• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Visuospatial properties of caudal area 7b in Macaca fascicularis

    2013-09-20 03:39:30HuiHuiJIANGYingZhouHUJianHongWANGYuanYeMAXinTianHU
    Zoological Research 2013年2期

    Hui-Hui JIANG, Ying-Zhou HU, , Jian-Hong WANG, Yuan-Ye MA, , Xin-Tian HU,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China;

    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    3. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

    4. Kunming Primate Research Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China

    When we attempt to grasp or reach for an object,our motor system requires that our sensory system provide information about the location of the target.However, different sensory stimuli are encoded in different reference frames: visual stimuli are captured by the retina, auditory stimuli are received within the head,and tactile stimuli arise from the body. Movement must be directed towards the target depending on where it is positioned with respect to the body part. To proceed from sensation to movement, our brain needs to integrate information from the different senses and transform it into a non-retinocentric frame of reference, such as a body-part-centered frame of reference. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether area caudal 7b was a part of this transformation system.

    To construct a body-part-centered visual receptive field, retinal signals must be integrated with other signals.For example, by combining retinocentric visual signals with eye position signals, the head-centered visual receptive field of the cells can be constructed (Graziano et al, 1997). The arm-centered visual receptive field of cells requires integration of not only retinocentric visual and eye position signals but also head and arm position signals. In addition to visual signals, eye position, head position, and vestibular signals converge on neurons in area 7a (Andersen et al, 1985; Andersen et al, 1990b;Andersen et al, 1997). These signals are combined in a systematic fashion using the “gain field” mechanism, in which other signals modify the retinocentric visual signal.1

    Anatomically, area 7a projects to area 7b and the ventral intraparietal cortex (VIP), which in turn connects to the ventral premotor cortex (PMv). Although other sensory signals modulate retinocentric visual signals, the visual receptive fields in area 7a are still eye-centered(Andersen et al, 1985). In the PMv, most neurons are bimodal cells, i.e., they respond to both tactile and visual stimuli (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996;Gentilucci et al, 1983; Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Most visual receptive fields encode nearby space in a body-part-centered reference frame (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996; Gentilucci et al, 1983;Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Additionally,most neurons in the VIP are bimodal (Colby et al, 1993;Duhamel et al, 1998) and employ a hybrid reference frame (Duhamel et al, 1997).

    On the basis of previous studies, it is known that area 7b receives visual and somatosensory inputs from cortical and subcortical brain structures (Andersen et al,1990a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1989a) and is also the target of cerebellar output, which suggests that it may be important in movement (Clower et al, 2001; Clower et al,2005). Damage to area 7b causes spatial deficits, such as neglect of contralateral peripersonal space (Matelli et al,1984), which suggests that this area is involved in spatial information processing. Area 7b contains cells with visual and tactile properties that resemble those of PMv cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). These results suggest that area 7b may be one component of the receptive field transformation system. Do neurons in this area have the characteristics of the transformation system?Does the area employ a retinocentric reference frame similar to area 7a, a hybrid system similar to VIP, or some other reference frame? To date, no quantitative studies on these issues have been conducted.

    In the present study, we first qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in the caudal portion of area 7b. If a neuron showed a clear visual response, the reference frame of the neuron was tested quantitatively.We plotted the visual receptive fields of neurons when the eyes were held still. The receptive fields were then replotted when the eyes were in a new position. In this way, we could determine whether the visual receptive fields were centered on the eyes.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Ethics statement

    All animal care and surgical procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Institute of Zoology.

    Two adult male Macaca fascicularis (4.2–6.0 kg)were used in the present research. They were singlehoused under standard conditions (a 12-h light/dark cycle with lights on from 07:00 to 19:00, humidity at 60%, and temperature at 21 ± 2℃ in the animal colony. Their body weights were closely monitored during the experiments.

    Surgical procedures

    All surgeries were performed under strict aseptic conditions and, unless otherwise indicated, under ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.4 mg/kg)anesthesia. Under deep anesthesia, one stainless steel recording chamber for chronic single-unit recording, 2.5 cm in diameter, was embedded in dental acrylic over the right parietal lobe of each monkey. A steel bolt for holding the monkeys’ head stationary during experiments was also embedded in the acrylic. During the same surgery session, one scleral search coil (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966)was implanted to record eye position signals.

    Post-surgical recovery lasted approximately one week. Both monkeys were given two additional weeks before behavioral training started to allow the skull to grow tightly around the skull screws.

    After the behavioral training was completed, the recording chamber was opened under aseptic conditions and a ~4 mm hole was drilled through the dental acrylic and bone to expose the dura mater. All data were collected from this region.

    Behavioral training

    Before experimental task training began, each monkey’s ad libitum daily water intake was measured.Based on this measurement, the monkeys were placed on a restricted water schedule whereby each monkey received most of its water as a reward for performing the task. If the monkey received less water than its normal daily amount during the experimental session, a postsession supplement was given. Each monkey also received ad libitum water for two consecutive days every weekend during which training and recording sessions were not conducted. Each monkey’s body weight was closely monitored during the time it was on the restricted water schedule.

    At the beginning of the task training, the monkey sat in the chair with its head and left arm fixed, and its eye movements were constantly monitored using a standard eye coil technique (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966;Graziano et al, 1997). As shown in Figure 1, three LEDs were placed 57 cm in front of the monkey at eye level,15 visual degrees apart. First, the monkeys were trained to perform the fixation task without a peripheral visual stimulus. The central LED was set to blink at a frequency of 6 Hz. If the monkey fixated on the central LED within a specified round spatial window (fixation window), the LED stopped blinking and remained lit. If the monkey maintained fixation for the remainder of the trial, the LED was turned off and the monkey received a drop of juice as a reward. A 3–10-second intertrial interval (ITI)commenced at the same time that the reward was given.If the monkey broke fixation at any time during the trial,the LED was turned off, the ITI was restarted, and the monkey was not rewarded. As the training progressed,the size of the spatial fixation window was decreased and the fixation period was increased. At the final stage, the monkeys were able to fixate within a round window of 3 visual degrees in diameter for a 4-second fixation period.After they learned to fixate on the central LED, the monkeys were trained to fixate on the two lateral LEDs using the same procedure.

    Having learned the fixation task, the monkeys were next trained to perform the same task when a peripheral visual stimulus was presented (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

    Recording procedure

    The recording sessions started after the monkey was able to perform the task for more than 700 trials in one day. During the daily recording sessions, a hydraulic microdriver was mounted to the top of the recording chamber. A steel guide cannula (22-gauge syringe needle)was slowly lowered through the small hole in the chamber until its tip was close to the surface of the dura mater. Then, a varnish-coated tungsten microelectrode(Frederick Haer, impedance 0.8–1.0 MΩ) was advanced slowly from the guide cannula through the dura mater and into the cortex. After the electrode penetrated the surface of the cortex, as indicated by the appearance of background neuronal signals, the electrode was withdrawn 1.5 mm, and the brain was allowed to recover from the indentation caused by the advance of the electrode for about one hour. The electrode was then slowly moved up and down to isolate single-unit activity.As the experiment progressed, the cannula and a new electrode were inserted into a slightly different location in the small hole.

    Tests

    When a single neuron was isolated, its activity was constantly monitored with an oscilloscope and a loudspeaker. Each neuron was first tested to determine if it had tactile, visual, and/or auditory responses. The tactile response was tested by manual palpation, gentle pressure, and stroking with a cotton swab. Tactile responses on the face were studied in the dark or when the eyes were covered. Visual responses were studied with hand-held objects, such as cotton swabs, a bunch of plastic grapes, monkey dolls, or a metal rod. The visual stimulus was moved into the visual receptive field from above, below, or the side. The receptive field was measured with the most effective stimulus when the response became stable and clear. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, we also tested the depth extension of visual RFs.

    If a cell showed clear visual responses, it was then tested quantitatively with one of the following two tests:

    Figure 1 Two experimental tests were used in the present study. A: robot arm test. In each trial, the monkey fixated on one of the three LEDs (FIX A, B, C), and the visual stimulus was advanced along one of the five trajectories indicated by the arrows. B: plastic rod test. In each trial, the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs (A, B, C). During the fixation, one of the five plastic rods indicated by the filled circles (stimulus positions 3 to 7) descended into view from behind a panel. The circles on the monkey’s head show the recording locations.

    Figure 2 Time course of the two experimental tests used in the present study. The change in the vertical position of the stimulus time course indicates stimulus movement.The dotted line indicates that the duration was random. FIX = fixation light; STIM = stimulus.

    Robot arm test

    Only monkey 1 was tested with this type of stimulus,as shown in Figure 1A. At 0.5 seconds after the onset of fixation, a visual stimulus (a piece of blue Styrofoam, 2 cm in diameter) was advanced towards the animal by a mechanized track at a speed of 8 cm/sec along one of five equally spaced parallel trajectories at the same level,15 visual degrees apart. The trajectories were 12 cm long and their locations were adjusted to match the visual receptive field being studied. The stimulus stayed at the end of the trajectory for 0.2 seconds before the ITI started. The stimulus was moved to the starting position of the next trajectory during the ITI. The time course of this test is demonstrated in Figure 2. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimulus trajectories resulted in fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were tested in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically had ten trials.

    However, there were some problems with the stimulus. Firstly, in the robot arm test, the Styrofoam stimulus was always in view and some area 7b neurons quickly habituated to it. Secondly, the five trajectories used in the robot arm test were parallel to each other and moved straight towards the monkey. When the stimulus was advanced towards the monkey along a trajectory located peripheral to the visual receptive field, it produced a much larger visual angle compared with other trajectories in the middle of the visual receptive field before reaching its end point. When a larger visual angle was covered, a larger area on the retina was stimulated,which made it more difficult to directly compare results from different trajectories. To address these problems, we designed a plastic rod test in which the stimulus suddenly came into view and the visual angle of visual stimulus was kept constant.

    Plastic rod test

    This test was used on both monkeys. An array of five small plastic rods, arranged 15 degrees apart along a semicircle and controlled by five different stepping motors, served as visual stimuli. The center of the semicircle was located at the midline of the monkey’s face, and its radius was 5 cm. There were a total of ten possible locations on the semicircle (labeled 1 to 10) for the five rods so that the locations of the stimuli could be adjusted according to the location of the visual receptive field being tested.

    Each trial began when the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs. After an initial fixation period of 1.25–2.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–2.5 seconds for monkey 2, one of the five rods descended at a speed of 10 cm/sec for 6.0 cm, emerging from behind a head-level panel into the monkey’s view. The rod remained stationary for 1.0 second in front of the animal. The trial was then ended and the animal received 0.2 ml of juice as a reward. A variable ITI began (4.0-7.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–3.0 seconds for monkey 2), and the rod was withdrawn to behind the panel. Figure 2 shows the time course for the test. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimuli (rods) yielded fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were run in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically contained ten trials.

    Statistical procedures

    Two analysis windows were chosen for each cell.The first, termed the "baseline window" and used to calculate the pre-stimulus baseline activity, consisted of the time period from 0.6 to 0.0 s before the onset of the stimulus. The other window, termed the "response window", was used to examine the neuron’s response to visual stimuli and consisted of the time period from the onset of the neuron’s main visual response (i.e., three standard deviations above the baseline for three consecutive bins, with a 50-ms bin length) to 1.5 s after stimulus onset because all recorded neurons continued their responses to the end of the trial. We chose not to use a fixed response window as in previous studies because the size and location of the receptive fields differed among the neurons, and as a result, the exact time when the stimulus moved into the receptive field varied from neuron to neuron. Because cells did not respond to the stimulus at the same time across different locations, we chose the response window from the earliest onset(which was usually also the best response) location and applied this window to all fifteen experimental conditions. The response window was shortened and lengthened for several tested neurons; very similar results were obtained, which demonstrated the robustness of this method of analysis.

    Qualitative analysis

    All neurons were classified qualitatively. Firstly,neurons without a clear peak (as judged by the existence of a response location in the curve that was significantly different from the response for at least one location on both sides of the peak, according to a t-test) in three tuning curves were not included in the data set for the spatial shift analysis. Secondly, before calculating the shift index, we compared the shapes of the tuning curves by moving two of the tuning curves until the peaks of three tuning curves overlapped, because shift index values can be affected by shapes of the tuning curves. We classified neurons into the following three types based on this comparison: (1) Neurons without obvious shape changes (as judged by the overlap of the standard deviations at each stimulus location) and receptive fields that did not shift with the eyes were classified as nonretinocentric neurons. (2) Neurons without obvious shape changes and receptive fields that shifted with the eyes were defined as retinocentric neurons. (3) Neurons with a partial spatial shift, which included two groups of neurons: the first group had no obvious shape changes but had partially shifted receptive fields; the second group had obvious shape changes and was also classified as partial spatial shift neurons.

    Quantitative analysis

    Based on the qualitative analysis, neurons with clear peaked responses were analyzed quantitatively. A shift index (SI) was calculated to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when eye position changed as the monkey fixated on different LEDs (Graziano,1999; Schlack et al, 2005).

    First, a center of mass (CM) was calculated for each of the tuning curves corresponding to the right (CMR)and left (CML) fixation LEDs. When the animal fixated on the right LED, the responses (number of spikes per second) from each of the five stimulus locations were numbered from the monkey’s left to right as R1 to R5.The formula used to calculate the CMR of the right fixation LED tuning curve is C MR = ( R1 + 2 × R 2+3 × R 3 + 4 × R 4 + 5 × R 5 )/(R1 + R 2 + R 3 + R 4 + R 5).

    The CML of the left LED could be calculated in the same way. From the CMs, the shift index (SI) was calculated as SI = C MR - C ML .

    A positive SI indicated that the visual receptive field shifted in the same direction as the change in eye position in the orbit. A negative SI indicated that the visual receptive field was displaced in the opposite direction from the change in eye position. An SI value close to zero indicated a stationary visual receptive field.

    Histology

    After the series of experiments was completed,monkey 1 was injected with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg) and perfused with saline and 4%paraformaldehyde. The head was removed from the body and placed in a stereotactic apparatus. The skull and dura mater were removed to expose the brain. The intraparietal, superior temporal and lateral sulci were mapped stereotactically. Figure 3 shows the entry location of the electrode in relation to the sulci for monkey 1. On this basis, we confirmed that the recording sites were located in the caudal portion of area 7b.

    Figure 3 Locations of area 7b and electrode penetration. Black dot: the recording area was ~4 mm in diameter and~2 mm in depth. IPL, the inferior parietal lobe; SPL,the superior parietal lobe; ips, the intraparietal sulcus.

    RESULTS

    Response categories

    In total, 291 neurons in caudal area 7b were examined in the right hemispheres of two awake monkeys. In these cells, neuronal responses were classified as somatosensory, visual, or bimodal(somatosensory + visual). We also tested 82 cells in this area using auditory stimuli and found that only one (1%)responded. Table 1 shows the proportions of the different response types.

    Table 1 Categories of neurons based on their response type

    Somatosensory cells

    To classify the tactile receptive fields, we arbitrarily divided the monkey body into four parts: head, arms(including the hands), trunk, and legs (including the feet).The tactile receptive fields were classified into three types according to the number of body parts encompassed by the receptive fields. The tactile receptive fields were also classified into three types:ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral according to the recording hemisphere. The distribution of the receptive fields of the somatosensory cells is shown in Table 2.

    Table 2 The distribution of tactile receptive fields

    Visual cells

    In total 35 of the 42 purely visual cells were recorded for a time to test the location of the visual receptive fields, whereas the remaining seven cells were only studied long enough to determine that they had visual responses. The visual receptive fields were divided in two ways. According to recording hemisphere, the visual receptive fields could be divided into three categories: ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral to the recording hemisphere. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, neurons were classified into two types: distance > 1 m and distance < 1m. Only five visual neurons were tested with stimuli at different distances. Table 3 shows the results.

    Table 3 The distribution of visual receptive fields

    Bimodal cell

    We assessed the locations of the tactile and visual receptive fields for 119 of the 122 bimodal cells. The remaining three cells were only recorded long enough to demonstrate the existence of visual and tactile responses.The tactile receptive and visual receptive fields of the bimodal cells were classified into different types in the same way as the somatosensory and visual cells, and the results are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

    One interesting finding is that the visual receptive field in bimodal neurons always surrounds the tactile receptive field. Overall, 76% (90/119) of the bimodal cells had tactile receptive fields that spatially match their visual receptive fields.

    We also tested the visual response to perceptual depth in 45 out of the 119 bimodal cells. More than half(64%) of these cells responded clearly to the stimuli presented more than 1 m away from the monkey’s face,and the remaining 36% of the visual receptive fields were confined to a depth of 1 m or less, with a mean inner-limit distance of 0.4 m.

    In summary, the qualitative tests showed that there were three major types of responsive neurons in caudal area 7b: visual neurons (14%), somatosensory neurons(15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The receptive fields of these three categories of neurons were usually large:52% (85/163) of all tactile receptive fields (including the somatosensory cells and bimodal cells) encompassed two or more parts of the body surface, 61% (100/163) of all tactile receptive fields were bilateral, and 66% (101/154)of the visual receptive fields (including the visual cells and bimodal cells) were bilateral. Most visual receptive fields extended more than 1 m away from the body part.Most of the bimodal cells had spatially matched tactile and visual receptive fields.

    Reference frames for encoding visual stimuli

    If a neuron showed a clear visual response, it was further studied to determine whether the receptive field moved with the eye. As described in the methods section,two types of stimuli were used and three different types of neurons were found.

    For some neurons, such as Neuron JC89 (Figure 4 and Figure 5) tested with the plastic rod stimulus, the visual receptive fields moved with the eye. As seen in the Figures, when the monkey shifted its fixation point from the right to the middle LED and then to the left LED, the position at which neuron JC89 had the best response shifted from position 3 to position 2 and then to position 1. These results suggest that the visual receptive field moves with the eyes.

    Some neurons had visual receptive fields that did not shift with eye movement. Neuron HB16 (Figure 6 and Figure 7), which was tested with the robot arm stimulus, belonged to this type of neuron. Figure 7 shows that regardless of the LED on which the monkey was fixating, the position with the best response did not change for this neuron; it always showed the strongest response to a stimulus presented at position 4, and the three tuning curves were similar and overlapping. These results demonstrate that the visual receptive fields do not move with the eyes.

    Figure 4 Histograms of activity from neuron JC89 in area 7b. The upper row of the histograms shows the visual responses to the stimuli presented at the five stimulus positions when the monkey was fixating on the left LED (marked as L). The middle row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the center LED (marked as M). The lower row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the right LED (marked as R).For each histogram, the x-axis shows the time in ms, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The vertical line inside each histogram indicates the time at which the visual stimulus began to move into view. The horizontal line inside histogram L1 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 5 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron JC89. The x-axis shows the stimulus position, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The dashed line shows the average pre-stimulus activity.During right fixation (circles), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 3.During middle fixation (filled diamonds), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 2. During left fixation (stars), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 1. This result indicates that the receptive field of this cell shifted with changes in eye position.

    Neuron HB86 (Figure 8, Figure 9), which was tested with the plastic rod stimulus, is an example of a neuron with properties intermediate to those of a visual receptive field, which did not move with the eyes, and those of a visual receptive field, which did. That is, these neurons had visual receptive fields that moved slightly.As seen from the three tuning curves of neuron HB86 in Figure 9, when the monkey’s eyes shifted from the right LED to the middle LED, the two tuning curves overlapped, i.e., the visual receptive field did not shift with the eyes. In contrast, when the eye moved from the middle LED to the left LED, the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2.

    To quantify the results, a shift index (SI) was calculated for each neuron to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when the eye position changed because the monkey was fixating on different LEDs. An example SI calculation for neuron JC89 is as follows:Thus, the shift index of JC89 is SI(J C 8 9)= C MRCML= 3 .0 - 2 .2 = 0 .8.

    Figure 6 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB16. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L4 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal responses to the stimulus.

    Figure 7 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB16.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles), middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), and left LED fixation (stars) the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 4. This result indicates that the receptive field of neuron HB 16 did not shift with changes in eye position.

    Using the same formula, the shift indices for the other two example neurons are as follows: neuron HB16= 0.1 and neuron HB86 = 0.3.

    Overall, 34 neurons showing clear responses to the automatically presented stimuli demonstrated peak responses. We calculated the shift index for each of the 34 neurons. Figure 10 shows the distribution of the shift indices was from –0.4 to 0.8. The distribution of the shift index was significantly greater than zero (χ2= 9.23, P <0.01). On average, the visual receptive fields moved when the eyes moved. Thus, some neurons had visual receptive fields that moved with eye movement, some neurons had partially moving visual receptive fields, and some had receptive fields that did not move with the eyes.

    Effect of eye position on the neuronal firing rate

    In addition to the location of the visual receptive field, the visual response magnitude of caudal area 7b neurons was sometimes significantly influenced by the position of the eyes in the orbit, which is termed the modulation effect. For example, regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, HB169 responded with almost equal strength at each of the five positions,although its response was slightly stronger when the stimulus was at position 5 (Figure 11). However, the response magnitude of the cell decreased monotonically

    Figure 8 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB86. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L2 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 9 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB86.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles) and middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), the two corresponding tuning curves overlapped. The cell showed the weakest response to the stimulus presented at position 1 and the strongest response to the stimulus at position 5. In contrast,when the eyes moved from the middle LED to the left LED (stars), the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by the increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2. Overall, the visual receptive field of neuron HB 86 partially shifted with changes in eye position.

    Figure 10 Distribution of shift indices for 34 neurons. The distribution of shift indices was significantly above zero (P< 0.01)

    as the eye moved from the right LED to the middle LED and from the middle LED to the left LED. A 5 × 3 within-subjects two-way ANOVA (5 stimulus positions ×3 eye positions) showed that the modulation of the cell response was significant (P < 0.001). Neuron JC 89 showed the same type of response modulation (P < 0.05).

    In contrast, neuron HB16 responses were not modulated by eye position (P > 0.5). This cell responded best to the stimulus presented at position 4. The magnitude of the visual response did not change significantly when the eyes were at different positions in the orbit.

    Figure 11 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuronHB169. Axes are the same as in Figure 5. Regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, neuron HB169 responded to the stimulus with almost equal strength when presented at each of the five positions, although the response was slightly stronger at position 5. However, the response magnitude decreased monotonically as the eyes moved from the right LED(circles) to the middle LED (filled diamonds) and from the middle LED to the left LED (stars). This result indicates that the visual response magnitude of neuron HB169 was significantly modulated by changes in eye position (P < 0.001).

    The ANOVA for the 34 neurons showed that the visual response magnitudes of 12 cells (35%) were significantly modulated by eye position, and the response magnitudes of the remaining 22 cells (65%) were not significantly modulated by eye position.

    DISCUSSION

    Visual and tactile responses in caudal area 7b

    In this study, we qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major types of responsive neurons were found: visual neurons(14%), somatosensory neurons (15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The bimodal, visual-somatosensory cells usually responded to visual stimuli positioned close to the tactile receptive field. Some cells responded only to stimuli within centimeters of the body whereas others responded to stimuli presented more than 1 m away.

    Other studies regarding the general properties of neurons in area 7b have also demonstrated that it contains visual cells, somatosensory cells, and bimodal cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). The proportions of cells across these three categories varied from study to study, with that the percentage of bimodal neurons varying from 6% to 33%. The present study showed 42% bimodal neurons.

    One possible reason for these quantitative differences is that the stimuli and the way in which stimuli are used may vary across labs. For example, we found that the visual response to a stimulus delivered from behind the animal and then moved into its view was usually better than the visual response observed when the same stimulus was delivered from in front of the animal.It is possible that the stimulus coming from behind was unexpected, and therefore, it drew more attention. Other labs using stimuli presented from the front may therefore report a lower percentage of visual responses. Another possible reason for the quantitative differences is that the recording sites (i.e., the sample population) may differ from the caudal part of area 7b used in the present study.Furthermore, the monkeys used in our study were awake,whereas other studies were conducted on anesthetized monkeys. As described previously, the wakefulness of animals can affect the response properties of area 7b neurons (Robinson & Burton, 1980). When the monkey is asleep, the receptive fields of some somatosensory neurons become smaller, the borders become more difficult to define, and the somatic activations become less clear.

    Transformation of reference frames

    It has been suggested that body-part-centered receptive fields provide a general solution to the central problem of sensory-motor integration (Graziano et al,1994) and that this type of reference frame can encode the distance and direction from a body part to a nearby visual stimulus (Graziano et al, 1997). However, to proceed from a retinocentric reference frame to a bodypart-centered reference frame requires a complicated transformation system that involves several brain areas.

    Only one study has reported that, in some cases, the visual responses of neurons in area 7b do not depend on the direction of the gaze (Leinonen et al, 1979). Our present research is the first quantitative study to explore whether the visual receptive fields of neurons in caudal area 7b move with the eyes. We found that neurons in caudal area 7b encoded space in a hybrid reference frame,and some neurons encoded space in a retinocentric reference frame. We did not further differentiate the reference frames employed by the non-retinocentric neurons, e.g., head-centered, body-centered, or worldcentered, but showed that the caudal part of area 7b was one component of the reference frame transformation system.

    Recent studies on the inferior parietal lobe (IPL)challenge the widely used bipartite subdivision of the IPL convexity into caudal and rostral areas (7a and 7b,respectively). These studies provide strong support for a subdivision of the IPL convexity into four distinct areas(Opt, PG, PFG, and PF) and indicate that these four areas are not only cytoarchitectonically distinct but also distinct in connectivity (Gregoriou et al, 2006; Rozzi et al, 2006). In our study, the recording site was located in the caudal portion of area 7b, corresponding to area PFG.The present results provide evidence that caudal area 7b may be one component of the reference frame transformation, which is consistent with the proposed function based on the connectivity pattern of area PFG(Borra et al, 2008; Fogassi & Luppino, 2005; Rozzi et al,2006).

    Eye-position-independent visual receptive fields in other brain areas

    The anterior intraparietal (AIP) area is located rostrally in the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus and is known to play a crucial role in visuomotor transformations for grasping. Anatomically, the AIP is connected to the IPL and the rostral ventral premotor area F5 (Borra et al, 2008; Luppino et al, 1999).Reversible lesion experiments have shown that AIP inactivation produces grasping impairment (Gallese et al,1994). Visual, motor, and visuomotor neurons have been recorded during the execution of grasping movements(Murata et al, 1996; Murata et al, 2000; Sakata et al,1995; Taira et al, 1990).

    Another parietal area suggested to have eyeposition-independent visual receptive field is the parietooccipital visual area (V6A). Studies have shown that although most of the visual receptive fields are eyecentered, there is a small portion of neurons in this area with visual receptive fields that remain static when the eyes move and another small group of visual receptive fields that partially move with the eyes (Fattori et al,1992; Galletti et al, 1993; Galletti et al, 1995).

    Area 7b, VIP, and PMv are monosynaptically interconnected and all project to the putamen (Cavada &Goldman-Rakic, 1989a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic,1989b; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1991; Matelli et al,1986). Studies of the putamen of anesthetized and awake macaque monkeys have shown that about 30% of the cells with tactile responses also respond to visual stimuli.For these bimodal neurons, the visual receptive fields are anchored to the tactile receptive fields, moving as the tactile receptive fields move (Graziano & Gross, 1993).

    Comparing these brain areas quantitatively by calculating the fraction of each cell type in each individual area, might provide more information about how the system works, and more experiments should be conducted in which all of these areas are tested using identical procedures.

    In summary, we tested the response properties and the spatial encoding coordinates of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major kinds of responsive neurons were found in this area: visual neurons, somatosensory neurons, and bimodal neurons. The receptive fields were usually large, and visual receptive fields of the bimodal neurons were always located near tactile receptive fields.Neurons in this area encoded space in a hybrid reference frame, which may be a characteristic of the reference frame transformation system. In addition, the responses of some neurons were modulated by the eye position.

    Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. 1985. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230(4724): 456-458.

    Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick G, Siegel RM. 1990a. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. J Comp Neurol, 296(1): 65-113.

    Andersen RA, Bracewell RM, Barash S, Gnadt JW, Fogassi L. 1990b.Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J Neurosci, 10(4): 1176-1196.

    Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J. 1997. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci, 20(1): 303-330.

    Borra E, Belmalih A, Calzavara R, Gerbella M, Murata A, Rozzi S,Luppino G. 2008. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cereb Cortex, 18(5): 1094-1111.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989a. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol,287(4): 422-425.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989b. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections. J Comp Neurol, 287(4): 393-421.Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1991. Topographic segregation of corticostriatal projections from posterior parietal subdivisions in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience, 42(3): 683-696.

    Clower DM, West RA, Lynch JC, Strick PL. 2001. The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus,and cerebellum. J Neurosci, 21(16): 6283-6291.

    Clower DM, Dum RP, Strick PL. 2005. Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb Cortex, 15(7): 913-920.

    Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME. 1993. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. J Neurophysiol, 69(3): 902-914.

    Dong WK, Chudler EH, Sugiyama K, Roberts VJ, Hayashi T. 1994.Somatosensory, multisensory, and task-related neurons in cortical area 7b (PF) of unanesthetized monkeys. J Neurophysiol, 72(2): 542-564.

    Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, BenHamed S, Graf W. 1997. Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature,389(6653): 845-848.

    Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. 1998. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol, 79(1): 126-136.

    Fattori P, Galletti C, Battaglini PP. 1992. Parietal neurons encoding visual space in a head-frame of reference. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,68(11): 663-670.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M, Pedotti A, Rizzolatti G. 1992. Space coding by premotor cortex. Exp Brain Res, 89(3): 686-690.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Rizzolatti G.1996. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4) . J Neurophysiol, 76(1): 141-157.

    Fogassi L, Luppino G. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe[J].Curr Opin Neurobiol, 15(6): 626-631.

    Fuchs AF, Robinson DA. 1966. A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. J Appl Physiol, 21(3):1068-1070.

    Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H. 1994. Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex.Neuroreport, 5(12): 1525-1529.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1993. Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates. Exp Brain Res, 96(2): 221-229.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1995. Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci,7(12): 2486-2501.

    Gentilucci M, Scandolara C, Pigarev IN, Rizzolatti G. 1983. Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position. Exp Brain Res, 50(2-3): 464-468.

    Graziano MS, Gross CG. 1993. A bimodal map of space:somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res, 97(1): 96-109.

    Graziano MS, Yap GS, Gross CG. 1994. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266(5187): 1054-1057.

    Graziano MS, Hu XT, Gross CG. 1997. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 77(5): 2268-2292.

    Graziano MS. 1999. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96(18): 10418-10421.

    Gregoriou GG, Borra E, Matelli M, Luppino G. 2006. Architectonic organization of the inferior parietal convexity of the macaque monkey.J Comp Neurol, 496(3): 422-451.

    Leinonen L, Hyv?rinen J, Nyman G, Linnankoski I. 1979. I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Exp Brain Res, 34(2): 299-320.

    Luppino G, Murata A, Govoni P, Matelli M. 1999. Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Exp Brain Res, 128(1-2): 181-187.

    Matelli M, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. 1984. Neurological deficit following a lesion in the parietal area 7b in the monkey. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,60(4): 839-844.

    Matelli M, Camarda R, Glickstein M, Rizzolatti G. 1986. Afferent and efferent projections of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol, 251(3): 281-298.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 1996. Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. J Neurophysiol, 75(5):2180-2186.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 2000.Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol, 83(5): 2580-2601.Robinson CJ, Burton H. 1980. Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis. J Comp Neurol, 192(1): 69-92.

    Rozzi S, Calzavara R, Belmalih A, Borra E, Gregoriou GG, Matelli M,Luppino G. 2006. Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex, 16(10): 1389-1417.

    Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S. 1995. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey.Cereb Cortex, 5(5): 429-438.

    Schlack A, Sterbing-D'Angelo SJ, Hartung K, Hoffmann KP, Bremmer F. 2005. Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J Neurosci, 25(18): 4616-4625.

    Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H. 1990. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp Brain Res, 83: 29-36.

    日本欧美视频一区| 日本 av在线| 国产av在哪里看| 丁香六月欧美| 国产麻豆69| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| av免费在线观看网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 黄色女人牲交| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产又爽黄色视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 手机成人av网站| 超碰成人久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 丝袜美足系列| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产三级黄色录像| 黄色视频不卡| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 在线观看www视频免费| 超碰成人久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 在线av久久热| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲片人在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 很黄的视频免费| 91成年电影在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩高清综合在线| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 午夜视频精品福利| 一区二区三区激情视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久国产精品影院| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 成人18禁在线播放| 久久九九热精品免费| 极品教师在线免费播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 超碰成人久久| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 黄色女人牲交| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产麻豆69| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久 成人 亚洲| 看片在线看免费视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 女警被强在线播放| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久影院123| 一级毛片精品| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品久久久精品久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产高清videossex| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 91国产中文字幕| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久久久大精品| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 操美女的视频在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 黄色视频不卡| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 伦理电影免费视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 午夜视频精品福利| av在线播放免费不卡| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 91大片在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日本欧美视频一区| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久国产精品影院| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久中文字幕一级| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 九色国产91popny在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久青草综合色| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 伦理电影免费视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 午夜免费观看网址| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 美女免费视频网站| 变态另类丝袜制服| 露出奶头的视频| 91av网站免费观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久99久视频精品免费| tocl精华| 多毛熟女@视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 黄色视频不卡| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲av成人av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 9热在线视频观看99| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 一夜夜www| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 级片在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 美女免费视频网站| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 级片在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| www国产在线视频色| av片东京热男人的天堂| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 9热在线视频观看99| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲全国av大片| av欧美777| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 窝窝影院91人妻| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久性视频一级片| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 91精品国产国语对白视频| 曰老女人黄片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 色播在线永久视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久精品影院6| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 精品人妻1区二区| 一区福利在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱 | 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久人妻av系列| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 在线天堂中文资源库| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 日本 av在线| 国产在线观看jvid| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 香蕉丝袜av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| a在线观看视频网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 级片在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | ponron亚洲| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 999精品在线视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久国产精品影院| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 成在线人永久免费视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 一区福利在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| videosex国产| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 天堂√8在线中文| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 在线观看日韩欧美| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 很黄的视频免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 黄片小视频在线播放| 很黄的视频免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久热这里只有精品99| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久热在线av| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 成人手机av| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 精品日产1卡2卡| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜影院日韩av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 一级片免费观看大全| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 精品第一国产精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久久久国内视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| www日本在线高清视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久热在线av| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| netflix在线观看网站| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 91国产中文字幕| 久久国产精品影院| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 午夜福利18| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 一区在线观看完整版| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久香蕉国产精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 午夜激情av网站| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲最大成人中文| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一区在线观看完整版| 999久久久国产精品视频| 很黄的视频免费| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 大码成人一级视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波|