• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    An eighteen-year longitudinal examination of school victimization and weapon use in California secondary schools

    2023-12-11 01:35:46RamiBenbenisht1RonAviAstorIlanRoziner
    World Journal of Pediatrics 2023年11期

    Rami Benbenisht1 · Ron Avi Astor · Ilan Roziner

    Keywords School violence · School climate · Weapons

    tInroduction

    School safety has been a major public health issue in the United States and internationally for more than three decades [1, 2].The current widely accepted def inition of school violence is “any behavior intended to harm,physically or emotionally, individuals in school, their property, or their school's property” [3– 5].This includes face-to-face and electronic media-related victimization,verbal and social bullying, physical violence, stealing,damage to property, expressions of hate, weapon use, sexual harassment, and assault.Indeed, research shows that many students worldwide are regularly exposed to wideranging victimization in schools, such as verbal, social (in person and online), physical, and sexual victimization [6,7].Some students are targets of bullying because of their looks, ethnicity, race, nationality, sexual orientation, or other biases [8, 9].Moreover, some students experience weapons on school grounds, such as carrying a weapon such as a gun or a knife, being threatened or injured by a weapon, or seeing another student carrying a weapon at school [10– 12].

    Victimization at school affects students’ school connectedness, nonattendance, and dropout [3].Victimization contributes negatively to overall mental health, depression,suicidal behaviors, and subsequent involvement in risky behaviors, such as substance use [13– 16].

    There is a strong media and public interest in mass shootings in schools.Each school shooting is a devastating act that terrorizes the nation.The national media report these events intensely and frequently [17, 18].With the recent increase in school shootings [19], there is a growing sense in the public that little has changed in two decades to make schools safe [20– 22].Given the horror of school shootings, there have been few empirical discussions related to increases or decreases in other harmful types of school victimization in the past two decades [23].

    During the past two decades, billions of dollars,resources, policies, programs, and community efforts have been focused on reducing victimization and increasing the safe climate in schools worldwide [24, 25].This represents a wide array of different policies for school violence, including but not limited to zero tolerance, prevention-oriented social-emotional programs, restorative justice approaches and trauma-informing school strategies [4].There is a great need for research examining school violence time trends after these types of policies and approaches have been implemented at the population level [3].

    To inform public health school safety policies and decisionmaking, this study examined a large sample of secondary schools and students during the past two decades in California.Specif ically, the study examined whether there are consistent trends in the prevalence of specif ic types of victimization and school climate and whether these trends differ by gender and ethnic affiliation.

    Several national surveillance systems track different types of school violence and crime [26, 27].An annual report on indicators of school crime and safety compiles reports from several resources and provides detailed information on the prevalence of 22 relevant indicators through the years (some indicators starting as early as 1992) [26].Based on this report, nationally, there have been consistent reductions over time in most indicators of victimization on school grounds.From 1992 to 2019, the total victimization rate and rates of specif ic crimes–thefts and violent victimizations–declined for students aged 12–18 years from 18.1% in 1992 to 3.0%in 2019, more than an 80% decrease [24].Having been in a physical f ight in school decreased from 11.09% in 2009 to 8.03% in 2019, and carrying a weapon on school property during the previous 30 days declined from 5.6% to 2.8%[26].

    These US annual surveillance reports are important in showing clear national trends.Nonetheless, they are limited.First, they represent the nation as a whole and thus are less useful in understanding regional variations among states.For instance, estimates regarding being involved in a physical f ight in school in 2019 ranged from 27.3% in Mississippi to 16.7% in Hawaii [26 , 27].Furthermore, complementary Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System state-level estimates available for 34 states are based on relatively small samples, making estimates far less reliable.For instance, the California sample included only 1295 students and the 95%conf idence interval for having been involved in a physical f ight in school was 6.32 to 30.65, an extremely wide range[28].Only a handful of studies have examined state-level trends in school victimization, and they have been limited in sample size and the length of time they cover [23].

    National or state-level data showing consistent trends of reductions in the prevalence of school victimization are mainly based on student-level data and do not inform policymakers whether, among these national and state trends, some schools show different patterns.For example, an empirical understanding of whether there are schools or districts in which violence is increasing rather than decreasing is lacking.This information is essential for state-level policymakers who need to prioritize districts and schools and allocate necessary resources [29, 30].

    Another important limitation is that many national surveillance surveys, such as those reporting indicators of school crime and safety, do not cover relevant aspects of school climate.Although there are multiple conceptualizations and measures of school climate [30, 31 ], there is an agreement in the research literature that students’ sense of safety, school belongingness, perceived support from adults in school, and the degree to which they have opportunities to participate and help make decisions and choices are central climate dimensions that could reduce school violence[32, 33].These climate dimensions make schools feel more welcoming, caring, and safe [34].Promoting school climate is part of the World Health Organization’s health-promoting schools framework [35].School climate could be considered a proximal determinant of risks associated with health and exposure to violence in school and should be part of the surveillance system.Trends showing declines in victimization should correspond to positive trends in school climate variables.Do declines in victimization and increases in school climate occur across all students? Are these trends similar across schools? These issues have yet to be studied using large-scale surveillance data.Social-ecological theoretical frameworks have long called for studies that examine changes in long-term trends of school violence as a way to improve theory, research and policy.The same theoretical frameworks suggest more studies exploring shifts in school violence trends with samples that represent large regions,such as states.There are fewer than a handful of empirical studies in the peer-reviewed literature that have examined these issues.

    The current study addressed these gaps in knowledge by analyzing a very large sample (close to a populationlevel sample) of schools and students in California for more than 18 years to examine (1) changes over time in students’reports of school victimization, weapon involvement, and school climate; (2) different trajectories among boys and girls and among students from different ethnicities and cultural groups, and (3) how many schools had similar or different patterns of changes over time.

    Methods

    Procedure and sample

    The data used in this study are from the California Healthy Kids Survey, a modular survey instrument developed by WestEd in collaboration with the California Department of Education and used biannually since 2001.The survey is conducted as a census among all school districts, schools,and students in the relevant grades.Every school year (e.g.,2001–2002), a survey is carried out in a group of districts and in the following year among the rest of the districts.Two consecutive school years (i.e., 2001–2002 and 2002–2003)create a representative dataset that includes most school districts and schools in all counties across the state.Student participation is voluntary, anonymous, and conf idential [36,37].Prior statewide studies report that approximately 85%of school districts in California participate in data collection[38, 39].Multiple studies using CHKS data from a Consortium of several school districts in the Southern California region report an 87% student-level response rate [40– 42].

    The authors merged all data from secondary schools(middle and high schools) from the period 2001–2002 to the period 2018–2019 school years (data are presented for each two consecutive school years that form a representative sample).The total sample includes 6,219,166 students(48.8% male) from 3253 schools–66% from high schools and the rest from middle schools.

    Measures

    Victimization

    Students responded to questions regarding their victimization at school in the past 12 months using a four-point scale:1 = 0 times, 2 = 1 time, 3 = 2 or 3 times, and 4 = 4 or more.

    Verbal, social, and physical victimization Examples of this type of victimization include being pushed, shoved, slapped,hit, or kicked at school; being afraid of being beaten up at school; and having mean rumors or lies spread at school and through the internet (α= 0.78).

    Discrimination-based harassment or bullying Students were asked whether they were harassed or bullied on school property for six reasons: race, religion, gender, gender identity, disability, and other (α= 0.73).

    Weapon involvement Four questions were asked regarding weapons: in the last 12 months, how many times a.the student carried a gun in school; b.carried another weapon; c.was threatened or injured with a weapon; and d.saw other students carrying a gun on school grounds (α= 0.71).

    School climate

    Feeling safe at school Students were asked to what extent they agree with the statement, “I feel safe in my school”(1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

    Adult support This variable was computed as a mean of six items asking about aspects of adult support (e.g., “At my school … there is a teacher or adult who truly cares about me,” “who tells me when I do a good job,” and “who notices when I’m not there”).Responses were provided on a scale from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very much true;α= 0.89).

    School belongingness This index, computed as a mean of f ive questions, assessed students’ feelings toward their school (e.g., “I feel close to the people at this school” and“I am happy to be at this school”) using a 5-point scale(1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree;α= 0.79).

    Participation This index, computed as a mean of three items, described student participation in school (e.g., “At school I help decide things” and “I do things at school that make a difference”) based on a 4-point scale (1 = not at all true to 4 = very much true;α= 0.76).

    Statistical analyses

    Descriptive statistics were computed for all types and indexes of victimization and climate.Time trends were assessed using three complementary methods: (1) Change between the f irst and last year of the survey was computed as the difference between the last and initial frequencies as a proportion of the initial frequency (last-f irst/(f irst)); (2) Cohen’sdwas computed as a measure of the effect size of last–f irst.For differences between percentages, we usedd= 2*sqrt(arcsin(last%))-2*sqrt(arcsin(first%)), whereas for differences between means, we usedd= ((mean(last)-mean(f irst))/(pooled SD),and (3) For continuous variables, regression analyses were conducted to assess linear trends over time considering all 18 data points, yieldingB, standard error (SE), andβcoefficients of the time trends.These analyses were carried out with SAS PROC SURVEYREG, controlling for school level (middle or high school), gender, and ethnicity, considering the clustered design of the sample (students nested in schools).Separate analyses were conducted to assess the interaction of time with gender and race/ethnicity.Effect sizes (Cohen’sd) and time trends (Bandβcoefficients) were computed separately for boys, girls, and each ethnicity, along with regression interaction effects for gender and ethnicity (boys and White were the reference groups).

    To identify groups of schools with potentially different trajectories of change across time, we estimated unconditional latent class growth models for each dependent variable using Mplus version 8.6 software with the MLR estimator, f itting models with one to three latent classes.In each growth model, the intercept, linear slope, and quadratic slope of change over time were tested [43– 45].

    The study was reviewed by the institutional review board(IRB) of the second author’s university and was exempted because it is a secondary analysis of publicly available data.

    Findings

    Table 1 presents the percentage of students reporting each type of victimization at each biannual point in time, measures of change over time (proportion of change and Cohen’sd), and regression coefficients of the time trend.(Similar tables were generated for each race and gender separately,but due to space limitations, they are not presented here and are available upon request).

    All victimization and weapon involvement items declined between 2001–2003 and 2017–2019.The largest reduction was for being involved in a physical f ight (from 25.4% in 2001–2003 to 11.0% in 2017–2019, a reduction of 14.4 percentage points or approximately 56%,d= -0.38).Weaponrelated behaviors also dropped sharply–e.g., carrying a gun on school grounds dropped from 4.3% to 1.3%, approximately 70% (d= -0.19).Similar reductions were evident for carrying another kind of weapon (67.8%,d= -0.31),seeing someone with a weapon on school grounds (61.2%,d= -0.48), and being threatened or injured with a weapon(58.9%.d= -0.28).Smaller reductions were noted for some nonphysical types of victimization, such as being made fun of because of looks (25.0%,d= -0.22) and having mean rumors spread (24.4%,d= -0.24).Effect sizes were small to medium–for instance, for seeing someone carrying a weapon on school grounds (d= -0.48), carrying a weapon(not a gun) on school grounds (d= -0.31), and being in a physical f ight (d= -0.48).The smallest reduction was in the index of discrimination-based victimization (d= -0.017).

    Table 2 presents the means and standard deviations of victimization and climate indexes, Cohen’sd, and unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients.Regression analyses revealed signif icant time effects for most of the indexes.The only signif icant effects were linear.The unstandardized coefficients were -0.017 for victimization, -0.014 for weapon involvement, and 0.001 for biasbased victimization.Note that coefficients indicate per-year change; hence, they should be multiplied by the 18-year span to assess the full effect of the reductions over time.

    The indexes capturing victimization and weapon involvement in Table 2 show sizeable time effects.For instance,Cohen’sdwas 0.46 for the index of weapon involvement and 0.38 for victimization.There were also signif icant increases in students’ sense of belonging to the school and feeling safe at school (bothd= 0.27).In contrast, adult support showed only a small increase over time (d= 0.05), and participation in school slightly declined over time (d= -0.10).

    To examine whether there are groups of students whose change over time was different than others, we computed the interactions of time with gender and race (Table 3).All gender interaction terms were signif icant, indicating a consistent pattern of boys changing over time more than girls.The largest difference between boys and girls was for reductions in weapon-related behaviors–e.g., carrying weapons other than guns (boys:d= -0.44, girls:d= -0.22).

    The interactions of time with race and ethnicity revealed more complex patterns.Overall, and quite consistently, the effect sizes of change over time were the smallest among White students (except when compared to students in the“other” race category).Additionally, African American and Hispanic students tended to have more reductions in victimization and weapon-related behaviors and more improvements in school climate than White students.

    The f indings of latent class growth models estimated for all indexes were consistent: at least 95% of the schools showed a linear trend of reductions in victimization and weapon-related behaviors, increases in feeling safe in school, school belongingness, and stable adult support; and a small reduction in student participation.Given that there were almost no variations in school-level latent class growth models, we did not explore differences in models between school types (e.g., between urban and nonurban schools).

    Discussion

    California secondary schools had massive reductions in all forms of verbal, psychological, property, physical, and weapons involvement behaviors during the 18-year period examined.This was especially strong in the physical victimization and weapons use areas (and much less in bias-based victimization).The consistent reductions were evident in more than 95% of California schools, affecting almost all schools and regions in California, and not in wealthy suburban schools only.Both boys and girls showed strong reductions, with boys showing stronger decreases.Extensive reductions were evident in all cultural, racial, and ethnic groups.In fact, the reductions in victimization among all other ethnic groups were greater than those among White students (except for those indicating “other” ethnicity), especially regarding reduced involvement with weapons.More research is needed to better understand the differential reductions for the variousethnic groups.However, given how ethnically homogenous California schools are, it is possible that more systemic efforts were placed in urban, high need, and schools with high proportions of Latinx and Black students.However, this possibility needs to be better explored by future research.

    Table 1 Victimization typesover time (N, %) by school year, change score(%), andlinear time effects

    Table 1 (continued)

    This consistent set of f indings, based on a very large and representative 18-year sample, goes in the opposite direction of the public’s concern and perception that school violence was a growing problem during these two decades [46– 48].Given the massive reductions in victimization overall, it is quite likely that the impressions of the public and policymakers regarding school safety and the effectiveness of state and national investments are associated with the escalation of school shootings and sustained and intense media coverage of mass shootings, rather than other forms of school victimization.The reductions in school violence raise the possibility that the efforts, norm shifts, and two decades of massive social investment in school safety contributed to dramatically less victimization for California’s students.The sharp declines in rates of victimization at school should be part of the public policy discourse that is currently overshadowed by school shootings.California’s policies have made billions of dollars of investment in school safety issues available.These have likely increased awareness and capacity,changed behavior practices, and provided evidence-based ways to address the problem.It is possible that these collective policies over the past two decades have contributed to the reductions during the same period.However, more detailed and nuanced mixed methods and qualitative studies are needed to better understand whether the implementation of these collective policies possibly reduced victimization levels.Furthermore, it is important to study to what extent f indings in California are similar to other regions that may implement different programs and policies.If the efforts in California made a difference, it is important for policymakers and the research literature to acknowledge the possible benef its of the efforts invested in violence prevention and sustain them in the future.

    We propose, therefore, that a clear distinction should be made between mass school shootings and other forms of school violence.A conceptual, methodological, and empirical distinction between school shootings and other forms of school violence would help identify different psychological,social, and ecological mechanisms that may lead to these potentially separate phenomena [49, 50 ].It would also sharpen the policy and practical implications derived from research, given that reductions in forms of school violence not involving shootings are strong and consistent.

    Biased-based victimization has not changed as much as all other types of victimization.It encompasses a wide set of biases, including gender and gender identity, race,religion, and disability.This f inding may ref lect the societal struggle with divisive policies and disagreements onbasic values that affect the school environment [51– 53].It should prompt a review of current interventions to develop ways in which education could lead to fewer bias-driven types of victimization.

    Table 2 Indexes of victimization and climate ( M, SD) by school year, Cohen’s d, and linear time effects ( B, β)

    Table 3 Time main effects and interactions of school victimization and climate by gender and ethnicity ( B, β, and Cohen’s d)

    Table 3 (continued)

    It is important to note that as could be expected based on the theoretical literature, reductions in school violence were accompanied by an improving sense of safety and school belongingness over time.In contrast, other aspects of a positive school climate, such as adult support and student participation, did not improve over time.This f inding, based on a large and longitudinal dataset, requires further investigation to review current claims about the role of adult support and student participation in preventing school violence.Perhaps developing school climate interventions that focus more on belonging and a sense of safety would produce stronger reductions in victimization.Adult support and student participation aspects of school climate may have other important educational advantages,but they may not contribute to violence prevention [54].More research is needed to specif ically examine the relationships between the effective components of school climate and the wide array of school safety interventions.Many interventions claim to impact school climate, but there is little empirical evidence examining the reciprocal relationships between school climate and evidence-based interventions.

    In conclusion, this study covered the period before the COVID-19 pandemic.There are several indications that the pandemic led to multiple negative mental health outcomes for children and adolescents and that returning to school may be associated with higher levels of school violence [55– 58].This potential increase in school violence should be monitored closely.Schools may continue to need more resources to address the increasing burden of COVID-19 mental health issues.It is important to learn from the policies and interventions that have helped reduce school violence in the last two decades to face these new challenges [59].

    Authors contributions BR, ARA: conceptualization, data curation.RI:formal analysis, writing–review and editing.

    Funding No funding was provided for the preparation of this manuscript.

    Data availability Data f iles will be provided in response to any reasonable request.

    Declarations

    Conflict of interest No f inancial or non-f inancial benef its have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    Ethical approval The University of Southern California IRB (project WP 2016, amendment ID = UP-15-00278-AM001).It was determined that the study is considered non-human subjects research and is not subject to 45 CFR 46 regulations, including informed consent requirements or further IRB review.

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons.org/ licen ses/ by/4.0/.

    俺也久久电影网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久6这里有精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一级黄片播放器| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| av福利片在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 嫩草影视91久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日韩中字成人| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 色av中文字幕| 久久久久国产网址| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 少妇的逼好多水| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久中文看片网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 插逼视频在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 午夜福利18| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线看三级毛片| 久久久久久久久中文| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 18+在线观看网站| 久久精品人妻少妇| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久精品人妻少妇| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 黄色一级大片看看| 99久久精品热视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲四区av| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产乱人视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久久久性生活片| 国产探花极品一区二区| av免费在线看不卡| 久99久视频精品免费| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产美女午夜福利| 看免费成人av毛片| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 99热网站在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| eeuss影院久久| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美潮喷喷水| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产成人freesex在线 | 午夜视频国产福利| 成人国产麻豆网| 俺也久久电影网| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产在线男女| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲无线在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产高潮美女av| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 色在线成人网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av在线观看视频网站免费| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人国产麻豆网| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 热99在线观看视频| 在线看三级毛片| 黄色日韩在线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品福利观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| www.色视频.com| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 尾随美女入室| 美女大奶头视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日本黄色片子视频| .国产精品久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品伦人一区二区| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | .国产精品久久| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 日本 av在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| av在线天堂中文字幕| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一本久久中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 少妇的逼水好多| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 免费高清视频大片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美3d第一页| 婷婷亚洲欧美| av免费在线看不卡| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久久久国产网址| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜免费激情av| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 天堂网av新在线| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 综合色av麻豆| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 中国美女看黄片| av在线老鸭窝| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 色哟哟·www| a级毛色黄片| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产午夜精品论理片| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 美女高潮的动态| 国产乱人视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一夜夜www| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 精品日产1卡2卡| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲国产色片| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 老司机影院成人| 小说图片视频综合网站| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久久久久大精品| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 成人精品一区二区免费| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| www.色视频.com| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 成人国产麻豆网| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美bdsm另类| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 美女大奶头视频| 欧美3d第一页| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 成人二区视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产成人91sexporn| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 日本 av在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| av国产免费在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品无大码| av在线播放精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜a级毛片| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 深夜a级毛片| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| videossex国产| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| www日本黄色视频网| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产av一区在线观看免费| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产高清三级在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久精品影院6| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 简卡轻食公司| 深夜a级毛片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费av观看视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 91精品国产九色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 一本一本综合久久| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| avwww免费| 男女那种视频在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 黄色配什么色好看| 一级毛片我不卡| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产视频内射| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 色综合站精品国产| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲性久久影院| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 在线播放无遮挡| av卡一久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产三级中文精品| 日本三级黄在线观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 此物有八面人人有两片| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产成人freesex在线 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产av不卡久久| 国产成人freesex在线 | 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 一级毛片电影观看 | 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费av观看视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 色综合站精品国产| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 悠悠久久av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲最大成人中文| 在线免费十八禁| 黄片wwwwww| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 色在线成人网| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品一及| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一本一本综合久久| 国产不卡一卡二| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 六月丁香七月| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 1000部很黄的大片| 高清毛片免费看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 韩国av在线不卡| av免费在线看不卡| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久6这里有精品| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产视频内射| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产成人福利小说| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久午夜福利片| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲av美国av| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99热6这里只有精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片|