• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Phylogenetic Relationships among Chinese Rice Frogs within the Fejervarya limnocharis Species Complex (Amphibia: Dicroglossidae)

    2023-01-05 03:03:50KunYANGYubinWOGangSHAOPinghuLIAOHaojieTONGRichardBROWNandYuantingJIN
    Asian Herpetological Research 2022年4期

    Kun YANG ,Yubin WO ,Gang SHAO ,Pinghu LIAO ,Haojie TONG ,Richard P.BROWN* and Yuanting JIN*

    1 College of Life Sciences,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang,China

    2 Ningbo Beilun District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Ningbo 315000,Zhejiang,China

    Abstract We present a molecular assessment of the widely-distributed rice frog (Fejervarya limnocharis)which provides many new samples that add to knowledge of their phylogeography within China and considers genetic support for five Chinese species within this complex.Two mtDNA fragments from 270 individuals and eight nuclear DNA loci (105 individuals) were sequenced from specimens sampled from across China.Data from nine specimens from China,Indonesia and Japan were also retrieved from previous studies.MtDNA was informative about population divergence within China and indicated one major clade (with four subclades) from South China and the Zhoushan Archipelago,Zhejiang,China,and a second major clade (with eight subclades) from other parts of China.Recent demographic expansions (less than 50ka ago) were detected within three of these 12 subclades,potentially associated with lowered sealevels after marine transgressions.Notably,most frogs from the previously unstudied Zhoushan Archipelago(eastern China) were found to be closely related to Japanese populations.BPP and STACEY species delimitation analyses of the multilocus data favoured five candidate species within the complex.Previous work had described Fejervarya multistriata and F.kawamurai from the Chinese mainland although here we detected considerable genetic divergence within the latter and found that this may be indicative of two species.One of these corresponds to the Zhoushan Archipelago,Zhejiang,China and Japan,and the other from most parts of Chinese mainland.This study provides a large multilocus dataset that contributes to the systematics of this species complex.

    Keywords amphibian,Asia,genetic structure,phylogeography,population expansion,Zhoushan Archipelago

    1.Introduction

    Systematics studies at the species level are important not only to determine the most fundamental taxonomic units but also to provide important insights into the historical biogeography of different regions.There has been a significant number of phylogeographic and systematics studies of intraspecific genetic variation in eastern Asia over the last 15 years,which have largely focused on specific regions such as the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau or the north-west Pacific (Favreet al.,2015;Muellner-Riehl,2019;Niet al.,2014).However,there is generally less known about intraspecific patterns than in some other regions,such as Europe and North America.Moreover,very few studies have addressed widespread terrestrial animals that are found across major geographical areas.

    Analyses that use the multispecies coalescent to analyze groups of sequences are useful tools for detecting population or species splits as well as examining the relationships between them (Heled and Drummond,2010;Leachéet al.,2019;Yang and Rannala,2010).Irrespective of differences in interpretation about whether groups represent divergent populations or valid species,they allow probabilistic assessment of several important characteristics of the species (or population) tree including its topology,the likely number of species and the times at which different species (rather than DNA sequences) diverged.They have been used to help reveal new species or hidden evolutionary significant units (ESUs) in systematic biology studies (Behroozet al.,2018;Casacciet al.,2014).They can greatly complement traditional morphological taxonomy studies by providing robust insights into population/species divergence histories,therefore allowing improved assessment of species proposals.

    Here we examined the Asian rice frogs,a species complex generally known asFejervarya limnocharisGravenhorst,1829.The species is distributed widely across central and southeastern China,southeast Asia and Japan (Zhonget al.,2008;Djonget al.,2011;Kotakiet al.,2010).Interestingly,there is considerable morphological variation within the rice frog which has led to taxonomic debate (Matsuiet al.,2007;Veith,2001).Using mtDNA control region (D-loop) sequences,analyses of this group revealed two distinct lineages within China: the Yangtze River lineage and the southern lineage (Zhonget al.,2008).

    Four species have been proposed within the rice frog complex on the basis of morphological or molecular divergence:(1)F.kawamuraiDjong,Matsui,Kuramoto,Nishioka,Sumida,2011;found on the Japan and possibly throughout northern and central China,and western Taiwan,China;(2)F.sakishimensisMatsui,Toda,and Ota,2008;from the Iriomote and Ishigaki islands (southern Ryukyus) of Japan and eastern Taiwan,China (Djonget al.,2011);(3)F.multistriataHallowell,1861;from southeast Asia and adjacent areas in southern China (Djonget al.,2011;Feiet al.,2002;Matsuiet al.,2007);(4) populations from the Orchard and Green islands in southeastern and eastern Taiwan,China seem to form a monophyletic group and could represent a distinct species (discussed by Djonget al.,2011 who described them as “Fejervaryasp.”).

    In addition to their taxonomic uncertainty,very few studies have addressed the distributions of the four recognized lineages (Zhonget al.,2008).Within China,Zhonget al.(2008)investigated the mtDNA phylogeography of all Chinese populations,which they considered to beF.multistriata,following Feiet al.(2002).They did not obtain well-supported phylogenetic trees but detected two lineages: a Yangtze lineage(within the drainage system of the Yangtze River) and a southern China lineage (Zhonget al.,2008).It has since become apparent that the Yangtze lineage could be grouped with central Chinese and Japanese populations (i.e.,F.kawamurai) while the southern Chinese lineage corresponds to the south AsianF.multistriata(see discussion in Djonget al.,2011).Nonetheless,there is still uncertainty about populations from unstudied areas,such as the Zhoushan Archipelago (and adjacent coastal areas in eastern China).These islands are of biogeographical interest because they harbor differentiated lineages of several groups,e.g.,the Zhoushan cobra (Linet al.,2008),the batPipistrellus abramus(Weiet al.,2010) and the toadBufo gargarizans(Tonget al.,2017).It is also rather notable that three of the proposed species (F.kawamurai,F.multistriataandFejervaryasp.) within the complex have been detected within the relatively small region of Taiwan,China,and its neighboring islands (Djonget al.,2011).Hence,despite considerable previous work on the complex (e.g.,Djonget al.,2011;Matsuiet al.,2007;Zhonget al.,2008),more systematics research is required to establish relationships within this group (Kotakiet al.,2010).

    In this study,we contributed a large amount of newly generated mtDNA and nuDNA sequence data from Chinese populations to the existing data from the rice frog complex.The aims were to: 1) examine the phylogeography of the Chinese populations within this complex,2) assess the overall lineage diversity of these populations relative to other members of complex,3) examine whether the multilocus data provided statistical support for delimitation of divergent groups into distinct species.

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.SamplingGenetic data were obtained from 270 individuals from sites in China (obtained between July 2016 and September 2017) which comprised (1) Zhoushan Archipelago: 119 individuals from 25 sites,(2) Hainan: 4 individuals from one site and (3) other regions of China: 147 individuals from 20 sites (see Supplementary Table S1 and Figure S1).Tissue samples (mostly muscle from toes) were stored in ethanol immediately after sampling,and subsequently maintained at 4℃.Fieldwork and tissue sampling authorization were performed in accordance with guidelines from the China Council on Animal Care and approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experiments at China Jiliang University.

    DNA sequences from 9 additional specimens were retrieved from GenBank (from Kotakiet al.,2010),and comprised rice frogs from the following areas: China,Indonesia and Japan,and labelled asFejervarya limnocharis(also referred to asFejervaryasp.by Djonget al.2011) (n=4),F.sakishimensis(n=2),andF.multistriata(n=2) (see Supplementary Table S1 and Figure S1).Sequences from an outgroup taxon (Fejervarya triora) were also used for some analyses based on phylogenetic relationship within theFejervarya genus(Kotakiet al.,2010).

    2.2.DNA extraction,amplification,and sequencingTotal DNA was extracted from the 270 Chinese rice frog tissue samples with a universal genome extraction kit (Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.) following the manufacturers protocol.Two pairs of primer were designed for amplification of two mtDNA regions: i)ND1-ND2containing subunits one and two of the NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) complex and ii)Cytb-CRcontaining cytochrome b,tRNA and control region sequences (see Supplementary Table S2).A cytochrome b region situated withinCytb-CRwas also available for the Genbank specimens.Eight modified pairs of primers that have been described previously (Bossuyt and Milinkovitch,2000;Kotakiet al.,2008,2010) were used for amplification of the following eight nuclear loci: i) C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 (CXCR4),ii) Tyrosinase (Tyr),iii) Rhodopsin (Rhod),iv) 3’ portions of recombination activating 1 (3RAG-1),v) 5’portions of recombination activating 1 (5RAG-1),vi) Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF),vii) sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX1),viii) recombination activating 2 (RAG-2) (see Supplementary Table S2).These loci were amplified in 105 specimens selected from all localities to cover a wide geographical area and all mtDNA lineages.PCR products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.These loci were selected as they were homologous with those in nine Genbank specimens (Supplementary Table S1).Sequencing chromatograms were spliced using SeqMam software in DNAstar v.7.10 (Nystuen,2001) and aligned using ClustalX(Thompsonet al.,1997).Nuclear sequences were phased using DnaSP v5 (Librado and Rozas,2009) to allow phylogenetic analyses of alleles detected at each locus.

    2.3.MtDNA analyses of Chinese rice frogsThe mtDNA sequences (Cytb-CRandND1-ND2,from 270 individuals,plus the outgroupF.cancrivorafrom Genbank EU652694) were used to investigate phylogeographic and demographic patterns within previously poorly sampled regions of the eastern China including Zhoushan Archipelago.Although nuclear loci were available for 105 specimens they showed relatively few variable sites within China and so were not used.The sequences were divided into the following five data partitions: 1st and 2nd (cp1 and 2) and 3rd (cp3) codon positions within theND1andND2gene codon sites,cp1 and 2 and cp3 within theCytbgene,tRNA and control region (see Table S3).Gene trees were inferred using both the Bayesian approach implemented in MrBayes v.3.2.6(Ronquist and Huelsenbeck,2003) and the maximum likelihood(ML) approach in RAxML v.8.2.11(Stamatakis,2014).

    The best DNA substitution model for each partition was assessed using MrModeltest v.2.3a (Nylander,2004) and then implemented within MrBayes.Details on prior setting and substitution models are listed in Supplementary Table S3.Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses were run for 9 million generations,trees were sampled every 500 generations and the first 1800 sampled trees were discarded as burn-in.

    The ML tree was obtained using the raxmlHPC-PTHREADS command in RAxML.Following the use of MrModeltest,the GTRGAMMA model of DNA substitution was the most suitable available model for each partition.A total of 1000 bootstrap replicates were generated.

    Historical demographic changes within five identified Chinese mtDNA groups that contained over ten individuals for each group were analyzed using two approaches.First,the mismatch raggedness indices (Excoffier and Schneider,1999),Tajima’sD(Tajima,1989) and Fu’sFsvalues (Fu,1997)were obtained using 1000 simulations (Program: Arlequin v.3.5) (Excoffier and Lischer,2010).Second,coalescent Bayesian skyline plots (BSPs) were generated using BEAST v1.8.2.A substitution rate of 0.957% per lineage per million years was used for this analysis based on an estimated divergence date of 10Ma for theND2divergence between European and AsianBufotoads (from Maceyet al.,1998).This rate appeared reasonable given the relative homogeneity ofND2rates across reptile and amphibian lineages (Maceyet al.,2001).Also,for greater reliability,the analyses used only sites that were homologous with theND2fragment analysed by Maceyet al.(1998).

    23 Who knows what may not happen before that? thought the miller s daughter; and besides, she saw no other way out of it,24 so she promised the manikin what he demanded,25 and he set to work once more and spun the straw into gold

    2.4.Species delimitation analysesThe general aim was to use the 279 nuclear and mtDNA sequences for multispecies coalescent species delimitation analyses (sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1).These analyses examined levels of genetic support for the four previously-proposed rice frog species within the complex (Djonget al.,2011;Kotakiet al.,2010;Matsuiet al.,2007;Zhonget al.,2008) although one of these was also separated into two candidate species.We therefore examined support for a total of five candidate species (described below) using the eight nuclear loci plus the mtDNA locus.

    Prior to these species tree analyses,we assessed mitonuclear discordance through analyses of nuclear and mtDNA gene trees.The same sequences (collapsed into haplotypes) that were used in the species delimitation analyses described below were used although the outgroup (Fejervarya triora: Supplementary Table S1)was also included.ML trees were estimated using haplotypes identified for: i) all eight phased nuclear loci (unpartitioned),ii) homologous mtDNA (Cytb,partition by codon position)sequence present in new specimens (note that we only usedCytbsequences because they were homologous with sequences used in previous studies that we wished to include).In both cases,partitioning was guided by PartitionFinder (Lanfearet al.,2017).The raxmlHPC-PTHREADS command within RAXML (Stamatakis,2014) was used,with the GTRGAMMA substitution model.Statistical support for nodes was derived from 1000 bootstrap replicates.

    The five specified candidate species that were tested in the multispecies coalescent analyses were mainly based on previously proposed species and the same names are used wherever possible (see Introduction for general details on these species).The candidate species were: i) rice frogs from the Iriomote and Ishigaki islands of Japan,and those from northeastern Taiwan,China (here,all described as “F.sakishimensis”),ii) rice frogs from Orchard and Green islands of southeastern Taiwan,China (Fejervaryasp.),iii) rice frogs from Thailand,Cambodia,Malaysia,Indonesia and adjacent areas in southern China (here,F.multistriata),iv) populations from the Hiroshima,Japan,and the Chinese Zhoushan Archipelago and some peripheralF.kawamuraiareas of south-central eastern China (such as Guangzhou and Guangxi),which includes populations that seem to have been assigned toF.multistriata(Djonget al.,2011) (here;F.kawamurai-ZS),v) north-central China populations,formerly described asF.kawamurai(here;F.kawamurai-NCC).The justification for splittingF.kawamuraiinto two candidate species (F.kawamurai-ZSandF.kawamurai-NCC) followed from the initial mtDNA analyses of Chinese populations which showed a major/deep well-supported basal split (see later).Rather than ignore this split,we examined more general genetic support for it using all nine loci in our species tree analyses.

    Species trees were analyzed using the Bayesian multispecies coalescent approaches implemented within the programs BPP v4.30 (Yang,2015) and STACEY v.1.2.5 (Jones,2017).All nine loci were used,i.e.,the mtDNA (Cytb) and eight nuclear loci.The analyses used all new specimens sequenced in this study,for which all loci were available (n=105),together with sequences(from eight individuals) that originated from Kotakiet al.(2010).BPP and STACEY allow assessment of support for different numbers of species,and the historical relationships among them,but implement quite different algorithms.Both programs allow specified candidate species to be lumped with one another but not split into additional species.

    BPP analyses (using the A11 configuration) provided posterior probabilities for different numbers of species and tree topologies.Unlike STACEY,it implements a reversible jump algorithm that allows the MCMC chain to move between species trees with any number of tips,up to the maximum number of candidate species proposed,which leads to changes in the parameterization of the species tree.BPP requires specification of priors on population sizes and divergence times.Inverse-gamma (INVG) priors were used to accommodate scenarios that implied different population sizes(θ) and divergence times (τ).Preliminary estimates suggested the most appropriate prior specification was: θ INVG (1.2,0.006),τ INVG (1.2,0.0005) and this was run in triplicate (from different starting positions) to ensure convergence on the same posterior(50000 post burn-in samples taken from a chain run for 2.5 million steps).Additional analyses with different priors were used to ensure that the results were not overly-sensitive to the population size and divergence time priors,as follows: i) smaller population size with more recent divergence time,θ INVG (1.2,0.0006),τ INVG (1.2,0.00005);ii) larger population size with longer divergence time,θ INVG(1.2,0.06),τ INVG(1.2,0.005);iii)larger population size but more recent divergence time,θ INVG(1.2,0.06),τ INVG (1.2,0.00005);iv) smaller population size with longer divergence time,θ INVG (1.2,0.0006),τ INVG (1.2,0.005).

    Equivalent analyses were carried out using STACEY combined with the associated SPECIESDELIMITATIONANAL YSER (Jones,2017).STACEY was implemented within BEAST ver2.6 (Bouckaertet al.,2014).A primary difference from BPP is that the problem of different numbers of parameters arising under different species delimitations is overcome using a particular birth-death model for the species tree that allows effective collapse of node heights close to zero.These collapsed nodes continue to exist,leaving the parameter space unchanged despite effective changes to the number of tip species.Another difference is that population size parameters are constant along each branch and integrated out,rather than being sampled.These aspects,together with newly-developed operators seem to allow good convergence,particularly when compared with *BEAST species tree analyses (Jones,2017).Here,the tree prior was specified from a Birth-Death-Collapse model,with a collapse height of 1×10–4(which specified the upper limit at which the node height is considered to be zero) the difference between birth and death rate,μ-λ=100,and the death rate relate to birth rate,μ/λ=0.5.The Jukes Cantor substitution model (as implemented in BPP) was used for all loci,except mtDNA where the HKY model was used to accommodate greater sequence divergence.The strict clock model was used for all loci,with priors specified from an inverse gamma distribution with parametersα=10,β=1.Collapse weight for species was specified as uniform using a Beta distribution,with both parameters set to 1,giving equal weight to any number of species between 1 and 5.Finally the popPriorScale prior was specified from a lognormal distribution with mean of–7 and standard deviation of 2.The MCMC was run for 2.5×108steps and sampled every 104steps (three replicates).

    3.Results

    3.1.SequencingMtDNA and nuclear sequences were obtained for all 270 Chinese specimens.The total aligned lengths/numbers of variable positions for individual loci were as follows: 2596/392 bp for mtDNA (ND1-ND2869/97 bp,Cytb-CR1729/295 bp) and for nDNA: 731/32 bp (3RAG-1),877/64 bp (5RAG-1),441/7 bp (BDNF),651/19 bp (CXCR4),770/9 bp(NCX1),869/41 bp (RAG-2),290bp/1 (Rhod) and 661/43 bp (Tyr).

    The first of these included four well-supported groups from the following regions in China: Guangxi (A);Guangzhou (B);Pinghu,Zhejiang (ZJPH) (C);the Zhoushan Archipelago (the majority of samples from this area) and the adjacent Hangzhou Bay area,Zhejiang (two samples) (D) (Figure 1).The second major mtDNA subgroup consisted of eight major subgroups(of which seven were well-supported by posterior probabilities>0.98 from the Bayesian analysis but only two were supported by bootstrap values >70% from the ML analysis) from the following regions in China: Hainan (E);Zhejiang province in eastern China along with some samples from the Zhoushan Archipelago (Jintang Island and the Dongji islands) that did not overlap with subgroup D (F);coastal areas of Zhejiang province and Jintang Island along with two individuals from Henan province,west of Zhejiang (G);Henan and Anui Provinces,and some western areas of Zhejang province (H);Hunan province(south of Zhejiang and Henan) (I);Guizhou (east of Hunan) (J);Henan (Xinyang) (K);Zhejiang and Shanghai Lucao,Anhui,Jiangxi and Hunan,which are close to Zhejiang,along with an individual from Henan (Tanghe) (L) (Figures 1 and S2).Groups,F,G and H showed overlapping distributions in Zhejiang province.

    Non-coalescent demographic analyses were only carried out on the more diverse mtDNA lineages,B,D,G,H and L,within which the sequence data contained a reasonable number of informative sites.This indicated rapid recent expansion within three of these: D,G and L (see Table 1 for details).The coalescent skyline test also suggested recent population demographic expansions 25~35 ka ago in D and L and a slightly more recent expansion in G (Figure 2).

    Figure 1 Phylogenetic trees of Chinese Fejervarya limnocharis from partitioned analyses using mtDNA haplotypes (Cytb-CR and ND1-ND2).Specimens found within each mtDNA group (A-L) are labelled and correspond to the full list provided in Table S1.Values on branches represent MrBayes posterior probabilities/RAxML bootstrap support values,respectively.

    Table 1 Summary statistics for Chinese mitochondrial clades.Haplotype diversity,nucleotide diversity,FS,Tajima’s D and raggedness indices were estimated from ND1-ND2 sequences.

    3.3.Species delimitation analysesPreliminary analyses of gene trees for the individual loci used for the species tree provided generally low levels of support (bootstrap value <50 for most nodes) and did not support general phylogenetic discordance between nuclear and mtDNA markers (Figures S3–S4).Concatenation of rice frog nuclear sequences revealed 92 haplotypes (excluding theF.trioraoutgroup) (Table S4).The nuclear tree using concatenated sequences was poorly resolved with low bootstrap support on the nodes (Figure S3).Only two major nodes had support over 70%: support for the ancestral node forF.sakishimensisandFejervaryasp.was 96%,while a large group of sequences with low divergence,comprising allF.kawamurai-ZS and the majority of theF.kawamurai-NCC haplotypes had 72% bootstrap support (Figure S3).MtDNA sequences were collapsed into 26 ingroup haplotypes and the ML tree showed generally higher node support than the nuclear tree (Table S5 and Figure S4).The net uncorrected cytochrome b divergences between the five candidate species are provided in 2.In the mtDNA tree (Figure S4),Fejervaryasp.(also referred to asF.limnocharisfrom Orchard Island in Djonget al.,2011) mtDNA haplotypes formed an outgroup to all other rice frog haplotypes,withF.sakishimensishaplotypes also forming an outgroup relative toF.kawamuraiandF.multistriatahaplotypes.Remaining haplotypes fall into two groups with bootstrap support for the respective ancestral nodes of 96% and 82%,although the node ancestral to both these groups is only weakly supported (40%).The first of these groups comprises eleven haplotypes and includesF.kawamurai-NCC and allF.multistriataindividuals,withF.multistriataoriginating from the more basal nodes within the group.There is a tendency for Hainan haplotypes to group with theseF.multistriatahaplotypes,reflecting a weak pattern that is also observed (but with low support) in the concatenated nuclear tree.The second of these two groups contains twelve haplotypes,which include all remainingF.kawamurai-NCC and allF.kawamurai-ZS haplotypes.

    The BPP species tree analysis revealed strong statistical support for the five candidate species that we tested within the rice frog complex,independent of different priors placed on population size and divergence times.Posterior probability(PP) support for a five species delimitation was PP=0.966 for our preferred analysis with θ specified as INVG (1.2,0.006),and τ specified as INVG (1.2,0.0005).We favored this analysis in part because prior and posterior means were very similar,both for θ (0.030 and 0.032,respectively) and τ(0.0025 and 0.0029,respectively) (this was not the case for the other exploratory analyses of the sensitivity of the analysis to these priors).The preferred specification provided very high individual delimitation PPs for each of the five proposed species (PP>0.990 forF.kawamurai-ZS,F.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriata;PP>0.967 forF.sakishimensisandFejervarya sp).A five species delimitation had greatest support (PP=0.967)in both above analyses and other analyses specifying small population sizes,although we note that overall support for five species was diminished when larger population sizes were specified (PP=0.434 for longer divergence times;PP=0.555 for shorter divergence times).The most strongly favored species tree topology in all analyses presented a ((F.kawamurai-ZS,F.kawamurai-NCC),F.multistriata) lineage that was reciprocally monophyletic with a (F.sakishimensis,Fejervaryasp.) lineage (Figure 3).The only exception to this finding was the aforementioned long divergence time/large population size analysis,in whichF.sakishimensisandFejervaryasp.were grouped as one species.Posterior support for the (((F.kawamurai-ZS,F.kawamurai-NCC),F.multistriata),(F.sakishimensis,Fejervarya sp)) topology was PP=0.750 in our preferred analysis with intermediate priors.

    The STACEY analyses also revealed greatest posterior support (PP=0.954) for the five species delimitation.Four species delimitations received much lower support,with a four species delimitation in whichF.sakishimensisandFejervaryasp.were joined as a single cluster being the most strongly favoured of these,but with a PP of only 0.046.The maximum clade credibility tree revealed an identical species tree topology to that favored by BPP.Highest PPs (1.000) were obtained for two nodes: i) the most basal node,representing the split betweenF.multistriataand the remaining species,and ii) the (F.kawamurai-ZS,F.kawamurai-NCC) node.Support for the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) ofF.sakishimensis,Fejervaryasp.was PP=0.910.The node with lowest posterior support (PP=0.548)was that representing the MRCA ofF.kawamurai-ZS,F.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriata.

    4.Discussion

    Figure 2 Bayesian skyline plots showing the population growth history of F.limnocharis.Horizontal axis corresponds to time (Ma),and vertical axis represents the product of female effective population size (Ne) and generation time(τ,years × 10?6).

    The analyses presented here throw new light on phylogeographical relationships among rice frog populations in China.Our species tree analyses suggest greater genetic diversity within theF.limnocharisspecies complex than previously described.In particular,our sampling across China allowed detection of a deep mtDNA split within the previously proposed speciesF.kawamurai(Djonget al.,2011) and,based on eight nuclear loci and the mtDNA locus,provided initial support for its future delimitation into two new sister species.One of these corresponds to Japan,the Zhoushan Archipelago and some regions close to the coasts of eastern and southern China (here denotedF.kawamurai-ZS),and the other is found in the centre and eastern coast of China,including two of the Zhoushan Archipelago (here denotedF.kawamurai-NCC).

    Genetic data also provided evidence that supported full species recognition of the previously-describedF.sakishimensisfrom the Japanese Iriomote and Ishigaki islands,close to Taiwan,China (Djonget al.2011).Furthermore,this group was found to be most closely related to,but distinct from,another proposed species that Djonget al.(2011) referred to as“Fejervaryasp.” from the Orchid and Green islands to the south-east of Taiwan,China.Finally,we find some evidence (albeit weaker)that most Chinese mainland (and Japanese) populations are more closely related to other Asian populations than they are to populations from islands in the East China Sea.Our findings are further supported by the finding of very substantial net pairwise mtDNA divergences of around 7.3% and 9.8% between most pairs of candidate species,with the exception ofF.multistriata/F.kawamurai-NCC (see below).

    Mitochondrial control region sequences previously showed that Chinese mainland populations ofF.limnochariswere split into northern Yangtze River basin and southern groups(Zhonget al.,2008).However,this study does not appear to have included sampled sites withinF.kawamurai-ZS,which might explain why it detected just two major mtDNA groups in China (the groups we refer to asF.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriata).Wider sampling by Zhonget al.(2008) would have revealed that their southern mtDNA group also included populations from the Zhoushan Archipelago,Zhejiang,China and Japan.

    We are also able to substantially advance the findings of Kotakiet al.(2010) who provided an impressively wide sample distribution from across Asia,but did not sample any other sites except Husa (adjacent to southeast Asia) within China.This likely explains why they did not detect theF.kawamurai-NCC andF.kawamurai-ZS groups.These two sister groups are separated by a net mtDNA divergence of 10% (Table 2),which is greater than expected within most vertebrate species.It is therefore surprising that the non-sister lineagesF.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriataare separated by only 1% mtDNA divergence (Table 2).This relationship within the species tree appears to be strongly driven by the nuclear loci:F.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriataactually show some of the greatest general nuclear divergence between candidate species pairs,similar to that betweenF.multistriataandF.sakishmensis.This cytonuclear discordance may have originated from mtDNA introgression betweenF.kawamurai-NCC andF.multistriata.This is one of several questions for future studies that are raised here.Future genomic and morphological analyses that examine the different major groups that we have identified in greater depth analyses will provide more definitive conclusions.

    Figure 3 BPP species tree showing posterior support for nodes.The five species delimitation was supported with a posterior probability of PP=0.967.

    Table 2 Net mtDNA divergence (cytochrome b) between candidate species (lower diagonal) with associated bootstrap standard error estimates (upper diagonal).

    Demographic coalescent analyses suggest quite rapid increases in population size within mitochondrial groups from i) neighboring Zhejiang,Jiangxi,Shanghai and Anhui regions close to the east coast of Chinese mainland and neighboring regions and ii) the adjacent Zhoushan Archipelago beginning around 25 000–35 000 ka.There were several late Pleistocene/early Holocene marine transgressions that might have affected the demographics of populations in this area.For example,the Ge Hu marine transgression (starting~40 ka ago) which flooded the area was followed by a drop in temperature,when sea-levels may have reached an all-time low (Linet al.,2012;Wanget al.,1980;Zhanget al.,2008).Large areas of marshland subsequently appeared in what is now the East China Sea and this likely provided opportunities for population expansion for these Zhejiang and Zhoushan groups.Other studies have related marine regression events to the rapid expansion ofPelophylaxfrogs (Dai,2009) andBufo gargarizans(Tonget al.,2017) in the same region.

    5.Conclusion

    We have added to knowledge of the biodiversity within theF.limnocharisspecies complex by detecting two lineages within the Chinese mainland.These are found withinF.kawamurai,although they included some individuals that would previously have been considered to be within the area occupied byF.multistriata.Overall the species delimitation approach favours five species within the complex,four of which (including“Fejervaryasp.”) have been proposed by previous studies(including two morphology studies).Areas of uncertainty clearly remain,which could be clarified by future studies.More complete sampling of the entire range of the rice frog and analysis of a larger proportion of the nuclear genome will provide more detailed insights into relationships and introgression between Rice frog groups.Nonetheless,this study establishes a new framework for understanding the population history of the rice frog and may help establish a stable taxonomy within this widely-distributed species complex.

    AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,China(LY21C040002),and partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41541002).We wish to thank Guowo DING for local specimen contribution.

    Appendix

    The Tables S1–S5 and Figures S1–S2 can be downloaded from the website https://pan.baidu.com/s/1DOWuYN7qMFeSiDvCjme_QQ?pwd=1407 (access code: 1407).

    Figure S3 Cladogram of F.limnocharis from RAxML based on nuclear DNA.Concatenation of rice frog nuclear sequences revealed 92 haplotypes (excluding the F.triora outgroup).The values labelled at the tree nodes show the RAxML bootstrap values.

    Figure S4 Cladogram of F.limnocharis from RAxML based on MtDNA sequences.MtDNA sequences were collapsed into 26 ingroup haplotypes.The values labelled at the tree nodes show the RAxML bootstrap values.

    av卡一久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 永久网站在线| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产极品天堂在线| 一级a做视频免费观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 少妇人妻 视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 大香蕉久久成人网| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 色哟哟·www| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 大码成人一级视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 老女人水多毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一级毛片我不卡| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品福利永久在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 高清毛片免费看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美97在线视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 少妇的逼好多水| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久人妻| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| av.在线天堂| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 999精品在线视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 三级国产精品片| 午夜福利,免费看| 永久免费av网站大全| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 男女免费视频国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久热在线av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲成色77777| xxx大片免费视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 五月开心婷婷网| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日本午夜av视频| 99久久综合免费| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 日本wwww免费看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 高清av免费在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成人影院久久| 久久午夜福利片| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 在线天堂中文资源库| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 9191精品国产免费久久| 婷婷色综合www| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 少妇 在线观看| av有码第一页| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲综合色惰| 在线观看三级黄色| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲四区av| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品人妻在线不人妻| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 熟女av电影| a级毛片在线看网站| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 婷婷色综合www| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| av电影中文网址| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 午夜福利视频精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| av在线观看视频网站免费| 性色avwww在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 中文欧美无线码| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一区二区av电影网| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av片东京热男人的天堂| 少妇 在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久影院123| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 国产综合精华液| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 一本久久精品| 嫩草影院入口| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 看十八女毛片水多多多| 香蕉国产在线看| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久久精品区二区三区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 精品久久久久久电影网| av电影中文网址| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲精品一二三| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 丝袜美足系列| 精品亚洲成国产av| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 人妻系列 视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品.久久久| 午夜av观看不卡| 有码 亚洲区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日本欧美视频一区| 色网站视频免费| 久久精品国产自在天天线| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| av不卡在线播放| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 美女主播在线视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产色婷婷99| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品成人在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 高清毛片免费看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 少妇人妻 视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 中国国产av一级| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 成年动漫av网址| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 日本黄大片高清| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看国产h片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲av.av天堂| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久免费观看电影| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲中文av在线| av免费在线看不卡| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产一区二区三区av在线| a级毛片黄视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 少妇人妻 视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 永久网站在线| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 一个人免费看片子| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 综合色丁香网| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品成人在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 成年动漫av网址| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 宅男免费午夜| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 日韩视频在线欧美| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 色94色欧美一区二区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久影院123| av视频免费观看在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 亚洲成色77777| av国产精品久久久久影院| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 一级片'在线观看视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 五月开心婷婷网| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲中文av在线| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 蜜桃在线观看..| 午夜久久久在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩中字成人| 黄色 视频免费看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲精品第二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 日日啪夜夜爽| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜日本视频在线| av黄色大香蕉| 9色porny在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 超碰97精品在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久久久国产网址| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲综合色惰| 色5月婷婷丁香| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 精品福利永久在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产片内射在线| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线观看人妻少妇| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲图色成人| 两个人看的免费小视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产男女内射视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 午夜激情av网站| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 最黄视频免费看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 咕卡用的链子| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 午夜影院在线不卡| 午夜福利视频精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 精品国产国语对白av| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 妹子高潮喷水视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看|