• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Fabrication of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced Mg matrix composites via powder thixoforging

    2022-12-30 03:40:48PingoWngJunShenTijunChenQinglinLiXioYueLingyunWng
    Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 2022年11期

    Pingo Wng,Jun Shen,Tijun Chen,Qinglin Li,Xio’n Yue,Lingyun Wng

    a State Key Laboratory of Solidificatio Processing,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an,710072,China

    b State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-ferrous Metals,Lanzhou University of Technology,Lanzhou,730050,China

    Abstract A powder thixoforging route combined with slurry based mixing process was proposed to fabricate graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) reinforced magnesium matrix composites (MgMCs).The originally spherical and ball-milled ZK60 powders were used as matrices,respectively.The mixing of 0.05wt.% GNPs with the spherical powder led to GNPs clusters and degraded the mechanical properties of the composite.In contrast,with the addition of an optimal content (0.1wt.%) of GNPs,the composite fabricated from ball-milled powder achieved a joint enhancement in tensile yield strength (52%) and fracture toughness (19%),demonstrating a pronounced strengthening efficien y of 650% and a good balance between strength and toughness.The ball-milled powder endowed the composite with a homogenous distribution of GNPs and a denser microstructure with reduced Mg-Zn eutectics,and the thixoforging process offered a well-bonded Mg/GNP interface,making full use of the strengthening and toughening potential of GNPs.Theoretical predication based on a modifie shear-lag model suggested that load transfer dominated the strengthening mechanisms.In-situ tensile tests verifie that crack deflection secondary cracks and GNPs bridging mainly accounted for the toughening mechanisms.A numerical model with consideration of GNPs orientations was also established to understand the toughening effect from GNPs bridging.

    Keywords: Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPS);Magnesium;Powder thixoforging;Strengthening;Toughening.

    1.Introduction

    Magnesium alloys are increasingly attractive for lightweight and energy saving applications in aerospace,automobile,electronics and sports-related industries,owing to their benefit such as low density,high specifi strength and stiffness,good damping capacity and recyclability [1,2].Nevertheless,their wide applications are seriously restricted as a result of the relatively low strength and poor ductility[3].Incorporation of reinforcing particles into alloys to obtain metal matrix composites (MMCs) has large potential to improve their mechanical properties.However,traditional micron oxide or ceramic reinforcing particles generally lead to the reduction in ductility.Previous studies have revealed that the addition of a small volume fraction of nanofiller could improve the strength of matrix without sacrificin the ductility/toughness,and offer the higher strengthening efficien y compared with micron particles [1].Accordingly,novel reinforcements with superb properties are hopeful to surmount the trade-off between strength and ductility that has plagued traditional MMCs [4].

    Graphene is being an attractive reinforcing nanofille in MMCs because of their ultra-high tensile strength (up to 130 GPa) and elastic modulus (~1 TPa),and other outstanding physical characteristics such as high thermal conductivity and low thermal expansion coefficien [5].Compared with ceramic or oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes (CNTs),the unique 2D geometry and large aspect ratio of graphene are favorable for a more effective load transfer from matrix to reinforcement [6,7] in MMCs.Usually,graphene nanoplatelets(GNPs) composed of multilayer graphene are preferred to be used as an alternative reinforcement for high-performance MMCs,because they are much easier to obtain and cost less than graphene,yet offer comparable strengthening efficien y[8].However,obtaining the uniform dispersion of GNPs into metal matrix remains challenging due to their large specifi surface area and poor wettability with metal melts,which really becomes a bottleneck in the fabrication of MMCs reinforced with GNPs.

    Until now,processing techniques of GNPs reinforced magnesium matrix composites (MgMCs) can be mainly classifie into two kinds: solidificatio processing and powder metallurgy.Basically,solidificatio processing is regarded as an effective pathway in terms of cost-effective and mass production.In this case,the traditional casting method has realized the incorporation and dispersion of GNPs into molten matrix through assisted technologies such as ultrasonic processing [7,9],semisolid stirring [7,10] and diluting precursor containing GNPs [10,11].Also,relatively novel methods like disintegrated melt deposition (DMD) [12–14]and semisolid processing [15,16] have been proposed to pursue a homogeneous distribution of GNPs in metal matrix.Nevertheless,nearly all these methods combined multiple dispersing means or steps to diminish the tendency of GNPs agglomeration.Moreover,additional deformation like hot extrusion [11,13,15] and friction stirring processing [9] is generally needed to further improve the dispersion and distribution of GNPs,and also enhance the interface bonding between GNPs and matrix,resultantly making the fabrication process more tedious and less practical in mass production.Furthermore,the relatively high processing temperature may impair the graphene structure through interfacial reactions[16].Alternatively,powder metallurgy is considerably popular in producing MMCs reinforced with nanoparticles owing to the efficien dispersion of reinforcement,fl xible constituent design and controllable interface reaction[17].This technique always involves three steps: mixing of powders,compacting of powder mixtures and sintering of green compact.However,additional deformation processing like hot extrusion or rolling is also indispensable for further consolidation.It should be pointed out that the commonly-used ball milling,being an economical and effective method to produce powder mixtures,may be still ineffective for uniformly dispersing GNPs in metal matrix because of the large specifi surface area and the attractive Van der Waals forces between graphene layers.Meanwhile,the improper milling parameters will damage the graphene structure and promote interfacial reactions,and hence impair the strengthening efficien y[18].To tackle these issues,improved methods such as semi-powder metallurgy or modifie powder metallurgy[19–21],fla e powder metallurgy[22,23] and graphene surface modificatio [24–26] have been proposed,which was expected to improve the compatibilities of GNPs and metal powders in terms of geometries and/or surface properties to achieve homogeneous distribution of GNPs in metal powders.Moreover,GNPs were usually mixed with metal powders in a solvent (e.g.ethanol) using mechanical stirring instead of ball milling to maintain the structural integrity of GNPs.Although these methods have made progress in uniformly distributing GNPs into metal matrix,the obtained microstructure still exhibits low density level and poor interfacial bonding,while the required post-processing step makes the process more complicated.Therefore,they are neither reliable nor cost-effective enough to produce complexshaped components.Thus,a more effective and facile route to fabricate MMCs reinforced with GNPs is highly desired.

    It is well known that thixoforming is favorable for obtaining dense microstructures and forming large components with complex shapes,and has been considered as a potential route for processing MgMCs [27].The key to this technique is to get semisolid ingot with non-dendritic microstructure,which can be easily obtained by reheating the green compact of atomized alloy powder at a semisolid temperature.Thus,powder thixoforming have been proposed to produce MMCs with desired mechanical properties in our previous works [28,29].This hopeful method combines the benefit of powder metallurgy and semisolid processing,not only allowing a uniform distribution of reinforcing particles and a dense microstructure,but also being sophisticated enough to fabricate complex-shaped and large-sized parts.Moreover,it is free from multistep processing typically required in powder metallurgy process and high forming temperature associated with fully liquid processing.

    On the basis of the viewpoints above,we made an attempt to fabricate ZK60-GNPs composites using powder thixoforging in this study.For comparison,the ball-milled and nonmilled ZK60 powders were mixed with GNPs through a wet mixing process and then consolidated into bulk composites by thixoforging,respectively.The influence of alloy powder shapes and GNPs content on the distribution of GNPs within matrix,microstructures and mechanical properties of composites were investigated.The possible strengthening mechanisms were theoretically analyzed.Also,the relevant toughening mechanisms were explored via in-situ tensile SEM observation,followed by numerical modeling.

    2.Experimental

    2.1.Raw materials

    Atomized ZK60 magnesium powder (Mg-5.20Zn-0.33Zr,supplied by Tangshan Weihao Magnesium Powder Co.,Ltd.,China) and GNPs (3–10nm in thickness,1–7μm in lateral size,Nanjing XFNano Material Tech Co.,Ltd.,China) were used as raw materials.As can be seen,the alloy powder is regularly spherical and consists of many small equiaxed grains with a mean particle size of 19μm (Fig.1(a) and (b)),and the used GNPs exhibit a 2D structure with small thickness of~5nm (Fig.1(c) and (d)).

    2.2.Fabrication of composites

    Fig.1.(a) SEM image and (b) particle size distribution of as-received ZK60 alloy powder;(c) SEM and (d) TEM image of raw GNPs.

    Fig.2.Schematic illustration of the preparation process for ZK60-GNPs composites by powder thixoforging.

    The fabrication process for ZK60-GNPs composites by powder thixoforging is schematically depicted in Fig.2,which contains four steps:powder mixing,compacting,partial remelting and thixoforging.

    The spherical ZK60 powder was initially ball milled to obtain an irregular powder shape under the protection of argon gas.The ball-to-powder mass ratio,rotation speed and milling time were 10:1,200rpm and 4h,respectively.In the meantime,the raw GNPs were pre-dispersed by tip-sonication in ethanol for 2h to achieve a uniform suspension.Subsequently,the slurry based mixing process [19] was employed to mix GNPs with the ZK60 powder.The ball-milled powder was mechanically stirred in ethanol to form slurry,and then the pre-dispersed GNPs suspension was added dropwise under continuous stirring to obtain the mixed slurry.To avoid the floatin and re-agglomerating of GNPs,the mixed slurry was bathed in water (50°C) and continuously stirred until in semi-dry state,and then was vacuum-dried at 60°C for 12h to obtain the mixed powders.About 60g mixed powders were compacted in a homemade vacuum mold at 180°C into a green compact (~Φ50×16mm),using a pressure of~300MPa.Then the green compact was partially melted in a tubular furnace under argon atmosphere by isothermally holding at a targeted semisolid temperature of 630°C for 60min to obtain semisolid billet for thixoforging.Finally,the semisolid billet was transferred rapidly into a preheated (300°C) steel die cavity with a diameter of 55mm and forged immediately under a pressure of ~240MPa and holding for 20s to produce fina composite (define as BM-GNPs composite).

    For comparison,the original i.e.,non-milled ZK60 powder was mixed with GNPs to forge NM-GNPs composite through the same procedure.The unreinforced NM and BM alloys were also thixoforged by directly compacting non-milled and ball-milled powder,respectively.

    2.3.Characterization

    The phases of the starting materials and fina composites were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD,Rigaku D/Max-2500).The distribution of GNPs within matrix,as well as the microstructures and fracture morphology of thixoforged samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope(SEM,JSM-6100F) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS).The microstructures of the thixoforged samples were also observed by an optical microscope (OM,Axio Scope A1).The interface structure of the thixoforged composite was investigated by using a transmission electron microscope (TEM,JEOL JEM-F200S).In-situ tensile tests were performed on a Quanta FEG 450 SEM to observe the fracture process of the thixoforged materials.To examine the mechanical strength,tensile and compression tests were conducted on a universal machine (AGS-X 300KN,Shimadzu Co.,Ltd.,Japan) with strain speed of 1×10?3s?1.For each material,fi e dog-bone shaped specimens (gauge length: 12.5mm;cross section: 5mm×2mm) and three cylindrical specimens(Φ8×12mm) were used for tensile and compression tests,respectively.The micro-hardness was measured by utilizing a micro-hardness tester (HV,W1102D37,Buehler Ltd.,USA)with a load of 100g and a dwell time of 10s.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Uniformity of GNPs distribution within the matrix powders

    Fig.3 shows the SEM images of the mixed powders.It is apparent that the ball-milled powder exhibited irregular shape and rougher surface.Also,the distribution of GNPs within matrix powder was strongly dependent upon GNPs concentration and powder shape.Within the ball-milled powder,a uniform distribution of GNPs was obtained by adding no more than 0.1wt.% GNPs.As seen in Fig.3(a–d),the welldispersed GNPs (denoted by yellow circles and arrows) were adhered onto the powder surface without obvious agglomeration.However,the addition of 0.15wt.% GNPs formed clusters either on the powder surface or among the powder particles (indicated by red circles and arrows,Fig.3(e) and (f)),indicating an inhomogeneous distribution of GNPs.Within the non-milled powder,GNPs were distributed non-uniformly,even if the content was as low as 0.05wt.%.As observed in Fig.3(g)and(h),most GNPs agglomerated among the spherical particles (as marked by red circles and arrows),with only a small amount of them dispersed onto the powder surface(marked by yellow circles).

    The compatibility in morphology between matrix powder and GNPs plays a key role in the distribution homogeneity of GNPs within matrix.Compared with GNPs with 2D geometry and large specifi surface area,spherical metal powder is featured with smooth surface and large curvature,which will limit the adhesion of GNPs to powder surface.Whereas,the irregularity of ball-milled powder can weaken the curvature effect and increase the actual contact area between the metal powder and GNPs,improving the compatibility in morphology [30].Accordingly,the ball-milled powder could accommodate more GNPs than the non-milled powder,achieving a uniform distribution of GNPs within the matrix.

    3.2.XRD results

    Fig.4 presents the XRD patterns of the starting materials and samples obtained from the different fabrication steps.It was evident that no diffraction peaks of GNPs were detected in the mixed powders and fina composite due to the low content of GNPs.The absence of peaks related to interfacial products was consistent with the fact that ZK60 would not react with GNPs.In addition,the intensity of MgO peaks in the fina composite was slightly higher due to high temperature during the partial remelting process.

    3.3.Microstructure characterization

    Firstly,there is a need for a basic description associated with the as-thixoforged microstructures.After partial remelting,the fin grains inside ZK60 powder particle are coarsened seriously and no longer remained due to a long-time holding at high temperature.In turn,the unmelted portion of one powder particle will mostly evolve into oneα-Mg particle or sometimes be separated into severalα-Mg particles by liquid,all of which are described as primaryα-Mg particles.Besides,during thixoforging,some small grains are solidifie from liquid phase,namely secondα-Mg grains.

    Fig.5 gives the optical micrographs of as-thixoforged alloys and composites.All the microstructures presented the primaryα-Mg particles (marked by arrows A) with clear particle boundaries (PBs,dark regions),along with some fin secondaryα-Mg grains (marked by arrows B).Moreover,the primaryα-Mg particles in the samples fabricated from non-milled powder (Fig.5(e) and (f)) were more round than those obtained from ball-milled powder (Fig.5(a-d)),indicating that the as-thixoforged microstructure partially inherited the feature of original powder.It has been reported that the addition of GNPs could markedly refin the grains by acting as nucleation substrates forα-Mg during solidificatio[12,13,16] or pinning grain boundaries to hinder grain growth during sintering [31].As shown in the insets of Fig.5,however,there was no dramatic decrease inα-Mg particle size of the composites,indicating an insignifican refinin effect of GNPs on theα-Mg particles.The reasons for this could be:(i) the primaryα-Mg particles in as-thixoforged microstructures evolved from the corresponding powder particles[32]instead of solidification thus their average size was largely determined by that of the powder particles;(ii) the naturally formed oxides on powder surface suppressed the growth of primaryα-Mg particles via pinning up the PBs,the pinning effect of GNPs on PBs was not fully exerted accordingly.Meanwhile,this suppressed growth of primaryα-Mg particles was also evidenced by the minor change from raw powder to primary α-Mg of unreinforced alloys in terms of average particle size,which increased from 19.2μm for the raw powder to 23.7μm for the BM alloy and to 24.4μm for the NM alloy.

    Fig.3.SEM images of mixed powders: (a) and (b) BM-0.05GNPs;(c) and (d) BM-0.1GNPs;(e) and (f) BM-0.15GNPs;(g) and (h) NM-0.05GNPs.

    Fig.4.XRD patterns of the starting materials and samples obtained from different fabrication steps.

    Fig.6 exhibits the SEM images and element maps of the BM-0.1GNPs.As indicated in Fig.6(b) and (c),an intense carbon (C) accumulation identifie the white strip-like phase as GNPs.Hence,it can be inferred that GNPs were distributed alongα-Mg PBs,accompanied by a fin dispersion of oxides.In this case,the inevitable absorption of oxygen on powder surface,as well as the easy adsorption of oxygen by GNPs because of their wrinkle surface [7] would form oxides especially at high temperature,which affected the mechanical properties of resultant composites.On the other hand,the presence of these oxygen atoms is advantageous to the interfacial bonding between Mg matrix and GNPs due to their preferential reaction with active Mg under high temperature[33].

    Fig.7 shows the TEM observation of BM-0.1GNPs.As shown in the inset of Fig.7(a),the selected area diffraction(SAED) patterns indicated that the Mg/GNP interface structure was composed of GNPs and Mg.The fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern of region B also manifested the characteristic (002) diffraction spots of C,as displayed in the inset of Fig.7(b).According to the noise-filtere inversed FFT image in Fig.7(c),the lattice spacing was measured as 0.3418nm,which further identifie the few-layered graphene structure of GNPs.As can be seen from the HRTEM image provided in Fig.7(b),small GNPs were embedded in the Mg matrix and no obvious gap at the Mg/GNP interface was observed.This suggests that the thixoforging process was adequate to achieve a tight interface bonding.The sufficiently-bonde interface was attributed to the improved wettability at relatively high remelting temperature and forging pressure,and could promote the mechanical interlocking and load transfer between GNPs and Mg matrix.

    Fig.8(a–d)compare the SEM(BSE model)microstructures of the two types of ZK60 alloys and their composites.The EDS results indicated that the black point A contained a high level of oxygen and a certain amount of carbon (Fig.8(e)),and the white point B was rich in Zn (Fig.8(f)),corresponding to pores and coarse Mg-Zn phases,respectively.It can be deduced that both pores and coarse Mg-Zn phases appeared heavily in the NM alloy and NM-GNPs composite,but were not distinct in the BM alloy and BM-GNPs composite.The unwanted pores were caused by two factors: (i) the spherical powder was associated with a more porous powder compact due to its low compressibility [34];(ii) GNPs clusters within the spherical powder would remain and generate pores in the fina composite,which was evidenced by the detectable C element in point A and the fact that pores in the NM-GNPs composite were more than those in the NM alloy.With respect to the coarse Mg-Zn phases,they were regarded as the secondary eutectics from solidificatio [15] and therefore related to the formation of liquid phase in semisolid microstructure,which could be understood with the aid of the water-quenched microstructure (Fig.9) of non-milled powder compact (~Φ12×5mm) partially remelted at 630°C for 30min.As seen in Fig.9(b),someα-Mg particles were enriched by liquid network (marked by arrows A),while others only involved isolated liquid phase (denoted by arrows B) or liquid-free zones (indicated by arrows C).Such liquid segregation should result from the compositional segregation in the original alloy powder,because this liquid phase derived mainly from the melting of the eutectics within alloy powder particles.During solidification the liquid-rich zones preferred to form coarse secondary eutectics due to the preferential concentration of Zn and Mg in melt [35].Maybe the high-density dislocations introduced by ball milling promoted the dissolution of eutectics within powder particles during partial remelting,and thus decreased the segregation of liquid in the corresponding semisolid microstructure,reducing the coarse secondary eutectics in the BM-GNPs composite[32].

    On the other hand,previous studies have reported that GNPs could refin the eutectics in the related MgMCs.For instance,Torabi Parizi et al.[15] considered that GNPs inhabited the atomic diffusion and enhanced the cooling rate,promoting the dissolution of the Mg17Al12eutectics in the AZ80/GNPs composites.Rashad et al.[13] assumed that GNPs could regulate the precipitation of Mg17Al12phase and help to dissolve Mg17Al12intermetallic network in the AZ61/GNP composite.As shown in Fig.8(b) and (d),the coarse Mg-Zn phases (marked with arrows) were still discernible in the BM alloy but nearly disappeared in the BMGNPs composite.Therefore,it was speculated that GNPs could similarly refin the secondary eutectics.Due to the agglomeration of GNPs in the matrix,the secondary eutectics in the NM-GNPs composite were refine insignificantl.Anyway,the reduction of pores and coarse eutectic phases was beneficia for the desired properties of composite.

    3.4.Mechanical behaviors

    Fig.5.Optical micrographs of the thixoforged monolithic alloys and composites: (a) BM ZK60;(b) BM-0.05GNPs;(c) BM-0.1GNPs;(d) BM-0.15GNPs;(e)NM ZK60;(f) NM-0.05GNPs.

    Fig.6.SEM images with the EDS results for the BM-0.1GNPs composite.

    Fig.7.(a) TEM image of BM-0.1GNPs,the inset is the SAED patterns of region A;(b) HRTEM image of region A in (a),the inset is the FFT image of region B;(c) the corresponding lattice spacing measurement recorded at region B in (b).

    Fig.8.SEM backscattered images and the EDS analysis of marked points: (a) NM ZK60;(b) BM ZK60;(c) NM-0.05GNPs;(d) BM-0.05GNPs;(e) and (f)the EDS results of point A and point B in (c),respectively.(For interpretation of the references to color in this figur legend,the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

    Fig.9.(a) water-quenched microstructure of NM powder compact remelted at 630 °C for 30min and (b) the local magnifie image in (a).

    Fig.10(a) and (b) present the tensile and compressive stress-strain curves of the fabricated samples.The strength and fracture strain obtained from tensile and compression tests are also illustrated in Fig.10(c) and (d),respectively.For the unreinforced samples,the BM alloy was stronger and more ductile than the NM alloy.The reason may be that,as stated above,the ball-milling was beneficia for a denser microstructure with reduced secondary eutectics.For the composites,the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and elongation of the NM-0.05GNPs decreased simultaneously compared to the NM alloy,as a result of the poor dispersion of GNPs within the non-milled powder.Encouragingly,a small percentage of GNPs triggered an appreciable strength enhancement of the BM-GNPs composites without significan loss of fracture strain,verifying the strengthening potential of GNPs.The BM-0.1GNPs exhibited noticeably the highest strength,while the fracture strain almost remained unchanged.The tensile yield stress (TYS,202MPa) and UTS(310MPa) were increased by 52% and 24%,and the compressive yield stress (CYS,221MPa) and ultimate compressive stress (UCS,509MPa) were also enhanced by 53% and 13%,respectively,in comparison with those of the BM alloy,demonstrating a good strength-ductility balance.With the addition of 0.15wt.% GNPs,the strength of composite dropped down clearly.This indicated that an excess of GNPs weakened the mechanical properties of composite due to the agglomeration of GNPs.The Vickers hardness and elastic modulus of samples followed a similar trend.As shown in Fig.10(e),there was a slight increase in both hardness and elastic modulus for the BM-0.05GNPs and BM-0.1GNPs.Another hallmark of mechanical behavior for the composites is considered as toughness,which can be evaluated by integrating the tensile stress-strain curve to the fracture point[36].As illustrated in Fig.10(e),the BM-0.05GNPs and BM-0.1GNPs exhibited a toughness of 22.8MJ/m3and 23.7MJ/m3respectively,corresponding to 15% and 19% enhancement over the BM alloy(19.9MJ/m3),owing to a better synergy between strength and ductility.

    Fig.10.Mechanical properties of the thixoforged samples: (a) tensile stress-strain curves;(b) compressive stress-strain curves;(c) TYS,UTS and elongation;(d) CYS,UCS and fracture strain;(e) hardness,elastic modulus and toughness.

    The strengthening efficien y(R)is commonly used to evaluate the strengthening effect of GNPs,which is given by[36]:

    whereσycandσymare the yield strength of composite and matrix,respectively,VGis the volume fraction of GNPs.Fig.11 compares the strengthening efficien y and mechanical properties in this work with those of Mg-GNPs composites reported in available literature.As indicated in Fig.11(a),Rvaried in a wide range of 11%–1550% with the major distribution of 100%–200%,and the BM-0.1GNPs obtained a relatively high strengthening efficien y of 650%,outperforming most other Mg-GNPs composites.Moreover,considering that the YS of these composites ranged basically from ~110MPa to ~250MPa with the elongation mostly distributed between 7% and 12% (Fig.11(b)),the as-thixoforged sample,without any post processing,exhibited a good combination of strength and ductility.Unfortunately,nearly all the reported composites,whether by solidificatio processing or powder metallurgy,have suffered from multiple dispersing and/or mixing procedures as well as additional deformation,which makes them less practical in mass production.Therefore,it can be expected that powder thixoforging is more preferable in developing graphene reinforced MMCs,attributed to the considerable mechanical properties of composite and the relatively simple processing process.

    Fig.11.Comparison of (a) the strengthening efficien y and (b) tensile properties of the GNPs reinforced MgMCs [37].

    Fig.12 presents the fracture morphology of the BM alloy and its composites.All the tensile fracture surfaces presents ductile dimples and facets (indicated by red arrows) typical of brittle fracture,demonstrating a mixed failure mode.In particular,apart from small dimples (pointed out by white arrows) as observed on the fracture surface of matrix,the larger ones (marked with dotted circles) are also associated with composites,at the bottom of which some GNPs can be found,implying that stress can be transferred from Mg matrix to GNPs [39].Meanwhile,some GNPs are observed to be either parallel or perpendicular to the load direction,as shown in Fig.12(d),further confirmin the random distribution of GNPs in the matrix.Generally,the spatial distribution of GNPs can influenc the mechanical properties of composites greatly,and the well-alignment of GNPs parallel to the axis stress is more efficien in the load transfer [20,38].As shown in Fig.12(e),as GNPs content is increased to 0.15wt.%,more micro-cracks (denoted by blue arrows) and fracture facets appear on the fracture surface,which is related to the agglomeration of GNPs.Reasonably,GNPs clusters will hinder the densificatio of composite and initiate more cracks,leading to the premature failure of material at low stress level,as evidenced by the presence of GNPs clusters at cracks,together with a void (Fig.12(f)).The typical compressive fracture surfaces of BM alloy and BM-0.1GNPs present shear bands without observable voids (Fig.12(g) and (h)).Conclusively,the characteristic of fracture surface is consistent with the mechanical properties of the corresponding composites.

    In all,the well-dispersed GNPs can contribute to the enhanced mechanical properties via efficien load transfer,while the GNPs clusters will weaken the strengthening effect and even deteriorate the mechanical properties mainly due to the weak bonding between graphene layers.More importantly,factors including the distribution of GNPs,Mg/GNP interface bonding,primaryα-Mg and second eutectics as well as microstructural defects can be tailored via the ball milling and the solidificatio processing in the thixoforging process,enabling the high strengthening efficien y and acceptable mechanical properties of BM-0.1GNPs [40].

    3.5.Strengthening mechanisms

    A basic understanding of strengthening mechanisms may be helpful to the development and fabrication of advanced MMCs for structural engineering applications.The remarkably higher strengthening efficien y of GNPs than ceramic reinforcements depends greatly on the effective load transfer from matrix to GNPs through interfacial shear stress,owing to their large aspect ratio [41].Furthermore,metallurgical factors including grain refinin effect and dislocations also contribute to the strengthening effect [42].It should be noted that Orowan looping mechanism,generally more pronounced in MMCs with ceramic nanoparticles distributed in the grains[43],contributes very little to the strengthening effect and can be neglected in this study,due to the large lateral size of GNPs (1–7μm) and their distribution along theα-Mg PBs.

    As seen in Fig.5,the incorporation of GNPs caused a slight decrease in grain size ofα-Mg matrix due to the pinning effect of GNPs on PBs.Thus,the increase in yield strength contributed by grain refinemen can be estimated by Hall-Petch relationship [44]:

    wheredmanddcare the averageα-Mg particle size of BM alloy and composite,respectively,andKis the Hall-Petch coefficien of the Mg matrix.

    The large discrepancy in the coefficien of thermal expansion (CTE) as well as elastic modulus between Mg and GNPs can induce the geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs),which may contribute to the strength increment.The contribution of GNDs can be expressed as [45]:

    wherekis a constant,GMis the shear modulus of the matrix,bis the burgers vector of the matrix,Δαis the CTE mismatch between GNPs and Mg matrix,εyis the yield strain (0.2%),ΔTis the difference between the thixoforging and test temperature.If one piece of GNPs is simplifie as a square plate with average thickness oftand length ofL,respectively,the effective particle diameter,de,is:

    Fig.13.Theoretical calculation of the various strengthening mechanisms: (a) strengthening contribution;(b) comparison between calculated and experimental strength values.

    Thus,taking the above two metallurgical factors into consideration,the yield strength of the composites (σyc) can be predicted using the modifie shear-lag model,which is given as [46,47]:

    whereS=2(L+t)×Lis the interfacial area of GNPs,A=L×tis the cross-sectional area.The parameters needed for calculating the strengthening contributions are listed in Table 1.The predicted strength and experimental values of composites are given in Table 2 and also compared in Fig.13.Clearly,the calculated strength of 204MPa for BM-0.1GNPs is very close to its experimental value (202MPa),while the overestimated values relative to the experimental results are associated with both BM-0.05GNPs and BM-0.15GNPs.Two limitations will make the measured strength smaller than the predicted values.Firstly,GNPs are randomly oriented and agglomerated at high content rather than well aligned with the load direction and ideally dispersed in the matrix as assumed in the shear-lag model.Second,the average size of GNPs used for prediction is only a rough estimate from SEM observations but the actual size distribute widely,which leads to the inaccuracy of the predicted values.For the BM-0.1GNPs,the refinin effect of GNPs on the secondary eutectics should be more significan due to the optimal GNPs content,which may contribute more to the increased strength,accounting for the good agreement of the predicted strength with the measured value.Besides,Fig.13(a) suggests that the dominant strengthening effect is from load transfer while the grain refin ing and GNDs strengthening contribute insignifican enhancement.Therefore,the load transfer should be regarded as the major strengthening mechanism in the present composites.

    Table 1 Parameters needed for calculating strengthening contributions.

    Table 2 The calculated strength increments of the composites.

    For a given thickness oft,the load transfer effect is highly dependent upon the length of GNPs.According to the shearlag model based on the fibe reinforced MMCs [36,48],the response of GNPs length to the load transfer effect can be predicted by introducing GNPs size parameters and critical length (Lcr).Upon the applied load,if the actual length of GNPs is larger than the critical length (L >Lcr),the stress on the GNPs is linearly increased from zero at its ends to the tensile strength of GNPs at its mid-point.Thus,GNPs fracture will occur and the strengthening effect of GNPs is more efficient whereas forL

    Based on a simple force balance on one piece of GNPs,Lcrcan be define as:

    Thus,the fracture strengthσc(UTS) of composite can be expressed as follows [48]:

    Fig.14.Effects of GNPs failure mode on strengthening efficien y (R) as functions of (a) GNPs length (L) and (b) interfacial bonding (τ) based on the shear-lag model.

    whereτis interfacial shear stress,σmis the UTS of matrix (251MPa),σGis the tensile strength of GNPs,namely 30GPa [23].Givenτis equal to its up-limitτm(i.e.,the shear strength of the matrix,~67MPa for BM alloy),Lcris calculated as 2.25μm from Eq.(6).Since the actual lateral size of GNPs ranges widely from 1μm to 7μm and covers the calculatedLcr,a possible combination of GNPs fracture mode and GNPs pull-out mode might take effect.Thereby,both the strength and toughness are increased simultaneously by GNPs.

    Based on Eq.(1),the strengthening efficien y corresponding toσccan be written as:

    According to Eqs.(7) – (9),Rcorresponding toLcan be expressed as:

    Fig.14(a) depicts theRobtained from Eqs.(10) and (11).Apparently,the longer the GNPs are,the larger theRvalue is.Long GNPs can activate the GNPs fracture mode,therefore being more helpful to the effective load transfer than short GNPs.

    Considering the relation between the GNPs failure behavior and interfacial strength (τ),one piece of GNPs with a specifi length (L) will be broken ifτis larger than a critical interfacial shear stress (τcr),which can be derived from Eq.(6) and expressed as:

    wheres=is the aspect ratio of GNPs.Otherwise,GNPs will be pulled out from the matrix.

    Combining Eq.(6),Eq.(10)and Eq.(11),Rcorresponding toτcan be deduced to be:

    As shown in Fig.14(b),theRobtained from Eqs.(13) and(14) is also in proportion toτ,and the maximumR(Rmax) is attained whenτreaches to its maximum value (τm).The result indicates that strong interfacial bonding can operate the GNPs fracture mode,corresponding to a higherR.Since the pull-out of GNPs caused by weak interfacial bonding is related to a lowerR,it is unfavorable for the load transfer efficien y.

    3.6.Toughening mechanisms

    In fibe or CNTs reinforced ceramic composites,the toughening has been considered to derive mainly from the extrinsic mechanisms including crack deflectio and GNPs bridging.The former is mostly governed by the shape of reinforcing phase,while the latter benefit from the reinforcement strength and the interfacial bonding [49,50].Likewise,for GNPs-reinforced composites,the unique 2D geometry with large aspect ratio of GNPs is expected to be highly effective in toughening composites through inducing crack evolution and interfacial interactions toward great energy absorption during crack propagation [51].

    To reveal the possible extrinsic toughening mechanisms,in-situ tensile SEM observations were carried out.Figs.15 and 16 present the in-situ SEM images of the BM alloy and BM-0.1GNPs,respectively.In the matrix alloy,the major crack propagated along a relatively straight path,neither clear deflection nor small secondary cracks appeared.In comparison,the primary crack in the composite propagated tortuously and was deflecte obviously (Fig.16(a-c)).Under the exerted load,several secondary cracks were stimulated and propagated near the primary crack (Fig.16(c)).The crack deflectio and the secondary cracks were induced by the interfacial mismatch between matrix and GNPs typically accompanied with the interfacial debonding [51],which can elongate the crack length,enlarging the fracture energy absorption.The energy required to propagate crack (Ws) correlates with the crack length by [49]:

    Fig.15.In-situ SEM images of BM alloy.The dash line indicates the joint position between the two consecutive observing stages.

    whereλis the crack length,δis the out-of-plane thickness of solid material,andγis the sum of surface energy (γs)and plastic deformation energy (γp).The crack length in Fig.15(b) was measured by pixels as ~260μm,while the total crack length in Fig.16(b) was ~352μm.This indicated that the toughness of composite was higher than that of the matrix alloy.

    Moreover,crack propagation can be impeded by GNPs pull-out process,which is the so-called "bridge-toughening effect" [52].The bridging effect of GNPs was also confirme by the experimentally observed GNPs pull-out and GNPs rupture phenomena.As seen in Fig.16(d),the GNPs with sharp jagged edge (marked with dotted circle) gave the evidence that GNPs had broken into two parts,while those with smooth edge (marked with arrows) similar to that of original GNPs were related to GNPs pull-out rather than breaking.This observation was also consistent with the GNPs failure mode judged byLcr,confirmin an achievement of both strengthening and toughening effects in the present composite.As shown in Fig.16(e) and (f),the exposed GNPs on the fracture surface of composite clearly demonstrated that some GNPs were pulled out from Mg matrix and straightened along the load direction (Fig.16(f)).It is considered that this stretching and pull-out process can enhance the matrix-GNP interactions and dissipate more fracture energy via interfacial debonding and subsequent friction,contributing to the toughness enhancement [53,54].

    It is hard to measure experimentally the toughness contribution from GNPs bridging.On the other hand,due to the random orientation of GNPs with unique 2D geometry,the developed theoretical models for cylindrical fiber aligned normal to the crack plane may be not applicable in this case.Therefore,we attempt to propose a suitable model for randomly oriented GNPs with 2D geometry to theoretically evaluate the toughening effect of GNPs bridging.As schematically illustrated in Fig.17,when one single piece of GNPs is pulled out from matrix at an angle to the pull-out load direction,certain assumptions are required: i) there exists a constant frictional shear stress at matrix/GNP interface;ii) GNPs and matrix are only frictionally bonded and only the interfacial friction contributes to the increase in pull-out energy.Thus,based on the proposed model [55] for randomly orientated short fiber in ceramics,and taking into account the 2D geometry and orientations of GNPs,the energy required to pull-out one single piece of GNPs can be expressed as:

    wherelis the embedded length of GNPs in the matrix,φdesignates the orientation angle of GNPs with normal to the crack plane,μis a coefficien of interfacial friction between GNPs and matrix.The interfacial shear stressτcan be estimated by [56]:

    Fig.16.(a)-(c) in-situ SEM images of BM-0.1GNPs composite: (d) the magnifie image of marked region in (b);(e) the exposed GNPs on the fracture surface;(f) the magnifie image of marked region in (e).The dash line indicates the joint position between the two consecutive observing stages.

    whereEmis Young’s modulus of the matrix (45GPa for the BM alloy),υmis Poisson’s ratio of the matrix (0.35 for Mg),ΔαandΔTare the same as define earlier.

    Thus,the total pull-out contribution to the composite fracture energy can be modelled as [55]:

    wherezdenotes the distance of the centroid of GNPs from crack plane,and the other related functions are define as follows:

    Fig.17.The model for pull-out of GNPs with the length L and the embedded length l,oriented at an angle φ to the loading axis.

    Note that the functionU(g) in Eq.(18) is used to discount those GNPs which will be broken instead of pull-out due to imperfect interfacial bonding,and the parameterβin Eq.(22) is an artificiall chosen large positive number depending upon the any desired accuracy of approximation[57].Based on the above formulas,the fracture energy (G) of the composite due to GNPs pull-out can be rewritten as:

    Numerical calculations were conducted using Matlab according to Eq.(25),and the influence of the involved parameters on the fracture toughness were examined.Fig.18(a)describes the fracture energy(G)as a function of GNPs length(L).There is a modelled critical length of GNPs (Lcr-m) analogous toLcrdefine in the shear-lag model,at which the maximum fracture energy (Gmax) is attained.Moreover,at a given GNPs content,ifL Lcr-m,the failure mode is converted from GNPs pull-out to GNPs fracture,thus the broken GNPs will lose contribution to the toughness enhancement.In this range,Gis reduced with increasingL.This numerical result is consistent with the aforementioned shear-lag model in Section 3.3.

    Moreover,the toughness contribution from GNPs bridging is sensitive to the friction coefficien of interface (μ).For short GNPs (L Lcr-m),increasingμleads to a significan drop inGand causesGmaxpeak shift towards the shorter GNPs length (e.g.,increasingμfrom 0.1 to 0.6 reducesLcr-mfrom 2.22μm to 1.68μm).According to Eq.(17),μdictates critically the interfacial bonding strength.A largerμmeans a stronger interface,which can supply not only a higher interfacial friction to resist GNPs pull-out but also a sufficien load transfer from the matrix to reinforcement.This dual effect enhances the fracture toughness and strength of composite,but leads to earlier onset of GNPs fracture,corresponding to a smallerLcr-m.In contrast,a smallerμrepresents a weaker interfacial bonding,which can promote GNPs pullout but lower the strengthening efficien y due to weak friction resistance,related to a largerLcr-m.On the other hand,the energy consumed by GNPs pull-out is a combination of the interfacial friction and GNPs pull-out length.For a stronger interface,obtaining the enhanced toughness requires only a shorter GNPs pull-out length.This can explain whyLcr-mdecreases butGstill increases with the increase inμ,as shown in Fig.18(a).From this point of view,it is possible to enhance the strength and toughness of composite simultaneously by tailoring GNPs length and interfacial strength.Fig.18(b)illustrates the fracture energy (G) as a function of fracture strength (σc).When GNPs length is below a certain threshold (Lcr),Gincreases with the increasing ofσc,indicating a trade-off between strength and toughness.In the regime ofL>Lcr,with the increasing ofL,σcincreases at the expense ofG.Therefore,a good match between GNPs length and interface strength,which can not only ensure a sufficien load transfer but also permit an acceptable GNPs pull-out length,may be appreciated in obtaining a strengthening-toughening balance.

    Furthermore,Fig.18(c)indicates that the increase of GNPs content can enhance the fracture toughness of composite.Surprisingly,as described in Fig.10(c),a relatively high content(0.15wt.%) of GNPs led to a decrease in the measured toughness.In the present model,the dispersion degradation caused by increased GNPs content has not been considered.Poor dispersion of GNPs will induce the formation of pores and thus cause local stress concentration,making crack propagate more quickly.Therefore,just like strengthening,only the better dispersion of GNPs can realize the potential of toughening effect.

    It should be pointed out that the present model is also applicable to chemically-bonded interfaces.Introducingμin this model is only to evaluate the interfacial bonding strength.Replacingτin Eq.(17) by a given interfacial shear stress,the toughening contribution of GNPs pull-out in terms of chemically-bonded interface can be modelled.

    4.Conclusions

    GNPs reinforced ZK60 matrix composites were fabricated by powder thixoforging combined with a wet mixing process.Based on the experimental and theoretically analytical results,the main conclusions can be drawn as follows:

    (1) The ball-milled powder was beneficia for a homogeneous distribution of GNPs and a denser microstructure with reduced eutectics as compared to the non-milled powder,which resulted in 52% increment in yield tensile strength and 19% enhancement in toughness for the BM-0.1GNPs compared with the BM alloy.The as-thixoforged composite was endowed with acceptable mechanical properties and high strengthening efficien y without additional deformation,demonstrating that the combination of GNPs and powder thixoforging has considerable potential in mass-producing novel MMCs.

    (2) GNPs were distributed alongα-Mg PBs.The thixoforging process was enough to promote a well-bonded Mg/GNP interface,which could provide a significan load transfer effect of GNPs,so a pronounced strengthening efficien y of 650% was achieved in the BM-0.1GNPs composite.

    (3) Theoretical analysis suggested that load transfer was the main strengthening mechanism,the grain refinin and GNDs strengthening contributed a little to the strengthening effect.

    (4) Crack deflectio and secondary cracks induced by GNPs and the bridging effect of GNPs mainly accounted for the toughening mechanisms.A suitable model for randomly oriented GNPs with 2D geometry was proposed to evaluate the toughening effect of GNPs bridging.The modelled results showed that the toughness contribution from GNPs bridging was dependent on both GNPs length and interfacial bonding between matrix and GNPs,and a good match between GNPs length and interface bonding strength can achieve the enhanced strength and toughness simultaneously.

    Declaration of Competing Interest

    None.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was financiall supported by the National natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.51761028).

    成人午夜高清在线视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 91av网一区二区| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 老女人水多毛片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产极品天堂在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 只有这里有精品99| 观看美女的网站| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产在视频线精品| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 22中文网久久字幕| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩电影二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品三级大全| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 青春草国产在线视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲成色77777| 少妇丰满av| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产在视频线在精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日韩电影二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| kizo精华| av国产免费在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产美女午夜福利| 麻豆成人av视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产老妇女一区| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美激情在线99| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费看日本二区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 人妻系列 视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 成人国产麻豆网| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 高清毛片免费看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 在线免费观看的www视频| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产成人一区二区在线| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 成年av动漫网址| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 观看美女的网站| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| .国产精品久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 人妻系列 视频| 久久久久国产网址| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲四区av| 秋霞伦理黄片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久网色| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中文欧美无线码| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| videos熟女内射| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 直男gayav资源| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 美女高潮的动态| 在线a可以看的网站| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| .国产精品久久| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美3d第一页| 日本黄大片高清| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| or卡值多少钱| 国产成人a区在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 黄色一级大片看看| 一级毛片电影观看| av在线老鸭窝| 国产不卡一卡二| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产老妇女一区| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产在视频线精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 床上黄色一级片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产精品.久久久| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 中文字幕久久专区| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲国产色片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产成人精品一,二区| av免费观看日本| 在线 av 中文字幕| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久人人爽人人片av| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产在线男女| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日本与韩国留学比较| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美+日韩+精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 丝袜喷水一区| 99热网站在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久热精品热| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久午夜电影| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| www.色视频.com| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产高潮美女av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 黑人高潮一二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 久热久热在线精品观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 18+在线观看网站| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| av专区在线播放| 日日撸夜夜添| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 成人无遮挡网站| www.av在线官网国产| 欧美性感艳星| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| freevideosex欧美| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜免费激情av| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久久性生活片| 午夜福利在线在线| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 51国产日韩欧美| av在线蜜桃| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 老司机影院毛片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 免费av观看视频| 男女国产视频网站| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 美女高潮的动态| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久草成人影院| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 免费看av在线观看网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久久成人免费电影| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 99热这里只有精品一区| 只有这里有精品99| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 一本久久精品| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产成人91sexporn| av在线老鸭窝| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美性感艳星| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲不卡免费看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 色5月婷婷丁香| 97在线视频观看| 国产色婷婷99| 一级毛片 在线播放| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 黄片wwwwww| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 免费看不卡的av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 观看美女的网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 老司机影院毛片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 色综合站精品国产| www.av在线官网国产| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| av在线蜜桃| 欧美3d第一页| 久久热精品热| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 欧美潮喷喷水| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 精品人妻视频免费看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲18禁久久av| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品酒店卫生间| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲美女视频黄频| or卡值多少钱| 国产在视频线在精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 麻豆成人av视频| 色哟哟·www| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 极品教师在线视频| ponron亚洲| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 少妇的逼水好多| 嫩草影院精品99| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 丝袜喷水一区| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| av一本久久久久| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 99热全是精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 免费av观看视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产成人一区二区在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| xxx大片免费视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲综合精品二区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 免费av观看视频| av在线播放精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日本免费在线观看一区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 色吧在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产极品天堂在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 色综合站精品国产| 日本免费在线观看一区| 一级黄片播放器| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 欧美97在线视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | av黄色大香蕉| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲在线观看片|