• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Nomogram for predicting transmural bowel infarction in patients with acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

    2020-08-17 07:12:34MengJiangChangLiLiChunQiuPanWenZhiLvYuFeiRenXinWuCuiChristophDietrich
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年26期

    Meng Jiang, Chang-Li Li, Chun-Qiu Pan, Wen-Zhi Lv, Yu-Fei Ren, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F Dietrich

    Abstract

    Key words: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; Acute mesenteric ischemia;

    INTRODUCTION

    As a rare insidious condition, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) has an incidence of 1 in 1000 emergency laparotomies for acute abdomen[1]. The prevalence of MVT has increased over the last two decades, likely as a result of the wide use of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Superior MVT (SMVT) is the most common type of MVT that accounts for approximately 5% - 10% of all mesenteric ischemia[2]. Despite advances in managing thromboembolic diseases over the past 40 years, the average 30-d mortality of acute SMVT is still as high as 32.1% in severe cases[3]. The predisposition to develop transmural bowel infarction (TBI) is of clinical concern, which can lead to fatal sepsis with hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure[4].

    Advances in imaging modalities, especially CT angiography, have greatly enabled early detection of SMVT in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Unfortunately, TBI is not rare, and intestinal resection is still mandatory for some patients. TBI often leads to a complex clinical situation and increases the patients' physiological burden, which poses a major challenge for clinicians. Thus, accurate and reliable prediction of bowel infarction is critical for decision-making in an emergency setting. Preventing the progression from reversible intestinal ischemia to TBI should be a primary goal in the management of SMVT.

    Nomograms can provide individualized and highly accurate risk estimation, which are easy to use and can facilitate clinical decision-making. We undertook the present study to develop and externally validate a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    Consecutive patients with SMVT from Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (as training cohort) and from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (as validation cohort) were included. This retrospective study (clinical trial number: ChiCTR1900026320) was approved by the institutional review board of the two hospitals. Since the study was retrospectively designed and did not cause any harm to the patients, the informed consent was waived by the board.

    We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record system using the key word “mesenteric venous thrombosis” to identify SMVT patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at the two institutions. SMVT-related AMI was defined as the association of acute abdominal symptoms, CT features of bowel injury, as well as vascular insufficiency of the superior mesenteric vein. Two senior radiologists reviewed all CT images and con?rmed the presence of thrombosis and bowel injury based on consensus. K statistics was used to evaluate the concordance between the two radiologists, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion. Diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in cases that intestinal resection was performed. To explore the effect of SMVT on bowel infarction without confounding risk factors, we excluded patients who had coexisting mesenteric artery thrombosis. In addition, cases in that acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction were also excluded.

    Treatment protocol

    At the two tertiary referral centers in China, we have employed a standard protocol for the treatment of acute SMVT. The treatment protocol included bowel rest, nasogastric tube decompression for patients with abdominal distention, intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics, prompt anticoagulation or surgical exploration if necessary. For all patients, once acute SMVT was diagnosed, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin (3000-5000 IU/d) or subcutaneous administration of lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH or enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg per day) was applied at first. Thereafter, for patients with anticipated surgery, intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered according to the active partial thrombin time. Patients who received conservative treatment were injected with LMWH (1 mg/kg; BID) subcutaneously and monitored closely. Transmural bowel necrosis from resected specimens was confirmed histologically.

    Outcomes

    To determine the indicators of TBI, patients were divided into two groups according to the final therapeutic outcome. The TBI group was defined as: (1) Pathology assessment as extensive, transmural intestinal necrosis; (2) De?nite imaging of bowel perforation on CT; or (3) Unresected patients with extensive bowel necrosis assessed during openclose laparotomy procedures. All resected specimens were retrospectively reviewed by a senior pathologist. The patients who did not progress to transmural bowel necrosis but recovered from AMI or superficial ischemic lesions after systemic anticoagulation or thrombectomy were categorized as reversible intestinal ischemia group. This was confirmed by explorative laparotomy, repeated CT scan or clinical follow-up.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range), and were compared between the training and validation cohort using Mann-Whitney U test orttest as appropriate. Categorical variables were reported as whole numbers and proportions and were compared by theχ2test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.6.1) and SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All the statistical signi?cance levels were two-sided, withPvalue less than 0.05. The detailed description of the decision curve analysis (DCA) algorithm is provided in the Supplementary text.

    Data collection

    Demographic and clinical data were extracted from case records, including age, gender, coexisting medical conditions (e.g., tobacco use, malignant disease, or previous history of deep venous thrombosis), clinical manifestations, physical ?ndings and laboratory test results. All serum biochemical parameters were collected at the onset of symptoms. Radiologic features including extent of thrombus and associated conditions (e.g., decreased bowel wall enhancement, bowel wall thickening and pneumatosis intestinalis) were also recorded. We also extracted the suspected risk factors for acute SMVT, such as recent surgery, intraperitoneal inflammation, and liver cirrhosis.

    Construction of the nomogram

    Continuous variables were transformed into dichotomous variables using the upper value of normal as the cutoff level (e.g., white blood cell count > 10 × 109/L, percentage of neutrophil granulocyte > 75%, creatinine > 106 μmol/L, or venous lactate levels > 2 mmol/L), and C-reactive protein (50 mg/L as cutoff value in line with previous study[5].

    Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess each variable in the training cohort for investigating the independent risk factors associated with TBI. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating all the significant risk variables was performed, using backward step-down selection procedure with a liberalP< 0.05 as the retention criteria to select the final indicators of TBI. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    Performance of the nomogram

    Calibration of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (non-significance of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicates good agreement)[6]. The discrimination performance of the nomogram was assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). The nomogram was subjected to bootstrapping validation (1000 bootstrap resamples) to calculate a relatively corrected AUC. Then the performance of the nomogram was tested in the external validation cohort by calibration curve and AUC.

    Clinical use assessment

    DCA was performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model by quantifying the net bene?ts at different threshold probabilities[7,8]. For clinical use, the total scores (defined as Nomo-score in this study) of each case were calculated according to the nomogram algorithm. Then the optimal cutoff value of the Nomoscore was determined by maximizing the Youden index. Performance of the optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.

    RESULTS

    Patient selection

    After excluding 12 patients with chronic SMVT, chart review yielded 230 consecutive patients who had acute SMVT in the training cohort between July 2005 and June 2018 (Wuhan cohort). Of the 230 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the analysis as the acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction. Acute SMVT concomitant with mesenteric artery thrombosis was found in 10 patients, who were also excluded, leaving a ?nal sample of 207 patients. Explorative laparotomy was performed in 78 (38%) patients , and bowel resection was performed in 65 (83%) of these patients based on assessment of bowel viability with respect to color, dilatation and peristaltic motion of the bowel, pulsations of the mesenteric arcade arteries, as well as bleeding from cut surfaces. Thrombectomy was performed in 11 (14%) patients, and 2 (3%) received open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis, who refused further treatment and died at last. The algorithm of patient screening in the training cohort is shown in Figure 1A. Pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed TBI in 56 (86%) of the 65 patients, while superficial ischemic lesions were seen in 9 (14%) patients. The mean time between admission and surgical exploration for patients with and without TBI was 41.6 ± 30.5 (8-192) h and 32.4 ± 23.7 (5-96) h, respectively.

    In this study, patients with superficial ischemic lesions confirmed by pathological examination and clinically recovered through thrombectomy were classified as reversible intestinal ischemia group, while patients who underwent open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis were deemed as TBI. One hundred twentynine patients (62%) who did not progress to surgery and recovered after conservative therapy were considered as having reversible intestinal ischemia. Eventually, reversible intestinal ischemia and TBI were the final diagnosis in 149 (72%) and 58 (28%) patients, respectively.

    In the external validation cohort (Guangzhou cohort), 89 eligible cases were retrieved from August 2007 to December 2018 using the same criteria (Figure 1B). TBI was confirmed in 27 (30%) of these patients.

    Characteristics of the study population

    The patients’ clinical characteristics in the training and validation cohorts are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two cohorts in most of the comparisons. In the training cohort, 82 patients had a clinical history of liver cirrhosis, and 20.7% (17/82) cases developed TBI. In the validation cohort, 18.9% (7/37) of the patients with liver cirrhosis progressed to TBI finally.

    Development and validation of a TBI-predicting nomogram

    The results of univariate logistic analysis are presented in Table 2. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001), rebound tenderness (OR = 7.14,P< 0.001), serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR = 3.14,P= 0.009) and previous history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001) all independently predicted TBI (Table 3). These independently associated risk factors were used to construct a TBI risk estimation nomogram (Figure 2A). The scoring system is shown in Supplementary Table 1, which can be used for a more accurate calculation of predictions than drawing lines on the nomogram. Figure 2B shows the calibration curve of the nomogram. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistics (P= 0.316) showed good calibration in the training cohort. An AUC of 0.860 (95%CI: 0.771-0.925) also showed good discrimination by the nomogram (Figure 2D). The favorable calibration of the nomogram was also confirmed in the external validation set (Figure 2C). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded aPvalue of 0.203, and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.851 (95%CI: 0.796-0.897) (Figure 2E). Thus, our nomogram performed well in both the training and external validation sets.

    Decision curve analysisDCA was used to facilitate the assessment of the nomogram. Figure 3A shows the basic plot of model performance for the nomogram. The DCA graphically demonstrated the clinical value of the model based on a continuum of threshold for TBI risk (X axis) and the net bene?t of using the model to stratify the risk of the patients (Y axis) relative to the hypothesis that no patient will have a TBI. The decision curve indicated that when the threshold probability for a patient or a doctor is within a range from 0 to 1.0, the nomogram adds more net benefit than the “treat-all”or “treat-none” schemes. Figure 3B shows the estimated number of patients who would be at high risk for each potential risk threshold and visually demonstrates the proportion of the patients who are truly positive cases. For instance, if a 40% risk threshold was used, of 1000 patients screened, about 200 patients would be deemed athigh risk, with about 180 of these patients being true TBI cases.

    Table 1 Participant characteristics

    Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort

    Predicting TBI based on the Nomo-score

    The optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was determined to be 90. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value when used in predicting TBI were 88.89%, 67.74%, 54.55%, and 93.33% in the training cohort, and 84.84%, 71.81%, 53.85%, and 92.24% in the external validation cohort, respectively (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    Acute SMVT is a rare but serious condition due to its intestinal ischemic complications. The widespread use of contrast-enhanced CT has made early diagnosis possible by a noninvasive approach, which can provide incremental information as evidence of ischemia warranting a change in treatment strategy. However, acute SMVT still carries a high risk of extensive intestinal infarction and surgical exploration with bowel resection is still mandatory for some patients. Recently, Kimet al[9]conducted a study involving 66 patients with acute SMVT, of whom 15 (23%) patients underwent bowel resection due to progressive intestinal ischemia and bowel infarction, and 3 (5%) patients died at last, despite adequate intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation were applied immediately at diagnosis. Another research reported the application of multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy for acute SMVT, and 18 of the 43 (42%) subjects underwent bowel resection due to TBI[10]. The reported rates of bowel infarction in existing literatures ranged from 6% to 42%, consistent with our rate of 29%[2,10-16]. Therefore, preventing the progression from reversible to irreversible ischemic bowel injury should be a primary goal in the management of acute SMVT[5]. However, the early detection of TBI remains a challenge and further investigation is required to identify the most important prognostic factors.

    In this retrospective study, we developed and externally validated a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT. The decreased bowel wall enhancement, rebound tenderness, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and previous history of DVT independently predicted this event. Incorporating these clinical, biological, and radiological factors into an easy-to-use prediction model can facilitate the individualized prediction of TBI. The nomogram also consistently predicted TBI with a high accuracy and provided good clinical usefulness throughout the range of bowel infarction risk as assessed by DCA.

    Based on our ?ndings, the previous history of DVT could increase the chances of bowel infarction in the setting of acute SMVT. Venous thrombosis often results from a combination of endothelial injury, hypercoagulability or stasis. The patients with a previous history of DVT may have had several episodes of undetected (possibly asymptomatic) MVT prior to the index event and thus have acute-on-chronic thrombosis with greater compromise of venous flow.

    The decreased bowel wall enhancement on CT angiography is a strong established risk indictor for bowel infarction[9,17]. In our study, CT scan detected this feature in 70 patients, and among them, 34 patients had confirmed TBI finally. Previous studies demonstrated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement in patients with acute SMVT was signi?cantly associated with surgical exploration and bowel resection[9,10].

    Several other reports on AMI implied that the extent of venous thrombus wasrelated to TBI[9,18]. However, Grishamet al[19]found no association between the presence of multiple vein thromboses and increased mortality rates. Additionally, Kumaret al[20]showed that patients with isolated SMVT were even at a greater risk of development of bowel infarction, and more likely to require surgery. In view of that the extent of venous thrombus did not show enough predictive strength on the basis of univariate association with bowel infarction, we excluded this variable for model construction.

    Table 4 Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction

    Peritoneal signs, including involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness, and abdominal wall rigidity often present in the case of TBI. According to our results, the rebound tenderness could be a strong predictor for TBI. In parallel with our outcomes, Kimet al[9]found that rebound tenderness was observed more frequently in patients who underwent bowel resection than those who did not (33%vs4%).

    Lactate is an important parameter that closely related to necrosis, inflammation and hypoxia. Our results demonstrated that serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L was significantly associated with the occurrence of TBI. In line with our findings, Higashizono and Nuzzo revealed that serum lactate levels tend to increase significantly after bowel infarction[5,21]. Additionally, Leoneet al[22]indicated that serum lactate levels decreased significantly after resection of the necrotic bowel, further validating its predictive value for TBI.

    Accurate identification of patients that will need surgery due to bowel infarction is crucial, because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with unidentified and unresected necrotic intestine[3,23,24]. Earlier resection of necrotic bowel before the development of multi-organ failure could improve the functional outcome of the small bowel and patient prognosis. However, this issue remains a challenge. In a study the authors presented 767 surgeons with a clinical vignette of AMI, and showed that the surgeons’ decision on whether a surgery is required or not varies markedly[25].

    In a previous study, Nuzzoet al[5]developed a risk score incorporating organ failure, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and bowel loop dilation on CT scan to predict irreversible transmural bowel necrosis for AMI. The risk factors associated with bowel necrosis identified in this study was partly different from ours, probably because their cohort comprised venous and arterial occlusion, but we just included acute SMVT patients. In addition, we suggested that organ failure might be of late onset during the disease course. Furthermore, we think that the risk score based on the number of predictive factors could not reflect the weight of each parameter.

    Although several studies have investigated the risk factors of TBI for AMI, to our knowledge, none have presented the data in the form of a validated nomogram[5,9,26,27]. Nomograms have advantages as they provide quanti?ed individual risk assessment in a dynamic manner. For clinical use of our nomogram, we proposed the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value in assessing the risk of TBI using 90 as the cut-off value (Table 4). We show that patients with a Nomo-score less than 90 are the subgroup of low-risk inclined to TBI (negative predictive value, 93.33% for training and 92.24% for validation). The AUC of our model was 0.860 and 0.851 in the training and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves presented a good agreement between the actual probability and predicted probability of TBI. Thus, we believe that our nomogram could be a reliable and objective tool that will provide clinicians favorable evidence for decision making.

    Figure 2 Nomogram for evaluation of transmural bowel infarction risk and its predictive performance. A: Nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The nomogram is used to find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the risk of TBI at the lower line of the nomogram. For example, a 30-year-old male patient (have transmural bowel infarction finally) with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, no rebound tenderness and no decreased bowel wall enhancement, has a risk of 59% of TBI calculated by the nomogram; B and C: Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves depict the calibration of the model in terms of the agreement between the predicted probabilities of TBI and observed outcomes of TBI. The dotted blue line represents an ideal prediction, and the dotted red line represents the predictive ability of the nomogram. The closer the dotted red line fit is to the dotted blue line, the better the predictive accuracy of the nomogram is; D and E: The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. TBI: Transmural bowel infarction; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic curve.

    Cautions should be exercised when interpreting the ?ndings due to several limitations. First, some bias may inevitably exist and affect our analysis because it was a retrospective study. And thus, treatment strategy might not be entirely consistent among clinicians. Second, although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application. Third, pathological evidence could not be obtained for patients that did not progress to surgery but confirmed by recovery from the specific vascular therapy. Fourth, evaluation of decreased bowel wall enhancement in the nomogram was related to the reading of CT images, and interpretation may vary among radiologists. In addition, since it is hard to assess the length of decreased bowel wall enhancement quantitatively on CT imaging, we did not examine the association between this factor and TBI. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify this issue. Finally, data on the long-term outcomes of patients were unavailable, however, this will not affect our ability to identify risk factors of TBI associated with AMI.

    Figure 3 Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. A: The Y-axis shows the net benefit. The X-axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The green line represents the assumption that all patients have transmural bowel infarction (TBI). The thin black line represents the assumption that no patients have TBI. The red line represents the nomogram. The decision curve in the validation cohort indicated that if the threshold probability is between 0 and 1.0, then using the nomogram to predict TBI adds more benefit than the treat-all-patients scheme or treat-none scheme; B: Clinical impact curve for the risk model. Of 1000 patients, the red solid line shows the total number who would be deemed at high risk for each risk threshold. The green dashed line shows how many of those would be true positives cases. DCA: Decision curve analysis; TBI: Transmural bowel infarction.

    In conclusion, our nomogram is an individual predictive tool that incorporates four risk factors, shows favorable predictive accuracy for assessing TBI risk in patients with AMI. The model might facilitate timely recognition and effective management of highrisk patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research conclusions

    The nomogram achieved an optimal prediction of TBI in patients with AMI. Using the model, the risk for an individual patient inclined to TBI can be assessed, thus providing a rational therapeutic choice.

    Research perspectives

    Although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application.

    宅男免费午夜| 露出奶头的视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 热re99久久国产66热| www.精华液| 国产亚洲欧美98| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲av熟女| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 久久伊人香网站| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 老司机靠b影院| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久99久视频精品免费| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 免费av毛片视频| 91字幕亚洲| 手机成人av网站| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 怎么达到女性高潮| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 午夜免费成人在线视频| av免费在线观看网站| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产成人欧美| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 免费高清视频大片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 美女免费视频网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 88av欧美| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 色播在线永久视频| 91在线观看av| 99国产精品99久久久久| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 岛国在线观看网站| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久热在线av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 成人免费观看视频高清| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 午夜a级毛片| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜视频精品福利| 黄色 视频免费看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 在线观看www视频免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| ponron亚洲| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 香蕉国产在线看| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 免费看日本二区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 天堂动漫精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 级片在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 91av网站免费观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲国产欧美网| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产视频内射| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 999精品在线视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费高清视频大片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 婷婷亚洲欧美| 美女午夜性视频免费| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 色播在线永久视频| av免费在线观看网站| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品久久久久久成人av| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 九色国产91popny在线| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 精品久久久久久,| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 91大片在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 18禁观看日本| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产99白浆流出| 99re在线观看精品视频| 露出奶头的视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 一a级毛片在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 黄色女人牲交| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产黄片美女视频| 丁香欧美五月| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 无限看片的www在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 丰满的人妻完整版| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 丁香六月欧美| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 一本一本综合久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 午夜a级毛片| 午夜免费激情av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 日本 欧美在线| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 嫩草影视91久久| 大型av网站在线播放| 一本精品99久久精品77| 精品国产亚洲在线| 免费av毛片视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产又爽黄色视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品高清国产在线一区| 黄色 视频免费看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 香蕉国产在线看| 1024手机看黄色片| bbb黄色大片| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲最大成人中文| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 不卡一级毛片| 深夜精品福利| 午夜精品在线福利| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 88av欧美| 国产av又大| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 男人舔奶头视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 宅男免费午夜| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产成人av教育| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 午夜激情av网站| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精品九九99| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产av在哪里看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 热99re8久久精品国产| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产成人精品无人区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 搞女人的毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品福利观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| bbb黄色大片| 手机成人av网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 制服诱惑二区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 看免费av毛片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中文资源天堂在线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产av又大| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美大码av| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久中文字幕一级| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产av在哪里看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| www.www免费av| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久精品影院6| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲av美国av| 一本精品99久久精品77| av在线播放免费不卡| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 熟女电影av网| 色播亚洲综合网| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久精品成人免费网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产免费男女视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲色图av天堂| a在线观看视频网站| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| xxx96com| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 男人操女人黄网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| av欧美777| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日本五十路高清| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 黄频高清免费视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一级黄色大片毛片| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产成人欧美| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 日本在线视频免费播放| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 美国免费a级毛片| 色播亚洲综合网| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| av天堂在线播放| 国产单亲对白刺激| av欧美777| 久久人妻av系列| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费|