Approach to an Integrated Electric Vehicle Drive Solution
為在不斷增加的燃油價(jià)格和必須減少CO2排放努力之間到達(dá)平衡,汽車(chē)制造商采用了以下不同途徑。通過(guò)最佳的內(nèi)燃機(jī)、傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)以及更大范圍的使用混合動(dòng)力技術(shù)來(lái)滿足今天CO2的排放指標(biāo)。在今后幾年內(nèi)傳統(tǒng)技術(shù)的改進(jìn)仍將扮演重要角色[1,2],而混合動(dòng)力技術(shù)將在中期內(nèi)對(duì)市場(chǎng)產(chǎn)生影響。在一個(gè)純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的虛擬世界中,其它技術(shù)將被放棄,盡管各種混合動(dòng)力技術(shù)的各種部件(電動(dòng)機(jī)、蓄電池)可被重復(fù)利用。從這點(diǎn)看,混合動(dòng)力技術(shù)經(jīng)常被標(biāo)注成一個(gè)“過(guò)渡期”的方案。但是,今天有大批專家認(rèn)為用純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)完全替代現(xiàn)有車(chē)輛將在很久以后出現(xiàn)或者根本不可能實(shí)現(xiàn)。如果假設(shè)上述所有技術(shù)并行存在的話。因而開(kāi)發(fā)包括混合動(dòng)力在內(nèi)的高效傳統(tǒng)技術(shù)和諸如純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的新型傳動(dòng)概念必須同時(shí)加速進(jìn)行。
對(duì)于即將到來(lái)的車(chē)輛電力傳動(dòng)而言,重要的是在討論車(chē)輛電氣化問(wèn)題時(shí)采用同一種語(yǔ)言。在從電力傳動(dòng)中區(qū)分混合動(dòng)力傳動(dòng)或者從串聯(lián)結(jié)構(gòu)從區(qū)分增程器時(shí),給出一個(gè)清晰定義是必要的。
通常傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)電氣化的路標(biāo)被描述成從“大內(nèi)燃機(jī)、小電動(dòng)機(jī)”到“大電動(dòng)機(jī)、無(wú)內(nèi)燃機(jī)”等這樣一個(gè)連續(xù)報(bào)道。為明確技術(shù)方案,必須避免這種連續(xù)化描述。因此規(guī)范必須進(jìn)行分類、組合,差別必須被定義而各組別間的技術(shù)等級(jí)必須建立,圖1。
1 Motivation
In an effort to strike a balance between increasing fuel prices and the necessity to reduce CO2emissions,different paths are followed by the automotive industries.The pursuance of optimization measures concerning combustion engines and transmissions as well as the broader use of hybrid technology provide the possibility of achieving today’s CO2targets.
The improvement of conventional technologies will still play a decisive role in the near future[1,2],while hybrid technology will affect the market in the medium term.In a fictional world of only pure electric drivelines,other technologies would be replaced,even if various components of the hybrid technology(electric motors,batteries)could be reused.On that score,hybrid technology is often labeled as“transitional”solution.However,nowadays lots of experts agree that an entire substitution by electric vehicles will take place very late or maybe never.It is rather assumed that all mentioned technologies will exist in parallel.Consequently the development of both,highly efficient conventional technology including hybrids and new driveline con-cepts such as drivelines for pure electric mobility,has to be pushed forward.
圖1 不同功能等級(jí)和規(guī)范的電氣化道路圖Fig.1 Electrification road map with functional steps and specifications
混合動(dòng)力車(chē)輛(HEV)
根據(jù)聯(lián)合國(guó)組織的定義,混合動(dòng)力車(chē)輛具有兩種不同的功率轉(zhuǎn)換設(shè)備和兩種不同的能量存儲(chǔ)裝置。通常該類車(chē)輛在內(nèi)燃機(jī)(ICE)和一個(gè)或多個(gè)電動(dòng)機(jī)(EM)之間轉(zhuǎn)換。因此被定義成混合動(dòng)力車(chē)輛(HEV)。HEV的儲(chǔ)能裝置是向內(nèi)燃機(jī)供油的油箱和向電動(dòng)機(jī)供能的蓄電池(或超級(jí)電容)。
HEV的主要潛力是在減速期間可以回收動(dòng)能。其優(yōu)點(diǎn)是能夠向電力儲(chǔ)能裝置輸送和存儲(chǔ)能量。當(dāng)電動(dòng)機(jī)作為發(fā)電機(jī)使用時(shí),原來(lái)制動(dòng)時(shí)所耗散的能量可轉(zhuǎn)換成電能。ZF公司的經(jīng)濟(jì)型并聯(lián)混合動(dòng)力方案早已投放市場(chǎng)[1,2]。
純電動(dòng)車(chē)輛(EV)
純電動(dòng)車(chē)輛僅由電動(dòng)機(jī)驅(qū)動(dòng),電能來(lái)源于蓄電池。電力驅(qū)動(dòng)能夠滿足所有規(guī)范。EV的一種特殊變型是增程型電動(dòng)汽車(chē),除了滿足上述條件外,這類車(chē)輛還可采用增程驅(qū)動(dòng)模式,例如臨時(shí)使用內(nèi)燃機(jī),如果內(nèi)燃機(jī)與驅(qū)動(dòng)橋相聯(lián)的話。從定義上理解,該增程器僅用來(lái)擴(kuò)展行駛里程而并不滿足電力驅(qū)動(dòng)的其它行駛規(guī)范(諸如最高車(chē)速、性能等)。EV車(chē)輛的增程器驅(qū)動(dòng)形式類似于混合動(dòng)力車(chē)輛。并聯(lián)結(jié)構(gòu)將內(nèi)燃機(jī)直接聯(lián)接到驅(qū)動(dòng)橋上;串聯(lián)結(jié)構(gòu)則需要一個(gè)額外的發(fā)電機(jī)向蓄電池充電或向電動(dòng)機(jī)供能,詳見(jiàn)第五節(jié)。
2 Definitions,Steps of electrification
With the upcoming of electric vehicle drives it is important to speak the same language when discussing vehicle electrification issues.Clear definitions are essential to distinguish e.g.hybrid drives from EV drives or serial architectures from range extender solutions.
Often the roadmap of driveline electrification is described as a continuous ramp from “much ICE,little EM”to“much EM,no ICE”.To develop distinct technical solutions such a continuous approach has to be avoided.The specifications rather have to be separated and grouped,differences have to be identified and technological steps between the groups have to be found,F(xiàn)igure1.
Hybrid Vehicles(HEV)
By definition of the UNO a hybrid vehicle has two different power converters and two different storage devices.In comm on hybrid electric vehicles the converters are a conventional internal combustion engine(ICE)and one or more electric motors(EM).Therefore the term hybrid electric vehicle arose(HEV).The storage devices of HEVs are a fuel tank which supplies the ICE with energy and a battery(or super-capacitor).
One of the main potentials of HEVs is the possibility to recover kinetic energy in deceleration phases.It is taken advantage of the ability of the electric storage device to deliver and to collect energy.Thereby energy,that was formerly lost while braking mechanically,can be transformed into electric energy by using the EM as a generator.Economic parallel hybrid solutions from ZF are in the market already[1,2].
HEV EV的差別
上述兩種驅(qū)動(dòng)的差別主要在于為實(shí)現(xiàn)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)所有行駛規(guī)范所采用的功率轉(zhuǎn)換方式。在HEV中100%來(lái)源于內(nèi)燃機(jī),而在EV中則來(lái)自于電動(dòng)機(jī)。
電動(dòng)汽車(chē)常被稱為未來(lái)車(chē)輛。事實(shí)上零排放的潛力似乎很具吸引力。對(duì)使用者而言,必須了解電力驅(qū)動(dòng)的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。圖2歸納了一些重要因素。
圖2 最終用戶的電力驅(qū)動(dòng)優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)Fig.2 Drawbacks and benefits of electric mobility for the end customer.
在開(kāi)發(fā)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)時(shí),感興趣的是純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的傳動(dòng)和常規(guī)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的不同之處。顯然裝置的特殊化因素發(fā)生了變化。先前的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)如換檔品質(zhì)、響應(yīng)和換檔模式等的重要性下降,而傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的效率、質(zhì)量和變速器的聲學(xué)特征等變得很重要,圖3。
將來(lái)純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)最重要的特性之一是效率。即便在全新緊湊型車(chē)身的設(shè)計(jì)中加熱、冷卻成為非常重要的議題,或者純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)關(guān)鍵部件-蓄電池在功率能量密度方面取得突破的話:絕大部分的能量傳遞仍將出現(xiàn)在傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)中,該系統(tǒng)包括逆變器、電動(dòng)機(jī)和介于電動(dòng)機(jī)及車(chē)輪之間的變速器。傳輸必須盡可能的高效,尤其是在驅(qū)動(dòng)/制動(dòng)雙向傳輸工況時(shí)。
Electric Vehicle(EV)
An electric vehicle(EV)is driven exclusively by electric power coming from the vehicle battery.All driving specifications can be fulfilled by the electric drive.A special variant of EVs are range extended electric vehicles,for which the last mentioned condition is valid as well,but with the addi-tion that these vehicles might be driven by the range extender device–e.g.an ICE–temporarily,if this device is connected to the drive axle.The range extender by definition does only extend the range and does not fulfill other driving specifications(like top speed,performance...)than the electric drive.The drive structures of range extender EVs are comparable to those of hybrid drives.Parallel structures are offering a direct connection of the above mentioned ICE to the axle;serial structures need an additional generator to re-charge the battery or to supply the motor with energy,see chapter 5.
Differentiation between HEV and EV
Like mentioned above the difference between the two drives should be defined by the power converter which is designed for all driving specifications of the driveline.In an HEV 100per cent of the spec shall be fulfilled by the ICE,in an EV all of by the EM.
3 Electric Vehicle Drives– Development goals
Electric vehicles very often are described as the future mobility solution.And indeed the potential of emission free driving seems to be attractive for the benefit of mankind.The meaning of electric mobility for the user–with all its benefits and drawbacks–has to be mentioned as well.Figure2 summarizes the important factors.
For the development of driveline systems it is of great interest how the characteristics of EV drives differ from the conventional ones.Obviously the set of differentiation factors changes.Former criteria like shift quality,response and shift patterns lose importance,while the efficiency of the driveline,its weight as well as the acoustic behavior,e.g.of the transmission,become very important,F(xiàn)igure3.
One of the most important characteristics of an EV drive of the future will be the driveline efficiency.Even if there will be energetically important issues like heating and cooling with new impacts on the cabin design,and even if battery developers will achieve big successes concerning the power and energy density of the EV drive’s key component:the biggest part of energy transformation will still take place in the driveline system consisting of the inverter,the electric motor and the transmission between the latter and the wheels.This transformation has to be as efficient as possible,especially because it occurs both for driving and braking(regeneration)phases.
從傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)開(kāi)發(fā)者的觀點(diǎn)看,最重要的是研究整個(gè)動(dòng)力傳輸鏈即包括“逆變器、電動(dòng)機(jī)、齒輪”的整個(gè)系統(tǒng)而不是單一部件。必須加以綜合考慮,見(jiàn)圖4。
圖3 純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)賣(mài)點(diǎn)的變化Fig.3 Change of Unique selling propositions(USP)of electric vehicles
圖4 純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的集成水平。水平2有望實(shí)現(xiàn)在經(jīng)濟(jì)性和效率方面的最佳系統(tǒng)Fig.4 Integration levels for electric drives.Level 2promises best results in terms of system optimization towards economics and efficiency
ZF EVD1(純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng))是ZF已經(jīng)研制成功的第一個(gè)產(chǎn)品。在這個(gè)高速方案中,所有動(dòng)力電子設(shè)備、電動(dòng)機(jī)和機(jī)械(例如傳動(dòng)、軸承)方面的知識(shí)和總體設(shè)計(jì)(處于水平1)的各種可能性都被用來(lái)開(kāi)發(fā)一套電動(dòng)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng),使其滿足質(zhì)量輕、緊湊、高功率密度和聲學(xué)最優(yōu)。圖5。
From the driveline developer’s point of view it is absolutely crucial to focus on the whole chain of power transformation,i.e.the complete system“inverter,motor,gears”instead of the single components.An integration approach has to be considered as shown in Figure4.
4 ZF’s solution for an Electric Vehicle Drive
A first approach has been made by ZF with the ZF EVD1(Electric Vehicle Drive 1).In this high speed solution all knowledge on power electronics,electric motors and mechanics,like gearings and bearing concepts and all possibilities of integrated design(on level 1)have been used to develop an electric vehicle drive which is light-weight,compact,highly power dense and acoustically optimized,F(xiàn)igure5.
圖5 作為集成化設(shè)計(jì)成果的ZF EVD1 Fig.5 ZF’s Electric Vehicle Drive 1as result of an integrated design
速比
經(jīng)常討論的問(wèn)題是關(guān)于EV傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的速比。許多專家都同意,在假設(shè)電動(dòng)轎車(chē)主要用于通勤目的,也就是短途行駛的話,其最高車(chē)速約在130km/h[3-7]左右這樣一個(gè)較低的水平。同樣也假設(shè)該緊湊型轎車(chē)的爬坡能力一般。因此可以設(shè)想驅(qū)動(dòng)橋最大轉(zhuǎn)矩約為1 200Nm。將轉(zhuǎn)矩和車(chē)速這兩個(gè)主要需求與現(xiàn)代化電動(dòng)機(jī)的轉(zhuǎn)矩-車(chē)速圖相比,便能夠清晰地發(fā)現(xiàn)無(wú)需多級(jí)變速,除非最高車(chē)速或最大轉(zhuǎn)矩超過(guò)了上述限值。而行駛效率則必須加以考慮。圖6是該研究的仿真結(jié)論。
圖6 與單級(jí)方案相比,兩級(jí)速比變速器在EVD1中的效率優(yōu)勢(shì)相當(dāng)小。其優(yōu)勢(shì)在于更好地利用電動(dòng)機(jī)的效率圖。這些優(yōu)勢(shì)(部分優(yōu)勢(shì))被附加部件和質(zhì)量以及換檔操作所抵消Fig.6 The efficiency-wise advantage of a two-speed transmission in an EVD1versus a simple one-speed solution is quite low.The advantages are linked to the better use of the efficiency map of the electric drive.These advantages are(partly over-)compensated by losses originated by additional parts and masses as well as by operations like the synchronization during shifting
高速傳動(dòng)概念
為獲得小尺寸、低質(zhì)量和低成本方面的優(yōu)勢(shì),ZF決定電動(dòng)機(jī)采用高速傳動(dòng)概念,其最高轉(zhuǎn)速達(dá)到21 000r/min同時(shí)變速器速比約為16。高速傳動(dòng)概念可減輕電動(dòng)機(jī)質(zhì)量約50%,而采用異步技術(shù)(ASM)帶來(lái)的功率密度劣勢(shì)也可被消除。這意味著,降低成本和質(zhì)量的雙重目標(biāo)可通過(guò)采用高速傳動(dòng)的ASM實(shí)現(xiàn),圖7。
Number of speeds
A discussion often starts when the question of gears for an EV driveline arises.Many authors agree on the assumption that an electric passenger car serves mainly for commuter purposes,i.e.on short trips with relatively low maximum speeds around 130km/h[3to 7].Also it is commonly assumed that the vehicle’s gradeability is that of a compact car in general.So a good assumption for a maximum axle torque could be around 1.200Nm.Comparing these two main demands–torque and speed–to the torque-speed map of modern electric motors,one can easily find out that multiple transmission ratios are not needed unless top speed or maximum torque exceeds the mentioned limits.At second sight the efficiency in cycles and customer routes has to be taken into account.The result of such an investigation by simulation means is described in Figure6.
High speed concept
To achieve the advantages of small package,low weight and cost advantages in comparison to standard approaches ZF decided to choose a highspeed concept with an electric machine that features a maximum speed of 21,000r/min and a transmission with a mechanical ratio of approximately 16.The high-speed concept reduces the weight of the electric machine by about 50per cent,and even the disadvantage of the asynchronous technology(ASM)in terms of power density can be eliminated.This means,that both targets,cost and weight reduction,are reached by choosing an ASM in a high-speed concept,F(xiàn)igure7.
Overall Efficiency
Besides compactness,efficiency is another target for an electric vehicle drive.With respect to this criterion,the advantages of a PSM over an ASM become negligible when choosing a high-speed concept.Although ZF has chosen the ASM technology,the technology investigation showed that both electric machine technologies(PSM and ASM)are feasible for the high speed concept with comparable performance data.The ASM technology was chosen,but for future developments the PSM technology is still a viable option.
圖7 采用高速傳動(dòng)降低質(zhì)量和成本。電動(dòng)機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)速為21 000r/min變速器速比為16時(shí)的最高車(chē)速為150km/hFig.7 Weight-and cost reduction due to high-speed concept.The transmission ratio 16gives a top speed of 150km/h at an electric motor rotational speed of 21 000r/min.Mass質(zhì)量 Ratio速比
總效率
除了小型化,效率是純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)追求的另一個(gè)目標(biāo)。就該標(biāo)準(zhǔn)而言,一旦選擇高速傳動(dòng)后,PSM(永磁同步電機(jī))相對(duì)于ASM(異步電機(jī))的優(yōu)勢(shì)可忽略不計(jì)。因此ZF采用ASM技術(shù),技術(shù)研究表明在上述參考數(shù)據(jù)前提下兩種電機(jī)均能采用高速傳動(dòng)概念。目前采用ASM技術(shù),將來(lái)PSM仍將是一項(xiàng)可行的選擇。
就效率而言必須了解相應(yīng)的工作模式。因此必須根據(jù)其性能需求分析消費(fèi)者行駛循環(huán)與官方行駛循環(huán)的不同。分析發(fā)現(xiàn),處于低或中等負(fù)荷下即接近車(chē)輛零阻力曲線附近時(shí)電力驅(qū)動(dòng)車(chē)輛的效率是非常重要的。對(duì)應(yīng)于預(yù)期最重要的城市使用工況,40-120km/h的車(chē)速范圍是一個(gè)有效的選擇,這時(shí)就功耗而言,高速遠(yuǎn)比低速更重要。因此,EVD1的電動(dòng)機(jī)被設(shè)計(jì)成在該模式下具有最佳的效率,圖8。
順便提及,該發(fā)現(xiàn)并不適用于以電動(dòng)機(jī)或發(fā)電機(jī)模式經(jīng)常工作在最高可用功率的HEV驅(qū)動(dòng)。
EVD1已造出數(shù)臺(tái)樣機(jī),目前正在評(píng)估性能指標(biāo)。試驗(yàn)在臺(tái)架上進(jìn)行圖9。試驗(yàn)結(jié)論表明其載荷/效率和聲學(xué)特性很有前途。樣車(chē)上的集成工作正在進(jìn)行中。EVD1的試驗(yàn)情況即將公布。
純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的瓶頸在于蓄電池。改進(jìn)不僅涉及到功率密度、成本,還涉及到充電時(shí)間等。由于這些方面的進(jìn)展很慢,目標(biāo)定義為減少每車(chē)所需的總蓄電池量。為能夠使用容量有限的蓄電池,用戶要么接受行駛里程受限,或者采用通過(guò)車(chē)載附加能源擴(kuò)展里程的裝置。通常該能源是燃油,用于驅(qū)動(dòng)一臺(tái)小型內(nèi)燃機(jī)。發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的動(dòng)力可經(jīng)發(fā)電機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)化為電能向蓄電池充電,或者直接驅(qū)動(dòng)電動(dòng)機(jī)(串聯(lián)結(jié)構(gòu))。另一種選擇是機(jī)械能直接作用在驅(qū)動(dòng)橋上。這通過(guò)一套附加的傳動(dòng)裝置(并聯(lián)結(jié)構(gòu))實(shí)現(xiàn)。上述兩者均有其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),這將導(dǎo)致兩者共存,正如并聯(lián)和功率分流混合動(dòng)力那樣,圖10。
With respect to efficiency the most relevant operating modes have to be known.Therefore different customer driving cycles and official driving cycles were analyzed with respect to their performance requirements.It could be found out,that especially for vehicles with electric traction the efficiency at small and medium loads,adjacent to the natural vehicle resistance curve,is of utmost importance.With the anticipated predominant urban usage profile,the speed range of 40to 120kph seems to be a viable choice,where,with respect to consumed power,higher speeds are more important than lower speeds.Therefore the EVD1electric machine is designed for optimum efficiency in these operation modes,F(xiàn)igure8.
This finding does–by the way–not apply to electric motors of HEV drives,which are most frequently used at maximum available power,be it in motor or regeneration mode.
The EVD1has been built up in several prototypes and is currently under thorough evaluation on the promised properties.Therefore test runs on load rigs are evaluated,F(xiàn)igure9.The results are– both with respect to load/efficiency and to acoustics–promising.The integration in a demonstrator vehicle is currently running.Experiences with driving the EVD1will be reported in presentations yet to come.
5 Range-Extender Concepts
The main bottleneck for pure electric mobility is the battery.Improvements have to be made particularly with regard to power density and costs,but also in terms of duration of recharge.Since these successes will be achieved slowly,efforts aim at reducing the required amount of stored electric energy per car.To enable the use of batteries with restricted capacity,either customers need to accept the limited range or devices are required that are able to extend the range by carrying extra energy supply onboard.Generally this energy is fuel which powers a small combustion engine.The engine power may then be transformed by agenerator into electric energy in order to charge the battery or to directly drive the motor(serial architecture).As an alternative the mechanical power may also be directed to the axle drive.This can be managed by an additional transmission module (parallel architecture).Both concepts have their pros and cons,which may result in a coexistence of solutions similar to those of parallel and power split hybrid drives,F(xiàn)igure10.
圖8 工況分析Fig.8 Analysis of relevant operation modes
圖9 試驗(yàn)臺(tái)架上的EVD1樣機(jī)Fig.9 EVD1prototypes on the test rig
圖10 EV傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)增程器構(gòu)架Fig.10 Range Extender architectures as derived from an EV driveline
References
[1] Wagner,G.;Naunheimer,H.;Scherer,H.;Dick,A.:Automatic 8-speed transmission for fuel consumption reduction.In ATZ,Automotive technology magazine,Issue 109(2007)
[2] Paul,M.,Domian,H.-J.and M.Mohr:Challenge CO2reduction–opportunities based on optimised drivelines.6.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeuggetriebe“,Berlin,2007-12-04/05.
[3] Sch?fer,U.:Selection of EV motors with respect to gear.9.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeug-Getriebe und Hybrid & Elektro-Antriebe“,Berlin,2010-11-29– 2010-12-02.
[4] Huckstep,A.,Kirkpatrick,G.:Development of Tata Vista EV S150transmission.9.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeug-Getriebe und Hybrid& Elektro-Antriebe“,Berlin,2010-11-29–2010-12-02.
[5] Bertolotto,S.,Gay,R.,Torrelli,C.:2-Speed Electric Vehicle with Seamless Gearshift System.9.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeug-Getriebe und Hybrid & Elektro-Antriebe“,Berlin,2010-11-29 –2010-12-02.
[6] Lugmayr,T.,Leitner,J.:Development of a highly efficient,two-speed electric powertrain for light commercial vehicles(LCV).9.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeug-Getriebe und Hybrid & Elektro-Antriebe“,Berlin,2010-11-29–2010-12-02.
[7] Schneider,E.,F(xiàn)ickel,F(xiàn).,Cebulski,B.,Liebold,J.:Highly integrative electric drive unit for Electric Vehicles.9.Internationales CTI Symposium ?Innovative Fahrzeug-Getriebe und Hybrid & Elektro-Antriebe“,Berlin,2010-11-29– 2010-12-02.