• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    以色列內(nèi)蓋夫沙漠的發(fā)現(xiàn)對黎凡特石器工業(yè)來源與去向的啟示

    2023-04-29 16:14:20OmryBARZILAI
    人類學學報 2023年5期

    Omry BARZILAI

    摘要:舊石器時代晚期初段,系統(tǒng)剝?nèi)∈~尖狀器技術(shù)開始出現(xiàn)并見于歐亞大陸不同地區(qū),這一現(xiàn)象被認為與MIS 3 階段現(xiàn)代人的擴張密切相關(guān)。黎凡特舊石器時代晚期初段的界定標準源自以色列內(nèi)蓋夫沙漠Boker Tachtit(波克·塔吉特)遺址兩組連續(xù)疊壓的石器工業(yè),遺址下部的Emiran(埃米爾)石器工業(yè)以雙向剝片石葉技術(shù)為特征,上部石器工業(yè)則以單向剝片石葉技術(shù)為標志。Boker Tachtit 遺址一直缺乏較可靠的年代學基礎(chǔ),但新近放射性測年數(shù)據(jù)表明Emiran 工業(yè)并存于黎凡特本土的莫斯特晚期石器工業(yè),Emiran 工業(yè)為外來的推測也由此得到了支持。由于Boker Tachtit 與尼羅河谷地及南阿拉伯地區(qū)年代接近的石器工業(yè)技術(shù)特點相似,早期的Boker Tachtit 人群很可能來自上述區(qū)域。Emiran 工業(yè)在BokerTachtit 演變?yōu)閱蜗騽兤~工業(yè)的同時一直向歐洲中部及亞洲中北部地區(qū)擴張。與之類似,單向剝片石葉工業(yè)一面向黎凡特北部及巴爾干地區(qū)傳播,一面在本地發(fā)展成為早期Ahamarian(艾瑪爾)工業(yè)技術(shù)體系。因此舊石器時代晚期初段至少發(fā)生過兩次人群擴散事件,第一次為來自尼羅河流域及阿拉伯半島人群在遷徙至黎凡特后向歐洲中部與亞洲中北部地區(qū)的迅速擴張;第二次事件的發(fā)生年代略晚,表現(xiàn)為黎凡特南部人群向黎凡特北部及巴爾干地區(qū)的逐步擴散。

    關(guān)鍵詞:舊石器時代晚期初段;Boker Tachtit;Emiran;石器技術(shù);人群擴散

    1 Introduction

    The transition from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in Eurasia corresponds withdemographic changes, namely the appearance of modern humans alongside with the demise ofNeanderthal populations[1-3]. This process received much attention in the scientific literature eversince the Neanderthals were discovered and defined in the 19th century in Europe[4]. For manyyears, the two populations were conceived as different species with minimal cultural contacts,but recent genetic studies have refuted this notion and proved Neanderthals and modern humansdid biologically interact[5-6].

    New advances in the fields of absolute chronology and paleo-genetics proposed modernhumans migrated from Africa to Eurasia numerous times in the period between 200-50 ka[7-9].The latest migration, known also as the "recent out of Africa", was the most influential one andpresumably brought the Neanderthal linage in Eurasia to an end.

    While genetic studies determined that Homo sapiens and Neanderthals met and bred, they donot provide the exact timing and locations of these interactions. Moreover, they do offer the pathsof modern human migration, but only very generally. The ultimate means for learning about suchprocesses are, naturally, the human fossil records but they are very rare in archaeological sites. Hence,the common way to discover more about these demographic changes and cultural transformations ispursued by material culture studies. Among these, lithics are by far the most abundant finds and oftencontain formal artifacts which are associated with specific human groups[10-11]. In Middle PaleolithicEurope for example, Levallois core technology, the formal method for producing spear points andhunting-related tools such as scrapers and knives, is associated with Neanderthals.1) On the other1) An exception is the Levantine Middle Paleolithic where Levallois assemblages were produced also by archaic Homo sapiens in MIS 5 hand, Upper Paleolithic blade technologies used for making projectiles, endscrapers and burins areassociated with Homo sapiens, as are bone and antler tools and shell ornaments.

    The intermediate phase between the Middle and the Upper Paleolithic is complex andcontains material culture remains which could be ascribed to both species. The lithic assemblagesbear technical properties common to both Upper and Middle Paleolithic technologies.Intermediate assemblages utilize Upper Paleolithic volumetric approach in which the narrowside of the block was used for manufacturing standardized blades. Conversely, the extraction ofthe blades followed Middle Paleolithic modes and gestures, such as platform preparations beforestriking (faceting) and use of a hard hammer stone.

    Today it is accepted to include intermediate assemblages under the general nomenclatureof Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP)[12]. What is not accepted is the identity of the makers of theseindustries. Was this material culture brought in by the migrating modern humans? Or did itdevelop from the local Middle Paleolithic industries of the Neanderthals? An examination of theterminological history of this phase shows that the IUP is not a homogeneous industry but ratherfeatures a more complex cultural sequence.

    The aims of this paper are to provide an updated summary on the Levantine IUP and refineour understanding on its chronology, phasing, and implications on MIS 3 human dispersals basedon the new excavation of the site of Boker Tachtit[13].

    2 The Levantine Initial Upper Paleolithic

    The Initial Upper Paleolithic was originally defined after the uppermost stratigraphic layer(Level 4) at the site of Boker Tachtit in the Negev Desert, Israel[14] (Fig.1). Comprehensive lithicstudies have shown Level 4 at Boker Tachtit evolved in-situ from the lower Levels 1-3, assignedto the Emiran techno-complex. Accordingly, the IUP industry was conceived as a locallydeveloped early Upper Paleolithic industry[15].

    The lower levels industry, the Emiran, was defined in the early 20th century by Turville-Petre[16] following his excavation at Emireh Cave, located in the eastern Galilee region ofIsrael (Fig.1). This industry is characterized by a blend of Middle and Upper Paleolithic toolsand includes a diagnostic projectile tool, the Emireh point[17]. Initially, the Emiran phase wasnot accepted by Dorothy Garrod, the preeminent prehistorian in the Near East at that time,who supposed the materials from Emireh Cave constituted mixed Paleolithic deposits. Later,however, Garrod changed her opinion after she identified similar assemblages at the sites of el-Wad Cave, Abu Halka and Ksar Akil[17-19]. A recent study of the lithic assemblage from EmirehCave confirmed both observations made by Garrod: the assemblage was indeed mixed andcontained Middle and Upper Paleolithic components, but also included distinctive components ofbidirectional blade technology and Emireh points[20] (Fig.2:1, 2:3, 2:6).

    Following Garrod's new conception of the Emiran this nomenclature was accepted as theearliest phase in the Upper Paleolithic of the southern Levant, and the Emireh point as the 'fossildirecteur used to assigned (or not) assemblages to this industry[21-22]. Presence of Emireh pointsat Qafzeh, e-Tabban, Kebara and Shovakh Caves suggested that this phase existed at other sites in the southern Levant even though their stratigraphies were not clear[17, 23-24] (Fig.1).The discovery of Boker Tachtit in 1974 in the Central Negev Project provided invaluableinformation regarding the lithic technology of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic intermediate phase[25-26].

    Boker Tachtit is composed of four archaeological horizons, all including well- preservedlithic assemblages with a high refitting ratio (Fig.3: 1-2). Comprehensive lithic studies of thelower levels (1-3), assigned to the Emiran phase, showed the knapping method emphasizedproduction of broad-base blades from bidirectional cores (Fig.2: 2; Fig.3: 1). The blades buttswere subjected to faceting before detachment by hard hammerstone. The Emiran reductionsequence made use of crested blades to establish the removal surface and core tablets forrenovation of the striking platform. The diagnostic tools consisted of Emireh points (Fig.2: 4-5),unretouched points that resemble Levallois, endscrapers and burins.

    The upper Level 4 at Boker Tachtit showed technological continuation from the lowerlevels. The major difference from the lower levels is the shift in production of blades frombidirectional to unidirectional (Fig.3: 2-10). The unidirectional core removal surfaces wereestablished by thick primary blades instead of crested blades which were common in the lowerlevels. The blades were subjected to butt preparation and extracted by hard hammerstones. The toolkit remained similar and comprised points, burins and endscrapers (Fig.3: 5-10). Still, thepoints turned narrower and the Emireh points were no longer in use. Despite its common features,Marks separated the new industry from the Emiran and termed it Initial Upper Paleolithic.

    Extensive work in the 1980-1990s in southern Jordan revealed more assemblagescorresponding to phase of Boker Tachtit 4 at the sites of Wadi Aghar and Tor Sadaf (Fig.1). In bothsites the unidirectional blade industry was dominant[27-28]. A recent study by Kadowaki and Henry[29]demonstrated systematic use of bladelet technology at Wadi Aghar in addition to the unidirectionalblades (Kadowaki et al in press). Bladelet production from "burin cores" was noted also at thelower level at Boker Tachtit and is conceived as one of the characteristics of the IUP[30].

    IUP assemblages were noted at several sites in the Northern Levant. The first sites wherethis phase was recognized were Abu Halka and Ksar Akil in Lebanon. These sites, together withel-Wad and Emireh Caves, were the four sites upon which Garrod proposed a transitional phaseat the lowermost stage of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic[17]. This observation by Garrod wassupported by the technological analyses conducted for two sites by Azoury[31] and Ohnuma[32] and even received the term 'Abu Halkan' by Copeland[33]. Recent work by Leder[34] showed thecommon method for blade production at the two sites was convergent unidirectional blade.

    Following his work at Boker Tachtit, Marks reviewed the Ksar Akil assemblages and foundhigh resemblance between Ksar Akil levels XXIII-XXII and Boker Tachtit level 4[35]. The majordifference between Ksar Akil and Boker Tachtit 4 was the presence of a transversal burin type,the chanfrein, in the Ksar Akil assemblages[36].

    The existence of the chanfrien along with absence of the Emireh point within the northernassemblages gave a false impression that there are geographical variants in the IUP, butsubsequent discoveries of findspots bearing Emireh points along the Lebanese coast suggest thatthe Emiran phase is also present in the northern Levant[33].

    In the 1990's Kuhn recognized assemblages similar to those of Ksar Akil Phase A at??a??zl? Cave[37]. Accordingly, he adopted Marks' term IUP to describe the early occurrence at??a??zl? but at the same time expanded this term to include all transitional assemblages in theLevant, including the Emiran phase[38]. Another site which fits the later phase is Umm el-Tlelwhich is characterized by unidirectional blades and bladelet technologies[39].

    3 The IUP absolute chronology

    The absolute chronology of the Levantine IUP is a debated topic that bear implications onthe study of human migrations[2, 13, 40-42]. Absolute dating was conducted independently at severalintermediate sites by different methods and protocols[2, 13, 28, 41, 42, 43-51](Tab.1). Not surprisingly theresults provided a wide range of time from as early as 47 ka to ca. 34 ka[2, 13, 41].

    There are two approaches to the Levantine IUP timeline, a lower and upper chronology. Thelower chronology, based upon the old dating of Boker Tachtit level 1[25], propose the beginning ofthe UP at 47 ka. For many years, this value was accepted as the startup age for the colonizationof Europe by modern humans, a process that presumably lasted 7000 years[52]. The lowerchronology was supported by a recent study at Kebara Cave which dated charcoals from MP andUP layers using two preparation protocols, ABA and ABOx[42]. While no IUP layer was evidentin the sampled stratigraphic section at Kebara, the time range for this phase was proposed at 48-46 ka based on dates from the MP layer below and the early UP layer above.

    In 2013, Douka et al proposed an upper chronology for the IUP based on new dating ofshell beads from the Ksar Akil collection. Their suggestion was that the IUP began at 42 ka basedon dates from Ksar Akil and ??a??zl? Cave. Considering the results, the dates of Kebara and theone date from Boker Tachtit level 1 were thought to be too old[53].

    A more recent dating project from Ksar Akil by Bosch et al[2]. demonstrated the problematicdating of shells from old collections as the new dates from the same levels were now ca.3000 years older, setting the beginning of the IUP in the northern Levant to 45 ka. A possibleexplanation for the disagreement in ages is the usage of differing sample selection and modelparameters. Still, a more plausible explanation is contamination and/or mislabeled samples whichwere excavated in the 1930s and 40s[19, 54]. The definitions and documentation of contexts from which the shells were collected does not meet current standards (i.e., site formation processes,microstratigraphy, retrieval of small components etc.).

    In 2017, Alex et al radiocarbon dated the Early Upper Paleolithic sequence at ManotCave[40]. The new study refuted the Douka et al chronology for the Early Upper PaleolithicAhmarian techno-complex[41] and supported that of Bosch et al[2]. Accordingly, we adopt here thelower chronology proposed for Ksar Akil by Bosch et al[2].

    The most recent and updated dating project is the new chronology of Boker Tachtit whichrelies on radiocarbon and OSL methods[13, 55]. The new study set the age of the IUP at Boker Tachtitto 50-44 ka. The early phase, the Emiran (Level 2 in the new study) began as early as 50 ka. Thelater phase, Level 4, start at 47 ka and ended at 44 ka. These results provide high-resolution forthe two phases at one site, providing a successive chrono-cultural sequence for the Levantine IUP.

    One of the major contributions of the new dating project at Boker Tachtit was therecognition of contemporaneous radiocarbon ages from the two levels Boker Tachtit with thefinal Late Middle Paleolithic (LMP) occupations at the neighboring sites of Farah II (westernNegev), Tor Faraj Layer C (southern Jordan), and the final stages of the LMP at Kebara Cave inMt. Carmel[13]. This overlapping clearly proved the Emiran was not a local industry.

    4 The origins and destinations of the Levantine IUP

    Tracing population movement in the archaeological record is not easy mainly due to a lackof human fossils and reliable absolute chronology. With the absence of human fossils, stone tooltechnologies are often considered as the most reliable indicators for specific populations[10,51]. Oneof the most widely acknowledged examples is the association of the Clovis culture (and the Clovispoint) with the colonization of North America[56]. In our case, we will refer to the diagnostic bladetechnology of the early and late phases of the Levantine IUP in an attempt to discern a spatial pattern.

    Regarding chronology, until recently the dates of the IUP were insecure as was theinterpretation for its role in the out-of-Africa model. New dating projects in some key regionsenable us now to examine the IUP and human dispersal model[13, 44, 49].

    5 The origins of the early phase, the Emiran

    Two scenarios have been suggested for the origins of the Boker Tachtit industries: localdevelopment and off-regional origin African/Arabian. The local development scenario, proposedby Meignen[57], argues that IUP technical traits emerged from local LMP groups. This hypothesisis now refuted as the new dates from Boker Tachtit clearly show the co-existence of Emiran andLate Mousterian, thus implying that the origin of the Emiran industry is not in this region.

    To test the off-regional origin of the Emiran industry we turn to the bordering regions fromthe south, the Nile Valley and Arabia.

    The late Middle Paleolithic in the Lower Nile Valley is characterized by the so-called Taramsanindustry[48]. In his comparative study, Van Peer describes the lithic assemblage from Taramsa 1 asa transitional Levallois system adapted to producing blades[47]. This system shares common featureswith Emiran, as noted by Van Peer, with respect to the core orientation and the volumetric conceptwhich emphasized production of blade from two opposed striking platforms. The chronology of theTaramsan is not well established and is thought to range between 60-40 ka (Taramsa phases IV IV V).Nevertheless, the site of Taramsa 1 is considered a potential forbearer of the Emiran[48].

    Another candidate of being the forerunner of the Emiran are the late MP sites of Shi'batDihya 1 and 2 in the southern Arabian Peninsula[58]. The sites, dated by OSL to 55 ka, showa clear orientation for blade technology in addition to Levallois. The blades were aimed atproducing elongated points from unidirectional cores.

    Another proposition for the origins of the Emiran was made by Marks who suggested that itevolved from the Tabun D tradition[15]. Currently it is difficult to confirm this hypothesis since there areno LMP sites bearing Tabun D tradition. The potential site referred by Marks is Ain Difla in southernJordan. While the lithic assemblages from the site are clearly dominated by bidirectional bladetechnology, the current chronology of the sites, dated to 105 ka, indicating a gap of 50 ka between AinDifla and Boker Tachtit[59]. Recent work by Rezek[60] is attempting to refine the chronology of AinDifla. Interestingly it is suggested the lithic industry could be ascribed to the local IUP.

    6 The destinations of the early phase- the Emiran

    This existence of bidirectional blade technology is noted in some of the IUP sites in otherregions – specifically in central Europe and northeast Asia.

    In central Europe it is noted in the Bohunician technocomplex. The work of ?krdla[61]demonstrated significant technological correspondence (except for bifacial points) between BokerTachtit, Negev Desert and the sites of Brno-Bohunice and Stránská skála, Czech Republic. The tworegions show also chronological similarities. The TL chronology of Brno-Bohunice (48 ka) indicate that the site is more or less contemporary with Boker Tachtit (50 ka). The radiocarbon from Stránskáskála are later (43-41 ka) indicating on local phases. Nevertheless, the chronological differencesbetween the early phase of the Emiran and the early phase of the Bohunician is ca. 2000 years, whichis the estimated time for an expansion from one region to another[13, 46].

    Another site bearing similar lithic technology is Tolbor 16, Mongolia[44]. Technologicallythe site is characterized by bidirectional blade technology accompanied with bladelet productionfrom burin cores. These two methods were in use in the Levantine Emiran at the lower levels atBoker Tachtit. Radiocarbon chronologies suggest the Tolbor 16 region was inhabited as early as45 ka, ca. 5000 years after Boker Tachtit was initially settled.

    7 The later expansion within IUP

    Unidirectional blade technology dominated the upper phase of Boker Tachtit, dated to 47-44 ka.Notably, unidirectional blades dominate the IUP occupations at Ksar Akil and ??a??zl? cave. Thechronology of the northern Levantine site is slightly later at Boker Tachtit by 1000-2000 years[2].Since no Emiran (early phase) with bidirectional blades was recorded at Ksar Akil and ??a??zl? caveit is reasonable to assume these assemblages emanated from the Negev.

    The recent dating project in the Balkans placed Bacho Kiro as the earliest IUP sitewith modern human remain at 45 ka[49]. The lithic technology at the site seem to follow theunidirectional concept; thus it is quite reasonable to assume the hominin population and theirlithic technology originated in the Levant.

    8 The two-dispersal model

    The new dating at the sites of Boker Tachtit, Ksar Akil, Tolbor 16 and Bacho Kirosuggests a more complex scenario for the MIS 3 dispersal of modern humans. According tothe lithic characteristics we know that there are two chronological phases at Boker Tachtit.When supplemented with absolute chronology we can observe two dispersal events. The first,the Emiran, characterized by the bidirectional blade technology, was likely initiated in the aridregions of the southern Levant at ca. 50 ka. The origins of this industry seem to be rooted in theTaramsan of the lower Nile Valley and possibly the late MP of southern Arabia which could havemet in the Negev Desert to form the Emiran (Fig.4).

    The Emiran developed locally at Boker Tachtit into a later phase characterized byunidirectional blades. But at the same time, it kept moving northward to the northern Levantfrom where it split into two directions, westward towards central Europe and eastward towardsnortheast Asia. The process was fast and lasted no more than 5000 years.

    A second dispersal wave began in the Negev from the upper level at Boker Tachtit,spreading locally in the southern Levant and to the northern Levant where it was well established.From there it probably spread to the Balkans, to Bacho Kiro which was the gateway to Europe. The later phase kept on evolving locally in the Levant into the Early Ahmarian whereas inEurope (Bacho Kiro) it evolved into the proto-Aurignacian.

    9 Conclusions

    Two lithic traditions were superimposed at the site of Boker Tachtit. The early one, theEmiran, was characterized by bidirectional blade technology whereas the later one featuredunidirectional blades.

    The early tradition is not native as its lithic technology is different from the local contemporarylate MP sites in the southern Levant. Its origins might have been the lower Nile Valley and/or southern

    Arabia. The Emiran established itself in the region ca. 50 ka and developed into the later phase butalso kept dispersing to the north, central Europe, and northeast Asia.

    The later phase expanded to the northern Levant and to southern Europe 45 ka. In theLevant it developed to the local Ahmarian tradition.

    Acknowledgements: Thanks are extended the following colleagues for their assistance: IsraelHershkovitz for reading an early draft of this manuscript; Samuel Wolf for editorial comments;Michal Birkenfeld for preparing Fig.1; Carmen Hersh for preparing Figures 2-4. All artifactimages in Figures 2-4 were photographed by Yael Yulevich and Clara Amit, and are courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority.

    References

    [1] Higham T, Douka K, Wood R, et al. The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance[J]. Nature, 2014, 512, 306–309

    [2] Bosch MD, Mannino MA, Prendergast AL, et al. New chronology for Ks?r ‘Akil (Lebanon) supports Levantine route of modernhuman dispersal into Europe[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(25): 7683–7688

    [3] Hublin JJ. The modern human colonization of western Eurasia: when and where?[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2015, 118: 194-210

    [4] Harvati K. Neanderthals-Evolution: Education and Outreach[J]. 2010, 3(3): 367-376

    [5] Sankararaman S, Mallick S, Dannemann M, et al. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans[J]. Nature,2014, 507(7492): 354-357

    [6] Prüfer K, Racimo F, Patterson N. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains[J]. Nature, 2014,505(7481): 43-49

    [7] Bae C, Dauka K, Petraglia MD. On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives[J]. Science, 2017, 358: eaai9067

    [8] Hershkovitz I, Marder O, Ayalon A, et al. Levantine cranium from Manot Cave (Israel) foreshadows the first European modernhumans[J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7546): 216-219

    [9] Hershkovitz I, Weber GW, Quam R, et al. The earliest modern humans outside Africa[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6374): 456-459

    [10] Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A. Following Pleistocene road signs of human dispersals across Eurasia[J]. Quat. Int., 2013, 285: 30-43

    [11] Groucut HG, Scerri EML, Lewis L, et al. Stone tool assemblages and models for the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa[J].Quat. Int., 2015, 382: 8-30

    [12] Kuhn SL, Zwyns N. Rethinking the Initial Upper Paleolithic[J]. Quat. Int., 2014, 347: 29-38

    [13] Boaretto E, Hernandez M, Goder-Goldberger M, et al. The absolute chronology of Boker Tachtit (Israel) and implications for theMiddle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Levant[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(25): e2014657118

    [14] Marks AE, Ferring CR. The Early Upper Paleolithic of the Levant[A]. In: Hoffecker JF, Wolf CA (Eds.). The Early UpperPaleolithic: Evidence from Europe and the Near East[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 437, 1988, 43-72

    [15] Marks AE, Rose JI. A century of research into the origins of the Upper Paleolithic in the Levant[A]. In: Otte M (Ed.). Néandertal/Cro-Magnon. La Rencontre[M]. Arles: Editions Errance, 2014, 221-266

    [16] Turville-Petre FAJ. Researches in prehistoric Galilee, 1925-1926: British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem[M]. London:Chiswick Press, 1927

    [17] Garrod DA. A transitional industry from the base of the Upper Palaeolithic in Palestine and Syria[J]. Journal of the AnthropologicalInstitute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1951, 81:121-130

    [18] Haller JEAN. Notes de préhistoire phénicienne: LAbri de Abou-Halka (Tripoli)[M]. Beyrouth: Bulletin de Musée, 1946, 6: 1-20

    [19] Ewing JF. Preliminary note on the excavations at the Palaeolithic site of Ksar Akil, Republic of Lebanon[J]. Antiquity, 1947, 21(84): 186

    [20] Barzilai O, Gubenko N. Rethinking Emireh Cave: the lithic technology perspectives[J]. Quat. Int., 2018, 464: 92-105

    [21] Copeland L. The Middle and Upper Paleolithic of Lebanon and Syria in the light of recent research[A]. In: Wendorf F, Marks A(Eds.). Problems in Prehistory: North Africa and the Levant[M]. Dallas: SMU Press. 1975, 317-350

    [22] Gilead I. The upper Paleolithic period in the Levant[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 1991, 5(2): 105-154

    [23] Binford SR. Me'arat Shovakh (Mugharet esh-Shubbabiq). Israel Exploration Journal, 1966, 16(1): 18-32

    [24] Schick T, Stekelis M. Mousterian assemblages in Kebara Cave, Mount Carmel[J]. Eretz-Israel: Archaeological, Historical andGeographical Studies, 1977, 97-149

    [25] Marks AE. Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel: the Avdat/Aqev Area (Vol. 3)[M]. Dallas: SMU Press. 1983

    [26] Volkman P. Boker Tachtit: core reconstructions[A]. In: Marks A (Ed.). Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev,Israel[M]. Dallas: SMU Press. 1983, 127-190

    [27] Fox J. The Tor Sadaf lithic assemblages: a technological study of the Early Upper Palaeolithic in the Wadi al-Hasa[A]. In: Goring-Morris AN, Belfer-Cohen A (Eds.). More than Meets the Eye: Studies on Upper Palaeolithic Diversity in the Near East[M]. Oxford:Oxbow Books. 2003, 80-94

    [28] Kadowaki S, Tamura T, Sano K, et al. Lithic technology, chronology, and marine shells from Wadi Aghar, southern Jordan, andInitial Upper Paleolithic behaviors in the southern inland Levant[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2019, 135: 102646

    [29] Kadowaki S, Suga E, Henry DO. Frequency and production technology of bladelets in Late Middle Paleolithic, Initial UpperPaleolithic, and Early Upper Paleolithic (Ahmarian) assemblages in Jebel Qalkha, Southern Jordan[J]. Quat. Int., 2021, 596, 4-21

    [30] Demidenko YE, ?krdla P, Rychta?íková T. Initial Upper Paleolithic Bladelet Production: Bladelets in Moravian Bohunician[J].Recherches Archeologiques, 2020, 61(1): 21-29

    [31] Azoury I. Ksar Akil, Lebanon: A technological and typological analysis of the transitional and early upper Palaeolithic levels ofKsar Akil and Abu Halka[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 289 (i) and 289 (ii), 1986

    [32] Ohnuma K. Ksar Akil, Lebanon, a Technological Study of the Earlier Upper Palaeolithic Levels at ‘Ksar Akil, Volume III. LevelsXXV-XIV[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 426, 1988

    [33] Copeland L. Forty-six Emireh points from the Lebanon in the context of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Levant[J].Paléorient, 2000, 26(1):73-92

    [34] Leder D. Lithic variability and techno-economy of the initial Upper Palaeolithic in the Levant[J]. International Journal ofArchaeology, 2018, 6(1): 23-36

    [35] Marks A. The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Southern Levant: Technological change as an adaptation to increasingmobility[A]. In: Otte M (Ed.). LHomme de Néandertal. Vol. 8: La Mutation[C]. Liège: Univ. de Liège. 1988, 109–124

    [36] Newcomer MH. The chamfered pieces from Ksar Akil (Lebanon)[J]. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, 1970, 8(9): 177-191

    [37] Kuhn SL, Stiner MC, Güle? E. Initial Upper Palaeolithic in south-central Turkey and its regional context: a preliminary report[J].Antiquity, 1999, 73: 505-517

    [38] Kuhn SL, Stiner MC, Güle? E, et al. The early Upper Paleolithic occupations at ??a?izli Cave (Hatay, Turkey)[J]. Journal ofHuman Evolution, 2009, 56(2): 87–113

    [39] Bo?da ?, Bonilauri S. The intermediate Paleolithic: the first bladelet production 40,000 years ago[J]. Anthropologie, 2006, 44(1): 75-92

    [40] Alex B, Barzilai O, Hershkovitz I, et al. Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals[J]. ScienceAdvances, 2017, 3: e1701450

    [41] Douka K, Bergman CA, Hedges REM, et al. Chronology of Ksar Akil (Lebanon) and implications for the colonization of Europeby Anatomically Modern Humans[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(9): e72931

    [42] Rebollo NR, Weiner S, Brock F, et al. New radiocarbon dating of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in KebaraCave, Israel[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, 38(9): 2424–2433

    [43] Zwyns N, Paine CH, Tsedendorj B, et al. The northern Route for Human dispersal in central and northeast Asia: new evidence fromthe site of Tolbor-16, Mongolia[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 1-10

    [44] Vasil'ev SA, Kuzmin YV, Orlova LA, et al. Radiocarbon-based chronology of the Paleolithic in Siberia and its relevance to thepeopling of the New World[J]. Radiocarbon, 2002, 44(2): 503-530

    [45] Tostevin GB, ?krdla P. New excavations at Bohunice and the question of the uniqueness of the type-site for the Bohunicianindustrial type[J]. Anthropologie, 2006, 44(1): 31-48

    [46] Richter D, Tostevin G, ?krdla P. Bohunician technology and thermoluminescence dating of the type locality of Brno-Bohunice(Czech Republic)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55(5): 871-885

    [47] Van Peer P. The Nile corridor and the out-of-Africa model an examination of the archaeological record[J]. Current Anthropology,1998, 39: S115-S140

    [48] Wurz S, Van Peer P. Out of Africa, the Nile Valley and the Northern route[J]. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2012, 67(196): 168-179

    [49] Hublin JJ, Sirakov N, Aldeias V, et al. Initial Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria[J]. Nature, 2020, 581: 299–302

    [50] Kadowaki S. Issues of chronological and geographical distributions of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic cultural variability in theLevant and implications for the learning behavior of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens[A]. In: Akazawa T, et al. (Eds). Dynamics ofLearning in Neanderthals and Modern Humans, Volume 1[C]. Tokyo: Springer, 2013: 59-91

    [51] Haynes G, Gary H. The Early Settlement of North America: the Clovis Era[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002

    [52] Mellars P. Archeology and the dispersal of modern humans in Europe: Deconstructing the “Aurignacian”[J]. EvolutionaryAnthropology, 2006, 15(5):167–182

    [53] Douka K. Exploring “the great wilderness of prehistory”: the chronology of the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic Transition in theNorthern Levant[J]. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte, 2013, 22:11–40

    [54] Williams JK, Bergman CA. Upper Paleolithic levels XIII-VI (A and B) from the 1937-1938 and 1947-1948 Boston collegeexcavations and the Levantine Aurignacian at Ksar Akil, Lebanon[J]. Paléorient, 2010, 36(2):117-161

    [55] Barzilai O, Boaretto E. Boqer Tahtit (Boker Tachtit): Preliminary Report[J]. Hadashot Arkheologiyot: Excavations and Surveys inIsrael, 2016, 128-133

    [56] Smallwood AM. Clovis technology and settlement in the American Southeast: Using biface analysis to evaluate dispersalmodels[J]. American Antiquity, 2012, 77(4): 689-713

    [57] Meignen L. Levantine perspectives on the Middle to Upper Paleolithic “transition”[J]. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropologyof Eurasia, 2012, 40: 12-21

    [58] Delagnes A, Tribolo C, Bertran P, et al. Inland human settlement in southern Arabia 55,000 years ago[J]. Journal of HumanEvolution, 2012, 63: 452-474

    [59] Clark GA, Schuldenrein J, Donaldson ML, et al. Chronostratigraphic contexts of Middle Paleolithic horizons at the ‘Ain Difla rockshelter(WHS 634), west-central Jordan[A]. The prehistory of Jordan, II. Perspectives from 1997[M]. Berlin: ex oriente, 1997, 77-100

    [60] Rezek Z. Ain Difla[A]. Archaeology in Jordan 2: 2018-2019[R]. Amman: ACOR Jordan, 2020, 134-135

    [61] ?krdla P. Comparison of Boker Tachtit and Stránská skála MP/UP transitional industries[J]. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society,2003, 33: 37-73

    午夜久久久久精精品| av天堂中文字幕网| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产三级在线视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久久久久久久久成人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产成人a区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 1024手机看黄色片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 色视频www国产| 一本一本综合久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 毛片女人毛片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| bbb黄色大片| 久99久视频精品免费| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久这里只有精品中国| www日本黄色视频网| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 热99在线观看视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| av天堂在线播放| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产老妇女一区| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 全区人妻精品视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产乱人视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 男人舔奶头视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日本五十路高清| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一a级毛片在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| avwww免费| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 88av欧美| 嫩草影院精品99| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日本在线视频免费播放| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美日韩黄片免| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看 | 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产精品一及| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 在现免费观看毛片| xxxwww97欧美| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 色在线成人网| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美激情在线99| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美日韩黄片免| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 日本免费a在线| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 国产毛片a区久久久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 免费大片18禁| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 久久亚洲精品不卡| 我要搜黄色片| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 看免费av毛片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 欧美日韩黄片免| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美午夜高清在线| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇丰满av| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 色播亚洲综合网| 一级av片app| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 老女人水多毛片| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 88av欧美| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲最大成人中文| 悠悠久久av| 丰满的人妻完整版| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 高清在线国产一区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 热99在线观看视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 最好的美女福利视频网| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美bdsm另类| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av欧美777| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 18+在线观看网站| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久久成人免费电影| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 日韩中字成人| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 日本与韩国留学比较| 综合色av麻豆| bbb黄色大片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 久久这里只有精品中国| 日本a在线网址| 校园春色视频在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 在线播放国产精品三级| 1024手机看黄色片| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 嫩草影院入口| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| av天堂在线播放| 最好的美女福利视频网| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日韩中字成人| 欧美zozozo另类| 一级av片app| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品影院久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产在线男女| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 69人妻影院| 内地一区二区视频在线| 在线天堂最新版资源| 深夜精品福利| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久久成人免费电影| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产日本99.免费观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 悠悠久久av| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 舔av片在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 99热精品在线国产| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| av在线蜜桃| 欧美性感艳星| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 黄色日韩在线| a级毛片a级免费在线| 1024手机看黄色片| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久99久视频精品免费| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 嫩草影视91久久| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 成年版毛片免费区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 一本综合久久免费| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产高潮美女av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 在线免费观看的www视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日本 av在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 舔av片在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 免费av毛片视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一本精品99久久精品77| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 精品人妻1区二区| 毛片女人毛片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 热99在线观看视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 床上黄色一级片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产视频内射| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久国产精品影院| 久久午夜福利片| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美bdsm另类| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 极品教师在线视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久热精品热| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 成人无遮挡网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲国产精品999在线| 三级毛片av免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 简卡轻食公司| 1000部很黄的大片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 青草久久国产| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| h日本视频在线播放| 久久6这里有精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | av视频在线观看入口| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成年版毛片免费区| www.www免费av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 三级毛片av免费| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 成人av在线播放网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 在线播放国产精品三级| www.999成人在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久色成人| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 色综合站精品国产|