• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The Development of 3D Atomic Force Microscopy with Magnetically Driven-Orthogonal Cantilever Probes

    2023-11-14 07:44:44HaoZhangJunyuanGengHaiboGaoWeibinRongHuiXie
    Engineering 2023年5期

    Hao Zhang, Junyuan Geng, Haibo Gao, Weibin Rong, Hui Xie*

    The State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Systems, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China

    Keywords:3D-AFM MD-OCP Critical dimensions (CDs)360° characterization 3D topography reconstruction

    ARTICLEINFO This paper presents a three-dimensional(3D)-atomic force microscopy(AFM)method based on magnetically driven (MD)-orthogonal cantilever probes (OCPs), in which two independent scanners with three degrees of freedom are used to achieve the vector tracking of a sample surface with a controllable angle.A rotating stage is integrated into the compact AFM system,which helps to achieve 360°omnidirectional imaging.The specially designed MD-OCP includes a horizontal cantilever, a vertical cantilever, and a magnetic bead that can be used for the mechanical drive in a magnetic field.The vertical cantilever,which has a protruding tip,can detect deep grooves and undercut structures.The design,simulation,fabrication,and performance analysis of the MD-OCP are described first.Then,the amplitude compensation and home positioning for 360° rotation are introduced.A comparative experiment using an AFM step grating verifies the ability of the proposed method to characterize steep sidewalls and corner details,with a 3D topography reconstruction method being used to integrate the images.The effectiveness of the proposed 3D-AFM based on the MD-OCP is further confirmed by the 3D characterization of a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) device with microcomb structures.Finally, this technique is applied to determine the critical dimensions (CDs) of a microarray chip.The experimental results regarding the CD parameters show that,in comparison with 2D technology,from which it is difficult to obtain sidewall information, the proposed method can obtain CD information for 3D structures with high precision and thus has excellent potential for 3D micro–nano manufacturing inspection.

    1.Introduction

    Micro–nano electronic components have been widely used in metamaterials [1], aerospace [2,3], the healthcare industry [4,5],environmental energy [6,7], biotechnology [8,9], and other fields since the development of integrated circuits, and micro-elements with a three-dimensional (3D) structure have been thoroughly explored due to their high information capacity.The critical dimensions(CDs)of these 3D devices,such as line edge roughness(LER), line width (LW), LW roughness (LWR), sidewall roughness(SWR), and sidewall angle, directly affect their electrical and mechanical properties [10,11]; therefore, high-precision 3Dstructure detection technology is needed to effectively ensure ultraprecision machining quality.

    Several techniques are available for performing 3D metrology,such as confocal microscopy [12] and optical interferometry [13],both of which are based on optical mechanisms and are forms of non-contact measurement, making them fast, nondestructive,and therefore widely used.However, as these techniques are limited by diffraction phenomena, the lateral resolution can only reach the sub-micron level, and it is impossible to extract more 3D topographic details from the obtained artifact images.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [14,15] and transmission electron microscopy [16] have high resolution and fast imaging speed, but these two methods can only detect conductive samples and need to be performed in a vacuum.Moreover, the cumbersome process of sample preparation can easily lead to material modification,and accurate height information can be difficult to obtain from the gray values of two-dimensional (2D) results.Atomic force microscopy(AFM)is a powerful tool for 3D detection because it has no special requirements for the working environment,sample preparation,or materials.Outstanding sub-nanometer measurement resolution,fast imaging, and flexible probe modification can be achieved[17–19]; most importantly, AFM is a true 3D imaging approach that uses the force feedback principle.

    Thus far, a variety of improvements in 3D-AFM imaging have been researched,such as system setups,probe structures,and scanning algorithms.In 1994, Martin and Wickramasinghe [20] proposed a 2D control strategy based on a flared probe: A lowfrequency horizontal vibration was attached to the vertical vibration to modulate its amplitude,thereby allowing prediction and adaptive measurement of the sidewall slope.In 2006, the Murayama team[21]incorporated a multi-angle-scanning method into CD-AFM,in which the tip approached the sidewall statically at different angles and the specimen surface was free from friction or lateral force.In the same year,they used a tilted probe to achieve tilt-step-in mode operation without friction[22].In 2015,Xie et al.[23]reported an AFM caliper that used dual optical fiber probes and could serially scan adjacent or opposite sidewalls without specimen rotation.Although 3D-AFM imaging technology has gone through decades of development, limitations remain, including complex operations[23,24],tip wear[25,26],and tip geometry convolution effects[27].

    Here, we present a novel 3D-AFM imaging method based on magnetically driven (MD)-orthogonal cantilever probes (OCPs).An MD-OCP consists of a horizontal cantilever,a vertical cantilever,and a magnetic bead,where the extended vertical cantilever with a protruding tip can detect deep grooves with height h and undercut structures with an angle of α.Compared with a flared probe, the MD-OCP has the advantages of high imaging resolution and small tip geometric convolution errors.Large lateral tip rigidity helps to avoid brittle tip fracture.The proposed method does not require complex rotation coordinate transformation, as in tilt modulation,and the MD-OCP can be easily integrated into commercial systems.This method can perform 360° omnidirectional 3D imaging, benefiting from a rotating sample stage along the z-axis that is integrated into the AFM system and from 3D image-reconstruction technology to recreate the detected 3D topography.The MD-OCP works at its first-order bending resonance frequency using a magnetic force drive, which has low hysteresis, high imaging resolution, low drive quality, and fast scanning speed [28,29].In addition,the MD probe overcomes the limitations of the traditional piezo-drive method [30,31], making it more suitable for the characterization of liquid samples and the drive of probes with complex architectures, resulting in good scalability.Two independent scanners cooperate to complete the tilt vector compensation in which the vector angle β is controllable (0°–90°).The proposed method is an important supplement in the field of 3D-AFM technology and holds strong potential for 3D micro–nano manufacturing inspection.

    This paper is organized as follows:Section 2 introduces the system configuration, the MD-OCP, and the performance measurement and analysis, including the performance calibration and amplitude compensation of the MD-OCP and home positioning for the 360° rotation; the experimental results and discussion are described in Section 3; Section 4 provides the conclusion.

    2.Experiments

    2.1.System configuration

    Fig.1.Schematic of the 3D-AFM with the MD-OCP.LIA: lock-in amplifier;Osc: oscillator; RT: rotatable stage; PSD: position-sensitive detector; τ: torque;m: magnetic moment of the magnetic bead; B: magnetic flux density; Un, Ul:detection of the bending and torsional deformation of the probe, respectively;Um(ω): drive signals of the solenoid and ω is resonance frequency.[xp, yp, zp]:coordinate of the probe; [xs, ys, zs]: coordinate of the sample; h: height of the sample;α: angle of inclination of sample sidewall; β: vector angle of the probe.

    Fig.1 provides a system schematic of the proposed 3D-AFM with MD-OCP.Two nano-positioning scanners are used for the sub-nanometer positioning of the sample and the probe (Scanner I: PDQ375HS; Scanner II: HS3; Mad City Labs, Inc., USA).A rotatable stage(RT)(ECR3030,Attocube Inc.,Germany)fixed on Scanner I and combined with an optical microscope realizes the rotational and coarse positioning of the sample.Sinusoidal voltage signals are supplied to the coil mounted in the sample stage, generating an electromagnetic field along the vertical direction in space.In this way, the magnetic bead attached to the probe is subjected to a torque: τ = m × B (where m is the magnetic moment of the magnetic bead and B is the magnetic flux density), which is used to mechanically oscillate the probe at its first-order bending resonance frequency[31,32].Compared with triangular wave signals,a sinusoidal voltage drive can effectively reduce the mechanical vibration caused by a sudden change at the corner of a triangular wave, thereby improving the scan speed [33,34].Deformation of the cantilever is detected via an optical lever containing a laser and a position-sensitive detector (PSD), which includes detection of the bending (Un) and torsional (Ul) deformation of the probe.A specialized AFM probe-dynamics controller (Dual-OC4, Nanonis GmbH, Germany) with an oscillator (Osc) and lock-in amplifier(LIA) is used to process the feedback signal of the probe.During scanning,the probe tracks the sample surface with a motion vector on the yz-plane using a controllable vector angle β.In the experiments, the mechanical amplitude and frequency were set at 50 nm (70% of the free oscillation amplitude) and 47.574 kHz,respectively.

    2.2.Magnetically driven-orthogonal cantilever probe

    2.2.1.Design and analysis

    Fig.2 provides the scheme of the proposed MD-OCP, which is composed of a horizontal cantilever, a vertical cantilever with a protruding tip, and a magnetic bead (made from a ferromagnetic material).The magnetic bead, which is bonded in the corner, is magnetized along the longitudinal axis of the horizontal cantilever.The horizontal cantilever and vertical cantilever are distributed orthogonally, further extending the detectable range in the vertical.The protruding tip not only is conveniently visible from the top view but also has the ability to scan re-entrant structures.The interaction between the MD-OCP and the sample is reflected in the deflection/torsion of the horizontal cantilever.

    According to the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, when the materials of the horizontal cantilever and vertical cantilever are the same(Young’s modulus;E;Poisson’s ratio:ν),the bending stiffness(kb) and torsional stiffness(kt) of the MD-OCP can be expressed as follows [35]:

    Fig.2.Schematic of the MD-OCP.L, W, T: length, width, and thickness of the horizontal cantilever, respectively; l, w, t: length, width, and thickness of the vertical cantilever, respectively; d: diameter of magnetic bead.

    where L,W,and T are the length,width,and thickness,respectively,of the horizontal cantilever; and l, w, and t are the length, width,and thickness, respectively, of the vertical cantilever (Fig.2).

    2.2.2.Fabrication

    First,the MD-OCP’s horizontal cantilever and vertical cantilever with a protruding tip were separately prepared by means of the focused ion beam(FIB)milling(FIB/SEM dual beam system,Helios NanoLab 600i, FEI Company, USA) of two commercial probes (HQ:NSC18/Al-BS, MikroMasch, USA; and ATEC-FM, Nanosensors,Switzerland).A ferromagnetic bead with a diameter similar to the width of the horizontal cantilever was then bonded to the free end of the horizontal cantilever using an epoxy adhesive(A-05HP,Angeluo, China).Finally, the vertical and horizontal cantilevers were assembled and glued as designed.The detailed equipment and assembly process is provided in our previous studies [35,36].Fig.5 shows SEM images of the prepared MD-OCP, with the geometric parameters marked.

    The batch fabrication of the probe involves two main approaches: ①The orthogonal cantilever is prepared by 3D printing technology, while the fabrication of the tip and bead relies on micromanipulation technology.②The cantilever and the tip are prepared by means of chemical etching and growth, and the bead is assembled manually.Thus,the probe fabrication is similar to the preparation of a cantilevered micropipette probe in that it is a combination of human effort and machine work.Improvement of this detailed process requires further research by professionals.

    2.3.Performance measurement and analysis

    2.3.1.Performance calibration of the MD-OCP

    Fig.3.Variations in the stiffness and the first resonance frequency with different (a) vertical cantilever lengths and (b) horizontal cantilever lengths.

    Fig.4.FEA dynamic analysis of the MD-OCP.

    Fig.5.SEM images of the MD-OCP: top view and side view (inset).

    Fig.6.Dynamic vibration spectrums of the MD-OCP.

    In the experiment, the first resonance frequency (ω1) of the MD-OCP was used, which can cause crosstalk from higher order modes.Fig.7 shows the amplitude response of the MD-OCP at different frequencies under mechanical excitation at ω1.It can be concluded from the experimental results in Fig.7(a)and the simulation results in Fig.7(b)that the high-order amplitude response is very low and insufficient to cause crosstalk.In addition, it can be seen that the MD-OCP has a twist at the working frequency,which means that the MD-OCP is actually vibrating in an oblique direction, caused by its own structural characteristics.

    2.3.2.Amplitude compensation of the MD-OCP on the y-axis

    As shown in Fig.1, during 3D imaging, Scanner I is responsible for the raster scanning on the xy-plane.The y-axis of Scanner II and the z-axis of Scanner I cooperate to realize the oblique compensation in the yz-plane.The relative movement of the MD-OCP laser spot along the y-axis will cause the amplitude of the probe to change.As shown in Fig.8, when the offset value reached 5 μm along the y-axis, the amplitude of the output voltage dropped by 2.2%–5.8% (red dotted line).Therefore, amplitude compensation of the MD-OCP is necessary and can be calculated as follows:

    2.3.3.Home positioning for 360° rotation

    In practice,it is almost impossible for the target sample to coincide with its center of rotation, meaning that the target sample deviates from its original position after rotation.Therefore, it is necessary to compensate for this eccentricity during 360°imaging.In this paper, a home positioning method is used to automatically compensate for the off-center displacement(Δx and Δy).As shown in Fig.9(a),prior to the experiment,the coordinates of the center of the target sample Otswere obtained by processing the optical image obtained from the top view (xy-plane) (Fig.9(a-i)), which includes gray processing (Fig.9(a-ii)), thresholding (Fig.9(a-iii)),hole filling (Fig.9(a-iv)), and edge contour extraction and center point positioning(Fig.9(a-v)).It should be noted that the upper left corner of the optical image was chosen as the coordinate origin O(0, 0), as shown in Fig.9(b), and the distance corresponding to a unit pixel of the optical image is 0.33 μm [36].During calibration of the rotation center Oc,the sample was rotated counterclockwise num times(num=3–5)with a certain angle θr(e.g.,θr=2°),and the center coordinates of the target sample were recorded as (x0, y0),(x1, y1),..., (xnum, ynum).Then, the rotation center and rotation radius of the target sample Oc(xc, yc) and R were obtained by the least-squares method.As shown in Fig.9(c), the eccentricity compensation for θrrotation can therefore be given by the following:

    Fig.7.Amplitude response of the MD-OCP at different frequencies under the mechanical excitation at ω1.(a) Experiment; (b) simulation.

    Fig.8.Amplitude compensation when the MD-OCP moves along the y-axis.

    Fig.9.Positioning method: (a) image processing; (b) calibration of the rotation center of the target sample; (c) compensation displacement calculation.Ots:coordinates of the center of the target sample;Oc:rotation center;R:rotation radius of the target sample;A–E:the center of the target sample after each rotation;P0,P1:points; θ0: the initial angle; θr: certain angle.

    where θ0is the initial angle of point P0—that is, the angle between OcP0and the y-axis.

    Points A–E shown in Fig.9(b) represent the center of the target sample after each rotation, the coordinates of which are (69.96,288.75), (151.47, 259.05), (220.44, 232.32), (293.70, 201.30), and(359.37, 170.28) (unit: μm), respectively.Based on this, the rotation center Ocis (-759.32, -2157.23) (unit: μm) and the rotation radius is R = 2582.58 μm.Thus, if point A is the starting point and the rotation angle θris 90°, then Δx = 1616.52 μm,Δy = -3275.10 μm, and θ0= 18.73°.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Characterization of the AFM step grating

    In this part of the research,an AFM step grating with a nominal height of (560.0 ± 2.6) nm (TGZ3, NT-MDT, Russia) was measured using two methods (the traditional tapping mode and the proposed method) to determine the 3D imaging performance of the proposed method for steep sidewalls and corner details.The traditional tapping mode(Dimension Icon,Bruker Co.,USA)uses β=45°and a standard probe k = 3 N·m-1(RFESPA-75, Bruker Co., USA),front angle (15 ± 2)°, back angle (25 ± 2)°, and side angle (17.5 ±2.0)°.Figs.10(a)and(b)provide SEM images of the AFM step grating,from which it can be seen that the width of the grating is about 1.16 μm and the height is about 563.2 nm ((443.8/sin52°) nm).

    Figs.10(c)and(d)provide the characterization results obtained by using the standard probe in the traditional tapping mode.During imaging,400 lines were scanned and 400 points were detected on each scan line.The scan rate was chosen to be 50 Hz.The difference between these two mapping results is mainly caused by the relative position of the probe and the sample.As shown in Fig.10(c),when the cantilever is parallel to the grating,the characterization result is mainly affected by the side angle of the tip.Therefore,the inclination angles on both sides of the obtained grating are basically the same (Fig.10(e)), and the critical angle that the standard probe can scan is 72.5°.However,when the cantilever is perpendicular to the grating (Fig.10(d)), the characterization result is related not only to the front and back angle of the tip but also to the installation angle of the probe 13°.As shown in Fig.10(f), the measured angle difference between the two sidewalls is 18.4°, while the theoretical difference is 16° ((15° + 13°)- (25° - 13°)).It should be noted that the above analysis ignores the installation angle of the sample, and the inclination angle is obtained by the linear fitting of the part corresponding to the dotted line in the figure.As mentioned above, due to the influence of the tip shape,the traditional tapping mode using a standard probe cannot obtain the sidewall information of the grating and can only be used to analyze the height of the sample.The measured height(Hsp) results are shown in Table 1.

    Fig.10(g) shows two sets of 3D scanning point clouds at opposite locations obtained by the proposed method, and the reconstructed 3D image is presented below it.The 3D scanning point clouds consist of 290 scan lines and 176 points on each scan line.The imaging speed was set as 50 Hz.Figs.10(h)–(k)show the profiles at the line marked in Fig.10(g), and the corresponding CD parameters are given in Table 1.Fig.10(h) gives three crosssections of the grating in the yz-plane and shows that the step height (H) of the TGZ3 obtained by the MD-OCP is (562.9 ± 1.6)nm, which is consistent with the result of the standard probe.In addition, the cross-sections show that the inclination angle on the left side is (82.54 ± 0.27)°, while that on the right side is(81.77 ± 1.03)°; the inclination angles are related to the manufacturing process.The LW in Fig.10(h) shows that the grating gradually narrows from the bottom (1.38 μm) to the top (1.05 μm),which corresponds to the inclination angle of the sidewall.To measure the LWR of the grating,245 cross-sections were taken at each height,as shown in the inset in Fig.10(i).The LWR(Rw)can then be calculated with the following [23]:

    Fig.10.SEM images of the AFM step grating in(a)top view and(b)52°tilting view.Characterization results obtained by using the standard probe in the traditional tapping mode.(c)The cantilever is parallel to the grating.(d)The cantilever is perpendicular to the grating.(e,f)Profiles of the lines marked in(c)and(d),where the inset is the 3D imaging.(g)3D imaging results obtained by the proposed method.Point cloud data and 3D stitched image results,x–y range:2.9 μm×2.7 μm.Profiles of the lines marked in(g).(h) Cross-sections.(i) LW, LER of the (j) left and (k) right sidewall.

    Table 1CD results of the AFM step grating.

    3.2.Characterization of the micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)device

    Fig.11.(a) SEM images of the MEMS device (left) and the enlarged view (right);(b) 3D imaging result of the MEMS device, x–y range: 6.3 μm × 4.0 μm;(c, d) profiles of the topography extracted from (b).

    To further verify the ability of the proposed method based on the MD-OCP to perform 3D imaging in steep sidewalls, an MEMS device with microcomb structures fabricated by means of deep reactive ion etching was studied.Fig.11(a)shows the SEM images of the microcomb structure, which is composed of uniform teeth.Before scanning,the MD-OCP first made contact with the top of the target microcomb; the sample then retreated a distance along the z-axis and the fast-scan axis(y-axis)in turn.While ensuring the tip was located over the gap between two teeth,the sample was raised along the z-axis to a certain height.During 3D scanning, the scan speed was chosen to be 50 Hz, and the MD-OCP approached obliquely to the sidewall at an inclination angle β of 45°, as shown in the enlarged view in Fig.11(a).The 3D imaging results from the MEMS device, in which the number of scan lines and the points collected on each scan line were set at 788 and 500, respectively,are provided in Fig.11(b).Fig.11(c) describes the corresponding height profiles of the six lines marked in Fig.11(b).From the linear fitting results of these six curves,the inclination angle of the MEMS sidewall can be obtained and is found to be about 88°.Fig.11(d)provides an enlarged view of the profiles of the sidewall, from which the LER of the sidewall can be obtained.The mean of the LER calculated from the six profiles shown in Fig.11(d) is(70.8 ± 4.8)nm.

    3.3.Characterization of the microarray chip

    The above experimental results show that,compared with standard probes,the proposed method based on the MD-OCP can obtain more detailed CD parameters of the 3D structure and has excellent characterization capabilities for vertical sidewalls.This subsection describes the 360°imaging of a microarray chip unit combined with the proposed method in which β = 45°, and compares it with the characterization results of a commercial standard probe (RFESPA-75, Bruker Co., USA).The microarray chip is a type of biochip and is a support for carrying the detector with biological information at a high density, such as nucleic acids [39,40], proteins [41,42],and biological tissues [43,44].Interaction between the detector and the target molecule in a sample yields biological information,which is the main function of the biochip.Due to their highly specific surface,microarray chips have been extensively studied[45].The CD parameters of a microarray chip unit can cause differences in chip quality by affecting the adhesion and distributed density of the biodetector on the substrate.It is therefore critical to evaluate the CD parameters of microarrays using 3D measurement technology.

    The microarray chip studied in this part of the research was fabricated on a polymer(intermediate polymer stamp(IPS))substrate using nanoimprinting technology[46].As shown in Figs.12(a)and(b),the characterized microarray unit is a square with a side length of about 15.5 μm and a height of about 2 μm.In addition,it can be seen from Fig.12(b)that the edges of the microarray unit are irregular and that many fish-scale-shaped burrs are distributed on the sidewall,especially within 1.5 μm in height(see the enlargement);these are the residual materials that collect during the nanoimprinting process and are piled up at the bottom.However, SEM images primarily allow qualitative analysis and are difficult to use to achieve quantitative description.Therefore,it is very necessary to perform the 3D AFM high-precision characterization of CD parameters.Fig.12(c) shows the results of 3D imaging of the microarray unit from different angles: 0° (A), 90° (B), 180° (C),and 270°(D)(A–D:sidewall).Each section contains 516 scan lines and 258 sampled points per line,which were obtained with a scan rate of 50 Hz.The 3D images of the sidewalls show the same characteristics as the SEM images.It can be seen from Fig.12(d),where the connected feature points are marked with circles of the same color for comparison, that the 3D morphological reconstruction is highly consistent with the SEM image.

    Fig.12.SEM images of the microarray unit in(a)top view(characterized)and(b)side view.Note that these microarray units are from the same batch but are not identical,and(a)is the sample being studied.(c)Topography sequence acquired at rotation angles of 0°(A),90°(B),180°(C),and 270°(D)(A–D:sidewall);x–y range:10 μm×20 μm.(d) 3D reconstructions of the topography, in which the connected feature points are marked with circles of the same color.

    Fig.13 gives the experimental results obtained by the two methods to characterize the microarray unit, from which its CD parameters can be analyzed.Fig.13(a) shows the sectional curves of the microarray unit at different positions, with six lines along the z-axis and four lines parallel to the xy-plane.Fig.13(b) shows the 3D imaging (left) and 2D topography (right) of the microarray unit with 516 scan lines and 516 points on each line, which was obtained by the standard probe with an imaging speed of 50 Hz.Figs.13(c)–(f) and Figs.13(g)–(j) respectively show the CD parameters obtained by the above two methods, and the corresponding CD parameters are given in Tables 2–4.As shown in Figs.13(c) and (g), the two methods give the same height for the microarray unit, which is about 2.0 μm.The measured height is slightly smaller than the height in the SEM image (Fig.12(b))because the sample is stretched during the preparation of the SEM sample.In addition, the upper edge of the sample had some bumps (~500 nm), which may be caused by a retraction of the nanoimprinting.The measured LW shows that the microarray unit is not an ideal square; its width difference is about 300–600 nm (LWAC>LWBD).However, the LW obtained by the traditional method is larger than that obtained by the proposed 3DAFM.The reason for this differenceis that the height of the sample is too high, which causes the sidewall of the tip to interact with the edge of the sample.This not only affects the height measurement but also affects the acquisition of information on the sidewall of the sample.Figs.13(d) and (h) show the profiles of the sidewall along the z-axis, from which it can be seen that there was obvious accumulation at a distance of about 1.50 μm from the bottom.Such material accumulation may be caused by the elastic recovery of some imprinted parts with elastic deformation after the pressure is unloaded.However, the sidewall angle obtained by the traditional method is significantly smaller than that obtained by the proposed method.To further analyze the angles of the sidewalls of the microarray unit obtained by the two methods, ten curves were collected on the four sidewalls for analysis; the results are shown in Table 4, where the angles in brackets are the critical angles that can be measured by the traditional method.The experimental results show that, except for the C sidewall, the sidewall angles measured by the two methods are basically the same; however, the deviation of the C sidewall is relatively large, indicating that the measurable sidewall angle of the traditional method is very limited.

    Figs.13(e) and (i)provide the profiles of the sample top,which show that the surface roughness () obtained by the standard probe is smaller than that obtained by the proposed method; this is mainly caused by the difference in the profile position and the tip radius.The profiles of the D sidewall from top to bottom are shown in Figs.13(f) and (j), in which the corresponding Rqvalues are given.The experimental results show that the Rqobtained by the proposed method gradually increases from top 7.0 nm to bottom 43.5 nm, which is consistent with the SEM image.However,the same phenomenon did not appear in the results obtained by the traditional method.This is mainly because the traditional method obtains fake 3D information, and there is no y-direction information but only z-direction information.In addition, the tip of the standard probe cannot touch the nearly vertical part of the sidewall (the part above the accumulation).These experimental results show that the proposed 3D-AFM technology can quantitatively analyze the CD parameters of the tested samples and provide technical support for the optimization of nanoimprinting technology.

    Fig.13.3D imaging results of the microarray unit: (a),(c–f) were obtained by the 3D-AFM based on the MD-OCP; and (b),(g–j)were obtained by traditional tapping mode based on the standard probe.(a)Sectional curves at different positions of the microarray unit,which represent the locations of the profiles in(c–f).(b)3D imaging(left)and 2D topography imaging (right) of the microarray unit, where the locations of the profiles in (g–j) are marked.(c, g) Sectional curves along the z-axis.(d, h) Profiles of the sidewall.(e, i) Surface roughness of the top.(f, j) Surface roughness of the sidewall D at different heights.Rq: surface roughness.

    Table 2CD parameters of the microarray unit using the 3D-AFM based on the MD-OCP.

    Table 3CD parameters of the microarray unit using the traditional tapping mode based on the standard probe.

    Table 4Sidewall angle of the microarray unit.

    4.Conclusions

    This paper proposes a 3D-AFM method based on an MD-OCP,in which an in-house-built AFM system integrates a rotating stage to achieve 360°omnidirectional imaging,and two independent scanners are used to realize the vector tracking of the probe.The MDOCP was designed and optimized through simulation analysis and then prepared using a nanorobotic system.It consists of a horizontal cantilever, a vertical cantilever, and a magnetic bead that can be used for the magnetic drive.The protruding tip on the vertical cantilever allows the MD-OCP to detect deep grooves and undercut structures.In the experimental part,an AFM step grating was first used to set up a comparison experiment with the traditional method based on a standard probe;this experiment verified the ability of the proposed method to characterize steep sidewalls and corner details and revealed the limitations of the standard probe.3D reconstruction technology was used to integrate and display the results.Then,the characterization of an MEMS device with microcomb structures further proved the MD-OCP’s ability to measure vertical sidewalls.Finally, a microarray chip was studied to determine the CD parameters of a microarray unit.The experimental results demonstrated the 3D imaging capabilities of the proposed method and revealed its clear advantages over 2D imaging methods.The proposed method can achieve the quantitative analysis of the CD parameters of a sample at the nanometer scale without modifying the laser system.It is a new method to improve AFM characterization techniques and is expected to have a long-term impact on the performance characterization of microarray chips.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1304903), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62003116,61925304, and 62127810), in part by the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690832), and in part by the Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund of China (LBH-Z20138).

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Hao Zhang,Junyuan Geng,Haibo Gao,Weibin Rong,and Hui Xie declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    国产av精品麻豆| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 91在线观看av| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| www.www免费av| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线视频色国产色| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久久香蕉激情| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| ponron亚洲| 91国产中文字幕| 色综合站精品国产| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 级片在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲第一电影网av| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| av在线天堂中文字幕| avwww免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 窝窝影院91人妻| 校园春色视频在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 色播亚洲综合网| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 老司机靠b影院| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 久久九九热精品免费| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产成人欧美| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 91精品三级在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 黄片播放在线免费| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 一级片免费观看大全| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品二区激情视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 手机成人av网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 日日夜夜操网爽| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 曰老女人黄片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 制服诱惑二区| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 欧美性长视频在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 1024视频免费在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品永久免费网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 电影成人av| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| av视频在线观看入口| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 香蕉国产在线看| bbb黄色大片| 国产成人av教育| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| av免费在线观看网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 黄片小视频在线播放| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 在线天堂中文资源库| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 看片在线看免费视频| 老司机靠b影院| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 午夜精品在线福利| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 色综合婷婷激情| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产不卡一卡二| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 免费看十八禁软件| 在线观看日韩欧美| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 1024视频免费在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| aaaaa片日本免费| www国产在线视频色| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜激情av网站| 久久国产精品影院| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 伦理电影免费视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 久久狼人影院| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 成人国产综合亚洲| 黄色成人免费大全| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 麻豆av在线久日| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 一级毛片精品| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 中国美女看黄片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 在线永久观看黄色视频| av视频在线观看入口| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一夜夜www| 久99久视频精品免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 999精品在线视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久香蕉激情| 大码成人一级视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 欧美在线黄色| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| bbb黄色大片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 丁香六月欧美| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 9色porny在线观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久国产成人免费| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲 国产 在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产片内射在线| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美大码av| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 91国产中文字幕| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 88av欧美| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 青草久久国产| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99久久国产精品久久久| 成人精品一区二区免费| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久热在线av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 青草久久国产| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 乱人伦中国视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 丝袜美足系列| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 又大又爽又粗| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 91成年电影在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 美女大奶头视频| a在线观看视频网站| 成人欧美大片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 久久 成人 亚洲| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av中文乱码字幕在线| av视频在线观看入口| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 黄色成人免费大全| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 黄片小视频在线播放| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| videosex国产| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 宅男免费午夜| 国产麻豆69| 看片在线看免费视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 97碰自拍视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久久国产成人免费| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久人妻av系列| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 久久伊人香网站| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| bbb黄色大片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产成人精品无人区| 人人澡人人妻人| 日本五十路高清| 国产成人精品无人区| 黄片播放在线免费| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 在线播放国产精品三级| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 色播亚洲综合网| 久久人妻av系列| 国产三级在线视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产片内射在线| 97碰自拍视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 色综合站精品国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 女警被强在线播放| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 十八禁网站免费在线| 91麻豆av在线| 18禁观看日本| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 91精品三级在线观看| www.精华液| 国产三级在线视频| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 我的亚洲天堂| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 又大又爽又粗| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久热在线av| 精品人妻在线不人妻| www国产在线视频色| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| tocl精华| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 露出奶头的视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 日本免费a在线| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品影院久久| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产成人精品无人区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产1区2区3区精品| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 免费观看人在逋| 精品第一国产精品| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 性欧美人与动物交配| av天堂在线播放| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020|