劉紅磊,馬順茂,楊京衛(wèi)*,于陽(yáng)陽(yáng),盧海英,何 煒
(1.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院物理診斷科,河北任丘 062552;2.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院普外二科,河北任丘 062552;3.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院口腔科,河北任丘 062552)
早期干預(yù)治療在嬰兒髖臼發(fā)育不良中的臨床意義
劉紅磊1,馬順茂2,楊京衛(wèi)1*,于陽(yáng)陽(yáng)3,盧海英1,何 煒1
(1.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院物理診斷科,河北任丘 062552;2.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院普外二科,河北任丘 062552;3.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院口腔科,河北任丘 062552)
目的 探討早期干預(yù)治療措施對(duì)髖臼發(fā)育不良(dysplasia the acetabulum,DA)恢復(fù)的有效性。方法40例DA患兒隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和治療組各20例,治療組早期(出生4周后)給予干預(yù)手段(采取屈髖外展操訓(xùn)練結(jié)合寬尿布片法治療),對(duì)照組無(wú)干預(yù)措施,超聲定期觀察髖關(guān)節(jié)恢復(fù)情況。結(jié)果治療組中2個(gè)月內(nèi)DA患兒恢復(fù)17例(85.0%),高于對(duì)照組11例(55.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);隨訪(fǎng)至病程3個(gè)月,治療組恢復(fù)20例(100.0%),對(duì)照組僅有14例(70.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);6個(gè)月時(shí)對(duì)照組仍有3例未恢復(fù)正常。治療組恢復(fù)效果的散點(diǎn)回歸方程斜率4.0大于對(duì)照組斜率2.9,表明治療組的恢復(fù)速度快于對(duì)照組。結(jié)論早期干預(yù)措施能夠促進(jìn)DA患兒的盡早恢復(fù)。
髖臼;骨疾病,發(fā)育性;超聲檢查;治療
發(fā)育性髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良(developmental dysplasia of the hip,DDH)是嬰幼兒最常見(jiàn)的下肢骨骼系統(tǒng)疾病之一。DDH一般分為3種類(lèi)型,髖臼發(fā)育不良(dysplasia of the acetabulum,DA)、半脫位與全脫位[1]。在嬰幼兒期采用外展操鍛煉、器具固定等非手術(shù)治療方法,對(duì)于半脫位與全脫位患兒的治療已經(jīng)達(dá)成了共識(shí)[2],但對(duì)于DA患兒,是否常規(guī)給予干預(yù)治療,尚無(wú)統(tǒng)一意見(jiàn),成為目前爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)。我們對(duì)于DA患兒采取早期干預(yù),定期超聲檢測(cè)觀察其髖關(guān)節(jié)的發(fā)展情況,現(xiàn)報(bào)告如下。
1.1 一般資料:2009年1月1日—2013年3月31日,本院超聲檢查出新生兒DA 40例,其中男性9例,女性31例。隨機(jī)分為治療組20例,對(duì)照組20例。采用PHILP IU22超聲診斷儀,線(xiàn)陣探頭,超聲頻率5.0~6.0MHz。入組標(biāo)準(zhǔn),根據(jù)超聲Graf法[3]檢查出DA,即α角為43~60°,β角為55~77°。
1.2 方法:治療組給予早期干預(yù)措施,在患兒出生4周后指導(dǎo)給予屈髖外展操訓(xùn)練以及應(yīng)用寬尿布片法。①屈髖外展操要點(diǎn),患兒仰臥屈膝屈髖90°,將膝關(guān)節(jié)同時(shí)外展外旋,使大腿外側(cè)貼近床面,維持此姿勢(shì)2s,復(fù)原體位,每天堅(jiān)持上、下午各做半小時(shí)約100次。②寬尿布片法,患兒兩腿之間尿片墊得寬一點(diǎn)、厚一點(diǎn),使患兒處于屈髖外展體位。對(duì)照組不給予干預(yù)措施。定期B超檢查隨訪(fǎng),每月1次,當(dāng)B超提示髖關(guān)節(jié)取得同心圓復(fù)位,則繼續(xù)維持2~4個(gè)月,超聲跟蹤隨訪(fǎng)至6個(gè)月。根據(jù)超聲Graf法[3]診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),正常髖關(guān)節(jié)α角>60°,β角<55°;髖臼發(fā)育不良β角為43~60°,α角為55~77°;半脫位α角<43°,β角>77°;全脫位α角<43°,β無(wú)法測(cè)量。
1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法:應(yīng)用SPSS15.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件包進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)處理,計(jì)數(shù)資料以百分率表示,采用χ2檢驗(yàn)。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
DA患兒超聲檢查隨訪(fǎng),治療組中2個(gè)月內(nèi)達(dá)到正常者17例(85.0%),高于對(duì)照組11例(55.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=4.286,P<0.05);隨訪(fǎng)至病程3個(gè)月,治療組恢復(fù)20例(100.0%),對(duì)照組僅14例(70.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=4.902,P<0.05);6個(gè)月時(shí)對(duì)照組仍有3例未恢復(fù)正常。
治療組和對(duì)照組恢復(fù)效果的散點(diǎn)回歸方程,治療組斜率4.0大于對(duì)照組斜率2.9,表明治療組的恢復(fù)速度快于對(duì)照組。
隨著超聲波技術(shù)加入篩查的行列,DDH的發(fā)現(xiàn)在新生兒和小嬰兒中進(jìn)一步提高,并帶動(dòng)了早期干預(yù)性治療的更廣泛開(kāi)展[4]。DDH中DA介于半脫位與正?;純褐g,此類(lèi)患兒約占90%,目前國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)DA病程轉(zhuǎn)歸缺乏準(zhǔn)確的認(rèn)識(shí),是否給予早期干預(yù)成為了大家爭(zhēng)論的熱點(diǎn)[5]。有學(xué)者[6-7]認(rèn)為在嬰兒期DA無(wú)需干預(yù),多能自然發(fā)育正常,過(guò)早治療增加了家庭的負(fù)擔(dān)。然而,同樣也有少部分患兒未給予及時(shí)干預(yù)治療,進(jìn)展為脫位、半脫位或持續(xù)性DA[8],導(dǎo)致長(zhǎng)期生物力學(xué)的異常而逐漸出現(xiàn)髖臼負(fù)重區(qū)軟骨退變、股骨頭局灶性壞死及骨關(guān)節(jié)炎等疾病,造成以后生活的功能障礙。屈髖外展操和寬尿布片法的干預(yù)性治療,方法安全、簡(jiǎn)單、費(fèi)用低廉,是一種易于被家長(zhǎng)接受的早期干預(yù)治療措施,在許多國(guó)家和地區(qū)也得到了應(yīng)用和普及[9]。
髖臼由髖、恥、坐三骨與軟骨組成,呈半球窩狀,與股骨頭構(gòu)成髖關(guān)節(jié)的主要部分。髖臼發(fā)育缺陷時(shí)變淺造成髖臼對(duì)股骨頭的覆蓋不良,容易導(dǎo)致脫位?;謴?fù)并維持股骨頭在髖臼中心位置是DA治療的關(guān)鍵[10],股骨頭與髖臼的正常解剖關(guān)系恢復(fù)后,可促使股骨近端快速發(fā)育,在DA的治療中非手術(shù)治療是主要的治療方法。本研究中患兒均已超過(guò)生后4周,已經(jīng)度過(guò)了新生兒髖關(guān)節(jié)不穩(wěn)定期,髖關(guān)節(jié)囊松弛的狀況趨于減少,6個(gè)月內(nèi)的嬰兒髖關(guān)節(jié)處于開(kāi)始負(fù)重之前,并且此階段的嬰兒髖關(guān)節(jié)生長(zhǎng)塑形潛力好,所以此時(shí)臨床治療的最佳時(shí)期。我們于患兒4周后,給予屈髖外展操結(jié)合寬尿布片法進(jìn)行治療,治療過(guò)程中配合超聲波髖關(guān)節(jié)跟蹤檢查,通過(guò)測(cè)量α角及β角的變化,實(shí)時(shí)檢測(cè)股骨頭復(fù)位情況,為確定髖關(guān)節(jié)何時(shí)發(fā)育正常并終止治療提供準(zhǔn)確的依據(jù)。隨著超聲儀器的不斷提高和檢查方法的不斷改進(jìn),超聲波髖關(guān)節(jié)檢查技術(shù)以其無(wú)輻射、安全、早期、敏感的特點(diǎn),已經(jīng)在DA診治中顯示出越來(lái)越重要的作用[11]。
本研究中,治療組患兒給予屈髖外展操訓(xùn)練,通過(guò)髖關(guān)節(jié)屈曲、內(nèi)收,股骨頭向后向外屈曲,使得股骨頭向髖臼靠近,股骨頭與髖臼得到正常接觸、擠壓、活動(dòng),促進(jìn)了股骨頭在髖臼中心位置的還納以及周?chē)M織、結(jié)構(gòu)解剖關(guān)系的恢復(fù)。寬尿片法起到使患兒處于屈髖外展體位的作用。治療組中20例DA患兒到3個(gè)月時(shí)均恢復(fù)了正常,治愈率為100.0%,而對(duì)照組中14例恢復(fù)正常,治愈率為70.0%;在直線(xiàn)回歸方程分析中可以看出治療組恢復(fù)速度快于對(duì)照組。本研究對(duì)照組3例未恢復(fù)正常的患兒中,無(wú)發(fā)展為脫位、半脫位者,其未來(lái)的進(jìn)展情況需要進(jìn)一步隨訪(fǎng)。
利用超聲技術(shù)對(duì)DA進(jìn)行跟蹤、隨訪(fǎng),是監(jiān)測(cè)DA發(fā)展的簡(jiǎn)便、安全、有效的方法。我們認(rèn)為DA患兒早期采取屈髖外展操訓(xùn)練結(jié)合寬尿布片法治療,是一種有效的干預(yù)治療措施。目前,國(guó)內(nèi)外尚無(wú)合適的評(píng)估方法用于預(yù)判哪些DA患兒將發(fā)展為半脫位、脫位或持續(xù)性DA[12],有待于廣大同仁繼續(xù)對(duì)于DA的病理發(fā)展、最佳治療方式、轉(zhuǎn)歸等進(jìn)行更加深入的研究。
[1]趙亮,程建高.發(fā)育性髖關(guān)節(jié)脫位的超聲早期診斷現(xiàn)狀[J].中華超聲影像學(xué)雜志,2011,20(4):355-357.
[2]GULATI V,ESEONU K,SAYANI J,et al.Developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn:a systematic review[J]. World JOrthop,2013,4(2):32-41.
[3]TSCHAUNER C,F(xiàn)üRNTRATH F,SABA Y,et al.Developmental dysplasia of the hip:impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf's method of hip ultrasonography[J].JChil Orthop,2011,5(6):415-424.
[4]MARTINOLI C,GARELLO I,MARCHETTI A,et al.Hip ultrasound[J].Eur JRadiol,2012,81(12):3824-3831.
[5]EWALD E,KIESEL E.Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns[J].Am Fam Physician,2013,87(1):10-11.
[6]JELLICOE P,AITKEN A,WRIGHT K.Ultrasound screening in developmental hip dysplasia:do all scanned hips need to be followed up?[J].JPediatr Orthop B,2007,16(3):192-195.
[7]RIAD J,CUNDY P,GENT RJ,et al.Longitudinal study of normal hip development by ultrasound[J].J Pediatr Orthop,2005,25(1):5-9.
[8]吉士俊,張立軍.提高發(fā)育性髖脫位療效的關(guān)鍵是實(shí)現(xiàn)治療的規(guī)范化[J].中華小兒外科雜志,2009,30(8):501-502.
[9]NEMETH BA,NAROTAM V.Developmental dysplasia of the hip[J].Pediatr Rev,2012,33(12):553-561.
[10]GODLEY DR.Assessment,diagnosis,and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip[J].JAAPA,2013,26(3):54-58.
[11]TRéGUIER C,CHAPUISM,BRANGER B,et al.Pubo-femoral distance:an easy sonographic screening test to avoid late diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip[J].Eur Radiol,2013,23(3):836-844.
[12]DORNACHER D,LIPPACHER S,REICHEL H,et al.Mid-term results after ultrasound-monitored treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hips:to what extent can a physiological development be expected?[J].J Pediatr Orthop B,2013,22(1):30-35.
(本文編輯:趙麗潔)
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF EARLY INTERVENTION IN DYSPLASIA OF ACETABULUM IN INFANTS
LIU Honglei1,MA Shunmao2,YANG Jingwei1*,YU Yangyang3,LU Haiying1,HEWei1
(1.Department of Ultrasound,the Huabei Oil Field General Hospital of HebeiMedical Uniuersity,Renqiu 062552,China;2.Department of General Surgery,the HuabeiOil Field General Hospital of Hebei Medical Uniuersity,Renqiu 062552,China;3.Department of Stomatology,the Huabei Oil Field General Hospital of HebeiMedical Uniuersity,Renqiu 062552,China)
Objective To observe the effects of early intervention in dysplasia of acetabulum(DA)in infants.M ethods Forty infantswith DA were divided into control group and treatment group. Treatment group was given early intervention measure,and control group was no intervention measure. Regular follow-up and ultrasonicmonitor weremade to the end of 6th month after birth.Results There were 17 infants(85.0%)with DA in treatment group and 11 infants(55.0%)had returned to normal within 2 months after treatment,there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05).Followup to 3 months,all infants in treatment group returned to normal,but in control group only 14 infants(70.0%)recovered,therewas significant difference between two groups(P<0.05).Until to 3 months,there were also 3 infants in control group who were not to recovered.Spot regression equation slope of treatment group was greater than that of control group,it showed that treatment group had higher recovery rate than control group.Conclusion Early intervention in DA in infantswill help them have normal hip.
acetabulum;bone disease,development;ultrasonography;therapy
R726.847.5
A
1007-3205(2013)11-1394-03
2013-08-06;
2013-10-10
中國(guó)石油華北油田礦區(qū)醫(yī)療資助項(xiàng)目(2011-HBG28-3)
劉紅磊(1980-),女,河北寧晉人,河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬華北石油管理局總醫(yī)院主治醫(yī)師,醫(yī)學(xué)碩士,從事腹部及骨骼肌肉系統(tǒng)疾病超聲診斷研究。
*通訊作者。E-mail:lhlcon@sina.com.
10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2013.11.011