• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Parametric study on the ballistic performance of seamed woven fabrics

    2023-07-04 07:58:20HngLiRuiZhngShengnnMinYiZhouJiuxioSun
    Defence Technology 2023年6期

    Hng Li , Rui Zhng , Shengnn Min , Yi Zhou ,*, Jiuxio Sun ,**

    a State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technologies,Wuhan Textile University, China

    b School of Materials Design & Engineering,Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology,100029,Beijing, China

    Keywords:Fabric Ballistic performance Seaming technology Energy absorption

    ABSTRACT

    1. Introduction

    The soft body armors are mostly composed of different stacked structures fabrics prepared from high-performance fibers. In a ballistic event, the flexible protective layer absorbs and consumes the kinetic energy of the projectile through fiber deformation,failure and friction between the fibers to offer ballistic protection.In most previous researches on body armor,hard ballistic materials were used,resulting in body armor that is not only heavy,but also motion-restrictive,and thus increasing the physiological burden on the wearer. To optimize the design of the soft body armor, researchers have been working to develop advanced systems with higher performance-to-weight ratios to improve the structure of body armor while ensuring ballistic performance.

    Over the past decades, various innovative methods have been used to study the performance of soft body armor[1].According to the energy absorption mechanism of soft body armor, increasing the friction between the fabric-forming yarns could possibly be an effective approach. Although experimental studies have demonstrated that only a minor portion of the energy is dissipated by friction, it has a significant effect on the fabric [2]. Duan et al. [3]found that friction reduced the lateral mobility of the yarns,allowing the projectile to load and break more yarns,so that fabric with a high level of friction absorbed more energy than fabric without friction. This takes full advantage of the mechanical properties of high-performance fibers and facilitates the energy absorption of the fabric [4—7]. However, some researchers have found that fabric ballistic performance is impaired when inter-yarn friction increases over a critical value[8—10].Therefore,generating reasonable friction between the weft and warp yarns is beneficial to fabric energy absorption and the ballistic performance of the fabric will be improved.

    To increase the friction between yarns to limit the mobility of yarns, researchers have studied many methods, the simplest of which is to weave tight fabrics to increase yarn crimp.Calvin et al.[11] manufactured woven fabrics with different cover factors,attempting to correlate the ballistic performance with weave tightness. They found that tightly-woven fabrics showed a slower transverse wave speed and a lower specific energy absorption value than loosely-woven fabrics.This is because highly undulated yarns in a tightly-woven fabric lead to a decreased initial tensile modulus,and therefore the sample target is more suspectable to have stress concentration on the impact point [12]. Besides, chemical treatment has also been widely used to improve the energy absorption properties of woven fabrics. One of the approaches is to treat the woven fabrics with shear thickening fluid(STF)[13—17].It has been reported that the treated fabrics exhibit better energy absorption capacity compared to the untreated fabrics, and the effect is more noticeable when STF deeply penetrates between the yarns [18].However,some literature pointed out that STF-treated fabrics have an almost unprotective effect when the impact velocity exceeds a certain critical value [8,10]. In addition, other approaches such as the plasma particles [19,20] and sol-gel [21]. Some of the recent literatures reported that grafting ZnO nanorod [22] is an effective method to roughen the fiber surface and consequently constrains the yarn mobility when subjected to both low-and high-speed impacts.

    While these approaches effectively increased the antipenetration properties of flexible fabrics, several studies have shown that the chemical treatment inevitably damaged the mechanical properties of the fibers,reduced the fabric flexibility[23],increased the weight of the fabric[24,25],and affected the wearing comfort of soft body armor.Some researchers have proposed to use different new high-performance fibers, such as poly-p-phenylene braced benzodiazole(PBO)fibers[26,27]and poly-2,5-dihydroxyl-1,4-phenylene pyridobisimidazole fibers (M5) [28]. However, the development of new high-performance fibers requires a huge investment of human and material resources,and is time-consuming and risky.In contrast,fabric tissue modification better conforms to the concept of enhancing performance and reducing weight in soft body ballistic layers.

    Based on this concept, some researchers have adopted the textile technology to composite the leno structure and plain structure to enhance the interweaving resistance of warp and weft yarns of aramid woven fabrics, and the results of the pull-out test showed that the incorporation of the leno structure enhances the grip performance of warp yarns on weft yarns and effectively limits the slipping between yarns [29]. Bilisik and Korkmaz [30] used nylon 66 as seaming thread to seam the aramid fabric, and the results of ballistic experiments showed that the backface signature(BFS) of the seamed panels is less pronounced than those of the unseamed panels. Zhou [31] also pointed out that a reasonable increase in the density of seaming lines in seamed panels can significantly increase both the energy absorption value and the SEA value of plain fabrics.

    Compared with previous studies, we parametrically investigated the effect of seaming distance, seaming orientation and different seaming materials on the ballistic performance of plain fabrics based on the seaming technique. The actual effect of this approach on improving the ballistic performance of plain weaves is explored through extensive research on the seaming technique.Five ballistic experiments are conducted on different fabric samples with impact velocities of 230 m/s and 400 m/s. The ballistic performance of the samples is characterized by specific energy absorption (SEA) values. The purpose of this paper is to gain further insight into the basic mechanism of the seaming technique to enhance the ballistic performance of aramid plain fabrics and to provide a reference solution for the optimal design of soft body armour.

    2. Material properties

    The plain fabrics were made of Kevlar?29 and Tekmilon?I multi-filament yarns,respectively.All of the fabrics have the same thread density of 70 threads/10 cm. Kevlar? 29 and Tekmilon? I multi-filament yarns have a linear density of 1670 dtex and 1300 dtex, respectively. Cotton thread was used for lock-stitching the fabric in different directions.The engineering constants of breaking strength and modulus in Gpa were given in Table 1.The velocity of the stress wave in Kevlar?29 and Tekmilon?I multi-filament yarns are 6977 m/s and 9605 m/s,respectively.Schematic diagrams of the lockstitch are shown in Fig. 1(a), where two seaming threads interlock with each other to form a stable structure.Fig.1(b)shows the seamed Kevlar plain weave with plain weave and seamed regions zoomed-in. In the seamed region, the brown cotton thread penetrates the fabric-forming yarns and therefore generates tiny gaps within the yarn structure. In this study, a comprehensive parametric study on the ballistic performance of seamed fabrics will be performed.Table 2 shows the specifications of the different fabric samples.

    Table 1Yarn and seaming thread properties.

    Table 2Specifications of seamed and unseamed fabrics.

    3. Testing of fabric properties

    3.1. Yarn pull-out tests

    The purpose of the yarn pull-out tests were to quantify the resistance of plain weaves and seamed fabrics to pull-out forces.When projectiles impact a dry woven fabric,yarn pull-out is often observed on the sample target. This phenomenon prevents highperformance fibers from fully realizing their mechanical properties and consequently lowers their impact resistance. In addition,based on the principle of energy conservation, the energytransformations that occur during the ballistic event can be represented by[33].

    These formulas indicate that the energy expended in overcoming friction is a major mechanism of energy absorption during the ballistic event. If we neglect the effect of air drag on the projectile loss,inter-yarn frictional sliding during pull-out is one of the major contributors to energy absorption. It is also believed that increased inter-yarn friction enables more yarns to engage with the impacting projectile, which significantly increases the amount of strain and kinetic energy deposited on the fabric target. Kirwood et al. [34,35] built a semi-empirical model to predict the energy dissipated by yarn pull-out during a ballistic event. They quantitatively correlated the yarn pull-out behavior and fabric energy absorption capacity. Numerous approaches have been used to increase the inter-yarn friction of the plain weave. The chemical treatments include but not limited to STF, plasma, ZnO nanowire,rubber, and graphene oxide. An improvement in the ballistic performance is always correlated with an increase in yarn pull-out force. Therefore, the yarn pull-out test is useful in characterizing the appreciable friction between the weft and warp yarns, serving to provide an intuitive prediction of the fabric performance during a ballistic event.

    In this section, yarn pull-out tests were performed based on sample 1 in Table 2 to characterize the influence of thread seaming on yarn-yarn friction. One of the commonly used methods to perform a yarn pull-out test is to clamp the lateral sides of the sample target,leaving the bottom free.One problem with using this method is that the sample target will have in-plane shear deformation prior to the initiation of yarn pull-out. This in-plane deformation would influence yarn pull-out force and decrease the initial modulus of the load-displacement curve, contributing to more random data. To avoid this, we clamp the bottom of thespecimen,leaving the lateral sides free.Schematic diagrams of the yarn pull-out method are shown in Fig. 2(a). Apart from sample 1,several other samples were created by seaming lines on sample 1,which are shown in Fig.2(b).Each sample was repeated ten times.samples were cut into 6 × 12 cm. The length of the fabric zone is 6 cm.Yarn tails were left on the top(3 cm)and bottom(3 cm)sides.A slot was retained for the very yarn to be pulled out on the bottom side while the rest of the tails were clamped by a bottom jaw. The upper jaw grips the selected weft yarn and moves at a constant rate of 250 mm/min.

    Fig. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the yarn pull-out test (b) samples with a different number of seaming lines.

    Fig. 3. A schematic diagram of the set-up for the ballistic test.

    Fig. 4. The schematic diagram (a) of the corner-clamped frame and the trajectory (b) of a projectile.

    3.2. Ballistic test

    Fig.3 shows the set-up used for ballistic penetration tests.In this ballistic apparatus, a steel sphere of diameter 8 mm and mass 2 g was used to impact the sample target. As the gun barrel was not rifled,sabot was used to retain the trajectory of the projectile. The projectile is propelled by compressed gas, and two impact velocities, 230 m/s and 400 m/s, were used in this study. A Photron FASTCAM SA-Z high-speed camera was used to analyze the backlit profile view of the fabric during ballistic impact and to measure the impact and the residual velocities of the projectile.Fig.4(b)shows the trajectory of a projectile before and after fabric penetration.The images were recorded at a frame rate of 20,000 fps,a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels and an exposure time of 8.8 ms. The velocity can then be obtained by identifying the distance between the adjacent projectiles. The energy loss of the projectile can be determined by

    where ΔEis the kinetic energy loss of the projectile,mis the mass of the projectile,andv1andv2are impact and residual velocities of the projectile, respectively.

    A corner-clamped frame was designed to clamp the sample target,as shown in Fig.4(a).In this frame,the fabric was clamped at its corners to allow yarn movement during the ballistic event.Fixing bolts were through-bolted with the backplate and fastened by screw nuts. The resistance against yarn pull-out arises solely from the frictional force at the crossovers and the stitching lines.

    4. Results

    4.1. Yarn pull-out test

    The constraining effect of the seaming lines is essential to improve the inter-yarn friction.The yarn pull-out tests were used to quantify the inter-yarn friction, and the constraining effect was characterized by measuring the force value required to pull the yarn out of seamed and unseamed plain fabrics. Fig. 5 shows the force-displacement curves of the yarn pull-out behavior and the peak load force at the same load rate using the aforementioned method. The curves indicate that the pull-out force of the seamed samples is significantly greater than that of the unseamed samples.It is also found that the maximum pull-out force increases with the number of seamed lines, suggesting that the inter-yarn friction is increased due to the fabric being seamed.From the curves in Fig.5,we can see that the peak pull-out force of the three seaming lines sample is the maximum at 46 N,which is approximately twice and ten times greater than that of the one seaming line sample and the PW (plain weave without thread seaming), respectively.

    Fig. 5. Pull-out force as a function of displacement for the seamed and un-seamed samples.

    Fig. 6. Specific energy absorption of the seamed and the non-seamed samples at impact velocities of approximately 230 m/s: (a) Seaming density; (b) Seaming distance; (c)Seaming orientation; (d) Seaming materials.

    Fig. 7. Specific energy absorption of the seamed and the non-seamed samples at impact velocities of approximately 400 m/s: (a) Seaming density; (b) Seaming distance; (c)Seaming orientation; (d) Seaming materials.

    4.2. Parametric study of the seamed fabrics

    This section describes the ballistic tests performed on the samples using the method described in Subsection 3.2.It had to be noticed that the seaming threads add to the weight of the fabric.Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 displays the normalized energy absorption of the single-layer unseamed and seamed samples at impact velocities of 230 m/s and 400 m/s,the value of which is termed specific energy absorption (SEA). It could be found that the specific energy absorption of the samples at an impact velocity of 400 m/s is lower than that at 230 m/s.For example,as the impact velocity increased from 230 m/s to 400 m/s,the SEA of sample 1,sample 4,sample 5,and sample 10 decreased from 21.25 J/kg?m-2, 26.66 J/kg?m-2,28.80 J/kg?m-2, and 17.64 J/kg?m-2to 13.92 J/kg?m-2, 17.32 J/kg?m-2,18.58 J/kg?m-2,and 8.93 J/kg?m-2,respectively,a decrease of 34.5%, 34.4%, 35.5% and 49.4%. This can be explained by the energy-absorbing mechanism of the plain weave: two mechanical waves are generated when it is impacted by the projectile, one is the transverse wave, and the other is the longitudinal wave; the transmission of the transverse wave leads to the transverse displacement of the primary yarns, which drives the second yarn movement, resulting in a pyramidal deformation of the fabric. In this case,the kinetic energy of the projectile is mainly transformed into the kinetic energy and strain energy of the fabric. In the seamed samples,the constraint of the sewing lines makes the effect of this energy absorption mechanism more pronounced.However,as the impact velocity increases well beyond the ballistic limit(the critical velocity of projectile penetration fabrics),the fabric absorbs the kinetic energy of the projectile through fibers failure and responds inelastically, resulting in a reduction of the fabric's energy absorption efficiency.

    Fig. 8. Fabric deformation at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 1; (b), (d) Sample 10.

    Fig. 9. Penetration images of different samples at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 1; (b), (d) Sample 10.

    4.2.1. Effect of seaming density on the energy absorption of the samples

    Different seaming densities significantly affect the energy absorption of the seamed samples.sample 1,sample 4,sample 5,and sample 10 represent the seamed samples at different seaming densities, the specifications shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Fig. 6(a) that the sample 10 exhibits inferior energy absorption capacity compared with other seamed samples, and the energy absorption shows a trend of increasing and then decreasing as the density of the seaming lines increases. The most significant increase in energy absorption was detected in the sample 5, followed by sample 4 and sample 10. For example, The sample 5 exhibits the highest specific energy absorption when the impact velocity is 230 m/s, showing an improvement of 35.5% in energy absorption capacity compared to the sample 1. Among all the sample targets, it was also found that the most-densely seamed fabric (sample 10) appears to be least protective. This is explained as follows: when the project impacts the fabric, the yarn displacement in the plain weave is effectively limited since the weft and warp yarns are constrained by the seaming threads, which enables more yarns to absorb the kinetic energy of the projectile through yarns failure, thus minimizing the possibility of “windowing” and yarn pull-out, and contributing to the energy absorption ability as well as enhancing the ballistic performance of the fabric.The fabric energy absorption increases with the density of the seaming lines, but when it is extremely dense, overconstraining the yarn mobility resulted in the early failure of the primary yarns.This explanation is supported by Zeng et al.[35]and Duan et al.[36]in their investigation of the finite element analysis.Two exemplary examples are presented for comparison:Tapie et al.investigated the effect of uniaxial pre-tension on the ballistic performance of plain weave. They found that at higher impact velocities,fabric performs better under lower pre-tensions absorb more energy. This is because pre-tension restrains yarn movement, and therefore decreases the energy absorbed by the fabric[37];Lu et al.found that the specific energy absorption of the single-ply and 10-ply STF impregnated fabric panels was 44.8%and 64.1%lower than that of their neat counterparts at the impact velocity of 500 m/s,respectively. The inferior performance was attributed to the overconstraint of the primary yarns imposed by STF impregnation[38].The results provided by these literature can be properly used to illustrate the inferior ballistic performance of sample 10 and the working mechanisms of yarn constraint during a ballistic event.

    Fig.8 shows the fabric deformation of sample 1 and sample 10 at projectile impact velocities of 230 m/s and 400 m/s, respectively.The fabric deformation is more obvious at low speed compared to high speed impact, which on the one hand also explains the fact that the fabric energy absorption decreases at high speed impact.It was also found that yarn pull-out occurred mostly in the unseamed sample (sample 1), indicating that the seaming lines provided a restraining to the yarns and hindered yarns pull-out. In addition,the deformation of the seamed sample(sample 10)at 230 m/s was significantly less than that of sample 1,which was due to the stress concentration phenomenon in the fabric caused by the overconstraining of the yarns, forcing the yarns to break prematurely.The perforation images of different fabrics after projectile impact are shown in Fig. 9. It is obvious that the pull-out phenomenon of the samples at 400 m/s is not obvious compared to 230 m/s.Due to the increasing velocity, the primary yarns of sample 1 failure to capture the projectile, the yarns are suddenly pulled and then broken,which causes the yarns to be contracted rather than pulled out (Fig. 9(c)). From Fig. 9(a), the energy absorption of the unseamed fabric is primarily realized by yarns pull-out.Because of the weak constraint between the yarns, when the projectile impacts the fabric, the yarns are unable to carry the projectile load,making it easier for the projectile to penetrate the fabric through the fabric “windowing”, so the energy absorption of the fabric is unapparent.In the seamed samples,the fabric dissipates the kinetic energy of the projectile by yarns failure and pull-out because the constraining effect of the seaming threads limits the yarn's slip.The greater the density of the seaming lines,the more pronounced the yarn fracture, as in Fig. 9(d). This corresponds to the fact that the energy absorption of the seamed samples is greater than that of the unseamed samples in Fig. 6.

    The error bars represent the standard deviation values.It can be found that the energy absorption of the plain weave has the least dispersion and the dispersion of the energy absorption values of the seamed samples increases with the width between the two seaming lines.This basically depends on the impact locations of the projectile. When the impact location is at the yarns directly, the projectile causes fiber failure and contributes to the energy absorption of the target; when it is between adjacent yarns, the projectile pushes the yarns aside and causes the energy absorption of the target to decrease.For seamed samples,the number of seam lines has a significant effect on the dispersion of the energy absorption values. Compared with the projectile impacting the seaming lines gap, when the projectile impacts the seaming lines,the probability of yarn failure is higher,and the fabric absorbs more energy.A densely-seamed sample is more likely to have the impact location on the seaming line than a sparsely-seamed sample,reducing the dispersion of energy absorption values.

    4.2.2. Effect of seaming distance on the energy absorption of the samples

    In the seaming process,it should be noted that the seaming distance is no greater than the width of a single yarn(1.4 mm).Based on the minimum seaming distance of the embroidery machine(0.4 mm),the seaming distances of 0.4 mm,0.8 mm,1.2 mm,1.6 mm were designed. On the one hand, the effect of seaming distance on the anti-impact performance of the seamed fabric was studied, on the other hand,the weight of the seamed samples was also relieved.Figs.6(b)and Fig.7(b)show the specific energy absorption(SEA)of samples with various seaming distances for the same seaming lines density at impact speeds of 230 m/s and 400 m/s. From Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, we can see that the SEA of samples increases and then decreases as the seaming distance becomes narrower. At the impact velocity of 230 m/s, The SEA of samples 5, 11, 12, and 13 were 28.8 J/kg-2,39.77 J/kg-2,36.29 J/kg-2,and 32.48 J/kg-2,respectively,which was approximately 35.52%, 87.15%, 80.18%, and 55.34%improvement than that of sample 1.At the impact velocity of 400 m/s, the improvements in SEA are 23.22%, 70.88%, 61.82% and 43.78%greater than that of sample 1,respectively.The results indicate that a reasonable seaming distance contributes to inter-yarn constraint and synergy, which is beneficial to the fabric's ballistic performance.However, when it is too narrow, the excessive density of seaming threads on the yarn results in a decrease in the energy absorbed by the fabric.

    Fig.10 and Fig.11 shows the deformation shows the penetration images of the samples with various seaming distances at an impact velocity of about 230 m/s and 400 m/s. It can be found that the seaming distance has an effect on the energy absorption mechanism of the seamed fabric.At an impact velocity of 230 m/s, yarns pull-out and breakage were observed for both samples,as shown in Fig. 11(a) and Fig. 11(b). In addition, the fabric deformation of sample 11 (0.8 mm) was found to be wider than that of sample 5(0.4 mm) by high-speed photographic images, as shown in Fig. 10(a) and (b). At the impact velocity of 400 m/s, the fabric deformation was more localized and the absorbed energy mainly by yarn breakage as shown in Fig. 11(c) and Fig. 11(d) however,compared with sample 11,sample 5 was completely penetrated by the projectile at 30 μs(Fig.10(c)),while sample 11 occurred at 70 μs(Fig. 10(d)), which prolonged the contact between the projectile and the fabric. This indicates that appropriately increasing the seaming distance is beneficial to avoid over-concentration of stress,enhance the strain energy of the fabric and improve the energy absorption of the samples.

    Fig.10. Fabric deformation at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 5; (b), (d) Sample 11.

    Fig.11. Penetration images of different samples at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 5; (b), (d) Sample 11.

    4.2.3. Effect of seaming orientation on the energy absorption of the samples

    The effect of seaming orientation on the seamed samples was also studied, and the energy absorption results are shown in Figs.6(c)and Fig.7(c).In this section,sewing lines were applied to the samples at angles of 0?/90?, -15?/+75?, -30?/+60?and -45?/+45?, marked as sample 5, sample 14, sample 15, sample 16,respectively. It was found that seaming orientation contributes to an increase in SEA.The sample 14(-15?/+75?)exhibits a peak SEA of approximately 36 J/kg?m-2at the impact velocity of 230 m/s,which is almost 169%and 124%higher than that of the sample 1 and sample 5(0?/90?),respectively.Similar performance was observed at the impact velocity of 400 m/s. Fig.12 records the penetration images of various samples by the projectile. It can be found that when the seaming threads are applied to the fabric at an orthogonal angle(sample 5(0?/90?)),the samples are more likely to be pulled out after being impacted by the projectile, and the primary yarns cannot support the impact of the projectile. When the seaming threads present a certain angle(sample 14(-15?/+75?)),the effect of the seaming threads makes more yarns participate in the impact of the projectile,and the yarns tend to absorb the projectile kinetic energy through fracture.These data show that changing the angle of seam lines contributes to the energy absorption of the seamed sample.When the stitches rotate at a certain angle,both the single yarn and adjacent yarns are constrained by the seaming threads,which improve the friction and synergy of inter-yarns and increases the energy absorption of fabric.

    Fig.12. Penetration images of different samples at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 5; (b), (d) Sample 14.

    Fig.13. Fabric deformation at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 17; (b), (d) Sample 18.

    4.2.4. The effect of material on the energy absorption of the samples

    It is well known that the soft body armors are made from highperformance fibers and the most used are aramid and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Figs. 6(d) and Fig. 7(d) shows the specific energy absorption (SEA) capacity of UHMWPE and aramid samples at impact velocities of 230 m/s and 400 m/s.The comparison shows that the SEA of UHMWPE samples is greater than that of aramid for both the seamless and seamed samples. Where, at 230 m/s, the SEA of UHMWPE unseamed sample (sample 17) and seamed sample (sample 18) are 24.21 J/kg?m-2and 26.4 J/kg?m-2, respectively, which are 114% and 150%of that of aramid unseamed sample(sample 1)and seamed sample(sample 10).At 400 m/s,the SEA of sample 17 sample 18 are 14.61 J/kg?m-2,17.1 J/kg?m-2, which are 104% and 191% of sample 1 and sample 10, respectively. In addition, the SEA of all UHMWPE seamed samples are greater than that of unseamed samples,however,the contrary results are observed in the aramid samples.This indicates that the constraining effect provided by seaming is better available in UHMWPE, which is mainly related to the mechanical properties of UHMWPE.

    Fig. 13 and Fig. 14 show images of fabric deformation and penetration of different polyethylene samples. As can be seen in Fig. 13, the range of deformation of the seamed samples at low speed is significantly more global than that of the unseamed samples,and also decreases the yarn pull-out,while yarn breakage is more pronounced for the seamed samples at high speed impact,as can also be seen in the images of the samples penetration in Fig.14.

    Fig.14. Penetration images of different samples at the impact velocity of approximately 230 m/s and 400 m/s: (a), (c) Sample 17; (b), (d) Sample 18.

    4.2.5. Energy absorption capacity of multi-layer fabrics and seamed fabric panels

    To further investigate the ballistic resistance of the seamed plain weaves, ballistic tests were conducted on multi-layer fabrics and seamed panels. In the study, the seamed plain weaves (sample 5)were superimposed up to form double-layer(sample 6)and triplelayer (sample 8) systems. In addition, to reduce the length of the seaming thread, single-layer plain fabrics (sample 1) were superimposed up and seamed together to form seamed panels(sample 7 and sample 9). Fig. 15 shows the bar charts of the SEA at impact velocities of 230 m/s and 400 m/s.The flexible systems absorb less energy at high impact velocities and the energy absorption of a flexible fabric system increases with the number of ply layers.However, in terms of specific energy absorption, the multi-ply systems are not sensitive to the number of plies. From the results in Fig.14,the SEA of sample1 increases only slightly as the number of fabric layers at the impact velocity of 230 m/s, and sample 3 achieved a maximum value of 24.75 J/kg?m-2.Similar trends were also observed on sample 5, sample 6 and sample 8. Interestingly,the seamed panels show better performance than the superimposed single-ply fabrics at all velocities.For instance,the SEA of sample 7 is approximately 156%greater than that of sample 6,and more than 200%that of sample 2.In addition,it was found that the SEA of all samples was less at the impact velocity of about 400 m/s compared to that at about 230 m/s.It is concluded that the flexible systems absorb less energy at high impact velocities.

    Fig.16 displays the images of sample 3,sample 8 and sample9 at the impact velocity of 230 m/s. Fabric deformation and yarn pullout were clearly observed by the high-speed camera during the ballistic event. As shown in Fig.16(a), as the projectile progresses,the shape of the fabric deformation changes from pyramidal to square due to the pull-out of primary yarns.From the above images,we can find that the pull-out of the primary yarns is most evident in sample 3 with the projectile impact time. At time 320 μs, for instance, the primary yarns were pulled to a great extent on the sample 3, while the sample 8 were completely penetrated and caught by the impacting projectile. This indicates that when the projectile impacts fabric at low velocities, the penetration of the sample 3 is caused by pull-out without fiber failure(Fig.16(a));the penetration of seamed sample 8 is caused by the dual mechanism of fiber failure and yarn displacement (Fig. 16(b)). Compared to sample 3, the pull-out of primed yarns in sample 8 was not only delayed but also to a lesser extent,which confirms the constraint of seaming on yarn mobility; the seamed panel sample 9 prevented the impacting projectile, so there were not any markers of yarn displacement and fiber failure on fabric. The transverse deformation width of the fabric indicates that the width of the deformation of the seamed sample is wider than that of sample 3.It is because when the projectile impacts the fabric, the primary yarns drive more secondary yarns to move,expanding the deformation area of the fabric and increasing the fabric energy absorption, and hence,the inter-yarn friction increases in the seamed samples. It is noteworthy that the seamed panel sample 9 has the largest transverse deformation, which corresponds to the results in Fig.15(a). Therefore,the sample 9 is most protective.

    Fig.15. Comparison of specific energy absorption between seamed panels and multi-layer fabrics at impact velocities of (a) 230 m/s and (b) 400 m/s.

    Fig.16. Fabric deformation of (a) sample 3, (b) sample 8 and (c) sample 9 at the impact velocity of about 230 m/s.

    Clearly, both the fabric transverse deformation and yarn pullout are less pronounced for all samples at the impact velocity of 400 m/s than that at 230 m/s (Fig.16 and Fig.17). The penetration mechanism of fabric is completely caused by fiber failure.When the projectile impacts the sample 3, the duration of the projectile’s engagement with the fabric is short due to the excessive velocity of the projectile, and the primary yarns were suddenly pulled by the impact and then damaged, which leads to primary yarns being contracted rather than pulled-out.In seamed samples,the seaming lines reduce the mobility of the yarns and prevent the primary yarns from being pulled out by the projectile, the yarn displacement is limited,and the deformation of the fabric is more localized.As a result, the primary yarn may be damaged by the impact loading, allowing the projectile to penetrate the fabric.

    Fig.17. Fabric deformation of (a) sample 3, (b) sample 8 and (c) sample 9 at the impact velocity of about 400 m/s.

    5. Conclusions

    This paper aims to investigate the ballistic performance of the single and multi-layer seamed plain weave fabrics prepared by the thread seaming technique. The improvement for the effect of seaming threads between the weft and warp yarns friction force was verified by yarn pull-out force-displacement curves obtained from yarn pull-out tests, and ballistic test results were used to characterize the energy absorption capacity of different fabric samples. Based on the test results, the following conclusions are obtained:

    (1) The seaming lines on the plain weave fabric provide significant additional constraints, which increases the inter-yarn friction force. The maximum values of the pull-out force with one and three seaming lines are approximately twice and ten times greater than that of PW,respectively.Besides,it can be noticed from the trend of the curves that the peak pull-out force increases with the number of the seaming lines.

    (2) The ballistic test results showed that the thread seaming technique can significantly improve the energy absorption capacity of plain weave fabrics. That is, the seamed samples had better ballistic performance compared to the unseamed samples. Among them, the seamed sample (sample 11)showed the best ballistic performance in the single-layer system. At the impact velocity of 230 m/s, the energy absorption value of sample 11 was more than 187%greater than that of the unseamed samples(sample 1).In the multi-layer system, the seamed panel (sample 9) showed the most significant improvement in ballistic performance. As can be seen from the high-speed photographic images, at the impact velocity of 230 m/s, sample9 completely stopped projectile penetration compared to the other samples. In addition,the energy absorption capacity of the fabric system decreases with increasing impact velocity.

    (3) The energy absorption of the seamed samples increases and then decreases with the number of the seaming lines.When the lines are over-dense, such as sample 10, the seaming technique is not conducive to fabric energy absorption. This is mainly a consequence of the over-constrained yarn mobility. The same reason explains the effect of seaming distance on the fabric system energy absorption in the thread seaming technique, where the fabric sample absorbed the most energy when the seaming distance was 0.8 mm.It was also found that the ballistic properties of the seamed fabrics are most favorable when the seaming orientation is -15?/+75?. In addition, compared to aramid, the thread seaming technique was more sensitive to the improvement of ballistic properties of the UHMWPE aramid plain weaves.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11902008) and Hubei Province Science and Technology Project (2021BAA069).

    Appendix

    Table A1Impact and residual velocities values for various impact velocities.

    91麻豆av在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美激情在线99| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 成人无遮挡网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产精品影院久久| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久久久久久久久成人| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 极品教师在线免费播放| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产乱人视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 一本一本综合久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 直男gayav资源| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 永久网站在线| 色在线成人网| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 嫩草影院新地址| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 国产亚洲精品av在线| 少妇高潮的动态图| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 免费大片18禁| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 熟女电影av网| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 校园春色视频在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | av视频在线观看入口| 日韩高清综合在线| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 露出奶头的视频| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久久精品大字幕| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲av一区综合| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 91在线观看av| 午夜两性在线视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 嫩草影院新地址| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 99热精品在线国产| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品久久视频播放| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲第一电影网av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产高清激情床上av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 一本一本综合久久| 一本精品99久久精品77| 99热精品在线国产| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 一a级毛片在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 欧美精品国产亚洲| or卡值多少钱| 久久性视频一级片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲av一区综合| av黄色大香蕉| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 99riav亚洲国产免费| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产乱人伦免费视频| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | av欧美777| 日本 欧美在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产免费男女视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 一级黄片播放器| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 嫩草影院精品99| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 看黄色毛片网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 波多野结衣高清作品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 91字幕亚洲| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| h日本视频在线播放| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 宅男免费午夜| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产综合懂色| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产精品永久免费网站| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久中文看片网| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 级片在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 97超视频在线观看视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 1024手机看黄色片| 色综合婷婷激情| av国产免费在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产野战对白在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲最大成人av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美性感艳星| 老司机福利观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日本黄色片子视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日本三级黄在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费观看人在逋| 国产高清三级在线| 此物有八面人人有两片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产成人av教育| 国产在线男女| 国产不卡一卡二| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 97碰自拍视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品福利观看| 精品久久久久久,| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 美女高潮的动态| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 天堂动漫精品| 一本一本综合久久| 天堂网av新在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 直男gayav资源| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 老司机福利观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 美女高潮的动态| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 看免费av毛片| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 三级毛片av免费| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 免费看日本二区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| or卡值多少钱| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 午夜影院日韩av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 色视频www国产| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜福利欧美成人| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 91av网一区二区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av在线蜜桃| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费高清视频大片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久精品国产自在天天线| a在线观看视频网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产真实乱freesex| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产色婷婷99| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| a在线观看视频网站| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 色播亚洲综合网| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 91狼人影院| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| www日本黄色视频网| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品人妻视频免费看| aaaaa片日本免费| 91久久精品电影网| 国产精华一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 此物有八面人人有两片| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久精品人妻少妇| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲精品在线美女| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久精品91蜜桃| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 在现免费观看毛片| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av一区综合| 特级一级黄色大片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美日本视频| 国产成人福利小说| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 有码 亚洲区| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费av毛片视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| av在线老鸭窝| 国产av不卡久久| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品一及| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产高清激情床上av| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 嫩草影视91久久| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 毛片女人毛片| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 一夜夜www| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 小说图片视频综合网站| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜免费激情av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲精品在线美女| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 日本三级黄在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品野战在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| ponron亚洲| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 精品福利观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久精品大字幕| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美区成人在线视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 |