• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Recent progress on deep learning-based disruption prediction algorithm in HL-2A tokamak

    2023-09-05 08:48:08ZongyuYang楊宗諭YuhangLiu劉宇航XiaoboZhu朱曉博ZhengweiChen陳正威FanXia夏凡WulyuZhong鐘武律ZheGao高喆YipoZhang張軼潑andYiLiu劉儀
    Chinese Physics B 2023年7期
    關(guān)鍵詞:宇航

    Zongyu Yang(楊宗諭), Yuhang Liu(劉宇航), Xiaobo Zhu(朱曉博), Zhengwei Chen(陳正威), Fan Xia(夏凡),Wulyu Zhong(鐘武律),?, Zhe Gao(高喆), Yipo Zhang(張軼潑), and Yi Liu(劉儀)

    1Southwestern Institute of Physics,Chengdu 610043,China

    2Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China

    Keywords: macroinstabilities,tokamaks,neural networks,magnetic confinement and equilibrium

    1.Introduction

    Disruption places the tokamak-based fusion power plant a dilemma.The ignition condition and economical efficiency call for large-scale devices and high parameter plasma,[1]while in these conditions the risk of thermal load, electromagnetic force and runaway electron beam during disruptions could be unacceptable.[2]Disruption prediction and mitigation techniques take the responsibility to resolve this conflict.By accurately predicting the disruptions and mitigate them in advance,their harmful effects can be distinctly alleviated.[3,4]

    In experiment, disruptions could be induced by various of causes and event chains, e.g., mode locking, radiation collapse and MHD instabilities.[5]The complexity of their precursors makes the prediction a tough task.There are mainly 2 pathways to solve the problem.One is to design a dedicated framework to monitor disruption-related events and analysis the evolution of event chains,which leads to some representative programs like DECAF (disruption event characterization and forecasting).[6]The other way is to use data-driven algorithms, such as deep learning, to build an end-to-end model by learning from labeled disruptive and non-disruptive data.In recent years, many data-driven algorithms have been developed on various tokamaks, such as DIII-D, JET, C-Mod,J-TEXT and EAST.[7–14]

    The data-driven method has been tried in HL-2A at around 2010.A multi-layer perceptron model is built to predict the disruptions according to the evolution of signals from bolometer array.[15]However,the ability of machine learning to comprehensive analysis multi-diagnostic signals is not very mature then.The performance of algorithm is limited since only a part of the disruptions will be accompanied with precursors on bolometer array.

    Since 2018, deep learning method is tried in HL-2A.A disruption prediction algorithm based on 1.5 dimensional convolutional neural network and long short-term memory recurrent neural network (1.5D CNN+LSTM) is proposed and shows great performance by combining information from 25 disruption-related signals.[16]Therefore, a series of subsequent researches are implemented around this algorithm,such as the interpretation of algorithm,[17]real-time implementation in plasma control system (PCS),[18]cross-tokamak prediction and data-physics dual-driver algorithm.[19]These researches aim to make the disruption prediction algorithm a reliable, regular operated and operator friendly module in the PCS and provide a possible solution for future large-scale tokamaks.In this paper,we give an overview on the progresses about deep learning-based algorithm in HL-2A and discusses the possible pathways to further promote the algorithm.

    The rest part consists of 5 sections.Section 2 introduces the backbone of HL-2A’s disruption prediction algorithm.Then the backbone model is modified or combined with supplement modules to solve three key problems for disruption prediction in future fusion reactors, i.e., interpretability,real-time capacity and transferability.In Section 3, an integrated disruption prediction and mitigation system is developed in HL-2A.It realizes the real-time prediction and mitigation during online experiment, which could be a solution for the problem of real-time capacity.Section 4 gives the method and main results of model interpretation, which answers the question of interpretability.Section 5 focuses on the issue of transferability, i.e., how to develop an algorithm with limited data on future tokamaks.And three possible solutions will be introduced with preliminary implementation examples.Finally,a summary and outlook is given in Section 6.

    2.Disruption prediction backbone: 1.5D CNN+LSTM

    Disruption prediction task can also be seen as a pattern recognition of disruption precursors, which is a classical problem for machine learning techniques.Previous machine learning-based disruption prediction algorithms often use vectors consist of scalar features as their input.[7,8,10]Therefore they are not so good at dealing with high dimensional,temporal and multi-diagnostic signals, which should contain much more information.This problem is solved by deep learning recently.Fusion recurrent neural network(FRNN)introduces the profile data to promote its performance.[13]And the hybrid neural network in DIII-D proves that temporal information is pretty helpful for disruption prediction task.[14]In HL-2A,a disruption predictor based on 1.5D CNN+LSTM is developed,which takes signals from lots of different diagnostics with possibly different sample rates.Dedicated structure is designed to solve the numerical instability when training with data from different sources.Finally the algorithm gets an accuracy of 96.1%on testing set,which mainly benefits from the wide range of input signals.[16]

    In this part, Subsection 2.1 introduces the HL-2A disruption prediction dataset.Subsection 2.2 presents the data pipeline and neural network structure of HL-2A’s algorithm.Subsection 2.3 shows the accuracy of algorithm and discusses the design philosophy of 1.5D CNN+LSTM.

    2.1.Dataset

    Three aspects are selected here to give a global presentation of HL-2A’s disruption prediction dataset, i.e., shot numbers,input signal lists and typical disruption shots.

    Table 1 shows the shot numbers used for the training,validation and testing of neural network.Almost all the shots after 2013 are used without any intended selection,unless some of the input signals are lacked or obviously abnormal.Therefore the dataset consists of many types of disruptions that ever appeared in HL-2A,such as density limit,mode locking,and low safety factor on boundary.

    Table 1.Shot numbers used for training,validation,and testing of the HL-2A’s disruption predictor.

    Table 2 gives the main information of the algorithm’s 25 input signals.These signals are selected to cover the basic plasma parameters and disruption precursors as completely as possible.An important fact is that the signals have different statistical distributions and sample rates.This leads to a series of pre-processing methods and special neural network structures,which will be introduced in the subsequent part.

    Table 2.Signals in HL-2A used as the input of disruption predictor.Their sample rate,statistical features and physical meanings are also listed here.[16]

    Table 2.(Continued).

    Fig.1.The evolution of main plasma parameters, (a) plasma current, (b) line averaged electron density, (c) plasma stored energy measured by diamagnetic method, (d) magnetic perturbation measured by Mirnov probe, (e) spectrogram of the magnetic perturbation signal, during a m/n=2/1 mode locking-induced disruptive shot in HL-2A.The left subfigures plot the evolution during the whole shot.And the right subfigures plot the evolution close to disruption.A mode-locking process can be found on the Mirnov probe signal in the right bottom subfigure,which takes place at about 15 ms before the disruption.

    Figure 1 presents a mode locking-induced disruptive shot in HL-2A.The plasma current in HL-2A is normally 150 kA and the line averaged electron density is normally 0.5×1019–3×1019m?3.The time scale of mode locking process in HL-2A is around 15 ms.During disruptions, the slope of plasma current is around 10 MA/s, which leads to a current quench time of 5–20 ms.Many types of disruption precursors can be found in HL-2A’s experimental data, including but not limited to mode-locking, density limit, plasma displacement, radiation collapse and low safety factor.The variety and short timescale of disruption precursors make the disruption prediction a tough task.

    2.2.Data pipeline and neural network structure

    The working cycle of HL-2A’s disruption predictor is determined as 1 ms by the PCS.During each cycle, the algorithm takes the signals in past 20 ms from the channels given in Table 2.After that, pre-processing is taken to make these signals into structured and normalized matrix.Then the neural network takes the matrix as input and returns a possibility of disruption as output.Finally the PCS decides if disruption mitigation techniques should be triggered according to the output.

    The pre-processing consists of 3 steps.

    (a)Resampling all the signals into 100 kHz.

    (b) Reducing data from each channel in Table 2 by the channel’s mean value, and dividing them by standard deviation.

    (c)Replacing the values larger than 10 with 10 and values smaller than?10 with?10.

    After pre-processing,the input signal for each cycle will be uniformed into a 25 channels,20 ms long and 100 kHz matrix,whose size should be 2000×25.

    The structure of neural network is presented in Fig.2,which consists of convolutional layers,LSTM layers and fully connected layers.The cell number of the last fully connected layer is 2, therefore the neural network will output 2 values for each cycle, representing the possibility of disruption and non-disruption.

    Fig.2.Structure of 1.5D CNN+LSTM.This figure is adapted from Fig.3 in Ref.[16],where only the 1.5D CNN is presented.LSTM is merged into the figure after adaptation.

    2.3.The performance of 1.5D CNN+LSTM

    The performance of disruption prediction algorithm is often evaluated by two indicators, i.e., true positive rate (TPR)and true negative rate (FPR).The former refers to the possibility that the algorithm accurately gives an alarm during a disruptive shot.And the latter refers to the possibility that the algorithm gives a false alarm during a non-disruptive shot.

    In this research,the deep learning disruption predictor has a TPR of 92.2%and a FPR of 2.5%,which is a pretty good result.A key promotion is brought by its design to separately deal with signals from different diagnostics at first and merge them in the middle layer of neural network.The structure is more suitable for fusion data, which is an array consists of many heterogeneous parameters with various statistical distributions and waveforms, rather than a structured matrix like images or sentences.Table 3 gives the result of ablation experiment for this design,where 2D CNN means to merge signals from different diagnostics at the first layer of neural network,and 1D CNN means to deal with signals separately all the time.It is obvious that the 1.5D CNN gets the best performance.

    Table 3.Shot numbers used for training,validation,and testing of the HL-2A’s disruption predictor.

    3.Real-time disruption prediction and mitigation in HL-2A

    To implement the disruption prediction algorithm in the PCS, two main adjustments should be made on the version described in Section 2.Firstly, the principle to select input signals in Section 2 is to cover the disruption precursors as completely as possible.But not all these signals can be acquired in HL-2A’s PCS due to some engineering limitation of data acquisition system(DAS).Therefore the input signal list will be kind of different from the one in Table 2,which might be harmful to the algorithm’s performance.Secondly, some adjustments on neural network structure are required to accelerate its calculation speed into 1 ms per cycle.The detailed description about these updates can be found in Ref.[17].

    After that, the integrated disruption prediction and mitigation system can be built based on the real-time algorithm.Figure 3 shows the framework of this integrated system.The DAS gathers all the needed diagnostic signals and sends them to the PCS.These data are firstly used to do the position and shape control, in which process some secondary signals are produced.Then these secondary signals, together with the raw diagnostic signals, are sent to the disruption prediction module.In HL-2A, the PCS is mainly developed in C language while the disruption prediction algorithm is developed in Python, so a cross language interaction is required.Thus,there is a C-based disruption prediction module, which organizes the input data and calls the Python-based disruption prediction module.Finally, the prediction result is sent back to the C-based module to decide whether or not a trigger signal should be sent to the disruption mitigation system.

    To validate the reliability of the integrated system,open-loop online testing is tried in 382 shots during shot Nos.38650–39347.A TPR of 95.8% and a FPR of 22.5%are got during the online testing, which is acceptable but not as good as the result in Subsection 2.3 due to the limited input signal list and the unpredictable interference in DAS.

    Fig.3.Design of the real-time disruption prediction and mitigation system.[18]

    Fig.4.A demo shot of real-time disruption prediction and mitigation.A vertical displacement takes place after 800 ms due to the improper control parameters of the upper divertor coil,as indicated in the second subfigure.The output of algorithm increases rapidly when the vertical displacement amplitude becomes too large.Then the SMBI system is triggered to implement the disruption mitigation,as shown in the third subfigure.Finally a mitigated disruption occurs.Rapid decline can be seen on signals of plasma current, plasma density and bolometer radiation.[18]

    Fig.5.Comparison on the current quench and thermal quench processes between shot 39303(mitigated)and shot 39301(unmitigated).The thermal quench process is observed by upper bolometer array with 16 channels.[18]

    After the system validation, closed-loop testing is implemented.Figure 4 presents a demo shot, i.e., shot 39303,where a vertical displacement-induced disruption is predicted and then mitigated by SMBI, showing the system’s ability to real-timely predict and mitigate the coming disruptions.Figure 5 compares the thermal quench and current quench process between shot 39303 and an unmitigated disruption, shot 39301.During shot 39303, the thermal energy of plasma is released by radiation within a longer time range and the peak value is clearly lower than in the unmitigated one.[18]

    4.Prediction with interpretability and cause recognition

    In most situations,deep learning is considered as an endto-end black-box algorithm,which takes the disruption related signals as input and returns a probability of disruption without any explanation.Such an opaque system is difficult to accept for a fusion reactor with high safety requirements.In this section,an interpretation method is proposed to crack the black box.Subsection 4.1 gives the detail of the interpretation method.Subsection 4.2 shows the result of interpretation on single shot or from statistical point of view.Subsection 4.3 describes a preliminary disruption reason recognizer developed on top of the interpretation method.These results show that deep learning has the potential to realize high accuracy and interpretability at the same time.[17]

    4.1.Interpretation method

    The interpretation method is based on the 1.5-D CNN structure.In this structure a special node exists, as marked with red box in Fig.2,where the input signals have been dealt with by several neural network layers and will be concatenated in the next layer.On this node, a Gaussian noise could be added on data from each input channel to eliminate their contribution to the output.Then a distribution of correlation between each input channel and the algorithm’s output could be generated by perturbing the channels in turn and recording their contributions.

    4.2.Interpretation results

    Figure 6 gives the result of interpretation on 2 example shots.The 2 heatmaps are temporal evolution of correlation between algorithm’s output and each input channel.The brighter color means the corresponding input channel onyaxis is more related to disruption.In shot 35104, an obvious mode-locking phenomenon can be observed in the Mirnov probe signals before the disruption, as shown in the left bottom subfigures.And the rows in the left heatmap corresponding to the Mirnov probes are brighter as expected.In shot 35240,the plasma density gradually increases and approaches the Greenwald density limit before disruption.And the row corresponding to the electronic density in heat map turns to be the brightest one.The result of single shot interpretation seems to be consistent with the physical expectation.

    Fig.7.Averaged correlation distribution of input signals on each disruption type in HL-2A.Each subplot corresponds to a type of disruption.The x-axis is the input signal list and the y-axis is the averaged correlation between the input signal and a certain type of disruptions.[17]

    Statistical analysis isalso implemented to further validate the method.As a support, 613 shots in HL-2A are manually labeled into 6 disruption types, i.e., horizontal displacement,vertical displacement, radiation collapse, density limit, mode locking and low safety factor on plasma boundary.The averaged correlation distribution on each disruption type is calculated and shown in Fig.7.As expected,the most important signals for vertical displacement,lock mode,radiation,low safety factor on boundary and density limit induced disruptions areZEFIT,Mirnov probes,Pradiation/SoftX,qa,EFITandne,fir,respectively.The result of horizontal displacement seems to be kind of complex.It is suspected that other causes might also result in horizontal displacement,which calls for a further investigation.

    4.3.Disruption cause recognizer

    An important application of interpretable disruption prediction is the active disruption avoidance.As a sanity check of this technique routine, a disruption cause recognizer is developed based on the previous interpretation method.When a trigger signal is sent by disruption prediction algorithm,the recognizer will take the correlation distribution within the last 30 ms as input and try to classify the disruption types listed in Subsection 4.2.Note that the data from type of low safety factor on plasma boundary are too few to support the training of model,so this type is abandoned here.The rest dataset contains 605 shots and 5 disruption types.A naive Bayes classifier is trained on this dataset.It can classify the 5 types of disruptions with an accuracy of 71.2%in 5-fold cross validation.Figure 8 gives the algorithm’s confusion matrix during 10-fold cross validation.According to the result,it seems possible to develop a disruption cause recognizer and take measures to eliminate the disruption causes and avoid the disruptions in the future.

    Fig.8.Confusion matrix of the disruption cause recognizer.The x-axis represents the manually labeled disruption cause.And the y-axis refers to the predicted cause.So the numbers in the blocks on the diagonal line from top left to bottom right are the shot numbers that are correctly predicted,and vice versa.[17]

    5.Few-shot learning on future devices

    Since disruption prediction techniques are investigated to solve the problem of future fusion reactors, the challenge of few-shot learning becomes extremely important.Considering the unacceptable result of disruptions, future devices can only provide very limited amount of data to support the development of disruption prediction algorithm.[20]There are mainly two pathways to solve the problem within the deep learning paradigm.One is to develop a transferable algorithm, which learns data from existing tokamaks and can be adapted to future devices.Examples for this routine could be the adaptive learning algorithms,[21]FRNN with a glimpse of future device,[13]scenario adaptive learning[22]and open world learning.[23]In Subsection 5.1, a new method called device adversarial neural network (DANN) is tried and performs well when it is trained on HL-2A,J-TEXT and adapted to HL-2M.The other routine is to train a reliable algorithm with as fewer training data as possible,with the help of physical prior knowledge,some examples has been implemented in DIII-D[24]and J-TEXT.[25]Subsections 5.2 and 5.3 propose two possible physical inductive biases, i.e., plasma equilibrium equation and disruption related instabilities,that could be integrated into the disruption prediction algorithm.The future works in HL-2A will focus on these two inductive biases and preliminary works are implemented to validate the feasibility of these methods.

    5.1.Device adversarial neural network

    The researches in Refs.[13,14] prove that training with mixed dataset, which consists of a large amount of data from‘existing’ devices and a few data from ‘future’ devices is a possible way to develop a cross-tokamak algorithm.DANN makes a further step on top of this method,which uses adversarial training strategy to extract transferable features on multiple devices on purpose.Figure 9 demonstrates the structure of DANN.The main difference between DANN and normal neural networks is that it has two output branches.One branch will predict the disruptions as normal, and the other branch will recognize the source device of the input data.Note that there is a gradient reversal layer in the second branch, which will opposite the gradients back propagated from the second branch during the training of neural network.Therefore the neural network will try to predict the disruptions as accurately as possible and try to recognize the source device of data as inaccurately as possible.In other words it will recognize the disruptions by common features among the multiple devices.

    Fig.9.Structure of the device adversarial neural network.The array size of input, output and middle nodes are marked with red texts.The neural network layer parameters are marked with black texts.The position of gradient reversal layer, which is the key of DANN, is marked with blue texts.The idea is based on the research in Ref.[26].

    DANN is trained on HL-2A/J-TEXT/HL-2M mixed datasets.The main information of the mixed dataset is shown in Tables 4 and 5.The algorithm gets an accuracy of 88.9%with only 44 training shots from HL-2M.[19]However, the testing set provided by HL-2M is pretty limited now,27 shots.More data are required to implement a reliable enough test on DANN.

    Table 4.Shot numbers for training,validation,and testing of HL-2M’s DANN disruption predictor.D means disruptive and ND means non-disruptive.[19]

    Table 5.The input signal list of HL-2M’s DANN disruption predictor.[19]

    5.2.Parameter evolution equations

    Another possible way to relieve the lacking of training data on future devices is to introduce more physical information.In deep learning paradigm,the physical information can be seen as the prior knowledge in the neural networks.And the research in this chapter aims to make plasma equilibrium equations into the neural network’s prior knowledge.This purpose can be realized by two steps.Firstly,train a plasma parameter prediction algorithm, based on the parameter evolution equations.Secondly, embed the information hidden in parameter prediction algorithm into the disruption prediction algorithm.

    The plasma parameter prediction algorithm predicts the evolution of electron temperature (Te), electron density (Ne)and horizontal displacement (Dh) of HL-2A according to the control target,control actuators and the plasma state.Table 6 shows part of the input and output list of the algorithm, three empirical equilibrium equations are hidden in the design of the signal list,such as the equation for Te given here.The input and output lists of Ne and Dh are designed with similar principles.By training the neural network to do the parameter prediction task, the equation can be embedded into the neural network,and could possibly be brought into the disruption prediction algorithm in the future.

    Table 6.The hidden equation for electron temperature of the parameter prediction algorithm.

    The algorithm is based on a encoder–decoder model.The encoder extracts the characteristics of the inputs and converts the inputs into the intermediate state matrix.The decoder reconstructs the intermediate matrix and restores the encoder outputs to the signals to be predicted.The algorithm is trained by 1500 shots and tested with 200 shots.The mean absolute errors (MAE) of Ne, Te and Dh on the testing set are 0.0393 (baseline: 0.1036), 0.0359 (baseline: 0.0561) and 0.0506 (baseline: 0.0738) respectively, while the baseline is evaluated by the difference between actual parameters and the delayed parameters in the inputs.The typical result is shown in Fig.10, the output of algorithm is very close to the actual signals.It seems that the neural network model has correctly learned the plasma equilibrium equations.

    Fig.10.Panels(a),(b)and(c)are electron density,electron temperature and horizontal displacement,respectively.On the left is the comparison of algorithm inputs and target outputs,where an obvious delay of ?T can be observed.Here ?T is 30 ms for Ne and Te,while it is 10 ms for Dh.On the right is the comparison of predicted parameters and target outputs,they are much closer than the situation in the left subfigures.

    The second step, namely, to embed the prior knowledge in parameter prediction algorithm into the disruption prediction algorithm is still ongoing.A simple implementation is to concatenate the intermediate matrix given by encoder into the inputs of disruption prediction algorithm.With this auxiliary input, the AUC of disruption prediction algorithm could be promoted by 4%.

    5.3.Disruption related instabilities

    Plasma instabilities are also helpful prior knowledge for disruption prediction.[2]Therefore,researches on recognizing instabilities with neural network are also implemented in HL-2A.For example, an CNN+LSTM neural network is developed to recognize fishbone mode.The algorithm takes the signal of magnetic fluctuations measured by Mirnov coil during a 1 ms window with sample rate of 1 MHz,i.e.,a 1000 length vector.The vector is firstly dealt with by mean-std normalization.Then a Fourier transformation with frame length of 1000 and frame step of 100 is implemented to get a 501×91 spectrum.Since the fishbone in HL-2A usually has a frequency between 5–35 kHz,only the spectrum in this frequency range is reserved.Finally the 30×91 spectrum is fed into a neural network as shown in Fig.11.After training on 770 shots,the neural network can real-timely recognize if there is a fishbone instability in the plasma with an accuracy of 95.1%.Figure 12 presents the algorithm’s output during an example shot.Similar works has been implemented on tearing modes,sawtooth,ELM and other instabilities.Future works will focus on combining these modules into the disruption prediction algorithm and check if this could alleviate the algorithm’s demand for training data.

    Fig.12.An example shot of fishbone instability recognition algorithm.

    6.Summary and future works

    The deep learning-based disruption prediction algorithm has proved its powerful ability in HL-2A tokamak.With dedicated neural network design, optimized training strategy and novel interpretation method, the algorithm can realize high accuracy,good interpretability and priliminary cross-tokamak adaptation at the same time.Real-time disruption prediction and mitigation experiment is taken in HL-2A to validate the algorithm and the result proves its reliability.In general,deep learning can be considered as a sophisticated solution for disruption prediction in‘existing’tokamaks,both from a research and engineering perspective.Therefore the future works will go beyond the ‘prediction on existing tokamaks’.There are mainly 2 pathways, i.e., ‘prediction on future tokamaks’ and‘prevention on existing tokamaks’.

    To predict the disruption in‘future’tokamaks,the preliminary research in Section 5 will be carried on.Domain adaptation techniques and physical inductive bias will be introduced to alleviate the algorithm’s demand for training data.HL-2M,a newly built tokamak which has realized the first plasma in 2020, has promoted its plasma current to 1 MA recently and will provide a great testing platform for these researches.

    The other pathway is to prevent the disruptions based on interpretable disruption prediction algorithm.A correlation analysis has been realized on HL-2A’s algorithm in Section 4.However, the method needs to go beyond the correlation and realize causality analysis to find the root cause from a bunch of correlated phenomena.A cause-and-effect diagram needs to be designed with consideration of the callable control actuators.Therefore,the root cause can be matched to the control measures to support the disruption prevention.

    In general,deep learning provides a potential solution for the disruption prediction,prevention and mitigation on future tokamaks.The basic feasibility has been proved in HL-2A and many other tokamaks in recent years.Some bottleneck problems,such as cross tokamak adaptation,disruption cause recognition still exist, but are being investigated and preliminary solved.It can be expected that there will be more breakthroughs in this direction in the next few years.

    Acknowledgements

    Project supported by the National MCF R&D Program of China (Grant Nos.2018YFE0302100 and 2019YFE03010003).The authors wish to thank all the members at South Western Institute of Physics for providing data,technique assistance and co-operating during the experiment.

    猜你喜歡
    宇航
    《宇航計(jì)測(cè)技術(shù)》征稿簡(jiǎn)則
    狼蛛
    Steered coherence and entanglement in the Heisenberg XX chain under twisted boundary conditions*
    《宇航計(jì)測(cè)技術(shù)》2020年第6期目次
    我的收獲
    《宇航計(jì)測(cè)技術(shù)》征稿啟事
    宇航人 夢(mèng)想飛揚(yáng)
    2016年中國(guó)宇航發(fā)射將首超20次
    我的宇航夢(mèng)
    我的宇航夢(mèng)
    50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久中文字幕一级| netflix在线观看网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 大香蕉久久网| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| a 毛片基地| 男女国产视频网站| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 丁香六月天网| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 老司机靠b影院| 精品高清国产在线一区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产在视频线精品| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 午夜久久久在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 中国美女看黄片| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久9热在线精品视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | av福利片在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| av网站在线播放免费| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 又大又爽又粗| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| av线在线观看网站| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 国产成人精品无人区| videosex国产| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 操出白浆在线播放| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 丝袜美足系列| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 国产成人系列免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 大香蕉久久成人网| 搡老乐熟女国产| www日本在线高清视频| 99久久人妻综合| 尾随美女入室| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 99九九在线精品视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 日本a在线网址| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品福利观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 另类精品久久| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 观看av在线不卡| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一级片免费观看大全| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲av男天堂| 高清欧美精品videossex| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美在线黄色| 丁香六月天网| 日本五十路高清| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲精品第二区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 少妇 在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 天天添夜夜摸| 一级片'在线观看视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 少妇 在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久狼人影院| 久久这里只有精品19| a 毛片基地| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 午夜久久久在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 黄色视频不卡| 国产三级黄色录像| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| a级毛片在线看网站| av一本久久久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 丝袜喷水一区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| a级毛片黄视频| 久久狼人影院| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产成人欧美| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久av网站| 观看av在线不卡| 9热在线视频观看99| videosex国产| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 欧美97在线视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 曰老女人黄片| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| a 毛片基地| 精品福利观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 最近手机中文字幕大全| av天堂在线播放| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | av天堂久久9| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 尾随美女入室| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 伦理电影免费视频| 老司机靠b影院| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产色视频综合| 大码成人一级视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日本wwww免费看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 色网站视频免费| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日本午夜av视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 在线观看国产h片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产成人av教育| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 色94色欧美一区二区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| av欧美777| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲图色成人| 久久99一区二区三区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜激情av网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久热在线av| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 悠悠久久av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 精品人妻1区二区| 一级片免费观看大全| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 国产精品一国产av| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一级片免费观看大全| 成人影院久久| 欧美日韩av久久| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 一区二区三区激情视频| av欧美777| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品第一国产精品| 18禁观看日本| 电影成人av| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 大香蕉久久成人网| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品二区激情视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 天天添夜夜摸| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日韩视频在线欧美| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 久久免费观看电影| 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 最黄视频免费看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 午夜激情av网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 制服人妻中文乱码| av国产精品久久久久影院| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| netflix在线观看网站| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 在线观看人妻少妇| 人人妻人人澡人人看| a 毛片基地| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产野战对白在线观看| 观看av在线不卡| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 男女国产视频网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 制服诱惑二区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 超色免费av| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 18禁观看日本| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 中国国产av一级| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男女午夜视频在线观看| av福利片在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 9热在线视频观看99| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 久久影院123| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| av一本久久久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| svipshipincom国产片| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 男女国产视频网站| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 丝袜喷水一区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 中国国产av一级| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| videosex国产| netflix在线观看网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲国产精品999| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久狼人影院| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产成人影院久久av| 一个人免费看片子| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 午夜视频精品福利| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品福利观看| 国产精品一国产av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 大香蕉久久成人网| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色网址| 尾随美女入室| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 黄频高清免费视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 人人澡人人妻人| 老司机影院毛片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院|