• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    An eighteen-year longitudinal examination of school victimization and weapon use in California secondary schools

    2023-12-11 01:35:46RamiBenbenisht1RonAviAstorIlanRoziner
    World Journal of Pediatrics 2023年11期

    Rami Benbenisht1 · Ron Avi Astor · Ilan Roziner

    Keywords School violence · School climate · Weapons

    tInroduction

    School safety has been a major public health issue in the United States and internationally for more than three decades [1, 2].The current widely accepted def inition of school violence is “any behavior intended to harm,physically or emotionally, individuals in school, their property, or their school's property” [3– 5].This includes face-to-face and electronic media-related victimization,verbal and social bullying, physical violence, stealing,damage to property, expressions of hate, weapon use, sexual harassment, and assault.Indeed, research shows that many students worldwide are regularly exposed to wideranging victimization in schools, such as verbal, social (in person and online), physical, and sexual victimization [6,7].Some students are targets of bullying because of their looks, ethnicity, race, nationality, sexual orientation, or other biases [8, 9].Moreover, some students experience weapons on school grounds, such as carrying a weapon such as a gun or a knife, being threatened or injured by a weapon, or seeing another student carrying a weapon at school [10– 12].

    Victimization at school affects students’ school connectedness, nonattendance, and dropout [3].Victimization contributes negatively to overall mental health, depression,suicidal behaviors, and subsequent involvement in risky behaviors, such as substance use [13– 16].

    There is a strong media and public interest in mass shootings in schools.Each school shooting is a devastating act that terrorizes the nation.The national media report these events intensely and frequently [17, 18].With the recent increase in school shootings [19], there is a growing sense in the public that little has changed in two decades to make schools safe [20– 22].Given the horror of school shootings, there have been few empirical discussions related to increases or decreases in other harmful types of school victimization in the past two decades [23].

    During the past two decades, billions of dollars,resources, policies, programs, and community efforts have been focused on reducing victimization and increasing the safe climate in schools worldwide [24, 25].This represents a wide array of different policies for school violence, including but not limited to zero tolerance, prevention-oriented social-emotional programs, restorative justice approaches and trauma-informing school strategies [4].There is a great need for research examining school violence time trends after these types of policies and approaches have been implemented at the population level [3].

    To inform public health school safety policies and decisionmaking, this study examined a large sample of secondary schools and students during the past two decades in California.Specif ically, the study examined whether there are consistent trends in the prevalence of specif ic types of victimization and school climate and whether these trends differ by gender and ethnic affiliation.

    Several national surveillance systems track different types of school violence and crime [26, 27].An annual report on indicators of school crime and safety compiles reports from several resources and provides detailed information on the prevalence of 22 relevant indicators through the years (some indicators starting as early as 1992) [26].Based on this report, nationally, there have been consistent reductions over time in most indicators of victimization on school grounds.From 1992 to 2019, the total victimization rate and rates of specif ic crimes–thefts and violent victimizations–declined for students aged 12–18 years from 18.1% in 1992 to 3.0%in 2019, more than an 80% decrease [24].Having been in a physical f ight in school decreased from 11.09% in 2009 to 8.03% in 2019, and carrying a weapon on school property during the previous 30 days declined from 5.6% to 2.8%[26].

    These US annual surveillance reports are important in showing clear national trends.Nonetheless, they are limited.First, they represent the nation as a whole and thus are less useful in understanding regional variations among states.For instance, estimates regarding being involved in a physical f ight in school in 2019 ranged from 27.3% in Mississippi to 16.7% in Hawaii [26 , 27].Furthermore, complementary Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System state-level estimates available for 34 states are based on relatively small samples, making estimates far less reliable.For instance, the California sample included only 1295 students and the 95%conf idence interval for having been involved in a physical f ight in school was 6.32 to 30.65, an extremely wide range[28].Only a handful of studies have examined state-level trends in school victimization, and they have been limited in sample size and the length of time they cover [23].

    National or state-level data showing consistent trends of reductions in the prevalence of school victimization are mainly based on student-level data and do not inform policymakers whether, among these national and state trends, some schools show different patterns.For example, an empirical understanding of whether there are schools or districts in which violence is increasing rather than decreasing is lacking.This information is essential for state-level policymakers who need to prioritize districts and schools and allocate necessary resources [29, 30].

    Another important limitation is that many national surveillance surveys, such as those reporting indicators of school crime and safety, do not cover relevant aspects of school climate.Although there are multiple conceptualizations and measures of school climate [30, 31 ], there is an agreement in the research literature that students’ sense of safety, school belongingness, perceived support from adults in school, and the degree to which they have opportunities to participate and help make decisions and choices are central climate dimensions that could reduce school violence[32, 33].These climate dimensions make schools feel more welcoming, caring, and safe [34].Promoting school climate is part of the World Health Organization’s health-promoting schools framework [35].School climate could be considered a proximal determinant of risks associated with health and exposure to violence in school and should be part of the surveillance system.Trends showing declines in victimization should correspond to positive trends in school climate variables.Do declines in victimization and increases in school climate occur across all students? Are these trends similar across schools? These issues have yet to be studied using large-scale surveillance data.Social-ecological theoretical frameworks have long called for studies that examine changes in long-term trends of school violence as a way to improve theory, research and policy.The same theoretical frameworks suggest more studies exploring shifts in school violence trends with samples that represent large regions,such as states.There are fewer than a handful of empirical studies in the peer-reviewed literature that have examined these issues.

    The current study addressed these gaps in knowledge by analyzing a very large sample (close to a populationlevel sample) of schools and students in California for more than 18 years to examine (1) changes over time in students’reports of school victimization, weapon involvement, and school climate; (2) different trajectories among boys and girls and among students from different ethnicities and cultural groups, and (3) how many schools had similar or different patterns of changes over time.

    Methods

    Procedure and sample

    The data used in this study are from the California Healthy Kids Survey, a modular survey instrument developed by WestEd in collaboration with the California Department of Education and used biannually since 2001.The survey is conducted as a census among all school districts, schools,and students in the relevant grades.Every school year (e.g.,2001–2002), a survey is carried out in a group of districts and in the following year among the rest of the districts.Two consecutive school years (i.e., 2001–2002 and 2002–2003)create a representative dataset that includes most school districts and schools in all counties across the state.Student participation is voluntary, anonymous, and conf idential [36,37].Prior statewide studies report that approximately 85%of school districts in California participate in data collection[38, 39].Multiple studies using CHKS data from a Consortium of several school districts in the Southern California region report an 87% student-level response rate [40– 42].

    The authors merged all data from secondary schools(middle and high schools) from the period 2001–2002 to the period 2018–2019 school years (data are presented for each two consecutive school years that form a representative sample).The total sample includes 6,219,166 students(48.8% male) from 3253 schools–66% from high schools and the rest from middle schools.

    Measures

    Victimization

    Students responded to questions regarding their victimization at school in the past 12 months using a four-point scale:1 = 0 times, 2 = 1 time, 3 = 2 or 3 times, and 4 = 4 or more.

    Verbal, social, and physical victimization Examples of this type of victimization include being pushed, shoved, slapped,hit, or kicked at school; being afraid of being beaten up at school; and having mean rumors or lies spread at school and through the internet (α= 0.78).

    Discrimination-based harassment or bullying Students were asked whether they were harassed or bullied on school property for six reasons: race, religion, gender, gender identity, disability, and other (α= 0.73).

    Weapon involvement Four questions were asked regarding weapons: in the last 12 months, how many times a.the student carried a gun in school; b.carried another weapon; c.was threatened or injured with a weapon; and d.saw other students carrying a gun on school grounds (α= 0.71).

    School climate

    Feeling safe at school Students were asked to what extent they agree with the statement, “I feel safe in my school”(1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

    Adult support This variable was computed as a mean of six items asking about aspects of adult support (e.g., “At my school … there is a teacher or adult who truly cares about me,” “who tells me when I do a good job,” and “who notices when I’m not there”).Responses were provided on a scale from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very much true;α= 0.89).

    School belongingness This index, computed as a mean of f ive questions, assessed students’ feelings toward their school (e.g., “I feel close to the people at this school” and“I am happy to be at this school”) using a 5-point scale(1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree;α= 0.79).

    Participation This index, computed as a mean of three items, described student participation in school (e.g., “At school I help decide things” and “I do things at school that make a difference”) based on a 4-point scale (1 = not at all true to 4 = very much true;α= 0.76).

    Statistical analyses

    Descriptive statistics were computed for all types and indexes of victimization and climate.Time trends were assessed using three complementary methods: (1) Change between the f irst and last year of the survey was computed as the difference between the last and initial frequencies as a proportion of the initial frequency (last-f irst/(f irst)); (2) Cohen’sdwas computed as a measure of the effect size of last–f irst.For differences between percentages, we usedd= 2*sqrt(arcsin(last%))-2*sqrt(arcsin(first%)), whereas for differences between means, we usedd= ((mean(last)-mean(f irst))/(pooled SD),and (3) For continuous variables, regression analyses were conducted to assess linear trends over time considering all 18 data points, yieldingB, standard error (SE), andβcoefficients of the time trends.These analyses were carried out with SAS PROC SURVEYREG, controlling for school level (middle or high school), gender, and ethnicity, considering the clustered design of the sample (students nested in schools).Separate analyses were conducted to assess the interaction of time with gender and race/ethnicity.Effect sizes (Cohen’sd) and time trends (Bandβcoefficients) were computed separately for boys, girls, and each ethnicity, along with regression interaction effects for gender and ethnicity (boys and White were the reference groups).

    To identify groups of schools with potentially different trajectories of change across time, we estimated unconditional latent class growth models for each dependent variable using Mplus version 8.6 software with the MLR estimator, f itting models with one to three latent classes.In each growth model, the intercept, linear slope, and quadratic slope of change over time were tested [43– 45].

    The study was reviewed by the institutional review board(IRB) of the second author’s university and was exempted because it is a secondary analysis of publicly available data.

    Findings

    Table 1 presents the percentage of students reporting each type of victimization at each biannual point in time, measures of change over time (proportion of change and Cohen’sd), and regression coefficients of the time trend.(Similar tables were generated for each race and gender separately,but due to space limitations, they are not presented here and are available upon request).

    All victimization and weapon involvement items declined between 2001–2003 and 2017–2019.The largest reduction was for being involved in a physical f ight (from 25.4% in 2001–2003 to 11.0% in 2017–2019, a reduction of 14.4 percentage points or approximately 56%,d= -0.38).Weaponrelated behaviors also dropped sharply–e.g., carrying a gun on school grounds dropped from 4.3% to 1.3%, approximately 70% (d= -0.19).Similar reductions were evident for carrying another kind of weapon (67.8%,d= -0.31),seeing someone with a weapon on school grounds (61.2%,d= -0.48), and being threatened or injured with a weapon(58.9%.d= -0.28).Smaller reductions were noted for some nonphysical types of victimization, such as being made fun of because of looks (25.0%,d= -0.22) and having mean rumors spread (24.4%,d= -0.24).Effect sizes were small to medium–for instance, for seeing someone carrying a weapon on school grounds (d= -0.48), carrying a weapon(not a gun) on school grounds (d= -0.31), and being in a physical f ight (d= -0.48).The smallest reduction was in the index of discrimination-based victimization (d= -0.017).

    Table 2 presents the means and standard deviations of victimization and climate indexes, Cohen’sd, and unstandardized and standardized regression coefficients.Regression analyses revealed signif icant time effects for most of the indexes.The only signif icant effects were linear.The unstandardized coefficients were -0.017 for victimization, -0.014 for weapon involvement, and 0.001 for biasbased victimization.Note that coefficients indicate per-year change; hence, they should be multiplied by the 18-year span to assess the full effect of the reductions over time.

    The indexes capturing victimization and weapon involvement in Table 2 show sizeable time effects.For instance,Cohen’sdwas 0.46 for the index of weapon involvement and 0.38 for victimization.There were also signif icant increases in students’ sense of belonging to the school and feeling safe at school (bothd= 0.27).In contrast, adult support showed only a small increase over time (d= 0.05), and participation in school slightly declined over time (d= -0.10).

    To examine whether there are groups of students whose change over time was different than others, we computed the interactions of time with gender and race (Table 3).All gender interaction terms were signif icant, indicating a consistent pattern of boys changing over time more than girls.The largest difference between boys and girls was for reductions in weapon-related behaviors–e.g., carrying weapons other than guns (boys:d= -0.44, girls:d= -0.22).

    The interactions of time with race and ethnicity revealed more complex patterns.Overall, and quite consistently, the effect sizes of change over time were the smallest among White students (except when compared to students in the“other” race category).Additionally, African American and Hispanic students tended to have more reductions in victimization and weapon-related behaviors and more improvements in school climate than White students.

    The f indings of latent class growth models estimated for all indexes were consistent: at least 95% of the schools showed a linear trend of reductions in victimization and weapon-related behaviors, increases in feeling safe in school, school belongingness, and stable adult support; and a small reduction in student participation.Given that there were almost no variations in school-level latent class growth models, we did not explore differences in models between school types (e.g., between urban and nonurban schools).

    Discussion

    California secondary schools had massive reductions in all forms of verbal, psychological, property, physical, and weapons involvement behaviors during the 18-year period examined.This was especially strong in the physical victimization and weapons use areas (and much less in bias-based victimization).The consistent reductions were evident in more than 95% of California schools, affecting almost all schools and regions in California, and not in wealthy suburban schools only.Both boys and girls showed strong reductions, with boys showing stronger decreases.Extensive reductions were evident in all cultural, racial, and ethnic groups.In fact, the reductions in victimization among all other ethnic groups were greater than those among White students (except for those indicating “other” ethnicity), especially regarding reduced involvement with weapons.More research is needed to better understand the differential reductions for the variousethnic groups.However, given how ethnically homogenous California schools are, it is possible that more systemic efforts were placed in urban, high need, and schools with high proportions of Latinx and Black students.However, this possibility needs to be better explored by future research.

    Table 1 Victimization typesover time (N, %) by school year, change score(%), andlinear time effects

    Table 1 (continued)

    This consistent set of f indings, based on a very large and representative 18-year sample, goes in the opposite direction of the public’s concern and perception that school violence was a growing problem during these two decades [46– 48].Given the massive reductions in victimization overall, it is quite likely that the impressions of the public and policymakers regarding school safety and the effectiveness of state and national investments are associated with the escalation of school shootings and sustained and intense media coverage of mass shootings, rather than other forms of school victimization.The reductions in school violence raise the possibility that the efforts, norm shifts, and two decades of massive social investment in school safety contributed to dramatically less victimization for California’s students.The sharp declines in rates of victimization at school should be part of the public policy discourse that is currently overshadowed by school shootings.California’s policies have made billions of dollars of investment in school safety issues available.These have likely increased awareness and capacity,changed behavior practices, and provided evidence-based ways to address the problem.It is possible that these collective policies over the past two decades have contributed to the reductions during the same period.However, more detailed and nuanced mixed methods and qualitative studies are needed to better understand whether the implementation of these collective policies possibly reduced victimization levels.Furthermore, it is important to study to what extent f indings in California are similar to other regions that may implement different programs and policies.If the efforts in California made a difference, it is important for policymakers and the research literature to acknowledge the possible benef its of the efforts invested in violence prevention and sustain them in the future.

    We propose, therefore, that a clear distinction should be made between mass school shootings and other forms of school violence.A conceptual, methodological, and empirical distinction between school shootings and other forms of school violence would help identify different psychological,social, and ecological mechanisms that may lead to these potentially separate phenomena [49, 50 ].It would also sharpen the policy and practical implications derived from research, given that reductions in forms of school violence not involving shootings are strong and consistent.

    Biased-based victimization has not changed as much as all other types of victimization.It encompasses a wide set of biases, including gender and gender identity, race,religion, and disability.This f inding may ref lect the societal struggle with divisive policies and disagreements onbasic values that affect the school environment [51– 53].It should prompt a review of current interventions to develop ways in which education could lead to fewer bias-driven types of victimization.

    Table 2 Indexes of victimization and climate ( M, SD) by school year, Cohen’s d, and linear time effects ( B, β)

    Table 3 Time main effects and interactions of school victimization and climate by gender and ethnicity ( B, β, and Cohen’s d)

    Table 3 (continued)

    It is important to note that as could be expected based on the theoretical literature, reductions in school violence were accompanied by an improving sense of safety and school belongingness over time.In contrast, other aspects of a positive school climate, such as adult support and student participation, did not improve over time.This f inding, based on a large and longitudinal dataset, requires further investigation to review current claims about the role of adult support and student participation in preventing school violence.Perhaps developing school climate interventions that focus more on belonging and a sense of safety would produce stronger reductions in victimization.Adult support and student participation aspects of school climate may have other important educational advantages,but they may not contribute to violence prevention [54].More research is needed to specif ically examine the relationships between the effective components of school climate and the wide array of school safety interventions.Many interventions claim to impact school climate, but there is little empirical evidence examining the reciprocal relationships between school climate and evidence-based interventions.

    In conclusion, this study covered the period before the COVID-19 pandemic.There are several indications that the pandemic led to multiple negative mental health outcomes for children and adolescents and that returning to school may be associated with higher levels of school violence [55– 58].This potential increase in school violence should be monitored closely.Schools may continue to need more resources to address the increasing burden of COVID-19 mental health issues.It is important to learn from the policies and interventions that have helped reduce school violence in the last two decades to face these new challenges [59].

    Authors contributions BR, ARA: conceptualization, data curation.RI:formal analysis, writing–review and editing.

    Funding No funding was provided for the preparation of this manuscript.

    Data availability Data f iles will be provided in response to any reasonable request.

    Declarations

    Conflict of interest No f inancial or non-f inancial benef its have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    Ethical approval The University of Southern California IRB (project WP 2016, amendment ID = UP-15-00278-AM001).It was determined that the study is considered non-human subjects research and is not subject to 45 CFR 46 regulations, including informed consent requirements or further IRB review.

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons.org/ licen ses/ by/4.0/.

    亚洲国产欧美人成| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 免费观看在线日韩| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久久久久久久成人| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲图色成人| 久久久久网色| 国内精品宾馆在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 三级国产精品片| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 色视频www国产| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 韩国av在线不卡| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 嫩草影院精品99| 99热网站在线观看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 五月天丁香电影| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 三级国产精品片| 高清毛片免费看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 禁无遮挡网站| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 秋霞伦理黄片| 色5月婷婷丁香| 少妇高潮的动态图| 全区人妻精品视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 99热网站在线观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产 精品1| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 色网站视频免费| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 七月丁香在线播放| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| 成人无遮挡网站| a级毛色黄片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲自拍偷在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 在线免费十八禁| 在线观看人妻少妇| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 男人舔奶头视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产视频内射| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 99热全是精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| av免费在线看不卡| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 嫩草影院精品99| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产av不卡久久| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲在线观看片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 成年免费大片在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 一级毛片我不卡| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 色哟哟·www| 美女高潮的动态| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av在线亚洲专区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日韩强制内射视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 春色校园在线视频观看| 91狼人影院| www.色视频.com| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 美女主播在线视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 91狼人影院| 七月丁香在线播放| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| kizo精华| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产av不卡久久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲精品第二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 在线观看国产h片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 91久久精品电影网| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av免费在线看不卡| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 成人二区视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 搞女人的毛片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 少妇 在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 免费av毛片视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩中字成人| 成人二区视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 永久免费av网站大全| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| av在线app专区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 午夜福利在线在线| 中国国产av一级| 国产91av在线免费观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 美女高潮的动态| tube8黄色片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| av.在线天堂| 欧美bdsm另类| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲国产色片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 永久免费av网站大全| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久97久久精品| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产av不卡久久| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| av福利片在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 九色成人免费人妻av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 春色校园在线视频观看| 熟女av电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 成年av动漫网址| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 搡老乐熟女国产| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 三级经典国产精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| av卡一久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产av国产精品国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美日本视频| 91久久精品电影网| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩电影二区| 97在线视频观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜免费观看性视频| 有码 亚洲区| 久热这里只有精品99| 97在线视频观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 免费av观看视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费看不卡的av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日本免费在线观看一区| 五月天丁香电影| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 深夜a级毛片| 中文字幕制服av| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 中国三级夫妇交换| 中文字幕久久专区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 麻豆成人av视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲性久久影院| 嫩草影院新地址| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久99精品国语久久久| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产美女午夜福利| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 看黄色毛片网站| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日日啪夜夜爽| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 免费看日本二区| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 色哟哟·www| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产 精品1| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 综合色av麻豆| 少妇高潮的动态图| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产极品天堂在线| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久精品性色| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 色综合色国产| 69人妻影院| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| av在线app专区| 777米奇影视久久| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 成人国产av品久久久| 大码成人一级视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费看a级黄色片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| freevideosex欧美| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 嫩草影院入口| 免费av不卡在线播放| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 免费看光身美女| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久久久国产网址| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 中文天堂在线官网| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 特级一级黄色大片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产高清三级在线| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 大香蕉久久网| 国产在视频线精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 超碰97精品在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| av在线亚洲专区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久久欧美国产精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲四区av| 午夜福利高清视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲av一区综合| 在线a可以看的网站| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | a级毛色黄片| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 免费av毛片视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 韩国av在线不卡| 美女国产视频在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 午夜福利高清视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产 一区精品| 51国产日韩欧美| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚州av有码| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲综合色惰| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲在线观看片| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| av.在线天堂| 国产精品一二三区在线看| av免费在线看不卡| 中文资源天堂在线| 一本久久精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片|