• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparative genomic analyses reveal cis-regulatory divergence after polyploidization in cotton

    2022-12-02 01:00:32JiqiYouMinLinZhenpingLiuLiulingPeiYuexunLongLiliTuXinlongZhngMojunWng
    The Crop Journal 2022年6期

    Jiqi You,Min Lin,Zhenping Liu,Liuling Pei,Yuexun Long,Lili Tu,Xinlong Zhng,Mojun Wng,*

    a National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement,Hubei Hongshan Laboratory,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,Hubei,China

    b School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,South-Central University for Nationalities,Wuhan 430074,Hubei,China

    Keywords:Cotton Polyploidization Transcriptional regulation Fiber development

    ABSTRACT Polyploidization has long been recognized as a driver for the evolutionary formation of superior plant traits coupled with gene expression novelty.However,knowledge of the effect of regulatory variation on expression changes following polyploidization remains limited.In this study,we characterized transcriptional regulatory divergence by comparing tetraploid cotton with its putative diploid ancestors.We identified 144,827,99,609,and 219,379 Tn5 transposase-hypersensitive sites(THSs)in Gossypium arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum,respectively,and found that the conservation of promoter THSs was associated with coordination of orthologous genes expression.This observation was consistent with analysis of transcription-factor binding sites(TFBS)for 262 known motifs:genes with higher TFBS conservation scores(CS)showed less change than those genes with lower TFBS CS in expression levels.TFBS influenced by genomic variation were involved in the novel regulation networks between transcriptional factors and target genes in tetraploid cotton.We describe an example showing that the turnover of TFBS was linked to expression pattern divergence of genes involved in fiber development(fiber-related genes).Our findings reveal the regulatory divergence of the transcriptional network in cotton after polyploidization and characterizes the regulatory relationships of genes contributing to desirable traits.

    1.Introduction

    Polyploidization is a common phenomenon in plant evolution,merging two or more genomes into one nucleus and leading to variation in phenotype and gene expression[1-4].In polyploids,gene expression and regulation are more complex than in diploids.The expression divergence of subgenomic homologous genes has been thought[5]to be mostly inherited from parental donor species.Gene expression in polyploids has characteristics such as‘‘genome dominance”[3,6-8]and‘‘homologous bias”[7,8].

    As a major food crop,wheat(Triticum aestivum),a natural allohexaploid,is used as a model to investigate homologous expression dominance.The asymmetric expression of genes associated with baking quality was identified by comparison of the transcriptomes of endosperm cells in seven different tissues or developmental stages[9].Transcriptome data from 22 tissues showed that 30% of homologous triads(composed of A,B,and D subgenome copies)displayed unbalanced expression[10].In the F1hybrid of Triticum turgidum(AABB)and Aegilops tauschii(DD),32.6% of D-subgenome genes were down-regulated in comparison with their parental counterparts,but only respectively 1.9% and 1.7% of genes were down-regulated in the A and B subgenomes[11].Similar findings have been reported for other polyploids[12-16].Although unbalanced epigenetic modification[17-20],homologous recombination[21],3D genome architecture[22],reactivation of transposable elements[23],and small interfering RNA(siRNA)expression[24]have been shown to drive gene expression bias or novelty,there is still a lack of understanding of the complexity of transcriptional regulation of subgenomic genes mediated by cis-regulatory elements in polyploids.

    Transcriptional factors(TFs)regulate gene expression by binding cis-acting elements,a complex process because of its spatiotemporal specificity.In the past decade,accessible chromatin regions were found to have regulatory functions,as active regulatory regions can be accessible to TFs.High-throughput technologies,such as formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements(FAIRE-seq)[25],micrococcal nuclease digestion of chromatin(MNase-seq)[26],and DNase I digestion followed by highthroughput sequencing(DNase-seq)[27]have been developed to identify accessible chromatin regions.Assay for transposaseaccessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing(ATACseq)interrogates regions of accessible chromatin with insertion of hyperactive transposase Tn5.ATAC-seq peaks were highly consistent with DNase-seq peaks while requiring fewer cells,making it useful for studies with limited material[28,29].Unlike these methods,chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing(ChIP-seq)[30]and DNA affinity purification sequencing(DAP-seq)[31,32]have been used to identify transcription factor binding sites via immunoprecipitation of DNA-protein complexes.Application of these high-throughput methods has provided a comprehensive map of TF binding activity[31-33].Based on these methods,TF binding sequences were collected for de novo motif discovery[31,34-36].Because of the evolutionary conservation of TF motifs among plants,TF binding sites in other plants can be inferred based on motifs in TF motif databases,such as HOMER[37]and TRANSFAC[38].

    Cotton(Gossypium spp.),is a major source of natural textile fiber.Approximately 1-2 million years ago(MYA),new allotetraploid species(genome AADD)were created by an intergenomic hybridization event between A-and D-genome ancestor species[2,39].The wild allotetraploid G.hirsutum has been domesticated into an annual crop,accounting for 90% of global cotton fiber production.In contrast to the putative donor species G.raimondii and G.arboreum,cultivated G.hirsutum produces long,white fibers[40].

    The unbalanced expression of orthologous genes has been identified in many tissues of diploid and tetraploid cotton species[41-45].Between the two diploid ancestors,42.0% to 50.0% of genes were differentially expressed in leaves[7].In natural allopolyploid or F1hybrid cotton,59.4%-70.9% of orthologous gene pairs maintain the same expression bias mode relative to the pairs between parental diploids,when 7.3%-19.1% showed novel bias mode[7].In fiber development,more genes showed biased expression towards the D subgenome than A subgenome[46].The regulatory mechanisms underlying these changes are largely unknown.The previous study[47]indicated G.hirsutum experienced asymmetric subgenome domestication,which had effect on cis-regulatory divergence.

    The objective of the present study was to characterize cisregulatory divergence after polyploidization.We used ATAC-seq to identify accessible chromatin regions in G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum.We also predicted TFBSs of 262 TF binding motifs in promoter sequences in the three species.By comparing the accessible chromatin regions and TF binding sites between orthologous genes,we found that gene pairs with conserved chromatin accessible regions or regulatory sequences exhibited less expression change after polyploidization.This study provides a resource for decoding the regulatory divergence of key genes associated with the formation of desirable traits in cotton.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Plant materials and growth conditions

    Cotton plants(including G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum)were grown in a climate-controlled greenhouse at 28-32 °C under a 14-h day/10-h night photoperiod with identical management practice.Young leaves were collected and divided into two equal parts for ATAC-seq and RNA-seq.For each experiment,two biological replicates were used.

    2.2.Library construction for ATAC-seq

    For each species,0.1 g of fresh leaves were collected and ground in liquid nitrogen.The powder was resuspended in 30 mL of precooled NPB buffer(20 mmol L-1MOPS,40 mmol L-1NaCl,90 mmol L-1KCl,2 mmol L-1EDTA,0.5 mmol L-1EGTA,0.5 mmol L-1spermidine,0.2 mmol L-1spermine),and shaken on ice for 15 min.This suspension was then filtered through a double-layer Miracloth Magic Filter cloth and the effluent was collected in a 50-mL Falcon tube and centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 min at 4 °C,and the supernatant was discarded.The sediment was resuspended in 2 mL of precooled EB2(0.25 mol L-1sucrose,10 mmol L-1Tris-HCl pH 8.0,10 mmol L-1MgCl2,5 mmol L-1βME,0.1 mmol L-1OMSF,protease inhibitor,ddH2O)and filtered through a 20-μm nylon membrane with gentle and repeated suction and agitation of the homogenate on the membrane to capture as many nuclei as possible,and the effluent was collected in a 2-mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 min at 4 °C.The pellet containing nuclei was resuspended in 0.5 mL of NEBuffer 2(New England Biolabs,Ipswich,MA,USA).The nuclei were stained with DAPI(Sigma-Aldrich,Saint Louis,MO,USA),and sorted by BD Aria SORP flow cytometry(Becton,Dickinson and Company,Franklin lake,NJ,USA).After centrifugation at 500×g and 4 °C,and discarding the supernatant,100,000 nuclei were collected in a 1.5-mL centrifuge tube and stored on ice.Library construction was performed following a published protocol[48].The final library was sequenced with MGISEQ-2000 sequencing system(MGI Tech Co.,Ltd.,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China)(Table S1).

    2.3.THS identification

    BWA-mem[49]was used to map reads to the reference genomes(G.arboreum[50],G.raimondii[50]and G.hirsutum[51])with default settings.The mapped reads from mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA were filtered out.To remove PCR duplicates and keep mapped reads of high mapping quality,Samtools(version 1.8)[52]with two commands(samtools rmdup;samtools view-bq 30)was used.As previously[48]described,sequencing reads with the same mapping coordinates but with different unique molecular identifier(UMI)sequences were kept.All kept reads were adjusted by‘‘start sites in forward strand+4 bp,start sites in negative strand-5 bp”to determine the Tn5 insertion positions.Peak calling on ATAC-seq data was performed using the MACS2 package[53]with parameters‘‘--nomodel-keep-dup all-B-SPMR-callsummits”.

    2.4.RNA-seq data analysis

    For leaf samples,total RNA was extracted using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit(Sigma-Aldrich,Saint Louis,MO,USA).Libraries were constructed and sequenced on an MGISEQ-2000 system.Public RNA-seq data(including petal,ovule,and fiber samples)from different laboratories were used to calculate gene expression(Table S2).Hisat2(version 2.1.0)[54]was used to map the sequence data to the reference genome.The mapped data were filtered using Samtools with programs(samtools rmdup and samtools view-bq 20).StringTie(version 1.3.0)[55]was used to calculate the fragments per kilobase million(FPKM)as genes expression levels.

    2.5.Identification of orthologous genes

    To identify orthologous gene pairs between diploid and tetraploid cotton,we combined MCScanX and BLAST+to improve accuracy[56,57].We used protein sequences of genes to conduct a bidirectional blastp analysis embedded in BLAST+(version 2.7.1)[57]with parameters‘‘-evalue 1e-20-outfmt 6”.Only the two-way best gene pairs with P-value<1e-20 were retained.MCScanX was used to identifiy collinearity blocks with parameters‘‘-g 3-s 5”.When one gene was located in more than one collinearity blocks,it’s orthologous gene in the largest collinearity block were retained.The genes found by both MCScanX and BLAST+,including 16,315 orthologous pairs between G.arboreum and G.hirsutum A subgenome(Ga-GhAt),and16,861 orthologous pairs between G.raimondii and G.hirsutum D subgenome(Gr-GhDt),were retained for further analysis.

    2.6.Mapping diploid THSs to the tetraploid genome

    The collinearity blocks identified in section 2.5 narrowed the range of sequence alignment between diploid and tetraploid cotton.For each collinearity block,we preformed‘‘inside block”LASTZ(version 1.04.03)[58]with settings(--notransition--step=20--strand=both--format=lav--allocate:traceback=200 M--hspthresh=8000--nogapped)to achieve block alignment.We used the UCSC Genome Browser tools chainPreNet,chainNet and netChainSubset(detail usage:http://genomewiki.ucsc.edu/index.php/HowTo:_Syntenic_Net_or_Reciprocal_Best)[59]to optimize block alignment files in turn.We used bnMapper[60]to extract positions of regions homologous to diploid THS from optimized block alignment files.For each diploid THS,a conserved THS was defined as one aligned to just one homologous region.A badly mapping THS was defined as one aligned to more than one homologous region.A non-mapping THS was defined as one not located in blocks or located in blocks but without the homologous region.

    2.7.Identification of TFBS using motif database

    The promoters(2 kb upstream of TSS)sequences from G.arboreum[50],G.raimondii[50],and G.hirsutum[51]genomes were extracted to identify transcription-factor binding sites.HOMER(version 4.10.4)[37]software with findMotifs.pl program was used.The motif file was from ChIP-seq or DAP-seq experiments in Arabidopsis,rice and other plants.Only TFBSs with a motif score above 10 were retained.A total of 506 plant TF motifs are contained in the HOMER database,and only 262 TF motifs were related to TFBS after removing unknown motifs.

    2.8.Calculation of TFBS conservation score

    For all TFBSs located in the promoters of an orthologous gene pair,if we identified TF-a TFBSs in both diploid and tetraploid promoters,the TFBSs of TF-a were defined as conserved TFBSs.If we identified TF-b TFBSs in the diploid but not in the tetraploid promoter,the TFBSs of TF-b were defined as non-conserved TFBSs.If we identified TF-c TFBSs in the tetraploid but not in the diploid promoter,the TFBSs of TF-c were defined as non-conserved TFBSs.For the diploid gene of an orthologous pair,all TFBSs in a promoter were classified as conserved TFBSs or non-conserved TFBSs,and a conservation score(CS-D)was calculated as(counts of conserved TFBSs/counts of total TFBSs)×100%.The same process was used to calculate conservation score for tetraploid gene(CS-T)of this orthologous pair.The method was used to calculate conservation scores for 16,315 Ga-GhAt gene pairs and 16,861 Gr-GhDt gene pairs.The mean conservation score was calculated as(CS-D+CST)/2.

    2.9.Genomic variation analysis

    For each pair of orthologous gene pair,promoter sequence of diploid gene was aligned to promoter of tetraploid gene with MUSCLE(version 3.8.1551)[61],and sequence variation was identified with an in-house Perl script.Base substitutions were treated as single nucleotide variations(SNVs),deletions or insertions of shorter than 50 bp were treated as insertion-deletions(InDels),and deletions or insertions longer than 50 bp were treated as structural variations(SVs).

    2.10.Identification of differentially expressed genes

    The prepDE.py script from StringTie(version 1.3.0)was used to obtain the RNA-seq read count matrixes.Differentially expressed genes were identified using the edgeR[62]package(false discovery rate(FDR)<0.05 and|log2(fold change)|>2).

    2.11.Regulatory network construction

    A TF-gene(fiber-related gene)network was constructed,in which edges were based on predicted TFBSs located in gene promoter regions.A total of 58 known fiber-related genes were incorporated in the network with the following conditions:(1)genes were annotated;(2)genes were differently expressed between diploid and tetraploid cotton in 10 days post anthesis(DPA)fiber or 20 DPA fiber;(3)genes were known to be functional in other plants.A set of 167 TFs that were predicted to bind promoters of these genes were also incorporated in the network.Cytoscape[63]was used to visualize the network,in which edges represented TF-DNA interactions.

    3.Results

    3.1.Genome-wide identification of THSs in three cotton species

    In order to document the genome-wide landscape of open chromatin in cotton,we performed Tn5 transposase digestion of chromatin in G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum.A total of 1611 million ATAC-seq reads were mapped to the reference genome of each species(Table S1).In view of the high reproducibility of biological replicates for each species,we combined the replicates for downstream analyses(Fig.S1).

    Respectively 144,827,99,609,and 219,379 Tn5 THSs were identified in G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum(Tables S3-S5).Genomic features of THSs in each cotton were characterized,including the distribution in 3′UTR,5′UTR,exon,intron,promoter region(2 kb upstream of transcription start sites),and intergenic region(>2 kb from transcription start sites)(Fig.1A).The distribution of THSs was similar in the three species:42.2%-45.6%of THSs were found in intergenic regions and 24.3%-28.7% in promoter regions.The proportion of THSs located in promoter regions decreased with increasing genome size,with 28.7% of THSs in G.raimondii(~0.7 Gb),25.5% in G.arboreum(~1.6 Gb),and 24.3% in G.hirsutum(~2.3 Gb).Plotting genomic position of THSs relative to genes showed that THSs in cotton were enriched around genes relative to intergenic regions(Fig.S2).

    To investigate the relationship between THSs and gene expression,we examined the expression level of genes using RNA-seq data in each cotton(Fig.1B;Table S2).Genes without observed expression(FPKM=0)were grouped into bin 1 and the other genes(FPKM>0)were grouped into five quintiles(bin 2-bin 6)based on expression level.It appeared that genes with higher expression showed higher chromatin accessibility.We categorized genes into two categories with or without THSs in promoter regions.In all three cottons,the expression of genes with THSs was significantly higher than that of genes without THSs in promoter regions(Fig.1C).We investigated the effect of distance(between the midpoint of the gene body and the midpoint of the nearest THS)on gene expression(Fig.1D).For each species,all genes were divided into eight groups with distance ranging from 0 to 2,2-5,5-10,10-20,20-50,50-100,100-200,and≥200 kb.In G.arboreum,48.3%(19,786 of 41,000)genes had THSs within 2 kb,and 0.6%(234 of 41,000)genes were located>200 kb from the nearest THS.In G.raimondii,41.4%(16,658 of 40,281)genes had THSs within 2 kb,and 0.007%(3 of 40,281)genes were located outside 200 kb of the nearest THS.In G.hirsutum,47.1%(32,476 of 68,900)genes had THSs within 2 kb,and 0.08%(60 of 68,900)genes were located outside 200 kb of the nearest THS.Thus,only a few genes were located far from accessible chromatin.The expression of genes showed a gradually decrease with increasing distance.

    Fig.1.ATAC-seq profilings in G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum.(A)Distribution of ATAC-seq THSs relative to genomic features in each cotton.(B)Line charts and heat maps for THSs around genes(-2 to 2 kb).The expressed genes were divided into five quintiles(from low expression[bin 2]to high expression[bin 6]).Inactive genes(FPKM=0)were classified into[bin 1].The y axes in line charts and colors in heat maps show the THS read counts around genes with expression levels.(C)Correlation of gene expression with the number of THSs in promoters.****,P-value<0.0001.(D)Correlation of gene expression with the distance between genes and the closest THSs.**,Pvalue<0.01;***,P-value<0.001;ns,P-value>0.05.(E)Correlation of gene expression with mean numbers of THSs located in promoters.The genes were divided into six bins as described in Fig.1B.The y axis shows the mean number of THSs for genes in each bin.Red dots and line,mean THS number in G.arboreum;Blue dots and line,mean THS number in G.raimondii;Purple dots and line,mean THS number in G.hirsutum.(F)Correlation of gene expression with the mean length of THSs in promoters.The y axis shows the mean length of THSs for genes,which were divided into bins as described in Fig.1B.Red dots and line,mean THS length in G.arboreum;Blue dots and line,mean THS length in G.raimondii;Purple dots and line,mean THS length in G.hirsutum.

    We further investigated whether the number or the length of THSs was correlated with gene expression(Fig.1E,F).All genes were categorized into six bins based on expression levels in Fig.1B.In each cotton,the highly expressed genes contained a high number of THSs,with a mean 3.5 times greater in bin 6 than in bin 2.In order to avoid the increasing number of THS affecting the statistics of THS length,genes with one promoter THS in each bin were used to calculate the mean THS length.We found that highly expressed genes contained longer THSs,with a mean of 22 bp longer in bin 6 than in bin 2.This result suggested that both the number and length of promoter THSs were associated with gene expression.

    3.2.Effect of promoter THSs on expression divergence after polyploidization

    We next investigated the possible role of promoter THSs in driving unbalanced expression of orthologous genes.To evaluate the sequence conservation of THSs between diploids and tetraploid subgenomes,we aligned THS regions across genomes(Figs.2A,S3).In total,81.6%(118,129 of 144,827,in G.arboreum)and 80.8%(80,455 of 99,609,in G.raimondii)diploid THSs were identified as conserved THSs for further analysis.Diploid THSs were grouped into three categories:conserved and shared THSs(conserved and annotated as THSs in both diploid and tetraploid collinear blocks);conserved but species-specific THSs(conserved and annotated as THSs only in diploid collinear blocks);nonconserved THSs(badly mapping THSs and non-mapping THSs).We found that 21.6%(31,237 of 144,827,in G.arboreum)and 25.3%(25,199 of 99,609,in G.raimondii)diploid THSs were identified as conserved and shared THSs.Compared with all THSs,conserved and shared THSs were enriched in promoter regions(P-value<0.001,chi-square test,25.5%-34.9% in G.arboreum,28.7%-36.7% in G.raimondii)and 5′UTR regions(P-value<0.001,chi-square test,ratio 8.8%-13.8% in G.arboreum,9.1%-13.6% in G.raimondii)(Figs.1A,2B).This result suggested that diploid THSs located around promoters were conserved after polyploidization.Based on the division of diploid THS,tetraploid THSs that overlapped with conserved and shared THSs were defined as conserved and shared THSs.The other tetraploid THSs were roughly defined as non-conserved THSs.

    Fig.2.Conservation of THSs between diploid and tetraploid cotton.(A)In the top panel,G.arboreum THSs are aligned to the G.hirsutum At subgenome.All G.arboreum THSs are divided into conserved THSs,badly mapping THSs,and non-mapping THSs based on block alignment(top bar).Conserved THSs are further divided into conserved and shared THSs and conserved but species-specific THSs based on chromatin accessibility;badly mapping THSs and non-mapping THSs are merged into non-conserved THSs(bottom bar).In the bottom panel,all G.raimondii THSs are aligned to the G.hirsutum Dt subgenome.The description of the bottom panel is similar to that of the top panel.(B)Distribution of conserved and shared diploid THSs relative to genomic features in tetraploid G.hirsutum.(C)Four classes of orthologous gene pairs with different combinations of THSs.Gray boxes,gene body;blue boxes,promoter region;orange boxes,conserved and shared THSs;green boxes,conserved but species-specific THSs;dark gray boxes,non-conserved THSs.(D)The expression levels of the four classes of gene pairs defined in Fig.2C.*,P-value<0.05;****,P-value<0.0001;ns,P-value>0.05.(E)GO enrichment of genes in class 1 and class 2.(F)Expression fold changes of orthologous gene pairs in four classes.Expression fold change:(max FPKM+0.1)/(min FPKM+0.1).(G)Four examples representing four classes of orthologous gene pairs.The genome browser tracks show gene annotation(gray),RNA-seq coverage(blue),and ATAC-seq coverage(pink).Conserved and shared THSs(orange)and conserved but species-specific THSs(green)are indicated by boxes.

    To investigate the effect of promoter THSs on gene expression,respectively 16,315 and 16,861 orthologous gene pairs were identified between the G.arboreum and G.hirsutum At subgenome and between the G.raimondii and G.hirsutum Dt subgenome(Table S6).Orthologous genes were grouped into four classes:class 1(only with conserved and shared THSs);class 2(with conserved and shared diploid THSs and other THSs);class 3(with conserved and species-specific THSs);class 4(without conserved THSs)(Fig.2C).Genes with conserved and shared THSs(class 1 and class 2)showed higher expression than those with conserved but species-specific THSs(class 3).Genes without conserved THSs(class 4)showed the lowest expression(Fig.2C,D).This result suggested that highly expressed genes frequently contained conserved and shared THSs.Gene Ontology(GO)enrichment analysis[64]showed that class 1 genes were enriched in some stressassociated pathways,including cellular response to stress(GO:0033554),positive regulation of defense response(GO:0031349),and positive regulation of cell death(GO:0010942)(Fig.2E).Class 2 genes were enriched in some development-associated pathways,including tissue development(GO:0009888),reproductive shoot system development(GO:0090567),and plant organ development(GO:0099402).

    In order to avoid the influence of overall expression level differences among species,we used expression fold change to quantify the degree of expression variation between orthologous gene pairs.We found that orthologous genes with conserved and shared THSs(class 1 and class 2)showed smaller expression changes than those with conserved but species-specific THSs(class 3),and orthologous genes with conserved but species-specific THSs(class 3)showed smaller expression change than those without conserved THSs(class 4)(Fig.2F).This finding suggested that change of promoter-THSs was associated with expression divergence.

    For example,FATB (Ga:Garb_05G011410,GhAt:Ghir_A05G013090;class 1),encodes an acyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase with a role in fatty acid synthesis(Fig.2G)[65].There was a conserved and shared THS in the promoter associated with a 1.83-fold expression change.VIH1(Ga:Garb_09G002550,GhAt:Ghir_A09G002220;class 2),encodes a functional VIP1/PPIP5Ktype ATP-grasp kinase with a role in jasmonate-regulated defenses[66].A conserved and shared THS,as well as species-specific THSs,was found in the promoter with associated with a 1.97-fold expression change.CED1(Ga:Garb_11G001840,GhAt:Ghir_A11G001900;class 3),encodes an epidermally expressed extracellular protein that likely functions as an alpha-beta hydrolase and is required for normal cuticle formation[67].Both conserved and species-specific THSs were found in the promoter with a 3.20-fold expression change.CDC68-like genes(Ga:Garb_12G000810,GhAt:Ghir_A12G000790;class 4)did not have conserved THSs in their promoters,and had a 2.30-fold expression change.

    3.3.Characterization of TFBS in diploid and tetraploid cotton

    Exploiting the evolutionary conservation of transcriptional regulation,known motifs in other plant species were used to predict TF binding sites(TFBSs)in cotton.In total,262 non-redundant TF binding motifs were used to identify TF binding sites(Table S7).Respectively 632,318,610,632,and 1,064,100 TF binding sites were identified in gene promoters of G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum(Tables S3-S5).As with THSs,TF binding sites were enriched around genes relative to intergenic regions(Fig.S4).

    The availability of 262 TF binding motifs provided an opportunity for exploring the genome-wide regulatory features mediated by transcriptional factors.Because different transcription factors may have opposite effects on gene expression,it is difficult to measure the effect of one or several TF binding motif changes in promoter regions at the expression level.In order to study the change of regulatory sequences after polyploidization,TF binding sites were classified according to the sequence variation among orthologous gene pairs:TF binding sites that were conserved between orthologous genes were defined as conserved TF binding sites,and the others were called non-conserved binding sites(Fig.3A).For each orthologous gene pair,a conservation score(CS)was calculated according to the number of conserved binding sites,and then two conservation scores,including CS-D(x-axis in plot)for the gene in the diploid and CS-T(y-axis in plot)for the gene in the tetraploid,were obtained.If a pair of genes contained the same TF binding sites,both CS-D and CS-T scores were 100%.

    CSs were calculated for 16,315 and 16,861 orthologous gene pairs,from Ga to GhAt and from Gr to GhDt,respectively(Table S8).These genes were plotted on a two-dimensional chart,9790 to 11,358 pairs with CS-D>66% and CS-T>66%,1227 to 1958 pairs with CS-D≤33%or CS-T≤33%,3730 to 5113 pairs with other conservation scores(Fig.3B,C).Thus,regulatory sequences were relatively conserved for the majority of genes after polyploidization.

    We next investigated the effect of regulatory sequence variation on gene expression in eight tissues or developmental stages(Fig.3D;Table S2).Orthologous gene pairs were sorted descendingly by their mean conservation scores.The first 33%(5438 of 16,315 from Ga to GhAt,5620 of 16,861 from Gr to GhDt)were defined as pairs with high conservation scores,and the last 33%as pairs with low conservation scores.Orthologous gene pairs with low conservation scores showed higher expression change than those with high conservation scores in a few tissues(Fig.3D).This finding suggested that orthologous genes with low conservation scores were those that had undergone expression divergence after polyploidization.

    3.4.Coordinated regulation of gene expression by THSs and TFBSs

    Both promoter THSs and promoter TFBSs were associated with expression divergence after polyploidization in cotton(Fig.2F,3D).We next sought to identify TF binding sites inside open chromatin regions.To illustrate the putative regulatory relationships in cotton,the TFBSs inside THSs were retained for further analyses.Orthologous genes with conserved and shared THSs(class 1 and class 2)gave higher CSs than those with conserved but speciesspecific THSs(class 3),and orthologous genes with conserved but species-specific THSs(class 3)gave higher CSs than those without conserved THSs(class 4)(Fig.4A).This result suggested that orthologous genes with conserved THSs yielded higher TFBS CSs.

    We quantified the regulatory variation after polyploidization.For each of 262 TF binding motifs,we calculated the number of orthologous genes containing TFBSs inside promoter THSs in G.arboreum,G.hirsutum At subgenome,G.raimondii,and the G.hirsutum Dt subgenome(Fig.4B,C).We found that each individual TF binding motif was predicted to regulate a similar number of genes(cor=0.9802,from Ga to GhAt;cor=0.9837,from Gr to GhDt).Although some TF binding motifs were involved in regulation gain and some were involved in regulation loss after polyploidization,at the global level we found that TF binding motifs in the At subgenome were predicted to regulate fewer genes than those in G.arboreum,while TF binding motifs in the Dt subgenome were predicted to regulate more genes than those in G.raimondii(simple linear regression;slope=0.86559,from Ga to GhAt;slope=1.15910,from Gr to GhDt).This finding suggested that the A and D genomes might have been subject to different evolutionary selection in terms of regulatory sequences after polyploidization.

    We next investigated the extent of conservation of the 262 TF binding motifs in the three cottons.We identified 33 TF binding motifs that were shared among conserved and shared THSs in G.arboreum,G.raimondii,and G.hirsutum(Fig.4D).For example,GBF3 is a transcription factor associated with drought tolerance in Arabidopsis[68].In G.arboreum,GBF3 binding sites were detected in 0.74% of conserved and shared THSs,but 0.38% of all THSs.In the At subgenome,GBF3 binding sites were detected in 0.86%of conserved and shared THSs,but 0.52%of all THSs.In G.raimondii,GBF3 binding sites were detected in 0.87%of conserved and shared THSs,but 0.52% of all THSs.In the Dt subgenome,GBF3 binding sites were detected in 1.1%of conserved and shared THSs,but 0.59% of all THSs.Using all THSs as a control,the GBF3 TFBSs were enriched in conserved and shared THSs(P-value<0.0001,chi-square test).The 33 TF motifs were clustered by motif similarity,including motif sequences ACGTG,TTGTC,TCTCTCTC,AAATATC,TCCATCA,CACGTG,CCGT,and GTGGTCC(Fig.S5A).

    We identified five TF binding motifs that were shared among Gr-specific THSs(including conserved and Gr-specific THSs and non-conserved THSs)(Fig.4E).ERF104 is a transcription factor responsive to cold stress in Arabidopsis[69].In G.raimondii,ERF104 binding sites were detected in 1.2% of Gr-specific THSs,but 0.94%of all THSs.Using all THSs as a control,the ERF104 TFBSs were enriched in Gr-specific THSs(P-value<0.0001,chi-square test).The five TF motifs were clustered by motif similarity,including motif sequence CCGCCG(Fig.S5B).There were no significantly enriched TF motifs among other species-specific THSs.

    Fig.3.Conservation of TFBSs between diploid and tetraploid cotton.(A)A schematic diagram of conservation score(CS)calculation based on transcription binding sites(TFBS).Ellipses represent TF binding both diploid promoter and tetraploid promoter(pink),TF binding only diploid promoter(blue)and TF binding only tetraploid promoter(orange).The short lines in pink,blue or orange represent TFBS.Conserved TFBS(C-TFBS)are circled by red dotted lines and non-conserved TFBS(NonC-TFBS)are circled by blue dotted lines.CS-D,CS-diploid;CS-T,CS-tetraploid.(B)The two-dimensional chart shows orthologous gene pairs based on conservation scores.Yellow bin,high density of gene pairs;Black bin,low density of gene pairs.(C)The stacked plot shows the total proportion of gene pairs.Red boxes,conservation scores within[66%-100%]and[66%-100%];yellow boxes,conservation scores within[33%-66%]or[33%-66%];green boxes,conservation scores within[0-33%]or[0-33%],in the comparisons of Ga-GhAt and Gr-GhDt,respectively.(D)Expression fold changes of gene pairs with high conservation scores(red boxes)and gene pairs with low conservation scores(green boxes)in eight tissues or developmental stages.Expression fold change:(max FPKM+0.1)/(min FPKM+0.1).*,P-value<0.05;**,P-value<0.01;***,P-value<0.001;****,P-value<0.0001;ns,P-value>0.05.

    Fig.4.Dynamics of TFBSs in promoter THSs between diploid and tetraploid cotton.(A)Mean conservation score based on TFBSs in promoter THSs of orthologous genes in four classes.Red bar,orthologous gene pairs from Ga to GhAt;blue bar,orthologous gene pairs from Gr to GhDt.**,P-value<0.01;****,P-value<0.0001;ns,P-value>0.05.(B)Correlation plot showing the number of genes regulated by TF binding motifs in Ga(x-axis)or GhAt(y-axis).A total of 239 dots,representing 239 TF binding motifs.Rectangle shows where the expanded region is located.Red line,y=x;black line with shading,simple linear regression fitting line with confidence interval.(C)Correlation plot showing the number of genes regulated by TF binding motifs in Gr(x-axis)or GhDt(y-axis).A total of 235 dots,representing 235 TF binding motifs.Rectangle shows where the expanded region is located.Red line,y=x;black line with shading,simple linear regression fitting line with confidence interval.(D)Comparison of TFBS enrichment between all THSs and conserved and shared THSs.(E)Comparison of TFBS enrichment between all THSs and five Gr-specific THSs.

    3.5.Influence of genomic variation on promoter TFBS

    The finding that change in promoter TFBSs can influence gene expression led us to investigate the underlying mechanisms with respect to sequence variation.TF motifs are essential short sequences in regulatory regions such as promoters,which are affected by genomic variation,including SNVs,InDels and SVs.

    The promoter sequences(2 kb upstream of TSS)of orthologous genes were aligned.We identified 6876 SVs,357,560 InDels,5,173,936 SNVs from Ga to GhAt,and 9310 SVs,292,878 InDels,and 4,086,309 SNVs from Gr to GhDt(Fig.5A).Among these genomic variations,48.1%-49.6%of SVs,7.5%-7.6%of InDels,and 4.8%-5.0% of SNVs were led to the formation of non-conserved TFBSs.This finding indicated that most genomic variation would not lead to TFBS variation;SVs had a larger role in affecting TFBSs in promoter regions than SNVs.A similar conclusion was obtained by the statistical analysis of cumulative genomic variation length(Fig.5B).But in fact,non-conserved TFBSs were influenced mainly by SNVs,owing to the large number of SNVs(Fig.5C).

    Based on promoter sequence,we identified 6216-6567 gene pairs with cumulative genomic variation length<0.2 kb,7566-8098 gene pairs with cumulative genomic variation length of 0.2-1 kb,and 2196-2533 gene pairs with cumulative genomic variation length>1 kb(Fig.5D).As expected,the mean conservation score dropped with the increase in genome variation length,suggesting that genomic variation was associated with the evolutionary turnover of TFBSs.

    3.6.Regulatory divergence of fiber-related genes in diploid and tetraploid cotton

    Cultivated tetraploid cotton has longer fibers than diploid ancestors,probably because the fiber in diploid cotton stops elongating when fiber in tetraploid cotton is still in rapid growth[40].A comparative transcriptome analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes between diploid and tetraploid fibers(FDR<0.05 and|log2(fold change)|>2)(Fig.S6).GO enrichment analysis revealed that up-regulated genes were enriched in pathways associated with fiber elongation and down-regulated genes were enriched in secondary cell wall biosynthesis in tetraploid cotton(Fig.6A).Presumably early secondary cell wall biosynthesis impeded fiber elongation in diploids.

    We next aimed at uncovering regulatory divergence contributing to the expression pattern differences of these genes between diploid and tetraploid cotton.In this analysis,209(between G.arboreum and G.hirsutum)and 282(between G.raimondii and G.hirsutum)fiber-related genes were characterized with differential expression levels between diploid and tetraploid cotton in at least one set of comparisons(10 DPA fiber,20 DPA fiber)(Fig.6B).Among the 491 differentially expressed genes,58 had known functional roles based on previous studies.The 58 genes were used to draw a fiber-related regulatory network(Fig.6C).77.4%(277 of 358)of regulatory relationships between TF and genes in G.arboreum,and 67.6%(227 of 336)of regulatory relationships in G.raimondii were conserved after polyploidization.Respectively 119 and 73 novel regulatory relationships were gained in the At and Dt subgenomes of G.hirsutum.For example,PLASMA MEMBRANE INTRINSIC PROTEIN 1E(PIP1E),functioning as an aquaporin,with an average CS of 67.0%(CS-Ga=67%,CS-GhAt=67%)and 80.5%(CS-Gr=92%,CS-GhDt=69%)(Fig.6D).PIP1E in G.arboreum and At-subgenome showed a larger expression difference than PIP1E in G.raimondii and Dt-subgenome,accompanied by the loss of old regulatory sequences and the acquisition of new regulatory sequences from an insertion/deletion variation(Fig.6E-G).Thus,the identification of TFBSs can facilitate the exploration of regulatory changes of genes associated with fiber development.

    4.Discussion

    In this study,we generated genome-wide chromatin accessibility maps from three cotton species:G.arboreum,G.raimondii and G.hirsutum,and achieved an unprecedented view of accessibility conservation across species after polyploidization.THSs were expected to encompass key regulatory elements that regulated gene expression in native cellular conditions.Genome-wide TFBS maps were established to predict the cis-regulation inside accessible chromatin.Overall,we investigated the similarities and differences in accessible chromatin and cis-regulatory landscape among diploid and tetraploid cottons,allowing us to identify and analyze regulatory relationships between TF and genes.These data can be expected to serve as a valuable resource for cis-regulation research in cotton.

    Fig.5.The effect of genomic variation on regulatory divergence in promoter regions.(A)The counts of different types of genomic variation in the comparison of Ga-GhAt and Gr-GhDt.Green boxes,genomic variation without TFBSs;Purple boxes,genomic variation within TFBSs.(B)The cumulative length of different types of genomic variation in the comparison of Ga-GhAt and Gr-GhDt.Green boxes,genomic variation outside TFBSs;purple boxes,genomic variation in TFBSs.(C)Numbers of non-conserved TFBSs affected by different types of genomic variation.(D)Correlation between the total conservation scores of gene pairs and genomic variation length.**,P-value<0.01;****,Pvalue<0.0001.

    Fig.6.Regulatory divergence of fiber-related genes between diploid and tetraploid cotton.(A)GO enrichment analysis was performed for differentially expressed genes in cotton fiber.(B)Heat maps showing expression fold change of gene pairs between diploids and tetraploid subgenomes in fibers at 10 DPA and 20 DPA.Color indicates higher(red)or lower(green)expression in tetraploid cotton.All fiber-related genes were categorized into eight or seven clusters.The representative genes from nine pathways were annotated as colored dots in each heatmap.The expression fold change was calculated using edgeR(FDR<0.05).(C)The regulatory network of 58 fiber-related genes,which was constructed based on TF binding motifs in target promoters.Fiber-related genes(genes from Ga/GhAt in red,genes from Gr/GhDt in blue)were differentially regulated after polyploidization.Sub-networks of PLASMA MEMBRANE INTRINSIC PROTEIN 1E(PIP1E)were circled in dashed lines as examples.(D)The conservation degree of PIP1E.(E)The expression fold change of PIP1E.(F)TF binding sites in promoters of PIP1E-Ga and PIP1E-GhAt.Landmarks are colored in red;common TFBSs were colored in black;TFBSs gained in GhAt are colored in red;TFBSs lost in GhAt are colored in blue.The genomic variation in TFBSs is highlighted with red circles.(G)TF binding sites in promoters of PIP1E-Gr and PIP1E-GhDt.

    Previous studies[31,70]have found that most regulatory elements were located proximally to target genes.We hypothesized that gene expression was regulated by promoter THSs as in tomato[71].Interestingly,the effect of THSs on gene expression decayed gradually with the increase of distance to genes.Long-distance transcription regulation is mediated by regulatory elements such as enhancers,through higher-order chromatin structures[22].

    In recent years,there have been many studies[70-74]of dynamic transcription regulation in accessible chromatin identified by DNase-seq or ATAC-seq.However,most of the reported dynamic transcription regulation events were from comparisons between different treatments of the same tissue,different development stages of the same tissue,and different tissues of the same species.In closely related species,although they evolved from the same ancestor,the coding sequences and non-coding sequences have changed greatly during independent evolution.One study[74]proposed an approach to analyze THSs among grasses,based on conservation of THS and chromatin accessibility.In the present study,approximately 80%of THSs in G.arboreum and G.raimondii were identified as conserved THSs by comparison with tetraploid G.hirsutum.This value is much higher than the 4.7%-29.6% observed among grasses[74].Given that allotetraploid cotton was formed much later(1-2 MYA)than the divergence of grasses(45-50 MYA),this might be the reason for higher THS conservation in cotton[2,75].Although the majority of THS sequences were conserved,the change of chromatin accessibility expanded the diversity of transcription regulation and led to the difference of gene expression.

    By using TF binding motif models,we present a genome-wide identification of TF binding sites among three cotton species.These sites were used to predict the regulatory relationships between TFs and target genes.Some regulatory relationships were gained and some lost in tetraploid cotton relative to the two diploid cotton species.At this stage,we do not know when these regulatory relationship changes occurred:during polyploidization or during the independent evolution of the tetraploid and the diploids[42,45].These findings provide an insight into the regulatory divergence of homologous gene transcription in cotton.

    Many technologies can be used to investigate the regulatory effect of TFs on a particular gene with well-established transformation platforms.However,when a variety of TFs are found to regulate target genes,it is challenging to predict the change of gene expression patterns.Previous study[33]suggested that the loss of TF occupancy at target promoters might down-regulate gene expression.In this study,we provided evidence using RNA-seq data in eight different tissues/stages to support the hypothesis that variation of TF binding motifs in promoters could lead to expression divergence.These data represent a resource for evolutionary study of transcriptional regulation in cotton.

    In summary,we investigated accessible chromatin regions and cis-regulatory sequence divergence of othologous genes in cotton.Future studies should use more high-throughput methods,such as DAP-seq and ChIP-seq,to uncover a more complete regulatory network mediated by TFs.For key genes associated with agronomic traits,functional study of the evolutionary change of regulatory sequences should be performed with the construction of genome-edited plants.

    Data availability

    The raw sequencing data generated in this study have been submitted to NCBI under the Bioproject accession number PRJNA576032.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Jiaqi You:Conceptualization,Formal analysis,Visualization,Writing-original draft.Min Lin:Data curation,Resources,Writing-review & editing.Zhenping Liu:Investigation.Liuling Pei:Resources.Yuexuan Long:Investigation.Lili Tu:Conceptualization.Xianlong Zhang:Supervision,Writing-review & editing.Maojun Wang:Conceptualization,Methodology,Supervision,Writing-review & editing.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31922069,32170645)and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662020ZKPY017).We thank the high-performance computing platform at National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement in Huazhong Agricultural University.

    Appendix A.Supplementary data

    Supplementary data for this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2022.03.002.

    91字幕亚洲| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日本在线视频免费播放| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 麻豆av在线久日| 精品日产1卡2卡| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 不卡一级毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 日本a在线网址| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 91麻豆av在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产在线观看jvid| 老司机靠b影院| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 天天添夜夜摸| 中国美女看黄片| 热99re8久久精品国产| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 波多野结衣高清作品| 久久精品影院6| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 成人三级做爰电影| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 麻豆av在线久日| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 看免费av毛片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 97碰自拍视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久久久性生活片| www日本在线高清视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 色av中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 天堂动漫精品| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲18禁久久av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美午夜高清在线| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 成人三级黄色视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 午夜影院日韩av| 69av精品久久久久久| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 久久人妻av系列| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 69av精品久久久久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 成年版毛片免费区| 天堂动漫精品| 性欧美人与动物交配| 成年版毛片免费区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 校园春色视频在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 高清在线国产一区| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 黄色 视频免费看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 最好的美女福利视频网| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 91在线观看av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| xxxwww97欧美| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 舔av片在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 午夜福利在线在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 老司机福利观看| 国产熟女xx| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 波多野结衣高清作品| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中文字幕久久专区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| av在线天堂中文字幕| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成人手机av| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲av美国av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 熟女电影av网| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 长腿黑丝高跟| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费看日本二区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 精品久久久久久,| av福利片在线| 悠悠久久av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 搞女人的毛片| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产视频内射| 国产三级中文精品| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 日韩免费av在线播放| a在线观看视频网站| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| xxx96com| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 美女免费视频网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 97碰自拍视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 午夜视频精品福利| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| ponron亚洲| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 高清在线国产一区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 午夜福利18| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品电影一区二区在线| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 老司机靠b影院| 一本一本综合久久| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 成人手机av| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲最大成人中文| 88av欧美| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美大码av| 深夜精品福利| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久久久久大精品| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久国内视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久香蕉激情| 日本五十路高清| 国产单亲对白刺激| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品一及| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产av又大| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产日本99.免费观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 窝窝影院91人妻| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 美女黄网站色视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| tocl精华| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 九色国产91popny在线| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 欧美午夜高清在线| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 在线看三级毛片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲色图av天堂| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久中文看片网| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 九色国产91popny在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| avwww免费| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| avwww免费| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 成人av在线播放网站| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| www.自偷自拍.com| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲av美国av| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 国产精品 国内视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 观看免费一级毛片| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| www.精华液| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| av在线播放免费不卡| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲国产看品久久| 一级毛片精品| cao死你这个sao货| 久久久久久人人人人人| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产视频内射| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| www国产在线视频色| 久久99热这里只有精品18| xxx96com| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久9热在线精品视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 成年免费大片在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 在线播放国产精品三级| 99热只有精品国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| av在线天堂中文字幕| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 毛片女人毛片| 97碰自拍视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产不卡一卡二| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 一级毛片高清免费大全| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲全国av大片| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久草成人影院| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 岛国在线观看网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久中文看片网|