• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater

    2014-03-15 07:47:01JohnLejuCelestinoLADUXiwu
    Water Science and Engineering 2014年2期

    John Leju Celestino LADU*, Xi-wu Lü

    1. School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China

    2. College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Juba 82, South Sudan

    Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater

    John Leju Celestino LADU*1,2, Xi-wu Lü1

    1. School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China

    2. College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Juba 82, South Sudan

    With rural population expansion and improvement of the socio-economic standard of living, treatment of rural domestic wastewater has rapidly become a major aspect of environmental concern. Selection of a suitable method for treatment of rural domestic wastewater depends on its efficiency, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigated the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), temperature, and effluent recycling on the treatment efficiency of an anaerobic filter (AF) reactor. The first round of experimental operations was run for three months with HRTs of one, two, and three days, temperatures of 18℃, 21℃, and 24℃, and no effluent recycling. The second round of experimental operations was conducted for another three months with HRTs of three and four days; temperatures of 30.67℃, 30.57℃, and 26.91℃; and three effluent recycling ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1. The first round of operations showed removal rates of 32% to 44% for COD, 30% to 35% for TN, 32% to 36% for, 19% to 23% for, and 12% to 22% for TP. In the second round of operations, the removal rates varied from 75% to 81% for COD, 35% to 41% for TN, 31% to 39% for, 30% to 34% for, and 41% to 48% for TP. The average gas production rates were 6.72 L/d and 7.26 L/d for the first and second rounds of operations, respectively. The gas production rate increased in the second round of operations as a result of applied effluent recycling. The best removal efficiency was obtained for an optimum HRT of three days, a temperature of 30℃, and an effluent recycling ratio of 2:1. The results show that the removal efficiency of the AF reactor was affected by HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling.

    anaerobic filter (AF); rural domestic wastewater; hydraulic retention time (HRT); effluent recycling; experimental operation

    1 Introduction

    Due to urbanization, changing attitudes, education, and improved socio-economic standards of living all over China, in particular in the eastern part of China, domestic wastewater is becoming a matter of concern. In the past, people lived in relatively small population units, often in the countryside, and the disposal of domestic wastewater was not devastating. However, with the expansion of rural populations, disposal and accumulation ofdomestic sewage products rapidly became one of the major aspects of environmental concern, due to the pollution of water sources, soil, and air, and, consequently, adverse impacts on the total environment. Hence, to cope with these alarming threats, an efficient, simple, cost-effective, and feasible means of anaerobic domestic wastewater treatment is highly recommended.

    Many advanced anaerobic treatment reactors have been invented to tackle the challenges faced in efficient treatment of domestic wastewater. Among the reactors are the anaerobic filter (AF) reactor (Ladu et al. 2012; Chernicharo and Machado 1998; Bodik et al. 2000, 2003), the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor (Heertjes and Van Der Meer 1978; Lettinga and Vinken 1980; Lettinga et al. 1983), the hybrid reactor (Elmitwalli et al. 2002a, 2002b; Chernicharo and Nascimento 2001), the anaerobic baffled reactor (Langenhoff and Stuckey 2000; Bodik et al. 2003), the anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (Angenent and Sung 2001), and the expanded granular sludge bed reactor (Van der Last and Lettinga 1992; Seghezzo 1997).

    Anaerobic processes have been used in the treatment of wastewater and sludge for more than 100 years (Martina 2008). Despite the application of these processes since the 19th century, anaerobic wastewater treatment has been considered to be inefficient and unstable. However, as a result of escalating energy prices during the 1970s and improvement in environmental education, the anaerobic treatment process has gained momentum, and more stable and efficient high-rate anaerobic systems have been developed, including AF, UASB, and the fluidized bed reactor (Gijzen 2002). The anaerobic method is now considered to be the best method for the treatment of rural domestic wastewater. Treatment of wastewater by the anaerobic process is considered sustainable (Lettinga 1996; Hammes et al. 2000) and appropriate for on-site wastewater treatment (Zeeman and Lettinga 1999) because of its simplicity and cost effectiveness, and the fact that it requires only a small space for operation.

    Among the anaerobic processes, the AF process has gained popularity and has been applied in various rural domestic wastewater treatment schemes since it was first developed by Young and McCarty (1969). An AF reactor is chiefly a column or tower packed with support filter material for the growth of biomass. Its process is simple, it has a low running cost, and it does not require complex professional management. Furthermore, the process has the advantage of producing methane gas, a high-calorie fuel gas (Chernicharo 2007).

    Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of AF reactors, including the influence of operating characteristics and packing media (Manariotis and Grigoropoulos 2006), in treating domestic or low-strength wastewater. The effect of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on pollutant removal performance of the AF reactor has been examined by several researchers (Elmitwalli et al. 2002b; Bodik et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2002). Important parameters affecting the performance of the AF reactor are the operating HRT (Chuan 2007) and temperature. When the temperature is high, the conversion rates of organic matter in the anaerobic process are also high (Luostarinen et al. 2007), and at the sametime, low temperature leads to low gas production in upflow reactors and insufficient mixing. Generally, the efficiency of the anaerobic treatment process is temperature-dependent (Bogte et al. 1993; Van Haandel and Lettinga 1994). When the temperature is low, more organic matter usually remains un-degraded as a result of slow hydrolysis of volatile solids at a given HRT (Seghezzo 2004). Other studies show that, at low temperatures, longer HRTs are needed because of the lower rate of hydrolysis in AF reactors (Van der Last and Lettinga 1992). Effluent recycling has been widely used in anaerobic treatment (Sam-Soon et al. 1991). However, the effects of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiencies of anaerobic filters in treating rural domestic wastewater have been contentious. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of these factors (HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling) on the overall performance of the AF reactor in treating rural domestic wastewater at the Taihu Lake Environmental Engineering Research Center of Southeast University, Wuxi, China.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Experimental setup

    The experimental system was comprised of a regulating tank (influent tank), two submersible pumps, and an AF bioreactor system. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The AF reactor system was composed of four columns made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), with a total capacity of 300 L. The first three columns were typically operated as an anaerobic zone and the fourth column contained an anoxic zone. The first two columns aimed mainly at the removal of physical solids in order to provide good processing conditions for the functioning of the third column. Usually, the second and third columns were optimized for volatile fatty acid (VFA) removal (Wang 1994). The AF reactors were connected in a series. The anaerobic columns had an internal diameter of 0.2 m and a height of 3 m, and the anoxic column had a diameter of 0.2 m and a height of 2 m. The columns was filled with non-woven fabric filter material with a length of 2.5 m, width of 50 mm, surface area of 150 m2/m3, and porosity of 97%. The AF reactors had an effective volume of 90 L for each anaerobic column and 60 L for the anoxic column. The influents werepumped from the same feed tank to the bottom of the columns with the help of a pump (BT100-2J). Sampling ports were located at different heights to help in extraction of samples for experimental tests and analysis.

    Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of experiment

    The flow rates were 300 L/d, 150 L/d, 100 L/d, and 75 L/d corresponding to HRTs of one day, two days, three days, and four days, respectively. The concentrations of suspended solids (SS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), and grey matter were 3 156 mg/L, 1 799 mg/L, and 1 357 mg/L, respectively, and the concentration ratio of VSS to SS was 0.5. The first three months of the experimental operation were conducted with HRTs of one, two, and three days, resulting in organic loading rates (OLRs) for COD of 0.19, 0.11, and 0.07 kg/(m3·d), respectively, without effluent recycling. After assessing the response of the reactor performance to those experimental factors and conditions in the first round of operations, the reactor was then operated with HRTs of three and four days, resulting in OLRs for COD of 0.08 and 0.06 kg/(m3·d) respectively, and operated with effluent recycling in the second round of operations. In this second round of experimental operations, effluent from the anoxic column was collected in the oxic column, some of it was pumped using a pump to the influent port of the reactor column, and some of it was pumped as effluent. The recycling ratio r can be defined as the ratio of the returned flow rate Qrto that of the main influent flow rate Q0, as shown in Eq. (1):

    Three effluent recycling ratios, 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, were used for the reactor. The total duration for these experimental operations was six months.

    2.2 Estimation of parameters

    2.2.1 Volumetric hydraulic load

    The am ount of wastewater applied daily to the reactor, per unit of volume, is termed the volumetric hydraulic load (L, m3/(m3·d)) (Martina 2008):

    where Q is the flow rate (m3/d), and V is the total volume of the reactor (m3). The hydraulic retention time (τ), given in days, is expressed as

    which gives

    2.2.2 Volumetric organic load

    The volumetric organic load (VOL) is the amount of organic matter applied daily to the reactor, per unit of volume (Martina 2008):

    where LOis the volumetric organic load for COD (kg/(m3·d)), and Siis the influent substrate concentration (kg/m3).

    For domestic wastewater characterized by low organic matter concentrations, the VOL value to be applied usually ranges from 2.5 to 3.5 kg/(m3·d) (Chernicharo 2007).

    2.2.3 Removal efficiency of reactor

    The removal of COD in the AF system refers to the difference between the influent concentration (Cinf) of COD and the effluent concentration (Ceff) of COD. Thus, the removal rate (Rr) of COD is expressed by the following equation:

    This equation can also be used to calculate the efficiency of the reactors in regards to other nutrients.

    2.2.4 Kinetics parameters of anaerobic reactor for anaerobic digestion process

    The substrate concentration surrounding the microorganisms is crucial to evaluating kinetics parameters based on Monod-type kinetic models (Govindaradjane and Sundararajan 2013). Different researchers have stressed the salience of the total OLR in assessing process performance as well as effluent substrate concentration. In view of the fact that anaerobic microorganisms, especially methanogens, are sensitive to their environment, it is more important to consider the amount of substrate per microorganism per unit period than the effluent concentration. The total OLR (Lx) takes into account both the flow rate and the concentration of the waste, and is then defined as

    where Xais the active biomass concentration in the reactor.

    The relationship between the substrate utilization rate (R) and Lxbecomes

    where k is the maximum specific substrate utilization rate, KLis the organic loading rate at R=k 2, and q is the specific substrate utilization rate.

    A mass balance on the substrate can be written around the entire system as follows:

    At steady state, Eq. (9) can be combined with Eq. (8) as follows:

    Similarly, a mass balance for the biomass gives the following expression:

    At steady state, Eqs. (7) and (8) are substituted for the substrate removal rate in Eq. (11) to solve for Xa:

    Eqs. (10) and (12) can be used to obtain the kinetic parameters k, KL, Kd, and Y.

    2.3 Wastewater used for experiment

    The type of wastewater used for this study was characterized by low strength. The influent was collected from a sewage manhole at the Taihu Lake Environmental Engineering Research Center of Southeast University, Wuxi, China, and then pumped into a storage tank as influent to the AF system. The AF reactors were inoculated with sludge obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant in Wuxi. The reactors were operated continuously for 20 days as the start-up period until the performance was stable (acclimatized). The effluent samples of every reactor were collected at the sampling ports of the reactors in separate bottles every two days and stored in a refrigerator at 5 ℃ before experimental tests in the laboratory. The pH value, temperature, and gas production rate were recorded daily. The composition of the raw domestic wastewater used in this study is shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Composition of study raw domestic wastewater

    2.4 Analytical procedures

    The experimental test was carried for a period of six months (April, May, June, July, August, and September, 2012). All the analyses were carried out in accordance with the Chinese standard methods in Determination of Municipal Sludge in Wastewater Treatment Plant (CJ/T 221―2005). The samples were filtered througha 0.45-μm membrane filter before experimental analysis. The influent and effluent COD, TN, NH+4-N, NO3?-N, and TPconcentrations were measured according to the standard methods recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Clescerl et al. 1998). Temperature and pH values were measured with a dissolved oxygen meter and pH meter, respectively. The gas production rate was measured with a wet gas meter. The flow rate was controlled by a valve and incessantly regulated with the help of a pump.

    3 Results and discussion

    3.1 COD removal

    The average concentrations of COD in the influent and effluent of the AF system were, in the first round of experimental operations, 203.07 mg/L and 123.53 mg/L, respectively, and, in the second round of experimental operations, 234.03 mg/L and 50.33 mg/L, respectively. The results provided in Tables 2 and 3 show the effects of the HRT, OLR, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal of COD.

    Table 2 Influent and effluent COD concentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 3 Influent and effluent COD concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    The COD removal efficiency throughout the treatment process in the first round of experimental operations was between 32% to 44% under the conditions of HRTs of three days, two days, and one day; OLRs for COD of 0.07 to 0.19 kg/(m3·d); temperatures ranging from 18 to 24℃; and without effluent recycling.

    The experimental results show that HRT, temperature, OLR, and effluent recycling have a significant influence on COD removal. In the first round of experimental operations, reducing HRTs from three to two days, and then to one day increases OLR and thus affects the efficiency, resulting in COD removal rates of 44%, 40%, and 32%, respectively. That is, when the HRT decreases, the COD removal rates also decrease, and this was found to be independent of the influent concentrations.

    In the second round of experimental operations, an increase in HRT and temperature andthe use of recycling led to improved efficiency of the reactor, in the range from 75% to 81% (Table 3). The maximum COD removal rate was 81%, which corresponds to an influent COD of 208.16 mg/L at a HRT of four days. The removal efficiency obtained coincided with the study conducted by Barbosa and Sant’Anna (1989), which achieved a COD removal efficiency of 74% when treating municipal wastewater at temperatures between 18℃ and 28℃, and also coincided with a study by Yu and Fang (2002), which obtained a COD removal efficiency of 89.2% without recycling and a COD removal efficiency of 92.5% with recycling. A study by Foresti (2001) showed that, at an average temperature of 25℃ and an HRT value lower than six hours, there was no significant difference in the anaerobic system performance at other temperatures and HRTs.

    Comparison of the two rounds of operations shows that the COD removal efficiency of the anaerobic reactor increased with an increase in HRT and effluent recycling, and decreased with an increase in OLR, and an increase in temperature always resulted in improved removal efficiency. This agreed with the findings of Lettinga et al. (1981), who reported a COD removal rate of 65% at high temperatures in a UASB reactor, which decreased to a removal rate of 55% when the temperature was reduced to between 13℃ and 17℃.

    3.2 TN removal

    The results in Tables 4 and 5 illustrate the effects of the HRT, nitrogen volumetric loading rate (VLR), temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiency of total nitrogen (TN) in the AF reactor. The average TN concentrations in the influent and effluent in the first round of experimental operations were 31.11 and 20.85 mg/L, respectively, and the average TN concentrations in the influent and effluent in the second round of experimental operations were 30.49 mg/L and 18.97 mg/L, respectively. These results indicate insignificant TN removal with regard to the operating conditions. This may be attributed to the low sludge production in the AF reactor, as reported by Barbosa and Sant’Anna (1989).

    Table 4 Influent and effluent TN concentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 5 Influent and effluent TN concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    It seems that an increase in HRT enhances the nitrification. However, there was no significant difference in the removal efficiency of the AF reactor at different nitrogen VLRs and temperatures, except for the operational conditions with or without effluent recycling. It can be seen that, the higher the amount of nitrogen compounds in the influent is, the higher the removal efficiency is. Some studies have shown that the TN removal efficiency depends on the ratio of COD to TN concentrations (COD/TN ratio) and the shape of the reactor. About 80% of the TN removal efficiency was observed at a COD/TN ratio greater than 3.9 in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) (Chul and Jay 2008). A study by Han (1996) reported a TN removal efficiency of 69.3% to 78.5% at a COD/TN ratio range of 4.5 to 5.8. In this study, a 37% to 41% of the total TN removal rate was obtained within a COD/TN ratio range of 7.2 to 7.5. The operation conditions without effluent recycling showed an average TN removal efficiency of 33%, while the operation conditions with effluent recycling revealed an average TN removal efficiency of 37.67%. Slight effects of temperature were observed.

    3.3 NH4+-N removal

    The results in Table 6 and Table 7 show the effect of HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling on the removal efficiency of. The average influent and effluent concentrations ofin the first round of experimental operations were 28.21 mg/L and 18.39 mg/L (Table 6). In the second round of experimental operations they were 29.33 mg/L and 18.73 mg/L, respectively (Table 7). The average removal efficiency forwith HRTs of one, two, and three days and without effluent recycling was 34.7%, while the average removal efficiency of the AF reactor with HRTs of four and three days and with effluent recycling forwas 36%. The results revealed insignificantremoval under these operating conditions. This can be attributed to inadequate sludge production in the reactor.

    Table 6 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 6 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) April 18.06 3 27.41 18.52 NR 32 May 21.49 2 28.20 18.13 NR 36 June 24.15 1 29.01 18.52 NR 36

    Table 7 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 7 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) July 30.67 4 29.59 18.29 1:1 38 August 30.57 3 29.30 17.91 1:2 39 September 26.91 3 29.10 19.98 2:1 31

    3.4 NO3--N removal

    Table 8 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 8 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in first round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) April 18.06 3 0.69 0.53 NR 23 May 21.49 2 0.58 0.47 NR 19 June 24.15 1 0.39 0.31 NR 21

    Table 9 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Table 9 Influent and effluentconcentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    Month Temperature (℃) HRT (d) Cinf(mg/L) Ceff(mg/L) July 30.67 4 5.20 3.43 August 30.57 3 3.27 2.30 September 26.91 3 3.59 2.48 Effluent recycling ratio Removal efficiency (%) 1:1 34 1:2 30 2:1 31

    3.5 TP removal

    The average influent and effluent total phosphorus (TP) c and 3.07 mg/L, respectively, in the first round of experimen 5.05 mg/L and 2.86 mg/L, respectively, in the second round of exp oncentrations were, 3.72 mg/L tal operations (Table 10), and erimental operations (Table 11).

    Table 10 Influent and effluent TP concentrations and removal efficienc operations and experimental condition ies in first round of experimental s

    Table 11 Influent and effluent TP concentrations and removal efficiencies in second round of experimental operations and experimental conditions

    In regards to TP, the HRT, temperature, and operation condition with or without effluent recycling had an influence on the reactor’s removal efficiency. The efficiency improved with increasing HRT, temperature, and effluent recycling. In the first round of experimental operations, the temperature was low and there was no effluent recycling, and a 17% average TP removal rate was obtained, whereas in the second round of experimental operations, the temperature was high and effluent recycling was used, and a 44% average TP removal rate was obtained. This shows that temperature and effluent recycling significantly affects the reactor’s performance in TP removal but HRT has only a slight effect. The results also showed that TP removal rates increased with an increase in COD concentration, and this result coincided with a study by Mohammed and Abbas (2007). Giuseppe (2009) found that the higher the recycling ratio for the anaerobic treatment process was (within a limit based on kinetic considerations), the higher the removal efficiency of nutrients could be. This result coincided with a study by Elmitwalli and Ralf (2007), in which an experimental test was conducted with a UASB reactor treating grey water at HRTs between 6 and 16 hours and a temperature of 30℃, and removal efficiencies of 22% to 30% for TN and 15% to 21% for TP were obtained.

    3.6 Variation of pH values

    The pH value fluctuations in the influent and effluent of the AF reactor were monitored over time and the average pH values in the influent and effluent were 7.70 and 7.94, respectively, during the first round of experimental operations, and 7.70 and 7.84, respectively, during the second round of experimental operations (Tables 12 and 13).

    Table 12 Influent and effluent pH values in first round of experimental operations

    Table 13 Influent and effluent pH values in second round of experimental operations

    Monitoring of pH value in the anaerobic reactor is crucial and can be helpful in detecting abnormalities of a system. In this study, the pH value of the treated domestic wastewater (effluent) was in the range of 7.68 to 8.04, indicating satisfactory conditions of the reactor. According to the literature (Stronach et al. 1986), pH values less than 6.8 or greater than 8.3 will cause souring of the reactor in the process of anaerobic digestion. The average pH value of the influent wastewater for the two experimental operations was 7.71, which is typical forwastewater with a mean pH value of 7.8, slightly higher than what reported by Chuan (2007). Several researchers have studied the effect of pH on the anaerobic treatment process (Yu and Fang 2002; Paulo et al. 2003; Hu et al. 2005) but there does not exist ample information about the influence of pH on AF’s efficiency in treating rural domestic waste. Generally, the pH throughout the AF effluent remained stable despite an increase in HRTs.

    3.7 Gas production rate

    The average gas production rate varying with time is shown in Tables 14 and 15. As the system stabilized, the average gas production rate varied between 5.82 and 8.39 L/d in the first round of experimental operations (Table 14) and in the range of 6.01 to 8.36 L/d in the second round of experimental operations (Table 15).

    Table 14 Gas production rate in first round of experimental operations

    Table 15 Gas production rate in second round of experimental operations

    The gas production rate during the experimental operations was in the range of 5.82 to 8.39 L/d. In the first round of experimental operations, the average gas production rate was 6.72 L/d, and in the second round of experimental operations, the average gas production rate was 7.26 L/d. For the first round of operations, the highest gas production rate was 8.39 L/d in April, and the lowest was 5.82 L/d in May. The highest amount recorded was due to an increased HRT and the fact that there was no effluent recycling, and also due to the fact that April was the start-up season with active sludge and organic-rich compounds. Moreover, in May, the average gas production rate dropped significantly to 5.82 L/d. This may have been a result of a decreased HRT, where biomass has a higher propensity to be washed out from the AF system. This finding corresponds with the results of Chuan (2007). Lew et al. (2004) experienced a decline in the gas production rate when the temperature was low. A study by Agrawal et al. (1997) revealed a 78% decrease in the gas production rate when the temperature was reduced from 30℃ to 10℃. Generally, the average gas production rate increased in the second round of experimental operations as a result of applied effluent recycling, which coincides with the findings of Yu and Fang (2002).

    4 Conclusions

    Rural domestic sewage and its composition vary with seasons and the natural cyclical pattern of human activity. In this study, an experiment was carried out to treat rural domestic sewage using AF reactors, and the effects of HRT, temperature, and effluents recycling on the treatment efficiency of the AF reactor were investigated. The best and optimum removal efficiency was obtained at an HRT of three days, an effluent recycling ratio of 2:1, and an average temperature of 30℃. The concentrations of TN,, and TP were slightly influenced by HRT, but significantly affected by temperature and the operating conditions with or without effluent recycling. For all the experimental operations with effluent recycling, the results obtained were better than for the experimental operations without effluent recycling.

    Thus, the application of the AF reactor in rural domestic wastewater can play a crucial part in the development of effective and feasible concepts for wastewater management, especially for people in rural low-income areas.

    Agrawal, L. K., Ohashi, Y., Mochida, E., Okui, H., Ueki, Y., Harada, H., and Ohashi, A. 1997. Treatment of raw sewage in a temperate climate using a UASB reactor and the hanging sponge cubes process. Water Science and Technology, 36(6-7), 433-440. [doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00552-0]

    Angenent, L. T., and Sung, S. 2001. Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system. Water Research, 35(7), 1739-1747. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00447-4].

    Barbosa, R. A., and Sant’Anna, G. L. 1989. Treatment of raw domestic sewage in an UASB reactor. Water Research, 23(12), 1483-1490. [doi:10.1016/0043-1354(89)90112-7]

    Bodik, L., Herdova, B., and Kratochvil, K. 2000. The application of anaerobic filter for municipal wastewater treatment. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Slovak Society of Chemical Engineering, 54(3), 159-164.

    Bodik, I., Kratochvil, K., Gaspirkova, E., and Hutnan, M. 2003. Nitrogen removal in an anaerobic baffled filter reactor with aerobic post-treatment. Bioresource Technology, 86(1), 79-84. [doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00109-8]

    Bogte, J. J., Breure, A. M., van Andel, J. G., and Lettinga, G. 1993. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in small scale UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology, 27(9), 75-82.

    Chaisri, R., Boonsawang, P., Prasertsan, P., and Chaiprapat, S. 2007. Effect of organic loading rate on methane and volatile fatty acids productions from anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in UASB and UFAF reactors. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, (s2), 311-323.

    Chernicharo, C. A. L., and Machado, R. M. G. 1998. Feasibility of UASB/AF system for domestic sewage treatment in developing countries. Water Science and Technology, 38(8-9), 325-332. [doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00708-2]

    Chernicharo, C. A. L., and Nascimento, M. C. P. 2001. Feasibility of a pilot-scale UASB/trickling filter system for domestic sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology, 44(4), 221-228.

    Chernicharo, C. A. L. 2007. Anaerobic Reactors, Biological Wastewater Treatment Series (Volume 4). London: IWA Publishing.

    Chuan, W. S. 2007. Performance of Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor Treating Municipal Wastewater at Different Retention Times. M. E. Dissertation, Kent Ridge: National University of Singaphore.

    Chul, H. W., and Jay, M. R. 2008. Anaerobic/oxic treatment of slurry-type swine waste. Environmental Engineering Research, 13(4), 203-209.

    Clescerl, L. S., Arnold, E. G., and Eaton, A. D. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Elmitwalli, T. A., Sklyar, V., Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 2002a. Low temperature pre-treatment of domestic sewage in an anaerobic hybrid or an anaerobic filter reactor. Bioresource Technology, 82(3), 233-239. [doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00191-2]

    Elmitwalli, T. A., Oahn, K. L. T., Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 2002b. Treatment of domestic sewage in a two step anaerobic filter/anaerobic hybrid system at low temperature. Water Research, 36(9), 2225-2232. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00438-9]

    Elmitwalli, T. A., and Ralf, O. 2007. Anaerobic biodegradability and treatment of grey water in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Water Research, 41(6), 1379-1387. [doi:10.1016/j.watres. 2006.12.016]

    Foresti, E. 2001. Perspectives on anaerobic treatment in developing countries. Water Science and Technology, 44(8), 141-148.

    Gijzen, H. J. 2002. Anaerobic digestion for sustainable development: a natural approach. Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 321-328.

    Giuseppe, B. 2009. Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5424-5430. [doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.005]

    Govindaradjane, S., and Sundararajan, T. 2013. Performance and kinetics of a huasb reactor for treating tapioca-based starch industrial waste stream. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(4), 55-64.

    Hammes, F., Kalogo, Y., and Verstraete, W. 2000. Anaerobic digestion technologies for closing the domestic water, carbon and nutrient cycles. Water Science and Technology, 41(3), 203-211.

    Han, D. J. 1996. Reaction Characteristics of the Development of Biofilm Process Combined Upflow Blanket Filter and Anoxic-Oxic Process for the Nutrient Removal. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chuncheon: Kangwon National University.

    Heertjes, P. M., and Van Der Meer, R. R. 1978. Dynamics of liquid flow in an upflow reactor used for anaerobic treatment of wastewater. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 20(10), 1577-1594. [doi:10.1002/ bit.260201007]

    Hu, Z. H., Yu, H. Q., and Zhu, R. F. 2005. Influence of particle size and pH on anaerobic degradation of cellulose by ruminal microbes. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 55(3), 233-238. [doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.02.002]

    Ladu, J. L. C., Lu, X., and Loboka, M. K. 2012. Experimental assessment on the effect of OLR and HRT on the efficiency of anaerobic filter treating abattoir. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(11), 415-420.

    Langenhoff, A. A. M., and Stucky, D. C. 2000. Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: Effect of low temperature. Water Research, 34(15), 3867-3875. [doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00) 00136-6].

    Lettinga, G., van Nelsen, A. F. H., Hobma, S. W., De Zeeu, W. W., and Klapwijk, A. 1980. Use of the upflow sludge (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 22(4), 699-734. [doi:10.1002/bit.260220402]

    Lettinga, G., Roersma, R., Grin, P., de Zeeuw, W., Hulshof Pol, L., van Velsen, L., Hovma, S., and Zeeman, G. 1981. Anaerobic treatment of sewage and low strength wastewater. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, 271-291. Travemunde: Elsevier Biomedical Press.

    Lettinga, G., Roersma, R., and Grin, P. 1983. Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic sewage at ambient temperatures using a granular bed UASB reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25(7), 1701-1723 [doi:10.1002/bit.260250703]

    Lettinga, G. 1996. Sustainable integrated biological wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology, 33(3), 85-98. [doi:10.1016/0273-1223(96)00303-4]

    Lew, B., Tarre, S., Belavski, M., and Green, M. 2004. UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment at low temperatures: a comparison between a classical UASB and hybrid UASB-filter reactor. Water Scienceand Technology, 49(11-12), 295-301.

    Luostarinen, S., Sanders, W., Kujawa-Roeleveld, K., and Zeeman, G. 2007. Effect of temperature on anaerobic treatment of black water in UASB-septic tank systems. Bioresource Technology, 98(5), 980-986. [doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.018]

    Manariotis, I. D., and Grigoropoulos, S. G. 2006. Anaerobic filter treatment of municipal wastewater: biosolids behavior. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(1), 23-31. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:1(23)]

    Martina, U. 2008. Effect of Hydraulic Loading Variation on a Pilot Scale UASB Reactor Treating Domestic Wastewater at Vapi CETP. M. E. Dissertation. Sweden: Lund University.

    Mohammed, A. H., and Abbas, H. A. 2007. Sequential anaerobic/aerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 14(2), 1-31.

    Paulo, P. L., Villa, G., Van Lier, J. B., and Lettinga, G. 2003. The anaerobic conversion of methanol under thermophilic conditions: pH and bicarbonate dependence. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96(3), 213-218.

    Sam-soon, P. A., Loewenthal, R. E., Wentzel, M. C., and Marais, G. V. R. 1991. A long chain fatty acid, oleate, as sole substrate in upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) systems. Water SA, 17(1), 165-170.

    Seghezzo, L. 1997. Kinetics and Structure of Anaerobic Granular Sludge from EGSB Reactors. M. E. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Seghezzo, L. 2004. Anaerobic Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in Subtropical Regions. Ph. D. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Stronach, S. M., Rudd, T., and Lester, J. N. 1986. Anaerobic Digestion Process in the Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Van der Last, A. R. M., and Lettinga, G. 1992. Anaerobic treatment of domestic sewage under moderate climatic (Dutch) conditions using upflow reactors at increased superficial velocities. Water Science and Technology, 25(7), 167-178.

    Van Haandel, A. C., and Lettinga, G. 1994. Anaerobic sewage treatment. A Practical Guide for Regions with a Hot Climate. Chcester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Wang, K. 1994. Integrated Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Sewage. Ph. D. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Young, J. C., and McCarty, P. L. 1969. The anaerobic filter for waste treatment. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 41(5), 160-173

    Yu, H. Q., and Fang, H. H. P. 2002. Acidogenesis of dairy wastewater at various pH levels. Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 201-206.

    Yu, H. Q., Hu, Z. H., Hong, T. Q., and Gu, G. W. 2002. Performance of an anaerobic filter treating soybean processing wastewater with and without effluent recycle. Process Biochemistry, 38(4), 507-513. [doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00175-9]

    Zeeman, G., and Lettinga, G. 1999. The role of anaerobic digestion of domestic sewage in closing the water and nutrient cycle at community level. Water Science and Technology, 39(5), 187-194.

    (Edited by Yun-li YU)

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51078074) and the Key Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 308010).

    *Corresponding author (e-mail: johnleju@yahoo.com)

    Received Mar. 1, 2013; accepted Jan. 1, 2014

    赤兔流量卡办理| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产在线免费精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 久久久久网色| av专区在线播放| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| av福利片在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中文天堂在线官网| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲精品一二三| 三级经典国产精品| 一区二区av电影网| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 97在线人人人人妻| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| av免费在线看不卡| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 免费观看性生交大片5| 在线观看www视频免费| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久久久久久精品精品| 极品教师在线视频| h日本视频在线播放| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 91久久精品电影网| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 9色porny在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 午夜福利视频精品| 高清毛片免费看| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 91精品国产九色| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 精品一区在线观看国产| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 在线观看国产h片| 99热全是精品| 久久av网站| 中文欧美无线码| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 韩国av在线不卡| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本av免费视频播放| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲av.av天堂| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 曰老女人黄片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日本色播在线视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久热精品热| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 综合色丁香网| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久久久久伊人网av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 一本久久精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 日本色播在线视频| av不卡在线播放| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久久久国产网址| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲图色成人| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 九草在线视频观看| 日韩强制内射视频| av在线app专区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产淫语在线视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲精品第二区| 免费看光身美女| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 春色校园在线视频观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| av有码第一页| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 99热网站在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 曰老女人黄片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产精品无大码| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 一级a做视频免费观看| 成年av动漫网址| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久av网站| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 色视频www国产| 永久网站在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 内地一区二区视频在线| av在线观看视频网站免费| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | av视频免费观看在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美区成人在线视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 一本一本综合久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 综合色丁香网| 久久av网站| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 免费观看av网站的网址| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 两个人免费观看高清视频 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 男女免费视频国产| 春色校园在线视频观看| 色网站视频免费| 免费观看性生交大片5| 少妇的逼水好多| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| xxx大片免费视频| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 只有这里有精品99| 两个人的视频大全免费| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 99九九在线精品视频 | 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 97超碰精品成人国产| 99久久人妻综合| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日韩电影二区| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 曰老女人黄片| 永久网站在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 一个人免费看片子| 久久久久视频综合| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产视频内射| 中文欧美无线码| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 性色av一级| av播播在线观看一区| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 男女边摸边吃奶| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 草草在线视频免费看| av线在线观看网站| 久久久久视频综合| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 午夜福利,免费看| 9色porny在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 美女福利国产在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产永久视频网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产一级毛片在线| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| av免费在线看不卡| 秋霞伦理黄片| 视频中文字幕在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 三级经典国产精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久热久热在线精品观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 看免费成人av毛片| 午夜91福利影院| 日本黄大片高清| 国产 精品1| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久久久久久国产电影| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲成色77777| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 老熟女久久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产亚洲最大av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 男女边摸边吃奶| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久久久成人| 一级毛片电影观看| av在线app专区| 草草在线视频免费看| 成人二区视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 热re99久久国产66热| 在线看a的网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| av福利片在线| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | 老熟女久久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲无线观看免费| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一级av片app| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 中国国产av一级| 久久av网站| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 麻豆成人av视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 高清不卡的av网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 免费观看在线日韩| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 国产 一区精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久青草综合色| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 嫩草影院入口| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产综合精华液| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 麻豆成人av视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国内精品宾馆在线| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 在线观看www视频免费| av福利片在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| xxx大片免费视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 内射极品少妇av片p| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 免费观看在线日韩| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产在线视频一区二区| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 欧美3d第一页| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲成人手机| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产一级毛片在线| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产综合精华液| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 五月天丁香电影| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 高清毛片免费看| 777米奇影视久久| av专区在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩伦理黄色片| 一级爰片在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 日本免费在线观看一区| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产精品成人在线| 91精品国产九色| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 尾随美女入室| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码|