• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    LSTDA:Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware Routing Mechanism for Flying Ad-Hoc Network(FANET)

    2023-12-12 15:50:58FarmanAliKhalidZamanBabarShahTariqHussainHabibUllahAltafHussainandDaehanKwak
    Computers Materials&Continua 2023年10期

    Farman Ali,Khalid Zaman,Babar Shah,Tariq Hussain,Habib Ullah,Altaf Hussain and Daehan Kwak

    1Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Sungkyunkwan University,Seoul,03063,South Korea

    2Information Engineering School,Chang’an University,Xi’an,710061,China

    3College of Technological Innovation,Zayed University,Dubai,19282,United Arab Emirates

    4School of Computer Science and Technology,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,310018,China

    5Institute of Computer Science and IT,The University of Agriculture Peshawar,Peshawer,25120,Pakistan

    6Department of Computer Science and Technology,Kean University,Union,New Jersey,07083,USA

    ABSTRACT The paper presents a new protocol called Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware(LSTDA)for Flying Adhoc Network (FANET) with a focus on network corridors (NC).FANET consists of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs) that face challenges in avoiding transmission loss and delay while ensuring stable communication.The proposed protocol introduces a novel link stability with network corridors priority node selection to check and ensure fair communication in the entire network.The protocol uses a Red-Black(R-B)tree to achieve maximum channel utilization and an advanced relay approach.The paper evaluates LSTDA in terms of End-to-End Delay(E2ED),Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR),Network Lifetime (NLT),and Transmission Loss (TL),and compares it with existing methods such as Link Stability Estimation-based Routing(LEPR),Distributed Priority Tree-based Routing(DPTR),and Delay and Link Stability Aware(DLSA)using MATLAB simulations.The results show that LSTDA outperforms the other protocols,with lower average delay,higher average PDR,longer average NLT,and comparable average TL.

    KEYWORDS LSTDA routing protocol;Flying Ad-hoc Network;link stability;unmanned aerial vehicles;maxim priority channel

    1 Introduction

    With the advancement and rapid development of technology,various types of communication networks have been introduced[1].Among these networks,self-organizing networks play an important role due to their ability to be deployed in emergencies,ease of installation[2],and lack of centralized control required by traditional infrastructure[3].Each device utilized in these innovative technologies can cover multiple aspects of a telecom organization.Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) are dedicated networks where nodes establish an ad hoc network and move from one location to another without centralized leasing control.Flying Ad hoc Networks(FANETs)are a novel form of MANET and represent one such network[4].FANETs consist of custom-built devices that enable the deployment of fifth-generation Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs)in three dimensions.Nodes within these networks can be positioned,extended,and transferred[5].Terms such as drones,quadcopters,and airplanes are used to describe these nodes.The coupling approach allows these nodes to join other nodes to aggregate their test functions [6].Drones can capture their surroundings using fixed cameras with two types of detection capabilities.One is active detection,where drones closely examine regions of interest [7].The other is passive detection,where a UAV detector acquires the target and then compiles and processes the data for further analysis by the operator at the base station[8].Ad-hoc networks,particularly FANETs,are well-suited for creating temporary networks,and their deployment is facilitated by their ability to handle both ground nodes and flying nodes.FANETs offer ease of deployment,as they require no human personnel,reducing risks and dangers.The primary reason for utilizing FANETs in this work is the market demand for ad hoc networks,with FANETs being particularly sought after.

    Technology is constantly evolving,and right from the beginning,it has surpassed demand at the highest level and continues to grow.Significant efforts have been made to enhance FANET in terms of power,routing,security,and node scalability [9],as well as its geographic coverage.Various authors have published their work on improving FANET from different perspectives[10–12].Numerous challenges in this network require appropriate solutions[13,14].By envisioning an efficient algorithm,the network can reach its peak performance.The research on FANET is still in its early stages,and several approaches have already been proposed to enhance routing in FANET,such as Distributed Priority Tree-based Routing(DPTR),Link Stability Estimation-based Routing(LEPR),Delay and Link Stability Aware(DLSA)[15],and others.In a previous study,the authors proposed a routing algorithm for establishing reliable connections and designed routing trees as intermediaries for different operational units of FANET,including terrestrial,air,and relay connections.However,due to the limitations and shortcomings of the previous work,the current research focuses on improving link reliability and selecting network corridors that maximize channel utilization.The proposed approach has been evaluated in various scenarios,and the main motivation behind it is the effectiveness of the proposed protocol called Link Stability and Transmission Delay Aware(LSTDA)across all scenarios.This research is driven by multiple motivations,with the primary priority being the improvement of FANET routing protocols.Given the existing protocols in FANET,routing remains a major concern,and therefore,reliability and transmission losses are the main areas of research.Stability is measured using a defined metric,which generates three distinct values for stability that are also used for selecting network corridors while considering channel utilization.

    FANET consists of flying nodes known as UAVs that can be operated remotely or through an alternative mechanism [16].The high maneuverability and three-dimensional movement of UAVs pose a research challenge in terms of avoiding transmission loss (TL),minimizing delay,and stabilizing communication between nodes in this network.Existing routing methods in FANET,such as LEPR and DPTR,are specifically designed to ensure transmission loss,latency,and continuous communication among drones.LEPR takes a routing perspective by utilizing the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector(AODV)routing protocol.It introduces stability metrics based on Global Positioning System (GPS) location information from airborne nodes to assess link stability.This approach enables the prediction of mobility,security,and connection quality.To establish stable connections,LEPR employs a flooding mechanism that determines suitable paths for data transmission among neighboring nodes.However,using the stability metric as a threshold for both Route Request(RREQ)and Route Reply(RREP)is unnecessary and leads to packet loss and delay.Moreover,this approach introduces overhead and suffers from packet loss due to high-threshold metrics,causing nodes to be unable to maintain a normal reception level for all packets[17].

    The issues with the existing systems are highlighted in this section,specifically mentioning DPTR and LEPR.On the other hand,DPTR introduces the challenge of network segmentation,which utilizes the different operating units of FANETs to function in three ad hoc units:air(M),terrestrial(N),and neural interface (K).This approach incorporates a red-black (R-B) tree to prioritize node communication efficiently.The concept employed in this research is to leverage each node’s capabilities,addressing the main network issue of high latency.DPTR utilizes a distributed network of networks,with the neural interface serving as the central operational node due to the longer time required to establish higher priority connections between nodes,thus allowing other nodes to be preserved.Two current approaches to tackle these issues are barriers and barriers,both aiming to enhance the security and functionality of FANET.Both LEPR and DPTR possess their own advantages and disadvantages.In this context,a recent study revealed a correlation between the processes of LEPR and DPTR,leading to the development of LSTDA.The fusion of the current quality measures in our research significantly contributes to pollution prevention and stabilization(DPTR and LEPR).

    The motivation and core contribution of this work encompasses various aspects of a novel approach.The approach revolves around link stability,relay strategy,and the selection of highpriority nodes in network corridors.The proposed work aims to enhance the network’s performance by modifying the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and reducing network delay.The PDR is increased through the maximization of link stability,while the network delay is reduced by utilizing the R-B tree to optimize channel usage,thereby minimizing the distance between nodes.The uniqueness of the proposed work lies in its introduction of the link stability metric,prioritization of Network Corridor(NCs),and the maximum utilization of channels in FANET,with a specific emphasis on maintaining communication stability among flying nodes.Additionally,the work introduces a threshold measuring calculation for stability and prioritizes the reduction of delay among nodes,including the End-to-End Delay(E2ED)within the network.The main contributions of this work are outlined as follows:

    ? This paper proposes a new LSTDA routing protocol for FANET,which intelligently focuses on network corridor selection to ensure link stability and channel utilization.Furthermore,the proposed work establishes a strong association between link stability and network corridor selection.

    ? An efficient and novel routing system based on channel utilization and network corridor priority is developed and presented.Additionally,an advanced LSTDA network corridor with maximum channel utilization is introduced as a reliability metric threshold method.

    ? The functionality of the proposed LSTDA protocol is achieved through the implementation of a fair selection R-B tree,specifically designed to handle a large number of nodes,thus ensuring optimal and equitable communication.Moreover,the proposed protocol is designed to operate in high-mobility scenarios involving UAVs,while maintaining fair communication.

    ? This paper thoroughly investigates new issues and challenges related to routing in FANET.

    ? A comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the routing protocols LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA are presented,considering parameters such as E2ED,PDR,Network Lifetime (NLT),and Transmission Loss(TS),in comparison with the LSTDA routing protocol for FANET.

    The remaining sections of this article are organized as follows:Section 2 discusses related works,Section 3 presents the proposed methodology,Section 4 describes the simulation results,Section 5 provides conclusions and recommendations for future research,and the article concludes.

    2 Related Work

    The LEPR routing protocol focuses on ensuring link stability by employing threshold metrics to calculate reliability in critical scenarios[9].Additionally,LEPR utilizes preemptive mechanisms using the RREQ and RREP methods of the AODV routing protocol.The protocol takes into account factors such as quality of service,predicted mobility,and connection quality.Performance evaluations of the LEPR protocol,based on AODV and Dynamic Source Routing(DSR),demonstrate its effectiveness in terms of routing costs,delay,and packet rate.Another FANET routing protocol,known as the Adaptive Density-Based Routing Protocol (ADRP) [10],aims to enhance transport efficiency by adaptively determining transportability.ADRP incrementally compensates for a hub’s rebroadcast potential to dictate a demand bundle based on the number of neighboring hubs.The program has shown that ADRP outperforms AODV in terms of packet delivery percentage,start-end delay,routing load,Media Access Control (MAC) load,and throughput.ADRP adaptively calculates the transmission probability to determine the validity of the guiding heuristic.A comparison between the Destination Sequenced Distance Vector(DSDV)and AODV protocols for FANET is conducted,with a particular focus on energy values as it poses a significant challenge due to the flight characteristics of UAVs in this network [11].Another study [12] addressed the issue of organizational boundaries between air and ground missions and proposes a guiding convention for transfers under a common scheme.This convention is governed by DPTR,which utilizes a red-black tree to form a demand network that determines the appropriate node and switching channel.The results showed significant improvements in various metrics such as packet delivery rates,channel utilization,start-to-end delays,overhead,uptime potential,and organizational throughput.To manage FANET scheduling,a variant of the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) process called AntHocNet (AHN) is proposed [14],with a focus on minimizing energy usage for different organizations.Evaluation results demonstrate that AHN outperforms ACO.In the study [18],a clustering tool-based calculation was proposed to ensure sensitive coverage and rapid portability of UAV networks while extending tissue lifetime and ensuring reliable communications.The proposed approach isolates and selects the best assignments for clustered components,and evaluation is performed using two clustering schemes: Bio-Inspired Clustering Schemes for FANET(BICSF)and Energy-Attention Link-Based Clustering(EALC)based on Health,High PDR,Low Latency (EMASS) Guarantees Clustering.In [19],a boosting method for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) called the Whale Optimization Algorithm(WOA)is presented to stabilize energy productivity in FANET.The proposed approach is compared to the existing work at a high level.Routing protocols and link stability are still in the early stages of development for FANET [20].Routing is a primary concern in FANET due to the 3D motion of high-speed UAVs,with researchers focusing on ensuring link stability and conserving energy due to the limited battery capacity of these drones [21,22].The study on FANET predominantly discusses routing protocols[23],with proposed approaches aimed at improving network reliability and connection stability between all nodes [24,25].Some of these proposed protocols are hybrid [26,27],while others have been comparatively evaluated[28].Additionally,a resource allocation protocol has been suggested for air slicing in multiple flexible UAV-assisted cellular communications[29],including Machine-to-Machine (M2M) [30] and Device-to-Device (D2D) communications [31–34].A reliable and energy-efficient route selection protocol is proposed to efficiently reduce energy consumption and network latency[35].Moreover,the same authors have proposed a novel routing protocol(RP)for heterogeneous environments,such as fault-tolerant aware(FTA)and workload resource management,to enhance energy efficiency[36,37].

    Research on routing protocols for FANET is still in its early stages.The primary challenge in this network is routing,given the high-speed nodes that move in three dimensions.Researchers have focused on improving routing to ensure link stability and energy efficiency,considering that UAVs are equipped with small batteries and are remotely operated.The existing literature has proposed various approaches to enhance network performance.Our proposed protocol aims to tackle the issue of network partitioning and maintain link stability among all nodes by introducing a new stability metric based on threshold values.Previous studies have mainly focused on hybrid routing protocols and conducted comparative evaluations.However,our research distinguishes itself as we have developed a standalone routing protocol capable of addressing the network partitioning problem while simultaneously supporting three units and introducing a novel stability metric.

    3 Research Methodology

    This section presents the research methodology,focusing on the simulation setup and the design of the system model depicted in Fig.1 for the LSTDA protocol.

    3.1 LSTDA:The Proposed Protocol

    The proposed LSTDA protocol,as shown in Fig.1,involves several steps.The first step is initialization,followed by the routing phase where the routing tree is examined to determine the need for cooperative mode communication.If the condition is met,the network switches to corridor priority.If the condition is not met,it reverts back to the previous routing step.Assuming the condition is accepted,the nodes are divided into two groups:external UAVs(acting as reset and shutdown nodes)and internal UAVs (acting as routing devices),which are combined into a self-organizing network corridor.Channel selection occurs next,with the highest priority channel being chosen for both the air and terrestrial ad hoc networks.The subsequent step is to determine the best route based on priority.If the selected ground node does not align with the network corridor,the protocol returns to the channel selection phase.If the conditions are met,a red-black tree is constructed for the three networks:ground(N),air(M),and intermediary neural networks(N).This process involves two phases,one for maintaining the number of antenna nodes and the other for combining them to obtain the number of ground nodes.The next step involves the roadmap and transmission phase,which is governed by two conditions related to the link stabilization procedure.This step is conditional and follows the preferred node selection path.It proceeds to the link stabilization process to establish link stability between nodes that will transmit data in case of a link failure or improper connection.If the link stability metric exceeds a certain threshold,data is transmitted using the link reliability process.Otherwise,the path with the best reliability metric value is chosen for communication by evaluating the reliability metric process.This scheme utilizes RREQ and RREP to determine the most reliable metric for the current connection.

    Once the reliability of the link with the highest metric is confirmed,the priority node is selected.If the check verifies that the terrestrial corridor(Cg)matches the terrestrial network and the antenna corridor(Ca)corresponds to the air network,the process proceeds to the single-hop routing step,which leads to the final step if the current state is true.However,if the condition is false,it moves to the multihop routing stage and connects to the subsequent stage.At this point,communication transitions to the next stage,which is the one-hop routing step,and then returns to the previous exit step.If the check in the exit step is true,the process advances to the subsequent step where the terrestrial and air ad hoc networks are interconnected through neural interfaces or mutual mode.Finally,the process proceeds to the next end state.

    Figure 1:Working algorithm and flow of the routing protocol LSTDA

    Algorithm 1 employs a link stability approach that incorporates threshold values.The provided metric ensures the maintenance of a stable link between nodes,which is dependent on link stability.The summation value results in 1,indicating the presence of stable links.If the value drops below 1,it signifies the absence of stable links.Conversely,if the value exceeds 1,the velocity of the UAVs increases,resulting in unstable links and posing challenges to maintaining reliable communication.Algorithm 1 serves as the central component of the proposed work,outlining the convergence and evaluation of the LSTDA routing protocol.It presents the overall link stability of LSTDA and establishes initial and maximum threshold metric values,each corresponding to a specific routing method for link stability.The algorithm prioritizes link stability and maximum network corridor when deploying and selecting nodes,favoring nodes with high-stability links and shorter distances.Fair node selection is achieved through the use of an R-B tree,and the threshold values range from 0 to 1,with 0 indicating no link stability and 1 indicating a stable link that allows direct communication or communication through a neighboring node.In this algorithm,N,M,and K represent the ground,aerial,and relay layers,respectively.Additionally,the algorithm utilizes three input values,specifically 0.33,0.34,and 0.33,to ensure highly stable link connectivity with a summation of 1.The term NC refers to the network corridor in the algorithm,and Eq.(2)provides an additional implementation of Algorithm 1.Table 1 presents several parameters proposed for LSTDA.

    Table 1:Setup for simulations

    Algorithm 1:Algorithm of the metric with link stability

    3.2 LSTDA Design Mechanism

    The design strategy of the proposed LSTDA is illustrated in Fig.2,which includes a mathematical model consisting of multiple numerical illustrations and equations.These equations demonstrate the network corridor with maximum channel utilization.The simulation was carried out in MATLAB.

    3.3 System Model

    The mathematical model is the core methodology of the proposed LSTDA routing protocol,which implements stability metrics and network corridor selection using an R-B tree.

    3.3.1 Stability with Threshold Metrics

    The threshold calculation for stability is provided by Eq.(1).

    Figure 2:Design of LSTDA based on DPTR and LEPR existing routing protocols

    Eq.(1)introduces the stability threshold metric,where(λ)lambda represents stability matric,LQpredicts link stability,and(Y)represents mobility factors along with the degree of mobility(D)and safety degree of mobility(S).While(i,j)denotes the coordinates for all UAVs in LSTDA.The proposed coefficient symbols for the stability metric are presented in Eq.(2).

    Eq.(2)expands the implementation of Algorithm 1 by specifying threshold values for the stability metric.Each value corresponds to 0.33,0.34,and 0.33 for each lambda.The weighting coefficients for these three values are 0.34,0.33,and 0.33.

    3.3.2 Network Corridor(NC)Selection

    The value of NC will be greater than 1 due to the adoption of a multiple sending and receiving strategy.The calculation of NC is performed using the collaborative mode,as shown in Eqs.(3)and(4).

    Eq.(3)describes the collaboration mode in LSTDA.In Eq.(4),Gsand NC represent the ground session and network corridor,respectively.Collaboration mode is achieved when the sender and receiver are within communication range.In collaborative mode,two or more nodes in LSTDA can form network corridors with multiple routing paths for communication.

    3.3.3 Sort Max Channel

    Maximum channel utilization and the sorting of channels based on priority are calculated using Eq.(5).

    Eq.(5) represents channel selection and sorting with the highest priority.In LSTDA,multiple channels are utilized by each UAV for different routing approaches.The division of the two network corridors is denoted as s/2,with the initial network corridor represented as NC1[4].

    3.3.4 Channel Utilization(CU)

    The objective is to maximize channel utilization while maintaining a priority order.Eqs.(6)and (7) were utilized to calculate the process and transmission time,which are important factors in determining channel utilization.

    The variables ttand tprepresent the transmit time and process time,respectively.The LSTDA routing protocol aims to establish connections between UAVs for potential communication and utilize each node based on link stability.A fairness concept was introduced to accomplish this goal.Eqs.(8)and(9)describe Eq.(7),incorporating the processing,queuing,and probability time(f)of the LSTDA protocol.

    They can be used to transmit data along a path with active link stability.Eq.(9) illustrates that the overall time(r)for the propagation and transmission of data can be represented by a value of 100.The equation also indicates the time it takes for data to travel from the sender to the receiver within a finite amount of time.

    3.3.5 Selection of Relay UAV as an Access with NCs

    Eqs.(10)–(12) are employed to calculate the NCs in LSTDA,where each NC represents a different transmission angle.These NCs are assigned to network corridors,which have been previously established for stable links.By multiplying each corridor with newly connected links,they can be extended further.Each corridor is denoted by the channel (C) and divided by s/2 to represent the concatenation of two links.Eq.(13)assumes that the designated NC is complete.

    3.3.6 Prediction of Network Leaving(L)and Joining(J)Rate

    Eqs.(14) and (15) are utilized to compute leaving and joining predictions for a network with multiple operating units.The leaving and joining rates are illustrated and calculated.Additionally,network probability factors are determined in Eqs.(16)and(17).

    The possibilities of leaving(L)and joining(J)in the network are given as follows with the change of time(Δt):

    The leaving(L)and joining(J)rates in the network are predicted using Eqs.(14)–(17),and their corresponding probabilities are introduced.The time interval for node variation is represented byΔt,and the link stability is characterized by the L and J rates of the network under the conditions of 0 and 1.

    4 Performance Evaluation

    This section presents the simulation results for the LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA methodologies.The findings presented here are based on a limited number of simulations,with each measurement requiring data collection.Although E2ED,PDR,NLT,and TL were not directly compared or scaled,they serve as valuable indicators for exploring alternative process planning strategies.A plot was generated in MATLAB,with the simulation duration set to 1000 s,and the x and y axes representing the assessment indicators.The assessed indicators include:

    ?E2ED:The time it takes for a packet to travel from the sender to the receiver.This includes the time it takes for the packet to be transmitted and received.A shorter delay is preferable,and it is measured in seconds or milliseconds(ms).

    ?PDR:The percentage of data packets sent by the sender that are received by the destination,or the total number of sent and received packets.

    ?NL:The total duration of uninterrupted network operation despite unstable links or disconnected nodes.This can be measured by counting the number of disconnected nodes.

    ?TL:The decrease in signal strength as it propagates from one node to another.It is measured in decibels mill watt(dBm).

    The evaluation criteria for the four routing mechanisms are presented below in both tabular and graphical formats.

    4.1 Evaluation of End-to-End Delay(E2ED)(ms)

    Fig.3 shows the calculated LSTDA results at 1000 s for E2ED.The results were 2.533 for DLSA,3.8 for DPTR,and 4.18 for LEPR.In comparison to the guaranteed LSTDA,the E2ED value was 1.384,which outperforms other routing approaches.As simulation time increased,the value of each protocol decreased in E2ED scenarios.However,the proposed protocol demonstrated a decrease in delay compared to others in all 1000 s.The primary reason for LSTDA’s superior performance over other protocols is its connection stability and the maximum channel utilization mechanism that utilizes all active nodes.This delay is indirectly related to the increased PDR in LSTDA,as the delay decreases.

    4.2 Evaluation of Packet Delivery Ratio(PDR)(%age)

    In Fig.4,the PDR values for LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR were determined.The estimated value for DLSA after 100 s was 2.66,while DPTR’s estimated value increased to 36.25 as the simulation progressed.The value for LEPR was 2.66,the same as LSTDA.Throughout all simulation scenarios,LSTDA consistently achieved the highest PDR value.Initially,DPTR had the best PDR performance,but over time,LSTDA gradually outperformed other protocols in terms of PDR.The key factor enabling LSTDA to achieve the best PDR was its optimal latency and PDR,as discussed in the previous section.This value had an influence on the PDR,which increased as the simulation time advanced.The PDR calculation for all protocols was based on the NC,which also considered channel utilization as an important factor.The NC determined the optimal path by prioritizing nodes with high priority and selecting nodes with shorter distances to efficiently transmit data.Various NCs,such as NC1,NC2,NC3,and NC/2,were introduced to calculate broken routing paths and transfer data through the best available routing path.When two nodes were connected,two NCs were required,with the sending node acting as NC1 and the receiving node as NC2.This task involved a large number of nodes,totaling 200,and NCs up to s/2 were introduced for session management.LSTDA consistently achieved the highest PDR value across all simulation runtimes.One crucial factor in achieving this result was the shorter delay in LSTDA compared to the previous section,which contributed to the increased PDR value.The utilization of NCs allowed for the calculation of optimal paths by prioritizing nodes and finding the best nodes with shorter distances for efficient data transmission.The decrease in protocol delay and the increase in PDR were indirectly related.Multiple NCs were introduced to calculate broken routing paths and transfer data through the best available routing path from NC1 to NC/2.When two UAVs were connected,two NCs were required,with the sending UAV acting as NC1 and the receiving UAV as NC2.This task involved a large number of nodes(200 nodes in total) with NCs up to s/2 for session management.The proposed protocol demonstrated higher PDR values due to its effective channel utilization and the use of NC priorities.

    Figure 4:PDR of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    4.3 Evaluation of Network Lifetime(NLT)(Sec)

    Fig.5 presents the NLT for various protocols,including LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR.The estimated values for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR increased as the simulation time progressed.For instance,at 100 s,the estimated values for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR were 2.68,2.45,and 2.15,respectively.LSTDA achieved the highest NLT value of 4.09,surpassing all other simulation scenarios.During the simulation,DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA achieved NLT values of 1.84,1.7,and 1.97,respectively,at 200 s.The proposed LSTDA achieved an NLT of 3.09 throughout the simulation.Furthermore,at 300 s,LSTDA achieved the highest NLT value of 2.39,indicating its superiority among all models.The NLT values for each protocol increased with simulation time,demonstrating that the proposed protocol achieved a higher NLT percentage throughout the entire 1000-s duration.The lower NLT values indicate that the network experienced minimal discontinuity and that all nodes had active transmission periods.

    4.4 Evaluation of Transmission Loss(TLs)(dBm)

    Fig.6 illustrates the TLs of LSTDA,DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR.The estimated TLs for DLSA,DPTR,and LEPR after 100 s were 1.494,1.8,and 1.243,respectively,with an increase in simulation duration.LSTDA demonstrated the best dBm value among all scenarios.The TL of interest consisted of 10 slots over 1000 s,each divided into 100-s intervals.LSTDA exhibited the lowest TL value,indicating superior performance.The utilization of the R.B tree in LSTDA contributed to the reduction in TL by leveraging NC to identify nodes with the shortest distance within the communication range.LSTDA achieved the best TL,and the minimization of delay resulted in increased PDR and NLT.The TL for each protocol was estimated using NC,R.B tree,and CU,which calculated the optimal path and identified the best nodes with shorter distances for efficient data transmission.Multiple NCs,including NC1,NC2,NC3,and NC/2,were introduced to compute broken routing paths and transfer data through the most optimal routing path.When two UAVs were connected,two NCs were required.This task involved 200 nodes with NCs up to s/2,where sessions were presented.

    Figure 5:NLT of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    Figure 6:TL of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR vs.simulation time

    4.5 Results of LSTDA,DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR

    This section presents the average values of four parameters(DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA)derived from Figs.3–6.The performance of the LSTDA routing protocol is evaluated and compared to DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA protocols in FANET using E2ED,PDR,network lifetime,and transmission losses as evaluation parameters.The results are summarized in Table 2.The average latency for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.6581,1.3961,0.7468,and 0.3393,respectively.Similarly,the mean PDR for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.743,0.65,0.802,and 1.243,respectively.The mean NLT for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 10.822,24.252,27.117,and 44.736,respectively.Lastly,the average TL for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA is 0.4336,0.6977,0.9632,and 0.6719,respectively,based on the simulation results.Table 2 presents the mean values of PDR,E2E delay,network lifetime,and transmission losses for the four routing protocols:DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA.The table provides the evaluation parameters for each protocol along with their corresponding values.In Fig.7a,individual charts display the average E2E delay values for each protocol,which are also compared to the overall average.Fig.7b presents the average PDR values for each protocol,while Fig.7c displays the average NLT values for DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA.Finally,Fig.7d shows the average TL for each of the four protocols.Following the MATLAB simulation,the results of all scenarios were evaluated in relation to the proposed task.The assessment parameters were discussed and justified,leading to the conclusion that the mobility of drones significantly impacts routing in FANET due to variations in speed and distance.Mean values were compared between the proposed work and existing methods,including LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA.The proposed work prioritizes link stability,proper channel utilization,and network corridor priority.However,the protocol does not prioritize QoS or energy efficiency,which are limitations.Additionally,it does not fully address energy,QoS,localization,network partitioning,and node geographic scaling,among other factors.

    Table 2:Evaluation of DPTR,LEPR,DLSA,and LSTDA

    Figure 7:Average results evaluations of LSTDA vs.DLSA,LEPR,and DPTR

    5 Discussion

    The study revealed that FANET is in its infancy and still requires routing approaches.Additionally,the proposed LSTDA routing protocol was introduced as a novel routing protocol for FANET.After conducting experimental analysis and discussions,it was suggested that the proposed protocol be performed efficiently.The core contributions and novelty of the proposed protocol lie in the network corridor and high-priority node selection.The advanced relay mechanism was introduced as a fair approach with the help of the R-B routing priority tree.This paper presents a novel routing mechanism called LSTDA for FANET,which is a hybrid protocol combining the existing LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA protocols.The focus of the proposed protocol is on link stability and maximum channel utilization in terms of NCs selection.The proposed protocol was evaluated based on transmission loss,network latency,packet forwarding speed,and network endurance.The results indicate that the proposed LSTDA achieved significantly better performance compared to other routing protocols in FANET.The average delay of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.6581,1.3961,and 0.7468,respectively,while LSTDA had an average delay of 0.3393.Similarly,the average PDR of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.743,0.65,and 0.802,respectively,whereas LSTDA had an average PDR of 1.243.The average network lifetime was evaluated as 10.822,24.252,and 27.117 for DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA,respectively,while LSTDA had a network lifetime of 44.736.Lastly,the average transmission loss of DPTR,LEPR,and DLSA was calculated as 0.4336,0.6977,and 0.9632,respectively,whereas LSTDA had an average transmission loss of 0.6719.These results demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed protocol compared to existing state-of-the-art protocols.The key factors contributing to this improvement are the priority given to NCs,maximum channel utilization,and threshold factors for link stability,which are not present in existing works.

    The future of FANET is still in its infancy but holds promising potential for communication,especially between ground and aerial nodes.Various challenges have emerged in FANET,such as scalability,mobility,and energy concerns due to the reliance on battery power for the flying nodes.In the future,it would be beneficial to evaluate the LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA protocols across different evaluation boundaries and portability models of FANET,including arbitrary waypoints.Other factors like jitter,road dissatisfaction,network duration,and power consumption should also be considered.FANET faces numerous challenges,including QoS,security,suitable platforms for drones,adaptability,and drone mobility.These challenges require robust mechanisms and solutions.This research work specifically focuses on link stability,NCs,channel utilization,and priority-based selection,rather than incorporating 5G or 6G implementations.Additionally,the study introduces metric threshold values,while other factors like energy,localization,and QoS are not addressed in this work.

    6 Conclusion

    This study investigated the current state of FANET and its need for efficient routing approaches.The proposed LSTDA routing protocol was introduced as a novel solution to address this need.Through experimental analysis and discussion,it was found that the proposed protocol performs efficiently,with core contributions and novelty achieved through network corridor and high-priority node selection.Additionally,an advanced relay mechanism was introduced using the R-B routing priority tree.The proposed hybrid protocol combines the existing LEPR,DPTR,and DLSA protocols and focuses on link stability and maximum channel utilization when selecting network corridors.The results of the study demonstrated that the proposed LSTDA protocol outperformed other state-ofthe-art routing protocols in FANET,achieving a TL of 0.6719,a network latency of 0.3393,a packet forwarding speed of 1.243,and a network endurance of 44.736.These findings highlight the potential of the proposed LSTDA routing protocol as a more efficient and effective solution for routing in FANET.Further research and development in this area can enhance the performance and reliability of FANET,enabling its application in various fields.

    The future development of FANET is confronted with several challenges,including scalability,mobility,and energy concerns arising from the reliance on batteries.Protocols such as LEPR,DPTR,DLSA,and LSTDA can be evaluated across different boundaries and portability models to address these issues,considering factors like jitter,road dissatisfaction,network strength duration,and absolute power consumption.Moreover,challenges related to QoS,security,adaptability,drone mobility,and finding suitable platforms for drones need to be addressed with robust mechanisms.

    Acknowledgement:We thank all the authors for their research contributions.

    Funding Statement:This work was supported in part by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs,Kean University,the RIF Activity Code 23009 of Zayed University,UAE,and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62172366.

    Author Contributions:Conceptualization,methodology,and draft manuscript preparation: F.A,K.Z,D.K;data collection,visualization,and analysis:B.S,T.H,H.U,and A.H.All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Availability of Data and Materials:This study used an open-source dataset.

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

    美女高潮的动态| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 不卡一级毛片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜激情欧美在线| 尾随美女入室| 91av网一区二区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 简卡轻食公司| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日韩欧美三级三区| 深夜a级毛片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 看片在线看免费视频| av在线老鸭窝| 国产综合懂色| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产黄片美女视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产av在哪里看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费观看人在逋| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 午夜福利18| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 少妇的逼好多水| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲自拍偷在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 舔av片在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 51国产日韩欧美| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日日啪夜夜撸| av视频在线观看入口| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产老妇女一区| 88av欧美| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久久久久久久久成人| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久精品大字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产不卡一卡二| 在线观看66精品国产| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 88av欧美| 国产精品久久视频播放| 很黄的视频免费| av专区在线播放| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久久久性生活片| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲图色成人| 此物有八面人人有两片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲第一电影网av| 看免费成人av毛片| av黄色大香蕉| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 91精品国产九色| 久久人妻av系列| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 久久这里只有精品中国| 有码 亚洲区| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产综合懂色| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 毛片女人毛片| av黄色大香蕉| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 美女大奶头视频| 热99在线观看视频| 久久中文看片网| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 午夜a级毛片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 此物有八面人人有两片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 韩国av在线不卡| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 久久热精品热| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美3d第一页| 在线观看舔阴道视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产视频内射| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久人妻av系列| 成人欧美大片| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲美女黄片视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 丝袜美腿在线中文| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产在视频线在精品| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久久色成人| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 舔av片在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 一本精品99久久精品77| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 色视频www国产| 欧美日韩黄片免| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 成人三级黄色视频| 美女高潮的动态| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 少妇丰满av| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | netflix在线观看网站| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 九色成人免费人妻av| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 精品日产1卡2卡| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 1000部很黄的大片| 久9热在线精品视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 美女高潮的动态| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲 国产 在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 91狼人影院| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产 一区精品| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 午夜a级毛片| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 亚洲不卡免费看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 午夜影院日韩av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 色视频www国产| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 国内精品宾馆在线| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 三级毛片av免费| 成人国产综合亚洲| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 久久99热这里只有精品18| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人精品一区二区免费| www日本黄色视频网| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一夜夜www| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 搡老岳熟女国产| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 国产成人a区在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 美女大奶头视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品久久久久久久末码| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日本五十路高清| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产日本99.免费观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 丰满的人妻完整版| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 欧美性感艳星| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 22中文网久久字幕| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一区福利在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 悠悠久久av| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲性久久影院| 色播亚洲综合网| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 色视频www国产| 精品国产三级普通话版| 99热精品在线国产| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产成人av教育| www日本黄色视频网| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产高潮美女av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 在线免费观看的www视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲图色成人| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 免费av观看视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 精品久久久久久,| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 久久午夜福利片| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | xxxwww97欧美| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 中国美女看黄片| 国产三级中文精品| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久久av| 色综合色国产| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 97碰自拍视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产精品久久视频播放| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 级片在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久久久国内视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜a级毛片| 色综合婷婷激情| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| .国产精品久久| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久亚洲真实| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 天堂网av新在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 午夜影院日韩av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 午夜福利在线在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久6这里有精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb|