Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”

Thomas Bjorsum-Meyer,Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Gunnar Baatrup

Abstract Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced nearly two decades ago. Initially,it was limited by poor image quality and short battery time, but due to technical improvements, it has become an equal diagnostic alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC). Hastened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, CCE has been introduced in clinical practice to relieve overburdened endoscopy units and move investigations to out-patient clinics. A wider adoption of CCE would be bolstered by positive patient experience, as it offers a diagnostic investigation that is not inferior to other modalities. The shortcomings of CCE include its inability to differentiate adenomatous polyps from hyperplastic polyps. Solving this issue would improve the stratification of patients for polyp removal. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in polyp detection and characterization to minimize incomplete CCEs and avoid needless examinations. Onboard AI appears to be a needed application to enable near-real-time decision-making in order to diminish patient waiting times and avoid superfluous subsequent OCs.With this letter, we discuss the potential and role of AI in CCE as a diagnostic tool for the large bowel.

Key Words: Video capsule endoscopy; Wireless capsule endoscopy; Artificial intelligence;Colonic polyps; Endoscopic surgical procedures; Colon neoplasm

TO THE EDITOR

We read with interest the in-depth review by Kr?neret al[1 ]. The authors presented a thorough account of the status and knowledge of artificial intelligence (AI) in everyday practice in gastroenterology[1 ]. As we apply AI in picture analysis of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), we feel obliged to offer some relevant insights. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 ) pandemic has accelerated the clinical adoption of CCE as an alternative first-line diagnostic procedure to optical colonoscopy (OC)[2 ]. CCE is a painless, low-risk procedure that can be performed in the patient’s home with minimal contact with healthcare workers and/or other patients, therefore abiding (when possible) by the distancing measures recommended to contain the spread of COVID-19 .

Furthermore, CCE is seen as a measure to relieve the pressure on overburdened endoscopy units with long waiting times for OC. The Scottish Capsule Programme has implemented CCE in a large-scale rollout to patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal symptoms to their general practitioners and found to be eligible for colonic investigation[3 ]. The programme enables effective upfront screening at the community level to address increasing demand and capacity pressure within the National Health Service.

Until recently, the clinical implementation of CCE has been hampered by low completion rates compared to OC. A significant drawback for CCE is its reliance on extensive orally administered bowel cleansing preparations to gain adequate visualization of the mucosa, as, unlike OC, water wash and suction are not possible. Although research into optimizing and standardizing bowel preparation regimens is ongoing, to date it has failed to meet the minimum standard of 90 % for OC[4 ]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 studies including 5000 patients showed that CCE’s (pooled)adequate colon cleanliness rate (ACCR) was only 77 %[5 ]. Therefore, further studies aiming to improve CCE’s ACCR are mandatory. Another way to achieve more conclusive CCE examinations is to enhance our ability to predict patients at high risk of an insufficient colon cleanliness level. AI algorithms based on demographic data are one possible solution. We are currently running a large randomized trial in Denmark (CFC2015 ) in which 2015 citizens are allocated to CCE. After the study is completed in Summer 2022 , we plan to create algorithms for just such a purpose. The cost-effectiveness of CCE needs to be improved before wider clinical adoption is considered. Hassanet al[6 ] found that improved compliance in the general population is mandatory to make CCE cost-effective compared to OC[6 ].

CCE produces many images, and reading them is very time-consuming and monotonous, increasing the risk of missing important lesions. Hence, the development of AI-based tools to assist readers is needed. Saraivaet al[7 ], in a recent article, developed a convolutional neural network based on AI. They found that it could detect protruding lesions in the colon with a sensitivity of 90 .7 % and a specificity of 92 .6 %[7 ]. To avoid unnecessary OC after CCE, it is essential to differentiate between hyperplastic polyps(HPs) and adenomatous polyps (APs). By applying flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement,Nakazawaet al[8 ] differentiated HPs from APs with a sensitivity of 91 .2 % and specificity of 88 .2 %[8 ].Further research is needed to detect sessile serrated lesions using AI-assisted CCE.

The delay between capsule egestion and the completion of video reading and report writing is currently two days. Onboard capsule intelligence has the potential to make near real-time assessments of colonic pathology, creating a report almost immediately after CCE completion. The authors of this letter aspire to the development of onboard integrated AI to make CCE an expeditious diagnostic tool comparable to OC.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Bj?rsum-Meyer T conceived of the idea for the manuscript and contributed to the manuscript drafting and critical revision; Koulaouzidis A and Baatrup G contributed to the manuscript drafting and critical revision.

Conflict-of-interest statement:AK is consultant for Jinshan. He is director of iCERV Ltd and cofounder of AJM Medicaps Ltd. He has received a GivenImaging Ltd-ESGE grant, and material support for clinical research from SynMed/Intromedic. In the last ten years, he has received honoraria & lecture fees from Jinshan, Dr FalkPharma UK and Ferring. He has also received educational travel support from Aquilant, Jinshan, Dr FalkPharma, Almirall,Ferring, and has participated in advisory board meetings for Tillots, Ankon, and Dr FalkPharmaUK.

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

Country/Territory of origin:Denmark

ORCID number:Thomas Bj?rsum-Meyer 0000 -0001 -5253 -0802 ; Anastasios Koulaouzidis 0000 -0002 -2248 -489 X; Gunnar Baatrup 0000 -0003 -0300 -5766 .

S-Editor:Fan JR

L-Editor:A

P-Editor:Fan JR