• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91

    2022-12-26 02:36:06VaratharajuluMuthukannanDuraiselvamBhuvaneshKumarJayaprakashBaskar
    Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 2022年10期

    M.Varatharajulu,Muthukannan Duraiselvam,M.Bhuvanesh Kumar,G.Jayaprakash,N.Baskar

    aDepartment of Production Engineering,National Institute of Technology,Tiruchirappalli 620015,Tamilnadu,India

    b Department of Mechanical Engineering,A.V.C.College of Engineering,Mannampandal,609305,Tamilnadu,India

    cDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,Saranathan College of Engineering,Tiruchirapalli 620012,Tamilnadu,India

    d Department of Mechanical Engineering,Kongu Engineering College,Perundurai 638060,Tamilnadu,India

    Abstract Magnesium(Mg)alloys are extensively used in the automotive and aircraft industries due to their prominent properties.The selection of appropriate process parameters is an important decision to be made because of the cost reduction and quality improvement.This decision entails the selection of suitable process parameters concerning various conflicting factors,so it has to be addressed with the Multiple Criteria Decision Making(MCDM)method.Therefore,this work addresses the MCDM problem through the TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)and COPRAS(COmplex PRoportional ASsessment)methods.The assessment carried out in the material Mg AZ91 with the Solid Carbide(SC)drill bit.The dependent parameters like drilling time,burr height,burr thickness,and roughness are considered with the independent parameters like spindle speed and feed rate.Drilling alternatives are ranked using the above said two methods and the results are evaluated.The optimum combination was found on the basis of TOPSIS and COPRAS for simultaneous minimization of all the responses which is found with a spindle speed of 4540 rpm and a feed rate of 0.076 mm/rev.The identical sequencing order was observed in TOPSIS and COPRAS method.The empirical model was developed through Box-Behnken design for each response.Superior empirical model developed for drilling time which is 3.959 times accurate than the conventional equation.The trends of various dependents based on the heterogeneity of various independents are not identical,these complex mechanisms are identified and reported.The optimized results of the Desirability Function Approach are greater accordance with the TOPSIS and COPRAS top rank.The confirmation results are observed with lesser deviation suggesting the selection of the above independent parameters.

    Keywords:Machining processes;Magnesium;TOPSIS;COPRAS;MCDM;Burr;Roughness.

    1.Introduction

    The applications of various advanced engineering materials have gained significant attention in the fields of automobile,aerospace,electronics,electrical and medical in recent years[1-3].This is due to the fact that they possess superior mechanical properties with less weight[4].Few specific materials and their alloys related to aluminum(Al),magnesium(Mg)are majorly used in structural applications because of high specific strength and low density.They are also difficult to machine due to their brittleness in nature[5-8].With these afore mentioned requirements,aviation industries demand other unique physical-mechanical properties such as rigidity and fatigue strength.The growing requirements necessitate the applications of composite materials[9-14].One of the major challenges while processing advanced materials is machining using conventional tools.The primary concern for researchers while machining advanced materials is the out-put characteristics in terms of Material Removal Rate(MRR),surface finish,tool wear,surface metallurgical characteristics and so on[15-18].Material deformation during machining plays a significant role in deciding the quality of the final component[19].Drilling is one of the fundamental machining operation carried out earlier to reaming,tapping and boring[20].The consistency and dimensional accuracy of a drilled hole is primarily affected by the cutting edge of a drill bit[21].This phenomenon depends on the cutting tool profile and material.The carbide twist drills[20]are performing comparatively better than any other tools in terms of life and surface damage[22,23].For assessing the machinability of Mg alloys using drilling,the tools are further coated and used[24].During drilling,some left out noticed along the tool periphery in the work piece due to the plastic deformation usually called as burr[25].It has many adverse feature-like minor wounds of assembly labors,inappropriate mating and functional problems[26].Hence,it requires deburring process,which additional increases approximately 20–30% of manufacturing cost[27].Controlling the burr height and thickness during machining itself is a necessary study which is highlighted in the present work.

    Multi-criteria decision-making(MCDM)methods are useful resources to offer solutions to decision-making problems,including contrasting and multipurpose goals,both in real life and in professional environments[28,29].These challenges involve a small range of solutions,evidently recognized at the outset of the decision-making process.Each alternative is shown by its success in a variety of parameters.The complexity of a choice-based problem results from the existence of more than one criterion for the determination of alternatives.The approach depends heavily on the desires of the decision-makers(DMs)[30,31].To decide the favorable and unfavorable ideal alternatives from the decision matrix,the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)method was used[32].The TOPSIS process is applied successfully for the selection of sequential parameters for the drilling process over hybrid polymer matrix composite[33].The combination of CCD-TOPSIS with the surface response method demonstrates its superiority in optimizing process parameters while enhancing the efficiency characteristics of the GFRP marine-grade drilling process[34].The Taguchi is combined with TOPSIS for multi-response optimization of rotary ultrasonic drilling of BK7 concerning taper,chipping width and MRR[35].The process parameters of micro EDM of AISI 304 steel analyzed by the combination of TOPSIS and ANOVA,establishes its efficiency[36].The geometrical characteristics and performance measures are optimized in cryogenically chilled micro EDM drilling process using TOPSIS[37].Solving a multi-response problem in the drilling process,the TOPSIS identified as an effective method and it was applied in cryogenic drilling on Ti-6Al-4V[38].The hole drilling of thermal barrier coated Nickel superalloy C263 using a laser was optimized by TOPSIS[39].The DOE based experimental study used in Fuzzy-TOPSIS methodology,successfully applied to determine the optimized parameters in the laser drilling process[40].

    The multi-objective Taguchi and TOPSIS were applied to optimize the process parameters in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer(CFRP)composite polymer and identified the quadratic model using Response Surface Analysis(RSA)[41].Identification of appropriate cutting fluids beneficial for machining operations and increases the productivity,life of the tool and quality of the components.In order to do so,the modified similarity-based method was applied effectively via TOPSIS[42].The different conventional and nonconventional manufacturing processes successfully applied the TOPSIS algorithm for optimizing their process parameter.In addition,this algorithm is very useful in chemical engineering,maintenance engineering and civil engineering[43].Petkovi′c,Madi′c and Radenkovi′c[44]carried out a comparative analysis of the use of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment(WASPAS)and COmplex PRoportional ASsessment(COPRAS)in MCDM methods to assist in the identification of the most effective non-conventional machining processes for ceramic machining.Taguchi based COPRAS was presented to identify the optimal combination of parameters in turning operation over stainless steel 304.The COPRAS method is successfully applied to convert the multi-objective into a single objective to carry out the examination[45].Five different normalization procedures evaluated by Yazdani,Jahan and Zavadskas[46]and suggested the superior one.The COPRAS method is applied for finding the best alternative in the drilling process on Al alloy using a solid carbide drill bit with a high-pressure coolant[47].In order to address the shortcomings of the fuzzy AHP methodology,the integration of a stable fuzzy AHP and fuzzy COPRAS was proposed for the machine tool selection.The specification of the consistency ratio(CR)is prevented while the fuzzy linguistic choice relationship is used to incorporate into the AHP.The suggested method of machine tool selection is intended to be conveniently extended[48].The stochastic type of COPRAS is effectively applied for selecting the suitable service provider in the cargo industry[31].

    Development of relation between independent and dependent parameters are essential in the case of machining with newer material like Mg AZ91[2].Minimal cutting forces observed in the case of AZ91 when it was assessed with AZ31 during turning operation,however the machining characteristics of AZ alloys during drilling was not described so far[5].Assessment by past researches reveals that,not much research has been done in the Mg alloy during the drilling process through TOPSIS and COPRAS while MCDM is a concern.It is worth looking at the machining behavior of Mg AZ91.This study focuses on the identification of significant aspects through TOPSIS and COPRAS and comparing the ranking with Desirability Function Approach(DFA).Though both the methods are adopted widely in the other machining parameters for optimization,ranking using TOPSIS is based on the relative closeness coefficient and COPRAS is based on utility degree[49].Hence there may be differences with their results that may not be a standard one.Different MCDM tools may result in a different sequence of results that may not be acceptable for generic concern.The novel aspect of this presentstudy is the comparative analysis of two MCDM tools namely TOPSIS and COPRAS for the selection of generic drilling parameters to machine Mg alloys.The complex behavior mechanism was analyzed with the appropriate technical reason.

    Fig.1.Methodology.

    2.Materials and methods

    The methodology employed in the current study is shown in Fig.1.The proposed method begins with an experimental work based on the coded and actual factors as shown in Table 1.The X6323 model ALTO make three axes vertical machining center was used to perform the experimental work.Addison make micro grain solid carbide straight shank twistdrill bit of 6 mm diameter(Jobber series)(IS5101–1991/DIN 338)is used for the drilling process.[Flute length 57 mm,Overall length 93 mm,helix angle 300,point angle 1180].The work material used is Mg AZ91 alloy and the elemental contents are presented in Table 2.To confirm the designation of the selected material,energy dispersive spectroscopy has beenanalyzed as shown in Fig.2.Further,the material properties are confirmed by the basic microstructure,in which the second phase precipitate across the grain boundary can be noted,as shown in Fig.3.The dimensions of the prepared work specimen are 150 mm(L)×70 mm(W)×10 mm(T).The range of machining parameters is decided based on the tool manufacturer’s recommendation and the competency of the machine tool.The different set of independent combinations(17 run)derived based on Box-Behnken Design(BBD)and experimented(Table 3).For each experimental run,drilling time is measured using a stop watch.Before experimentation,the drilling time is calculated based on the basic formula.The ratio of length of workpiece(in mm)with cross product of spindle speed(in rpm)and feed rate(mm/rev.)providing drilling time.However,these values are noticed with larger disparities and the average deviation found larger with 16.687%(with experimental drilling time),which inquisitive to find a superior model.

    Table 1Levels and ranges of input parameters.

    Table 2Chemical composition of Mg AZ91.

    Table 3Number of run versus coded and actual factors(Box-Behnken Design).

    Fig.2.Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy report.

    Fig.3.SEM images of work piece with(a)200X Magnification(b)500X Magnification.

    After the drilling process,the burr height at the entry and exit of the hole is measured using a coordinated measuring machine named HELMEL 80–19(Model 216–142).The measurement of burr height is determined based on the average taken from four values measured over different places of both entry and exit portions respectively.The measurement of burr thickness is done using a digital vernier caliper(Mitutoyo CD 6 CS3).The thickness of the burr is considered as the difference between the external and internal diameter of the projected burr.The roughness of the resulting surface inside the hole is measured in different places using a surface roughness testing machine Mitutoyo SJ 210 and the average is taken for analysis.The responses measured during and after the experiments are presented in Table 4.The complete experimental setup and process flow are illustrated in Fig.4.The determination of entry and exit burr height using CMM,gauging surface roughness using surface roughness tester and the burr development in the workpiece material were illustrated in Fig.5.

    Table 4Experimental data.

    The objective of this study is to minimize multiple responses as stated above by identifying appropriate spindle speed and feed rate,which is more likely to be a multiresponse optimization problem.Hence to make a decision on this multi-response problem,TOPSIS and COPRAS techniques are incorporated.

    3.Result and discussion

    3.1.TOPSIS methodology

    TOPSIS is an efficient and advanced MCDM methodology,which was first introduced by Hwang and Yoon[50]to obtain the finest choice based on the compromise solution principle.The acceptable solution can be seen as preferring the answer with the shortest route from the favorable ultimate limit and the longest route from the unfavorable ultimate limit[51].

    The subsequent procedures are used for choosing the right alternatives using the TOPSIS algorithm[52,53].

    Step 1:The identification of essential attributes(dependent and independent parameters)has to be done primary.Generally,the dependent parameters desire maximization considered as most preferable and the dependent parameters wishes minimization reckoned as least preferable.

    Surmising the present study,all the parameters are considered are least preferable attribute(for minimization)while none of the parameter considered as a most preferable attribute.Because the diminishing the responses leads to an increase in the productivity and quality of the component.

    Step 2:A matrix more often termed as decision matrix used to represent all the information,which has i row(m-alternatives)and j column(n-criteria).

    The decision matrix[D17×6]is given in Eq.(1).

    Step 3:The following formula[Eq.(2)]is used to determine the elements in the normalized matrixNij[53].

    The calculation of normalized data[Eq.(3)]for first and last element is as follows

    The calculated normalized decision matrix[N17×6]is presented in Eq.(4).

    Step 4:The cross multiplication of individual weight with the respective column of normalized decision matrix will provide weighted normalized decision matrix.

    whereWjis the weight criteria andNijis the normalized matrix.The weight(Wj)of each criterion is decided based on the expertise,which is 0.3 for drilling time,surface roughness and for rest it was 0.1.The weighted normalized value W17×6is calculated using Eq.(5)is given as Eq.(6).

    The weighted normalized matrix[W17×6]is presented in Eq.(7).

    Step 5:Estimation of the positive ultimate solution(A??)and the negative ultimate solution(A?).These are analyzed using following formula,Eq.(8)and Eq.(9):

    J=1,2,3,…,n-whereJis related with the benefit criteriaJ’=1,2,3,…,n-whereJ’is related with the cost criteria.The positive ideal solution(A??)is considered based on minimization whereas the unfavorable ideal solution(A?)is reckoned based on maximization.Deeming the present study all the six responses have to be minimized for increasing the productivity and quality of the component.The respective favorable and unfavorable ideal solution are given below[Eq.(10)]

    Step 6:The separation measure is obtained using Eq.(11).The same for each preference from the favorable ultimate one is specified by Eq.(12).

    Similarly,the unfavorable ultimate one is calculated using Eq.(13)and it is specified by Eq.(14).

    Step 7:The relative closeness is examined using Eq.(15)for each alternative and it is described in Eq.(16).

    The best alternative is chosen based onCi?value and closeness to ultimate solution.The separation measure of favorable,unfavorable ultimate solution and relative closeness value are presented in Table 5.

    Table 5Separation measure of positive,negative ideal solutions and relative closeness value.

    Table 6Relative weight,utility degree and its rank.

    Fig.4.Experimental setup and process flow.

    Step 8:Ranking based on relative closeness value.

    According to the calculated results,the complete ranking of the alternative is obtained as 17–16–15–12–13–14–5–7–2–10–6–4–3–8–1–9–11.The optimal experimental design is sequenced as follows 15>9>13>12>7>11>8>14>16>10>17>4>5>6>3>2>1.It means that the best-combined input is in run 15,and the worst is in run 1.Run 15 has 91.33% relative closeness and run 1 has 33.7% relative closeness.The superior combination to minimize the responses identified in run 15 succeeding to run 9 and 13.The optimal combination was identified with a spindle speed of 4540 rpm and a feed rate of 0.076 mm/rev.Therefore,it is suggested to select the above sequence in order to diminish the manufacturing cost and to enhance the quality of the component.

    3.2.COPRAS methodology

    Zavadskas,Kaklauskas and Sarka[54]conceived the COPRAS which entails direct and proportional reliance on the importance and usefulness of the alternatives available in the presence of mutually contrasting parameters.COPRAS en-compasses the success of variants in terms of various parameters and related weights by using the step-by-step ranking and determining the system of choice of variants in terms of their relevance and their degree of usefulness.Variety of dynamic decision-making problems COPRAS proposes to take advantage of this approach in the application of engineering[55].The primary benefit of this technique is its ease of use and friendliness.However,when dealing with qualitative metrics and characteristics,it has its drawbacks[56].

    Fig.5.Response measurement(a)burr height measurement using CMM(b)surface roughness measurement using SR tester(c)burr development at the tool exit portion(d)sample roughness measurement for run number 9.

    The subsequent steps are used for choosing the right alternatives using the COPRAS algorithm[57].

    Step 1:Identification of the objective and the significant attributes(same as that of TOPSIS).

    Step 2:Representation of decision matrix[Eq.(1)].

    Step 3:The following formula[Eq.(17)]is used to calculate the elements in the normalized matrixNij[57].In order to bring the unit free responses,the normalization is essential for comparing them[58].

    The calculation of normalized data for first and last element is as follows[Eq.(18)].

    Eq.(19)shows the normalized decision matrix[N17×6].The calculated decision matrix correctness can be crosschecked on the following basis.The summation of an individual attribute should be equal to the ratio of unity to the number of runs.Referring Eq.(19),the average of each attribute is 0.0588 is equal to the ratio of unit to number of run(1/17=0.0588).

    Step 4:The procedure followed in TOPSIS is same in determining the weighted normalized decision matrix[Eq.(20)],even the same weight is considered in order to keep them constant.

    The perceived weighted normalized matrix[W17×6]is given in Eq.(21).

    Step 5:Calculation ofPi,which is identified by the summation of attributes those need to be maximized.That is,the summation over the beneficial criteria[59].

    In the above Eq.(22),k is the number of responses which necessitate to be maximized.Concerning the current study,none of the attribute has to be maximized;therefore,all thePivalue is equal to zero.

    Step 6:Calculation ofRi,which is calculated by the summation of attributes those need to be minimized.That is,the summation over the non-beneficial criteria[59].

    In the above formula Eq.(23),(m-k)is the number of responses which required to be lessened.Conceiving the current study,all of the attributes have to be minimized,due to their adverse features.The sample calulation is presented in Eq.(24).

    Step 7:Perceiving the diminutive value ofRi[Eq.(25)].

    Step 8:Determination of the relative weight of each responsesQi.The relative noteworthy value of a response shows the measure of contentment achieves by that response.The larger is the priority of the alternative is based on the higher value ofQi.The superior selection among the alternatives is based on the largest relative valueQmax[59].

    Applying the values calculated through the Eq.(26),Eq.(28)and Eq.(29)in Eq.(27),the relative weight can be calculated,which is presented in Eq.(30).

    Rather,Eq.(25)some researcher will follow the following Eq.(31),however both the equation will return the same results.

    Step 9:Computation of the optimality criterionQmax

    Step 10:Computation of the precedence of the work.The major weight(relative weight of response)Qi,the longer is the primacy(rank)of the work.SurmisingQmax,the agreement degree is the largest.

    Step 11:Estimation of the utility degree of each response.The degree of utility of the responses,which assist to a complete ranking of responses,is calculated by evaluating the preferences of all responses with the most effective[Eq.(34)]and can be defined as follows[59]:

    From the application of Eq.(31)and Eq.(32),the above one is examined[Eq.(35)].These utility degree values of each alternative vary from 0% to 100%.

    Based on the evidence presented on the requirements for the response of the drilling process,reasonable strategies can be sought to increase efficiency and minimize costs.According to the calculated results,the complete ranking of the alternative is obtained as 17–16–15–12–13–14–6–7–2–11–5–3–4–8–1–9–10.The optimal experimental design is sequenced as follows 15>9>12>13>11>7>8>14>16>17>10>4>5>6>3>2>1.It means that the bestcombined input is in run 15,and the worst is in run 1.Run 15 is the best alternative with 100% utility degree and run 1 is the worst alternative with 44% utility degree(Table 6).The superior combination to minimize the responses identified in run 15 succeeding to run 9 and 12.The optimal combination was identified with a spindle speed of 4540 rpm and a feed rate of 0.076 mm/rev.Therefore,it is suggested to select the above sequence in order to diminish the manufacturing cost and to augment the quality of the component.

    Table 7Confirmation test result.

    The ranking performance of TOPSIS has greater concurrence with the COPRAS methods.There are 64.71% of ranking coincide with the COPRAS,deeming the higher and lower order it was identical.The 1st,2nd,7th,8th,9th,12th to 17th rankings are the same(Fig.6).Distinguishing ranking was observed for 35.29% of data;however,the sequence is coherent.The significant similarities between the two ranking methods are observed.The computational techniques of the two approaches are simple and easy in terms of recognizing and implementing these methods for comparing the alternatives and choosing the drilling parameters.

    Fig.6.Comparison of TOPSIS and COPRAS ranking.

    3.3.Modeling through Response Surface Methodology(RSM)

    The empirical models have been developed for the present study using BBD[2,3].The coefficient of determination(R2)value obtained for various responses are 99.68,97.64,89.2,94.77,99.57 and 94.13 respectively,seem better the prediction ability of the developed model.The developed individual responses are presented in Eqs.(36)to(41).In the following equation,dtdenotes drilling time,bhenrepresents entry burr height,bhexspecifies exit burr height,btenindicates entry burr thickness,btexdesignates exit burr thickness,srspecifies surface roughness,Ndenotes spindle speed andFrepresents feed rate.

    The accordance between the experimental and RSM data is evident from Fig.7.The 17 number of runs are converted into 9 by taking the average in the middle value of the feed rate.Reckoning the BBD,the run 2 and 3 are similar,run 5 and 6 are the same,from 7 to 11 are identical,run 12 and 13 are equal,run 15 and 16 are indistinguishable.Therefore,Fig.7 has a 9 number of runs in the abscissa.Based on the accordance,these empirical models can be applied for the identification of suitable inputs by process planning engineer.Once the superior model is developed,the BBD is further extended to optimization through DFA.The procedure for DFA followed from the past literature[3,60].The result of DFA is greater concurrence with the top rank of TOPSIS and COPRAS.Conceiving Eq.(36),the RSM drilling time is determined,subsequently the average percentage of deviation is calculated with 4.215% which is 3.959 times superior than drilling time(Fig.7a)which is calculated based on basic formula.

    3.4.Characterization

    The behavior study of the spindle speed and feed rate over all the responses are performed through RSM 3D graph and individual value plot(Fig.8).Considering drilling time(Fig.8a,b),an increase in spindle speed decreases the drilling time at all levels of feed rate.This is because of increasedshearing rate over the material during machining[25,61].The recent study found that,enhancing spindle speed propagating incisaling action.Incisaling action is introduced by the recent work which includes material removal along the shearing action[62].During the lower range of feed rate sudden drop-in drilling time was observed and for a medium and larger range of feed rate,reduction in drilling time is gradual.Increasing feed rate declines drilling time till intermittent range thereafter increases while the spindle speed is in minimal and intermittent range.Till intermittent range of feed rate the augmented dribbling action propagating material removal causes drop-off in drilling time,beyond intermittent range due to the same phenomena the material removal found larger which leads to poor extrusion of chips causes ascent in drilling time.While the spindle speed is high,the amplifying feed rate lessens drilling time that too with plodding way.The combination of minor spindle speed and minor feed rate produces larger drilling time and on the other hand shorter drilling time identified at the combination of major spindle speed and major feed rate.

    Fig.7.Validation of experimental results for various responses(a)drilling time(b)entry burr height(c)exit burr height(d)entry burr thickness(e)exit burr thickness(f)surface roughness.

    Fig.8.Spindle speed versus feed rate on various responses(a)Drilling time:3D graph(b)Drilling time:Individual value plot(c)Entry burr height:3D graph(d)Entry burr height:Individual value plot(e)Exit burr height:3D graph(f)Exit burr height:Individual value plot(g)Entry burr thickness:3D graph(h)Entry burr thickness:Individual value plot(i)Exit burr thickness:3D graph(j)Exit burr thickness:Individual value plot(k)Surface roughness:3D graph(l)Surface roughness:Individual value plot.

    Fig.8.Continued

    In view of entry burr height(Fig.8c & d),entry burr thickness(Fig.8g & h),exit burr thickness(Fig.8i & j)and surface roughness(Fig.8k & l),the spindle speed has a sinusoidal relation and larger is the spindle speed shorter is the entry burr height till 1960 rpm thereafter matures till 3680 rpm;beyond this point,the response condenses.This occurrence is found in all ranges of feed rate.Increase in spindle speed till 1960 rpm increases incisaling rate causes minimal responses,thereafter further increase in incisaling rate increases more material removal results in lack of room for movement of chips and consequences larger responses.Once,it reaches 3680 rpm,due to higher centrifugal material ejection the chips are thrown away from the base material causes lesser responses.Type of chip generated during perforation process has a significant role in the response behavior pattern[16,61].Types of chips reported in the past study[63]are ribbon type,tubular type,cork screw type,helical type,spiral type,arc type,elemental type and needle type.All these types are in three different form and they are short,long and snarled.Concerning the present study,chips are identified with elemental type,short and snarled helical type.Feed rate has erratic relation over the responses[other than drilling time and exit burr height].For the lower and middle range of spindle speed;the longer is the feed rate,the shorter is the responses.This could be because of high temperature generation due to faster tool penetration which leads to thermal softening resulting minimal response[64].For the higher range of spindle speed;lengthening the feed rate shrinkages the response till the middle range thereafter extends.When both the independent are high,due to the increased tool vibration and wobbling the chips are left around the periphery even it has larger material ejection and higher thermal softening.It has greater concurrence with the past study[65],due to high heat distribution on surface causes shorter chips which left around the periphery.Least responses are observed during the lower spindle speed(1960 rpm)at different feed rate and greater responses are noticed at higher spindle speed(3680 rpm)at any ranges of feed rate.The minimal entry burr height(Fig.8d)observed in the combination of higher speed and medium feed,larger entry burr height attained in the lower speed and feed.The arrangement of diminutive independents are producing least entry burr thickness(Fig.8h)and it was largest when those independents are maximal.The mixture of intermittent speed and higher feed produced minimal exit burr thickness(Fig.8j).The minimal surface roughness(Fig.8l)observed in the amalgamation of higher speed and lower feed.These two responses(exit burr thickness and surface roughness)are found larger with lower speed and intermittent feed.

    For all ranges of spindle speed;increase in feed rate,decreases exit burr height till medium range,later increases(Fig.8e & f).This could be due to high temperature generation due to faster tool penetration which leads to thermal softening resulting minimal exit burr height till intermittent feed range,subsequently due to the amplified frictional force among workpiece material and drill bit causing deficient strain,due to which breaking of chips decreased and resulted in retentive burrs at exit of holes[64].The poorer exit burr height is produced during all ranges of the spindle speed at medium feed rate and greater exit burr height is produced by all ranges of the spindle speed and lower range of feed rate.Burr generation found minimal at entry side when it was evaluated with exit side.Initially shearing noticed due to plastic deformation,when drill bit penetrates in the material with chisel edge followed by cutting lip and peripheral cutting edge[66].Till cutting tool engages with workpiece,it produces elemental chips and fan chips which ousted at the top surface causes minimal burr height and thickness.Once,it engages with the workpiece surface,sheared material starts to move through flute and some chips are left with the periphery causing noticeable burr height and thickness in the entry side.The thin lamina of material is bent and exiled when drill bit near the bottom due to tearing[67].Due to negligible shearing and ousting,the chips are left around the periphery causing higher burr height and thickness in the exit side.

    3.5.Confirmation test

    To verify the enhancement of the output characteristics,validation test has been carried out of the drilling process with an optimum combination of parameters.Based on TOPSIS,COPRAS and DFA,the optimal drilling independents is found at experiment number 15 with the spindle speed of 4540 rpm and a feed rate of 0.076 mm/rev.With these suggested independents,the confirmation test carried out with three trails and the average value taken for evaluation.The results of the confirmation test are presented in Table 7.Theconfirmation test results are concurrent with the initial values having an error percent of 4.622,confirms the validation of suggested inputs.

    4.Conclusion

    In the current study TOPSIS and COPRAS algorithms are applied for multi-objective optimization to determine the superior amalgamation of drilling parameters such as spindle speed and feed rate for simultaneous minimization of all the responses while drilling Mg AZ91 with carbide tools.

    ·The TOPSIS method is worn to choose the greatest arrangement of drilling parameters.Based on the value of relative closeness,the responses are sorted as follows:17–16–15–12–13–14–5–7–2–10–6–4–3–8–1–9–11.The optimal experimental design is sequenced as follows 15>9>13>12>7>11>8>14>16>10>17>4>5>6>3>2>1.

    ·The same arrangement based on COPRAS is as follows:17–16–15–12–13–14–6–7–2–11–5–3–4–8–1–9–10.The optimal experimental design is sequenced as follows 15>9>12>13>11>7>8>14>16>17>10>4>5>6>3>2>1.

    ·From both the algorithm,the best-combined input is observed in run 15,and the worst is observed in run 1.The sequencing performances of TOPSIS and COPRAS methods are identical.

    ·The optimal arrangement identified based on TOPSIS and COPRAS of drilling independent for simultaneous minimization of all the responses are identified with a spindle speed of 4540 rpm and feed rate of 0.076 mm/rev.The same process parameter identified as optimum input through DFA.

    ·The result of the confirmation test validates the proposed independent parameter with minimal error percentage.

    ·The empirical model is developed with a higher reliability measure through BBD[Eqs.(36)to(41)],which can be applied for finding the independents without experimentation.

    ·For drilling time,a superior mathematical model was established that is 3.959 times more accurate than the standard model drilling time.

    ·The rate of incisaling found larger with an addition of spindle speed causes larger material removal rate,resulting drilling in a faster rate.Poor extrusion of chips making the process time consuming.Centrifugal material ejection found with larger speed is the reason for minimal responses in general.

    ·Dribbling action found with feed rate influencing on material removal,extending the study with lack of room for movement of chips affecting response.Faster tool penetration found with larger feed rate resulting minimal responses.

    ·The experiment can be done at a faster rate with a higher combination of both the response.The lower combination of both the responses produces minimal entry burr thickness.The combination of lower spindle speed with a higher feed rate produces entry burr height in a minimal way.

    ·The higher surface quality components achieved through the mixture of higher spindle speed with a lower feed rate.The intermittent spindle speed associated with a higher feed rate minimizes the exit burr height and exit burr thickness.

    The effect of process parameters of drilling parameters using coated tools is not considered in the present work,might be worth some investigation.Two different process input parameters alone considered in the present investigation.Inclusion of other parameters like material thickness,drill diameter,drill bit point angle,drill type,cutting fluid may enhance the rate of prediction.The responses considered are also limited.Consideration of thrust force,torque,material removal rate,tool wear and study of chip formation would be a good extension.

    一级毛片女人18水好多| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲av成人av| tocl精华| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| av欧美777| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久性视频一级片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 亚洲人成网站在线播| 无限看片的www在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产野战对白在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 在线看三级毛片| 18+在线观看网站| 国产三级中文精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 久久久成人免费电影| 日本 欧美在线| 国产av一区在线观看免费| h日本视频在线播放| 一区福利在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 小说图片视频综合网站| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 午夜福利18| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久这里只有精品中国| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产野战对白在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 51国产日韩欧美| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品人妻1区二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品,欧美在线| 日本一二三区视频观看| 丁香六月欧美| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产视频内射| h日本视频在线播放| 色吧在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 老司机福利观看| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| av中文乱码字幕在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 黄片小视频在线播放| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 禁无遮挡网站| netflix在线观看网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品 国内视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 免费看十八禁软件| 看免费av毛片| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 一本一本综合久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| www.999成人在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| avwww免费| 日本一二三区视频观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲av成人av| 色av中文字幕| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人欧美大片| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 女警被强在线播放| 黄色日韩在线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 午夜免费激情av| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 色吧在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| ponron亚洲| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 女警被强在线播放| 精品国产亚洲在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 久久中文看片网| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美日本视频| 日本 av在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 日本 欧美在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 三级毛片av免费| 小说图片视频综合网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 悠悠久久av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 在线视频色国产色| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲内射少妇av| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产野战对白在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产黄片美女视频| av视频在线观看入口| 成人精品一区二区免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| ponron亚洲| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 三级毛片av免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 此物有八面人人有两片| 深夜精品福利| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美+日韩+精品| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 看片在线看免费视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 中国美女看黄片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99久久精品热视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久精品人妻少妇| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 不卡一级毛片| 久久久色成人| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 黄色日韩在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产综合懂色| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 91av网一区二区| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产高潮美女av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| www日本黄色视频网| or卡值多少钱| xxxwww97欧美| av天堂中文字幕网| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 十八禁网站免费在线| e午夜精品久久久久久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 观看免费一级毛片| 午夜福利18| 成人av在线播放网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久久色成人| ponron亚洲| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| av福利片在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 免费看光身美女| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产探花极品一区二区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 手机成人av网站| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 俺也久久电影网| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日韩有码中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| www.999成人在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | www日本黄色视频网| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 精品福利观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久久久久大精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久国产成人免费| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美色视频一区免费| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 不卡一级毛片| 免费看十八禁软件| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 丁香欧美五月| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 香蕉av资源在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 国产美女午夜福利| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 观看美女的网站| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 青草久久国产| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| www日本黄色视频网| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 综合色av麻豆| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 丁香六月欧美| 美女黄网站色视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | xxxwww97欧美| ponron亚洲| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产综合懂色| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产黄片美女视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 免费av毛片视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久久久久久久中文| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 午夜影院日韩av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 欧美bdsm另类| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品影院久久| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲av一区综合| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 看免费av毛片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 午夜精品在线福利| 国产不卡一卡二| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品电影一区二区在线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av成人av| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 极品教师在线免费播放| 1000部很黄的大片| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 乱人视频在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产视频内射| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 波多野结衣高清作品| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产三级黄色录像| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久草成人影院|