• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Nomogram for predicting transmural bowel infarction in patients with acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

    2020-08-17 07:12:34MengJiangChangLiLiChunQiuPanWenZhiLvYuFeiRenXinWuCuiChristophDietrich
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年26期

    Meng Jiang, Chang-Li Li, Chun-Qiu Pan, Wen-Zhi Lv, Yu-Fei Ren, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F Dietrich

    Abstract

    Key words: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; Acute mesenteric ischemia;

    INTRODUCTION

    As a rare insidious condition, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) has an incidence of 1 in 1000 emergency laparotomies for acute abdomen[1]. The prevalence of MVT has increased over the last two decades, likely as a result of the wide use of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Superior MVT (SMVT) is the most common type of MVT that accounts for approximately 5% - 10% of all mesenteric ischemia[2]. Despite advances in managing thromboembolic diseases over the past 40 years, the average 30-d mortality of acute SMVT is still as high as 32.1% in severe cases[3]. The predisposition to develop transmural bowel infarction (TBI) is of clinical concern, which can lead to fatal sepsis with hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure[4].

    Advances in imaging modalities, especially CT angiography, have greatly enabled early detection of SMVT in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Unfortunately, TBI is not rare, and intestinal resection is still mandatory for some patients. TBI often leads to a complex clinical situation and increases the patients' physiological burden, which poses a major challenge for clinicians. Thus, accurate and reliable prediction of bowel infarction is critical for decision-making in an emergency setting. Preventing the progression from reversible intestinal ischemia to TBI should be a primary goal in the management of SMVT.

    Nomograms can provide individualized and highly accurate risk estimation, which are easy to use and can facilitate clinical decision-making. We undertook the present study to develop and externally validate a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    Consecutive patients with SMVT from Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (as training cohort) and from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (as validation cohort) were included. This retrospective study (clinical trial number: ChiCTR1900026320) was approved by the institutional review board of the two hospitals. Since the study was retrospectively designed and did not cause any harm to the patients, the informed consent was waived by the board.

    We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record system using the key word “mesenteric venous thrombosis” to identify SMVT patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at the two institutions. SMVT-related AMI was defined as the association of acute abdominal symptoms, CT features of bowel injury, as well as vascular insufficiency of the superior mesenteric vein. Two senior radiologists reviewed all CT images and con?rmed the presence of thrombosis and bowel injury based on consensus. K statistics was used to evaluate the concordance between the two radiologists, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion. Diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in cases that intestinal resection was performed. To explore the effect of SMVT on bowel infarction without confounding risk factors, we excluded patients who had coexisting mesenteric artery thrombosis. In addition, cases in that acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction were also excluded.

    Treatment protocol

    At the two tertiary referral centers in China, we have employed a standard protocol for the treatment of acute SMVT. The treatment protocol included bowel rest, nasogastric tube decompression for patients with abdominal distention, intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics, prompt anticoagulation or surgical exploration if necessary. For all patients, once acute SMVT was diagnosed, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin (3000-5000 IU/d) or subcutaneous administration of lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH or enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg per day) was applied at first. Thereafter, for patients with anticipated surgery, intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered according to the active partial thrombin time. Patients who received conservative treatment were injected with LMWH (1 mg/kg; BID) subcutaneously and monitored closely. Transmural bowel necrosis from resected specimens was confirmed histologically.

    Outcomes

    To determine the indicators of TBI, patients were divided into two groups according to the final therapeutic outcome. The TBI group was defined as: (1) Pathology assessment as extensive, transmural intestinal necrosis; (2) De?nite imaging of bowel perforation on CT; or (3) Unresected patients with extensive bowel necrosis assessed during openclose laparotomy procedures. All resected specimens were retrospectively reviewed by a senior pathologist. The patients who did not progress to transmural bowel necrosis but recovered from AMI or superficial ischemic lesions after systemic anticoagulation or thrombectomy were categorized as reversible intestinal ischemia group. This was confirmed by explorative laparotomy, repeated CT scan or clinical follow-up.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range), and were compared between the training and validation cohort using Mann-Whitney U test orttest as appropriate. Categorical variables were reported as whole numbers and proportions and were compared by theχ2test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.6.1) and SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All the statistical signi?cance levels were two-sided, withPvalue less than 0.05. The detailed description of the decision curve analysis (DCA) algorithm is provided in the Supplementary text.

    Data collection

    Demographic and clinical data were extracted from case records, including age, gender, coexisting medical conditions (e.g., tobacco use, malignant disease, or previous history of deep venous thrombosis), clinical manifestations, physical ?ndings and laboratory test results. All serum biochemical parameters were collected at the onset of symptoms. Radiologic features including extent of thrombus and associated conditions (e.g., decreased bowel wall enhancement, bowel wall thickening and pneumatosis intestinalis) were also recorded. We also extracted the suspected risk factors for acute SMVT, such as recent surgery, intraperitoneal inflammation, and liver cirrhosis.

    Construction of the nomogram

    Continuous variables were transformed into dichotomous variables using the upper value of normal as the cutoff level (e.g., white blood cell count > 10 × 109/L, percentage of neutrophil granulocyte > 75%, creatinine > 106 μmol/L, or venous lactate levels > 2 mmol/L), and C-reactive protein (50 mg/L as cutoff value in line with previous study[5].

    Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess each variable in the training cohort for investigating the independent risk factors associated with TBI. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating all the significant risk variables was performed, using backward step-down selection procedure with a liberalP< 0.05 as the retention criteria to select the final indicators of TBI. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    Performance of the nomogram

    Calibration of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (non-significance of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicates good agreement)[6]. The discrimination performance of the nomogram was assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). The nomogram was subjected to bootstrapping validation (1000 bootstrap resamples) to calculate a relatively corrected AUC. Then the performance of the nomogram was tested in the external validation cohort by calibration curve and AUC.

    Clinical use assessment

    DCA was performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model by quantifying the net bene?ts at different threshold probabilities[7,8]. For clinical use, the total scores (defined as Nomo-score in this study) of each case were calculated according to the nomogram algorithm. Then the optimal cutoff value of the Nomoscore was determined by maximizing the Youden index. Performance of the optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.

    RESULTS

    Patient selection

    After excluding 12 patients with chronic SMVT, chart review yielded 230 consecutive patients who had acute SMVT in the training cohort between July 2005 and June 2018 (Wuhan cohort). Of the 230 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the analysis as the acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction. Acute SMVT concomitant with mesenteric artery thrombosis was found in 10 patients, who were also excluded, leaving a ?nal sample of 207 patients. Explorative laparotomy was performed in 78 (38%) patients , and bowel resection was performed in 65 (83%) of these patients based on assessment of bowel viability with respect to color, dilatation and peristaltic motion of the bowel, pulsations of the mesenteric arcade arteries, as well as bleeding from cut surfaces. Thrombectomy was performed in 11 (14%) patients, and 2 (3%) received open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis, who refused further treatment and died at last. The algorithm of patient screening in the training cohort is shown in Figure 1A. Pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed TBI in 56 (86%) of the 65 patients, while superficial ischemic lesions were seen in 9 (14%) patients. The mean time between admission and surgical exploration for patients with and without TBI was 41.6 ± 30.5 (8-192) h and 32.4 ± 23.7 (5-96) h, respectively.

    In this study, patients with superficial ischemic lesions confirmed by pathological examination and clinically recovered through thrombectomy were classified as reversible intestinal ischemia group, while patients who underwent open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis were deemed as TBI. One hundred twentynine patients (62%) who did not progress to surgery and recovered after conservative therapy were considered as having reversible intestinal ischemia. Eventually, reversible intestinal ischemia and TBI were the final diagnosis in 149 (72%) and 58 (28%) patients, respectively.

    In the external validation cohort (Guangzhou cohort), 89 eligible cases were retrieved from August 2007 to December 2018 using the same criteria (Figure 1B). TBI was confirmed in 27 (30%) of these patients.

    Characteristics of the study population

    The patients’ clinical characteristics in the training and validation cohorts are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two cohorts in most of the comparisons. In the training cohort, 82 patients had a clinical history of liver cirrhosis, and 20.7% (17/82) cases developed TBI. In the validation cohort, 18.9% (7/37) of the patients with liver cirrhosis progressed to TBI finally.

    Development and validation of a TBI-predicting nomogram

    The results of univariate logistic analysis are presented in Table 2. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001), rebound tenderness (OR = 7.14,P< 0.001), serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR = 3.14,P= 0.009) and previous history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001) all independently predicted TBI (Table 3). These independently associated risk factors were used to construct a TBI risk estimation nomogram (Figure 2A). The scoring system is shown in Supplementary Table 1, which can be used for a more accurate calculation of predictions than drawing lines on the nomogram. Figure 2B shows the calibration curve of the nomogram. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistics (P= 0.316) showed good calibration in the training cohort. An AUC of 0.860 (95%CI: 0.771-0.925) also showed good discrimination by the nomogram (Figure 2D). The favorable calibration of the nomogram was also confirmed in the external validation set (Figure 2C). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded aPvalue of 0.203, and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.851 (95%CI: 0.796-0.897) (Figure 2E). Thus, our nomogram performed well in both the training and external validation sets.

    Decision curve analysisDCA was used to facilitate the assessment of the nomogram. Figure 3A shows the basic plot of model performance for the nomogram. The DCA graphically demonstrated the clinical value of the model based on a continuum of threshold for TBI risk (X axis) and the net bene?t of using the model to stratify the risk of the patients (Y axis) relative to the hypothesis that no patient will have a TBI. The decision curve indicated that when the threshold probability for a patient or a doctor is within a range from 0 to 1.0, the nomogram adds more net benefit than the “treat-all”or “treat-none” schemes. Figure 3B shows the estimated number of patients who would be at high risk for each potential risk threshold and visually demonstrates the proportion of the patients who are truly positive cases. For instance, if a 40% risk threshold was used, of 1000 patients screened, about 200 patients would be deemed athigh risk, with about 180 of these patients being true TBI cases.

    Table 1 Participant characteristics

    Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort

    Predicting TBI based on the Nomo-score

    The optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was determined to be 90. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value when used in predicting TBI were 88.89%, 67.74%, 54.55%, and 93.33% in the training cohort, and 84.84%, 71.81%, 53.85%, and 92.24% in the external validation cohort, respectively (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    Acute SMVT is a rare but serious condition due to its intestinal ischemic complications. The widespread use of contrast-enhanced CT has made early diagnosis possible by a noninvasive approach, which can provide incremental information as evidence of ischemia warranting a change in treatment strategy. However, acute SMVT still carries a high risk of extensive intestinal infarction and surgical exploration with bowel resection is still mandatory for some patients. Recently, Kimet al[9]conducted a study involving 66 patients with acute SMVT, of whom 15 (23%) patients underwent bowel resection due to progressive intestinal ischemia and bowel infarction, and 3 (5%) patients died at last, despite adequate intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation were applied immediately at diagnosis. Another research reported the application of multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy for acute SMVT, and 18 of the 43 (42%) subjects underwent bowel resection due to TBI[10]. The reported rates of bowel infarction in existing literatures ranged from 6% to 42%, consistent with our rate of 29%[2,10-16]. Therefore, preventing the progression from reversible to irreversible ischemic bowel injury should be a primary goal in the management of acute SMVT[5]. However, the early detection of TBI remains a challenge and further investigation is required to identify the most important prognostic factors.

    In this retrospective study, we developed and externally validated a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT. The decreased bowel wall enhancement, rebound tenderness, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and previous history of DVT independently predicted this event. Incorporating these clinical, biological, and radiological factors into an easy-to-use prediction model can facilitate the individualized prediction of TBI. The nomogram also consistently predicted TBI with a high accuracy and provided good clinical usefulness throughout the range of bowel infarction risk as assessed by DCA.

    Based on our ?ndings, the previous history of DVT could increase the chances of bowel infarction in the setting of acute SMVT. Venous thrombosis often results from a combination of endothelial injury, hypercoagulability or stasis. The patients with a previous history of DVT may have had several episodes of undetected (possibly asymptomatic) MVT prior to the index event and thus have acute-on-chronic thrombosis with greater compromise of venous flow.

    The decreased bowel wall enhancement on CT angiography is a strong established risk indictor for bowel infarction[9,17]. In our study, CT scan detected this feature in 70 patients, and among them, 34 patients had confirmed TBI finally. Previous studies demonstrated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement in patients with acute SMVT was signi?cantly associated with surgical exploration and bowel resection[9,10].

    Several other reports on AMI implied that the extent of venous thrombus wasrelated to TBI[9,18]. However, Grishamet al[19]found no association between the presence of multiple vein thromboses and increased mortality rates. Additionally, Kumaret al[20]showed that patients with isolated SMVT were even at a greater risk of development of bowel infarction, and more likely to require surgery. In view of that the extent of venous thrombus did not show enough predictive strength on the basis of univariate association with bowel infarction, we excluded this variable for model construction.

    Table 4 Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction

    Peritoneal signs, including involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness, and abdominal wall rigidity often present in the case of TBI. According to our results, the rebound tenderness could be a strong predictor for TBI. In parallel with our outcomes, Kimet al[9]found that rebound tenderness was observed more frequently in patients who underwent bowel resection than those who did not (33%vs4%).

    Lactate is an important parameter that closely related to necrosis, inflammation and hypoxia. Our results demonstrated that serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L was significantly associated with the occurrence of TBI. In line with our findings, Higashizono and Nuzzo revealed that serum lactate levels tend to increase significantly after bowel infarction[5,21]. Additionally, Leoneet al[22]indicated that serum lactate levels decreased significantly after resection of the necrotic bowel, further validating its predictive value for TBI.

    Accurate identification of patients that will need surgery due to bowel infarction is crucial, because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with unidentified and unresected necrotic intestine[3,23,24]. Earlier resection of necrotic bowel before the development of multi-organ failure could improve the functional outcome of the small bowel and patient prognosis. However, this issue remains a challenge. In a study the authors presented 767 surgeons with a clinical vignette of AMI, and showed that the surgeons’ decision on whether a surgery is required or not varies markedly[25].

    In a previous study, Nuzzoet al[5]developed a risk score incorporating organ failure, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and bowel loop dilation on CT scan to predict irreversible transmural bowel necrosis for AMI. The risk factors associated with bowel necrosis identified in this study was partly different from ours, probably because their cohort comprised venous and arterial occlusion, but we just included acute SMVT patients. In addition, we suggested that organ failure might be of late onset during the disease course. Furthermore, we think that the risk score based on the number of predictive factors could not reflect the weight of each parameter.

    Although several studies have investigated the risk factors of TBI for AMI, to our knowledge, none have presented the data in the form of a validated nomogram[5,9,26,27]. Nomograms have advantages as they provide quanti?ed individual risk assessment in a dynamic manner. For clinical use of our nomogram, we proposed the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value in assessing the risk of TBI using 90 as the cut-off value (Table 4). We show that patients with a Nomo-score less than 90 are the subgroup of low-risk inclined to TBI (negative predictive value, 93.33% for training and 92.24% for validation). The AUC of our model was 0.860 and 0.851 in the training and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves presented a good agreement between the actual probability and predicted probability of TBI. Thus, we believe that our nomogram could be a reliable and objective tool that will provide clinicians favorable evidence for decision making.

    Figure 2 Nomogram for evaluation of transmural bowel infarction risk and its predictive performance. A: Nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The nomogram is used to find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the risk of TBI at the lower line of the nomogram. For example, a 30-year-old male patient (have transmural bowel infarction finally) with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, no rebound tenderness and no decreased bowel wall enhancement, has a risk of 59% of TBI calculated by the nomogram; B and C: Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves depict the calibration of the model in terms of the agreement between the predicted probabilities of TBI and observed outcomes of TBI. The dotted blue line represents an ideal prediction, and the dotted red line represents the predictive ability of the nomogram. The closer the dotted red line fit is to the dotted blue line, the better the predictive accuracy of the nomogram is; D and E: The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. TBI: Transmural bowel infarction; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic curve.

    Cautions should be exercised when interpreting the ?ndings due to several limitations. First, some bias may inevitably exist and affect our analysis because it was a retrospective study. And thus, treatment strategy might not be entirely consistent among clinicians. Second, although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application. Third, pathological evidence could not be obtained for patients that did not progress to surgery but confirmed by recovery from the specific vascular therapy. Fourth, evaluation of decreased bowel wall enhancement in the nomogram was related to the reading of CT images, and interpretation may vary among radiologists. In addition, since it is hard to assess the length of decreased bowel wall enhancement quantitatively on CT imaging, we did not examine the association between this factor and TBI. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify this issue. Finally, data on the long-term outcomes of patients were unavailable, however, this will not affect our ability to identify risk factors of TBI associated with AMI.

    Figure 3 Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. A: The Y-axis shows the net benefit. The X-axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The green line represents the assumption that all patients have transmural bowel infarction (TBI). The thin black line represents the assumption that no patients have TBI. The red line represents the nomogram. The decision curve in the validation cohort indicated that if the threshold probability is between 0 and 1.0, then using the nomogram to predict TBI adds more benefit than the treat-all-patients scheme or treat-none scheme; B: Clinical impact curve for the risk model. Of 1000 patients, the red solid line shows the total number who would be deemed at high risk for each risk threshold. The green dashed line shows how many of those would be true positives cases. DCA: Decision curve analysis; TBI: Transmural bowel infarction.

    In conclusion, our nomogram is an individual predictive tool that incorporates four risk factors, shows favorable predictive accuracy for assessing TBI risk in patients with AMI. The model might facilitate timely recognition and effective management of highrisk patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research conclusions

    The nomogram achieved an optimal prediction of TBI in patients with AMI. Using the model, the risk for an individual patient inclined to TBI can be assessed, thus providing a rational therapeutic choice.

    Research perspectives

    Although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application.

    久久 成人 亚洲| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本色播在线视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 色播在线永久视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产在视频线精品| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 午夜老司机福利片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久热在线av| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美97在线视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品福利永久在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜激情av网站| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| svipshipincom国产片| 99九九在线精品视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 午夜两性在线视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 超色免费av| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 老司机影院毛片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 黄片播放在线免费| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| av在线播放精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久欧美国产精品| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲国产看品久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 精品一区二区三卡| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产成人一区二区在线| av有码第一页| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| cao死你这个sao货| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 婷婷色综合www| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| videosex国产| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 大型av网站在线播放| 一区在线观看完整版| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产高清videossex| 欧美大码av| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 91成人精品电影| 欧美在线黄色| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美另类一区| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 中文欧美无线码| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| a级毛片黄视频| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产成人精品无人区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 男女免费视频国产| 日本午夜av视频| 国产男女内射视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 另类精品久久| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 丁香六月天网| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 精品福利观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 欧美另类一区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 香蕉国产在线看| 热re99久久国产66热| videos熟女内射| 久久中文字幕一级| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日本wwww免费看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 91成人精品电影| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 老司机影院成人| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产在线免费精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 电影成人av| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| av天堂在线播放| kizo精华| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产成人91sexporn| bbb黄色大片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜91福利影院| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 两个人看的免费小视频| av不卡在线播放| 中文字幕制服av| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 看免费av毛片| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 99国产精品99久久久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 悠悠久久av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 成人国语在线视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 一本久久精品| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 精品福利观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久久久网色| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 桃花免费在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 免费av中文字幕在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产成人91sexporn| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 少妇人妻 视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 18禁观看日本| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 男女国产视频网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | av欧美777| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 考比视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 99国产精品99久久久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久中文字幕一级| svipshipincom国产片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av福利片在线| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲成人手机| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 大香蕉久久网| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品一国产av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av一本久久久久| 搡老岳熟女国产| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | av有码第一页| 欧美另类一区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久热在线av| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文字幕色久视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 天天影视国产精品| av福利片在线| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 女警被强在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | av福利片在线| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 日本五十路高清| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 色播在线永久视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 黄片小视频在线播放| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 一级毛片 在线播放| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| videos熟女内射| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| a 毛片基地| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产成人影院久久av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲av美国av| 久久影院123| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 黄片播放在线免费| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲av男天堂| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 青草久久国产| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲 国产 在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 午夜两性在线视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 香蕉丝袜av| 99国产精品99久久久久| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| av在线app专区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 午夜av观看不卡| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 男人舔女人的私密视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 另类精品久久| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 精品福利观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| av在线app专区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久精品成人免费网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品福利观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 熟女av电影| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| av有码第一页| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 成人国语在线视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 欧美日韩精品网址| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 成年av动漫网址| 久久影院123| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 高清av免费在线| 色94色欧美一区二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产成人欧美| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产av精品麻豆| 黄色 视频免费看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久ye,这里只有精品|