Sant’Anna, G. L. 1989. Treatment of raw domestic sewage in an UASB reactor. Water Research, 23(12), 1483-1490. [doi:10.1016/0043-1354(89)90112-7]

    Bodik, L., Herdova, B., and Kratochvil, K. 2000. The application of anaerobic filter for municipal wastewater treatment. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Slovak Society of Chemical Engineering, 54(3), 159-164.

    Bodik, I., Kratochvil, K., Gaspirkova, E., and Hutnan, M. 2003. Nitrogen removal in an anaerobic baffled filter reactor with aerobic post-treatment. Bioresource Technology, 86(1), 79-84. [doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00109-8]

    Bogte, J. J., Breure, A. M., van Andel, J. G., and Lettinga, G. 1993. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in small scale UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology, 27(9), 75-82.

    Chaisri, R., Boonsawang, P., Prasertsan, P., and Chaiprapat, S. 2007. Effect of organic loading rate on methane and volatile fatty acids productions from anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in UASB and UFAF reactors. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, (s2), 311-323.

    Chernicharo, C. A. L., and Machado, R. M. G. 1998. Feasibility of UASB/AF system for domestic sewage treatment in developing countries. Water Science and Technology, 38(8-9), 325-332. [doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00708-2]

    Chernicharo, C. A. L., and Nascimento, M. C. P. 2001. Feasibility of a pilot-scale UASB/trickling filter system for domestic sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology, 44(4), 221-228.

    Chernicharo, C. A. L. 2007. Anaerobic Reactors, Biological Wastewater Treatment Series (Volume 4). London: IWA Publishing.

    Chuan, W. S. 2007. Performance of Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor Treating Municipal Wastewater at Different Retention Times. M. E. Dissertation, Kent Ridge: National University of Singaphore.

    Chul, H. W., and Jay, M. R. 2008. Anaerobic/oxic treatment of slurry-type swine waste. Environmental Engineering Research, 13(4), 203-209.

    Clescerl, L. S., Arnold, E. G., and Eaton, A. D. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Elmitwalli, T. A., Sklyar, V., Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 2002a. Low temperature pre-treatment of domestic sewage in an anaerobic hybrid or an anaerobic filter reactor. Bioresource Technology, 82(3), 233-239. [doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00191-2]

    Elmitwalli, T. A., Oahn, K. L. T., Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 2002b. Treatment of domestic sewage in a two step anaerobic filter/anaerobic hybrid system at low temperature. Water Research, 36(9), 2225-2232. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00438-9]

    Elmitwalli, T. A., and Ralf, O. 2007. Anaerobic biodegradability and treatment of grey water in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Water Research, 41(6), 1379-1387. [doi:10.1016/j.watres. 2006.12.016]

    Foresti, E. 2001. Perspectives on anaerobic treatment in developing countries. Water Science and Technology, 44(8), 141-148.

    Gijzen, H. J. 2002. Anaerobic digestion for sustainable development: a natural approach. Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 321-328.

    Giuseppe, B. 2009. Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5424-5430. [doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.005]

    Govindaradjane, S., and Sundararajan, T. 2013. Performance and kinetics of a huasb reactor for treating tapioca-based starch industrial waste stream. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(4), 55-64.

    Hammes, F., Kalogo, Y., and Verstraete, W. 2000. Anaerobic digestion technologies for closing the domestic water, carbon and nutrient cycles. Water Science and Technology, 41(3), 203-211.

    Han, D. J. 1996. Reaction Characteristics of the Development of Biofilm Process Combined Upflow Blanket Filter and Anoxic-Oxic Process for the Nutrient Removal. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chuncheon: Kangwon National University.

    Heertjes, P. M., and Van Der Meer, R. R. 1978. Dynamics of liquid flow in an upflow reactor used for anaerobic treatment of wastewater. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 20(10), 1577-1594. [doi:10.1002/ bit.260201007]

    Hu, Z. H., Yu, H. Q., and Zhu, R. F. 2005. Influence of particle size and pH on anaerobic degradation of cellulose by ruminal microbes. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 55(3), 233-238. [doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.02.002]

    Ladu, J. L. C., Lu, X., and Loboka, M. K. 2012. Experimental assessment on the effect of OLR and HRT on the efficiency of anaerobic filter treating abattoir. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(11), 415-420.

    Langenhoff, A. A. M., and Stucky, D. C. 2000. Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: Effect of low temperature. Water Research, 34(15), 3867-3875. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00) 00136-6].

    Lettinga, G., van Nelsen, A. F. H., Hobma, S. W., De Zeeu, W. W., and Klapwijk, A. 1980. Use of the upflow sludge (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 22(4), 699-734. [doi:10.1002/bit.260220402]

    Lettinga, G., Roersma, R., Grin, P., de Zeeuw, W., Hulshof Pol, L., van Velsen, L., Hovma, S., and Zeeman, G. 1981. Anaerobic treatment of sewage and low strength wastewater. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, 271-291. Travemunde: Elsevier Biomedical Press.

    Lettinga, G., Roersma, R., and Grin, P. 1983. Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic sewage at ambient temperatures using a granular bed UASB reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25(7), 1701-1723 [doi:10.1002/bit.260250703]

    Lettinga, G. 1996. Sustainable integrated biological wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology, 33(3), 85-98. [doi:10.1016/0273-1223(96)00303-4]

    Lew, B., Tarre, S., Belavski, M., and Green, M. 2004. UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment at low temperatures: a comparison between a classical UASB and hybrid UASB-filter reactor. Water Scienceand Technology, 49(11-12), 295-301.

    Luostarinen, S., Sanders, W., Kujawa-Roeleveld, K., and Zeeman, G. 2007. Effect of temperature on anaerobic treatment of black water in UASB-septic tank systems. Bioresource Technology, 98(5), 980-986. [doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.018]

    Manariotis, I. D., and Grigoropoulos, S. G. 2006. Anaerobic filter treatment of municipal wastewater: biosolids behavior. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(1), 23-31. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:1(23)]

    Martina, U. 2008. Effect of Hydraulic Loading Variation on a Pilot Scale UASB Reactor Treating Domestic Wastewater at Vapi CETP. M. E. Dissertation. Sweden: Lund University.

    Mohammed, A. H., and Abbas, H. A. 2007. Sequential anaerobic/aerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 14(2), 1-31.

    Paulo, P. L., Villa, G., Van Lier, J. B., and Lettinga, G. 2003. The anaerobic conversion of methanol under thermophilic conditions: pH and bicarbonate dependence. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96(3), 213-218.

    Sam-soon, P. A., Loewenthal, R. E., Wentzel, M. C., and Marais, G. V. R. 1991. A long chain fatty acid, oleate, as sole substrate in upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) systems. Water SA, 17(1), 165-170.

    Seghezzo, L. 1997. Kinetics and Structure of Anaerobic Granular Sludge from EGSB Reactors. M. E. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Seghezzo, L. 2004. Anaerobic Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in Subtropical Regions. Ph. D. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Stronach, S. M., Rudd, T., and Lester, J. N. 1986. Anaerobic Digestion Process in the Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Van der Last, A. R. M., and Lettinga, G. 1992. Anaerobic treatment of domestic sewage under moderate climatic (Dutch) conditions using upflow reactors at increased superficial velocities. Water Science and Technology, 25(7), 167-178.

    Van Haandel, A. C., and Lettinga, G. 1994. Anaerobic sewage treatment. A Practical Guide for Regions with a Hot Climate. Chcester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Wang, K. 1994. Integrated Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Sewage. Ph. D. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Young, J. C., and McCarty, P. L. 1969. The anaerobic filter for waste treatment. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 41(5), 160-173

    Yu, H. Q., and Fang, H. H. P. 2002. Acidogenesis of dairy wastewater at various pH levels. Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 201-206.

    Yu, H. Q., Hu, Z. H., Hong, T. Q., and Gu, G. W. 2002. Performance of an anaerobic filter treating soybean processing wastewater with and without effluent recycle. Process Biochemistry, 38(4), 507-513. [doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00175-9]

    Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 1999. The role of anaerobic digestion of domestic sewage in closing the water and nutrient cycle at community level. Water Science and Technology, 39(5), 187-194.

    (Edited by Yun-li YU)

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51078074) and the Key Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 308010).

    *Corresponding author (e-mail: johnleju@yahoo.com)

    Received Mar. 1, 2013; accepted Jan. 1, 2014

    黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 18在线观看网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 97在线人人人人妻| videosex国产| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 自线自在国产av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产色视频综合| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| bbb黄色大片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 99热网站在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 1024视频免费在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| www.999成人在线观看| tocl精华| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品福利观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久久久久国产电影| 黄色视频不卡| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 一个人免费看片子| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 成人影院久久| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产麻豆69| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 激情视频va一区二区三区| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| av线在线观看网站| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 美女大奶头黄色视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| av福利片在线| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 999精品在线视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产麻豆69| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 色播在线永久视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成在线人永久免费视频| 91国产中文字幕| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久99一区二区三区| 高清在线国产一区| 99久久人妻综合| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久热在线av| tube8黄色片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产成人av教育| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日本五十路高清| av网站免费在线观看视频| av天堂久久9| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久免费观看电影| 99九九在线精品视频| 美女中出高潮动态图| 超色免费av| 99国产精品99久久久久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产在线观看jvid| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 一区二区三区激情视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| av一本久久久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 午夜福利视频精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 777米奇影视久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品 国内视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 人妻一区二区av| 成人国产av品久久久| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久久久网色| 大香蕉久久网| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产又爽黄色视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 美女福利国产在线| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 黄色 视频免费看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| av不卡在线播放| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线av久久热| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| av电影中文网址| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 桃花免费在线播放| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲av美国av| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 伦理电影免费视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一级片'在线观看视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产av又大| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 99热全是精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 久久性视频一级片| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 精品国产一区二区久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 嫩草影视91久久| 制服诱惑二区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 999久久久国产精品视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| av在线app专区| 电影成人av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产淫语在线视频| tocl精华| 岛国在线观看网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 久久久久国内视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 老司机靠b影院| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产精品九九99| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久狼人影院| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 香蕉国产在线看| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 一本综合久久免费| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | svipshipincom国产片| av欧美777| 国产激情久久老熟女| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产精品999| 两个人看的免费小视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 丁香六月欧美| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一区福利在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 一级片免费观看大全| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 青草久久国产| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 国产成人av教育| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品免费大片| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 99九九在线精品视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 自线自在国产av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 制服诱惑二区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 午夜免费观看性视频| 成人影院久久| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| h视频一区二区三区| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 成年动漫av网址| 精品第一国产精品| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产区一区二久久| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 午夜91福利影院| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品高清国产在线一区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 宅男免费午夜| 午夜91福利影院| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 电影成人av| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 中文字幕色久视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 18禁观看日本| av网站在线播放免费| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 又大又爽又粗| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲中文av在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 大型av网站在线播放| 中文字幕制服av| av网站在线播放免费| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 老司机影院成人| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产淫语在线视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 成人影院久久| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久久久视频综合| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 精品福利观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 精品一区二区三卡| 丝袜美足系列| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 看免费av毛片| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品影院久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍|