• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    LSTDA:Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware Routing Mechanism for Flying Ad-Hoc Network(FANET)

    2023-12-12 15:50:58FarmanAliKhalidZamanBabarShahTariqHussainHabibUllahAltafHussainandDaehanKwak
    Computers Materials&Continua 2023年10期

    Farman Ali,Khalid Zaman,Babar Shah,Tariq Hussain,Habib Ullah,Altaf Hussain and Daehan Kwak

    1Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Sungkyunkwan University,Seoul,03063,South Korea

    2Information Engineering School,Chang’an University,Xi’an,710061,China

    3College of Technological Innovation,Zayed University,Dubai,19282,United Arab Emirates

    4School of Computer Science and Technology,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,310018,China

    5Institute of Computer Science and IT,The University of Agriculture Peshawar,Peshawer,25120,Pakistan

    6Department of Computer Science and Technology,Kean University,Union,New Jersey,07083,USA

    ABSTRACT The paper presents a new protocol called Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware(LSTDA)for Flying Adhoc Network (FANET) with a focus on network corridors (NC).FANET consists of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs) that face challenges in avoiding transmission loss and delay while ensuring stable communication.The proposed protocol introduces a novel link stability with network corridors priority node selection to check and ensure fair communication in the entire network.The protocol uses a Red-Black(R-B)tree to achieve maximum channel utilization and an advanced relay approach.The paper evaluates LSTDA in terms of End-to-End Delay(E2ED),Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR),Network Lifetime (NLT),and Transmission Loss (TL),and compares it with existing methods such as Link Stability Estimation-based Routing(LEPR),Distributed Priority Tree-based Routing(DPTR),and Delay and Link Stability Aware(DLSA)using MATLAB simulations.The results show that LSTDA outperforms the other protocols,with lower average delay,higher average PDR,longer average NLT,and comparable average TL.

    KEYWORDS LSTDA routing protocol;Flying Ad-hoc Network;link stability;unmanned aerial vehicles;maxim priority channel

    1 Introduction

    With the advancement and rapid development of technology,various types of communication networks have been introduced[1].Among these networks,self-organizing networks play an important role due to their ability to be deployed in emergencies,ease of installation[2],and lack of centralized control required by traditional infrastructure[3].Each device utilized in these innovative technologies can cover multiple aspects of a telecom organization.Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) are dedicated networks where nodes establish an ad hoc network and move from one location to another without centralized leasing control.Flying Ad hoc Networks(FANETs)are a novel form of MANET and represent one such network[4].FANETs consist of custom-built devices that enable the deployment of fifth-generation Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs)in three dimensions.Nodes within these networks can be positioned,extended,and transferred[5].Terms such as drones,quadcopters,and airplanes are used to describe these nodes.The coupling approach allows these nodes to join other nodes to aggregate their test functions [6].Drones can capture their surroundings using fixed cameras with two types of detection capabilities.One is active detection,where drones closely examine regions of interest [7].The other is passive detection,where a UAV detector acquires the target and then compiles and processes the data for further analysis by the operator at the base station[8].Ad-hoc networks,particularly FANETs,are well-suited for creating temporary networks,and their deployment is facilitated by their ability to handle both ground nodes and flying nodes.FANETs offer ease of deployment,as they require no human personnel,reducing risks and dangers.The primary reason for utilizing FANETs in this work is the market demand for ad hoc networks,with FANETs being particularly sought after.

    Technology is constantly evolving,and right from the beginning,it has surpassed demand at the highest level and continues to grow.Significant efforts have been made to enhance FANET in terms of power,routing,security,and node scalability [9],as well as its geographic coverage.Various authors have published their work on improving FANET from different perspectives[10–12].Numerous challenges in this network require appropriate solutions[13,14].By envisioning an efficient algorithm,the network can reach its peak performance.The research on FANET is still in its early stages,and several approaches have already been proposed to enhance routing in FANET,such as Distributed Priority Tree-based Routing(DPTR),Link Stability Estimation-based Routing(LEPR),Delay and Link Stability Aware(DLSA)[15],and others.In a previous study,the authors proposed a routing algorithm for establishing reliable connections and designed routing trees as intermediaries for different operational units of FANET,including terrestrial,air,and relay connections.However,due to the limitations and shortcomings of the previous work,the current research focuses on improving link reliability and selecting network corridors that maximize channel utilization.The proposed approach has been evaluated in various scenarios,and the main motivation behind it is the effectiveness of the proposed protocol called Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware(LSTDA)across all scenarios.This research is driven by multiple motivations,with the primary priority being the improvement of FANET routing protocols.Given the existing protocols in FANET,routing remains a major concern,and therefore,reliability and transmission losses are the main areas of research.Stability is measured using a defined metric,which generates three distinct values for stability that are also used for selecting network corridors while considering channel utilization.

    FANET consists of flying nodes known as UAVs that can be operated remotely or through an alternative mechanism [16].The high maneuverability and three-dimensional movement of UAVs pose a research challenge in terms of avoiding transmission loss (TL),minimizing delay,and stabilizing communication between nodes in this network.Existing routing methods in FANET,such as LEPR and DPTR,are specifically designed to ensure transmission loss,latency,and continuous communication among drones.LEPR takes a routing perspective by utilizing the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector(AODV)routing protocol.It introduces stability metrics based on Global Positioning System (GPS) location information from airborne nodes to assess link stability.This approach enables the prediction of mobility,security,and connection quality.To establish stable connections,LEPR employs a flooding mechanism that determines suitable paths for data transmission among neighboring nodes.However,using the stability metric as a threshold for both Route Request(RREQ)and Route Reply(RREP)is unnecessary and leads to packet loss and delay.Moreover,this approach introduces overhead and suffers from packet loss due to high-threshold metrics,causing nodes to be unable to maintain a normal reception level for all packets[17].

    The issues with the existing systems are highlighted in this section,specifically mentioning DPTR and LEPR.On the other hand,DPTR introduces the challenge of network segmentation,which utilizes the different operating units of FANETs to function in three ad hoc units:air(M),terrestrial(N),and neural interface (K).This approach incorporates a red-black (R-B) tree to prioritize node communication efficiently.The concept employed in this research is to leverage each node’s capabilities,addressing the main network issue of high latency.DPTR utilizes a distributed network of networks,with the neural interface serving as the central operational node due to the longer time required to establish higher priority connections between nodes,thus allowing other nodes to be preserved.Two current approaches to tackle these issues are barriers and barriers,both aiming to enhance the security and functionality of FANET.Both LEPR and DPTR possess their own advantages and disadvantages.In this context,a recent study revealed a correlation between the processes of LEPR and DPTR,leading to the development of LSTDA.The fusion of the current quality measures in our research significantly contributes to pollution prevention and stabilization(DPTR and LEPR).

    The motivation and core contribution of this work encompasses various aspects of a novel approach.The approach revolves around link stability,relay strategy,and the selection of highpriority nodes in network corridors.The proposed work aims to enhance the network’s performance by modifying the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and reducing network delay.The PDR is increased through the maximization of link stability,while the network delay is reduced by utilizing the R-B tree to optimize channel usage,thereby minimizing the distance between nodes.The uniqueness of the proposed work lies in its introduction of the link stability metric,prioritization of Network Corridor(NCs),and the maximum utilization of channels in FANET,with a specific emphasis on maintaining communication stability among flying nodes.Additionally,the work introduces a threshold measuring calculation for stability and prioritizes the reduction of delay among nodes,including the End-to-End Delay(E2ED)within the network.The main contributions of this work are outlined as follows:

    ? This paper proposes a new LSTDA routing protocol for FANET,which intelligently focuses on network corridor selection to ensure link stability and channel utilization.Furthermore,the proposed work establishes a strong association between link stability and network corridor selection.

    ? An efficient and novel routing system based on channel utilization and network corridor priority is developed and presented.Additionally,an advanced LSTDA network corridor with maximum channel utilization is introduced as a reliability metric threshold method.

    ? The functionality of the proposed LSTDA protocol is achieved through the implementation of a fair selection R-B tree,specifically designed to handle a large number of nodes,thus ensuring optimal and equitable communication.Moreover,the proposed protocol is designed to operate in high-mobility scenarios involving UAVs,while maintaining fair communication.

    ? This paper thoroughly investigates new issues and challenges related to routing in FANET.

    ? A comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the routing protocols LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA are presented,considering parameters such as E2ED,PDR,Network Lifetime (NLT),and Transmission Loss(TS),in comparison with the LSTDA routing protocol for FANET.

    The remaining sections of this article are organized as follows:Section 2 discusses related works,Section 3 presents the proposed methodology,Section 4 describes the simulation results,Section 5 provides conclusions and recommendations for future research,and the article concludes.

    2 Related Work

    The LEPR routing protocol focuses on ensuring link stability by employing threshold metrics to calculate reliability in critical scenarios[9].Additionally,LEPR utilizes preemptive mechanisms using the RREQ and RREP methods of the AODV routing protocol.The protocol takes into account factors such as quality of service,predicted mobility,and connection quality.Performance evaluations of the LEPR protocol,based on AODV and Dynamic Source Routing(DSR),demonstrate its effectiveness in terms of routing costs,delay,and packet rate.Another FANET routing protocol,known as the Adaptive Density-Based Routing Protocol (ADRP) [10],aims to enhance transport efficiency by adaptively determining transportability.ADRP incrementally compensates for a hub’s rebroadcast potential to dictate a demand bundle based on the number of neighboring hubs.The program has shown that ADRP outperforms AODV in terms of packet delivery percentage,start-end delay,routing load,Media Access Control (MAC) load,and throughput.ADRP adaptively calculates the transmission probability to determine the validity of the guiding heuristic.A comparison between the Destination Sequenced Distance Vector(DSDV)and AODV protocols for FANET is conducted,with a particular focus on energy values as it poses a significant challenge due to the flight characteristics of UAVs in this network [11].Another study [12] addressed the issue of organizational boundaries between air and ground missions and proposes a guiding convention for transfers under a common scheme.This convention is governed by DPTR,which utilizes a red-black tree to form a demand network that determines the appropriate node and switching channel.The results showed significant improvements in various metrics such as packet delivery rates,channel utilization,start-to-end delays,overhead,uptime potential,and organizational throughput.To manage FANET scheduling,a variant of the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) process called AntHocNet (AHN) is proposed [14],with a focus on minimizing energy usage for different organizations.Evaluation results demonstrate that AHN outperforms ACO.In the study [18],a clustering tool-based calculation was proposed to ensure sensitive coverage and rapid portability of UAV networks while extending tissue lifetime and ensuring reliable communications.The proposed approach isolates and selects the best assignments for clustered components,and evaluation is performed using two clustering schemes: Bio-Inspired Clustering Schemes for FANET(BICSF)and Energy-Attention Link-Based Clustering(EALC)based on Health,High PDR,Low Latency (EMASS) Guarantees Clustering.In [19],a boosting method for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) called the Whale Optimization Algorithm(WOA)is presented to stabilize energy productivity in FANET.The proposed approach is compared to the existing work at a high level.Routing protocols and link stability are still in the early stages of development for FANET [20].Routing is a primary concern in FANET due to the 3D motion of high-speed UAVs,with researchers focusing on ensuring link stability and conserving energy due to the limited battery capacity of these drones [21,22].The study on FANET predominantly discusses routing protocols[23],with proposed approaches aimed at improving network reliability and connection stability between all nodes [24,25].Some of these proposed protocols are hybrid [26,27],while others have been comparatively evaluated[28].Additionally,a resource allocation protocol has been suggested for air slicing in multiple flexible UAV-assisted cellular communications[29],including Machine-to-Machine (M2M) [30] and Device-to-Device (D2D) communications [31–34].A reliable and energy-efficient route selection protocol is proposed to efficiently reduce energy consumption and network latency[35].Moreover,the same authors have proposed a novel routing protocol(RP)for heterogeneous environments,such as fault-tolerant aware(FTA)and workload resource management,to enhance energy efficiency[36,37].

    Research on routing protocols for FANET is still in its early stages.The primary challenge in this network is routing,given the high-speed nodes that move in three dimensions.Researchers have focused on improving routing to ensure link stability and energy efficiency,considering that UAVs are equipped with small batteries and are remotely operated.The existing literature has proposed various approaches to enhance network performance.Our proposed protocol aims to tackle the issue of network partitioning and maintain link stability among all nodes by introducing a new stability metric based on threshold values.Previous studies have mainly focused on hybrid routing protocols and conducted comparative evaluations.However,our research distinguishes itself as we have developed a standalone routing protocol capable of addressing the network partitioning problem while simultaneously supporting three units and introducing a novel stability metric.

    3 Research Methodology

    This section presents the research methodology,focusing on the simulation setup and the design of the system model depicted in Fig.1 for the LSTDA protocol.

    3.1 LSTDA:The Proposed Protocol

    The proposed LSTDA protocol,as shown in Fig.1,involves several steps.The first step is initialization,followed by the routing phase where the routing tree is examined to determine the need for cooperative mode communication.If the condition is met,the network switches to corridor priority.If the condition is not met,it reverts back to the previous routing step.Assuming the condition is accepted,the nodes are divided into two groups:external UAVs(acting as reset and shutdown nodes)and internal UAVs (acting as routing devices),which are combined into a self-organizing network corridor.Channel selection occurs next,with the highest priority channel being chosen for both the air and terrestrial ad hoc networks.The subsequent step is to determine the best route based on priority.If the selected ground node does not align with the network corridor,the protocol returns to the channel selection phase.If the conditions are met,a red-black tree is constructed for the three networks:ground(N),air(M),and intermediary neural networks(N).This process involves two phases,one for maintaining the number of antenna nodes and the other for combining them to obtain the number of ground nodes.The next step involves the roadmap and transmission phase,which is governed by two conditions related to the link stabilization procedure.This step is conditional and follows the preferred node selection path.It proceeds to the link stabilization process to establish link stability between nodes that will transmit data in case of a link failure or improper connection.If the link stability metric exceeds a certain threshold,data is transmitted using the link reliability process.Otherwise,the path with the best reliability metric value is chosen for communication by evaluating the reliability metric process.This scheme utilizes RREQ and RREP to determine the most reliable metric for the current connection.

    Once the reliability of the link with the highest metric is confirmed,the priority node is selected.If the check verifies that the terrestrial corridor(Cg)matches the terrestrial network and the antenna corridor(Ca)corresponds to the air network,the process proceeds to the single-hop routing step,which leads to the final step if the current state is true.However,if the condition is false,it moves to the multihop routing stage and connects to the subsequent stage.At this point,communication transitions to the next stage,which is the one-hop routing step,and then returns to the previous exit step.If the check in the exit step is true,the process advances to the subsequent step where the terrestrial and air ad hoc networks are interconnected through neural interfaces or mutual mode.Finally,the process proceeds to the next end state.

    Figure 1:Working algorithm and flow of the routing protocol LSTDA

    Algorithm 1 employs a link stability approach that incorporates threshold values.The provided metric ensures the maintenance of a stable link between nodes,which is dependent on link stability.The summation value results in 1,indicating the presence of stable links.If the value drops below 1,it signifies the absence of stable links.Conversely,if the value exceeds 1,the velocity of the UAVs increases,resulting in unstable links and posing challenges to maintaining reliable communication.Algorithm 1 serves as the central component of the proposed work,outlining the convergence and evaluation of the LSTDA routing protocol.It presents the overall link stability of LSTDA and establishes initial and maximum threshold metric values,each corresponding to a specific routing method for link stability.The algorithm prioritizes link stability and maximum network corridor when deploying and selecting nodes,favoring nodes with high-stability links and shorter distances.Fair node selection is achieved through the use of an R-B tree,and the threshold values range from 0 to 1,with 0 indicating no link stability and 1 indicating a stable link that allows direct communication or communication through a neighboring node.In this algorithm,N,M,and K represent the ground,aerial,and relay layers,respectively.Additionally,the algorithm utilizes three input values,specifically 0.33,0.34,and 0.33,to ensure highly stable link connectivity with a summation of 1.The term NC refers to the network corridor in the algorithm,and Eq.(2)provides an additional implementation of Algorithm 1.Table 1 presents several parameters proposed for LSTDA.

    Table 1:Setup for simulations

    Algorithm 1:Algorithm of the metric with link stability

    3.2 LSTDA Design Mechanism

    The design strategy of the proposed LSTDA is illustrated in Fig.2,which includes a mathematical model consisting of multiple numerical illustrations and equations.These equations demonstrate the network corridor with maximum channel utilization.The simulation was carried out in MATLAB.

    3.3 System Model

    The mathematical model is the core methodology of the proposed LSTDA routing protocol,which implements stability metrics and network corridor selection using an R-B tree.

    3.3.1 Stability with Threshold Metrics

    The threshold calculation for stability is provided by Eq.(1).

    Figure 2:Design of LSTDA based on DPTR and LEPR existing routing protocols

    Eq.(1)introduces the stability threshold metric,where(λ)lambda represents stability matric,LQpredicts link stability,and(Y)represents mobility factors along with the degree of mobility(D)and safety degree of mobility(S).While(i,j)denotes the coordinates for all UAVs in LSTDA.The proposed coefficient symbols for the stability metric are presented in Eq.(2).

    Eq.(2)expands the implementation of Algorithm 1 by specifying threshold values for the stability metric.Each value corresponds to 0.33,0.34,and 0.33 for each lambda.The weighting coefficients for these three values are 0.34,0.33,and 0.33.

    3.3.2 Network Corridor(NC)Selection

    The value of NC will be greater than 1 due to the adoption of a multiple sending and receiving strategy.The calculation of NC is performed using the collaborative mode,as shown in Eqs.(3)and(4).

    Eq.(3)describes the collaboration mode in LSTDA.In Eq.(4),Gsand NC represent the ground session and network corridor,respectively.Collaboration mode is achieved when the sender and receiver are within communication range.In collaborative mode,two or more nodes in LSTDA can form network corridors with multiple routing paths for communication.

    3.3.3 Sort Max Channel

    Maximum channel utilization and the sorting of channels based on priority are calculated using Eq.(5).

    Eq.(5) represents channel selection and sorting with the highest priority.In LSTDA,multiple channels are utilized by each UAV for different routing approaches.The division of the two network corridors is denoted as s/2,with the initial network corridor represented as NC1[4].

    3.3.4 Channel Utilization(CU)

    The objective is to maximize channel utilization while maintaining a priority order.Eqs.(6)and (7) were utilized to calculate the process and transmission time,which are important factors in determining channel utilization.

    The variables ttand tprepresent the transmit time and process time,respectively.The LSTDA routing protocol aims to establish connections between UAVs for potential communication and utilize each node based on link stability.A fairness concept was introduced to accomplish this goal.Eqs.(8)and(9)describe Eq.(7),incorporating the processing,queuing,and probability time(f)of the LSTDA protocol.

    They can be used to transmit data along a path with active link stability.Eq.(9) illustrates that the overall time(r)for the propagation and transmission of data can be represented by a value of 100.The equation also indicates the time it takes for data to travel from the sender to the receiver within a finite amount of time.

    3.3.5 Selection of Relay UAV as an Access with NCs

    Eqs.(10)–(12) are employed to calculate the NCs in LSTDA,where each NC represents a different transmission angle.These NCs are assigned to network corridors,which have been previously established for stable links.By multiplying each corridor with newly connected links,they can be extended further.Each corridor is denoted by the channel (C) and divided by s/2 to represent the concatenation of two links.Eq.(13)assumes that the designated NC is complete.

    3.3.6 Prediction of Network Leaving(L)and Joining(J)Rate

    Eqs.(14) and (15) are utilized to compute leaving and joining predictions for a network with multiple operating units.The leaving and joining rates are illustrated and calculated.Additionally,network probability factors are determined in Eqs.(16)and(17).

    The possibilities of leaving(L)and joining(J)in the network are given as follows with the change of time(Δt):

    The leaving(L)and joining(J)rates in the network are predicted using Eqs.(14)–(17),and their corresponding probabilities are introduced.The time interval for node variation is represented byΔt,and the link stability is characterized by the L and J rates of the network under the conditions of 0 and 1.

    4 Performance Evaluation

    This section presents the simulation results for the LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA methodologies.The findings presented here are based on a limited number of simulations,with each measurement requiring data collection.Although E2ED,PDR,NLT,and TL were not directly compared or scaled,they serve as valuable indicators for exploring alternative process planning strategies.A plot was generated in MATLAB,with the simulation duration set to 1000 s,and the x and y axes representing the assessment indicators.The assessed indicators include:

    ?E2ED:The time it takes for a packet to travel from the sender to the receiver.This includes the time it takes for the packet to be transmitted and received.A shorter delay is preferable,and it is measured in seconds or milliseconds(ms).

    ?PDR:The percentage of data packets sent by the sender that are received by the destination,or the total number of sent and received packets.

    ?NL:The total duration of uninterrupted network operation despite unstable links or disconnected nodes.This can be measured by counting the number of disconnected nodes.

    ?TL:The decrease in signal strength as it propagates from one node to another.It is measured in decibels mill watt(dBm).

    The evaluation criteria for the four routing mechanisms are presented below in both tabular and graphical formats.

    4.1 Evaluation of End-to-End Delay(E2ED)(ms)

    Fig.3 shows the calculated LSTDA results at 1000 s for E2ED.The results were 2.533 for DLSA,3.8 for DPTR,and 4.18 for LEPR.In comparison to the guaranteed LSTDA,the E2ED value was 1.384,which outperforms other routing approaches.As simulation time increased,the value of each protocol decreased in E2ED scenarios.However,the proposed protocol demonstrated a decrease in delay compared to others in all 1000 s.The primary reason for LSTDA’s superior performance over other protocols is its connection stability and the maximum channel utilization mechanism that utilizes all active nodes.This delay is indirectly related to the increased PDR in LSTDA,as the delay decreases.

    4.2 Evaluation of Packet Delivery Ratio(PDR)(%age)

    In Fig.4,the PDR values for LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR were determined.The estimated value for DLSA after 100 s was 2.66,while DPTR’s estimated value increased to 36.25 as the simulation progressed.The value for LEPR was 2.66,the same as LSTDA.Throughout all simulation scenarios,LSTDA consistently achieved the highest PDR value.Initially,DPTR had the best PDR performance,but over time,LSTDA gradually outperformed other protocols in terms of PDR.The key factor enabling LSTDA to achieve the best PDR was its optimal latency and PDR,as discussed in the previous section.This value had an influence on the PDR,which increased as the simulation time advanced.The PDR calculation for all protocols was based on the NC,which also considered channel utilization as an important factor.The NC determined the optimal path by prioritizing nodes with high priority and selecting nodes with shorter distances to efficiently transmit data.Various NCs,such as NC1,NC2,NC3,and NC/2,were introduced to calculate broken routing paths and transfer data through the best available routing path.When two nodes were connected,two NCs were required,with the sending node acting as NC1 and the receiving node as NC2.This task involved a large number of nodes,totaling 200,and NCs up to s/2 were introduced for session management.LSTDA consistently achieved the highest PDR value across all simulation runtimes.One crucial factor in achieving this result was the shorter delay in LSTDA compared to the previous section,which contributed to the increased PDR value.The utilization of NCs allowed for the calculation of optimal paths by prioritizing nodes and finding the best nodes with shorter distances for efficient data transmission.The decrease in protocol delay and the increase in PDR were indirectly related.Multiple NCs were introduced to calculate broken routing paths and transfer data through the best available routing path from NC1 to NC/2.When two UAVs were connected,two NCs were required,with the sending UAV acting as NC1 and the receiving UAV as NC2.This task involved a large number of nodes(200 nodes in total) with NCs up to s/2 for session management.The proposed protocol demonstrated higher PDR values due to its effective channel utilization and the use of NC priorities.

    Figure 4:PDR of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    4.3 Evaluation of Network Lifetime(NLT)(Sec)

    Fig.5 presents the NLT for various protocols,including LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR.The estimated values for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR increased as the simulation time progressed.For instance,at 100 s,the estimated values for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR were 2.68,2.45,and 2.15,respectively.LSTDA achieved the highest NLT value of 4.09,surpassing all other simulation scenarios.During the simulation,DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA achieved NLT values of 1.84,1.7,and 1.97,respectively,at 200 s.The proposed LSTDA achieved an NLT of 3.09 throughout the simulation.Furthermore,at 300 s,LSTDA achieved the highest NLT value of 2.39,indicating its superiority among all models.The NLT values for each protocol increased with simulation time,demonstrating that the proposed protocol achieved a higher NLT percentage throughout the entire 1000-s duration.The lower NLT values indicate that the network experienced minimal discontinuity and that all nodes had active transmission periods.

    4.4 Evaluation of Transmission Loss(TLs)(dBm)

    Fig.6 illustrates the TLs of LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR.The estimated TLs for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR after 100 s were 1.494,1.8,and 1.243,respectively,with an increase in simulation duration.LSTDA demonstrated the best dBm value among all scenarios.The TL of interest consisted of 10 slots over 1000 s,each divided into 100-s intervals.LSTDA exhibited the lowest TL value,indicating superior performance.The utilization of the R.B tree in LSTDA contributed to the reduction in TL by leveraging NC to identify nodes with the shortest distance within the communication range.LSTDA achieved the best TL,and the minimization of delay resulted in increased PDR and NLT.The TL for each protocol was estimated using NC,R.B tree,and CU,which calculated the optimal path and identified the best nodes with shorter distances for efficient data transmission.Multiple NCs,including NC1,NC2,NC3,and NC/2,were introduced to compute broken routing paths and transfer data through the most optimal routing path.When two UAVs were connected,two NCs were required.This task involved 200 nodes with NCs up to s/2,where sessions were presented.

    Figure 5:NLT of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    Figure 6:TL of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    4.5 Results of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR

    This section presents the average values of four parameters(DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA)derived from Figs.3–6.The performance of the LSTDA routing protocol is evaluated and compared to DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA protocols in FANET using E2ED,PDR,network lifetime,and transmission losses as evaluation parameters.The results are summarized in Table 2.The average latency for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.6581,1.3961,0.7468,and 0.3393,respectively.Similarly,the mean PDR for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.743,0.65,0.802,and 1.243,respectively.The mean NLT for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 10.822,24.252,27.117,and 44.736,respectively.Lastly,the average TL for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.4336,0.6977,0.9632,and 0.6719,respectively,based on the simulation results.Table 2 presents the mean values of PDR,E2E delay,network lifetime,and transmission losses for the four routing protocols:DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA.The table provides the evaluation parameters for each protocol along with their corresponding values.In Fig.7a,individual charts display the average E2E delay values for each protocol,which are also compared to the overall average.Fig.7b presents the average PDR values for each protocol,while Fig.7c displays the average NLT values for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA.Finally,Fig.7d shows the average TL for each of the four protocols.Following the MATLAB simulation,the results of all scenarios were evaluated in relation to the proposed task.The assessment parameters were discussed and justified,leading to the conclusion that the mobility of drones significantly impacts routing in FANET due to variations in speed and distance.Mean values were compared between the proposed work and existing methods,including LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA.The proposed work prioritizes link stability,proper channel utilization,and network corridor priority.However,the protocol does not prioritize QoS or energy efficiency,which are limitations.Additionally,it does not fully address energy,QoS,localization,network partitioning,and node geographic scaling,among other factors.

    Table 2:Evaluation of DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA

    Figure 7:Average results evaluations of LSTDA vs.DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR

    5 Discussion

    The study revealed that FANET is in its infancy and still requires routing approaches.Additionally,the proposed LSTDA routing protocol was introduced as a novel routing protocol for FANET.After conducting experimental analysis and discussions,it was suggested that the proposed protocol be performed efficiently.The core contributions and novelty of the proposed protocol lie in the network corridor and high-priority node selection.The advanced relay mechanism was introduced as a fair approach with the help of the R-B routing priority tree.This paper presents a novel routing mechanism called LSTDA for FANET,which is a hybrid protocol combining the existing LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA protocols.The focus of the proposed protocol is on link stability and maximum channel utilization in terms of NCs selection.The proposed protocol was evaluated based on transmission loss,network latency,packet forwarding speed,and network endurance.The results indicate that the proposed LSTDA achieved significantly better performance compared to other routing protocols in FANET.The average delay of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.6581,1.3961,and 0.7468,respectively,while LSTDA had an average delay of 0.3393.Similarly,the average PDR of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.743,0.65,and 0.802,respectively,whereas LSTDA had an average PDR of 1.243.The average network lifetime was evaluated as 10.822,24.252,and 27.117 for DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA,respectively,while LSTDA had a network lifetime of 44.736.Lastly,the average transmission loss of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.4336,0.6977,and 0.9632,respectively,whereas LSTDA had an average transmission loss of 0.6719.These results demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed protocol compared to existing state-of-the-art protocols.The key factors contributing to this improvement are the priority given to NCs,maximum channel utilization,and threshold factors for link stability,which are not present in existing works.

    The future of FANET is still in its infancy but holds promising potential for communication,especially between ground and aerial nodes.Various challenges have emerged in FANET,such as scalability,mobility,and energy concerns due to the reliance on battery power for the flying nodes.In the future,it would be beneficial to evaluate the LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA protocols across different evaluation boundaries and portability models of FANET,including arbitrary waypoints.Other factors like jitter,road dissatisfaction,network duration,and power consumption should also be considered.FANET faces numerous challenges,including QoS,security,suitable platforms for drones,adaptability,and drone mobility.These challenges require robust mechanisms and solutions.This research work specifically focuses on link stability,NCs,channel utilization,and priority-based selection,rather than incorporating 5G or 6G implementations.Additionally,the study introduces metric threshold values,while other factors like energy,localization,and QoS are not addressed in this work.

    6 Conclusion

    This study investigated the current state of FANET and its need for efficient routing approaches.The proposed LSTDA routing protocol was introduced as a novel solution to address this need.Through experimental analysis and discussion,it was found that the proposed protocol performs efficiently,with core contributions and novelty achieved through network corridor and high-priority node selection.Additionally,an advanced relay mechanism was introduced using the R-B routing priority tree.The proposed hybrid protocol combines the existing LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA protocols and focuses on link stability and maximum channel utilization when selecting network corridors.The results of the study demonstrated that the proposed LSTDA protocol outperformed other state-ofthe-art routing protocols in FANET,achieving a TL of 0.6719,a network latency of 0.3393,a packet forwarding speed of 1.243,and a network endurance of 44.736.These findings highlight the potential of the proposed LSTDA routing protocol as a more efficient and effective solution for routing in FANET.Further research and development in this area can enhance the performance and reliability of FANET,enabling its application in various fields.

    The future development of FANET is confronted with several challenges,including scalability,mobility,and energy concerns arising from the reliance on batteries.Protocols such as LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA can be evaluated across different boundaries and portability models to address these issues,considering factors like jitter,road dissatisfaction,network strength duration,and absolute power consumption.Moreover,challenges related to QoS,security,adaptability,drone mobility,and finding suitable platforms for drones need to be addressed with robust mechanisms.

    Acknowledgement:We thank all the authors for their research contributions.

    Funding Statement:This work was supported in part by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs,Kean University,the RIF Activity Code 23009 of Zayed University,UAE,and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62172366.

    Author Contributions:Conceptualization,methodology,and draft manuscript preparation: F.A,K.Z,D.K;data collection,visualization,and analysis:B.S,T.H,H.U,and A.H.All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Availability of Data and Materials:This study used an open-source dataset.

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

    91精品国产九色| 一级黄色大片毛片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产av不卡久久| 久久热精品热| 三级经典国产精品| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲性久久影院| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 内射极品少妇av片p| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产乱来视频区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 中文资源天堂在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产在视频线精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲性久久影院| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 搞女人的毛片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 永久网站在线| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 欧美人与善性xxx| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 老女人水多毛片| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 色视频www国产| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 大香蕉久久网| 三级毛片av免费| or卡值多少钱| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲性久久影院| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 观看免费一级毛片| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| av免费观看日本| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产视频内射| 成年免费大片在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产在视频线精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 老司机影院成人| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 18+在线观看网站| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品午夜福利在线看| 成人国产麻豆网| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 插逼视频在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 天堂网av新在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 禁无遮挡网站| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 三级经典国产精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| av线在线观看网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美激情在线99| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 综合色av麻豆| 国产精品一及| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 99久久精品热视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 毛片女人毛片| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 99热全是精品| 久久久色成人| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产成人freesex在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| av免费观看日本| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 简卡轻食公司| 青春草国产在线视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 成年版毛片免费区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美日本视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 18+在线观看网站| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 看黄色毛片网站| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 小说图片视频综合网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲18禁久久av| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久久久国产网址| 少妇的逼水好多| 三级经典国产精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 久久热精品热| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产极品天堂在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产视频内射| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美日本视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产亚洲最大av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日本一本二区三区精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 少妇丰满av| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| kizo精华| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 深夜a级毛片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产一级毛片在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 大香蕉久久网| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产真实乱freesex| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美+日韩+精品| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 午夜久久久久精精品| 两个人的视频大全免费| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产真实乱freesex| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日本黄色片子视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲图色成人| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 少妇的逼好多水| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 免费大片18禁| 久久精品夜色国产| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产不卡一卡二| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 免费看av在线观看网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美激情在线99| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 我要搜黄色片| 高清毛片免费看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 色吧在线观看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| av在线蜜桃| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| av专区在线播放| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩欧美精品v在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲av熟女| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | av在线亚洲专区| 综合色丁香网| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久午夜福利片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久精品夜色国产| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 一级爰片在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 三级毛片av免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 观看美女的网站| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产乱来视频区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久久久久国产电影| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| videossex国产| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产成人a区在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 51国产日韩欧美| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产成人福利小说| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 熟女电影av网| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 97超视频在线观看视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| av免费观看日本| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国内精品宾馆在线| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久午夜福利片| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久久色成人| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日韩欧美在线乱码| av免费在线看不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 伦精品一区二区三区| 舔av片在线| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 极品教师在线视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 一级av片app| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久草成人影院| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久精品91蜜桃| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 永久网站在线| 1024手机看黄色片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 观看免费一级毛片| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久久色成人| 国产乱人视频| 三级毛片av免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕|