• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Visuospatial properties of caudal area 7b in Macaca fascicularis

    2013-09-20 03:39:30HuiHuiJIANGYingZhouHUJianHongWANGYuanYeMAXinTianHU
    Zoological Research 2013年2期

    Hui-Hui JIANG, Ying-Zhou HU, , Jian-Hong WANG, Yuan-Ye MA, , Xin-Tian HU,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China;

    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    3. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

    4. Kunming Primate Research Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China

    When we attempt to grasp or reach for an object,our motor system requires that our sensory system provide information about the location of the target.However, different sensory stimuli are encoded in different reference frames: visual stimuli are captured by the retina, auditory stimuli are received within the head,and tactile stimuli arise from the body. Movement must be directed towards the target depending on where it is positioned with respect to the body part. To proceed from sensation to movement, our brain needs to integrate information from the different senses and transform it into a non-retinocentric frame of reference, such as a body-part-centered frame of reference. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether area caudal 7b was a part of this transformation system.

    To construct a body-part-centered visual receptive field, retinal signals must be integrated with other signals.For example, by combining retinocentric visual signals with eye position signals, the head-centered visual receptive field of the cells can be constructed (Graziano et al, 1997). The arm-centered visual receptive field of cells requires integration of not only retinocentric visual and eye position signals but also head and arm position signals. In addition to visual signals, eye position, head position, and vestibular signals converge on neurons in area 7a (Andersen et al, 1985; Andersen et al, 1990b;Andersen et al, 1997). These signals are combined in a systematic fashion using the “gain field” mechanism, in which other signals modify the retinocentric visual signal.1

    Anatomically, area 7a projects to area 7b and the ventral intraparietal cortex (VIP), which in turn connects to the ventral premotor cortex (PMv). Although other sensory signals modulate retinocentric visual signals, the visual receptive fields in area 7a are still eye-centered(Andersen et al, 1985). In the PMv, most neurons are bimodal cells, i.e., they respond to both tactile and visual stimuli (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996;Gentilucci et al, 1983; Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Most visual receptive fields encode nearby space in a body-part-centered reference frame (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996; Gentilucci et al, 1983;Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Additionally,most neurons in the VIP are bimodal (Colby et al, 1993;Duhamel et al, 1998) and employ a hybrid reference frame (Duhamel et al, 1997).

    On the basis of previous studies, it is known that area 7b receives visual and somatosensory inputs from cortical and subcortical brain structures (Andersen et al,1990a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1989a) and is also the target of cerebellar output, which suggests that it may be important in movement (Clower et al, 2001; Clower et al,2005). Damage to area 7b causes spatial deficits, such as neglect of contralateral peripersonal space (Matelli et al,1984), which suggests that this area is involved in spatial information processing. Area 7b contains cells with visual and tactile properties that resemble those of PMv cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). These results suggest that area 7b may be one component of the receptive field transformation system. Do neurons in this area have the characteristics of the transformation system?Does the area employ a retinocentric reference frame similar to area 7a, a hybrid system similar to VIP, or some other reference frame? To date, no quantitative studies on these issues have been conducted.

    In the present study, we first qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in the caudal portion of area 7b. If a neuron showed a clear visual response, the reference frame of the neuron was tested quantitatively.We plotted the visual receptive fields of neurons when the eyes were held still. The receptive fields were then replotted when the eyes were in a new position. In this way, we could determine whether the visual receptive fields were centered on the eyes.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Ethics statement

    All animal care and surgical procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Institute of Zoology.

    Two adult male Macaca fascicularis (4.2–6.0 kg)were used in the present research. They were singlehoused under standard conditions (a 12-h light/dark cycle with lights on from 07:00 to 19:00, humidity at 60%, and temperature at 21 ± 2℃ in the animal colony. Their body weights were closely monitored during the experiments.

    Surgical procedures

    All surgeries were performed under strict aseptic conditions and, unless otherwise indicated, under ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.4 mg/kg)anesthesia. Under deep anesthesia, one stainless steel recording chamber for chronic single-unit recording, 2.5 cm in diameter, was embedded in dental acrylic over the right parietal lobe of each monkey. A steel bolt for holding the monkeys’ head stationary during experiments was also embedded in the acrylic. During the same surgery session, one scleral search coil (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966)was implanted to record eye position signals.

    Post-surgical recovery lasted approximately one week. Both monkeys were given two additional weeks before behavioral training started to allow the skull to grow tightly around the skull screws.

    After the behavioral training was completed, the recording chamber was opened under aseptic conditions and a ~4 mm hole was drilled through the dental acrylic and bone to expose the dura mater. All data were collected from this region.

    Behavioral training

    Before experimental task training began, each monkey’s ad libitum daily water intake was measured.Based on this measurement, the monkeys were placed on a restricted water schedule whereby each monkey received most of its water as a reward for performing the task. If the monkey received less water than its normal daily amount during the experimental session, a postsession supplement was given. Each monkey also received ad libitum water for two consecutive days every weekend during which training and recording sessions were not conducted. Each monkey’s body weight was closely monitored during the time it was on the restricted water schedule.

    At the beginning of the task training, the monkey sat in the chair with its head and left arm fixed, and its eye movements were constantly monitored using a standard eye coil technique (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966;Graziano et al, 1997). As shown in Figure 1, three LEDs were placed 57 cm in front of the monkey at eye level,15 visual degrees apart. First, the monkeys were trained to perform the fixation task without a peripheral visual stimulus. The central LED was set to blink at a frequency of 6 Hz. If the monkey fixated on the central LED within a specified round spatial window (fixation window), the LED stopped blinking and remained lit. If the monkey maintained fixation for the remainder of the trial, the LED was turned off and the monkey received a drop of juice as a reward. A 3–10-second intertrial interval (ITI)commenced at the same time that the reward was given.If the monkey broke fixation at any time during the trial,the LED was turned off, the ITI was restarted, and the monkey was not rewarded. As the training progressed,the size of the spatial fixation window was decreased and the fixation period was increased. At the final stage, the monkeys were able to fixate within a round window of 3 visual degrees in diameter for a 4-second fixation period.After they learned to fixate on the central LED, the monkeys were trained to fixate on the two lateral LEDs using the same procedure.

    Having learned the fixation task, the monkeys were next trained to perform the same task when a peripheral visual stimulus was presented (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

    Recording procedure

    The recording sessions started after the monkey was able to perform the task for more than 700 trials in one day. During the daily recording sessions, a hydraulic microdriver was mounted to the top of the recording chamber. A steel guide cannula (22-gauge syringe needle)was slowly lowered through the small hole in the chamber until its tip was close to the surface of the dura mater. Then, a varnish-coated tungsten microelectrode(Frederick Haer, impedance 0.8–1.0 MΩ) was advanced slowly from the guide cannula through the dura mater and into the cortex. After the electrode penetrated the surface of the cortex, as indicated by the appearance of background neuronal signals, the electrode was withdrawn 1.5 mm, and the brain was allowed to recover from the indentation caused by the advance of the electrode for about one hour. The electrode was then slowly moved up and down to isolate single-unit activity.As the experiment progressed, the cannula and a new electrode were inserted into a slightly different location in the small hole.

    Tests

    When a single neuron was isolated, its activity was constantly monitored with an oscilloscope and a loudspeaker. Each neuron was first tested to determine if it had tactile, visual, and/or auditory responses. The tactile response was tested by manual palpation, gentle pressure, and stroking with a cotton swab. Tactile responses on the face were studied in the dark or when the eyes were covered. Visual responses were studied with hand-held objects, such as cotton swabs, a bunch of plastic grapes, monkey dolls, or a metal rod. The visual stimulus was moved into the visual receptive field from above, below, or the side. The receptive field was measured with the most effective stimulus when the response became stable and clear. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, we also tested the depth extension of visual RFs.

    If a cell showed clear visual responses, it was then tested quantitatively with one of the following two tests:

    Figure 1 Two experimental tests were used in the present study. A: robot arm test. In each trial, the monkey fixated on one of the three LEDs (FIX A, B, C), and the visual stimulus was advanced along one of the five trajectories indicated by the arrows. B: plastic rod test. In each trial, the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs (A, B, C). During the fixation, one of the five plastic rods indicated by the filled circles (stimulus positions 3 to 7) descended into view from behind a panel. The circles on the monkey’s head show the recording locations.

    Figure 2 Time course of the two experimental tests used in the present study. The change in the vertical position of the stimulus time course indicates stimulus movement.The dotted line indicates that the duration was random. FIX = fixation light; STIM = stimulus.

    Robot arm test

    Only monkey 1 was tested with this type of stimulus,as shown in Figure 1A. At 0.5 seconds after the onset of fixation, a visual stimulus (a piece of blue Styrofoam, 2 cm in diameter) was advanced towards the animal by a mechanized track at a speed of 8 cm/sec along one of five equally spaced parallel trajectories at the same level,15 visual degrees apart. The trajectories were 12 cm long and their locations were adjusted to match the visual receptive field being studied. The stimulus stayed at the end of the trajectory for 0.2 seconds before the ITI started. The stimulus was moved to the starting position of the next trajectory during the ITI. The time course of this test is demonstrated in Figure 2. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimulus trajectories resulted in fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were tested in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically had ten trials.

    However, there were some problems with the stimulus. Firstly, in the robot arm test, the Styrofoam stimulus was always in view and some area 7b neurons quickly habituated to it. Secondly, the five trajectories used in the robot arm test were parallel to each other and moved straight towards the monkey. When the stimulus was advanced towards the monkey along a trajectory located peripheral to the visual receptive field, it produced a much larger visual angle compared with other trajectories in the middle of the visual receptive field before reaching its end point. When a larger visual angle was covered, a larger area on the retina was stimulated,which made it more difficult to directly compare results from different trajectories. To address these problems, we designed a plastic rod test in which the stimulus suddenly came into view and the visual angle of visual stimulus was kept constant.

    Plastic rod test

    This test was used on both monkeys. An array of five small plastic rods, arranged 15 degrees apart along a semicircle and controlled by five different stepping motors, served as visual stimuli. The center of the semicircle was located at the midline of the monkey’s face, and its radius was 5 cm. There were a total of ten possible locations on the semicircle (labeled 1 to 10) for the five rods so that the locations of the stimuli could be adjusted according to the location of the visual receptive field being tested.

    Each trial began when the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs. After an initial fixation period of 1.25–2.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–2.5 seconds for monkey 2, one of the five rods descended at a speed of 10 cm/sec for 6.0 cm, emerging from behind a head-level panel into the monkey’s view. The rod remained stationary for 1.0 second in front of the animal. The trial was then ended and the animal received 0.2 ml of juice as a reward. A variable ITI began (4.0-7.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–3.0 seconds for monkey 2), and the rod was withdrawn to behind the panel. Figure 2 shows the time course for the test. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimuli (rods) yielded fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were run in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically contained ten trials.

    Statistical procedures

    Two analysis windows were chosen for each cell.The first, termed the "baseline window" and used to calculate the pre-stimulus baseline activity, consisted of the time period from 0.6 to 0.0 s before the onset of the stimulus. The other window, termed the "response window", was used to examine the neuron’s response to visual stimuli and consisted of the time period from the onset of the neuron’s main visual response (i.e., three standard deviations above the baseline for three consecutive bins, with a 50-ms bin length) to 1.5 s after stimulus onset because all recorded neurons continued their responses to the end of the trial. We chose not to use a fixed response window as in previous studies because the size and location of the receptive fields differed among the neurons, and as a result, the exact time when the stimulus moved into the receptive field varied from neuron to neuron. Because cells did not respond to the stimulus at the same time across different locations, we chose the response window from the earliest onset(which was usually also the best response) location and applied this window to all fifteen experimental conditions. The response window was shortened and lengthened for several tested neurons; very similar results were obtained, which demonstrated the robustness of this method of analysis.

    Qualitative analysis

    All neurons were classified qualitatively. Firstly,neurons without a clear peak (as judged by the existence of a response location in the curve that was significantly different from the response for at least one location on both sides of the peak, according to a t-test) in three tuning curves were not included in the data set for the spatial shift analysis. Secondly, before calculating the shift index, we compared the shapes of the tuning curves by moving two of the tuning curves until the peaks of three tuning curves overlapped, because shift index values can be affected by shapes of the tuning curves. We classified neurons into the following three types based on this comparison: (1) Neurons without obvious shape changes (as judged by the overlap of the standard deviations at each stimulus location) and receptive fields that did not shift with the eyes were classified as nonretinocentric neurons. (2) Neurons without obvious shape changes and receptive fields that shifted with the eyes were defined as retinocentric neurons. (3) Neurons with a partial spatial shift, which included two groups of neurons: the first group had no obvious shape changes but had partially shifted receptive fields; the second group had obvious shape changes and was also classified as partial spatial shift neurons.

    Quantitative analysis

    Based on the qualitative analysis, neurons with clear peaked responses were analyzed quantitatively. A shift index (SI) was calculated to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when eye position changed as the monkey fixated on different LEDs (Graziano,1999; Schlack et al, 2005).

    First, a center of mass (CM) was calculated for each of the tuning curves corresponding to the right (CMR)and left (CML) fixation LEDs. When the animal fixated on the right LED, the responses (number of spikes per second) from each of the five stimulus locations were numbered from the monkey’s left to right as R1 to R5.The formula used to calculate the CMR of the right fixation LED tuning curve is C MR = ( R1 + 2 × R 2+3 × R 3 + 4 × R 4 + 5 × R 5 )/(R1 + R 2 + R 3 + R 4 + R 5).

    The CML of the left LED could be calculated in the same way. From the CMs, the shift index (SI) was calculated as SI = C MR - C ML .

    A positive SI indicated that the visual receptive field shifted in the same direction as the change in eye position in the orbit. A negative SI indicated that the visual receptive field was displaced in the opposite direction from the change in eye position. An SI value close to zero indicated a stationary visual receptive field.

    Histology

    After the series of experiments was completed,monkey 1 was injected with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg) and perfused with saline and 4%paraformaldehyde. The head was removed from the body and placed in a stereotactic apparatus. The skull and dura mater were removed to expose the brain. The intraparietal, superior temporal and lateral sulci were mapped stereotactically. Figure 3 shows the entry location of the electrode in relation to the sulci for monkey 1. On this basis, we confirmed that the recording sites were located in the caudal portion of area 7b.

    Figure 3 Locations of area 7b and electrode penetration. Black dot: the recording area was ~4 mm in diameter and~2 mm in depth. IPL, the inferior parietal lobe; SPL,the superior parietal lobe; ips, the intraparietal sulcus.

    RESULTS

    Response categories

    In total, 291 neurons in caudal area 7b were examined in the right hemispheres of two awake monkeys. In these cells, neuronal responses were classified as somatosensory, visual, or bimodal(somatosensory + visual). We also tested 82 cells in this area using auditory stimuli and found that only one (1%)responded. Table 1 shows the proportions of the different response types.

    Table 1 Categories of neurons based on their response type

    Somatosensory cells

    To classify the tactile receptive fields, we arbitrarily divided the monkey body into four parts: head, arms(including the hands), trunk, and legs (including the feet).The tactile receptive fields were classified into three types according to the number of body parts encompassed by the receptive fields. The tactile receptive fields were also classified into three types:ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral according to the recording hemisphere. The distribution of the receptive fields of the somatosensory cells is shown in Table 2.

    Table 2 The distribution of tactile receptive fields

    Visual cells

    In total 35 of the 42 purely visual cells were recorded for a time to test the location of the visual receptive fields, whereas the remaining seven cells were only studied long enough to determine that they had visual responses. The visual receptive fields were divided in two ways. According to recording hemisphere, the visual receptive fields could be divided into three categories: ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral to the recording hemisphere. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, neurons were classified into two types: distance > 1 m and distance < 1m. Only five visual neurons were tested with stimuli at different distances. Table 3 shows the results.

    Table 3 The distribution of visual receptive fields

    Bimodal cell

    We assessed the locations of the tactile and visual receptive fields for 119 of the 122 bimodal cells. The remaining three cells were only recorded long enough to demonstrate the existence of visual and tactile responses.The tactile receptive and visual receptive fields of the bimodal cells were classified into different types in the same way as the somatosensory and visual cells, and the results are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

    One interesting finding is that the visual receptive field in bimodal neurons always surrounds the tactile receptive field. Overall, 76% (90/119) of the bimodal cells had tactile receptive fields that spatially match their visual receptive fields.

    We also tested the visual response to perceptual depth in 45 out of the 119 bimodal cells. More than half(64%) of these cells responded clearly to the stimuli presented more than 1 m away from the monkey’s face,and the remaining 36% of the visual receptive fields were confined to a depth of 1 m or less, with a mean inner-limit distance of 0.4 m.

    In summary, the qualitative tests showed that there were three major types of responsive neurons in caudal area 7b: visual neurons (14%), somatosensory neurons(15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The receptive fields of these three categories of neurons were usually large:52% (85/163) of all tactile receptive fields (including the somatosensory cells and bimodal cells) encompassed two or more parts of the body surface, 61% (100/163) of all tactile receptive fields were bilateral, and 66% (101/154)of the visual receptive fields (including the visual cells and bimodal cells) were bilateral. Most visual receptive fields extended more than 1 m away from the body part.Most of the bimodal cells had spatially matched tactile and visual receptive fields.

    Reference frames for encoding visual stimuli

    If a neuron showed a clear visual response, it was further studied to determine whether the receptive field moved with the eye. As described in the methods section,two types of stimuli were used and three different types of neurons were found.

    For some neurons, such as Neuron JC89 (Figure 4 and Figure 5) tested with the plastic rod stimulus, the visual receptive fields moved with the eye. As seen in the Figures, when the monkey shifted its fixation point from the right to the middle LED and then to the left LED, the position at which neuron JC89 had the best response shifted from position 3 to position 2 and then to position 1. These results suggest that the visual receptive field moves with the eyes.

    Some neurons had visual receptive fields that did not shift with eye movement. Neuron HB16 (Figure 6 and Figure 7), which was tested with the robot arm stimulus, belonged to this type of neuron. Figure 7 shows that regardless of the LED on which the monkey was fixating, the position with the best response did not change for this neuron; it always showed the strongest response to a stimulus presented at position 4, and the three tuning curves were similar and overlapping. These results demonstrate that the visual receptive fields do not move with the eyes.

    Figure 4 Histograms of activity from neuron JC89 in area 7b. The upper row of the histograms shows the visual responses to the stimuli presented at the five stimulus positions when the monkey was fixating on the left LED (marked as L). The middle row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the center LED (marked as M). The lower row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the right LED (marked as R).For each histogram, the x-axis shows the time in ms, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The vertical line inside each histogram indicates the time at which the visual stimulus began to move into view. The horizontal line inside histogram L1 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 5 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron JC89. The x-axis shows the stimulus position, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The dashed line shows the average pre-stimulus activity.During right fixation (circles), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 3.During middle fixation (filled diamonds), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 2. During left fixation (stars), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 1. This result indicates that the receptive field of this cell shifted with changes in eye position.

    Neuron HB86 (Figure 8, Figure 9), which was tested with the plastic rod stimulus, is an example of a neuron with properties intermediate to those of a visual receptive field, which did not move with the eyes, and those of a visual receptive field, which did. That is, these neurons had visual receptive fields that moved slightly.As seen from the three tuning curves of neuron HB86 in Figure 9, when the monkey’s eyes shifted from the right LED to the middle LED, the two tuning curves overlapped, i.e., the visual receptive field did not shift with the eyes. In contrast, when the eye moved from the middle LED to the left LED, the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2.

    To quantify the results, a shift index (SI) was calculated for each neuron to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when the eye position changed because the monkey was fixating on different LEDs. An example SI calculation for neuron JC89 is as follows:Thus, the shift index of JC89 is SI(J C 8 9)= C MRCML= 3 .0 - 2 .2 = 0 .8.

    Figure 6 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB16. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L4 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal responses to the stimulus.

    Figure 7 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB16.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles), middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), and left LED fixation (stars) the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 4. This result indicates that the receptive field of neuron HB 16 did not shift with changes in eye position.

    Using the same formula, the shift indices for the other two example neurons are as follows: neuron HB16= 0.1 and neuron HB86 = 0.3.

    Overall, 34 neurons showing clear responses to the automatically presented stimuli demonstrated peak responses. We calculated the shift index for each of the 34 neurons. Figure 10 shows the distribution of the shift indices was from –0.4 to 0.8. The distribution of the shift index was significantly greater than zero (χ2= 9.23, P <0.01). On average, the visual receptive fields moved when the eyes moved. Thus, some neurons had visual receptive fields that moved with eye movement, some neurons had partially moving visual receptive fields, and some had receptive fields that did not move with the eyes.

    Effect of eye position on the neuronal firing rate

    In addition to the location of the visual receptive field, the visual response magnitude of caudal area 7b neurons was sometimes significantly influenced by the position of the eyes in the orbit, which is termed the modulation effect. For example, regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, HB169 responded with almost equal strength at each of the five positions,although its response was slightly stronger when the stimulus was at position 5 (Figure 11). However, the response magnitude of the cell decreased monotonically

    Figure 8 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB86. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L2 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 9 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB86.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles) and middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), the two corresponding tuning curves overlapped. The cell showed the weakest response to the stimulus presented at position 1 and the strongest response to the stimulus at position 5. In contrast,when the eyes moved from the middle LED to the left LED (stars), the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by the increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2. Overall, the visual receptive field of neuron HB 86 partially shifted with changes in eye position.

    Figure 10 Distribution of shift indices for 34 neurons. The distribution of shift indices was significantly above zero (P< 0.01)

    as the eye moved from the right LED to the middle LED and from the middle LED to the left LED. A 5 × 3 within-subjects two-way ANOVA (5 stimulus positions ×3 eye positions) showed that the modulation of the cell response was significant (P < 0.001). Neuron JC 89 showed the same type of response modulation (P < 0.05).

    In contrast, neuron HB16 responses were not modulated by eye position (P > 0.5). This cell responded best to the stimulus presented at position 4. The magnitude of the visual response did not change significantly when the eyes were at different positions in the orbit.

    Figure 11 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuronHB169. Axes are the same as in Figure 5. Regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, neuron HB169 responded to the stimulus with almost equal strength when presented at each of the five positions, although the response was slightly stronger at position 5. However, the response magnitude decreased monotonically as the eyes moved from the right LED(circles) to the middle LED (filled diamonds) and from the middle LED to the left LED (stars). This result indicates that the visual response magnitude of neuron HB169 was significantly modulated by changes in eye position (P < 0.001).

    The ANOVA for the 34 neurons showed that the visual response magnitudes of 12 cells (35%) were significantly modulated by eye position, and the response magnitudes of the remaining 22 cells (65%) were not significantly modulated by eye position.

    DISCUSSION

    Visual and tactile responses in caudal area 7b

    In this study, we qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major types of responsive neurons were found: visual neurons(14%), somatosensory neurons (15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The bimodal, visual-somatosensory cells usually responded to visual stimuli positioned close to the tactile receptive field. Some cells responded only to stimuli within centimeters of the body whereas others responded to stimuli presented more than 1 m away.

    Other studies regarding the general properties of neurons in area 7b have also demonstrated that it contains visual cells, somatosensory cells, and bimodal cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). The proportions of cells across these three categories varied from study to study, with that the percentage of bimodal neurons varying from 6% to 33%. The present study showed 42% bimodal neurons.

    One possible reason for these quantitative differences is that the stimuli and the way in which stimuli are used may vary across labs. For example, we found that the visual response to a stimulus delivered from behind the animal and then moved into its view was usually better than the visual response observed when the same stimulus was delivered from in front of the animal.It is possible that the stimulus coming from behind was unexpected, and therefore, it drew more attention. Other labs using stimuli presented from the front may therefore report a lower percentage of visual responses. Another possible reason for the quantitative differences is that the recording sites (i.e., the sample population) may differ from the caudal part of area 7b used in the present study.Furthermore, the monkeys used in our study were awake,whereas other studies were conducted on anesthetized monkeys. As described previously, the wakefulness of animals can affect the response properties of area 7b neurons (Robinson & Burton, 1980). When the monkey is asleep, the receptive fields of some somatosensory neurons become smaller, the borders become more difficult to define, and the somatic activations become less clear.

    Transformation of reference frames

    It has been suggested that body-part-centered receptive fields provide a general solution to the central problem of sensory-motor integration (Graziano et al,1994) and that this type of reference frame can encode the distance and direction from a body part to a nearby visual stimulus (Graziano et al, 1997). However, to proceed from a retinocentric reference frame to a bodypart-centered reference frame requires a complicated transformation system that involves several brain areas.

    Only one study has reported that, in some cases, the visual responses of neurons in area 7b do not depend on the direction of the gaze (Leinonen et al, 1979). Our present research is the first quantitative study to explore whether the visual receptive fields of neurons in caudal area 7b move with the eyes. We found that neurons in caudal area 7b encoded space in a hybrid reference frame,and some neurons encoded space in a retinocentric reference frame. We did not further differentiate the reference frames employed by the non-retinocentric neurons, e.g., head-centered, body-centered, or worldcentered, but showed that the caudal part of area 7b was one component of the reference frame transformation system.

    Recent studies on the inferior parietal lobe (IPL)challenge the widely used bipartite subdivision of the IPL convexity into caudal and rostral areas (7a and 7b,respectively). These studies provide strong support for a subdivision of the IPL convexity into four distinct areas(Opt, PG, PFG, and PF) and indicate that these four areas are not only cytoarchitectonically distinct but also distinct in connectivity (Gregoriou et al, 2006; Rozzi et al, 2006). In our study, the recording site was located in the caudal portion of area 7b, corresponding to area PFG.The present results provide evidence that caudal area 7b may be one component of the reference frame transformation, which is consistent with the proposed function based on the connectivity pattern of area PFG(Borra et al, 2008; Fogassi & Luppino, 2005; Rozzi et al,2006).

    Eye-position-independent visual receptive fields in other brain areas

    The anterior intraparietal (AIP) area is located rostrally in the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus and is known to play a crucial role in visuomotor transformations for grasping. Anatomically, the AIP is connected to the IPL and the rostral ventral premotor area F5 (Borra et al, 2008; Luppino et al, 1999).Reversible lesion experiments have shown that AIP inactivation produces grasping impairment (Gallese et al,1994). Visual, motor, and visuomotor neurons have been recorded during the execution of grasping movements(Murata et al, 1996; Murata et al, 2000; Sakata et al,1995; Taira et al, 1990).

    Another parietal area suggested to have eyeposition-independent visual receptive field is the parietooccipital visual area (V6A). Studies have shown that although most of the visual receptive fields are eyecentered, there is a small portion of neurons in this area with visual receptive fields that remain static when the eyes move and another small group of visual receptive fields that partially move with the eyes (Fattori et al,1992; Galletti et al, 1993; Galletti et al, 1995).

    Area 7b, VIP, and PMv are monosynaptically interconnected and all project to the putamen (Cavada &Goldman-Rakic, 1989a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic,1989b; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1991; Matelli et al,1986). Studies of the putamen of anesthetized and awake macaque monkeys have shown that about 30% of the cells with tactile responses also respond to visual stimuli.For these bimodal neurons, the visual receptive fields are anchored to the tactile receptive fields, moving as the tactile receptive fields move (Graziano & Gross, 1993).

    Comparing these brain areas quantitatively by calculating the fraction of each cell type in each individual area, might provide more information about how the system works, and more experiments should be conducted in which all of these areas are tested using identical procedures.

    In summary, we tested the response properties and the spatial encoding coordinates of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major kinds of responsive neurons were found in this area: visual neurons, somatosensory neurons, and bimodal neurons. The receptive fields were usually large, and visual receptive fields of the bimodal neurons were always located near tactile receptive fields.Neurons in this area encoded space in a hybrid reference frame, which may be a characteristic of the reference frame transformation system. In addition, the responses of some neurons were modulated by the eye position.

    Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. 1985. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230(4724): 456-458.

    Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick G, Siegel RM. 1990a. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. J Comp Neurol, 296(1): 65-113.

    Andersen RA, Bracewell RM, Barash S, Gnadt JW, Fogassi L. 1990b.Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J Neurosci, 10(4): 1176-1196.

    Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J. 1997. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci, 20(1): 303-330.

    Borra E, Belmalih A, Calzavara R, Gerbella M, Murata A, Rozzi S,Luppino G. 2008. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cereb Cortex, 18(5): 1094-1111.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989a. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol,287(4): 422-425.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989b. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections. J Comp Neurol, 287(4): 393-421.Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1991. Topographic segregation of corticostriatal projections from posterior parietal subdivisions in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience, 42(3): 683-696.

    Clower DM, West RA, Lynch JC, Strick PL. 2001. The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus,and cerebellum. J Neurosci, 21(16): 6283-6291.

    Clower DM, Dum RP, Strick PL. 2005. Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb Cortex, 15(7): 913-920.

    Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME. 1993. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. J Neurophysiol, 69(3): 902-914.

    Dong WK, Chudler EH, Sugiyama K, Roberts VJ, Hayashi T. 1994.Somatosensory, multisensory, and task-related neurons in cortical area 7b (PF) of unanesthetized monkeys. J Neurophysiol, 72(2): 542-564.

    Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, BenHamed S, Graf W. 1997. Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature,389(6653): 845-848.

    Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. 1998. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol, 79(1): 126-136.

    Fattori P, Galletti C, Battaglini PP. 1992. Parietal neurons encoding visual space in a head-frame of reference. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,68(11): 663-670.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M, Pedotti A, Rizzolatti G. 1992. Space coding by premotor cortex. Exp Brain Res, 89(3): 686-690.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Rizzolatti G.1996. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4) . J Neurophysiol, 76(1): 141-157.

    Fogassi L, Luppino G. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe[J].Curr Opin Neurobiol, 15(6): 626-631.

    Fuchs AF, Robinson DA. 1966. A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. J Appl Physiol, 21(3):1068-1070.

    Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H. 1994. Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex.Neuroreport, 5(12): 1525-1529.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1993. Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates. Exp Brain Res, 96(2): 221-229.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1995. Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci,7(12): 2486-2501.

    Gentilucci M, Scandolara C, Pigarev IN, Rizzolatti G. 1983. Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position. Exp Brain Res, 50(2-3): 464-468.

    Graziano MS, Gross CG. 1993. A bimodal map of space:somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res, 97(1): 96-109.

    Graziano MS, Yap GS, Gross CG. 1994. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266(5187): 1054-1057.

    Graziano MS, Hu XT, Gross CG. 1997. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 77(5): 2268-2292.

    Graziano MS. 1999. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96(18): 10418-10421.

    Gregoriou GG, Borra E, Matelli M, Luppino G. 2006. Architectonic organization of the inferior parietal convexity of the macaque monkey.J Comp Neurol, 496(3): 422-451.

    Leinonen L, Hyv?rinen J, Nyman G, Linnankoski I. 1979. I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Exp Brain Res, 34(2): 299-320.

    Luppino G, Murata A, Govoni P, Matelli M. 1999. Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Exp Brain Res, 128(1-2): 181-187.

    Matelli M, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. 1984. Neurological deficit following a lesion in the parietal area 7b in the monkey. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,60(4): 839-844.

    Matelli M, Camarda R, Glickstein M, Rizzolatti G. 1986. Afferent and efferent projections of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol, 251(3): 281-298.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 1996. Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. J Neurophysiol, 75(5):2180-2186.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 2000.Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol, 83(5): 2580-2601.Robinson CJ, Burton H. 1980. Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis. J Comp Neurol, 192(1): 69-92.

    Rozzi S, Calzavara R, Belmalih A, Borra E, Gregoriou GG, Matelli M,Luppino G. 2006. Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex, 16(10): 1389-1417.

    Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S. 1995. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey.Cereb Cortex, 5(5): 429-438.

    Schlack A, Sterbing-D'Angelo SJ, Hartung K, Hoffmann KP, Bremmer F. 2005. Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J Neurosci, 25(18): 4616-4625.

    Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H. 1990. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp Brain Res, 83: 29-36.

    国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 99riav亚洲国产免费| aaaaa片日本免费| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产午夜精品论理片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 88av欧美| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品九九99| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 久久草成人影院| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 精品第一国产精品| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日韩欧美三级三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 美女免费视频网站| 久久亚洲真实| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久性视频一级片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 波多野结衣高清作品| 禁无遮挡网站| 成人欧美大片| av中文乱码字幕在线| a级毛片a级免费在线| bbb黄色大片| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 黄色女人牲交| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 嫩草影院精品99| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 悠悠久久av| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久草成人影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 91av网站免费观看| 91大片在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲精品在线美女| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 全区人妻精品视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 黄色视频不卡| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲中文av在线| 免费av毛片视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | av免费在线观看网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 无限看片的www在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久久久久大精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产野战对白在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 午夜a级毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | av天堂在线播放| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 97碰自拍视频| 一本一本综合久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| av欧美777| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费观看人在逋| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产在线观看jvid| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久久久久久久中文| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| av福利片在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久香蕉国产精品| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩免费av在线播放| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 在线播放国产精品三级| 黄色女人牲交| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| av有码第一页| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 一级毛片精品| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品一及| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 高清在线国产一区| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产在线观看jvid| 校园春色视频在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 日本三级黄在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 国产三级中文精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 免费看日本二区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产成人精品无人区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久性视频一级片| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 在线看三级毛片| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日本黄大片高清| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久久久久人人人人人| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 大型av网站在线播放| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 999精品在线视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 色在线成人网| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产精品 国内视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久精品成人免费网站| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 舔av片在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久国产精品影院| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一a级毛片在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 99国产精品99久久久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 看黄色毛片网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 久久 成人 亚洲| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久久草成人影院| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产成人av教育| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 欧美大码av| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 成人手机av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 宅男免费午夜| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 在线观看www视频免费| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 青草久久国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 嫩草影院精品99| 黄色成人免费大全| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 欧美大码av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一夜夜www| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| avwww免费| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 成人精品一区二区免费| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美在线黄色| 一级毛片精品| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 黄色成人免费大全| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久久久国内视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 十八禁网站免费在线| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 91老司机精品| 黄频高清免费视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 99热6这里只有精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 丁香六月欧美| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 一本精品99久久精品77| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 欧美中文综合在线视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产av不卡久久| 欧美日韩精品网址| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲av美国av| 日本熟妇午夜| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美在线黄色| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久性视频一级片| av在线播放免费不卡| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久性视频一级片| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 舔av片在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 伦理电影免费视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产99白浆流出| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 悠悠久久av| 日韩欧美国产在线观看|