• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Nomogram for predicting transmural bowel infarction in patients with acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

    2020-08-17 07:12:34MengJiangChangLiLiChunQiuPanWenZhiLvYuFeiRenXinWuCuiChristophDietrich
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年26期

    Meng Jiang, Chang-Li Li, Chun-Qiu Pan, Wen-Zhi Lv, Yu-Fei Ren, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F Dietrich

    Abstract

    Key words: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; Acute mesenteric ischemia;

    INTRODUCTION

    As a rare insidious condition, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) has an incidence of 1 in 1000 emergency laparotomies for acute abdomen[1]. The prevalence of MVT has increased over the last two decades, likely as a result of the wide use of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Superior MVT (SMVT) is the most common type of MVT that accounts for approximately 5% - 10% of all mesenteric ischemia[2]. Despite advances in managing thromboembolic diseases over the past 40 years, the average 30-d mortality of acute SMVT is still as high as 32.1% in severe cases[3]. The predisposition to develop transmural bowel infarction (TBI) is of clinical concern, which can lead to fatal sepsis with hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure[4].

    Advances in imaging modalities, especially CT angiography, have greatly enabled early detection of SMVT in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Unfortunately, TBI is not rare, and intestinal resection is still mandatory for some patients. TBI often leads to a complex clinical situation and increases the patients' physiological burden, which poses a major challenge for clinicians. Thus, accurate and reliable prediction of bowel infarction is critical for decision-making in an emergency setting. Preventing the progression from reversible intestinal ischemia to TBI should be a primary goal in the management of SMVT.

    Nomograms can provide individualized and highly accurate risk estimation, which are easy to use and can facilitate clinical decision-making. We undertook the present study to develop and externally validate a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    Consecutive patients with SMVT from Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (as training cohort) and from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (as validation cohort) were included. This retrospective study (clinical trial number: ChiCTR1900026320) was approved by the institutional review board of the two hospitals. Since the study was retrospectively designed and did not cause any harm to the patients, the informed consent was waived by the board.

    We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record system using the key word “mesenteric venous thrombosis” to identify SMVT patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at the two institutions. SMVT-related AMI was defined as the association of acute abdominal symptoms, CT features of bowel injury, as well as vascular insufficiency of the superior mesenteric vein. Two senior radiologists reviewed all CT images and con?rmed the presence of thrombosis and bowel injury based on consensus. K statistics was used to evaluate the concordance between the two radiologists, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion. Diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in cases that intestinal resection was performed. To explore the effect of SMVT on bowel infarction without confounding risk factors, we excluded patients who had coexisting mesenteric artery thrombosis. In addition, cases in that acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction were also excluded.

    Treatment protocol

    At the two tertiary referral centers in China, we have employed a standard protocol for the treatment of acute SMVT. The treatment protocol included bowel rest, nasogastric tube decompression for patients with abdominal distention, intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics, prompt anticoagulation or surgical exploration if necessary. For all patients, once acute SMVT was diagnosed, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin (3000-5000 IU/d) or subcutaneous administration of lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH or enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg per day) was applied at first. Thereafter, for patients with anticipated surgery, intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered according to the active partial thrombin time. Patients who received conservative treatment were injected with LMWH (1 mg/kg; BID) subcutaneously and monitored closely. Transmural bowel necrosis from resected specimens was confirmed histologically.

    Outcomes

    To determine the indicators of TBI, patients were divided into two groups according to the final therapeutic outcome. The TBI group was defined as: (1) Pathology assessment as extensive, transmural intestinal necrosis; (2) De?nite imaging of bowel perforation on CT; or (3) Unresected patients with extensive bowel necrosis assessed during openclose laparotomy procedures. All resected specimens were retrospectively reviewed by a senior pathologist. The patients who did not progress to transmural bowel necrosis but recovered from AMI or superficial ischemic lesions after systemic anticoagulation or thrombectomy were categorized as reversible intestinal ischemia group. This was confirmed by explorative laparotomy, repeated CT scan or clinical follow-up.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range), and were compared between the training and validation cohort using Mann-Whitney U test orttest as appropriate. Categorical variables were reported as whole numbers and proportions and were compared by theχ2test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.6.1) and SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All the statistical signi?cance levels were two-sided, withPvalue less than 0.05. The detailed description of the decision curve analysis (DCA) algorithm is provided in the Supplementary text.

    Data collection

    Demographic and clinical data were extracted from case records, including age, gender, coexisting medical conditions (e.g., tobacco use, malignant disease, or previous history of deep venous thrombosis), clinical manifestations, physical ?ndings and laboratory test results. All serum biochemical parameters were collected at the onset of symptoms. Radiologic features including extent of thrombus and associated conditions (e.g., decreased bowel wall enhancement, bowel wall thickening and pneumatosis intestinalis) were also recorded. We also extracted the suspected risk factors for acute SMVT, such as recent surgery, intraperitoneal inflammation, and liver cirrhosis.

    Construction of the nomogram

    Continuous variables were transformed into dichotomous variables using the upper value of normal as the cutoff level (e.g., white blood cell count > 10 × 109/L, percentage of neutrophil granulocyte > 75%, creatinine > 106 μmol/L, or venous lactate levels > 2 mmol/L), and C-reactive protein (50 mg/L as cutoff value in line with previous study[5].

    Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess each variable in the training cohort for investigating the independent risk factors associated with TBI. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating all the significant risk variables was performed, using backward step-down selection procedure with a liberalP< 0.05 as the retention criteria to select the final indicators of TBI. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    Performance of the nomogram

    Calibration of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (non-significance of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicates good agreement)[6]. The discrimination performance of the nomogram was assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). The nomogram was subjected to bootstrapping validation (1000 bootstrap resamples) to calculate a relatively corrected AUC. Then the performance of the nomogram was tested in the external validation cohort by calibration curve and AUC.

    Clinical use assessment

    DCA was performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model by quantifying the net bene?ts at different threshold probabilities[7,8]. For clinical use, the total scores (defined as Nomo-score in this study) of each case were calculated according to the nomogram algorithm. Then the optimal cutoff value of the Nomoscore was determined by maximizing the Youden index. Performance of the optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.

    RESULTS

    Patient selection

    After excluding 12 patients with chronic SMVT, chart review yielded 230 consecutive patients who had acute SMVT in the training cohort between July 2005 and June 2018 (Wuhan cohort). Of the 230 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the analysis as the acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction. Acute SMVT concomitant with mesenteric artery thrombosis was found in 10 patients, who were also excluded, leaving a ?nal sample of 207 patients. Explorative laparotomy was performed in 78 (38%) patients , and bowel resection was performed in 65 (83%) of these patients based on assessment of bowel viability with respect to color, dilatation and peristaltic motion of the bowel, pulsations of the mesenteric arcade arteries, as well as bleeding from cut surfaces. Thrombectomy was performed in 11 (14%) patients, and 2 (3%) received open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis, who refused further treatment and died at last. The algorithm of patient screening in the training cohort is shown in Figure 1A. Pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed TBI in 56 (86%) of the 65 patients, while superficial ischemic lesions were seen in 9 (14%) patients. The mean time between admission and surgical exploration for patients with and without TBI was 41.6 ± 30.5 (8-192) h and 32.4 ± 23.7 (5-96) h, respectively.

    In this study, patients with superficial ischemic lesions confirmed by pathological examination and clinically recovered through thrombectomy were classified as reversible intestinal ischemia group, while patients who underwent open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis were deemed as TBI. One hundred twentynine patients (62%) who did not progress to surgery and recovered after conservative therapy were considered as having reversible intestinal ischemia. Eventually, reversible intestinal ischemia and TBI were the final diagnosis in 149 (72%) and 58 (28%) patients, respectively.

    In the external validation cohort (Guangzhou cohort), 89 eligible cases were retrieved from August 2007 to December 2018 using the same criteria (Figure 1B). TBI was confirmed in 27 (30%) of these patients.

    Characteristics of the study population

    The patients’ clinical characteristics in the training and validation cohorts are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two cohorts in most of the comparisons. In the training cohort, 82 patients had a clinical history of liver cirrhosis, and 20.7% (17/82) cases developed TBI. In the validation cohort, 18.9% (7/37) of the patients with liver cirrhosis progressed to TBI finally.

    Development and validation of a TBI-predicting nomogram

    The results of univariate logistic analysis are presented in Table 2. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001), rebound tenderness (OR = 7.14,P< 0.001), serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR = 3.14,P= 0.009) and previous history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001) all independently predicted TBI (Table 3). These independently associated risk factors were used to construct a TBI risk estimation nomogram (Figure 2A). The scoring system is shown in Supplementary Table 1, which can be used for a more accurate calculation of predictions than drawing lines on the nomogram. Figure 2B shows the calibration curve of the nomogram. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistics (P= 0.316) showed good calibration in the training cohort. An AUC of 0.860 (95%CI: 0.771-0.925) also showed good discrimination by the nomogram (Figure 2D). The favorable calibration of the nomogram was also confirmed in the external validation set (Figure 2C). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded aPvalue of 0.203, and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.851 (95%CI: 0.796-0.897) (Figure 2E). Thus, our nomogram performed well in both the training and external validation sets.

    Decision curve analysisDCA was used to facilitate the assessment of the nomogram. Figure 3A shows the basic plot of model performance for the nomogram. The DCA graphically demonstrated the clinical value of the model based on a continuum of threshold for TBI risk (X axis) and the net bene?t of using the model to stratify the risk of the patients (Y axis) relative to the hypothesis that no patient will have a TBI. The decision curve indicated that when the threshold probability for a patient or a doctor is within a range from 0 to 1.0, the nomogram adds more net benefit than the “treat-all”or “treat-none” schemes. Figure 3B shows the estimated number of patients who would be at high risk for each potential risk threshold and visually demonstrates the proportion of the patients who are truly positive cases. For instance, if a 40% risk threshold was used, of 1000 patients screened, about 200 patients would be deemed athigh risk, with about 180 of these patients being true TBI cases.

    Table 1 Participant characteristics

    Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort

    Predicting TBI based on the Nomo-score

    The optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was determined to be 90. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value when used in predicting TBI were 88.89%, 67.74%, 54.55%, and 93.33% in the training cohort, and 84.84%, 71.81%, 53.85%, and 92.24% in the external validation cohort, respectively (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    Acute SMVT is a rare but serious condition due to its intestinal ischemic complications. The widespread use of contrast-enhanced CT has made early diagnosis possible by a noninvasive approach, which can provide incremental information as evidence of ischemia warranting a change in treatment strategy. However, acute SMVT still carries a high risk of extensive intestinal infarction and surgical exploration with bowel resection is still mandatory for some patients. Recently, Kimet al[9]conducted a study involving 66 patients with acute SMVT, of whom 15 (23%) patients underwent bowel resection due to progressive intestinal ischemia and bowel infarction, and 3 (5%) patients died at last, despite adequate intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation were applied immediately at diagnosis. Another research reported the application of multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy for acute SMVT, and 18 of the 43 (42%) subjects underwent bowel resection due to TBI[10]. The reported rates of bowel infarction in existing literatures ranged from 6% to 42%, consistent with our rate of 29%[2,10-16]. Therefore, preventing the progression from reversible to irreversible ischemic bowel injury should be a primary goal in the management of acute SMVT[5]. However, the early detection of TBI remains a challenge and further investigation is required to identify the most important prognostic factors.

    In this retrospective study, we developed and externally validated a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT. The decreased bowel wall enhancement, rebound tenderness, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and previous history of DVT independently predicted this event. Incorporating these clinical, biological, and radiological factors into an easy-to-use prediction model can facilitate the individualized prediction of TBI. The nomogram also consistently predicted TBI with a high accuracy and provided good clinical usefulness throughout the range of bowel infarction risk as assessed by DCA.

    Based on our ?ndings, the previous history of DVT could increase the chances of bowel infarction in the setting of acute SMVT. Venous thrombosis often results from a combination of endothelial injury, hypercoagulability or stasis. The patients with a previous history of DVT may have had several episodes of undetected (possibly asymptomatic) MVT prior to the index event and thus have acute-on-chronic thrombosis with greater compromise of venous flow.

    The decreased bowel wall enhancement on CT angiography is a strong established risk indictor for bowel infarction[9,17]. In our study, CT scan detected this feature in 70 patients, and among them, 34 patients had confirmed TBI finally. Previous studies demonstrated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement in patients with acute SMVT was signi?cantly associated with surgical exploration and bowel resection[9,10].

    Several other reports on AMI implied that the extent of venous thrombus wasrelated to TBI[9,18]. However, Grishamet al[19]found no association between the presence of multiple vein thromboses and increased mortality rates. Additionally, Kumaret al[20]showed that patients with isolated SMVT were even at a greater risk of development of bowel infarction, and more likely to require surgery. In view of that the extent of venous thrombus did not show enough predictive strength on the basis of univariate association with bowel infarction, we excluded this variable for model construction.

    Table 4 Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction

    Peritoneal signs, including involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness, and abdominal wall rigidity often present in the case of TBI. According to our results, the rebound tenderness could be a strong predictor for TBI. In parallel with our outcomes, Kimet al[9]found that rebound tenderness was observed more frequently in patients who underwent bowel resection than those who did not (33%vs4%).

    Lactate is an important parameter that closely related to necrosis, inflammation and hypoxia. Our results demonstrated that serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L was significantly associated with the occurrence of TBI. In line with our findings, Higashizono and Nuzzo revealed that serum lactate levels tend to increase significantly after bowel infarction[5,21]. Additionally, Leoneet al[22]indicated that serum lactate levels decreased significantly after resection of the necrotic bowel, further validating its predictive value for TBI.

    Accurate identification of patients that will need surgery due to bowel infarction is crucial, because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with unidentified and unresected necrotic intestine[3,23,24]. Earlier resection of necrotic bowel before the development of multi-organ failure could improve the functional outcome of the small bowel and patient prognosis. However, this issue remains a challenge. In a study the authors presented 767 surgeons with a clinical vignette of AMI, and showed that the surgeons’ decision on whether a surgery is required or not varies markedly[25].

    In a previous study, Nuzzoet al[5]developed a risk score incorporating organ failure, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and bowel loop dilation on CT scan to predict irreversible transmural bowel necrosis for AMI. The risk factors associated with bowel necrosis identified in this study was partly different from ours, probably because their cohort comprised venous and arterial occlusion, but we just included acute SMVT patients. In addition, we suggested that organ failure might be of late onset during the disease course. Furthermore, we think that the risk score based on the number of predictive factors could not reflect the weight of each parameter.

    Although several studies have investigated the risk factors of TBI for AMI, to our knowledge, none have presented the data in the form of a validated nomogram[5,9,26,27]. Nomograms have advantages as they provide quanti?ed individual risk assessment in a dynamic manner. For clinical use of our nomogram, we proposed the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value in assessing the risk of TBI using 90 as the cut-off value (Table 4). We show that patients with a Nomo-score less than 90 are the subgroup of low-risk inclined to TBI (negative predictive value, 93.33% for training and 92.24% for validation). The AUC of our model was 0.860 and 0.851 in the training and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves presented a good agreement between the actual probability and predicted probability of TBI. Thus, we believe that our nomogram could be a reliable and objective tool that will provide clinicians favorable evidence for decision making.

    Figure 2 Nomogram for evaluation of transmural bowel infarction risk and its predictive performance. A: Nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The nomogram is used to find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the risk of TBI at the lower line of the nomogram. For example, a 30-year-old male patient (have transmural bowel infarction finally) with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, no rebound tenderness and no decreased bowel wall enhancement, has a risk of 59% of TBI calculated by the nomogram; B and C: Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves depict the calibration of the model in terms of the agreement between the predicted probabilities of TBI and observed outcomes of TBI. The dotted blue line represents an ideal prediction, and the dotted red line represents the predictive ability of the nomogram. The closer the dotted red line fit is to the dotted blue line, the better the predictive accuracy of the nomogram is; D and E: The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. TBI: Transmural bowel infarction; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic curve.

    Cautions should be exercised when interpreting the ?ndings due to several limitations. First, some bias may inevitably exist and affect our analysis because it was a retrospective study. And thus, treatment strategy might not be entirely consistent among clinicians. Second, although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application. Third, pathological evidence could not be obtained for patients that did not progress to surgery but confirmed by recovery from the specific vascular therapy. Fourth, evaluation of decreased bowel wall enhancement in the nomogram was related to the reading of CT images, and interpretation may vary among radiologists. In addition, since it is hard to assess the length of decreased bowel wall enhancement quantitatively on CT imaging, we did not examine the association between this factor and TBI. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify this issue. Finally, data on the long-term outcomes of patients were unavailable, however, this will not affect our ability to identify risk factors of TBI associated with AMI.

    Figure 3 Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. A: The Y-axis shows the net benefit. The X-axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The green line represents the assumption that all patients have transmural bowel infarction (TBI). The thin black line represents the assumption that no patients have TBI. The red line represents the nomogram. The decision curve in the validation cohort indicated that if the threshold probability is between 0 and 1.0, then using the nomogram to predict TBI adds more benefit than the treat-all-patients scheme or treat-none scheme; B: Clinical impact curve for the risk model. Of 1000 patients, the red solid line shows the total number who would be deemed at high risk for each risk threshold. The green dashed line shows how many of those would be true positives cases. DCA: Decision curve analysis; TBI: Transmural bowel infarction.

    In conclusion, our nomogram is an individual predictive tool that incorporates four risk factors, shows favorable predictive accuracy for assessing TBI risk in patients with AMI. The model might facilitate timely recognition and effective management of highrisk patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research conclusions

    The nomogram achieved an optimal prediction of TBI in patients with AMI. Using the model, the risk for an individual patient inclined to TBI can be assessed, thus providing a rational therapeutic choice.

    Research perspectives

    Although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application.

    国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 老司机福利观看| 露出奶头的视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 黄片小视频在线播放| 在线观看www视频免费| 91老司机精品| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 精品久久久久久久久av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 成人欧美大片| www.www免费av| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 色av中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲性久久影院| av黄色大香蕉| 禁无遮挡网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久精品91蜜桃| 级片在线观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产视频内射| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产视频内射| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 很黄的视频免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 少妇丰满av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 在线看三级毛片| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 午夜影院日韩av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 综合色av麻豆| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 在线免费十八禁| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲 国产 在线| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 在线观看一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 色综合色国产| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 97热精品久久久久久| eeuss影院久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 老司机福利观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日日夜夜操网爽| 高清在线国产一区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲av成人av| 午夜视频国产福利| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| av视频在线观看入口| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 日本五十路高清| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 色av中文字幕| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 美女大奶头视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产视频内射| videossex国产| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费观看人在逋| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 色综合站精品国产| 嫩草影院精品99| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 99热这里只有精品一区| 毛片女人毛片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 性色avwww在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产精品一及| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 日本色播在线视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| www.www免费av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 一本久久中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久末码| 97热精品久久久久久| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日本色播在线视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日本 av在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日韩中字成人| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 91av网一区二区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产免费男女视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 99热这里只有是精品50| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产视频内射| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 一a级毛片在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产老妇女一区| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久99热这里只有精品18| videossex国产| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 亚洲av美国av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 欧美日本视频| 97碰自拍视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 在线播放无遮挡| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 一本精品99久久精品77| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| av国产免费在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 午夜视频国产福利| 99久久精品热视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| av天堂在线播放| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 不卡一级毛片| 春色校园在线视频观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 黄色女人牲交| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产成人a区在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 精品久久久噜噜| 免费av毛片视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产不卡一卡二| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日本 av在线| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 黄色女人牲交| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲av美国av| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日本免费a在线| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| av在线蜜桃| 在线免费十八禁| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产精品无大码| 91精品国产九色| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲18禁久久av| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 91狼人影院| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 18+在线观看网站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 黄色一级大片看看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 免费看日本二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久热精品热| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 99久久精品热视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲图色成人| 精品午夜福利在线看| 午夜视频国产福利| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 午夜免费激情av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 美女高潮的动态| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 精品久久久噜噜| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国内精品宾馆在线| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 在线免费十八禁| 午夜福利在线在线| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚州av有码| 久久久久久久久中文| 嫩草影院新地址| 成人国产综合亚洲| 日韩高清综合在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 免费观看在线日韩| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 如何舔出高潮| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 一区二区三区激情视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| www.www免费av| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产老妇女一区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 俺也久久电影网| 国产三级在线视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产老妇女一区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 99久久精品热视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 美女免费视频网站| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 嫩草影院入口| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲av熟女| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日本 欧美在线| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 中国美女看黄片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 97碰自拍视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 级片在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 日韩强制内射视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 如何舔出高潮| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧美日韩黄片免| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日本免费a在线| 国产乱人视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放|